The present disclosure relates generally to servers capable of efficiently handling routine packet inspection or other tasks without direction from a main processor. More particularly, systems supporting offload or auxiliary processing modules that can be physically connected to a system memory bus to process packet data independent of a host processor of the server are described.
Packet handling and security applications can require a significant amount of scarce computational resources in enterprise server or cloud based data systems. These can include services such as packet repeaters, intrusion detection systems (IDS), intrusion protection systems (IPS), and routing mechanisms for virtual private networks (VPNs). Many proprietary and incompatible hardware systems are available for such packet handling and transport services, but cost and a desire for standardization pushes enterprise data storage and processing providers toward software defined stacks running on commodity (e.g., x86 architecture) hardware.
Unfortunately, processors based on x86 architectures are ill-equipped to handle such high volume applications. Even idling, x86 processors use a significant amount of power, and near continuous operation for high bandwidth packet analysis functionality make the processor energy costs one of the dominate price factors. In addition, issues with the high cost of context switching, the limited parallelism, and the security implications associated with running encryption/decryption modules on x86 processors have reduced the effectiveness of enterprise or cloud data security.
A method for handling packets can include providing at least one main processor connected to a plurality of offload processors by a memory bus; configuring the offload processors to provide security related services on packets prior to redirection to the main processor; and operating a virtual switch respectively connected to the main processor and the plurality of offload processors using the memory bus, with the virtual switch capable of receiving memory read/write data over the memory bus
Packet handling and security applications for enterprise server or cloud based data systems can be efficiently implemented on offload processing modules connected to a memory bus, for example, by insertion into a socket for a Dual In-line Memory Module (DIMM). Such modules can be referred to as Xocket™ In-line Memory Modules (XIMMs), and can have multiple “wimpy” cores associated with a memory channel. Using one or more XIMMs it is possible to execute lightweight packet handling tasks without intervention from a main server processor. As will be discussed, XIMM modules can have high efficiency context switching, high parallelism, and can solve security problems associated with running encryption/decryption modules on x86 processors. Such systems as a whole are able to handle high network bandwidth traffic at a lower latency and at a very low power when compared to traditional high power ‘brawny’ server cores. XIMMs can provide services such as firewall packet repeaters, intrusion detection systems (IDS), intrusion protection systems (IPS), and routing mechanisms for virtual private networks with low power costs and high reliability.
The virtual switch 208 can be created with virtual switching software such as OpenFlow. OpenFlow is an open standard network protocol used to manage traffic between commercial Ethernet switches, routers and wireless access points. OpenFlow enables software-defined networking (SDN) for programmable networks and typically emulates a hardware Ethernet switch. Using a configurable data flow table it is possible to connect multiple switches and/or networks together to create a data flow, and then flexibly managing the entire infrastructure, setting policies and managing traffic type as needed. It allows for deployment of innovative routing and switching protocols in a network for many different applications, including virtual machine and high-security networks. The software stack running on a processor of the server also provides control plane provisioning (216) which includes a variety of packet handling services including but not limited to virtual private network (VPN) encryption/decryption through an open source technology such as OpenVPN, as but one example. Upon receipt, a decrypted packet is arbitrated by said processor acting as a switch to a second of a plurality of other offload processors (210). The second offload processor 210 can be running an operating system such as Apache, and may utilize a software stack for packet handling services. It reassembles decrypted packet data and performs intrusion prevention systems (IPS) signature detection in order to detect malicious incoming packet traffic. Optionally, a connection can also be established between the XIMM 206 and another server processor (e.g., a x86 processor) (214) through a high speed bus. Packets may be sent to the x86 processor 214 via a bus, including but limited to memory busses such as a double data rate (DDR, DDR2, DDR3, DDR4) bus. In this example, an Ethernet tunnel (212) exists over a DDR bus between the XIMM and the server's x86 processor (214) for the transmission of packets or other information between the two.
Advantageously, such a system can greatly improve computational and power efficiency for management of simultaneously running IPS and VPN services. Traditionally, IPS protocols require the assembly of data for signature detection before traffic is allowed to access a server, but VPN protocols mandate decryption on the server to produce signature detection data. In practice, many cloud service providers are forced to use proprietary hardware or simply disallow IPS services to a server core (limiting IPS to between an enterprise router and a gateway). Use of XIMMs allows the problems associated with simultaneous IPS and VPN to be avoided, since signature detection can occur on the XIMM (for example, with the aid of Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) cores implementable on FPGA cores in a XIMM), while VPN interconnection is maintained.
On the x86 server processor, an operating system is also present and can run database and analytics software (318, 322), such as a Hadoop and MySQL as but two possible examples. A software hypervisor such as SessionVisor may run as well, providing virtualization services to a plurality of guest OS sessions (312). The hypervisor is responsible for the provisioning of hardware resources to the guest sessions, and also runs virtual switching software such as OpenFlow for directing packets to their destination sessions. An x86 software stack can also include one or more software applications related to the XIMM. In the particular embodiment shown, two XIMM specific software applications are also present. A software application socket (314) facilitates communication between the CPU and the XIMM offload processors, and a NIC driver (316) provides Ethernet-over-DDR tunneling and packet transmission from the NIC to the XIMM.
The following example(s) provide illustration and discussion of exemplary hardware and data processing systems suitable for implementation and operation of the foregoing discussed systems and methods. In particular, hardware and operation of wimpy cores or computational elements connected to a memory bus and mounted in DIMM or other conventional memory socket is discussed.
The computation elements or offload processors are accessible through memory bus 405. In this embodiment, the module can be inserted into a Dual Inline Memory Module (DIMM) slot on a commodity computer or server using a DIMM connector (407), providing a significant increase in effective computing power to system 400. The XIMM may communicate with other components in the commodity computer or server via one of a variety of busses including but not limited to any version of existing double data rate standards (e.g., DDR, DDR2, DDR3, etc.)
This illustrated embodiment of the XIMM contains five offload processors (400a, 400b, 400c, 400d, 400e) however other embodiments containing greater or fewer numbers of processors are contemplated. The offload processors can be custom manufactured or one of a variety of commodity processors including but not limited to field-programmable grid arrays (FPGA), microprocessors, reduced instruction set computers (RISC), microcontrollers or ARM processors. The computation elements or offload processors can include combinations of computational FPGAs such as those based on Altera, Xilinx (e.g., Artix class), or Zynq architecture (e.g., Zynq 7020), and/or conventional processors such as those based on Intel Atom or ARM architecture (e.g., ARM A9). For many applications, ARM processors having advanced memory handling features such as snoop control unit (SCU) are preferred, since this allows coherent read and write of memory. Other preferred advanced memory features can include processors that support an accelerator coherency port (ACP) that can allow for coherent supplementation of the cache through an FPGA fabric or computational element.
Each offload processor on the XIMM may run one of a variety of operating systems including but not limited to Apache or Linux. In addition, the offload processors may have access to a plurality of dedicated or shared storage methods. In this embodiment, each offload processor connects to two dedicated storage units (404a, 404b, 404c, 404d, 404e) which can be of a variety of storage types, including but not limited to random access memory (RAM), dynamic random access memory (DRAM), sequential access memory (SAM), static random access memory (SRAM), synchronous dynamic random access memory (SDRAM), reduced latency dynamic random access memory (RLDRAM), flash memory, or other emerging memory standards such as those based on DDR4 or hybrid memory cubes (HMC).
In this embodiment, one of the Zynq computational FPGAs can act as arbiter providing a memory cache, giving an ability to have peer to peer sharing of data (via memcached or OMQ memory formalisms) between the other Zynq computational FPGAs. All traffic departing for the computational FPGAs is controlled through memory mapped I/O. The arbiter queues session data for use, and when a computational FPGA asks for address outside of the provided session, the arbiter is the first level of retrieval, external processing determination, and predictors set.
Operation of one embodiment of a XIMM module 430 using an ARM A9 architecture is illustrated with respect to
The following table (Table 1) illustrates potential states that can exist in the scheduling of queues/threads to XIMM processors and memory such as illustrated in
These states help coordinate the complex synchronization between processes, network traffic, and memory-mapped hardware. When a queue is selected by a traffic manager a pipeline coordinates swapping in the desired L2 cache (440), transferring the reassembled IO data into the memory space of the executing process. In certain cases, no packets are pending in the queue, but computation is still pending to service previous packets. Once this process makes a memory reference outside of the data swapped, a scheduler can require queued data from the network interface card (NIC) to continue scheduling the thread. To provide fair queuing to a process not having data, the maximum context size is assumed as data processed. In this way, a queue must be provisioned as the greater of computational resource and network bandwidth resource, for example, each as a ratio of an 800 MHz A9 and 3 Gbps of bandwidth. Given the lopsidedness of this ratio, the ARM core is generally indicated to be worthwhile for computation having many parallel sessions (such that the hardware's prefetching of session-specific data and TCP/reassembly offloads a large portion of the CPU load) and those requiring minimal general purpose processing of data.
Essentially zero-overhead context switching is also possible using XIMM modules as disclosed in
In operation, metadata transport code can relieve a main or host processor from tasks including fragmentation and reassembly, and checksum and other metadata services (e.g., accounting, IPSec, SSL, Overlay, etc.). As IO data streams in and out, L1 cache 437 can be filled during packet processing. During a context switch, the lockdown portion of a translation lookaside buffer (TLB) of an L1 cache can be rewritten with the addresses corresponding to the new context. In one very particular implementation, the following four commands can be executed for the current memory space.
MRC p15,0,r0,c10,c0,0; read the lockdown register
BIC r0,r0,#1; clear preserve bit
MCR p15,0,r0,c10,c0,0; write to the lockdown register;
write to the old value to the memory mapped Block RAM
Bandwidths and capacities of the memories can be precisely allocated to support context switching as well as applications such as Openflow processing, billing, accounting, and header filtering programs.
For additional performance improvements, the ACP 434 can be used not just for cache supplementation, but hardware functionality supplementation, in part by exploitation of the memory space allocation. An operand is written to memory and the new function called, through customizing specific Open Source libraries, so putting the thread to sleep and the hardware scheduler validates it for scheduling again once the results are ready. For example, OpenVPN uses the OpenSSL library, where the encrypt/decrypt functions can be memory mapped. Large blocks are then available to be exported without delay, or consuming the L2 cache 440, using the ACP. Hence, a minimum number of calls are needed within the processing window of a context switch, improving overall performance.
It should be appreciated that in the foregoing description of exemplary embodiments of the invention, various features of the invention are sometimes grouped together in a single embodiment, figure, or description thereof for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure aiding in the understanding of one or more of the various inventive aspects. This method of disclosure, however, is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed invention requires more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects lie in less than all features of a single foregoing disclosed embodiment. Thus, the claims following the detailed description are hereby expressly incorporated into this detailed description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment of this invention.
It is also understood that the embodiments of the invention may be practiced in the absence of an element and/or step not specifically disclosed. That is, an inventive feature of the invention may be elimination of an element.
Accordingly, while the various aspects of the particular embodiments set forth herein have been described in detail, the present invention could be subject to various changes, substitutions, and alterations without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/650,373 filed May 22, 2012, 61/753,892 the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5237662 | Green et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5446844 | Steckler | Aug 1995 | A |
5577213 | Avery et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5870350 | Bertin et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6092146 | Dell et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6157955 | Narad et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6751113 | Bhakta et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6810442 | Lin et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6873534 | Bhakta et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6877076 | Cho et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6930900 | Bhakta et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6930903 | Bhakta et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7062618 | Tsunoda et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7089412 | Chen et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7254036 | Pauley et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7286436 | Bhakta et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7289386 | Bhakta et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7305574 | Ferraiolo et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7375970 | Pauley et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7421552 | Long | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7442050 | Bhakta et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7454749 | Oberdorfer | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7467251 | Park et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7480611 | Gooding et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7532537 | Solomon et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7619893 | Yu | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7619912 | Bhakta et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7636274 | Solomon et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7716035 | Oshins et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7716411 | Panabaker et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7811097 | Bhakta et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7839645 | Pauley et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7840748 | Gower et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7864627 | Bhakta et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7881150 | Solomon et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7916574 | Solomon et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
8001434 | Lee et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8033836 | Bhakta et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8072837 | Solomon et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8081535 | Bhakta et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8081536 | Solomon et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8081537 | Bhakta et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8117369 | Nishtala et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8154901 | Lee et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8190699 | Mcmillian et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8264903 | Lee et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8287291 | Bhakta et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8301833 | Chen et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8347005 | Bresniker | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8359501 | Lee et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8417870 | Lee et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8489837 | Lee | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8516185 | Lee et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8516187 | Chen et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8516188 | Solomon et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8553470 | Lee et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8555002 | Karamcheti et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8599634 | Lee et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8631193 | Smith et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8656072 | Hinkle et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8689064 | Lee et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8756364 | Bhakta et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8775858 | Gower et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8782350 | Lee et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8782373 | Karamcheti et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8787060 | Lee | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8864500 | Bhakta et al. | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8868829 | Rajan et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8874831 | Lee et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8874843 | Okin et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8881389 | Kanapathippillai et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8904098 | Amidi et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8924680 | Perego et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8930647 | Smith | Jan 2015 | B1 |
8943245 | Karamcheti et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
20040093477 | Oberdorfer | May 2004 | A1 |
20040202319 | Hussain et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050018495 | Bhakta et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20070079185 | Totolos | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070124532 | Bennett et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070299990 | Ben-yehuda et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080229049 | Nanda et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080304481 | Gurney et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090138440 | Goyal | May 2009 | A1 |
20090201711 | Solomon et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100091540 | Bhakta et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100110642 | Pauley et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100128507 | Solomon et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100183033 | Hannuksela | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110016250 | Lee et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110085406 | Solomon et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110090749 | Bhakta et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110110376 | Jiang | May 2011 | A1 |
20110202679 | Cohen et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110235260 | Lee et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120106228 | Lee | May 2012 | A1 |
20120239874 | Lee et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120250386 | Lee et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120271990 | Chen et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130003556 | Boden et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130019057 | Stephens et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130019076 | Amidi et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130039128 | Amidi et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130086309 | Lee et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130132639 | Amidi et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130219168 | Gearhart et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130262739 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140040568 | Lee et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140040569 | Solomon et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140075106 | Okin et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140281661 | Milton et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140337539 | Lee et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150070959 | Lee | Mar 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Senapathi et al., Introduction to TCP Offload Engines, Mar. 2004, Dell, pp. 103-107. |
Microsoft, Overview of Single Root I/O Virtualization, Sep. 2012, Microsoft, p. 1. |
George Crump, Offloading I/O from the Hypervisor with SR-IOV, Aprius, Sep. 2010, pp. 1-3. |
PCT International Search Report for International Application PCT/US2013/047205, dated Sep. 24, 2013. |
PCT Written Opinion of the International Search Authority for International Application PCT/US2013/047205, dated Sep. 24, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140157396 A1 | Jun 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61650373 | May 2012 | US |