This disclosure relates generally to prosthetics and, more particularly, to a motor for a robotic finger.
There are many tasks in the workplace today that are accomplished by human hands. Some tasks are very repetitive and cause carpal tunnel problems. Others take place in hazardous environments. Still others require extremely precise movements and are gradually becoming beyond the capability of humans. Prosthetic devices can be used to replace human hands in the above and other areas.
In one aspect the disclosure relates to a direct drive brushless motor for a robotic finger. The motor may include a plurality of rotational components and a plurality of non-rotational components. The plurality of rotational components include a center rotation shaft circumscribed by a plurality of coils. The plurality of non-rotational components include a plurality of outer magnets positioned around the plurality of coils. The direct drive brushless motor further includes a dual magnetic circuit formed from ones of the rotational components and non-rotational components. The dual magnetic circuit includes an outer circuit and an inner circuit wherein the outer circuit includes at least the plurality of outer magnets and the plurality of coils and wherein the inner circuit includes at least the plurality of coils and the center rotation shaft.
An exemplary approach for providing current to the plurality of coils takes into account that the motor does not need to run through complete turns of 360 degrees in order to mimic the behavior of a human finger; rather, turns of 90 or 30 degrees may be sufficient. Using this approach a plurality of electrical wires may be routed to the plurality of coils via, for example, a flex cable electrically connected to an electrical connector physically coupled to one or more of the plurality of rotational components. Since turns of less than 360 degrees are contemplated, the flex cable may be used to supply current to the plurality of coils without becoming wrapped around or otherwise entangled in the rotating components of the motor. This enables current to be conducted to the coils without using, for example, brushes or a commutator of the type employed in brushed DC motors. Moreover, because the plurality of rotational components will typically be relatively lightweight, rapid rotation and directional changes may be attained.
In another aspect the disclosure is directed to a direct drive brushless motor including a plurality of rotational components and a plurality of non-rotational components. The plurality of rotational components may include a center rotation shaft circumscribed by a plurality of coils and a coil termination plate configured to support the plurality of coils. The plurality of non-rotational components may include a plurality of outer magnets positioned around the plurality of coils. A flex cable having one or more leads provides electrical current to one or more of the plurality of coils without the use of brushes. In this aspect the direct drive brushless motor further includes a dual magnetic circuit formed from ones of the plurality rotational components and ones of the plurality non-rotational components. The dual magnetic circuit includes an outer circuit and an inner circuit wherein the outer circuit includes at least the plurality of outer magnets and the plurality of coils and wherein the inner circuit includes at least the plurality of coils and the center rotation shaft.
The disclosure also pertains to a direct drive brushless motor including a plurality of outer magnets arranged as a first Halbach cylinder. A coil assembly includes a plurality of coils surrounded by the plurality of outer magnets. The plurality of coils are connected without the use of brushes to an external source of electrical current and the coil assembly is disposed to rotate relative to the plurality of outer magnets. A plurality of inner magnets are arranged as a second Halbach cylinder and are surrounded by the plurality of coils. A core element is surrounded by the plurality of inner magnets. A center rotation shaft is positioned within an interior space circumscribed by the core element.
The features, nature and advantages of the present disclosure will become more apparent from the detailed description set forth below when taken in conjunction with the drawings in which like reference characters identify correspondingly throughout and wherein:
In the following description of exemplary embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which it is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.
The word “exemplary” is used herein to mean “serving as an example or illustration.” Any aspect or design described herein as “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other aspects or designs.
It should be understood that the specific order or hierarchy of steps in the processes disclosed herein is an example of exemplary approaches. Based upon design preferences, it is understood that the specific order or hierarchy of steps in the processes may be rearranged while remaining within the scope of the present disclosure.
Reference will now be made in detail to aspects of the subject technology, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout.
Disclosed herein are embodiments of a motor adapted to act as, for example, a servo direct drive brushless motor for a robotic finger joint. Embodiments of the motor advantageously provide a high torque output in a relatively small package size (e.g., 20 to 30 mm in diameter). In addition, embodiments of the motor draw relatively low current draw and thereby mitigate overheating.
The motor disclosed herein may be used in connection with robotic fingers designed to emulate the range of motion of human fingers. A human finger includes three joints, two of which move over a maximum range of approximately 90 degrees while a third is capable of moving through a range of approximately 30 degrees.
In one embodiment, the design of the motor takes into account that the motor does not need to run through complete turns of 360 degrees in order to mimic the behavior of a human finger; rather, turns of 90 or 30 degrees may be sufficient.
Accordingly, in one embodiment the motor comprises a partial moving-coil rotary motor. The partial rotary motor may be advantageously configured to have a light moving mass, thereby facilitating a fast response and low current draw.
Turning now to the drawings,
Attention is now directed to
As shown in
During operation of the direct drive brushless motor 300, current is introduced through the coils 312 thereby creating a magnetic field having a direction that depends on the direction that the current is flowing through the coils 312. The magnitude of the magnetic field corresponds to the number of turns associated with each coil and the amperage conducted through the conductive material. It should be understood that any type of conductive material with varying specifications can be used. It should further be understood that the coils 312 may be electrically connected to a power source and/or connected together in any manner known in the electrical and mechanical arts.
The outer magnets 116 can be, for example, substantially rectangular with a curved cross section as shown in
As noted above, the linear encoder assembly 150 includes a linear encoder feedback scale 154 and a linear feedback scale read head 158. The linear encoder feedback scale 154 is supported by a linear scale support 162. The linear encoder assembly 150 can also include feedback circuitry (not shown) along with the linear encoder feedback scale 154 for indicating linear positional feedback to, for example, a controller (such as a remote computer). The linear feedback scale read head 158 (e.g., a sensor, a transducer etc.), can be paired with the linear encoder feedback scale 154 that can encode position. The linear feedback scale read head 158 can read the linear encoder feedback scale 154 and convert the encoded position into an analog or digital signal. This in turn can then be decoded into position data by a digital readout (DRO) or motion controller (not shown in
The linear encoder feedback scale 154 may include a series of stripes or markings running along a length of the linear encoder feedback scale 154. During operation of the direct drive brushless motor 100B/300, the linear feedback scale read head 158 (e.g., an optical reader) can count the number of stripes or markings read in order to determine the current position of the rotational components 304 relative to the non-rotational components 308. In some instances, the recorded positional data can be transmitted to a remote device for monitoring purposes. In some instances, a user can input one or more values to a remote device (such as a connected computer) in order to designate an amount of rotation desired for a particular task. These values can then be transmitted to a controller (not shown in
Again referring to
As an example, a unit that has been developed utilizing this arrangement has a diameter of 25 mm and produces a torque of 0.2 Nm. This in turn yields, at 30 mm from the center of the motor, a resultant force of 6.7N (at 48 VDC and 1.5 amps peak). This is slightly less than but comparable to the force of 8 to 10 N capable of being produced by a typical human finger at the same distance from the 3rd joint.
As is discussed below with reference to
The motors described herein may be used as robotic joint drives providing near-human capabilities. The use of direct drive advantageously results in the motor being relatively compliant with respect to external forces; that is, the motor will move freely when outside forces are applied. This contrasts with the typical behavior of geared motors, which may lock up and become damaged upon the application of such external force.
Attention is now directed to
Specifically, the direct drive brushless motor described herein may also be configured to implement the “soft land” and programmable force methods patented by the assignee of the present application. These allow a robotic finger 520 to closely approximate the capability of a human finger to softly contact surfaces and then apply force. In one embodiment, the motor 300 sends measurements from its linear encoder to the controller 510 to indicate the precise rotational position about the axis A. In this way a portion of the robotic finger 520 or other mechanical element coupled to the motor 300 may be moved to an approach position relatively close to, but safely away from, a target surface 530 of an object of interest. From the approach position, a “soft-land” operation may be optionally performed whereby the robotic finger 520 is brought into contact with the target surface 530 by the motor 300 so as not to damage either the robotic finger 520 or the surface 530. Additional information about the soft-land operation is set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 5,952,589 entitled “Soft Landing Method for Tool Assembly” (the “'589 patent”) and U.S. Publication No. 2005/0234565 entitled “Programmable Control System for Automated Actuator Operation”, respectively, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties for all purposes.
As is discussed in the '589 patent, the soft-land procedure typically involves placing the robotic finger 520 at an approach position. This approach position can be arbitrarily established in accordance with the desires of the operator, but preferably, the approach position places the robotic finger 520 much closer than about one millimeter away from the target surface 530. The approach position will generally be dependent on the characteristics of the target surface 530; namely, the approach position can be made to be closer to objects with smooth target surfaces relative to rougher surfaces without substantially increasing the risk of forceful, inadvertent contact. In any event, the robotic finger 520 is placed at the approach position for subsequent movement along a path from the approach position into soft contact with a predetermined point on the target surface 530.
Initially, the robotic finger 520 is held stationary at the approach position. Then, the forces which are acting to hold the robotic finger 520 stationary are changed by the motor 300 in magnitude until the inherent static friction forces that have been acting on the robotic finger 520 are overcome. When the static friction forces have been overcome, the system becomes dynamic and the robotic finger 520 advances toward the target surface 530 under the influence of the resultant force.
As the robotic finger 520 is advanced toward the target surface 530, it is moved rapidly in a position mode until the approach position. From the approach position, the robotic finger 520 proceeds in a soft land mode until contact is made with the target surface 530. Specifically, several control modes of operation for determining soft contact are possible. In particular, each of these control modes depends on a measurable parameter that is characteristic of the movement of the robotic finger 520. These measurable parameters include i) the finger's travel position on the path toward the surface 530 (i.e. a position control mode), ii) its velocity (i.e. a velocity control mode), and iii) the acceleration/deceleration of the finger 520 (i.e. torque control mode). In an alternate embodiment, none of the above mentioned measurable parameters are monitored and, instead, the finger 520 is allowed to merely advance into soft contact with target surface 530 under the influence of the resultant force (i.e. a basic mode). The position control mode of operation, velocity control mode of operation and the torque control mode of operation are described in further detail in the '589 patent.
In some configurations, the controller 510 can be, for example, a Galil DMC31012 controller with built-in amplifier and a 16 bit analog output.
As is known, the controller 510, such as a servo controller, can generate control signals that operate the motor 300. For example, in accordance with programmed instructions, typically in the form of software, the controller 510 can generate control signals and output such control signals to the motor 300 to cause movement of the robotic finger 520. In one embodiment the controller 510 is programmed to control the motor 300 depending on the particular application for which the finger 300 is being utilized. Typically, a computer (not shown) is coupled to the controller 510 to generate and transmit software (code representing a set of instructions to be executed) generated in a programming language to the controller 510 for the specific application. Such software, once running on the controller 510, will instruct the motor 300 to move the robotic finger 520 in a manner specific to the particular application or task.
Examples of computer code include, but are not limited to, micro-code or micro-instructions, machine instructions, such as produced by a compiler, code used to produce a web service, and files containing higher-level instructions that are executed by a computer using an interpreter. For example, embodiments may be implemented using imperative programming languages (e.g., C, FORTRAN, etc.), functional programming languages (Haskell, Erlang, etc.), logical programming languages (e.g., Prolog), object-oriented programming languages (e.g., Java, C++, etc.) or other suitable programming languages and/or development tools. Additional examples of computer code include, but are not limited to, control signals, encrypted code, and compressed code.
Turning to
During operation the motor control apparatus 550 functions to control currents flowing through the coils 312. To this end a first current sensor 554 detects a first current Ia flowing through one of the coils 312 and a second current sensor 558 detects a second current Ib flowing through another of the coils 312. As shown, measurements of the currents Ia, Ib and an actual position signal (θ) from the encoder read head 158 (or other position sensor operative to detect the angular positon of a rotating component of the motor 300) are supplied to a d-q transform module 558 configured to implement a d-q transform (also known as a Park transform). As is known, the d-q transform may be used to effectively transform or otherwise project a three-phase system onto a two-dimensional control space. Although in the general case implementation of the d-q transform requires Ic in addition to Ia, Ib and θ, in the present embodiment the 3-phase coils of the motor 300 are balanced and thus Ic can be reconstructed from Ia and Ib.
Implementation of the Park transform enables the module 558 to express the set of three sinusoidal currents present on the coils 312 as a direct axis current Id and a quadrature axis current Iq. Since the Park-transformed currents Id, Iq are essentially constant, it becomes possible to control the motor 300 by using the constant currents Id, Iq rather than the sinusoidal signals actually supplied to the motor 300.
As shown in
Attention is now directed to
As shown in
The direct drive brushless motor 600 may further include a plurality of non-rotational inner magnets 628. The back plate 640 supports a center pole structure 644 circumscribed by the non-rotational inner magnets 628. The motor 600 further includes a front ball bearing 660 and rear ball bearing 664. A linear encoder assembly includes a linear encoder feedback scale 654 and a linear feedback scale read head 658. The linear encoder feedback scale 654 is supported by a motor hub 662. The read head 658 provides, to an external computing element or device (not shown), position feedback information concerning rotation of the rotational components of the direct drive brushless motor 600.
Embodiments of the direct drive brushless motor 600 may utilize a dual magnetic circuit in order to obtain higher torque. Specifically, the outer magnets 616, center pole 644, and coils 612 form a first circuit. The coils 612, inner magnets 628 and center rotation shaft 608 form a second circuit. This arrangement is believed to provide substantially more torque than is capable of being provided by standard brushless motors employing only a single “outer” circuit.
Turning now to
Attention is now directed to
As shown in
The flex cable 810 may facilitate communication between an external controller (not shown) and the plurality of coils so that, for example, the external controller can control the rotation rate and positioning of the shaft 840. In one embodiment electrical current from the external controller may be provided to flex cable 810 via the second electrical connector 832.
The design of the motor 800 is based in part upon the realization that the motor 800 need not run through complete turns of 360 degrees in order to mimic the behavior of a human finger; rather, turns of 90 or 30 degrees may be sufficient. Since turns of less than 360 degrees are contemplated, the flex cable 810 may be used to supply current to the plurality of coils without becoming wrapped around or otherwise entangled in the rotating components of the motor as the coil termination plate 830 rotates through turns of less than 360 degrees. Thus, the flex cable 810 may provide current to the coils of the motor 800 without using, for example, brushes or a commutator of the type employed in brushed DC motors.
Turning now to
Although the present invention has been fully described in connection with embodiments thereof with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be noted that various changes and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art. Such changes and modifications are to be understood as being included within the scope of the present invention. The various embodiments of the invention should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not by way of limitation. Likewise, the various diagrams may depict an example architectural or other configuration for the invention, which is done to aid in understanding the features and functionality that can be included in the invention. The invention is not restricted to the illustrated example architectures or configurations, but can be implemented using a variety of alternative architectures and configurations. Additionally, although the invention is described above in terms of various exemplary embodiments and implementations, it should be understood that the various features and functionality described in one or more of the individual embodiments are not limited in their applicability to the particular embodiment with which they are described. They instead can, be applied, alone or in some combination, to one or more of the other embodiments of the invention, whether or not such embodiments are described, and whether or not such features are presented as being a part of a described embodiment. Thus the breadth and scope of the invention should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments.
Terms and phrases used in this document, and variations thereof, unless otherwise expressly stated, should be construed as open ended as opposed to limiting. As examples of the foregoing: the term “including” should be read as meaning “including, without limitation” or the like; the term “example” is used to provide exemplary instances of the item in discussion, not an exhaustive or limiting list thereof; and adjectives such as “conventional,” “traditional,” “normal,” “standard,” “known”, and terms of similar meaning, should not be construed as limiting the item described to a given time period, or to an item available as of a given time. But instead these terms should be read to encompass conventional, traditional, normal, or standard technologies that may be available, known now, or at any time in the future. Likewise, a group of items linked with the conjunction “and” should not be read as requiring that each and every one of those items be present in the grouping, but rather should be read as “and/or” unless expressly stated otherwise. Similarly, a group of items linked with the conjunction “or” should not be read as requiring mutual exclusivity among that group, but rather should also be read as “and/or” unless expressly stated otherwise. Furthermore, although items, elements or components of the invention may be described or claimed in the singular, the plural is contemplated to be within the scope thereof unless limitation to the singular is explicitly stated. For example, “at least one” may refer to a single or plural and is not limited to either. The presence of broadening words and phrases such as “one or more,” “at least,” “but not limited to”, or other like phrases in some instances shall not be read to mean that the narrower case is intended or required in instances where such broadening phrases may be absent.
Additionally, memory or other storage, as well as communication components, may be employed in embodiments of the invention. It will be appreciated that, for clarity purposes, the above description has described embodiments of the invention with reference to different functional units and processors. However, it will be apparent that any suitable distribution of functionality between different functional units, processing logic elements or domains may be used without detracting from the invention. For example, functionality illustrated to be performed by separate processing logic elements, or controllers, may be performed by the same processing logic element, or controller. Hence, references to specific functional units are only to be seen as references to suitable means for providing the described functionality, rather than indicative of a strict logical or physical structure or organization.
The foregoing description, for purposes of explanation, used specific nomenclature to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that specific details are not required in order to practice the invention. Thus, the foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the invention are presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed; obviously, many modifications and variations are possible in view of the above teachings. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical applications, they thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the following claims and their equivalents define the scope of the invention.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/441,913, entitled HIGH-TORQUE, LOW CURRENT BRUSHLESS MOTOR, filed Jan. 3, 2017, and is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 14/611,113, entitled DIRECT DRIVE MOTOR FOR ROBOTIC FINGER, filed Jan. 30, 2015, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/934,628, entitled DIRECT DRIVE MOTOR FOR ROBOTIC FINGER, filed Jan. 31, 2014. This application is related to U.S. application Ser. No. 13/927,076, entitled ROBOTIC FINGER, filed Jun. 25, 2013. The content of each of the foregoing applications is hereby expressly incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3152275 | Aske | Oct 1964 | A |
| 3602749 | Esters | Aug 1971 | A |
| 3734332 | Grulich | May 1973 | A |
| 4398167 | Dickie | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4488242 | Tabata et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4576421 | Teramachi | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4616886 | Teramachi | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4677375 | Nakaie et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4693676 | Inaba | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4696144 | Bankuty et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4745589 | Nomura | May 1988 | A |
| 4799803 | Tanaka | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4804913 | Shimizu et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4808955 | Godkin et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4857786 | Nihei et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4858452 | Ibrahim | Aug 1989 | A |
| 5051635 | Kasahara | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5053670 | Kosugi | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5057753 | Leuthold et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5111088 | Fujino | May 1992 | A |
| 5115617 | Lewis et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5160865 | Gururangan | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5161586 | Auriemma | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5175456 | Neff et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5201838 | Roudaut | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5212862 | Eshghy | May 1993 | A |
| 5225725 | Shiraki et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5270625 | Neff | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5317222 | Neff et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5349543 | Buliszyn et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5376862 | Stevens | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5446323 | Neff et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5450050 | Ban et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5476324 | Takei | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5501498 | Ulrich | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5594309 | McConnell et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5685214 | Neff | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5722300 | Burkhard et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5751075 | Kwon et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5751077 | Gonzalez | May 1998 | A |
| 5834872 | Lamb | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5859482 | Crowell et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5893646 | Mizutani et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5952589 | Leung et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6004029 | Moslehi et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6021555 | Leong | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6043573 | Neff et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6073505 | Yuda | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6091167 | Vu et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6105343 | Grove et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6116139 | Yuda et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6118360 | Neff | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6223971 | Sato | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6227703 | DiMatteo | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6290308 | Zitzelsberger | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6404086 | Fukasaku et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6439103 | Miller | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6494611 | Edwards et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6495935 | Mishler | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6525439 | Whelan et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6741151 | Livshitz et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6792657 | Reid et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6848164 | Jung | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6907651 | Fisher et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6997077 | Kollmann et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7011117 | Carpino et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7053583 | Hazelton | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7168748 | Townsend et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7323798 | Hartramph et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7336007 | Chitayat | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7482717 | Hochhalter | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7517721 | Ito et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7800470 | Wright et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7960893 | Kim et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 8083278 | Yuan | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8415838 | Eghbal et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
| 8487484 | Miller, Jr. et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
| 8498741 | Ihrke et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8578760 | Calhoun et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8890389 | Li et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8915047 | Wilhelm et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 9375848 | Neff et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9381649 | Neff | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9731418 | Neff et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9748823 | Neff et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9748824 | Neff et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9780634 | Neff et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9871435 | Neff et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9887612 | Eghbal | Feb 2018 | B1 |
| 10005187 | Neff et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 10205355 | Neff et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10215802 | Neff et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10429211 | Neff et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 20010013728 | Harita et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20020148205 | Takebe et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020166221 | Clew | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030009241 | Kruger et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030218391 | Hirata | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040076348 | Dalessandro et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040227535 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040232800 | Seguchi et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040237679 | Enright | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050211512 | Fenwick | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050234565 | Marks et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050253469 | Hochhalter et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050258701 | Soitu | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060023980 | Kato et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060113847 | Randall et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060242929 | Servadei et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060279140 | Jenny | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070047050 | Masahiko et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070053781 | Davis | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070107801 | Cochran et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070296364 | Shoemaker et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080048505 | Moriyama et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080150559 | Nayak et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080157607 | Scheich et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080258654 | Neff | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090013642 | Yuyama et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090040247 | Cato et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090058198 | Finkbeiner et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090058201 | Brennvall | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090058581 | Neff et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090114052 | Haniya et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090152960 | Kimura et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090218894 | Aso et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090261663 | Aso et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090278412 | Kimura et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090302798 | Wei | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090309442 | Qu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100005918 | Mizuno et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100101192 | Krevald | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100133924 | Neff et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100171378 | Kim et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100181858 | Hibbs et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100203249 | Elgimiabi | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100244605 | Nakano et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100274365 | Evans | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100295401 | Nakagawa et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20110037333 | Atallah et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110068595 | Ihrke et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110083405 | Dewert et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110132169 | Kapoor et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110187222 | Li et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110210636 | Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20120043832 | Neff et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120080960 | Neff et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120187779 | Lee | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120206024 | Yoshida et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120299405 | Li et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120305092 | Corso et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130093276 | Kim | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130154397 | Sullivan | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20140159407 | Neff et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140159408 | Neff et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140159513 | Neff et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140159514 | Neff et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140210396 | Yamanaka et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140317941 | Patti et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140333241 | Zhao | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20150048695 | Stoltenberg et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150168483 | Kim | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150171723 | Neff et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150236575 | Walsh | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150279539 | Blanding et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150303785 | Neff | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20160013712 | Neff et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160184989 | Neff et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160229064 | Neff et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20170012519 | Neff et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170014964 | Neff | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170089976 | Neff et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20180071921 | Neff | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180191210 | Neff et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2217958 | Oct 1973 | DE |
| 0556469 | Aug 1993 | EP |
| 1278109 | Jan 2003 | EP |
| 1827073 | Aug 2007 | EP |
| 645281 | Oct 1950 | GB |
| 61-116964 | Jun 1986 | JP |
| 04-181562 | Jun 1992 | JP |
| 03285554 | Dec 1992 | JP |
| 5-23994 | Feb 1993 | JP |
| 06-054497 | Feb 1994 | JP |
| 06-245446 | Sep 1994 | JP |
| 06-260332 | Sep 1994 | JP |
| 07-015942 | Jan 1995 | JP |
| 07-131967 | May 1995 | JP |
| H09-214187 | Aug 1997 | JP |
| 10-329081 | Dec 1998 | JP |
| 2000-152592 | May 2000 | JP |
| 2001-238427 | Aug 2001 | JP |
| 2001-286121 | Oct 2001 | JP |
| 2002-176292 | Jun 2002 | JP |
| 2004-332935 | Nov 2004 | JP |
| 2005-020901 | Jan 2005 | JP |
| 2005-080415 | Mar 2005 | JP |
| 2008-048556 | Feb 2008 | JP |
| 2008-155302 | Jul 2008 | JP |
| 2008-193845 | Aug 2008 | JP |
| 2010-178614 | Aug 2010 | JP |
| 52-22705 | Jun 2013 | JP |
| 2013-126334 | Jun 2013 | JP |
| 10-2008-0090040 | Oct 2008 | KR |
| 20-2011-0003488 | Apr 2011 | KR |
| 10-2011-0139434 | Dec 2011 | KR |
| WO 2007026566 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007063729 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008081685 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009116343 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009117827 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| WO 2011088964 | Jul 2011 | WO |
| WO 2013099008 | Jul 2013 | WO |
| WO 2014076809 | May 2014 | WO |
| WO 2015117095 | Aug 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015154026 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/012223, dated Apr. 24, 2018, 9 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/047727, dated Oct. 16, 2013, 7 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2013/047727, dated Dec. 31, 2014, 5 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/047728, dated Oct. 16, 2013, 9 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2013/047728, dated Dec. 31, 2014, 7 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2008/071988, dated Nov. 3, 2008, 5 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2008/071988, dated Feb. 2, 2010, 5 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2008/052121, dated Aug. 6, 2008, 5 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2008/052121, dated Jul. 28, 2009, 5 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2011/053070, dated Feb. 16, 2012, 6 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability International Application No. PCT/US2011/053070, dated Mar. 26, 2013, 5 pages. |
| Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 14191347.5, dated May 4, 2015, 7 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/014133, dated Apr. 29, 2015, 8 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/024341, dated Jul. 15, 2015, 10 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2015/024341, dated Oct. 4, 2016, 8 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/054314, dated Jan. 22, 2016, 10 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/014602, dated May 12, 2016, 9 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/041793, dated Oct. 3, 2016, 7 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/053565, dated Dec. 27, 2016, 8 pages. |
| Dirjish, M., “What's the difference between brush DC and brushless DC motors?”, Electronic Design, Feb. 16, 2012, 5 pages. |
| Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC, “DC Motor Driver Fundamentals,” Publication Order No. TND6041/D, ON Semiconductor [online], Mar. 2014—Rev. 1, pp. 1-9, www.onsemi.com. |
| Machine Design, Design FAQs, Variable Wattage Control Systems for Electric Heaters, “Moving coil motor technology,” [online], Feb. 26, 2009, [Retrieved from the Internet: Jul. 31, 2015], <URL: http://machinedesign.com/motion-control/moving-coil-motor-technology>, 1 page. |
| Thomas Publishing Company, Product News: Mechanical Power Transmission, “Actuator and Ball Spline come in mini and micro sizes,” [online], Sep. 3, 2004, [Retrieved from the Internet: Aug. 7, 2015], <URL: http://news.thomasnet.com/fullstory/455177>, 5 pages. |
| Luna Bearings, Automation & Power Transmission, WON Linear Motion System, “Compact Ball Spline,” [online], 2009, [Retrieved from the Internet: Aug. 7, 2015], <URL: http://www.lunabearings.com/won.htm>, 6 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 15773920.2, dated Jan. 4, 2018, 7 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20180071921 A1 | Mar 2018 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62441913 | Jan 2017 | US | |
| 61934628 | Jan 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14611113 | Jan 2015 | US |
| Child | 15712047 | US |