Dynamically throttling host commands to disk drives

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9274966
  • Patent Number
    9,274,966
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, February 20, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 1, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
Example implementations described herein are related to methods for dynamically throttling host commands (up or down) to disk drives that include cache memory and rotating media, based on environmental conditions and/or drain rate from the cache memory to the rotating media, to provide consistent throughput for extended periods of time, and to avoid dramatic swings in performance from the pre-saturation state to the post-saturation state. The example implementations may be further extended to dynamically throttling host commands to devices that have HDD and SSD portions.
Description
BACKGROUND

1. Technical Field


Methods and example implementations described herein are generally directed to disk drives, and more specifically, to throttling host commands to disk drives.


2. Related Art


New schemes are being evaluated for using the cache memory of a disk drive or a solid state disk (SSD) portion of a device, to mitigate vibration and other issues seen by the rotating media of the disk drive, or a hard disk drive (HDD) portion of the device.


One of the schemes is to direct all new host write commands to the cache when the disk drive or device is subjected to different environmental conditions. For example, under persistent vibration conditions, draining of data from the cache/SSD portion to rotating media/HDD portion is much slower resulting in saturation (i.e., filling) of the cache. Once the cache saturates, performance will drop dramatically as the disk drive or device is thereby limited to the write capability of the HDD portion/rotating media under vibration, which is often very limited. Such conditions may induce inconsistent swings in performance over time.



FIGS. 1(
a) and 1(b) illustrate example related art operation flows during a non-vibration mode operation and a vibration mode operation, respectively. As illustrated in FIG. 1(a), write host commands 200 are transmitted to both the cache 101 and the rotating media 103 of a disk drive when the disk drive is not undergoing adverse vibration conditions. As illustrated in FIG. 1(b), when the disk drive undergoes adverse vibration conditions, the write host commands 200 are sent only to the cache 101, which is drained to the rotating media 103. Because the rate of writing to the cache can greatly exceed the rate of writing to the rotating media (which is typically very low during vibrations), prolonged operation of sending the write commands only to the cache 101 will eventually result in cache saturation. The same situation can also take place in a device with an HDD portion and an SSD portion used as a cache to the HDD portion.



FIG. 2 illustrates an example vibration throughput plot for the example operation flow of FIG. 1(b). As illustrated in FIG. 2, the throughput during vibration mode operation may remain adequate, as shown at 300, until the cache becomes saturated, whereupon the throughput performance may decrease drastically, as shown at 301. The likelihood of the cache becoming saturated may increase significantly when the device or disk drive operates under vibration mode over an extended period of time. Cache saturation may eventually lead to the disk drive or device not being able to timely process data access commands, which in turn may cause an operating system of the host to hang or go into an unrecoverable error state.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1(
a) and 1(b) illustrate example related art operation flows during a non-vibration mode operation and a vibration mode operation, respectively.



FIG. 2 is a plot illustrating an example of data throughput under vibration for the example operation flow of FIG. 1(b).



FIGS. 3(
a) and 3(b) illustrate example configurations for a device and a disk drive, in accordance with example embodiments.



FIGS. 4(
a) and 4(b) illustrate example operation flows in accordance with example embodiments.



FIG. 5 is a plot illustrating an example of data throughput under vibration for the example operation flow of FIG. 4.



FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating a control circuitry throttling host commands based on receiving information containing at least one of a rate at which data is being drained and at least one environmental condition, in accordance with an example embodiment.



FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating a control circuitry throttling host commands based on monitoring a rate at which data is being drained, in accordance with an example embodiment.



FIG. 8 is a flow diagram illustrating a control circuitry throttling host commands based on monitoring the rate at which data is being drained and at least one environmental condition, in accordance with an example embodiment.



FIG. 9 is a flow diagram illustrating a control circuitry introducing a delay to throttle host commands, in accordance with an example embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Some example embodiments of the present inventive concept are related to methods for dynamically throttling host commands (up or down) to disk drives that include cache memory and rotating media based on environmental conditions and/or drain rate from the cache memory to the rotating media, to provide consistent throughput for an extended period of time and to avoid dramatic swings in performance from pre-saturation state to post-saturation state. Some embodiments are related to dynamically throttling host commands to devices that have HDD and SSD portions.



FIG. 3(
a) illustrates an example configuration of a device 100, in accordance with an example embodiment. The device 100 may include a disk drive 105, control circuitry 104, cache memory 101, and a servo 102. The disk drive 105 may include rotating media 103 which may include embedded servo sectors 320-32N that define a plurality of servo tracks 34. The device 100 may be a computing device, a data storage device such as a network attached storage device, etc. A voice coil motor (VCM) 40 rotates an actuator arm 42 about a pivot to actuate a head 18 radially over the rotating media 103 to perform read and write operations. The control circuitry 104 is configured to throttle host commands based on at least one of a rate at which data is being drained from the cache memory 101 to the rotating media 103, and at least one environmental condition. The control circuitry 104 may be disposed externally from the disk drive 105, for example, but not limited to, on a motherboard for the device 100, etc., or may be disposed in the disk drive 105. The cache memory 101, which may include non-volatile semiconductor memory (NVSM) or an SSD, may also be disposed externally from the disk drive 105, for example, but not limited to, on a motherboard for the device 100, etc., or may be a part of the disk drive 105. One or more servos 102 and/or sensors (not shown) may be employed to provide information, such as various environmental conditions (e.g., vibration, moisture, temperature, etc.), to the control circuitry 104.


In another example configuration, FIG. 3(b) illustrates an example of a disk drive 105-1, which may involve a configuration wherein the control circuitry 104, the cache memory 101 and the servo 102 are part of the disk drive 105-1. The disk drive 105-1 may also include one or more sensors so that one or more servos 102 and/or sensors (not shown) may be employed to provide information, such as various environmental conditions (e.g., vibration, moisture, temperature, etc.), to the control circuitry 104. For example, in a hybrid disk drive configuration, the cache memory 101 may include an SSD or NVSM.



FIGS. 4(
a) and 4(b) illustrate example operation flows in accordance with example embodiments. In the operation flow of FIG. 4(a), the control circuitry 104 controls the rate at which the write host commands 200 are forwarded to the cache 101, and may additionally monitor or receive information regarding one or more environmental conditions 400 and/or the rate 401 at which data is being drained from the cache 101 to the rotating media 103. FIG. 4(b) illustrates another similar operation flow for a device 100 utilizing a disk drive 105-1.


The one or more environmental conditions 400 may include conditions such as vibration, temperature, moisture, or other conditions that may affect the performance of the disk drive or device. In an example embodiment, the control circuitry can receive information regarding the vibration condition of the disk drive 105-1 or device 100. The information regarding the vibration condition may include a vibration mode categorization (e.g., nominal vibration, low vibration, vibration, extreme vibration, etc.) detected by the servo 102 and/or sensor(s), or as determined by the control circuitry 104. Each vibration mode categorization may represent a predefined vibration threshold based on a desired implementation. Depending on the vibration mode or measurement, the control circuitry 104 can choose to throttle the host commands, for example, but not limited to, reducing or increasing the rate of the write host commands being forwarded to cache memory 101, introducing or removing delays between each write host command to be forwarded to the cache, etc.


Other implementations of the present inventive concept may be configured for other desired environmental conditions. For example, temperature for the device 100 or disk drive 105-1 may be monitored, and various modes of categorization may be implemented to represent various temperature thresholds. In adverse temperature modes (e.g., high heat, etc.), where throughput may degrade due to prolonged use, the control circuitry 104 may throttle the rate of the host commands being sent to the cache memory downwards. Other environmental conditions, such as moisture, battery life, etc. may be detected in a similar fashion by the servo 102 and/or sensors, or as determined by the control circuitry 104.


The rate 401 at which data is being drained from the cache memory 101 to the rotating media 103 can also be monitored by the control circuitry 104. For example, if the rate 401 falls below a minimum throughput threshold, the control circuitry 104 may determine to throttle the host commands upwards, thereby increasing the rate of host commands to the cache memory 101. The minimum throughput threshold can be predetermined (e.g. factory preset, etc.) or set/adjusted by the control circuitry, or determined by other methods. In another example embodiment, if there are no adverse environmental conditions, the control circuitry 104 may determine that the disk drive does not need to be restricted to the minimum throughput threshold, and may throttle the host commands upwards. Further example implementations are provided below in the descriptions of FIGS. 6-9.



FIG. 5 is a plot illustrating an example of data throughput under vibration for the example operation flow of FIG. 4. In an example implementation, the throttling of host commands during adverse vibration conditions thereby leads to consistent performance when writing to the cache, which subsequently avoids cache saturation, mitigating the risk of the disk drive or device becoming unable to timely service host commands. Compared to FIG. 2, where no throttling is performed, FIG. 5 shows a rationed or measured use of the total available throughput under a vibration condition. This may be preferable in many ways. First, although performance is lower initially as compared to state 300 shown in FIG. 2 (a relatively short period of time), the throttled approach avoids cache saturation for a longer period of time. Indeed, as many vibration conditions are temporary, the throttled approach provides a greater chance that the vibration conditions would pass without cache saturation. Second, the longer period of saturation avoidance allows for possible warning signal(s) to be sent and action(s) to be taken. For example, in one embodiment the disk drive or device under such constant vibration may send a warning signal to the host to anticipate potential problems, which may allow the host to take actions to avoid entering into an error state.


It is to be noted that although FIG. 5 shows one throttling state, the rate of throttling may vary in practice due to varying environmental conditions and/or drain rate observed, as described further below.



FIGS. 6-9 illustrate example flow diagrams for the control circuitry, in accordance with example embodiments of the present inventive concept.


In the example embodiment of FIG. 6, the control circuitry receives information containing at least one of a rate at which data is being drained from the cache memory to the rotating media, and at least one environmental condition (600). The control circuitry can determine if throttling is needed based on the information received (601). If the control circuitry determines that throttling is needed (601—Yes), then the control circuitry can proceed to throttle the host commands (602).


In this example embodiment, the control circuitry can thereby receive information in an ad-hoc manner and determine the throttling decision accordingly. For example, information for the at least one environmental condition may not necessarily need to be sent to the control circuitry unless there is a status change (e.g., mode change for one or more environmental conditions). In that situation, the control circuitry may determine that the disk drive does not need to be restricted to the minimum throughput threshold, and may throttle the host commands upwards to maximize throughput, in the absence of any adverse environmental conditions.


Similarly, the control circuitry may determine from one or more adverse environmental conditions (e.g., extreme vibration, extreme temperature, etc.) to immediately throttle the host commands downwards, and subsequently monitor the drain rate to ensure that the minimum throughput threshold is met. The control circuitry may also determine from the drain rate (e.g., quickly falling drain rate, drain rate below minimum throughput threshold, etc.) to immediately throttle the host commands upwards or downwards appropriately, regardless of the environmental conditions. Other configurations based on the example embodiment of FIG. 6 are also possible.


In the example embodiment of FIG. 7, the control circuitry monitors the rate at which data is being drained from the cache memory to the rotating media, without monitoring environmental conditions (700). The example embodiment of FIG. 7 may be utilized in situations such as, but not limited to, a server or a desktop. The control circuitry determines if throttling is needed based on the rate alone (701). If the control circuitry determines that throttling is needed (701—Yes), then the control circuitry can proceed to throttle the host commands (702).


The example embodiment of FIG. 7 controls to meet or exceed a minimum throughput requirement of the device or disk drive. For example, if the control circuitry determines that the rate is declining quickly, the control circuitry may decide to throttle the host commands downwards to avoid having the rate fall below the minimum throughput requirement. Similarly, the control circuitry may decide to throttle the host commands upwards to increase the throughput as needed to avoid falling below the minimum throughput requirement. The control circuitry can be configured to throttle the host commands upwards or downwards in various situations based on the monitored rate.


In the example embodiment of FIG. 8, the control circuitry receives information regarding a rate at which data is being drained from the cache memory to the rotating media (800), and at least one environmental condition (801). In this example embodiment, the control circuitry may constantly monitor both the environmental conditions and the drain rate before determining a throttling decision. The control circuitry determines if throttling is needed based on the information received (802). If the control circuitry determines that throttling is needed (802—Yes), then the control circuitry can proceed to throttle the host commands (803). The example embodiment of FIG. 8 may be used for devices that may undergo an extreme range of adverse but otherwise temporary conditions (e.g., tablets, laptops, etc.) so that the device does not needlessly throttle the host commands from a temporarily adverse environmental condition alone.


The throttling of the host commands may be implemented in various ways. In an example embodiment of FIG. 9, the throttling of host commands is performed by introducing a delay between each of the host commands being sent to the cache memory. After a determination is made that throttling needs to be conducted, the control circuitry determines a delay for throttling the host commands (901). For example, if the determination is made that the host commands should be throttled upwards, the delay may be decreased. Conversely, the delay can also be increased if the determination is made that the host commands should be throttled downwards. The control circuitry introduces the delay between each of the host commands as they are sent to the cache memory, or between groups or types of host commands, or at other times (902).


Any suitable control circuitry may be employed to implement the flow diagrams of the example embodiments noted above, for example, but not limited to, any suitable integrated circuit or circuits. For example, the control circuitry may be implemented within a read channel integrated circuit, or in a component separate from the read channel, such as a disk controller, or certain steps described above may be performed by a read channel and others by a disk controller. In one example, the read channel and disk controller are implemented as separate integrated circuits, and in an alternative embodiment they are fabricated into a single integrated circuit or system on a chip (SOC). In addition, the control circuitry may include a suitable preamp circuit implemented as a separate integrated circuit, integrated into the read channel or disk controller circuit, or integrated into an SOC.


In one example, the control circuitry may take the form of a microprocessor executing instructions, the instructions being operable to cause the microprocessor to execute in accordance with the flow diagrams described above. The instructions may be stored in any computer-readable storage medium, which may involve tangible media such as flash memory, RAM, etc. Alternatively, the instructions may be stored in a computer-readable signal medium, which involves non-tangible media such as carrier waves. In one example, they may be stored on a non-volatile semiconductor memory external to the microprocessor, or integrated with the microprocessor in a SOC. In another example, the instructions are stored on the disk and read into a volatile semiconductor memory when the disk drive or device is powered on. In yet another example, the control circuitry comprises suitable logic circuitry, such as state machine circuitry.


Furthermore, some portions of the detailed description are presented in terms of algorithms and symbolic representations of operations within a computer. These algorithmic descriptions and symbolic representations are the means used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the essence of their innovations to others skilled in the art. An algorithm is a series of defined steps leading to a desired end state or result. In the example implementations, the steps carried out require physical manipulations of tangible quantities for achieving a tangible result.


Moreover, other implementations of the present application will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the example implementations disclosed herein. Various aspects and/or components of the described example implementations may be used singly or in any combination. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as examples, with a true scope and spirit of the application being indicated by the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A disk drive, comprising: rotating media;cache memory; andcontrol circuitry configured to throttle a rate of host commands by introducing a delay between each of the host commands sent from a host based on a minimum throughput requirement of the cache memory and information comprising at least one of: a rate at which data is being drained from the cache memory to the rotating media; andat least one environmental condition;
  • 2. The disk drive of claim 1, wherein the control circuitry is further configured to determine a vibration mode for the disk drive, and wherein the at least one environmental condition comprises the determined vibration mode.
  • 3. The disk drive of claim 1, wherein the control circuitry is further configured to monitor the rate at which data is being drained from the cache memory to the rotating media and to determine the delay based at least in part on the rate at which data is drained from the cache memory.
  • 4. The disk drive of claim 1, wherein the information comprises the rate at which the data is being drained from the cache memory to the rotating media, and the at least one environmental condition.
  • 5. The disk drive of claim 1, wherein the disk drive is a hybrid disk drive, and wherein the cache memory is a non-volatile semiconductor memory (NVSM) cache.
  • 6. The disk drive of claim 1, wherein the delay is decreased for an absence of the at least one environmental condition.
  • 7. The disk drive of claim 1, wherein the at least one environmental condition comprises vibration, wherein the delay is increased in response to detection of vibration of the disk drive.
  • 8. The disk drive of claim 1, wherein the at least one environmental condition comprises a plurality of modes of detected vibration of the disk drive, each of the plurality of modes representing a different vibration threshold, wherein the delay is increased in response to a change from a first mode of the plurality of modes to a second mode of the plurality of modes, the second mode having a higher threshold than the first mode.
  • 9. The disk drive of claim 1, wherein the at least one environmental condition comprises a plurality of modes of detected vibration of the disk drive, each of the plurality of modes representing a different vibration threshold, wherein the delay is decreased in response to a change from a first mode of the plurality of modes to a second mode of the plurality of modes, the second mode having a lower threshold than the first mode.
  • 10. A method, comprising: receiving information comprising at least one of: a rate at which data is being drained from a cache memory in a disk drive to a rotating media in a disk drive; andat least one environmental condition of the disk drive;determining a throttling decision from the received information; andthrottling a rate of host commands sent from a host and received by the disk drive based on the throttling decision by introducing a delay between each of the host commands based on the information and a minimum throughput requirement of the cache memory, the delay being increased in response to a decline in the rate at which data is being drained from the cache memory while the rate at which data is being drained from the cache memory is at or above the minimum throughput requirement, and the delay being decreased for the rate at which data is being drained from the cache memory falling below the minimum throughput requirement of the cache memory.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the at least one environmental condition comprises a vibration mode of the disk drive.
  • 12. The method of claim 10, further comprising monitoring the rate at which the data is being drained from the cache memory in the disk drive to the rotating media in the disk drive, and determining the delay based at least in part on the rate at which the data is being drained from the cache memory.
  • 13. The method of claim 10, wherein the information comprises the rate at which the data is being drained from the cache memory in the disk drive to the rotating media in the disk drive, and the at least one environmental condition.
  • 14. The method of claim 10, wherein the disk drive is a hybrid disk drive, and wherein the cache memory is a non-volatile semiconductor memory (NVSM) cache.
  • 15. A control circuitry configured to: receive information comprising at least one of: a rate at which data is being drained from a cache memory in a disk drive to a rotating media in the disk drive; andat least one environmental condition of the disk drive;determine a throttling decision from the received information; andthrottle a rate of host commands sent from a host based on the throttling decision by introducing a delay between each of the host commands based on the information and a minimum throughput requirement of the cache memory, the delay being increased in response to a decline in the rate a rate at which data is being drained from the cache memory while the rate at which data is being drained from the cache memory is at or above the minimum throughput requirement, and the delay being decreased for the rate at which data is being drained from the cache memory falling below the minimum requirement of the cache memory.
  • 16. The control circuitry of claim 15, wherein the at least one environmental condition comprises a vibration mode of the disk drive.
  • 17. The control circuitry of claim 15, wherein the control circuitry is further configured to monitor the rate at which the data is being drained from the cache memory in the disk drive to the rotating media in the disk drive, and to determine the delay based at least in part on the rate at which the data is being drained from the cache.
  • 18. The control circuitry of claim 15, wherein the information comprises the rate at which the data is being drained from the cache memory in the disk drive to the rotating media in the disk drive, and the at least one environmental condition.
  • 19. A device, comprising: a disk drive;cache memory; andcontrol circuitry configured to throttle a rate of host commands sent from a host by introducing a delay between each of the host commands based on a minimum throughput requirement of the cache memory and information comprising at least one of: a rate at which data is being drained from the cache memory to the disk drive; andat least one environmental condition;wherein the delay is increased in response to a decline in the rate at which data is being drained from the cache memory while the rate at which data is being drained from the cache memory is at or above the minimum throughput requirement, and the delay is decreased for the rate at which data is being drained from the cache memory falling below the minimum throughput requirement of the cache memory.
  • 20. The device of claim 19, wherein the control circuitry is further configured to determine a vibration mode for the device, and wherein the at least one environmental condition comprises the determined vibration mode.
  • 21. The device of claim 19, wherein the control circuitry is further configured to monitor the rate at which data is being drained from the cache memory to the disk drive and to determine the delay based at least in part on the rate at which data is being drained from the cache memory.
  • 22. The device of claim 19, wherein the information comprises the rate at which the data is being drained from the cache memory to the disk drive, and the at least one environmental condition.
  • 23. The device of claim 19, wherein the cache memory is disposed externally from the disk drive.
  • 24. The device of claim 19, wherein the control circuitry is disposed externally from the disk drive.
US Referenced Citations (111)
Number Name Date Kind
6058466 Panwar et al. May 2000 A
6189080 Ofer Feb 2001 B1
6240502 Panwar et al. May 2001 B1
6856556 Hajeck Feb 2005 B1
6986019 Bagashev et al. Jan 2006 B1
7126857 Hajeck Oct 2006 B2
7249268 Bhandarkar Jul 2007 B2
7411757 Chu et al. Aug 2008 B2
7430136 Merry, Jr. et al. Sep 2008 B2
7447807 Merry et al. Nov 2008 B1
7477477 Maruchi et al. Jan 2009 B2
7502256 Merry, Jr. et al. Mar 2009 B2
7509441 Merry et al. Mar 2009 B1
7596643 Merry, Jr. et al. Sep 2009 B2
7653778 Merry, Jr. et al. Jan 2010 B2
7685337 Merry, Jr. et al. Mar 2010 B2
7685338 Merry, Jr. et al. Mar 2010 B2
7685374 Diggs et al. Mar 2010 B2
7733712 Walston et al. Jun 2010 B1
7765373 Merry et al. Jul 2010 B1
7898855 Merry, Jr. et al. Mar 2011 B2
7912991 Merry et al. Mar 2011 B1
7936603 Merry, Jr. et al. May 2011 B2
7962792 Diggs et al. Jun 2011 B2
8078918 Diggs et al. Dec 2011 B2
8090899 Syu Jan 2012 B1
8095851 Diggs et al. Jan 2012 B2
8108692 Merry et al. Jan 2012 B1
8122185 Merry, Jr. et al. Feb 2012 B2
8127048 Merry et al. Feb 2012 B1
8135903 Kan Mar 2012 B1
8151020 Merry, Jr. et al. Apr 2012 B2
8161227 Diggs et al. Apr 2012 B1
8166245 Diggs et al. Apr 2012 B2
8243525 Kan Aug 2012 B1
8254172 Kan Aug 2012 B1
8261012 Kan Sep 2012 B2
8271692 Dinh et al. Sep 2012 B1
8296625 Diggs et al. Oct 2012 B2
8312207 Merry, Jr. et al. Nov 2012 B2
8316176 Phan et al. Nov 2012 B1
8341339 Boyle et al. Dec 2012 B1
8375151 Kan Feb 2013 B1
8392635 Booth et al. Mar 2013 B2
8397107 Syu et al. Mar 2013 B1
8407449 Colon et al. Mar 2013 B1
8423722 Deforest et al. Apr 2013 B1
8433858 Diggs et al. Apr 2013 B1
8443167 Fallone et al. May 2013 B1
8447920 Syu May 2013 B1
8458435 Rainey, III et al. Jun 2013 B1
8478930 Syu Jul 2013 B1
8489854 Colon et al. Jul 2013 B1
8503237 Horn Aug 2013 B1
8521972 Boyle et al. Aug 2013 B1
8549236 Diggs et al. Oct 2013 B2
8583835 Kan Nov 2013 B1
8601311 Horn Dec 2013 B2
8601313 Horn Dec 2013 B1
8612669 Syu et al. Dec 2013 B1
8612804 Kang et al. Dec 2013 B1
8615681 Horn Dec 2013 B2
8638602 Horn Jan 2014 B1
8639872 Boyle et al. Jan 2014 B1
8683113 Abasto et al. Mar 2014 B2
8700834 Horn et al. Apr 2014 B2
8700950 Syu Apr 2014 B1
8700951 Call et al. Apr 2014 B1
8706985 Boyle et al. Apr 2014 B1
8707104 Jean Apr 2014 B1
8713066 Lo et al. Apr 2014 B1
8713357 Jean et al. Apr 2014 B1
8719531 Strange et al. May 2014 B2
8724422 Agness et al. May 2014 B1
8725931 Kang May 2014 B1
8745277 Kan Jun 2014 B2
8751728 Syu et al. Jun 2014 B1
8769190 Syu et al. Jul 2014 B1
8769232 Suryabudi et al. Jul 2014 B2
8775720 Meyer et al. Jul 2014 B1
8782327 Kang et al. Jul 2014 B1
8788778 Boyle Jul 2014 B1
8788779 Horn Jul 2014 B1
8788880 Gosla et al. Jul 2014 B1
8793429 Call et al. Jul 2014 B1
20050171753 Rosing et al. Aug 2005 A1
20080024899 Chu et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080141063 Ridgeway et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080209103 Haga Aug 2008 A1
20090049312 Min Feb 2009 A1
20100174849 Walston et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100185820 Hughes et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100250793 Syu Sep 2010 A1
20110099323 Syu Apr 2011 A1
20110283049 Kang et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120260020 Suryabudi et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120278531 Horn Nov 2012 A1
20120284460 Guda Nov 2012 A1
20120324191 Strange et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130132638 Horn et al. May 2013 A1
20130145106 Kan Jun 2013 A1
20130290793 Booth et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140059405 Syu et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140101369 Tomlin et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140115427 Lu Apr 2014 A1
20140133220 Danilak et al. May 2014 A1
20140136753 Tomlin et al. May 2014 A1
20140149826 Lu et al. May 2014 A1
20140157078 Danilak et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140181432 Horn Jun 2014 A1
20140223255 Lu et al. Aug 2014 A1