The present invention relates to dynamic impedance circuitry that improves voltage distribution across a stack of transistors in a high power switch, thereby allowing for high power designs that exhibit a minimum area/performance penalty.
Transistors 1201-120N are connected in series between the first port 101 and the second port 102. These transistors 1201-120N are controlled to route (or prevent the routing of) RF signals between the first port 101 and the second port 102. As used herein, an RF signal is defined as a signal having a frequency in the range of about 10 kHz to 50 GHz. The on-resistance of the RF switch (RON) multiplied by the off-capacitance of the RF switch (COFF) is a key figure of merit, which dictates the ability to transmit RF power with low losses through the on-state uniform transistor stack 100, while maintaining adequate isolation across the off-state uniform transistor stack 100. Thin film SOI CMOS transistors are attractive for RF switch applications, because these transistors reduce the junction capacitance component of the off-capacitance value, COFF. Transistors 1201-120N are therefore typically implemented using thin film SOI CMOS transistors.
The multi-finger structure of transistor 1201 allows this transistor to exhibit a relatively small on-resistance (RON) and a relatively high power handling capability. The width (Wf) of each gate finger can be relatively long (e.g, on the order of about 15 microns), and the number of gate fingers can be relatively high (e.g., in the hundreds), such that the total effective gate width is relatively large (e.g., on the order of 5 mm), resulting in a low on-resistance (RON) of this transistor.
Relatively high voltage RF signals (e.g., 40-70V) are typically applied across the first and second ports 101-102 of the uniform stack while the transistors of the uniform stack 100 are in an off-state. In general, the gate length (Lg) of each of transistors 1201-120N (and the number of transistors N) must be relatively large to provide the required off-state isolation. In one example, the gate length (Lg) is about 0.18 microns or more, and there are about 30 or more transistors 1201-120N in the uniform transistor stack 100 to enable the off-state stack to withstand 70 Volts across ports 101 and 102.
Source/drain resistors 1501-150N help to keep the interior source/drain nodes of transistors 1201-120N at the same potential as the port receiving the RF signal. Without source/drain resistors 1501-150N, the interior transistors of uniform stack 100 would not see the full gate-to-source and body-to-source DC biases.
Parasitic capacitances that exist between transistors 1201-120N and the underlying substrate result in a voltage imbalance across the transistors 1204-120N in the stack 100. In practice, the voltage drops across the transistors 1204-120N are non-uniform, with larger voltage drops existing across transistors located near the ports 101-102. For example, when a high power signal is applied to the first port 101, the highest voltage drop will exist across transistor 1204. The voltage drops across successive transistors 1202-120N decrease in a non-uniform manner. In a particular example, when a high power signal is applied to the first port 101, a peak voltage drop of about 4.0 Volts may exist across transistor 1204, a peak voltage drop of about 3.7 Volts may exist across transistor 1202, a peak voltage drop of about 3.5 Volts may exist across transistor 1203, and a peak voltage drop of about 3.4 Volts may exist across transistor 1204. If the power becomes high enough that the voltage across transistor 1204 exceeds the breakdown voltage of this transistor (e.g. 4.2 Volts), then the entire associated RF switch will fail. A similar problem exists when a high power signal is applied to the second port 102, wherein the highest voltage drop will exist across transistor 120N.
Moreover, during high power conditions, relatively high second and third harmonic voltages may undesirably exist in the signal transmitted through the conventional uniform stack 100.
It would therefore be desirable to have an improved transistor stack structure that eliminates the above-described deficiencies of conventional uniform transistor stack 100.
Accordingly, the present invention provides an improved transistor stack that can be used to transmit RF signals between a first port and a second port. The transistor stack includes a plurality of transistor switch circuits connected in series between the first and second ports. A first subset of the plurality of transistor switch circuits are located immediately adjacent to the first port (i.e., the first subset of the plurality of transistor switch circuits are directly connected to the first port).
In accordance with one embodiment, each of the transistor switch circuits in the first subset includes a switching transistor (which is connected in series between the first and second ports), and a dynamic impedance circuit, which is coupled in parallel with the switching transistor. Each of the dynamic impedance circuits is configured to reduce the effective impedance of the corresponding switching transistor when an RF signal received on the first port is transmitted through the switching transistor.
In accordance with one embodiment, each of the dynamic impedance circuits includes: a first diode connected in series with a first resistor to form a first diode/resistor pair, and a second diode connected in series with a second resistor to form a second diode/resistor pair. The first and second diode/resistor pairs are each coupled in parallel with the corresponding switching transistor. The first and second diodes are configured in opposite directions with respect to the associated switching transistor.
The characteristics of the first diode/resistor pairs and the second diode/resistor pairs are selected such that the voltage drops across the corresponding switching transistors are uniform when an RF signal is being transmitted through these switching transistors. In a particular embodiment, the first and second diode/resistor pairs in the transistor switch circuits located nearer to the first port have lower impedances than the first and second diode/resistor pairs in the transistor switch circuits located further from the first port.
In accordance with one embodiment, all of the transistor switch circuits that are not included in the first subset (i.e., the transistor switch circuits coupled between the first subset of transistor switch circuits and the second port) include switching transistors that are coupled in series between the first and second ports, but do not include dynamic impedance circuits.
In accordance with another embodiment, the plurality of transistor switch circuits additionally includes a second subset of the plurality of transistor switch circuits located immediately adjacent to the second port (i.e., the second subset of the transistor switch circuits are directly connected to the second port). In this embodiment, each of the transistor switch circuits in the second subset includes a switching transistor (which is connected in series between the first and second ports), and a dynamic impedance circuit, which is coupled in parallel with the switching transistor. Each of the dynamic impedance circuits is configured to reduce the effective impedance of the corresponding switching transistor when an RF signal received on the second port is transmitted through the switching transistor. In this embodiment, uniform voltage drops are maintained across the switching transistors located at both ends of the transistor stack (i.e., near the first port and near the second port).
The present invention will be more fully understood in view of the following description and drawings.
In general, the present invention provides dynamic impedance circuits in parallel with transistors located at one or both the ends of a high-voltage transistor stack. Each dynamic impedance circuit may include a diode connected in series with a resistor. During high power conditions (i.e., when a high voltage signal is applied across the transistor stack), impedances of the dynamic impedance circuits are reduced (by turning on the diodes), thereby limiting voltage drops across the corresponding parallel transistors. This advantageously allows for more uniform voltage distribution across the transistors of the stack and enables the transistor stack to exhibit improved power handling (e.g., handle a higher peak voltage). In addition, voltage harmonics through the transistor stack may be reduced during certain high power conditions. Advantageously, the dynamic impedance circuits only slightly increase the required layout area and off-capacitance when compared with a conventional uniform stack.
As shown in
In addition to the above-described circuit elements, transistor switch circuits TS1-TS6 include dynamic impedance circuits Z1-Z6, respectively, and transistor switch circuits TS21-TS26 include dynamic impedance circuits Z21-Z26, respectively. Dynamic impedance circuits Z1-Z6 include diodes D1-D6, respectively, which are connected in series with resistors R1-R6, respectively. Dynamic impedance circuits Z1-Z6 further include diodes D1′-D6′, respectively, which are connected in series with resistors R1′-R6′, respectively. Similarly, dynamic impedance circuits Z21-Z26 include diodes D21-D26, respectively, which are connected in series with resistors R21-R26, respectively. Dynamic impedance circuits Z21-Z26 further include diodes D21′-D26′, respectively, which are connected in series with resistors R21′-R26′, respectively. Within each of the transistor switch circuits TS1-TS6 and TS21-TS26, each of the series-connected diode/resistor pairs is connected in parallel with the corresponding high-voltage transistor. For example, within transistor switch circuit TS1, the series-connected diode/resistor pairs D1/R1 and D1′/R1′ are each connected in parallel with high voltage transistor 1201. Within each of the transistor switch circuits TS1-TS6 and TS21-TS26, the corresponding diodes are connected in opposing directions with respect to the high voltage transistor. For example, within transistor switch circuit TS1, the cathode of diode D1 is connected to the drain of transistor 1201, while the cathode of diode D1′ is connected to the source of transistor 1201. In general, diodes D1-D6 and D21-D26 may be forward biased when the voltage on the first port 101 is greater than the voltage on the second port 102, and diodes D1′-D6′ and D21′-D26′ may be forward biased when the voltage on the second port 102 is higher than the voltage on the first port 101.
The operation of transistor stack 300 as an RF switch will now be described. The present example assumes that the transistors 1201-12026 are n-channel devices (although transistors 1201-12026 may be p-channel devices in alternate embodiments). To turn the RF switch to an ‘on-state’, a high gate bias voltage is applied to the gates of transistors 1201-12026 (via gate bias resistors 1301-13026), thereby turning on these transistors. A bias voltage is applied to the channel/body regions of transistors 1201-12026 (via channel/body bias resistors 1401-14026). Under these conditions, an RF signal may be transmitted between ports 101 and 102 through turned-on transistors 1201-12026.
Under low power conditions (i.e., when the RF signal has a relatively low peak voltage), diodes D1-D6, D21-D26, D1′-D6′ and D21′-D26′ are not forward biased (and therefore do not conduct current). Under these conditions, the on-resistance of the transistor stack 300 is therefore determined by the characteristics of the high voltage transistors 1201-12026 and the parallel resistors 1501-15026. Thus, under low power conditions, the transistor stack 300 may exhibit the same on-resistance as the conventional uniform transistor stack 100 (assuming that the transistors used in these stacks are identical).
Under high power conditions (i.e., when the RF signal has a relatively high peak voltage), diodes D1-D6, D21-D26, D1′-D6′ and D21′-D26′ may become forward biased (and therefore conduct current). More specifically, if an RF signal having a relatively high peak voltage is applied to the first port 101, then diodes D1-D6 and D1′-D6′ of dynamic impedance circuits Z1-Z6 may become forward biased. Conversely, if an RF signal having a relatively high peak voltage is applied to the second port 102, then diodes D21-D26 and D21′-D26′ of dynamic impedance circuits Z21-Z26 may become forward biased. The inclusion of dynamic impedance circuits Z1-Z6 and Z21-Z26 therefore allows high power RF signals to be symmetrically applied to either the first port 101 or the second port 102. However, if RF signals will only be applied to the first port 101, then only dynamic impedance circuits Z1-Z6 are required. Conversely, if RF signals will only be applied to the second port 102, then only dynamic impedance circuits Z21-Z26 are required.
Assume that a high power condition exists, wherein an RF signal having a power of 48 dBm (and a peak voltage of about 89 Volts) is applied to the first port 101. Under these conditions, the on-resistances of transistor switch circuits TS1-TS6 are determined largely by the characteristics of the high voltage transistors 1201-1206, the impedances of the forward biased diodes D1-D6 and D1′-D6′, and the impedances of resistors R1-R6 and R1′-R6′. The forward biased diodes D1-D6 and D1′-D6′ and the associated resistors R1-R6 and R1′-R6′ have combined impedances that are significantly lower than the impedances of the parallel source/drain resistors 1501-1506. As a result, the voltage drops across the associated transistors 1201-1206 are controlled by the impedances of the forward biased diodes D1-D6 and D1′-D6′ and the associated resistors R1-R6 and R1′-R6′. By properly selecting the impedances of the forward biased diodes D1-D6 and D1′-D6′ and the associated resistors R1-R6 and R1′-R6′, the voltage drops across each of the transistors 1201-1206 are controlled to have approximately the same voltage (which is less than the breakdown voltages of these transistors) under high power conditions. This results in a more uniform voltage distribution across all of the transistors 1201-12026 of the transistor stack 300. Limiting the voltage drops across the transistors 1201-1206 closest to the port 101 receiving the high power RF signal prevents voltage breakdown within these transistors, effectively enabling the transistor stack 300 to handle higher power RF signals than a conventional uniform stack 100.
In the manner described above, diodes D1-D6 and D1′-D6′ effectively change the resistances (impedances) in parallel with transistors 1201-1206 based on the voltage drops across these transistors 1201-1206. Resistors R1-R6 and R1′-R6′ limit the voltage drops across diodes D1-D6 and D1′-D6′ to avoid worsening the linearity of the diodes and the overall switch. Under the above-described high power conditions, the dynamic impedance circuits Z1-Z6 (resistor/diode pairs) will have lower impedances than the corresponding transistors 1201-1206, respectively, thereby reducing the overall impedances of the corresponding transistor switch circuits TS1-TS6. As a result, the voltage drops across transistors 1201-1206 are reduced, thereby resulting in more uniform voltage drops across these transistors 1201-1206.
Note that the diodes D21-D26 and D21′-D26′ might not be forward biased under the above-described high power condition. However, if a high power RF signal is applied to the second terminal 102, then these diodes D21-D26 and D21′-D26′ will become forward biased, such that these diodes D21-D26 and D21′-D26′ (along with the associated resistors R21-R26 and R21′-R26′) will control the voltage drops across the corresponding transistors 12021-12026 in the same manner described above.
In accordance with one embodiment, the sizes of the diodes D1-D6, D21-D26, D1′-D6′ and D21′-D26′ and the resistances of resistors R1-R6, R21-R26, R1′-R6′ and R21′-R26′ are selected to ensure that the voltage drops across the corresponding transistors 1201-1206 and 12021-12026 are relatively the same, and less than the breakdown voltages of these transistors during high power conditions. To accomplish this, the diodes D1-D6, D21-D26, D1′-D6′ and D21′-D26′ can have different sizes (different impedances) and the resistors R1-R6, R21-R26, R1′-R6′ and R21′-R26′ can have different resistances.
In accordance with one embodiment, the diodes in the dynamic impedance circuits nearer to the first and second ports 101-102 have lower impedances than the diodes in the dynamic impedance circuits further from the first and second ports 101-102. Similarly, the resistors located in the dynamic impedance circuits nearer to the first and second ports 101-102 have lower resistances than the resistors in the dynamic impedance circuits located further from the first and second ports 101-102.
Thus, in a specific example, each of the resistors R1, R1′, R26 and R26′ (in dynamic impedance circuits Z1 and Z26) has a resistance of 300 Ohms; each of the resistors R2, R2′, R25 and R25′ (in dynamic impedance circuits Z2 and Z25) has a resistance of 550 Ohms; each of the resistors R3, R3′, R4, R4′, R23, R23′, R24 and R24′ (in dynamic impedance circuits Z3, Z4, Z23 and Z24) has a resistance of 900 Ohms; and each of the resistors R5, R5′, R6, R6′, R21, R21′, R22 and R22′ (in dynamic impedance circuits Z5, Z6, Z21 and Z22) has a resistance of 2000 Ohms. Note that other resistances are possible in other embodiments.
A metal interconnect structure 541 contacts each of the n-type semiconductor regions 501-516 (and couples these n-type semiconductor regions to the first port 101). Similarly, a metal interconnect structure 542 contacts each of the p-type semiconductor regions 521-535 (and couples these p-type semiconductor regions to resistor R1′). Although a single contact is shown to each of the semiconductor regions 501-516 and 521-535, it is understood that many contacts are typically provided to each of these semiconductor regions.
Active region 500 has a width WA and a length LA, as illustrated. N-type semiconductor regions 501-516 and p-type semiconductor regions 521-535 form 30 parallel diode structures, each having a p-n junction width of WA, such that the total effective width of the diode D1′ is 30×WA. In a particular example, WA is 15 microns (e.g., the same as the widths of the polysilicon fingers (Wf) of the corresponding high-voltage transistor structure 1201). These dimensions cause the diode D1′ to exhibit a first impedance.
In order to create a diode having a higher impedance than diode D1′, the number of parallel n-type (and p-type) regions may be reduced. For example, if n-type regions 509-516 and p-type regions 529-535 are eliminated from the structure of
In accordance with one embodiment, each of diodes D1-D3, D1′-D3′, D24-D26 and D24′-D26′ in the dynamic impedance circuits Z1-Z3 and Z24-Z26 has a first layout that includes a first number of parallel diode structures, and each of diodes D4-D6, D4′-D6′, D21-D23 and D21′-D23′ in the dynamic impedance circuits Z4-Z6 and Z21-Z23 has a second layout that includes a second number of parallel diode structures, wherein the first number is greater than the second number. In a particular embodiment, each of diodes D1-D3, D1′-D3′, D24-D26 and D24′-D26′ has a layout similar to that shown in
In yet other embodiments, harmonic voltages transmitted through the transistors 1201-12026 of stack 300 can be reduced by controlling the sizes of the diodes in the dynamic impedance circuits Z1-Z6 and Z21-Z26 (i.e., increasing the sizes of the diodes will reduce the harmonic voltages).
In accordance with one embodiment transistor stack 300 may exhibit a power handling capability about 2 dBm higher than uniform transistor stack 100, while exhibiting very uniform voltage distribution across transistors 1201-12026. At an input power of 48 dBm, all of the transistors 1201-12026 of stack 300 exhibit a source-to-drain voltage less than 4 Volts.
Because the highest voltage drops occur across transistors located near the end of the transistor stack 300 that receives the RF signal, dynamic impedance circuits Z1-Z6 and Z21-Z26 are only provided near the ends of transistor stack 300. Although the illustrated embodiments show dynamic impedance circuits in the six transistor switch circuits TS1-TS6 and TS21-TS26 closest to each end of the transistor stack 300, it is understood that in other embodiments, other numbers of dynamic impedance circuits can be used.
Although the transistor stack 300 of the described embodiments includes 26 transistor switch circuits TS1-TS26, it is understood that other embodiments may include other numbers of transistor switch circuits. In general, the number of transistor switch circuits should be minimized, while maintaining the required operating parameters of the associated RF switch (e.g., peak voltage).
The active regions of diodes D1-D6 and D21-D26 are laid out immediately adjacent to the right ends of the active regions of transistors 1201-1206 and 12021-12026, respectively. Similarly, the active regions of diodes D1′-D6′ and D21′-D26′ are laid out immediately adjacent to the left ends of the active regions of transistors 1201-1206 and 12021-12026, respectively. Diodes D1-D3, D1′-D3′, D24-D26 and D24′-D26′ have the same general layout shown in
Note that if layout area of the active regions of transistors 1201-12026 corresponds with the required layout area of conventional uniform stack 100, then the required layout area of the active regions of transistor stack 300 of the present invention represents an area increase of about 7.5 percent. In this example, the addition of dynamic impedance circuits Z1-Z6 and Z21-Z26 also increases the off-capacitance (COFF) of the transistor stack 300, relative to the off-capacitance of the conventional uniform stack 100, by about 6%. As a result, the transistor stack 300 of the present invention exhibits a larger RON×COFF value than the conventional uniform stack 100. In the present example, conventional uniform stack 100 exhibits a RON×COFF value of about 86.4, and transistor stack 300 exhibits a RON×COFF value of about 91.6.
However, by reducing the voltage drop exhibited across the transistors 1201-1206 and 12021-12026 at the ends of the transistor stack 300, the dynamic impedance circuits Z1-Z6 and Z21-Z26 advantageously increase the power handling ability of transistor stack 300 relative to the uniform transistor stack 100. In the present example, the transistor stack 300 of the present invention is able to handle peak voltages up to 89 Volts, while conventional uniform stack 100 is only able to handle peak voltages up to 70 Volts. That is, while a peak voltage of 89 Volts is applied to the first port 101 (or the second port 102) and transistors 1201-12026 are in an on-state, the dynamic impedance circuits Z1-Z6 and Z21-Z26 ensure that the voltages across transistors 1201-12026 do not exceed their breakdown voltage.
For a better comparison of the conventional uniform stack 100 and the transistor stack 300 of the present invention, the following figure of merit (FOM) is proposed:
FOM=(RON×COFF)×Area/ACBV (1)
wherein Area is the layout area of the active regions of the transistor stack and ACBV is the AC breakdown voltage of the transistor stack (i.e., the off-state voltage, which if exceeded, will cause one or more of the transistors in the stack to exceed its breakdown voltage). Thus, a higher layout area will increase the FOM value, while a higher AC breakdown voltage will reduces the FOM value. A lower FOM value is more desirable.
Using equation (1), the uniform transistor stack 100 of the present example exhibits a FOM value of about 0.1975, while the transistor stack 300 of the present invention exhibits a FOM value of about 0.1787, which represents an improvement of about 10 percent.
Although the invention has been described in connection with several embodiments, it is understood that this invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed, but is capable of various modifications, which would be apparent to a person skilled in the art. Thus, the invention is limited only by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
8008988 | Yang | Aug 2011 | B1 |
9124265 | Dykstra | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9190994 | Hurwitz | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9438223 | de Jongh | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9876496 | Yoo | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10050609 | Yoo | Aug 2018 | B2 |