The field of the invention relates generally to nano-fabrication of structures. More particularly, the present invention is directed to a technique to reduce defect replication in patterns formed during nano-scale fabrication.
Nano-fabrication involves the fabrication of very small structures, e.g., having features on the order of nano-meters or smaller. One area in which nano-fabrication has had a sizeable impact is in the processing of integrated circuits. As the semiconductor processing industry continues to strive for larger production yields while increasing the circuits per unit area formed on a substrate, nano-fabrication becomes increasingly important. Nano-fabrication provides greater process control while allowing increased reduction of the minimum feature dimension of the structures formed. Other areas of development in which nano-fabrication has been employed include biotechnology, optical technology, mechanical systems and the like.
An exemplary nano-fabrication technique is commonly referred to as imprint lithography. Exemplary imprint lithography processes are described in detail in numerous publications, such as United States patent application publication 2004/0065976 filed as U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/264,960, entitled, “Method and a Mold to Arrange Features on a Substrate to Replicate Features having Minimal Dimensional Variability”; United States patent application publication 2004/0065252 filed as U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/264,926, entitled “Method of Forming a Layer on a Substrate to Facilitate Fabrication of Metrology Standards”; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,936,194, entitled “Functional Patterning Material for Imprint Lithography Processes,” all of which are assigned to the assignee of the present invention.
The fundamental imprint lithography technique disclosed in each of the aforementioned United States patent application publications and United States patent includes formation of a relief pattern in a polymerizable layer and transferring a pattern corresponding to the relief pattern into an underlying substrate. The substrate may be positioned upon a motion stage to obtain a desired position to facilitate patterning thereof. To that end, a template is employed spaced-apart from the substrate with a formable liquid present between the template and the substrate. The liquid is solidified to form a solidified layer that has a pattern recorded therein that is conforming to a shape of the surface of the template in contact with the liquid. The template is then separated from the solidified layer such that the template and the substrate are spaced-apart. The substrate and the solidified layer are then subjected to processes to transfer, into the substrate, a relief image that corresponds to the pattern in the solidified layer.
To that end, imprint lithography may have unlimited resolution in pattern replication. However, this may result in difficulties related to defect sensitive applications such as microelectronic devices. The primary advantage of all “imaging” lithography solutions such as photolithography, EUV lithography, e-beam, etc. is that the machine system can be “de-tuned” to set a desired resolution limit. For example, in optical/EUV lithography, the resolution of the process is defined by R=(k1×λ)/NA, where k1 is a scaling factor that is less than 1 and is a function of mask complexity and resist dose settings; λ is the wavelength of light; and NA is the numerical aperture of the optical system. For EUV lithography, λ=˜13.2 nm. To that end, to print devices using EUV lithography with a desired resolution (dR) of 40 nm (with k1=0.8 based on acceptable mask and process complexity), NA needs to equal ˜0.264. As a result, any features that were placed on the mask that may result in features less than the desired resolution (40 nm) on the wafer may be inherently “filtered out”. This sets the threshold on what should be detectable as defects on the mask using a mask inspection tool to avoid the printing of defects that are less than dR=40 nm.
To that end, it may be desired to provide an improved method of patterning substrates substantially absent of defects employing imprint lithography.
The present invention provides a method of forming a desired pattern in a layer positioned on a substrate with a mold, the method including, inter alia, contacting the layer with the mold forming a shape therein having a plurality of features extending in a first direction; and altering dimensions of the shape of the layer in a second direction, orthogonal to the first direction, to eliminate a subset of the plurality of features having a dimension less that a predetermined magnitude while obtaining the desired pattern in the layer. These embodiments and others are described more fully below.
Referring to
Multi-layered structure 12 may comprise a substrate 22, a transfer layer 24, and a polymeric material 26, with transfer layer 24 being positioned between polymeric material 26 and substrate 22. Transfer layer 24 may comprise a low-k silicon containing dielectric and may be formed using any known techniques, dependent upon the materials and the application desired, including but not limited to drop dispense, spin-coating, dip coating, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), physical vapor deposition (PVD), and the like. In a further embodiment, multi-layered structure 12 may comprise an underlying organic layer (not shown) positioned between transfer layer 24 and substrate 22.
Polymeric material 26 may be an anti-reflective coating (BARC) layer, such as DUV30J-6 available from Brewer Science, Inc. of Rolla, Mo. Additionally, polymeric material 26 may be a silicon-containing low-k layer, or a BCB layer, for example. In an alternative embodiment, a composition for polymeric material 26 may be silicon-free and consists of the following:
In COMPOSITION 1, isobornyl acrylate comprises approximately 55% of the composition, n-hexyl acrylate comprises approximately 27%, ethylene glycol diacrylate comprises approximately 15% and the initiator 2-hydroxy-2-methyl-1-phenyl-propan-1-one comprises approximately 3%. The initiator is sold under the trade name DAROCUR® 1173 by CIBA® of Tarrytown, N.Y. The above-identified composition also includes stabilizers that are well known in the chemical art to increase the operational life of the composition.
Template 16 and/or mold 18 may be formed from such materials including but not limited to, fused-silica, quartz, silicon, organic polymers, siloxane polymers, borosilicate glass, fluorocarbon polymers, metal, and hardened sapphire. As shown, patterning surface 20 comprises features defined by a plurality of spaced-apart recesses 28 and protrusions 30. Further, patterning surface 20 is shown comprising a protruding defect 31a and an indention defect 31b, with protruding defect 31a and indention defect 31b having a dimension less than a desired resolution, described further below. In a further embodiment, patterning surface 20 may be substantially smooth and/or planar. Patterning surface 20 may define an original pattern that forms the basis of a pattern to be formed on multi-layered structure 12.
Template 16 may be coupled to an imprint head 32 to facilitate movement of template 16, and therefore, mold 18. In a further embodiment, template 16 may be coupled to a template chuck (not shown), the template chuck (not shown) being any chuck including, but not limited to, vacuum and electromagnetic. A fluid dispense system 34 is coupled to be selectively placed in fluid communication with multi-layered structure 12 so as to deposit polymeric material 26 thereon. It should be understood that polymeric material 26 may be deposited using any known technique, e.g., drop dispense, spin-coating, dip coating, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), physical vapor deposition (PVD), and the like.
A source 36 of energy 38 is coupled to direct energy 38 along a path 40. Imprint head 32 and stage 14 are configured to arrange mold 18 and multi-layered structure 12, respectively, to be in superimposition and disposed in path 40. Either imprint head 32, stage 14, or both vary a distance between mold 18 and multi-layered structure 12 to define a desired volume therebetween that is filled by polymeric material 26.
Typically, polymeric material 26 is disposed upon multi-layered structure 12 before the desired volume is defined between mold 18 and multi-layered structure 12. However, polymeric material 26 may fill the volume after the desired volume has been obtained. After the desired volume is filled with polymeric material 26, source 36 produces energy 38, e.g., broadband ultraviolet radiation that causes polymeric material 26 to solidify and/or cross-link conforming to the shape of a surface 42 of multi-layered structure 12 and patterning surface 20. Control of this process is regulated by a processor 44 that is in data communication with stage 14, imprint head 32, fluid dispense system 34, source 36, operating on a computer readable program stored in a memory 46.
To that end, as mentioned above, either imprint head 32, stage 14, or both vary a distance between mold 18 and multi-layered structure 12 to define a desired volume therebetween that is filled by polymeric material 26. As a result, a pattern may be recorded in polymeric material 26 that conforms to a shape of patterning surface 20. However, it may be desired to pattern polymeric material 26 substantially absent of any features having a dimension less than a desired resolution (dR). Features having a dimension less than a desired resolution may result in, inter alia, undesirable patterning of subsequent layers positioned on multi-layered structure 12, undesired functionality in devices formed from multi-layered structure 12, and misalignment between multi-layered structure 12 and mold 18.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In COMPOSITION 2, hydroxyl-functional polysiloxane comprises approximately 4% of the composition, hexamethoxymethylmelamine comprisies approximately 0.95%, toluenesulfonic acid comprises approximately 0.05% and methyl amyl ketone comprises approximately 95%. In COMPOSITION 3, hydroxyl-functional polysiloxane comprises approximately 4% of the composition, hexamethoxymethylmelamine comprisies approximately 0.7%, gamma-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane comprises approximately 0.25%, toluenesulfonic acid comprises approximately 0.05%, and methyl amyl ketone comprises approximately 95%.
Conformal layer 62 includes first and second opposed sides. First side 64 faces polymerizable layer 126. The second side faces away from polymerizable layer 126, forming normalization surface 66. Normalization surface 66 is provided with a substantially normalized profile by ensuring that the distances k1, k3, k5, k7, k9, k11, k13, and k15 between protrusions 56 and normalization surface 66 are substantially the same and that the distance k2, k4, k6, k8, k10, k12, and k14 between recessions 58 and normalization surface 66 are substantially the same.
One manner in which to provide normalization surface 66 with a normalized profile is to contact conformal layer 62 with a planarizing mold (not shown) having a planar surface. Thereafter, the planarizing mold (not shown) is separated from conformal layer 62 and radiation impinges upon conformal layer 62 to polymerize and, therefore, to solidify the same. The radiation impinged upon conformal layer 46 may be ultraviolet, thermal, electromagnetic, visible light, heat, and the like. In a further embodiment, the radiation impinged upon conformal layer 62 may be impinged before the planarizing mold (not shown) is separated from conformal layer 62. To ensure that conformal layer 62 does not adhere to the planarizing mold (not shown), a low surface energy coating may be deposited upon the planarizing mold (not shown).
Alternatively, release properties of conformal layer 62 may be improved by including in the material from which the same is fabricated a surfactant. The surfactant provides the desired release properties to reduce adherence of conformal layer 62 to the planarizing mold (not shown). For purposes of this invention, a surfactant is defined as any molecule, one tail of which is hydrophobic. Surfactants may be either fluorine containing, e.g., include a fluorine chain, or may not include any fluorine in the surfactant molecule structure. An exemplary surfactant is available under the trade name ZONYL® FSO-100 from DUPONT™ that has a general structure of R1R2, where R1═F(CF2CF2)Y, with y being in a range of 1 to 7, inclusive and R2═CH2CH2O(CH2CH2O)xH, where X being in a range of 0 to 15, inclusive. It should be understood that the surfactant may be used in conjunction with, or in lieu of, the low surface energy coating that may be applied to the planarizing mold (not shown).
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In still a further embodiment, referring to
The embodiments of the present invention described above are exemplary. Many changes and modification may be made to the disclosure recited above, while remaining within the scope of the invention. The scope of the invention should, therefore, be determined with reference to the appended claims along with their full scope of equivalents.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/632,104, filed on Dec. 1, 2004, entitled “Eliminating Printabilty of Sub-Resolution Defects in Imprint Lithography,” listing Sidlgata V. Sreenivasan as an inventor, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4070116 | Frosch et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4267212 | Sakawaki | May 1981 | A |
4426247 | Tamamura et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4440804 | Milgram | Apr 1984 | A |
4507331 | Hiraoka | Mar 1985 | A |
4512848 | Deckman et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4552832 | Blume et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4657845 | Frchet et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4692205 | Sachdev et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4707218 | Giammarco et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4731155 | Napoli et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4737425 | Lin et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4891303 | Garza et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4909151 | Fukui et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4931351 | McColgin et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4959252 | Bonnebat et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4976818 | Hashimoto et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5028366 | Harakal et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5071694 | Uekita et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5073230 | Maracas et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5110514 | Soane | May 1992 | A |
5126006 | Cronin et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5151754 | Ishibashi et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5173393 | Sezi et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5198326 | Hashimoto et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5234793 | Sebald et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5240550 | Boehnke et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5246880 | Reele et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5259926 | Kuwabara et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5277749 | Griffith et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5314772 | Kozicki et al. | May 1994 | A |
5357122 | Okubora et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5425848 | Haisma et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5434107 | Paranjpe | Jul 1995 | A |
5480047 | Tanigawa et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5512131 | Kumar et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5545367 | Bae et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5601641 | Stephens | Feb 1997 | A |
5654238 | Cronin et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5669303 | Maracas et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5700626 | Lee et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5743998 | Park | Apr 1998 | A |
5753014 | Van Rijn | May 1998 | A |
5772905 | Chou | Jun 1998 | A |
5776748 | Singhvi et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5820769 | Chou | Oct 1998 | A |
5849209 | Kindt-Larsen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5849222 | Jen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5888650 | Calhoun et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5900160 | Whitesides et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905104 | Eklund et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907782 | Wu | May 1999 | A |
5948470 | Harrison et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956216 | Chou | Sep 1999 | A |
6033977 | Gutsche et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6046056 | Parce et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6074827 | Nelson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6096655 | Lee et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6180239 | Whitesides et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6218316 | Marsh | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6232175 | Liu et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6245213 | Olsson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6309580 | Chou | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6326627 | Putvinski et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6329256 | Ibok | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334960 | Willson et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6337262 | Pradeep et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342097 | Terry et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6355198 | Kim et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6387787 | Mancini et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6391217 | Schaffer et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6426288 | Meikle | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6455411 | Jiang et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6468896 | Rohr et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6482742 | Chou | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6503829 | Kim et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6517977 | Resnick et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6517995 | Jacobson et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6518189 | Chou | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6580172 | Mancini et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6646662 | Nebashi et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6696220 | Bailey et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6703190 | Elian et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6713238 | Chou et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6716767 | Shih et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6719915 | Willson et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730256 | Bloomstein et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6737202 | Gehoski et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6743713 | Mukher-Hee-Roy et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6767983 | Fujiyama et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6776094 | Whitesides et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6777170 | Bloomstein et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6809356 | Chou | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6814879 | Shibata | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6820677 | Grinberg et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6828244 | Chou | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6849558 | Schaper | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6870301 | Choi et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6900881 | Sreenivasan et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6908861 | Sreenivasan et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6916584 | Sreenivasan et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6932934 | Choi et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7214624 | Fujita et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
20020038916 | Chiu et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020042027 | Chou et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020094496 | Choi et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020132482 | Chou | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020167117 | Chou | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020177319 | Chou | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030034329 | Chou | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030062334 | Lee et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030080471 | Chou | May 2003 | A1 |
20030080472 | Chou | May 2003 | A1 |
20030184917 | Chang et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040021866 | Watts et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040022888 | Sreenivasan et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040029041 | Shih et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040029396 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040036201 | Chou et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040038552 | Watts et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040046288 | Chou | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040065252 | Sreenivasan et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040065976 | Sreenivasan et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040110856 | Young et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040118809 | Chou et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040124566 | Sreenivasan et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040131718 | Chou et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040137734 | Chou et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040146792 | Nimmakayala et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040156108 | Chou et al | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040188381 | Sreenivasan | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040192041 | Jeong et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040197843 | Chou et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040211754 | Sreenivasan | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040224261 | Resnick et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040250945 | Zheng et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050037143 | Chou et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20060017876 | Watts | Jan 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
58-129074 | Aug 1983 | JP |
1-196749 | Aug 1989 | JP |
02-24848 | Jan 1990 | JP |
02-92603 | Apr 1990 | JP |
02192045 | Jul 1990 | JP |
4-70379 | May 1992 | JP |
WO 8702935 | May 1987 | WO |
WO 9905724 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 0021689 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0147003 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 2005031299 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2005031855 | Apr 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060113697 A1 | Jun 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60632104 | Dec 2004 | US |