This invention relates to optical sensors, and in particular to sensors, devices, apparatus, systems and methods for laser beam and optics characterization, replacing microlens arrays with one or more switchable diffractive waveplate microlens arrays for providing wavefront and light intensity measurements with higher resolution and wider dynamic range of characteristics than are possible using prior art, thus allowing more complete and precise characterization of optical wavefronts and beam profiles.
Sensors such as a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor are often used to characterize the spatial characteristics of optical wavefronts, including the spatial characteristics of laser beams. Sensors of this type employing prior art may include a charge-coupled device (CCD) or complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) focal plane array (FPA), or other type of FPA, to detect optical radiation, such as laser radiation. In such sensors, a microlens array is placed in front of the CCD, CMOS, or other image sensor, and the wavefront slope at a number of transverse locations of the wavefront is determined by measuring the location of the centroid of the focal spots formed by each lenslet of the microlens array.
Although the prior art wavefront sensors, including Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors, allow for extensive and useful characterization of optical beams, these sensors are limited in their wavefront sensing capability due to limitations imposed by two major factors. The first factor is the limitation on spatial resolution of the microlens array used in these sensors. The second factor is the limitation on angular resolution imposed by the focal length of the microlenses composing the microlens array, combined with the pitch of the CCD, CMOS, or other image sensor used to detect the optical beam.
The spatial resolution of a wavefront sensor constructed using the prior art is determined by the pitch of the microlens array, that is, the distance between centerlines of adjacent microlenses of the array. The spatial resolution cannot be indefinitely increased by the manufacturer because reducing the pitch (thus obtaining a higher spatial resolution) while keeping the microlens focal length constant also reduces the range of wavefront slopes measureable by the wavefront sensor.
The angular resolution of a wavefront sensor of the Shack-Hartmann type is determined by the focal length of the individual microlenses of the microlens array and the pitch of the CCD, CMOS, or other image sensor used to detect the focused spots produced by the microlens array. The angular resolution of the wavefront sensor cannot be indefinitely increased by the manufacturer by increasing the focal length of the microlenses because increasing the focal length (thus obtaining greater angular resolution) while keeping the pitch of the microlens array constant also reduces the range of wavefront slopes measureable by the wavefront sensor.
For any given wavefront sensing task, there will typically be an optimum combination of values of the pitch and focal length of the microlens array, such that the wavefront sensor is capable of measuring the full range of wavefront tilts that are present in the measured wavefront, and also provides adequate spatial resolution. A fixed microlens array with fixed pitch and fixed focal length will not be optimal for every wavefront measurement task encountered by users.
One method that has been used in prior art to allow optimization of a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor for each particular wavefront sensing task is the provision of field-replaceable microlens arrays. With this method, the user picks a microlens array for each wavefront measurement task, and installs it into the wavefront sensor. Typically, a lengthy and difficult calibration procedure must be performed each time the microlens array is removed and replaced. The process of removing and replacing the microlens array thus becomes time-consuming and expensive.
A Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor constructed using prior art provides measurements of the beam power density with a spatial sampling period equal to the period of the microlens array. For measurements in which it would be valuable to measure the beam power density with a period smaller than the period of the microlens array, the microlens array could be removed, thereby offering the opportunity to measure the beam power density with a sampling period equal to the pitch of the CCD, CMOS, or other image sensor. However, as noted above, removing and replacing the microlens array is, if it is possible at all, a time-consuming and expensive process.
Thus, there is a need for a wavefront sensor that can be optimized by the user, or automatically by the wavefront sensor system, without the need for removal and replacement of the microlens array.
A primary objective of the present invention is to provide sensors, devices, apparatus, systems and methods for replacing non-switchable microlens arrays based on prior art with one or more switchable diffractive waveplate microlens arrays for providing useful measurements of wavefronts with a wider range of characteristics for allowing more complete characterization of optical wavefronts.
The present invention includes innovations relating to replacement of the non-switchable microlens arrays in wavefront sensors with one or more electrically-switchable microlens arrays. This makes it possible to optimize the microlens characteristics for each wavefront sensing application either manually, or automatically. Specific characteristics to be optimized by means of the switchable microlens array or arrays include focal length and pitch.
The present invention therefore includes disclosure of methods of fabricating Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors that contain switchable diffractive waveplate microlens arrays.
The wavefront sensor of the present invention may employ one or more diffractive waveplate microlens arrays.
The wavefront sensor of the present application may employ one or more liquid crystal microlens arrays.
The wavefront sensor of the present invention can employ methods of wavefront analysis using multiple settings of a switchable diffractive waveplate microlens array, for example using one setting to obtain a beam profile with high spatial resolution, and another setting to obtain measurements of wavefront slope.
The wavefront sensor of the present invention can include a plurality of microlens arrays, all of which have the same focal length, but each of which as different spacings between adjacent lenslets.
The wavefront sensor of the present invention can include a plurality of microlens arrays, all of which have the same spacings between adjacent lenslets, but each of which has different focal lengths.
The wavefront sensor of the present invention can include a polarization selector in order to assure that the focal power of the lenslets of the array of diffractive waveplate lenses has the desired sign, in the case that the microlens array is a diffractive waveplate microlens array.
The wavefront sensor of the present invention can employ a plurality of microlens arrays in order to adapt to input beams of different wavelengths. A Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor, can include at least one switchable microlens array, an optical sensor array, and an electronics system for reading, analyzing and displaying the output of the optical sensor array in order to derive the phase of optical wavefronts and intensity distribution in the beam incident on the wavefront sensor.
The switchable microlens array can include at least one switchable diffractive waveplate microlens array.
The switchable microlens array can include at least one switchable liquid crystal microlens arrays.
The electronics system for reading, analyzing and displaying the output of the optical sensor array can allow for measurements of a wavefront and intensity distribution of the incident beam for varying settings of the switchable diffractive waveplate microlens array.
The switchable microlens arrays can have the same microlens pitch.
At least part of the plurality of switchable microlens arrays can have different pitch.
The wavefront sensor can further include a polarizer at the input of the sensor.
A Shack-Hartmann sensor system, can include at least two switchable microlens for receiving an optical wavefront, and an optical sensor array having a plurality of pixels, where the switchable microlens array focuses the optical wavefront on a focal spot of the array.
The at least two switchable microlens arrays can include a first switchable microlens array in parallel and spaced apart from a second switchable microlens array.
The optical detector array can include a focal plane array (FPA).
The optical detector array can include a CCD (charge-coupled device) array.
The optical detector array can include a CMOS (complementary metal-oxide semiconductor) array.
A Shack-Hartmann sensor system, can include a plurality of microlens arrays, wherein optical power of the plurality of microlens arrays is cycled between focusing and non-focusing states allowing to complement the wavefront measurement obtained in focusing state with beam intensity profile measurement in non-focusing state.
Further objects and advantages of this invention will be apparent from the following detailed description of the presently preferred embodiments which are illustrated schematically in the accompanying drawings.
Before explaining the disclosed embodiments of the present invention in detail it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its applications to the details of the particular arrangements shown since the invention is capable of other embodiments. Also, the terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation.
In the Summary above and in the accompanying drawings, reference is made to particular features (including method steps) of the invention. It is to be understood that the disclosure of the invention in this specification does not include all possible combinations of such particular features. For example, where a particular feature is disclosed in the context of a particular aspect or embodiment of the invention, that feature can also be used, to the extent possible, in combination with and/or in the context of other particular aspects and embodiments of the invention, and in the invention generally.
In this section, some embodiments of the invention will be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which preferred embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout, and prime notation is used to indicate similar elements in alternative embodiments.
The present invention includes devices, apparatus, systems and methods for creating a wavefront sensor that can more fully characterize an optical beam, such as a laser beam, than is possible employing sensors based on the prior art. In particular, methods are disclosed to replace the single, static (non-switchable) microlens array employed in prior art with one or more switchable microlens arrays.
A list of the components in the figures will now be described.
For the specific case illustrate in
An expanded view 106 of this 4 pixel by 4 pixel region is shown in
The constraints on measurements by the wavefront sensor based on prior art can be illustrated by reference to
Using the prior art methods illustrated in
The possibility of the user of a wavefront sensor of the Shack Hartmann type electronically switching the optical characteristics of a microlens array, instead of the user having to physically replace one fixed microlens array with another fixed microlens array with different optical characteristics, such as focal length and pitch is enabled by the recent development of switchable diffractive waveplate lenses. Particularly, the lens array function can be switched off altogether allowing high resolution imaging of the beam intensity profile.
Such switchable diffractive waveplate lenses are described and shown, for example, in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/688,256 filed Apr. 16, 2015 to Tabirian et al. entitled “Diffractive Waveplate Lenses for Correcting Aberrations and Polarization-Independent Functionality”, which is co-assigned to the same assignee as the subject invention, and which is incorporated by reference in its' entirety. Such devices can be fabricated in many forms, including as microlens arrays, and the like.
An additional possible form of the microlens array of the present invention is that of an array of liquid crystal microlenses. Such microlenses can be produced, in particular, between two glass substrates comprising transparent electrodes such as Indium Thin Oxide (ITO), Graphene, Graphene oxide based compositions, and the like. Liquid crystal polymer microlenses can be combined with a liquid crystal variable half-wave phase retarder in-between to provide switching function between non-focusing and focusing states.
As a first embodiment of the present invention, the fixed, static microlens array 102 of
As an example, Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors currently available for purchase, employing CCD or CMOS image sensors, are such that the pitch of the microlens array is 30 to 65 times the pitch of the CCD or CMOS image sensor, and (as previously noted) the spatial sampling period for both wavefront slope and beam power density is equal to the pitch of the microlens array. If the microlens array could be switched off, the same CCD or CMOS image sensor could be used to sample the beam power density with a sampling period 30 to 65 times smaller than is the case with these existing available Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors.
A first embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in
As was the case illustrated in
From the user point of view, the major difference between the sensor configuration illustrated in
A second embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in
Also, for the embodiment illustrated in
In
In
The size of sensor array elements 406 in
Depending on the characteristics of the wavefront to be measured, either one of the configurations illustrated in
For any embodiment of the disclosed invention, it would be possible to take advantage of the capabilities of the switchable microlens array by employing software that adapts the sensor configuration to the measured wavefront, or makes consecutive measurements of the same wavefront in multiple configurations of the sensor in order to enhance the accuracy and completeness of the wavefront characterization.
As will be evident to those skilled in the art, there are many variations of the disclosed invention, including, but not limited to, the use of different types of FPAs for wavefront sensors operating in different regions of the electromagnetic spectrum; various combinations of different types of switchable diffractive waveplate microlens arrays; polarization selectors to optimize the wavefront measurement capability and account for the dependence on light polarization of the focusing properties of diffractive waveplate elements; switchable diffractive microlens arrays based on switchable liquid crystal microlenses; and the ability to select (either automatically or manually) one or more switchable microlens arrays that are optimal for a particular range of wavefront wavelengths.
The term “approximately” can be +/−10% of the amount referenced. Additionally, preferred amounts and ranges can include the amounts and ranges referenced without the prefix of being approximately.
While the invention has been described, disclosed, illustrated and shown in various terms of certain embodiments or modifications which it has presumed in practice, the scope of the invention is not intended to be, nor should it be deemed to be, limited thereby and such other modifications or embodiments as may be suggested by the teachings herein are particularly reserved especially as they fall within the breadth and scope of the claims here appended.
This application claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/186,622 filed Jun. 30, 2015. The entire disclosure of the application listed in this paragraph is incorporated herein by specific reference thereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2435616 | Vittum | Feb 1948 | A |
3721486 | Bramley | Mar 1973 | A |
3897136 | Bryngdahl | Jul 1975 | A |
4160598 | Firester et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4301023 | Schuberth | Nov 1981 | A |
4698816 | Chun | Oct 1987 | A |
4956141 | Allen | Sep 1990 | A |
4983332 | Hahn | Jan 1991 | A |
5032009 | Gibbons | Jul 1991 | A |
5042950 | Salmon, Jr. | Aug 1991 | A |
5047847 | Toda | Sep 1991 | A |
5100231 | Sasnett et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5142411 | Fiala | Aug 1992 | A |
5150234 | Takahashi | Sep 1992 | A |
5218610 | Dixon | Jun 1993 | A |
5325218 | Willett | Jun 1994 | A |
5446596 | Mostrorocco | Aug 1995 | A |
5621525 | Vogeler et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5895422 | Hauber | Apr 1999 | A |
5903330 | Funschilling | May 1999 | A |
5989758 | Komatsu | Nov 1999 | A |
6107617 | Love et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6139147 | Zhang | Oct 2000 | A |
6170952 | La Haye | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6191880 | Schuster | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6219185 | Hyde | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6320663 | Ershov | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6373549 | Tombling | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6452145 | Graves et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6551531 | Ford | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6678042 | Tabirian et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6728049 | Tabirian et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6792028 | Cook | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6911637 | Vorontsov | Jun 2005 | B1 |
7048619 | Park | May 2006 | B2 |
7094304 | Nystrom | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7095772 | Delfyett et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7196758 | Crawford | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7319566 | Prince | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7324286 | Glebov | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7450213 | Kim et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7764426 | Lipson | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8045130 | Son | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8077388 | Gerton | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8264623 | Marrucci | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8520170 | Escuti | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8582094 | Shortt | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8643822 | Tan et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8937701 | Rossini | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8982313 | Escuti et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9541772 | De Sio et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9557456 | Tabirian et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9592116 | De Sio et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9617205 | Tabirian et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9658512 | Tabirian et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9715048 | Tabirian et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9753193 | Tabirian et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
20010002895 | Kawano | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010018612 | Carson et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010030720 | Ichihashi | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020027624 | Seiberle | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020097361 | Ham | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020167639 | Coates | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030021526 | Bouevitch | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030072896 | Kwok | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030152712 | Motomura | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030206288 | Tabirian et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030214700 | Sidorin | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030218801 | Korniski | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040051846 | Blum | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040105059 | Ohyama | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040165126 | Ooi et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050030457 | Kuan et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050110942 | Ide | May 2005 | A1 |
20050219696 | Albert et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050271325 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050280171 | Chen | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060008649 | Shinichiro | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060055883 | Morris et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060109532 | Savas | May 2006 | A1 |
20060221449 | Glebov et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060222783 | Hayashi | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070032866 | Portney | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070040469 | Yacoubian | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070115551 | Spilman | May 2007 | A1 |
20070122573 | Yasuike | May 2007 | A1 |
20070132930 | Ryu et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070247586 | Tabirian | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070258677 | Chigrinov | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080226844 | Shemo | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080278675 | Escuti | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090002588 | Lee et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090073331 | Shi | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090122402 | Shemo | May 2009 | A1 |
20090141216 | Marrucci | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090201572 | Yonak | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090256977 | Haddock | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090257106 | Tan | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090264707 | Hendricks | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100003605 | Gil | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100066929 | Shemo | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110069377 | Wu et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110075073 | Oiwa | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110085117 | Moon et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110097557 | May | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110109874 | Piers et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110135850 | Saha et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110188120 | Tabirian et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110234944 | Powers | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110262844 | Tabirian | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120140167 | Blum | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120162433 | Fuentes Gonzalez | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120188467 | Escuti | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130057814 | Prushinskiy et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130202246 | Meade | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140055740 | Spaulding | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140211145 | Tabirian | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140252666 | Tabirian | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150049487 | Connor | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150081016 | De Sio et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150276997 | Tabirian et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160023993 | Tabirian | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160047955 | Tabirian | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160047956 | Tabirian et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160363484 | Barak | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170010397 | Tabirian et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1970734 | Sep 2008 | EP |
2088456 | Dec 2009 | EP |
2209751 | May 1989 | GB |
2001142033 | May 2001 | JP |
2004226752 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2007122573 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008130555 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008130559 | Oct 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Yin, Xiaoming, et al. “Adaptive thresholding and dynamic windowing method for automatic centroid detection of digital Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor.” Applied optics 48.32 (2009): 6088-6098. |
Martinez-Cuenca, et al., Reconfigurable Shack-Hartmann Sensor Without Moving Elements, Optical Society of America, May 2010, pp. 1338-1340, vol. 35, No. 9. |
Tabiryan, et al., The Promise of Diffractive Waveplates, OPN Optics and Photonics News, Mar. 2010, 6 pages. |
Tabiryan, et al., Fabricating Vector Vortex Waveplates for Coronagraphy; Aerospace Conference, 2012, EEE; publicly available Apr. 19, 2012, 12 pages. |
Nersisyan, et al., Study of azo dye surface command photoalignment material for photonics applications, Applied Optics, vol. 49, No. 10, Apr. 1, 2010, 8 pages. |
Niersisyan, et al., Characterization of optically imprinted polarization gratings, Applied Optics, vol. 48, No. 21, Jul. 20, 2009, 6 pages. |
Nersisyan, et al., Fabrication of Liquid Crystal Polymer Axial Waveplates for UV-IR Wavelengths, Optics Express, vol. 17, No. 14, Jul. 2009, 9 pages. |
Nersisyan, et al., Optical Axis Gratings in Liquid Crystals and Their Use for Polarization Insensitive Optical Switching, Journal of Nonlinear Optical Physics & Materials, vol. 18, No. 1, 2009, 47 pages. |
Nersisyan, et al., Polarization insensitive imaging through polarization gratings, Optics Express, vol. 17, No. 3, Feb. 2, 2009, 14 pages. |
Sarkissian, et al., Longitudinally modulated nematic bandgap structure, Optical Society of America, vol. 23, No. 8, Aug. 2008, 6 pages. |
Sarkissian, et al., Polarization-universal bandgap in periodically twisted nematics, Optics Letters, vol. 31, No. 11, Jun. 1, 2006, abstract, 4 pages. |
Sarkissian, et al., Periodically Aligned Liquid Crystal: Potential Application for Projection Displays, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., vol. 451, 2006, 19 pages. |
Sarkissian, et al., Potential application of Periodically Aligned Liquid Crystal cell for projection displays, JThE12, 2005, 3 pages. |
Sarkissian, et al., Polarization-Controlled Switching Between Diffraction Orders in Transverse-Periodically Aligned Nematic Liquid Crystals, Optics Letters, Aug. 2006, abstract, 4 pages. |
Schadt, et al., Photo-Induced Alignment and Patterning of Hybrid Liquid Crystalline Polymer Films on Single Substrates, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 34, Part 2, No. 6B, Jun. 15, 1995, 4 pages. |
Schadt , et al., Photo-Generation of Linearly Polymerized Liquid Crystal Aligning Layers Comprising Novel, Integrated Optically Patterned Retarders and Color Filters, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 34, Part 1, No. 6A, Jun. 1995, 10 pages. |
Schadt, et al., Optical patterning of multi-domain liquid-crystal displays with wide viewing angles, Nature, vol. 381, May 16, 1996, 4 pages. |
Escuti, et al., A Polarization-Independent Liquid Crystal Saptial-Light-Modulator, Liquid Crystals X, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 6332, 2006, 9 pages. |
Escuti, et al., Polarization-Independent LC Microdisplays Using Liquid Crystal Polarization Gratings: A Viable Solution (?), Dept of Electrical & Computer Engineering @ ILCC, Jul. 1, 2008, 30 pages. |
Escuti, et al., Simplified Spectropolarimetry Using Reactive Mesogen Polarization Gratings, Imaging Spectrometry XI, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 6302, 2006, 11 pages. |
Gibbons, et al., Optically Controlled Alignment of Liquid Crystals: Devices and Applications, Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals, vol. 251, 1994, 19 pages. |
Gibbons, et al., Optically generated liquid crystal gratings, Appl. Phys. Lett., 65, Nov. 14, 1994, 3 pages. |
University of Central Florida, School of Optics CREOL PPCE, Optics in the Southeast, Technical Conference and Tabletop Exhibit, Nov. 12-13, 2003, 9 pages. |
Ichimura, et al., Surface assisted photoalignment control of lyotropic liquid crystals, Part 1, Characterization and photoalignment of aqueous solutions of a water soluble dyes as lyotropic liquid crystals, J. Materials. Chem., vol. 12, 2002, abstract, 2 pages. |
Ichimura, et al., Reversible Change in Alignment Mode of Nematic Liquid Crystals Regulated Photochemically by “Command Surfaces” Modified with an Azobenzene Monolayer, American Chemical Society, Langmuir, vol. 4, No. 5, 1988, 3 pages. |
Zel'Dovich, et al., Devices for displaying visual information, Disclosure, School of Optics/CREOL, University of Central Florida, Jul. 2000, 10 pages. |
Provenzano, et al., Highly efficient liquid crystal based diffraction grating induced by polarization holograms at the aligning surfaces, Applied Physics Letter 89, 2006, 4 pages. |
Titus, et al., Efficient polarization-independent, re ective liquid crystal phase grating, Applied Physics Letter 71, Oct. 20, 1197, 3 pages. |
Chen, et al. An Electrooptically Controlled Liquid-Crystal Diffraction Grating, Applied Physics Letter 67, Oct. 30, 1995, 4 pages. |
Kim, et al., Unusual Characteristics of Diffraction Gratings in a Liquid Crystal Cell, Advanced Materials, vol. 14, No. 13-14, Jul. 4, 2002, 7 pages. |
Pan, et al., Surface Topography and Alignment Effects in UV-Modified Polyimide Films with Micron Size Patterns, Chinese Journal of Physics, vol. 41, No. 2, Apr. 2003, 8 pages. |
Fuh, et al., Dynamic studies of holographic gratings in dye-doped liquid-crystal films, Optics Letter, vol. 26, No. 22, Nov. 15, 2001, 3 pages. |
Yu, et al., Polarization Grating of Photoaligned Liquid Crystals with Oppositely Twisted Domain Structures, Molecular Crystals Liquid Crystals, vol. 433, 2005, 7 pages. |
Crawford, et al., Liquid-crystal diffraction gratings using polarization holography alignment techniques, Journal of Applied Physics 98, 2005, 10 pages. |
Seiberle, et al., 38.1 Invited Paper: Photo-Aligned Anisotropic Optical Thin Films, SID 03 Digest, 2003, 4 pages. |
Wen, et al., Nematic liquid-crystal polarization gratings by modification of surface alignment, Applied Optics, vol. 41, No. 7, Mar. 1, 2002, 5 pages. |
Anagnostis, et al., Replication produces holographic optics in volume, Laser Focus World, vol. 36, Issue 3, Mar. 1, 2000, 6 pages. |
Gale, Replicated Diffractive Optics and Micro-Optics, Optics and Photonics News, Aug. 2003, 6 pages. |
Mceldowney, et al., Creating vortex retarders using photoaligned LC polymers, Optics Letter, vol. 33, No. 2, Jan. 15, 2008, 3 pages. |
Stalder, et al., Lineraly polarized light with axial symmetry generated by liquid-crystal polarization converters, Optics Letters vol. 21, No. 1996, 3 pages. |
Kakichashvili, et al., Method for phase polarization recording of holograms, Sov. J. Quantum. Electron, vol. 4, No. 6, Dec. 1974, 5 pages. |
Todorov, et al., High-Sensitivity Material With Reversible Photo-Induced Anisotropy, Optics Communications, vol. 47, No. 2, Aug. 15, 1983, 4 pages. |
Attia, et al., Anisoptropic Gratings Recorded From Two Circularly Polarized Coherent Naves, Optics Communications, vol. 47, No. 2, Aug. 15, 1983, 6 pages. |
Cipparrone, et al., Permanent polarization gratings in photosensitive langmuir blodget films, Applied Physics Letter, vol. 77, No. 14, Oct. 2, 2000, 4 pages. |
Nikolova, et al., Diffraction Efficiency and Selectivity of Polarization Holographic Recording, Optica Acta: International Journal of Optics, vol. 31, No. 5, 1984, 11 pages. |
Lee et al., “Generation of pretilt angles of liquid crystals on cinnamte-based photoalignment . . . ”, Opt., Expr., vol. 17 (26) (Dec. 2009), abstract, 4 pages. |
Yaroshchuk et al. “Azodyes as photoalignment agents for polymerizable liquid crystals”, IDW'06 Digest vol. 1-3, 2006, 4 pages. |
Chigrinov et al. “Anchoring properties of photoaligned azo-dye materials” Phys. Rev., E vol. 68, (Dec. 2003), 5 pages. |
Pagliusi et al. Surface-induced photorefractivity in twistable nematics: toward the all-optical control of gain, Opt. Expr. vol. 16, Oct. 2008, 9 pages. |
M. Honma, T. Nose, Polarization-independent liquid crystal grating fabricated by microrubbing process, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1, vol. 42, 2003, 3 pages. |
Anderson, G., et al., Broadband Antihole Photon Sieve Telescope, Applied Optics, vol. 16, No. 18., Jun. 2007, 3 pages. |
Early, J. et al., Twenty Meter Space Telescope Based on Diffractive Fresnel Lens, SPIE, U.S. Department of Energy, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Jun. 2003, 11 pages. |
Serak, S., et al., High-efficiency 1.5 mm Thick Optical Axis Grating and its Use for Laser Beam Combining, Optical Society of America, vol. 32, No., Jan. 2007, 4 pages. |
Ono et al., Effects of phase shift between two photoalignment substances on diffration properties in liquid crystalline grating cells, Appl. Opt. vol. 48, Jan. 2009, 7 pgs. |
Naydenova et al., “Diffraction form polarization holographic gratings with surface relief in side chain azobenzene polyesters” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, vol. 15, (1998), 14 pages. |
Oh et al., Achromatic polarization gratings as highly efficent thin-film polarizing beamsplitters for broadband light Proc. SPIE vol. 6682, (2007), 4 pages. |
Nersisyan, S., et al., Polarization insensitive imaging through polarization gratins, Optics Express, vol. 17, No. 3, Feb. 2, 2009, 14 pages. |
OISE, Optics in the Southeast, Technical Conference and Tabletop Exhibit, Optical Society of America, Orlando, FL., Nov. 12-13, 2003, 9 pages. |
Dierking, Polymer Network-Stabilized Liquid Crystals, Advanced Materials, vol. 12, No. 3, 2000, 15 pages. |
Tabiryan, et al., Broadband waveplate lenses, Optics Express 7091, vol. 24, No. 7, Mar. 24, 2016, 12 pages. |
Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration dated Oct. 10, 2016, 16 pages. |
Marrucci, et al., Pancharatnam-Berry phase optical elements for wave front shaping in the visible domain, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 2006, 3 pages. |
Sobolewska et al., “On the inscription of period and half period surface relief gratings in azobenzene-functionalized polymers”. |
Barrett et al., Model of laser driven mass transport in thin films of dye-functionalized polymers, J. Chem. Phys., vol. 109 (4), Jul. 22, 1998, 13 pages. |
Tabirian, U.S. Appl. No. 14/214,375, filed Mar. 14, 2014, Office Action Summary dated Jun. 27, 2017, 10 pages. |
Tabirian, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 14/688,425, filed Apr. 16, 2015, Office Action Summary dated Oct. 5, 2017, 10 pages. |
Serak, et al. Diffractive Waveplate Arrays [Invited], Journal of the Optical Society of America B, May 2017, pp. B56-B63, vol. 34, No. 5, 8pages. |
Emoto, et al, Optical & Physical Applications of Photocontrollable Materials: Azobenzene-Containing & Liquid Crystalline Polymers, Polymers, Jan. 2012, 150-186, vol. 4, 38 pgs. |
Tabiryan, et al. Thin waveplate lenses of switchable focal length—new generation in optics, Optics Express 25783, vol. 23, No. 20, Sep. 19, 2015, 12 pages. |
Tabiryan, et al. Superlens in the skies: liquid-crystal-polymer technology for telescopes, Newsroom, 2016, 2 pages. |
Nersisyan, et al., The principles of laser beam control with polarization gratings introduced as diffractive waveplates, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 7775, 2010, 10 pages. |
Heller, A Giant Leap for Space Telescopes, Foldable Optics, S&TR, Mar. 2003, 7 pages. |
Beam Engineering for Advanced Measurements Co., PCT Application No. PCT/US2015026186, The Extended European Search Report, filed on Mar. 8, 2017, 13 pages. |
Blinov, et al., Electrooptic Effects in Liquid Crystal MAterials, Springer-Verlag New York, 1994, 17 pages. |
Crawford, et al., Liquid Crystals in Complex Geometries; Formed by Polymer and Porous Networks, Taylor and Francis, 1996, 4 pages. |
Honma, et al., Liquid-Crystal Fresnel Zone Plate Fabricated by Microorubbing, Japanese Journal of Applied Phsyics, vol. 44, No. 1A, 2005, 4 pages. |
Tabirian, N., et al., U.S. Appl. No. 61/757,259, filed Jan. 28, 2013, 29 pages. |
Beam Engineering for Advaced Measurements Co., et al., PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/038666 filed Jun. 22, 2016, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search. |
Tabirian, N., Utility U.S. Appl. No. 14/194,808, filed Mar. 2, 2014, Office Action Summary dated Feb. 9, 2018, 10 pages. |
Tabirian, N., Utility U.S. Appl. No. 14/324,126, filed Jul. 4, 2014, Office Action Summary dated Feb. 8, 2018, 13 pages. |
Tabirian, N., Utility U.S. Appl. No. 151189,551, filed Jun. 22, 2016, Office Action Summary dated Feb. 27, 2018, 16 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62186622 | Jun 2015 | US |