None.
1) Field of the Invention
The present invention is a device and supporting assembly for measuring electrical properties over a range of frequencies for a dielectric material in which surface contours of the material are concave or convex.
2) Description of the Prior Art
The nondestructive measurement of insulating materials includes using an open-ended coaxial probe. The coaxial probe is unique among techniques for measuring the dielectric properties of materials. Because the open-ended coaxial probe uses a non-invasive method that only requires contact with a material sample; the probe can characterize properties over a broad range of frequencies.
In Rivera (U.S. Pat. No. 7,495,454), a coaxial probe comprises two components. One component is a section of open coaxial line attached to a conducting flange. When placed firmly against the dielectric material of an insulator; the probe determines a relative permittivity as a function of frequency from measurements that includes a complex reflection coefficient.
The open-ended coaxial probe relies on a testing surface in which the surface is relatively flat and smooth. When the probe is placed on a surface which is not flat; errors result because of air gaps between the aperture surface and the sample. To accurately account for the presence of air gaps, computer modeling methods are required to fully represent the electromagnetic fields within the material and in the air gap region.
Examples exist for measuring the dielectric properties of a curved dielectric surface. In a prior art device, a center conductor of a probe extends to contact the material and minimize the air gap. A finite-element method is used; thereby, requiring the probe and dielectric surface to be accurately modeled. This is disadvantageous because coaxial probes are non-standard devices which could have any size; thereby, requiring a time-consuming effort for modeling varying sizes and shapes.
As such, a need exists for a probe which can contact varying surfaces such as a convex or concave dielectric surface without air gaps.
It is therefore a primary object and general purpose of the present invention to provide a probe and a calibration saddle for the probe to contact varying surfaces of a material including concave or convex dielectric surfaces in order to provide non-destructive measurement of the complex relative dielectric permittivity of the material.
To attain the present invention, a measurement probe and a calibration saddle is disclosed for the non-destructive measurement of complex relative dielectric permittivity of a dielectric material in which the material can have varying shapes.
The probe generally comprises a center electrode, two side electrodes and a mounting harness. The mounting harness serves as a central support with the side electrodes and a feed point connector attached to the harness. The center electrode is soldered to the feed point connector. Apertures in the mounting harness allow attachment of the probe to a mechanically adjustable arm in order to guide the probe onto a dielectric sample.
A bulbous tip of the center electrode is used to contact a dielectric material under test. The bulbous tip includes a surface area for improved measurement sensitivity and a smooth contour to permit rotation on the dielectric material without marring the material. The probe can rest perpendicularly on a dielectric material as well as operate in a tilted position without a loss of measurement accuracy.
The calibration saddle ensures that measurements of the reflection coefficient using the probe, are conducted near the bulbous tip. When the probe inserted into the saddle; the center electrode and the side electrodes short together with a clear indication on a vector network analyzer to which the probe is attached. By adjusting an electrical delay on the analyzer, a reference plane shifts from the end of a coaxial transmission line connected to the feed point connector to the bulbous tip.
The voltage wave generated by a vector network analyzer is guided between the electrodes, toward the bulbous tip and into the dielectric material. Gap spacing between the center electrode and the side electrodes determines the depth of the electric field infringing into the dielectric material within the saddle. The material under test reflects the incoming voltage wave back to the network analyzer with the ratio of the reflected and forward voltages forming a reflection coefficient. The dielectric properties of the material are calculated using the reflection coefficient data.
The effective permittivity detected by the probe depends on the radius of the probe tip, the radius of the insulator material and the true permittivity of the material. When the bulbous tip rests on a curved dielectric; the electric field of the probe retains the same shape with a dielectric material regardless whether the material is convex or concave.
The probe can be used in the manufacture and quality control of antenna radomes of circular and semi-circular shape. The probe can also be used to measure the moisture content of building materials such as lumber and cast concrete as well as measuring the dielectric properties of soil and rocks, biological materials or agricultural products.
A more complete understanding of the invention and many of the attendant advantages thereto will be readily appreciated as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numerals and symbols designate identical or corresponding parts throughout the several views and wherein:
The invention is a probe 10 for non-destructive measurement of complex relative dielectric permittivity εm of an material in which the material can have varying shapes. The complex relative permittivity is determined by Equation (1) as:
εm=εm′−jεm″ (1)
where εm′ is the dielectric constant and εm″ is the loss factor and j=√{square root over (−1)}.
A loss tangent tan δ is defined by Equation (2) as
where the dielectric permittivity is determined with a complex reflection coefficient.
In
The side electrodes 14 and the mounting harness 16 are preferably made from stainless steel for corrosion resistance but can be made from other non-ferrous materials. A dielectric cover plate 24 is preferably made from Delrin but can be made from other high-strength polymeric composites such as flame-retardant electrical grade fiberglass.
Apertures 26 or holes in the mounting harness 16 allow attachment to a mechanically adjustable arm (not shown) to guide the probe 10 onto a dielectric sample. This feature frees an operator from having to press the probe 10 firmly against the sample for a sustained period of time; thereby, reducing fatigue and attendant errors in measurement.
A bulbous tip 28 of the center electrode 12 is used to contact a dielectric material 200 under test. The bulbous tip 28 includes a large surface area for improved measurement sensitivity and a smooth contour to permit rotation on the dielectric material without marring the finish of the material.
As shown in
Ideally, the probe 10 is positioned perpendicularly over the dielectric material 200 but there may be circumstances when the probe cannot be positioned in this manner. In these circumstances, the probe 10 can be tilted to an angle (symbol: φ) over the surface of the dielectric material 200 and can still yield reliable results.
In
As shown in the figures, the probe 10 has multiple parts. The shapes of the various parts provide a unified device that can withstand repeated handling. Important characteristics of the probe 10 are the gap spacing between the center electrode 12, the side electrodes 14 and the radius of the bulbous tip 28. The metal parts of the probe 10 can be fabricated with corrosion resistant metal such as stainless steel, naval brass or phosphor bronze.
The gap spacing between the center electrode 12 and the side electrodes 14 determines the depth of the electric field infringing into the dielectric material 200. The radius of the bulbous tip 28 increases the sensitivity of the probe 10 when measuring the permittivity of materials having air voids.
The physical size of the probe 10 is small compared to the smallest operating wavelength. This permits a simple equivalent circuit representation. The operating wavelength (λ) is defined by Equation (3)
where υo is the speed of light and f is the operating frequency.
The probe 10, as illustrated in
In the circuit of
Y(ω)=G+jωCo (4)
where w is the angular frequency (radians per second, rad/s), being proportional to the operating frequency f by Equation (5)
ω=2πf. (5)
The significance of the electrical quantities describing the probe 10 are that the characteristic impedance Zo is the resistance experienced by a propagating electromagnetic wave as the wave travels from the feed point connector 18 to the bulbous tip 28. The electrical quantities include: a capacitance Co representing a stored electric field energy at the bulbous tip 28; a conductance G representing energy loss from the bulbous tip in the form of radiation; and a phase constant β describing how a sinusoidal wave changes in amplitude as the wave travels between two points.
The phase constant β of the probe 10 (units: radians per meter, rad/m) is calculated by Equation (6)
β≈2π√{square root over (εs*)}/λ (6)
where λ is previously defined and εs* is an effective (or apparent) value of the dielectric constant of the insulating support that holds the conducting electrodes together (εs*≈1.89). The product (βH) of the phase constant β and the probe height H is the phase angle (units: radians) and describes a fraction of a full cycle of an electromagnetic wave arriving at the probe 10.
The value of Co and Zo have been measured to 0.30 picofarads (pF) and 43.7 ohms, respectively. Since the electrode spacing (s) is electrically small (the ratio s/λ<<1), the conductance G depends on the height of the probe (H) and the operating wavelength (λ) as expressed by Equation (7)
where the constant (m) and exponent (n) are experimentally determined.
In the operational frequency range, the height-to-wavelength ratio (H/λ) of the probe 10 is very small compared to the product ωCo (known as the susceptance, symbol: B, units: Siemens, S) or by Equation (8)
G<<ωCo. (8)
The critical quantity is the capacitance Co of the bulbous tip 28 which should be as large as practicable as the capacitance depends on the surface area of the bulbous tip.
When the bulbous tip 28 contacts the dielectric material 200, the value of capacitance Co of the tip proportionally with the permittivity εm, of the material forms a modified admittance Y*(ω) by Equation (9)
Y*(ω)≈jωεmeCo (9)
where εme is an apparent value of the permittivity. This apparent permittivity is smaller than the true value (εm) because of a radius of curvature of the dielectric material 200.
A voltage wave traveling down an equivalent transmission line encounters this modified admittance and reflects a wave back whose strength is proportional to the modified admittance, from which the permittivity of the dielectric material 200 is inferred.
In the operation of the probe 10, a voltage wave generated by a vector network analyzer (not shown) is guided between the electrodes 14 and travels toward the bulbous tip 28 and into the dielectric material 200. The dielectric material 200 reflects this incoming voltage wave back to the network analyzer with an amplitude and phase that is unique to that material. The ratio of the reflected and forward voltages forms the reflection coefficient (symbol: Γ). The dielectric properties of the dielectric material 200 are inferred from reflection coefficient data.
The reflection coefficient is a complex quantity and may be written by Equation (10)
Γ=Γ′−jΓ″ (10)
but is commonly represented by the complex exponential quantity of Equation (11)
Γ=Me−jθ (11)
where M is the magnitude, defined in Equation (12) as
M=√{square root over ((Γ′)2+(Γ″)2)} (12)
and θ is the phase angle defined in Equation (13) as
The probe 10 demonstrates that for low loss materials (when tan δ≤0.05), the reflection coefficient phase angle θ changes more than the magnitude M. Lossy materials (tan δ>0.05) undergo marked changes in both M and θ.
Attendant with the voltage wave propagating between the electrodes 14; the energized probe 10 will also have an electric current flowing over the surface of the probe. The flow paths taken by the current with amplitude changes over the surface of the probe 10; generate an electromagnetic emission that is characteristic of numerous vector electric and magnetic field components.
With the probe 10 energized, small electric and magnetic field sensors (in the form of thin-wire dipoles and loop antennas), pass over the probe surface 200 at a close range to determine the vector character of emitted fields. Close range is defined as the radial distance (symbol: ρ) between the probe 10 and the field sensors, with the distance being very small compared to the operating wavelength (λ) as shown in Equation (14)
ρ/λ<<1. (14)
When the probe 10 rests on a material; the emitted electric field is divided over a portion in the air space above the material and a portion in the dielectric material 200. The magnetic field emitted by the probe 10 can propagate without attenuation through the dielectric material 200.
Experiments performed with the probe 10 indicate that the depth of electric field penetration (de) into a dielectric material 200 is directly proportional to the electrode spacing (s) and is expressed in Equation (15) as
de≈4s. (15)
The probe 10 in
For t/s≥4, a phase change is within 95% of the terminal phase value obtained with an infinitely thick dielectric. In practice, the dielectric material 200 does not need to be excessively thick in order to obtain an accurate determination of permittivity.
When the field penetration depth is such that the dielectric material 200 appears as if infinitely thick (that is, when de≈4s); the field occupies an irregularly-shaped volume Vs that may be represented as geometric proportions of the probe 10, expressed in Equation (16) as
Vs≈(k1s+k2W1+k3W2)as (16)
where k1, k2 and k3 are frequency and material dependent constants. W1 and W2 are the widths of the center electrode 12 and the side electrodes 14 with a and s respectively being a radius of the bulbous tip 28 and electrode spacing. The probe 10 can detect anomalous defects in dielectrics over a region having the sensing volume Vs.
The determination of the true (or bulk) permittivity εm of a curved insulator is complicated by the fact that the electric field(s) emitted by the probe 10 is (are) unequally split between the air and material regions. Also, the non-symmetrical geometric shape of the probe 10 generates a complicated electromagnetic field emission characteristic which does not permit a simple analytic implementation.
An infinite series formula is derived by the following observations: in which in the air region, the electric lines are roughly parallel to the dielectric boundary; in the immediate vicinity of the air-dielectric boundary, part of the electric field lines are parallel and parts are perpendicular; and in the dielectric, the field lines are roughly perpendicular.
As the radius of the dielectric material 200 decreases relative to the radius of the bulbous tip 28; the field intensity in the air region increases and the probe 10 detects an effective permittivity with a value between the value obtained for air (εm=1) and the bulk permittivity of the material. As such, the effective permittivity εme detected by the probe 10 depends on: the radius (symbol: a) of the bulbous tip 28; the radius (symbol: b) of the dielectric material 200; and the true (εm) permittivity of the material.
Since the dimensions of the probe 10 and the dielectric material 200 are assumed to be small compared to the smallest operating wavelength, frequency-dependent effects on the effective permittivity εme are assumed to be due to innate changes in true permittivity εm with frequency. Examples include: when b/a→∞ (a flat surface), εme=εm; when b/a→0 (a vanishing cylinder), εme=1; when εm=1 and b/a is arbitrary, εme=1; and the rate-of-decrease in εme as b/a→0 is dependent on εm.
Observations indicate that a formula for εme should have at least two terms. A first term represents the absence of a dielectric at the bulbous tip 28 (that is, εme=1 when εm=1) and a second term that accounts for the presence of a dielectric material 200 that curves away or toward the tip. The previous considerations permit deduction of the formula in the form of an infinite series, as represented in Equation (17):
whereas in Equation (18):
F is a function of εm,a,b having a mathematical form as:
and cij are unknown coefficients.
The infinite series formula for εme describes a spatial orientation of the electric field lines emitted by the probe 10 when in contact with a curved dielectric material. It is assumed that the probe 10 can be distorted such that the electric field emitted into the dielectric sample travels in a straight line between two points, in a manner similar to a parallel-plate capacitor. The electric field lines in the parallel-plate capacitor would span a gap.
When the bulbous tip 28 rests on a curved dielectric; the electric field of the probe 10 retains the same shape (with curved lines) with a dielectric material 200 regardless whether the material is convex or concave. The infinite series formula expresses an electromagnetic field equivalence between the probe 10 resting on a curved dielectric emitting a curved electric field, and a parallel-plate capacitor with a linear electric field and two curved dielectric boundaries (air and dielectric).
The proportions of these dielectrics is dependent on the ratio of the radii of the bulbous tip 28 and dielectric sample (b/a) as well as the permittivity of the dielectric (εm). Given the asymmetric shape of the probe 10 and the electromagnetic field interaction between the probe and the dielectric material 200; the empirical infinite-series formula is a reasonable representation of the physics of the probe.
The determination of the permittivity of a material with a finite thickness requires additional observations to determine a solution. An infinitely thick material has a physical thickness (t) that is equal to (or greater than) four times the electrode spacing (s), or as in Equation (19)
t≥4s. (19)
Under this condition, any additional increase in the material thickness results in an incremental (and negligible) change in the phase angle (θ) of the reflection coefficient. Alternatively, thin material is one in which the inequality, as shown in Equation (20) applies
t<4s. (20)
Under this condition, the reflection coefficient (as measured at the feed point connector 18) changes with thickness because the field emitted by the probe 10 penetrates through the thin material under test and continues to a depth defined by Equation (21) where the material attains a negligibly small amplitude
d≈4s. (21)
If the infinite-series formula is used to determine the permittivity εm; the formula would yield an erroneous answer because the probe 10 detects a smaller value of εme due to an interaction between the thin material and the air space below.
Returning to the parallel-plate equivalent, two materials would appear as series-connected capacitors with unequal amounts of dielectrics. To solve this problem, the layered dielectrics are replaced with a homogeneous dielectric having an effective permittivity value ε* that is expressed in terms of the constituent dielectrics (εm1,εm2) and the thickness t. With the effective permittivity of the two-layer dielectric determined, this value is used to calculate the overall dielectric value seen by the probe 10. The infinite series formula is modified and written to be defined by Equation (22)
where
The effective permittivity ε* of the layered dielectrics can be defined by Equation (24)
where α is a shape-dependent numerical constant for the probe 10, and β is an exponent (not to be confused with phase constant).
The formula, described above, simplifies measuring a thin material under test backed by air. If εm1=εm (the bulk relative permittivity of the material under test) and εm2=1 (the dielectric material under test backed by air), the effective permittivity formula reduces to be defined by Equation (25)
Experiments with numerous convex dielectrics indicate that the exponent β is between 1.4 and 1.6, suggesting a mean value of β≈1.5. The probe constant α is a α≈0.06. For concave materials, the expression for ε* will also be the same form because of similar electric field line orientations within the thin layer, but with differing constants α and β.
A probe 10 can behave as a transmission line because electrode spacing is a small fraction of a wavelength at the highest frequency of operation. Capacitance Ca is the ratio of the per-unit-length electric charge and voltage (C=Q/V) between adjacent electrodes (ground and center, respectively) in an air space above a dielectric material. A fringing capacitance Co of the bulbous tip 28 is the component that interacts with the dielectric material 200. The total capacitance Ct(Eε) seen at the bulbous tip 28 is the sum in Equation (26) as
Ct(ε)=Ca+Co(ε−1). (26)
The formula above indicates that when the dielectric is air (ε=1), Ct(1)=Ca. Let Cm be the total capacitance at the bulbous tip 28 with the material under test as defined by Equation (27)
Cm=Ct(εm)=Cair+(εm−1)Co. (27)
Let Cs be the total capacitance at the bulbous tip 28 with a dielectric having a permittivity εs calculated by Equation (28)
Cs=Ct(εs)=Cair+(εs−1)Co. (28)
Using the capacitances Cm and Cs, solve for εm by eliminating Co and obtain from Equation (29)
If each capacitance is written in terms of impedance Z, defined by Equation (30)
then
The formula, previously described, indicates that the permittivity of the unknown material is determined solely by measuring the impedance of the material under test, air, and a known dielectric standard at the bulbous tip 28. A way to circumvent Equation (31) is to mathematically translate these impedances to the feed point connector or input port 18. This will involve a measurement of a short circuit.
Let Zocp be the impedance at the input port 18 with an open circuit at the bulbous tip 28. Also, let Zscp be the impedance at input port 18 with an short circuit at the bulbous tip 28. Let Zsp be the impedance at input port 18 with a dielectric standard at the bulbous tip 28 and let Zmp be the impedance at the input port with the dielectric material 200 at the bulbous tip.
The impedances Zs, Zm and Zair can be rewritten in terms of the quantities above by Equation (32) and Equation (33)
and as Equation (34)
Zair=Zocp. (34)
The substitution of these quantities in the εm formula results in Equation (35)
where the superscript p is at the input port. Since a vector network analyzer measures complex reflection coefficients (Γ); a formula for the relative permittivity of the dielectric material 200 in terms of Γ would be more useful.
The final step in the derivation requires writing each impedance Z in terms of the respective reflection coefficients using the standard definition of Equation (36)
where Zo is a measurement reference or system impedance (typically 50 ohms). The substitution of the formula above into the expression for εme becomes
where in Equation (37), superscript p is suppressed.
Although the method for the relative permittivity εm is derived for a flat dielectric, the method also works for curved dielectrics. If the ratio is b/a>4, the dielectric material 200 can be considered to be flat and the above formula for εme can be used. If the ratio is b/a≤4, cylindrical standards (concave or convex) must be used for calibration with the same formula for the flat dielectric case, but renaming (εme)* in order to distinguish between the two cases, so in Equation (38)
where (εme)* is the permittivity of the unknown curved material 200; εsc is the permittivity of a known curved dielectric standard; Γoc is the complex reflection coefficient of the probe 10, measured at the feed point connector 18 with the bulbous tip 28 terminated by air (the subscript oc meaning an open circuit); Γscc is the complex reflection coefficient of the probe, measured at the feed point connector, with the probe tip touching a curved metal surface (the subscript sc meaning a short circuit); Γsc is the complex reflection coefficient of the probe, measured at the feed point connector, with the bulbous tip touching the surface of a curved dielectric with a known value (the subscript s meaning a dielectric standard) and Γmc is the complex reflection coefficient of the probe, measured at the connector port, with the bulbous tip touching the surface of the curved material (the subscript m meaning the material under test or the dielectric material 200).
In the range of b/a≤4, low-loss cylindrical standards are required for calibration. Ideally, a large collection of cylindrical sizes could be available to closely match the material under test in order to accurately measure the dielectric properties.
Low-loss cylinders of varying radii (b) having a fixed permittivity εs and a probe tip radius (a) indicate that the magnitude of the reflection coefficient M has a rate-of-change (or slope) of M with radius b written in Equation (39) as
Similarly, the rate-of-change of the reflection coefficient phase angle θ with a cylindrical radius b written in Equation (40) as
where f is the frequency and p1(a,εs) and p2(a,εs) are constants that depend on the radius a of the bulbous tip 28 and the permittivity of the standard, εs.
For cylinders made from G-10/FR-4 fiberglass with εs=4.7−j 0.08 and a probe tip radius a=0.75 inch, these constants have the values p1(a,εs)≈0.002 and p2(a,εs)≈−0.026 over the frequency (f) range of 50 to 400 MHz. The units of p1 and p2 are per inch (inch−1) and degree per inch per MHz (deg·inch−1·MHz−1), respectively.
The rate-of-change of the reflection coefficient magnitude M with a metal cylinder of radius b has the form written in Equation (41) as
and that the rate-of-change of the reflection coefficient phase angle θ written in Equation (42) as
where the constants p3 and p4 depend on the radius a and electrical conductivity σ of the metal cylinder.
The values of these constants for aluminum cylinders (σ=3.5×107 Siemens per meter, S/m) are p3(a,σ)≈−0.00003 and p4(a,σ)≈−0.055. The units of the constants p3 and p4 are MHz per inch (MHz·inch−1) and degrees per MHz (deg·MHz−1), respectively, over the frequency range of 200 MHz to 600 MHz.
The results above suggest that the rate-of-change in the reflection coefficient (magnitude and phase) are sufficiently small such that diameters of the cylindrical dielectric and short circuit standards do not have to be exact in size with the material under test; some deviation is permissible. For a given radius of a material under test, the maximum deviation in the radius of the cylindrical dielectric standard and short circuit should be within ±25% to yield reliable permittivity measurement results.
Generally speaking, small-diameter materials under test are solid and larger-diameter materials under test can be either solid or hollow. This analysis is restricted to tubular materials under test that satisfies the condition written in Equation (43) as
Under this condition, the material under test can be treated as flat and the permittivity formula for εme can be used with a correction.
For a thin dielectric measurement, the reflection coefficients of a dielectric standard are measured, short and open and the material under test (Γs, Γsc, Γoc, Γm) at the frequencies of interest. Then, calculate the apparent relative permittivity seen by the probe 10. Calculate the permittivity of the material under test εm written in Equation (44) as
where the probe constants (α and β) were previously determined. If
then the dielectric is considered to be infinitely thick and no correction is needed.
Using the preceding formulas, the method for determining the permittivity of a curved dielectric is summarized in a flowchart of
The foregoing description of the preferred embodiments of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description only. It is not intended to be exhaustive nor to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed; and obviously many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. Such modifications and variations that may be apparent to a person skilled in the art are intended to be included within the scope of this invention as defined by the accompanying claims.
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/589,621 filed on 22 Nov. 2017 by the inventor, David F. Rivera and entitled “Dielectric Measurement Probe for Curved Surfaces”.
The invention described herein may be manufactured and used by or for the Government of the United States of America for governmental purposes without the payment of any royalties thereon or therefor.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5065106 | Hendrick | Nov 1991 | A |
6472885 | Green | Oct 2002 | B1 |
7075314 | Ehata | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7495454 | Rivera | Feb 2009 | B2 |
20140347073 | Brown | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140375337 | Meaney | Dec 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
11108608 | Apr 1999 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62589621 | Nov 2017 | US |