The present invention relates to characterizing media, and more specifically, characterizing digital media with voice tags.
Digital libraries, photo sharing sites, image search engines, on-line encyclopedias, and other computer systems all hold large numbers of images in file systems or databases. Users accessing these sites may have trouble finding desired images because, unlike documents, images (and other digital media) do not include words or phrases that can be indexed.
One solution to the problem of finding desired images is image recognition, but this approach is prohibitively expensive for user-generated content, and is not highly accurate. Another known method is to group images in named categories (such as folders) to facilitate access. This requires, however, manual effort and the images must be known ahead of time.
There are many ways of organizing these images, including collections, sets, and hierarchies. One common method to organize a collection is tagging. When a user sees the image, the user may type in a word or phrase to “tag” (describe) the image. Multiple users can add one or more tags to the same image. When another user accesses the site, they can then navigate to the images labeled by particular tags.
There are various ways image navigation using tags may be accomplished. For instance, the user may type in a word or phrase that is an existing tag for a set of one or more images. Alternatively, a user may see the tags arranged in various ways (alphabetically, by popularity, etc.) and then choose a tag which describes the image(s). The efficacy of text tagging for social navigation is widely used and well understood.
There are also ways of presenting digital media so that users can scan and identify items (collages, grids, visualizations). A major drawback of these approaches is that they are not scaleable: the display becomes cluttered and the screen may run out of pixels, particularly on small screens such as on mobile devices.
There are also ways to ‘automatically’ process digital media to derive metadata that can then be used for searching. Metadata (location, time) may be captured at the time of image acquisition and subsequently used to navigate to the visual digital media.
However, there are many situations in which creating or using textual tags is not possible or is inconvenient. Examples include when users: are using mobile phones (takes a long time or diverts attention from a visual task to type in a word or phrase); are physically disabled (cannot type the words or phrases); are illiterate or semi-literate because of limited education (have only a limited ability to read or write); or have vision problems (cannot see the words or phrases) or combinations of these situations.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, a system including a client computing device that includes a media object capture device and a voice capture device and running a client application that associates media objects to voice samples is provided. The system of this embodiment also includes a communications network coupled to the client computing device, a voice tagging system coupled to the communications network and receiving at least one association between a first media object and a first voice sample and a database coupled to the voice tagging system, the database including one or more voice tags, each voice tag being coupled to one or more voice samples.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, a method of tagging media objects is disclosed. The method of this embodiment includes: receiving at a server an association between a first voice sample and a first media object; comparing the first voice sample to one or more other voice samples; linking the first voice sample to a first voice tag; linking the first voice tag to the first media object; and storing the first voice sample, the first voice tag, the first media object and any links between them in a database coupled to the server.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, a method searching a digital database containing voice tagged media objects is disclosed. The method includes: receiving a first audio search at a server; comparing the first audio search to digital representations of voice tags stored in the digital database; and returning one or more media objects linked to voice tags matching the first audio search.
Additional features and advantages are realized through the techniques of the present invention. Other embodiments and aspects of the invention are described in detail herein and are considered a part of the claimed invention. For a better understanding of the invention with the advantages and the features, refer to the description and to the drawings.
The subject matter which is regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the claims at the conclusion of the specification. The forgoing and other features, and advantages of the invention are apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
Embodiments of the present invention may address some or all of the problems described above or others not mentioned. The systems and methods of the present invention may, in some cases, allow users to tag media objects with audio identifiers. These audio identifiers may be referred to herein as “voice samples.” In addition, the present invention includes systems and methods for searching media objects linked to voice samples in a database based on a “voice queries.” A voice query is a sequence of words in a human language, each word consisting of a sequence of phonemes. If a voice query sounds like one or more voice samples, these tags linked to these voice samples will be used to retrieve media objects.
In one embodiment, methods are provided for users to tag digital media with an audio recording of their voice saying a word or phrase and another for users to search and browse digital media using these voice tags. It should be understood that a “user” is the person saying the word or phrase, not necessarily the owner of the device to which voice tags are provided.
Specifically, some embodiments provide systems and methods for tagging images and other digital media with spoken audio (e.g., words and phrases). The systems and methods disclosed herein may include the ability to recognize a sequence of phonemes in a voice sample as the tag. Subsequently, if the same or another user speaks a closely matching sequence of phonemes the systems and method disclosed herein can retrieve the digital media.
A method is also provided for a user to listen to voice tags and select one of the tags to then retrieve the associated digital media. Tags can be arranged alphabetically, by popularity, in a hierarchy, or other ways. In a hierarchy, more general tags may be presented before more specific ones, and tags may have synonyms, as determined by user judgment of the tag's level of specificity or similarity. If a tag is selected at a given level, then more specific tags at the next level down may be presented or a new synonym for the selected tag can be recorded. If no tag is selected at a given level, then a tag can be recorded and added to the hierarchy at this level. When the user listens to voice tags, audio characteristics (e.g., loudness) of the linked voice samples may be used to indicate popularity or other characteristics of the tag relative to the entire set of tags and the identity if the speaker may be used to select tags or particular voice samples of tags according to preferences. For example, one may prefer to hear one's own voice for a tag before other users' voices.
Thus, as configured in
It will be appreciated that the system 100 can be any suitable computer or computing platform, and may include a terminal, wireless device, information appliance, device, workstation, mini-computer, mainframe computer, personal digital assistant (PDA) or other computing device. It shall be understood that the system 100 may include multiple computing devices linked together by a communication network. For example, there may exist a client-server relationship between two systems and processing may be split between the two.
Examples of operating systems that may be supported by the system 100 include Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows NT 4.0, Windows XP, Windows 2000, Windows CE, Windows Vista, Mac OS, Java, AIX, LINUX, and UNIX, or any other suitable operating system. The system 100 also includes a network interface 106 for communicating over a network 116. The network 116 can be a local-area network (LAN), a metro-area network (MAN), or wide-area network (WAN), such as the Internet or World Wide Web.
Users of the system 100 can connect to the network through any suitable network interface 116 connection, such as standard telephone lines, digital subscriber line, LAN or WAN links (e.g., T1, T3), broadband connections (Frame Relay, ATM), and wireless connections (e.g., 802.11(a), 802.11(b), 802.11(g)).
As disclosed herein, the system 100 includes machine-readable instructions stored on machine readable media (for example, the hard disk 104) for capture and interactive display of information shown on the screen 115 of a user. As discussed herein, the instructions are referred to as “software” 120. The software 120 may be produced using software development tools as are known in the art. The software 120 may include various tools and features for providing user interaction capabilities as are known in the art.
In some embodiments, the software 120 is provided as an overlay to another program. For example, the software 120 may be provided as an “add-in” to an application (or operating system). Note that the term “add-in” generally refers to supplemental program code as is known in the art. In such embodiments, the software 120 may replace structures or objects of the application or operating system with which it cooperates.
It shall be understood that, in one embodiment, the system of the present invention may be configured in a particular manner and include multiple computing devices. To that end,
The system 200 includes one or more client computing devices 202a-202c. The client computing device 202a (as well as any other client computing devices such as 202b and 202c) may be any type of computing device. In one embodiment, the client computing device 202a includes a microphone and a speaker. In one embodiment, and as shown in
The client computing devices 202a-202c may be coupled to a communications network 214. The communications network 214 may be a cellular network in one embodiment. For example, the communications network 214 could be a GSM, TDMA, 2G, 3G or 4G wireless network. The communications network 214 could also be a wireless data network such as WIMAX or 802.11. Of course, the communications link 216 could be wireless or physical. In one embodiment, the communications network may be an intranet or the Internet.
The system 200 may also include a voice tagging system 218. The voice tagging system 218 is coupled to the communications network 214. Accordingly, the voice tagging system 218 may communicate with the client computing devices 202 over the communications network 214. In one embodiment, the voice tagging system 218 may be implanted on a server. The voice tagging system 218, in some embodiments, may be configured to run a web application that handles requests for media objects and voice tags and performs voice tag matching. In one embodiment, the voice tagging system 218 may include a speech processing unit with a phoneme-level speech model for human language that, given a voice sample, returns the closest matching sequence of phonemes. Of course, the speech processing unit could be in, or could be implemented on, a separate unit.
The system 200 may also include a database 220 coupled to the voice tagging system 218. The database 220 may store information utilized by the voice tagging system 218. In one embodiment, the voice tagging system 218 may include the database 220 within it.
a shows an example of information that may be stored in the database 220. In one embodiment, the database 220 may include a voice tag store 302, digital media 304 and a speaker registry 306. Of course, the database 220 need not be divided in this particular manner.
The digital media store 304 may include digital media objects. Digital media objects may include any type of media capable of visual reproduction including, but not limited to, images, documents, animations, and videos. It shall be understood that in one embodiment, all of the digital media available to the voice tagging system 218 (
The speaker registry 306 may include voice clips associated with a particular speaker. In one embodiment, some or all of the voice clips may be associated with a phoneme representation of the respective voice clip. This may not be required for voice tagging but may utilized in speaker identify verification (SIV) discussed below.
Voice tags are objects that store associations between one or more voice clips with one or more digital media objects and are stored in the voice tag store 302. In one embodiment, “tagging” shall refer to creating an association between a media object and a voice sample. In contrast, the voice tags in the voice tag store 302 include links to at least one media object and one voice sample.
b shows a more detailed version of the speaker registry 306. The speaker registry uniquely identifies users of the voice tagging system. Speakers may have different ways of being identified: typing in their name or a special code using the touch screen, voice clips to match against (“say the word ‘baggage’), phone number from caller ID, or any other ways of coming up with a unique speaker identifier that can be linked to voice clips to identify the speaker who was talking when the voice clip was recorded.
The phoneme representation 412 (as well as any other phoneme representations for other voice clips) may be formed in a number of different manners. In one embodiment, the audio clip may be broken into voice and non-voice segments and then the phonemes for the voice portion may be recognized utilizing known or later developed techniques. As shown, by way of example, the first voice clip 402 may represent the phonemes “hw
The first voice tag 426 may also be linked to a second voice clip 404 that is coupled to a second speaker identifier 414 and phoneme representation 416. In this embodiment, the second voice clip 404 represents the phonemes “w
The second voice tag 428 is associated with both the first digital media object 430 and the second digital media object 432. This illustrates the principle of the present invention allowing one voice tag to be linked to one or more digital media objects including digital media objects of different types, such as an image and a video. Similar to the first voice tag 426, the second voice tag 428 may be linked to one or more voice clips. In this example, the second voice tag 428 is linked to a third voice clip 406 and a fourth voice clip 408. The third voice clip 406 is linked to a speaker identifier 410 and a phoneme representation 420. Similarly, the fourth voice clip 408 is linked to a speaker identifier 410 and a phoneme representation 424. Of course, the speaker identifiers could be combined in one embodiment.
Users may create associations between voice clips and media objects. These associations may be utilized to create voice tags and create links between voice tags, digital media objects and voice clips as shown in
Tagging of Images
There are several ways in which an image may be tagged according to the present invention. One method is disclosed with respect to
At a block 504 a voice tagging application is enabled. The voice tagging application may be, for example, a client application capable of receiving voice samples and associating them with an image being viewed. In one embodiment, the voice tagging application is a client application on a cellular phone.
At a block 506, a voice sample is received from a user. In one embodiment, the voice sample may be received while an image or other media object is presented to the user.
At a block 507, a voice sample may be analyzed to determine the identity of the speaker. If no speaker can be identified, the voice tagging system can operate with an anonymous speaker. Various information may be used to determine the speaker identity including but not limited to the caller ID (phone number), speaker identity verification (SIV), and typing in a name on the phone keypad. One or more voice samples stored in the Speaker Registry may also be used to match against the voice sample provided by the user and stored in the speaker registry. Optionally, if there are no matches at block 507, a new speaker identifier may be created in the speaker registry. In such a case, a dialog with the user may be required to record a voice clip, a name, a phone number, or other identifying information.
At a block 508, an association between the voice sample and the media object is created. This association may be between the voice sample and a downloaded media file, media already loaded on the device, or a media object created by the user. Regardless, the association may describe a voice clip's location and the media objects location and the time the association was created.
At a block 510, the association may be transmitted to the voice tagging system. Of course, if the voice sample or the media object were not previously stored in the database, they may be transmitted along with the association. For example, if a user downloads an image from database 220 (
Creating a Database of Tagged Images
As discussed above, individual users may create associations between voice samples and media objects. These associations form the basis for the links shown in
At a block 602 an association is received. The association associates a voice sample and a media object. The association may come from, for example, simultaneously recording the voice sample and displaying the image. Alternatively, the association may come from a system that allows associations to be made without displaying the image. In one embodiment, one or both of a media object and a voice sample may be received along with the association, in the event, for example, that one or both of the media object or voice sample is not already present in the database. The association may be received, for example, by the voice tagging system 218 (
At a block 604, the voice sample is converted into a phoneme representation. The phoneme representation may be created by known techniques. The phoneme representation is linked to the voice sample. In addition, if the speaker of the voice sample is known, it may be linked to the creator of the voice sample in the speaker registry. This linking may link every voice sample to at least one speaker identifier. A speaker identifier may identify a unique anonymous user, for example, when a unique speaker cannot be identified, or when speaker identification is not used and thus all voice samples are linked to the anonymous speaker identifier. Of course, multiple samples could be linked to a single identifier.
At a block 606 the phoneme representation of existing voice samples in the database are compared to the phoneme representation for the newly received voice sample. There are many ways to perform such matching. One example includes matching (and thus classifying) words that sound alike based upon the start of the word. Such matching may include: extracting the first M phonemes recognized in the voice sample for each of these N phonemes. For some situations as little as M+3 phonemes may be used. For each voice tag, sequentially compare the phonemes. The tag receives a score based upon the level of match to their Mth phoneme. A match to the M−1th phoneme may be weighted higher than the Mth phoneme. In one embodiment, the level of match is based on the number of matching features of the phonemes, such as voiced and unvoiced consonants, and a no match receives a score of −1. There are 5 features per phoneme, so the best score is a 15 and the worst is a −3.
At a block 608 is determined if a match between the new and an existing voice sample exists. If multiple existing voice samples are retrieved from the database of existing voice samples and match, the user may select the best one. In that event a match exists to a single voice sample, at a block 610 the new voice sample is linked to the voice tag that the existing voice sample is linked to. For example, referring again to
Referring now back to
In the event that there is no match between the new voice sample and an existing voice sample (i.e., this is a voice sample of a word not previously spoken), at a block 616 a new voice tag is created. The newly created voice tag is then, at a block 618, linked to the new voice sample. The newly created voice tag is used for the processing starting at block 612 already described. Thus, if this is an association to a matching media object, then the new voice tag is linked to the media object the voice sample was previously associated with. If this is a non-matching new media object, then the newly created tag will be linked to the new media object. It is thus possible to voice tag a newly captured image using a newly recorded voice sample, where the voice sample does not match any existing tags.
As discussed above, the speaker registry 306 may be utilized to uniquely identify users of the voice tagging system. The information for the speaker may be gathered as described above.
Searching Database of Tagged Images
The above description detailed how a database may be created and modified. the following description describes how the database may be searched in one embodiment.
At a block 704 a search utilizing voice search terms is created. This may include the user saying words into a microphone. The search is then submitted to the server at a block 706.
At a block 708, the server (e.g., voice tagging system 218,
At a block 710 results are returned to the searcher. In the event that multiple voice tags have a high enough score, those tags are returned. In the event that no tags are found, such may be indicated to the searcher. Assuming there is a match, the associations are presented to the user. One or more matching media objects linked to the selected tags are displayed to the searcher. Selecting a matching media object on a touchscreen device may play the voice tags associated with each media object by playing the associated voice sample with the best score.
In an alternate embodiment, an image is captured and sent via MMS (the multimedia messaging service) and the system performs hierarchical classification of the voice input. In this embodiment, the system may include a “voice gateway” which is itself an assembly of components that connect a user's telephone (thru the public switch telephone network, or PSTN) to a computer system.
Referring now back to
In this embodiment, a user calls the IVR system on any mobile camera phone connected to the PSTN, and goes thru the following step to hierarchically classify a photo: 1. the user takes a photo with their camera phone; the user sends the photo (using email or MMS) from their mobile phone to the IVR service; 3. the IVR service stores the photo in the database and adds the photo to a queue of untagged photos; 4. the user logs on to the IVR service. The caller ID of the user's telephone or explicit logon also is used to identify the user; the user uses an IVR menu to select the photo by listening to a text-to-speech (TTS) generation of metadata associated with each untagged photo. In this embodiment, the upload time of each untagged photo in the queue is used; the user is then prompted by the IVR if they would like to tag the photo and, if so, an IVR menu tree is constructed from the previously recorded hierarchy of voice tags; 8. at each level N of the IVR menu tree, said user is prompted to: a) select an appropriate tag, b) create a new tag or c) delete a tag; 9. If the user has selected an appropriate tag, then the voice tags at level N+1 are retrieved; and 10. If no more specific tags are available, then the voice tag is stored with the photo.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, element components, and/or groups thereof.
The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of all means or step plus function elements in the claims below are intended to include any structure, material, or act for performing the function in combination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. The description of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and the practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated
The flow diagrams depicted herein are just one example. There may be many variations to this diagram or the steps (or operations) described therein without departing from the spirit of the invention. For instance, the steps may be performed in a differing order or steps may be added, deleted or modified. All of these variations are considered a part of the claimed invention.
While the preferred embodiment to the invention had been described, it will be understood that those skilled in the art, both now and in the future, may make various improvements and enhancements which fall within the scope of the claims which follow. These claims should be construed to maintain the proper protection for the invention first described.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1191425 | Huddle | Jul 1916 | A |
4592085 | Watari et al. | May 1986 | A |
5390278 | Gupta et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5422816 | Sprague et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
6718368 | Ayyadurai | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6834270 | Pagani et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6879257 | Hisano et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7003570 | Messinger et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7047027 | Jeon | May 2006 | B2 |
7065544 | Moreno | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7151490 | Richards | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7163151 | Kiiskinen | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7177795 | Chen et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7209949 | Mousseau et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7225249 | Barry et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7228228 | Bartlett et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7263597 | Everdell et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7266754 | Shah et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7337115 | Liu et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7512659 | Keohane et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7551935 | Karmakar | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7634528 | Horvitz et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7650376 | Blumenau | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7693945 | Dulitz et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7729689 | Chakraborty et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7886083 | Pinkerton et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7917911 | Bansal et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7970923 | Pedersen et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8209620 | Dempski et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8539542 | Elhag et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
20020138582 | Chandra et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020165961 | Everdell et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030009385 | Tucciarone et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030031309 | Rupe et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033394 | Stine | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030115366 | Robinson | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120822 | Langrind et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030182421 | Faybishenko et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040019648 | Huynh et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040022264 | McCue | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040024817 | Pinkas | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040260551 | Atkin et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010573 | Garg | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038660 | Black et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050060372 | DeBettencourt et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060381 | Huynh et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050102625 | Lee et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114357 | Chengalvarayan et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050171768 | Gierach | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192808 | Sugiyama | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198270 | Rusche et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060015339 | Charlesworth et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060036441 | Hirota | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060109976 | Sundaram et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060155854 | Selgert | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060287867 | Cheng et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070008069 | Lastinger et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070019793 | Cheng | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070025543 | Vadlakonda et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070033229 | Fassett et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070078986 | Ethier et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070171066 | Fein et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174326 | Schwartz et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070192422 | Stark et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070237135 | Trevallyn-Jones et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070290787 | Fiatal et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080004056 | Suzman | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080057922 | Kokes et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080075433 | Gustafsson | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080083024 | Glazer et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080091723 | Zuckerberg et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080134205 | Bansal et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155534 | Boss et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080159266 | Chen et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080162132 | Doulton | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080233977 | Xu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080233981 | Ismail | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090012841 | Saft et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090031006 | Johnson | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090037515 | Zapata et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090062949 | Heo et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090094190 | Stephens | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090099906 | Kirley et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125595 | Maes | May 2009 | A1 |
20090128335 | Leung | May 2009 | A1 |
20090131080 | Nadler et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090131087 | Johan | May 2009 | A1 |
20090150501 | Davis et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090150786 | Brown | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164287 | Kies et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090186641 | Vaananen | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090191902 | Osborne | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090199114 | Lewis et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090210226 | Ma | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216805 | Coffman et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090265631 | Sigurbjornsson | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270068 | Ahopelto et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271380 | Julia et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276488 | Alstad | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100015956 | Qu et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023451 | Lambert et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023475 | Lahav | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023506 | Sahni et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030578 | Siddique et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100048242 | Rhoads et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100049599 | Owen et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100087172 | Klassen et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100122331 | Wang et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100128335 | Maeda et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100158236 | Chang et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100174622 | Sohn et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100201845 | Feinberg et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100210248 | Morrissey et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211868 | Karmarkar et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100287197 | Wang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100296646 | Hemm et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110021178 | Balasaygun et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110035284 | Moshfeghi | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110061068 | Ali et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110072015 | Lin et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110077941 | Dey et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110141855 | Gault et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145356 | Tanner | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153723 | Mutnuru et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153839 | Rajan et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110212736 | Jaime et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110219018 | Bailey et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110221960 | Glaznev et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231747 | Zuckerberg et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110244887 | Dupray et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110246560 | Gibson | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110276513 | Erhart et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120134548 | Rhoads | May 2012 | A1 |
20120246238 | Bailey et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120266102 | Dempski et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130100301 | Rhoads | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130166332 | Hammad | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140111354 | Hergesheimer et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2493180 | Jul 2005 | CA |
1852354 | Oct 2006 | CN |
1340096 | Sep 2003 | EP |
2396520 | Jun 2004 | GB |
2461730 | Jan 2010 | GB |
2009134774 | Jun 2009 | JP |
0241029 | May 2002 | WO |
2005025155 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2006127791 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2007086683 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2008026945 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2009012516 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009135292 | Nov 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report; International Application No.: PCT/US11/23557; International Filing Date: Feb. 3, 2011; Date of Mailing: Apr. 4, 2011. |
International Search Report—Written Opinion; International Application No.: PCT/US11/23557; International Filing Date: Feb. 3, 2011; Date of Mailing: Apr. 4, 2011. |
IBM et al., “Apparatus for Sending a Sequence of Asynchronous Messages Through the Same Channel in a Messaging Middleware Cluster,” Published Oct. 4, 2005, Copyright IP.com, Inc., pp. 1-7. |
Anind K. Dey and Gregory D. Abowd, “CybreMinder: A Context Aware System for Supporting Reminders,” HUC 2000, LNCS 1927, pp. 172-186, 2000. |
ACM Digital Library, [online]; [retrieved on Mar. 14, 2011]; retrieved from the Internet http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1670452 Alberto Gonzalez Prieto et al.,“Adaptive Performance Management for SMS Systems,” Journal of Network and Systems Management; vol. 17 Issue 4, Dec. 2009. |
NMS Adaptive, [online]; [retrieved on Mar. 14, 2011]; retrieved from the Internet http://www.nms-adaptive.com/products/pages/desktop-sms-frameset.htm. |
Carnegie Mellon University, [online]; [retrieved on Mar. 14, 2011]; retrieved from the Internet http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.70.4047&rep=rep1&type=pdf Daniel Siewiorek et al.,“SenSay: A Context-Aware Mobile Phone,” 2003. |
The Symbian Blog [online]; [retrieved on Mar. 15, 2011]; retrieved from the Internet http://www.symbianzone.co.cc/2010/08/sms-tag-v10-sms-organizer-symbian-os-94.html Symbian SMS Tag Organizer; 2010. |
AdaptiveMobile [online]; [retrieved on Mar. 15, 2011]; retrieved from the Internet http://www.adaptivemobile.com 2011. |
V. Zhumatiy et al., “Metric State Space Reinforcement Learning for a Vision-Capable Mobile Robot,” Technical Report; IDSIA; Mar. 2006. |
Ricci et al., “Acquiring and Revising Preferences in a Critique-Based Mobile Recommender System,” May/Jun. 2007, vol. 22, No. 3, IEEE Computer Society, Copyright 2007 IEEE. |
T. Blackwell, “Fast Decoding of Tagged Message Formats,” Proceeding IEEE INFOCOM '96, Mar. 24-28, 1996, Copyright 1996 IEEE, pp. 224-231. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No.: PCT/US2011/023557; International Filing Date: Feb. 3, 2011; 5 pages. |
Bae et al., “TagReel: A Visualization of Tag Relations among User Interests in the Social Tagging System”, 2009 Six International Conference on Computer Graphics, Imaging and Visualization, IEEE Computer society, 2009, pp. 437-442. |
Best Shareware, “Sound Pix Plus”, http://www.bestshareware.net/download/soundpixplus.htm, retrieved from the internet on Jan. 12, 2012, 2 pages. |
Computerworld, “Facebook photo privacy PANIC: Auto-tag apology and apologia”, http://blogs.computerworld.com/18435/facebook—photo—privacy—panic—auto—tag—apology—and—apologia, retrieved from the internet on Jan. 12, 2012, 7 pages. |
Digital Photography School, “Columbus V-900 GPS Voice Photo Data Logger Review”, http://www.digital-photography-school.com/columbus-v-900-gps-voice-photo-data-logger-review, retrieved from the internet on Jan. 12, 2012, 3 pages. |
Google Image Labeler, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google—Image—Labeler, Aug. 31, 2006, 4 pages. |
Hosy, Marc, Indexing/Labeling?Enhancing digital pictures using Voice Tags/Commands/Comments, www.ip.com, IP.com electronicl IPCOM000169425D; Publication Apr. 22, 2008; 3 pages. |
Mobile Phones Nokia patents voice tagging of hotos, http://www.mobilephones.org.uk/nokia/nokia-patents-voice-tagging-of-photos/, retrieved from the internet on Apr. 12, 2012, 4 pages. |
resco.net Developer & Mobile Enterprise, “How to use mobile devices camera and microphone in business applications”, http://www.resco.net/developer/company/articles.aspx?file=articles/article14, retrieved from the internet on Jan. 12, 2012, 6 pages. |
“Sentiment140”, http://help.sentiment140.com/, retrieved from Internet May 8, 2012, 2 pages. |
The Stanford Natural Language Processing Group, “Stanford Log-linear Part-Of—Speech Tagger”, http://npl.stanford.edu/software/tagger.shtml, retrieved from the internet on Apr. 11, 2012, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110219018 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |