This specification relates generally to a system for testing electronic assemblies (EAs), such as printed circuit boards (PCBs), in parallel.
Manufacturers typically test devices, including electronic assemblies (EAs) such as printed circuit boards (PCBs), for compliance with various requirements. Typically, PCBs are tested in panels. Generally, a panel includes multiple instances of a PCB in a common matrix. A panel is installed in a test system and, one-by-one, the individual PCBs within the panel are tested. Panel-based testing is primarily an artifact of the sizes of PCBs. For example, traditionally, PCBs were sized for computers, which made panel-based testing an acceptable alternative. However, in recent years, a large portion of PCBs to test, such as those used in smartphones, are considerably smaller than in previous eras. Due to the proliferation of smartphones and other portable electronic devices, the numbers of smaller PCBs that require testing have also increased, while the testing requirements have, in many cases, become more stringent.
An example system for testing electronic assemblies (EAs) may include: carriers for holding EAs; and slots for testing at least some of the EAs in parallel, with each slot being configured to receive a corresponding carrier containing an EA and to test the EA. An example carrier comprises a first part and a second part, with at least one of the first part and the second part comprising a first structure. The first structure is movable to enable electrical connection between an EA and an electrical interface, where a direction of movement of the first structure is substantially perpendicular to a surface of the EA. The example system may include one or more of the following features, either alone or in combination.
At least one of the first part and the second part may comprise a second structure. The second structure may be moveable to enable electrical connection between the EA and an electrical interface.
At least a portion of the first part may be configured to move relative to the second part to enable insertion of the EA into the carrier and removal of the EA from the carrier. The first part may be configured to move relative to the second part to achieve electrical connection of the EA through the first structure, where a direction of motion of the first structure is substantially perpendicular to a surface of the EA. The at least a portion of the first part may be configured to move non-vertically relative to the second part when there is already separation between the first part and the second part. The first part may comprise a hinge and a frame, with the frame being the portion of the first part that is configured to move angularly.
The example system may comprise guides between the first part and the second part. In a first position, the guides may separate the first part from the second structure so that the first part and the second part are substantially parallel to each other. In a second position, the guides may be moved within at least one of the first structure and the second structure so that the first part and the second part move closer together (touching or not touching).
The EA may have localized heat sources. At least one of the first part and the second part may comprise thermally-conductive objects at locations corresponding to the localized heat sources, where the thermally-conductive objects are used to conduct, convect, or radiate heat from the localized heat sources. The thermally-conductive objects may comprise pins that are thermally conductive and that are arranged at a location of the first structure or the second structure that corresponds to a location of the localized heat sources. The thermally-conductive objects may comprise fins that are thermally conductive and that are arranged at a location of the first structure or the second structure that corresponds to a location of the localized heat sources.
The carrier may comprise circuitry configured to emulate a power source that is usable in a product for which the EA is intended. Each carrier may comprise one or more air pathways, through which air is able to flow through the carrier. Each slot may comprise an air mover for blowing air through the slot and through air pathways in a carrier in the slot. The air may be below 25° C. or above 25° C.
The first structure may comprise first pins that can pass through the first structure; and a third structure comprising circuit traces, with the first pins for effecting electrical connection between the EA and the circuit traces on the third structure. The first part may comprise the first structure and the second part may comprise a second structure. The second structure may be moveable to enable electrical connection with an electrical interface. The second part may comprise second pins that can pass through the second structure; and a fourth structure comprising circuit traces, with the second pins for effecting electrical connection between the EA and the circuit traces on the fourth structure.
The example system may comprise a heat source for providing heat to an interior of the carrier. The example system may comprise radio frequency (RF) shielding for each carrier.
The example system may comprise automation to move carriers into, and out of, the slots during a testing process. The automation may comprise: a device transport mechanism to move carriers between a shuttle mechanism and slots; a feeder to provide carriers containing untested EAs and to receive carriers containing tested EAs; and the shuttle mechanism to receive a carrier containing an untested EA from the feeder and to provide the carrier containing the untested EA to the device transport mechanism, and to receive a carrier containing a tested EA from the device transport mechanism and to provide the carrier containing the tested EA to the feeder.
At least some of the slots in the example system may comprise a pack for receiving corresponding carriers, with a carrier and a pack each having beveled edges that are configured to interact to force motion of the first structure.
A carrier in the example system may comprise a first interior region that includes the EA; a second interior region; RF (Radio Frequency) shielding material between the first interior region and the second interior region; an antenna for communicating with an RF test system; and RF control circuitry communicatively coupled to the EA and the antenna, to enable wireless RF testing of the EA. The example carrier may comprise a cable having RF shielding that is in electrical communication with the EA for wired RF testing of the EA.
An example carrier for holding an electronic assembly (EA) to test may comprise: a first part; and a second part, with at least one of the first part and the second part being movable towards the EA, with a direction of motion of the at least one of the first part and the second part being substantially perpendicular to a surface of the EA, and with motion of the at least one of the first part and the second part resulting in electrical connection between the EA and an electrical interface. The example carrier may include one or more of the following features, either alone or in combination.
At least one of the first part and the second part may comprise: a structure having first holes therethrough at points corresponding to electrical test points of the EA; and a substrate comprising first pins at locations corresponding to the first holes, with the first pins being part of an electrical pathway to a connector. The first part may be movable relative to the second part so that the first pins move through the first holes to connect to/disconnect from the EA. The first part may be movable angularly relative to the second part when there is already separation between the first part and the second part. The first part may comprise a hinge and a frame, with the frame being configured to pivot angularly about the hinge.
The example carrier may comprise guides between the second part and the first part. In a first position, the guides may separate the first part from the second part so that the first part and the second part are substantially parallel to each other. In a second position, the guides may be moved within at least one of the first part and the second part so that the second part and the first part move closer together.
The EA may have localized heat sources. At least one of the first part and the second part may comprise thermally-conductive objects corresponding to the localized heat sources, with the thermally-conductive objects to conduct, convect, or radiate heat from the localized heat sources. The thermally-conductive objects may comprise pins that are thermally conductive and that are arranged at a location of the first part or second part that corresponds to a location of the localized heat sources. The thermally-conductive objects may comprise fins that are thermally conductive and that are arranged at a location of the first part or second part that corresponds to a location of the localized heat sources.
The example carrier may comprise circuitry configured to emulate a power source that is usable in a product for which the EA is intended. The example carrier may comprise one or more air pathways, through which air is able to flow over an EA in the carrier. The air may be below 25° C. or above 25° C.
The example carrier may comprise a heat source for providing heat to an interior of the carrier and/or radio frequency (RF) shielding enclosing at least part of the carrier. At least one of the first part and the second part may have a beveled surface. The example carrier may comprise a first interior region that includes the EA; a second interior region; RF shielding material between the first interior region and the second interior region; an antenna for communicating with an RF test system; and RF control circuitry communicatively coupled to the EA and the antenna, to enable wireless RF testing of the EA. The example carrier may comprise a cable having RF shielding that is in electrical communication with the EA for wired RF testing of the EA.
An example method may be for use in an example system comprising carriers for holding EAs and slots for testing at least some of the EAs in parallel, with each slot being configured to receive a corresponding carrier containing an EA and to test the EA. An example carrier may comprise a first part and a second part; where at least one of the first part and the second part is configured to enable electrical connection between an EA and an electrical interface. The example method may comprise: moving the first part away from the second part; moving the first part to expose an area for receiving an EA; inserting an EA into the area; and moving the first part so as to contact the EA and thereby establish an electrical connection between the EA and the electrical interface, where a direction of motion of the first part is substantially perpendicular to a surface of the EA.
In the example method, moving the first part to expose an area for receiving an EA may comprise moving the first part angularly relative to the second part when there is already separation between the first part and the second part.
Any two or more of the features described in this specification, including in this summary section, can be combined to form implementations not specifically described herein.
The systems and techniques described herein, or portions thereof, can be implemented as/controlled by a computer program product that includes instructions that are stored on one or more non-transitory machine-readable storage media, and that are executable on one or more processing devices to control (e.g., coordinate) the operations described herein. The systems and techniques described herein, or portions thereof, can be implemented as an apparatus, method, or electronic system that can include one or more processing devices and memory to store executable instructions to implement various operations.
The details of one or more implementations are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Described herein are example systems for testing devices in parallel, including, but not limited to, electronic assemblies (EAs) such as printed circuit boards (PCB). Although the example systems described herein focus on testing PCBs, the systems may be used in testing any type of device or assembly.
Example systems for testing devices, such as PCBs, include multiple slots arranged, e.g., in a rack of slots. Each slot is configured to test a corresponding PCB in parallel with PCBs being tested in other slots. For example, each slot may include electrical connections, circuitry, processing devices, communication mechanisms, and the like, which may be used to perform one or more tests on a PCB contained therein. As noted, testing of PCBs in some slots may be performed in parallel with testing of other PCBs in other slots. Furthermore, the testing may be asynchronous. For example, testing in one slot need not be synchronized with testing in any other slot. Rather, testing in each slot may proceed according to its own schedule. Furthermore, the testing performed in different slots of the same system may include the same tests or different tests.
In some implementations, PCBs may be inserted into, and removed from, the slots using automated mechanisms, examples of which are described below. In some implementations, PCBs may be inserted into, and removed from, the slots manually. In some implementations, PCBs may be inserted into, and removed from, the slots using a combination of automated mechanisms and manual labor. The example systems described herein are not limited to use with the automated and/or manual processes of PCB insertion and removal that are described herein. Rather, any appropriate insertion and removal processes may be used.
In some implementations, each PCB is resident in a carrier. The carrier includes a physical and electrical interface to a corresponding slot. For example, the carrier may include one or more electrical connectors that mate to one or more corresponding electrical connectors in a slot. Test signals to/from the PCB in the carrier are transmitted through such electrical connector(s). The slot may be sized and shaped to accommodate the size and shape of a carrier.
First part 11 also includes a lock 16, which mates to a corresponding mechanism 17 on second part 12, to prevent carrier 10 from opening during testing or other operations. In order to reduce friction on electrical connections (described below) on the PCB and on the first part and/or the second part, carrier 10 is configured so that, during closing, different sides of the perimeter of the first part contact corresponding sides of the perimeter of the second part at approximately the same time. To this end, first part 11 includes guides to control separation of the top and second parts. In the example implementations described herein the guides are posts; however, other types of guides may be used. Posts 19a to 19c control separation of first part 11 from second part 12 during angular motion of frame 14 (
In the example of
To load an untested PCB into carrier 10 (or to remove a tested PCB from carrier 10), carrier 10 is opened from a closed position (
As shown in
To close carrier 10, frame 14 may be pivoted downwards, in the direction of arrow 25, to the position shown in
In some implementations, a support structure (e.g., a support plate) may be included on the first part or second part only. In such implementations, the electrical connections are implemented only via the part containing the support structure and associated circuitry.
The PCB may include electrical contacts on both sides, e.g., its top and bottom. Support plate 27 may therefore include holes having a pattern that corresponds to a pattern of electrical contacts on the bottom of the PCB under test. Referring to
Below substrate 30, and not shown in
In the example of
In some implementations, chips and other circuitry on the PCB act as localized heat sources. This heat can build and can have various adverse effects. To address this, the carrier may include thermally-conductive objects, examples of which include, but are not limited to, heat sinks at locations corresponding to the local heat sources. The heat sinks draw heat from the local heat sources, and dissipate the heat. In this context, drawing the heat may include conducting, convecting, and/or radiating heat away. In some implementations, the heat sinks are structures that are connected to the support plate at locations corresponding to locations on the PCB that have more than a predefined amount of heating. For example, the heat sinks may be placed proximate (e.g., below or above) the locations of chips on the PCB. For example,
In some implementations, the heat sinks may include multiple pins or posts in order to increase the surface area over which heat is dissipated. In some implementations, the heat sinks may include fins or the like, which also increases surface area dissipation. The heat sink can be any appropriate thermal conductor.
Heat may dissipate from the heat sinks by air flow passing through the slot. To facilitate this dissipation, in some implementations, a carrier may include one or more air pathways or access ports, through which the air may pass. In some implementations, the air pathways or access ports may be vents 47 (
In some implementations, the carrier may include one or more heat sources. The one or more heat sources may be computer-controlled, and used for temperature control inside the carrier. The heat sources may be located along the sides 49, 50 (
In some implementations, each carrier may have Radio Frequency (RF) shielding so as to reduce the effects of RF cross-talk among PCBs in a rack, or to comply with regulations concerning RF emissions. The RF shielding may enclose all of, or part of, the carrier. The RF shielding may be sheet metal, metal screen, metal foam, metal mesh or any other appropriate material, with openings in the shielding, if any, being smaller than the wavelength of the radiation that is of concern.
In some implementations, the connector may include coaxial cable or other appropriately shielded wire or other environment so as to enable, and test, RF communications to and from the PCB through wired or wireless connection to external RF instrumentation. The RF cable and/or other RF circuitry may be communicatively coupled to the PCB via the test connections described herein to enable wired and/or wireless RF testing. In an example system for wirelessly testing an RF signal transceiver device, a structure, such as the carrier, defines a shield enclosure or a controlled electromagnetic environment which includes interior and exterior regions, with the interior region substantially isolated from electromagnetic radiation in the exterior region. The interior region includes a first interior region that holds the PCB and a second interior region that is around the first interior region. RF-absorbent material(s) may be incorporated into a volume between the first and second interior regions. An electrically conductive signal path is coupled to the PCB and conveys one or more electrical signals between the interior and exterior regions. One or more antennas are disposed at the second interior region to radiate phase-controlled RF test signals. RF signal control circuitry is coupled to the electrically-conductive signal path and to the antennas. The RF signal control circuitry is responsive to a plurality of data signals from the PCT related to the phase-controlled RF signals and conveyed via one or more electrical signals and to an RF test signal by: replicating the RF test signal to provide replica RF test signals, and controlling, in accordance with the data signals, respective phases of at least a portion of the replica RF test signals to provide the phase-controlled RF test signals. An example system for testing an RF system wirelessly is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/839,583, titled “System and Method for Testing Radio Frequency Wireless Signals Transceivers Using Wireless Test Signals”, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full.
In some implementations, the carrier includes circuitry configured to emulate a power source, such as a battery, that is usable in a product for which the PCB is intended. For example, if the PCB is intended to be part of a smartphone, the emulation circuitry will emulate the battery of that smartphone, and power the PCB. Including emulation circuitry in the carrier can enable testing of the PCB under conditions that more accurately simulate actual operating conditions.
The carrier described above may be used in any appropriate testing system, examples of which are provided below. In this regard, the systems described below are described with respect to testing PCBs. However, they may be used to test any EA, device, or system massively and in parallel.
Referring
In an example implementation, a rack 101 is served by a mast 105. In this example, “servicing” includes moving untested PCBs (in carriers) into test slots in the rack, and moving tested PCBs (in carriers) out of test slots in the rack. An example of a mast 105 used to service test rack 101 is shown in
In the example of
In some implementations, track 106 may run substantially parallel to the front (see, e.g.,
In some implementations, mast 105 includes an automation arm 107 for removing carriers from, and inserting carriers into, corresponding test slots in the rack. In an example implementation, automation arm 107 is a structure that supports a carrier, and that projects from the mast to a slot during engagement with a slot, and that retracts towards the mast when disengaging from the slot. Automation arm 107 is movable vertically along mast 105 to align to a slot to be serviced. In this regard, as noted above, mast 105 moves horizontally along track 106. The combination of the mast's horizontal motion and the automation arm's vertical motion enables servicing of any slot in a test rack. At least part of the horizontal and vertical motions may be concurrent.
Referring to
Referring to
Shuttle 110 is an automated device that is movable horizontally along a track between a feeder and mast 105. Shuttle 110 is configured to move carriers containing untested PCBs from the feeder to elevator 109, and to move carriers containing tested PCBs from elevator 109 to the feeder. Advantageously, shuttle 110 is operable so that a carrier containing an untested PCB is carried from the feeder to the elevator, and then a carrier containing a tested PCB is carried from the elevator on the shuttle's return trip back to the feeder. This can increase testing throughput, since no shuttle trip is wasted.
Shuttle 110 includes an automation arm 112 for holding carriers containing tested and untested PCBs, and for interacting with elevator 109. As described below, automation arm 112 is controllable to retrieve a carrier containing an untested PCB from the feeder, to transfer the carrier containing the untested PCB to elevator 109, to receive a carrier containing a tested PCB from elevator 109, and to transfer the carrier containing the tested PCB to the feeder. In the implementation of
Referring to
In
Referring to
In
Referring to
In
Area 508 between racks 501 and 502 is referred to as a cold atrium. Area 509 outside of rack 501 and area 510 outside of rack 502 are referred to as warm atriums. In implementations like that shown in
Generally, air in a cold atrium is maintained at a lower temperature than air in a warm atrium. For example, in some implementations, air in each cold atrium is below 25° C. and air in each warm atrium is above 25° C. In some implementations, air in each cold atrium is at about 15° C. and air in each warm atrium is at about 40° C. In some implementations, the air temperature in the warm and cold atriums is within prescribed ranges of 40° C. and 15° C., respectively. In some implementations, the air temperatures in the warm and cold atriums may be different than 40° C. and/or 15° C., respectively. The relative air temperatures may vary, e.g., in accordance with system usage and requirements.
During testing, cold air from a cold atrium 508 is drawn through the test slots, and through the carriers in the slots. This is done in order to control the temperature of PCBs during test. Due at least in part to PCB testing and/or operation in the slots, the temperature of the cold air passing over the devices rises. The resulting warm air is then expelled into a warm atrium 510. Air from each warm atrium is then drawn through a corresponding cooling mechanism, and expelled to the cold atrium. From there, the resulting cold air is re-cycled. In the example implementation of FIG. 28, there are one or more cooling mechanisms 512 and corresponding air movers 513 at the top of each rack and at the bottom of each rack. There may be different arrangements and/or mechanisms used in other implementations.
Air flow between the cold and warm atriums is depicted by the arrows shown in
In some implementations, slots in a rack are organized as packs. Each pack may hold multiple slots and is mounted in a rack. An example pack 520 is shown in
In some implementations, the air blown through a slot is above 25° C., and in some implementations, the air blown through a slot is over 25° C. Accordingly, the air blown through a slot may be either warm or cold.
Referring to
In some implementations, each air plenum outputs cold air, which moves towards the center of a rack. For example, air may move from the top of a rack towards the center or from the bottom of a rack towards the center. In this regard, air movers create a high pressure area at the plenum exhaust, and the movement of the air through the slots causes a relatively lower air pressure towards the middle of the racks, so the air appropriately diffuses. Air movers in the slots draw this cold air from the cold atrium over devices in the slots.
In some implementations, the warm atrium may include one or more air mover boxes 513a, 513b at the top and/or bottom of the racks. An example interior of a warm atrium is shown in
In some implementations, a grating may be installed over and above air mover boxes at the bottom of the rack, thereby forming a walkway for a technician to access the back of each slot via the warm atrium. Accordingly, the technician may service a slot through the back of a slot, without requiring an interruption in movement of the automated mechanisms (mast, shuttle, etc.) at the front of the rack.
In some implementations, two devices (e.g., PCBs, disposed within corresponding carriers) may be tested in same slot, and those two devices are not physically or electrically connected together in a way that would cause testing, removal or replacement of a PCB in one carrier to have a significant (or any) effect on testing, removal or replacement of a PCB in another carrier that is still in the slot. Also, in some implementations, testing performed on two PCBs in the same slot is not coordinated. Accordingly, the test system may operate asynchronously or mostly asynchronously vis-à-vis the two devices in the same slot.
Implementations that use a two-sided slot will typically employ a mast, shuttle, and other automated mechanisms of the type described herein in both the warm atriums and the cold atriums. Accordingly, in such implementations, there may be less opportunity for a technician to service slots from the warm atrium. However, the increase in throughput resulting from double-sided servicing may make-up for this decrease in serviceability.
In some implementations, the plenums and air movers may be located in a column of each rack instead of at the rack top and bottom. An example implementation in which this is the case is shown in
In some implementations, a test system may include a control center, from which one or more test engineers may direct testing of PCBs in the slots. The test system may include or more of the features described herein, either above or below, or it may have different features. In some examples, the test system includes slots for holding devices under test, and automation for moving carriers into, and out of, the slots. In other implementations, the test sites may not be slots, but rather other areas or structures at which a test may be conducted.
Each slot or site of the test system may include one or more processing devices. In some implementations, the processing devices may be in the carriers or there may be different processing devices in the carriers and the slots, which coordinate operation together. In some implementations, a processing device may include, but is not limited to, a microcontroller, a microprocessor, an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field-programmable gate array (FPGA), a network processor, and/or any other type of logic and/or circuitry capable of receiving commands, processing data, and providing an output. In some implementations, a processing device in each slot is also capable of providing and/or routing power to the slot, including to a device under test in the slot and to other circuit elements in the slot.
Each processing device may be configured (e.g., programmed) to communicate with a device under test (e.g., a PCB) in the slot and with other elements of the slot, such as the slot air mover. For example, each processing device may monitor operations of a device in the slot during testing (including test responses), and report test results or other information back to the control center.
In some implementations, as described above, there may be a single (one) processing device per slot. In other implementations, a single processing device may serve multiple slots. For example, in some implementations, a single processing device may service a pack, a rack, or other grouping of slots.
The communications to/from each processing device may include, but are not limited to, data representing/for testing status, yield, parametrics, test scripts, and device firmware. For example, testing status may indicate whether testing is ongoing or completed, whether the device under test has passed or failed one or more tests and which tests were passed or failed, whether the device under test meets the requirements of particular users (as defined, e.g., by those users), and so forth. Testing yield may indicate a percentage of times a device under test passed a test or failed a test, a percentage of devices under test that passed or failed a test, a bin into which a device under test should be placed following testing (e.g., a highest quality device, an average quality device, a lowest quality device), and so forth. Testing parametrics may identify particular test performance and related data. For example, for a disk drive under test, parametrics may identify a non-repeatable run-out track pitch, a position error signal, and so forth.
In some implementations, test scripts may include instructions and/or machine-executable code for performing one or more test operations on a device held in a slot for test. The test scripts may be executable by a processing device, and may include, among other things, test protocols and information specifying how test data is to be handled or passed to the control center.
A control center for use with the test system may include a computing device. The computing device may include one or more digital computers, examples of which include, but are not limited to, laptops, desktops, workstations, personal digital assistants, servers, blade servers, mainframes, and other appropriate computing devices. The computing device may also include various forms of mobile devices, examples of which include, but are not limited to, personal digital assistants, cellular telephones, smartphones, and other similar computing devices. The components described herein, their connections and relationships, and their functions, are meant to be examples only, and are not meant to limit implementations of the technology described and/or claimed herein.
The computing device includes appropriate features that enable it to communicate with the processing devices in the test system slots in the manner described herein. The computing device (or other devices directed by it) may also control various other features of the example test system described herein, such as the feeder(s), the mast(s), the shuttle(s), and so forth.
In some implementations, the carriers described herein may be used with a PCB test system having the configuration of
Any features described herein with respect to
In the example implementation of
In some implementations, the mechanisms may include one or more plates, as described above. In some implementations, the mechanisms may include one or more support pins (also referred to as “tooling pins”) that may be supported by second part 956, that do not contact electrical contacts on the PCB, and that hold the PCB. In some implementations, an area of second part 956 (or top part 955) may be routed-out (e.g., hollowed) to match, substantially, the shape of a PCB under test. The PCB may be placed in that area prior to closing the carrier. In other implementations, different types of mechanisms may be used to support the PCB in the carrier prior to closing the carrier and/or while the carrier is closed.
As in the example of
As in the example of
In other implementations, first part 955 may be removed completely from second part 956 (e.g., lifted-off) to enable loading or unloading of the PCB in carrier 950. In other implementations, other methods and mechanisms may be used to open carrier 950 and thereby expose area 970 for loading/unloading a PCB.
In the example implementation of
As shown in
In operation, carrier 950 is opened, either manually or automatically, and an area for holding a PCB is thereby exposed. The PCB is placed in that area, either manually or automatically. The carrier is then closed, either manually or automatically. For example, initial closure or final opening of the carrier may be performed as described above with respect to
In some implementations, such as that shown in
In some implementations, only the top part and/of the bottom part is movable, with the other part remaining stationary during closing. In other implementations, both the top part and the bottom part are movable during closing. Furthermore, electrical connections may be made via pins and contacts on the top of the PCB and/or via pins and contacts on the bottom of the PCB, as also described above.
In some implementations, the carrier may be hinged, but this movement does not cause electrical connection. For example, the carrier may be vacuum operated, and the connection of pins to electrical contacts on the PCB board may be achieved using vacuum and perpendicular motion. Other, non-vacuum carriers may use a press down unit (PDU) to force the pins to contact the PCB at a normal angle.
In some implementations, there may be no electrical contacts on either the top part or the bottom part, resulting in electrical connections being made solely through the part containing the electrical connections.
The implementations described herein show the carrier inserted horizontally into the slots or packs. That is, in the examples, the carrier is inserted such that the PCB is oriented horizontally in the slot or pack. In other implementations, the carrier may be inserted into the slots such that the PCB (and also the carrier) is oriented vertically in a slot or pack. In some implementations, the slots or packs may be arranged so as to accommodate both horizontal and vertical insertion.
While this specification describes example implementations related to “testing” and a “test system,” the systems described herein are equally applicable to implementations directed towards burn-in, manufacturing, incubation, or storage, or any implementation which would benefit from asynchronous processing, temperature control, and the other features described herein.
Testing performed by the example test system described herein, which includes controlling (e.g., coordinating movement of) various automated elements to operate in the manner described herein or otherwise, may be implemented using hardware or a combination of hardware and software. For example, a test system like the ones described herein may include various controllers and/or processing devices located at various points in the system to control operation of the automated elements. A central computer (not shown) may coordinate operation among the various controllers or processing devices. The central computer, controllers, and processing devices may execute various software routines to effect control and coordination of the various automated elements.
In this regard, testing of PCBs and other types of EAs in a system of the type described herein may be controlled by a computer, e.g., by sending signals to and from one or more connections to each test slot. The testing can be controlled, at least in part, using one or more computer program products, e.g., one or more computer program tangibly embodied in one or more information carriers, such as one or more non-transitory machine-readable media, for execution by, or to control the operation of, one or more data processing apparatus, e.g., a programmable processor, a computer, multiple computers, and/or programmable logic components.
A computer program can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a network.
Actions associated with implementing all or part of the testing can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform the functions described herein. All or part of the testing can be implemented using special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) and/or an ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit).
Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read-only storage area or a random access storage area or both. Elements of a computer (including a server) include one or more processors for executing instructions and one or more storage area devices for storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from, or transfer data to, or both, one or more machine-readable storage media, such as mass PCBs for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto-optical disks, or optical disks. Machine-readable storage media suitable for embodying computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile storage area, including by way of example, semiconductor storage area devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash storage area devices; magnetic disks, e.g., internal hard disks or removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and CD-ROM and DVD-ROM disks.
Although the example test systems described herein are used to test PCBs, the example test systems may be used to test any type of device.
Any “electrical connection” as used herein may imply a direct physical connection or a connection that includes intervening components but that nevertheless allows electrical signals to flow between connected components. Any “connection” involving electrical circuitry mentioned herein, unless stated otherwise, is an electrical connection and not necessarily a direct physical connection regardless of whether the word “electrical” is used to modify “connection”.
Elements of different implementations described herein may be combined to form other embodiments not specifically set forth above. Elements may be left out of the structures described herein without adversely affecting their operation. Furthermore, various separate elements may be combined into one or more individual elements to perform the functions described herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
557186 | Cahill | Mar 1896 | A |
2224407 | Passur | Dec 1940 | A |
2380026 | Clarke | Jul 1945 | A |
2631775 | Gordon | Mar 1953 | A |
2635524 | Jenkins | Apr 1953 | A |
3120166 | Lyman | Feb 1964 | A |
3360032 | Sherwood | Dec 1967 | A |
3364838 | Bradley | Jan 1968 | A |
3517601 | Courchesne | Jun 1970 | A |
3845286 | Aronstein et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
4147299 | Freeman | Apr 1979 | A |
4233644 | Hwang et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4336748 | Martin et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4379259 | Varadi et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4477127 | Kume | Oct 1984 | A |
4495545 | Dufresne et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4526318 | Fleming et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4554505 | Zachry | Nov 1985 | A |
4620248 | Gitzendanner | Oct 1986 | A |
4648007 | Garner | Mar 1987 | A |
4654727 | Blum et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4654732 | Mesher | Mar 1987 | A |
4665455 | Mesher | May 1987 | A |
4683424 | Cutright et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4685303 | Branc et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4688124 | Scribner et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4713714 | Gatti et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4739444 | Zushi et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4754397 | Varaiya et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4758176 | Abe | Jul 1988 | A |
4768285 | Woodman, Jr. | Sep 1988 | A |
4778063 | Ueberreiter | Oct 1988 | A |
4801234 | Cedrone | Jan 1989 | A |
4809881 | Becker | Mar 1989 | A |
4817273 | Lape et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4817934 | McCormick et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4851965 | Gabuzda et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4881591 | Rignall | Nov 1989 | A |
4888549 | Wilson et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4911281 | Jenkner | Mar 1990 | A |
4967155 | Magnuson | Oct 1990 | A |
4969828 | Bright | Nov 1990 | A |
5012187 | Littlebury | Apr 1991 | A |
5045960 | Eding | Sep 1991 | A |
5061630 | Knopf et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5119270 | Bolton et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5122914 | Hanson | Jun 1992 | A |
5127684 | Klotz et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5128813 | Lee | Jul 1992 | A |
5136395 | Ishii et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5143193 | Geraci | Sep 1992 | A |
5158132 | Guillemot | Oct 1992 | A |
5168424 | Bolton et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5171183 | Pollard et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5173819 | Takahashi et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176202 | Richard | Jan 1993 | A |
5205132 | Fu | Apr 1993 | A |
5205742 | Goff | Apr 1993 | A |
5206772 | Hirano et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5207613 | Ferchau et al. | May 1993 | A |
5210680 | Scheibler | May 1993 | A |
5237484 | Ferchau et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5263537 | Plucinski et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5268637 | Liken et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5269698 | Singer | Dec 1993 | A |
5290193 | Goff | Mar 1994 | A |
5295392 | Hensel et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5309323 | Gray et al. | May 1994 | A |
5325263 | Singer et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5343403 | Beidle et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5349486 | Sugimoto et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5367253 | Wood | Nov 1994 | A |
5368072 | Cote | Nov 1994 | A |
5374395 | Robinson et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5379229 | Parsons et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5398058 | Hattori | Mar 1995 | A |
5412534 | Cutts et al. | May 1995 | A |
5414591 | Kimura et al. | May 1995 | A |
5426581 | Kishi et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5469037 | McMurtrey, Sr. et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5477416 | Schkrohowsky et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5484012 | Hiratsuka | Jan 1996 | A |
5486681 | Dagnac et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5491610 | Mok et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5543727 | Bushard et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5546250 | Diel | Aug 1996 | A |
5557186 | McMurtrey, Sr. et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563768 | Perdue | Oct 1996 | A |
5570740 | Flores et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5586891 | Kelly | Dec 1996 | A |
5593380 | Bittikofer | Jan 1997 | A |
5596229 | Simon | Jan 1997 | A |
5601141 | Gordon et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5604662 | Anderson et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5610893 | Soga et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5617430 | Angelotti et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5644705 | Stanley | Jul 1997 | A |
5646918 | Dimitri et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5654846 | Wicks et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5673029 | Behl et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5694290 | Chang | Dec 1997 | A |
5703843 | Katsuyama et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5718627 | Wicks | Feb 1998 | A |
5718628 | Nakazato et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5731928 | Jabbari et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5751549 | Eberhardt et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754365 | Beck et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761032 | Jones | Jun 1998 | A |
5793610 | Schmitt et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5807104 | Ikeya | Sep 1998 | A |
5811678 | Hirano | Sep 1998 | A |
5812761 | Seki et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5819842 | Potter et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5831525 | Harvey | Nov 1998 | A |
5844418 | Wood | Dec 1998 | A |
5851143 | Hamid | Dec 1998 | A |
5859409 | Kim et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5859540 | Fukumoto | Jan 1999 | A |
5862037 | Behl | Jan 1999 | A |
5870630 | Reasoner et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5886639 | Behl et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5890959 | Pettit et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5892367 | Magee et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5912799 | Grouell et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5913926 | Anderson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5914856 | Morton et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5927386 | Lin | Jul 1999 | A |
5956301 | Dimitri et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959834 | Chang | Sep 1999 | A |
5999356 | Dimitri et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
5999365 | Hasegawa et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6000623 | Blatti et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005404 | Cochran et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005770 | Schmitt | Dec 1999 | A |
6008636 | Miller et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008984 | Cunningham et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6011689 | Wrycraft | Jan 2000 | A |
6031717 | Baddour et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6034870 | Osborn et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042348 | Aakalu et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045113 | Itakura | Apr 2000 | A |
6055814 | Song | May 2000 | A |
6066822 | Nemoto et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067225 | Reznikov et al. | May 2000 | A |
6069792 | Nelik | May 2000 | A |
6084768 | Bolognia | Jul 2000 | A |
6094342 | Dague et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6104607 | Behl | Aug 2000 | A |
6107813 | Sinshelmer et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115250 | Schmitt | Sep 2000 | A |
6122131 | Jeppson | Sep 2000 | A |
6122232 | Schell et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6124707 | Kim et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6129428 | Helwig et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6130817 | Flotho et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144553 | Hileman et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6161205 | Tuttle | Dec 2000 | A |
6166901 | Gamble et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6169413 | Pack et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6169930 | Blachek et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177805 | Pih | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178835 | Orriss et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181557 | Gatti | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185065 | Hasegawa et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6185097 | Behl | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188191 | Frees et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192282 | Smith et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193339 | Behl et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6209842 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6227516 | Webster, Jr. et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6229275 | Yamamoto | May 2001 | B1 |
6231145 | Liu | May 2001 | B1 |
6233148 | Shen | May 2001 | B1 |
6236563 | Buican et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6247944 | Bolognia et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249824 | Henrichs | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252769 | Tullstedt et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258609 | Farnworth | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262863 | Ostwald et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272007 | Kitlas et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6272767 | Botruff et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281677 | Cosci et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282501 | Assouad | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285524 | Boigenzahn et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289678 | Pandolfi | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297950 | Erwin | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6298672 | Valicoff, Jr. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6302714 | Bolognia et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304839 | Ho et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307386 | Fowler et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6327150 | Levy et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330154 | Fryers et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6351379 | Cheng | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6354792 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356409 | Price et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356415 | Kabasawa | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6383825 | Farnworth | May 2002 | B1 |
6384995 | Smith | May 2002 | B1 |
6388437 | Wolski et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6388875 | Chen | May 2002 | B1 |
6388878 | Chang | May 2002 | B1 |
6389225 | Malinoski et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6396290 | Kimura | May 2002 | B1 |
6411584 | Davis et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6421236 | Montoya et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434000 | Pandolfi | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434498 | Ulrich et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434499 | Ulrich et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6464080 | Morris et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6467153 | Butts et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6473297 | Behl et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473301 | Levy et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476627 | Pelissier et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6477044 | Foley et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6477442 | Valerino, Sr. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6480380 | French et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6480382 | Cheng | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6487071 | Tata et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6489793 | Jones et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6494663 | Ostwald et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6525933 | Eland | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6526841 | Wanek et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535384 | Huang | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6537013 | Emberty et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6544309 | Hoefer et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6546445 | Hayes | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553532 | Aoki | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6560107 | Beck et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6565163 | Behl et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6566859 | Wolski et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6567266 | Ives et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6568770 | Gonska et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6570734 | Ostwald et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6577586 | Yang et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6577687 | Hall et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6618254 | Ives | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626846 | Spencer | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6628518 | Behl et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6635115 | Fairbairn et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6640235 | Anderson | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6644982 | Ondricek et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6651192 | Viglione et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654240 | Tseng et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6679128 | Wanek et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6693757 | Hayakawa et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6736583 | Ostwald et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6741529 | Getreuer | May 2004 | B1 |
6746648 | Mattila et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6751093 | Hsu et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6791785 | Messenger et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6791799 | Fletcher | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798651 | Syring et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798972 | Ito et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6801834 | Konshak et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6806700 | Wanek et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6808353 | Ostwald | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6811427 | Garrett et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6826046 | Muncaster et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6830372 | Liu et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6832929 | Garrett et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6861861 | Song et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6862173 | Konshak et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6867939 | Katahara et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6892328 | Klein et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6904479 | Hall et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6908330 | Garrett et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6914424 | Chi | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6928336 | Peshkin et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6937432 | Sri-Jayantha et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6957291 | Moon et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6965811 | Dickey et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6974017 | Oseguera | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6976190 | Goldstone | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6980381 | Gray et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6982872 | Behl et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7006325 | Emberty et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7013198 | Haas | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7021883 | Plutt et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7039924 | Goodman et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7042238 | Tani | May 2006 | B2 |
7054150 | Orriss et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7070323 | Wanek et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7076391 | Pakzad et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7077614 | Hasper et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7077665 | Kanesashi | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7088541 | Orriss et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7092251 | Henry | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7106582 | Albrecht et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7123477 | Coglitore et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7126777 | Flechsig et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130138 | Lum et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7134553 | Stephens | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7139145 | Archibald et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7164579 | Muncaster et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7167360 | Inoue et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7181458 | Higashi | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7203021 | Ryan et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7203060 | Kay et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7206201 | Behl et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7214077 | Lu | May 2007 | B2 |
7216968 | Smith et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7217580 | Ondricek | May 2007 | B2 |
7219028 | Bae et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7219273 | Fisher et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7227746 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7232101 | Wanek et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7243043 | Shin | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7248467 | Sri-Jayantha et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7254889 | Cherian | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7259966 | Connelly, Jr. et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7273344 | Ostwald et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7273386 | Olson | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7280353 | Wendel et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7289885 | Basham et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7296430 | Hamilton | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7297011 | Lai | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7304855 | Milligan et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7315447 | Inoue et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7335030 | Kunioka | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7349205 | Hall et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349217 | Hashimoto | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7353524 | Lin et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7385385 | Magliocco et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7395133 | Lowe | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7403451 | Goodman et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7421623 | Haugh | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7437212 | Farchmin et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7447011 | Wade et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7457112 | Fukuda et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7462057 | Hsu | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7467024 | Flitsch | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7476362 | Angros | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7479795 | Hayashi | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7483269 | Marvin, Jr. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7503772 | Kobori | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505264 | Hall et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7540745 | Lin | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7554811 | Scicluna et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7559784 | Hsiao | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7568122 | Mechalke et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7570455 | Deguchi et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7573715 | Mojaver et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7584851 | Hong et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7612996 | Atkins et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7625027 | Kiaie et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7630196 | Hall et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7643289 | Ye et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7646596 | Ng | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7650762 | Hamilton | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7654830 | Lin | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7656179 | Suzuki | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7729107 | Atkins et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7735216 | Schnabel | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7771210 | Cherian | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7778031 | Merrow et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7789267 | Hutchinson et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7848106 | Merrow | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7890207 | Toscano et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7904211 | Merrow et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7908029 | Slocum | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7911778 | Merrow | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7920380 | Merrow et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7929303 | Merrow | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7932734 | Merrow et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7940529 | Merrow et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7945424 | Garcia et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7985090 | Hsu | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7987018 | Polyakov et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7995349 | Merrow et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7996174 | Garcia et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8041449 | Noble | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8086343 | Slocum | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8095234 | Polyakov et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8096812 | Perino | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8102173 | Merrow | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8116079 | Merrow | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8117480 | Merrow et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8140182 | Noble et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8160739 | Toscano et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8167626 | Cherian | May 2012 | B2 |
8233280 | Koprivnak | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8238099 | Merrow | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8279603 | Merrow et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8305751 | Merrow | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8363410 | Kobori | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8405971 | Merrow et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8466699 | Merrow et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8467180 | Merrow et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8482915 | Merrow | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8499611 | Merrow et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8513963 | Chen | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8537480 | Haw | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8547123 | Merrow et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8549912 | Merrow et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8628239 | Merrow et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8631698 | Merrow et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8655482 | Merrow | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8678365 | Hofmann | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8687349 | Truebenbach | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8687356 | Merrow | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8717048 | Richter | May 2014 | B2 |
20010006453 | Glorioso et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010044023 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010046118 | Yamanashi et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010048590 | Behl et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020024104 | Earl | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020030981 | Sullivan et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020044416 | Harmon, III et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020051338 | Jiang et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020071248 | Huang et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020079422 | Jiang | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020090320 | Burow et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020116087 | Brown | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020161971 | Dimitri et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020172004 | Ives et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030035271 | Lelong et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030043550 | Ives | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030206397 | Allgeyer et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040165489 | Goodman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040230399 | Shin | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236465 | Butka et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040264121 | Orriss et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004703 | Christie | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010836 | Bae et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050018397 | Kay et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050055601 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050057849 | Twogood et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050069400 | Dickey et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050109131 | Wanek et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050116702 | Wanek et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131578 | Weaver | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050179457 | Min et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050207059 | Cochrane | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050219809 | Muncaster et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050225338 | Sands et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050270737 | Wilson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060010353 | Haugh | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060023331 | Flechsig et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060028802 | Shaw et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060066974 | Akamatsu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060130316 | Takase et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060190205 | Klein et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060227517 | Zayas et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060250766 | Blaalid et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070034368 | Atkins et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070035874 | Wendel et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070035875 | Hall et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070053154 | Fukuda et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070082907 | Canada et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070127202 | Scicluna et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070127206 | Wade et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070195497 | Atkins | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070248142 | Rountree et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070253157 | Atkins et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070286045 | Onagi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080007865 | Orriss et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080030945 | Mojaver et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080112075 | Farquhar et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080239564 | Farquhar et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080282275 | Zaczek et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080282278 | Barkley | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090028669 | Rebstock | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090082907 | Stuvel et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090122443 | Farquhar et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090142169 | Garcia et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090153992 | Garcia et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090153993 | Garcia et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090153994 | Merrow | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090175705 | Nakao et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090261047 | Merrow | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090261228 | Merrow | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090261229 | Merrow | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090262444 | Polyakov et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090262445 | Noble et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090262454 | Merrow | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090262455 | Merrow | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265032 | Toscano et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265043 | Merrow | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265136 | Garcia et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090297328 | Slocum, III | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100083732 | Merrow et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100165498 | Merrow et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100165501 | Polyakov et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100168906 | Toscano et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100172722 | Noble et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100174404 | Slocum | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100193661 | Merrow | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100194253 | Merrow et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100195236 | Merrow et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100265609 | Merrow et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100265610 | Merrow et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100302678 | Merrow | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110011844 | Merrow et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110012631 | Merrow et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110012632 | Merrow | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110013362 | Merrow et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110013665 | Merrow et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110013666 | Merrow et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110013667 | Merrow et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110064546 | Merrow | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110157825 | Merrow et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110172807 | Merrow | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110185811 | Merrow | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110189934 | Merrow | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110236163 | Smith et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110261483 | Campbell et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110305132 | Merrow et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310724 | Martino | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120023370 | Truebenbach | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120034054 | Polyakov et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120050903 | Campbell et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120106351 | Gohel et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120274345 | Chen et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120286799 | Partee | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120321435 | Truebenbach | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130071224 | Merrow et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130108253 | Akers | May 2013 | A1 |
20130256967 | Carvalho | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140262149 | Merrow | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140271064 | Merrow | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
583716 | May 1989 | AU |
1177187 | Mar 1998 | CN |
2341188 | Sep 1999 | CN |
1114109 | Jul 2003 | CN |
1192544 | Mar 2005 | CN |
3786944 | Nov 1993 | DE |
69111634 | May 1996 | DE |
69400145 | Oct 1996 | DE |
19701548 | Aug 1997 | DE |
19804813 | Sep 1998 | DE |
69614460 | Jun 2002 | DE |
69626584 | Dec 2003 | DE |
19861388 | Aug 2007 | DE |
0210497 | Jul 1986 | EP |
0242970 | Oct 1987 | EP |
0 277 634 | Aug 1988 | EP |
0356977 | Aug 1989 | EP |
0442642 | Feb 1991 | EP |
0466073 | Jul 1991 | EP |
0776009 | Nov 1991 | EP |
0582017 | Feb 1994 | EP |
0617570 | Sep 1994 | EP |
0635836 | Jan 1995 | EP |
741508 | Nov 1996 | EP |
0757320 | Feb 1997 | EP |
0757351 | Feb 1997 | EP |
0840476 | May 1998 | EP |
1 045 301 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1209557 | May 2002 | EP |
1422713 | May 2004 | EP |
1234308 | May 2006 | EP |
1760722 | Mar 2007 | EP |
1612798 | Nov 2007 | EP |
2241118 | Aug 1991 | GB |
2276275 | Sep 1994 | GB |
2299436 | Oct 1996 | GB |
2312984 | Nov 1997 | GB |
2328782 | Mar 1999 | GB |
2439844 | Jul 2008 | GB |
61-115279 | Jun 1986 | JP |
62-177621 | Aug 1987 | JP |
62-239394 | Oct 1987 | JP |
62-251915 | Nov 1987 | JP |
63-002160 | Jan 1988 | JP |
63-004483 | Jan 1988 | JP |
63-016482 | Jan 1988 | JP |
63-062057 | Mar 1988 | JP |
63-201946 | Aug 1988 | JP |
63-214972 | Sep 1988 | JP |
63-269376 | Nov 1988 | JP |
63-195697 | Dec 1988 | JP |
64-089034 | Apr 1989 | JP |
2-091565 | Mar 1990 | JP |
2-098197 | Apr 1990 | JP |
2-185784 | Jul 1990 | JP |
2-199690 | Aug 1990 | JP |
2-278375 | Nov 1990 | JP |
2-297770 | Dec 1990 | JP |
3-008086 | Jan 1991 | JP |
3-078160 | Apr 1991 | JP |
3-105704 | May 1991 | JP |
3-207947 | Sep 1991 | JP |
3-210662 | Sep 1991 | JP |
3-212859 | Sep 1991 | JP |
3-214490 | Sep 1991 | JP |
3-240821 | Oct 1991 | JP |
3-295071 | Dec 1991 | JP |
4-017134 | Jan 1992 | JP |
4-143989 | May 1992 | JP |
4-172658 | Jun 1992 | JP |
4-214288 | Aug 1992 | JP |
4-247385 | Sep 1992 | JP |
4-259956 | Sep 1992 | JP |
4-307440 | Oct 1992 | JP |
4-325923 | Nov 1992 | JP |
5-035053 | Feb 1993 | JP |
5-035415 | Feb 1993 | JP |
5-066896 | Mar 1993 | JP |
5-068257 | Mar 1993 | JP |
5-073566 | Mar 1993 | JP |
5-073803 | Mar 1993 | JP |
5-101603 | Apr 1993 | JP |
5-173718 | Jul 1993 | JP |
5-189163 | Jul 1993 | JP |
5-204725 | Aug 1993 | JP |
5-223551 | Aug 1993 | JP |
6-004220 | Jan 1994 | JP |
6-004981 | Jan 1994 | JP |
6-162645 | Jun 1994 | JP |
6-181561 | Jun 1994 | JP |
6-215515 | Aug 1994 | JP |
6-274943 | Sep 1994 | JP |
6-314173 | Nov 1994 | JP |
7-007321 | Jan 1995 | JP |
7-029364 | Jan 1995 | JP |
7-037376 | Feb 1995 | JP |
7-056654 | Mar 1995 | JP |
7-111078 | Apr 1995 | JP |
7-115497 | May 1995 | JP |
7-201082 | Aug 1995 | JP |
7-226023 | Aug 1995 | JP |
7-230669 | Aug 1995 | JP |
7-257525 | Oct 1995 | JP |
1982246 | Oct 1995 | JP |
7-307059 | Nov 1995 | JP |
8007994 | Jan 1996 | JP |
8-030398 | Feb 1996 | JP |
8-030407 | Feb 1996 | JP |
8-079672 | Mar 1996 | JP |
8-106776 | Apr 1996 | JP |
8-110821 | Apr 1996 | JP |
8-167231 | Jun 1996 | JP |
8-212015 | Aug 1996 | JP |
8-244313 | Sep 1996 | JP |
8-263525 | Oct 1996 | JP |
8-263909 | Oct 1996 | JP |
8-297957 | Nov 1996 | JP |
2553315 | Nov 1996 | JP |
9-044445 | Feb 1997 | JP |
9-064571 | Mar 1997 | JP |
9-082081 | Mar 1997 | JP |
2635127 | Jul 1997 | JP |
9-306094 | Nov 1997 | JP |
9-319466 | Dec 1997 | JP |
10-040021 | Feb 1998 | JP |
10-049365 | Feb 1998 | JP |
10-064173 | Mar 1998 | JP |
10-098521 | Apr 1998 | JP |
2771297 | Jul 1998 | JP |
10-275137 | Oct 1998 | JP |
10-281799 | Oct 1998 | JP |
10-320128 | Dec 1998 | JP |
10-340139 | Dec 1998 | JP |
2862679 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11-134852 | May 1999 | JP |
11-139839 | May 1999 | JP |
2906930 | Jun 1999 | JP |
11-203201 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11-213182 | Aug 1999 | JP |
11-327800 | Nov 1999 | JP |
11-353128 | Dec 1999 | JP |
11-353129 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2000-056935 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000-066845 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2000-112831 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000-113563 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000-114759 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000-125290 | Apr 2000 | JP |
3052183 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000-132704 | May 2000 | JP |
2000-149431 | May 2000 | JP |
2000-228686 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2000-235762 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2000-236188 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2000-242598 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2000-278647 | Oct 2000 | JP |
3097994 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2000-305860 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001-005501 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001-023270 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001-100925 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2002-42446 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2007-87498 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2007-188615 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2007-220184 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2007-293936 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2007-305206 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2007-305290 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2007-328761 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2008-503824 | Feb 2008 | JP |
10-1998-0035445 | Aug 1998 | KR |
10-0176527 | Nov 1998 | KR |
10-0214308 | Aug 1999 | KR |
10-0403039 | Oct 2003 | KR |
45223 | Jan 1998 | SG |
387574 | Apr 2000 | TW |
WO 8901682 | Feb 1989 | WO |
WO 9706532 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO 0049487 | Feb 2000 | WO |
00-67540 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0067253 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0109627 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0141148 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 03013783 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 03021597 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03021598 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03067385 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO 2004006260 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2004114286 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2005024830 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005024831 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005109131 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2006030185 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 2006048611 | May 2006 | WO |
WO 2006100441 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO 2006100445 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO 2007031729 | Mar 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 13/633,741, filed Oct. 2, 2012. |
PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/058454, filed Oct. 2, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/553,681, filed Oct. 31, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/834,803, filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/834,880, filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/834,740, filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/835,131, filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/835,356, filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/835,538, filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
Bakken et al., “Low Cost, Rack Mounted, Direct Access Disk Storage Device”, www.ip.com, 4 pages, Mar. 3, 2005. |
Biber et al., “Disk Drive Drawer Thermal Management”, Advances in Electronic Packaging vol. 1:43-46, 1995. |
Chung et al., “Vibration Absorber for Reduction of the In-plane Vibration in an Optical Disk Drive”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, Vo. 48, May 2004. |
FlexStar Technology, 30E/Cascade Users Manual, Doc #98-36387-00 Rev. 1.8, pp. 1-33. |
FlexStar Technology, “A World of Storage Testing Solutions,” http://www.flexstar.com, 1 page (1999). |
FlexStar Technology, “Environment Chamber Products,” http://www.flexstar.com, 1 page (1999). |
FlexStar Technology, “FlexStar's Family of Products,” http://www.flexstar.com, 1 page (1999). |
Gurumurthi, “The Need for temperature-Aware Storage Systems”, The Tenth Intersociety conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronics, ITHERM pp. 387-394, 2006. |
Gurumurthi et al., “Thermal Issues in Disk Drive Design: Challenges and Possible Solutions”, ACM Transactions on Storage 2:41-73, Feb. 2006. |
Henderson, “HAD High Aerial Densities Require Solid Test Fixtures”, Flexstar Technology. |
Lindner, “Disk drive mounting”, IBM Technical Disclosure Brochure, vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 903-904, Aug. 1973. |
Morgenstern, Micropolis Drives Target High-end Apps; Technology Provides Higher Uninterrupted Data Transfer. (Applications; Microdisk AV LS 3020 and 1050AV and 1760AV LT Stackable Hard Drive Systems) (Product Announcement) MacWeek, vol. 8, No. 6, p. 8; Feb. 7, 1994. |
Morris, “Zero Cost Power and Cooling Monitor System”, www.delphion.com/tdbs/tdb?order=94A+61950, 3 pages, Jan. 15, 2008. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, PCT/US2008/086181, 15 pages, Mar. 16, 2009. |
Park, “Vibration and Noise Reduction of an Optical Disk Drive by Using a Vibration Absorber Methods and Apparatus for Securing Disk Drives in a Disk”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 48, Nov. 2002. |
Ruwart et al., “Performance Impact of External Vibration on Consumer-grade and enterprise-class Disk Drives”, Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE/13th Goddard Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies, 2005. |
Seagate Product Marketing, “Seagate's Advanced Multidrive System (SAMS) Rotational Vibration Feature”, Publication TP-229D, Feb. 2000. |
Schroeder et al., “Disk Failures in the Real World: What does an MTTP of 1,000,000 hours mean to you?”, In FAST'07: 5th USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies, San Jose, CA, Feb. 14-16, 2007. |
Schulze et al., “How Reliable is a Raid?,” COMPCON Spring apos; 89. Thirty-Fouth IEEE Computer Society International Conference: Intellectual Leverage, Digest of papers; pp. 118-123, Feb. 27-Mar. 3, 1989. |
Winchester, “Automation Specialists Use Machine Vision as a System Development Tool”, IEE Computing & Control Engineering, Jun./Jul. 2003. |
Xyratex website “Storage Infrastructure” www.xyratex.com/Products/storage-infrastructure/default.aspx 1995-2008. |
Xyratex website “Production Test Systems” www.xyratex.com/Products/production-test-systems/default.aspx 1995-2008. |
Xyratex website “Single cell—Production Test Systems” www.xyratex.com/products/production-test-systems/single-cell.aspx 1995-2008. |
Xyratex website “Continuous Innovation—Production Test Systems” www.xyratex.com/products/production-test-systems/continuous-innovation.aspx 1995-2008. |
Xyratex website “Key Advantages—Production Test Systems” www.xyratex.com/products/production-test-systems/advantages.aspx 1995-2008. |
Xyratex website “Testing Drives Colder—Production Test Systems” www.xyratex.com/products/productino-test-systems/colder.aspx 1995-2008. |
“Xyratex to Debut its New Automated Test Solution for 2.5-Inch Disk Drives at DISKCON USA 2004” 2004 PR Newswire Europe www.prnewswire.co.uk/cgi/news/release?id=130103. |
“Automated Production Test Solutions”, Xyratex Product Test brochure, 2006. |
Xyratex “Process Challenges in the Hard Drive Industry” slide presentation, 2006 Asian Diskcon. |
Suwa et al., “Evaluation System for Residual Vibration from HDD Mounting Mechanism” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 868-873, Mar. 1999. |
Suwa et al., “Rotational Vibration Suppressor” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Oct. 1991. |
Abraham et al., “Thermal Proximity Imaging of Hard-Disk Substrates”, IEEE Transactions on Mathematics 36:3997-4004, Nov. 2000. |
Anderson et al., “High Reliability Variable Load Time Controllable Vibration Free Thermal Processing Environment”, Delphion, hhtps://www.delphion.com/tdbs/tdb?order=93A+63418, 3 pages, Mar. 18, 2009. |
Asbrand, “Engineers at One Company Share the Pride and the Profits of Successful Product Design”, Professional Issues, 4 pages, 1987. |
Bair et al., “Measurements of Asperity Temperatures of a Read/Write Head Slider Bearing in Hard Magnetic Recording Disks”, Journal of Tribology 113:547-554, Jul. 1991. |
Christensen, “How Can Great firms Fail? Insights from the hard Disk Drive Industry”, Harvard Business School Press, pp. 1-26, 2006. |
Haddad et al., “A new Mounting Adapter for Computer Peripherals with Improved Reliability, Thermal Distribution, Low Noise and Vibration Reduction”, ISPS, Advances in Information Storage and Processing Systems, 1:97-108, 1995. |
HighBeam Research website “ACT debuts six-zone catalytic gas heater. (American Catalytic Technologies offers new heaters)” www.highbeam.com, 4 pages, 1998. |
HighBeam Research website “Asynchronous Testing Increases Throughput.” www.highbeam.com, 7 pages, 2000. |
HighBeam Research website “Credence announces Production Release of the EPRO AQ Series for Integrated Test and Back-end Processing.” www.highbeam.com, 4 pages, 1995. |
HighBeam Research website “Test Multiple Parts at Once for Air Leaks. (Brief Article)”, www.highbeam.com, 1 page, 1999. |
Iwamiya, “Hard Drive Cooling Using a Thermoelectric Cooler”, EEP—vol. 19-2, Advances in Electronic Packaging, vol. 2:2203-2208, ASME 1997. |
Ku, “Investigation of Hydrodynamic Bearing Friction in Data Storage information System Spindle Motors”, ISPSvol. 1, Advances in Information Storage and Processing Systems, pp. 159-165, ASME 1995. |
McAuley, “Recursive Time Trapping for Synchronization of Product and CHAMBER Profiles for Stress Test”, Delphion, www.delphion.com/tdbs/tdb?order=88A+60957, 3 pages, Mar. 18, 2009. |
Prater et al., “Thermal and Heat-Flow Aspects of Actuators for Hard Disk Drives”, InterSociety Conference on Thermal Phenomena, pp. 261-268, 1994. |
Terwiesch et al., “An Exploratory Study of International Product Transfer and Production Ramp-Up in the Data Storage Industry”, The Information Storage Industry Center, University of California, www-irps.ucsd.edu/˜sloan/, pp. 1-31, 1999. |
Tzeng, “Dynamic Torque Characteriestics of Disk-Drive Spindle Bearings”, ISPS—vol. 1, Advances in Information Storage and Processing Systems, pp. 57-63, ASME 1995. |
Tzeng, “Measurements of Transient Thermal Strains in a Disk-Drive Actuator”, InterSociety conference on Thermal Phenomena, pp. 269-274, 1994. |
Wilson-7000 disk Drive Analyzer Product Literature, date accessed Jan. 28, 2009, 2 pages. |
Annex to Form PCT/ASA/206 Communication Relating to the Results of the Partial International Search, for International Application No. PCT/US2008/086814, dated Apr. 3, 2009, 1 page. |
Annex to Form PCT/ASA/206 Communication Relating to the Results of the Partial International Search, for International Application No. PCT/US2008/086809, dated Apr. 3, 2009, 1 page. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/039926, Sep. 1, 2009, 13 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/039591, Aug. 31, 2009, 10 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2008/086814, Sep. 18, 2009, 17 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/039888, Sep. 28, 2009, 13 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/039921, Sep. 25, 2009, 14 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/040058, Sep. 29, 2009, 13 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/040829, Oct. 28, 2009, 13 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/040835, Oct. 30, 2009, 13 pages. |
Abramovitch, “Rejecting Rotational Disturbances on Small Disk Drives Using Rotational Accelerometers”, Proceedings of the 1996 IFAC World Congress in San Francisco, CA, Jul. 1996 http://dabramovitch.com/pubs/amrfac—matj.pdf. |
Ali et al., “Modeling and Simulation of Hard Disk Drive Final Assembly Using a HDD Template” Proceedings of the 2007 Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE pp. 1641-1650, 2007 http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1351837. |
Anderson et al., “Clinical chemistry: concepts and applications”, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., pp. 131-132, 2003. |
Curtis et al., “InPhase Professional Archive Drive Architecture” Dec. 17, 2007 http://www.science.edu/TechoftheYear/Nominees/InPhase/Holographic%20Storage.pdf. |
Findeis et al., “Vibration Isolation Techniques Sutiable for Portable Electronic Speckle Pattern Interferometry”, Proc. SPIE vol. 4704, pp. 159-167, 2002 http://www.ndt.uct.ac.za/Papers/spiendt2002.pdf. |
Frankovich, “The Basics of Vibration Isolation Using Elastomeric Materials”, EARSC 2005 http://www.isoloss.com/pdfs/engineering/BasicsofVibrationIsolation.pdf. |
Grochowski et al., “Future Trends in Hard Disk Drives” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 1850-1854, May 1996 http://svn.tribler.org/abc/branches/leo/dataset/preferences/johan/johan-68.pdf. |
Gurumurthi et al., “Disk Drive Roadmap from the Thermal Perspective: A Case for Dynamic Thermal Management”, International Symposium on Computer Architecture Proceedings of the 32nd Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, pp. 38-49, 2005 http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1069807.1069975. |
Johnson et al., “Performance Measurements of Tertiary Storage Devices”, Proceedings of the 24th VLDB Conference, New York, pp. 50-61, 1998. |
Nagarajan, “Survey of Cleaning and cleanliness Measurement in Disk Drive Manufacture”, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Feb. 1997. |
Yee Leong Low et al., “Thermal network model for temperature prediction in hard disk drive” Journal Microsystem Technologies, vol. 15, No. 10-11, pp. 1653-1656, Oct. 2009 http://www.springerlink.com/content/20668jn67pk426r5/. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/039590, Oct. 30, 2009, 10 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/040757, Nov. 23, 2009, 12 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/039898, Nov. 24, 2009, 12 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/040795, Nov. 26, 2009, 13 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/045583, Nov. 27, 2009, 13 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/040888, Dec. 29, 2009, 14 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/040894, Dec. 22, 2009, 12 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/039934, Dec. 23, 2009, 12 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/040965, Dec. 23, 2009, 12 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/040973, Jan. 11, 2010, 13 pages. |
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report completed Dec. 30, 2009, including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Transferring Disk Drives Within Disk Drive Testing Systems”, inventors: Polyakov et al, and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/727,150. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 12/104,536. |
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report completed Jan. 4, 2010, including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Transferring Storage Devices Within Storage Device Testing Systems”, inventors: John P. Toscano et al., and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/727,201. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 12/424,980. |
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report completed Jan. 5, 2009, including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Processing Storage Devices”, inventors: Richard W. Slocum III., and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/727,619. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 12/474,388. |
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report completed Jan. 15, 2010, including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Bulk Feeding Disk Drives to Disk Drive Testing Systems”, inventors: Noble et al., and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/726,856. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 12/104,869. |
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report completed Jan. 13, 2010, including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Dependent Temperature Control Within Disk Drive Testing Systems”, inventors: Merrow et al., and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/727,207. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 12/105,069. |
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report completed Jan. 13, 2010, including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Test Slot Cooling System for a Storage Device Testing System”, inventors: Merrow et al., and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/727,700. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 12/503,567. |
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report completed Feb. 17, 2010, including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Storage Device Testing System Cooling”, inventors: Brian S. Merrow and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/775,560. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 12/698,575. |
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report completed Jan. 6, 2010, including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Conductive Heating”, inventors: Brian S. Merrow et al., and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/836,915. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 12/503,593. |
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report completed Jan. 7, 2010, including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Conductive Temperature Sensing”, inventors: Brian S. Merrow et al., and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/760,305. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 12/503,687. |
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report completed Jan. 14, 2010, including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Solid State Temperature Control of Hard Drive Tester”, inventors: Brian S. Merrow and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/856,056. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 12/105,103. |
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report completed Jan. 12, 2010, including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Single Test Slot for Dynamic Isolation of Hard Drive”, inventors: Brian S. Merrow and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/767,142. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 12/105,105. |
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report completed Jan. 14, 2010, including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Hard Drive Transport Sled”, inventors: Brian S. Merrow et al., and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/766,680. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 12/959,133. |
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report completed Feb. 18, 2010, including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Chilled Water Temp Control of Disk Drive Tester”, inventors: Brian S. Merrow and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/937,918. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 12/105,061. |
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report completed Jan. 12, 2010, including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Vibration Isolation Within Disk Drive Testing Systems”, inventors: Brian S. Merrow and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/767,142. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 12/105,105. Revised as of Mar. 30, 2010. |
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report completed Apr. 4, 2010, including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Disk Drive Clamping Transport and Testing”, inventors: Brian S. Merrow et al., and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/767,113. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 11/959,133. Revised as of Apr. 4, 2010. |
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report completed Apr. 1, 2010, including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Disk Drive Clamping Transport and Testing”, inventors: Brian S. Merrow et al., and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/766,680. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 11/959,133. Revised as of Apr. 1, 2010. |
FlexStar Technology, 30E/Cascade Users Manual, Doc #98-36387-00 Rev. 1.8, pp. 1-33, Jun. 1, 2004. |
Henderson, “HAD High Aerial Densities Require Solid Test Fixtures”, Flexstar Technology, Feb. 26, 2007. |
Exhibit 1 in Xyratex Technology, LTD v. Teradyne, Inc.; Newspaper picture that displays the CSO tester; 1990. |
Exhibit 2 in Xyratex Technology, LTD v. Teradyne, Inc.; Photos of the CSO tester obtained from Hitachi; 1990. |
Exhibit 1326 in Xyratex Technology, LTD v. Teradyne, Inc.; Image of the back of Exhibit 1 and Exhibit 2 photos, which display the photos' dates; 1990. |
Exhibit 1314 in Xyratex Technology, LTD. V. Teradyne, Inc.; Case, “Last products of Disk-File Development at Hursley and Millbrook,” IBM, Oct. 12, 1990. |
Exhibit 1315 in Xyratex Technology, LTD. V. Teradyne, Inc.; Case, “History of Disk-File Development at Hursley and Millbrook,” IBM, Oct. 17, 1990. |
Xyratex Technology, LTD. V. Teradyne, Inc., Teradyne, Inc's Prior Art Notice Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. Section 282. Case No. CV 08-04545 SJO (PLAx), Oct. 16, 2009. |
Xyratex Technology, LTD. V. Teradyne, Inc., Amended Joint Trial Exhibit List of Xyratex and Teradyne. Case No. CV 08-04545 SJO (PLAx), Nov. 12, 2009. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/GB2005/003490, Jan. 26, 2006, 10 pages. |
Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Chapter 1 of the Patent Cooperation Treaty), International Application No. PCT/US2009/040973, Oct. 28, 2010, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Aug. 14, 2014 in international application No. PCT/US2014/019832, 16 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140306728 A1 | Oct 2014 | US |