This disclosure relates in general to wireless communications, and more particularly to enforcement of user level policies from visited networks in a mobile IP environment.
The mobile Internet Protocol (IP) provides portable access to IP communication services. Mobile IP allows an access terminal to roam from its home network while maintaining a relatively permanent IP address. By maintaining a relatively permanent IP address, mobile IP may provide relatively seamless communication services while the access terminal moves from one network to another.
A mobile IP enabled network generally includes a home agent in the access terminal's home network and a foreign agent in a visited network where the access terminal is located. The access terminal may be any mobile IP network aware device that may be used for data communications and may be, for example, a cellular telephone, a notebook computer, or a personal digital assistant (PDA). The access terminal may connect to the Internet by forming a point of attachment to the home agent or to the foreign agent. If the access terminal connects to the Internet through the designated home agent, registration of the access terminal may be performed with the home agent in the normal manner. If the access terminal connects to the Internet through the foreign agent, however the foreign agent negotiates the connection with the home agent to register the connection.
In one embodiment according to the present disclosure, a system for providing mobile Internet Protocol (IP) connectivity includes a memory and a processor. The memory stores one or more user level policies associated with an access terminal. The processor establishes a mobile IP connection with the access terminal. The processor receives the user level policies from a home IP gateway of the access terminal, and applies the user level policies to the mobile IP connection.
Embodiments of the disclosure may provide numerous technical advantages. Some, none, or all embodiments may benefit from the below described advantages. According to one embodiment, a policy enforcement point may be formed at the foreign agent when the access terminal forms a point of attachment to the foreign agent. The policy enforcement point may control various user level policy rule of the IP connection, such as quality of service (QoS), user security, accounting, user mobility, and packet inspection. Mobile IP extensions may be used to convey the user level policy rules from the home agent to the foreign agent.
Other technical advantages will be apparent to one of skill in the art.
For a more complete understanding of the present disclosure and its advantages, reference is now made to the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The home network may enforce user level policies of a mobile IP session used by the access terminal while attached to the home network. A policy enforcement point of a home network administers user level policies, such as quality of service (QoS), user security, accounting, user mobility, and packet inspection. Mobile IP, however may not provide adequate enforcement for user level policies while the access terminal is attached to the Internet through a visited network.
The access terminal 14 may be any mobile IP network aware device that may be used for data communications and may be, for example, a cellular telephone, a notebook computer, or a personal digital assistant (PDA). Access terminal 14 may communicate with radio access network 20a using any suitable wireless communication network protocol, such as a CDMA network protocol. The radio access network 20 may be any suitable type of radio access network, such as a high rate packet data (HRPD) network, an Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UTMS) or a Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) network telecommunication system.
Home network 12a generally includes a radio access network (RAN) 20a, a security manager 24a, a home bearer manager 26a, and an IP gateway 28a. In one embodiment, home network 12a may be an IP multimedia subsystem (IMS) that provides various data communication services, such as, for example, packet-switched voice call services, e-mail messaging services, instant messaging services, and Internet access services. In another embodiment, home network 12a may be a code division multiple access 2000 (CDMA2000) multimedia domain (MMD) network. In the particular embodiment shown, home network 12a is a multimedia domain network, such that home network 12a includes a security manager 24a, a bearer manager 26a, and an IP gateway 28a.
The IP gateway 28a may be any IP packet routing device suitable for routing IP packets between the radio access network 20a and the IP network 16 through the bearer manager 26a. In one embodiment, IP gateway 28a may be operable to transcode IP packets from bearer manager 26a into RP packets suitable for transmission over the radio access network 20a.
The bearer manager 26a couples the IP gateway 28a to the IP network 16 and may provide various security functions, such as firewall functions, intrusion detection functions, and distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack prevention functions. The bearer manager 26a may have a policy enforcement point (PEP) 27a. The policy enforcement point 27a may enforce various user level policies of an IP session between the access terminal 14 and the IP network 16. In one embodiment, these user level policies may be uniquely associated with each access terminal 14.
The security manager 24a is coupled to the bearer manager 26a and may register access terminal 14 to the home network 12a or visited network 12b. Home security manager 36 may have a memory for storage of user level policies 30 associated with the access terminal 14. Examples of network policies may include quality of service (QoS), user security, accounting, user mobility, charging, and packet inspection policies.
In one embodiment, security manager 24a includes a policy decision function (PDF) 25a. Policy, decision function 25a may manage authorization of services for the access terminal 14 based on network policies. In the embodiment shown, policy decision function 25a is implemented in security manager 24a. The policy decision function 25a, however, may exist as a separate entity.
The user level policies 30 may be governed by a service agreement entered into between the mobility service provider and owner of the access terminal 18. For example, the service agreement may specify various aspects of services provided, such as expected level of quality and/or access availability. The agreed upon terms of the service agreement may then be stored as one or more user level policies 30 that may be used by the bearer manager 26a to control the level of quality and/or access availability in accordance with the agreed upon terms of the service agreement.
The security manager 24a, bearer manager 26a, and/or IP gateway 28a may be implemented on one or more computing systems, each having a computer processor that is operable to execute instructions stored in a memory. In one embodiment, security manager 24a, bearer manager 26a, and IP gateway 28a may be implemented on a single computing system in which security manager 24a, bearer manager 26a, and IP gateway 28a may communicate using, for example, internal system calls. In another embodiment, security manager 24a, bearer manager 26a, and IP gateway 28a may each be implemented on separate computing systems such that communication between security manager 24a, bearer manager 26a, and/or IP gateway 28a is accomplished via a communication link, such as an Ethernet or other similar communication link.
The visited network 12b generally includes a radio access network (RAN) 20b, a visited security manager 24b, a visited bearer manager 26b, and an IP gateway 28b. In one embodiment, visited network 12b may be a multimedia domain network, such that visited network 12b includes an IP gateway 28b, a bearer manager 26b, a policy decision function 25b, and a security manager 24b that function in a manner similar to the IP gateway 28a, bearer manager 26a, policy decision function 25a, and security manager 24a of home network 12a. The visited bearer manager 26b differs from home bearer manager 26a in that visited bearer manager 26b may have a foreign agent 22. Foreign agent 22 may implement mobile IP functions at the visited bearer manager 26a.
In one embodiment, bearer manager 26b serves as a policy enforcement point for various user level policies when access terminal 14 has a point of attachment to the visited network 12b. In another embodiment, the policy enforcement point may be shared between the bearer manager 26a in the home network 12a and the bearer manager 26b in the visited network 12b. In one embodiment, an IP peering connection 32 may be provided for communication of user level policies 30 in between home policy decision function 25a and visited policy decision function 25b. Home policy decision function 25a and visited policy decision function 25b may also have a policy peering relationship with home bearer manager 26a and visited bearer manager 26b, respectively.
In the particular embodiment described above, enforcement of user level policies 30 in visited network 12b may be provided by the bearer manager 26b. Enforcement of user level policies 30, however may be provided by any network node in the visited network 12b, in other embodiments. For example, IP gateway 28b in visited network 12b may be used as a policy enforcement point for control of mobile IP connectivity of access terminal 14 to the IP network 16.
As described previously, registration of access terminal 14 to the IP network 16 through either home network 12a or visited network 12b may include implementation of one or more user level policies 30 that are stored in the security manager 24a of the access terminal's home network 12a. When connected to the IP network 16 through the home network 12a, the bearer manager 26a may use these user level policies 30 to control various network-based provisions of the mobile IP session. The bearer manager 26b in the visited network 12b may also use these user level policies 30 to control various network-based provisions of the mobile IP session when the access terminal 14 has a point of attachment to the visited network 12b. Although home network 12a is described in this disclosure as the designated home network of access terminal 14, it should be understood that home network 12a may serve as a visited network and visited network 12b may serve as a home network for another access terminal in which visited network 12b is the designated home network.
The mobile IP protocol provides mobile IP control messages for transmitting information between the home IP gateway 28a and foreign agent 22. In one embodiment, user level policies 30 may be transmitted from the home IP gateway 28a to the foreign agent 22 as one or more extensions in a mobile IP control message.
A component of environment 10 may include any suitable arrangement of elements, for example, an interface, logic, memory, other suitable element, or a combination of any of the preceding. An interface receives input, sends output, processes the input and/or output, performs other suitable operation, or performs a combination of any of the preceding. An interface may comprise hardware and/or software.
Logic performs the operations of the component, for example, executes instructions to generate output from input. Logic may include hardware, software, other logic, or a combination of any of the preceding. Certain logic, such as a processor, may manage the operation of a component. Examples of a processor include one or more applications, other logic, or a combination of any of the preceding.
A memory stores information. A memory may comprise computer memory (for example, Random Access Memory (RAM) or Read Only Memory (ROM)), mass storage media (for example, a hard disk), removable storage media (for example, a Compact Disk (CD) or a Digital Video Disk (DVD)), database and/or network storage (for example, a server), other computer-readable medium, or a combination of any of the preceding.
Modifications, additions, or omissions may be made to environment 10 without departing from the scope of the invention. The components of environment 10 may be integrated or separated. Moreover, the operations of environment 10 may be performed by more, fewer, or other components. Additionally, operations of environment 10 may be performed using any suitable logic comprising software, hardware, other logic, or any suitable combination of the preceding. As used in this document, “each” refers to each member of a set or each member of a subset of a set.
Standard mobile IP extension 36 includes a type field 38, a length field 40, and an user level policies field 42. The type field 38 indicates that this particular extension is an user level policies extension. The type field 38 may be any numeric value that uniquely identifies the standard mobile IP extension 36 from other types of mobile IP extensions. The length field 40 specifies the length of the extension in bytes.
The user level policies field 42 may include one or more policy identifiers corresponding to one or more user level policies. For example, the user level policy field may include one policy identifiers corresponding to one particular user level policy, such as the charging policy to be applied to a particular mobile IP session. As another example, the user level policy field 42 may include several policy identifiers corresponding to several user level policies, such as the quality of service, user security level, and user mobility to be applied to another particular mobile IP session. In one embodiment, a single mobile IP extension 36 may be used. In another embodiment, a number of mobile IP extensions 36 may be used.
In one embodiment, the standard mobile IP extension 36 may be skippable such that the foreign agent 22 will continue to process the remaining extensions in the IP control message in the event that one or more user level policy rules are not recognized. Certain embodiments incorporating skippable extensions may provide an advantage in that mobile IP registration with a foreign agent may still be allowed with visited networks that do recognize user level policy rules from the home IP gateway 28a.
Vendor-specific mobile IP extension 44 generally includes a type field 46, a length field 48, a reserved field 50, a vendor ID field 52, an user level policy type field 54, and an user level policy value field 56. More specifically, the type field 46 has a value of 134 to indicate that the extension is a normal vendor-specific extension. Length field 48 specifies the length of the extension in bytes. The vendor ID field 52 indicates the identity of the home network 12a. The user level policies field 56 may include one or more policy identifiers corresponding to one or more user level policies as described above. The user level policies field 56 is generally similar to the user level policy field 42 of
In one embodiment, extensions may be implemented on mobile IP version 4 (MIPv4) control messages. MIPv4 control messages are described in document “IP Mobility Support For IPv4,” RFC 3344 of the Network Working Group (August 2002). In another embodiment, extensions may be implemented on mobile IP version 6 (MIPv6) control messages. MIPv6 control messages are described in document “IP Mobility Support For IPv6,” RFC 3775 of the Network Working Group (June 2004).
At step 102, the IP gateway 28b sends the identity asserted by the access terminal 14 in an identity message to the visited security manager 24b. At step 104, the IP gateway 28b determines the home network 12a of the access terminal 14 and sends this identity message to the home security manager 24a. In one embodiment, the visited security manager 24b may determine the home network using a domain portion of the identity, wherein the identity may be of the form “user@domain.”
At step 106, once the home security manager 24a receives the identity message, it proceeds to authenticate the access terminal 14. The home security manager 24a may authenticate the access terminal 14 using any suitable authentication protocol. In one embodiment, the home security manager 24a authenticates the access terminal 14 using an EAP protocol. In another embodiment, the home security manager 24a authenticates the access terminal 14 using a point-to-point protocol (PPP).
At step 108, the IP gateway 28b establishes a mobility binding with the bearer manager 26b in the visited network 12b. At step 110, the bearer manager 26b generates a care-of-address and sends this care-of-address to the IP gateway 28b. In one embodiment, the bearer manager 26b generates the care-of-address using a Stateless Address Auto Configuration (SLAAC) according to “IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration,” RFC 2462 of Network Working Group (December 1998). In another embodiment, the bearer manager 26b generates the care-of-address using a dynamic host configuration protocol (DHCP). “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6,” RFC 3315 of the Network Working Group (July 2003), describes one embodiment of a protocol that may be used to implement DHCP for generation of the care-of-address. At step 112, IP gateway 28b forwards this care-of-address to the access terminal 14.
At step 114, the access terminal 14 registers the care-of-address by sending a care-of-address message to the home bearer manager 26a. At step 116, the home bearer manager 26a sends an user level policy request message to the home policy decision function 25a requesting any available user level policies 30 associated with the access terminal 14. At step 118, the home policy decision function 25a responds by sending the requested user level policies 30 to the home bearer manager 26a.
At step 120, the bearer manager 26a implements any pertinent user level policy controls on the pending mobile IP session. At step 122, the home bearer manager 26a forwards the user level policy message to the visited bearer manager 26b. At step 124, the visited bearer manger 26b applies any pertinent user level policy controls to the pending mobile IP session. At this point, mobile IP service registration is complete.
The mobile IP service registration described above may be implemented with any mobile IP enabled network having a configurable policy enforcement point. For example, the mobile IP service registration described above may be implemented on an access terminal 14 that has formed a point of attachment to a multimedia domain network. In another example, the mobile IP service registration may be accomplished in a similar manner with a non-multimedia domain network, yet having a configurable policy enforcement point, such as an IP gateway 28b. That is, nodes other than the bearer manager 26b may be used as a policy enforcement point for control of access terminal 14 in a mobile IP session. The IP gateway 28b may also be used for negotiating the registration of the access terminal 14 to the foreign agent 22.
Modifications, additions, or omissions may be made to the method without departing from the scope of the invention. The method may include more, fewer, or other steps. Additionally, steps may be performed in any suitable order.
Embodiments of the disclosure may provide numerous technical advantages. Some, none, or all embodiments may benefit from the below described advantages. According to one embodiment, a policy enforcement point may be formed at the foreign agent when the access terminal forms a point of attachment to the foreign agent. The policy enforcement point may control various user level policy rule of the IP connection, such as quality of service (QoS), user security, accounting, user mobility, and packet inspection. Mobile IP extensions may be used to convey the user level policy rules from the home agent to the foreign agent.
Although the present disclosure describes several embodiments, various changes and modifications may be suggested to one skilled in the art. It is intended that the present disclosure encompass such changes and modifications as falls within the scope of the appended claims.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/780,176, entitled “VERIZON WIRELESS MULTI-MEDIA PLUS (MMD+) PROGRAM SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE DOCUMENT,” filed Mar. 6, 2006, by Flemming Andreasen et al., which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5602907 | Hata et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5822411 | Swale et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828737 | Sawyer | Oct 1998 | A |
5905736 | Ronen et al. | May 1999 | A |
5909238 | Nagashima et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5946670 | Motohashi et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5956391 | Melen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5970477 | Roden | Oct 1999 | A |
5987498 | Athing et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6016509 | Dedrick | Jan 2000 | A |
6035281 | Crosskey et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047051 | Ginzboorg et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6070192 | Holt et al. | May 2000 | A |
6075854 | Copley et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6131024 | Boltz | Oct 2000 | A |
6137791 | Frid et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141684 | McDonald et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6175879 | Shah et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6208977 | Hernandez et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6229887 | Albers et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6282573 | Darago et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6295447 | Reichelt et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6330562 | Boden et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332163 | Bowman-Amuah | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6339832 | Bowman-Amuah | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6434568 | Bowman-Amuah | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434628 | Bowman-Amuah | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438594 | Bowman-Amuah | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442748 | Bowman-Amuah | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6466964 | Leung et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477580 | Bowman-Amuah | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6477665 | Bowman-Amuah | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6480485 | Kari et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490451 | Denman et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493547 | Raith | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496850 | Bowman-Amuah | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502213 | Bowman-Amuah | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6510513 | Danieli | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6529909 | Bowman-Amuah | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6529948 | Bowman-Amuah | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6539396 | Bowman-Amuah | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6549949 | Bowman-Amuah | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6550057 | Bowman-Amuah | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6571282 | Bowman-Amuah | May 2003 | B1 |
6578068 | Bowman-Amuah | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6601192 | Bowman-Amuah | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601234 | Bowman-Amuah | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606660 | Bowman-Amuah | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611821 | Stahl et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6615199 | Bowman-Amuah | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6615253 | Bowman-Amuah | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6615263 | Dulai et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6621820 | Williams et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636242 | Bowman-Amuah | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6640238 | Bowman-Amuah | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6640244 | Bowman-Amuah | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6647262 | Demetrescu et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6665537 | Lioy | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665718 | Chuah et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671675 | Iwamura | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6684243 | Euget et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6684256 | Warrier et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6708225 | Cho et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714515 | Marchand | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6715145 | Bowman-Amuah | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6728266 | Sabry et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728365 | Li et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728884 | Lim | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6742015 | Bowman-Amuah | May 2004 | B1 |
6742036 | Das et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6757371 | Kim et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760444 | Leung | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6768726 | Dorenbosch et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6769000 | Akhtar et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6771623 | Ton | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785256 | O'Neill | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6804518 | Core et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6826173 | Kung et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6829709 | Acharya et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6834341 | Bahl et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6839338 | Amara et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6842906 | Bowman-Amuah | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6856676 | Pirot et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6889321 | Kung et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6907501 | Tariq et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6910074 | Amin et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6915345 | Tummala et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6917605 | Kakemizu et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6920503 | Nanji et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6922404 | Narayanan et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6925160 | Stevens et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6947401 | El-Malki et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6961774 | Shannon et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6967941 | Roy | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6978128 | Raman et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6980802 | Jung | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6980962 | Arganbright et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6981047 | Hanson et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6982967 | Leung | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6990337 | O'Neill et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993333 | Laroia et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7003294 | Singhai et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7020697 | Goodman et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7024687 | Chaudhuri et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7028311 | Roach et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039027 | Bridgelall | May 2006 | B2 |
7054268 | Parantainen et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7079499 | Akhtar et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7082301 | Jagadeesan et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7103359 | Heinonen et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7127234 | Ishii | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130286 | Koodli et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133386 | Holur et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7142520 | Haverinen et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7151758 | Kumaki et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7151772 | Kalmanek et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7154868 | Sharma et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7161914 | Shoaib et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171555 | Salowey et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7184418 | Baba et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7187931 | Trossen | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7190793 | Hsu | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197763 | Hsu | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7212821 | Laroia et | May 2007 | B2 |
7230951 | Mizell et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7233583 | Asthana et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7251733 | Haverinen et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7263371 | Das et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7269727 | Mukherjee et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7272122 | Trossen et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7272123 | Wall | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7275156 | Balfanz et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7389106 | Dawson et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
20010023428 | Miyazaki et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020021681 | Madour | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020023174 | Garrett et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020036982 | Chen | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020059114 | Cockrill et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020091802 | Paul et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020138601 | Piponius et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020151312 | Bos et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030021252 | Harper et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030039237 | Forslow | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030108015 | Li | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030154400 | Pirttimaa et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030187817 | Agrawal et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030217165 | Buch et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040114553 | Jiang et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040162876 | Kohavi | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162892 | Hsu | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040196821 | Haddad et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210524 | Benenati et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040259562 | Madour | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050002407 | Shaheen et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050025132 | Harper et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050130659 | Grech et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149651 | Doak et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050176428 | Gabor et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050195766 | Nasieiski et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201324 | Zheng | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213606 | Huang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050220039 | Hoshino et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050278420 | Hartikainen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286709 | Horton et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060014547 | Walter | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060018272 | Mutikainen et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060023662 | Inoue | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060077924 | Rune | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060116113 | Gass | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060126630 | Shirazipour et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060141995 | Purnadi et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060171310 | Ahluwalia et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060250956 | Alfano et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060251038 | Tamura et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060264207 | Tamura et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060268819 | Chen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070008882 | Oran | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070036312 | Cai et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070086582 | Tai et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094712 | Gibbs et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070121615 | Weill et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070121642 | Battin et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070153720 | Baglin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070206539 | Tegani et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070254661 | Chowdhury et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 9826381 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9931610 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 2005107297 | Nov 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60780176 | Mar 2006 | US |