In the field of geophysical prospecting, the knowledge of the earth's subsurface structure is useful for finding and extracting valuable mineral resources such as oil and natural gas. A well-known tool of geophysical prospecting is a “seismic survey.” In a seismic survey, acoustic waves produced by one or more sources are transmitted into the earth as an acoustic signal. When the acoustic signal encounters an interface between two subsurface strata having different acoustic impedances, a portion of the acoustic signal is reflected back to the earth's surface. Sensors detect these reflected portions of the acoustic signal, and the sensors' outputs are recorded as data. Seismic data processing techniques are then applied to the collected data to estimate the subsurface structure. Such surveys can be performed on land or in water.
In a typical marine seismic survey, multiple streamer cables and one or more seismic sources are towed behind a vessel. A typical streamer includes multiple seismic sensors positioned at spaced intervals along its length. The seismic sensors often include pressure sensors (“hydrophones”) and accelerometers. The use of different sensor types enables better rejection of noise and directional filtering of seismic waves.
Suitable accelerometer types for use in marine seismic streamers include micro electromechanical systems (“MEMS”) accelerometers. Such accelerometers generally employ a semiconductor substrate with an etched or deposited mechanical element that moves or deforms in response to the sensor's acceleration. Circuitry on the substrate measures the degree of movement or deformation to generate a sensor output signal. Feedback can be employed to ensure that the sensor makes accurate measurements.
A better understanding of the various disclosed embodiments can be obtained when the detailed description is considered in conjunction with the attached drawings, in which:
It should be understood that the drawings and detailed description do not limit the disclosure, but on the contrary, they provide the foundation for understanding all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope of the appended claims.
Though many commercial hydrophone embodiments exist, they lack the advantages of a MEMS device. At least one effort to provide a MEMS hydrophone is documented in U.S. Pat. App. Pub. 2007/0230721 “Trapped fluid microsystems for acoustic sensing”, filed Jan. 23, 2007 by White and Grosh. As such devices are miniaturized, it becomes possible to make their sensing elements increasingly sensitive. However, because the sensing elements are in a confined, fluid-filled space, the molecular motion of that fluid becomes an increasingly significant contributor to measurement noise. To combat this source of noise while still making it possible to measure pressure, there is proposed herein a pressure sensor in which the sensing element is enclosed within a vacuum or low-pressure space. The sensing element is electrostatically coupled to a membrane that moves or deforms in response to an ambient or applied pressure. The electrostatic coupling may be provided by similarly charged electrodes on the sensing element and the membrane. These electrodes may be separated by a small gap or capacitively coupled via a pair of intermediate electrodes. These configurations may preserve the sensitivity of the sensing element while shielding it from molecular-motion induced noise.
The principles and operation of the disclosed embodiments are best understood in a suitable usage context. Accordingly,
The streamers 24A are towed via a harness 28 that produces a desired arrangement of the streamers 24. The harness 28 includes multiple interconnected cables and paravanes 30A to control the positioning of the streamers. Electrical conductors and/or fiber optic cables connect the sensor units in the streamer sections 26 of the streamers 24 to the data recording system 18 aboard the ship 12.
A seismic source 20 produces acoustic waves 32 under the control of the data recording system 18. The seismic source 20 may be or include, for example, an air gun, a vibrator, or other device. The acoustic waves 32 travel through the water 14 and into a subsurface 36 below a bottom surface 34. When the acoustic waves 32 encounter changes in acoustic impedance (e.g., at boundaries or layers between strata), portions of the acoustic waves 32 are reflected. The portions of the acoustic waves 32 reflected from subsurface layers are called “seismic reflections”. In
In at least some streamer embodiments, the sensor units 50 are partitioned into groups of N sensor units, where N is preferably between about 4 and approximately 64. When grouped, the sensor units 50 in each group are connected to a common group control unit. Each group control unit may receive data signals from the corresponding sensor units 50 and produce a single output data stream that conveys the data from the group. The output data stream may be produced using, for example, data compression techniques, time division multiplexing techniques, and/or frequency division multiplexing techniques.
Electrical power requirements and streamer weight often limit a number of sensors that can be located in streamer sections, so it is desirable to employ light sensors with low power requirements. Embodiments of an illustrative sensor unit 50 including one or more digital sensors are described below. At least some embodiments also employ MEMS technology to further reduce weight and power requirements. MEMS devices include micromachined components with miniature moving mechanical structures. Micromachining creates precisely patterned structures on relatively thick substrates through either bulk or surface processing technologies. Bulk micromachining sculpts moving pieces by removing material from the substrates. Surface micromachining involves depositing and subsequently etching thin films on the substrates, akin to common integrated circuit manufacturing processes. Both technologies can produce physically smaller sensors that typically weigh less and dissipate less electrical energy. As explained further below, integrated digitization circuitry further reduces energy consumption as compared to an analog sensor followed by a separate analog-to-digital converter. The usage of such digital sensors in a streamer may make it possible to have an increased number of sensors while maintaining or reducing overall power and wiring requirements for the streamer.
Pressure sensor 80 also includes a flexible membrane 96 having an electrode or conductive layer 100. The flexible membrane 96 is substantially planar, and is oriented parallel to one of the major surfaces of the cantilever member 82. The conductive layer 100 is positioned near the second electrode 94 to facilitate electrostatic coupling between the two. The flexible membrane 96 forms a wall of a second chamber 98 within the housing 86, and it is configured to deform in response to an input stimulus (e.g., pressure or a mechanical force). The flexible membrane 96 has a thickness that gives it sufficient strength to withstand expected hydrostatic pressures, yet deform sufficiently in an acoustic pressure field to generate adequate electrical forces on the cantilever member 82.
The two chambers are sealed; chamber 84 with a vacuum or low pressure to avoid causing or affecting the cantilever's movement, and chamber 98 with a pressure that provides an appropriate balance for external pressure conditions. Note that the figures are not drawn to scale and that chamber 98 may in practice be larger than chamber 84. Depending on the design conditions, chamber 98 may be filled with an inert gas or even kept at a vacuum. In the embodiment of
Before operation, electrodes 94 and 100 are charged so as to exert a repulsive electrostatic force on each other, enabling motion of the membrane 96 to be communicated to the cantilever member 82. The cantilever member 82 has an inherent resilience that, absent any external forces, causes it to return to a neutral position. As the flexible membrane 96 moves toward the free end 90 of the cantilever member 82, the repulsive electrostatic force between the electrodes would increase, tending to cause the free end 90 of the cantilever member 82 to move away from the approaching flexible membrane 96 (i.e., to move in the same direction as the flexible membrane 96). Similarly, as the membrane 96 moves away from the cantilever, the repulsive force would decrease, enabling the inherent resilience of the cantilever member to cause the free end 90 of the cantilever member 82 to move towards the receding membrane.
As indicated in
When an external stimulus tends to cause the equilibrium position of the cantilever to vary from the null position, the quantizer produces relatively more ones or zeros based on what is required to maintain the equilibrium position at the null point. The digital transducer circuit may include an output unit 124 that converts the pulse density modulated signal to a digital sensor reading. In at least some embodiments, the output unit 124 is a counter that measures the number of pulses in each given time interval. So long as the clock for the quantizer and output unit are substantially higher (e.g., >10 times) the highest frequency component of the measurand, the digital transducer circuit produces an accurate measurement.
Numerous variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art once the above disclosure is fully appreciated. For example, the foregoing description employed marine seismic surveys as a context for describing digital pressure sensors and streamers, but the applications are not so limited. Moreover, other sensor feedback mechanisms may be employed beyond those described above. For example the control/sense electrodes can each be split into multiple electrodes for more precise sensing and individual feedback control. It is intended that the following claims be interpreted to embrace all such variations and modifications.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3397358 | Allenden | Aug 1968 | A |
3832762 | Johnston | Sep 1974 | A |
4864463 | Shkedi et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
5070483 | Berni | Dec 1991 | A |
5109362 | Berni | Apr 1992 | A |
5134882 | Taylor | Aug 1992 | A |
5170566 | Fowler et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5327216 | Berni | Jul 1994 | A |
5440939 | Barny et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5723790 | Andersson | Mar 1998 | A |
5894316 | Sakai et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5903349 | Vohra et al. | May 1999 | A |
5955884 | Payton et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6109113 | Chavan et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6684160 | Ozbek et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6788618 | Clayton et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6842006 | Conti et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6873571 | Clayton et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6901028 | Clayton et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6921894 | Swierkowski | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7116036 | Balasubramaniam et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7298672 | Tenghamn | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7331803 | Steigerwald | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7642784 | Reddig et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7667375 | Berkcan | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7671598 | Ronaess et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
20050194201 | Tenghamn et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20070230721 | White | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080253225 | Welker et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090235752 | Miyashita | Sep 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 210 843 | Jul 1986 | EP |
2402745 | Dec 2004 | GB |
7335909 | Dec 1995 | JP |
WO-2004053528 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2007029133 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2010054216 | May 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PGS, “OptoSeis Reservoir Imaging”, (Online) (Retrieved on May 5, 2010) Retrieved from the internet URL <http://www.pgs.com/upload/208514/PGS%20OptoSeis.pdf>, 6 pgs. |
Seth, Samir N., “Reservoir Optimization: Permanent Seismic Monitoring Using Fiber Optics”, PGS Optomism, (May 19, 2009), 29 pgs. |
Seeger, Joseph I., et al., “Sense Finger Dynamics in a ΣΔ Force-Feedback Gyroscope”, Technical Digest of the Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop, (Jun. 2000), pp. 296-299, Hilton Head Island, SC. |
Chandrakasan, Anantha et al., “Trends in Low Power Digital Signal Processing”, Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, (1998), pp. 604-607, vol. 4, Monterey, CA (USA). |
Mitcheson, P.D. et al., “MEMS Electrostatic Micropower Generator for Low Frequency Operation”, Sensors and Actuators A, (2004), pp. 523-529, vol. 115. |
Ergen, Sinem C., “Zigbee/IEEE 802.15.4 Summary”, Advanced Technology Lab of National Semiconductor, (Sep. 4, 2004), 37 pgs. |
Lewis, Christopher P., et al., “Simulation of Micromachined Digital Accelerometer in SIMULINK and PSPICE”, UKACC International Conference on Control, (Sep. 1996), pp. 205-209, vol. 1, Conf. Publ. No. 427. |
Lee, Haksue et al., “A Micro-Machined Piezoelectric Flexural-Mode Hydrophone with Air Backing: Benefit of Air Backing for Enhancing Sensitivity”, J. Acoustical Society of America, (Sep. 2010), pp. 1033-1044, vol. 128, No. 3. |
Choi, Sungjoon et al., “A Micro-Machined Piezoelectric Flexural-Mode Hydrophone with Air Backing: A Hydrostatic Pressure-Balancing Mechanism for Integrity Preservation”, J. Acoustical Society of America, (Sep. 2010), pp. 1021-1032, vol. 128, No. 3. |
Rickert, William T., et al., “Systems and Methods for Wireless Communication in a Geophysical Survey Streamer”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/073,832, filed Mar. 28, 2011. |
Tenghamn, Stig Rune L., “Systems and Methods for Energy Harvesting in a Geophysical Survey Streamer”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/073,823, filed Mar. 28, 2011. |
Tenghamn, Stig Rune L., et al., “Digital Sensor Streamers and Applications Thereof”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/206,002, filed Aug. 9, 2011. |
Barr, Frederick J., et al., “Piezoelectric Sensors for Geophysical Streamers”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/209,909, filed Aug. 15, 2011. |
United Kingdom Search Report, mailing date: Sep. 14, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130042695 A1 | Feb 2013 | US |