Disclosed embodiments relate generally to an LED backlight having individually controlled subsections and an associated liquid crystal display.
Liquid Crystal Displays (LCDs) contain several layers which work in combination to create a viewable image. A backlight is used to generate the rays of light that pass through what is commonly referred to as the LCD stack, which typically contains several layers that perform either basic or enhanced functions. The most fundamental layer within the LCD stack is the liquid crystal material, which may be actively configured in response to an applied voltage in order to pass or block a certain amount of light which is originating from the backlight. The layer of liquid crystal material is divided into many small regions which are typically referred to as pixels. For full-color displays these pixels are typically further divided into independently-controllable regions of red, green and blue subpixels, where the red subpixel has a red color filter, blue subpixel has a blue color filter, and green subpixel has a green color filter. These three colors are typically called the primary colors. Of course, some displays may use additional color filters (such as adding a yellow filter) and these could also be used with the embodiments herein.
The light which is passing through each subpixel originates as “white” (or broadband) light from the backlight, although in general this light is far from being uniform across the visible spectrum. The subpixel color filters allow each subpixel to transmit a certain amount of each color (red, green or blue). When viewed from a distance, the three subpixels appear as one composite pixel and by electrically controlling the amount of light which passes for each subpixel color the composite pixel can produce a very wide range of different colors due to the effective mixing of light from the red, green, and blue subpixels.
Currently, the common illumination source for LCD backlight assemblies is fluorescent tubes, but the industry is moving toward light emitting diodes (LEDs). Environmental concerns, small space requirements, lower energy consumption, and long lifetime are some of the reasons that the LCD industry is beginning the widespread usage of LEDs for backlights.
LCDs are becoming popular for not only home entertainment purposes, but are now being used as informational/advertising displays in both indoor and outdoor locations. When used for information/advertising purposes, the displays may remain ‘on’ for extended periods of time and thus would see much more use than a traditional home theatre use. Further, when displays are used in areas where the ambient light level is fairly high (especially outdoors) the displays must be very bright in order to maintain adequate picture brightness. When used for extended periods of time and/or outdoors, overall energy consumption can become an issue. Thus, it is desirable to limit the power consumption of these displays as much as possible while maintaining image fidelity.
Exemplary embodiments provide a backlight with individually controlled subsections. The luminance for each subsection can be controlled based on the image data being sent to the LCD. The incoming image data may be analyzed to determine the requirements for each subsection, and some may be selectively ‘dimmed’ if they correspond to portions of the image which do not require the full luminance output of the backlight. Selectively dimming portions of the backlight allows for several benefits, including but not limited to reduced power consumption, longer product lifetime, and higher contrast ratios.
These and other objects are achieved by a device as described in the following detailed description.
A better understanding will be obtained from a reading of the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings wherein identical reference characters refer to identical parts and in which:
The histogram data for each subimage is analyzed to determine the proper luminance level for the backlight subsection corresponding to each subimage.
Once the histogram data has been created 40, a first average μ1 and standard deviation σ1 are calculated 41. The following is one method for calculating these values and analyzing them:
Let N=the total number of pixels (red, green, or blue) in the subimage.
Denote the histogram as H(i) where i ranges from 0 to 255
The initial luminance value for this subsection of the backlight may then be calculated 42 as the average value plus one and a half standard deviations. Y=μ1+1.5·σ1. It should be noted that one and a half standard deviations was chosen as effective for one embodiment. Depending on several factors, some systems may require more or less than 1.5 standard deviations for adequate system performance. This variable could be adjusted for each display.
The backlight luminance can range from ‘off’ to ‘full on’ and these points, along with all of the settings in between, should be calibrated with the brightness index values from the histogram which can also vary from 0 (off) to 255 (full on). Thus, once the initial luminance value is calculated it may be compared with the maximum value of 255 (see step 43). If the initial luminance value is greater than 255, then the backlight luminance for this subsection is simply set to full on (255) and is stored for this channel (go directly from step 43 to step 47). The use of ‘channel’ herein denotes one of the primary colors that are used to create the image within the LCD. As discussed above, a typical LCD contains three channels (Red, Green, and Blue) but other LCD designs may use additional colors (such as Yellow) and thus may contain 4 or more channels.
Next, the histogram data for this channel may be tested for a bimodal distribution 44. This step may be performed because if the distribution contains multiple peaks, simply averaging and adding some amount of standard deviations may completely miss a peak which would require a higher backlight level. For example, in reference to
The following is one method for determining if a histogram is bimodal 44. Using Otsu's algorithm, find the optimal separation point between distributions in the histogram:
C=nB(T)nO(T)[μB(T)−μO(t)] (Otsu's algorithm)
The final luminance value (Yf) for this channel can then be calculated 46 as the average plus one standard deviation. Yf=μ2+1.0·σ2 Again, acceptable results have been found by using one standard deviation, but different display setups may require a different number of standard deviations. This final luminance value should be compared to the maximum luminance value possible (255) and if it is larger than this value, the luminance value will simply be stored as the maximum luminance of 255. (If Yf>255 then Yf=255) The final luminance value for this channel is then stored 47 and steps 40-47 are repeated for the remaining two channels. Finally, when the final luminance value for all three channels (R, G, and B) has been determined, they are compared with one another and the largest final luminance value Yf is stored 48 as the proper luminance value for the backlight subsection.
However, LCD subpixel voltages are typically determined based on a ‘full on’ backlight and when sections of the backlight are dimmed, the subpixel voltages may need rescaled (‘adjusted’) to ensure that the picture fidelity remains high and the proper colors are produced by the display. One method for rescaling the LCD subpixel voltages is to divide the subpixel voltage by the ratio of proper luminance level to maximum luminance.
For example, subsection 50 shown in
As a second example, subsection 55 shown in
It is common in LCD assemblies to place a light diffusing/scattering element (herein ‘diffuser’) in between the backlight and the liquid crystal material in order to provide a more uniform appearance of light through the display. Without the diffuser, the LED point-sources of light may be visible through the final display. Thus, when the backlight from
As can be easily observed, the diffusing properties alter the actual luminance levels of the backlight, especially near the edges of the subsections. Looking at subsection 50 for example, the luminance in the center 51 is acceptable, while the luminance near the edges 52 has been increased due to ‘bleed over’ from brighter adjacent subsections 60.
One method discovered to account for this phenomenon is the creation of a ‘virtual backlight’ or ‘VB’ where the ‘bleed over’ behavior of adjacent subsections can be mathematically modeled and accounted for during the rescaling of the LCD subpixel voltages. There are many methods for mathematically modeling a given backlight in order to create a VB.
One method for creating the VB may be referred to as ‘virtual subsections’ and is based on the use of a stored matrix of data that represents the appearance of a single, fully illuminated subsection in the backlight assembly as seen through the diffuser.
It should be noted that because the plot for the adjacent subsections 100 and 101 are symmetrical about line 105 and about the relative luminance of 0.5, if the subsections were driven to the same backlight luminance level they would blend to create 100% luminance across the line 105 between the subsections. Obviously, at line 105 the VB data for each subsection is at 0.5 or 50% of the backlight luminance for that subsection, so if each subsection were driven to the same backlight luminance, these would add together to create the same luminance level across the line 105. If the subsections were driven to different luminance levels, as the VB data is entered, this will blend between the different luminance levels. For example, at pixel location 38 within subsection 100, the VB data should be 90% of the luminance for subsection 100 plus 10% of the luminance for subsection 101.
Obviously, the relationship shown in
By using the luminance values for each backlight subsection along with the model for backlight luminance along the subsection edges, an array of VB data for each subsection can be stored and then combined to create a larger array which contains VB data for each pixel in the display. As discussed above, the original subpixel voltages may then be divided by the ratio of VB data over the maximum backlight value in order to properly rescale the original LCD image data.
It should be noted that although a Gaussian curve has been used in
If using the gaussian relationship shown in
Preferably, there would be a gap between the end of the dividing walls 120 and the diffuser. This would prevent any of the dividing walls 120 from being visible through the final display. The precise geometry of the dividing walls 120 and their relationship to the diffuser may require fine tuning for each display. Acceptable results have been found for 70 inch LCD displays where the dividing walls 120 are about two to three inches high with a gap between the dividing wall 120 and diffuser of 30-40 mm.
As mentioned above, other mathematical models may be used to simulate the backlight through the diffuser. One other method is to use a point spread function (PSF). If the diffuser is treated like an optical low pass filter, then a 2D filter operation can be performed on the virtual backlight. One could also modify the PSF by observing that a diffused backlight only requires a blurring operation along the boundaries between subsections.
An examination of the edges between a fully illuminated subsection and an adjacent dimmer subsection constructed via the Gaussian Point Spread Function reveals a series of common curves.
Thus, a two-step process for this method could include: (1) Create a series of changing brightness lines that run vertically down the middle of each subsection using the above formula. If the subsections are rectangular, then a “longer” brightness function will be required for this operation and (2) Starting at the top of the VB, create a series of horizontal brightness curves using the data from step 1 as the endpoints for each curve.
A final technique to produce a virtual backlight would be through the use of Bezier Curves. In this approach, cubic splines could be used to interpolate between the subsection centers and thus simulate diffusion. For each point in the Virtual Backlight, the following equation would be calculated:
B(t)=(1−t)3P0+3t(1−t)2P1+3t2(1−t)P2+t3P3, t∈[0,1].
As discussed above, once the data for the VB has been generated, it may be divided into the corresponding subpixel voltages in order to properly rescale the LCD video image. This can be accomplished in many ways. Because division is typically a time-consuming operation, one exemplary embodiment may use a 256 byte lookup table of 8-bit scaling factors. These would be multiplied by each pixel and then followed by an 8-bit shift. The 8-bit shift can be skipped if only the upper byte of the product is used. If an overflow occurs, the resulting pixel value would be 255.
Before driving the backlight subsections with the appropriate luminance values, gamma correction may be applied. This step may help correct the contrast and may also provide additional power savings. Assuming backlight intensities from 0 to 255, one method of gamma correction may be: I=255·(Y/255)γ where γ is typically equal to 2.2 (but this may be varied depending on the application). For example, assume that the luminance value (Y) for the subsection was calculated to be 128. When this value is used in the gamma equation above, the actual intensity of the backlight (I) is calculated to be 56. This backlight intensity (I) can now be converted to actual voltage/current and sent to the appropriate backlight subsection. Also, the re-scaled image data can now be sent to the LCD as the backlight is updated.
An example for the physical architecture which could perform the operations as discussed above is now presented. It should be pointed out that this architecture is only an example and those skilled in the art could modify this example or create other types of physical architecture which are capable of performing the operations discussed herein.
Two frame buffers 200 may be used to store the incoming frame and process and output the outgoing frame. Each frame buffer should store 2,073,600 RGB values and the width of the frame buffer should be at least 24 bits. Eight, three channel histogram accumulators 210 may be used for statistical processing. Each accumulator 210 should consist of 256 15-bit counters. There may be accumulators for each of the three color channels (if using an RGB-type LCD). The output of each counter should be double buffered. Two virtual backlight buffers 215 may be used to store newly created backlight based on incoming image data and rescale the gain of outgoing LCD data.
The embodiment for the architecture described here would implement the steps above using a “Pitch and Catch” approach. While one block is ‘catching’ and analyzing the incoming video data, the other block is scaling and ‘pitching’ video data to the output. As shown in
The lower half of the system is operating in “pitch” mode. During this phase, each pixel from the input buffer 200 is divided by the corresponding pixel in the virtual backlight buffer 215 and sent to the video out MUX. To speed execution and avoid the use of a hardware divider, a lookup table may be used to determine a scaling factor. This factor can then be used to rescale the RGB data with three 8×8 multipliers. Concurrent with the rescaling operation, the individual subsections of the backlight matrix will be updated synchronously using the values calculated during the “catch” phase.
It should be noted that the system and method described herein has been described with reference to each ‘frame’ and in an exemplary embodiment the backlight subsections would be updated for each ‘frame.’ However, there are many different frame rates of video which exist as well as different refresh rates of LCD displays (ex. 60 Hz, 120 Hz, 240 Hz, etc.). As used herein, the term ‘frame’ represents each time that the pixel voltages are updated for the LCD display. Thus, the backlight subsections should preferably be updated (and the LCD subpixel voltages re-scaled) each time that a new set of subpixel data is sent to the LCD display.
Having shown and described preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will realize that many variations and modifications may be made to affect the described embodiments and still be within the scope of the claims. Thus, many of the elements indicated above may be altered or replaced by different elements which will provide the same result and fall within the spirit of the claimed embodiments. It is the intention, therefore, to limit the invention only as indicated by the scope of the claims.
This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 13/850,854 filed on Mar. 26, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,803,790, which is in turn a divisional of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 13/722,537 filed on Dec. 20, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,704,752, which is in turn a divisional of and claimed priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 12/793,474 filed on Jun. 3, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,350,799, which is a non-provisional application of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/183,592 filed Jun. 3, 2009, each of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1812919 | Balder | Jul 1931 | A |
3510973 | Mazzocco, Sr. | May 1970 | A |
4257084 | Reynolds | Mar 1981 | A |
4804953 | Castleberry | Feb 1989 | A |
5040878 | Eichenlaub | Aug 1991 | A |
5046805 | Simon | Sep 1991 | A |
5066106 | Sakamoto et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5363149 | Furuno et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5365354 | Jannson et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5381309 | Borchardt | Jan 1995 | A |
5440324 | Strickling et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5453855 | Nakamura et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5528720 | Winston et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5598068 | Shirai | Jan 1997 | A |
5661578 | Habing et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5856854 | Hyun | Jan 1999 | A |
6027222 | Oki et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6166389 | Shie et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6307216 | Huh et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6400101 | Biebl et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409356 | Nishimura | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6419372 | Shaw et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421103 | Yamaguchi | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6437673 | Nishida et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446467 | Lieberman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6481130 | Wu | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6556258 | Yoshida et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6601984 | Yamamoto et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6636003 | Rahm et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6683639 | Driessen-Olde Scheper et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6762815 | Lee | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6789921 | Deloy et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6805468 | Itoh et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6842204 | Johnson | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6860628 | Robertson et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6936968 | Cross et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6949772 | Shimizu et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6958743 | Shin et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6982686 | Miyachi et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7012379 | Chambers et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7015650 | McGrath | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7018054 | Miyashita et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7025474 | Campbell et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7038186 | De Brabander et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7040794 | Bernard | May 2006 | B2 |
7045828 | Shimizu et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7049761 | Timmermans et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7053557 | Cross et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7057590 | Lim et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7178963 | Ueda et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7190416 | Paukshto et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7194158 | Schultheis et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7210839 | Jung | May 2007 | B2 |
7218812 | Maxwell et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7232250 | Chuang | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7250637 | Shimizu et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7259403 | Shimizu et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7307391 | Shan | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7307614 | Vinn | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7324080 | Hu et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7327416 | Lee et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7347706 | Wu et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7352940 | Charters et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7375381 | Shimizu et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7421167 | Charters et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7427140 | Ma | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7473019 | Laski | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7481553 | Kim et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7481566 | Han | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7510299 | Timmermans et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7513637 | Kelly et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7542108 | Saito et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7546009 | Kukulj et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7639220 | Yoshida et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7682047 | Hsu et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7738746 | Charters et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7781979 | Lys | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7795574 | Kennedy et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7813694 | Fishman et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7853288 | Ma | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7982706 | Ichikawa et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8021900 | Maxwell et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8064744 | Atkins et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8120595 | Kukulj et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8125163 | Dunn et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8194031 | Yao et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8233115 | Hadlich et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8274626 | Choi et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8294168 | Park et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8351013 | Dunn et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8400430 | Dunn et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8508155 | Schuch | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8529993 | Charters et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8648993 | Dunn et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8674390 | Harris et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8674963 | Cornish et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8803790 | Wasinger et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8810501 | Budzelaar et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8829815 | Dunn et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8842366 | Arnett et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9030129 | Dunn et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9141329 | Reicher et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9167655 | Dunn et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9348174 | Dunn et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9812047 | Schuch et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9867253 | Dunn et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9924583 | Schuch et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10126579 | Dunn et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10191212 | Dunn | Jan 2019 | B2 |
20010009508 | Umemoto et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010033726 | Shie et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020043012 | Shibata et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020126078 | Horibe et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030026085 | Ueda et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030043312 | Nishida et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030227428 | Nose | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040062029 | Ato | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040113044 | Ishiguchi | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050094391 | Campbell et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050105303 | Emde | May 2005 | A1 |
20050117323 | King | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050140640 | Oh | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050140848 | Yoo et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050162737 | Whitehead et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050265019 | Sommers et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060012985 | Archie, Jr. et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060055012 | Hsin Chen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060072299 | Lai | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060077686 | Plan et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060082700 | Gehlsen et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060087521 | Chu et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060092346 | Moon et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060092348 | Park | May 2006 | A1 |
20060092618 | Tanaka | May 2006 | A1 |
20060125418 | Bourgault | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060197474 | Olsen | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060214904 | Kimura et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060221612 | Song et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060238367 | Tsuchiya | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060262079 | Seong et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060279946 | Park et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060289201 | Kim et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070001997 | Kim | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070013647 | Lee et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070013828 | Cho et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021217 | Wu | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070047808 | Choe | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070070615 | Joslin et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070097321 | Whitehead et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070115686 | Tyberghien | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127144 | Gao | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070139574 | Ko et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070139929 | Yoo et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070147037 | Wang | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070153515 | Hong et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171353 | Hong | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171623 | Zagar et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171676 | Chang | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070177071 | Egi et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070195535 | Artwohl et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198638 | Omura et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070206158 | Kinoshita et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070222910 | Hu | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070230218 | Jachim et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070268234 | Wakabayashi et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070279369 | Yao et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070297163 | Kim et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070297172 | Furukawa et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080019147 | Erchak et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080036940 | Song et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080043463 | Park | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049164 | Jeon et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080068836 | Hatanaka et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080074372 | Baba et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080089064 | Wang | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080101086 | Lee | May 2008 | A1 |
20080106527 | Cornish et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080111949 | Shibata et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080143916 | Fujino et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151527 | Ueno et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080158468 | Kim et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080170178 | Kubota | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080170400 | Maruyama | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080212305 | Kawana et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080231196 | Weng et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080266331 | Chen | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080272999 | Kurokawa | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080276507 | Hines | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080278432 | Ohshima | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080284942 | Mahama et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080291686 | Cull et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090002990 | Becker et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090009102 | Kahlman et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090015755 | Bang et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090021461 | Hu et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090033612 | Roberts et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090058795 | Yamazaki | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090061945 | Ma | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090085859 | Song | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090091634 | Kennedy et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090109165 | Park et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090135167 | Sakai et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090135583 | Hillman et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090174840 | Lee et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090196069 | Iwasaki | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090243501 | Dunn et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090244884 | Trulaske, Sr. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090284457 | Botzas et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090289580 | Dunn et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100039440 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100102735 | Chang et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100109553 | Chang et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100165240 | Cho et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100194296 | Park | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100220258 | Dunn et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100231563 | Dunn et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100307800 | Wee et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100313592 | Pae | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110007228 | Yoon et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110013114 | Dunn et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110083460 | Thomas et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110102704 | Dunn et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110116000 | Dunn et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110141724 | Erion | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110164434 | Derichs | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110205145 | Lin et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110242437 | Yoo et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110242839 | Dunn et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110283199 | Schuch et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120050958 | Sanford et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120062819 | Dunn et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120086344 | Schuch | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120098794 | Kleinert et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120105424 | Lee et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120134139 | Jang et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120154712 | Yu et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120212520 | Matsui et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120212956 | Chen | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120242926 | Hsu et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120250329 | Suehiro et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120274882 | Jung | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120299891 | Fujiwara et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120314447 | Huang | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120327039 | Kukulj | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130016080 | Dunn et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130016296 | Fujita et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130027633 | Park et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130063326 | Riegel | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130094160 | Narumi | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130163277 | Kim et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130258659 | Edon | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130278868 | Dunn et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140016355 | Ajichi | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140078407 | Green et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140085564 | Hendren et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140104538 | Park et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140134767 | Ishida et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140144083 | Artwohl et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140160365 | Kwong et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140268657 | Dunn et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140285477 | Cho et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140340375 | Dunn et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140361969 | Wasinger et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150009653 | Dunn et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150153506 | Dunn | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150219954 | Kubo | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150226996 | Ohashi | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150245443 | Dunn et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150346525 | Wolf et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160037606 | Dunn et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160103275 | Diaz et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160238876 | Dunn et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160300549 | Zhang | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160334666 | Liu | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160335705 | Williams et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160338181 | Schuch et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160338182 | Schuch et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160351133 | Kim et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160358538 | Schuch et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170059938 | Brown et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170248823 | Dunn et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180012566 | Lin et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180048849 | Dunn | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180061297 | Schuch et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2004283319 | May 2005 | AU |
2007216782 | Sep 2007 | AU |
2536130 | May 2005 | CA |
2688214 | Nov 2008 | CA |
1836179 | Sep 2006 | CN |
101432647 | May 2007 | CN |
10104685 | Oct 2007 | CN |
101339272 | Jan 2009 | CN |
101351765 | Jan 2009 | CN |
101681222 | Mar 2010 | CN |
0313331 | Apr 1989 | EP |
1678534 | Jul 2006 | EP |
1805539 | Jul 2007 | EP |
2156276 | May 2008 | EP |
1941342 | Jul 2008 | EP |
153110 | Nov 1920 | GB |
302007 | Feb 2006 | IN |
032009 | May 2008 | IN |
152010 | Dec 2009 | IN |
11095214 | Apr 1999 | JP |
2002064842 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002209230 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002366121 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2004004581 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2007509372 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2004-325629 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2004325629 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005228996 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2005236469 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005-292939 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2008518251 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2005-332253 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2006-198344 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2007080872 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2009535723 | May 2007 | JP |
200876755 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2008112719 | May 2008 | JP |
2008256819 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2009036964 | Feb 2009 | JP |
2009512898 | Mar 2009 | JP |
2009231473 | Oct 2009 | JP |
2010509622 | Mar 2010 | JP |
2010527100 | Aug 2010 | JP |
2010282109 | Dec 2010 | JP |
2011081424 | Apr 2011 | JP |
20-0286961 | Aug 2002 | KR |
1020070003755 | Feb 2006 | KR |
20070005637 | Jan 2007 | KR |
1020070084554 | May 2007 | KR |
20080013592 | Feb 2008 | KR |
20080063414 | Jul 2008 | KR |
20080074972 | Aug 2008 | KR |
1020090007776 | Jan 2009 | KR |
20100019997 | Feb 2010 | KR |
1020050033986 | Apr 2014 | KR |
101796718 | Nov 2017 | KR |
200615598 | May 2006 | TW |
200802054 | Jan 2008 | TW |
200808925 | Feb 2008 | TW |
200809285 | Feb 2008 | TW |
200809287 | Feb 2008 | TW |
200828093 | Jul 2008 | TW |
200912200 | Mar 2009 | TW |
201030376 | Aug 2010 | TW |
201038114 | Oct 2010 | TW |
WO9608892 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO2005051054 | Jun 2005 | WO |
W02005093703 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO2006001559 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO2006109237 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO2007052777 | May 2007 | WO |
WO2005040873 | May 2008 | WO |
WO2008138049 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO2008152832 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO2009004574 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009004574 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO2010080624 | Jul 2010 | WO |
W02010129271 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO2011100429 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO2011143719 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO2014158642 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO2015003130 | Jan 2015 | WO |
WO2018031753 | Feb 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Wikipedia, Gradient-index optics, 2016. |
Patrick Frantz & Deania Fernandez, Printed Circuit Boards (PCBs), Feb. 18, 2004, 2 Pages, Version 1.1. |
Teravision Corp., LCD-TV Panel Control Board Specification, Nov. 2007, 24 Pages. |
Supertex Inc., Constant Off-time, Buck-based LED Drivers Using HV9910, Nov. 2, 2004, 4 Pages. |
Grin Tech, Grin Lenses, Aug. 25, 2016, 4 Pages. |
Supertex Inc., Universal High Brightness LED Driver, 2007, 8 Pages. |
Shigeru Aoyama, Akihiro Funamoto & Koichi Imanaka, Hybrid normal-reverse prism coupler for light-emitting diode backlight systems, Oct. 1, 2006, 6 Pages, vol. 45, No. 28. |
Panel-Brite, Inc., High Brightness LED Backlight Technology, Mar. 11, 2009, 1 Page. |
RPO, How Digital Waveguide Touch Works, Sep. 15, 2011, 1 Page. |
Dave Roos, How Transmissive Film Works, article, 2008, 9 pages. |
Schott, Glass made of Ideas—OPALIKA, 2016, 2 pages. |
Anandan, LED Backlight: Enhancement of picture quality on LCD screen, Oct. 8-12, 2006, 5 pages. |
Lu, Color shift reduction of a multi-domain IPS-LCD using RGB-LED backlight, 2006, 10 pages. |
Anandan, M., Progress of LED backlights for LCDs, Journal of the SID, 2008, pp. 287-310, 16/2. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140361969 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61183592 | Jun 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13722537 | Dec 2012 | US |
Child | 13850854 | US | |
Parent | 12793474 | Jun 2010 | US |
Child | 13722537 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13850854 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 14453966 | US |