The field of the invention is systems, processors and methods for electroplating substrates.
Microelectronic devices such as semiconductor devices are generally fabricated on and/or in substrates or wafers. In a typical fabrication process, one or more layers of metal or other conductive materials are formed on a wafer in an electroplating processor. The processor may have a bath of electrolyte held in vessel or bowl, with one or more anodes in the bowl. The wafer itself may be held in a rotor in a head movable into the bowl for processing and away from the bowl for loading and unloading. A contact ring on the rotor generally has a large number of contact fingers that make electrical contact with the wafer. A membrane may be positioned in the bowl between the anodes and the wafer, as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,585,398 and 7,264,698, incorporated herein by reference. The membrane allows certain ions to pass through, while blocking passage of other molecules, which can provide improved electroplating results and performance.
In many electroplating processors, the membrane is supported on the top and the bottom via mechanical supports as shown for example in FIG. 5 of U.S. Patent Publication No. 2012/0292181. However, certain newer processors are designed to be much shorter, so that the processors may be stacked on two levels of a processing system. The stacked two level processing system may have twice as many processors as a single level processing system, effectively doubling processing capacity in many applications, while requiring little or no additional clean room space. Conventional membrane supports though are not suitable for use in these compact processors because they are too large in the vertical dimension, taking up too much height in the bowl.
Gas bubbles in the electrolyte may tend to nucleate or adhere to the surfaces of conventional membrane supports. Gas bubbles are a leading cause of wafer defects in the electroplating process. In processors having a relatively large vertical space between the membrane supports and the wafer, such as the processor described in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2012/0292181, gas bubbles on the membrane supports are generally not a significant disadvantage because their effects at the wafer are reduced by the relatively large spacing between them.
On the other hand, in current compact processor designs having much more limited vertical dimension, the membrane is necessarily much closer to the wafer. As a result, in these types of processors gas bubbles present a significant engineering challenge.
The membrane material can significantly expand when wetted. It may also stretch when subjected to liquid pressure forces in the bowl, such as pressure differences in the catholyte above and the anolyte below the membrane. The membrane, if not supported, may therefore tend to sag or wrinkle, which contributes to gas bubble trapping and interference with fluid flow within the chamber. Accordingly, improved processors and methods are needed.
In the drawings, the same element number indicates the same element in each of the views.
As shown in
The membrane support 50 as constructed of a thin plastic film supports or holds up the membrane, even though the membrane support 50 may be very thin, so that it does not significantly contribute to the height requirements of the processor 20.
The geometry of the membrane support 50 may be easily cut and shaped to form open areas necessary to provide a desired electrical current distribution in the processor. The support 50 may be provided as a flat sheet cut into a pattern via laser cutting, water jet or die-stamping, or other techniques. In this case when clamped in place under the membrane 40, the support 50 and the membrane 40 both may conform to a three dimensional partially conical shape of the bottom surfaces of the rigid cup 46. Alternatively the support 50 may be formed as a three dimensional component, optionally matching the geometry of the bottom surfaces of the cup 46, rather than formed as a flat component.
The support 50 may be made of various plastics such as PEEK or Teflon fluorine resins, with a sheet thickness of 0.01 to 0.15 inches. Generally, the thickness of the support 50 is less than 20, 10, 5 or 1% of the minimum thickness DD of the cup 46. The cup 46 typically has a minimum thickness of 0.2 or 0.3 inches or more. As shown in
Alternatively, as shown in
In
Thus, a novel processor has been shown and described. Various changes and substitutions may of course be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The invention, therefore, should not be limited except by the following claims and their equivalents.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/732,254, filed Nov. 30, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5143593 | Ueno et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5762751 | Bleck et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5883762 | Calhoun et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6126798 | Reid et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6368475 | Hanson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6527920 | Mayer et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6635157 | Dordi et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
7247222 | Yang | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7351314 | Klocke et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7351315 | Klocke et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7438788 | Hanson et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7585398 | Hanson et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
8177944 | Saito et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8496789 | McHugh et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8518224 | Ma et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
20050087439 | Hanson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050092601 | Herchen | May 2005 | A1 |
20070151844 | Wilson et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070261964 | Wilson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20100044236 | Mayer et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100147679 | Feng et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100307913 | Ma et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140151218 A1 | Jun 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61732254 | Nov 2012 | US |