Patent Application
20190071657
The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which has been submitted electronically in ASCII format and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Said ASCII copy, created on Feb. 4, 2016, is named 29539-0189001_SL.txt and is 129,880 bytes in size.
The invention relates, at least in part, to engineered Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPRs)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) nucleases with altered and improved target specificity and their use in genomic engineering, epigenomic engineering, genome targeting, genome editing, and in vitro diagnostics.
CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases enable efficient genome editing in a wide variety of organisms and cell types (Sander & Joung, Nat Biotechnol 32, 347-355 (2014); Hsu et al., Cell 157, 1262-1278 (2014); Doudna & Charpentier, Science 346, 1258096 (2014); Barrangou & May, Expert Opin Biol Ther 15, 311-314 (2015)). Target site recognition by Cas9 is programmed by a chimeric single guide RNA (sgRNA) that encodes a sequence complementary to a target protospacer (Jinek et al., Science 337, 816-821 (2012)), but also requires recognition of a short neighboring PAM (Mojica et al., Microbiology 155, 733-740 (2009); Shah et al., RNA Biol 10, 891-899 (2013); Jiang et al., Nat Biotechnol 31, 233-239 (2013); Jinek et al., Science 337, 816-821 (2012); Sternberg et al., Nature 507, 62-67 (2014)).
As described herein, Cas9 Proteins can be engineered to show increased specificity, theoretically by reducing the binding affinity of Cas9 for DNA. Thus, described herein are a number of Cas9 variants that have increased specificity (i.e., induce substantially fewer off target effects) as compared to the wild type protein, as well as methods of using them.
In a first aspect, the invention provides isolated Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 (SpCas9) proteins with mutations at one, two, three, four, five, six or all seven of the following positions: L169A, Y450, N497, R661, Q695, Q926, and/or D1135E e.g., comprising a sequence that is at least 80% identical to the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:1 with mutations at one, two, three, four, five, six, or seven of the following positions: L169, Y450, N497, R661, Q695, Q926, D1135E, and optionally one or more of a nuclear localization sequence, cell penetrating peptide sequence, and/or affinity tag. A mutation alters the amino acid to an amino acid other than the native amino acid (e.g., 497 is anything but N). In preferred embodiments the mutation changes the amino acid to any amino acid other than the native one, arginine or lysine; in some embodiments, the amino acid is alanine.
In some embodiments, the variant SpCas9 proteins comprise one, two, three, or all four of the following mutations: N497A, R661A, Q695A, and Q926A.
In some embodiments, the variant SpCas9 proteins comprise mutations at Q695 and/or Q926, and optionally one, two, three, four or all five of L169, Y450, N497, R661 and D1135Ee.g., including but not limited to Y450A/Q695A, L169A/Q695A, Q695A/Q926A, Q695A/D1135E, Q926A/D1135E, Y450A/D1135E, L169A/Y450A/Q695A, L169A/Q695A/Q926A, Y450A/Q695A/Q926A, R661A/Q695A/Q926A, N497A/Q695A/Q926A, Y450A/Q695A/D1135E, Y450A/Q926A/D1135E, Q695A/Q926A/D1135E, L169A/Y450A/Q695A/Q926A, L169A/R661A/Q695A/Q926A,Y450A/R661A/Q695A/Q926A, N497A/Q695A/Q926A/D1135E, R661A/Q695A/Q926A/D1135E, and Y450A/Q695A/Q926A/D1135E.
In some embodiments, the variant SpCas9 proteins comprise mutations at R63; R78; H160; K163; R165; L169; R403; N407; Y450; M495; N497; K510; Y515; W659; R661; M694; Q695; H698; A728; Q926; K1107; E1108; S1109; K1113; R1114; S1116; K1118; D1135; S1136; K1153; K1155 ; K1158; K1200; Q1221; K1289; R1298; K1300; K1325; K1334; T1337 and/or S1216.
In some embodiments, the variant SpCas9 proteins also comprise one or more of the following mutations: R63A; R78A; R165A; R403A; N407A; N497A; Y450A; K510A; Y515A; R661A; Q695A; Q926A; K1107A; E1108A; S1109A; K1113A; R1114A; S1116A; K1118A; D1135A; S1136A; K1153A; K1155A; K1158A; K1200A; Q1221A; K1289A; R1298A; K1300A; K1325A; K1334A; T1337A and/or S1216A. In some embodiments, variant SpCas9 proteins comprise one or more of the following additional mutations: R63A, R66A, R69A, R70A, R71A, Y72A, R74A, R75A, K76A, N77A, R78A, R115A, H160A, K163A, R165A, L169A, R403A,T404A, F405A, N407A, R447A, N497A, I448A, Y450A, S460A, M495A, K510A, Y515A, R661A, M694A, Q695A, H698A, Y1013A, V1015A, R1122A, K1123A, K1124A, K1158A, K1185A, K1200A, S1216A, Q1221A, K1289A, R1298A, K1300A, K1325A, R1333A, K1334A, R1335A, and T1337A.
In some embodiments, the variant SpCas9 proteins comprise multiple substitution mutations: N497/R661/Q695/Q926 (quadruple variant mutants); Q695/Q926 (double mutant); R661/Q695/Q926 and N497/Q695/Q926 (triple mutants). In some embodiments, the additional substitution mutations at L169, Y450 and/or D1135 might be added to these double-, triple, and quadruple mutants or added to single mutants bearing substitutions at Q695 or Q926. In some embodiments, the mutants have alanine in place of the wild type amino acid. In some embodiments, the mutants have any amino acid other than arginine or lysine (or the native amino acid).
In some embodiments, the variant SpCas9 proteins also comprise one or more mutations that decrease nuclease activity selected from the group consisting of mutations at D10, E762, D839, H983, or D986; and at H840 or N863.
In some embodiments, the mutations are: (i) D10A or D1ON, and (ii) H840A, H840N, or H840Y.
In some embodiments, the SpCas9 variants can also include one of the following sets of mutations: D1135V/R1335Q/T1337R (VQR variant); D1135E/R1335Q/T1337R (EQR variant); D1135V/G1218R/R1335Q/T1337R (VRQR variant); or D1135V/G1218R/R1335E/T1337R (VRER variant).
Also provided herein are isolated Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 (SaCas9) protein, with mutations at one, two, three, four, five, or six of the following positions: Y211, W229, R245, T392, N419, R654, e.g., comprising a sequence that is at least 80% identical to the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:1 with mutations at one, two, three, four, or five, or six of the following positions: Y211, W229, R245, T392, N419, R654, and optionally one or more of a nuclear localization sequence, cell penetrating peptide sequence, and/or affinity tag. In some embodiments, the SaCas9 variants described herein include the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2, with mutations at one, two, three, four, five, or all six of the following positions: Y211, W229, R245, T392, N419, and/or R654. The isolated protein of claim 8, comprising one or more of the following mutations: Y211A, W229, R245A, T392A, N419A, and/or R654A.
In some embodiments, the variant SaCas9 proteins comprise mutations at N419 and/or R654, and optionally one, two, three or four of the additional mutations Y211, W229, R245 and T392, e.g., including but not limited to N419A/R654A, Y211A/R654A, W229A/R654A, Y211A/R245A/R654A, Y211A/R245A/N419A, Y211A/N419A/R654A, R245A/N419A/R654A, T392A/N419A/R654A, R245A/T392A/N419A/R654A, Y211A/R245A/N419A/R654A, W229A/R245A/N419A/R654A, Y211A/R245A/T392A/N419A/R654A, and Y211A/W229A/R245A/N419A/R654A.
In some embodiments, the variant SaCas9 proteins comprise mutations at Y211; W229; Y230; R245; T392; N419; L446; Y651; R654; D786; T787; Y789; T882; K886; N888; 889; L909; N985; N986; R991; R1015; N44; R45; R51; R55; R59; R60; R116; R165; N169; R208; R209; Y211; T238; Y239; K248; Y256; R314; N394; Q414; 1(57; R61; H111; K114; V164; R165; L788; 5790; R792; N804; Y868; K870; K878; K879; K881; Y897; R901; and/or K906.
In some embodiments, the variant SaCas9 proteins comprise one or more of the following mutations: Y211A; W229A; Y230A; R245A; T392A; N419A; L446A; Y651A; R654A; D786A; T787A; Y789A; T882A; K886A; N888A; A889A; L909A; N985A; N986A; R991A; R1015A; N44A; R45A; R51A; R55A; R59A; R60A; R116A; R165A; N169A; R208A; R209A; T238A; Y239A; K248A; Y256A; R314A; N394A; Q414A; K57A; R61A; H111A; K114A; V164A; R165A; L788A; S790A; R792A; N804A; Y868A; K870A; K878A; K879A; K881A; Y897A; R901A; K906A.
In some embodiments, variant SaCas9 proteins comprise one or more of the following additional mutations: Y211A, W229A, Y230A, R245A, T392A, N419A, L446A, Y651A, R654A, D786A, T787A, Y789A, T882A, K886A, N888A, A889A, L909A, N985A, N986A, R991A, R1015A, N44A, R45A, R51A, R55A, R59A, R60A, R116A, R165A, N169A, R208A, R209A, T238A, Y239A, K248A, Y256A, R314A, N394A, Q414A, K57A, R61A, H111A, K114A, V164A, R165A, L788A, S790A, R792A, N804A, Y868A, K870A, K878A, K879A, K881A, Y897A, R901A, K906A.
In some embodiments, the variant SaCas9 proteins comprise multiple substitution mutations: R245/T392/N419/R654 and Y221/R245/N419/R654 (quadruple variant mutants); N419/R654, R245/R654, Y221/R654, and Y221/N419 (double mutants); R245/N419/R654, Y211/N419/R654, and T392/N419/R654 (triple mutants). In some embodiments the mutants contain alanine in place of the wild type amino acid.
In some embodiments, the variant SaCas9 proteins also comprise one or more mutations that decrease nuclease activity selected from the group consisting of mutations at D10, E477, D556, H701, or D704; and at H557 or N580. In some embodiments, the mutations are: (i) D10A or D10N, (ii) H557A, H557N, or H557Y, (iii) N580A, and/or (iv) D556A.
In some embodiments, the variant SaCas9 proteins comprise one or more of the following mutations: E782K, K929R, N968K, or R1015H. Specifically, E782K/N968K/R1015H (KKH variant); E782K/K929R/R1015H (KRH variant); or E782K/K929R/N968K/R1015H (KRKH variant).
In some embodiments, the variant Cas9 proteins include mutations to one or more of the following regions to increase specificity:
Also provided herein are fusion proteins comprising the isolated variant Cas9 proteins described herein fused to a heterologous functional domain, with an optional intervening linker, wherein the linker does not interfere with activity of the fusion protein. In preferred embodiments, the heterologous functional domain acts on DNA or protein, e.g., on chromatin. In some embodiments, the heterologous functional domain is a transcriptional activation domain. In some embodiments, the transcriptional activation domain is from VP64 or NF-κB p65. In some embodiments, the heterologous functional domain is a transcriptional silencer or transcriptional repression domain. In some embodiments, the transcriptional repression domain is a Kruppel-associated box (KRAB) domain, ERF repressor domain (ERD), or mSin3A interaction domain (SID). In some embodiments, the transcriptional silencer is Heterochromatin Protein 1 (HP1), e.g., HP1α or HP1β. In some embodiments, the heterologous functional domain is an enzyme that modifies the methylation state of DNA. In some embodiments, the enzyme that modifies the methylation state of DNA is a DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) or the entirety or the dioxygenase domain of a TET protein, e.g., a catalytic module comprising the cysteine-rich extension and the 2OGFeDO domain encoded by 7 highly conserved exons, e.g., the Tet1 catalytic domain comprising amino acids 1580-2052, Tet2 comprising amino acids 1290-1905 and Tet3 comprising amino acids 966-1678. In some embodiments, the TET protein or TET-derived dioxygenase domain is from TET1. In some embodiments, the heterologous functional domain is an enzyme that modifies a histone subunit. In some embodiments, the enzyme that modifies a histone subunit is a histone acetyltransferase (HAT), histone deacetylase (HDAC), histone methyltransferase (HMT), or histone demethylase. In some embodiments, the heterologous functional domain is a biological tether. In some embodiments, the biological tether is MS2, Csy4 or lambda N protein. In some embodiments, the heterologous functional domain is FokI.
Also provided herein are nucleic acids, isolated nucleic acids encoding the variant Cas9 proteins described herein, as well as vectors comprising the isolated nucleic acids, optionally operably linked to one or more regulatory domains for expressing the variant Cas9 proteins described herein. Also provided herein are host cells, e.g., bacterial, yeast, insect, or mammalian host cells or transgenic animals (e.g., mice), comprising the nucleic acids described herein, and optionally expressing the variant Cas9 proteins described herein.
Also provided herein are methods of altering the genome of a cell, by expressing in the cell isolated variant Cas9 proteins as described herein, and at least one guide RNA having a region complementary to a selected portion of the genome of the cell with optimal nucleotide spacing at the genomic target site.
Also provided herein are methods of altering the genome of a cell, by expressing in the cell an isolated variant Cas9 protein described herein, and a guide RNA having a region complementary to a selected portion of the genome of the cell with optimal nucleotide spacing at the genomic target site.
Also provided herein are isolated nucleic acids encoding the Cas9variants, as well as vectors comprising the isolated nucleic acids, optionally operably linked to one or more regulatory domains for expressing the variants, and host cells, e.g., mammalian host cells, comprising the nucleic acids, and optionally expressing the variant proteins.
Also provided herein are methods for altering, e.g., selectively altering, the genome of a cell by contacting the cell with, or expressing in the cell, a variant protein as described herein, and a guide RNA having a region complementary to a selected portion of the genome of the cell. In some embodiments, the isolated protein or fusion protein comprises one or more of a nuclear localization sequence, cell penetrating peptide sequence, and/or affinity tag.
Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Methods and materials are described herein for use in the present invention; other, suitable methods and materials known in the art can also be used. The materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting. All publications, patent applications, patents, sequences, database entries, and other references mentioned herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety. In case of conflict, the present specification, including definitions, will control.
Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description and figures, and from the claims.
The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.
A limitation of the CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases is their potential to induce undesired off-target mutations (see, for example, Tsai et al., Nat Biotechnol. 2015), in some cases with frequencies rivaling those observed at the intended on-target site (Fu et al., Nat Biotechnol. 2013). Previous work with CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases has suggested that reducing the number of sequence-specific interactions between the guide RNA (gRNA) and the spacer region of a target site can reduce mutagenic effects at off-target sites of cleavage in human cells (Fu et al., Nat Biotechnol. 2014).
This was earlier accomplished by truncating gRNAs at their 5′ ends by 2 or 3 nts and it was hypothesized that the mechanism of this increased specificity was a decrease in the interaction energy of the gRNA/Cas9 complex so that it was poised with just enough energy to cleave the on-target site, making it less likely to have enough energy to cleave off-target sites where there would presumably be an energetic penalty due to mismatches in the target DNA site (WO2015/099850).
It was hypothesized that off-target effects of SpCas9 might be minimized by decreasing non-specific interactions with its target DNA site. SpCas9-sgRNA complexes cleave target sites composed of an NGG PAM sequence (recognized by SpCas9) (Deltcheva, E. et al. Nature 471, 602-607 (2011); Jinek, M. et al. Science 337, 816-821 (2012); Jiang, W., et al., Nat Biotechnol 31, 233-239 (2013); Sternberg, S.H., et al., Nature 507, 62-67 (2014)) and an adjacent 20 bp protospacer sequence (which is complementary to the 5′ end of the sgRNA) (Jinek, M. et al. Science 337, 816-821 (2012); Jinek, M. et al. Elife 2, e00471 (2013); Mali, P. et al., Science 339, 823-826 (2013); Cong, L. et al., Science 339, 819-823 (2013)). It was previously theorized that the SpCas9-sgRNA complex may possess more energy than is needed for recognizing its intended target DNA site, thereby enabling cleavage of mismatched off-target sites (Fu, Y., et al., Nat Biotechnol 32, 279-284 (2014)). One can envision that this property might be advantageous for the intended role of Cas9 in adaptive bacterial immunity, giving it the capability to cleave foreign sequences that may become mutated. This excess energy model is also supported by previous studies demonstrating that off-target effects can be reduced (but not eliminated) by decreasing SpCas9 concentration (Hsu, P.D. et al. Nat Biotechnol 31, 827-832 (2013); Pattanayak, V. et al. Nat Biotechnol 31, 839-843 (2013)) or by reducing the complementarity length of the sgRNA (Fu, Y., et al., Nat Biotechnol 32, 279-284 (2014), although other interpretations for this effect have also been proposed (Josephs, E.A. et al. Nucleic Acids Res 43, 8924-8941 (2015); Sternberg, S.H., et al. Nature 527, 110-113 (2015); Kiani, S. et al. Nat Methods 12, 1051-1054 (2015))). Structural data suggests that the SpCas9-sgRNA-target DNA complex may be stabilized by several SpCas9-mediated DNA contacts, including direct hydrogen bonds made by four SpCas9 residues (N497, R661, Q695, Q926) to the phosphate backbone of the target DNA strand (Nishimasu, H. et al. Cell 156, 935-949 (2014); Anders, C., et al. Nature 513, 569-573 (2014)) (
As described herein, Cas9 proteins can be engineered to show increased specificity, theoretically by reducing the binding affinity of Cas9 for DNA. Several variants of the widely used Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 (SpCas9) were engineered by introducing individual alanine substitutions into various residues in SpCas9 that might be expected to interact with phosphates on the DNA backbone using structural information, bacterial selection-based directed evolution, and combinatorial design. The variants were further tested for cellular activity using a robust E.coli-based screening assay to assess the cellular activities of these variants; in this bacterial system, cell survival depended on cleavage and subsequent destruction of a selection plasmid containing a gene for the toxic gyrase poison ccdB and a 23 base pair sequence targeted by a gRNA and SpCas9, and led to identification of residues that were associated with retained or lost activity. In addition, another SpCas9 variant was identified and characterized, which exhibited improved target specificity in human cells.
Furthermore, activities of single alanine substitution mutants of SpCas9 as assessed in the bacterial cell-based system indicated that survival percentages between 50-100% usually indicated robust cleavage, whereas 0% survival indicated that the enzyme had been functionally compromised. Additional mutations of SpCas9 were then assayed in bacteria to include: R63A, R66A, R69A, R70A, R71A, Y72A, R74A, R75A, K76A, N77A, R78A, R115A, H160A, K163A, R165A, L169A, R403A, T404A, F405A, N407A, R447A, N497A, I448A, Y450A, S460A, M495A, K510A, Y515A, R661A, M694A, Q695A, H698A, Y1013A, V1015A, R1122A, K1123A, K1124A, K1158A, K1185A, K1200A, S1216A, Q1221A, K1289A, R1298A, K1300A, K1325A, R1333A, K1334A, R1335A, and T1337A. With the exception of 2 mutants (R69A and F405A) that had <5% survival in bacteria, all of these additional single mutations appeared to have little effect on the on-target activity of SpCas9 (>70% survival in the bacterial screen).
To further determine whether the variants of Cas9 identified in the bacterial screen functioned efficiently in human cells, various alanine substitution Cas9 mutants were tested using a human U2OS cell-based EGFP-disruption assay. In this assay, successful cleavage of a target site in the coding sequence of a single integrated, constitutively expressed EGFP gene led to the induction of indel mutations and disruption of EGFP activity, which was quantitatively assessed by flow cytometry (see, for example, Reyon et al., Nat Biotechnol. 2012 May;30(5):460-5).
These experiments show that the results obtained in the bacterial cell-based assay correlate well with nuclease activities in human cells, suggesting that these engineering strategies could be extended to Cas9s from other species and different cells. Thus these findings provide support for SpCas9 and SaCas9 variants, referred to collectively herein as “variants” or “the variants”.
All of the variants described herein can be rapidly incorporated into existing and widely used vectors, e.g., by simple site-directed mutagenesis, and because they require only a small number of mutations, the variants should also work with other previously described improvements to the SpCas9 platform (e.g., truncated sgRNAs (Tsai et al., Nat Biotechnol 33, 187-197 (2015); Fu et al., Nat Biotechnol 32, 279-284 (2014)), nickase mutations (Mali et al., Nat Biotechnol 31, 833-838 (2013); Ran et al., Cell 154, 1380-1389 (2013)), FokI-dCas9 fusions (Guilinger et al., Nat Biotechnol 32, 577-582 (2014); Tsai et al., Nat Biotechnol 32, 569-576 (2014); W02014144288); and engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities (Kleinstiver et al., Nature. 2015 Jul. 23;523(7561):481-5).
Thus, provided herein are Cas9 variants, including SpCas9 variants. The SpCas9 wild type sequence is as follows:
The SpCas9 variants described herein can include the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:1, with mutations (i.e., replacement of the native amino acid with a different amino acid, e.g., alanine, glycine, or serine), at one or more of the following positions: N497, R661, Q695, Q926 (or at positions analogous thereto). In some embodiments, the SpCas9 variants are at least 80%, e.g., at least 85%, 90%, or 95% identical to the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:1, e.g., have differences at up to 5%, 10%, 15%, or 20% of the residues of SEQ ID NO:1 replaced, e.g., with conservative mutations, in addition to the mutations described herein. In preferred embodiments, the variant retains desired activity of the parent, e.g., the nuclease activity (except where the parent is a nickase or a dead Cas9), and/or the ability to interact with a guide RNA and target DNA).
To determine the percent identity of two nucleic acid sequences, the sequences are aligned for optimal comparison purposes (e.g., gaps can be introduced in one or both of a first and a second amino acid or nucleic acid sequence for optimal alignment and non-homologous sequences can be disregarded for comparison purposes). The length of a reference sequence aligned for comparison purposes is at least 80% of the length of the reference sequence, and in some embodiments is at least 90% or 100%. The nucleotides at corresponding amino acid positions or nucleotide positions are then compared. When a position in the first sequence is occupied by the same nucleotide as the corresponding position in the second sequence, then the molecules are identical at that position (as used herein nucleic acid “identity” is equivalent to nucleic acid “homology”). The percent identity between the two sequences is a function of the number of identical positions shared by the sequences, taking into account the number of gaps, and the length of each gap, which need to be introduced for optimal alignment of the two sequences. Percent identity between two polypeptides or nucleic acid sequences is determined in various ways that are within the skill in the art, for instance, using publicly available computer software such as Smith Waterman Alignment (Smith, T. F. and M. S. Waterman (1981) J Mol Biol 147:195-7); “BestFit” (Smith and Waterman, Advances in Applied Mathematics, 482-489 (1981)) as incorporated into GeneMatcher Plus™, Schwarz and Dayhof (1979) Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure, Dayhof, M.O., Ed, pp 353-358; BLAST program (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool; (Altschul, S. F., W. Gish, et al. (1990) J Mol Biol 215: 403-10), BLAST-2, BLAST-P, BLAST-N, BLAST-X, WU-BLAST-2, ALIGN, ALIGN-2, CLUSTAL, or Megalign (DNASTAR) software. In addition, those skilled in the art can determine appropriate parameters for measuring alignment, including any algorithms needed to achieve maximal alignment over the length of the sequences being compared. In general, for proteins or nucleic acids, the length of comparison can be any length, up to and including full length (e.g., 5%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, or 100%). For purposes of the present compositions and methods, at least 80% of the full length of the sequence is aligned.
For purposes of the present invention, the comparison of sequences and determination of percent identity between two sequences can be accomplished using a Blossum 62 scoring matrix with a gap penalty of 12, a gap extend penalty of 4, and a frameshift gap penalty of 5.
Conservative substitutions typically include substitutions within the following groups: glycine, alanine; valine, isoleucine, leucine; aspartic acid, glutamic acid, asparagine, glutamine; serine, threonine; lysine, arginine; and phenylalanine, tyrosine.
In some embodiments, the SpCas9 variants include one of the following sets of mutations: N497A/R661A/Q695/Q926A (quadruple alanine mutant); Q695A/Q926A (double alanine mutant); R661A/Q695A/Q926A and N497A/Q695A/Q926A (triple alanine mutants). In some embodiments, the additional substitution mutations at L169 and/or Y450 might be added to these double-, triple, and quadruple mutants or added to single mutants bearing substitutions at Q695 or Q926. In some embodiments, the mutants have alanine in place of the wild type amino acid. In some embodiments, the mutants have any amino acid other than arginine or lysine (or the native amino acid).
In some embodiments, the SpCas9 variants also include one of the following mutations, which reduce or destroy the nuclease activity of the Cas9: D10, E762, D839, H983, or D986 and H840 or N863, e.g., D10A/D10N and H840A/H840N/H840Y, to render the nuclease portion of the protein catalytically inactive; substitutions at these positions could be alanine (as they are in Nishimasu al., Cell 156, 935-949 (2014)), or other residues, e.g., glutamine, asparagine, tyrosine, serine, or aspartate, e.g., E762Q, H983N, H983Y, D986N, N863D, N863S, or N863H (see WO 2014/152432). In some embodiments, the variant includes mutations at D10A or H840A (which creates a single-strand nickase), or mutations at D10A and H840A (which abrogates nuclease activity; this mutant is known as dead Cas9 or dCas9).
The SpCas9 N497A/R661A/Q695A/R926A mutations have analogous residues in Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 (SaCas9); see
SaCas9 variants described herein include the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2, with mutations at one, two, three, four, five, or all six of the following positions: Y211, W229, R245, T392, N419, and/or R654, e.g., comprising a sequence that is at least 80% identical to the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2 with mutations at one, two, three, four five or six of the following positions: Y211, W229, R245, T392, N419, and/or R654.
In some embodiments, the variant SaCas9 proteins also comprise one or more of the following mutations: Y211A; W229A; Y230A; R245A; T392A; N419A; L446A; Y651A; R654A; D786A; T787A; Y789A; T882A; K886A; N888A; A889A; L909A; N985A; N986A; R991A; R1015A; N44A; R45A; R51A; R55A; R59A; R60A; R116A; R165A; N169A; R208A; R209A; Y211A; T238A; Y239A; K248A; Y256A; R314A; N394A; Q414A; K57A; R61A; H111A; K114A; V164A; R165A; L788A; S790A; R792A; N804A; Y868A; K870A; K878A; K879A; K881A; Y897A; R901A; K906A.
In some embodiments, variant SaCas9 proteins comprise one or more of the following additional mutations: Y211A, W229A, Y230A, R245A, T392A, N419A, L446A, Y651A, R654A, D786A, T787A, Y789A, T882A, K886A, N888A, A889A, L909A, N985A, N986A, R991A, R1015A, N44A, R45A, R51A, R55A, R59A, R60A, R116A, R165A, N169A, R208A, R209A, Y211A, T238A, Y239A, K248A, Y256A, R314A, N394A, Q414A, K57A, R61A, H111A, K114A, V164A, R165A, L788A, S790A, R792A, N804A, Y868A, K870A, K878A, K879A, K881A, Y897A, R901A, K906A.
In some embodiments, the variant SaCas9 proteins comprise multiple substitution mutations: R245/T392/N419/R654 and Y221/R245/N419/R654 (quadruple variant mutants); N419/R654, R245/R654, Y221/R654, and Y221/N419 (double mutants); R245/N419/R654, Y211/N419/R654, and T392/N419/R654 (triple mutants). In some embodiments the mutants contain alanine in place of the wild type amino acid.
In some embodiments, the variant SaCas9 proteins also comprise mutations at E782K, K929R, N968K, and/or R1015H. For example, the KKH variant (E782K/N968K/R1015H), the KRH variant (E782K/K929R/R1015H), or the KRKH variant (E782K/K929R/N968K/R1015H)]
In some embodiments, the variant SaCas9 proteins also comprise one or more mutations that decrease nuclease activity selected from the group consisting of mutations at D10, E477, D556, H701, or D704; and at H557 or N580.
In some embodiments, the mutations are: (i) D10A or D10N, (ii) H557A, H557N, or H557Y, (iii) N580A, and/or (iv) D556A.
Also provided herein are isolated nucleic acids encoding the Cas9 variants, vectors comprising the isolated nucleic acids, optionally operably linked to one or more regulatory domains for expressing the variant proteins, and host cells, e.g., mammalian host cells, comprising the nucleic acids, and optionally expressing the variant proteins.
The variants described herein can be used for altering the genome of a cell; the methods generally include expressing the variant proteins in the cells, along with a guide RNA having a region complementary to a selected portion of the genome of the cell. Methods for selectively altering the genome of a cell are known in the art, see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 8,993,233; US 20140186958; U.S. Pat. No. 9,023,649; WO/2014/099744; WO 2014/089290; W02014/144592; W0144288; W02014/204578; W02014/152432; W02115/099850; U.S. Pat. No. 8,697,359; US20160024529; US20160024524; US20160024523; US20160024510; US20160017366; US20160017301; US20150376652; US20150356239; US20150315576; US20150291965; US20150252358; US20150247150; US20150232883; US20150232882; US20150203872; US20150191744; US20150184139; US20150176064; US20150167000; US20150166969; US20150159175; US20150159174; US20150093473; US20150079681; US20150067922; US20150056629; US20150044772; US20150024500; US20150024499; US20150020223;; US20140356867; US20140295557; US20140273235; US20140273226; US20140273037; US20140189896; US20140113376; US20140093941; US20130330778; US20130288251; US20120088676; US20110300538; US20110236530; US20110217739; US20110002889; US20100076057; US20110189776; US20110223638; US20130130248; US20150050699; US20150071899; US20150045546; US20150031134; US20150024500; US20140377868; US20140357530; US20140349400; US20140335620; US20140335063; US20140315985; US20140310830; US20140310828; US20140309487; US20140304853; US20140298547; US20140295556; US20140294773; US20140287938; US20140273234; US20140273232; US20140273231; US20140273230; US20140271987; US20140256046; US20140248702; US20140242702; US20140242700; US20140242699; US20140242664; US20140234972; US20140227787; US20140212869; US20140201857; US20140199767; US20140189896; US20140186958; US20140186919; US20140186843; US20140179770; US20140179006; US20140170753; WO/2008/108989; WO/2010/054108; WO/2012/164565; WO/2013/098244; WO/2013/176772; Makarova et al., “Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems” 9(6) Nature Reviews Microbiology 467-477 (1-23) (Jun. 2011); Wiedenheft et al., “RNA-guided genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea” 482 Nature 331-338 (Feb. 16, 2012); Gasiunas et al., “Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria” 109(39) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA E2579-E2586 (Sep. 4, 2012); Jinek et al., “A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity” 337 Science 816-821 (Aug. 17, 2012); Carroll, “A CRISPR Approach to Gene Targeting” 20(9) Molecular Therapy 1658-1660 (Sep. 2012); U.S. Appl. No. 61/652,086, filed May 25, 2012; Al-Attar et al., Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPRs): The Hallmark of an Ingenious Antiviral Defense Mechanism in Prokaryotes, Biol Chem. (2011) vol. 392, Issue 4, pp. 277-289; Hale et al., Essential Features and Rational Design of CRISPR RNAs That Function With the Cas RAMP Module Complex to Cleave RNAs, Molecular Cell, (2012) vol. 45, Issue 3, 292-302.
The variant proteins described herein can be used in place of or in addition to any of the Cas9 proteins described in the foregoing references, or in combination with mutations described therein. In addition, the variants described herein can be used in fusion proteins in place of the wild-type Cas9 or other Cas9 mutations (such as the dCas9 or Cas9 nickase described above) as known in the art, e.g., a fusion protein with a heterologous functional domains as described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,993,233; US 20140186958; U.S. Pat. No. 9,023,649; WO/2014/099744; WO 2014/089290; W02014/144592; W0144288; W02014/204578; W02014/152432; W02115/099850; U.S. Pat. No. 8,697,359; US2010/0076057; US2011/0189776; US2011/0223638; US2013/0130248; WO/2008/108989; WO/2010/054108; WO/2012/164565; WO/2013/098244; WO/2013/176772; US20150050699; US 20150071899 and WO 2014/124284. For example, the variants, preferably comprising one or more nuclease-reducing or killing mutation, can be fused on the N or C terminus of the Cas9 to a transcriptional activation domain or other heterologous functional domains (e.g., transcriptional repressors (e.g., KRAB, ERD, SID, and others, e.g., amino acids 473-530 of the ets2 repressor factor (ERF) repressor domain
(ERD), amino acids 1-97 of the KRAB domain of KOX1, or amino acids 1-36 of the Mad mSIN3 interaction domain (SID); see Beerli et al., PNAS USA 95:14628-14633 (1998)) or silencers such as Heterochromatin Protein 1 (HP1, also known as swi6), e.g., HP1α or HP1β; proteins or peptides that could recruit long non-coding RNAs (IncRNAs) fused to a fixed RNA binding sequence such as those bound by the MS2 coat protein, endoribonuclease Csy4, or the lambda N protein; enzymes that modify the methylation state of DNA (e.g., DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) or TET proteins); or enzymes that modify histone subunits (e.g., histone acetyltransferases (HAT), histone deacetylases (HDAC), histone methyltransferases (e.g., for methylation of lysine or arginine residues) or histone demethylases (e.g., for demethylation of lysine or arginine residues)) as are known in the art can also be used. A number of sequences for such domains are known in the art, e.g., a domain that catalyzes hydroxylation of methylated cytosines in DNA. Exemplary proteins include the Ten-Eleven-Translocation (TET)1-3 family, enzymes that converts 5-methylcytosine (5-mC) to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) in DNA.
Sequences for human TET1-3 are known in the art and are shown in the following table:
In some embodiments, all or part of the full-length sequence of the catalytic domain can be included, e.g., a catalytic module comprising the cysteine-rich extension and the 2OGFeDO domain encoded by 7 highly conserved exons, e.g., the Teti catalytic domain comprising amino acids 1580-2052, Tet2 comprising amino acids 1290-1905 and Tet3 comprising amino acids 966-1678. See, e.g.,
Other catalytic modules can be from the proteins identified in Iyer et al., 2009.
In some embodiments, the heterologous functional domain is a biological tether, and comprises all or part of (e.g., DNA binding domain from) the MS2 coat protein, endoribonuclease Csy4, or the lambda N protein. These proteins can be used to recruit RNA molecules containing a specific stem-loop structure to a locale specified by the dCas9 gRNA targeting sequences. For example, a dCas9 variant fused to MS2 coat protein, endoribonuclease Csy4, or lambda N can be used to recruit a long non-coding RNA (IncRNA) such as XIST or HOTAIR; see, e.g., Keryer-Bibens et al., Biol. Cell 100:125-138 (2008), that is linked to the Csy4, MS2 or lambda N binding sequence. Alternatively, the Csy4, MS2 or lambda N protein binding sequence can be linked to another protein, e.g., as described in Keryer-Bibens et al., supra, and the protein can be targeted to the dCas9 variant binding site using the methods and compositions described herein. In some embodiments, the Csy4 is catalytically inactive. In some embodiments, the Cas9 variant, preferably a dCas9 variant, is fused to FokI as described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,993,233; US 20140186958; U.S. Pat. No. 9,023,649; WO/2014/099744; WO 2014/089290; W02014/144592; W0144288;
W02014/204578; W02014/152432; W02115/099850; U.S. Pat. No. 8,697,359; US2010/0076057; US2011/0189776; US2011/0223638; US2013/0130248; WO/2008/108989; WO/2010/054108; WO/2012/164565; WO/2013/098244; WO/2013/176772; US20150050699; US 20150071899 and WO 2014/204578.
In some embodiments, the fusion proteins include a linker between the dCas9 variant and the heterologous functional domains. Linkers that can be used in these fusion proteins (or between fusion proteins in a concatenated structure) can include any sequence that does not interfere with the function of the fusion proteins. In preferred embodiments, the linkers are short, e.g., 2-20 amino acids, and are typically flexible (i.e., comprising amino acids with a high degree of freedom such as glycine, alanine, and serine). In some embodiments, the linker comprises one or more units consisting of GGGS (SEQ ID NO:3) or GGGGS (SEQ ID NO:4), e.g., two, three, four, or more repeats of the GGGS (SEQ ID NO:5) or GGGGS (SEQ ID NO:6) unit. Other linker sequences can also be used.
In some embodiments, the variant protein includes a cell-penetrating peptide sequence that facilitates delivery to the intracellular space, e.g., HIV-derived TAT peptide, penetratins, transportans, or hCT derived cell-penetrating peptides, see, e.g., Caron et al., (2001) Mol Ther. 3(3):310-8; Langel, Cell-Penetrating Peptides: Processes and Applications (CRC Press, Boca Raton Fla. 2002); El-Andaloussi et al., (2005) Curr Pharm Des. 11(28):3597-611; and Deshayes et al., (2005) Cell Mol Life Sci. 62(16):1839-49.
Cell penetrating peptides (CPPs) are short peptides that facilitate the movement of a wide range of biomolecules across the cell membrane into the cytoplasm or other organelles, e.g. the mitochondria and the nucleus. Examples of molecules that can be delivered by CPPs include therapeutic drugs, plasmid DNA, oligonucleotides, siRNA, peptide-nucleic acid (PNA), proteins, peptides, nanoparticles, and liposomes. CPPs are generally 30 amino acids or less, are derived from naturally or non-naturally occurring protein or chimeric sequences, and contain either a high relative abundance of positively charged amino acids, e.g. lysine or arginine, or an alternating pattern of polar and non-polar amino acids. CPPs that are commonly used in the art include Tat (Frankel et al., (1988) Cell. 55:1189-1193, Vives et al., (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272:16010-16017), penetratin (Derossi et al., (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269:10444-10450), polyarginine peptide sequences (Wender et al., (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:13003-13008, Futaki et al., (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276:5836-5840), and transportan (Pooga et al., (1998) Nat. Biotechnol. 16:857-861).
CPPs can be linked with their cargo through covalent or non-covalent strategies. Methods for covalently joining a CPP and its cargo are known in the art, e.g. chemical cross-linking (Stetsenko et al., (2000) J. Org. Chem. 65:4900-4909, Gait et al. (2003) Cell. Mol. Life. Sci. 60:844-853) or cloning a fusion protein (Nagahara et al., (1998) Nat. Med. 4:1449-1453). Non-covalent coupling between the cargo and short amphipathic CPPs comprising polar and non-polar domains is established through electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions.
CPPs have been utilized in the art to deliver potentially therapeutic biomolecules into cells. Examples include cyclosporine linked to polyarginine for immunosuppression (Rothbard et al., (2000) Nature Medicine 6(11):1253-1257), siRNA against cyclin B1 linked to a CPP called MPG for inhibiting tumorigenesis (Crombez et al., (2007) Biochem Soc. Trans. 35:44-46), tumor suppressor p53 peptides linked to CPPs to reduce cancer cell growth (Takenobu et al., (2002) Mol. Cancer Ther. 1(12):1043-1049, Snyder et al., (2004) PLoS Biol. 2:E36), and dominant to negative forms of Ras or phosphoinositol 3 kinase (PI3K) fused to Tat to treat asthma (Myou et al., (2003) J. Immunol. 171:4399-4405).
CPPs have been utilized in the art to transport contrast agents into cells for imaging and biosensing applications. For example, green fluorescent protein (GFP) attached to Tat has been used to label cancer cells (Shokolenko et al., (2005) DNA Repair 4(4):511-518). Tat conjugated to quantum dots have been used to successfully cross the blood-brain barrier for visualization of the rat brain (Santra et al., (2005) Chem. Commun. 3144-3146). CPPs have also been combined with magnetic resonance imaging techniques for cell imaging (Liu et al., (2006) Biochem. and Biophys. Res. Comm. 347(1):133-140). See also Ramsey and Flynn, Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Jul. 22. pii: S0163-7258(15)00141-2.
Alternatively or in addition, the variant proteins can include a nuclear localization sequence, e.g., SV40 large T antigen NLS (PKKKRRV (SEQ ID NO:7)) and nucleoplasmin NLS (KRPAATKKAGQAKKKK (SEQ ID NO:8)). Other NLSs are known in the art; see, e.g., Cokol et al., EMBO Rep. 2000 Nov. 15; 1(5): 411-415; Freitas and Cunha, Curr Genomics. 2009 Dec; 10(8): 550-557.
In some embodiments, the variants include a moiety that has a high affinity for a ligand, for example GST, FLAG or hexahistidine sequences. Such affinity tags can facilitate the purification of recombinant variant proteins.
For methods in which the variant proteins are delivered to cells, the proteins can be produced using any method known in the art, e.g., by in vitro translation, or expression in a suitable host cell from nucleic acid encoding the variant protein; a number of methods are known in the art for producing proteins. For example, the proteins can be produced in and purified from yeast, E. coli, insect cell lines, plants, transgenic animals, or cultured mammalian cells; see, e.g., Palomares et al., “Production of Recombinant Proteins: Challenges and Solutions,” Methods Mol Biol. 2004;267:15-52. In addition, the variant proteins can be linked to a moiety that facilitates transfer into a cell, e.g., a lipid nanoparticle, optionally with a linker that is cleaved once the protein is inside the cell. See, e.g., LaFountaine et al., Int J Pharm. 2015 Aug. 13;494(1):180-194.
To use the Cas9 variants described herein, it may be desirable to express them from a nucleic acid that encodes them. This can be performed in a variety of ways. For example, the nucleic acid encoding the Cas9 variant can be cloned into an intermediate vector for transformation into prokaryotic or eukaryotic cells for replication and/or expression. Intermediate vectors are typically prokaryote vectors, e.g., plasmids, or shuttle vectors, or insect vectors, for storage or manipulation of the nucleic acid encoding the Cas9 variant for production of the Cas9 variant. The nucleic acid encoding the Cas9 variant can also be cloned into an expression vector, for administration to a plant cell, animal cell, preferably a mammalian cell or a human cell, fungal cell, bacterial cell, or protozoan cell.
To obtain expression, a sequence encoding a Cas9 variant is typically subcloned into an expression vector that contains a promoter to direct transcription. Suitable bacterial and eukaryotic promoters are well known in the art and described, e.g., in Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning, A Laboratory Manual (3d ed. 2001); Kriegler, Gene Transfer and Expression: A Laboratory Manual (1990); and Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Ausubel et al., eds., 2010). Bacterial expression systems for expressing the engineered protein are available in, e.g., E. coli, Bacillus sp., and Salmonella (Palva et al., 1983, Gene 22:229-235). Kits for such expression systems are commercially available. Eukaryotic expression systems for mammalian cells, yeast, and insect cells are well known in the art and are also commercially available.
The promoter used to direct expression of a nucleic acid depends on the particular application. For example, a strong constitutive promoter is typically used for expression and purification of fusion proteins. In contrast, when the Cas9 variant is to be administered in vivo for gene regulation, either a constitutive or an inducible promoter can be used, depending on the particular use of the Cas9 variant. In addition, a preferred promoter for administration of the Cas9 variant can be a weak promoter, such as HSV TK or a promoter having similar activity. The promoter can also include elements that are responsive to transactivation, e.g., hypoxia response elements, Gal4 response elements, lac repressor response element, and small molecule control systems such as tetracycline-regulated systems and the RU-486 system (see, e.g., Gossen & Bujard, 1992, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89:5547; Oligino et al., 1998, Gene Ther., 5:491-496; Wang et al., 1997, Gene Ther., 4:432-441; Neering et al., 1996, Blood, 88:1147-55; and Rendahl et al., 1998, Nat. Biotechnol., 16:757-761).
In addition to the promoter, the expression vector typically contains a transcription unit or expression cassette that contains all the additional elements required for the expression of the nucleic acid in host cells, either prokaryotic or eukaryotic. Atypical expression cassette thus contains a promoter operably linked, e.g., to the nucleic acid sequence encoding the Cas9 variant, and any signals required, e.g., for efficient polyadenylation of the transcript, transcriptional termination, ribosome binding sites, or translation termination. Additional elements of the cassette may include, e.g., enhancers, and heterologous spliced intronic signals.
The particular expression vector used to transport the genetic information into the cell is selected with regard to the intended use of the Cas9 variant, e.g., expression in plants, animals, bacteria, fungus, protozoa, etc. Standard bacterial expression vectors include plasmids such as pBR322 based plasmids, pSKF, pET23D, and commercially available tag-fusion expression systems such as GST and LacZ.
Expression vectors containing regulatory elements from eukaryotic viruses are often used in eukaryotic expression vectors, e.g., SV40 vectors, papilloma virus vectors, and vectors derived from Epstein-Barr virus. Other exemplary eukaryotic vectors include pMSG, pAV009A+, pMTO10/A+, pMAMneo-5, baculovirus pDSVE, and any other vector allowing expression of proteins under the direction of the SV40 early promoter, SV40 late promoter, metallothionein promoter, murine mammary tumor virus promoter, Rous sarcoma virus promoter, polyhedrin promoter, or other promoters shown effective for expression in eukaryotic cells.
The vectors for expressing the Cas9 variants can include RNA Pol III promoters to drive expression of the guide RNAs, e.g., the H1, U6 or 7SK promoters. These human promoters allow for expression of Cas9 variants in mammalian cells following plasmid transfection.
Some expression systems have markers for selection of stably transfected cell lines such as thymidine kinase, hygromycin B phosphotransferase, and dihydrofolate reductase. High yield expression systems are also suitable, such as using a baculovirus vector in insect cells, with the gRNA encoding sequence under the direction of the polyhedrin promoter or other strong baculovirus promoters.
The elements that are typically included in expression vectors also include a replicon that functions in E. coli, a gene encoding antibiotic resistance to permit selection of bacteria that harbor recombinant plasmids, and unique restriction sites in nonessential regions of the plasmid to allow insertion of recombinant sequences.
Standard transfection methods are used to produce bacterial, mammalian, yeast or insect cell lines that express large quantities of protein, which are then purified using standard techniques (see, e.g., Colley et al., 1989, J. Biol. Chem., 264:17619-22; Guide to Protein Purification, in Methods in Enzymology, vol. 182 (Deutscher, ed., 1990)). Transformation of eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells are performed according to standard techniques (see, e.g., Morrison, 1977, J. Bacteriol. 132:349-351; Clark-Curtiss & Curtiss, Methods in Enzymology 101:347-362 (Wu et al., eds, 1983).
Any of the known procedures for introducing foreign nucleotide sequences into host cells may be used. These include the use of calcium phosphate transfection, polybrene, protoplast fusion, electroporation, nucleofection, liposomes, microinjection, naked DNA, plasmid vectors, viral vectors, both episomal and integrative, and any of the other well-known methods for introducing cloned genomic DNA, cDNA, synthetic DNA or other foreign genetic material into a host cell (see, e.g., Sambrook et al., supra). It is only necessary that the particular genetic engineering procedure used be capable of successfully introducing at least one gene into the host cell capable of expressing the Cas9 variant.
The present invention also includes the vectors and cells comprising the vectors.
The invention is further described in the following examples, which do not limit the scope of the invention described in the claims.
Competent E. coli BW25141(λDE3)23 containing a positive selection plasmid (with embedded target site) were transformed with Cas9/sgRNA-encoding plasmids. Following a 60 minute recovery in SOB media, transformations were plated on LB plates containing either chloramphenicol (non-selective) or chloramphenicol +10 mM arabinose (selective).
To identify additional positions that might be critical for genome wide target specificity, a bacterial selection system previously used to study properties of homing endonucleases (hereafter referred to as the positive selection) (Chen & Zhao, Nucleic Acids Res 33, e154 (2005); Doyon et al., J Am Chem Soc 128, 2477-2484 (2006)) was adapted.
In the present adaptation of this system, Cas9-mediated cleavage of a positive selection plasmid encoding an inducible toxic gene enables cell survival, due to subsequent degradation and loss of the linearized plasmid. After establishing that SpCas9 can function in the positive selection system, both wild-type and the variants were tested for their ability to cleave a selection plasmid harboring a target site selected from the known human genome. These variants were introduced into bacteria with a positive selection plasmid containing a target site and plated on selective medium. Cleavage of the positive selection plasmid was estimated by calculating the survival frequency: colonies on selective plates / colonies on non-selective plates (see
U2OS.EGFP cells harboring a single integrated copy of a constitutively expressed EGFP-PEST reporter gene15 were cultured in Advanced DMEM media (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM GlutaMax (Life Technologies), penicillin/streptomycin, and 400 μg/ml of G418 at 37 ° C. with 5% CO2. Cells were co-transfected with 750 ng of Cas9 plasmid and 250 ng of sgRNA plasmid (unless otherwise noted) using the DN-100 program of a Lonza 4D-nucleofector according to the manufacturer's protocols. Cas9 plasmid transfected together with an empty U6 promoter plasmid was used as a negative control for all human cell experiments. (see
EGFP disruption experiments were performed as previously described16. Transfected cells were analyzed for EGFP expression˜52 hours post-transfection using a Fortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Background EGFP loss was gated at approximately 2.5% for all experiments (see
T7E1 assays were performed as previously described for human cells (Kleinstiver, B.P. et al., Nature 523, 481-485 (2015)). For U2OS.EGFP human cells, genomic DNA was extracted from transfected cells˜72 hours post-transfection using the Agencourt DNAdvance Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (Beckman Coulter Genomics). Roughly 200 ng of purified PCR product was denatured, annealed, and digested with T7E1 (New England BioLabs). Mutagenesis frequencies were quantified using a Qiaxcel capillary electrophoresis instrument (QIagen), as previously described for human cells 15.
GUIDE-seq experiments were performed as previously described (Tsai et al., Nat Biotechnol 33, 187-197 (2015)). Briefly, phosphorylated, phosphorothioate-modified double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides (dsODNs) were transfected into U2OS cells with Cas9 nuclease along with Cas9 and sgRNA expression plasmids, as described above. dsODN-specific amplification, high-throughput sequencing, and mapping were performed to identify genomic intervals containing DSB activity. For wild-type versus double or quadruple mutant variant experiments, off-target read counts were normalized to the on-target read counts to correct for sequencing depth differences between samples. The normalized ratios for wild-type and variant SpCas9 were then compared to calculate the fold-change in activity at off-target sites. To determine whether wild-type and SpCas9 variant samples for GUIDE-seq had similar oligo tag integration rates at the intended target site, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assays were performed by amplifying the intended target loci with Phusion Hot-Start Flex from 100 ng of genomic DNA (isolated as described above). Roughly 150 ng of PCR product was digested with 20 U of Ndel (New England BioLabs) for 3 hours at 37 ° C. prior to clean-up using the Agencourt Ampure XP kit. RFLP results were quantified using a Qiaxcel capillary electrophoresis instrument (QIagen) to approximate oligo tag integration rates. T7E1 assays were performed for a similar purpose, as described above.
One potential solution to address targeting specificity of CRISPR-Cas9 RNA guided gene editing would be to engineer Cas9 variants with novel mutations.
Based on these earlier results, it was hypothesized (without wishing to be bound by theory) that the specificity of CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases might be significantly increased by reducing the non-specific binding affinity of Cas9 for DNA, mediated by the binding to the phosphate groups on the DNA or hydrophobic or base stacking interactions with the DNA. This approach would have the advantage of not decreasing the length of the target site recognized by the gRNA/Cas9 complex, as in the previously described truncated gRNA approach. It was reasoned that non-specific binding affinity of Cas9 for DNA might be reduced by mutating amino acid residues that contact phosphate groups on the target DNA.
An analogous approach has been used to create variants of non-Cas9 nucleases such as TALENs (see, for example, Guilinger et al., Nat. Methods. 11: 429 (2014)).
In an initial test of the hypothesis, the present inventors attempted to engineer a reduced affinity variant of the widely used S. pyogenes Cas9 (SpCas9) by introducing individual alanine substitutions into various residues in SpCas9 that might be expected to interact with phosphates on the DNA backbone. An E.coli-based screening assay was used to assess the activities of these variants (Kleinstiver et al., Nature. 2015 Jul. 23;523(7561):481-5). In this bacterial system, cell survival depended on cleavage (and subsequent destruction) of a selection plasmid containing a gene for the toxic gyrase poison ccdB and a 23 base pair sequence targeted by a gRNA and SpCas9. Results of this experiment identified residues that retained or lost activity (Table 1).
Survival percentages between 50-100% usually indicated robust cleavage, whereas 0% survival indicated that the enzyme has been functionally compromised. Additional mutations that were assayed in bacteria (but are not shown in the table above) include: R69A, R71A, Y72A, R75A, K76A, N77A, R115A, H160A, K163A, L169A, T404A, F405A, R447A, I448A, Y450A, S460A, M495A, M694A, H698A, Y1013A, V1015A, R1122A, K1123A, and K1124A. With the exception of R69A and F405A (which had <5% survival in bacteria), all of these additional single mutations appeared to have little effect on the on-target activity of SpCas9 (>70% survival in the bacterial screen).
15 different SpCas9 variants bearing all possible single, double, triple and quadruple combinations of the N497A, R661A, Q695A, and Q926A mutations were constructed to test whether contacts made by these residues might be dispensable for on-target activity (
Next, experiments were performed to assess the relative activities of all 15 SpCas9 variants at mismatched target sites. To do this, the EGFP disruption assay was repeated with derivatives of the EGFP-targeted sgRNA used in the previous experiment that contain pairs of substituted bases at positions 13 and 14, 15 and 16, 17 and 18, and 18 and 19 (numbering starting with 1 for the most PAM-proximal base and ending with 20 for the most PAM-distal base;
To determine how robustly SpCas9-HF1 functions at a larger number of on-target sites, direct comparisons were performed between this variant and wild-type SpCas9 using additional sgRNAs. In total, 37 different sgRNAs were tested: 24 targeted to EGFP (assayed with the EGFP disruption assay) and 13 targeted to endogenous human gene targets (assayed using the T7 Endonuclease I (T7EI) mismatch assay). 20 of the 24 sgRNAs tested with the EGFP disruption assay (
S. pyogenes sgRNAs
GGGT
GGC
To test whether SpCas9-HF1 exhibited reduced off-target effects in human cells, the genome-wide unbiased identification of double-stranded breaks enabled by sequencing (GUIDE-seq) method was used. GUIDE-seq uses integration of a short double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide (dsODN) tag into double-strand breaks to enable amplification and sequencing of adjacent genomic sequence, with the number of tag integrations at any given site providing a quantitative measure of cleavage efficiency (Tsai, S.Q. et al,Nat Biotechnol 33, 187-197 (2015)). GUIDE-seq was used to compare the spectrum of off-target effects induced by wild-type SpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1 using eight different sgRNAs targeted to various sites in the endogenous human EMX1, FANCF, RUNX1, and ZSCAN2 genes. The sequences targeted by these sgRNAs are unique and have variable numbers of predicted mismatched sites in the reference human genome (Table 2). Assessment of on-target dsODN tag integration (by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay) and indel formation (by T7EI assay) for the eight sgRNAs revealed comparable on-target activities with wild-type SpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1 (
To confirm the GUIDE-seq findings, targeted amplicon sequencing was used to more directly measure the frequencies of NHEJ-mediated indel mutations induced by wild-type SpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1. For these experiments, human cells were transfected only with sgRNA- and Cas9-encoding plasmids (i.e., without the GUIDE-seq tag). Next-generation sequencing was then used to examine 36 of the 40 off-target sites that had been identified with wild-type SpCas9 for six sgRNAs in the GUIDE-seq experiments (four of the 40 sites could not be examined because they could not be specifically amplified from genomic DNA). These deep sequencing experiments showed that: (1) wild-type SpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1 induced comparable frequencies of indels at each of the six sgRNA on-target sites (
Next the capability of SpCas9-HF1 to reduce genome-wide off-target effects of sgRNAs that target atypical homopolymeric or repetitive sequences was assessed. Although many now try to avoid on-target sites with these characteristics due to their relative lack of orthogonality to the genome, it was desirable to explore whether SpCas9-HF1 might reduce off-target indels even for these challenging targets. Therefore, previously characterized sgRNAs (Fu, Y. et al., Nat Biotechnol 31,Tsai, S.Q. et al., Nat Biotechnol 33, 187-197 (2015) were used that target either a cytosine-rich homopolymeric sequence or a sequence containing multiple TG repeats in the human VEGFA gene (VEGFA site 2 and VEGFA site 3, respectively) (Table 2). In control experiments, each of these sgRNAs induced comparable levels of GUIDE-seq ds ODN tag incorporation (
Previously described methods such as truncated gRNAs (Fu, Y. et al., Nat Biotechnol 32, 279-284 (2014)) and the SpCas9-D1135E variant (Kleinstiver, B.P. et al., Nature 523, 481-485 (2015)) can partially reduce SpCas9 off-target effects, and the present inventors wondered whether these might be combined with SpCas9-HF1 to further improve its genome-wide specificity. Testing of SpCas9-HF1 with matched full-length and truncated sgRNAs targeted to four sites in the human cell-based EGFP disruption assay revealed that shortening sgRNA complementarity length substantially impaired on-target activities (
To determine whether SpCas9-HF2, -HF3, and -HF4 could reduce indel frequencies at two off-target sites (for the FANCF site 2 and VEGFA site 3 sgRNAs) that were resistant to SpCas9-HF1, further experiments were performed. For the FANCF site 2 off-target, which bears a single mismatch in the seed sequence of the protospacer, SpCas9-HF4 reduced indel mutation frequencies to near background level as judged by T7EI assay while also beneficially increasing on-target activity (
To generalize the T7E1 assay findings described above that show SpCas9-HF4 and SpCas9-HF2 have improved discrimination relative to SpCas9-HF1 against off-targets of the FANCF site 2 and VEGFA site 3 sgRNAs, respectively, the genome-wide specificities of these variants were examined using GUIDE-seq. Using an RFLP assay, it was determined that SpCas9-HF4 and SpCas9-HF2 had similar on-target activities to SpCas9-HF1, as assayed by GUIDE-seq tag integration rates (
SpCas9-HF1 robustly and consistently reduced off-target mutations when using sgRNAs designed against standard, non-repetitive target sequences. The two off-target sites that were most resistant to SpCas9-HF1 have only one and two mismatches in the protospacer. Together, these observations suggest that off-target mutations might be minimized to undetectable levels by using SpCas9-HF1 and targeting non-repetitive sequences that do not have closely related sites bearing one or two mismatches elsewhere in the genome (something that can be easily accomplished using existing publicly available software programs (Bae, S., et al, Bioinformatics 30, 1473-1475 (2014)). One parameter that users should keep in mind is that SpCas9-HF1 may not be compatible with the common practice of using a G at the 5′ end of the gRNA that is mismatched to the protospacer sequence. Testing of four sgRNAs bearing a 5′ G mismatched to its target site showed three of the four had diminished activities with SpCas9-HF1 compared to wild-type SpCas9 (
Further biochemical work can confirm or clarify the precise mechanism by which SpCas9-HF1 achieves its high genome-wide specificity. It does not appear that the four mutations introduced alter the stability or steady-state expression level of SpCas9 in the cell, because titration experiments with decreasing concentrations of expression plasmids suggested that wild-type SpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1 behaved comparably as their concentrations are lowered (
It was possible that SpCas9-HF1 might also be combined with other mutations that have been shown to alter Cas9 function. For example, an SpCas9 mutant bearing three amino acid substitutions (D1135V/R1335Q/T1337R, also known as the SpCas9-VQR variant), recognizes sites with NGAN PAMs (with relative efficiencies for NGAG>NGAT=NGAA>NGAC) (Kleinstiver, B.P. et al, Nature 523, 481-485 (2015)) and a recently identified quadruple SpCas9 mutant (D1135V/G1218R/R1335Q/T1337R, referred to as the SpCas9-VRQR variant) has improved activities relative to the VQR variant on sites with NGAH (H=A, C, or T) PAMs (
More broadly, these results illuminate a general strategy for the engineering of additional high-fidelity variants of CRISPR-associated nucleases. Adding additional mutations at non-specific DNA contacting residues further reduced some of the very small number of residual off-target sites that persist with SpCas9-HF1. Thus, variants such as SpCas9-HF2, SpCas9-HF3, SpCas9-HF4, and others can be utilized in a customized fashion depending on the nature of the off-target sequences. Furthermore, success with engineering high-fidelity variants of SpCas9 suggests that the approach of mutating non-specific DNA contacts can be extended to other naturally occurring and engineered Cas9 orthologues (Ran, F.A. et al., Nature 520, 186-191 (2015), Esvelt, K.M. et al., Nat Methods 10, 1116-1121 (2013); Hou, Z. et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2013); Fonfara, I. et al., Nucleic Acids Res 42, 2577-2590 (2014); Kleinstiver, B.P. et al, Nat Biotechnol (2015).as well as newer CRISPR-associated nucleases (Zetsche, B. et al., Cell 163, 759-771 (2015); Shmakov, S. et al., Molecular Cell 60, 385-397). that are being discovered and characterized with increasing frequency.
1. Sander, J.D. & Joung, J.K. CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes. Nat Biotechnol 32, 347-355 (2014).
2. Hsu, P.D., Lander, E.S. & Zhang, F. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell 157, 1262-1278 (2014).
3. Doudna, J.A. & Charpentier, E. Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science 346, 1258096 (2014).
4. Barrangou, R. & May, A.P. Unraveling the potential of CRISPR-Cas9 for gene therapy. Expert Opin Biol Ther 15, 311-314 (2015).
5. Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816-821 (2012).
6. Sternberg, S.H., Redding, S., Jinek, M., Greene, E.C. & Doudna, J.A. DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9. Nature 507, 62-67 (2014).
7. Hsu, P.D. et al. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat Biotechnol 31, 827-832 (2013).
8. Tsai, S.Q. et al. GUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases. Nat Biotechnol 33, 187-197 (2015).
9. Hou, Z. et al. Efficient genome engineering in human pluripotent stem cells using Cas9 from Neisseria meningitidis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2013).
10. Fonfara, I. et al. Phylogeny of Cas9 determines functional exchangeability of dual-RNA and Cas9 among orthologous type II CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res 42, 2577-2590 (2014).
11. Esvelt, K.M. et al. Orthogonal Cas9 proteins for RNA-guided gene regulation and editing. Nat Methods 10, 1116-1121 (2013).
12. Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819-823 (2013).
13. Horvath, P. et al. Diversity, activity, and evolution of CRISPR loci in Streptococcus thermophilus. J Bacteriol 190, 1401-1412 (2008).
14. Anders, C., Niewoehner, 0., Duerst, A. & Jinek, M. Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease. Nature 513, 569-573 (2014).
15. Reyon, D. et al. FLASH assembly of TALENs for high-throughput genome editing. Nat Biotechnol 30, 460-465 (2012).
16. Fu, Y. et al. High-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells. Nat Biotechnol 31, 822-826 (2013).
17. Chen, Z. & Zhao, H. A highly sensitive selection method for directed evolution of homing endonucleases. Nucleic Acids Res 33, e154 (2005).
18. Doyon, J.B., Pattanayak, V., Meyer, C.B. & Liu, D.R. Directed evolution and substrate specificity profile of homing endonuclease I-SceI. J Am Chem Soc 128, 2477-2484 (2006).
19. Jiang, W., Bikard, D., Cox, D., Zhang, F. & Marraffini, L.A. RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Biotechnol 31, 233-239 (2013).
20. Mali, P. et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339, 823-826 (2013).
21. Hwang, W.Y. et al. Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol 31, 227-229 (2013).
22. Chylinski, K., Le Rhun, A. & Charpentier, E. The tracrRNA and Cas9 families of type II CRISPR-Cas immunity systems. RNA Biol 10, 726-737 (2013).
23. Kleinstiver, B.P., Fernandes, A.D., Gloor, G.B. & Edgell, D.R. A unified genetic, computational and experimental framework identifies functionally relevant residues of the homing endonuclease I-Bmol. Nucleic Acids Res 38, 2411-2427 (2010).
24. Gagnon, J.A. et al. Efficient mutagenesis by Cas9 protein-mediated oligonucleotide insertion and large-scale assessment of single-guide RNAs. PLoS One 9, e98186 (2014).
underlined, 3xFLAG tag in bold:
TACAAAGACCATGACGGTGATTATAAAGATCATGACATCGATTACAAGGATGACGATGACAAGTGA
TACAAAGACCATGACGGTGATTATAAAGATCATGACATCGATTACAAGGATGACGATGACAAGTGA
TACAAAGACCATGACGGTGATTATAAAGATCATGACATCGATTACAAGGATGACGATGACAAGTGA
TACAAAGACCATGACGGTGATTATAAAGATCATGACATCGATTACAAGGATGACGATGACAAGTGA
TACAAAGACCATGACGGTGATTATAAAGATCATGACATCGATTACAAGGATGACGATGACAAGTGA
TACAAAGACCATGACGGTGATTATAAAGATCATGACATCGATTACAAGGATGACGATGACAAGTGA
TACAAAGACCATGACGGTGATTATAAAGATCATGACATCGATTACAAGGATGACGATGACAAGTGA
TACAAAGACCATGACGGTGATTATAAAGATCATGACATCGATTACAAGGATGACGATGACAAGTGA
It is to be understood that while the invention has been described in conjunction with the detailed description thereof, the foregoing description is intended to illustrate and not limit the scope of the invention, which is defined by the scope of the appended claims. Other aspects, advantages, and modifications are within the scope of the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/369,533, filed Dec. 5, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/015,947, filed Feb. 4, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,512,446, which claims priority under 35 USC § 119(e) to U.S. Patent Provisional Application Ser. Nos. 62/211,553, filed on Aug. 28, 2015; 62/216,033, filed on Sep. 9, 2015; and 62/258,280, filed on Nov. 20, 2015. The entire contents of the foregoing are hereby incorporated by reference.
This invention was made with Government support under Grant Nos. DP1 GM105378 and R01 GM088040 awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The Government has certain rights in the invention.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62211553 | Aug 2015 | US | |
| 62216033 | Sep 2015 | US | |
| 62258280 | Nov 2015 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15369533 | Dec 2016 | US |
| Child | 16155808 | US | |
| Parent | 15015947 | Feb 2016 | US |
| Child | 15369533 | US |
