Patent Application
20220155142
This invention relates to illumination devices comprising light emitting diodes (LEDs) and, more particularly, to an improved emitter module design for an LED illumination device.
The following descriptions and examples are provided as background only and are intended to reveal information that is believed to be of possible relevance to the present invention. No admission is necessarily intended, or should be construed, that any of the following information constitutes prior art impacting the patentable character of the subject matter claimed herein.
Lamps and displays using LEDs (light emitting diodes) for illumination are becoming increasingly popular in many different markets. LEDs provide a number of advantages over traditional light sources, such as incandescent and fluorescent light bulbs, including low power consumption, long lifetime, no hazardous materials, and additional specific advantages for different applications. When used for general illumination, LEDs provide the opportunity to adjust the color (e.g., from white, to blue, to green, etc.) or the color temperature (e.g., from “warm white” to “cool white”) to produce different lighting effects.
Although LEDs have many advantages over conventional light sources, one disadvantage of LEDs is that their output characteristics (e.g., luminous flux and chromaticity) vary over changes in drive current, temperature and over time as the LEDs age. These effects are particularly evident in multi-colored LED illumination devices, which combine a number of differently-colored emission LEDs into a single package.
An example of a multi-colored LED illumination device is one in which two or more different colors of LEDs are combined within the same package to produce white or near-white light. There are many different types of white light lamps on the market, some of which combine red, green, and blue (RGB) LEDs, red, green, blue, and yellow (RGBY) LEDs, phosphor-converted white and red (WR) LEDs, RGBW LEDs, etc. By combining different colors of LEDs within the same package and driving the differently-colored LEDs with different drive currents, these lamps may be configured to generate white or near-white light within a wide gamut of color points or correlated color temperatures (CCTs) ranging from “warm white” (e.g., roughly 2600 K-3700 K), to “neutral white” (e.g., 3700 K-5000 K) to “cool white” (e.g., 5000 K-8300 K). Some multi-colored LED illumination devices also enable the brightness and/or color of the illumination to be changed to a particular set point. These tunable illumination devices should all produce the same color and color rendering index (CRI) when set to a particular dimming level and chromaticity setting (or color set point) on a standardized chromaticity diagram.
A chromaticity diagram maps the gamut of colors the human eye can perceive in terms of chromaticity coordinates and spectral wavelengths. The spectral wavelengths of all saturated colors are distributed around the edge of an outlined space (called the “gamut” of human vision), which encompasses all the hues perceived by the human eye. The curved edge of the gamut is called the spectral locus and corresponds to monochromatic light, with each point representing a pure hue of a single wavelength. The straight edge on the lower part of the gamut is called the line of purples. These colors, although they are on the border of the gamut, have no counterpart in monochromatic light. Less saturated colors appear in the interior of the figure, with white and near-white colors near the center.
In the 1931 CIE Chromaticity Diagram, colors within the gamut of human vision are mapped in terms of chromaticity coordinates (x, y). For example, a red (R) LED with a peak wavelength of 625 nm may have a chromaticity coordinate of (0.69, 0.31), a green (G) LED with a peak wavelength of 528 nm may have a chromaticity coordinate of (0.18, 0.73), and a blue (B) LED with a peak wavelength of 460 nm may have a chromaticity coordinate of (0.14, 0.04). The chromaticity coordinates (i.e., color points) that lie along the blackbody locus obey Planck's equation, E(λ)=Aλ−5/(e(B/T)−1). Color points that lie on or near the blackbody locus provide a range of white or near-white light with color temperatures ranging between approximately 2500 K and 10,000 K. These color points are typically achieved by mixing light from two or more differently colored LEDs. For example, light emitted from the RGB LEDs shown in
Although an illumination device is typically configured to produce a range of white or near-white color temperatures arranged along the blackbody curve (e.g., about 2500 K to 5000 K), some illumination devices may be configured to produce any color within the color gamut 18 (triangle) formed by the individual LEDs (e.g., RGB). The chromaticity coordinates of the combined light, e.g., (0.437, 0.404) for 3000 K white light, define the target chromaticity or color set point at which the device is intended to operate. In some devices, the target chromaticity or color set point may be changed by altering the ratio of drive currents supplied to the individual LEDs.
In general, the target chromaticity of the illumination device may be changed by adjusting the drive current levels (in current dimming) or duty cycle (in PWM dimming) supplied to one or more of the emission LEDs. For example, an illumination device comprising RGB LEDs may be configured to produce “warmer” white light by increasing the drive current supplied to the red LEDs and decreasing the drive currents supplied to the blue and/or green LEDs. Since adjusting the drive currents also affects the lumen output and temperature of the illumination device, the target chromaticity must be carefully calibrated and controlled to ensure that the actual chromaticity equals the target value. Most prior art illumination devices fail to provide an accurate calibration and compensation method for controlling the color of the illumination device.
Some prior art illumination devices also provide dimming capabilities, i.e., the ability to change the brightness or luminous flux output from the emission LEDs, in addition to (or instead of) color tuning. In most cases, the dimming level is changed by adjusting the drive current levels (in current dimming) or the duty cycle of the drive currents (in PWM dimming) supplied to all emission LEDs to produce a target dimming level. However, adjusting the supplied drive currents changes the chromaticity of the illumination, and this change in chromaticity differs for different LED devices and different dimming methods. For example, the chromaticity of an RGB LED illumination device may change rather significantly with changes drive current level and duty cycle, while the chromaticity of a phosphor-converted white LED illumination device is more consistent. In order to maintain a consistent target chromaticity, a range of target chromaticity values must be carefully calibrated over a range of target dimming levels.
In practice, the lumen output and chromaticity produced by prior art illumination devices often differs from the target dimming level and target chromaticity setting, due to changes in temperature and over time as the LEDs age. In general, changes in temperature affect the lumen output and chromaticity of all phosphor-converted and non-phosphor-converted LEDs. While prior art devices may perform some level of temperature compensation, they fail to provide accurate results by failing to recognize that temperature affects the lumen output and chromaticity of different colors of LEDs differently. Moreover, these prior art devices fail to account for chromaticity shifts in the illumination produced by phosphor-converted LEDs, which result from phosphor aging. As a consequence, these prior art devices cannot maintain a desired luminous flux and a desired chromaticity for an LED illumination device over operating conditions and over the lifetime of the illumination device.
A need remains for improved illumination devices and methods for calibrating and compensating individual LEDs within an LED illumination device, so as to accurately maintain a desired luminous flux and a desired chromaticity for the illumination device over changes in temperature, changes in drive current and over time, as the LEDs age. This need is particularly warranted in multi-color LED illumination devices, since different colors of LEDs are affected differently by temperature and age, and in tunable illumination devices that enable the target dimming level and/or the target chromaticity setting to be changed by adjusting the drive currents supplied to one or more of the LEDs, since changes in drive current inherently affect the lumen output, color, and temperature of the illumination device.
The following description of various embodiments of illumination devices is not to be construed in any way as limiting the subject matter of the appended claims.
Various embodiments of improved emitter modules for a light emitting diodes (LED) illumination device are provided herein. In general, the improved emitter modules disclosed herein may utilize a single-layer substrate or a multiple-layer substrate, which is designed to improve thermal separation between the emission LEDs, and between the emission LEDs and the photodetectors, while also providing good thermal conductivity to the heat sink. The multiple-layer substrate further includes multiple routing and dielectric layers, which provides enhanced routing flexibility for connecting chains of the emission LEDs together, and electrically isolates the emission LEDs and photodetectors from the heat sink.
According to one embodiment, an illumination device is provided herein comprising one or more emitter modules, wherein each emitter module generally includes a plurality of emission LEDs configured for producing illumination for the illumination device, and one or more photodetectors configured for detecting the illumination produced by the plurality of LEDs. In general, the plurality of LEDs and the one or more photodetectors are mounted upon a substrate and encapsulated within a primary optics structure. A heat sink is coupled to a bottom surface of the substrate for dissipating heat generated by the emitter module.
The emitter module may include substantially any number and color of emission LEDs and substantially any number and color of photodetectors. In one exemplary embodiment, the emission LEDs include one or more red LEDs, one or more blue LEDs, one or more green LEDs and one or more white or yellow LEDs. The emission LEDs may generally be arranged in an array near the center of the primary optics structure, and the one or more photodetectors may generally be arranged about a periphery of the array. In one exemplary embodiment, the one or more photodetectors may include one or more red, orange, yellow, and/or green LEDs. In some embodiments, the one or more photodetectors may be omitted if one or more of the emission LEDs are configured, at times, for detecting incident light.
The primary optics structure may be formed from a variety of different materials and may have substantially any shape and/or dimensions necessary to shape the light emitted by the emission LEDs in a desirable manner. In some embodiments, the primary optics structure may have a dome shape. However, one skilled in the art would understand how the primary optics structure may have substantially any other shape or configuration, which encapsulates the emission LEDs and the one or more photodetectors. In some embodiments, the shape, size, and material of the dome may be generally designed to improve optical efficiency and color mixing within the emitter module.
The heat sink is coupled to a bottom surface of the substrate for drawing heat away from the heat generating components of the emitter module. In general, the heat sink may comprise substantially any material with relatively high thermal and electrical conductivity. In some embodiments, the heat sink is formed from a material having a thermal conductivity that ranges between about 200 W/(mK) and about 400 W/(mK). In one embodiment, the heat sink is formed from a copper or copper-alloy material, or an aluminum or aluminum-alloy material. In some embodiments, the heat sink may be a relatively thick layer ranging between about 1 mm and about 10 mm, and in one embodiment, may be about 3 mm thick.
The substrate is generally configured to provide a relatively high thermal impedance in the lateral direction, and a relatively low thermal impedance in the vertical direction. In one embodiment, the substrate is formed so as to include only a single layer of material. In order to provide the relatively high thermal impedance in the lateral direction, the single-layer substrate may be formed from a material having a relatively high thermal impedance, or a relatively low thermal conductivity. In one example, the substrate may be formed from a material (e.g., aluminum nitride) having a thermal conductivity less than about 150 W/(mK), a material (e.g., aluminum oxide) having a thermal conductivity less than about 30 W/(mK), or a material (e.g., a PTFE or other laminate material) having a thermal conductivity less than about 1 W/(mK).
In general, the single-layer substrate may provide the relatively low thermal impedance in the vertical direction by providing a relatively low thermal impedance path between each of the emission LEDs and each of the one or more photodetectors to the heat sink. In some embodiments, the low thermal impedance paths may be implemented by minimizing a thickness of the substrate and connecting each of the LEDs and each of the one or more photodetectors to the heat sink with a plurality of thermally conductive lines. For example, a thickness of the substrate may range between about 300 μm and about 500 μm.
The plurality of thermally conductive lines may comprise substantially any thermally conductive material. In some embodiments, the thermally conductive lines may be formed from a material having a thermal conductivity that ranges between about 200 W/(mK) and about 400 W/(mK). The material used for the thermally conductive lines may be the same material used for the heat sink or may be different. In one embodiment, the thermally conductive lines are formed from an aluminum, aluminum-alloy, copper, or copper-alloy material. The plurality of thermally conductive lines may be formed by drilling vertical holes through the substrate (using any mechanical or optical means), and filling or plating the holes (or vias) with a metal material using any appropriate method. In some embodiments, each thermally conductive line may comprise a plurality (e.g., about 10-20) of densely-packed vias, with each via being only a couple of hundred microns wide.
While the single-layer substrate provides desirable thermal characteristics (e.g., good thermal separation between emission LEDs and between emission LEDs and photodetectors, and good thermal conductivity to the heat sink), it may not provide the electrical characteristics that are desired in some emitter modules. In order to provide improve routing flexibility and electrical isolation the emission LEDs and photodetectors and the heat sink, a preferred embodiment of the invention may utilize a multiple-layer substrate.
According to one embodiment, a multiple-layer substrate may include a first routing layer, a first dielectric layer, a second routing layer, and a second dielectric layer. The first routing layer may be coupled to the electrical contacts of the emission LEDs and the one or more photodetectors and may be formed on the first dielectric layer. In some cases, the first routing layer may have a thickness that ranges between about 10 μm to about 20 μm, and may be formed of a material (e.g., a copper or aluminum material, or an alloy thereof) having a thermal conductivity that ranges between 200 W/(mK) and about 400 W/(mK).
The first dielectric layer 116 is coupled to a bottom surface of the first routing layer and is sandwiched between the first routing layer and the second routing layer for electrically isolating the electrical contacts of the emission LEDs and the photodetectors from the heat sink. In some embodiments, the first dielectric layer may be a relatively thin layer having a thickness between about 10 μm and about 100 μm and may be formed from a dielectric material having a relative permittivity that ranges between about 3 and 12. In one example, the first dielectric layer may be formed from an aluminum nitride material or an aluminum oxide material but is not limited to such materials.
In addition to providing electrical isolation, the first dielectric layer provides a relatively high thermal impedance in the lateral direction by using a material with a relatively low thermal conductivity, which is less than about 150 W/(mK) and keeping the thickness of the layer small relative to the spacing between the emission LEDs and the photodetectors. In one exemplary embodiment, the first dielectric layer may have a thickness of about 30 μm, and the emission LEDs and photodetectors may be spaced at least 200-300 μm apart on an upper surface of the multiple-layer substrate. Such an embodiment would provide at least 10 times higher thermal conductivity in the vertical direction than in the lateral direction.
The second routing layer is coupled between the first dielectric layer and the second dielectric layer and is generally configured for routing signals between the first routing layer and external electrical contacts (not shown) arranged outside of the primary optics structure. Like the first routing layer, the second routing layer may have a thickness that ranges between about 10 μm to about 20 μm, and may be formed of a material (e.g., a copper or aluminum material, or an alloy thereof) having a thermal conductivity that ranges between 200 W/(mK) and about 400 W/(mK). In some embodiments, vias may be formed within the first dielectric layer to route signals between the first routing layer and the second routing layer. These vias may be formed in accordance with any known process.
In some embodiments, the second dielectric layer may be coupled between the second routing layer and the heat sink. In other embodiments, a third routing layer may be coupled between the second dielectric layer and the heat sink. Unlike the first and second routing layers, which comprise metal lines printed on the first and second dielectric layers, the third routing layer may extend substantially continuously across an upper surface of the heat sink for improving the thermal contact between the plurality of thermally conductive lines and the heat sink and improving heat spreading there across.
Like the first dielectric layer, the second dielectric layer may be configured to provide a relatively high thermal impedance in the lateral direction by using a material with a relatively low thermal conductivity. For example, the second dielectric layer may be formed from a ceramic material (e.g., aluminum nitride) having a thermal conductivity less than about 150 W/(mK), or a ceramic material (e.g., aluminum oxide) having a thermal conductivity less than about 30 W/(mK). However, the first and second dielectric layers are not limited to ceramic materials, or even dielectric materials. In some embodiments, these layers may be formed using a laminate material, such as a printed circuit board (PCB) FR4 or a metal clad PCB material. However, since the thermal conductivity of laminate materials (e.g., less than about 1 W/(mK)) is significantly less than that of ceramic materials, using a laminate material in lieu of a ceramic material would reduce the thermal conductivity of the second dielectric layer.
Unlike the first dielectric layer, which is relatively thin, the second dielectric layer provides rigidity to the emitter module by utilizing a relatively thick layer (e.g., about 100 μm and about 1000 μm). In addition, the second dielectric layer includes a plurality of thermally conductive lines, which extend vertically through the second dielectric layer between the second routing layer and the heat sink, to improve thermal conductivity in the vertical direction.
As noted above, the plurality of thermally conductive lines may be formed from a material having a thermal conductivity that ranges between about 200 W/(mK) and about 400 W/(mK), such as a copper or aluminum material, or an alloy thereof, and may be formed by drilling vertical holes through the second dielectric layer (using any mechanical or optical means), and filling or plating the holes (or vias) with an appropriate metal material using any appropriate method. In some embodiments, each thermally conductive line may comprise a plurality (e.g., about 10-20) of densely-packed vias, with each via being a couple of hundred microns wide. In some embodiments, thermal conductivity may be further improved in the vertical direction by increasing the number of thermally conductive lines included under the emission LEDs. While this approach would provide better overall thermal conductivity from the LED array to the heat sink, it may provide worse thermal separation between the emission LEDs.
Other objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the accompanying drawings.
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof are shown by way of example in the drawings and will herein be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the drawings and detailed description thereto are not intended to limit the invention to the form disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
An LED generally comprises a chip of semiconducting material doped with impurities to create a p-n junction. As in other diodes, current flows easily from the p-side, or anode, to the n-side, or cathode, but not in the reverse direction. Charge-carriers-electrons and holes-flow into the junction from electrodes with different voltages. When an electron meets a hole, it falls into a lower energy level, and releases energy in the form of a photon (i.e., light). The wavelength of the light emitted by the LED, and thus its color, depends on the band gap energy of the materials forming the p-n junction of the LED.
Red and yellow LEDs are commonly composed of materials (e.g., AlInGaP) having a relatively low band gap energy, and thus produce longer wavelengths of light. For example, most red and yellow LEDs have a peak wavelength in the range of approximately 610-650 nm and approximately 580-600 nm, respectively. On the other hand, green and blue LEDs are commonly composed of materials (e.g., GaN or InGaN) having a larger band gap energy, and thus, produce shorter wavelengths of light. For example, most green and blue LEDs have a peak wavelength in the range of approximately 515-550 nm and approximately 450-490 nm, respectively.
In some cases, a “white” LED may be formed by covering or coating, e.g., a blue LED having a peak emission wavelength of about 450-490 nm with a phosphor (e.g., YAG), which down-converts the photons emitted by the blue LED to a lower energy level, or a longer peak emission wavelength, such as about 525 nm to about 600 nm. In some cases, such an LED may be configured to produce substantially white light having a correlated color temperature (CCT) of about 3000 K. However, a skilled artisan would understand how different colors of LEDs and/or different phosphors may be used to produce a “white” LED with a potentially different CCT.
When two or more differently-colored LEDs are combined within a single package, the spectral contents of the individual LEDs are combined to produce blended light. In some cases, differently-colored LEDs may be combined to produce white or near-white light within a wide gamut of color points or CCTs ranging from “warm white” (e.g., roughly 2600 K-3000 K), to “neutral white” (e.g., 3000 K-4000 K) to “cool white” (e.g., 4000 K-8300 K). Examples of white light illumination devices include, but are not limited to, those that combine red, green, and blue (RGB) LEDs, red, green, blue, and yellow (RGBY) LEDs, white and red (WR) LEDs, and RGBW LEDs.
The present invention is generally directed to illumination devices having a plurality of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and one or more photodetectors. For the sake of simplicity, the term “LED” will be used throughout this disclosure to refer to a single LED, or a chain of serially-connected LEDs supplied with the same drive current. According to one embodiment, the present invention provides improved methods for calibrating and compensating individual LEDs within an LED illumination device, so as to accurately maintain a desired luminous flux and a desired chromaticity for the illumination device over changes in drive current, temperature, and/or time.
Although not limited to such, the present invention is particularly well suited to illumination devices (i.e., multi-colored illumination devices) in which two or more different colors of LEDs are combined to produce blended white or near-white light, since the output characteristics of differently-colored LEDs vary differently over drive current, temperature, and time. The present invention is also particularly well suited to illumination devices (i.e., tunable illumination devices) that enable the target dimming level and/or the target chromaticity setting to be changed by adjusting the drive currents supplied to one or more of the LEDs, since changes in drive current inherently affect the lumen output, color, and temperature of the illumination device.
As LEDs age, the luminous flux output from both phosphor-converted and non-phosphor-converted LEDs, and the chromaticity of phosphor-converted LEDs, also changes over time. Early on in life, the luminous flux can either increase (get brighter) or decrease (get dimmer), while late in life, the luminous flux generally decreases. As expected, the lumen output decreases faster over time when the LEDs are subjected to higher drive currents and higher temperatures. As a phosphor-converted LED ages, the phosphor becomes less efficient and the amount of blue light that passes through the phosphor increases. This decrease in phosphor efficiency causes the overall color produced by the phosphor-converted LED to appear “cooler” over time. Although the dominant wavelength and chromaticity of a non-phosphor-converted LED does not change over time, the luminous flux decreases as the LED ages, which in effect causes the chromaticity of a multi-colored LED illumination device to change over time.
When differently-colored LEDs are combined within a multi-colored illumination device, the color point of the resulting device often changes significantly with variations in temperature and over time. For example, when red, green, and blue LEDs are combined within a white light illumination device, the color point of the device may appear increasingly “cooler” as the temperature rises. This is because the luminous flux produced by the red LEDs decreases significantly as temperatures increase, while the luminous flux produced by the green and blue LEDs remains relatively stable (see,
To account for temperature and aging effects, some prior art illumination devices attempt to maintain a consistent lumen output and/or a consistent chromaticity over temperature and time by measuring characteristics of the emission LEDs and increasing the drive current supplied to one or more of the emission LEDs. For example, some prior art illumination devices measure the temperature of the illumination device (either directly through an ambient temperature sensor or heat sink measurement, or indirectly through a forward voltage measurement), and adjust the drive currents supplied to one or more of the emission LEDs to account for temperature-related changes in lumen output. Other prior art illumination devices measure the lumen output from individual emission LEDs, and if the measured value differs from a target value, the drive currents supplied to the emission LED are increased to account for changes in luminous flux that occur over time.
However, changing the drive currents supplied to the emission LEDs inherently affects the luminous flux and the chromaticity produced by the LED illumination device.
Although some prior art illumination devices may adjust the drive currents supplied to the emission LEDs, these devices fail to provide accurate temperature and age compensation by failing to account for the non-linear relationship that exists between luminous flux and junction temperature for certain colors of LEDs (
A need remains for improved illumination devices and methods for calibrating and compensating individual LEDs included within an illumination device, so as to maintain a desired luminous flux and a desired chromaticity over variations in drive current and temperature and over time, as the LEDs age. This need is particularly relevant to multi-colored LED illumination devices, since different LED colors respond differently over temperature and time, and to illumination devices that provide dimming and/or color tuning capabilities, since changes in drive current inherently affect the lumen output, color, and temperature of the illumination device.
To meet these needs, improved illumination devices and methods are provided herein to individually calibrate and compensate each LED used in the LED illumination device. The improved calibration and compensation methods described herein overcome the disadvantages of conventional methods, which fail to provide accurate temperature and age compensation for all LEDs included within an LED illumination device.
Exemplary Embodiments of Improved Methods for Calibrating an Illumination Device
Exemplary embodiments of an improved illumination device will be described below with reference to
As shown in
For example, a plurality of optical measurements may be obtained from the illumination produced by each emission LED at each of the different drive current levels (in step 14). According to one embodiment, the optical measurements may include a plurality of luminous flux, x-chromaticity and y-chromaticity measurements, which are obtained for each emission LED at two or more different drive current levels. However, the optical measurements described herein are not limited to luminous flux, x-chromaticity and y-chromaticity, and may include additional or alternative optical measurements in other embodiments of the invention.
In general, the chromaticity calibration values described herein may correspond to the CIE 1931 XYZ color space, the CIE 1931 RGB color space, the CIE 1976 LUV color space, and various other RGB color spaces (e.g., sRGB, Adobe RGB, etc.). Although the calibration and compensation methods described herein acquire and utilize only x- and y-chromaticity calibration values, one skilled in the art would understand how chromaticity values from other color spaces could be alternatively acquired and used in the methods described herein. As such, the calibration and compensation methods described herein and recited in the claims are considered to encompass chromaticity calibration values from any color space that can be used to describe the gamut of an LED illumination device comprising substantially any combination of emission LEDs as described herein.
In one preferred embodiment, three luminous flux (Luma) measurements, three x-chromaticity (x chrom) measurements, and three y-chromaticity (y chrom) measurements are measured from each emission LED at roughly a maximum drive current level (typically about 500 mA, depending on LED part number and manufacturer), roughly 30% of the maximum drive current, and roughly 10% of the maximum drive current, as shown in
In addition, a plurality of electrical measurements may be obtained from each of the emission LEDs and each of the dedicated photodetector(s) at each of the different drive current levels (in step 16). These electrical measurements may include, but are not limited to, photocurrents induced on the dedicated photodetector(s) and forward voltages measured across the dedicated photodetector(s) and/or the emission LEDs. Unlike the optical measurements described above, the electrical measurements may be obtained from the dedicated photodetector(s) and the emission LEDs using the LED driver and receiver circuit included within the illumination device. An exemplary embodiment of such a circuit is shown in
At each of the different drive currents levels, the LED driver and receiver circuit measures the photocurrents that are induced on the dedicated photodetector by the illumination individually produced by each emission LED. In one preferred embodiment, three photocurrent (Iph_d1) measurements may be obtained from the dedicated photodetector for each emission LED when the emission LEDs are successively driven to produce illumination at three different drive current levels (e.g., 100%, 30% and 10% of a max drive level). In some embodiments, the LED driver and receiver circuit may obtain the photocurrent (Iph_d1) measurements at substantially the same time the external calibration tool is measuring the luminous flux and x- and y-chromaticity of the illumination produced by the emission LEDs at each of the different drive current levels.
In general, the drive currents applied to the emission LEDs to measure luminous flux, chromaticity, and induced photocurrent may be operative drive current levels (e.g., about 20 mA to about 500 mA). In some cases, increasingly greater drive current levels may be successively applied to each of the emission LEDs to obtain the measurements described herein. In other cases, the measurements may be obtained upon successively applying decreasing levels of drive current to the emission LEDs. The order in which the drive current levels are applied is largely unimportant, only that the drive currents be different from one another.
Although examples are provided herein, the present invention is not limited to any particular value or any particular number of drive current levels and may apply substantially any value and any number of drive current levels to an emission LED within the operating current level range of that LED. However, it is generally desired to obtain the luminous flux and chromaticity measurements from the emission LEDs and the photocurrent measurements from the photodetector at a sufficient number of different drive current levels, so that the non-linear relationship between these measurements and drive current can be accurately characterized across the operating current level range of the LED.
While increasing the number of measurements does improve the accuracy with which the non-linear relationships are characterized, it also increases the calibration time and costs. While the increase in calibration time and cost may not be warranted in all cases, it may be beneficial in some. For example, additional luminous flux measurements may be beneficial when attempting to characterize the luminous flux vs. drive current relationship for certain colors of LEDs (e.g., blue and green LEDs), which tend to exhibit a significantly more non-linear relationship than other colors of LEDs (see,
Since increasing drive currents affect the junction temperature of the emission LEDs, a forward voltage may be measured across each emission LED and each photodetector immediately after each operative drive current level is supplied to the emission LEDs (in step 16). For each operative drive current level, the forward voltages can be measured across each emission LED and each photodetector before or after the photocurrent measurements for that operative drive current level are obtained. Unlike the optical measurements, however, relatively small drive currents are applied to the emission LEDs and the dedicated photodetector(s) to measure the forward voltages developed there across.
In one preferred embodiment, three forward voltage (Vfe) measurements may be obtained from each emission LED and three forward voltage (Vfd1) measurements may be obtained from each dedicated photodetector (in step 16) immediately after each of the different drive current levels (e.g., 100%, 30% and 10% of a max drive level) is applied to the emission LEDs to measure the luminous flux, x-chromaticity and y-chromaticity. The forward voltage (Vfe and Vfd1) measurements can be obtained before or after the induced photocurrents (Iph_d1) are measured at each of the different drive current levels. By measuring the forward voltage (Vfe) across each emission LED and the forward voltage (Vfd1) across each dedicated photodetector immediately after each operative drive current level is applied to the emission LEDs, the Vfe and Vfd1 measurements may be used to provide a good indication of how the junction temperature of the emission LEDs and the dedicated photodetector change with changes in drive current.
When taking forward voltage measurements, a relatively small drive current is supplied to each of the emission LEDs and each of the dedicated photodetector LEDs, one LED at a time, so that a forward voltage (Vfe or Vfd1) developed across the anode and cathode of the individual LEDs can be measured (in step 16). When taking these measurements, all other emission LEDs in the illumination device are preferably turned “off” to avoid inaccurate forward voltage measurements (since light from other emission LEDs would induce additional photocurrents in the LED being measured).
As used herein, a “relatively small drive current” may be broadly defined as a non-operative drive current, or a drive current level which is insufficient to produce significant illumination from the LED. Most LED device manufacturers, which use forward voltage measurements to compensate for temperature variations, supply a relatively large drive current to the LEDs (e.g., an operative drive current level sufficient to produce illumination from the LEDs) when taking forward voltage measurements. Unfortunately, forward voltages measured at operative drive current levels tend to vary significantly over the lifetime of an LED. As an LED ages, the parasitic resistance within the junction increases, which in turn causes the forward voltage measured at operating current levels to increase over time, regardless of temperature. For this reason, a relatively small (i.e., non-operative) drive current is used herein when obtaining forward voltage measurements to limit the resistive portion of the forward voltage drop.
For some common types of emission LEDs with one square millimeter of junction area, the optimum drive current used herein to obtain forward voltage measurements from the emission LEDs may be roughly 0.1-10 mA, and more preferably may be about 0.3-3 mA. In one embodiment, the optimum drive current level may be about 1 mA for obtaining forward voltage measurements from the emission LEDs. However, smaller/larger LEDs may use proportionally less/more current to keep the current density roughly the same. In the embodiments that use a significantly smaller LED as the dedicated photodetector, the optimum drive current level for obtaining forward voltage measurements from a single photodetector may range between about 100 μA to about 300 μA. In one embodiment, the optimum drive current level used for obtaining forward voltage measurements from a plurality of dedicated photodetectors connected in parallel may be about 1 mA. The relatively small, non-operative drive currents used to obtain forward voltage measurements from the emission LEDs (e.g., about 0.3 mA to about 3 mA) and the relatively small, non-operative drive currents used to obtain forward voltage measurements from a dedicated photodetector (e.g., about 100 μA to about 300 μA) are substantially smaller than the operative drive current levels (e.g., about 20 mA to about 500 mA) used in steps 14 and 16 to measure luminous flux, chromaticity, and induced photocurrent.
After the measurements described in steps 14-16 are obtained at the first temperature, the illumination device is subjected to a second ambient temperature, which is substantially different from the first ambient temperature (in step 18). Once subjected to this second temperature, steps 12-16 are repeated (in step 20) to obtain an additional plurality of optical measurements from each of the emission LEDs (in step 14), and an additional plurality of electrical measurements from the emission LEDs and the dedicated photodetector (in step 16). The additional measurements may be obtained at the second ambient temperature in the same manner described above for the first ambient temperature.
In one embodiment, the second ambient temperature may be substantially less than the first ambient temperature. For example, the second ambient temperature may be approximately equal to room temperature (e.g., roughly 25° C.), and the first ambient temperature may be substantially greater than room temperature. In one example, the first ambient temperature may be closer to an elevated temperature (e.g., roughly 70° C.) or a maximum temperature (e.g., roughly 85° C.) at which the device is expected to operate. In an alternative embodiment, the second ambient temperature may be substantially greater than the first ambient temperature.
It is worth noting that the exact values, number, and order in which the temperatures are applied to calibrate the individual LEDs is somewhat unimportant. However, it is generally desired to obtain the luminous flux, x- and y-chromaticity, and photocurrent calibration values at a number of different temperatures, so that the non-linear relationships between these measurements and drive current can be accurately characterized across the operating temperature range of each LED. In one preferred embodiment, the illumination device may be subjected to two substantially different ambient temperatures, which are selected from across the operating temperature range of the illumination device. While it is possible to obtain the measurements described herein at three (or more) temperatures, doing so may add significant expense, complexity and/or time to the calibration process. For this reason, it is generally preferred that the emission LEDs and the dedicated photodetector(s) be calibrated at only two different temperatures (e.g., about 25° C. and about 70° C.).
In some embodiments, the illumination device may be subjected to the first and second ambient temperatures by artificially generating the temperatures during the calibration process. However, it is generally preferred that the first and second ambient temperatures are ones which occur naturally during production of the illumination device, as this simplifies the calibration process and significantly decreases the costs associated therewith. In one embodiment, the measurements obtained at the elevated temperature may be taken after burn-in of the LEDs when the illumination device is relatively hot (e.g., roughly 50° C. to 85° C.), and sometime thereafter (e.g., at the end of the manufacturing line), a room temperature calibration may be performed to obtain measurements when the illumination device is relatively cool (e.g., roughly 20° C. to 30° C.).
Once the calibration measurements are obtained, the calibration values may be stored within the illumination device (in step 22), so that the stored values can be later used to compensate the illumination device for changes in luminous flux and/or chromaticity that may occur over variations in drive current, temperature, and time. In one embodiment, the calibration values may be stored within a table of calibration values as shown, for example, in
For each emission LED (e.g., each white, blue, green, and red emission LED) and each ambient temperature (T0, T1), the calibration table shown in
The calibration table shown in
As noted above, the present invention is not limited to the exemplary number of drive current levels and values of drive current shown in
It is also possible to obtain and store a different number of forward voltage (Vfe) measurements from the emission LEDs, or a different number of forward voltage (Vfd1) measurements from the at least one dedicated photodetector. For example, the calibration table shown in the embodiment of
As shown in
In another alternative embodiment, the calibration method of
In another alternative embodiment of the invention, the calibration method shown in
In yet another alternative embodiment of the invention, the calibration method shown in
As noted above, some embodiments of the invention may include a phosphor-converted white emission LED within the emitter module. These LEDs may be formed by coating or covering, e.g., a blue LED, having a peak emission wavelength of about 400-500 nm, with a phosphor material (e.g., YAG) to produce substantially white light with a CCT of about 3000 K. Other combinations of LEDs and phosphors may be used to form a phosphor-converted LED, which is capable of producing white or near-white light with a CCT in the range of about 2700 K to about 10,000 K.
In phosphor-converted LEDs, the spectral content of the LED combines with the spectral content of the phosphor to produce white or near-white light. As shown in
As the phosphor-converted LED ages, the efficiency of the phosphor decreases, which causes the chromaticity of the phosphor-converted LED to appear “cooler” over time. In order to account for age-related chromaticity shifts in a phosphor-converted LED, it may be desirable in some embodiments of the calibration method shown in
In general, the detection range of the first and second photodetectors may be selected based on the spectrum of the phosphor-converted LED being measured. In the exemplary embodiment described above, in which a phosphor-converted white emission LED is included within the emitter module and implemented as described above, the detection range of the first photodetector may range between about 400 nm and about 500 nm for measuring the photocurrents induced by light emitted by the blue LED portion, and the detection range of the second photodetector may range between about 500 nm and about 650 nm for measuring the photocurrents induced by light that passes through the phosphor portion of the phosphor-converted white LED. The first and second photodetectors may include dedicated photodetectors and/or emission LEDs, which are sometimes configured for detecting incident light.
As noted above, the emitter module of the illumination device preferably includes at least one dedicated photodetector. In one embodiment, the emitter module may include two different colors of dedicated photodetectors, such as one or more dedicated green photodetectors and one or more dedicated red photodetectors (see, e.g.,
In the calibration method described above and shown in
In some embodiments of the calibration method shown in
As shown in
In addition to storing separate photocurrent measurements (Iph_d2 and Iph_d1) for the phosphor-converted white LED, the calibration table may also store separate luminous flux (Luma), x-chromaticity (x chrom) and y-chromaticity (y chrom) measurements for the LED portion and the phosphor portion of the phosphor-converted white LED spectrum at each of the calibrated drive currents and temperatures. While this is not explicitly shown in
Exemplary methods for calibrating an illumination device comprising a plurality of emission LEDs and one or more photodetectors has now been described with reference to
The calibration method provided herein improves upon conventional calibration methods in a number of ways. First, the method described herein calibrates each emission LED (or chain of LEDs) individually, while turning off all other emission LEDs not currently under test. This not only improves the accuracy of the stored calibration values, but also enables the stored calibration values to account for process variations between individual LEDs, as well as differences in output characteristics that inherently occur between different colors of LEDs.
Accuracy is further improved herein by supplying a relatively small (i.e., non-operative) drive current to the emission LEDs and the photodetector(s) when obtaining forward voltage measurements, as opposed to the operative drive current levels typically used in conventional calibration methods. By using non-operative drive currents to obtain the forward voltage measurements, the present invention avoids inaccurate compensation by ensuring that the forward voltage measurements for a given temperature and fixed drive current do not change significantly over time (due to parasitic resistances in the junction when operative drive currents are used to obtain forward voltage measurements).
As another advantage, the calibration method described herein obtains a plurality of optical measurements from each emission LED and a plurality of electrical measurements from each photodetector at a plurality of different drive current levels and a plurality of different temperatures. This further improves calibration accuracy by enabling the non-linear relationship between luminous flux and drive current and the non-linear relationship between photocurrent and drive current to be precisely characterized for each individual LED. Furthermore, obtaining the calibration values at a number of different ambient temperatures improves compensation accuracy by enabling the compensation methods (described below) to interpolate between the stored calibration values, so that accurate compensation values may be determined for current operating temperatures.
As yet another advantage, the calibration method described herein may use different colors of photodetectors to measure photocurrents, which are induced by different portions (e.g., an LED portion and a phosphor portion) of a phosphor-converted LED spectrum. The different colors of photodetectors may also be used to measure the photocurrent, which is induced by a reference emission LED, whose peak emission wavelength falls within the LED portion of the spectrum emitted by the phosphor-converted LED. By storing these calibration values within the illumination device, the calibration values may be later used to detect and account for chromaticity shifts that may occur in a phosphor-converted LED over time.
As described in more detail below, the calibration values stored within the calibration table can be used in one or more compensation methods described herein to adjust the individual drive currents supplied to the emission LEDs, so as to obtain a desired luminous flux and a desired chromaticity over changes in drive current, changes in temperature and over time, as the LEDs age. For example, the luminous flux (Luma) measurements may be used in some embodiments to maintain a consistent lumen output and chromaticity over changes in temperature. In other embodiments, the luminous flux (Luma) measurements may be used along with the chromaticity (e.g., x chrom, y chrom) measurements to obtain a new target lumen output or a new target chromaticity when the dimming level or color point setting for the illumination device is changed. Regardless of the particular luminous flux or chromaticity setting used, the photocurrent (Iph) measurements may be used to adjust the individual drive currents supplied to the emission LEDs to account for LED aging effects. While the most accurate results may be obtained by utilizing all such measurements when compensating an LED illumination device, one skilled in the art would understand how one or more of the calibration values described herein may be used to improve upon the compensation methods performed by prior art illumination devices.
Exemplary Embodiments of Improved Methods for Controlling an Illumination Device
In some embodiments, the compensation methods shown in
Exemplary embodiments of an illumination device will be described below with reference to
According to one embodiment,
However, the previously-filed applications failed to disclose methods for controlling an illumination device, so as to maintain a desired luminous flux and a desired chromaticity over time, or to obtain a new luminous flux or a new chromaticity when the dimming level or the color point setting is changed for the illumination device. The optional method steps shown in dashed outline in
As shown in
In one preferred embodiment, the compensation method may be performed only if a significant change in ambient temperature is detected (in step 32). In some embodiments, the ambient temperature may be monitored by a dedicated temperature sensor or an additional LED, which is used as both a temperature sensor and an optical sensor, as discussed below with reference to
In some embodiments, the compensation method may also be performed if the dimming level and/or the color point setting is changed in a tunable illumination device. To accommodate such changes, the compensation method may monitor the target luminance (Ym) and the target chromaticity setting (xm, ym) stored within the control circuitry of the illumination device. In some embodiments, the target luminance (Ym) may be expressed as a finite set of dimming levels, and the target chromaticity setting (xm, ym) may be expressed as a range of x,y coordinates within the color gamut of the illumination device. In some embodiments, the target luminance (Ym) and the target chromaticity setting (xm, ym) may be stored, e.g., as 16-bit integer values within a hardware or software register of the control circuitry and may be changed by a user or a building controller by storing alternative values within the illumination device. If no changes to the stored Ym, xm and ym values are detected by the control circuitry (“No” branch in step 34), the compensation method may continue to drive the plurality of emission LEDs substantially continuously to produce illumination (in step 30). Otherwise, the compensation method may proceed to step 36.
As used herein, the term “substantially continuously” means that an operative drive current is supplied to the plurality of emission LEDs almost continuously, with the exception of periodic intervals during which the plurality of emission LEDs are momentarily turned “off” for short durations of time (in step 36). In the exemplary embodiment of
During each periodic interval, one emission LED is driven with a relatively small, non-operative drive current (e.g., approximately 0.1-10 mA, not shown in
In one alternative embodiment, the compensation method of
In some embodiments of the invention, the compensation method shown in
To determine the drive current (Ix) needed to produce a desired luminous flux (Lx) for a given LED, the compensation method of
In some embodiments, the interpolation technique(s) used to calculate the luminous flux values (Δ's) and to generate the relationship between the calculated values may depend on the color of the LED being compensated. For example, the luminous flux vs. junction temperature (or forward voltage) relationship for blue, green, and white LEDs is substantially linear over the operating temperature range (see,
In one embodiment, the higher-order interpolation technique may be in the form of a quadratic interpolation, which follows the general equation:
ax
2
+bx+c=y (EQ.1)
where ‘x’ is Vf (or temperature), ‘y’ is luminous flux, and ‘a,’ ‘b,’ and ‘c’ are coefficients. If forward voltage and luminous flux values were previously obtained during the calibration phase at three different temperatures, the ‘a,’ ‘b’ and ‘c’ coefficient values may be precisely determined by inserting the stored calibration values into EQ. 1 and separately solving the equation for ‘a,’‘b,’ and ‘c’. If, on the other hand, the LED was calibrated at only two different temperatures, as described above, the ‘a’ coefficient may be obtained from data sheets provided by the LED manufacturer, while the ‘b’ and ‘c’ coefficients are determined from the calibration values. While the latter method (sometimes referred to as a “poor man's quadratic interpolation”) may sacrifice a small amount of accuracy, it may represent an acceptable trade-off between accuracy and calibration costs. In some embodiments, the calibration table may store the actual (i.e., measured) luminous flux calibration values, or just the coefficients needed for the higher-order interpolation. In other embodiments, a combination of measured values and coefficients may be stored in the calibration table.
In some embodiments, the relationship (solid line in
In some embodiments, an appropriate interpolation technique may be selected based on trade-offs between memory and processing requirements, and/or based upon the particular color of LED being compensated. As noted above, some LED colors, such as blue and green, exhibit a comparatively more non-linear luminous flux vs. drive current relationship than other LED colors, such as red and red-orange (see,
Once the relationship between luminous flux and drive current is derived for a given LED, the drive current (Ix) needed to produce a desired luminous flux (Lx) may be selected from the generated relationship, as shown in the example of
In some embodiments, the compensation method shown in
Once the present forward voltages and the present drive currents are determined, the compensation method may determine the chromaticity values (xi, yi) that are expected for each emission LED (in step 42) using the present forward voltage (Vfe_present) measured across the LED, the present drive current (Idrv) supplied to the LED, the table of stored calibration values generated during the calibration method of
In
If the drive current (Idrv) presently supplied to the emission LED differs from one of the calibrated drive current levels, the compensation method of
The interpolation technique used to generate the relationship between the calculated x- and y-chromaticity values (Δ's) may generally depend on the color of LED being compensated. As noted above, the change in chromaticity with drive current and temperature is significantly different for different colors of LEDs. For a red LED, the peak emission wavelength increases relatively linearly with drive current yet increases significantly with temperature. The peak emission wavelength of a blue LED decreases somewhat non-linearly with drive current and increases slightly with temperature. Although the peak emission wavelength of a green LED varies very little with temperature, it decreases very non-linearly with drive current. In some embodiments, a piecewise linear interpolation technique may be used to generate the relationship between the calculated x- and y-chromaticity values (Δ's), or a typical curvature may be assumed from data sheets provided by an LED manufacturer. In other embodiments, however, a higher-order interpolation technique may be used to increase accuracy when compensating certain colors of LEDs (e.g., green LEDs), which exhibit more significant non-linear changes in chromaticity with drive current.
The x- and y-chromaticity values expected for each emission LED may be expressed as a color point in the form of (xi, yi). In an illumination device comprising four emission LEDs, step 42 of the compensation method may result in the generation of four expected color points: (x1, y1), (x2, y2), (x3, y3), and (x4, y4). Once the expected color points are determined in step 42, the compensation method may calculate the relative lumens needed from each of the emission LEDs to achieve the target luminance (Ym) and the target chromaticity setting (xm, ym) in step 44. For example, when light from four emission LEDs is combined, the target luminance (Ym) of the combined light may be expressed as:
Ym=Y
1
+Y
2
+Y
3
+Y
4 (EQ. 2)
where Y1, Y2, Y3, and Y4 represent the relative lumens of the four emission LEDs. The relative lumen values (Y1, Y2, Y3, and Y4) may be calculated using well-known color mixing equations, the target luminance (Ym) and target chromaticity (xm, ym) values set within the illumination device, and the expected color points (x1, y1), (x2, y2), (x3, y3), (x4, y4) determined in step 42 of the compensation method. As these equations are well-known and readily understood by a skilled artisan, further description of such equations will be omitted herein.
Once the relative lumens (e.g., Y1, Y2, Y3, and Y4) are calculated for each emission LED (in step 44), the drive currents that should be supplied to each emission LED to achieve the target luminance (Ym) are determined in step 46 similar to the manner described above. However, instead of determining a drive current (Ix) needed to achieve a “desired luminous flux” (Lx) from each emission LED, the current embodiment determines the drive current (Ix) needed to achieve the relative lumen value (Y1, Y2, Y3, or Y4), which was calculated for each emission LED in step 44. Once the individual drive currents (Ix) are determined in step 46, the emission LEDs are driven with the determined drive currents to produce illumination having a desired luminous flux and a desired chromaticity in step 48.
The compensation method shown in
One embodiment of a compensation method for controlling an LED illumination device over changes in drive current and temperature has now been described with reference to
The compensation method shown in
Conventional methods often rely on typical values or linear relationships between luminous flux and drive current when performing temperature compensation. In contrast, the compensation method described herein interpolates between a plurality of stored luminous flux calibration values taken at different drive currents and different temperatures and derives a non-linear relationship between luminous flux and drive current for each LED at the present operating temperature (Vfe_present). This enables the present compensation method to accurately and individually characterize the luminous flux vs. drive current relationship for each LED included within the illumination device, and to provide accurate temperature compensation, regardless of process. As a consequence, the compensation method described herein provides more accurate control of the luminous flux over temperature changes.
The compensation method shown in
While the compensation method shown in
In general, the compensation method shown in
As shown in
During some of the periodic intervals, one emission LED is driven with an operative drive current level (I1) to produce illumination, while the remaining LEDs remain “off,” and the photocurrent (e.g., Iph1) induced in the photodetector by the illumination from the driven LED is measured. The photocurrents (e.g., Iph1, Iph2, Iph3, and Iph4) induced in the photodetector by the illumination produced by each of the emission LEDs are measured, one LED at a time, as shown in
Sometime before or after the photocurrent (Iph) measurements are obtained, a forward voltage (Vfd) is measured across the photodetector by applying a relatively small, non-operative drive current (e.g., approximately 0.1-0.3 mA) to the photodetector (in step 56 of
In one exemplary embodiment, the presently described compensation method may be utilized within an illumination device comprising a plurality of photodetectors implemented with differently colored LEDs. In particular, each emitter module of the illumination device may include one or more red LEDs and one or more green LEDs as photodetectors. In such an embodiment, a forward voltage measurement (Vfd) may be obtained from each photodetector by applying a small drive current thereto (in step 56). In some cases, the photocurrents associated with each emission LED (e.g., Iph1, Iph2, Iph3, Iph4) and the forward voltage(s) associated with each photodetector (Vfd) may be independently averaged over a period of time, filtered to eliminate erroneous data, and stored for example in a register of the illumination device.
In addition to the photocurrents and detector forward voltage(s), the periodic intervals shown in
In other embodiments, the periodic intervals may be used to measure different portions of a particular LED's spectrum using two or more different colors of photodetectors. For example, the spectrum of a phosphor-converted white LED may be divided into two portions, and each portion may be measured separately during two different periodic intervals using two different photodetectors. Specifically, a first periodic interval may be used to detect the photocurrent, which is induced on a first photodetector (e.g., a green photodetector) by a first spectral portion (e.g., about 400 nm to about 500 nm) of the phosphor-converted white LED. A second periodic interval may then be used to detect the photocurrent, which is induced on a second photodetector (e.g., a red photodetector) by a second spectral portion (e.g., about 500 nm to about 650 nm) of the phosphor-converted white LED. As described in more detail below, dividing the spectrum of the phosphor-converted white LED into two portions, and measuring each portion separately with two different colors of photodetectors may enable the compensation method of
Once the photocurrents and detector forward voltage(s) are measured, the compensation method shown in
In
The change in photocurrent over temperature is non-linear for all LED colors, since both the emitted power and the responsivity of the photodetector decrease linearly with temperature. For this reason, a non-linear interpolation technique may be used to calculate the photocurrent values (Δ's) at the present operating temperature for all LED colors. In some embodiments, the non-linear interpolation technique may be a higher-order interpolation, a “poor man's” quadratic interpolation, or an assumed curvature. In other embodiments, the results of two different linear interpolations (e.g., a linear interpolation between emitted power and temperature, and a linear interpolation between detector responsivity and temperature) may be multiplied together to calculate the photocurrent values (Δ's) at the present operating temperature.
If the drive current (Idrv) presently supplied to the emission LED differs from one of the calibrated drive current levels, the compensation method of
Once expected photocurrents (Iph_exp) are determined for each emission LED (in step 58), the compensation method shown in
The compensation method described above and illustrated in
Like non-phosphor-converted LEDs, the luminous flux produced by a phosphor-converted LED generally decreases over time. Unlike non-phosphor-converted LEDs, however, phosphor-converted LEDs are also susceptible to changes in chromaticity over time since the efficiency of the phosphor degrades as the phosphor ages. When a phosphor-converted LED is included in the emitter module, the compensation method shown in
In order to detect and account for chromaticity shifts that occur over time in a phosphor-converted white LED, the different portions of the phosphor-converted LED spectrum must first be calibrated. For example, the dedicated red photodetector and the dedicated green photodetector (or the green emission LED) may both be used in step 16 of the calibration method of
As described above and shown in
Sometime before or after each Iph_d1 and Iph_d2 measurement is obtained, a forward voltage (Vfd1 or Vfd2) is measured across the dedicated red photodetector and the dedicated green photodetector (or the green emission LED) to provide an indication of the red detector junction temperature and the green detector junction temperature at each of the calibrated drive current levels and ambient temperatures. The Vfd1 and Vfd2 measurements may be stored within the calibration table, as shown in
During the compensation method of
For example, the white LED-on-red detector scale factor can be applied in step 62 to an overall desired luminous flux value for the phosphor-converted LED to account for lumen changes caused by LED and phosphor aging. In some cases, the overall desired luminous flux value for the phosphor-converted LED may be determined by adding together the relative lumen values, which were separately calculated for the LED portion and the phosphor portion of the phosphor-converted LED in steps 40-44 of the compensation method of
To account for chromaticity shifts in the phosphor-converted white LED over time, the white LED-on-green detector scale factor can be compared to the white LED-on-red detector scale factor. Based on such comparison, the actual chromaticity of the phosphor-converted LED can be determined using well known color mixing equations, and the overall chromaticity of the illumination device can be maintained by adjusting the drive currents applied to all emission LEDs.
While the method described above provides an acceptable solution for controlling the luminous flux and chromaticity of a phosphor-converted LED over time, the chromaticity of the phosphor-converted white LED may be more accurately determined, in some embodiments, by accounting for detector aging. For example, the photocurrents induced on the red and green photodetectors (or the green emission LED) by a given amount of incident light generally decreases over time. Although such decrease is typically not large, it may cause the white LED-on-green detector scale factor and the white LED-on-red detector scale factor to likewise decrease over time, which in turn, decreases the accuracy with which the chromaticity of the phosphor-converted white LED is adjusted. To eliminate this source of measurement error, the scale factors generated in step 60 for the phosphor-converted LED may be adjusted, in some embodiments, to account for detector aging. This may be achieved, for example, by using the blue emission LED as a reference for the phosphor-converted white LED.
In some embodiments, the dedicated red photodetector and the dedicated green photodetector (or the green emission LED) may both be used in step 54 of the compensation method of
In order to account for detector aging in the phosphor-converted LED scale factors, the white LED-on-green detector scale factor may be divided by the blue LED-on-green detector scale factor to produce a white-over-blue-on-green scale factor ratio (WoBoG). Likewise, the white LED-on-red detector scale factor may be divided by the blue LED-on-red detector scale factor to produce a white-over-blue-on-red scale factor ratio (WoBoR). Next, the WoBoR scale factor ratio may be further divided by the WoBoG scale factor ratio to produce a White Phosphor over White Blue pump (WPoWB) ratio. The White Phosphor over White Blue pump (WPoWB) ratio provides an indication of how the spectrum of the phosphor-converted white LED changes over time and accounts for any degradation of the detector responsivity that may over time. In some embodiments, the WPoWB ratio may be used to adjust the overall chromaticity of the phosphor-converted LED. Once the overall chromaticity of the phosphor-converted LED is set, the white-on-red detector scale factor may be applied in step 62 to the overall desired luminous flux value for the phosphor-converted white LED to account for age-related lumen changes.
The compensation method shown in
Exemplary Embodiments of Improved Illumination Devices
The improved methods described herein for calibrating and controlling an illumination device may be used within substantially any LED illumination device having a plurality of emission LEDs and one or more photodetectors. As described in more detail below, the improved methods described herein may be implemented within an LED illumination device in the form of hardware, software, or a combination of both.
Illumination devices, which benefit from the improved methods described herein, may have substantially any form factor including, but not limited to, parabolic lamps (e.g., PAR 20, 30, or 38), linear lamps, flood lights and mini-reflectors. In some cases, the illumination devices may be installed in a ceiling or wall of a building and may be connected to an AC mains or some other AC power source. However, a skilled artisan would understand how the improved methods described herein may be used within other types of illumination devices powered by other power sources (e.g., batteries or solar energy).
Exemplary embodiments of an improved illumination device will now be described with reference to
An exemplary emitter module 72 that may be included within the linear lamp 70 of
In at least one embodiment, photodetector 78 is an LED with a peak emission wavelength in the range of approximately 550 nm to 700 nm. A photodetector with such a peak emission wavelength will not produce photocurrent in response to infrared light, which reduces interference from ambient light sources. In at least one preferred embodiment, photodetector 78 may comprise a small red, orange, or yellow LED. In some embodiments, the dedicated photodetector 78 may be arranged to capture a maximum amount light, which is reflected from a surface of the dome 76 from the emission LEDs having the shortest wavelengths (e.g., the blue and green emission LEDs).
In some embodiments, the emitter module 72 may include a phosphor-converted white (W) emission LED 74, and the dedicated photodetector 78 may be used to measure the photocurrents (Iph_d1) that are induced by the light that passes through the phosphor portion of the phosphor-converted LED. In order to measure the photocurrents (Iph_d2) induced by the blue LED portion of the phosphor-converted LED, the green emission LED 74 may be configured, at times, as an additional photodetector. These photocurrent measurements may be stored within the calibration table of
In the illustrated embodiment, emitter module 82 includes an array of emission LEDs 84 and a plurality of dedicated photodetectors 88, all of which are mounted on a common substrate and encapsulated within a primary optics structure (e.g., a dome) 86. In some embodiments, the array of emission LEDs 84 may include a number of differently-colored chains of LEDS, wherein each chain is configured for producing illumination at a different peak emission wavelength. According to one embodiment, the array of emission LEDs 84 may include a chain of four red LEDs, a chain of four green LEDs, a chain of four blue LEDs, and a chain of four white or yellow LEDs. Each chain of LEDs is coupled in series and driven with the same drive current. In some embodiments, the individual LEDs in each chain may be scattered about the array and arranged so that no color appears twice in any row, column or diagonal, to improve color mixing within the emitter module 82.
In the exemplary embodiment of
In at least one preferred embodiment, emitter module 82 includes a phosphor-converted white (W) emission LED 84 and two different colors of photodetectors for measuring different portions of the phosphor-converted LED spectrum. In one example, the dedicated photodetectors 88 may include one or more small red LEDs and one or more small green LEDs. In such an example, the dedicated red photodetector(s) 88 may be used to measure the photocurrents (Iph_d1) that are induced by the light that passes through the phosphor portion of the phosphor-converted LED, while the dedicated green photodetector(s) 88 are used to measure the photocurrents (Iph_d2) induced by the light emitted by blue LED portion of the phosphor-converted LED. These photocurrent measurements (Iph_d1 and Iph_d2) may be stored within the calibration table of
The illumination devices shown in
Emitter module 90 may include substantially any number and color of emission LEDs 92 and substantially any number and color of dedicated photodetectors 94. In one exemplary embodiment, the emission LEDs 92 include one or more red LEDs, one or more blue LEDs, one or more green LEDs and one or more white or yellow LEDs, as shown in
The primary optics structure 98 may be formed from a variety of different materials and may have substantially any shape and/or dimensions necessary to shape the light emitted by the emission LEDs in a desirable manner. Although the primary optics structure 98 is described herein as a dome, one skilled in the art would understand how the primary optics structure may have substantially any other shape or configuration, which encapsulates the emission LEDs 92 and the at least one photodetector 94. In some embodiments, the shape, size, and material of the dome 98 may be generally designed to improve optical efficiency and color mixing within the emitter module 90.
In one embodiment, substrate 96 may comprise a laminate material such as a printed circuit board (PCB) FR4 material, or a metal clad PCB material. However, substrate 96 may be formed from a ceramic material (or some other optically reflective material), in at least one preferred embodiment of the invention, so that the substrate may generally function to improve output efficiency by reflecting light back out of the emitter module 90. In addition, substrate 96 may be configured to provide a relatively high thermal impedance, or low thermal conductivity, in the lateral direction (i.e., the direction in the plane of the substrate). In one embodiment, substrate 96 may be formed from a material (e.g., aluminum nitride, AlN) having a thermal conductivity less than or equal to about 150 W/(mK). In another embodiment, substrate 96 may be formed from a material (e.g., an aluminum oxide Al2O3 material) having a thermal conductivity less than about 30 W/(mK), or material (e.g., a PCB laminate material) having a thermal conductivity less than about 1 W/(mK). The high thermal impedance, or low thermal conductivity, provided by substrate 96 in the lateral direction advantageously isolates the junction temperatures of the emission LEDs 92 and the photodetectors 94, and avoids inaccurate Vfe and Vfd measurements.
In some embodiments, substrate 96 may be further configured to provide a relatively low thermal impedance, or high thermal conductivity, in the vertical direction (i.e., the direction perpendicular to the plane of the substrate). In particular, a relatively low thermal impedance path 102 may be provided between each emission LED 92 and each photodetector 94 to the heat sink 100. In addition to improving heat dissipation, the low thermal impedance paths 102 enable the substrate 96 to maintain a consistent temperature difference between the emitter and detector junction temperatures over operating conditions.
As noted above, alternative embodiments of the temperature compensation method shown in
The improved emitter module 90 shown in
In general, the plurality of thermally conductive lines 102 may comprise substantially any thermally conductive material. In some embodiments, the thermally conductive lines 102 are formed from a material having a thermal conductivity that ranges between about 200 W/(mK) and about 400 W/(mK). The material used for the thermally conductive lines 102 may be the same material used for the heat sink 100 or may be different. In one embodiment, the thermally conductive lines 102 are formed from an aluminum, aluminum-alloy, copper, or copper-alloy material. The plurality of thermally conductive lines 102 may be formed by drilling vertical holes through the substrate (using any mechanical or optical means), and filling or plating the holes (or vias) with a metal material using any appropriate method. In some embodiments, each thermally conductive line 102 may comprise a plurality (e.g., about 10-20) of densely-packed vias, with each via being on the order of a couple of hundred microns wide.
If the emitter module 90 shown in
While the emitter module shown in
Emitter module 1810 may include substantially any number, color, and arrangement of emission LEDs 92 and substantially any number, color, and arrangement of dedicated photodetectors 94. The emission LEDs 92 and the dedicated photodetectors 94 may be similar to those described above but are not limited to such. In some embodiments, one or more of the dedicated photodetectors 94 may be omitted if one or more of the emission LEDs 92 are configured, at times, for detecting incident light.
The primary optics structure 98 may be formed from a variety of different materials and may have substantially any shape and/or dimensions necessary to shape the light emitted by the emission LEDs 92 in a desirable manner. Although the primary optics structure 98 is described herein as a dome, one skilled in the art would understand how the primary optics structure may have substantially any other shape or configuration, which encapsulates the emission LEDs 92 and the at least one photodetector 94. In some embodiments, the shape, size, and material of the dome 98 may be generally designed to improve optical efficiency and color mixing within the emitter module 110.
Heat sink 100 is coupled to a bottom surface of the substrate 1812 for drawing heat away from the heat-generating components of the emitter module 1810. The heat sink 100 may comprise substantially any material with relatively high thermal and electrical conductivity. In some embodiments, heat sink 100 is formed from a material having a thermal conductivity that ranges between about 200 W/(mK) and about 400 W/(mK). In one embodiment, the heat sink is formed from a copper or copper-alloy material, or an aluminum or aluminum-alloy material. In some embodiments, the heat sink 100 may be a relatively thick layer ranging between about 1 mm and about 10 mm, and in one embodiment, may be about 3 mm thick.
Emitter module 1810 differs from emitter module 90, in at least one aspect, by electrically isolating the electrical contacts of the emission LEDs 92 and the photodetectors 94 from the heat sink 100. This is achieved in the embodiment of
According to one embodiment, multiple-layer substrate 1812 may include a first routing layer 1814, a first dielectric layer 1816, a second routing layer 1818, and a second dielectric layer 1820. The first routing layer 1814 is coupled to the electrical contacts of the emission LEDs 92 and the one or more photodetectors 94 and may be formed on the first dielectric layer 1816. The first routing layer 1814 may have a thickness that ranges between about 10 μm to about 20 μm, may be formed of a material (e.g., a copper or aluminum material, or an alloy thereof) having a thermal conductivity that ranges between 200 W/(mK) and about 400 W/(mK), and may be formed by any well-known process on the upper surface of the first dielectric layer 1816. For example, the first routing layer 1814 may be formed by printing or depositing metal lines on the upper surface of the first dielectric layer 1816.
The first dielectric layer 1816 is sandwiched between the first routing layer 1814 and the second routing layer 1818 for electrically isolating the electrical contacts of the LEDs from the heat sink 100. In some embodiments, the first dielectric layer 1816 may be a relatively thin layer having a thickness between about 10 μm and about 100 μm and may be formed from a dielectric material having a relative permittivity that ranges between about 3 and 12. In one example, the first dielectric layer 1816 may be formed from an aluminum nitride material or an aluminum oxide material but is not limited to such materials.
In addition to providing electrical isolation, first dielectric layer 1816 provides a relatively high thermal impedance in the lateral direction by using a material with a relatively low thermal conductivity, which is less than about 150 W/(mK), and keeping the thickness of the layer small relative to the spacing between the emission LEDs and the photodetectors. In one exemplary embodiment, the first dielectric layer 1816 may have a thickness of about 30 μm, and the emission LEDs 92 and photodetectors 94 may be spaced at least 200-300 μm apart on an upper surface of the substrate 1812. Such an embodiment would provide at least 10 times higher thermal conductivity in the vertical direction than in the lateral direction.
The second routing layer 1818 is coupled between the first dielectric layer 1816 and the second dielectric layer 1820 and is generally configured for routing signals between the first routing layer 1814 and external electrical contacts (not shown) arranged outside of the primary optics structure. Like the first routing layer 1814, the second routing layer 1818 may have a thickness that ranges between about 10 μm to about 20 μm, may be formed of a material (e.g., a copper or aluminum material, or an alloy thereof) having a thermal conductivity that ranges between 200 W/(mK) and about 400 W/(mK), and may be formed by any well-known process on the upper surface of the second dielectric layer 1820. For example, the second routing layer 1818 may be formed by printing or depositing metal lines on the upper surface of the second dielectric layer 1820. In order to route signals between the first routing layer 1814 and the second routing layer 1818, vias 1824 may be formed within the first dielectric layer 1816. These vias may be formed in accordance with any known process.
In some embodiments, the second dielectric layer 1820 may be coupled between the second routing layer 1818 and the heat sink 100 and may be generally configured for providing a relatively high thermal impedance in the lateral direction, and a relatively low thermal impedance in the vertical direction. In some embodiments, the second dielectric layer 1820 may be a relatively thick layer having a thickness between about 100 μm and about 1000 μm, which imparts rigidity to the emitter module 1810. In some embodiments, the second dielectric layer 1820 may be formed from a dielectric material having a relative permittivity that ranges between about 3 and 12 and a thermal conductivity that is less than about 150 W/(mK). In one example, the second dielectric layer 1820 may be formed from an aluminum nitride material or an aluminum oxide material but is not limited to such materials.
The second dielectric layer 1820 is similar to the substrate 96 shown in
In some embodiments, a third routing layer 1826 may be coupled between the second dielectric layer 1820 and the heat sink 100. Unlike the first and second routing layers, which comprise metal lines printed on the first and second dielectric layers, the third routing layer 1826 may extend substantially continuously across an upper surface of the heat sink 100 for improving the thermal contact between the plurality of thermally conductive lines 1822 and the heat sink 100 and improving heat spreading there across.
Like the substrate 96 shown in
The multiple-layer substrate 1812 shown in
The multiple-layer substrate 1812 can also be implemented somewhat differently in alternative embodiments of the invention. For example, instead of using dielectric or ceramic materials for layers 1816 and 1820, these layers could be using a laminate material such as a printed circuit board (PCB) FR4 material, or a metal-clad PCB material. However, since the thermal conductivity of laminate materials (e.g., less than about 1 W/(mK)) is much less than that of ceramic materials, using a laminate material in lieu of a ceramic material would reduce the thermal conductivity of layer 1820. Regardless of the material used for layer 1820, thermal conductivity may be increased in some embodiments of the invention by increasing the number of thermally conductive lines 1822 included under the LED array. While this approach would provide better overall thermal conductivity from the LED array to the heat sink, it would provide worse thermal separation between the emission LEDs.
In the illustrated embodiment, illumination device 110 comprises a plurality of emission LEDs 126 and one or more dedicated photodetectors 128. The emission LEDs 126, in this example, comprise four chains of any number of LEDs. In typical embodiments, each chain may have 2 to 4 LEDs of the same color, which are coupled in series and configured to receive the same drive current. In one example, the emission LEDs 126 may include a chain of red LEDs, a chain of green LEDs, a chain of blue LEDs, and a chain of white or yellow LEDs. However, the present invention is not limited to any particular number of LED chains, any particular number of LEDs within the chains, or any particular color or combination of LED colors.
Although the one or more dedicated photodetectors 128 are also illustrated in
In addition to including one or more emitter modules, illumination device 110 includes various hardware and software components, which are configured for powering the illumination device and controlling the light output from the emitter module(s). In one embodiment, the illumination device is connected to an AC mains 112, and includes an AC/DC converter 114 for converting AC mains power (e.g., 120 V or 240 V) to a DC voltage (VDC). As shown in
In the illustrated embodiment, PLL 118 locks to the AC mains frequency (e.g., 50 or 60 HZ) and produces a high-speed clock (CLK) signal and a synchronization signal (SYNC). The CLK signal provides the timing for control circuit 122 and LED driver and receiver circuit 124. In one example, the CLK signal frequency is in the tens of MHz range (e.g., 23 MHz), and is precisely synchronized to the AC Mains frequency and phase. The SYNC signal is used by the control circuit 122 to create the timing used to obtain the various optical and electrical measurements described above. In one example, the SYNC signal frequency is equal to the AC Mains frequency (e.g., 50 or 60 HZ) and also has a precise phase alignment with the AC Mains.
In some embodiments, a wireless interface 120 may be included and used to calibrate the illumination device 110 during manufacturing. As noted above, for example, an external calibration tool (not shown in
Wireless interface 120 is not limited to receiving only calibration data and may be used for communicating information and commands for many other purposes. For example, wireless interface 120 could be used during normal operation to communicate commands, which may be used to control the illumination device 110, or to obtain information about the illumination device 110. For instance, commands may be communicated to the illumination device 110 via the wireless interface 120 to turn the illumination device on/off, to control the dimming level and/or color set point of the illumination device, to initiate the calibration procedure, or to store calibration results in memory. In other examples, wireless interface 120 may be used to obtain status information or fault condition codes associated with illumination device 110.
In some embodiments, wireless interface 120 could operate according to ZigBee, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or any other proprietary or standard wireless data communication protocol. In other embodiments, wireless interface 120 could communicate using radio frequency (RF), infrared (IR) light or visible light. In alternative embodiments, a wired interface could be used, in place of the wireless interface 120 shown, to communicate information, data and/or commands over the AC mains or a dedicated conductor or set of conductors.
Using the timing signals received from PLL 118, the control circuit 122 calculates and produces values indicating the desired drive current to be used for each LED chain 126. This information may be communicated from the control circuit 122 to the LED driver and receiver circuit 124 over a serial bus conforming to a standard, such as SPI or I2C, for example. In addition, the control circuit 122 may provide a latching signal that instructs the LED driver and receiver circuit 124 to simultaneously change the drive currents supplied to each of the LEDs 126 to prevent brightness and color artifacts.
In general, the control circuit 122 may be configured for determining the respective drive currents needed to achieve a desired luminous flux and/or a desired chromaticity for the illumination device in accordance with one or more of the compensation methods shown in
In general, the LED driver and receiver circuit 124 may include a number (N) of driver blocks 130 equal to the number of emission LED chains 126 included within the illumination device. In the exemplary embodiment discussed herein, LED driver and receiver circuit 124 comprises four driver blocks 130, each configured to produce illumination from a different one of the emission LED chains 126. The LED driver and receiver circuit 124 also comprises the circuitry needed to measure ambient temperature (optional), the detector and/or emitter forward voltages, and the detector photocurrents, and to adjust the LED drive currents accordingly. Each driver block 130 receives data indicating a desired drive current from the control circuit 122, along with a latching signal indicating when the driver block 130 should change the drive current.
As shown in
As noted above, some embodiments of the invention may use one of the emission LEDs (e.g., a green emission LED), at times, as a photodetector. In such embodiments, the driver blocks 130 may include additional circuitry for measuring the photocurrents (Iph_d2), which are induced across an emission LED, when the emission LED is configured for detecting incident light. For example, each driver block 130 may include a transimpedance amplifier 135, which generally functions to convert an input current to an output voltage proportional to a feedback resistance. As shown in
When measuring the photocurrents (Iph_d2) induced by an emission LED, the buck converters 132 connected to all other emission LEDs should be turned off to avoid visual artifacts produced by LED current transients. In addition, the buck converter 132 coupled to the emission LED under test should also be turned off to prevent switching noise within the buck converter from interfering with the photocurrent measurements. Although turned off, the Vdr output of the buck converter 132 coupled to the emission LED under test is held to a particular value (e.g., about 2-3.5 volts times the number of emission LEDs in the chain) by the capacitor within LC filter 138. When this voltage (Vdr) is supplied to the anode of emission LED under test and the positive terminal of the transimpedance amplifier 135, the transimpedance amplifier produces an output voltage (relative to Vdr) that is supplied to the positive terminal of difference amplifier 136. Difference amplifier 136 compares the output voltage of transimpedance amplifier 135 to Vdr and generates a difference signal, which corresponds to the photocurrent (Iph_d2) induced across the LED chain 126.
In addition to including a plurality of driver blocks 130, the LED driver and receiver circuit 124 may include one or more receiver blocks 140 for measuring the forward voltages (Vfd) and photocurrents (Iph_d1 or Iph_d2) induced across the one or more dedicated photodetectors 128. Although only one receiver block 140 is shown in
In the illustrated embodiment, receiver block 140 comprises a voltage source 142, which is coupled for supplying a DC voltage (Vdr) to the anode of the dedicated photodetector 128 coupled to the receiver block, while the cathode of the photodetector 128 is connected to current source 144. When photodetector 128 is configured for obtaining forward voltage (Vfd), the controller 154 supplies a “Detector_On” signal to the current source 144, which forces a fixed drive current (Idrv) equal to the value provided by the “Detector Current” signal through photodetector 128.
When obtaining detector forward voltage (Vfd) measurements, current source 144 is configured for drawing a relatively small amount of drive current (Idrv) through photodetector 128. The voltage drop (Vfd) produced across photodetector 128 by that current is measured by difference amplifier 147, which produces a signal equal to the forward voltage (Vfd) drop across photodetector 128. As noted above, the drive current (Idrv) forced through photodetector 128 by the current source 144 is generally a relatively small, non-operative drive current. In the embodiment in which four dedicated photodetectors 128 are coupled in parallel, the non-operative drive current may be roughly 1 mA. However, smaller/larger drive currents may be used in embodiments that include fewer/greater numbers of photodetectors, or embodiments that do not connect the photodetectors in parallel.
Similar to driver block 130, receiver block 140 also includes circuitry for measuring the photocurrents (Iph_d1 or Iph_d2) induced on photodetector 128 by light emitted by the emission LEDs. As shown in
As noted above, some embodiments of the invention may scatter the individual LEDs within each chain of LEDs 126 about the array of LEDs, so that no two LEDs of the same color exist in any row, column, or diagonal (see, e.g.,
As shown in
In some embodiments, the LED driver and receiver circuit 124 may include an optional temperature sensor 156 for taking ambient temperature (Ta) measurements. In such embodiments, multiplexor 150 may also be coupled for multiplexing the ambient temperature (Ta) with the forward voltage and photocurrent measurements sent to the ADC 152. In some embodiments, the temperature sensor 156 may be a thermistor, and may be included on the driver circuit chip for measuring the ambient temperature surrounding the LEDs, or a temperature from the heat sink of the emitter module. In other embodiments, the temperature sensor 156 may be an LED, which is used as both a temperature sensor and an optical sensor to measure ambient light conditions or output characteristics of the LED emission chains 126. If the optional temperature sensor 156 is included, the output of the temperature sensor may be used in some embodiments to determine if a significant change in temperature is detected in step 32 of
One implementation of an improved illumination device 110 has now been described in reference to
It will be appreciated to those skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure that this invention is believed to provide an improved illumination device and improved methods for calibrating and compensating individual LEDs in the illumination device, so as to maintain a desired luminous flux and a desired chromaticity over variations in drive current, temperature and time. In addition, emitter modules having improved thermal and electrical characteristics are also provided herein. Further modifications and alternative embodiments of various aspects of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art in view of this description. It is intended, therefore, that the following claims be interpreted to embrace all such modifications and changes and, accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/834,368, filed Mar. 30, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/231,925, filed Dec. 24, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,605,652, issued Mar. 31, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/314,482, filed Jun. 25, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,161,786, issued Dec. 25, 2018, which is related to commonly assigned U.S. application Ser. No. 13/970,944 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,237,620), Ser. No. 13/970,964 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,651,632), and Ser. No. 13/970,990 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,578,724); U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/886,471; and U.S. application Ser. No. 14/097,339, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,360,174. The entirety of each of these applications is incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16834368 | Mar 2020 | US |
| Child | 17665921 | US | |
| Parent | 16231925 | Dec 2018 | US |
| Child | 16834368 | US | |
| Parent | 14314482 | Jun 2014 | US |
| Child | 16231925 | US |
