A plasma reactor for processing a workpiece can employ an electron beam as a plasma source. Such a plasma reactor can exhibit non-uniform distribution of processing results (e.g., distribution of etch rate across the surface of a workpiece) due to non-uniform distribution of electron density and/or kinetic energy within the electron beam. Such non-uniformities can be distributed along the direction of beam propagation and can also be distributed in a direction transverse to the beam propagation direction.
A plasma reactor for processing a workpiece, includes a workpiece processing chamber having a processing chamber enclosure comprising a ceiling and a side wall and an electron beam opening in said side wall, a workpiece support pedestal in said processing chamber having a work lace support surface facing said ceiling and defining a workpiece processing region between said workpiece support surface and said ceiling, said electron beam opening facing said workpiece processing region. The plasma reactor further comprises an electron beam source chamber comprising an electron beam source chamber enclosure that is open to said electron beam opening of said workpiece processing chamber, and an array of plasma sources distributed along a portion of said electron beam source chamber enclosure opposite from said electron beam opening, each of said plasma sources comprising a supply of plasma source power and a plasma source power applicator coupled to the supply of plasma source power. A controller governs each supply of plasma source power of each of said plasma sources.
The array of plasma sources is distributed along direction parallel with a plane of said workpiece support surface.
The plasma sources affect plasma electron density in respective portions of said electron beam source chamber, said respective portions distributed along a direction parallel with a plane of said workpiece support surface. The plasma reactor of claim 3 wherein said controller governs plasma electron density distribution along said direction.
So that the manner in which the exemplary embodiments of the present invention are attained and can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to the embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be appreciated that certain well known processes are not discussed herein in order to not obscure the invention.
To facilitate understanding, identical reference numerals have been used, where possible, to designate identical elements that are common to the figures. It is contemplated that elements and features of one embodiment may be beneficially incorporated in other embodiments without further recitation. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only exemplary embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
The plasma is generated in the process region 118 of the process chamber 100 by an electron beam from an electron beam source 120. The electron beam source 120 includes a plasma generation chamber 122 outside of the process chamber 100 and having a conductive enclosure 124. The conductive enclosure 124 has a gas inlet or neck. 125. An electron beam source gas supply 127 is coupled to the gas inlet 125. The conductive enclosure 124 has an opening 124a facing the process region 118 through an opening 102a in the sidewall 102 of the process chamber 100 through which the electron beam enters the process chamber 100.
The electron beam source 120 includes an extraction grid 126 between the opening 124a and the plasma generation chamber 122, and an acceleration grid 128 between the extraction grid 126 and the process region 118, best seen in the enlarged view of
The electron beam source 120 further includes a pair of electromagnets 134-1 and 134-2 aligned with the electron beam source 120, and producing a magnetic field parallel to the direction of the electron beam. The electron beam flows across the processing region 118 over the workplece 110, and is absorbed on the opposite side of the processing region 118 by a beam dump 136. The beam dump 136 is a conductive body having a shape adapted to capture the wide thin electron beam.
A negative terminal of plasma D.C. discharge voltage supply 140 is coupled to the conductive enclosure 124, whereas a positive terminal of the voltage supply 140 is connected to the extraction grid 126. In turn, a negative terminal of an electron beam acceleration voltage supply 142 is connected to the extraction grid 126, and positive terminal is connected to the grounded sidewall 102 of the process chamber 100. The electrons extracted from the DC discharge plasma through the extraction grid 126 are accelerated as they travel towards the acceleration grid 128 by the potential difference (typically of the order of a few kV) provided by the voltage supply 142. In another example, the negative terminal of voltage supply 142 may be coupled to the conductive enclosure 124, instead of the extraction grid 126. In this case, the voltage supply 142 not only performs work to accelerate the electrons, but also to sustain DC discharge. The voltage supply 140, in this case, only performs work on a small portion of a discharge current caused by electrons that do not make it through the openings and bombard the extraction grid. A coil current supply 146 is coupled to the electromagnets 134-1 and 134-2. Plasma is generated within the chamber 122 of the electron beam source 120 by a D.C. gas discharge produced by power from the voltage supply 140, which provides a voltage typically of the order of a few hundred volts. This D.C. gas discharge is the main plasma source of the electron beam source 120. Electrons are extracted from the plasma in the chamber 122 through the extraction grid 126, and accelerated through the acceleration grid 128 due to a voltage difference between the acceleration grid and the extraction grid to produce an electron beam that flows into the processing chamber 100. Distribution of the plasma ion density and plasma electron density across the chamber 122 affects the uniformity of the electron beam. For example, referring to
While the main plasma source in the electron beam source 120 is a D.C. gas discharge produced by the voltage supply 140, any other suitable plasma source may be employed instead as the main plasma source. For example, the main plasma source of the electron beam source 120 may be a toroidal RF plasma source, a capacitively coupled RE plasma source, or an inductively coupled RF plasma source.
In the illustrated embodiment, the main plasma source of the electron beam source 120 is the D.C. gas discharge maintained within the chamber 122 by the D.C. discharge voltage supply 140. This main plasma source is augmented by an array of plasma sources 201, 202, 203 and 204 distributed along a direction generally parallel to the workpiece support plane of the pedestal 108. A controller 150 governs the rate at which each plasma source 201, 202, 203 and 204 generates plasma ions and electrons, each plasma source, 201, 202, 203, 204 being controlled independently. The plasma sources 201, 202, 203 and 204 are RF plasma sources employing respective RE power generators 215-1, 215-2, 215-3 and 215-4, and the controller 150 governs the RE power level of each RE generator 215-1, 215-2, 215-3 and 215-4 separately. Each plasma source 201, 202, 203 and 204 faces a region 301, 302, 303 and 304 of the chamber 122. The output power level of each of the RF generators 215-1, 215-2, 215-3 and 215-4 affects plasma ion density and the plasma electron density in the corresponding region 301, 302, 303 and 304 of the chamber 122. The distribution across the electron beam width of electron density reflects the distribution of plasma electron density and plasma ion density along the beam width among the regions 301, 302, 303 and 304 within the electron beam source chamber 122. The controller 150 can therefore adjust plasma electron distribution across the width of the electron beam by changing the proportion of RF power output levels of the RF generators 215-1, 215-2, 215-3 and 215-4. Such adjustments may be made in response to measurements of distribution across a test workpiece (processed in the process chamber 100) of a process parameter (e.g., etch depth). Non-uniformities in distribution may be ameliorated or corrected by increasing RF power for those regions experiencing lower electron density and/or decreasing RF power for those regions experiencing higher electron density.
In the illustrated embodiment, each plasma source 201-204 is a toroidal RF plasma source consisting of an external reentrant conduit 210 having a pair of ports 211, 212 through a back wall 124-1 of the chamber 122, a ring 213 of a magnetically permeable material around the reentrant conduit 210, a conductive coil 214 around the ring 213, and an RF generator (e.g., 215-1, 215-2, 215-4) coupled to the coil 214 through an RF impedance match 216.
In the embodiment of
In the embodiment of
In each of the foregoing embodiments, the electron beam source 120 has a single plasma source chamber 122 extending across the entire width of the plasma beam, corresponding to the width of the process region 118 of the process chamber 100. In the embodiment of
The four plasma sources 601, 602, 603 and 604 face respective regions 501, 502, 503, and 504 of the processing chamber 100 and affect electron (and ion) density within those regions. The four plasma sources can provide different amounts of plasma to the different regions 501, 502, 503, and 504. The different D.C. discharge voltages provided to the e-beam sources 601, 602, 603 and 604 affect plasma ion density and the plasma electron density in the corresponding regions 501, 502, 503 and 504 of the processing chamber 100. The distribution of electron density across the combined electron beam width (from all 4 sources) reflects the distribution of plasma electron density and plasma ion density along the beam width among the regions 501, 502, 503 and 504 within the processing chamber 100. The controller 150 can therefore adjust plasma density distribution across the width of the electron beam by adjusting the voltages 642-1, 642-2, 642-3 and 642-4 to provide different D.C. gas discharge voltages to the different chambers 622-1, 622-2, 622-3 and 622-4. Such adjustments may be made in response to measurements of distribution across a test workpiece (processed in the process chamber 100) of a process parameter (e.g., etch depth).
In addition to providing different densities of beam electrons in the different regions 501, 502, 503, and 504, the plasma sources 601, 602, 603 and 604 may provide different energies of beam electrons in the different regions. This is done by the controller 150 adjusting the variable resistors 630-1, 630-2, 630-3 and 630-4. This may be one so as to compensate for non-uniformities in the distribution of plasma density in the chamber 100. Such non-uniformities may be detected by measuring process results on a test workpiece. While the electron energy levels of the different plasma sources 601-604 are depicted as being controlled by different variable resistors 630-1, 630-2, 630-3, 640-4 from a shared accelerating voltage supply 646, in one modification the same control may be realized by providing separate accelerating voltage supplies (not illustrated) controlled by the controller 150, rather than separate variable resistors.
While the foregoing is directed to embodiments of the present invention, other and further embodiments of the invention may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/549,340, filed Oct. 20, 2011 entitled ELECTRON BEAM PLASMA SOURCE WITH ARRAYED PLASMA SOURCES FOR UNIFORM PLASMA GENERATION, by Leonid Dorf, et al.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3755073 | Haught et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
5003178 | Livesay | Mar 1991 | A |
5368676 | Nagaseki et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5539274 | Araki et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5874807 | Neger et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5903106 | Young et al. | May 1999 | A |
6116187 | Murakami et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6211622 | Ryoji et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6291940 | Scholte Van Mast | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6348158 | Samukawa | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356026 | Murto | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6407399 | Livesay | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6452338 | Horsky | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6501081 | Foad et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
7470329 | Oehrlein et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7547899 | Vanderpot et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7734014 | Bergmann et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
20020004309 | Collins et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020078893 | Os et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020168049 | Schriever et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20040104353 | Berglund | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20070040130 | Nanataki et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070170414 | Takai et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070278417 | Horsky et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20090140176 | Hershkowitz et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090159811 | Klemm et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100032587 | Hosch et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110024047 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120258601 | Holland et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120258606 | Holland et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120258607 | Holland et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20140035458 | Wu et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO2011024174 | Mar 2011 | IL |
08-222553 | Aug 1996 | JP |
2001-085414 | Mar 2001 | JP |
10-2005-0008065 | Jan 2005 | KR |
10-2007-0041220 | Apr 2007 | KR |
10-2009-0008932 | Jan 2009 | KR |
10-2010-0042610 | Apr 2010 | KR |
Entry |
---|
Official Action Dated Dec. 24, 2014 Issued in Related U.S. Appl. No. 13/595,292. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/176,365, filed Feb. 10, 2014, Dorf et al. |
Official Action Issued Jul. 31, 2014 in Corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/595,292. |
Official Action Issued Aug. 6, 2014 in Corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/595,452. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/595,452, filed Aug. 27, 2012, Bera et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/595,134, filed Aug. 27, 2012, Dorf et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/595,252, filed Aug. 27, 2012, Dorf et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/595,292, filed Aug. 27, 2012, Dorf et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/595,351, filed Aug. 27, 2012, Bera et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/595,655, filed Aug. 27, 2012, Ramaswamy et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/595,612, filed Aug. 27, 2013, Bera et al. |
Furman, M.A., et al. “Stimulation of Secondary Electron Emission Based Upon a Phenomenological . . . ” LBNL-52807/SLAC-PUB-9912, Jun. 2, 2003, pp. 1-31, Lawrence Berkely Natl. Lab. |
Official Action Dated Nov. 25, 2014 Issued in Related U.S. Appl. No. 13/595,612. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130098551 A1 | Apr 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61549340 | Oct 2011 | US |