It can be difficult to screen semiconductor devices for functionality. Defects observed at the package interface may cause the entire device to fail. Previous approaches to determining whether a device is functional include wafer sort and final packaged testing. However, because the test equipment associated with such tests is often expensive, sophisticated capital equipment, the tests themselves become expensive, with the cost of the test increasing with test duration.
Various embodiments are disclosed herein that relate to electrically screening semiconductor devices. For example, one embodiment provides a method for electrically characterizing a pin of a semiconductor device. The example method includes providing a test pattern to the semiconductor device. Further, the method includes adjusting a selected electrical state of a pin of the semiconductor device and measuring a value for a dependent electrical state of the pin responsive to the selected electrical state. The example method also includes generating an electrical characterization for the pin by correlating the dependent electrical state with the selected electrical state and outputting the electrical characterization for display.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter. Furthermore, the claimed subject matter is not limited to implementations that solve any or all disadvantages noted in any part of this disclosure.
Defects occurring during semiconductor manufacturing may cause functional faults in semiconductor devices. For example, manufacturing faults like open circuit defects, impurity defects, and packaging defects may cause faults potentially leading to poor device performance or device failure. Semiconductor devices may be tested at an electrical test and/or sort facility using automated test equipment (ATE) to determine if the device is logically functional. Depending on the logical function of the device, additional techniques may be used to analyze specific failure modes of the device and/or to investigate the electrical character of the device. For example, pin characterization equipment may be used to characterize various electrical properties of electrical pins of the semiconductor device. However, existing approaches to characterizing pin electrical properties generally do not provide logic function test capability.
The disclosed embodiments relate to systems and methods for electrically characterizing a semiconductor device. For example, a computer-readable storage medium excluding a signal per se and comprising instructions stored thereon that are executable by a computing device to electrically characterize pins included in the semiconductor device is disclosed. The example instructions comprise instructions to provide a test pattern to the semiconductor device via one or more of the pins, the test pattern configured to set the semiconductor device to a selected logical state prior to electrically characterizing a selected pin. The example instructions also comprise instructions to adjust an electrical state of the selected pin after the test pattern is provided to the device, generate an electrical characterization for the selected pin, and output the electrical characterization for display.
The disclosed embodiments may provide an approach to characterize the electrical behavior of one or more pins included in a semiconductor device rapidly. Further, in some embodiments, the system and methods described herein may provide a compact approach to checking device functionality without the overhead of traditional ATE hardware. For example, in some embodiments, the hardware and software described herein may be implemented in a portable and/or compact manner
As shown in
Characterization computing device 102 may receive data for characterizing semiconductor device 106 and comparing the characterization generated to characterizations for other devices (such as statistical baseline data, manufacturing specification data, device performance data, and the like) from server 108 and/or database 110 via network 114. While
In some embodiments, providing the test pattern to the semiconductor device may include setting one or more pins of the semiconductor device to a logic low state while a pin selected for electrical characterization is characterized. In some embodiments, setting a pin to a logic low state may include setting the pin to a D.C. voltage of 0.8 V or less, within an acceptable tolerance. In some embodiments, setting the pins to a logic low may include setting the pins to a ground state. Setting the pins to a ground state may be performed prior to performing the selected characterization techniques on the selected pin. For example, setting the semiconductor device to a ground state may be performed prior to performing a voltage-current characterization of the selected pin and/or a continuity characterization for the selected pin, as described further below.
In some other embodiments, providing the test pattern to the semiconductor device may include setting one or more pins of the semiconductor device to a logic high state while the selected pin is characterized. In some embodiments, setting such pins to a logic high state may include setting the pins to a D.C. voltage of 2.5 V, within an acceptable tolerance. For example, using a test pattern to set the semiconductor device to the powered state may enable an input leakage determination as described below.
At 304, method 300 includes pausing the test pattern while the pin selected for electrical characterization is characterized. Pausing the test pattern provides a D.C. state for characterization of the selected pin. Thus, the test pattern is paused to adjust the selected electrical state and measure the value for the dependent electrical state for the selected pin. It will be appreciated that the test pattern may be paused for any suitable period of time. In one example, the test pattern may be paused for less than 100 milliseconds while the dependent electrical state is measured.
At 306, method 300 includes adjusting a selected electrical state of the selected pin of the semiconductor device, and, at 308, measuring a value for a dependent electrical state of the selected pin responsive to the selected electrical state. For example, a test unit configured to perform an electrical measurement of the semiconductor device may adjust the selected electrical state of the selected pin and measure the dependent electrical state of the selected pin in response. It will be appreciated that selection and adjustment of the electrical state may be performed in any suitable way. For example, in some embodiments, a value for the electrical state may be selected and provided as a stimulus to the selected pin and a response of the selected pin may be detected and measured by a suitable sensor in response. The selected value may be incremented and/or indexed through a selected range of values in some embodiments, while the selected value may be a single value in some other embodiments.
At 308, method 300 includes generating an electrical characterization for the pin by correlating the dependent electrical state with the selected electrical state. For example, a correlation may be formed from one or more selected electrical state values provided to the pin may and the respective dependent electrical state values measured in response. Any suitable manner of correlating the dependent electrical state to the electrical state may be employed without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. In some embodiments, a plurality of correlations may be generated from the data along with statistical information related to the quality of the correlation, such as a correlation coefficient, for each, potentially allowing judgments to be made about outlier data points, various defect modes that may be identifiable via various correlation techniques, and so on.
Various examples of electrical characterizations that may be generated and the electrical state adjustments and dependent electrical state measurements are described below. For example, a voltage-current characterization may be generated using current measurements made in response to voltage adjustments to a selected pin. In this example, adjusting the selected electrical state of the selected pin may include adjusting a selected voltage incrementally within a selected voltage range. For example, one non-limiting voltage range may include voltages selected in the range from −1.4 V to +1.4 V selected in increments of 0.1 V. Measuring the value for the dependent electrical state of the selected pin in this example may include measuring a current value at the selected pin for each voltage setting. Once the current measurements are collected, the voltage-current characterization may be generated by suitably correlating the current measurements with their respective voltage settings. In some embodiments, generating the voltage-current relationship for the selected pin may include setting one or more pins other than the selected pin to a logic low state prior to adjusting the voltage of the selected pin. For example, each pin other than the selected pin may be set to a logic low state prior to adjusting the voltage of the selected pin. In some other embodiments, each of a plurality of pins other than the selected pin may be set to logic high and/or logic low states respectively prior to adjusting the voltage of the selected pin.
In another example, an input leakage characterization may be generated for a selected pin. In this example, adjusting the selected electrical state of the selected pin may include selecting a voltage and measuring the value for the dependent electrical state may include measuring a current value in response. For example, a selected pin may be set to a voltage of 3.3 V and a current may be measured at the selected pin. Once the current measurement is collected, the input leakage characterization may be generated by suitably correlating the current measurement with the voltage setting. In some embodiments, generating the voltage-current relationship for the selected pin may include setting one or more pins other than the selected pin to a powered state prior to adjusting the selected voltage of the selected pin. For example, each power pin other than the selected pin may be set to a powered state prior to adjusting the voltage of the selected pin.
In yet another example, a pin continuity characterization may be generated for a selected pin. In this example, adjusting the selected electrical state of the selected pin may include selecting a current and measuring the value for the dependent electrical state of the selected pin may include measuring a voltage value in response. For example, a selected pin may be set to a current of −1.0 μA and a voltage may be measured at the selected pin. Once the voltage measurement is collected, the continuity characterization may be generated by suitably correlating the voltage measurement with the current setting. In some embodiments, generating the voltage-current relationship for the selected pin may include setting one or more pins other than the selected pin to a logic low state prior to adjusting the selected current. For example, each pin other than the selected pin may be set to an unpowered state prior to adjusting the current of the selected pin.
At 310, method 300 may optionally include comparing the electrical characterization for the selected pin to an expected or reference electrical characterization for the selected pin. Comparing the characterization for the selected pin to an expected characterization may provide an approach for determining whether the selected pin has acceptable pin characteristics. Such judgments may be made by comparing inflection points, slopes, and/or other suitable features of the generated characterization and/or the correlation underlying the generated characterization to the reference. Further, comparison of the characterization generated for the selected pin to a reference characterization may provide an approach for diagnosing potential failure mechanisms if the selected pin is faulty. For example, differences between the characterizations for the selected pin and the expected electrical characterization may indicate further tests that may be performed, potential causes for the fault, and so on. Any suitable expected electrical characterization may be used for comparison without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. In some embodiments, the expected electrical characterization may have been generated from a previously tested pin on the device under test, from a reference device, from a simulation or theory, from a relevant industry standard, and the like.
In some embodiments, the semiconductor device may include a plurality of pins that may be selected for characterization. In such embodiments, method 300 may be repeated to characterize the additional selected pins. Accordingly, at 312, method 300 includes determining if portions of method 300 are to be repeated for another pin under test. If an additional pin is selected for characterization, method 300 returns to 304.
In some embodiments, a plurality of pins of the semiconductor device may be tested according to a predetermined sequence. It will be appreciated that any suitable sequence may be used for characterizing the pins. For example, the pins may be tested according to a suitable pin identifier.
If no additional pins are selected for characterization, method 300 continues to 314. At 314, method 300 includes, at 314, outputting the electrical characterization for display. Virtually any suitable display output may be employed without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. In some embodiments, the displayed output may be presented in a customizable format and/or in various graphical and/or tabular displays as described below.
In some embodiments, a graphical comparison of generated and expected electrical characterizations for a selected pin or pins may be output for display.
Continuing with
It will be appreciated that method 300 is provided by way of example and as such is not meant to be limiting. Method 300 may include additional or alternative steps that those shown in
Logic subsystem 506 may include one or more physical devices configured to execute one or more instructions stored in data-holding subsystem 504. For example, logic subsystem 506 may include one or more processors that are configured to execute software instructions.
Display subsystem 508 may be used to present the output described herein in a manner so that the output may be transformed into a visually cognizable form. Display subsystem 508 may include any suitable display device, which may be combined in a shared enclosure with data-holding subsystem 504 and logic subsystem 506 or which may be include one or more peripheral display devices.
As shown in
Parametric measurement unit module 516 is configured to adjust the selected electrical state and measure the dependent electrical state of the pin. Thus, parametric measurement unit module 516 may be used to select and adjust suitable voltage and current values and to detect and collect suitable current and voltage measurements in response.
Relay module 518 is configured to switchably electrically couple pattern generation module 514 or parametric measurement unit module 516 to the pin. Because a logical state may not be set for a pin concurrent with electrical characterization, in some embodiments, relay module 518 may be employed to switch the active electrical communication of the pin between pattern generation module 514 and parametric measurement unit module 516 upon selection of that pin for electrical characterization. Thus, that pin may be able to be selected and deselected for electrical characterization and pattern testing, respectively, without being physically disconnected from test unit 512.
Further, as shown in
In this way, the semiconductor testing system described herein may generate an electrical characterization of one or more pins by adjusting an electrical state of a pin and measuring the corresponding dependent characteristic of that pin. By first providing the test pattern, a logical state of the pin prior to measuring an electrical characteristic may be known. In this way, the electrical characteristic of the pin may be predictable and the semiconductor device may be screened for faults.
It is to be understood that the configurations and/or approaches described herein are exemplary in nature, and that these specific embodiments or examples are not to be considered in a limiting sense, because numerous variations are possible. The specific routines or methods described herein may represent one or more of any number of processing strategies. As such, various acts illustrated may be performed in the sequence illustrated, in other sequences, in parallel, or in some cases omitted. Likewise, the order of the above-described processes may be changed.
The subject matter of the present disclosure includes all novel and nonobvious combinations and subcombinations of the various processes, systems and configurations, and other features, functions, acts, and/or properties disclosed herein, as well as any and all equivalents thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2883255 | Anderson | Apr 1959 | A |
3082374 | Buuck | Mar 1963 | A |
4012625 | Bowen | Mar 1977 | A |
4434489 | Blyth | Feb 1984 | A |
4646299 | Schinabeck et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4928278 | Otsuji et al. | May 1990 | A |
5490151 | Feger | Feb 1996 | A |
5696771 | Beausang | Dec 1997 | A |
5717701 | Angelotti | Feb 1998 | A |
6185707 | Smith | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6275023 | Oosaki et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6498473 | Yamabe | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6618827 | Benavides | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6628141 | Alt | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6775796 | Finkler | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6832122 | Huber | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6836136 | Aghaeepour | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6882950 | Jennion | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6883115 | Sanada | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6950771 | Fan | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7012444 | Kojima | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7071833 | Nagano | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7266741 | Luk | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7320115 | Kuo | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7512508 | Rajski | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7568139 | Dokken | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7571422 | Adel | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7574682 | Riviere-Cazaux | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7729884 | Huang | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7752581 | Lanzerotti | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7876120 | Awaji et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7987442 | Rajski | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8141026 | Reilly | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8205173 | Wu | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8343781 | Kumar | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8412991 | Ackerman | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8453088 | Akar | May 2013 | B2 |
8539389 | Akar | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8560904 | Ackerman | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8626460 | Kaufman et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
20030046621 | Finkler | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030046624 | Muhtaroglu | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030057990 | West | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040049722 | Matsushita | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050066294 | Templeton | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071659 | Ferguson | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050076316 | Pierrat | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050270165 | Nagano | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278670 | Brooks | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060031792 | Zavadsky | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060053357 | Rajski | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060066338 | Rajski | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060066339 | Rajski | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060085768 | Heng | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060111873 | Huang | May 2006 | A1 |
20060132165 | Walker et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060132166 | Walker et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060161452 | Hess | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060279310 | Walker et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070011519 | Takeda | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016879 | Kuo | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070143718 | Abercrombie | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070226570 | Zou | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080040637 | Huang | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080091981 | Dokken | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080148201 | Lanzerotti | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080209365 | Riviere-Cazaux | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080284453 | Swenton | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090177936 | Koenemann | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090210183 | Rajski | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100095177 | Forlenza | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100122229 | Lo | May 2010 | A1 |
20100164013 | Jaffe | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100306606 | Huang | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332172 | Kaufman | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110219346 | Lo | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231722 | Mukherjee | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110265157 | Ryder | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110276935 | Fouquet | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120079439 | Akar | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079440 | Akar | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079442 | Akar | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120161808 | Elias | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130049790 | Frost | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130061103 | Ackerman | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130219237 | Ackerman | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140115412 | Ackerman | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140115551 | Akar | Apr 2014 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
“Per Pin Parametric Measurement Unit/Source Measure Unit,” Analog Devices, Inc., 24 pages, Sep. 2005. |
Kashyap, Chandramouli et al., “Silicon feedback to improve frequency of high-performance microprocessors—an overview”; Published in Proceedings ICCAD '08 Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design; 2008; 5 pages. |
Stolowitz Ford Cowger, Listing of Related Cases, Jul. 15, 2014, 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130049790 A1 | Feb 2013 | US |