This invention relates generally to semiconductor devices, and more particularly to an ESD protection device and method.
As electronic components are getting smaller and smaller along with the internal structures in integrated circuits, it is getting easier to either completely destroy or otherwise impair electronic components. In particular, many integrated circuits are highly susceptible to damage from the discharge of static electricity. Electrostatic discharge (ESD) is the transfer of an electrostatic charge between bodies at different electrostatic potentials (voltages), caused by direct contact or induced by an electrostatic field. The discharge of static electricity, or ESD is a critical problem for the electronics industry.
Device failures that result from ESD events are not always immediately catastrophic or apparent. Often, the device is only slightly weakened but is less able to withstand normal operating stresses and, hence, may result in a reliability problem. Therefore, various ESD protection circuits must be included in the device to protect the various components.
When an ESD pulse occurs on a transistor, the extremely high voltage of the ESD pulse can break down the transistor and can potentially cause permanent damage. Consequently, the input/output pads of an integrated circuit need to be protected from ESD pulses so they are not damaged.
Integrated circuits and the geometry of the transistors which comprise the integrated circuits continue to be reduced in size and the transistors are arranged closer together. A transistor's physical size limits the voltage that the transistor can withstand without being damaged. Thus, breakdown voltages of transistors are lowered and currents capable of overheating components are more frequently reached by the voltages and currents induced by an ESD event. Additionally, recent advances in technology have produced devices which can fail at voltage levels lower than the triggering voltages of known ESD protection circuits. Thus, there is a need for improved ESD protection circuits with lower triggering voltages.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
a-2b are circuit diagrams of conventional ESD structures;
a-3b are circuit diagrams of an embodiment ESD structure;
a-4d contain a layout view and cross sectional views of an ESD structure;
a-5b contain a layout view and a cross sectional view of another embodiment ESD structure;
a-6b contain a layout view and a cross sectional view of a further embodiment ESD structure; and
a-7b contains a circuit diagram a cross sectional view of yet another embodiment ESD structure.
Corresponding numerals and symbols in different figures generally refer to corresponding parts unless otherwise indicated. The figures are drawn to clearly illustrate the relevant aspects of the preferred embodiments and are not necessarily drawn to scale. To more clearly illustrate certain embodiments, a letter indicating variations of the same structure, material, or process step may follow a figure number.
The making and using of the presently preferred embodiments are discussed in detail below. It should be appreciated, however, that the invention provides many applicable inventive concepts that can be embodied in a wide variety of specific contexts. The specific embodiments discussed are merely illustrative of specific ways to make and use the invention, and do not limit the scope of the invention.
The invention will be described with respect to preferred embodiments in a specific context, namely a NMOS ESD structure. The invention may also be applied, however, to other semiconductor structures.
Before discussing details of preferred embodiments, it will be instructive to consider prior art ESD protection structures. Much of the discussion with respect to
Typically the device is connected as shown in the circuit diagram of
The structure of
This structure has a number of drawbacks. The ESD trigger voltage is too high to adequately protect devices fabricated on fine geometry processes. There is also a tendency to encounter multi-finger trigger problems because of variation in the parasitic substrate resistance 122 which generates different base voltages at the base of the parasitic transistor 120.
One possible conventional solution used to reduce the trigger voltage of the ESD device is shown in the circuit diagram of
The conventional solution of
The ability of the solution depicted in
While the solution shown in
Various methods for the formation of ESD protection devices using these concepts will be described with respect to
Turning to
The embodiment of
Dimensioning of the capacitance 112 and the resistance of the diode 141 should be done in accordance with the RC-time constant of a typical ESD discharge event, e.g., about 150 ns. For example, for a typical drain-gate overlap capacitance of 0.3 fF/um and a typical device size width of 200 um, the typical reverse resistance of the diode should be 150 ns/60 fF=2.5 MOhms. There should also be sufficient reverse bias current in the diode to discharge the capacitance 112 and bring the gate 104 back down to ground potential after an ESD event.
While the ESD protection device described shown in the circuit diagram of
a shows a top layout view of an embodiment of the present invention.
In the embodiment of
Focusing now on the cross section shown in
c shows a detailed view of the end of the gate region for an alternate embodiment of the present invention. As in the embodiment discussed herein above, a diode 135 is formed by the abutment of n-type region 146 and p-type region 144. Silicide region 142, however, touches the p-type region 144 on the edge, making an electrical contact. Silicide region 142 can be disposed over n-type, p-type, or undoped or “intrinsic” polysilicon gate material.
The layout and cross section of embodiments of the present invention has so far been described in terms of an NMOS ESD device. In an alternate embodiment shown in
Another embodiment of the invention is shown in
a shows a layout view of the other embodiment. The layout comprises a source region 108, and drain region 102, a gate 150 and doped regions 158 that form either the anode or cathode of a substrate or a well diode. The gate 150 can be made from polysilicon, metal, or silicide. A substrate or well tie 152 is provided to form a current path to a supply. Connector 156, e.g., couples the gate region 150 to the highly doped region 158.
In an NMOS implementation of the other embodiment of the invention, drain/source regions 102/108 comprise n-type regions, doped regions 158 comprise n-type material, and the substrate tie 152 comprises a p-type region that contacts the p-substrate or a p-well 140. A diode is formed at the interface between the silicided n-type region 158 and the underlying p-well or p-substrate, whereby the silicided n-type region 158 forms the cathode and the p-well or p-substrate forms the anode. The p-type substrate/p-well tie region 152 is typically connected to ground 101 via contacts 154.
Alternatively, in a PMOS implementation of the other embodiment of the invention, drain/source regions 102/108 comprise p-type regions, doped regions 158 comprise p-type material, and the well tie 152 comprises an n-type region that contacts an n-well. A diode is formed at the interface between the p-type region 158 and the underlying n-well, whereby the silicided p-type doped region 158 forms the anode and the n-well forms the cathode. The n-type n-well tie region is typically coupled to a supply voltage via contacts 154 instead of to ground 101 as is shown in
Turning to
b is drawn in assuming that the ESD device utilizes an NMOS transistor. The diode 161 is drawn with the cathode being the doped region 158 comprising n-type material and the well/substrate comprising p-type material. In an alternate embodiment where a PMOS transistor is used, the doped region 158 comprises a p-type material and the substrate/well region 140 comprises an n-type material. The polarity of diode 161 would be reversed.
A further embodiment of the invention is shown in
In the case of an NMOS device, the heavily doped region 158 comprises n-type material and heavily doped region 170 comprises p-type material. The gate 150 is coupled to the n+ cathode of the n+/p+ diode 175. The p+ anode of n+/p+ diode 170 is coupled to ground 101.
In the case of a PMOS device, on the other hand, the heavily doped region 158 comprises p-type material and the heavily doped region 170 comprises n-type material. The gate 104 is coupled to the anode of the n+/p+ diode 175. The polarity of the diodes depicted in
The invention has been described thus far with respect to specific implementations. It should be clear that variations are possible without departing from the inventive concepts. As one example, while the diagram of
An example of such a modified circuit is shown in
The embodiment shown in
While this invention has been described with reference to illustrative embodiments, this description is not intended to be construed in a limiting sense. Various modifications and combinations of the illustrative embodiments, as well as other embodiments of the invention, will be apparent to persons skilled in the art upon reference to the description. It is therefore intended that the appended claims encompass any such modifications or embodiments.
This is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/083,308 filed on Apr. 8, 2011 and is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/509,366 filed on Aug. 24, 2006, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3806773 | Watanabe | Apr 1974 | A |
4044373 | Nomiya et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4152711 | Nakata | May 1979 | A |
4236831 | Hendrickson | Dec 1980 | A |
4559694 | Yoh et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4628215 | Lou | Dec 1986 | A |
4745079 | Pfiester | May 1988 | A |
4760434 | Tsuzuki et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4831424 | Yoshida et al. | May 1989 | A |
4841349 | Nakano | Jun 1989 | A |
4870469 | Nishizawa et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4890143 | Baliga et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4990976 | Hattori | Feb 1991 | A |
5204988 | Sakurai | Apr 1993 | A |
5418383 | Takagi et al. | May 1995 | A |
5438007 | Vinal et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5536958 | Shen et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5661322 | Williams et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5753952 | Mehrad | May 1998 | A |
5844272 | Soderbarg et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5910738 | Shinohe et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5914619 | Tihanyi | Jun 1999 | A |
5977591 | Fratin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6028573 | Orita et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6172383 | Williams | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175383 | Yadid-Pecht et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6229379 | Okamoto | May 2001 | B1 |
6232163 | Voldman et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6462625 | Kim | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6617649 | Chang et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6665159 | Takikawa et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6690065 | Chang et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6750507 | Williams et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6768149 | Mann et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6861703 | Inagawa et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7554777 | Fukami | Jun 2009 | B2 |
20020000618 | Saito et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020190313 | Takaishi et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020195657 | Williams et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030057497 | Higashida et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040232450 | Yilmaz | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20060186466 | Mizokuchi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060209479 | Grombach et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070023779 | Hirose et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102005013687 | Dec 2005 | DE |
2002009115 | Jan 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Amerasekera, A., et al., “ESD in Silicon Integrated Circuits,” 2001, 83 pages, Chaper 6, 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Son. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130264645 A1 | Oct 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13083308 | Apr 2011 | US |
Child | 13910071 | US | |
Parent | 11509366 | Aug 2006 | US |
Child | 13083308 | US |