EMI shielding for a signal trace

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11363746
  • Patent Number
    11,363,746
  • Date Filed
    Friday, September 6, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 14, 2022
    2 years ago
Abstract
An example apparatus includes a cover to shield, at least partly, a conductive trace on a surface of a circuit board from electromagnetic interference. The cover includes a conductive surface that faces the conductive trace. The cover at least partly encloses a volume over the conductive trace. The volume is for holding air over the conductive trace. One or more contacts electrically connect the conductive surface of the cover to electrical ground on the circuit board.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This specification describes examples of electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding for a signal trace.


BACKGROUND

Crosstalk is a type of electromagnetic interference that results on one conductor from a signal transmitted on a different conductor. Crosstalk can be particularly problematic when two conductors in close proximity to each other carry high-frequency signals. EMI shielding can reduce or eliminate crosstalk and other types of electromagnetic interference between two conductors.


SUMMARY

An example apparatus includes a cover to shield, at least partly, a conductive trace on a surface of a circuit board from electromagnetic interference. The cover includes a conductive surface that faces the conductive trace. The cover at least partly encloses a volume over the conductive trace. The volume is for holding air over the conductive trace. One or more contacts electrically connect the conductive surface of the cover to electrical ground on the circuit board. The example apparatus may include one or more of the following features, either alone or in combination.


The cover may include an indentation that defines the volume at least partly. The indentation may have a lateral width that is between 3 mils (76.2 microns) and 30 mils (762 microns) inclusive. The cover may include multiple indentations, with one of the indentations defining the volume at least partly and with others of the indentations defining other volumes over other conductive traces. Each of the other volumes are for holding air over a corresponding conductive trace.


The volume is a first volume and the conductive trace is a first conductive trace, and the cover may at least partly enclose a second volume that is different from the first volume. The second volume is for holding air over a second conductive trace. The cover may include a first indentation that defines the first volume and a second indentation that defines the second volume. The one or more contacts may include a first contact a side of the first indentation, a second contact on a side of the second indentation, and a third contact between the first indentation and the second indentation. The cover may be configured to hold the air in direct contact with the conductive trace. The one or more contacts may be integral parts of the cover. The one or more contacts may be separate components from the cover.


The conductive surface may include at least one of the following: copper; aluminum; gold; silver; an alloy of copper, aluminum, gold, or silver; or a nickel-cobalt ferrous alloy. An entirety of the cover may include conductive material. The conductive material may form the conductive surface. The cover may include a non-conductive material. The conductive surface may be connected to the non-conductive material.


The cover may include a first indentation that defines the volume at least partly and a second indentation that defines a second volume at least partly. The first indentation may be separated from the second indentation by 78 mils (1981.2 microns) or less at a point on the circuit board containing electrical contacts for the conductive traces. The apparatus may be configured for removal from the circuit board. In an example, the apparatus is not an integral part of the circuit board.


An example test system includes test instruments including a radio frequency (RF) test instrument for sending signals to, and receiving signals from, a device under test (DUT). A device interface board (DIB) is for connecting the test instrument to the DUT. The DIB includes conductive traces on a surface of the DIB. The conductive traces are for carrying the signals. At least some of the signals are at 800 megahertz (MHz) or more. An electromagnetic interference (EMI) shield is attachable to, and removable from, the surface of DIB. The EMI shield includes a cover to enclose one or more of the conductive traces at least partly. The cover includes a conductive material having one or more indentations that define one or more volumes to hold air over the one or more conductive traces. The example system may include one or more of the following features, either alone or in combination.


The cover may include multiple indentations that define multiple volumes to hold air over multiple conductive traces. At least one of the multiple volumes may have a lateral width that is between 3 mils (76.2 microns) and 30 mils (762 microns) inclusive, and at least two of the multiple volumes may be separated by 78 mils (1981.2 microns) or less at a point on the DIB where the DUT connects to the DIB. The EMI shield may include one or more contacts to make an electrical connection between the cover and electrical ground on the DIB. An entirety of the cover may include the conductive material. The cover may include a non-conductive material. The conductive material may be connected to the non-conductive material and may be configured to face the conductive trace. The system may include means for attaching the EMI shield to the DIB. The system may include one or more bars across the cover that are configured to attach the EMI shield to the surface of the DIB. The system may include one or more screws for attaching the EMI shield to the surface of the DIB. The EMI shield may be attached to the surface of the DIB using solder.


The DIB may include first contacts for connecting electrically to one or more of the test instruments and second contacts for connecting electrically to the DUT. The conductive traces may decrease in pitch from locations of the first contacts to locations of the second contacts.


Any two or more of the features described in this specification, including in this summary section, may be combined to form implementations not specifically described in this specification.


At least part of the test systems and processes described in this specification may be configured or controlled by executing, on one or more processing devices, instructions that are stored on one or more non-transitory machine-readable storage media. Examples of non-transitory machine-readable storage media include read-only memory, an optical disk drive, memory disk drive, and random access memory. At least part of the test systems and processes described in this specification may be configured or controlled using a computing system comprised of one or more processing devices and memory storing instructions that are executable by the one or more processing devices to perform various control operations.


The details of one or more implementations are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the following description. Other features and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.





DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a block diagram of components of an example test system on which the example EMI shield described herein may be used.



FIG. 2 is a top view of an example device interface board.



FIG. 3 shows two surfaces of an EMI shield cover, with the surface on the right facing towards conductive traces of a circuit board and with the surface on the left facing away from the conductive traces.



FIG. 4 is a top view showing an EMI shield connected to a device interface board.



FIG. 5 is a cut-away side view of the EMI shield connected to the device interface board.



FIG. 6 is a cut-away side view of the EMI shield connected to a device interface board that contains traces that transmit differential signals.





Like reference numerals in different figures indicate like elements.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Described herein are example EMI shields for shielding conductive traces from electromagnetic interference, such as crosstalk. An example EMI shield includes a cover to shield one or more conductive traces on a surface of a circuit board. The cover includes a conductive surface that faces a conductive trace. The cover at least partly encloses a volume filled with air over the conductive trace. Air provides less electromagnetic resistance than other types of dielectrics. As a result, signals can propagate through the conductive trace more quickly and with less loss of signal integrity. The EMI shield also includes contacts. The contacts may be integral parts of the cover or separate conductive structures that electrically connect to the conductive surface on the cover. The contacts electrically connect the conductive surface to an electrical ground located on or in the circuit board, for example. The resulting EMI shield reduces the amount of electromagnetic interference that reaches the conductive trace and the amount of electromagnetic interference that the conductive trace outputs to neighboring conductive traces. That is, the conductive trace is wholly or partially surrounded by electrically grounded conductive material, which absorbs both incoming and outing electromagnetic interference transmitted through the air.


The example EMI shields are described herein for use with a test system, such as automatic test equipment (ATE). However, the EMI shields are not limited to use with the example test systems described herein or to use with testing in general. Rather, the EMI shields may be used in any appropriate technological context.



FIG. 1 shows components of example ATE 10. In FIG. 1, the dashed lines represent, conceptually, potential signal paths between components of the system.


ATE 10 includes a test head 11 and a host computing system 12. The host computing system is a control system in this example. The host computing system may include a computing system comprised of one or more microprocessors or other appropriate processing devices as described herein. A device interface board (DIB) 16 includes a printed circuit board (PCB) that is connected to test head 11 and that includes mechanical and electrical interfaces to one or more devices under test (DUTs) 21A to 21N that are being tested or are to be tested by the ATE.


In the example of FIG. 1, DIB 16 connects, electrically and mechanically, to test head 11. The DIB includes sites 21, which may include pins, conductive traces, or other points of electrical and mechanical connection to which the DUTs may connect. Test signals, response signals, and other signals pass via test channels over the sites between the DUTs and test instruments. DIB 16 may also include, among other things, connectors, conductive traces, and circuitry for routing signals between the test instruments, DUTs connected to sites 21, and other circuitry.


In some implementations, the conductive traces are on the surface of the DIB. For example, as shown in FIG. 2, example DIB 50 includes three conductive traces 51. Although only three conductive traces are shown, a DIB such as DIB 50 may include any appropriate number of conductive traces arranged in any appropriate configuration. In this regard, example DIB 50 includes contacts 52 for electrically connecting the DIB to one or more test instruments, which are described below. The DIB also includes contacts 54 for electrically connecting a DUT to the DIB. In this example, conductive traces 51 run between contacts 52 and 54. The resulting electrical connections on the DIB allow signals to pass between a DUT and one or more test instruments on the ATE. In this example, the conductive traces decrease in pitch from locations of contacts 52 to locations contacts 54. In an example, pitch includes the distance between adjacent conductive traces. In an example, pitch is defined by the total or partial width across a set of adjacent conductive traces. Decreasing the pitch of the conductive traces increases the likelihood of electromagnetic interference, such as crosstalk, among two or more of the conductive traces.


The example conductive traces 51 run on and along a surface of the DIB. As a result, the conductive traces are at least partly exposed to air. Air has a lower electromagnetic resistance than other types of dielectrics. Therefore, signals may travel through the conductive traces that are exposed to air at a greater speed than through conductive traces that are not exposed to air. This can be particularly advantageous for testing radio frequency (RF) circuitry on a DUT. The DIB may also include electrical connections that run through the interior of the DIB.


Referring back to FIG. 1, host computing system 12 communicates with components of the test head to control testing. For example, host computing system 12 may download test program sets to test instruments 13A to 13N in the test head. The test instruments are hardware devices that may include one or more processing devices and other circuitry. Test instruments 13A to 13N may run the test program sets to test DUTs in communication with the test instruments. Host computing system 12 may also send, to test instruments in the test head, instructions, test data, and/or other information that are usable by the test instruments to perform appropriate tests on DUTs interfaced to the DIB. In some implementations, this information may be sent via a computer or other type of network or via a direct electrical path. In some implementations, this information may be sent via a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN).


In the example of FIG. 1, ATE 10 includes multiple test instruments 13A to 13N, each of which may be configured, as appropriate, to perform one or more of testing and/or other functions. Although only three test instruments are depicted, the system may include any appropriate number of test instruments, including those residing outside of test head 11. In some implementations, each test instrument may be configured to output test signals to test a DUT based, e.g., on data provided by the host computing system, and to receive response signals from the DUT. Different test instruments may be configured to perform different types of tests and/or be configured to test different DUTs. The received signals may include response signals that are based on the test signals and/or signals that originate from the DUT that are not prompted by (e.g., are not in response to) test signals. In some implementations, there may be electrical conductors, such as copper wires, between the DUT, the DIB, and the test instrument interfaces over which test and response signals are sent.


In this example, the test instruments may include one or more RF test instruments. Among their other functions, RF test instruments test RF circuitry on the DUTs. In some examples, DUTs have large numbers of RF ports for sending and receiving RF signals, for example, 128 ports. For example, the RF signals may have frequencies of 800 megahertz (MHz) or more. The more ports, such as RF ports, that a DUT contains, the greater the number of signals that must be sent to and from the DUT. Since there is a limited amount of space on the DIB, this inevitably increases the density of conductive traces on the surface of the DIB. Increasing the density of the conductive traces also increases the likelihood of electromagnetic interference, such as crosstalk, between adjacent or other traces. Accordingly, the example system described herein employs EMI shielding to electromagnetically shield the conductive traces and thereby reduce the EMI interference among the conductive traces. Examples of the EMI shielding are described below. While the shielding may be particularly useful in the case of RF testing, the shielding may be used to electromagnetically shield conductive traces that run between a DUT and any type of test instrument. In this regard, the test system may include types of test instruments other than RF test instruments. For example, the system may include VI (voltage-current) test instruments. In other examples, test instruments may be included that are configured to produce alternating current (AC) voltage and/or AC current signals having frequencies, for example, that are greater than 1 kilohertz (KHZ), on a test channel.


Signals may be sent to, and received from, the DUT over multiple test channels. In some examples, a test channel may include the physical transmission medium or media over which signals are sent from the test instrument to a DUT and over which signals are received from the DUT. Physical transmission media may include, but are not limited to, electrical conductors alone or in combination with optical conductors, wireless transmission media, or both optical conductors and wireless transmission media. In some examples, a test channel may include a range of frequencies over which signals are transmitted over one or more physical transmission media. A test channel may include and/or electrically connect to a conductive trace on the DIB.


Each test instrument has a corresponding interface (I/F) circuit 16A to 16N for outputting signals to, and receiving signals from, a corresponding DUT via the DIB. In some implementations, each interface circuit may be implemented using a device, such as an FPGA, an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), or other appropriate hardware. Input circuitry and output circuitry for a test instrument may reside in the interface of each test instrument. In this regard, each test instrument may include input circuitry for receiving signals from one or more DUTs or other appropriate signal source(s). Each test instrument may also include output circuitry for outputting signals to a communication channel defined by the test instrument.


In the implementation of FIG. 1, test instruments 13A to 13N may be interconnected through backplane 42 or any other appropriate electrical or mechanical mechanism. For example, test instruments 13A to 13N may mechanically interface, e.g., plug into, backplane 42 of FIG. 1. Backplane 42 may include one or more transmission media over which signals pass among the various components of FIG. 1, including the test instruments and the test computer/host computing system. In some implementations, the transmission media may be, or include, one or more serial buses such as a peripheral component interconnect express (PCIe) bus, Ethernet cable, or appropriate types of copper or other conductive transmission media.


In some examples, ATE 10 includes a connection interface 14 that connects test instrument test channels 15 to a DIB 16. Connection interface 14 may include connectors 20 or other devices for routing signals between the test instruments and DIB 16. For example, the connection interface may include one or more circuit boards or other substrates on which such connectors are mounted. Conductors that are included in the test channels may be routed through the connection interface and the DIB.


Referring back to FIG. 2, as noted, conductive traces 51 run between instrument contacts 52 and DUT contacts 54. As also noted, at least part of the conductive traces are disposed on the surface of the DIB and, as a result, at least part of the conductive traces are exposed to air. To shield the conductive traces exposed to air, in an example, an example EMI shield includes a cover that has indentations that complement the shape of at least part of, at least one of, the conductive traces. The cover fits over all or part of the DIB. The cover includes a conductive surface that faces the conductive traces. The conductive surface may be made of any appropriate conductive material, including, but not limited to, one or more of copper; aluminum; gold; silver; an alloy of copper, aluminum, gold, or silver; or a nickel-cobalt ferrous alloy such as Kovar®. In the example of FIG. 3, the surface 55 of cover 56 that faces the conductive traces has indentations 58 that complement (e.g., have complementary shapes as) all of the traces of FIG. 2. The surface 63 of cover 56 that faces away from the conductive traces is also shown in FIG. 3. FIG. 4 shows the cover, which is part of EMI shield 64, over substantially all of the conductive traces on DIB 50.


As noted above, in the example of FIG. 3, the conductive surface of the EMI shield has indentations that complement all traces on the circuit board. However, the indentations may complement only some conductive traces, only parts of the conductive traces, or only parts of only some of the conductive traces. For example, in some cases, only part of the traces may require EMI shielding. For example, in FIG. 2, the pitch of conductive traces at region 60 may be sufficiently large that crosstalk is not a problem and therefore EMI shielding is not required in region 60. Accordingly, in this example, the EMI shielding may be limited to region 61 where the conductive traces are at a finer pitch and, therefore, more susceptible to crosstalk. In some implementations, fewer than all traces may be shielded using the cover. For example, in some implementations, every other trace may be shielded. More specifically, because crosstalk is partly a function of the distance between traces, it may not be necessary to shield every single trace, but rather only to shield enough traces to limit crosstalk between unshielded traces. For example, in the case of FIG. 2, shielding only trace 51b may reduce or eliminate crosstalk since traces 51a and 51c may be too far apart for signals traveling through those traces to interfere electromagnetically with each other.


The indentations on the conductive surface of the EMI shield may be formed using micromachining tools in some implementations. The indentations on the conductive surface may be formed during construction of the conductive surface. For example, the conductive surface may be molded and the mold may include the indentations. For example, the conductive surface may be formed using three-dimensional (3D) printing. For example, the conductive surface may be formed using stamping. Other techniques for forming the conductive surfaces may also be used.


Cover 56 at least partly encloses a volume over a conductive trace. For example, each indentation covers a complementary trace, but is larger than that trace in both width and depth. As a result, when the cover mates to the DIB, a volume is formed over each conductive trace that covers the conductive trace. The volume contains air and holds the air over, and in direct contact with, the conductive trace. As a result, the conductive trace remains exposed to air within the volume, thereby retaining the benefits of being at least partly surrounded by an air dielectric while also being shielded electromagnetically from environmental electromagnetic signals.


The EMI shield includes one or more contacts that electrically connect the conductive surface of the cover to electrical ground on the DIB or other circuit board. In this regard, these contacts may be integral parts of the cover or these contacts may be separate components from the cover. For example, in some implementations, the entire EMI shield, including the cover, may be made of a conductive material, such as copper; aluminum; gold; silver; an alloy of copper, aluminum, gold, or silver; and/or a nickel-cobalt ferrous alloy such as Kovar®. In these examples, the contacts may be formed as an integral part of structure that makes up the EMI shield as shown, for example, in FIGS. 5 and 6. In some implementations, the cover may include a non-conductive material and the conductive surface containing the indentations may be connected to the non-conductive material. For example, the non-conductive material may be plastic or FR-4. The conductive surface may be fixed to the non-conductive material such that the conductive surface faces the conductive traces on the DIB. In such implementations, the contacts to the cover may be integral parts of the conductive surface or they may be separate components that are connected to the cover and that are connected electrically to the conductive surface. The contacts on the EMI shield may be connected to the electrical grounds on the DIB using solder, for example.



FIG. 5 is a side view of example EMI shield 64 connected to example DIB 50. In this example, the EMI shield is not part of the underlying DIB; that is, the EMI shield is not integrated into, or formed with, the DIB. Rather, the shield can be added to, or removed from, the DIB, using appropriate tools. As such, the EMI shield may be reused on circuit boards having a surface trace configuration that matches, in whole or part, the configuration of the indentations on the conductive surface of the EMI shield.


In some implementations, the EMI shield may be connected to the DIB using one or more removable bars across the cover that are configured to be tightened to attach the EMI shield to the surface of the DIB. In some implementations, the EMI shield may be connected to the DIB using one or more removable screws. For example, FIG. 4 shows four screw holes 81 for attaching the EMI shield to the DIB.


In the example of FIG. 5, the cover includes three indentations, with one of the indentations defining a volume over conductive trace 51a and with others of the indentations defining other volumes over the other conductive traces. The volumes thus include a first volume 65a for first conductive trace 51a, a different second volume 65b for second conductive trace 51b, and a different third volume 65c for third conductive trace 51c. As shown, each volume is fully or partially electromagnetically isolated from the other volumes and each trace 51a, 51b, and 51c is exposed to air in respective volumes 65a, 65b, and 65c. The contacts include a first contact 66a on a side of the indentation defining volume 65a, a second contact 66b on a side of the indentation defining volume 65c, and contacts 66c and 66d between indentations and between the other two contacts 66a and 66b. As shown in FIG. 5, the contacts connect electrically to an electrical ground plane 68 in the DIB. In some implementations, the volumes are air-tight, whereas in other implementations the volumes are not air-tight. In some implementations, there may be parts of the conductive traces that are not covered by the EMI shield; that is, each volume may cover only part of a conductive trace.


In some implementations, each conductive trace may be shielded in a separate volume, as shown in FIG. 5. This may reduce the chances of crosstalk or other electromagnetic interference between adjacent conductive traces. In some implementations, conductive traces that carry differential signals are shielded in the same volume. For example, as shown in FIG. 6, in EMI shield 69, differential signal pair 70 is shielded within volume 71 and differential signal pair 72 is shielded within volume 73. The remaining features of the DIB and the EMI shield are the same as, or substantially the same as, the features described with respect to FIGS. 1 to 5.


The EMI shield and the indentations may have any appropriate sizes and shapes. In an example, a volume created by an indentation over a conductive trace has a lateral width that is between 3 mils (76.2 microns) and 30 mils (762 microns) inclusive (e.g., 5 mils (126 microns)). In an example, at least two of multiple volumes created by the EMI shield over different traces are separated by 78 mils (1981.2 microns) or less at a point on the DIB where the DUT connects to the DIB.


In some implementations, a conductive plate having micro-machined grooves or channels creates shielding and/or an impedance structure to surface traces, which are single-ended or differential, on a printed circuit board (PCB). The plate may be mechanically attached to the PCB's outer layers. The added shielding that the plate provides will enable signals to be brought closer together at faster speeds.


All or part of the test systems and processes described in this specification and their various modifications may be configured or controlled at least in part by one or more computers such as host computing system 12 using one or more computer programs tangibly embodied in one or more information carriers, such as in one or more non-transitory machine-readable storage media. A computer program can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, part, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a network.


Actions associated with configuring or controlling the test systems and processes can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to control all or some of the well formation operations described previously. All or part of the test systems and processes can be configured or controlled by special purpose logic circuitry, such as, an FPGA (field programmable gate array) and/or an ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit).


Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read-only storage area or a random access storage area or both. Elements of a computer include one or more processors for executing instructions and one or more storage area devices for storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from, or transfer data to, or both, one or more machine-readable storage media, such as mass storage devices for storing data, such as magnetic, magneto-optical disks, or optical disks. Non-transitory machine-readable storage media suitable for embodying computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile storage area, including by way of example, semiconductor storage area devices, such as EPROM (erasable programmable read-only memory), EEPROM (electrically erasable programmable read-only memory), and flash storage area devices; magnetic disks, such as internal hard disks or removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and CD-ROM (compact disc read-only memory) and DVD-ROM (digital versatile disc read-only memory).


Elements of different implementations described may be combined to form other implementations not specifically set forth previously. Elements may be left out of the systems described previously without adversely affecting their operation or the operation of the system in general. Furthermore, various separate elements may be combined into one or more individual elements to perform the functions described in this specification.


Other implementations not specifically described in this specification are also within the scope of the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus comprising: a cover to shield, at least partly, a conductive trace on a surface of a circuit board from electromagnetic interference, the cover comprising a conductive surface that faces the conductive trace, the cover at least partly enclosing a volume over the conductive trace, the volume for holding air over the conductive trace, and the volume having a shape that is complementary to a shape of at least part of the conductive trace that extends between two electrical contacts, where the shape that is complementary comprises an indentation having a shape that tracks a shape of the conductive trace; andone or more ground contacts that electrically connect the conductive surface of the cover to electrical ground on the circuit board.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the indentation has a shape that tracks a shape of an entirety of the conductive trace.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the indentation has a lateral width that is between 3 mils (76.2 microns) and 30 mils (762 microns) inclusive.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the cover comprises multiple indentations, the indentations the indentation defines the volume at least partly and with others of the indentations defining other volumes over other conductive traces, each of the other volumes for holding air over a corresponding conductive trace.
  • 5. An apparatus comprising: a cover to shield, at least partly, a conductive trace on a surface of a circuit board from electromagnetic interference, the cover comprising a conductive surface that faces the conductive trace, the cover at least partly enclosing a volume over the conductive trace, the volume for holding air over the conductive trace; andone or more contacts that electrically connect the conductive surface of the cover to electrical ground on the circuit board;wherein the volume is a first volume and the conductive trace is a first conductive trace; andwherein the cover at least partly encloses a second volume that is different from the first volume, the second volume for holding air over a second conductive trace.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the cover comprises a first indentation that defines the first volume and a second indentation that defines the second volume.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein the one or more contacts comprises a first contact on a side of the first indentation, a second contact on a side of the second indentation, and a third contact between the first indentation and the second indentation.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the cover is configured to hold the air in direct contact with the conductive trace.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the one or more contacts are integral parts of the cover.
  • 10. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the one or more contacts are separate components from the cover.
  • 11. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the conductive surface comprises at least one of the following: copper; aluminum; gold; silver; an alloy of copper, aluminum, gold, or silver, or a nickel-cobalt ferrous alloy.
  • 12. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein an entirety of the cover comprises conductive material, the conductive material forming the conductive surface.
  • 13. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the cover comprises a non-conductive material; the conductive surface being connected to the non-conductive material.
  • 14. An apparatus comprising: a cover to shield, at least partly, a conductive trace on a surface of a circuit board from electromagnetic interference, the cover comprising a conductive surface that faces the conductive trace, the cover at least partly enclosing a volume over the conductive trace, the volume for holding air over the conductive trace; andone or more ground contacts that electrically connect the conductive surface of the cover to electrical ground on the circuit board;wherein the cover comprises a first indentation that defines the volume at least partly and a second indentation that defines a second volume at least partly, the first indentation being separated from the second indentation by 78 mils (1981.2 microns) or less at a point on the circuit board containing electrical contacts for the conductive traces.
  • 15. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the apparatus is configured for removal from the circuit board.
  • 16. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the apparatus is not an integral part of the circuit board.
  • 17. A test system comprising: test instruments including a radio frequency (RF) test instrument for sending signals to, and receiving signals from, a device under test (DUI);a device interface board (DIB) for connecting the test instrument to the DUT, the DIB comprising conductive traces on a surface of the DIB, the conductive traces for carrying the signals, at least some of the signals being at 800 megahertz (MHz) or more; andan electromagnetic interference (EMI) shield that is attachable to, and removable from, the surface of DIB, the EMI shield comprising the apparatus of claim 1;wherein the circuit board comprises the DIB;wherein the conductive trace is among the conductive traces on the DIB; andwherein the cover is configured to shield, at least partly, the conductive traces on the DIB from electromagnetic interference, the conductive surface of the cover facing the conductive traces on the DIB, the cover at least partly enclosing a volume over each of the conductive traces on the DIB, each volume for holding air over a corresponding conductive trace.
  • 18. The test system of claim 17, wherein the cover comprises multiple indentations that define multiple volumes to hold air over the conductive traces, at least one of the multiple volumes having a lateral width that is between 3 mils (76.2 microns) and 30 mils (762 microns) inclusive, and at least two of the multiple volumes being separated by 78 mils (1981.2 microns) or less at a point on the DIB where the DUT connects to the DIB.
  • 19. The test system of claim 17, wherein the EMI shield comprises multiple ground contacts to make an electrical connection between the cover and electrical ground on the DIB.
  • 20. The test system of claim 17, wherein an entirety of the cover comprises the conductive material.
  • 21. The test system of claim 17, wherein the cover comprises a non-conductive material, the conductive material being connected to the non-conductive material and being configured to face the conductive trace.
  • 22. The test system of claim 17, further comprising means for attaching the cover to the DIB.
  • 23. The test system of claim 17, further comprising one or more bars across the cover that are configured to attach the cover to the surface of the DIB.
  • 24. The test system of claim 17, further comprising one or more screws for attaching the EMI shield to the surface of the DIB.
  • 25. The test system of claim 17, wherein the cover is attached to the surface of the DIB using solder.
  • 26. The test system of claim 17, wherein the DIB comprises first contacts for connecting electrically to one or more of the test instruments and second contacts for connecting electrically to the DUT, the conductive traces decreasing in pitch from locations of the first contacts to locations of the second contacts.
US Referenced Citations (144)
Number Name Date Kind
3516077 Bobeck et al. Jun 1970 A
3577131 Morrow et al. May 1971 A
3673433 Kupfer Jun 1972 A
3934236 Aiken et al. Jan 1976 A
4021790 Aiken et al. May 1977 A
4117543 Minnick et al. Sep 1978 A
4692839 Lee et al. Sep 1987 A
4729166 Lee et al. Mar 1988 A
4754546 Lee et al. Jul 1988 A
4757256 Whann et al. Jul 1988 A
4758785 Rath Jul 1988 A
4778950 Lee et al. Oct 1988 A
4804132 DiFrancesco Feb 1989 A
4912399 Greub et al. Mar 1990 A
4918383 Huff et al. Apr 1990 A
4922192 Gross et al. May 1990 A
4954873 Lee et al. Sep 1990 A
4975638 Evans et al. Dec 1990 A
4980637 Huff et al. Dec 1990 A
5020219 Leedy Jun 1991 A
5072176 Miller et al. Dec 1991 A
5083697 DiFrancesco Jan 1992 A
5105557 Leedy Apr 1992 A
5132613 Papae et al. Jul 1992 A
5180977 Huff et al. Jan 1993 A
5264787 Woith et al. Nov 1993 A
5355079 Evans et al. Oct 1994 A
5378982 Feigenbaum et al. Jan 1995 A
5416429 McQuade et al. May 1995 A
5422574 Kister Jun 1995 A
5456404 Robinette, Jr. et al. Oct 1995 A
5468157 Roebuck et al. Nov 1995 A
5469072 Williams et al. Nov 1995 A
5623213 Liu et al. Apr 1997 A
5914613 Gleason et al. Jun 1999 A
5968282 Yamasaka Oct 1999 A
5973405 Keukelaar et al. Oct 1999 A
6246245 Akram et al. Jun 2001 B1
6256882 Gleason et al. Jul 2001 B1
6307387 Gleason et al. Oct 2001 B1
6356098 Akram et al. Mar 2002 B1
6359337 Keukelaar et al. Mar 2002 B1
6437584 Gleason et al. Aug 2002 B1
6444922 Kwong Sep 2002 B1
6494734 Shuey Dec 2002 B1
6499216 Fjelstad et al. Dec 2002 B1
6566898 Theissen et al. May 2003 B2
6578264 Gleason et al. Jun 2003 B1
6586955 Fjelstad et al. Jul 2003 B2
6633175 Evans et al. Oct 2003 B1
6661244 McQuade et al. Dec 2003 B2
6690186 Fjelstad et al. Feb 2004 B2
6708386 Gleason et al. Mar 2004 B2
6756797 Brandorff et al. Jun 2004 B2
6825677 Gleason et al. Nov 2004 B2
6838890 Tervo et al. Jan 2005 B2
6860009 Gleason et al. Mar 2005 B2
6911835 Chraft et al. Jun 2005 B2
6927585 Gleason et al. Aug 2005 B2
6927586 Thiessen Aug 2005 B2
6930498 Tervo et al. Aug 2005 B2
6965244 Miller et al. Nov 2005 B2
7084657 Matsumura Aug 2006 B2
7109731 Gleason et al. Sep 2006 B2
7148711 Tervo et al. Dec 2006 B2
7161363 Gleason et al. Jan 2007 B2
7178236 Gleason et al. Feb 2007 B2
7227371 Miller Jun 2007 B2
7233160 Hayden et al. Jun 2007 B2
7266889 Gleason et al. Sep 2007 B2
7271603 Gleason et al. Sep 2007 B2
7285969 Hayden et al. Oct 2007 B2
7304488 Gleason et al. Dec 2007 B2
7355420 Smith et al. Apr 2008 B2
7368927 Smith et al. May 2008 B2
7400155 Gleason et al. Jul 2008 B2
7403025 Tervo et al. Jul 2008 B2
7403028 Campbell et al. Jul 2008 B2
7417446 Hayden et al. Aug 2008 B2
7420381 Burcham et al. Sep 2008 B2
7427868 Strid et al. Sep 2008 B2
7436194 Gleason et al. Oct 2008 B2
7443181 Miller Oct 2008 B2
7443186 Strid et al. Oct 2008 B2
7449899 Campbell et al. Nov 2008 B2
7453275 Yamaguchi Nov 2008 B2
7453276 Hayden et al. Nov 2008 B2
7456646 Hayden et al. Nov 2008 B2
7482823 Gleason et al. Jan 2009 B2
7489149 Gleason et al. Feb 2009 B2
7492175 Smith et al. Feb 2009 B2
7495461 Hayden et al. Feb 2009 B2
7498829 Gleason et al. Mar 2009 B2
7501842 Gleason et al. Mar 2009 B2
7504842 Schwindt Mar 2009 B2
7514944 Smith et al. Apr 2009 B2
7518387 Gleason et al. Apr 2009 B2
7533462 Gleason et al. May 2009 B2
7535247 Andrews et al. May 2009 B2
7541821 Gleason et al. Jun 2009 B2
7601039 Eldridge et al. Oct 2009 B2
7609077 Campbell et al. Oct 2009 B2
7619419 Campbell Nov 2009 B2
7656172 Andrews et al. Feb 2010 B2
7681312 Gleason et al. Mar 2010 B2
7688097 Hayden et al. Mar 2010 B2
7723999 Strid et al. May 2010 B2
7750652 Campbell Jul 2010 B2
7759953 Strid et al. Jul 2010 B2
7761983 Hayden et al. Jul 2010 B2
7761986 Gleason et al. Jul 2010 B2
7764072 Strid et al. Jul 2010 B2
7764075 Miller Jul 2010 B2
7791361 Karklin et al. Sep 2010 B2
7800001 Hamada et al. Sep 2010 B2
7876114 Campbell et al. Jan 2011 B2
7888957 Smith et al. Feb 2011 B2
7893704 Gleason et al. Feb 2011 B2
7898273 Gleason et al. Mar 2011 B2
7898281 Andrews et al. Mar 2011 B2
7934944 Hamada et al. May 2011 B2
7934945 Narita et al. May 2011 B2
7940069 Andrews et al. May 2011 B2
8013623 Burcham et al. Sep 2011 B2
8033838 Eldridge et al. Oct 2011 B2
8202684 Hamada et al. Jun 2012 B2
8373428 Eldridge et al. Feb 2013 B2
8410806 Smith Apr 2013 B2
8451017 Gleason et al. May 2013 B2
9435855 Lewinnek et al. Sep 2016 B2
20030122538 Parrish et al. Jul 2003 A1
20050223543 Cohen et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060124927 Groves et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060272856 Arnold Dec 2006 A1
20080061808 Mok et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080100323 Mayder May 2008 A1
20080265919 Izadian Oct 2008 A1
20110095778 Chou et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110133738 Abbink Jun 2011 A1
20120017428 Hsu et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120034820 Lang et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120175612 Ding et al. Jul 2012 A1
20140253109 Singh Sep 2014 A1
20150091594 Hamilton Apr 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
0298219 Jan 1989 EP
0361779 Apr 1990 EP
1988005544 Jul 1988 WO
2013134568 Sep 2013 WO
2019152762 Aug 2019 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (27)
Entry
“New Product Release: Reliant Switch for better RF testing,” DowKey.com, copyright 2010, retrieved on Feb. 3, 2015, http://www.dowkey.coininews details.php?id=110.
“Reliant Switch High Repeatability”, DowKey.com, Data Sheet; retrieved on Feb. 3, 2015; http://www.dowkey.com news at h file s,10,1.21k12 1 . . . , Reliant Switch . . . patasheet.pdf.
Kister et al., “Test Cost Reduction Using the Membrane Probe”, Probe Technology, Santa Clara, CA (at least before Apr. 22, 1997, the issue date of U.S. Pat. No. 5,623,213).
Fisher et al., “Reducing Test Costs for High-Speed and High Pin-Count Devices”, Probe Technology, Feb. 1992, Santa Clara, CA.
Fresh Quest Corporation, “Fresh Quest Corporation Announces the Deliver of QC2TM Bare Die Carriers and QPCTM Probe Cards for the Production of Known Good Die”, Chandler, AZ (at least before Apr. 22, 1997, the issue date of U.S. Pat. No. 5,623,213).
Fresh Quest Corporation, “Quest Pricing Guidelines” (at least before Apr. 22, 1997, the issue date of U.S. Pat. No. 5,623,213).
Hewlett Packard, “High Speed Wafer Probing with the HP 83000 Model F660”, 1993, Germany.
Hughes Aircraft Company, “Additional Technical Data for Hughes' Membrane Test Probe”, 1993.
Hughes, “Membrane Wafer Probe—The Future of the IC Test Industry” (at least before Apr. 22, 1997, the issue date of U.S. Pat. No. 5,623,213).
Packard Hughes Interconnect, “Science Over Art, Our New IC Membrane Test Probe”, 1993, Irvine, CA.
Packard Hughes Interconnect, “Our New IC Membrane Test Probe. It's priced the Same, But It Costs Less.”, 1993, Irvine, CA.
Probe Technology, “Membrane Probe Card—The Concept” (at least before Apr. 22, 1997, the issue date of U.S. Pat. No. 5,623,213).
Probe Technology, “Prober Interface Unit for HP83000 Model—INT768” (at least before Apr. 22, 1997, the issue date of U.S. Pat. No. 5,623,213).
Chong et al., “The Evolution of MCM Test from High Performance Bipolar Mainframe Multichip Modules to Low Cost Work Station Mulitchip Modules”, ICEMM Proceedings '93, pp. 404-410.
Doane, D., “Foreword: Advancing MCM Technologies”, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology—Part B:Advanced Packaging, 17(1):1 (Feb. 1994).
Davidson, E., “Design, Analysis, Applications”, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, Manufacturing Technology—Part B: Advanced Packaging, 17(1):2 (Feb. 1994).
Russell, T., “Testing”, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, Manufacturing Technology—Part B: Advanced Packaging, 17(1):2 (Feb. 1994).
Marshall et al., “CAD-Based Net Capacitance Testing of Unpopulated MCM Substrates”, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, Manufacturing Technology—Part B: Advanced Packaging, 17(1):50-55 (Feb. 1994).
Economikos et al., “Electrical Test of Multichip Substrates”, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, Manufacturing Technology—Part B: Advanced Packaging, 17(1):56-61 (Feb. 1994).
Brunner et al., “Electron-Beam MCM Testing and Probing”, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, Manufacturing Technology—Part B: Advanced Packaging (1994).
Weste, et al., Principles of CMOS VLSI Design: A Systems Perspective, 2nd Ed., Chapter 8 (1993).
Reid et al., “Micromachined Rectangular-Coaxial Transmission Lines”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 54, No. 8 (Aug. 2006).
Ralston et al., “Liquid-Metal Vertical Interconnects for Flip Chip Assembly of GaAs C-Band Power Amplifiers Onto Micro-Rectangular Coaxial Transmission Lines”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 47, No. 10 (Oct. 2012).
International Search Report and Written Opinion; PCT/US2014/063646; dated Jan. 28, 2015; 15 pp.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/048933, dated Mar. 17, 2022, (7 pages).
Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/048933, dated Dec. 8, 2020, (5 pages).
International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/048933, dated Dec. 8, 2020, (5 pages).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210076546 A1 Mar 2021 US