This invention relates to field-effect-transistor multiplexing/demultiplexing architectures and methods of forming the same.
Electrical communication in and out of an array of tightly pitched wires can be difficult. It can be difficult because aligning an electrical bond pad to each wire without accidentally connecting to an adjacent wire can require a machine capable of high accuracy.
One structure for electrically connecting to wires of an array is called a multiplexing/demultiplexing architecture (a “mux/demux architecture”). The mux/demux architecture does not need an electrical bond pad to be connected or aligned with each wire of an array. Instead, one bond pad is typically connected to all of the wires of the array.
This one bond pad, however, does not allow communication with each wire of the array individually. To differentiate between wires, an address element, such as a transistor, can be contacted with each of the wires. For a 16-wire array, for instance, four transistors can be contacted with each wire. By selectively turning the transistors on and off, only one of the 16 wires can be permitted to communicate with the one bond pad. Manufacturing this mux/demux architecture is typically less expensive and more reliable than connecting a bond pad to each wire.
In
For example, a third wire 122 can be selected if all four of the transistors 118 that are in contact with the third wire 122 are turned on. The transistors 118 of the third wire 122 are turned on by turning the address circuit 110 on, the circuit 112 on, the circuit 114 off, and the circuit 116 on. When on, the transistors 118 on the “Logical YES” side of each of the address circuits turn on and on the “Logical NOT” side turn off, and vice-versa. Address wires 124, 126, 128, and 130 are used to turn the address circuits 110, 112, 114, and 116 on or off, respectively.
One problem with this mux/demux architecture 108 is that it uses address elements (like transistors, diodes, and resistors) that typically need to be aligned with the wires during fabrication. Aligning these elements with the wires can be accomplished with typical processing machines if the wires of the array have a large enough pitch 103. For smaller pitches, however, the address elements of the mux/demux architecture 108 may not be alignable with wires of the array.
There is, therefore, a need for small-pitched devices and methods for addressing them electrically.
The same numbers are used throughout the disclosure and figures to reference like components and features.
Overview
This application discloses field-effect-transistor (FET) multiplexing/demultiplexing (mux/demux) architectures and methods for forming them. One of these mux/demux architectures enables decoding of an array of tightly pitched conductive structures. Another enables efficient decoding of various types of conductive-structure arrays, tightly pitched or otherwise.
Also, processes for forming FET mux/demux architectures are disclosed that, in some instances, use alignment-independent processing steps. One of these processes uses one, low-accuracy processing step and further alignment-independent processing steps. By not relying on accurate alignment steps, this process may be less expensive and/or more production-friendly than processes that rely on them.
Imprinting
Referring initially to
In one embodiment, the second dielectric layer 208 comprises two materials having different dielectric constants. For example, layer 208 can comprise a high-k dielectric layer 212 and a low-k dielectric layer 214. The high-k dielectric layer 212 can comprise a dielectric material having a higher dielectric constant than the low-k dielectric layer 214, such as tantalum oxide or hafnium oxide. The low-k dielectric layer 214 can comprise silicon dioxide, for instance.
In the ongoing embodiment shown in
An imprinting mold 218 is also set forth in
Referring to
The top-plan view shows the unique cross-sections of elongate rows 302. These rows 302 can be formed with one imprinting step with the mold 218 being a three-dimensional negative of the elongate rows 302. In the top-plan view, the first tiers 304 are shown with the same fill-pattern as shown in the cross-section along lines A-A′. The second tiers 306, however, are shown with a different fill-pattern (a diagonal cross-hatch) to aid the reader in visualizing the structure.
In at least one embodiment, rows 302 can be formed with a process that utilizes or requires very little alignment accuracy. In the ongoing embodiment, for instance, the mold 218 can be pressed on the imprintable layer 210 without regard to an existing structure (other than the size of the substrate 202) with which the rows 302 must be aligned. By making the substrate 202 sufficiently large, the rows 302 can be formed with a low-accuracy machine. If the substrate 202 is ten centimeters square, for instance, and the mold 218 is 1/10 of one centimeter square, the mold 218 can be pressed on the imprintable layer 210 with a machine capable of about plus or minus five centimeters tolerance. Thus, the rows 302 can be formed with little regard to alignment.
Alignment-Independent Techniques
Referring to
In the ongoing embodiment, the array 402 is formed in the regions 312 and 310 by removing parts of the semi-conductive layer 206 in the third regions 314. By so doing, the array 402 of the conductive structures 404 in this embodiment is formed having a pitch of less than or about ninety nanometers. The array 402 is shown in cross-section perpendicular to an elongate dimension of conductive structures 404 of the array 402. Also in this embodiment, the conductive structures 404 comprise material from the semi-conductive layer 206. Other embodiments where the conductive structures 404 also comprise highly conductive materials are discussed in greater detail following
Semi-Conductive, Conductive-Structure Arrays
In the ongoing embodiment, an array of dielectric structures 406 is also formed, either as part of the alignment-independent technique for forming the array 402 or with a separate alignment-independent technique. The array 406 of dielectric structures 408, in this embodiment, are in physical contact with and mirror the arrangement of the array 402 of the conductive structures 404.
Also in the ongoing embodiment, the third regions 314 of the dielectric layer 208 and the semi-conductive layer 206 are removed, while the first and second regions 310 and 312 are not removed because they are protected by the first and second tiers 304 and 306 of the rows 302.
Referring to
In the ongoing embodiment, the first tiers 304 are made thinner and the second tiers 306 are removed, exposing tops of some of the dielectric structures 408 in the second regions 312.
Referring to
In the ongoing embodiment where the dielectric layer 208 comprises the high-k dielectric layer 212 and the low-k dielectric layer 214, the low-k dielectric material 214 can be removed, thereby differentiating the dielectric structures 408 into the gates 602 and the non-gates 604. Though the non-gates 604 may comprise both the high-k dielectric layer 212 and the low-k dielectric layer 214, the low-k dielectric layer 214 will have a dominant effect on gate electrical capacitance, thereby keeping the non-gates 604 effectively at a low dielectric constant.
In another embodiment where the dielectric layer 208 comprises the low-k dielectric layer 214 and not the high-k dielectric layer 212 (also shown in
Referring also to
In one embodiment, a conductivity of the conductive structures 404 at the regions 606 is altered through implantation or another suitable alignment-independent technique. The polarity of these regions 606 is altered so that the conductive structures 404 are not conductive at these regions 606. The polarity at regions near the non-gates 604 is not altered because of the additional thickness of the non-gates 604 or due to comprising different materials than the gates 602. The gates 602, if appropriately charged, can be used to invert the polarity at these regions 606, thereby permitting measurable current to pass through the conductive structure 404. In the ongoing embodiment, however, the gates 602 can be used to reduce the conductivity at the regions 606 if their polarity is not altered.
Referring to
Addressing the FET Gates
Referring to
In one embodiment, the address lines 802 are formed substantially co-parallel with the elongate rows 704 and over the gates 602 and the non-gates 604.
Conductive Structures with Semi-Conductive and Highly Conductive Regions
Referring to
Two examples of the substrate 202 and its layers (marked first substrate system 904 with the highly conductive layer 902 and second substrate system 906 without the highly conductive layer 902) are shown. The highly conductive layer 902 comprises aluminum and is about ten nanometers thick in this embodiment. As set forth below, each of these systems can be processed with further alignment-independent techniques to form conductive structures having semi-conductive and highly conductive regions that are capable of being addressed using FETs.
Two imprinting molds 908 and 910 are also set forth in
Referring to
In these embodiments, similar to the embodiments shown in
Each of a plurality of the rows 302 can have unique cross-sections. These rows 302 can be formed with one imprinting step with the mold 908 or 910 being a three-dimensional negative of the elongate rows 302. Forming the rows 302 can be performed as set forth in the description of
Processing the System without the Conductive Layer
Referring to
Referring to
Some of the thickness of the rows 302 is removed through time-etching or another suitable alignment-independent technique. In the ongoing embodiment, the first tiers 304 are made thinner and the second tiers 306 are removed, exposing some of the semi-conductive layer 206 in the second regions 312.
Referring to
The remainder of the elongate rows 302 is removed by time-etching or another suitable alignment-independent technique. By so doing, some of the semi-conductive layer 206 is exposed at the first regions 310.
Processing the System with the Highly Conductive Layer
Referring to
In this ongoing embodiment, the third regions 314 of the highly conductive layer 902 and the semi-conductive layer 206 are removed, while the first and second regions 310 and 312 are not removed because they are protected by the first and second tiers 304 and 306 of the rows 302.
Both Systems; with and without Conductive Layer
Referring to
In the embodiment using the system 906 of
In the embodiment using the system 904 of
In the ongoing embodiment using the system 904, the conductive structures 1504 comprise the highly conductive structures 1202 (though here formed from the conductive structure precursors 1404) and the semi-conductive structures 1506 (also of the conductive structure precursors 1404). The semi-conductive structures 1506 comprise material from the semi-conductive layer 206.
In the ongoing embodiment using the system 906, the conductive structures 1504 comprise the highly conductive structures 1202 and the semi-conductive structures 1506.
Thus, using different alignment-independent techniques, both of the systems 904 and 906 can be processed into the embodiment shown in
Referring to
Addressing the FET Gates of Both Systems
Referring to
Although the invention is described in language specific to structural features and methodological steps, it is to be understood that the invention defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or steps described. Rather, the specific features and steps disclosed represent exemplary forms of implementing the claimed invention.
This Application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/835,659, filed Apr. 30, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,247,531, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. U.S. patent application having Ser. No. 10/453,329, a filing date of Jun. 2, 2003, for MULTILEVEL IMPRINT LITHOGRAPHY of Kornilovich, et al is related to this application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2744970 | Shockley | May 1956 | A |
2939057 | Tezner | May 1960 | A |
3964296 | Matzuk | Jun 1976 | A |
4097314 | Schlesier et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4240845 | Esch et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
5008616 | Lauks et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5105245 | Riemenschneider et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5118801 | Lizardi et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5132278 | Stevens et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5202290 | Moskovits | Apr 1993 | A |
5237523 | Bonne et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5317541 | Chan | May 1994 | A |
5330612 | Watanabe | Jul 1994 | A |
5376755 | Negm et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5418558 | Hock et al. | May 1995 | A |
5493167 | Mikol et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5591896 | Lin | Jan 1997 | A |
5622825 | Law et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5747180 | Miller et al. | May 1998 | A |
5767521 | Takeno et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772905 | Chou | Jun 1998 | A |
5780710 | Murase et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5801124 | Gamble et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5837454 | Cozzette et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5837466 | Lane et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5843653 | Gold et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5869244 | Martin et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5918110 | Abraham-Fuchs et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5972710 | Weigl et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5997958 | Sato et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6028013 | Annapragada et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6034389 | Burns, Jr. et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6120844 | Chen et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6150097 | Tyagi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6150106 | Martin et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6231744 | Ying et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6238085 | Higashi et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243283 | Bertin et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256767 | Kuekes et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6284979 | Malozemoff et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6294450 | Chen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6355436 | Martin et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359288 | Ying et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360582 | Chelvayohan et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6365059 | Pechenik | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6407443 | Chen et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6438501 | Szecsody et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6463124 | Weisman | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6482639 | Snow et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6521109 | Bartic et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6562577 | Martin et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6643491 | Kinouchi et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6680377 | Stanton et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6694800 | Weckstrom et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6712666 | Wu | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6747180 | Ostgard et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
20010033585 | Lazarus et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010046674 | Ellington | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020012937 | Tender et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020061536 | Martin et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020117659 | Lieber et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020130353 | Lieber et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030089899 | Lieber et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030132461 | Roesner et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030148562 | Luyken et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030161205 | Chevallier | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030162190 | Gorenstein et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030170650 | Karube et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030186522 | Duan et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030189202 | Li et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030219801 | Lipshutz | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030224435 | Seiwert | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040005723 | Empedocles et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040005923 | Allard et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040007740 | Abstreiter et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040009510 | Seiwert et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040028936 | Kogiso et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040031975 | Kern et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040043527 | Bradley et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040245544 | Fricke et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070241413 A1 | Oct 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10835659 | Apr 2004 | US |
Child | 11765374 | US |