DIAGNOSTIC METHOD BASED ON LARGE SCALE IDENTIFICATION OF POST-TRANSLATIONAL MODIFICATION OF PROTEINS

Abstract
Methods for the large scale identification of post-translational modification states of proteins and enzyme activities for carrying out post-translational modification reactions involve the analysis of functional extracts from fresh and frozen samples using protein arrays. The methods and kits of the present invention can be used to analyze and characterize compounds for their effects on post-translational modifications and their pathways. The methods and kits can also be used to diagnose and characterize a wide variety of diseases and medical conditions, including cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, immune diseases, infectious diseases, genetic diseases, metabolic conditions, and drug effects using cells or body fluids of a patient.
Description
SEQUENCE LISTING

The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which has been submitted via EFS-Web and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Said ASCII copy, created on Feb. 4, 2010, is named 28060668.txt, and is 1,222 bytes in size.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Post-translational modification (PTM) of proteins has been studied largely using purified systems or whole cells. The analysis of protein PTM in cell extracts as well as extracellular fluids is both theoretically and empirically problematic. For example, both ubiquitination and phosphorylation, common examples of PTM, are very rapidly reversed, and this reversal requires no energy input or special conditions, aside from the actions of isopeptidases and phosphatases. Moreover, classical biochemical methods such as Western blot do not work well for concentrated mixtures of proteins, because the modified protein bands spread throughout the electrophoretic gel, and in complex samples, such as a cell extract or a blood plasma sample, many protein species would overlap, making protein identification difficult or impossible. Specifically, genome-wide methods for detecting PTM alterations are still in their infancy and largely depend on the interactions of biochemically purified systems. Chemical methods such as mass spectrometry cannot distinguish ubiquitin and polyubiquitin chains, yet only the latter are critical for protein degradation. A further limitation of such classical biochemical methods is that cryopreserved specimens which can be more readily available or are more logistically easy to procure cannot be used for most of these analyses and may have altered representation of the physiological condition. Furthermore, MS methods do not analyze the activity/function of a specific tissue/sample and its content but rather identifies the abundance of certain proteins in it. Thus, the complexity of the tissue and the dynamic range of different protein level are often limiting their detection.


In recent years, our understanding of posttranslational modifications and their implication for human diseases have greatly increased. In Alzheimer's disease (25) and Parkinson's disease (26-28) the ubiquitination of proteins has been shown to play a pivotal role in the regulation of cellular processes and human pathologies. Although the role that ubiquitination plays in tumorigenesis is still poorly understood, cases of ubiquitin ligases showing relationships with oncogenesis were recently described (29-31). Thus, systematic assays for the screening, including diagnostic screening, of ubiquitinated or other post-translationally modified proteins remain limited.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention provides methods and kits for the systematic and large scale determination of protein PTMs and the enzyme activities that catalyze them. The methods entail incubating protein microarrays or another protein array format with cell extracts or fluids from a subject, performing specific PTM reactions on the microarrays, and detecting protein modification states of specific proteins. The methods according to the invention overcome obstacles associated with classical biochemical techniques by performing PTM reactions on protein microarrays with biological samples, such as patient materials, whose physiological state is preserved, appropriately supplemented, if so desired, with limiting PTM reaction components, and make it possible for the first time to rapidly screen patient samples for activities that modulate PTM states related to disease, and to rapidly screen for test agents that modulate PTM or PTM alteration pathways.


Accordingly, in one aspect, described herein is a method of identifying at least one post-translational modification (PTM) or PTM alteration on at least one protein, the method comprising the steps of:


(a) contacting a functional cell extract with a solid state array, the array comprising an ordered plurality of proteins under conditions that allow PTM to occur or that allow PTM to be modified;


(b) establishing at least one PTM reaction or PTM alteration reaction thereof on the array, whereby the reaction results in at least one PTM or PTM alteration of at least one protein on the array through the activity of one or more enzymes present in the cell extract; and


(c) detecting the at least one PTM or PTM alteration by detecting a signal from the array thereby identifying the PTM or PTM alteration on the at least one protein.


In one embodiment of this aspect, the method further comprises identifying the effect of a test agent on the PTM or PTM alteration comprising the additional steps of:


(a) contacting the functional cell extract with a test agent;


(b) establishing at least one PTM reaction or PTM alteration on the array in the presence of the test agent, whereby the PTM reaction results in at least one PTM or PTM alteration of at least one protein on the array through the activity of one or more enzymes present in the cell extract; and


(c) detecting the at least one PTM or PTM alteration and comparing the PTM reaction or PTM alteration reaction with a parallel reaction where a control agent has been added thereby allowing for detection of an effect of the test agent on at least one PTM or PTM alteration.


In one embodiment of this aspect, an increase in the signal from the array compared to a background or the reaction with a control is indicative of increased PTM. In another embodiment of this aspect, a decrease in the signal from the array compared to a background or the reaction with a control is indicative of PTM alteration.


In one embodiment of this aspect, the detecting is performed using an antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof, a natural or recombinant ligand, a small molecule, a modifying moiety, or a biochemical analysis capable of detecting the PTM or PTM alteration. In some embodiments, the antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof, the natural or recombinant ligand, the small molecule, or the modifying moiety is labeled with a tag. In some such embodiments, the tag is a fluorescent molecule, a radioisotope, a nucleotide chromophore, an enzyme, a substrate, a chemiluminescent moiety, magnetic particle, bioluminescent moiety, or peptide. In some embodiments, the biochemical analysis is performed using mass spectroscopy, peptide mapping, or amino acid sequencing.


In one embodiment of this aspect, the functional cell extract is not diluted prior to the contacting with the solid state array. In one embodiment of this aspect, the functional cell extract is concentrated prior to the contacting with the solid state array.


In another embodiment of this aspect, the functional cell extract is obtained from a frozen or cryopreserved sample.


In another embodiment of this aspect, an additional cellular energy source in the form of ATP is provided to the functional cell extract.


In another embodiment of this aspect, the array comprising a plurality of proteins, comprises at least one protein, protein fragment or peptide attached to the array without an added tag.


In another embodiment of this aspect, the array comprising a plurality of proteins comprises at least one protein, protein fragment or peptide attached to the array with a C-terminal or N-terminal tag.


In another embodiment of this aspect, the functional cell extract is derived from a specified cellular compartment. In one embodiment, the cellular compartment is nucleus. In one embodiment, the cellular compartment is cytosol. In one embodiment, the cellular compartment is mitochondria.


In another embodiment of this aspect, the functional cell extract is derived from a biological sample. In one embodiment, the biological sample is selected from the group consisting of saliva, whole blood, serum, plasma, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, peritoneal fluid, chorionic villus, placenta, solid tissue, amniotic fluid, a cell sample, and a tissue culture sample.


In one embodiment of this aspect, the PTM is selected from the group consisting of ubiquitination, phosphorylation, glycosylation, sumoylation, acetylation, S-nitrosylation or nitrosylation, citrullination or deimination, neddylation, OClcNAc, ADP-ribosylation, methylation, hydroxylation, fattenylation, ufmylation, prenylation, myristoylation, S-palmitoylation, tyrosine sulfation, formylation, carboxylation, and any combination thereof.


In one embodiment of this aspect, the PTM alteration is selected from the group consisting of deubiquitination (DUB), dephosphorylation, deglycosylation, desumoylation, deacetylation, de-S-nitrosylation or denitrosylation, decitrullination or dedeimination, deneddylation, removal of OClcNAc, de-ADP-ribosylation, demethylation, de-hydroxylation, defattenylation, deufmylation, and any combination thereof.


In another embodiment of this aspect, the solid state array is selected from the group consisting of protein arrays on microchips, ELISA plates with immobilized proteins attached on the plates, protein-coated beads, and microfluidic chips coated with desired proteins.


In another embodiment of this aspect, 2-10 PTM or PTM alterations thereof are identified simultaneously.


In one embodiment of this aspect, and all such aspects described herein, the invention utilizes protein microarrays or other array formats of proteins together with appropriately supplemented functional cell extracts or body fluid samples to study the role of PTM in the presence and progression of many types of disease and many aspects of cellular function. Certain PTM states are mechanistically involved in cellular protein turnover, and consequently PTM states can be correlated with diseases related to protein turnover, such as, for example, Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases, and diseases related to regulation of the cell cycle, such as cancer.


In one aspect, the invention provides a method of identifying an altered PTM state of a protein in a patient. The method includes contacting a functional extract of a sample from the patient with a microarray containing an ordered plurality of proteins that represent proteins in the patient, establishing conditions for a specific PTM reaction in the extract, and determining the level of PTM of one or more proteins in the microarray. The presence or absence, or the observed level, of PTM of proteins in the microarray is then compared with the level of PTM of the corresponding proteins in a control sample, so that altered PTM states of proteins are identified that are expected to be similarly altered in the patient.


Another aspect of the invention is a method of identifying a protein PTM enzyme activity in a patient. The method includes contacting a functional extract of a sample from the patient with an array comprising an ordered plurality of proteins that represent proteins in the patient, and identifying post-translationally modified proteins in the array. The presence or absence, or the relative amount, of a PTM enzyme activity in the patient can be inferred from the protein posttranslational modifications observed in the array. The presence or absence, or the relative amount, of a corresponding PTM state produced by the enzyme activity in the patient may also be inferred from the results obtained with this method.


Still another aspect of the invention is a method of diagnosing a disease or medical condition in a patient. The method includes contacting a functional extract of a sample from the patient with a microarray containing an ordered plurality of proteins that represent proteins in the patient and identifying post-translationally modified proteins in the microarray to obtain a PTM state data set. The data set can serve as a signature or profile of protein PTMs in the patient as well as of the enzymes producing them. The data set is then compared with a standard data set that includes PTM state data diagnostic for the disease or medical condition and, based on the comparison, the disease or medical condition is diagnosed in the patient.


Yet another aspect of the invention is a method of identifying a set of biomarkers for a disease or medical condition. The method includes comparing the PTM profile of one or more patients having the disease or medical condition with similar profiles from one or more control subjects who do not have the disease or medical condition. The profiles are obtained by separately contacting functional extracts from the patients and control subjects with an array containing an ordered plurality of proteins, such as proteins encoded by the human genome, and determining the level of PTM of one or more proteins in the array. The presence or absence, or the observed level, of PTM of proteins in the array for the patients is then compared with the presence or absence or level of PTM of the corresponding proteins for the control subjects. A set of biomarkers is formed from proteins of the patients whose level of PTM is altered compared to control levels.


In a further aspect, the invention provides a kit for the diagnosis of a disease or medical condition, or the characterization of the effects of a drug, by the analysis of a PTM state of a protein in a patient sample. The kit includes a standard containing one or more functional extracts capable of producing a known pattern of protein PTM states on a protein microarray or in another array format. The kit also is adapted for, and contains instructions for, carrying out one of the above described methods. Optionally, the kit further contains a protein microarray, or a reagent such as a substrate, an enzyme, an enzyme inhibitor, a drug, or one or more antibodies. When applied with a method according to the invention, the standard produces a pattern of protein PTM that is diagnostic for a disease or medical condition, or the effects of a drug.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiments thereof and from the claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.



FIG. 1A presents a schematic illustration of a PTM reaction carried out on a protein microarray using a functional extract from a patient sample. FIG. 1B shows a schematic illustration of the use of a PTM reaction on a protein microarray to diagnose a disease in a patient sample. The inset shows a reaction scheme common to ubiquitin-like modifiers, and the inset at the right shows example E1 and E2 enzymes for several ubiquitin-like modifiers.



FIG. 2A shows the degradation of 35S-labeled securin, added as a control to functional extracts, as a function of time at selected points during the cell cycle. The reactions were stopped at the indicted times by the addition of sample buffer and were then analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. The star (*) labeled lanes reflect the state of the extracts at the time when incubation on the protein microarrays were stopped. FIG. 2B is a schematic illustration of the use of a protein microarray for the detection of posttranslational modifications. An example of one block/subarray out of the 48 on each chip is given (16 rows×16 columns). FIG. 2C is a schematic description of the steps of using a protein microarray for the detection of PTMs and PTM alterations.



FIG. 3A shows the distribution of signal intensity minus background values of all the spots on a protein microarray after detection of polyubiquitinated proteins. Reactivities were divided into 100 equally-sized bins, and the number of spots (y-axis) at different intensity levels (x-axis) of CP-released (left) and APC-inhibited (right) cell extracts was plotted. The inset represents a 20× magnification of the positive signals where the y-axis ranges between 0 and 250 and the x-axis ranges between 0 and 45,000. In FIG. 3B the reactivity level of 13 known APC substrates (dots) was compared to the reactivity level of the ‘buffer’ spots located in the same subarray (stars). The reactivities were then compared using a two-sample t-test to determine their significance, and the p-values were labeled below each substrate. FIG. 3C shows scatter plots of the positive signal intensities on each chip. The plots show the variability between two biological replicates (black dots; x-axis: CP-released, y-axis: CP-released) vs. the variability between signals from two different conditions (red dots; x-axis: APC-inhibited, y-axis: CP-released).



FIG. 4A shows analysis by SDS-PAGE (4-15% gels) and autoradiography of 35S-labelled substrates (Nek9, Calm2, RPS6KA4 and cyclin G2) added to CP synchronized HeLa S3 extracts with and without the addition of the APC-inhibitor emil. FIG. 4B shows a similar analysis in which 35S-labelled p27 was added to CP synchronized HeLa S3 extracts with the addition of UbcH10, DN-UbcH10, or MG-132, or Emil; the bottom panel shows the change in stability of p27 under this condition. The top panel is the same gel exposed for 4 days (long exposure) to detect p27-conjugated ubiquitin chains.



FIGS. 5A and 5B show the results of experiments to test the recognition of polyubiquitinated proteins with FK1 antibody.



FIG. 6 shows the distribution of signal and background levels observed on four representative protein microarrays.



FIG. 7 shows the signal-to-noise ratio for all spots on a protein microarray chip.



FIG. 8 shows the signal-background values for the buffer spots on five representative protein microarrays.



FIG. 9 shows the levels of the indicated endogenous proteins in functional extracts as a function of time as detected by Western blotting.



FIGS. 10A and 10B show the signal intensity distribution of all the spots on a protein microarray. FIG. 10A shows the results for a CP-released extract, and FIG. 10B shows the results for an APC-inhibited extract.



FIG. 11 shows human proteins that were significantly ubiquitinated by enzymes present in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from a patient with brain tumor.



FIG. 12 shows a Western blot of normal human CSF proteins that were polyubiquitinated using enzyme activity in CSF.



FIG. 13 shows the results of ubiquitination of a microarray of human proteins using normal human CSF. The number of ubiquitinated proteins detected is represented as a function of the fold increase of fluorescence over background.



FIG. 14 shows human proteins detected on a microarray as polyubiquitinated by enzymes present in two normal human CSF samples. The proteins shown revealed a fluorescence signal at least 50-fold over background.



FIG. 15 shows the fluorescence signal obtained for differentially modified proteins on a microarray after the indicated PTM reactions using extracts of mitotic checkpoint arrested and released HeLa S3 cells.



FIG. 16 presents a Venn diagram illustrating the relationships among protein targets found to be modified by different ubiquitin-like modifiers.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The inventors have developed methods that permit the rapid and large-scale diagnostic screening of altered protein PTM and PTM alteration states and related enzyme activities correlated with disease. The methods involve, in part, applying concentrated cell extracts or biological fluid samples from a subject to protein microarrays and appropriately supplementing them to carry out one or more specific PTM or PTM alteration reactions. Specifically, one or more PTM or PTM alterations are then detected by labeling the modified proteins and scanning the array.


Patterns of post-translational changes in certain polypeptides are known to correlate with certain diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease and cancer (see, for example, Table 3). While the altered polypeptides themselves may be detectable in extracellular fluids or cell extracts, and could be useful in diagnosing disease and monitoring its progression, an easier alternative to looking for the modified proteins themselves is to assay for the activity of specialized enzymes that make the modifications and are present in such fluids or extracts. Such assays are the focus, in part, of this invention. Assaying for such activities requires, in addition to the enzyme itself or enzymes themselves, which is/are supplied by the biological sample, such as a patient sample, the presence of one relevant cofactors and appropriate substrates. A PTM or PTM alteration activity assay can, for example, be used not only to diagnose a disease state, it can also be used to identify candidate biomarkers of diseases in biological fluid samples and cell extracts prepared from patient samples, and to test the effects of test agents on PTM or PTM alteration pathways, for applications such as drug design and discovery. Knowledge of the modified target proteins in a disease provides intrinsically important information about the altered post-translational process that occurs in the disease and its role in the disease.


Covalently modified proteins, such as polyubiquitinated, ubiquitinated, phosphorylated, glycosylated, sumoylated, acetylated, S-nitrosylated or nitrosylated, citrullinated or deiminated, neddylated, OClcNAc-added, ADP-ribosylated, methylated, hydroxymethylated, fattenylated, ufmylated, prenylated, myristoylated, S-palmitoylated, tyrosine sulfated, formylated, and carboxylated proteins are hard to identify by the standard biochemical technique of gel electrophoresis, because the modified protein bands spread throughout the gel. Identifying the converse alteration of a PTM, such as, for example, deubiquitination (DUB), dephosphorylation, deglycosylation, desumoylation, deacetylation, deS-nitrosylation or denitrosylation, decitrullination or dedeimination, deneddylation, removal of OClcNAc, de-ADP-ribosylation, demethylation, de-hydroxylation, defattenylation, deufmylation, deprenylation, demyristoylation, de-S-palmitoylation, tyrosine desulfation, deformylation, decarboxylation, and deamidation is similarly difficult to detect using such standard biochemical methods. In a complex sample like a functional cell extract or biological sample, such as an undiluted or concentrated body fluid, many protein molecular species would overlap, making identification of specific modified proteins difficult or impossible. The high concentration and large number of different proteins in patient samples such as cell or tissue extracts, and body fluids such as blood plasma or CSF, generally require additional processing steps to separate the sample into different fractions or to purify certain molecular components prior to analysis. In contrast, with the present methods described herein, a PTM or PTM alteration reaction is performed directly on a solid state array, such as a protein microarray, or any other array format wherein the location of each protein is known. The known physical location of the protein on the array, rather than its electrophoretic mobility in a gel, is used to identify the target. Combined with the use of antibodies that have binding specificity for particular PTM or PTM alteration states, such as polyubiquitinated vs. monoubiquitinated proteins, or combined with the use of any labeled modifying moiety, the use of protein arrays greatly simplifies the problem of identifying specific PTM or PTM alteration states on specific proteins, and the use of multiplex formats, such as microarrays, also makes possible the simultaneous analysis of thousands of proteins. Thus, the present invention overcomes previous obstacles to identifying altered PTM or PTM alteration states and altered activity of enzymes that produce PTM or PTM alteration in a patient and brings PTM and PTM alteration analysis into a realm where it is possible for the first time to diagnose disease in a clinical setting.


Accordingly, in one aspect, described herein is a method of identifying at least one post-translational modification (PTM) or PTM alteration on at least one protein, the method comprising the steps of:


(a) contacting a functional cell extract with a solid state array, the array comprising an ordered plurality of proteins under conditions that allow PTM to occur or that allow PTM to be modified;


(b) establishing at least one PTM reaction or PTM alteration reaction thereof on the array, whereby the reaction results in at least one PTM or PTM alteration of at least one protein on the array through the activity of one or more enzymes present in the cell extract; and


(c) detecting the at least one PTM or PTM alteration by detecting a signal from the array thereby identifying the PTM or PTM alteration on the at least one protein.


In one embodiment of this aspect, the method further comprises identifying the effect of a test agent on the PTM or PTM alteration comprising the additional steps of:


(a) contacting the functional cell extract with a test agent;


(b) establishing at least one PTM reaction or PTM alteration on the array in the presence of the test agent, whereby the PTM reaction results in at least one PTM or PTM alteration of at least one protein on the array through the activity of one or more enzymes present in the cell extract; and


(c) detecting the at least one PTM or PTM alteration and comparing the PTM reaction or PTM alteration reaction with a parallel reaction where a control agent has been added thereby allowing for detection of an effect of the test agent on at least one PTM or PTM alteration.


As used herein, an “agent” for use in the methods described herein refers to any compound or substance such as, but not limited to, a small molecule, nucleic acid, polypeptide, peptide, drug, ion, etc. An “agent” can be any chemical, entity or moiety, including without limitation synthetic and naturally-occurring proteinaceous and non-proteinaceous entities. In some embodiments, an agent is nucleic acid, nucleic acid analogues, proteins, antibodies, peptides, aptamers, oligomer of nucleic acids, amino acids, or carbohydrates including without limitation proteins, oligonucleotides, ribozymes, DNAzymes, glycoproteins, siRNAs, lipoproteins, aptamers, and modifications and combinations thereof etc. In certain embodiments, agents are small molecules having a chemical moiety. For example, chemical moieties included unsubstituted or substituted alkyl, aromatic, or heterocyclyl moieties including macrolides, leptomycins and related natural products or analogues thereof. Compounds can be known to have a desired activity and/or property, or can be selected from a library of diverse compounds.


As used herein, the term “small molecule” refers to a chemical agent which can include, but is not limited to, a peptide, a peptidomimetic, an amino acid, an amino acid analog, a polynucleotide, a polynucleotide analog, an aptamer, a nucleotide, a nucleotide analog, an organic or inorganic compound (e.g., including heterorganic and organometallic compounds) having a molecular weight less than about 10,000 grams per mole, organic or inorganic compounds having a molecular weight less than about 5,000 grams per mole, organic or inorganic compounds having a molecular weight less than about 1,000 grams per mole, organic or inorganic compounds having a molecular weight less than about 500 grams per mole, and salts, esters, and other pharmaceutically acceptable forms of such compounds.


In such embodiments, the effects of one or more test agents that modify specific PTM or PTM alteration pathways can be determined using the methods described herein. The ability to rapidly screen one or more test agents for effects on a multitude of specific PTM or PTM alteration reactions simultaneously is useful for drug design and discovery purposes. As defined herein, a test agent that modifies or modulates a specific PTM or PTM alteration pathway is one that causes a detectable change in a PTM or PTM alteration reaction mediated by a functional cell extract, such as, changing the kinetics of the reaction (increase or decrease) or preventing the reaction from occurring entirely. In some embodiments, the test agent can replace a missing component of the functional cell extract, such that a PTM or PTM alteration reaction occurs, which did not occur in the absence of the test agent. In such embodiments, the test agent acts to replace or modulate a component of the PTM or PTM alteration pathway. The ability to rapidly and simultaneously screen for the effects of a test agents on PTM or PTM alteration pathway is useful for high-throughput applications, such as screening of compounds for drug discovery applications.


In another embodiment, the methods described herein comprise detecting the PTM or PTM alteration using one or more agents capable of specifically detecting the PTM or PTM alteration. Agents specific for detecting the PTM or PTM alteration include, but are not limited to, antibodies or antigen-binding fragments thereof, natural or recombinant ligands, small molecules; nucleic acid sequence and nucleic acid analogues; intrabodies; aptamers; and other proteins or peptides; and a modifying moiety. In some embodiments, the detecting comprises the use of one or more antibodies which are directly labeled with a tag. In other embodiments, the detecting comprises the use of one or more antibodies than can be detected using a secondary antibody. In some embodiments, the secondary antibody is directly labeled with a tag. In other embodiments, the secondary antibody is detected using a tertiary antibody directly labeled with a tag. In other embodiments, one or more biochemical methods can be used for detecting PTM or PTM alterations. In such embodiments, the biochemical methods can include, but are not limited to, mass spectroscopy, peptide mapping, and amino acid sequencing.


In some embodiments of this aspect and all aspects described herein, the preferred agents specific for detecting the PTM or PTM alteration are antibody agents that specifically bind the PTM or PTM alteration, and can include polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies, and antigen-binding derivatives or fragments thereof. Well-known antigen binding fragments include, for example, single domain antibodies (dAbs; which consist essentially of single VL or VH antibody domains), Fv fragment, including single chain Fv fragment (scFv), Fab fragment, and F(ab′)2 fragment. Methods for the construction of such antibody molecules are well known in the art. Accordingly, as used herein, the term “antibody” refers to an intact immunoglobulin or to a monoclonal or polyclonal antigen-binding fragment with the Fc (crystallizable fragment) region or FcRn binding fragment of the Fc region. Antigen-binding fragments may be produced by recombinant DNA techniques or by enzymatic or chemical cleavage of intact antibodies. “Antigen-binding fragments” include, inter alia, Fab, Fab′, F(ab′)2, Fv, dAb, and complementarity determining region (CDR) fragments, single-chain antibodies (scFv), single domain antibodies, chimeric antibodies, diabodies and polypeptides that contain at least a portion of an immunoglobulin that is sufficient to confer specific antigen binding to the polypeptide. The terms Fab, Fc, pFc′, F(ab′) 2 and Fv are employed with standard immunological meanings [Klein, Immunology (John Wiley, New York, N.Y., 1982); Clark, W. R. (1986) The Experimental Foundations of Modern Immunology (Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York); Roitt, I. (1991) Essential Immunology, 7th Ed., (Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford)]. Such antibodies or antigen-binding fragments specific for CD31, CD105, CD105, CD44, and Sca-1 are available commercially from vendors such as R&D Systems, BD Biosciences, e-Biosciences and Miltenyi, or can be raised against these modifications by methods known to those skilled in the art.


In some embodiments of the aspects described herein, an agent specific for a PTM or PTM alteration, such as an antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof, a natural or recombinant ligand, a small molecule, or a modifying moiety, is directly labeled with a tag to facilitate the detection of the modification. The terms “label” or “tag”, as used herein, refer to a composition capable of producing a detectable signal indicative of the presence of a target, such as, the presence of a specific modification in a biological sample. Suitable labels include fluorescent molecules, radioisotopes, nucleotide chromophores, enzymes, substrates, chemiluminescent moieties, magnetic particles, bioluminescent moieties, peptide tags (c-Myc, HA, VSV-G, HSV, FLAG, V5 or HIS) and the like. As such, a label is any composition detectable by spectroscopic, photochemical, biochemical, immunochemical, electrical, optical or chemical means needed for the methods to identify the PTM or PTM alteration. In some embodiments of the aspects described herein, the modification moiety itself may be labeled directly. For example, one can use a radioactive label or a florescent label so that the protein modification can be read directly (or in combination with other modifications) without the use of antibodies. Naturally, also antibodies may be labeled to assist in their direct detection.


The terms “labeled antibody” or “tagged antibody”, as used herein, includes antibodies that are labeled by detectable means and include, but are not limited to, antibodies that are fluorescently, enzymatically, radioactively, and chemiluminescently labeled. Antibodies can also be labeled with a detectable tag, such as c-Myc, HA, VSV-G, HSV, FLAG, V5, or HIS, which can be detected using an antibody specific to the tag, for example, an anti-c-Myc antibody. Various methods of labeling polypeptides and glycoproteins are known in the art and may be used. Non-limiting examples of fluorescent labels or tags for labeling the antibodies for use in the methods of invention include Hydroxycoumarin, Succinimidyl ester, Aminocoumarin, Succinimidyl ester, Methoxycoumarin, Succinimidyl ester, Cascade Blue, Hydrazide, Pacific Blue, Maleimide, Pacific Orange, Lucifer yellow, NBD, NBD-X, R-Phycoerythrin (PE), a PE-Cy5 conjugate (Cychrome, R670, Tri-Color, Quantum Red), a PE-Cy7 conjugate, Red 613, PE-Texas Red, PerCP, Peridinin chlorphyll protein, TruRed (PerCP-Cy5.5 conjugate), FluorX, Fluoresceinisothyocyanate (FITC), BODIPY-FL, TRITC, X-Rhodamine (XRITC), Lissamine Rhodamine B, Texas Red, Allophycocyanin (APC), an APC-Cy7 conjugate, Alexa Fluor 350, Alexa Fluor 405, Alexa Fluor 430, Alexa Fluor 488, Alexa Fluor 500, Alexa Fluor 514, Alexa Fluor 532, Alexa Fluor 546, Alexa Fluor 555, Alexa Fluor 568, Alexa Fluor 594, Alexa Fluor 610, Alexa Fluor 633, Alexa Fluor 647, Alexa Fluor 660, Alexa Fluor 680, Alexa Fluor 700, Alexa Fluor 750, Alexa Fluor 790, Cy2, Cy3, Cy3B, Cy3.5, Cy5, Cy5.5 or Cy7.


In some embodiments of the methods described herein, a PTM comprises ubiquitination, phosphorylation, glycosylation, sumoylation, acetylation, S-nitrosylation or nitrosylation, citrullination or deimination, neddylation, deimination, OClcNAc, ADP-ribosylation, methylation, hydroxylation, fattenylation, ufmylation, prenylation, myristoylation, S-palmitoylation, tyrosine sulfation, formylation, carboxylation, and any combination thereof. In some embodiments, a PTM consists essentially of ubiquitination, phosphorylation, glycosylation, sumoylation, acetylation, S-nitrosylation or nitrosylation, citrullination or deimination, neddylation, OClcNAc, ADP-ribosylation, methylation, hydroxylation, fattenylation, ufmylation, prenylation, myristoylation, S-palmitoylation, tyrosine sulfation, formylation, carboxylation, and any combination thereof. In some embodiments, a PTM consists of ubiquitination, phosphorylation, glycosylation, sumoylation, acetylation, S-nitrosylation or nitrosylation, citrullination or deimination, neddylation, OClcNAc, ADP-ribosylation, methylation, hydroxylation, fattenylation, ufmylation, prenylation, myristoylation, S-palmitoylation, tyrosine sulfation, formylation, carboxylation, and any combination thereof.


In some embodiments of the methods described herein, a PTM alteration comprises deubiquitination (DUB), dephosphorylation, deglycosylation, desumoylation, deacetylation, de-S-nitrosylation or denitrosylation, decitrullination or dedeimination, deneddylation, removal of OClcNAc, de-ADP-ribosylation, demethylation, de-hydroxylation, defattenylation, deufmylation, deprenylation, demyristoylation, de-S-palmitoylation, tyrosine desulfation, deformylation, decarboxylation, deamidation, and any combination thereof. In some embodiments, a PTM alteration consists essentially of deubiquitination (DUB), dephosphorylation, deglycosylation, desumoylation, deacetylation, de-S-nitrosylation or denitrosylation, decitrullination or dedeimination, deneddylation, removal of OClcNAc, de-ADP-ribosylation, demethylation, de-hydroxylation, defattenylation, deufmylation, deprenylation, demyristoylation, de-S-palmitoylation, tyrosine desulfation, deformylation, decarboxylation, deamidation, and any combination thereof. In some embodiments, a PTM alteration consists of deubiquitination (DUB), dephosphorylation, deglycosylation, desumoylation, deacetylation, de-S-nitrosylation or denitrosylation, decitrullination or dedeimination, deneddylation, removal of OClcNAc, de-ADP-ribosylation, demethylation, de-hydroxylation, defattenylation, deufmylation, deprenylation, demyristoylation, de-S-palmitoylation, tyrosine desulfation, deformylation, decarboxylation, deamidation, and any combination thereof.


As used herein, the term “post-translational modification” or “PTM” refers to a reaction wherein a chemical moiety is covalently added to or non-covalently binds to protein. As used herein, the term “PTM alteration” refers to a reaction wherein a chemical moiety covalently attached to or non-covalently bound to a protein is removed or altered (maybe in chain topology, different PTM combinations, etc). “Covalent bonding,” as used herein, refers to the form of chemical bonding that is characterized by the sharing of pairs of electrons between atoms, and other covalent bonds. Covalent bonding includes many kinds of interactions, including, but not limited to, σ-bonding, π-bonding, metal to non-metal bonding, agostic interactions, and three-center two-electron bonds. “Non-covalent bonding,” as used herein, refers to the type of chemical bond, typically between macromolecules, that does not involve the sharing of pairs of electrons, but rather involves more dispersed variations of electromagnetic interactions. Noncovalent bonds are critical in maintaining the three-dimensional structure of large molecules, such as proteins and nucleic acids, and are involved in many biological processes in which large molecules bind specifically but transiently to one another. Examples of noncovalent interactions include, but are not limited to, ionic bonds, hydrophobic interactions, hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, i.e. “London dispersion forces”, and Dipole-dipole bonds.


Many proteins can be post-translationally modified through the covalent addition or transient non-covalent binding of a chemical moiety (also referred to herein as a “modifying moiety”) after the initial synthesis (i.e., translation) of the polypeptide chain. Such chemical moieties usually are added by an enzyme to an amino acid side chain or to the carboxyl or amino terminal end of the polypeptide chain (i.e., PTM), and may be cleaved off by another enzyme (i.e., PTM alteration). Single or multiple chemical moieties, either the same or different chemical moieties, can be added to or bound to a single protein molecule. PTM of a protein can alter its biological function, such as its enzyme activity, its binding to or activation of other proteins, or its turnover, and is important in cell signaling events, development of an organism, and disease. Examples of PTM covered by the methods of the invention described herein include, but are not limited to, ubiquitination, phosphorylation, sumoylation, neddylation, ADP-ribosylation, glycosylation, acetylation, S-nitrosylation or nitrosylation, citrullination or deimination, the addition of OClcNAc, methylation, hydroxylation, fattenylation, ufmylation, prenylation, myristoylation, S-palmitoylation, tyrosine sulfation, formylation, and carboxylation. In some embodiments, a PTM can include both a covalent addition and non-covalent binding of a chemical moiety to a protein. For example, small ubiquitin-related modifiers (SUMOs) can be both covalently conjugated to a protein, and transiently non-covalently bound to the same protein to mediate different effects. In such embodiments, the covalent conjugation and non-covalent binding require different sequence motifs.


Similarly, a PTM alteration can involve removal of a covalently conjugated or a non-covalently bound chemical moiety. Examples of PTM alteration covered by the methods of the invention described herein include, but are not limited to, deubiquitination (DUB), dephosphorylation, deglycosylation, desumoylation, deacetylation, deS-nitrosylation, denitrosylation, decitrullination or dedeimination, deneddylation, de-ADP-ribosylation, removal of OClcNAc, demethylation, de-hydroxylation, defattenylation, deufmylation, deprenylation, demyristoylation, de-S-palmitoylation, tyrosine desulfation, deformylation, decarboxylation, and deamidation.


As used herein, “ubiquitination” or “ubiquitylation” refers to the post-translational modification of a protein by the covalent attachment (via an isopeptide bond) of one or more ubiquitin monomers. The ubiquitylation cascade is started by the E1 enzyme. The amino acid sequence of human ubiquitin is:









(SEQ ID NO: 1)


MQIFVKTLTGKTITLEVEPSDTIENVKAKIQDKEGIPPDQQRLIFAGKQLE





DGRTLSDYNIQKESTLHLVLRLRGG.






As used herein, removal of one or more ubiquitin molecules is known as “deubiquitination.”


As used herein, “phosphorylation” refers to the addition of a phosphate (PO4) group to a protein or other organic molecule. As used herein, “dephosphorylation” refers to the removal of a phosphate group from a protein or other organic molecule.


As used herein, “sumoylation” refers to the process whereby Small Ubiquitin-like Modifier or “SUMO” proteins are covalently attached to other proteins in cells to modify their function. SUMO proteins are similar to ubiquitin, and SUMOylation is directed by an enzymatic cascade analogous to that involved in ubiquitination. As defined herein, “desumoylation” refers to the process whereby SUMO proteins are removed from proteins in cells.


As used herein, “neddylation” refers to the process by which the ubiquitin-like protein Nedd8 is conjugated to its target proteins. This process is analogous to ubiquitination, although it relies on its own E1 and E2 enzymes. As used herein, “deneddylation” refers to the process by which the ubiquitin-like protein Nedd8 is unconjugated from its target proteins.


As used herein, “ADP-ribosylation” refers to the PTM of proteins that involves the addition of one or more ADP and ribose moieties. As used herein, “de-ADP-ribosylation” refers to the removal of one or more ADP and ribose moieties.


As defined herein, “glycosylation” refers to the enzymatic process that links saccharides to produce glycans, attached to proteins, lipids, or other organic molecules. For the methods described herein, glycosylation includes N-linked glycosylation, O-linked glycosylation (O—N-acetylgalactosamine (O-GalNAc), O-fucose, O-glucose, O—N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc), O—N-acetylglucosamine, O-mannose, Collagen Glycosylation, Hydroxyproline Glycosylation, Glycosylation of Glycogenin, Glycosylation of Ceramide, Proteoglycans), phospho-Serine Glycosylation and C-mannosylation. As defined herein, “deglycosylation” refers to the enzymatic process that removes saccharides attached to proteins, lipids, or other organic molecules.


As used herein, “acetylation” (or in IUPAC nomenclature “ethanoylation”) refers to the reaction that introduces an acetyl functional group into a chemical compound, and includes N-alpha-terminal acetylation and lysine acetylation. As used herein, “deacetylation” (or in IUPAC nomenclature “de-ethanoylation”) refers to the reaction that removes an acetyl functional group from a chemical compound.


As defined herein, “S-nitrosylation” or “nitrosylation” refer to the addition of a nitroso group to a sulfur atom of an amino acid residue of a protein. As defined herein, “de-S-nitrosylation” or “de-nitrosylation” refer to the removal of a nitroso group from a sulfur atom of an amino acid residue of a protein.


As used herein, “citrullination” or “deimination” are the terms used for the post-translational modification of the amino acid arginine in a protein into the amino acid citrulline. As used herein, “decitrullination” or “de-deimination” are the terms used for the removal of the amino acid citrulline from a protein.


As used herein, “methylation” is the term used to denote the addition of a methyl group to a substrate or the substitution of an atom or group by a methyl group. Methylation is a form of alkylation with specifically a methyl group. Protein methylation typically takes place on arginine or lysine amino acid residues in the protein sequence. Arginine can be methylated once (monomethylated arginine) or twice, with either both methyl groups on one terminal nitrogen (asymmetric dimethylated arginine) or one on both nitrogens (symmetric dimethylated arginine) by peptidylarginine methyltransferases (PRMTs). Lysine can be methylated once, twice or three times by lysine methyltransferases. As used herein, “demethylation” refers to the removal of a methyl group from a protein.


As used herein, “hydroxylation” refers to the chemical process that introduces one or more hydroxyl groups (—OH) into a compound (or radical) thereby oxidizing it. The principal residue to be hydroxylated in proteins is proline. The hydroxylation occurs at the Cγ atom, forming hydroxyproline (Hyp). In some cases, proline may be hydroxylated instead on its Cβ atom. Lysine may also be hydroxylated on its Cδ atom, forming hydroxylysine (Hyl). As used herein, “dehydroxylation” refers to the chemical process that removes one or more hydroxyl groups (—OH) from a protein.


As used herein, “ufmylation” refers to the process whereby the ubiquitin-like modifier Ufm-1 is covalently attached to a protein. As used herein, “deufmylation” refers to the process whereby the ubiquitin-like modifier Ufm-1 is removed from a protein.


As used herein, “fattenylation” refers to the process whereby the ubiquitin-like modifier FAT10 is covalently attached to a protein. As used herein, “defattenylation” refers to the process whereby the ubiquitin-like modifier FAT10 is removed from a protein.


As used herein, the terms “prenylation,” “isoprenylation,” or “lipidation” refers to the addition of hydrophobic molecules to a protein. Protein prenylation involves the transfer of either a farnesyl or a geranyl-geranyl moiety to C-terminal cysteine(s) of the target protein. As used herein, the terms “deprenylation,” “desoprenylation,” or “delipidation” refers to the removal of hydrophobic molecules from a protein.


As used herein, “myristoylation” refers to the PTM process wherein myristoyl group (derived from myristic acid) is covalently attached via an amide bond to the alpha-amino group of an N-terminal amino acid of a polypeptide. It is more common on glycine residues but also occurs on other amino acids. Myristoylation occurs post-translationally, for example when previously internal glycine residues become exposed by caspase cleavage during apoptosis. As used herein, “demyristoylation” refers to the PTM alteration wherein myristoyl group (derived from myristic acid) is removed from the alpha-amino group of an N-terminal amino acid of a polypeptide.


As used herein, “S-palmitoylation” refers to the covalent attachment of fatty acids, such as palmitic acid, to cysteine residues of proteins. As used herein, “de-S-palmitoylation” refers to the removal of fatty acids, such as palmitic acid, to cysteine residues from proteins.


As used herein, “tyrosine sulfation” is a PTM where a sulfate group is added to a tyrosine residue of a protein molecule. As used herein, “tyrosine desulfation” is a PTM alteration where a sulfate group is removed from a tyrosine residue of a protein molecule.


As used herein, “deamidation” refers to the chemical reaction in which an amide functional group is removed from a protein. The reaction damages the amide-containing side chains of the amino acids asparagine and glutamine.


As used herein, “formylation” is a type of PTM in which a formyl group is added to the N-terminus of a protein. As used herein, “deformylation” is a type of PTM alteration in which a formyl group is removed from the N-terminus of a protein.


As used herein, “carboxylation” is a PTM in which a carboxylic acid group is added to glutamate residues in proteins. It occurs primarily in proteins involved in the blood clotting cascade, specifically factors II, VII, IX, and X, protein C, and protein S, and also in some bone proteins. As used herein, “decarboxylation” is a PTM alteration in which a carboxylic acid group is removed from glutamate residues in proteins.


In some embodiments of the present invention, the PTM reaction is a modification of proteins with a ubiquitin-like modifier selected from the group consisting of ISG15, UCRP, FUB1, NEDD8, FAT10, SUMO-1, SUMO-2, SUMO-3, Apg8, Apg12, Urm1, UBL5, and Ufm1 (see Table 1 for further description). In other embodiments of the present invention, the PTM reaction is one of ubiquitination, sumoylation, and neddylation.


The methods described herein can be used to detect changes both in PTM enzyme activity and its cognate protein targets in a patient through the analysis of a patient sample, such as plasma, CSF, or from an extract prepared from biopsy tissue. There is great need for a method that is capable of rapidly detecting biomarkers of diseases such as Alzheimer's disease or cancer in a patient sample, and to distinguish the disease from the normal state. Detecting PTMs of a large number of proteins provides a detailed fingerprint of the PTM enzymes released from tissues during disease.


In some embodiments, the functional cell extract for use in the methods described herein is obtained from a biological sample. As used herein, a “biological sample” includes, but is not limited to, saliva, blood, umbilical cord blood, serum, plasma, urine, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), chorionic villus, lymph fluid, placenta, breast milk, nipple aspirates, pleural fluid, mucus, semen, vaginal secretions, any cell sample (heterogenous or homogenous), any solid tissue, a tumor, amniotic fluid, and a tissue culture sample. Tissue samples include but are not limited to, skin tissue, lung tissue, adipose tissue, connective tissue, sub-epithelial tissue, epithelial tissue, liver tissue, kidney tissue, uterine tissue, respiratory tissues, gastrointestinal tissue, and genitourinary tract tissue. In some embodiments, the sample is from a resection, bronchoscopic biopsy, or core needle biopsy of a primary or metastatic tumor, or a cell block from pleural fluid. In addition, fine needle aspirate samples can be used. A cell sample includes, for example, a population of cells obtained from a single-cell suspension of a tissue, for example, spleen, lymph node, or thymus. In some embodiments, a cell sample can be a heterogenous population of cells, such as the population of immune cells found in the spleen. In other embodiments, a cell sample refers to a purified population of cells, such as purified T or B cells isolated from lymph node tissue by methods known to one of skill in the art. In other embodiments, the functional cell extract can be directly prepared from a tissue or tumor by homogenization of the tissue or tumor. In some embodiments, the tumor sample refers to a biopsy of a tumor. Regarding extracellular fluids, such as interstitial fluids, lymph, CSF, blood, serum, plasma, urine, saliva, umbilical cord blood, amniotic fluid, breast milk, mucus, semen, and vaginal secretions, it is still unclear how certain intracellular proteins are deposited in such extracellular fluids, though they are expected to result from cellular turnover; nevertheless, many examples of intracellular proteins in such fluids are known. For example, it is known that cytoskeletal proteins such as tau and post-translationally modified forms thereof (phospho-tau) can be readily detected in CSF from patients suffering from Alzheimer's disease. Prior to the present invention, however, it was unknown whether functional PTM enzymes are present in extracellular fluid samples such as CSF and plasma and could be used to modify target proteins. Thus, the invention now provides a means to assay PTM enzyme activities in samples that were previously not used for such analysis.


In other embodiments, the methods described herein are useful for assaying PTM or PTM alterations of frozen or cryopreserved biological samples. Biological samples that can be frozen or cryopreserved include, but are not limited to, any of the biological samples described herein. Previously, the methods used to assay PTM or PTM alterations were limited to the use of fresh biological samples, i.e., those taken from a subject and processed immediately, or those extracts obtained from an in vivo source and processed ex vivo (i.e., isolated cells). As used herein, “cryopreservation” refers to the process where cells or whole tissues are preserved by cooling to low sub-zero temperatures, such as, 77 K or −196° C. (the boiling point of liquid nitrogen). For example, machines can be used that freeze biological samples, to be used in the methods described herein, using programmable steps, or controlled rates, before it is deep frozen, or by cryopreserving such samples in liquid nitrogen. Such machines can be used for freezing any of the biological samples described herein, including blood products, embryo, sperm, stem cells, and general tissues. Freezing must be regulated carefully to preserve the integrity of the biological sample, and lethal intracellular freezing can be avoided, for example, if cooling is slow enough to permit sufficient water to leave the cell during progressive freezing of the extracellular fluid. That rate differs between cells of differing size and water permeability: a typical cooling rate around 1° C./minute is appropriate for many mammalian cells after treatment with cryoprotectants such as glycerol or dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO), but the rate is not a universal optimum. In some embodiments, vitrification can be performed to prepare the cryopreserved biological sample. In clinical cryopreservation, vitrification usually requires the addition of cryoprotectants prior to cooling. Cryoprotectants lower the freezing temperature and increase the viscosity of the biological sample, such that instead of crystallizing, the syrupy solution turns into an amorphous ice, i.e., it vitrifies. Vitrification of water is promoted by rapid cooling, and can be achieved without cryoprotectants by an extremely rapid drop in temperature (megakelvins per second). Many solutes do both, but larger molecules generally have larger effect, particularly on viscosity. Rapid cooling also promotes vitrification. In established methods of cryopreservation, the solute must penetrate the cell membrane in order to achieve increased viscosity and depress freezing temperature inside the cell. Sugars do not readily permeate through the membrane. Those solutes that do, such as dimethyl sulfoxide, a common cryoprotectant, are often toxic in high concentration. One of the difficult compromises faced in vitrifying cryopreservation is limiting the damage produced by the cryoprotectant itself. In general, cryopreservation is easier for thin samples and small clumps of individual cells, because these can be cooled more quickly and so require lower doses of toxic cryoprotectants. Examples of biological samples that can be cryopreserved using vitrifying cryopreservation include, but are not limited to, semen; blood and blood products such as serum and plasma; cells; stem cells; umbilical cord blood; tissue samples like tumors and histological cross sections; oocytes; 2, 4, or 8 cell embryos; and ovarian tissue. Cryoprotectant media may be, for example, supplemented with either egg yolk or soy lecithin.


The ability to use frozen or cryopreserved biological samples provides a significant and useful improvement over the standard biochemical methods used to detect PTM or PTM alterations, as such samples can be assayed long after they are obtained, and can be used to make comparisons between samples obtained at different timepoints, and from different locations. Further, if multiple biological replicates of these samples are prepared prior to the freezing or cryopreservation, a frozen or cryopreserved biological sample can be assayed multiple times. For example, the effect of a drug or treatment on PTM and PTM alterations can be assayed using cryopreserved samples taken at different timepoints from a subject being treated for a disorder. Also, cryopreserved samples can be used to compare PTM or PTM alterations between biological samples, such as a tumor biopsy, obtained from different subjects at different locations, to determine whether one or more PTM or PTM alterations or patterns of PTM or PTM alterations are shared between the same types of tumors in different subjects.


As used herein, the term “functional extract” refers to the extract of a biological sample, either in its entirety (i.e., not diluted) or any unfractionated portion or volume portion thereof, or any dilution or concentrations thereof. The term “functional extract” also includes an extracellular fluid sample obtained from a patient, applied undiluted, diluted or concentrated, in its entirety or as any mass portion or volume portion thereof. Preferably, the functional extract is not subjected to a protein purification process prior to use in a PTM or PTM alteration reaction on a solid state array, such as a protein microarray. The extract as used for a PTM or PTM alteration reaction can be supplemented with any reagent, including salts, buffers, gases, substrates, enzymes, inhibitors, etc., as desired or as appropriate for the particular PTM or PTM alteration reaction being performed.


A functional cell extract derived from a biological sample for use in the methods described herein to detect PTMs and PTM alterations can be an undiluted or concentrated extract. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the functional cell extract is not diluted prior to contacting with a solid state array. In some embodiments, functional cell extracts of patient samples or biological samples are preferably maintained at a protein concentration approaching that of in the body of the subject, so that protein-protein interactions that might affect activity are retained in the extract. In other embodiments, the functional cell extract is concentrated prior to contacting with a solid state array. In some such embodiments, the functional cell extract is highly concentrated prior to contacting with a solid state array. In such embodiments where a concentrated functional cell extract is used, the method of concentration does not involve protein purification or protein removal from the extract, but rather removal of extra cellular fluid or buffers used to isolate and prepare the cellular extract. For example, when a cell lysis solution is used to lyse a biological sample for use in the methods described herein, methods of protein concentration known to those of skill in the art can be used to concentrate the sample to form the functional cell extract prior to contacting with a solid state array for detection of a PTM or PTM alteration reaction in the extract. Non-limiting examples of methods to concentrate a functional cell extract include membrane filtering (microfiltration and ultrafiltration techniques), the use of high-speed vacuums, membrane dialysis, and TCA precipitation.


Highly concentrated cellular extracts have been shown to have demonstrable function. Such cellular extracts from Xenopus and from somatic cells that demonstrated a function specified for a particular phase of the cell cycle have allowed for the recapitulation of complex events, such as the ordered degradation of mitotic substrates (1). Also, in recent years, these systems have been employed for an in vitro expression cloning (IVEC) screening approach (2) and were used successfully to identify proteins that undergo mitosis-specific degradation (3, 4), apoptotic protease substrates (5), protein kinase substrates (5), and other binding interactions (6).


A functional cell extract derived from a biological sample for use in the methods described herein to detect PTMs and PTM alterations is essentially devoid of detergents or surfactants, as well as toxins or substances that could inhibit the biological function of components of the extract, e.g., enzymes and co-factors involved in PTM reactions, or that could denature or alter the protein targets in the microarray. In contrast to the methods described in US2008/0138836, where a commercial buffer containing three detergents are used to prepare an extract, the methods described herein allow an artisan to use a detergent-free or essentially devoid of detergents functional cell extract for detecting PTM or PTM alterations on a solid state array. Accordingly, in some embodiments, an essentially detergent-free functional cell extract is contacted with a solid state array for detecting a PTM or PTM alteration. In some embodiments, a functional cell extract is prepared from a biological sample using one or more detergent-free or essentially detergent-free solutions. In some embodiments, the functional cell extract is detergent-free. Negligible amounts of detergents, toxins, or other factors that do not affect PTM activity may be present.


A non-limiting example of a method for preparing a functional extract from a cell sample is to use a gentle, minimally diluting method such as one or more cycles of freeze-thaw, optionally combined with mildly hypotonic lysis of cells that may be present in the sample. The amount of sample material used to prepare the extract will depend on the scale of the experiment, such as the number and size of the microarrays used, but generally at least one million cells or at least an amount of tissue or bodily fluid equivalent to 50 microliters of an undiluted lysed tissue sample or cell extract, or at least about 20 μl of a bodily fluid such as plasma or cerebrospinal fluid is sufficient for preparing an extract to cover a single 1×3 inch microarray.


In order to prepare a functional extract from a cell sample, cells are first harvested using standard techniques for collecting cells, e.g., from culture or from a specimen obtained from a patient. Such techniques can include, for example, single-cell suspension preparation, tissue homogenization, treatment of tissue or cell culture with trypsin, collagenase, or other enzymes, passage through a needle, sonication, or separation by centrifugation or passage through a column, such as an affinity column. In other embodiments, purified cells can be obtained using methods and techniques known to skilled artisan for cell purification and isolation, such as magnetic bead isolation using columns, or via flow cytometric sorting techniques. Cells can be swelled in a buffer such as 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, containing 1.5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT, optionally containing a preferred mixture of protease inhibitors, such as COMPLETE™ protease inhibitors (Roche). In some embodiments, in order to concentrated the functional cell extract, the ratio of lysis or homogenization solution preferably is kept to a minimum, e.g., similar to or less than the volume of cells being extracted, in order to minimize the dilution of extracted material. In some embodiments, a ratio of about 0.5 to 1 volume of lysis solution to cell volume can be used to concentrate the functional cell extract. In some embodiments, preferably 0.8 volumes or less of lysis solution is used for each volume of cells to be disrupted to form the concentrated functional cell extract. After homogenization, the crude cell extract can be treated to remove membranes and whole or fragmented cells, such as by centrifugation.


In some embodiments, the functional cell extract for use in the methods described herein is derived from one or more specified cellular compartments. In such embodiments, the functional cell extract derived from one or more specified cellular compartments can also be concentrated prior to contact with a solid state array. In one embodiment, the cellular compartment is nucleus. In another embodiment, the cellular compartment is cytosol. In another embodiment, the cellular compartment is mitochondria. In one embodiment, the cellular compartments are nucleus and cytosol. In one embodiment, the cellular compartments are nucleus and mitochondria. In one embodiment, the cellular compartments are cytosol and mitochondria. In some embodiments, the functional cell extract for use in the methods described herein lacks one or more specified cellular compartments. In one embodiment, the functional extract lacks nucleus. In one embodiment, the functional extract lacks cytosol. In one embodiment, the functional extract lacks mitochondria. Functional extracts can be made from these different cellular compartments according to published protocols known to one of skill in the art.


Functional extracts can be prepared from any suitable source of cells, tissue, or biological fluid that can be obtained from a patient or subject. The patient or subject can be a human or a non-human animal. The terms “subject”, “patient” and “individual” are used interchangeably herein, and refer to an animal, for example a human, from whom the biological sample can be obtained from. For treatment of disease states which are specific for a specific animal such as a human subject, the term “subject” refers to that specific animal. The terms “non-human animals” and “non-human mammals” are used interchangeably herein, and include mammals such as rats, mice, rabbits, sheep, cats, dogs, cows, pigs, and non-human primates. The term “subject” also encompasses any vertebrate including but not limited to mammals, reptiles, amphibians and fish. However, advantageously, the subject is a mammal such as a human, or other mammals such as a domesticated mammal, e.g. dog, cat, horse, and the like, or production mammal, e.g. cow, sheep, pig, and the like are also encompassed in the term subject. Sources of cells or tissue for extraction can include, for example, a biopsy specimen, such as a tumor or suspected tumor, serum, plasma, cerebrospinal fluid, saliva, urine. Non-cellular (e.g., bodily fluid, interstitial fluid) samples usually contain intracellular content that is sufficient for analysis; such content may be derived, for example, from directed secretion from cells, from inflammation, or tissue damage. In other embodiments, a non-cellular biological sample comprises the media obtained from tissue culture samples.


A functional extract can be supplemented with one or more substances to aid in the analysis of a specific post-translational state or a specific PTM enzyme or PTM modifying enzyme activity. For example, an extract can be supplemented with a reagent, a substrate, an enzyme, an enzyme inhibitor, a drug, an antibody, or any mixture thereof. Alternatively, an extract can be depleted using antibodies directed to a chosen protein, protein complex, or modified protein. An extract lacking a particular protein component also can be prepared from knockout or knockdown cells. In some embodiments of the methods described herein, an additional cellular energy source in the form of, for example, ATP is provided to the functional cell extract. In one embodiment, a biochemical energy source such as ATP plus an ATP regenerating system is added to the extract or fluid to establish a reaction on the microarray. A high concentration of creatine phosphate (e.g. 150 mM) is a suitable ATP-regenerating system. Creatine phosphokinase can also be added in addition to creatine phosphate, but may be omitted if sufficiently present in the extract or fluid. Preferably, a substrate for a PTM enzyme, such as ubiquitin, is also added to the extract or fluid to establish a specific PTM reaction.


For some PTM reactions (e.g., ubiquitination, requiring E1, E2, and E3 enzymes), more than one enzyme is necessary to carry out the reaction, and while one or more enzyme is supplied by the extract or fluid sample, one or more other enzymes required for optimal activity may be limited or missing. In such cases the missing or limited enzyme or enzymes can be added to the extract or fluid to establish an optimal PTM reaction or PTM alteration reaction. A further useful strategy is to add to the extract an inhibitor of an enzyme that inhibits a particular type of PTM or PTM alteration. Examples include methyl-ubiquitin and dominant-negative E2 enzymes for ubiquitination or sumoylation. An exemplary list of enzymes that might be added to supplement a PTM reaction is provided in Table 1. One skilled in the art can readily identify additional enzymes and enzyme combinations based on existing or acquired knowledge of PTM pathways and reactions. The methods of the invention do not depend on specific combination of components.













TABLE 1






Ubiquitin
E1-E2-E3 Conjugating




Ubiquitin-Like
Sequence
Enzymes Deconjugating


Modifier
Homology (%)
Enzyme (DCE)
Substrates
Functions







ISG15 (UCRP)
29, 27
E1: UBE1L; E2: UBCH8
PLCγ1, JAK1, STAT1,
Positive regulator of IFN-related


(2 ubiquitins)


ERK1/2, serpin 2a
immune response, potentially






involved in cell growth and






differentiation


FUB1 (MNSFβ)
37
NA
TCR-α-like protein, Bcl-G
Negative regulator of leukocyte






activation and proliferation


NEDD8 (Rub1)
58
E1: APPBP1-UBA3; E2: UBC12; E3:
cullins, p53, Mdm2, synphilin-1
Positive regulator of ubiquitin E3s;




Roc1, Mdm2; DCE: DEN1/NEDP1,

directs to proteasomal degradation




UCH-L1, UCH-L3, USP21, COP9


FAT10 (2
29, 36
NA
MAD2
Cell cycle checkpoint for spindle


ubiquitins)



assembly, directs to proteasomal






degradation


SUMO-1 (SMT3C,
18
E1: SAE-1/-2 (AOS1-UBA2); E2:
Glut1, Glut4, c-Jun, lκBα, p53,
Control of protein stability, function,


GMP1, UBL1)

UBC9; E3: RanBP2, Pc2, PIAS
Mdm2, SOD-1, RXRα, NEMO,
and localization, antagonist to




superfamily; DCE: SENP-1 and -2
PML, Sam68, RanGAP1,
ubiquitin, overlap with SUMO-2/-3




(Ulp-1 and -2), SUSP4
RanBP2, ADAR1, PCNA,





Drp1, STAT-1, Sp3, thymine-





DNA glycosylase,





topoisomerase II


SUMO-2 (SMT3B);
16
E1: SAE-1/-2; E2: UBC9; DCE:
RanGAP1, C/EBPβ1,
Transcription regulation, cell cycle


SUMO-3 (SMT3A)

SENP-3 and -5
topoisomerase II, thymine-
progression





DNA glycosylase


Apg 8
10
E1: Apg7; E2: Apg3; DCE: Apg4
Phosphatidylethanolamine
Autophagy, cytoplasm-to-vacuole






targeting


Apg 12
17
E1: Apg7; E2: Apg10
Apg 5
Autophagy, cytoplasm-to-vacuole






targeting


Urm1
12
E1: Uba4
Ahp1
Potential role in oxidative stress






response


UBL5 (Hub1)
25
NA
CLK4, Snu66, Sph1, Hbt1
Pre-mRNA splicing, appetite






regulation


Ufm1
16
E1: Uba5; E2: Ufc1
NA
Potential role in endoplasmic stress






response









Small molecule inhibitors may also be used in a PTM reaction. Additionally, adenosine 5′-(gamma-thio)triphosphate can be added as an inhibitor of ATP-dependent processes in an extract. Also, certain proteases can be inhibited, removed, or supplemented into the reaction in order to check their effect or to find specific targets.


Any solid state array can be used for the methods described herein. A “solid state array,” as used herein, refers to any combination of one or more target proteins or peptides attached to a solid support. Such a support can be a microchip, a bead, a glass slide, or any other support suitable for arraying a target protein or peptide. An array for use in the invention also can be fabricated in any desired format or dimensions and with any desired number of target proteins, as long as the position of each target protein is known and the target can be identified by its position within the array. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the solid state array for use in the methods described herein includes protein arrays on microchips, ELISA plates with immobilized proteins attached on the plates, protein-coated beads, and microfluidic chips coated with desired proteins. In some embodiments of this aspect, 2-10 PTM or PTM alterations are identified simultaneously. For example, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more PTM or PTM alterations can be screened in one assay with suitable detection methods, such as labeled antibodies. In some embodiments, the multiple PTMs, PTM alterations, or combinations thereof are detected in parallel. In some embodiments, multiple PTMs, PTM alterations, or combinations thereof are detected sequentially. In such embodiments, the first PTM may affect the second PTM. Such sequential identification of PTM or PTM alteration allows one to determine PTM pathways and screen for different agents affecting various parts of the PTM or PTM alteration pathway. In some embodiments, multiplex analysis of 10-15, 10-100 PTM and/or PTM alteration reactions can be performed.


A protein microarray for use in the methods of the invention can be selected from commercially available or in-house microarrays. The array has a substrate upon which proteins are deposited in a two-dimensional array (i.e., an ordered plurality of proteins), such that each position in the array contains a single type of known protein whose PTM or PTM alteration can be investigated. The substrate of the array can be made of a material such as a glass slide, to which protein molecules are covalently or non-covalently bound. Optionally, glass can be coated with nitrocellulose or derivatized with expoxy or amino groups to provide desirable surface properties, to reduce non-specific binding, or to provide attachment points for proteins. An example of a commercially available protein microarray suitable for use in the invention is the PROTO-ARRAY® Human Protein Microarray from Invitrogen, which contains over 8000 human proteins. Other commercially available or user prepared arrays or microarrays can be used as well. In some embodiments of the methods described herein, the array comprises at least one protein, protein fragment, or peptide attached to the array with a C-terminal or N-terminal tag. Selected proteins, for example recombinant proteins that are N-terminally or C-terminally tagged and purified, can be used to prepare any desired protein microarray for use in the invention. In other embodiments, the array comprises at least one protein, protein fragment or peptide attached to the array without an added tag or moiety to facilitate binding to the solid support.


A protein array for use with the invention can have at least 2, 5, 10, 100, 1000, 8000, 10,000, 30,000, or 100,000 or more individual protein spots or wells in the array, in addition to which other locations can be added to the array for controls or background determination, or other purposes as desired. The individual proteins in the array can be all distinct, or the proteins at some positions can be identical to proteins at other positions, or can be variants (e.g., sequence mutants or differently modified versions) of proteins at other positions.


An alternative to using a protein microarray for detection is to use an array constructed from a microtiter plate or any similar container having a plurality of wells. Individual target proteins can be added to individual wells at known locations for carrying out the PTM or PTM alteration reaction and detection. It is only necessary to retain the proteins at their respective locations throughout the reaction, washing, and detection steps. For example, recombinant proteins bearing a tag, such as a GST, FLAG, or myc tag, can be coupled to glass beads that are deposited at specific locations in a microtiter plate. The beads can be retained in the wells during solution exchange, and offer the possibility to uncouple and release the modified proteins for further study, e.g., by mass spectrometry. In other embodiments, the recombinant proteins are directly deposited at specific locations in a microtiter plate, and binding is mediated by the properties of the microtiter plate. For example, untreated and irradiated polystyrene microtiter plates permit hydrophobic and hydrophilic interactions between the polystyrene and the protein being deposited.


Another alternative to using a protein microarray for detection is to use a solid state array comprising beads to which the protein targets of the PTM or PTM alteration are attached, such as a multiplex bead assay. For example, in some embodiments, protein targets of a PTM or PTM alteration are attached to beads of different sizes or colors (emission spectra) in a multiplex bead based assay. In such embodiments, a plurality of beads of different sizes is coated with different protein targets of a PTM or PTM alteration, wherein each bead of a specific size is conjugated to a specific protein target. Accordingly, each bead can be differentiated by its unique light scatter characteristics. A biological sample, such as a blood sample, to be assayed for the presence of at least one PTM or PTM alteration is then contacted with a plurality of beads of different sizes having different protein targets, thus allowing the PTM or PTM alteration to occur on one or more protein targets attached to specific beads.


In some embodiments of this aspect, such bead-based technology can be employed wherein bead populations are identified by one type of fluorescence, while the PTM or PTM alteration of the protein target on the bead is generated by one or more detection reagents carrying a second type of fluorescent signal, thus creating a bead set specific for detecting a plurality of PTM or PTM alteration. In preferred embodiments, the distinguishable bead populations are prepared by staining the beads with two or more fluorescent dyes at various ratios. Each bead having a specific ratio of the two or more fluorescent dyes is conjugated to a specific protein target, thus assigning each bead-protein target a unique fluorescent signature. The immunoassay signal is generated by detection reagents, coupled to a third type of fluorescent dye. A biological sample to be assayed for the presence of at least PTM or PTM alteration is then contacted with the plurality of beads with unique fluorescent signatures and protein target specificity, forming a PTM or PTM alteration on specific beads having the protein target of that PTM or PTM alteration. The presence of each of the at least one PTM or PTM alteration can be ascertained by flow cytometric analyses on the bead bound-target proteins. For example, in some embodiments, beads are dyed with fluorochromes having different fluorescence intensities. In some embodiments, the beads are 7.5 μm in diameter. In some embodiments, the fluorescent dye incorporated in the beads fluoresces strongly at 650 nm upon excitation with an argon laser. Each bead population of a given fluorescence intensity represents a discrete population for constructing an immunoassay for a single protein target. Each bead population having a given fluorescence intensity upon excitation is covalently coupled with a specific protein target. For example, a target of an E1 ligase. These target protein-bound bead populations, each of which are unique in their fluorescence emission intensity, serve as targets for specific PTM or PTM alteration enzymes present in a biological sample.


Accordingly, as defined herein a “capture bead” is a bead having a unique fluorescence emission intensity conjugated to a specific target protein. When these capture beads specific for different target proteins are used as a mixture, different PTM or PTM alterations, can be simultaneously measured within a given sample. In some embodiments, detection is mediated by the binding of a specific detection antibody, for example, an antibody that detects any PTM or PTM alteration present in a sample, that is directly conjugated with a fluorescent tag, such as phycoerythrin (PE), to each of the modified protein targets present after contacting with the biological sample, thus providing a second fluorescent signal for each capture bead. The fluorescent signal is proportional to the concentration of the biomarker in the sample. Separately established calibration curves can be used to determine the degree of PTM or PTM alteration in the test sample, using dedicated analysis software, such as CBA software.


The data collected using a flow cytometer includes information about the physical and spectral parameters of the beads, such as size and the fluorescence emission characteristics of each bead population. These fluorescence emission characteristics include the fluorescent emission of the dyed beads, and the potential fluorescent emissions of the detection fluorochrome (for example, phycoerythrin). When samples are analyzed using a flow cytometer in conjunction with a typical data acquisition and analysis package (for e.g., BD CellQuest™ software), a list-mode data file is saved using a flow cytometry standard file format, FCS. The data stored in the FCS files can be reanalyzed to determine the median fluorescence intensities (MFI) of the various bead populations, defined by their unique physical and spectral characteristics, to then compare reference samples with unknowns. The PTM or PTM alterations being assayed within individual samples can then be calculated from calibration curves generated by serial dilutions of standard solutions having known PTM or PTM alterations. An automated or semiautomated analysis method can be used for rapid reanalysis of the data stored in each FCS file. For example, BD CBA Software is written in the MICROSOFT® Excel Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) programming language. The CBA Software can recognize FCS 2.0 and 3.0 format data files and automates the identification of CBA bead populations and the determination of detector fluorochrome MFI values for each bead population within the data file for a single sample. Using this data analysis function of the CBA Software for multiple standard files, the MFI values for standards are then determined and plotted. From the plotted standard curve and complex mathematical interpolation, values for unknown samples can be rapidly determined in comparison to known standards using the software.


A functional extract is contacted with a solid state array, such as a protein microarray, usually by depositing an aliquot or portion of the extract, optionally after dilution or supplementation with a reagent or buffer, which may include an energy source, such as ATP and/or one or more enzymes that take part in the PTM or PTM alteration reaction, onto the surface of the microarray where proteins are deposited. Alternatively, supplements can be added after the extract is deposited onto the microarray. Once contacted with the microarray, the extract can be incubated under any desired conditions, such as at room temperature or another temperature (e.g., 30 or 37° C.), suitable to promote the protein-protein interactions and enzyme reactions necessary to allow a PTM state to be established. Generally, the incubation will last for a period ranging from several minutes to hours. The incubation conditions should be sufficient to permit a steady state level for the particular PTM reaction under consideration to be established.


One method of the invention involves detection and analysis of altered states of PTM in one or more proteins in a biological sample from a patient compared to a biological sample from a control patient, or control data, or data obtained from the same patient at an earlier time. A state of PTM can be altered, for example, if there is a change in the average number of a given chemical group attached per protein molecule, if there is a change in the type of chemical group or groups attached per protein molecule, or if there is a different mixture of protein molecules having distinct modification patterns in a patient sample. Alteration of a PTM state of a protein includes going from an unmodified protein to a modified one and vice-versa, as well as changes in the number or type of chemical moieties added to the protein.


Thus, one embodiment of the invention is a method of identifying an altered PTM state of a protein in a patient. The method includes the steps of (i) contacting a functional extract of a sample from the patient with a protein microarray containing proteins that are representative of proteins in the patient; (ii) establishing a specific PTM reaction on the microarray, whereby the reaction results in a PTM of one or more proteins in the microarray through the activity of one or more enzymes present in the extract; (iii) determining the level of PTM of proteins in the microarray; and (iv) comparing the levels of PTM with PTM levels of corresponding proteins in a control sample to identify altered PTM states of one or more proteins in the patient.


A specific PTM reaction can be established on an array by adding a substrate (e.g., ubiquitin) to the extract or fluid sample that is required for a single PTM reaction. An assay also can be rendered specific for a single PTM reaction by the use of an antibody that detects only one specific PTM state. Methods according to the invention can be addressed to either a single specific PTM reaction at a time or more than one specific PTM reactions performed simultaneously in the same reaction mixture (multiplex format).


The particular target proteins in the microarray can be selected so as to be representative of the proteins available in the patient. For example, the microarray can include a large number of human proteins if the patient is a human patient. In one embodiment, the proteins in the microarray are initially in an unmodified state, such as that obtained by expressing the proteins in a recombinant expression system that does not modify the proteins. In another embodiment, the proteins in the microarray have various states of PTM; such proteins can be further modified by a functional extract, providing differential modification signals. Alternatively, in another embodiment the target proteins in the array can be biochemically stripped of certain PTMs prior to exposure to the functional extract for analysis. During the step of contacting the functional extract with the microarray, one or more proteins in the array will become post-translationally modified by the enzymes, cofactors, and substrates in the extract.


Following an appropriate incubation period, the cell extract can be washed off the microarray by standard techniques, including spin drying, centrifugation, or blowing a stream of gas (e.g., air or nitrogen) over the surface of the microarray followed by application of a buffer solution to the microarray. The washing step can be repeated as needed to remove components from the cell extract from the microarray, leaving the modified target proteins attached to the microarray for subsequent detection. A suitable washing solution is a Tris buffered saline solution (TBS), optionally supplemented with one or more detergents (e.g., 0.05% Tween, or for more stringent conditions 0.5% SDS) to dissociate non-specifically bound proteins from the proteins in the array.


After the cell extract has been removed, the next step is to determine the level of PTM of individual proteins in the microarray. This can be accomplished, for example, using an antibody that specifically binds all proteins having a specific type of modification. Many such antibodies are commercially available, such as Anti-Polyubiquitin (BioMol), anti-ubiquitin (with specific linkages, Cell Signaling), anti-sumol (Cell Signaling, BioMol), anti-sumo2/3 (Cell Signaling, Biomol), anti-NEDD8 (Biomol, MB1, Sigma), anti-APG8 (Boston Biochem), anti-FAT10 (Boston Biochem), and anti-UFM1 (Boston Biochem). Examples of commercially available antibodies that can be used to specifically detect different PTM and PTM alteration states are listed in Table 2.











TABLE 2





PTM Detected/Antibody
Catalog Number
Company







Ubiquitin monoclonal mouse monoclonal
AB-001
Cell




Signaling


SUMO2 polyclonal mouse polyclonal
AB-S80
Cell




Signaling


SUMO2 monoclonal mouse monoclonal
AB-S81
Cell




Signaling


SUMO3 MaxPab polyclonal mouse polyclonal
AB-S90
Cell




Signaling


SUMO3 polyclonal mouse polyclonal
AB-S91
Cell




Signaling


SUMO3 monoclonal mouse monoclonal
AB-S92
Cell




Signaling


SUMO3 monoclonal mouse monoclonal
AB-S93
Cell




Signaling


SUMO4 MaxPab polyclonal mouse polyclonal
AB-S95
Cell




Signaling


SUMO4 polyclonal rabbit polyclonal
AB-S96
Cell




Signaling


SUMO4 polyclonal rabbit polyclonal
AB-S97
Cell




Signaling


Anti-NEDD8 rabbit polyclonal
A-812
Cell




Signaling


Anti-UBE1L (E1) rabbit polyclonal
A-306
Cell




Signaling


Anti-ISG15 rabbit polyclonal
A-600
Cell




Signaling


UBE2L6 (UbcH8) MaxPab polyclonal mouse
AB-242
Cell


polyclonal

Signaling


UBE2L6 polyclonal mouse polyclonal
AB-243
Cell




Signaling


UBE2L6 (UbcH8) monoclonal mouse monoclonal
AB-244
Cell


Ubiquitin monoclonal mouse monoclonal
AB-001
Cell




Signaling


SUMO2 polyclonal mouse polyclonal
AB-S80
Cell




Signaling


SUMO2 monoclonal mouse monoclonal
AB-S81
Cell




Signaling


SUMO3 MaxPab polyclonal mouse polyclonal
AB-S90
Cell




Signaling


SUMO3 polyclonal mouse polyclonal
AB-S91
Cell




Signaling


SUMO3 monoclonal mouse monoclonal
AB-S92
Cell




Signaling


SUMO3 monoclonal mouse monoclonal
AB-S93
Cell




Signaling


SUMO4 MaxPab polyclonal mouse polyclonal
AB-S95
Cell




Signaling


SUMO4 polyclonal rabbit polyclonal
AB-S96
Cell




Signaling


SUMO4 polyclonal rabbit polyclonal
AB-S97
Cell




Signaling


Anti-NEDD8 rabbit polyclonal
A-812
Cell




Signaling


Anti-UBE1L (E1) rabbit polyclonal
A-306
Cell




Signaling


Anti-ISG15 rabbit polyclonal
A-600
Cell




Signaling


UBE2L6 (UbcH8) MaxPab polyclonal mouse
AB-242
Cell


polyclonal

Signaling


UBE2L6 polyclonal mouse polyclonal
AB-243
Cell




Signaling




Signaling


ISG15 MaxPab polyclonal rabbit polyclonal
AB-I10
Cell




Signaling


ISG15 monoclonal clonal mouse monoclonal
AB-I11
Cell




Signaling


Anti-UFM1 rabbit polyclonal
A-500
Cell




Signaling


APG3 polyclonal mouse recombinant
AB-A10APG3
Cell




Signaling


APG3 monoclonal mouse monoclonal
AB-A11APG3
Cell




Signaling


APG4B polyclonal rabbit polyclonal
AB-A20APG4B
Cell




Signaling


APG4C MaxPab polyclonal mouse polyclonal
AB-A21APG4C
Cell


Ubiquitin monoclonal mouse monoclonal
AB-001
Cell




Signaling


SUMO2 polyclonal mouse polyclonal
AB-S80
Cell




Signaling


SUMO2 monoclonal mouse monoclonal
AB-S81
Cell




Signaling


SUMO3 MaxPab polyclonal mouse polyclonal
AB-S90
Cell




Signaling


SUMO3 polyclonal mouse polyclonal
AB-S91
Cell




Signaling


SUMO3 monoclonal mouse monoclonal
AB-S92
Cell




Signaling


SUMO3 monoclonal mouse monoclonal
AB-S93
Cell




Signaling


SUMO4 MaxPab polyclonal mouse polyclonal
AB-S95
Cell




Signaling


SUMO4 polyclonal rabbit polyclonal
AB-S96
Cell




Signaling


SUMO4 polyclonal rabbit polyclonal
AB-S97
Cell




Signaling


Anti-NEDD8 rabbit polyclonal
A-812
Cell




Signaling


Anti-UBE1L (E1) rabbit polyclonal
A-306
Cell




Signaling


Anti-ISG15 rabbit polyclonal
A-600
Cell




Signaling


UBE2L6 (UbcH8) MaxPab polyclonal mouse
AB-242
Cell


polyclonal

Signaling


UBE2L6 polyclonal mouse polyclonal
AB-243
Cell




Signaling




Signaling


APG4C polyclonal rabbit polyclonal
AB-A22APG4C
Cell




Signaling


APG5 monoclonal mouse monoclonal
AB-A25APG5
Cell




Signaling


APG7 MaxPab polyclonal mouse polyclonal
AB-A30APG7
Cell




Signaling


APG7 polyclonal rabbit polyclonal
AB-A31APG7
Cell




Signaling


APG9A polyclonal rabbit polyclonal
AB-A40APG9
Cell




Signaling


APG10 polyclonal rabbit polyclonal
AB-A50APG10
Cell




Signaling


APG10 polyclonal rabbit polyclonal
AB-A51APG10
Cell


Ubiquitin monoclonal mouse monoclonal
AB-001
Cell




Signaling


SUMO2 polyclonal mouse polyclonal
AB-S80
Cell




Signaling


SUMO2 monoclonal mouse monoclonal
AB-S81
Cell




Signaling


SUMO3 MaxPab polyclonal mouse polyclonal
AB-S90
Cell




Signaling


SUMO3 polyclonal mouse polyclonal
AB-S91
Cell




Signaling


SUMO3 monoclonal mouse monoclonal
AB-S92
Cell




Signaling


SUMO3 monoclonal mouse monoclonal
AB-S93
Cell




Signaling


SUMO4 MaxPab polyclonal mouse polyclonal
AB-S95
Cell




Signaling


SUMO4 polyclonal rabbit polyclonal
AB-S96
Cell




Signaling


SUMO4 polyclonal rabbit polyclonal
AB-S97
Cell




Signaling


Anti-NEDD8 rabbit polyclonal
A-812
Cell




Signaling


Anti-UBE1L (E1) rabbit polyclonal
A-306
Cell




Signaling


Anti-ISG15 rabbit polyclonal
A-600
Cell




Signaling


UBE2L6 (UbcH8) MaxPab polyclonal mouse
AB-242
Cell


polyclonal

Signaling


UBE2L6 polyclonal mouse polyclonal
AB-243
Cell




Signaling




Signaling


APG12 MaxPab polyclonal mouse polyclonal
AB-A64APG12
Cell




Signaling


APG12 polyclonal rabbit polyclonal
AB-A65APG12
Cell




Signaling


APG12 monoclonal mouse monoclonal
AB-A66APG12
Cell




Signaling


URM1 polyclonal rabbit polyclonal
AB-O30
Cell




Signaling


Anti Fat10 (Protein derived)
PW9680-002
Biomol


anti- Fat10 Polyclonal
PW9585-0025
Biomol


anti-URM1 polyclonal
PW9595-0025
Biomol


anti-FUB1 polyclonal
PW9615-0025
Biomol


Mouse Anti-O-GlcNAc Monoclonal Antibody
sc-81483
Santa Cruz


Ubiquitin monoclonal mouse monoclonal
AB-001
Cell




Signaling


SUMO2 polyclonal mouse polyclonal
AB-S80
Cell




Signaling


SUMO2 monoclonal mouse monoclonal
AB-S81
Cell




Signaling


SUMO3 MaxPab polyclonal mouse polyclonal
AB-S90
Cell




Signaling


SUMO3 polyclonal mouse polyclonal
AB-S91
Cell




Signaling


SUMO3 monoclonal mouse monoclonal
AB-S92
Cell




Signaling


SUMO3 monoclonal mouse monoclonal
AB-S93
Cell




Signaling


SUMO4 MaxPab polyclonal mouse polyclonal
AB-S95
Cell




Signaling


SUMO4 polyclonal rabbit polyclonal
AB-S96
Cell




Signaling


SUMO4 polyclonal rabbit polyclonal
AB-S97
Cell




Signaling


Anti-NEDD8 rabbit polyclonal
A-812
Cell




Signaling


Anti-UBE1L (E1) rabbit polyclonal
A-306
Cell




Signaling


Anti-ISG15 rabbit polyclonal
A-600
Cell




Signaling


UBE2L6 (UbcH8) MaxPab polyclonal mouse
AB-242
Cell


polyclonal

Signaling


UBE2L6 polyclonal mouse polyclonal
AB-243
Cell




Signaling


S-nitrosocysteine antibody
ab50185
Abcam


Acetylated-Lysine Antibody
#9441
Cell




Signaling


acetyl Lysine antibody
ab76
Abcam


Citrulline polyclonal antibody
PAB0068
Abnova









In order to visualize the specifically bound antibody molecules on the microarray, the unbound first antibody is first washed away and a second antibody (e.g., an anti-immunoglobulin that specifically binds the first antibody) can be added to the microarray and allowed to bind with the first antibody. The second antibody can be labeled, e.g., by conjugation to a label moiety such as a fluorescent dye, so as to generate a signal permitting detection by a microarray scanner, such as a GenePix 4000B (Molecular Devices). Preferably, the signal emitted to detect post-translationally modified proteins in the microarray is a light signal, though other signals such as radioactivity can be used as well. The scanner can detect both the amount of signal and its position within the microarray. Two or more PTMs or PTM alterations can be detected simultaneously by using a selection of different first antibodies, each binding specifically to a different protein modification and each recognized by a different second antibody, with each second antibody conjugated to a different labeling moiety (e.g., different fluorescent dyes having excitation and emission wavelengths selected to enable simultaneous detection). An alternative method is to use labeled primary antibodies specific for the PTM or PTM alterations instead of using secondary antibodies. The data can be output as an image, or as an amount of signal detected in each spot of the microarray.


An alternative method for detecting PTM of proteins in the microarray is to add the modifying moiety (e.g., a protein such as ubiquitin or sumo that is added during the PTM reaction) in a tagged form, such as a His-, GST-, or Myc-tagged moiety, and to detect the tagged molecule using a specific antibody for the tag (e.g., anti-His, anti-GST, or anti-Myc antibody. In yet another alternative method of detection, a modification moiety can be labeled with a labeling moiety such as biotin or a 35S-labeled or radioiodinated amino acid. Phosphorylation of proteins can be detected using an antibody specific for a phosphoprotein or by adding gamma-32P-ATP into the reaction. Many techniques, such as streptavidin binding or autoradiography, can be used to visualize such labeled modification moieties instead of using antibodies, or where an appropriate antibody is not available.


Yet another method of detecting modification of proteins in the microarray is to harvest the proteins from individual spots in the array and to perform biochemical analysis, e.g., by mass spectrometry, to identify the nature of the modification, such as the number and position of modified amino acids in the protein sequence. This can be accomplished, for example, by treating individual protein-containing spots with a proteolytic enzyme such as trypsin, or by using a specifically labile chemical linkage to the substrate of the array. Quantities of individual proteins in the pg to ng range can be recovered from microarray spots; such amounts are sufficient for a wide variety of biochemical analyses, including peptide mapping, amino acid sequencing, and mass spectroscopy.


In such embodiments, the modification of proteins in the microarray can be determined by mass spectrometry such as MALDI/TOF (time-of-flight), SELDI/TOF, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS), capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometry, or tandem mass spectrometry (e.g., MS/MS, MS/MS/MS, ESI-MS/MS, etc.). See for example, U.S. Patent Application Nos: 20030199001, 20030134304, 20030077616, which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.


The terms “mass spectrometry” or “MS” as used herein refer to methods of filtering, detecting, and measuring ions based on their mass-to-charge ratio, or “m/z.” In general, one or more molecules of interest are ionized, and the ions are subsequently introduced into a mass spectrographic instrument where, due to a combination of magnetic and electric fields, the ions follow a path in space that is dependent upon mass (“m”) and charge (“z”). See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,204,500, entitled “Mass Spectrometry From Surfaces;” U.S. Pat. No. 6,107,623, entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Tandem Mass Spectrometry;” U.S. Pat. No. 6,268,144, entitled “DNA Diagnostics Based On Mass Spectrometry;” U.S. Pat. No. 6,124,137, entitled “Surface-Enhanced Photolabile Attachment And Release For Desorption And Detection Of Analytes;” Wright et al., “Proteinchip surface enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SELDI) mass spectrometry: a novel protein biochip technology for detection of prostate cancer biomarkers in complex protein mixtures,” Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases 2: 264-76 (1999); and Merchant and Weinberger, “Recent advancements in surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization-time of flight-mass spectrometry,” Electrophoresis 21: 1164-67 (2000), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, including all tables, figures, and claims. Mass spectrometry methods are well known in the art and have been used to quantify and/or identify biomolecules, such as proteins and hormones (see, e.g., Li et al., (2000), Tibtech. 18:151-160; Starcevic et. al., (2003), J. Chromatography B, 792: 197-204; Kushnir M M et. al. (2006), Clin. Chem. 52:120-128; Rowley et al. (2000), Methods 20: 383-397; and Kuster and Mann (1998), Curr. Opin. Structural Biol. 8: 393-400). Further, mass spectrometric techniques have been developed that permit at least partial de novo sequencing of isolated proteins. Chait et al., (1993), Science, 262:89-92; Keough et al., (1999), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:7131-6; reviewed in Bergman (2000), EXS 88:133-44.


Various methods of ionization are known in the art. For examples, Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionisation (APCI) Chemical Ionisation (CI) Electron Impact (EI) Electrospray Ionisation (ESI) Fast Atom Bombardment (FAB) Field Desorption/Field Ionisation (FD/FI) Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionisation (MALDI) and Thermospray Ionisation (TSP). In certain embodiments, a gas phase ion spectrophotometer is used. In other embodiments, laser-desorption/ionization mass spectrometry is used to analyze the sample. Modern laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (“LDI-MS”) can be practiced in two main variations: matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization (“MALDI”) mass spectrometry and surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization (“SELDI”). In MALDI, the analyte is mixed with a solution containing a matrix, and a drop of the liquid is placed on the surface of a substrate. The matrix solution then co-crystallizes with the biological molecules. The substrate is inserted into the mass spectrometer. Laser energy is directed to the substrate surface where it desorbs and ionizes the biological molecules without significantly fragmenting them. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,118,937 (Hillenkamp et al.), and U.S. Pat. No. 5,045,694 (Beavis & Chait).


In SELDI, the substrate surface is modified so that it is an active participant in the desorption process. In one variant, the surface is derivatized with adsorbent and/or capture reagents that selectively bind the protein modification of interest. In another variant, the surface is derivatized with energy absorbing molecules that are not desorbed when struck with the laser. In another variant, the surface is derivatized with molecules that bind the protein modification of interest and that contain a photolytic bond that is broken upon application of the laser. In each of these methods, the derivatizing agent generally is localized to a specific location on the substrate surface where the sample is applied. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,719,060 and WO 98/59361. The two methods can be combined by, for example, using a SELDI affinity surface to capture an analyte and adding matrix-containing liquid to the captured analyte to provide the energy absorbing material. For additional information regarding mass spectrometers, see, e.g., Principles of Instrumental Analysis, 3rd edition, Skoog, Saunders College Publishing, Philadelphia, 1985; and Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 4.sup.th ed. Vol. 15 (John Wiley & Sons, New York 1995), pp. 1071-1094. Detection and quantification of the biomarker will typically depend on the detection of signal intensity. For example, in certain embodiments, the signal strength of peak values from spectra of a first sample and a second sample can be compared (e.g., visually, by computer analysis etc.), to determine the relative amounts of particular biomarker. Software programs such as the Biomarker Wizard program (Ciphergen Biosystems, Inc., Fremont, Calif.) can be used to aid in analyzing mass spectra. The mass spectrometers and their techniques are well known to those of skill in the art.


The methods described herein involves detection and analysis of PTMs and PTM alterations using any composition or agent that can be detected by spectroscopic, photochemical, biochemical, immunochemical, electrical, optical or chemical means, thus providing a detectable signal to identify the PTM or PTM alteration. A PTM or PTM alteration can be detected using the methods described herein, for example, if there is a change in the average number of a given chemical group attached per protein molecule, if there is a change in the type of chemical group or groups attached per protein molecule, or if there is a different mixture of protein molecules having distinct modification patterns in a patient sample with respect to a control sample. Alteration of a PTM state of a protein includes going from an unmodified protein to a modified one and vice-versa, as well as changes in the number or type of chemical moieties added to the protein. A control sample or level is used herein to describe a control patient, control or reference data, or data obtained from the same patient at an earlier time. For example, in some embodiments, a control sample is a functional cell extract obtained from a biological sample obtained from a subject not suffering from the disease being examined in the test sample. In another example, a control sample is a functional cell extract obtained population of cells obtained from the same biological source that has been treated with identical media, culture condition, temperature, confluency, flask size, pH, etc., with the exception of a test agent.


Accordingly, in some embodiments, an increase in the signal from a solid-state array compared to a background or the reaction with a control is indicative of increased PTM. The terms “increased,” “increase,” or “enhance” are all used herein to generally mean an increase by a statically significant amount; for the avoidance of any doubt, the terms “increased,” “increase,” or “enhance” mean an increase, as compared to a reference level, of at least about 10%, of at least about 15%, of at least about 20%, of at least about 25%, of at least about 30%, of at least about 35%, of at least about 40%, of at least about 45%, of at least about 50%, of at least about 55%, of at least about 60%, of at least about 65%, of at least about 70%, of at least about 75%, of at least about 80%, of at least about 85%, of at least about 90%, of at least about 95%, or up to and including a 100%, or at least about a 2-fold, or at least about a 3-fold, or at least about a 4-fold, or at least about a 5-fold, at least about a 6-fold, or at least about a 7-fold, or at least about a 8-fold, at least about a 9-fold, or at least about a 10-fold increase, or any increase of 10-fold or greater, as compared to a control sample or level.


In some embodiments, a decrease in the signal from a solid-state array compared to a background or the reaction with a control is indicative of a PTM alteration. The terms “decreased,” “decrease,” or “reduce” are all used herein to generally mean a decrease by a statically significant amount; for the avoidance of any doubt, the terms “decreased,” “decrease,” or “reduce” mean a decrease, as compared to a reference or control level, of at least about 10%, of at least about 15%, of at least about 20%, of at least about 25%, of at least about 30%, of at least about 35%, of at least about 40%, of at least about 45%, of at least about 50%, of at least about 55%, of at least about 60%, of at least about 65%, of at least about 70%, of at least about 75%, of at least about 80%, of at least about 85%, of at least about 90%, of at least about 95%, or up to and including a 100%.


Preferably, the microarray includes control spots (e.g., spotted with buffer but no protein or of GST spotted on the array) distributed across the array which can be used for background subtraction or normalization. Analysis of the distribution of background signal intensities as well as the distribution of control modified protein signal intensities, taking into account the signal-to-noise ratio, will suggest an appropriate threshold level of signal intensity considered to be significant enough to represent a positive result (i.e., detection of a post-translationally modified protein).


After the level of the PTM state for one or more proteins in the solid state array, such as a microarray has been detected, alteration of this state can be identified by comparing the results for each individual protein to similar results obtained using a control sample. The control sample can be obtained from another patient, for example, or obtained from the same patient at an earlier date or from a control tissue sample obtained from another subject. A functional extract prepared from the control is used in the same method as for the test subject and applied to a second protein microarray, preferably an identical microarray to the first microarray used for the test subject, having the same proteins as the first microarray. Alternatively, comparison data can be used that have been generated using a set of patients, or data representing known or defined ratios of certain modifications. The level of a PTM state for a given protein in the first microarray (results for the test subject) is compared to the level obtained for the corresponding protein in the second microarray. Analysis of the change in state, e.g., the direction and extent of change, or the presence or absence of any change, optionally can be used to diagnose a disease or medical condition, to determine a physiological, metabolic, or developmental state, to assess the effectiveness of a drug in the patient, or to identify target proteins for treatment based on either different modification activity or different modification state.


The analysis of functional extracts using protein microarrays can also be applied to a method for identifying a PTM state of a protein. This method can be applied either to a patient sample, or to any specimen of cells or living tissue. A functional extract is prepared from the patient sample or cell or tissue specimen, as outlined above. The extract, or a portion or dilution of the extract, is contacted with a protein microarray as described earlier, and one or more proteins in the microarray becomes post-translationally modified, or a PTM becomes altered (e.g., degree of polyubiquitination) or is removed, i.e., PTM alteration. Optionally, the extract is supplemented with one or more reagents, co-factors, substrates, enzymes, or antibodies either prior to or during the step of contacting the microarray. A signal is then detected from the modified proteins in the array, such as the fluorescence signal obtained from primary and labeled secondary antibodies as described previously. The signal, preferably background subtracted, is correlated with the identity of the protein in the respective position in the microarray, which results in identification of a PTM state of a particular protein.


A method of diagnosing a disease or medical condition related to a pattern of protein PTM can be carried out using the strategies outlined above. A functional extract is prepared from a sample of a patient suspected of having a certain disease or medical condition. The extract, or a portion or dilution of the extract, optionally substituted with one or more reagents to promote and/or stabilize a particular PTM reaction, is contacted with a protein microarray. The microarray contains an ordered array of proteins corresponding to proteins in the patient. During the incubation of the extract on the microarray, one or more target proteins in the array become post-translationally modified. The extract is washed away and the modified proteins in the microarray are detected, using a strategy such as described earlier, for example, by detecting a fluorescence signal from a primary/secondary antibody pair. The pattern of signals from the microarray are measured and recorded to form a PTM data set for the patient sample. The patient data set is compared to a standard data set containing a pattern of PTM states that is characteristic or diagnostic for the disease or medical condition.


This type of diagnostic assay can be applied to a wide variety of diseases, medical conditions, and biological states. A number of diseases or conditions for which PTMs are known or suspected to play a role are summarized in Table 3. The methods of the present invention are particularly suited to diagnosing diseases or medical conditions including, but not limited to: cancer, such as breast cancer, ovarian cancer, uterine cancer, brain cancer, including astrocytoma, renal cell carcinoma, and vascular tumors of the central nervous system; neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, amyelotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, prion diseases, neuronal intranuclear disease, Rett syndrome, and Rubenstein-Taybi syndrome; metabolic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus, diabetic ventricular dysfunction, and gaut; immune diseases, including autoimmune diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, collagen-induced arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, celiac disease, encephalomyelitis, and IgA neuropathy; infectious diseases, such as viral diseases; cardiovascular diseases, such as cardiac dysfunction and atherosclerosis; and biological states such as cell cycle progression, DNA damage and repair, apoptosis, the NFkB pathway, Fanconi anemia, tumorigenesis, cellular, tissue, and embryonic differentiation, and aging. PTMs that may contribute to tumorigenesis include phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, glycosylation, prolyl isomerization, hydroxylation, oxidation, glutathionylation, and ubiquitination.













TABLE 3







MODIFIED




PTM
DISEASE
PROTEIN
REFERENCE
TITLE







Ubiquitination
Cancer/tumor
cMyc, HectH9 (E3
33
The ubiquitin ligase




ligase)

HectH9 regulates






transcriptional activation






by Myc and is essential for






tumor cell proliferation


Ubiquitination
Cancer/tumor, Breast
BRCA1 (E3 ligase)
34
Ubiquitination and



and ovarian cancer


proteasomal degradation of






the BRCA1 tumor






suppressor is regulated






during cell cycle






progression.


SUMOylation
Cancer/tumor
Ubc9 (E2 conjugating
35
A role for Ubc9 in




enzyme)

tumorigenesis


Ubiquitination
Alzheimers disease
Bcl-2
36
Inhibition of the ubiquitin-






proteasome system in






Alzheimer's Disease


Glycosylation
Alzheimers disease
tau
37
Glycosylation of






microtubule-associated






protein tau: an abnormal






posttranslational






modification in






Alzheimer's disease


K48-linked and K63-linked
Parkinson's disease
synphilin-1, parkin, α-
38
Parkin mediated lysine 63-


ubiquitination

synuclein, UCHL1

linked polyubiquitination: a






link to protein inclusions






formation in Parkinson's






and other conformational






diseases?


Ubiquitination
Parkinson's Disease,
Parkin
39
Parkin-mediated K63-



Autophagy


linked polyubiquitination: a






signal for targeting






misfolded proteins to the






aggresome-autophagy






pathway.


Ubiquitination
Neurodegenerative
P62
40
Lysine 63-linked



Diseases


polyubiquitin potentially






partners with p62 to






promote the clearance of






protein inclusions by






autophagy.


Acetylation, deacetylation,
Neurologic and
HDAC
41
Epigenetic targets of


methylation
psychiatric disorders


HDAC inhibition in



including Huntington's


neurodegenerative and



disease, Parkinson's


psychiatric disorders.



disease, anxiety and



mood disorders,



Rubinstein-Taybi



syndrome, and Rett



syndrome


Nedd8ylation
Neurodegenerative
NEDD8
42
Accumulation of NEDD8



Diseases, Parkinson's


in neuronal and glial



disease and Rosenthal


inclusions of



fibres in astrocytoma


neurodegenerative






disorders.



Neurodegenerative
Mad2, BubR1
43
Inhibitory factors



diseases
associated to cDc20

associated with anaphase-






promoting






complex/cylosome in






mitotic checkpoint.


Ubiquitination
Cell Cycle progression

44
Ubiquitin dependence of






selective protein






degradation demonstrated






in the mammalian cell






cycle mutant ts85.



Cell Cycle progression
cyclin
45
Cyclin: a protein specified






by maternal mRNA in sea






urchin eggs that is






destroyed at each cleavage






division.



Cell Cycle progression
APC/C (cDc20, CDH1
46
Control of mitotic




and MAD2)

transitions by the anaphase-






promoting complex.


Conjugation
Cell Cycle progression
cyclin
47
Cyclin is degraded by the






ubiquitin pathway.


Ubiquitination
Cell Cycle progression
Cdc34, CDK activity-
48
How proteolysis drives the




by degrading CDK

cell cycle




activators or inhibitors


Ubiquitination
Cell Cycle progression
APC/C (cDc20,
49
Ubiquitination by the




MAD2)

anaphase-promoting






complex drives spindle






checkpoint inactivation.


Ubiquitination, phosphorylation,
DNA damage and repair
ATR/MRN complex
50
Twists and turns in the


methylation DNA damage and



function of DNA damage


repair



signaling and 5 repair






proteins by PTMs.


Acetylation, methylation,
Huntington disease
Histone (H2A, H2B,
51
Mechanisms of disease:


phosphorylation, ubiquitination

H3 and H4)

Histone modifications in


and SUMOylation



Huntington's disease.


SUMOylation
Huntington disease
Huntingtin (Httex1p)
52
SUMO modification of






Huntingtin and






Huntington's disease






pathology.


Ubiquitination, SUMOylation,
NFkB pathway
IkappaB kinase (IKK)
53
PTMs regulating the


phosphorylation, acetylation and

complex, the IkappaB

activity and function of the


nitrosylation

proteins and the NF-

nuclear factor kappa B




kappaB

pathway.


SUMOylation
Neuronal Intranuclear
SUMOylation
54
SUMOylation substrates in



Inclusion disease (NIID)
substrates:

neuronal intranuclear




Promyelocytic

inclusion disease.




leukaemia protein




(PML) and




RanGAP1.HDAC4


SUMOylation
Type 1 diabetes
M55V substitution of
55
SUMO wrestling with type




SUMO4

1 diabetes.


SUMOylation
Polyglutamine Diseases
ESCA1 and ESCA2
56
Enhanced SUMOylation in






polyglutamine diseases


Ubiquitination
Kidney cancers
HIF-alpha
57
The role of von Hippel-






Lindau tumor suppressor






protein and hypoxia in






renal clear cell carcinoma.


Neddylation, SUMOylation,
Renal cell carcinomas,
pVHL, NEDD8
58
The von Hippel-Lindau



pheochromocytomas,
conjugation to Cul-2

tumor suppressor gene



and vascular tumors of


product promotes, but is



the central nervous


not essential for, NEDD8



system


conjugation to cullin-5 2.


SUMOylation
Diabetes mellitus,
ERK5, Ubc9 (SUMO
59
Effects of MEK5/ERK5



diabetic ventricular
E2 conjugase) or

association on small



dysfunction
PIAS1 (E3 ligase)

ubiquitin-related






modification of ERK5:






implications for diabetic






ventricular dysfunction






after myocardial infarction.


Ubiquitination, SUMOylation
Parkinson's,
αSYN (PARK1), UCH-
60
The ubiquitin proteasome



Alzheimer's,
L1, DJ-1 binds to the

system in



Huntington's, Prion and
SUMO E3 PIASx, Aβ

neurodegenerative



amyotrophic lateral
and tau, UBB + 1etc . . .

diseases: sometimes the



sclerosis


chicken, sometimes the






egg.


Methylation, deimination, and
Multiple Sclerosis
MBP
61
Multiple sclerosis: an


phosphorylation



important role for PTMs of






myelin basic protein in






pathogenesis.


Glycosylation
Autoimmunity,
IgG and IgA1
62
Plasma proteins



Rheumatoid arthritis and


glycosylation and its



IgA nephropathy


alteration in disease.


SUMOylation
Parkinson
DJ-1
63
Proper SUMO-1






conjugation is essential to






DJ-1 to exert its full






activities.


SUMOylation
Parkinson
DJ-1, and pyrimidine
64
DJ-1 transcriptionally up-




tract-binding protein-

regulates the human




associated splicing

tyrosine hydroxylase by




factor (PSF)

inhibiting the sumoylation






of pyrimidine tract-binding






protein-associated splicing






factor.


Ubiquitination, phosphorylation
Cancer
p53
65
Ubiquitination,


and acetylation



phosphorylation and






acetylation: the molecular






basis for p53 regulation.


Phosphorylation
Cancer
Fra-1
66
Accumulation of Fra-1 in






ras-transformed cells






depends on both






transcriptional






autoregulation and MEK-






dependent posttranslational






stabilization.


Phophorylation
Cancer
NF-kappa B
67
Inhibition of constitutive






NF-kappa B activity by I






kappa B alpha M






suppresses tumorigenesis.


Ubiquitination, SUMOylation
Cancer
Smad4
68
Sumoylation of Smad4, the






common Smad mediator of






transforming growth






factor-beta family






signaling.


Phophorylation
Uterine leiomyomas
Ref-1
69
Altered PTM of redox






factor 1protein in human






uterine smooth muscle






tumors.


Phophorylation
tumorigenesis,
p53, GSK3beta
70
Glycogen synthase kinase3



differentiation and


beta phosphorylates serine



apoptosis


33 of p53 and activates






p53's transcriptional






activity.


Phophorylation
tumorigenesis
pp60c-src
71
pp60c-src in human






melanocytes and melanoma






30 cells exhibits elevated






specific activity and






reduced tyrosine 530






phosphorylation compared






to human fibroblast pp60c-






src.


Phophorylation
tumorigenesis
P120
72
Abelson murine leukemia






virus






transformationdefective






mutants with impaired






P120 associated protein






kinase activity.


Glycosylation
Prion Disease
PrP
73
Asparagine-linked






glycosylation of the scrapie






and cellular prion proteins.


Ubiquitination
Fanconi anemia
FANCD2
74
Fanconi anemia: causes






and consequences of






genetic instability.


Ubiquitination
Fanconi anemia
FANCD2, catalytic
75
A novel ubiquitin ligase is




subunit PHF9(FANCL)

deficient in Fanconi






anemia.


Ubiquitination
Aging
BRCA1; PCNA;
76
Aging and the




NFκB; p27;

ubiquitinome: traditional




SNEVPrp19/Pso4

and non-traditional






functions of ubiquitin in






aging cells and tissues.


Ubiquitination, SUMOylation,
Aging

77
Aging and dietary


Oxydation



restriction effects on






ubiquitination,






sumoylation, and the






proteasome in the heart.


Ubiquitination
Aging
DAF-16, RLE-1 (E3
78
RLE-1, an E3 ubiquitin




ligase)

ligase, regulates C. elegans






aging by catalyzing DAF-






16 polyubiquitination.


SUMOylation
Aging
POMP-1
79
Effects of aging and dietary






restriction on






ubiquitination,






sumoylation, and the






proteasome in the spleen.



Aging
Decrease of expressed
80
Caretaker or undertaker?




Proteasome

The role of the proteasome




proteins: S9: Rpn6

in aging




(p44.5), Rpn5 (p55), a2




(HC3), a7(HC8),




S7: Rpt1 (MSS1) and




S10b: Rpt4 (p42)


S-nitrosylation, Ubiquitination
Parkinson's disease
parkin
81
Nitrosative stress linked to






sporadic Parkinson's






disease: S-nitrosylation of






parkin regulates its E3






ubiquitin ligase activity.


Glycosylation
Virus related diseases
penv9, penv14
82
Glycosylation inhibitors






block the expression of






LAV/HTLV-III (HIV)






glycoproteins.


Glycosylation
Virus related diseases
gp46
83
Immunogenicity and






conformational properties






of an N-linked glycosylated






peptide epitope of human






T-lymphotropic virus type






1 (HTLVI).


Glycosylation
Virus related diseases
peroxiredoxin 1 and
84
Posttranslational




HTLV-1-p24-(gag)

glycosylation of target






proteins implicate






molecular mimicry in the






pathogenesis of HTLV-1






associated neurological






disease.


Glycosylation
Virus related diseases
gp 100
85
A glycopolypeptide (gp






100) is the main antigen






detected by HTLV-III






antisera.


Citrullination/deimination
Multiple Sclerosis,
Myelin basic protein
86
A tale of two citrullines-



Diabetes, Alzheimer's
(MBP)

structural and functional






aspects of myelin basic






protein deimination in






health and 5 disease.


OGlcNAc
Cardiac dysfunction
SP1, eNOS,
87
O-GlcNAc modification of






nucleocytoplasmic proteins






and diabetes.


OGlcNAc
Diabetes, Alzheimer's
tau, β-amyloid
88
O-GlcNAc modification in



disease
precurssor, AP-3,

diabetes and Alzheimer's




synapsin-I,

disease.




Neurofilament H, L, M.




IRS, GS, PDX-1,




eNOS, SP1


OGlcNAc
Diabetes

89
A bittersweet modification:






O-GlcNAc and cardiac






dysfunction.


OGlcNAc
Diabetes
Sp1(but also
90
PTM by O15 GlcNAc:




metionned the serum

another way to change




response factor, c-myc,

protein function.




estrogen receptors and




RNA pol II)


Various PTMs
Atherosclerosis; celiac
αB-crystallin, MBP,
91
Posttranslational protein



disease; autoimmune
Fibrin, Type II

modifications: new flavors



encephalomyelitis;
collagen, MBP Ac1-1,

in the menu of



multiple sclerosis;
Sm D1, D3, Wheat

autoantigens.



systemic lupus
gliadin, LDL, SnRNP



erythematosus; collagen-
D



induced arthritis;



rheumatoid arthritis


Various PTMs
Multiple sclerosis/EAE,
Fillagrin, Vimentin,
92
Posttranslational



Collagen-induced
H2B

modifications of self-



arthritis, Rheumatoid


antigens.



arthritis, systemic lupus



erythematosus.


Various PTMs
Rheumatoid arthritis;
trichohyalin, filaggrin
93
Modifications of arginines



Multiple sclerosis;
and keratin, myelin

and their role in



Systemic lupus
basic protein(MBP),

autoimmunity.



erythematosus
fibrin, vimentin and




nucleophosmin/B23,




histones, Sm-D1, Sm-




D3, Sm-ByB9, LSm4


Citrullination
Rheumatoid arthritis
Fibrin
94
Autoantigenic






posttranslational






modifications of proteins:






does it apply to rheumatoid






arthritis?









The methods of the invention can be applied to identify a set of biomarkers for a disease or medical condition. The set of biomarkers can include information such as the identity of two or more proteins whose level of a given PTM is altered (i.e., either increased, decreased, or modified in terms of the number or position of attached modifying moieties) in the disease or medical condition. The set can be established, for example, by comparing the protein PTM profile of one or more patients having the disease or medical condition with similar profiles from one or more control subjects who do not have the disease or medical condition. The profiles are obtained by separately contacting functional extracts from the patients and control subjects with a microarray containing an ordered plurality of proteins, such as proteins encoded by the human genome, and determining the level of PTM of one or more proteins in the microarray. The presence or absence, or the observed level, of PTM of proteins in the microarray for the patients is then compared with the presence or absence or level of PTM of the corresponding proteins for the control subjects. A set of biomarkers is formed from proteins of the patients whose level of PTM is altered compared to control levels. The biomarker set in some cases can be specific for a certain type of patient sample (e.g., plasma, cerebrospinal fluid, tissue, or cell type). Biomarker sets so identified can be used in any of the methods according to the invention, e.g., in a method of diagnosis.


Methods of the invention can be used to screen for and identify substrates of protein modifying enzymes. For example, a protein microarray containing a set of proteins that include candidate proteins for one or more selected types of PTM can be incubated with a solution containing one or more enzymes that catalyze PTM reactions. The methods described above can be employed to label and identify proteins in the array that serve as substrates for the enzyme(s). Optionally, the array can include variations of one or more protein substrates, e.g., sequence variants or proteins having one or more known modifications at different sites. The array can include only a single protein and its variants, or it can include proteins representative of an entire genome, or proteins expressed by a given cell or tissue, or any subset thereof. Such screening methods can be used to define the specificity of a protein modifying enzyme with respect to protein substrates or with respect to the enzyme recognition sequence, for example, or to analyze signaling pathways.


A further use for the methods of the invention is to characterize the activity of one or more protein modifying enzymes in a functional extract. A functional extract can be analyzed using methods described earlier, while supplementing only with chemical compounds that supply energy for the PTM reaction carried out by a particular enzyme or which serve as cofactors. The protein substrates for the enzyme are supplied in the protein microarray. Further characterization of the functional extract can then be obtained by supplementing it with one or more protein modifying enzymes. Depending on the nature of the signaling pathway, the functional extract can be supplemented with additional enzymes in different combinations in parallel assays. For example, in the case of polyubiquitination, one assay can be performed with the functional extract alone (i.e., no supplementation with exogenous enzymes), another assay can involve the supplementation of the functional extract with an E1 enzyme, and additional assays can involve supplementation with an E1 enzyme plus different combinations of E2 enzymes. In this way a full signaling pathway or any portion thereof can be characterized for a given functional extract using a large number of potential protein substrates by performing only a few reactions.


The invention also includes kits that are useful in practicing the methods presented here, e.g., diagnostic kits. A kit for the diagnosis of a disease or medical condition by the analysis of a PTM state of a protein in a patient sample contains a standard set of one or more functional extracts capable of producing a known pattern of protein PTM states on a protein microarray. Optionally, the kit also contains instructions for carrying out one or more of the methods outlined above. The kit can also optionally contain one or more reagents, such as substrates, co-factors, biochemical agents, buffers, enzymes, enzyme inhibitors, antibodies, or labeling moieties such as fluorophores or radiolabeled compounds. The kit also can include computer software for analysis, one or more protein microarrays, blocking reagents for such microarrays, and packaging material for any of the kit components.


Previous protein-based diagnostic tests typically have assayed the abundance of a protein, and in certain cases its activity. However, the present invention is unique in utilizing functional samples from patients to determine global PTMs or PTM alterations for diagnostics purposes. These methods may serve both for diagnosis of different diseases as described herein, and as a tool for the discovery of new biomarkers and drug targets.


There are many assays available to detect binding interactions, but up to now they have used either dilute protein solutions or detergent-containing cell lysates. The number and strength of the interactions detected are therefore distorted by the change in relative concentration of ligand and target, or by the presence of detergents. In addition, the modification profile can be affected by a change in the relative amounts of, for example, kinase/phosphatase pairs. In the methods according to the present invention, however, undiluted extract (functional extract) can be used without adding detergent, preserving the original physiological state. In addition to examining cytoplasmic fractions, nuclear fractions and smaller organelles can be applied to the microarray as well.


The present methods have far greater dynamic range than available mass spectrometry methods, since thousands of proteins can be spotted on an individual chip in pure form and at high concentration, removing the effect of their relative abundance. Proteins can also be attached to the microarray in different orientations to ensure that binding to different parts of the protein can be detected. The present methods are more straightforward compared to mass spectrometry, and considerably less time-consuming than SDS gels and similar techniques.


As used herein the term “comprising” or “comprises” is used in reference to compositions, methods, and respective component(s) thereof, that are essential to the invention, yet open to the inclusion of unspecified elements, whether essential or not. As used herein the term “consisting essentially of” refers to those elements required for a given embodiment. The term permits the presence of additional elements that do not materially affect the basic and novel or functional characteristic(s) of that embodiment of the invention. The term “consisting of” refers to compositions, methods, and respective components thereof as described herein, which are exclusive of any element not recited in that description of the embodiment.


As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus for example, references to “the method” includes one or more methods, and/or steps of the type described herein and/or which will become apparent to those persons skilled in the art upon reading this disclosure and so forth.


It is understood that the foregoing detailed description and the following examples are illustrative only and are not to be taken as limitations upon the scope of the invention. Various changes and modifications to the disclosed embodiments, which will be apparent to those of skill in the art, may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Further, all patents, patent applications, and publications identified are expressly incorporated herein by reference for the purpose of describing and disclosing, for example, the methodologies described in such publications that might be used in connection with the present invention. These publications are provided solely for their disclosure prior to the filing date of the present application. Nothing in this regard should be construed as an admission that the inventors are not entitled to antedate such disclosure by virtue of prior invention or for any other reason. All statements as to the date or representation as to the contents of these documents are based on the information available to the applicants and do not constitute any admission as to the correctness of the dates or contents of these documents.


Example I
Protein Ubiquitination Patterns Upon Escape from the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint in Mammalian Cells

Protein microarrays were used to identify the polyubiquitination state of proteins under specific cellular conditions. Highly concentrated cellular extracts that have demonstrable function specific for a particular phase of the cell cycle were used to modify the polyubiquitination state of human proteins on a microarray.


Specifically, the degradation of proteins involved in mitosis was examined by determining the polyubiquitination state of certain proteins at specific stages of the cell cycle. During mitosis, rapid degradation of the mitotic cyclins (11, 12) causes abrupt shut-down of mitotic kinase activity, allowing the cell to enter anaphase. The Anaphase Promoting Complex (APC), a multi-subunit E3 ligase, targets cyclins and other mitotic substrates for proteasomal degradation (13, 14) which in turn leads to the metaphase to anaphase transition. Thus, cell division is highly controlled by the degradation of polyubiquitinted proteins (15).


The experimental strategy was to use nocodazole arrested HeLa S3 functional cytoplasmic extracts and to follow protein polyubiquitination during release from the checkpoint by incubation on protein microarrays by assaying reactivity with labeled antibodies against polyubiquitin chains. Differentially modified proteins were examined in APC-inhibited versus APC-active extracts. The polyubiquitin signature of G1 extracts was also examined.


Tissue Culture and Cell Synchronization

HeLa S3 cells were synchronized in prometaphase by treatment with nocodazole, or in G1 by a release from nocodazole arrest. Cells were incubated in thymidine-containing (2 mM) medium, and then released into fresh medium, followed by a nocodazole arrest (0.1 g/ml). For G1 cells, nocodazole-arrested cells were released into fresh medium for 4 h. Cells were harvested, washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and processed for extraction as described below.


Extract Preparation

HeLa S3 cells were synchronized with thymidine for 20 hours, released for 3 hours, and then arrested in mitosis by the addition of nocodazole for an additional 11 hours. Synchronized cells (CP-extracts) were then harvested, washed with PBS, lysed in Swelling Buffer (25 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 tablet of Complete protease inhibitors (Roche)), and homogenized by freeze-thawing and passage through a needle. G1-extracts were prepared in the same manner with an additional 4 hour release from nocodazole arrest. Extracts were cleared by subsequent centrifugation (5 min at 5,000 r.p.m. followed by 60 min at 14,000 r.p.m.). Extract (20 μl) was supplemented with Degradation Cocktail (1 μL) containing 1.5 mg/ml ubiquitin (Boston Biochem), 150 mM creatine phosphate, 20 mM ATP (pH 7.4), 2 mM EGTA (pH 7.7), 20 mM MgCl2).


Incubation of Extracts with Microarrays


Human PROTO-ARRAY® microarrays (Invitrogen) were washed three times (10 min each) with TBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 (TBS-T) and then blocked for 4 hours at 4° C. with microarray blocking solution (ARRAYIT® brand BLOCKIT™ (TeleChem International, Inc.)). Extracts were pre-incubated with either Emil (1 mg/ml) or H2O for 30 minutes. 100 μl of CP or G1 extracts (˜25 mg/ml) were then supplemented with UbcH10 (5 μl, 1 mg/ml; Boston Biochem) and incubated under a coverslip on the microarrays for 1 hour at RT. The arrays were then washed and incubated overnight with anti-polyubiquitin antibody (FK1, 1 mg/ml; Biomol) diluted 1:250. To label modified (polyubiquitinated) proteins, an anti-mouse Cy3-conjugated secondary antibody (3 μl; 1 mg/ml, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) was incubated for 1 hour at RT. The arrays were washed again, spin-dried (200 g, 5 min) and scanned with a GenePix 4000B scanner.


Images and Data Processing

Results were recorded as TIFF files and images were quantified using Gene Pix Pro 5 feature extraction software (version 4000B). Scanning parameters were set so that none of the spots showed saturation: PMT gain value=400; laser power=30% (see FIG. 10). For each spot, the local background intensity was subtracted from the median spot intensity.


Data Filtering and Normalization

The processed data set was organized in a matrix where each column contains the reactivities measured for a given array and each row contains the reactivities measured for a given protein over all arrays. The negative values were set to zero and the data was then normalized using the quantile normalization algorithm (32).


Data Analysis

To determine subsets of proteins that were differentially modified on the different microarrays a two-sample t-test was used. Each protein was tested separately by comparing its signal intensity values in two different conditions (2 replicates per chip; 2 chips for each tested condition). Thus four signal intensities were measured for each protein and each condition. 1000 permutations were performed (within rows, i.e., all values for each protein were shuffled) and permutation-based p-values were calculated based on the new t-scores. P-values lower than 0.01 were considered significant.


Degradation Assays

Coupled in vitro transcription and translation were performed from pCS2+ constructs using a rabbit reticulocyte lysate system (TnT SP6, Promega) or wheat germ extracts. 35S-labelled substrates were added to G1 or CP extracts of synchronized HeLa S3 cells (see extract preparation). Aliquots were removed at 0, 30, 60, and 90 min and analyzed by SDS-PAGE (4-15%) and autoradiography. Additionally, endogenous protein levels (actin (Sigma), securin (Mbl), calmodulin (Upstate), and p27 (Upstate)) were determined in the extracts by Western blotting at the indicated times.


Results

The E2-conjugating enzyme, UbcH10, has been shown to overcome the metaphase-anaphase transition (16). After arresting cells in nocodazole, concentrated extracts (apprx 25 mg/ml) were made and these retain the checkpoint state (CP extracts). It is known that addition of UbcH10 to a concentration of 5 uM (approx. 25 mg protein/ml) to nocodazole-arrested, concentrated cell extracts inactivates the metaphase state and leads to APC-dependant substrate degradation (17).


Extracts were prepared from synchronized HeLa S3 cells arrested in mitosis or in G1. CP extracts were divided into three aliquots; one was retained, one was supplemented with UbcH10, and the third received UbcH10 and an inhibitor of APC, emil. The samples were placed on the protein microarray for 60 minutes at room temperature (FIG. 2B). In order to control for the activity of the extracts, an aliquot of each sample was removed and 35S labeled-securin, a well-characterized APC substrate, was added to record its degradation (FIG. 2A). Securin remained stable in CP extracts even after 60 minutes at room temperature (FIG. 2A, right panel) which is consistent with the inhibition of APC by the spindle checkpoint. CP extract supplemented with UbcH10 (CP-released) degraded securin rapidly while the addition of the APC inhibitor Emil (APC-inhibited) stabilized securin for at least sixty minutes. To label modified proteins on the arrays, an anti-polyubiquitin antibody (FK1) was used (FIG. 5) with a Cy3-conjugated secondary antibody. Microarrays were then scanned and the median signal intensity and local background of each spot was measured. FIG. 2B illustrates the process and depicts one representative scanned subarray (out of 48 on each chip) and its reactivity.


Most of the spots in the microarray revealed a signal of low intensity or similar to the background level. Only 9-11% of the spots on each chip gave a positive signal after subtracting the local background intensity. FIG. 3A shows the distribution of the data of two representative chips under the CP-released (left panel) and APC-inhibited condition (right panel); the inset depicts the positive signal reactivity that was detected. A commonly accepted criterion for determining minimum signal (threshold) that can be accurately quantified is the measure of Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) where a higher SNR indicates higher signal over background noise; a signal-to-noise ratio of 3 is commonly considered the lower limit for accurate detection. Thus, the SNR ratio for every spot on the chip was calculated as follows: SNR=(signal mean—background mean)/(standard deviation of the background) (18). Even though the background signal within each microarray was variable (FIG. 6), the SNR per spot revealed a clear signal (SNR>3) even for spots with a low signal intensity of about 1500 units (FIG. 7).


The threshold level defining a significant polyubiquitination signal was determined using the signal from 96 ‘buffer’ spots on each microarray. When subtracting the local background from the signal, 99% of the buffer spots on each chip gave a negative value (mean value of −1130; see FIG. 8). The signal of thirteen known APC substrates was determined on each chip was compared with the signal of the ‘buffer’ spots located adjacent to them (i.e., in the same subarray). As shown in FIG. 3B, nine of these substrates appeared to have a signal that was significantly higher than the buffer spots (p<0.05) but only five of them gave a positive signal. In order to reduce the potential false positive rate, only positive values were considered as reflecting real modification signals in this study.


To test the reproducibility of the assay and its ability to detect differential PTMs between different conditions, microarrays that were incubated with different extract preparations (biological replicates) were compared, and microarrays with extracts under different conditions (CP released vs. APC-inhibited) were also compared. FIG. 3C depicts the scatter plots of the positive spot reacitivities in each comparison (log scale). Visually the two different conditions (red dots) produced a signal that was more spread and variable compared to the biological replicates (black dots), which are closer to the diagonal. These distributions differ very significantly by statistical tests. Two microarrays were compared from each condition, and the p-value of the differences between corresponding proteins (each comprised of 4 spots) was calculated using a two-sample t-test. To control for the multiple hypothesis testing, the p-value determination was based on 1000 permutations (per protein) of the data. More than a hundred proteins yielded a significant p-value (p<0.01); these proteins are listed in Table 4. While these proteins varied greatly in their attributed functions and cellular processes, several known APC substrates are among the significantly detected proteins, including all three aurora kinases. Given the state of knowledge of APC substrates it was to be expected that some new substrates should have been detected by this approach. Five proteins (Nek9, Calm2, RPS6KA4, cyclin G2 and p27) that were detected as differentially modified in these microarrays had previously been reported to play a role in mitosis. These five proteins, together with two proteins (Zap-70 and MAP3K11) that were not previously shown to be involved in mitosis, were selected for a biochemical assay to test their ability to serve as APC substrates. Zap-70 and MAP3K11 showed no detectable ubiquitination or degradation in the biochemical assay for mitosis dependent degradation. It should be noted that not all substrates would be expected to score in such an assay, due to lack of cofactors, poor folding, lack of posttranslational modification, or other factors, and therefore a negative result is not dispositive. However, Nek9, Calm2, RPS6KA4 and cyclin G2 proteins were found to be degraded in the CP extracts, and their degradation was inhibited by the addition of emil (FIG. 4A). Interestingly, p27 appeared to be degraded in the CP-released extracts as well; however, a longer exposure (FIG. 4B) revealed that the protein accumulated polyubiquitin chains (causing a gel shift) and was not rapidly degraded (compare with the addition of the proteasome inhibitor MG-132). While the addition of emil did not inhibit completely the formation of ubiquitin chains, it appeared to yield a lower signal then seen in the CP-released extract; this conjugation might have occurred during the pre-incubation of the emil with the extracts. The endogenous level of calm2 and p27 in CP-released and APC-inhibited extracts was examined by Western blot. Both p27 and calm2 were degraded in the extracts from cells released into an anaphase-like state, and their degradation was inhibited by the addition of emil.











TABLE 4





Protein Name
Accession
p- value







histone UNFRAC. WHOLE HISTONE - known Autoantigen

0.0002


ring finger protein 128 (RNF128) transcript variant 1
NM_194463.1
0.0004


erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1 like 5
BC054508.1
0.0004


BC013173 Homo sapiens, clone MGC: 17340
BC013173.1
0.0004


Clmodulin 2
NM_001743
0.0005


HTGN29 protein (HTGN29)
NM_020199.1
0.0006


ankyrin repeat domain 13
BC032833.2
0.0006


ribosomal protein S6 kinase 90 kDa polypeptide 4 (RPS6KA4) transcript variant 2
NM_001006944.1
0.0007


macrophage stimulating 1 receptor (c-met-related tyrosine kinase) (MST1R)
NM_002447.1
0.0008


hypothetical protein FLJ11184
BC011842.2
0.0008


PCTAIRE protein kinase 2
BC033005.1
0.0008


aurora kinase A (AURKA) transcript variant 2
NM_003600.2
0.0009


dolichyl-phosphate mannosyltransferase polypeptide 2 regulatory subunit (DPM2)
NM_152690.1
0.0009


transcript variant 2


ems1 sequence (mammary tumor and squamous cell carcinoma-associated (p80/85 src
NM_138565.1
0.0009


substrate) (EMS1)


cytochrome P450 family 26 subfamily A polypeptide 1 (CYP26A1) transcript variant 2
NM_057157.1
0.0010


KIAA0157 protein (KIAA0157)
NM_032182.2
0.0010


solute carrier family 23 (nucleobase transporters) member 2
BC013112.2
0.0011


ring finger protein 111
BC060862.1
0.0011


additional sex combs like 1 (Drosophila)
BC064984.1
0.0012


cDNA clone MGC: 39273 IMAGE: 5440834
BC024289.1
0.0012


PAS domain containing serine/threonine kinase (PASK)
NM_015148.1
0.0013


YY1 transcription factor (YY1)
NM_003403.3
0.0013


proteasome (prosome macropain) 26S subunit non-ATPase 4 (PSMD4) transcript variant 1
NM_002810.1
0.0014


hypothetical protein LOC143458 (LOC143458)
NM_174902.2
0.0014


selectin ligand interactor cytoplasmic-1 (SLIC1) transcript variant 1
NM_153337.1
0.0015


MAX interacting protein 1 (MXI1) transcript variant 2
NM_130439.1
0.0015


neural precursor cell expressed developmentally down-regulated 8 (NEDD8)
NM_006156.1
0.0016


aurora kinase B (AURKB)
NM_004217.2
0.0016


src homology three (SH3) and cysteine rich domain
BC020221.1
0.0016


hypothetical protein DKFZp762O076 (DKFZp762O076)
NM_018710.1
0.0016


Nedd4 family interacting protein 1 (NDFIP1)
NM_030571.2
0.0016


hypothetical protein FLJ36175
BC029520.1
0.0017


EGF-like repeats and discoidin I-like domains 3
BC053656.1
0.0018


hypothetical protein MGC4618 (MGC4618)
NM_032326.1
0.0019


zeta-chain (TCR) associated protein kinase 70 kDa (ZAP70) transcript variant 1
NM_001079.3
0.0019


ribosomal protein L30 (RPL30)
NM_000989.2
0.0019


feline sarcoma oncogene (FES)
NM_002005.2
0.0019


met proto-oncogene (hepatocyte growth factor receptor) (MET)
NM_000245.2
0.0021


ADP-ribosylation factor-like 7 (ARL7)
NM_005737.3
0.0022


Histone_F2a2 H2a(f2a2) - known Autoantigen

0.0022


likely ortholog of mouse gene trap locus 3 (GTL3)
NM_013242.1
0.0022


immediate early response 3 (IER3) transcript variant short
NM_003897.2
0.0023


potassium voltage-gated channel shaker-related subfamily beta member 2 (KCNAB2)
NM_003636.1
0.0023


immunoglobulin heavy constant gamma 1 (G1m marker)
BC014667.1
0.0024


ring finger protein 4 (RNF4)
NM_002938.2
0.0025


proteasome (prosome macropain) 26S subunit non-ATPase 4 (PSMD4) transcript variant 2
NM_153822.1
0.0026


chromosome 6 open reading frame 145 (C6orf145)
NM_183373.2
0.0027


neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor type 1 (NTRK1) transcript variant 3
NM_001007792.1
0.0028


pleckstrin homology domain containing family G member 5 (PLEKHG5) transcript
NM_020631.2
0.0028


variant 1


Sjogren syndrome antigen A1 (52 kDa ribonucleoprotein autoantigen SS-A/Ro) (SSA1)
NM_003141.2
0.0028


interferon stimulated gene 20 kDa (ISG20)
NM_002201.3
0.0028


WD repeat domain 45 (WDR45) transcript variant 1
NM_007075.3
0.0029


TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1)
NM_013254.2
0.0029


chromosome 16 open reading frame 5
BC002882.1
0.0030


insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R)
NM_000875.2
0.0030


ring finger protein 111
BC010369.1
0.0031


G protein-coupled receptor kinase 4 (GRK4) transcript variant 2
NM_001004056.1
0.0032


v-yes-1 Yamaguchi sarcoma viral related oncogene homolog (LYN)
NM_002350.1
0.0033


RAS-like family 10 member B
BC041133.1
0.0034


hypothetical protein MGC11257 (MGC11257)
NM_032350.3
0.0035


chromosome 7 open reading frame 2 (C7orf2)
NM_022458.2
0.0035


expressed in T-cells and eosinophils in atopic dermatitis (ETEA)
NM_014613.1
0.0036


mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 11 (MAP3K11)
NM_002419.2
0.0036


casein kinase 1 alpha 1 (CSNK1A1) transcript variant 1
NM_001025105.1
0.0038


zeta-chain (TCR) associated protein kinase 70 kDa transcript variant 1
BC053878.1
0.0038


hypothetical gene LOC128439 (LOC128439)
NM_139016.2
0.0038


hypothetical protein MGC17403 (MGC17403)
NM_152634.1
0.0039


N-glycanase 1 (NGLY1)
NM_018297.2
0.0039


signal recognition particle 19 kDa
BC010947.1
0.0040


DNA fragmentation factor 40 kDa beta polypeptide (caspase-activated DNase) (DFFB)
NM_001004285.1
0.0040


transcript variant 3


casein kinase 1 delta (CSNK1D) transcript variant 1 Not full-length.
NM_001893.3
0.0042


dendritic cell-derived ubiquitin-like protein (DC-UbP)
NM_152277.1
0.0043


cDNA clone MGC: 3432 IMAGE: 2959461
BC013957.1
0.0043


DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog subfamily B member 12 (DNAJB12) transcript variant 1
NM_001002762.1
0.0043


solute carrier family 36 (proton/amino acid symporter) member 4
BC047374.1
0.0044


SMT3 suppressor of mif two 3 homolog 1 (yeast) (SUMO1) transcript variant 1
NM_003352.4
0.0044


similar to hypothetical protein FLJ25555
BC044239.1
0.0049


lysosomal-associated protein transmembrane 4 alpha (LAPTM4A)
NM_014713.2
0.0050


KIAA1458 protein
BC031691.2
0.0051


interleukin 17E (IL17E) transcript variant 1
NM_022789.2
0.0053


serum/glucocorticoid regulated kinase (SGK)
NM_005627.1
0.0053


hypothetical protein FLJ10156
BC005004.1
0.0054


thousand and one amino acid protein kinase (TAO1)
NM_004783.1
0.0054


ADP-ribosylation-like factor 6 interacting protein 4 (ARL6IP4)
NM_016638.1
0.0054


zinc finger protein 313 (ZNF313)
NM_018683.2
0.0055


solute carrier family 6 (neurotransmitter transporter) member 15
BC022253.1
0.0055


XM_378350.2
XM_378350.2
0.0057


low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 10 (LRP10)
NM_014045.1
0.0060


arrestin domain containing 3 (ARRDC3)
NM_020801.1
0.0062


cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1B (p27 Kip1) (CDKN1B)
NM_004064.2
0.0062


p53-regulated DDA3 (DDA3)
NM_032636.2
0.0065


calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV (CAMK4)
NM_001744.2
0.0066


BC015569 Homo sapiens, Similar to SRp25 nuclear protein
BC015569.1
0.0066


chromosome 6 open reading frame 201 (C6orf201)
NM_206834.1
0.0067


tripartite motif-containing 52 (TRIM52)
NM_032765.1
0.0067


hypothetical protein FLJ38628 (FLJ38628)
NM_152267.2
0.0071


vasopressin-induced transcript
BC000877.1
0.0074


Ro-52 Ro-52 - known Autoantigen

0.0074


cyclin G2
BC032518.1
0.0076


mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 6 (MAP2K6) transcript variant 2; mutant
NM_031988.1
0.0077


protein: MAP2K6 mutant


conserved helix-loop-helix ubiquitous kinase (CHUK)
NM_001278.3
0.0078


aurora kinase C (AURKC) transcript variant 1
NM_001015878.1
0.0079


dual-specificity tyrosine-(Y)-phosphorylation regulated kinase 3 (DYRK3) transcript
NM_001004023.1
0.0080


variant 2


cullin 3 (CUL3)
NM_003590.2
0.0080


hepatocyte growth factor-regulated tyrosine kinase substrate (HGS)
NM_004712.3
0.0084


B lymphoid tyrosine kinase (BLK)
NM_001715.2
0.0084


hypothetical protein MGC40579 (MGC40579)
NM_152776.1
0.0086


NIMA (never in mitosis gene a)-related kinase 9 (NEK9)
NM_033116.2
0.0086


solute carrier family 1 member 1 (SLC1A1) nuclear gene encoding mitochondrial protein
NM_004170.2
0.0086



Homo sapiens, SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of

BC018953.1
0.0086


chromatin, subfamily d, member 2


calcium binding protein 4
BC033167.1
0.0088


chromosome 19 open reading frame 28 (C19orf28)
NM_174983.2
0.0088


ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1-like (UBE1L)
NM_003335.2
0.0090


regenerating islet-derived 1 alpha (pancreatic stone protein pancreatic thread protein)
BC005350.1
0.0090


DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog subfamily B member 6 transcript variant 2
BC000177.2
0.0091


calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CaM kinase) II beta (CAMK2B)
NM_001220.3
0.0093


transcript variant1


ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2-like
BC064566.1
0.0094


melanoma antigen family B 1 (MAGEB1)
NM_002363.1
0.0097


secretory carrier membrane protein 3 (SCAMP3) transcript variant 1
NM_005698.2
0.0097


hypothetical protein LOC255330
BC042038.1
0.0099









Example II
Ubiquitination of Human Brain Proteins in Alzheimer's Disease

Human brain specimens are collected from deceased human subjects at autopsy after obtaining informed consent from the next of kin under protocols approved by the Partners Human Research Committee at Brigham and Women's Hospital. Weighed frozen human temporal or frontal cortices containing white and gray matter are added to freshly prepared, ice-cold TBS (20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) at a ratio of 4:1 (TBS volume/brain wet weight) and homogenized with 25 strokes at a setting of 10 on a mechanical Dounce homogenizer. The homogenate is centrifuged at 175,000×g in a TLA100.2 rotor on a Beckman TL 100 centrifuge, and then the supernatant is aliquoted and stored at −80° C.


For analysis of ubiquitination, samples are thawed on ice, supplemented with 5 ubiquitin, 2 mM ATP, and 150 mM creatine phosphate, and then incubated on a microarray to carry out the ubiquitination reaction. Optionally, E1 and/or E2 enzymes can be added to the extract, to determine if they are limiting the ubiquitination reaction.


Example III
Protein Ubiquitination in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) from a Patient with Brain Tumor

Undiluted CSF from a patient with brain tumor was analyzed for enzyme activity responsible for PTM (ubiquitination) of human proteins. Conditions were similar to conditions used for cellular extracts. An ATP regenerating system and ubiquitin were added to the CSF sample, and the mixture was reacted with a protein microarray containing 8000 human proteins. A control reaction contained the same CSF sample but was not supplemented with ubiquitin or the energy mix.


A specific subset of proteins that are disproportionately expressed in brain (compared to a background of all the proteins that were on the chip) were found to be ubiquitinated (i.e., showed at least 2.5-fold higher signal than in the control), as shown in FIG. 11. The proteins that underwent CSF-mediated ubiquitination were distinct from background modification seen under control conditions. The functional annotation categories (gene ontology (‘GO’) terms) of these proteins were analyzed using the FatiGO online tool. List #1 shown in FIG. 11 holds the accession numbers for proteins that were highly ubiquitinated in comparison to the control (i.e. predicted list). List #2 holds the accession numbers of all the proteins on the microarray (i.e. background list). The ‘GO’ terms that are labeled with an asterisk (*) were shown to be enriched in this analysis, and the percentages of their appearance in the predicted list and in the background list is given in the third column. For comparison, terms associated with stress response (second row) showed no difference percentage of appearance in the ubiquitinated list when compared to the background list.


Example IV
Analysis of Protein Ubiquitination in Normal Human Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Sample

The ubiquitinating activity in a normal human CSF sample was tested by Western blotting. The ubiquitination reaction was started by adding an ATP regenerating system (2 mM ATP and 150 mM creatine phosphate) and ubiquitin (5 μM) to an aliquot of the CSF sample, and the reaction was run for 1 hour at 30° C. After the reaction was completed, the reaction mixture was subjected to SDS-PAGE and detection was performed with an anti-polyubiquitin antibody (FK1, Biomol). The results are shown in FIG. 12. There was a high molecular weight smear of ubiquitinated proteins in the reaction that included CSF and added ubiquitin, as compared to negative controls (CSF treated at 95° C. for 5 min or ubiquitin omitted).


Next, the ubiquitinating activity of CSF was tested by allowing it to ubiqutinate proteins in a human protein microarray. The CSF sample was supplemented with 2 mM ATP and 150 mM creatine phosphate and ubiquitin (5 The sample was then incubated on a Human PROTO-ARRAY® (Invitrogen) protein microarray in order to identify the basal ubiquitination activity in the sample. After incubation of the samples on the arrays for 60 min at 25° C., the activity was stopped by washing the microarrays with TBS containing 0.05% Tween-20, and the modified proteins were identified using a first antibody specific for the polyubiqutinated state, and a second antibody (DyLight 649-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgM with minimal cross-reactivity to human, (catalog #115-495-075), Jackson ImmunoResearch) directed to the first antibody. The second antibody carried a fluorescent label (DyLight 649) for detection. The signal intensity of each spot in the microarray (reflecting the ubiquitination of the protein on that spot) was used to statistically identify ubiquitinated proteins (i.e., those spots having signal statistically significant over background fluorescence or a control spot). Ubiquitinated proteins in the array showed a difference of between 2- and 50-fold compared to a control reaction without added CSF (FIG. 13). The number of proteins that met the criteria ranged from 12 to 485 proteins in one CSF sample (lower line, •) and from 10 to 265 in the other (upper line, +). FIG. 14 presents a list of proteins that showed increased modification signal in each of the two CSF samples at a level of more than 50-fold when compared to the control (non-CSF) reaction, together with the fluorescence intensity of four spots for each protein. The scale indicates the value (log transformed) of each of the 4 duplicate spots of these proteins (2 microarrays; 2 spots per microarray, lanes 1-4) compared to the values on the control array on the right (lanes 5-6). A colorbar is given on the right (blue (bottom of the scale), low reactivity; red (top of the scale), high reactivity). A list of proteins that showed at least a 50-fold increase in their level of ubiquitination by the CSF (vs. no CSF) is presented in Table 5.










TABLE 5





Accession
Protein Description







NM_006259
S100 calcium binding protein A14 (S100A14), mRNA


NM_020672
Williams Beuren syndrome chromosome region 22, mRNA



(cDNA clone MGC: 2022 IMAGE: 3544156)


BC001780
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 10 (ZC3H10), mRNA


NM_032786
chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 11 (CXCL11), mRNA


NM_032357
ankyrin repeat and BTB (POZ) domain containing 1



(ABTB1), transcript variant 1, mRNA


NM_006597
interleukin 1, alpha (IL1A), mRNA


NM_032548
v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 3 (protein



kinase B, gamma) (AKT3), transcript variant 1, mRNA


NM_174902
serine carboxypeptidase 1, mRNA (cDNA clone IMAGE:



4328599), partial cds


NM_000961
v-raf murine sarcoma 3611 viral oncogene homolog



(ARAF), mRNA


NM_002609
tec protein tyrosine kinase (TEC), mRNA


NM_025160
myotilin (MYOT), transcript variant 1, mRNA


NM_017881
platelet-derived growth factor receptor, beta polypeptide



(PDGFRB), mRNA


NM_033505
SELI selenoprotein I (SLE1)









Example V
Proteins Modified with Ubiquitin-Like Modifiers Upon Mitotic Release

The PTM of human proteins in a microarray was studied using functional cell extracts from HeLa S3 cells obtained after release from the mitotic checkpoint (CP). Growth, cell cycle modulation, preparation of extracts of the cells, and microarray measurements were as described in Example 1. Separate reactions were performed using each of the following modifying moieties (ubiquitin-like modifiers): ubiquitin, sumo1, sumo2/3, FAT10, UFM1, and ISG15. Table 1 describes further details of selected ubiquitin-like modifiers. In each case, the cell extract was supplemented with energy mix plus 5 μM of the respective modifying moiety.


Checkpoint extracts from HeLa S3 cells arrested with nocodazole were divided into two aliquots, one was denoted as the checkpoint-arrested extract (CP-arrested), and one was supplemented with UbcH10 to relieve the checkpoint arrest (CP-released). Microarrays were incubated with these extracts to allow the proteins on the array to be modified. Each microarray contained approximately 8000 proteins spotted in duplicates at a reported level of around 10 μg per spot (median diameter approximately 150 μm). After washing the reaction off the microarray, an antibody specific to the modifying moiety used in the reaction was added to detect modified proteins on the microarray. Microarrays were scanned, and the median signal intensity and local background of each spot was measured. Then, the anti-modifier antibody was detected by adding a fluorescently-labeled secondary antibody. Microarrays were scanned and the median signal intensity and local background of each spot was measured. The data were then organized in a matrix where each column contains the reactivity measured for a given array, and each row contains the reactivity measured for a given protein over all arrays. The negative values were set to zero, and the data were then normalized using a quantile normalization algorithm. Table 6 summarizes the proteins that were either differentially modified in anaphase over metaphase or were highly modified. The highly modified (but not differentially modified) proteins are indicated with an asterisk, and the remaining proteins were differentially modified.











TABLE 6





GenBank




Accession
Gene Symbol
Name















Ubiquitin









BC001396
C9ORF32
CHROMOSOME 9 OPEN READING FRAME 32


BC004967
UBAC1
UBIQUITIN ASSOCIATED DOMAIN CONTAINING 1


BC007581
ALDH4A1
ALDEHYDE DEHYDROGENASE 4 FAMILY, MEMBER A1


BC008720
CRELD1
DKFZP566D213 PROTEIN


BC010369
RNF111
RING FINGER PROTEIN 111


BC011399
SYK
SPLEEN TYROSINE KINASE


BC013173
RSPRY1
RING FINGER AND SPRY DOMAIN CONTAINING 1


BC015219
RBCK1
CHROMOSOME 20 OPEN READING FRAME 18


BC020221
STAC
SH3 AND CYSTEINE RICH DOMAIN


BC021988
NDFIP2
NEDD4 FAMILY INTERACTING PROTEIN 2


BC032518
CCNG2
CYCLIN G2


BC036540
LOC400120
HYPOTHETICAL LOC400120


BC041133
RASL10B
RAS-LIKE, FAMILY 10, MEMBER B


BC044239
ANKRD13D
ANKYRIN REPEAT DOMAIN 13 FAMILY, MEMBER D


BC046151
TOM1
TARGET OF MYB1 (CHICKEN)


BC048970
TTLL7
TUBULIN TYROSINE LIGASE-LIKE FAMILY,




MEMBER 7


BC056240
SPRR1B
SMALL PROLINE-RICH PROTEIN 1B (CORNIFIN)


BC066340
BLOC1S1
BIOGENESIS OF LYSOSOME-RELATED ORGANELLES




COMPLEX-1, SUBUNIT 1


NM_000875
IGF1R
INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH FACTOR 1 RECEPTOR


NM_001004056
GRK4
G PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTOR KINASE 4


NM_001220
CAMK2B
CALCIUM/CALMODULIN-DEPENDENT PROTEIN




KINASE (CAM KINASE) II BETA


NM_002103
GYS1
GLYCOGEN SYNTHASE 1 (MUSCLE)


NM_002378
MATK
MEGAKARYOCYTE-ASSOCIATED TYROSINE




KINASE


NM_002648
PIM1
PIM-1 ONCOGENE


NM_002810
PSMD4
PROTEASOME (PROSOME, MACROPAIN) 26S




SUBUNIT, NON-ATPASE, 4


NM_003045
SLC7A1
SOLUTE CARRIER FAMILY 7 (CATIONIC AMINO




ACID TRANSPORTER, Y+ SYSTEM), MEMBER 1


NM_003403
YY1
YY1 TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR


NM_004438
EPHA4
EPH RECEPTOR A4


NM_004712
HGS
HEPATOCYTE GROWTH FACTOR-REGULATED




TYROSINE KINASE SUBSTRATE


NM_004783
TAOK2
TAO KINASE 2


NM_005030
PLK1
POLO-LIKE KINASE 1 (DROSOPHILA)


NM_005727
TSPAN1
TETRASPANIN 1


NM_005737
ARL4C
ADP-RIBOSYLATION FACTOR-LIKE 4C


NM_006007
ZFAND5
ZINC FINGER, A20 DOMAIN CONTAINING 2


NM_006293
TYRO3
TYRO3 PROTEIN TYROSINE KINASE


NM_013242
C16ORF80
GENE TRAP LOCUS 3 (MOUSE)


NM_018215
FLJ10781
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN FLJ10781


NM_018384
GIMAP5
GTPASE, IMAP FAMILY MEMBER 5


NM_022905
TTC23
TETRATRICOPEPTIDE REPEAT DOMAIN 23


NM_032182
KIAA0157
KIAA0157


NM_032765
TRIM52
TRIPARTITE MOTIF-CONTAINING 52


NM_080823
SRMS
SRC-RELATED KINASE LACKING C-TERMINAL




REGULATORY TYROSINE AND N-TERMINAL




MYRISTYLATION SITES


NM_130439
MXI1
MAX INTERACTOR 1


NM_152285
ARRDC1
ARRESTIN DOMAIN CONTAINING 1


NM_153217
TMEM174
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN MGC13034


NM_153822
PSMD4
PROTEASOME (PROSOME, MACROPAIN) 26S




SUBUNIT, NON-ATPASE, 4


NM_173541
C10ORF91
CHROMOSOME 10 OPEN READING FRAME 91


NM_194271
RNF34
RING FINGER PROTEIN 34


BC016381
NA
NA


BC004967*
UBAC1
UBIQUITIN ASSOCIATED DOMAIN CONTAINING 1


BC010369*
RNF111
RING FINGER PROTEIN 111


BC014475*
BIRC7
LIVIN INHIBITOR-OF-APOTOSIS


BC015569*
ARL6IP4
ADP-RIBOSYLATION-LIKE FACTOR 6 INTERACTING




PROTEIN 4


BC021988*
NDFIP2
NEDD4 FAMILY INTERACTING PROTEIN 2


BC023982*
C5ORF32
PUTATIVE NUCLEAR PROTEIN ORF1-FL49


BC025700*
AFF4
AF4/FMR2 FAMILY, MEMBER 4


BC044239*
ANKRD13D
ANKYRIN REPEAT DOMAIN 13 FAMILY, MEMBER D


BC053895*
IRS1
INSULIN RECEPTOR SUBSTRATE 1


BC054049*
ZNF364
ZINC FINGER PROTEIN 364


BC060833*
PRRG1
PROLINE RICH GLA (G-CARBOXYGLUTAMIC ACID) 1


NM_001033551*
TOM1L2
TARGET OF MYB1-LIKE 2 (CHICKEN)


NM_002019*
FLT1
FMS-RELATED TYROSINE KINASE 1 (VASCULAR




ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR/VASCULAR




PERMEABILITY FACTOR RECEPTOR)


NM_002110*
HCK
HEMOPOIETIC CELL KINASE


NM_002253*
KDR
KINASE INSERT DOMAIN RECEPTOR (A TYPE III




RECEPTOR TYROSINE KINASE)


NM_002938*
RNF4
RING FINGER PROTEIN 4


NM_002944*
ROS1
V-ROS UR2 SARCOMA VIRUS ONCOGENE HOMOLOG




1 (AVIAN)


NM_002946*
RPA2
REPLICATION PROTEIN A2, 32 KDA


NM_005053*
RAD23A
RAD23 HOMOLOG A (S. CEREVISIAE)


NM_005228*
EGFR
EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR




(ERYTHROBLASTIC LEUKEMIA VIRAL (V-ERB-B)




ONCOGENE HOMOLOG, AVIAN)


NM_012478*
WBP2
WW DOMAIN BINDING PROTEIN 2


NM_017949*
CUEDC1
CUE DOMAIN CONTAINING 1


NM_020182*
TMEPAI
TRANSMEMBRANE, PROSTATE ANDROGEN




INDUCED RNA


NM_020630*
RET
RET PROTO-ONCOGENE (MULTIPLE ENDOCRINE




NEOPLASIA AND MEDULLARY THYROID




CARCINOMA 1, HIRSCHSPRUNG DISEASE)


NM_030636*
EEPD1
KIAA1706 PROTEIN


NM_130465*
TSPAN17
TETRASPANIN 17


NM_152267*
RNF185
RING FINGER PROTEIN 185


NM_153229*
TMEM92
TRANSMEMBRANE PROTEIN 92


NM_153345*
TMEM139
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN FLJ90586


NM_194271*
RNF34
RING FINGER PROTEIN 34







Sumo2/3









NM_014805
EPM2AIP1
EPM2A (LAFORIN) INTERACTING PROTEIN 1


NM_177974
CASC4
CANCER SUSCEPTIBILITY CANDIDATE 4


BC017789
CHORDC1
CYSTEINE AND HISTIDINE-RICH DOMAIN (CHORD)-




CONTAINING 1


NM_018393
TCP11L1
T-COMPLEX 11 (MOUSE) LIKE 1


NM_017588
WDR5
WD REPEAT DOMAIN 5


BC056402
LOC144097
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN BC007540


NM_003697
OR5F1
OLFACTORY RECEPTOR, FAMILY 5, SUBFAMILY F,




MEMBER 1


NM_014868
RNF10
RING FINGER PROTEIN 10


NM_016269
LEF1
LYMPHOID ENHANCER-BINDING FACTOR 1


BC014475
BIRC7
LIVIN INHIBITOR-OF-APOTOSIS


BC009207
HIC2
HYPERMETHYLATED IN CANCER 2


NM_031845
MAP2
MICROTUBULE-ASSOCIATED PROTEIN 2


BC020523
INTS7
CHROMOSOME 1 OPEN READING FRAME 73


NM_018679
TCP11
T-COMPLEX 11 (MOUSE)


NM_019087
ARL15
ADP-RIBOSYLATION FACTOR-LIKE 15


BC043247
TLE3
TRANSDUCIN-LIKE ENHANCER OF SPLIT 3 (E(SP1)




HOMOLOG, DROSOPHILA)


BC002677
AHDC1
AT HOOK, DNA BINDING MOTIF, CONTAINING 1


NM_003403
YY1
YY1 TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR


BC039583
MGEA5
MENINGIOMA EXPRESSED ANTIGEN 5




(HYALURONIDASE)


NM_015148
PASK
PAS DOMAIN CONTAINING SERINE/THREONINE




KINASE


BC010125
C3ORF37
CHROMOSOME 3 OPEN READING FRAME 37


NM_001786
CDC2
CELL DIVISION CYCLE 2, G1 TO S AND G2 TO M


BC005008
CEACAM6
CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN-RELATED CELL




ADHESION MOLECULE 6 (NON-SPECIFIC CROSS




REACTING ANTIGEN)


NM_144706
C2ORF15
CHROMOSOME 2 OPEN READING FRAME 15


NM_007277
EXOC3
EXOCYST COMPLEX COMPONENT 3


NM_002648
PIM1
PIM-1 ONCOGENE


NM_002019
FLT1
FMS-RELATED TYROSINE KINASE 1 (VASCULAR




ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR/VASCULAR




PERMEABILITY FACTOR RECEPTOR)


NM_152619
DCLK2
DOUBLECORTIN AND CAM KINASE-LIKE 2


BC022253
SLC6A15
SOLUTE CARRIER FAMILY 6, MEMBER 15


NM_017949
CUEDC1
CUE DOMAIN CONTAINING 1


NM_006002
UCHL3
UBIQUITIN CARBOXYL-TERMINAL ESTERASE L3




(UBIQUITIN THIOLESTERASE)


NM_001278
CHUK
CONSERVED HELIX-LOOP-HELIX UBIQUITOUS




KINASE


NM_001219
CALU
CALUMENIN


BC050645
BYSL
BYSTIN-LIKE


BC040272
IL16
INTERLEUKIN 16 (LYMPHOCYTE




CHEMOATTRACTANT FACTOR)


BC023152
GYG2
GLYCOGENIN 2


NM_002011
FGFR4
FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR 4


BC024725
ANKRD50
ANKYRIN REPEAT DOMAIN 50


NM_138353
LOC90379
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN BC002926


BC061697
C3ORF62
CHROMOSOME 3 OPEN READING FRAME 62


NM_015417
SPEF1
CHROMOSOME 20 OPEN READING FRAME 28


NM_181707
C17ORF64
CHROMOSOME 17 OPEN READING FRAME 64


NM_199334
THRA
THYROID HORMONE RECEPTOR, ALPHA




(ERYTHROBLASTIC LEUKEMIA VIRAL (V-ERB-A)




ONCOGENE HOMOLOG, AVIAN)


BC060760
GIMAP6
IMMUNE ASSOCIATED NUCLEOTIDE 2


NM_002738
PRKCB1
PROTEIN KINASE C, BETA 1


BC000247
THAP4
THAP DOMAIN CONTAINING 4


BC013567
USP48
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN FLJ11328


NM_198498
C11ORF53
CHROMOSOME 11 OPEN READING FRAME 53


BC012289
KIAA0515
KIAA0515 PROTEIN


BC004219
AGPAT3
1-ACYLGLYCEROL-3-PHOSPHATE O-




ACYLTRANSFERASE 3


NM_130766
SKIP
SKELETAL MUSCLE AND KIDNEY ENRICHED




INOSITOL PHOSPHATASE


NM_001328
CTBP1
C-TERMINAL BINDING PROTEIN 1


BC058861
SULT1C4
SULFOTRANSFERASE FAMILY, CYTOSOLIC, 1C,




MEMBER 2


BC046117
DNALI1
DYNEIN, AXONEMAL, LIGHT INTERMEDIATE




POLYPEPTIDE 1


NM_032017
STK40
SERINE/THREONINE KINASE 40


NM_173822
FAM126B
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN MGC39518


BC032120
C20ORF11
CHROMOSOME 20 OPEN READING FRAME 11


NM_001556
IKBKB
INHIBITOR OF KAPPA LIGHT POLYPEPTIDE GENE




ENHANCER IN B-CELLS, KINASE BETA


NM_032014
MRPS24
MITOCHONDRIAL RIBOSOMAL PROTEIN S24


NM_145796
POGZ
POGO TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENT WITH ZNF




DOMAIN


NM_001042599
ERBB4


NM_017629
EIF2C4
ARGONAUTE 4


NM_032846
RAB2B
RAB2B, MEMBER RAS ONCOGENE FAMILY


BC011234
SMNDC1
SURVIVAL MOTOR NEURON DOMAIN CONTAINING 1


NM_017583
TRIM44
TRIPARTITE MOTIF-CONTAINING 44


NM_005639
SYT1
SYNAPTOTAGMIN I


NM_016954
TBX22
T-BOX 22


NM_002796
PSMB4
PROTEASOME (PROSOME, MACROPAIN) SUBUNIT,




BETA TYPE, 4


NM_000666
ACY1
AMINOACYLASE 1


NM_032326
TMEM175
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN MGC4618


NM_001197
BIK
BCL2-INTERACTING KILLER (APOPTOSIS-




INDUCING)


NM_170672
RASGRP3
RAS GUANYL RELEASING PROTEIN 3 (CALCIUM




AND DAG-REGULATED)


BC017357
ZNF765
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN BC001610


BC020233
IGLC2
IMMUNOGLOBULIN LAMBDA CONSTANT 1 (MCG




MARKER)


BC059374
STK31
SERINE/THREONINE KINASE 31


NM_014248
RBX1
RING-BOX 1


NM_005158
ABL2
V-ABL ABELSON MURINE LEUKEMIA VIRAL




ONCOGENE HOMOLOG 2 (ARG, ABELSON-RELATED




GENE)


NM_018668
VPS33B
VACUOLAR PROTEIN SORTING 33B (YEAST)


BC063451
TCP10L2
T-COMPLEX 10 (MOUSE)


NM_002623
PFDN4
PREFOLDIN SUBUNIT 4


BC016652
BMX
BMX NON-RECEPTOR TYROSINE KINASE


NM_153486
LDHD
LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE D


NM_033307
CASP4
CASPASE 4, APOPTOSIS-RELATED CYSTEINE




PEPTIDASE


NM_004113
FGF12
FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR 12


NM_005148
UNC119
UNC-119 HOMOLOG (C. ELEGANS)


NM_004838
HOMER3
HOMER HOMOLOG 3 (DROSOPHILA)


NM_016355
DDX47
DEAD (ASP-GLU-ALA-ASP) (SEQ ID NO: 2) BOX




POLYPEPTIDE 47


NM_014548
TMOD2
TROPOMODULIN 2 (NEURONAL)


BC016964
MRGPRF
MAS-RELATED GPR, MEMBER F


BC029220
SOX5
SRY (SEX DETERMINING REGION Y)-BOX 5


BC030711
C2ORF13
CHROMOSOME 2 OPEN READING FRAME 13


NM_001571
IRF3
INTERFERON REGULATORY FACTOR 3


BC031830
KLHL32
KIAA1900


NM_153498
CAMK1D
CALCIUM/CALMODULIN-DEPENDENT PROTEIN




KINASE ID


NM_144602
C16ORF78
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN MGC32905


NM_012325
MAPRE1
MICROTUBULE-ASSOCIATED PROTEIN, RP/EB




FAMILY, MEMBER 1


BC057840
PSMB5
PROTEASOME (PROSOME, MACROPAIN) SUBUNIT,




BETA TYPE, 5


NM_079422
MYL1
MYOSIN, LIGHT POLYPEPTIDE 1, ALKALI;




SKELETAL, FAST


BC029267
MUC20
MUCIN 20


NM_020830
WDFY1
WD REPEAT AND FYVE DOMAIN CONTAINING 1


NM_033003
GTF2I


BC009571
STRA13
STIMULATED BY RETINOIC ACID 13 HOMOLOG




(MOUSE)


NM_005030
PLK1
POLO-LIKE KINASE 1 (DROSOPHILA)


NM_022754
SFXN1
LIKELY ORTHOLOG OF MOUSE SIDEROFLEXIN 1


BC012997
SULF1
SULFATASE 1


NM_001221
CAMK2D
CALCIUM/CALMODULIN-DEPENDENT PROTEIN




KINASE (CAM KINASE) II DELTA


BC031691
SLAIN2
KIAA1458 PROTEIN


NM_014840
NUAK1
NUAK FAMILY, SNF1-LIKE KINASE, 1


BC001772
QARS
GLUTAMINYL-TRNA SYNTHETASE


NM_032693
ARD1B


BC025314
IGHG1
IMMUNOGLOBULIN HEAVY CONSTANT GAMMA 1




(G1M MARKER)


BC033491
ADAD2
TESTIS NUCLEAR RNA-BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE


BC009650
PDS5A
SCC-112 PROTEIN


NM_018326
GIMAP4
GTPASE, IMAP FAMILY MEMBER 4


NM_005239
ETS2
V-ETS ERYTHROBLASTOSIS VIRUS E26 ONCOGENE




HOMOLOG 2 (AVIAN)


NM_006257
PRKCQ
PROTEIN KINASE C, THETA


NM_152667
NANP
N-ACETYLNEURAMINIC ACID PHOSPHATASE


BC001728*
TFPT
TCF3 (E2A) FUSION PARTNER (IN CHILDHOOD




LEUKEMIA)


BC001772*
QARS
GLUTAMINYL-TRNA SYNTHETASE


BC007048*
ZMYM5
ZINC FINGER, MYM-TYPE 5


BC010125*
C3ORF37
CHROMOSOME 3 OPEN READING FRAME 37


BC017314*
ETS1
V-ETS ERYTHROBLASTOSIS VIRUS E26 ONCOGENE




HOMOLOG 1 (AVIAN)


BC020985*
COASY
COENZYME A SYNTHASE


BC036572*
ZCCHC12
ZINC FINGER, CCHC DOMAIN CONTAINING 12


BC040949*
MEF2D
MADS BOX TRANSCRIPTION ENHANCER FACTOR 2,




POLYPEPTIDE D (MYOCYTE ENHANCER FACTOR




2D)


BC056402*
LOC144097
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN BC007540


BC056415*
RPAP3
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN FLJ21908


NM_001014796*
DDR2
DISCOIDIN DOMAIN RECEPTOR FAMILY, MEMBER 2


NM_001039468*
MARK2
MAP/MICROTUBULE AFFINITY-REGULATING




KINASE 2


NM_001786*
CDC2
CELL DIVISION CYCLE 2, G1 TO S AND G2 TO M


NM_001910*
CTSE
CATHEPSIN E


NM_002378*
MATK
MEGAKARYOCYTE-ASSOCIATED TYROSINE




KINASE


NM_002497*
NEK2
NIMA (NEVER IN MITOSIS GENE A)-RELATED




KINASE 2


NM_002938*
RNF4
RING FINGER PROTEIN 4


NM_003141*
TRIM21
TRIPARTITE MOTIF-CONTAINING 21


NM_006257*
PRKCQ
PROTEIN KINASE C, THETA


NM_006259*
PRKG2
PROTEIN KINASE, CGMP-DEPENDENT, TYPE II


NM_006937*
SUMO2
SMT3 SUPPRESSOR OF MIF TWO 3 HOMOLOG 2




(YEAST)


NM_015981*
CAMK2A
CALCIUM/CALMODULIN-DEPENDENT PROTEIN




KINASE (CAM KINASE) II ALPHA


NM_016058*
TPRKB
TP53RK BINDING PROTEIN


NM_017838*
NOLA2
NUCLEOLAR PROTEIN FAMILY A, MEMBER 2




(H/ACA SMALL NUCLEOLAR RNPS)


NM_021709*
SIVA1
CD27-BINDING (SIVA) PROTEIN


NM_032752*
ZNF496
ZINC FINGER PROTEIN 496


NM_130807*
MOBKL2A
MOB1, MPS ONE BINDER KINASE ACTIVATOR-LIKE




2A (YEAST)


NM_145173*
DIRAS1
DIRAS FAMILY, GTP-BINDING RAS-LIKE 1


NM_175907*
ZADH2
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN BC010734


NM_033003*
NA
NA







Nedd8









BC000178
KCMF1
POTASSIUM CHANNEL MODULATORY FACTOR 1


BC000395
LETMD1
LETM1 DOMAIN CONTAINING 1


BC001852
THG1L
INTERPHASE CYCTOPLASMIC FOCI PROTEIN 45


BC002526
HSPA4
HEAT SHOCK 70 KDA PROTEIN 4


BC007312
KIRREL2
KIN OF IRRE LIKE 2 (DROSOPHILA)


BC009074
C8ORF70
CHROMOSOME 8 OPEN READING FRAME 70


BC009485
C4ORF16
CHROMOSOME 4 OPEN READING FRAME 16


BC012945
C19ORF57
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN MGC11271


BC018953
SMARCD2
SWI/SNF RELATED, MATRIX ASSOCIATED, ACTIN




DEPENDENT REGULATOR OF CHROMATIN,




SUBFAMILY D, MEMBER 2


BC020658
TMEM40
TRANSMEMBRANE PROTEIN 40


BC038504
SNF1LK
SNF1-LIKE KINASE


BC050696
C12ORF48
CHROMOSOME 12 OPEN READING FRAME 48


BC051849
RPAIN
RPA INTERACTING PROTEIN


BC062736
CTD-2090I13.4
BASIC TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 3, PSEUDOGENE 9


NM_004235
KLF4
KRUPPEL-LIKE FACTOR 4 (GUT)


NM_004391
CYP8B1
CYTOCHROME P450, FAMILY 8, SUBFAMILY B,




POLYPEPTIDE 1


NM_005206
CRK
V-CRK SARCOMA VIRUS CT10 ONCOGENE




HOMOLOG (AVIAN)


NM_005651
TDO2
TRYPTOPHAN 2,3-DIOXYGENASE


NM_006251
PRKAA1
PROTEIN KINASE, AMP-ACTIVATED, ALPHA 1




CATALYTIC SUBUNIT


NM_012328
DNAJB9
DNAJ (H5P40) HOMOLOG, SUBFAMILY B, MEMBER 9


NM_013442
STOML2
STOMATIN (EPB72)-LIKE 2


NM_014878
KIAA0020
KIAA0020


NM_018014
BCL11A
B-CELL CLL/LYMPHOMA 11A (ZINC FINGER




PROTEIN)


NM_019895
CLNS1A
CHLORIDE CHANNEL, NUCLEOTIDE-SENSITIVE, 1A


NM_021803
IL21
INTERLEUKIN 21


NM_152443
RDH12
RETINOL DEHYDROGENASE 12 (ALL-TRANS AND 9-




CIS)


BC051366
NA
NA


BC005008*
CEACAM6
CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN-RELATED CELL




ADHESION MOLECULE 6 (NON-SPECIFIC CROSS




REACTING ANTIGEN)


BC006323*
ABCB7
ATP-BINDING CASSETTE, SUB-FAMILY B




(MDR/TAP), MEMBER 7


BC011707*
NRBF2
NUCLEAR RECEPTOR BINDING FACTOR 2


BC012109*
HOMER2
HOMER HOMOLOG 2 (DROSOPHILA)


BC020985*
COASY
COENZYME A SYNTHASE


BC021906*
FMNL1
FORMIN-LIKE 1


BC053895*
IRS1
INSULIN RECEPTOR SUBSTRATE 1


BC056669*
DCUN1D2
DCN1, DEFECTIVE IN CULLIN NEDDYLATION 1,




DOMAIN CONTAINING 2 (S. CEREVISIAE)


BC058924*
UBE2M
UBIQUITIN-CONJUGATING ENZYME E2M (UBC12




HOMOLOG, YEAST)


NM_001004105*
GRK6
G PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTOR KINASE 6


NM_001039468*
MARK2
MAP/MICROTUBULE AFFINITY-REGULATING




KINASE 2


NM_001798*
CDK2
CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASE 2


NM_001895*
CSNK2A1
CASEIN KINASE 2, ALPHA 1 POLYPEPTIDE


NM_003141*
TRIM21
TRIPARTITE MOTIF-CONTAINING 21


NM_003668*
MAPKAPK5
MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE-




ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE 5


NM_005019*
PDE1A
PHOSPHODIESTERASE 1A, CALMODULIN-




DEPENDENT


NM_005038*
PPID
PEPTIDYLPROLYL ISOMERASE D (CYCLOPHILIN D)


NM_006156*
NEDD8
NEURAL PRECURSOR CELL EXPRESSED,




DEVELOPMENTALLY DOWN-REGULATED 8


NM_012247*
SEPHS1
SELENOPHOSPHATE SYNTHETASE 1


NM_012325*
MAPRE1
MICROTUBULE-ASSOCIATED PROTEIN, RP/EB




FAMILY, MEMBER 1


NM_015417*
SPEF1
CHROMOSOME 20 OPEN READING FRAME 28


NM_016058*
TPRKB
TP53RK BINDING PROTEIN


NM_018014*
BCL11A
B-CELL CLL/LYMPHOMA 11A (ZINC FINGER




PROTEIN)


NM_022754*
SFXN1
LIKELY ORTHOLOG OF MOUSE SIDEROFLEXIN 1


NM_030662*
MAP2K2
MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE KINASE 2


NM_032141*
CCDC55
COILED-COIL DOMAIN CONTAINING 55


NM_130439*
MXI1
MAX INTERACTOR 1


NM_138559*
BCL11A
B-CELL CLL/LYMPHOMA 11A (ZINC FINGER




PROTEIN)


NM_175907*
ZADH2
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN BC010734


NM_212535*
PRKCB1
PROTEIN KINASE C, BETA 1


FAT10


NM_005737
ARL4C
ADP-RIBOSYLATION FACTOR-LIKE 4C


BC013648
EFHD2
EF-HAND DOMAIN FAMILY, MEMBER D2


BC031247
CCDC67
COILED-COIL DOMAIN CONTAINING 67


NM_015621
CCDC69
COILED-COIL DOMAIN CONTAINING 69


NM_024099
C11ORF48
CHROMOSOME 11 OPEN READING FRAME 48


NM_016951
CKLF
CHEMOKINE-LIKE FACTOR


BC008919
TBC1D9B
KIAA0676 PROTEIN


NM_032855
HSH2D
HEMATOPOIETIC SH2 DOMAIN CONTAINING


NM_152788
ANKS1B
ANKYRIN REPEAT AND STERILE ALPHA MOTIF




DOMAIN CONTAINING 1B


NM_001277
CHKA
CHOLINE KINASE ALPHA


NM_152434
CWF19L2
CWF19-LIKE 2, CELL CYCLE CONTROL (S. POMBE)


NM_004811
LPXN
LEUPAXIN


NM_182739
NDUFB6
NADH DEHYDROGENASE (UBIQUINONE) 1 BETA




SUBCOMPLEX, 6, 17 KDA


BC053602
C15ORF38
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN FLJ35955


NM_018976
SLC38A2
SOLUTE CARRIER FAMILY 38, MEMBER 2


BC004967
UBAC1
UBIQUITIN ASSOCIATED DOMAIN CONTAINING 1


BC010360
LMBRD1
LMBR1 DOMAIN CONTAINING 1


BC016381
NA
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN


BC017101
POMZP3
POM (POM121 HOMOLOG, RAT) AND ZP3 FUSION


BC026175
ATF2
ACTIVATING TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 2


BC062359
C8ORF47
CHROMOSOME 8 OPEN READING FRAME 47


NM_000301
PLG
PLASMINOGEN


NM_002815
PSMD11
PROTEASOME (PROSOME, MACROPAIN) 26S




SUBUNIT, NON-ATPASE, 11


NM_002854
PVALB
PARVALBUMIN


NM_012198
GCA
GRANCALCIN, EF-HAND CALCIUM BINDING




PROTEIN


NM_017727
FLJ20254
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN FLJ20254


NM_021925
C2ORF43
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN FLJ21820


NM_138785
C6ORF72
CHROMOSOME 6 OPEN READING FRAME 72


NM_144686
TMC4
TRANSMEMBRANE CHANNEL-LIKE 4


NM_012416
RANBP6
RAN BINDING PROTEIN 6


NM_006899
IDH3B
ISOCITRATE DEHYDROGENASE 3 (NAD+) BETA


BC001726
NOL11
NUCLEOLAR PROTEIN 11


BC015219
RBCK1
CHROMOSOME 20 OPEN READING FRAME 18


BC034801
ZDHHC19
ZINC FINGER, DHHC-TYPE CONTAINING 19


BC022244
PYCR1
PYRROLINE-5-CARBOXYLATE REDUCTASE 1


NM_006399
BATF
BASIC LEUCINE ZIPPER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR,




ATF-LIKE


BC014949
DHX58
LIKELY ORTHOLOG OF MOUSE D11LGP2


NM_014182
ORMDL2
ORM1-LIKE 2 (S. CEREVISIAE)


NM_024114
TRIM48
TRIPARTITE MOTIF-CONTAINING 48


NM_006607
PTTG2
PITUITARY TUMOR-TRANSFORMING 2


NM_004357
CD151
CD151 ANTIGEN (RAPH BLOOD GROUP)


NM_005513
GTF2E1
GENERAL TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR IIE,




POLYPEPTIDE 1, ALPHA 56 KDA


NM_016231
NLK
NEMO-LIKE KINASE


NM_054033
FKBP1B
FK506 BINDING PROTEIN 1B, 12.6 KDA


NM_152646

hypothetical protein MGC23270


NM_173518
C8ORF45
CHROMOSOME 8 OPEN READING FRAME 45


NM_177951
PPM1A
PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE 1A (FORMERLY 2C),




MAGNESIUM-DEPENDENT, ALPHA ISOFORM


NM_020990
CKMT1B
CREATINE KINASE, MITOCHONDRIAL 1B


NM_001258
CDK3
CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASE 3


NM_138565
CTTN
CORTACTIN


NM_018189
DPPA4
DEVELOPMENTAL PLURIPOTENCY ASSOCIATED 4


NM_001330
CTF1
CARDIOTROPHIN 1


BC029541
LETM2
LEUCINE ZIPPER-EF-HAND CONTAINING




TRANSMEMBRANE PROTEIN 2


NM_144594
GTSF1
FAMILY WITH SEQUENCE SIMILARITY 112,




MEMBER B


NM_173192
KCNIP2
KV CHANNEL INTERACTING PROTEIN 2


BC034468
FLJ11171
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN FLJ11171


NM_033306
CASP4
CASPASE 4, APOPTOSIS-RELATED CYSTEINE




PEPTIDASE


BC041132
KIFC3
KINESIN FAMILY MEMBER C3


BC011461
MITF
MICROPHTHALMIA-ASSOCIATED TRANSCRIPTION




FACTOR


BC046214
MPHOSPH8
M-PHASE PHOSPHOPROTEIN, MPP8


BC057774
RG9MTD3
RNA (GUANINE-9-) METHYLTRANSFERASE DOMAIN




CONTAINING 3


NM_016606
REEP2
RECEPTOR ACCESSORY PROTEIN 2


NM_145265
CCDC127
SIMILAR TO RIKEN CDNA 0610011N22


BC015056
ACAD10
ACYL-COENZYME A DEHYDROGENASE FAMILY,




MEMBER 10


BC007224
GALNT10
UDP-N-ACETYL-ALPHA-D-




GALACTOSAMINE: POLYPEPTIDE N-




ACETYLGALACTOSAMINYLTRANSFERASE 10




(GALNAC-T10)


BC009289
ACSBG1
ACYL-COA SYNTHETASE BUBBLEGUM FAMILY




MEMBER 1


BC011786
NA
CHROMOSOME 11 OPEN READING FRAME 43


NM_000559
HBG2
HEMOGLOBIN, GAMMA A


NM_024680
E2F8
E2F TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 8


BC000557
PEMT
PHOSPHATIDYLETHANOLAMINE N-




METHYLTRANSFERASE


BC005974
VAMP4
VESICLE-ASSOCIATED MEMBRANE PROTEIN 4


BC009771
BCCIP
CDK INHIBITOR P21 BINDING PROTEIN


BC053508
ARL6IP2
ADP-RIBOSYLATION FACTOR-LIKE 6 INTERACTING




PROTEIN 2


NM_001307
CLDN7
CLAUDIN 7


NM_002688
12:00 AM
SEPTIN 5


NM_004123
GIP
GASTRIC INHIBITORY POLYPEPTIDE


NM_004545
NDUFB1
NADH DEHYDROGENASE (UBIQUINONE) 1 BETA




SUBCOMPLEX, 1, 7 KDA


NM_004712
HGS
HEPATOCYTE GROWTH FACTOR-REGULATED




TYROSINE KINASE SUBSTRATE


NM_005621
S100A12
S100 CALCIUM BINDING PROTEIN A12




(CALGRANULIN C)


NM_016388
TRAT1
T CELL RECEPTOR ASSOCIATED TRANSMEMBRANE




ADAPTOR 1


NM_138998
DDX39
DEAD (ASP-GLU-ALA-ASP) (SEQ ID NO: 2) BOX




POLYPEPTIDE 39


NM_144673
CMTM2
CKLF-LIKE MARVEL TRANSMEMBRANE DOMAIN




CONTAINING 2


NM_182597
C7ORF53
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN FLJ39575


BC035601
WWC3
KIAA1280 PROTEIN


BC036365
C10ORF81
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN LOC338564


NM_002103
GYS1
GLYCOGEN SYNTHASE 1 (MUSCLE)


NM_145252
LOC124220
SIMILAR TO COMMON SALIVARY PROTEIN 1


NM_139280
ORMDL3
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN LOC51242


NM_022372
GBL
G PROTEIN BETA SUBUNIT-LIKE


BC052805
EPB49
ERYTHROCYTE MEMBRANE PROTEIN BAND 4.9




(DEMATIN)


NM_014551
NCAPH2
KLEISIN BETA


NM_017848
FAM120C
CHROMOSOME X OPEN READING FRAME 17


BC008141
UCHL5IP
THREE PRIME REPAIR EXONUCLEASE 2


NM_005832
KCNMB2
POTASSIUM LARGE CONDUCTANCE CALCIUM-




ACTIVATED CHANNEL, SUBFAMILY M, BETA




MEMBER 2


NM_173517
VKORC1L1
VITAMIN K EPOXIDE REDUCTASE COMPLEX,




SUBUNIT 1-LIKE 1


NM_173473
C10ORF104
CHROMOSOME 10 OPEN READING FRAME 104


NM_030650
KIAA1715
KIAA1715


NM_014570
ARFGAP3
ADP-RIBOSYLATION FACTOR GTPASE ACTIVATING




PROTEIN 3


NM_021159
RAP1GDS1
RAP1, GTP-GDP DISSOCIATION STIMULATOR 1


BC017066
PRRC1
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN MGC12103


NM_014805
EPM2AIP1
EPM2A (LAFORIN) INTERACTING PROTEIN 1


BC033734
C17ORF66
CHROMOSOME 17 OPEN READING FRAME 66


NM_021644
HNRPH3
HETEROGENEOUS NUCLEAR RIBONUCLEOPROTEIN




H3 (2H9)


BC021987
NMI
N-MYC (AND STAT) INTERACTOR


NM_002489
NDUFA4
NADH DEHYDROGENASE (UBIQUINONE) 1 ALPHA




SUBCOMPLEX, 4, 9 KDA


NM_033542
DBNDD2
CHROMOSOME 20 OPEN READING FRAME 35


BC015754
CADPS
CA2+-DEPENDENT SECRETION ACTIVATOR


NM_032357
CCDC115
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN MGC12981


XM_291436


BC012266
ATG12
ATG12 AUTOPHAGY RELATED 12 HOMOLOG (S. CEREVISIAE)


BC012377
EGFL7
EGF-LIKE-DOMAIN, MULTIPLE 7


BC017943
PPP1R1C
PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE 1, REGULATORY




(INHIBITOR) SUBUNIT 1C


BC058031
HP
HAPTOGLOBIN


BC060828
ARID3A
AT RICH INTERACTIVE DOMAIN 3A (BRIGHT-LIKE)


NM_144586
LYPD1
LY6/PLAUR DOMAIN CONTAINING 1


BC009106
SEC16B
LEUCINE ZIPPER TRANSCRIPTION REGULATOR 2


NM_018990
CXORF9
CHROMOSOME X OPEN READING FRAME 9


NM_004935
CDK5
CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASE 5


BC014484
TOR1A
TORSIN FAMILY 1, MEMBER A (TORSIN A)


BC063111
GGT6
GAMMA-GLUTAMYLTRANSFERASE 6 HOMOLOG




(RAT)


NM_023937
MRPL34
MITOCHONDRIAL RIBOSOMAL PROTEIN L34


NM_030810
TXNDC5
THIOREDOXIN DOMAIN CONTAINING 5


NM_138463
TLCD1
TLC DOMAIN CONTAINING 1


BC007919
STARD10
START DOMAIN CONTAINING 10


BC016703
ACSM5
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN FLJ20581


NM_001004354
NRARP
SIMILAR TO ANKYRIN-REPEAT PROTEIN NRARP


NM_002436
MPP1
MEMBRANE PROTEIN, PALMITOYLATED 1, 55 KDA


NM_004013
DMD
DYSTROPHIN (MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY, DUCHENNE




AND BECKER TYPES)


NM_018335
C14ORF131
CHROMOSOME 14 OPEN READING FRAME 131


NM_138385
TMEM129
TRANSMEMBRANE PROTEIN 129


NM_001823
CKB
CREATINE KINASE, BRAIN


NM_004440
EPHA7
EPH RECEPTOR A7


NM_006779
CDC42EP2
CDC42 EFFECTOR PROTEIN (RHO GTPASE BINDING) 2


NM_007162
TFEB
TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR EB


NM_014248
RBX1
RING-BOX 1


NM_016267
VGLL1
VESTIGIAL LIKE 1 (DROSOPHILA)


NM_181656
C17ORF58
CHROMOSOME 17 OPEN READING FRAME 58


NM_138482

hypothetical protein BC009264


BC026345
KIAA1189
KIAA1189


NM_032315
SLC25A33
PNC1 PROTEIN


NM_002944
ROS1
V-ROS UR2 SARCOMA VIRUS ONCOGENE HOMOLOG




1 (AVIAN)


BC017048
GJB2
GAP JUNCTION PROTEIN, BETA 2, 26 KDA




(CONNEXIN 26)


BC039814
ZRANB2
ZINC FINGER PROTEIN 265


NM_001044
SLC6A3
SOLUTE CARRIER FAMILY 6 (NEUROTRANSMITTER




TRANSPORTER, DOPAMINE), MEMBER 3


NM_138470

hypothetical protein BC008131


NM_005084
PLA2G7
PHOSPHOLIPASE A2, GROUP VII (PLATELET-




ACTIVATING FACTOR ACETYLHYDROLASE,




PLASMA)


BC012499
SIRT1
SIRTUIN (SILENT MATING TYPE INFORMATION




REGULATION 2 HOMOLOG) 1 (S. CEREVISIAE)


BC045532
LSM8
LSM8 HOMOLOG, U6 SMALL NUCLEAR RNA




ASSOCIATED (S. CEREVISIAE)


NM_003295
TPT1
TUMOR PROTEIN, TRANSLATIONALLY-




CONTROLLED 1


NM_006912
RIT1
RAS-LIKE WITHOUT CAAX 1


NM_014184
CNIH4
CORNICHON HOMOLOG 4 (DROSOPHILA)


BC003065
CDK2
CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASE 2


BC009793
ERCC8
EXCISION REPAIR CROSS-COMPLEMENTING




RODENT REPAIR DEFICIENCY, COMPLEMENTATION




GROUP 8


NM_005114
HS3ST1
HEPARAN SULFATE (GLUCOSAMINE) 3-O-




SULFOTRANSFERASE 1


NM_018129
PNPO
PYRIDOXINE 5′-PHOSPHATE OXIDASE


NM_152285
ARRDC1
ARRESTIN DOMAIN CONTAINING 1


BC009710
GOSR2
GOLGI SNAP RECEPTOR COMPLEX MEMBER 2


NM_015966
ERGIC3
ERGIC AND GOLGI 3


NM_020370
GPR84
G PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTOR 84


NM_130398
EXO1
EXONUCLEASE 1


NM_145865
ANKS4B
ANKYRIN REPEAT AND STERILE ALPHA MOTIF




DOMAIN CONTAINING 4B


BC001234
LOH11CR2A
LOSS OF HETEROZYGOSITY, 11, CHROMOSOMAL




REGION 2, GENE A


BC062625
SLC39A4
SOLUTE CARRIER FAMILY 39 (ZINC TRANSPORTER),




MEMBER 4


BC001889
NAPG
N-ETHYLMALEIMIDE-SENSITIVE FACTOR




ATTACHMENT PROTEIN, GAMMA


BC013768
PCCB
PROPIONYL COENZYME A CARBOXYLASE, BETA




POLYPEPTIDE


BC020651
MRPL35
MITOCHONDRIAL RIBOSOMAL PROTEIN L35


BC051291
RDH11
RETINOL DEHYDROGENASE 11 (ALL-TRANS AND 9-




CIS)


BC069328
BMF
BCL2 MODIFYING FACTOR


NM_006426
DPYSL4
DIHYDROPYRIMIDINASE-LIKE 4


NM_178863
KCTD13
POTASSIUM CHANNEL TETRAMERISATION DOMAIN




CONTAINING 13


BC004176
SSH3
SLINGSHOT HOMOLOG 3 (DROSOPHILA)


BC008790
GSTM3
GLUTATHIONE S-TRANSFERASE M3 (BRAIN)


BC010176
NY-SAR-48
SARCOMA ANTIGEN NY-SAR-48


BC020885
C12ORF65
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN FLJ38663


BC034554
SERPINA3
SERPIN PEPTIDASE INHIBITOR, CLADE A (ALPHA-1




ANTIPROTEINASE, ANTITRYPSIN), MEMBER 3


NM_000394
CRYAA
CRYSTALLIN, ALPHA A


NM_078476
BTN2A1
BUTYROPHILIN, SUBFAMILY 2, MEMBER A1


BC015904
MRPL10
MITOCHONDRIAL RIBOSOMAL PROTEIN L10


BC019039
RGS3
REGULATOR OF G-PROTEIN SIGNALLING 3


BC067445
DAB1
DISABLED HOMOLOG 1 (DROSOPHILA)


NM_003221
TFAP2B
TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR AP-2 BETA (ACTIVATING




ENHANCER BINDING PROTEIN 2 BETA)


NM_015959
TXNDC14
THIOREDOXIN DOMAIN CONTAINING 14


BC010033
QPRT
QUINOLINATE PHOSPHORIBOSYLTRANSFERASE




(NICOTINATE-NUCLEOTIDE PYROPHOSPHORYLASE




(CARBOXYLATING))


NM_152522
ARL6IP6
ADP-RIBOSYLATION-LIKE FACTOR 6 INTERACTING




PROTEIN 6


BC019254
ENOX2
CYTOSOLIC OVARIAN CARCINOMA ANTIGEN 1


NM_012148
DUX3
DOUBLE HOMEOBOX, 3


NM_025004
CCDC15
COILED-COIL DOMAIN CONTAINING 15


BC017475
TTC15
TETRATRICOPEPTIDE REPEAT DOMAIN 15


NM_172211
CSF1
COLONY STIMULATING FACTOR 1 (MACROPHAGE)


BC007862
GPR108
G PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTOR 108


BC010850
HEATR2
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN FLJ20397


NM_016009
SH3GLB1
SH3-DOMAIN GRB2-LIKE ENDOPHILIN B1


NM_152328
ADSSL1
ADENYLOSUCCINATE SYNTHASE LIKE 1


BC020867
SLC6A13
SOLUTE CARRIER FAMILY 6 (NEUROTRANSMITTER




TRANSPORTER, GABA), MEMBER 13


NM_178126
FAM134C
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN LOC162427


NM_007241
SNF8
SNF8, ESCRT-II COMPLEX SUBUNIT, HOMOLOG (S. CEREVISIAE)


NM_016440
VRK3
VACCINIA RELATED KINASE 3


BC035314
BXDC1
BRIX DOMAIN CONTAINING 1


NM_030881
DDX17
DEAD (ASP-GLU-ALA-ASP) BOX POLYPEPTIDE 17


NM_001033578
SGK3
SERUM/GLUCOCORTICOID REGULATED KINASE




FAMILY, MEMBER 3


BC010155
FDX1L
SIMILAR TO RIKEN CDNA B230118G17 GENE


NM_018667
SMPD3
SPHINGOMYELIN PHOSPHODIESTERASE 3,




NEUTRAL MEMBRANE (NEUTRAL




SPHINGOMYELINASE II)


NM_017812
CHCHD3
COILED-COIL-HELIX-COILED-COIL-HELIX DOMAIN




CONTAINING 3


NM_001613
ACTG2
ACTIN, ALPHA 2, SMOOTH MUSCLE, AORTA


BC031329
TMEM149
U2(RNU2) SMALL NUCLEAR RNA AUXILIARY




FACTOR 1-LIKE 4


BC039256
PDS5B
ANDROGEN-INDUCED PROLIFERATION INHIBITOR


NM_017634
KCTD9
POTASSIUM CHANNEL TETRAMERISATION DOMAIN




CONTAINING 9


NM_001017980
LOC203547
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN LOC203547


BC053320
CTBP1
C-TERMINAL BINDING PROTEIN 1


NM_152619
DCLK2
DOUBLECORTIN AND CAM KINASE-LIKE 2


BC033668
ARHGAP28
KIAA1314 PROTEIN


BC059396
FAM92A3
FAMILY WITH SEQUENCE SIMILARITY 92, MEMBER




A3


NM_080660
ZC3HAV1L
SIMILAR TO RIKEN CDNA 1200014N16 GENE


BC003551
TGM2
TRANSGLUTAMINASE 2 (C POLYPEPTIDE, PROTEIN-




GLUTAMINE-GAMMA-GLUTAMYLTRANSFERASE)


NM_172341
LIN37
PRESENILIN ENHANCER 2 HOMOLOG (C. ELEGANS)


NM_005158
ABL2
V-ABL ABELSON MURINE LEUKEMIA VIRAL




ONCOGENE HOMOLOG 2 (ARG, ABELSON-RELATED




GENE)


NM_005558
LAD1
LADININ 1


NM_000624
SERPINA5
SERPIN PEPTIDASE INHIBITOR, CLADE A (ALPHA-1




ANTIPROTEINASE, ANTITRYPSIN), MEMBER 5


NM_173799
VSTM3
V-SET AND IMMUNOGLOBULIN DOMAIN




CONTAINING 9


NM_003592
CUL1
CULLIN 1


BC017594
APIP
APAF1 INTERACTING PROTEIN


NM_032498
RHOXF2
PEPP SUBFAMILY GENE 2


BC008730
HK1
HEXOKINASE 1


BC016276
DLG7
DISCS, LARGE HOMOLOG 7 (DROSOPHILA)


BC033708
RALGPS1
RAL GEF WITH PH DOMAIN AND SH3 BINDING




MOTIF 1


BC051000
TCL1B
T-CELL LEUKEMIA/LYMPHOMA 1B


BC066974
NA
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN


BC022983
LNX1
LIGAND OF NUMB-PROTEIN X 1


NM_003256
TIMP4
TIMP METALLOPEPTIDASE INHIBITOR 4


NM_003674
CDK10
CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASE (CDC2-LIKE) 10


BC004549
DUS3L
DIHYDROURIDINE SYNTHASE 3-LIKE (S. CEREVISIAE)


BC015596*
C21ORF51
CHROMOSOME 21 OPEN READING FRAME 51


BC018206*
FAM128B
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN FLJ14346


BC018722*
ASPSCR1
ALVEOLAR SOFT PART SARCOMA CHROMOSOME




REGION, CANDIDATE 1


BC022357*
RPL17
RIBOSOMAL PROTEIN L17


BC023152*
GYG2
GLYCOGENIN 2


BC025700*
AFF4
AF4/FMR2 FAMILY, MEMBER 4


BC032825*
SH3GL2
SH3-DOMAIN GRB2-LIKE 2


BC038838*
PRR16
MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL PROTEIN DSC54


BC052805*
EPB49
ERYTHROCYTE MEMBRANE PROTEIN BAND 4.9




(DEMATIN)


BC056415*
RPAP3
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN FLJ21908


BC065370*
C20ORF112
CHROMOSOME 20 OPEN READING FRAME 112


NM_001032296*
STK24
SERINE/THREONINE KINASE 24 (STE20 HOMOLOG,




YEAST)


NM_002498*
NEK3
NIMA (NEVER IN MITOSIS GENE A)-RELATED




KINASE 3


NM_002624*
PFDN5
PREFOLDIN SUBUNIT 5


NM_004329*
BMPR1A
BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN RECEPTOR, TYPE




IA


NM_014245*
RNF7
RING FINGER PROTEIN 7


NM_014548*
TMOD2
TROPOMODULIN 2 (NEURONAL)


NM_015646*
RAP1B
RAP1B, MEMBER OF RAS ONCOGENE FAMILY


NM_017949*
CUEDC1
CUE DOMAIN CONTAINING 1


NM_018393*
TCP11L1
T-COMPLEX 11 (MOUSE) LIKE 1


NM_018679*
TCP11
T-COMPLEX 11 (MOUSE)


NM_024591*
CHMP6
CHROMATIN MODIFYING PROTEIN 6


NM_032368*
LZIC
LEUCINE ZIPPER AND CTNNBIP1 DOMAIN




CONTAINING


NM_033118*
MYLK2
MYOSIN LIGHT CHAIN KINASE 2, SKELETAL




MUSCLE


NM_130807*
MOBKL2A
MOB1, MPS ONE BINDER KINASE ACTIVATOR-LIKE




2A (YEAST)


NM_145173*
DIRAS1
DIRAS FAMILY, GTP-BINDING RAS-LIKE 1


NM_152376*
UBXD3
UBX DOMAIN CONTAINING 3


NM_182493*
MLCK
MLCK PROTEIN


BC056907*
NA
NA







SUMO1









BC033766
NDUFV3
NADH DEHYDROGENASE (UBIQUINONE)




FLAVOPROTEIN 3, 10 KDA


NM_001312
CRIP2
CYSTEINE-RICH PROTEIN 2


NM_004111
FEN1
FLAP STRUCTURE-SPECIFIC ENDONUCLEASE 1


NM_000805
GAST
GASTRIN


NM_030645
SH3BP5L
SH3-BINDING DOMAIN PROTEIN 5-LIKE


BC019337
IGHG1
IMMUNOGLOBULIN HEAVY CONSTANT GAMMA 1




(G1M MARKER)


BC056673
PPP1R2P9
PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE 1, REGULATORY




(INHIBITOR) SUBUNIT 2 PSEUDOGENE 9


BC054520
MEF2D
MADS BOX TRANSCRIPTION ENHANCER FACTOR 2,




POLYPEPTIDE D (MYOCYTE ENHANCER FACTOR




2D)


NM_006902
PRRX1
PAIRED RELATED HOMEOBOX 1


NM_004436
ENSA
ENDOSULFINE ALPHA


NM_006255
PRKCH
PROTEIN KINASE C, ETA


NM_007080
LSM6
LSM6 HOMOLOG, U6 SMALL NUCLEAR RNA




ASSOCIATED (S. CEREVISIAE)


NM_000860
HPGD
HYDROXYPROSTAGLANDIN DEHYDROGENASE 15-




(NAD)


NM_144679
C17ORF56
CHROMOSOME 17 OPEN READING FRAME 56


NM_017431
PRKAG3
PROTEIN KINASE, AMP-ACTIVATED, GAMMA 3




NON-CATALYTIC SUBUNIT


NM_031473
IFT81
INTRAFLAGELLAR TRANSPORT 81 HOMOLOG




(CHLAMYDOMONAS)


BC064593
DCP2
DCP2 DECAPPING ENZYME HOMOLOG (S. CEREVISIAE)


BC007347
CHD2
CHROMODOMAIN HELICASE DNA BINDING




PROTEIN 2


BC003690
IPO4
IMPORTIN 4


BC016327
NUP62CL
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN FLJ20130


NM_080600
MAG
MYELIN ASSOCIATED GLYCOPROTEIN


BC017258
MCM2
MCM2 MINICHROMOSOME MAINTENANCE




DEFICIENT 2, MITOTIN (S. CEREVISIAE)


NM_017785
CCDC99
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN FLJ20364


BC000809
TCEAL1
TRANSCRIPTION ELONGATION FACTOR A (SII)-LIKE 1


NM_000485
APRT
ADENINE PHOSPHORIBOSYLTRANSFERASE


NM_138820
HIGD2A
HIG1 DOMAIN FAMILY, MEMBER 2A


BC009415
KIF26A
KINESIN FAMILY MEMBER 26A


BC017440
TRAPPC2L
HEMATOPOIETIC STEM/PROGENITOR CELLS 176


NM_001092
ABR
ACTIVE BCR-RELATED GENE


BC013352
HTF9C
HPAII TINY FRAGMENTS LOCUS 9C


NM_021947
SRR
SERINE RACEMASE


BC011585
PRKCDBP
PROTEIN KINASE C, DELTA BINDING PROTEIN


BC052600
ZNF718
ZINC FINGER PROTEIN 718


BC004518
SYT17
SYNAPTOTAGMIN XVII


NM_178509
STXBP4
SYNTAXIN BINDING PROTEIN 4


BC017770
NA
NA


BC066938
DDX43
DEAD (ASP-GLU-ALA-ASP) (SEQ ID NO: 2) BOX




POLYPEPTIDE 43


BC000393
FAM127B
DKFZP564B147 PROTEIN


BC025787
ALKBH1
ALKB, ALKYLATION REPAIR HOMOLOG 1 (E. COLI)


BC015944
TIA1
TIA1 CYTOTOXIC GRANULE-ASSOCIATED RNA




BINDING PROTEIN


NM_017988
SCYL2
SCY1-LIKE 2 (S. CEREVISIAE)


NM_002020
FLT4
FMS-RELATED TYROSINE KINASE 4


NM_031472
TRPT1
TRNA PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE 1


BC001728*
TFPT
TCF3 (E2A) FUSION PARTNER (IN CHILDHOOD




LEUKEMIA)


BC003566*
ZNF24
ZINC FINGER PROTEIN 24 (KOX 17)


BC005383*
CETN3
CENTRIN, EF-HAND PROTEIN, 3 (CDC31 HOMOLOG,




YEAST)


BC007048*
ZMYM5
ZINC FINGER, MYM-TYPE 5


BC010125*
C3ORF37
CHROMOSOME 3 OPEN READING FRAME 37


BC011804*
C1ORF165
CHROMOSOME 1 OPEN READING FRAME 165


BC015803*
IRF2
INTERFERON REGULATORY FACTOR 2


BC017314*
ETS1
V-ETS ERYTHROBLASTOSIS VIRUS E26 ONCOGENE




HOMOLOG 1 (AVIAN)


BC036335*
BTBD12
BTB (POZ) DOMAIN CONTAINING 12


BC036572*
ZCCHC12
ZINC FINGER, CCHC DOMAIN CONTAINING 12


BC051688*
FLJ10781
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN FLJ10781


BC056402*
LOC144097
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN BC007540


BC067299*
MDM4
MDM4, TRANSFORMED 3T3 CELL DOUBLE MINUTE




4, P53 BINDING PROTEIN (MOUSE)


NM_000176*
NR3C1
NUCLEAR RECEPTOR SUBFAMILY 3, GROUP C,




MEMBER 1 (GLUCOCORTICOID RECEPTOR)


NM_001008239*
C18ORF25
CHROMOSOME 18 OPEN READING FRAME 25


NM_001722*
POLR3D
POLYMERASE (RNA) III (DNA DIRECTED)




POLYPEPTIDE D, 44 KDA


NM_001895*
CSNK2A1
CASEIN KINASE 2, ALPHA 1 POLYPEPTIDE


NM_002739*
PRKCG
PROTEIN KINASE C, GAMMA


NM_002938*
RNF4
RING FINGER PROTEIN 4


NM_003141*
TRIM21
TRIPARTITE MOTIF-CONTAINING 21


NM_003345*
UBE2I
UBIQUITIN-CONJUGATING ENZYME E2I (UBC9




HOMOLOG, YEAST)


NM_003352*
SUMO1
SMT3 SUPPRESSOR OF MIF TWO 3 HOMOLOG 1




(YEAST)


NM_004454*
ETV5
ETS VARIANT GENE 5 (ETS-RELATED MOLECULE)


NM_006977*
ZBTB25
ZINC FINGER AND BTB DOMAIN CONTAINING 25


NM_014720*
SLK
STE20-LIKE KINASE (YEAST)


NM_032141*
CCDC55
COILED-COIL DOMAIN CONTAINING 55


NM_145796*
POGZ
POGO TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENT WITH ZNF




DOMAIN


NM_175907*
ZADH2
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN BC010734


NM_212540*
E2F6
E2F TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 6







UFM1









NM_005879
TRAIP
TRAF INTERACTING PROTEIN


NM_001018
RPS15
RIBOSOMAL PROTEIN S15


NM_013974
DDAH2
DIMETHYLARGININE




DIMETHYLAMINOHYDROLASE 2


NM_001278
CHUK
CONSERVED HELIX-LOOP-HELIX UBIQUITOUS




KINASE


BC012611
EIF4E
EUKARYOTIC TRANSLATION INITIATION FACTOR




4E


NM_006819
STIP1
STRESS-INDUCED-PHOSPHOPROTEIN 1




(HSP70/HSP90-ORGANIZING PROTEIN)


NM_024647
NUP43
NUCLEOPORIN 43 KDA


NM_007045
FGFR1OP
FGFR1 ONCOGENE PARTNER


NM_014460
CSDC2
COLD SHOCK DOMAIN CONTAINING C2, RNA




BINDING


NM_021260
ZFYVE1
ZINC FINGER, FYVE DOMAIN CONTAINING 1


NM_017437
CPSF2
CLEAVAGE AND POLYADENYLATION SPECIFIC




FACTOR 2, 100 KDA


NM_138722
BCL2L14
BCL2-LIKE 14 (APOPTOSIS FACILITATOR)


NM_016059
PPIL1
PEPTIDYLPROLYL ISOMERASE (CYCLOPHILIN)-LIKE 1


NM_020139
BDH2
3-HYDROXYBUTYRATE DEHYDROGENASE, TYPE 2


NM_182493
MLCK
MLCK PROTEIN


BC000578
HPRT1
HYPOXANTHINE PHOSPHORIBOSYLTRANSFERASE 1




(LESCH-NYHAN SYNDROME)


BC060785
TRIM40
TRIPARTITE MOTIF-CONTAINING 40


BC003132
NUDC
NUCLEAR DISTRIBUTION GENE C HOMOLOG (A. NIDULANS)


NM_031219
HDHD3
HALOACID DEHALOGENASE-LIKE HYDROLASE




DOMAIN CONTAINING 3


NM_002358
MAD2L1
MAD2 MITOTIC ARREST DEFICIENT-LIKE 1 (YEAST)


NM_006578
GNB5
GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE BINDING PROTEIN (G




PROTEIN), BETA 5


NM_004064
CDKN1B
CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASE INHIBITOR 1B (P27,




KIP1)


BC030280
KIAA0513
KIAA0513


NM_005338
HIP1
HUNTINGTIN INTERACTING PROTEIN 1


NM_004881
TP53I3
TUMOR PROTEIN P53 INDUCIBLE PROTEIN 3


BC015395
CCDC148
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN BC015395


NM_000394
CRYAA
CRYSTALLIN, ALPHA A


BC005955
C8ORF53
CHROMOSOME 8 OPEN READING FRAME 53


BC001327
IFRD2
INTERFERON-RELATED DEVELOPMENTAL




REGULATOR 2


BC021551
NFATC2IP
NUCLEAR FACTOR OF ACTIVATED T-CELLS,




CYTOPLASMIC, CALCINEURIN-DEPENDENT 2




INTERACTING PROTEIN


BC050537
FLJ20160
FLJ20160 PROTEIN


BC058862
TSKS
TESTIS-SPECIFIC KINASE SUBSTRATE


NM_005235
ERBB4
V-ERB-A ERYTHROBLASTIC LEUKEMIA VIRAL




ONCOGENE HOMOLOG 4 (AVIAN)


NM_014012
REM1
RAS (RAD AND GEM)-LIKE GTP-BINDING 1


NM_022110
FKBPL
FK506 BINDING PROTEIN LIKE


NM_006147
IRF6
INTERFERON REGULATORY FACTOR 6


NM_001349
DARS
ASPARTYL-TRNA SYNTHETASE


BC064945
SCYL1BP1
SCY1-LIKE 1 BINDING PROTEIN 1


NM_032385
C5ORF4
CHROMOSOME 5 OPEN READING FRAME 4


NM_172037
RDH10
RETINOL DEHYDROGENASE 10 (ALL-TRANS)


NM_173621
C17ORF44
CHROMOSOME 17 OPEN READING FRAME 44


NM_004074
COX8A
CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE SUBUNIT 8A




(UBIQUITOUS)


NM_022156
DUS1L
DIHYDROURIDINE SYNTHASE 1-LIKE (S. CEREVISIAE)


NM_016401
C11ORF73
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN HSPC138


NM_019617
GKN1
GASTROKINE 1


BC054501
DNM2
DYNAMIN 2


NM_058173
MUCL1
SMALL BREAST EPITHELIAL MUCIN


BC032307
CCDC123
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN FLJ14640


BC034028
SHARPIN
SHANK-ASSOCIATED RH DOMAIN INTERACTOR


BC015202
CENPT
CHROMOSOME 16 OPEN READING FRAME 56


BC013957
FAM62B
FAMILY WITH SEQUENCE SIMILARITY 62 (C2




DOMAIN CONTAINING) MEMBER B


BC015569
ARL6IP4
ADP-RIBOSYLATION-LIKE FACTOR 6 INTERACTING




PROTEIN 4


BC020221
STAC
SH3 AND CYSTEINE RICH DOMAIN


BC053895
IRS1
INSULIN RECEPTOR SUBSTRATE 1


NM_002748
MAPK6
MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE 6


NM_198086
JUB
JUB, AJUBA HOMOLOG (XENOPUS LAEVIS)


NM_006621
AHCYL1
S-ADENOSYLHOMOCYSTEINE HYDROLASE-LIKE 1


NM_018698
NXT2
NUCLEAR TRANSPORT FACTOR 2-LIKE EXPORT




FACTOR 2


NM_005034
POLR2K
POLYMERASE (RNA) II (DNA DIRECTED)




POLYPEPTIDE K, 7.0 KDA


NM_018438
FBXO6
F-BOX PROTEIN 6


NM_033547
INTS4
INTEGRATOR COMPLEX SUBUNIT 4


NM_153212
GJB4
GAP JUNCTION PROTEIN, BETA 4 (CONNEXIN 30.3)


NM_175738
RAB37
RAB37, MEMBER RAS ONCOGENE FAMILY


BC013031
PHLDB1
PLECKSTRIN HOMOLOGY-LIKE DOMAIN, FAMILY B,




MEMBER 1


NM_001005465
OR10G3
OLFACTORY RECEPTOR, FAMILY 10, SUBFAMILY G,




MEMBER 3


NM_001899
CST4
CYSTATIN S


NM_004753
DHRS3
DEHYDROGENASE/REDUCTASE (SDR FAMILY)




MEMBER 3


NM_021992
TMSL8
THYMOSIN-LIKE 8


NM_197970
BOLL
BOL, BOULE-LIKE (DROSOPHILA)


NM_139246
C9ORF97
CHROMOSOME 9 OPEN READING FRAME 97


NM_005586
MDFI
MYOD FAMILY INHIBITOR


BC041831
TLE3
TRANSDUCIN-LIKE ENHANCER OF SPLIT 3 (E(SP1)




HOMOLOG, DROSOPHILA)


NM_003130
SRI
SORCIN


BC030237
SLC22A18AS
SOLUTE CARRIER FAMILY 22 (ORGANIC CATION




TRANSPORTER), MEMBER 18 ANTISENSE


BC053351
DLX1
DISTAL-LESS HOMEOBOX 1


BC022034
LDHAL6B
LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE A-LIKE 6B


BC031964
GLUL
GLUTAMATE-AMMONIA LIGASE (GLUTAMINE




SYNTHETASE)


NM_032350
C7ORF50
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN MGC11257


NM_152646

hypothetical protein MGC23270


BC024245
SALL2
SAL-LIKE 2 (DROSOPHILA)


NM_001004300
ZNF720
ZINC FINGER PROTEIN 720


NM_079422
MYL1
MYOSIN, LIGHT POLYPEPTIDE 1, ALKALI;




SKELETAL, FAST


NM_024295
DERL1
DER1-LIKE DOMAIN FAMILY, MEMBER 1


BC026241
UBE3C
UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE E3C


BC064144
NA
NA


NM_152266
C19ORF40
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN MGC32020


NM_017722
TRMT1
TRM1 TRNA METHYLTRANSFERASE 1 HOMOLOG (S. CEREVISIAE)


NM_000905
NPY
NEUROPEPTIDE Y


BC001553
CHMP2B
CHROMATIN MODIFYING PROTEIN 2B


NM_006438
COLEC10
COLLECTIN SUB-FAMILY MEMBER 10 (C-TYPE




LECTIN)


NM_014424
HSPB7
HEAT SHOCK 27 KDA PROTEIN FAMILY, MEMBER 7




(CARDIOVASCULAR)


NM_001179
ART3
ADP-RIBOSYLTRANSFERASE 3


NM_020348
CNNM1
CYCLIN M1


NM_006928
SILV
SILVER HOMOLOG (MOUSE)


NM_022568
ALDH8A1
ALDEHYDE DEHYDROGENASE 8 FAMILY, MEMBER




A1


NM_178152
DCX
DOUBLECORTEX; LISSENCEPHALY, X-LINKED




(DOUBLECORTIN)


NM_153822
PSMD4
PROTEASOME (PROSOME, MACROPAIN) 26S




SUBUNIT, NON-ATPASE, 4


NM_001699
AXL
AXL RECEPTOR TYROSINE KINASE


BC006195
ACLY
ATP CITRATE LYASE


NM_020397
CAMK1D
CALCIUM/CALMODULIN-DEPENDENT PROTEIN




KINASE ID


BC017249
ENO3
ENOLASE 1, (ALPHA)


BC001600
CDC123
CHROMOSOME 10 OPEN READING FRAME 7


NM_024770
METTL8
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN FLJ13984


NM_194270
MORN2
MORN REPEAT CONTAINING 2


NM_022650
RASA1
RAS P21 PROTEIN ACTIVATOR (GTPASE




ACTIVATING PROTEIN) 1


BC005830
ANXA9
ANNEXIN A9


NM_014065
ASTE1
ASTEROID HOMOLOG 1 (DROSOPHILA)


BC014244
RTN2
RETICULON 2


BC024002
FNDC8
FIBRONECTIN TYPE III DOMAIN CONTAINING 8


NM_178034
PLA2G4D
PHOSPHOLIPASE A2, GROUP IVD (CYTOSOLIC)


BC025266
TASP1
TASPASE, THREONINE ASPARTASE, 1


NM_003928
FAM127A
CAAX BOX 1


NM_017819
LOC131909
RNA (GUANINE-9-) METHYLTRANSFERASE DOMAIN




CONTAINING 1


NM_018158
SLC4A1AP
SOLUTE CARRIER FAMILY 4 (ANION EXCHANGER),




MEMBER 1, ADAPTOR PROTEIN


NM_175571
GIMAP8
GTPASE, IMAP FAMILY MEMBER 8


BC000453
PCM1
PERICENTRIOLAR MATERIAL 1


NM_000910
NPY2R
NEUROPEPTIDE Y RECEPTOR Y2


NM_018679
TCP11
T-COMPLEX 11 (MOUSE)


NM_022559
GH1
CHORIONIC SOMATOMAMMOTROPIN HORMONE 1




(PLACENTAL LACTOGEN)


BC030957
ANK1
ANKYRIN 1, ERYTHROCYTIC


NM_003168
SUPT4H1
SUPPRESSOR OF TY 4 HOMOLOG 1 (S. CEREVISIAE)


BC012095
BST1
BONE MARROW STROMAL CELL ANTIGEN 1


BC013740
SLC2A6
SOLUTE CARRIER FAMILY 2 (FACILITATED




GLUCOSE TRANSPORTER), MEMBER 6


NM_016505
ZCCHC17
ZINC FINGER, CCHC DOMAIN CONTAINING 17


NM_018697
LANCL2
LANC LANTIBIOTIC SYNTHETASE COMPONENT C-




LIKE 2 (BACTERIAL)


NM_152619
DCLK2
DOUBLECORTIN AND CAM KINASE-LIKE 2


NM_152770
C4ORF22
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN MGC35043


NM_004401
DFFA
DNA FRAGMENTATION FACTOR, 45 KDA, ALPHA




POLYPEPTIDE


NM_030636
EEPD1
KIAA1706 PROTEIN


BC014260
PARP3
POLY (ADP-RIBOSE) POLYMERASE FAMILY,




MEMBER 3


BC009010
C6ORF142
CHROMOSOME 6 OPEN READING FRAME 142


BC047722
C2ORF64
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN MGC52110


NM_080873
ASB11
ANKYRIN REPEAT AND SOCS BOX-CONTAINING 11


NM_173547
TRIM65
TRIPARTITE MOTIF-CONTAINING 65


BC041668
RIPK3
RECEPTOR-INTERACTING SERINE-THREONINE




KINASE 3


BC033728
NA
NA


BC048217
SPATA5
SPERMATOGENESIS ASSOCIATED 5


NM_001001852
PIM3
PIM-3 ONCOGENE


NM_002904
RDBP
RD RNA BINDING PROTEIN


BC030608
PODN
PODOCAN


BC023982
C5ORF32
PUTATIVE NUCLEAR PROTEIN ORF1-FL49


NM_133332
WHSC1
WOLF-HIRSCHHORN SYNDROME CANDIDATE 1


NM_004040
RHOB
RAS HOMOLOG GENE FAMILY, MEMBER B


BC033708
RALGPS1
RAL GEF WITH PH DOMAIN AND SH3 BINDING




MOTIF 1


NM_002491
NDUFB3
NADH DEHYDROGENASE (UBIQUINONE) 1 BETA




SUBCOMPLEX, 3, 12 KDA


BC015944
TIA1
TIA1 CYTOTOXIC GRANULE-ASSOCIATED RNA




BINDING PROTEIN


BC050688
RPSA
RIBOSOMAL PROTEIN SA


NM_002443
MSMB
MICROSEMINOPROTEIN, BETA-


NM_172314
IL25
INTERLEUKIN 17E


NM_019845
RPRM
REPRIMO, TP53 DEPENDENT G2 ARREST MEDIATOR




CANDIDATE


BC013163
DCUN1D1
DCN1, DEFECTIVE IN CULLIN NEDDYLATION 1,




DOMAIN CONTAINING 1 (S. CEREVISIAE)


BC017741
GTDC1
PRO0159 PROTEIN


BC023152
GYG2
GLYCOGENIN 2


NM_005663
WHSC2
WOLF-HIRSCHHORN SYNDROME CANDIDATE 2


NM_000214
JAG1
JAGGED 1 (ALAGILLE SYNDROME)


NM_004403
DFNA5
DEAFNESS, AUTOSOMAL DOMINANT 5


NM_022073
EGLN3
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN FLJ21620


NM_030571
NDFIP1
NEDD4 FAMILY INTERACTING PROTEIN 1


NM_145252
LOC124220
SIMILAR TO COMMON SALIVARY PROTEIN 1


BC000772
SIPA1L3
SIGNAL-INDUCED PROLIFERATION-ASSOCIATED 1




LIKE 3


NM_006579
EBP
EMOPAMIL BINDING PROTEIN (STEROL




ISOMERASE)


BC014441
NSUN4
NOL1/NOP2/SUN DOMAIN FAMILY, MEMBER 4


BC019902
CCDC21
COILED-COIL DOMAIN CONTAINING 21


BC036827
LILRB2
LEUKOCYTE IMMUNOGLOBULIN-LIKE RECEPTOR,




SUBFAMILY B (WITH TM AND ITIM DOMAINS),




MEMBER 2


NM_001680
FXYD2
FXYD DOMAIN CONTAINING ION TRANSPORT




REGULATOR 2


NM_006439
MAB21L2
MAB-21-LIKE 2 (C. ELEGANS)


NM_032786
ZC3H10
ZINC FINGER CCCH-TYPE CONTAINING 10


NM_024613
PLEKHF2
PLECKSTRIN HOMOLOGY DOMAIN CONTAINING,




FAMILY F (WITH FYVE DOMAIN) MEMBER 2


NM_001752
CAT
CATALASE


NM_152471

hypothetical protein MGC17515


NM_152716
PATL1
FLJ36874 PROTEIN


BC004243
BCAT2
BRANCHED CHAIN AMINOTRANSFERASE 2,




MITOCHONDRIAL


BC056246
GALNT3
UDP-N-ACETYL-ALPHA-D-




GALACTOSAMINE: POLYPEPTIDE N-




ACETYLGALACTOSAMINYLTRANSFERASE 3




(GALNAC-T3)


NM_022133
SNX16
SORTING NEXIN 16


NM_025221
KCNIP4
KV CHANNEL INTERACTING PROTEIN 4


NM_025234
WDR61
WD REPEAT DOMAIN 61


BC014649
GAL3ST1
GALACTOSE-3-O-SULFOTRANSFERASE 1


NM_002734
PRKAR1A
PROTEIN KINASE, CAMP-DEPENDENT,




REGULATORY, TYPE I, ALPHA (TISSUE SPECIFIC




EXTINGUISHER 1)


NM_023934
FUNDC2
FUN14 DOMAIN CONTAINING 2


NM_145173
DIRAS1
DIRAS FAMILY, GTP-BINDING RAS-LIKE 1


NM_020142
NDUFA4L2
NADH: UBIQUINONE OXIDOREDUCTASE MLRQ




SUBUNIT HOMOLOG


NM_016485
VTA1
CHROMOSOME 6 OPEN READING FRAME 55


NM_000345
SNCA
SYNUCLEIN, ALPHA (NON A4 COMPONENT OF




AMYLOID PRECURSOR)


BC067447
DAB1
DISABLED HOMOLOG 1 (DROSOPHILA)


NM_001010971
SAMD13
STERILE ALPHA MOTIF DOMAIN CONTAINING 13


BC022043
C7ORF36
CHROMOSOME 7 OPEN READING FRAME 36


BC004233*
TTYH2
TWEETY HOMOLOG 2 (DROSOPHILA)


BC017504*
DEF6
DIFFERENTIALLY EXPRESSED IN FDCP 6 HOMOLOG




(MOUSE)


BC018206*
FAM128B
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN FLJ14346


BC018404*
FGF21
FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR 21


BC020985*
COASY
COENZYME A SYNTHASE


BC031469*
LOC554207
HYPOTHETICAL LOC554207


BC058924*
UBE2M
UBIQUITIN-CONJUGATING ENZYME E2M (UBC12




HOMOLOG, YEAST)


NM_000020*
ACVRL1
ACTIVIN A RECEPTOR TYPE II-LIKE 1


NM_000154*
GALK1
GALACTOKINASE 1


NM_001014796*
DDR2
DISCOIDIN DOMAIN RECEPTOR FAMILY, MEMBER 2


NM_001105*
ACVR1
ACTIVIN A RECEPTOR, TYPE I


NM_001752*
CAT
CATALASE


NM_002227*
JAK1
JANUS KINASE 1 (A PROTEIN TYROSINE KINASE)


NM_002498*
NEK3
NIMA (NEVER IN MITOSIS GENE A)-RELATED




KINASE 3


NM_002964*
S100A8
S100 CALCIUM BINDING PROTEIN A8




(CALGRANULIN A)


NM_003063*
SLN
SARCOLIPIN


NM_004972*
JAK2
JANUS KINASE 2 (A PROTEIN TYROSINE KINASE)


NM_005036*
PPARA
PEROXISOME PROLIFERATIVE ACTIVATED




RECEPTOR, ALPHA


NM_005122*
NR1I3
NUCLEAR RECEPTOR SUBFAMILY 1, GROUP I,




MEMBER 3


NM_005123*
NR1H4
NUCLEAR RECEPTOR SUBFAMILY 1, GROUP H,




MEMBER 4


NM_014583*
LMCD1
LIM AND CYSTEINE-RICH DOMAINS 1


NM_015646*
RAP1B
RAP1B, MEMBER OF RAS ONCOGENE FAMILY


NM_016495*
TBC1D7
TBC1 DOMAIN FAMILY, MEMBER 7


NM_021709*
SIVA1
CD27-BINDING (SIVA) PROTEIN


NM_030572*
C12ORF39
CHROMOSOME 12 OPEN READING FRAME 39


NM_033360*
KRAS
V-HA-RAS HARVEY RAT SARCOMA VIRAL




ONCOGENE HOMOLOG


NM_130807*
MOBKL2A
MOB1, MPS ONE BINDER KINASE ACTIVATOR-LIKE




2A (YEAST)


NM_145173*
DIRAS1
DIRAS FAMILY, GTP-BINDING RAS-LIKE 1


NM_173541*
C10ORF91
CHROMOSOME 10 OPEN READING FRAME 91


BC004233*
NA
NA


BC008624*
NA
NA







ISG15









BC013366*
URP2
UNC-112 RELATED PROTEIN 2


BC017314*
ETS1
V-ETS ERYTHROBLASTOSIS VIRUS E26 ONCOGENE




HOMOLOG 1 (AVIAN)


BC018404*
FGF21
FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR 21


BC022363*
VPS37A
VACUOLAR PROTEIN SORTING 37A (YEAST)


BC024725*
ANKRD50
ANKYRIN REPEAT DOMAIN 50


BC025307*
PRKD2
PROTEIN KINASE D2


BC029112*
SAMSN1
SAM DOMAIN, SH3 DOMAIN AND NUCLEAR




LOCALISATION SIGNALS, 1


BC029480*
LOC554203
HYPOTHETICAL LOC554203


BC035636*
APBB1IP
AMYLOID BETA (A4) PRECURSOR PROTEIN-




BINDING, FAMILY B, MEMBER 1 INTERACTING




PROTEIN


BC038838*
PRR16
MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL PROTEIN DSC54


BC039244*
NFYA
NUCLEAR TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR Y, ALPHA


BC042999*
ASXL2
ADDITIONAL SEX COMBS LIKE 2 (DROSOPHILA)


BC062423*
C7ORF41
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN ELLS1


NM_001571*
IRF3
INTERFERON REGULATORY FACTOR 3


NM_001926*
DEFA6
DEFENSIN, ALPHA 6, PANETH CELL-SPECIFIC


NM_002505*
NFYA
NUCLEAR TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR Y, ALPHA


NM_003141*
TRIM21
TRIPARTITE MOTIF-CONTAINING 21


NM_004304*
ALK
ANAPLASTIC LYMPHOMA KINASE (KI-1)


NM_005214*
CTLA4
CYTOTOXIC T-LYMPHOCYTE-ASSOCIATED




PROTEIN 4


NM_005902*
SMAD3
SMAD, MOTHERS AGAINST DPP HOMOLOG 3




(DROSOPHILA)


NM_006324*
CFDP1
CRANIOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT PROTEIN 1


NM_007242*
DDX19B
DEAD (ASP-GLU-ALA-AS) (SEQ ID NO: 2)




BOX POLYPEPTIDE 19B


NM_012472*
LRRC6
LEUCINE RICH REPEAT CONTAINING 6


NM_015927*
TGFB1I1
TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA 1




INDUCED TRANSCRIPT 1


NM_017724*
LRRFIP2
LEUCINE RICH REPEAT (IN FLII) INTERACTING




PROTEIN 2


NM_017855*
ODAM
APIN PROTEIN


NM_023112*
OTUB2
OTU DOMAIN, UBIQUITIN ALDEHYDE BINDING 2


NM_025241*
UBXD1
UBX DOMAIN CONTAINING 1


NM_053283*
DCD
DERMCIDIN


NM_172160*
KCNAB1
POTASSIUM VOLTAGE-GATED CHANNEL, SHAKER-




RELATED SUBFAMILY, BETA MEMBER 1


NM_175907*
ZADH2
HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN BC010734









The protein targets showing the highest reactivity in a sumol PTM assay were the RANBP2 protein, which was previously identified as a sumol E3 ligase, and TGFII. In the sumo2/3 PTM profile, one of the top reactivities was UbcH9, the only known E2 characterized to date for sumo conjugation. Additionally, among the highest reactivities (top 7) of neddylated proteins were the E2 and E3 enzymes that are known to be involved in the neddylation pathway. The other reactive proteins did not appear to be relevant to the neddylation pathway. Thus, among the top reacting proteins for each of these modifications were the enzymes that are involved in catalysis of the relevant PTM itself. In the case of FAT10, many of the highly reactive proteins were mitotic regulators or cytoskeleton related. To date only one substrate, Mad2, has been described for modification with FAT10, and indeed Mad2 was highly FATtenylated in this assay. FAT10 is known to be highly expressed in certain kinds of cancers, and its overexpression may lead to chromosomal aberrations as well as mitotic arrest. For UFM1 there are no previously known substrates, and therefore all of the identified UFM1 substrates are newly discovered.


For each of the modifying moieties, signals from the CP-arrested and the CP-released extracts were compared. Two microarrays from each condition were examined, and a two-tailed t-test was used to identify differentially modified proteins. To determine significance, a permutation-based p-value calculation was used, and corrected for false discovery rate (FDR) either using Storey's method or using the Hochberg-Benjamini correction. For each modifying moiety tested (i.e. ubiquitin, sumol, sumo2/3, nedd8, FA10, UFM1, ISG15) the proteins showing significant change in their modification state upon release from the mitotic CP were identified. For each PTM, two biological replicates and two different mitotic conditions (CP-arrested and CP-released) were examined. A subset of the microarray proteins showed a marked difference under the two different conditions but were similar in the biological replicates. These were identified as differentially modified proteins. The data were then clustered based on the differentially modified proteins (FIG. 15). Each row in FIG. 15 represents a different protein that was found to be differentially modified under the two different mitotic conditions. The list of differentially modified proteins was compared for each of the modifications (see Table 7), and the results showed that the proteins were differentially targeted by each of the modifying moieties, and the sets of proteins modified by the different modifying moieties were not overlapping more than would be expected by chance. This is shown in a Venn diagram in FIG. 16, and suggests specialized roles for each different modification in regulating a unique set of target proteins.


REFERENCES



  • 1. M. Rape, S. K. Reddy, M. W. Kirschner, Cell 124, 89 (Jan. 13, 2006).

  • 2. N. G. Ayad, S. Rankin, D. Ooi, M. Rape, M. W. Kirschner, Methods Enzymol 399, 404 (2005).

  • 3. T. J. McGarry, M. W. Kirschner, Cell 93, 1043 (Jun. 12, 1998).

  • 4. R. W. King, K. D. Lustig, P. T. Stukenberg, T. J. McGarry, M. W. Kirschner, Science 277, 973 (Aug. 15, 1997).

  • 5. K. D. Lustig et al., Methods Enzymol 283, 83 (1997).

  • 6. F. Kanai et al., Embo J 19, 6778 (Dec. 15, 2000).

  • 7. Y. H. Oh et al., Biosens Bioelectron 22, 1260 (Feb. 15, 2007).

  • 8. R. Gupta et al., Mol Syst Biol 3, 116 (2007).

  • 9. J. Ptacek et al., Nature 438, 679 (Dec. 1, 2005).

  • 10. C. Schnack, K. M. Danzer, B. Hengerer, F. Gillardon, Neuroscience (Feb. 29, 2008).

  • 11. T. Evans, E. T. Rosenthal, J. Youngblom, D. Distel, T. Hunt, Cell 33, 389 (June, 1983).

  • 12. M. Glotzer, A. W. Murray, M. W. Kirschner, Nature 349, 132 (Jan. 10, 1991).

  • 13. R. W. King et al., Cell 81, 279 (Apr. 21, 1995).

  • 14. G. Fang, H. Yu, M. W. Kirschner, Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 354, 1583 (Sep. 29, 1999).

  • 15. R. W. King, R. J. Deshaies, J. M. Peters, M. W. Kirschner, Science 274, 1652 (Dec. 6, 1996).

  • 16. H. Yu, R. W. King, J. M. Peters, M. W. Kirschner, Curr Biol 6, 455 (Apr. 1, 1996).

  • 17. S. K. Reddy, M. Rape, W. A. Margansky, M. W. Kirschner, Nature 446, 921 (Apr. 19, 2007).

  • 18. D. Verdick, S. Handran, and S. Pickett, p. 83-98. In G. Kamberova (ed.), DNA image analysis: nuts and bolts, DNA Press LLC, Salem, Mass., Key considerations for accurate microarray scanning and image analysis. K. G. (ed), Ed., DNA Array Image Analysis: Nuts and Bolts. (DNA Press LLC: Salem, Mass., 2002.), pp. 83-98.

  • 19. J. G. Chafouleas, W. E. Bolton, H. idaka, A. E. Boyd, 3rd, A. R. eans, Cell 28, 41 (January, 1982).

  • 20. J. Roig, A. Mikhailov, C. Belham, J. Avruch, Genes Dev 16, 1640 (Jul. 1, 2002).

  • 21. J. Roig, A. Groen, J. Caldwell, J. Avruch, Mol Biol Cell 16, 4827 (October, 2005).

  • 22. M. J. Kallio, V. A. Beardmore, J. Weinstein, G. J. Gorbsky, J Cell Biol 158, 841 (Sep. 2, 2002).

  • 23. J. W. Raff, K. Jeffers, J. Y. Huang, J Cell Biol 157, 1139 (Jun. 24, 2002).

  • 24. J. Huang, J. W. Raff, Embo J 18, 2184 (Apr. 15, 1999).

  • 25. Y. A. Lam et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97, 9902 (Aug. 29, 2000).

  • 26. K L. Lim, V. L. Dawson, T. M. Dawson, Neurobiol Aging 27, 524 (April, 2006).

  • 27. J. A. Olzmann, L. S. Chin, Autophagy 4, 85 (January-February, 2008).

  • 28. J. M. Tan et al., Hum Mol Genet 17, 431 (Feb. 1, 2008).

  • 29. S. Adhikary et al., Cell 123, 409 (Nov. 4, 2005).

  • 30. C. L. Brooks, W. Gu, Cell Cycle 3, 895 (July, 2004).

  • 31. A. D. Choudhury, H. Xu, R. Baer, J Biol Chem 279, 33909 (Aug. 6, 2004).

  • 32. B. M. Bolstad, R. A. Irizarry, M. Astrand, T. P. Speed, Bioinformatics 19, 185 (Jan. 22, 2003).

  • 33. Adhikary, S., Marinoni, F., Hock, A., Hulleman, E., Popov, N., Beier, R., Bernard, S., Quarto, M., Capra, M., Goettig, S., et al. 2005. The ubiquitin ligase HectH9 regulates transcriptional activation by Myc and is essential for tumor cell proliferation. Cell 123:409-421.

  • 34. Choudhury, A. D., Xu, H., and Baer, R. 2004. Ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of the BRCA1 tumor suppressor is regulated during cell cycle progression. J Biol Chem 279:33909-33918.

  • 35. Mo, Y. Y., Yu, Y., Theodosiou, E., Rachel Ee, P. L., and Beck, W. T. 2005. A role for Ubc9 in tumorigenesis. Oncogene 24:2677-2683.

  • 36. Lam, Y. A., Pickart, C. M., Alban, A., Landon, M., Jamieson, C., Ramage, R., Mayer, R. J., and Layfield, R. 2000. Inhibition of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in Alzheimer's disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:9902-9906.

  • 37. Wang, J. Z., Grundke-Iqbal, I., and Iqbal, K. 1996. Glycosylation of microtubule-associated protein tau: an abnormal posttranslational modification in Alzheimer's disease. Nat Med 2:871-875.

  • 38. Lim, K. L., Dawson, V. L., and Dawson, T. M. 2006. Parkin-mediated lysine 63-linked polyubiquitination: a link to protein inclusions formation in Parkinson's and other conformational diseases? Neurobiol Aging 27:524-529.

  • 39. Olzmann, J. A., and Chin, L. S. 2008. Parkin-mediated K63-linked polyubiquitination: a signal for targeting misfolded proteins to the aggresome-autophagy pathway. Autophagy 4:85-87.

  • 40. Tan, J. M., Wong, E. S., Kirkpatrick, D. S., Pletnikova, O., Ko, H. S., Tay, S. P., Ho, M. W., Troncoso, J., Gygi, S. P., Lee, M. K., et al. 2008. Lysine 63-linked ubiquitination promotes the formation and autophagic clearance of protein inclusions associated with neurodegenerative diseases. Hum Mol Genet 17:431-439.

  • 41. Abel, T., and Zukin, R. S. 2008. Epigenetic targets of HDAC inhibition in neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders. Curr Opin Pharmacol 8:57-64.

  • 42. Mori, F., Nishie, M., Piao, Y. S., Kito, K., Kamitani, T., Takahashi, H., and Wakabayashi, K. 2005. Accumulation of NEDD8 in neuronal and glial inclusions of neurodegenerative disorders. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 31:53-61.

  • 43. Braunstein, I., Miniowitz, S., Moshe, Y., and Hershko, A. 2007. Inhibitory factors associated with anaphase-promoting complex/cylosome in mitotic checkpoint. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:4870-4875.

  • 44. Ciechanover, A., Finley, D., and Varshaysky, A. 1984. Ubiquitin dependence of selective protein degradation demonstrated in the mammalian cell cycle mutant ts85. Cell 37:57-66.

  • 45. Evans, T., Rosenthal, E. T., Youngblom, J., Distel, D., and Hunt, T. 1983. Cyclin: a protein specified by maternal mRNA in sea urchin eggs that is destroyed at each cleavage division. Cell 33:389-396.

  • 46. Fang, G., Yu, H., and Kirschner, M. W. 1999. Control of mitotic transitions by the anaphase-promoting complex. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 354:1583-1590.

  • 47. Glotzer, M., Murray, A. W., and Kirschner, M. W. 1991. Cyclin is degraded by the ubiquitin pathway. Nature 349:132-138.

  • 48. King, R. W., Deshaies, R. J., Peters, J. M., and Kirschner, M. W. 1996. How proteolysis drives the cell cycle. Science 274:1652-1659.

  • 49. Reddy, S. K., Rape, M., Margansky, W. A., and Kirschner, M. W. 2007. Ubiquitination by the anaphase-promoting complex drives spindle checkpoint inactivation. Nature 446:921-925.

  • 50. Dery, U., and Masson, J. Y. 2007. Twists and turns in the function of DNA damage signaling and repair proteins by PTMs. DNA Repair (Amst) 6:561-577.

  • 51. Sadri-Vakili, G., and Cha, J. H. 2006. Mechanisms of disease: Histone modifications in Huntington's disease. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2:330-338.

  • 52. Steffan, J. S., Agrawal, N., Pallos, J., Rockabrand, E., Trotman, L. C., Slepko, N., Illes, K., Lukacsovich, T., Zhu, Y. Z., Cattaneo, E., et al. 2004. SUMO modification of Huntingtin and Huntington's disease pathology. Science 304:100-104.

  • 53. Perkins, N. D. 2006. PTMs regulating the activity and function of the nuclear factor kappa B pathway. Oncogene 25:6717-6730.

  • 54. Takahashi-Fujigasaki, J., Arai, K., Funata, N., and Fujigasaki, H. 2006. SUMOylation substrates in neuronal intranuclear inclusion disease. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 32:92-100.

  • 55. Li, M., Guo, D., Isales, C. M., Eizirik, D. L., Atkinson, M., She, J. X., and Wang, C. Y. 2005. SUMO wrestling with type 1 diabetes. J Mol Med 83:504-513.

  • 56. Ueda, H., Goto, J., Hashida, H., Lin, X., Oyanagi, K., Kawano, H., Zoghbi, H. Y., Kanazawa, I., and Okazawa, H. 2002. Enhanced SUMOylation in polyglutamine diseases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 293:307-313.

  • 57. Sufan, R. I., Jewett, M. A., and Ohh, M. 2004. The role of von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein and hypoxia in renal clear cell carcinoma. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 287:F1-6.

  • 58. Wada, H., Yeh, E. T., and Kamitani, T. 1999. The von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene product promotes, but is not essential for, NEDD8 conjugation to cullin-2. J Biol Chem 274:36025-36029.

  • 59. Shishido, T., Woo, C. H., Ding, B., McClain, C., Molina, C. A., Yan, C., Yang, J., and Abe, J. 2008. Effects of MEK5/ERK5 association on small ubiquitin-related modification of ERK5: implications for diabetic ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Circ Res 102:1416-1425.

  • 60. Ciechanover, A., and Brundin, P. 2003. The ubiquitin proteasome system in neurodegenerative diseases: sometimes the chicken, sometimes the egg. Neuron 40:427-446.

  • 61. Kim, J. K., Mastronardi, F. G., Wood, D. D., Lubman, D. M., Zand, R., and Moscarello, M. A. 2003. Multiple sclerosis: an important role for PTMs of myelin basic protein in pathogenesis. Mol Cell Proteomics 2:453-462.

  • 62. Matei, L. 1997. Plasma proteins glycosylation and its alteration in disease. Rom J Intern Med 35:3-11.

  • 63. Shinbo, Y., Niki, T., Taira, T., Ooe, H., Takahashi-Niki, K., Maita, C., Seino, C., Iguchi-Ariga, S. M., and Ariga, H. 2006. Proper SUMO-1 conjugation is essential to DJ-1 to exert its full activities. Cell Death Differ 13:96-108.

  • 64. Zhong, N., Kim, C. Y., Rizzu, P., Geula, C., Porter, D. R., Pothos, E. N., Squitieri, F., Heutink, P., and Xu, J. 2006. DJ-1 transcriptionally up-regulates the human tyrosine hydroxylase by inhibiting the sumoylation of pyrimidine tract-binding protein-associated splicing factor. J Biol Chem 281:20940-20948.

  • 65. Brooks, C. L., and Gu, W. 2003. Ubiquitination, phosphorylation and acetylation: the molecular basis for p53 regulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol 15:164-171.

  • 66. Casalino, L., De Cesare, D., and Verde, P. 2003. Accumulation of Fra-1 in ras-transformed cells depends on both transcriptional autoregulation and MEK-dependent posttranslational stabilization. Mol Cell Biol 23:4401-4415.

  • 67. Fujioka, S., Sclabas, G. M., Schmidt, C., Niu, J., Frederick, W. A., Dong, Q. G., Abbruzzese, J. L., Evans, D. B., Baker, C., and Chiao, P. J. 2003. Inhibition of constitutive NF-kappa B activity by I kappa B alpha M suppresses tumorigenesis. Oncogene 22:1365-1370.

  • 68. Lee, P. S., Chang, C., Liu, D., and Derynck, R. 2003. Sumoylation of Smad4, the common Smad mediator of transforming growth factor-beta family signaling. J Biol Chem 278:27853-27863.

  • 69. Orii, A., Masutani, H., Nikaido, T., Zhai, Y. L., Kato, K., Kariya, M., Konishi, I., Yodoi, J., and Fujii, S. 2002. Altered PTM of redox factor 1 protein in human uterine smooth muscle tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:3754-3759.

  • 70. Turenne, G. A., and Price, B. D. 2001. Glycogen synthase kinase3 beta phosphorylates serine 33 of p53 and activates p53's transcriptional activity. BMC Cell Biol 2:12.

  • 71. O'Connor, T. J., Neufeld, E., Bechberger, J., and Fujita, D. J. 1992. pp60c-src in human melanocytes and melanoma cells exhibits elevated specific activity and reduced tyrosine 530 phosphorylation compared to human fibroblast pp60c-src. Cell Growth Differ 3:435-442.

  • 72. Reynolds, F. H., Jr., Van de Ven, W. J., and Stephenson, J. R. 1980. Abelson murine leukemia virus transformation-defective mutants with impaired P120-associated protein kinase activity. J Virol 36:374-386.

  • 73. Haraguchi, T., Fisher, S., Olofsson, S., Endo, T., Groth, D., Tarentino, A., Borchelt, D. R., Teplow, D., Hood, L., Burlingame, A., et al. 1989. Asparagine-linked glycosylation of the scrapie and cellular prion proteins. Arch Biochem Biophys 274:1-13.

  • 74. Kalb, R., Neveling, K., Nanda, I., Schindler, D., and Hoehn, H. 2006. Fanconi anemia: causes and consequences of genetic instability. Genome Dyn 1:218-242.

  • 75. Meetei, A. R., de Winter, J. P., Medhurst, A. L., Wallisch, M., Waisfisz, Q., van de Vrugt, H. J., Oostra, A. B., Yan, Z., Ling, C., Bishop, C. E., et al. 2003. A novel ubiquitin ligase is deficient in Fanconi anemia. Nat Genet 35:165-170.

  • 76. Grillari, J., Katinger, H., and Voglauer, R. 2006. Aging and the ubiquitinome: traditional and non-traditional functions of ubiquitin in aging cells and tissues. Exp Gerontol 41:1067-1079.

  • 77. Li, F., Zhang, L., Craddock, J., Bruce-Keller, A. J., Dasuri, K., Nguyen, A., and Keller, J. N. 2008. Aging and dietary restriction effects on ubiquitination, sumoylation, and the proteasome in the heart. Mech Ageing Dev 129:515-521.

  • 78. Li, W., Gao, B., Lee, S. M., Bennett, K., and Fang, D. 2007. RLE-1, an E3 ubiquitin ligase, regulates C. elegans aging by catalyzing DAF-16 polyubiquitination. Dev Cell 12:235-246.

  • 79. Zhang, L., Li, F., Dimayuga, E., Craddock, J., and Keller, J. N. 2007. Effects of aging and dietary restriction on ubiquitination, sumoylation, and the proteasome in the spleen. FEBS Lett 581:5543-5547.

  • 80. Gaczynska, M., Osmulski, P. A., and Ward, W. F. 2001. Caretaker or undertaker? The role of the proteasome in aging. Mech Ageing Dev 122:235-254.

  • 81. Yao, D., Gu, Z., Nakamura, T., Shi, Z. Q., Ma, Y., Gaston, B., Palmer, L. A., Rockenstein, E. M., Zhang, Z., Masliah, E., et al. 2004. Nitrosative stress linked to sporadic Parkinson's disease: S-nitrosylation of parkin regulates its E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:10810-10814.

  • 82. Blough, H. A., Pauwels, R., De Clercq, E., Cogniaux, J., Sprecher-Goldberger, S., and Thiry, L. 1986. Glycosylation inhibitors block the expression of LAV/HTLV-III (HIV) glycoproteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 141:33-38.

  • 83. Conrad, S. F., Byeon, I. J., DiGeorge, A. M., Lairmore, M. D., Tsai, M. D., and Kaumaya, P. T. 1995. Immunogenicity and conformational properties of an N-linked glycosylated peptide epitope of human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-I). Biomed Pept Proteins Nucleic Acids 1:83-92.

  • 84. Lee, S., Shin, Y., Marler, J., and Levin, M. C. 2008. Post-translational glycosylation of target proteins implicate molecular mimicry in the pathogenesis of HTLV-1 associated neurological disease. J Neuroimmunol.

  • 85. Schneider, J., Bayer, H., Bienzle, U., and Hunsmann, G. 1985. A glycopolypeptide (gp 100) is the main antigen detected by HTLV-III antisera. Med Microbiol Immunol 174:35-42.

  • 86. Harauz, G., and Musse, A. A. 2007. A tale of two citrullines—structural and functional aspects of myelin basic protein deimination in health and disease. Neurochem Res 32:137-158.

  • 87. Akimoto, Y., Hart, G. W., Hirano, H., and Kawakami, H. 2005. O-GlcNAc modification of nucleocytoplasmic proteins and diabetes. Med Mol Morphol 38:84-91.

  • 88. Dias, W. B., and Hart, G. W. 2007. O-GlcNAc modification in diabetes and Alzheimer's disease. Mol Biosyst 3:766-772.

  • 89. Jones, S. P. 2005. A bittersweet modification: O-GlcNAc and cardiac dysfunction. Circ Res 96:925-926.

  • 90. Kudlow, J. E. 2006. PTM by O-GlcNAc: another way to change protein function. J Cell Biochem 98:1062-1075.

  • 91. Doyle, H. A., and Mamula, M. J. 2002. Posttranslational protein modifications: new flavors in the menu of autoantigens. Curr Opin Rheumatol 14:244-249.

  • 92. Doyle, H. A., and Mamula, M. J. 2005. Posttranslational modifications of self-antigens. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1050:1-9.

  • 93. van Boekel, M. A., and van Venrooij, W. J. 2003. Modifications of arginines and their role in autoimmunity. Autoimmun Rev 2:57-62.

  • 94. Zhou, Z., and Menard, H. A. 2002. Autoantigenic posttranslational modifications of proteins: does it apply to rheumatoid arthritis? Curr Opin Rheumatol 14:250-253.



While the present invention has been described in conjunction with a preferred embodiment, one of ordinary skill, after reading the foregoing specification, will be able to effect various changes, substitutions of equivalents, and other alterations to the compositions and methods set forth herein. It is therefore intended that the protection granted by Letters Patent hereon be limited only by the definitions contained in the appended claims and equivalents thereof.

Claims
  • 1. A method of identifying an altered post-translational modification (PTM) state of a protein in a patient, the method comprising: contacting a functional extract of a sample from the patient with an array comprising an ordered plurality of proteins that are representative of proteins in the patient;establishing a specific PTM reaction on the array, whereby the reaction results in a PTM of one or more proteins in the array through the activity of one or more enzymes present in the extract;determining a level of the PTM of said one or more proteins by detecting a signal from the array; andcomparing the level of PTM of said one or more proteins in the array with the level of PTM of the corresponding one or more proteins in a control sample to identify an altered PTM state of a protein in the patient.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the PTM is selected from the group consisting of ubiquitination, phosphorylation, sumoylation, and neddylation.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the patient sample is obtained from a source selected from the group consisting of plasma, cerebrospinal fluid, saliva, urine, and a biopsy specimen comprising cells or tissues of the patient.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the source is a biopsy specimen which is a tumor.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the patient is suspected of having cancer, a neurodegenerative disease, a metabolic disease, an immune disease, or an infectious disease.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the patient is suspected of having a neurodegenerative disease and the neurodegenerative disease is Alzheimer's disease or Huntington's disease.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 wherein, prior to or during the step of establishing a specific PTM reaction, the extract is supplemented with a reagent, a substrate, an enzyme, an enzyme inhibitor, ATP, creatine phosphate, a drug, an antibody, or a combination thereof.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the extract is supplemented with a substrate of an enzyme that carries out said specific PTM reaction.
  • 9. The method of claim 7, wherein the extract is supplemented with an inhibitor of an enzyme that reverses said specific PTM reaction.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the functional extract is prepared by a method comprising hypotonic lysis or freeze-thawing of cells in the patient sample.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the extract is prepared by adding lysis buffer in an amount no more than 0.8 times the volume of cells.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the functional extract is essentially detergent-free.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the signal is a light signal.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, wherein, in the step of determining, the position and intensity of the light signal are measured.
  • 15. The method of claim 1 further comprising, following the step of establishing a specific PTM reaction, washing the reaction components off the array and incubating the array with a first antibody that specifically binds proteins in the array bearing said specific PTM.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, further comprising washing unbound first antibody off the array and contacting the array with a second antibody that specifically binds the first antibody, wherein the second antibody is attached to a label moiety.
  • 17. The method of claim 1 further comprising, prior to the step of comparing, performing the steps of establishing and determining using a control sample instead of the patient sample and a second array comprising said ordered plurality of proteins, wherein the results obtained from the step of determining using the control sample are compared with the results obtained from the step of determining using the patient sample in the step of comparing.
  • 18. The method of claim 1 further comprising, prior to the step of contacting, preparing the functional extract.
  • 19. The method of claim 1, wherein two or more specific PTM reactions are established simultaneously.
  • 20. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of establishing a specific PTM reaction includes adding a biochemical energy source to the extract.
  • 21. The method of claim 20, wherein the biochemical energy source is a mixture of ATP and creatine phosphate.
  • 22. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of establishing a specific PTM reaction includes adding a protein modifying moiety to the extract.
  • 23. The method of claim 22, wherein the modifying moiety is a ubiquitin-like modifying moiety selected from the group consisting of ISG15, UCRP, FUB1, NEDD8, FAT10, SUMO-1, SUMO-2, SUMO-3, Apg8, Apg12, Urml, UBL5, and Ufm1.
  • 24. A method of identifying a protein PTM enzyme activity in a patient, the method comprising: contacting a functional extract of a sample from the patient with an array comprising an ordered plurality of proteins that are representative of proteins in the patient;establishing a specific PTM reaction on the array, whereby the reaction results in a PTM of one or more proteins in the array through said enzyme activity present in the extract;determining a level of the PTM of said protein by detecting a signal from the array; andcomparing the results of the step of determining with results obtained for a control reaction lacking said functional extract, wherein a PTM enzyme activity in the patient is identified when the level of the PTM of said protein is higher than the level of the PTM for said protein in the control.
  • 25. The method of claim 24, wherein the PTM is selected from the group consisting of ubiquitination, phosphorylation, sumoylation, and neddylation.
  • 26. The method of claim 24, wherein the patient sample is obtained from a source selected from the group consisting of plasma, cerebrospinal fluid, saliva, urine, and a biopsy specimen comprising cells or tissues of the patient.
  • 27. The method of claim 26, wherein the source is a tumor.
  • 28. The method of claim 24, wherein the patient is suspected of having cancer, a neurodegenerative disease, a metabolic disease, an immune disease, or an infectious disease.
  • 29. The method of claim 28, wherein the patient is suspected of having a neurodegenerative disease and the neurodegenerative disease is Alzheimer's disease or Huntington's disease.
  • 30. The method of claim 24, wherein prior to or during the step of contacting, the extract is mixed with a reagent, a substrate, an enzyme, an enzyme inhibitor, ATP, creatine phosphate, a drug, an antibody, or a combination thereof.
  • 31. The method of claim 30, wherein the extract is supplemented with a substrate for said PTM enzyme.
  • 32. The method of claim 30, wherein the extract is supplemented with an inhibitor of said PTM enzyme.
  • 33. The method of claim 24, wherein the functional extract is prepared by a method comprising hypotonic lysis or freeze-thawing of cells in the patient sample.
  • 34. The method of claim 33, wherein the extract is prepared by adding lysis buffer in an amount no more than 0.8 times the volume of cells.
  • 35. The method of claim 24, wherein the functional extract is essentially detergent-free.
  • 36. The method of claim 24, wherein the signal is a light signal.
  • 37. The method of claim 36 wherein, in the step of determining, the position and intensity of the light signal are measured.
  • 38. The method of claim 24 further comprising, following the step of establishing a specific PTM reaction, washing the reaction components off the array and incubating the array with a first antibody that specifically binds proteins in the array bearing said specific PTM.
  • 39. The method of claim 38, further comprising washing unbound first antibody off the micrroarray and contacting the array with a second antibody that specifically binds the first antibody, wherein the second antibody is attached to a label moiety.
  • 40. The method of claim 24 further comprising, prior to the step of contacting, preparing the functional extract.
  • 41. The method of claim 24, wherein two or more specific PTM reactions are established simultaneously.
  • 42. The method of claim 24, wherein the step of establishing a specific PTM reaction includes adding a biochemical energy source to the extract.
  • 43. The method of claim 42, wherein the biochemical energy source is a mixture of ATP and creatine phosphate.
  • 44. The method of claim 24, wherein the step of establishing a specific PTM reaction includes adding a protein modifying moiety to the extract.
  • 45. The method of claim 44, wherein the modifying moiety is a ubiquitin-like modifying moiety selected from the group consisting of ISG15, UCRP, FUB1, NEDD8, FAT10, SUMO-1, SUMO-2, SUMO-3, Apg8, Apg12, Urml, UBL5, and Ufm1.
  • 46. A method of diagnosing a disease or medical condition in a patient, the method comprising: contacting a functional extract of a sample from the patient with an array comprising an ordered plurality of proteins that are representative of proteins in the patient;establishing a specific PTM reaction on the array, whereby the reaction results in a PTM of one or more proteins in the array through the activity of one or more enzymes present in the extract;identifying one or more post-translationally modified proteins in the array by detecting a signal from the array to yield a PTM state data set for the patient sample; andcomparing the PTM state data set with a standard data set comprising PTM state data that are diagnostic for the disease or medical condition, so as to diagnose the disease or medical condition in the patient.
  • 47. The method of claim 46, wherein the signal generated on the array indicates a PTM state selected from the group consisting of ubiquitination, phosphorylation, sumoylation, and neddylation.
  • 48. The method of claim 46, wherein the patient sample is obtained from a source selected from the group consisting of plasma, cerebrospinal fluid, saliva, urine, and a biopsy specimen comprising cells or tissues of the patient.
  • 49. The method of claim 48, wherein the source is a tumor.
  • 50. The method of claim 46, wherein the patient is suspected of having cancer, a neurodegenerative disease, a metabolic disease, an immune disease, or an infectious disease.
  • 51. The method of claim 48, wherein the patient is suspected of having a neurodegenerative disease and the neurodegenerative disease is Alzheimer's disease or Huntington's disease.
  • 52. The method of claim 46 further comprising, following the step of contacting, washing the reaction components off the array and incubating the array with a first antibody that specifically binds proteins in the array bearing said specific PTM.
  • 53. The method of claim 52, further comprising washing unbound first antibody off the micrroarray and contacting the array with a second antibody that specifically binds the first antibody, wherein the second antibody is attached to a label moiety.
  • 54. The method of claim 46 further comprising, prior to the step of contacting, preparing the functional extract.
  • 55. The method of claim 46, wherein two or more specific PTM reactions are established simultaneously.
  • 56. The method of claim 46, wherein the step of establishing a specific PTM reaction includes adding a biochemical energy source to the extract.
  • 57. The method of claim 56, wherein the biochemical energy source is a mixture of ATP and creatine phosphate.
  • 58. The method of claim 46, wherein the step of establishing a specific PTM reaction includes adding a protein modifying moiety to the extract.
  • 59. The method of claim 58, wherein the modifying moiety is a ubiquitin-like modifying moiety selected from the group consisting of ISG15, UCRP, FUB1, NEDD8, FAT10, SUMO-1, SUMO-2, SUMO-3, Apg8, Apg12, Urm1, UBL5, and Ufm1.
  • 60. A kit for the diagnosis of a disease or medical condition or the detection of a biological state by the analysis of a PTM state of a protein in a patient sample, the kit comprising: a standard comprising one or more functional extracts capable of producing a known pattern of protein PTM states on a protein microarray, wherein the pattern is diagnostic for the disease, medical condition, or biological state; andinstructions for carrying out the method of any one of claims 1, 24, and 46.
  • 61. The kit of claim 60, further comprising a reagent selected from the group consisting of a substrate, an enzyme, an enzyme inhibitor, a drug, an antibody, ATP, creatine phosphate, and a protein modifying moiety.
  • 63. The kit of claim 60, further comprising a protein microarray.
  • 64. A method of identifying a set of biomarkers for a disease, medical condition, or biological state, comprising: comparing a protein PTM profile from one or more patients having the disease, medical condition, or biological state with a protein PTM profile from one or more control subjects who do not have the disease, medical condition, or biological state, wherein the profiles are obtained by analyzing functional extracts from the patients and control subjects with a microarray containing an ordered plurality of proteins according to the method of any one of claims 1, 24, and 46; anddetermining one or more differences in a PTM state of one or more proteins between the patient and control profiles, wherein said one or more differences are identified as a set of biomarkers for the disease, medical condition, or biological state.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 14/796,408 filed Jul. 10, 2015, which is a continuation application under 35 U.S.C. § 120 of U.S. Ser. No. 12/696,866 filed on Jan. 29, 2010, now Abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part application under 35 U.S.C. § 120 of an International Application PCT/US09/005670, filed Oct. 19, 2009, which claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/196,461, filed Oct. 17, 2008, the contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.

GOVERNMENT SUPPORT

This invention was made with government support under grant No. GM039023 awarded by The National Institutes of Health. The government has certain rights in the invention.

Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61196461 Oct 2008 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 14796408 Jul 2015 US
Child 17722956 US
Parent 12696866 Jan 2010 US
Child 14796408 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent PCT/US09/05670 Oct 2009 US
Child 12696866 US