This application is a National Phase Entry under 35 USC § 371 of PCT Patent Application Serial No. PCT/FI2016/050134 filed Mar. 4, 2016, which claims priority to Finnish Patent Application No. 20155154, filed Mar. 9, 2015, the disclosure of each of these applications is expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The present invention relates to a transparent display device, and particularly to a transparent display device according to the preamble of claim 1. The present invention further relates to a method for manufacturing a transparent display device, and particularly to method according to the preamble of claim 10.
Electroluminescent (hereinafter, “EL”) displays are dominantly emissive flat panel displays created for example by interposing a layer of luminescent material between two insulator layers and two conductor layers to which a controllable voltage can be applied, creating a controllable electric field over at least a portion of the luminescent material for excitation, and thus making it luminous at the location of excitation. At least the one of said conductors is at least partially transparent to allow the luminescent radiation (usually visible light) to leave the display structure for viewing purposes. Usually said layers are thin, their thickness is in the order of some 10s to 100s of nanometers (nm). Such displays are thus called Thin Film EL displays, (“TFEL” displays or “TFELs” for short).
When a voltage is applied to said conductors, the layer of EL material (“luminescent material”) emits radiation in some emission wavelengths, giving rise to an emission spectrum. This spectrum can consist of one or more continuous wavelength regions where said emissions take place, separated by regions with no or only negligible emissions. For display purposes, said emission spectrum comprises at least one band of wavelengths of visible light. Said conductors are usually arranged to form a matrix of row and column electrodes, giving rise to the picture elements or pixels of the display device. Such a display is thus called a “matrix display”. It is also possible to arrange the electrodes into segments of arbitrary symbols or shapes. In this case the segments can be lit independently of one another. Such a display is called a “segmented display”. A TFEL display also features control electronics which is connected to the electrodes of the TFEL display. Control electronics is usually not visible to the viewer of the display, and outside the image forming display area of the TFEL display.
The light emission color of TFEL displays depends on the physical properties of the material used as a luminescent layer of the active layer. This layer is also called the “phosphor” layer in the display community. Typical materials are e.g. ZnS:Mn (zinc sulphide doped with manganese) and ZnS:Tb (zinc sulphide doped with terbium) for yellow and green emission colors, respectively. The emission ranges of these substances are rather narrow, covering only a part of the visible wavelength spectrum. A typical performance level of a commercial state-of-the-art TFEL display is a luminance of 100 nits (=100 candelas/m2) or more.
Thin film electroluminescent (TFEL) technology is well known, and many important aspects of TFEL technology like the basic physics, typical materials, electrical operations, driving methods, long term stability and reliability issues and manufacturing technology of TFEL displays are common and general knowledge. In particular, AC-driven, inorganic thin film electroluminescent (TFEL) displays have reached a mature stage. In such displays, the display is driven with an alternating current (and voltage) with both substantially positive and negative driving voltage signals. Further, in such displays, luminescent layers, insulator layers and conductor layers of the display are substantially of inorganic material. A good overview of related technology is available from the book “Electroluminescent Displays” by Yoshimasa A. Ono, World Scientific Publishing Co., 1995 (ISBN 981-02-1920-0), in particular from Chapters 3, 5 and 8.
Visible light is the portion of the electromagnetic (hereinafter, “EM”) spectrum to which the human eye is sensitive, causing the sense of sight or vision. The spectrum of the visible light (“visible spectrum”) has a wavelength of approximately 380 nm-760 nm. Human eye interprets different wavelengths of visible spectrum of light as different colors. For example, light with wavelength of 580 nm is seen as yellow, light with wavelength of 545 nm is seen as green, and light with wavelength of 690 nm is seen as red color. In case there are many wavelengths present, the sense of vision interprets the aggregate radiation according to the well-known color theory. White light is a suitable combination of light components of different wavelengths (e.g. three components: red, green and blue).
Primary properties of any EM radiation, including visible light, are intensity, propagation direction and speed, frequency or wavelength spectrum, and polarisation. Propagation speed of the EM radiation in vacuum c0=299,792,458 m/s is a fundamental constant. However, for any non-vacuum media, speed of the EM radiation is lower. Light speed in media with refractive index n is simply c0/n (speed of EM radiation in vacuum divided by refractive index of the media). Intensity of radiation (also known as power density) is the power transferred per unit area (W/m2) by the EM radiation. For any viewing application, the intensity of visible light must be sufficient for the sense of sight to detect information. To convey information, information conveying light must also be detectable from the background ambient light by the sense of sight, meaning that the contrast of the information conveying light must be high enough relative to the ambient light.
An important, emerging subtype of thin film electroluminescent displays is the transparent thin film electroluminescent display, denoted also as “TASEL” or “TASEL display” for brevity. These displays are usually inorganic, AC-driven displays, but other types such as DC-driven displays or organic light emitting displays (OLED) are also possible. Transparent TFEL displays possess the significant advantage of allowing the viewer (or user) of the display to access simultaneously both the information shown on the display and information or events which are present or take place behind the display. Vehicle dashboard meters (e.g. tachometer and speedometer), neonatal intensive care unit displays and display cabinets for luxury goods with digital signage are examples of applications where it is very advantageous to see behind the display device and through the display device so that virtually nothing is obstructed from the view and maximal information is conveyed also from behind the display to the viewer. Additional information on prior art transparent TFEL technology is set forth for example in a public white paper by Abileah et al., “Transparent Electroluminescent (EL) Displays”, published by Planar Systems, Inc. (2008).
Inorganic, thin film electroluminescent (TFEL) technology is especially well suitable for transparent display applications as it provides a light emitting display with potentially very high transparency with photopic transmission (as defined later) values of being higher than 50%. Consequently, unless otherwise indicated, the word “transparent” in the present application means a structure that passes light in the visible spectrum so that the photopic transmission of the structure, and in particular, the TASEL, is above 30%, more preferably above 40% and most preferably above 50%.
The main difference between transparent and conventional TFEL displays is that the opaque metal electrode material (typically aluminium) is replaced by transparent electrode material (typically indium tin oxide, ITO) so that the electrodes (and naturally, other possible layers) on both sides of the luminescent layer are suitably transparent to light. Irrespective of the display type, all TFEL displays are known for excellent picture quality, rugged design and long-term reliability.
A significant drawback of the prior art transparent TFEL displays, TASELs, is their performance in bright ambient light. Naturally, the intensity of the light emitted from the EL pixels or segments must be such that the light conveying the displayed information is clearly observable in the ambient lighting conditions by the sense of sight (also called “eyesight”). The ambient lighting conditions are unfortunately more difficult to control with TASELs than with more traditional, non-transparent TFEL displays where the completely opaque backside of the display device blocks a large portion of the ambient light.
An important measure of the display performance in ambient light is the maximum achievable contrast ratio. To make the information conveyed by the display as easy to observe as possible by the sense of sight, the contrast ratio should be as high as possible. A simple way to estimate the contrast ratio CR is given by the following equation:
CR=(LEM+LAM)/LAM,
where
LEM=Luminance of a display pixel or display segment when pixel/segment is active (in a luminance state), and
LAM=Luminance of a pixel or segment originating from ambient light (pixel or segment is in a non-luminance state).
From the equation above it is easy to see that anything that decreases LAM and increases LEM would improve the contrast ratio and consequently improve display's ability to convey information for the viewer.
Prior art approaches for increasing contrast ratio CR include the idea of simply increasing LEM, and in practical terms this can be achieved e.g. by driving the display with more power. However, there is an upper limit to the power imposed by physical characteristics of the display device. Further, power consumption must usually be minimized in any electrical appliance, especially if the appliance is portable and operated mostly or solely under battery power. As already discussed, decreasing ambient light with prior art methods in transparent displays has been challenging especially in outdoor conditions where, during daytime, sunshine creates a very strong ambient luminance from the display (ambient luminance means the light intensity reflected from or passed through the display as perceived by human eye falling upon the display viewing side surface side or backside surface from ambient light sources such as Sun, indoor lighting or car headlights).
For a transparent display, another important property is the transmission of light through the display, best characterized by a photopic transmission coefficient T, of the display over the whole visible light range as perceived by human eye, originating from a standard light source.
As EM radiation (EM radiation is also called EM waves) interacts with the media differently at different frequencies (and correspondingly, wavelengths), TR (subscript R for spectral radiometric transmission) is wavelength (“λ”) dependent (TR=TR(λ)). TR is a spectral radiometric quantity, and it indicates the ratio of the power (or a related quantity, energy) of transmitted EM wave and incident wave at some material interface or interfaces at a certain wavelength. A TASEL or other such transparent optical device is naturally one such relatively complex example of such surfaces and material interfaces. TR can be measured using a double beam spectrometer (one beam measuring the incident, the other the transmitted wave) which produces a transmission spectrum between some wavelengths λ1 and Δ2.
To get a more realistic transmission information related to human vision, TR(λ) must be weighted with a photopic spectral response of a human eye V(λ), as only wavelengths contributing to the sense of sight are relevant in display applications—power carried by the radiation outside the visible spectrum is, from the standpoint of vision, lost.
As radiation sources also exhibit a frequency (and thus, wavelength) dependent response, to further increase the accuracy of the transmission analysis related to human vision, spectrum characteristics I(λ) of a light source should be taken into account, too. For example, it is possible to express I(λ) as a standard CIE-D65 light source, denoted as I(λ)D65, a commonly used standard illuminant defined by the International Commission on Illumination (CIE) that corresponds roughly to a midday sun in Western Europe or Northem Europe.
The combined result of V(λ), I(λ) and TR(λ) is known as the visible light transmission or photopic transmission TP, measuring the brightness of an object (e.g. display) radiating according to a standard spectral response I(λ)D65 as perceived by a human eye, having response V(λ):
A basic requirement for transparent displays like TASELs is that the value for photopic transmission TP of the display structure is high, more than 30%, more preferably more than 40% and most preferably more than 50%, as otherwise the transparent nature of the display starts to suffer. With careful design, value of 65% or even higher for the photopic transmission TP of a TASEL is achievable. However, as already discussed, prior art transparent displays suffer from the high intensity of ambient light that the high photopic transmission of the transparent display allows to pass through, cutting down the contrast ratio, and seriously hampering the readability and usability of the transparent (e.g. TASEL) displays.
It is also possible to express the transmission of an optical element like light source or a reflector without taking into account the physiological characteristics of vision, and to take into account the special emissive characteristics of the light source. For example, for the characteristic emissivity of EL displays, I(λ)EL, the electroluminescent transmission TEL can be defined as
A related quantity is the electroluminescent reflectance, REL, defined here as REL=1−TEL−L. This means that amount of light emitted by the EL light source (such as an EL display) not transmitted through the surface of the light source is reflected back at the surface, or lost into the optical loss mechanisms (expressed as coefficient L) of the source.
By studying the expression for TEL it is evident that in the numerator there is a product of two factors, I(λ)EL and TR(λ). If either one of these factors is zero or close to zero, the product is zero or close to zero, and the contribution to the integral is also zero or close to zero. Thus, it is possible to achieve a very small overall TEL with a design that transmits very little (manifested by a low values of TR(λ)) at wavelengths where the emissivity is high (manifested by high values of I(λ)EL), and transmits substantially at wavelengths where the emissivity is low.
In other words, an EL display structure can have a relatively high photopic transmission (say, 60%), leading to a rather low photopic reflectance (100%−60%=40%, assuming small or negligible losses). Such a structure is substantially transparent to the sense of sight. However, at the same time, its electroluminescent transmission can be very low (in the order of 5%-35%), leading to a very high electroluminescent reflectance (65%-95%, again assuming zero or otherwise negligible losses). Such a structure is almost entirely non-transparent to electroluminescent light. The difference in photopic and electroluminescent values is created mostly by the different spectral characteristics of the light sources in TP and TEL and wavelength-specific response of the structure. If such a structure substantially reflects light on a narrow band of wavelengths, it is often called a narrowband reflector (“NBR” for short).
Depending on the application, values for suitable electroluminescent transmission of the narrowband reflector of the transparent thin film electroluminescent display of the present invention are from 50% to 65%, from 25% to 50%, or from 0.1% to 25% for the emission spectrum emitted by the active layer of the display. Assuming small losses (L is approximately 0), this leads to electroluminescent reflectance (REL=1−TEL) of from 35% to 50%, from 50% to 75%, or from 75% to 99.9% for the emission spectrum emitted by the active layer of the display, respectively.
In prior art, the problem of lack of contrast in bright ambient light has usually been solved with a specific backside photochromic layer that darkens the rear of the display element, as provided for example in US patent publication U.S. Pat. No. 5,757,127. Naturally, driving and control circuitry must be provided for the darkening layer for excitation and detection of bright ambient light, making such approach complex and requiring external energy. The approach is also based on absorption of light, not on the reflection of light. Thus, light emitted by the display towards the backside is lost from viewing purposes, and thus part of the energy driving the display is wasted.
Prior art also shows display devices where narrowband reflectors are used. For example WO2005/064383 uses a narrow band reflector for separating two stacked displays. This document does not present anything about the lack of display's contrast in bright ambient light as the overall display device is completely non-transparent and therefore not prone to ambient light passing through the overall structure.
An object of the present invention is to provide a transparent display and a method for manufacturing such a transparent display to overcome or at least alleviate the above mentioned prior art disadvantages. The objects of the invention are achieved by a transparent display device which is characterized by what is stated in the characterizing portion of independent claim 1. The objects of the present invention are further achieved by a method which is characterized by what is stated in the characterizing portion of independent claim 10.
The preferred embodiments of the invention are disclosed in the dependent claims.
The present invention is based on the idea of providing at least one narrowband reflector (hereinafter, “NBR”) to a transparent display. It has been surprisingly found out that an NBR can make a major improvement to the contrast ratio of a transparent display without a substantial negative impact on the visibility through the display as perceived by the viewer of the display. With “narrowband” the present application means that only a subset, one or more sub-bands of the visible spectrum is reflected by the NBR. Thin film optical reflectors with narrowband characteristics are, as such, well known, and many important aspects of that technology like basic physics, typical materials, optical design concepts and design software tools and manufacturing technology are common and general knowledge, e.g. from the book “Thin Film Optical Filters”, by H. A. McLeod, published by Institute of Physics Publishing, ISBN 0 7503 0688 2, Chapter 5.2.
A transparent display has two sides, first side, the viewing side, and a second side, the backside. Display surfaces are called the viewing side surface at the viewing side, and the backside surface at the backside, respectively. The viewer of the display observes the display from the viewing side, through the viewing side surface. Even though the display is transparent, in most cases it makes sense to observe the display from the first, viewing side only, as the information displayed on the display appears as a mirror image on the second side, on the backside surface of the display, making it difficult to comprehend. According to the present invention, the viewing side surface and the one or more narrowband reflectors are placed on the opposite sides of the active layer. Said active layer contains at least one luminescent layer of the display. An active layer can also contain other layers like barrier layers (improving the lifetime and reliability of the display) and optical matching layers (improving the optical properties of the display) inside or on top of the active layer structure. There can be one or many NBRs, but relevant to the current invention is that they are positioned on the other side of the active layer than the viewing side surface.
Due to the narrowband operation of the NBR, the NBR still has a suitably high photopic transmission so that the overall TASEL structure incorporating one or more NBRs has a photopic transmission TP of more than 30%, more preferably more than 40% and most preferably more than 50%, rendering the TASEL substantially transparent for the purposes of human vision.
As the active layer of a prior art TASEL emits approximately half (˜50%) of its radiated power (=power that is radiated to the outside of the display structure) towards the viewing side surface, and the rest towards the backside surface, and as the NBR is adapted to considerably reflect the light back towards the viewing side surface at the emissive wavelengths, luminance of the light emitted by the active layer at the viewing side surface is increased when compared to a prior art display with no NBR preset in the structure. Similarly, the luminance of the ambient light over the visible spectrum towards the viewer on the viewing side surface is decreased since part of the ambient light (in particular ambient light in the substantially emissive wavelengths of the active layer) is considerably reflected by the NBR towards the backside surface. As the emitted luminance is thus increased and luminance due to ambient light is decreased, contrast ratio of the transparent display is increased and enhanced considerably, leading to overall improvement of TASEL's readability and usability.
The present invention is further based on the method of manufacturing an advantageous transparent thin film electroluminescent display having a viewing side surface, an active layer and a narrowband reflector, wherein the method comprises a step of arranging a narrowband reflector and a viewing side surface on the opposite sides of the active layer.
In the following the invention will be described in greater detail by means of preferred embodiments with reference to the accompanying
In the Figures,
Finally,
It should be noted that in
In the following description, for the purposes of clear explanation, a number of specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. It is apparent to one skilled in the art that embodiments of the invention may, however, be practiced without one or more of these specific details or with some equivalent arrangement. Furthermore, the features of the specific embodiments described below may be combined in any suitable manner.
A “substrate” in the context of the present application is the material providing the main, rigid structure of the display. Such substrate materials may include soda lime, borosilicate glass, or any other material with sufficient transparency. In some embodiments, substrates other than glass materials may be suitable, such as polymer substrates which may provide greater mechanical durability or flexibility than glass. The photopic transmission of suitable substrates is preferably greater than 60%. In some embodiments, the transmission of a substrate may be greater than 80% or even greater than 90%. Substrate thickness may be in the range of 0.05 mm-5 mm or more. In some embodiments, the thickness of the substrate may be in the range of 0.3 mm-3 mm or 0.7 mm-1.2 mm, and a suitable thickness is about 1.1 mm.
Further, a variety of different thin film materials may be used for the TFEL display structure and for the optical structure of the NBR. Materials that are generally suitable for transparent TFEL display manufacturing or for manufacturing of optical narrowband reflectors are advantageous. ZnS:Mn luminescent material is preferred for yellow emitting TFEL displays so that luminescent layer and consequently the active layer comprise ZnS:Mn. ZnS:Tb luminescent material is preferred for green emitting TFEL displays so that luminescent layer and consequently the active layer comprise ZnS:Tb. However, the selection of materials is not limited to these luminescent materials. Other luminescent material can be used and are preferred especially if other emission colors are needed.
Insulator or dielectric materials for the TFEL display may include Al2O3, TiO2, HfO2, ZrO2, SiO2 and combinations and mixtures of these materials, or other materials, in particular oxide materials.
Transparent electrode materials for the TFEL display may include indium tin oxide (ITO), ZnO:Al, SnO2 or any other conductive material with sufficient transparency. The sheet resistance (Rs) of a suitable transparent electrode is preferably less than 500 Ohm/sq. In some embodiments, the Rs may be less than 30 Ohm/sq. In other embodiments, the Rs may be less than 10 Ohm/sq.
Materials for manufacturing one or more NBRs may include Al2O3, SiO2, TiO2, HfO2, ZrO2, ZnO and ZnS, a combination of these materials, or other suitably transparent materials.
Further, in terms of manufacturing methods, many different manufacturing methods such as sputtering or evaporation methods may be used for making the TASEL structure and for making the optical structure of the NBR. Many different manufacturing methods (e.g. bonding with adhesive) may also be used for integrating or combining the parts of the TASEL structure and the NBR. Methods that are generally accepted as suitable for transparent TFEL display manufacturing or for the manufacturing of optical narrowband reflectors or their integration or combining are preferred and suitable.
A preferred manufacturing method for both luminescent and insulator layers of TFEL display, and for thin films of the one or more NBRs, is the Atomic Layer Deposition method, for short, “ALD”. ALD is a generally known coating method in which one or more surfaces of a substrate or other such surface are subjected to alternating surface reactions of at least a first and second gaseous (or vapour phase) precursors.
One ALD cycle is completed when the surfaces of the substrate to be coated by ALD are subjected once to all gaseous (usually two) precursors. By repeating the cycles, material layers of different thicknesses can be achieved. The ALD surface reactions are normally substantially saturated surface reactions, meaning that only one monolayer of material is formed on the surfaces of the substrate in one ALD cycle. One basic characteristic of ALD method is the excellent conformity of the surfaces reactions. This means that the ALD growth layers of material grow on all the surfaces which are subjected to the precursors, and at a substantially same thickness. This makes ALD very attractive in optical applications where even the slightest variation in material thicknesses leads to optical distortion and other such problems, and thus ALD is also a prominent method for making TFELs and related structures like NBRs and luminescent layers.
In
It is evident for a man skilled in the art that all layers of the TFEL display can consist of different sub-layers. For example, the insulator layers can consist of two different insulating materials each, and the luminescent layer can also consist of two or more different materials that are luminescent or otherwise improve the overall operation of the luminescent layer.
Electrodes may be patterned to form rows and columns of the TFEL display for a matrix type of display, or segments, symbols or shapes for a segmented type of display. In
It should be noted that small perforations (holes penetrating through the electrode) or thin-outs (small dimples not penetrating through the electrode but making it thinner and thus easier for light to penetrate) can also be arranged to the electrodes to enable light pass through the electrodes even better (perforations not shown), further increasing the quality of the display functions.
A simple prior art transparent thin film display structure shown in
In general, the narrowband reflector comprises at least one layer of high refractive index material, and at least one layer of low refractive index material. In the present application, “high” and “low” are relative terms, “high” refractive index material must have a higher refractive index than the “low” refractive index material, but their absolute values are not specific. As is evident for a man skilled in the art, refractive index is also slightly wavelength dependent. For example, aluminium oxide (Al2O3) has refractive index of approximately 1.64 in the visible wavelength range, and the value 1.64 is a typical example value for a low refractive index material. Thus, in this case, the low refractive index material comprises aluminium. By the same token, titanium dioxide (TiO2) has refractive index of approximately 2.4 in the visible wavelengths, and 2.4 is a typical example value for a high refractive index material. Therefore, in this case, the high refractive index material comprises titanium. As is also evident for a man skilled in the art, an NBR can also contain other layers for e.g. optical purposes, e.g. one or more layers of a third material with a third refractive index other than high or low refractive index. For example a material with a very low refractive index, e.g. 1.52 or lower, enables optimization of NBR's optical properties, e.g. a better matching of the NBR to its surrounding, for example free space (air). SiO2 is one such third material. Each of the layers can have an independent thickness (not shown). Such a structure causes wavelength-dependent constructive or destructive interference to the light propagating through and reflecting multiple times from the NBR's dielectric layers and their interfaces, resulting in wavelength-dependent transmission and reflection. If the layers of the NBR are low loss materials, the entire NBR will be substantially a low loss structure, too. The material parameters and thicknesses of each of the layers can be chosen to fulfill reflection and transmission specifications for various wavelengths of visible light. Theory of choosing the material parameters, thicknesses and layer arrangements for a desired frequency/wavelength response of transmission and reflection are well known prior art, available e.g. from “Thin Film Optical Filters”, by H. A. McLeod, published by Institute of Physics Publishing, ISBN 0 7503 0688 2, Chapter 5.2.
According to an embodiment of the present invention,
Light emitted by the active layer 78b is split into two components, viewing surface light 71 and back surface light 72. Back surface light 72 travels towards the NBR subunit 79 and the NBR 79a. Part of the back surface light 72 is reflected from the NBR 79a back towards the viewing surface as reflected viewing surface light 73. This reflected viewing surface light 73 contributes to the intensity of the viewing surface light 71. Thus, the display's information conveying light observable to the viewer 77a of the display becomes brighter. At the same time, part of the ambient light 74 from some ambient light source 77b (like the sun, office lighting, car head lights or some other such ambient light source) entering the transparent display through the backside surface 5b is reflected by the NBR 79a and becomes reflected ambient light 76 leaving the TASEL 70 through the backside surface 5b. Consequently, the overall intensity of the transmitted ambient light 75 first passing the TASEL 70 and finally reaching the viewing side surface 5 and the viewer 77a decreases. As the luminance of the emitted light of the active layer is increased (contributions from both luminances of viewing surface light 71 and reflected viewing surface light 73), and the luminance of the transmitted ambient light 75 is decreased at the viewing side surface 5, the viewer 77a observes an increased contrast and contrast ratio of the display, improving the readability and usability of the transparent display. The encapsulated TASEL subunit 78 and NBR subunit 79 are separated in
As indicated in
An example of a TASEL display according to an embodiment of the present invention is shown in
Another example of a transparent TFEL display and its manufacture according to another embodiment of the present invention is shown in
Another example of a transparent TFEL display according to yet another embodiment of the present invention is shown in
A still further example and yet another embodiment of a TASEL display is shown in
Related to
In the following description related to
It should be noted that in each of the
For example, assuming refractive index of n=1.64 for Al2O3, a typical L type of material with a low refractive index, thickness for a layer denoted as “0.98L” is 0.98*580 nm/1.64/4=86.6 nm, assuming a design wavelength of 580 nm. Designing the stack of H and L (and S) materials to achieve a certain wavelength response for the stack is well known prior art as discussed above. Here the NBR is arranged to have a low electroluminescent transmission, and consequently, high electroluminescent reflectance.
In
The structure behind result shown in
Both structures, as characterized in
By measuring the structure related to
To examine the effect of the NBR, an ambient light level must be set to some practical level. By using a typical value of LAM=100 nits, contrast ratio for a structure with NBR (related to
Finally,
It is obvious to a person skilled in the art that, as the technology advances, the inventive concept can be implemented in various ways. The invention and its embodiments are not limited to the examples described above but may vary within the scope of the claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20155154 | Mar 2015 | FI | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/FI2016/050134 | 3/4/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/142579 | 9/15/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5757127 | Inoguchi et al. | May 1998 | A |
9226362 | Harkonen | Dec 2015 | B2 |
20050062693 | Suzuki | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050134528 | Valliath et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20080038584 | Akai | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080278063 | Cok | Nov 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
100530676 | Aug 2009 | CN |
202275258 | Jun 2012 | CN |
H03222287 | Oct 1991 | JP |
WO-2005024501 | Mar 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued by the Finnish Patent and Registration Office acting as the International Searching Authority in relation to International Application No. PCT/FI2016/050134 dated Jun. 3, 2016 (6 pages). |
International Search Report issued by the Finnish Patent and Registration Office acting as the International Searching Authority in relation to International Application No. PCT/FI2016/050134 dated Jun. 3, 2016 (5 pages). |
First Notification of Office Action issued by The State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China in relation to Chinese Application No. 201680014137.X dated Jul. 10, 2018 (English language translation only 11 pages). |
Search Report issued by the Patent Office of the People's Republic of China in relation to Chinese Application No. 201680014137X dated Jun. 29, 2018 (2 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180077773 A1 | Mar 2018 | US |