Fusion proteins and antibodies targeting human red blood cell antigens

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Drug delivery by red blood cells (RBCs) was envisioned many decades ago[1-3] and the field has recently seen substantial growth [4-6], spurred by advances in drug loading within cells [7, 8] and coupling to the cell surface[9, 10], new technologies for genetic manipulation[11], and clinical successes in cellular therapeutics overall[12]. Furthermore, recent reports that carriage of drugs by RBCs can modulate immunogenicity, even inducing tolerance, expand the potential applications of RBC delivery[13-15]. Delivery by carrier RBCs enhances the pharmacokinetics and, in some cases, the pharmacodynamics of the loaded agents. RBC-encapsulated agents, including dexamethasone and L-asparaginase, have entered clinical trials.

Surface-coupling may offer some advantages with respect to clinical translatability, manufacturing, and bio-compatibility[16]. Animal studies demonstrated highly desirable features of surface-coupled anti-thrombotic and anti-inflammatory agents[10, 17-20]. For example, coupling of thrombomodulin (TM) to murine RBCs improves its efficacy in thrombotic[20], inflammatory, and ischemia-reperfusion injuries[21].

Previous reports have generally used fusion proteins, antibodies, and peptides to couple therapeutics to the surface of murine and porcine, but not human, RBCs. Fusion to murine RBCs is typically accomplished by derivatives of Ter119, an antibody to an epitope associated with glycophorin A (GPA)[22], or with ERY1 peptide, whose putative target is also GPA[13]. While no overt adverse effects on RBCs have been noted when using these ligands, the effects of their binding to murine RBCs have not been characterized extensively [23].

The translational aspects of RBC delivery are challenging, as the considerable polymorphism of RBC antigenic determinants among species hinders any generalization of the effects of extracellular ligands to human RBCs. While we expect that surface-coupling is comparatively less-damaging than encapsulation methods (for example, hypotonic opening of membrane pores), careful and rigorous examination of affinity-coupling of bio-therapeutics to the surface of human red blood cells, assessment of their perturbation of red cell physiology, and subsequent demonstration of efficacy in humanized models, have not been reported.

It is known that RBC ligands, even monovalent, specifically targeted to GPA and Band 3, have the potential to cause undesirable alterations of RBC, including changes in deformability[24-28], exposure of phosphatidylserine (PS)[29], and generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS)[30]. These effects have been shown to vary even among epitopes within the same target protein. It is critical to examine these effects to identify the optimal RBC target for each therapeutic ligand, which should be erythroid specific, present in sufficient copy number for its therapeutic intent, be widely distributed among human populations, be non-immunogenic, and for most applications, not compromise RBC biocompatibility. Importantly, expression of three blood group systems is largely confined to erythropoiesis, GPA (MNS system), Band 3 (Diego system), and Rhesus family members (RhCE and RhD, Rh system)[34].

Therefore, antibodies and fusion proteins useful for targeting RBCs for drug delivery in subjects are needed.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The compositions and methods described herein relate to antibodies, fragments, fusion proteins and conjugates which specifically bind red blood cells, specifically via anti-RHCE or anti-Band 3. In one aspect, an antibody or fragment thereof comprising at least a VH or VL sequence as shown in Table 2 or Table 5 is provided, wherein said antibody or fragment thereof specifically binds an erythrocyte. In one embodiment, the antibody or fragment comprises a VH and a VL sequence as shown in Table 2 or Table 5. In one embodiment, the antibody is an scFv.

In another aspect, compositions are provided in which any pharmacological, therapeutic, prophylactic, imaging or diagnostic agent which is coupled to, bound, fused, associated with or conjugated to an anti-RHCE or anti-Band 3 antibody described herein. In one embodiment, the cargo is a liposome.

In another aspect, a method for delivering an agent using red blood cells is provided. The method includes administering any of the compositions described herein to a subject in need thereof. In another embodiment, a method of prolonging circulation of an agent in the body is provided. The method includes administering any of the compositions described herein to a subject in need thereof. In another aspect, a method for preventing or reducing coagulation is provided. The method includes administering any of the compositions described herein to a subject in need thereof. In yet another aspect, a method of treating or preventing thrombosis, tissue ischemia, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), non-segmented elevated AMI, deep vein thrombosis, ischemic stroke, hyperoxic injury, transient ischemic attack (TIA), cerebrovascular disease, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), pulmonary embolism, ischemic peripheral vascular disease, inflammation, pulmonary edema, sepsis, malaria, SDC, PNH, hemolytic anemia, acute lung injury (ALI), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), a bleeding disorder such as hemophilia, or aseptic systemic inflammation is provided. The method includes administering any of the compositions described herein to a subject in need thereof.

Other aspects and advantages of the invention will be readily apparent from the following detailed description of the invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1A-FIG. 1G provide characterization of aRh17 and aWrb ligands and their binding to human RBCs. Representative size exclusion HPLC analysis of (FIG. 1A) hTM-scFv fusions and (FIG. 1B) scFvs alone directed to Band3/GPA (aWrb, solid blue lines) and RhCE (aRh17, dashed red lines) demonstrates high purity of recombinant proteins and elution times consistent with theoretical molecular weights. Direct binding assays with radiolabeled proteins demonstrates high affinity and Bmax (Table 7) consistent with reported copy number of the surface targets for both the (FIG. 1C) hTM-scFv fusions and the (FIG. 1D) scFv antibodies. No significant non-specific binding to control murine RBCs was seen. Representative data of 3 independent experiments are shown. Ligand dissociation studies demonstrated slow dissociation kinetics (>50% bound at 3 hours) for both the (FIG. 1E) TM-scFv fusions and (FIG. 1F) scFv antibodies. (FIG. 1G) Binding assay by hemagglutination techniques demonstrated that when anti-hTM IgG antibody (100 nM) was added to RBC pre-bound with the indicated concentration of hTM-scFv fusions, agglutination was observed when 1000 copies of hTM would be expected on the surface. Representative data of 3 independent experiments are shown. No agglutination was seen with RBCs treated with either scFv or hTM-scFv alone or with mouse, rat, or pig RBCs treated with scFv or hTM-scFv followed by anti-hTM.

FIG. 2A-FIG. 2F show that aRh17 and aWrb antibodies demonstrate differential effects on RBC resistance to osmotic and mechanical stress. Osmotic stress was induced by incubation in buffered (10 mM sodium phosphate) saline at a range of osmolalities (0-308 mOsm). Mechanical stress was induced by rotation in the presence of glass beads at 1% Hct. Antibodies were added at 10 nM and 100 nM to 5% Hct RBC suspension, which produces a ratio of approximately 104 and 105 ligands per RBC and is below saturation for both target antigens. (FIG. 2A) RBCs treated with 500 nM aWrb scFv (blue) showed a left shift in the osmotic lysis curve compared to naïve (black) or aRh17 scFv treated RBCs (red). (FIG. 2B) RBCs treated with aWrb but not aRh17 showed a significant change in the concentration required for 50% hemolysis (128 vs 120 mOsm, n=3, *p<0.05 one-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak correction for multiple comparisons) (FIG. 2C) aWrb scFv treated RBCs (blue) show a dose-dependent decrease in hemolysis in response to osmotic stress at 128 mOsm (EC50 for naïve RBCs) and (FIG. 2D) a dose-dependent increase in hemolysis in response to mechanical stress. aRh17 scFv treated RBCs (red) do not demonstrate any significant change in response to (FIG. 2E) osmotic stress or (FIG. 2F) mechanical stress. In all experiments means±SD are shown, n=3 for each condition. (*p<0.05 compared to naive, one-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak correction for multiple comparisons).

FIG. 3A-FIG. 3D show that aRh17 and aWrb hTM-scFv fusion proteins demonstrate similar patterns of changes in RBC resistance to osmotic and mechanical stress as the parent scFv. Fusion proteins were added at 10 nM and 100 nM to 5% Hct RBC suspension, which produces a ratio of approximately 104 and 105 fusion proteins per RBC and is below saturation for both target antigens. (FIG. 3A) aWrb hTM-scFv shows a dose-dependent decrease in hemolysis in response to osmotic stress and (FIG. 3B) a dose-dependent increase in hemolysis in response to mechanical stress. aRh17 hTM-scFv does not demonstrate any significant change in response to (FIG. 3C) osmotic stress or (FIG. 3D) mechanical stress. In all experiments means±SD are shown, n=3 for each condition. (*p<0.05 compared to naive, one-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak correction for multiple comparisons)

FIG. 4A-FIG. 4D show that aWrb scFv and hTM-scFv increase RBC rigidity, while aRh17 scFv and hTM-scFv show no changes compared to naïve RBC. Ektacytometry was performed on 5% Hct RBC suspensions incubated with scFv or hTM-scFv at the indicated concentrations. Elongation index (as calculated automatically by the instrument) was read as a function of shear stress and non-linear regression was used to calculate the shear stress required for half-maximal deformation and the maximum elongation index. Representative curves of at least 3 independent experiments with different donors. (FIG. 4A) hTM-scFv fusions and (FIG. 4C) scFv antibodies targeted to Band3/GPA (aWrb blue dotted lines) demonstrated a rightward shift in the ektacytometry curves compared to naïve (solid line) while aRh17 fusions and scFv (red dashed lines) showed no change from naïve (scFvs and fusion proteins added at 1000 nM) (FIG. 4B and FIG. 4D) The shift in deformability was quantified as the SS1/2, which showed dose-dependent increases in response to Band3/GPA targeted ligands and not RhCE ligands. In (FIG. 4B) and (FIG. 4D), mean±SD is shown, n=3-5 per condition. (*p<0.05 compared to naive, one-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak correction for multiple comparisons)

FIG. 5A-FIG. 5F show that IgG antibodies against Band3 and GPA rigidify RBCs, while IgGs against RhCE and RhD do not. Representative ektacytometric curves (at least 3 separate donors studied per antibody) of RBCs treated with antibodies targeting (FIG. 5A) RhD or RhCE, (FIG. 5B) Band 3 or Wrb, or (FIG. 5C) GPA. A 5% suspension of RhD+ human RBCs in PBS was treated with 100 nM of the indicated antibody clones (˜100,000 IgG/RBC). After incubation for 1 hour at 37° C., the red cell suspensions were read on an ektacytometer in 5.5% PVP. Legends indicate antibody clones. (FIG. 5D) Ektacytometric dose-response of anti-RhCE versus anti-Wrb IgG antibodies. Selected antibody clones against RhCE (BRIC69, red) and Wrb (BRIC14, blue) were added at 100 nM to varying hematocrit RBC suspensions (2.5, 5, 10, and 20%, 6 donors tested) to result in ligand ratios of 25,000-100,000 IgG/RBC. aWrb demonstrated a significant increase in SS1/2 at all ligand loading ratios, while no significant difference was seen for aRhCE antibodies. Mean±SD is shown, n=3-6 for each condition. (FIG. 5E) Flow cytometry on aRhCE (BRIC69, red) and aWrb (BRIC14, blue) IgG treated RBCs stained with AlexaFluor488 labeled anti-mouse secondary antibodies shows no significant difference in bound IgGs (based on median fluorescence) at the indicated loading ratios. (FIG. 5F) Representative histogram demonstrating similar antibody loading for RBCs treated with aRhCE (BRIC69, red) and aWrb (BRIC14, blue) antibodies.

FIG. 6A-FIG. 6E provide characterization of the activity of RBCs bound by hTM-scFv fusions and their therapeutic efficacy in a microfluidic model of inflammatory thrombosis (FIG. 6A) APC generation by RBCs loaded with hTM-scFv demonstrates a dose- and copy-number dependent response in APC generation as measured by chromogenic assay. hTM-aBand3 (circles) showed about 2-fold higher APC generation per RBC compared to hTM-aRhCE (triangles), although copy numbers are expected to 5- to 10-fold higher. Soluble hTM (shTM) treated RBCs are shown as a non-binding control (open squares) (FIG. 6B) Comparison of APC generative capacity of sTM versus hTM-scFv fusions (added at 50 nM) in a high hematocrit (20%) RBC suspension. Mean±SD is shown, n=3 for each condition. (*p<0.05 vs sTM, one-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak correction for multiple comparisons) A slight reduction in activity was seen for hTM-aBand3 but not hTM-aRhCE. (FIG. 6C) Fibrin generation on TNF-alpha activated, endothelialized microfluidic channels perfused with human whole blood preincubated with either PBS control (open squares), shTM control (crosses), hTM-Wrb (blue circles), or hTM-aRh17 (red triangles). Both fusion proteins (and shTM positive control) significantly reduced fibrin generation. (*p<0.05 vs untreated, one-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak correction for multiple comparisons) as compared to the control channel. An increase in fibrin generation was noted toward the end of the observation period for the hTM-aWrb treated channels. (FIG. 6D) hTM-aRh17 treatment (red triangles) more effectively reduced platelet and leukocyte adhesion (quantified with calcein AM fluorescence) than hTM-aWrb (blue circles) versus untreated control (open squares). hTM-Rh17 treatment was similar to shTM positive control (crosses). For (FIG. 6C) and (FIG. 6D) mean±SEM for 2 independent channels is shown. (FIG. 6E) Representative composite images of whole blood (fibrin in red, platelets and leukocytes in green, brightfield image in gray) flowing through endothelialized channels at the end of the observation period (t=20 min). Fibrin is decreased in both fusion treated channels. An increase in platelet adhesion with associated fibrin (yellow, arrowhead) is seen in the hTM-aWrb treated channels compared to hTM-aRh17. Videos of the full time-course are not provided.

FIG. 7A-FIG. 7D show that binding of fluorescent fusion proteins to RBCs measured by flow cytometry. Representative binding curves for fluorescently labeled (FIG. 7A) hTM-aRh17 and (FIG. 7B) hTM-aWrb fusions demonstrate similar binding parameters as radiolabeled fusions (representative of at least 3 repeated studies). Histograms for mouse (red), pig (blue), rat (black) and human (green) RBCs bound by fluorescently labeled fusion proteins demonstrate that both (FIG. 7C) hTM-Rh17 and (FIG. 7D) hTM-Wrb bind to human and not mouse, rat, or pig RBCs.

FIG. 8A-FIG. 8E shows that binding of scFvs to RBCs is maintained after exposure to low (5 dyne/cm2) and high (200 dyne/cm2) shear stress flow. A fraction of washed, isolated human RBCs was treated with saturating concentrations of anti-Wrb or anti-Rh17 scFv labeled with Alexa Flour 647 or Alexa Flour 488, respectively. The labeled RBCs were then added to fresh donor human whole blood (collected in citrate) at 0.5% of the total RBC population. The resulting blood was flowed through the Bioflux microfluidic device at either 5 dyne/cm2 or 200 dyne/c2 and the (FIG. 8A) inlet and (FIG. 8B and FIG. 8C) outlet blood was analyzed by flow cytometry. The results demonstrate that (FIG. 8D) the labeled RBCs maintained the same fluorescence intensity as the inlet populations and (FIG. 8E) were present in equal proportion to the unlabeled RBCs.

FIG. 9A-FIG. 9C show that dissociation and exchange of scFv from pre-treated RBCs onto naïve RBCs under constant mixing at 37° C. A fraction of washed, isolated human RBCs was treated with saturating concentrations of anti-Wrb or anti-Rh17 scFv labeled with Alexa Flour 647 or Alexa Flour 488, respectively. The labeled RBCs were then added to fresh donor human whole blood (collected in citrate) at 0.5-1% of the total RBC population. This mixture was then incubated at 37° C. under constant mixing by inversion. We observed (FIG. 9A) a gradual decrease in fluorescence intensity in the targeted RBCs, with >65% of fluorescence signal retained on the targeted RBCs at two hours. We quantified both the (FIG. 9B) dissociation of the scFvs and their (FIG. 9C) gradual rebinding to the naive population.

FIG. 10 shows Wright-Giemsa stained blood smears of hTM-scFv treated RBCs. Whole blood was treated with 1 μM hTM-scFv and incubated for 1 hour prior to preparation of smears. At a normal hematocrit, this ratio is ˜105 fusions/RBC. Slides were dried and stained with a commercial Wright-Giemsa stain (Sigma Aldrich) per package insert.

FIG. 11 provides maximum elongation index (EImax) of human RBCs treated with hTM-aWrb and hTM-aRh17 fusion proteins. Donor RBCs at 5% Hct were treated with the indicated concentration of fusion protein and measured in the ektacytometer. EImax calculated using non-linear regression. Mean±SD is shown (n=3-5 for each condition). (*p<0.05 vs naïve RBC, one-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak correction for multiple comparisons)

FIG. 12 shows size-exclusion HPLC of IgG and Fab antibodies against GPA. Antibodies prepared from hybridoma clone YTH89.1 which targets human glycophorin A. Full IgG was prepared from hybridoma supernatant using standard techniques and purified using protein G. Fab was prepared by enzymatic digestion of IgG with papain solution (Immucor) followed by treatment with protein A-sepharose (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for removal of Fc fragments and preparative size-exclusion HPLC for removal of residual papain enzyme. Representative HPLC from two independent antibody production runs.

FIG. 13 shows RBCs bound by ligands to human GPA also demonstrate slight increases in rigidity and changes in mechanical and osmotic resistance. (FIG. 13A) Representative ektacytometric curves of at least 3 studies of human RBCs treated with anti-GPA Fab and IgG, derived from antibody clone YTH89.1 demonstrate a rightward shift after antibody treatment (FIG. 13B) At high ligand loading, anti-GPA Fab induced a significant increase in SS1/2 while anti-GPA IgG (100 nM) more potently induced rigidification. Mean±SD is shown, n=3 for each condition. (*p<0.05, one-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak correction for multiple comparions) (FIG. 13C) Anti-GPA Fab induced increased hemolysis in response to hypo-osmolar stress and (FIG. 13D) slightly increased hemolysis in response to mechanical stress. Mean±SD, n=3 is shown, representative of 2 independent experiments. (*p<0.05 vs naïve RBCs, one-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak correction for multiple comparisons)

FIG. 14A-FIG. 14D show Ter119 ligands induce changes in murine RBCs similar to human RBCs treated with Wrb ligands. Ter119-TM fusion proteins induce changes to (FIG. 14A) osmotic resistance and (FIG. 14B) mechanical resistance similar to aWrb fusions in human RBCs. Mean±SD is sown, n=3 for each condition. (*p<0.05 vs naïve RBCs, one-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak correction for multiple comparisons) (FIG. 14C) Representative ektacytometric curves of at least 3 independent experiments showing that Ter119-TM (1000 induced a slight rightward shift in ektacytometric curves, indicating increased RBC rigidity. The parent Ter119 IgG induced marked ektacytometric changes. (FIG. 14D) SS1/2 derived from ektacytometric curves demonstrates a significant, dose-dependent increase in SS1/2 with Ter119-TM treatment of murine RBCs. Mean±SD is shown, n=5-8 for each condition. (*p<0.05 vs naïve RBCs, one-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak correction for multiple comparisons).

FIG. 15A-FIG. 15B show human RBC ligands do not induce significant ROS generation or PS exposure. (FIG. 15A) No significant ROS generation was observed for cells treated with aWrb, aRh17, or aGPA ligands. Human RBCs were preincubated with 5 μM dihydrorhodamine 123 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 1% hematocrit for 30 min at 37 C, washed, then treated with either t-butyl hydrogenperoxide (10 μM) as a positive control or 100 nM of the indicated ligands for 1 hr at 37 C. ROS generation was measured as median FL1 fluorescence and the mean±SD are shown (n=4). (FIG. 15B) No significant PS exposure was observed for cells treated with aWrb, aRh17, or aGPA ligands. Human RBCs were treated with 200 nM of the indicated ligands at 5% hematocrit (˜2×105 ligands/RBC). Ter119-mTM was used as a non-binding negative control, and 2 mM t-butyl hydrogenperoxide was used as a positive control. Cells were treated at 37° C. for 1 hour, washed, and resuspended in annexin V-Alexa Fluor 488 in annexin assay buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) per manufacturer protocol. Mean±SD, n=3 is shown for each condition. (*p<0.05 vs non-binding control, one-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak correction for multiple comparisons)

FIG. 16 shows APC generation by fusion proteins (hTM-scFv). APC generation by fusion proteins in soluble phase (green) is similar to shTM alone (red). shTM or hTM-aBand3 (20 nM) were assayed by chromogenic methods. No significant APC generation was seen in the presence of excess anti-TM blocking antibody (Phx-01, blue) or without TM added (purple). Mean±SD is shown (n=3). (*p<0.05 vs no TM, one-way ANOVA)

FIG. 17 shows aWrb scFvs rigidify human RBCs in whole blood at 200 nM. Whole blood treated with 200 nM aWrb scFv shows significant rigidification (increased SS1/2) while treatment with 200 nM aRh17 scFv shows no change compared to naïve whole blood. Blood was treated at 37 C for 1 hour prior to ektacytometry in 5.5% PVP solution. These ratios produce approximately 25,000 ligands per RBC. Mean±SD is shown, n=5-6, three donors tested. (*p<0.05 vs naïve RBC, one-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak correction for multiple comparisons).

FIG. 18 is a schematic of the hTM-aRHCE vector which includes a human thrombomodulin domain (hTM), and Rh17 VH and VL chains.

FIG. 19A-FIG. 19C demonstrate that RBC-targeted liposomes are maintained in circulation significantly longer than conventional ‘stealth’ liposomes. (FIG. 19A) Whole animal biodistribution of Ter119-liposomes (100-200 scFv:liposome) loaded onto RBCs in vivo by direct injection into the blood stream (blue) or unconjugated PEGylated liposomes (red). For in vivo loading liposomes were injected at a ratio of approximately 50 liposomes per RBC. (FIG. 19B) Blood PK curves demonstrate that the large majority of both in vivo loaded Ter119-liposomes (blue) are maintained in circulation at 3 hours and gradually drop off over 24 hours. Compared to traditional “stealth” liposomes (red), there is approximately a 2-fold increase in area under the curve (p<0.05) (FIG. 19C) Ter-119 liposomes are found mostly (>80%) in the RBC pellet of collected blood and gradually clear this compartment while free liposomes are largely in the plasma fraction.

FIG. 20A-FIG. 20B demonstrate circulation of ex vivo liposome loaded RBCs is dependent on the number of loaded nanocarriers. (FIG. 20A) Schema for ex vivo loading of RBCs with liposomes, 15 min of incubation typically resulted in >65% of liposomes bound (FIG. 20B) 30 min biodistribution of 51-Cr labeled RBCs loaded with either 200 or 20,000 liposomes per RBC demonstrates that while high loading leads to rapid clearance, low loading maintains near normal circulation of RBCs. For liposomes loaded ex vivo at a 200:1 ratio, PK data (up to 3 hours) were nearly identical to in vivo loading approaches.

FIG. 21A-FIG. 21B demonstrate effects of liposome binding on RBC agglutination and RBC membrane deformability. (FIG. 21A) High ratios of liposome loading on RBCs leads to agglutination in vitro, while lesser ratios (<200:RBC) do not induce macroscopically detectable agglutination, as measured in a round-bottom well agglutination assay. Human RBCs shown as negative control. (FIG. 21B) Ektacytometry demonstrates that RBCs maintain normal membrane deformability at ratios up to 200 liposomes per RBC, above which dose-dependent rigidification of the membrane was observed

FIG. 22 demonstrates that Ter119IgG-liposomes are less stably retained on circulating RBCs and produce greater RBC rigidification than Ter119scFv-liposomes. (left panel) Mice were injected with radiolabeled liposomes conjugates with similar numbers (100-200/lipo) of either Ter119 IgG or Ter119 scFv. A higher percentage of Ter119-scFv liposomes remained in the RBC pellet, while Ter119-IgG was more rapidly cleared. (Middle and right panels) Ter119-IgG liposomes produced a higher degree of RBC membrane rigidification, as measured by ektacytometry (curves in middle panel, quantification in right panel, *p<0.05)

FIG. 23 shows that rigidification of RBC membranes by loaded liposomes is target dependent. Ektacytometry on human RBCs loaded with liposomes targeted to Wright(b) antigen (red) or RHCE (blue), compared to human RBCs mixed with untargeted liposomes (green). Liposomes loaded onto Wright(b) demonstrate significant rigidification while RHCE targeted liposomes preserve normal RBC deformability. Liposomes were targeted with IgGs to human RHCE (BRIC69) or Wright(b) (BRIC14).

FIG. 24A-FIG. 24B show that whole blood treated with aWrb scFv shows increased platelet adhesion in response to flow over TNF-α activated endothelium compared to blood treated with aRh17. (FIG. 24A) Representative image of endothelialized channels subjected to flow with either (top) aWrb scFv treated whole blood or (bottom) aRh17 scFv treated whole blood. Blood was collected in citrate with corn trypsin inhibitor, incubated with scFv (500 nM) for 15 minutes, recalcified, and flowed over channels for 15 min after which images were captured across the channels. Prior to flow, platelets and leukocytes were stained by addition of calcein AM dye. (FIG. 24B) Quantification of the experiments in panel A (mean fluorescence intensity) demonstrate a significant increase in calcein AM signal in the aWrb scFv treated blood but not aRh17 scFv (n=4, *p<0.05, one-way ANOVA).

FIG. 25 is a Western blot that demonstrates that anti-Rh17 recognizes a linear epitope in human RhCE. A Western blot was performed to assess the binding of KP3-17 (anti-Rh17) to proteins extracted from mouse and human erythrocyte ghosts. Because proteins were denatured in reducing SDS-PAGE buffer prior to gel electrophoresis, the presence of binding is due to interaction with linear, and not conformational, epitopes. This is in contrast to anti-RhCE mAbs described by other groups, which recognize conformational epitopes.

FIG. 26 is a bar graph which demonstrates that KP3-17 (anti-Rh17) recognizes an epitope present in the 6th extracellular loop of human RhCE. Flow cytometry was used to assess the binding of anti-Rh17 to human erythrocytes in the presence and absence of linear peptides corresponding to the amino acid sequence 6th extracellular loop of human RhD (negative control) and human RhCE. A decrease in binding signal only in the presence of the RhCE-derived peptide demonstrates that the 6th extracellular loop of RhCE is involved in the binding of Rh17 to human erythrocytes. (* denotes p<0.05 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey's post-hoc test).

FIG. 27 is a 3D model of human RHCE (looking top down onto a membrane), with 6^thextracellular loop boxed.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Carriage of drugs by red blood cells (RBCs) enhances pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, modulates immune responses, and is approaching clinical translation. The effects of attaching therapeutics to human RBCs have not been well defined and optimal RBC surface determinants have not been identified. As described herein, non-human-primate single chain antibodies (scFv) directed to human RBCs were engineered and fused with human thrombomodulin (hTM) as a representative therapeutic cargo (hTM-scFv). Binding these fusions to RBC determinants Band3 (Wrb) and RHCE (Rh17) endowed RBC with hTM activity, but differed in their effect on RBC physiology and specific activity. scFv and hTM-scFv targeted to Band3 increased membrane rigidity, sensitized RBCs to hemolysis induced by mechanical stress, and decreased hypo-osmotic hemolysis. Similar trends were seen for monovalent ligands bound to glycophorin A (GPA) on human and murine RBCs. In contrast, binding of scFv and hTM-scFv to RHCE did not alter RBC deformability or sensitivity to mechanical and osmotic stress at similar copy numbers per RBC. Although RBC-bound hTM-scFv fusions all generated APC in the presence of thrombin, RHCE-bound TM demonstrated superior specific activity. Both fusion proteins were efficacious in endothelialized microfluidic models of inflammatory thrombosis in human whole blood wherein they significantly decreased fibrin deposition in response to TNF-alpha activation, but RHCE-bound hTM-scFv more effectively reduced platelet and leukocyte adhesion.

As used herein, the term “subject” means a mammalian animal, including a human, a veterinary or farm animal, a domestic animal or pet, and animals normally used for clinical research. In one embodiment, the subject of these methods and compositions is a human. Still other suitable subjects include, without limitation, murine, rat, canine, feline, porcine, bovine, ovine, non-human primate and others. As used herein, the term “subject” is used interchangeably with “patient”.

The term “immunoglobulin” or “antibody” is used herein to include antibodies, including functional fragments thereof. As used herein, the term antibody includes scFvs. As used herein, the term antibody also includes FABs, single domain antibodies, heavy chain antibodies (camelids), DARTs, F(ab′)2, BITEs, and immunoadhesins. These antibody fragments or artificial constructs may include a single chain antibody, a Fab fragment, a univalent antibody, a bivalent of multivalent antibody, or an immunoadhesin. An scFv is a fusion protein of the variable regions of the heavy (VH) and light chains (VL) of immunoglobulins, connected with a short linker peptide of ten to about 25 amino acids. The antibody may also be a monoclonal antibody, a “humanized” antibody, a multivalent antibody, or another suitable construct. An “immunoglobulin molecule” is a protein containing the immunologically-active portions of an immunoglobulin heavy chain and immunoglobulin light chain covalently coupled together and capable of specifically combining with an antigen. Immunoglobulin molecules are of any type (e.g., IgG, IgE, IgM, IgD, IgA and IgY), class (e.g., IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4, IgA1 and IgA2) or subclass. The terms “antibody” and “immunoglobulin” may be used interchangeably herein. An “immunoglobulin heavy chain” is a polypeptide that contains at least a portion of the antigen binding domain of an immunoglobulin and at least a portion of a variable region of an immunoglobulin heavy chain. Thus, the immunoglobulin derived heavy chain has significant regions of amino acid sequence homology with a member of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily. For example, the heavy chain in a Fab fragment is an immunoglobulin-derived heavy chain. An “immunoglobulin light chain” is a polypeptide that contains at least a portion of the antigen binding domain of an immunoglobulin and at least a portion of the variable region. Thus, the immunoglobulin-derived light chain has significant regions of amino acid homology with a member of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily. An “immunoadhesin” is a chimeric, antibody-like molecule that combines the functional domain of a binding protein, usually a receptor, ligand, cell-adhesion molecule, or 1-2 immunoglobulin variable domains with immunoglobulin constant domains, usually including the hinge or GS linker and Fc regions. A “fragment antigen-binding” (Fab) fragment” is a region on an antibody that binds to antigens. It is composed of one constant and one variable domain of each of the heavy and the light chain. With respect to immunoglobulins or antibodies as described herein, each fragment of an immunoglobulin coding sequence may be derived from one or more sources, or synthesized. Suitable fragments may include the coding region for one or more of, e.g., a heavy chain, a light chain, and/or fragments thereof such as the constant or variable region of a heavy chain (CH1, CH2 and/or CH3) and/or or the constant or variable region of a light chain. Alternatively, variable regions of a heavy chain or light chain may be utilized. Where appropriate, these sequences may be modified from the “native” sequences from which they are derived, as described herein.

Antibodies may exist in a variety of forms including, for example, polyclonal antibodies, monoclonal antibodies, camelid heavy chain only (VHH) antibodies, intracellular antibodies (“intrabodies”), recombinant antibodies, multispecific antibody, antibody fragments, such as, Fv, Fab, F(ab)₂, F(ab)₃, Fab′, Fab′-SH, F(ab′)2, single chain variable fragment antibodies (scFv), tandem/bis-scFv, Fc, pFc′, scFvFc (or scFv-Fc), disulfide Fv (dsfv), bispecific antibodies (bc-scFv) such as BiTE antibodies; humanized camelid antibodies, resurfaced antibodies, humanized antibodies, shark antibodies, fully human antibodies, single-domain antibody (sdAb, also known as NANOBODY®), chimeric antibodies, chimeric antibodies comprising at least one human constant region, and the like. “Antibody fragment” refers to at least a portion of the variable region of the immunoglobulin that binds to its target, e.g., the RHCE protein. In one embodiment, the antibody referred to herein is an scFv.

The term “heterologous” when used with reference to a protein or a nucleic acid indicates that the protein or the nucleic acid comprises two or more sequences or subsequences which are not found in the same relationship to each other in nature. For instance, the nucleic acid is typically recombinantly produced, having two or more sequences from unrelated genes arranged to make a new functional nucleic acid. For example, in one embodiment, the nucleic acid has a promoter from one gene arranged to direct the expression of a coding sequence from a different gene. Thus, with reference to the coding sequence, the promoter is heterologous. With regard to the antibodies described herein, in one embodiment the constant regions of the heavy and/or light chain are from a different source (e.g., different clone) than the variable regions of the heavy and/or light chain. Thus, with reference to each other, said constant and variable regions are heterologous, or said heavy and light chains are heterologous. The different sources may be from the same species or different species.

As used herein, a “vector” or “plasmid” refers to a nucleic acid molecule which comprises an immunoglobulin coding sequence (e.g., an immunoglobulin VH or VL or another fragment of an immunoglobulin construct, or combinations thereof), promoter, and may include other regulatory sequences therefor, which plasmid or vector may be delivered to a host cell, wherein said coding sequence is expressed recombinantly.

In one embodiment, the “linker” refers to any moiety used to attach or associate the antibody to the cargo. Thus, in one embodiment, the linker is a covalent bond. In another embodiment, the linker is a non-covalent bond. In another embodiment the linker is composed of at least one to about 25 atoms. Thus, in various embodiments, the linker is formed of at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 or 25 atoms. In still another embodiment, the linker is at least one to about 60 nucleic acids. Thus in various embodiments, the linker is formed of a sequence of at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, up to 60 nucleic acids. In yet another embodiment, the linker refers to at least one to about 30 amino acids. Thus in various embodiments, the linker is formed of a sequence of at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, up to about 30 amino acids. In still other embodiments, the linker can be a larger compound or two or more compounds that associate covalently or non-covalently. In still other embodiment, the linker can be a combination of the linkers defined herein. The linkers used in the constructs of the compositions and methods are in one embodiment cleavable. The linkers used in the constructs of the compositions and methods are in one embodiment non-cleavable. Without limitation, in one embodiment, the linker is a disulfide bond. In the examples below, the exemplified linker comprises a complex of biotin bound to the construct oligonucleotide sequence by a disulfide bond, with streptavidin fused to the ligand. In another embodiment, the biotin is bound to the ligand and the streptavidin is fused to the construct oligonucleotide sequence.

Antibodies

As described herein, antibodies and antibody fragments which specifically bind erythrocytes are provided. Antibodies and single chain antibody fragments (scFv) against epitopes on Band 3 protein (we) and RHCE protein (Rh17/Hr₀) on human erythrocytes are described herein. These antibodies and fragments were generated using phage display libraries prepared from immunized cynamolgous macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Both antigens are present on RBCs from nearly 100% of the human population and are considered relatively erythroid specific[31, 32].

RHCE

The Rh blood group system is the second most clinically significant of the blood groups, second only to ABO. It is also the most polymorphic of the blood groups, with variations due to deletions, gene conversions, and missense mutations. The Rh blood group includes this gene which encodes both the RhC and RhE antigens on a single polypeptide (RHCE) and a second gene which encodes the RhD protein. The classification of Rh-positive and Rh-negative individuals is determined by the presence or absence of the highly immunogenic RhD protein on the surface of erythrocytes. A mutation in this gene results in amorph-type Rh-null disease. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants encoding several different isoforms.

As used herein, “RHCE” refers to the above-described polypeptide, including all isoforms thereof (UniProtKB-P18577). The “canonical” sequence can be found under Uniprot Identifier: P18577-1, also called isoform 1 or RHI, and is shown below and as SEQ ID NO: 366.

10 20 30 40

MSSKYPRSVR RCLPLWALTL EAALILLFYF FTHYDASLED

50 60 70 80

QKGLVASYQV GQDLTVMAAL GLGFLTSNFR RHSWSSVAFN

90 100 110 120

LFMLALGVQW AILLDGFLSQ FPPGKVVITL FSIRLATMSA

130 140 150 160

MSVLISAGAV LGKVNLAQLV VMVLVEVTAL GTLRMVISNI

170 180 190 200

FNTDYHMNLR HFYVFAAYFG LTVAWCLPKP LPKGTEDNDQ

210 220 230 240

RATIPSLSAM LGALFLWMFW PSVNSPLLRS PIQRKNAMFN

250 260 270 280

TYYALAVSVV TAISGSSLAH PQRKISMTYV HSAVLAGGVA

290 300 310 320

VGTSCHLIPS PWLAMVLGLV AGLISIGGAK CLPVCCNRVL

330 340 350 260

GIHHISVMHS IFSLLGLLGE ITYIVLLNLH TVWNGNGMIG

270 380 290 400

FQVLLSIGEL SLAIVIALTS GLLTGLLLNL KIWKAPHVAK

410

YFDDQVFWKF PHLAVGF

Provided herein are antibodies which bind to one or more antigens on the RHCE polypeptide. Specifically, the antibodies are reactive against Rh17 (Hr₀). RH17 is an antigen present on all red blood cells having the common Rh phenotypes, except D- and Rh null RBCs. Because RBC lacking the rh17 antigen are extremely rare, antibodies against rh17 specifically bind to virtually all erythrocytes. Anti-rh17 antibodies are believed to bind to extracellular loops present in RHCE but not RHD. As is shown herein, the antibody termed KP3-17 (anti-Rh17) recognizes a linear epitope on human, but not mouse RBC (FIG. 25). A model showing the 6^thextracellular loop can be seen in FIG. 27. It is believed the anti-rh17 antibodies described herein bind to all or a portion comprising at least 5 consecutive amino acids of SEQ ID NO: 361. In one embodiment, the epitope is HTVWN (SEQ ID NO: 365). In one embodiment, at least 100,000 copies of the epitope to which the subject antibody binds, are present on the erythrocyte.

In another embodiment, an antibody is provided which competes for the binding site of the anti-rh17 antibody.

In one embodiment, the antibodies described herein comprise one or more anti-rh17 antibody CDR sequence. Suitable CDR sequences are shown below in Table 1. In one embodiment, the CDRs from a single clone are used to produce an antibody or antibody fragment, e.g., CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 from KP3-11, KP3-14 or KP3-17. In another embodiment, the CDRs from one or more clone are used to produce an antibody. As a non-limiting illustrative example, CDR1 from clone KP3-11 and CDR2 and 3 from clone KP3-14 are used in conjunction to produce an antibody. In another embodiment, the VH CDRs from one clone are use with the VL CDRs from another clone. In another embodiment, the CDRs described herein are utilized with heterologous antibody sequences to produce a chimeric antibody. In one embodiment, the antibody comprises 1 CDR sequence selected from SEQ ID Nos 1-18. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises two CDR sequences selected from SEQ ID Nos 1-18. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises three CDR sequences selected from SEQ ID Nos 1-18. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises four CDR sequences selected from SEQ ID Nos 1-18. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises five CDR sequences selected from SEQ ID Nos 1-18. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises six CDR sequences selected from SEQ ID Nos 1-18.

In one embodiment, the antibodies described herein comprise one or more anti-rh17 antibody light (VL) or heavy (VH) variable chain sequence. Suitable VH and VL sequences are shown below in Table 2. In one embodiment, the VH and VL from a single clone are used to produce an antibody or antibody fragment, e.g., VH and VL from KP3-11, KP3-14 or KP3-17. In another embodiment, the VH from one clone is used in conjunction with a VL from another clone. In one embodiment, only a VH sequence is used. In another embodiment, only a VL sequence is used. In another embodiment, the variable chain sequences described herein are utilized with heterologous antibody sequences to produce a chimeric antibody. In one embodiment, the antibody comprises a VH sequence selected from SEQ ID NO: 19, 21, and 23. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises a VL sequence selected from SEQ ID NO: 20, 22 and 24. In one embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ DI Nos: 19 and 20. In one embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 21 and 22. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 23 and 24.

Also provided are nucleic acid sequence encoding the antibodies described herein. Such sequences include those shown in Table 3, SEQ ID Nos: 25-30. Also contemplated are nucleic acid sequences encoding the described antibodies. Such sequences include those which share at least about 60% identity with any of the sequence of SEQ ID Nos: 25-30. In another embodiment, the coding sequences share at least about 65% identity with any of the sequence of SEQ ID Nos: 25-30. In another embodiment, the coding sequences share at least about 70% identity with any of the sequence of SEQ ID Nos: 25-30. In another embodiment, the coding sequences share at least about 75% identity with any of the sequence of SEQ ID Nos: 25-30. In another embodiment, the coding sequences share at least about 80% identity with any of the sequence of SEQ ID Nos: 25-30. In another embodiment, the coding sequences share at least about 85% identity with any of the sequence of SEQ ID Nos: 25-30. In another embodiment, the coding sequences share at least about 90% identity with any of the sequence of SEQ ID Nos: 25-30. In another embodiment, the coding sequences share at least about 95% identity with any of the sequence of SEQ ID Nos: 25-30.

It is also contemplated that one or more of the antibody sequences useful herein encompasses variants of the antibody sequences described herein where modifications and/or substitutions have been made. In one embodiment, the antibody comprises one or more sequences sharing at least 80% identity with any of SEQ ID NOS: 1-24. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises one or more sequences sharing at least 85% identity with any of SEQ ID NOS: 1-24. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises one or more sequences sharing at least 90% identity with any of SEQ ID NOS: 1-24. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises one or more sequences sharing at least 91% identity with any of SEQ ID NOS: 1-24. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises one or more sequences sharing at least 92% identity with any of SEQ ID NOS: 1-24. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises one or more sequences sharing at least 93% identity with any of SEQ ID NOS: 1-24. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises one or more sequences sharing at least 94% identity with any of SEQ ID NOS: 1-24. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises one or more sequences sharing at least 95% identity with any of SEQ ID NOS: 1-24. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises one or more sequences sharing at least 96% identity with any of SEQ ID NOS: 1-24. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises one or more sequences sharing at least 97% identity with any of SEQ ID NOS: 1-24. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises one or more sequences sharing at least 98% identity with any of SEQ ID NOS: 1-24. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises one or more sequences sharing at least 99% identity with any of SEQ ID NOS: 1-24.

In one embodiment, the antibody described herein does not significantly adversely alter the membrane deformability of the erythrocyte to which it is bound. As used herein, the term “does not significantly adversely alter the membrane deformability” means less than a 10% change in membrane rigidity as compared to a naïve erythrocyte. Membrane deformability can be measured by the person of skill in the art using known techniques and those described herein, e.g., in Example 4. For example, ektacytometry can be used to test whether alterations in membrane deformability are observed. In this technique, a decrease in the maximal elongation index (EImax) or an increase in the shear stress to reach half-maximal deformation (SS1/2) reflects an increase in RBC rigidity. See, e.g., Bessis M., Mohandas N., and Feo C., “Automated ektacytometry: A new method of measuring red cell deformability and red cell indices,” Blood Cells 6(3), 315-327 (1979) and Chien S., “Principles and techniques for assessing erythrocyte deformability,” in Red Cell Rheology, edited by Bessis M., Shohet S., and Mohandas N. (Springer; Berlin Heidelberg, 1978), pp. 71-99, which are incorporated herein by reference.

In another embodiment, the antibody described herein does not significantly alter the resistance to stress of the erythrocyte to which it is bound. As used herein, the term “does not significantly alter resistance to stress” means less than a 10% change to physical, chemical, mechanical and/or other stresses, or combinations of thereof. In one embodiment, the term does not significantly alter resistance to stress” means less than a 10% change in osmotic hemolysis or hemolysis induced by mechanical stress as compared to a naïve erythrocyte. Stress to the erythrocyte can be measured by the person of skill in the art using known techniques and those described herein, e.g., in Example 4. For example, osmotic stress can be measured using an osmotic fragility test. See, Godal et al. The normal range of osmotic fragility of red blood cells, Scand J Haematol. 1980 August; 25(2):107-12, which is incorporated herein by reference. Mechanical stress can be measured using, e.g., the mechanical stress assay (Pan D, Vargas-Morales O, Zern B, et al. The Effect of Polymeric Nanoparticles on Biocompatibility of Carrier Red Blood Cells. PLoS One. 2016; 11(3):e0152074, which is incorporated herein by reference) does not directly represent a pathophysiologic scenario, it is intended to reflect overall integrity of the RBC membrane architecture.

Band 3

Band 3, the human RBC anion exchange protein (AE1), is the most abundant integral membrane protein found in erythrocytes and a well-characterized transporter and is encoded by the SLC4a1 gene. There are two blood group antigens, the low-incidence Wr(a) and the high-incidence Wr(b), that are considered to be antithetical and are produced as allelic forms of the same structural gene defined in the Band 3 protein. The Wr(b) antigen requires glycophorin A for surface presentation. See, Huang et al, Blood, Vol 87, No 9 (May I), 1996: pp 3942-3947, which is incorporated herein by reference.

As used herein, “Band 3” refers to the above-described polypeptide, including all isoforms thereof (UniProtKB-P02730). The “canonical” sequence can be found under Uniprot Identifier: P02730-1, also called isoform 1 or eAE1, and is shown below and in SEQ ID NO: 367. The molecular basis of the Wr(a)/Wr(b) blood group antigens is a single variation in position 658; Lys-658 corresponds to Wr(a) and Glu-658 to Wr(b).

10 20 30 40

MEELQDDYED MMEENLEQEE YEDPDIPESQ MEEPAAHDTE

50 60 70 80

ATATDYHTTS HPGTHKVYVE LQELVMDEKN QELRWMEAAR

90 100 110 120

WVQLEENLGE NGAWGRPHLS HLTFWSLLEL RRVFTKGTVL

130 140 150 160

LDLQETSLAG VANQLLDRFI FEDQIRPQDR EELLRALLLK

170 180 190 200

HSHAGELEAL GGVKPAVLTR SGDPSQPLLP QHSSLETQLF

210 220 230 240

CEQGDGGTEG HSPSGILEKI PPDSEATLVL VGRADFLEQP

250 260 270 280

VLGFVRLQEA AELEAVELPV PIRFLFVLLG PEAPHIDYTQ

290 300 310 320

LGRAAATLMS ERVFRIDAYM AQSRGELLHS LEGFLDCSLV

330 340 350 360

LPPTDAPSEQ ALLSLVPVQR ELLRRRYQSS PAKPDSSFYK

370 380 390 400

GLDLNGGPDD PLQQTGQLFG GLVRDIRRRY PYYLSDITDA

410 420 430 440

FSPQVLAAVI FIYFAALSPA ITFGGLLGEK TRNQMGVSEL

450 460 470 480

LISTAVQGIL FALLGAQPLL VVGFSGPLLV FEEAFFSFCE

490 500 510 520

TNGLEYIVGR VWIGFWLILL VVLVVAFEGS FLVRFISRYT

530 540 550 560

QEIFSFLISL IFIYETFSKL IKIFQDHPLQ KTYNYNVLMV

570 580 590 600

PKPQGPLPNT ALLSLVLMAG TFFFAMMLRK FKNSSYFPGK

610 620 630 640

LRRVIGDFGV PISILIMVLV DFFIQDTYTQ KLSVPDGFKV

650 660 670 680

SNSSARGWVI HPLGLRSEFP IWMMFASALP ALLVFILIFL

690 700 710 720

ESQITTLIVS KPERKMVKGS GFHLDLLLVV GMGGVAALFG

730 740 750 760

MPWLSATTVR SVTHANALTV MGKASTPGAA AQIQEVKEQR

770 780 790 800

ISGLLVAVLV GLSILMEPIL SRIPLAVLFG IFLYMGVTSL

810 820 830 840

SGIQLFDRIL LLFKPPKYHP DVPYVKRVKT WRMHLFTGIQ

850 860 870 880

IICLAVLWVV KSTPASLALP FVLILTVPLR RVLLPLIFRN

890 900 910

VELQCLDADD AKATFDEEEG RDEYDEVAMP V

Provided herein are antibodies which bind to one or more antigens on the Band 3 polypeptide. Specifically, the antibodies are reactive against Wr(b) (“Wrb” also called DI4). See, Pool J., The Diego blood group system—an update, Immunohematology, 15(4), 1999, which is incorporated herein by reference.

In one embodiment, the antibodies described herein comprise one or more anti-Wrb antibody CDR sequence. Suitable CDR sequences are shown below in Table 4. In one embodiment, the CDRs from a single clone are used to produce an antibody or antibody fragment, e.g., CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 from KP2-01, KP2-02 or KP2-04, KP2-06, KP2-07, KP2-08, KP2-09, KP2-11, KP2-13, KP2-14, KP2-15, KP2-17, KP2-18, KP2-19, KP2-20, KP2-22, KP2-23, KP2-24, KP3-01, KP3-02, KP3-03, KP3-05, KP3-06, KP3-07, KP3-08, KP3-09, KP3-12, KP3-13, KP3-15, KP3-16, KP3-18, KP3-19, or KP3-20. In another embodiment, the CDRs from one or more clone are used to produce an antibody. As a non-limiting illustrative example, CDR1 from clone KP2-01 and CDR2 and 3 from clone KP2-02 are used in conjunction to produce an antibody. In another embodiment, the VH CRDs from one clone are use with the VL CDRs from another clone. In another embodiment, the CDRs described herein are utilized with heterologous antibody sequences to produce a chimeric antibody. In one embodiment, the antibody comprises 1 CDR sequence selected from SEQ ID Nos 31-228. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises two CDR sequences selected from SEQ ID Nos 31-228. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises three CDR sequences selected from SEQ ID Nos 31-228. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises four CDR sequences selected from SEQ ID Nos 31-228. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises five CDR sequences selected from SEQ ID Nos 31-228. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises six CDR sequences selected from SEQ ID Nos 31-228.

In one embodiment, the antibodies described herein comprise one or more anti-Wrb antibody light (VL) or heavy (VH) variable chain sequence. Suitable VH and VL sequences are shown below in Table 5. In one embodiment, the VH and VL from a single clone are used to produce an antibody or antibody fragment, e.g., VH and VL from from KP2-01, KP2-02 or KP2-04, KP2-06, KP2-07, KP2-08, KP2-09, KP2-11, KP2-13, KP2-14, KP2-15, KP2-17, KP2-18, KP2-19, KP2-20, KP2-22, KP2-23, KP2-24, KP3-01, KP3-02, KP3-03, KP3-05, KP3-06, KP3-07, KP3-08, KP3-09, KP3-12, KP3-13, KP3-15, KP3-16, KP3-18, KP3-19, or KP3-20. In another embodiment, the VH from one clone is used in conjunction with a VL from another clone. In one embodiment, only a VH sequence is used. In another embodiment, only a VL sequence is used. In another embodiment, the variable chain sequences described herein are utilized with heterologous antibody sequences to produce a chimeric antibody. In one embodiment, the antibody comprises a VH sequence selected from SEQ ID NO: 229-261. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises a VL sequence selected from SEQ ID NO: 262-294. In one embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos. 229 and 262. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 230 and 263. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 231 and 264. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 232 and 265. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 233 and 266. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 234 and 267. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 235 and 268. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 236 and 269. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 237 and 270. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 238 and 271. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 239 and 272. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 240 and 273. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 241 and 274. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 242 and 275. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 243 and 276. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 244 and 277. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 245 and 278. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 246 and 279. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 247 and 280. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 248 and 281. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 249 and 282. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 250 and 283. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 251 and 284. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 252 and 285. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 253 and 286. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 254 and 287. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 255 and 288. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 256 and 289. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 257 and 290. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 258 and 291. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 259 and 292. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 260 and 293. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises SEQ ID Nos: 261 and 294.

Also provided are nucleic acid sequence encoding the antibodies described herein. Such sequences include those shown in Table 6, SEQ ID Nos: 295-360. Also contemplated are nucleic acid sequences encoding the described antibodies. Such sequences include those which share at least about 60% identity with any of the sequence of SEQ ID Nos: 295-360. In another embodiment, the coding sequences share at least about 65% identity with any of the sequence of SEQ ID Nos: 295-360. In another embodiment, the coding sequences share at least about 70% identity with any of the sequence of SEQ ID Nos: 295-360. In another embodiment, the coding sequences share at least about 75% identity with any of the sequence of SEQ ID Nos: 295-360. In another embodiment, the coding sequences share at least about 80% identity with any of the sequence of SEQ ID Nos: 295-360. In another embodiment, the coding sequences share at least about 85% identity with any of the sequence of SEQ ID Nos: 295-360. In another embodiment, the coding sequences share at least about 90% identity with any of the sequence of SEQ ID Nos: 295-360. In another embodiment, the coding sequences share at least about 95% identity with any of the sequence of SEQ ID Nos: 295-360.

It is also contemplated that one or more of the antibody sequences useful herein encompasses variants of the antibody sequences described herein where modifications and/or substitutions have been made. In one embodiment, the antibody comprises one or more sequences sharing at least 80% identity with any of SEQ ID NOS: 229-294. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises one or more sequences sharing at least 85% identity with any of SEQ ID NOS: 229-294. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises one or more sequences sharing at least 90% identity with any of SEQ ID NOS: 229-294. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises one or more sequences sharing at least 91% identity with any of SEQ ID NOS: 229-294. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises one or more sequences sharing at least 92% identity with any of SEQ ID NOS: 229-294. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises one or more sequences sharing at least 93% identity with any of SEQ ID NOS: 229-294. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises one or more sequences sharing at least 94% identity with any of SEQ ID NOS: 229-294. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises one or more sequences sharing at least 95% identity with any of SEQ ID NOS: 229-294. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises one or more sequences sharing at least 96% identity with any of SEQ ID NOS: 229-294. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises one or more sequences sharing at least 97% identity with any of SEQ ID NOS: 229-294. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises one or more sequences sharing at least 98% identity with any of SEQ ID NOS: 229-294. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises one or more sequences sharing at least 99% identity with any of SEQ ID NOS: 229-294.

The antibody sequences herein were produced by immunizing a non-human primate with human erythrocytes. Thus, it may be desirable to make certain changes to the described sequences to make the antibodies more effective in human subjects. For example, in one embodiment, changes are made to one or more of the described sequences to make the antibody more human like. See, Gao S H, Huang K, Tu H, Adler A S. Monoclonal antibody humanness score and its applications. BMC Biotechnol. 2013; 13:55, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Such modifications and/or substitutions can be made at the nucleic acid or amino acid level. In one embodiment, the coding sequence of one or more immunoglobulin chain or region is codon optimized.

Once the target and immunoglobulin are selected, the coding sequences for the selected immunoglobulin (e.g., heavy and/or light chain(s)) may be obtained and/or synthesized. Methods for sequencing a protein, peptide, or polypeptide (e.g., as an immunoglobulin) are known to those of skill in the art. Once the sequence of a protein is known, there are web-based and commercially available computer programs, as well as service-based companies which back translate the amino acids sequences to nucleic acid coding sequences. See, e.g., backtranseq by EMBOSS, http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/st/; Gene Infinity (http://www.geneinfinity.org/sms/sms_backtranslation.html); ExPasy (http://www.expasy.org/tools/). In one embodiment, the RNA and/or cDNA coding sequences are designed for optimal expression in human cells.

Codon-optimized coding regions can be designed by various methods. This optimization may be performed using methods which are available on-line (e.g., GeneArt), published methods, or a company which provides codon optimizing services, e.g., DNA2.0 (Menlo Park, Calif.). One codon optimizing method is described, e.g., in US International Patent Publication No. WO 2015/012924, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. See also, e.g., US Patent Publication No. 2014/0032186 and US Patent Publication No. 2006/0136184. Suitably, the entire length of the open reading frame (ORF) for the product is modified. However, in some embodiments, only a fragment of the ORF may be altered (e.g., heavy constant, light constant, heavy variable, light variable chains). By using one of these methods, one can apply the frequencies to any given polypeptide sequence, and produce a nucleic acid fragment of a codon-optimized coding region which encodes the polypeptide.

A number of options are available for performing the actual changes to the codons or for synthesizing the codon-optimized coding regions designed as described herein. Such modifications or synthesis can be performed using standard and routine molecular biological manipulations well known to those of ordinary skill in the art. In one approach, a series of complementary oligonucleotide pairs of 80-90 nucleotides each in length and spanning the length of the desired sequence are synthesized by standard methods. These oligonucleotide pairs are synthesized such that upon annealing, they form double stranded fragments of 80-90 base pairs, containing cohesive ends, e.g., each oligonucleotide in the pair is synthesized to extend 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more bases beyond the region that is complementary to the other oligonucleotide in the pair. The single-stranded ends of each pair of oligonucleotides are designed to anneal with the single-stranded end of another pair of oligonucleotides. The oligonucleotide pairs are allowed to anneal, and approximately five to six of these double-stranded fragments are then allowed to anneal together via the cohesive single stranded ends, and then they ligated together and cloned into a standard bacterial cloning vector, for example, a TOPO® vector available from Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, Calif. The construct is then sequenced by standard methods. Several of these constructs consisting of 5 to 6 fragments of 80 to 90 base pair fragments ligated together, i.e., fragments of about 500 base pairs, are prepared, such that the entire desired sequence is represented in a series of plasmid constructs. The inserts of these plasmids are then cut with appropriate restriction enzymes and ligated together to form the final construct. The final construct is then cloned into a standard bacterial cloning vector, and sequenced. Additional methods would be immediately apparent to the skilled artisan. In addition, gene synthesis is readily available commercially.

In one embodiment, such variants include sequences in which amino acid substitutions have been made to the known anti-RHCE or anti-Band3 variable chain sequences or heterologous backbone sequences described herein. Substitutions may also be written as (amino acid identified by single letter code)-position #-(amino acid identified by single letter code) whereby the first amino acid is the substituted amino acid and the second amino acid is the substituting amino acid at the specified position. The terms “substitution” and “substitution of an amino acid” and “amino acid substitution” as used herein refer to a replacement of an amino acid in an amino acid sequence with another one, wherein the latter is different from the replaced amino acid. Methods for replacing an amino acid are well known to the person skilled in the art and include, but are not limited to, mutations of the nucleotide sequence encoding the amino acid sequence. Methods of making amino acid substitutions in IgG are described, e.g., for WO 2013/046704, which is incorporated by reference for its discussion of amino acid modification techniques.

The term “amino acid substitution” and its synonyms described above are intended to encompass modification of an amino acid sequence by replacement of an amino acid with another, substituting amino acid. The substitution may be a conservative or non-conservative substitution. The term conservative, in referring to two amino acids, is intended to mean that the amino acids share a common property recognized by one of skill in the art. The term non-conservative, in referring to two amino acids, is intended to mean that the amino acids which have differences in at least one property recognized by one of skill in the art. For example, such properties may include amino acids having hydrophobic nonacidic side chains, amino acids having hydrophobic side chains (which may be further differentiated as acidic or nonacidic), amino acids having aliphatic hydrophobic side chains, amino acids having aromatic hydrophobic side chains, amino acids with polar neutral side chains, amino acids with electrically charged side chains, amino acids with electrically charged acidic side chains, and amino acids with electrically charged basic side chains. Both naturally occurring and non-naturally occurring amino acids are known in the art and may be used as substituting amino acids in embodiments. Thus, a conservative amino acid substitution may involve changing a first amino acid having a hydrophobic side chain with a different amino acid having a hydrophobic side chain; whereas a non-conservative amino acid substitution may involve changing a first amino acid with an acidic hydrophobic side chain with a different amino acid having a different side chain, e.g., a basic hydrophobic side chain or a hydrophilic side chain. Still other conservative or non-conservative changes change be determined by one of skill in the art.

In still other embodiments, the substitution at a given position will be to an amino acid, or one of a group of amino acids, that will be apparent to one of skill in the art in order to accomplish an objective identified herein.

The terms “identical” or percent “identity,” in the context of two or more nucleic acids or polypeptide sequences, refer to two or more sequences or subsequences that are the same or have a specified percentage of amino acid residues or nucleotides that are the same (i.e., about 70% identity, preferably 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, or higher identity over a specified region (e.g., any one of the modified ORFs provided herein when compared and aligned for maximum correspondence over a comparison window or designated region) as measured using a BLAST or BLAST 2.0 sequence comparison algorithms with default parameters described below, or by manual alignment and visual inspection (see, e.g., NCBI web site or the like). As another example, polynucleotide sequences can be compared using Fasta, a program in GCG Version 6.1. Fasta provides alignments and percent sequence identity of the regions of the best overlap between the query and search sequences. For instance, percent sequence identity between nucleic acid sequences can be determined using Fasta with its default parameters (a word size of 6 and the NOPAM factor for the scoring matrix) as provided in GCG Version 6.1, herein incorporated by reference. Generally, these programs are used at default settings, although one skilled in the art can alter these settings as needed. Alternatively, one of skill in the art can utilize another algorithm or computer program that provides at least the level of identity or alignment as that provided by the referenced algorithms and programs. This definition also refers to, or can be applied to, the compliment of a sequence. The definition also includes sequences that have deletions and/or additions, as well as those that have substitutions. As described below, the preferred algorithms can account for gaps and the like. Preferably, identity exists over a region that is at least about 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200 amino acids or nucleotides in length, and oftentimes over a region that is 225, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, 500 amino acids or nucleotides in length or over the full-length of an amino acid or nucleic acid sequences.

Typically, when an alignment is prepared based upon an amino acid sequence, the alignment contains insertions and deletions which are so identified with respect to a reference AAV sequence and the numbering of the amino acid residues is based upon a reference scale provided for the alignment. However, any given AAV sequence may have fewer amino acid residues than the reference scale. In the present invention, when discussing the parental sequence, the term “the same position” or the “corresponding position” refers to the amino acid located at the same residue number in each of the sequences, with respect to the reference scale for the aligned sequences. However, when taken out of the alignment, each of the proteins may have these amino acids located at different residue numbers. Alignments are performed using any of a variety of publicly or commercially available Multiple Sequence Alignment Programs. Sequence alignment programs are available for amino acid sequences, e.g., the “Clustal X”, “MAP”, “PIMA”, “MSA”, “BLOCKMAKER”, “MEME”, and “Match-Box” programs. Generally, any of these programs are used at default settings, although one of skill in the art can alter these settings as needed. Alternatively, one of skill in the art can utilize another algorithm or computer program which provides at least the level of identity or alignment as that provided by the referenced algorithms and programs. See, e.g., J. D. Thomson et al, Nucl. Acids. Res., “A comprehensive comparison of multiple sequence alignments”, 27(13):2682-2690 (1999).

Cargoes

For several decades, researchers have used erythrocytes for drug delivery of a wide variety of therapeutics to improve their pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, controlled release and pharmacodynamics. Provided herein are compositions in which both therapeutic and non-therapeutic cargoes are coupled to the surface of the red blood cell using the antibodies described herein.

As used herein, the term “cargo” or “agent” refers to any pharmacological, therapeutic, prophylactic, imaging or diagnostic agent which is coupled to, bound, fused, associated with or conjugated to an anti-RHCE or anti-Band 3 antibody described herein. In one embodiment, the term cargo or agent refers to more than one cargo or agent described herein, e.g., liposomes loaded with other drugs. Drugs whose delivery may be improved by coupling to RBCs include antigens and cytokines to stimulate the immune response, antibodies for vascular targeting of RBC-loaded cargoes, antibodies and other ligands to capture circulating pathological mediators such toxins and pathogens themselves, therapeutic enzymes and other biomolecules whose targets are localized within the bloodstream, and complement inhibitors to protect RBCs against pathological hemolysis. See, Villa et al, Delivery of drugs bound to erythrocytes: new avenues for an old intravascular carrier, Therapeutic Delivery, 6(7), 2015, which is incorporated herein by reference.

In one embodiment, the cargo is a liposome. Liposomes are small artificial vesicles of spherical shape that can be created from cholesterol and natural non-toxic phospholipids. See, Akbarzakeh et al, Nanoscale Res Lett. 2013; 8(1): 102, which is incorporated herein by reference. Liposomes consist of an aqueous core surrounded by a lipid bilayer, much like a membrane, separating the inner aqueous core from the bulk outside. Liposomes have been used to improve the therapeutic index of new or established drugs by modifying drug absorption, reducing metabolism, prolonging biological half-life or reducing toxicity. Drug distribution is then controlled primarily by properties of the carrier and no longer by physico-chemical characteristics of the drug substance only.

Lipids forming liposomes may be natural or synthetic, and liposome constituents are not exclusive of lipids, new generation liposomes can also be formed from polymers (sometimes referred to as polymersomes). Whether composed of natural or synthetic lipids or polymers, liposomes are biocompatible and biodegradable which make them suitable for biomedical research. The unique feature of liposomes is their ability to compartmentalize and solubilize both hydrophilic and hydrophobic materials by nature. Hydrophobic drugs place themselves inside the bilayer of the liposome and hydrophilic drugs are entrapped within the aqueous core or at the bilayer interface. Liposomal formulations enhance the therapeutic efficiency of drugs in preclinical models and in humans compared to conventional formulations due to the alteration of biodistribution. Liposome binding drugs, into or onto their membranes, are expected to be transported without rapid degradation and minimum side effects to the recipient because generally liposomes are composed of biodegradable, biologically inert and non-immunogenic lipids. Moreover, they produce no pyrogenic or antigenic reactions and possess limited toxicity. Consequently, all these properties as well as the ease of surface modification to bear the targetable properties make liposomes attractive candidates for use as drug-delivery. Additional cargoes may be loaded into the liposomes and coupled to the described antibodies. Such additional cargoes are selected from any useful agent, including those described herein.

In one embodiment, the cargo may be any anti-thrombotic agent (molecule), anti-inflammatory agent, or pro-drug thereof for which targeting to a red blood cell is desired for purposes of systemic delivery, or alternatively, for delivery to the site of a pathological condition including conditions characterized by the production or presence of an enzyme that can cleave the anti-thrombotic agent, anti-inflammatory agent, or the pro-drug, from the fusion protein.

As used herein, the term “pro-drug” or “prodrug” encompasses any polypeptide encoding an anti-thrombotic or anti-inflammatory agent and a cleavage site for activation of the agent. The pro-drug is inactive (or significantly less active) upon administration, and is metabolized in vivo into an active form. In further embodiments, the pro-drug is a pro-drug of an anti-thrombotic or anti-inflammatory agent.

In one embodiment, the anti-thrombotic agent is one that is capable of producing its therapeutic effect when attached to the RBC, i.e., an active anti-thrombotic agent. In another embodiment, the anti-thrombotic agent is a pro-drug which contains a native or synthetic cleavage site and which produces an active anti-thrombotic effect only upon cleavage from its pro-drug state.

Among such anti-thrombotic agents include without limitation, plasminogen activators. In still a further embodiment, the plasminogen activator is tPA, urokinase, tenectase, retavase, streptokinase, staphylokinase, or a plasminogen activator from venoms and saliva of bats, insects, and other animals. In another embodiment, the plasminogen activator is anistreplase, pro-urokinase (pUK), or a hybrid plasminogen activator (e.g., as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,916,071). In one embodiment, the cargo is thrombomodulin, as shown in the examples herein.

In a further embodiment the anti-thrombotic agent is the low molecular weight single chain urokinase-like plasminogen activator described in the examples below (also termed uPA (as the exemplary plasminogen activator), lUK, lmwUK, and lmw scuPA within the examples). Also included are mutants or variants thereof, which retain plasminogen activator activity, such as variants which have been chemically modified or in which one or more amino acids have been added, deleted or substituted or in which one or more functional domains have been added, deleted or altered such as by combining the active site of one plasminogen activator or fibrin binding domain of another plasminogen activator or fibrin binding molecule. In a further embodiment, the anti-thrombotic agent contains a moiety presented by a protease domain of a plasminogen activator. Naturally-occurring pro-drugs of these agents may be employed. Synthetically designed prodrugs based on these agents may also be employed. Prodrugs containing modified cleavage sites may also be employed.

In one embodiment, the cargo is a therapeutic protein or pro-drug of an anti-inflammatory agent. In one embodiment, the anti-inflammatory agent is an antibody against a cytokine or other pro-inflammatory mediator. In a further embodiment, the anti-inflammatory agent may comprise a moiety presented by thrombomodulin or a domain thereof. Among other anti-inflammatory agents for use in the fusion proteins described herein are, without limitation, somatostatin, adiponectin, cortistatin, corticotrophin releasing factor, sauvagine, nocifensins, as well as the anti-inflammatory cytokines, IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-lra), IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-13 and the soluble receptors sTNFRI, sTNFRp55, sTNFRII, sTNFRp75, sIL-1RII, mIL-1RII, and IL-18BP, among others. Anti-inflammatory proteins may be native or mutated proteins. Similarly, native, mutated or synthetic anti-inflammatory peptides, including without limitation, peptides described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,480,869; 7,816,449 and 5,229,367, among other known peptides may also form part of the fusion proteins described herein. One of skill in the art may select or design an appropriate anti-inflammatory agent or prodrug depending on the pathological condition being treated.

In still another embodiment, the therapeutic molecule is a molecule which binds a pro-inflammatory mediator. In one embodiment, the pro-inflammatory mediator is the HMGB1 cytokine. In one embodiment, signaling by HMGB1 is disrupted by binding of the lectin-like domain of thrombomodulin (abbreviated herewith as TM). In other embodiments, the pro-inflammatory cytokine is IL-1-α, IL-1-β, IL-6, TNF-α, TGF-β, LIF, IFN-γ, OSM, CNTF, GM-CSF, IL-8, IL-11, IL-12, IL-17, and IL-18.

In one embodiment, a fusion protein may contain a therapeutically-active site, domain or moiety of any of the anti-thrombotic agents, anti-inflammatory agents, or pro-drugs listed herein or known to the art to be suitable for direct targeted administration to the site of a thrombus. Other useful pro-drugs known to one of skill in the art may be used herein.

In still other embodiments, mutations in protein sequence of the anti-thrombotic agent or anti-inflammatory agent, therapeutically-active site, domain, or moiety thereof allows its conversion into a pro-drug activated and/or released locally at a desired pathological site (e.g., pathological nascent intravascular thrombi) using specific activity of pathological factors that exist only in these pathological sites, such as protease thrombin. Such mutations in the amino acid sequences or nucleotide sequences encoding the therapeutic protein can be employed to insert a desired cleavage, enzymatic or activation site into the therapeutic molecule, or into or adjacent the linker between the antibody and the cargo. Alternatively, such mutations can change a native cleavage site to another desired cleavage site, or to insert a cleavage site where none naturally existed into or adjacent to a cargo.

In one embodiment, the therapeutic pro-drug molecule is activated or the mature drug molecule released from the fusion protein by an enzyme, which level is locally elevated under pathological conditions. In a further embodiment, the enzyme is a protease. In still further embodiments, the protease is a leukocyte protease (e.g., cathepsin), an activated protease in the coagulation cascade (e.g., activated Factor Xa), or an activated protease in the complement cascade. In other embodiments, the protease's activity is elevated locally in tissue. In still other embodiments, the protease is a metalloproteinase, elastase, or collagenase.

In still other embodiments of fusion proteins containing therapeutic pro-drug molecules, the enzyme is a pathological mediator. In further embodiments, the pathological mediator is involved in coagulation or fibrinolysis. In another embodiment, the pathological mediator is thrombin or plasmin. In a further embodiment, the pathological mediator is thrombin. Thus, for example, in one embodiment, the therapeutic pro-drug molecule is the thrombin activatable low molecular weight single chain urokinase-like plasmin activator, described in the examples below. In another embodiment, the therapeutic pro-drug molecule is thrombin-activatable thrombomodulin, or thrombin-activatable tPA (or its mouse analog, mRNK-T).

Other cargoes useful include blood factors including those involved in blood clotting. Such blood factors include factor VIII and factor IX. Further cargoes include small molecule drugs. Other cargoes useful herein include anti-malarial drugs, such as chloroquine, quinine sulfate, hydroxychloroquine, mefloquine, atovaquone and proguanil. Other useful cargoes include anti-hemolytic agents. In one embodiment, such drugs are loaded into liposomes, polymeric particles, lipid nanoparticles, natural or artificial biomolecules or assemblies. See, e.g., Giri et al, Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2016; 16(7):816-31; WO 2017/023358; Jo et al, Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2014 Nov. 1; 123:345-63. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.09.029. Epub 2014 Sep. 22, each of which is incorporated herein by reference.

Fusion Proteins and Conjugates

The cargoes and antibodies described herein are coupled in one of various appropriate methods. Such methods include fusion proteins, chemical conjugation, chemical crosslinking, use of a linker, click chemistry and the like. Such methods are known in the art. As used herein, terms such as and including “coupled to”, “bound”, “fused, “associated with” or “conjugated to” are used interchangeably. Where one embodiment is provided utilizing the antibody and cargo as e.g., a fusion protein, another embodiment is contemplated in which the antibody and cargo are coupled via another method, e.g., using click chemistry or the like.

In one embodiment, the antibody and the cargo are expressed as a fusion protein. Fusion proteins are created through the joining of two or more genes that originally coded for separate proteins. In one embodiment, the fusion protein comprises an scFv and a heterologous expression product. Such expression products include certain of the cargoes described herein. In one embodiment, the fusion proteins contain a targeting single chain antigen-binding domain (scFv) that binds to a determinant expressed on the surface of a red blood cell, e.g., RHCE (rh17) or Band3 (Wrb). Use of an scFv (monovalent) avoids cross-linking of binding sites or determinants, thereby avoiding potentially harmful cell membrane modification and cell aggregation.

ScFvs may be generated conventionally, e.g., by the method of Spitzer, et al. (Mol. Immunol. 2003, 40:911-919), or by the methods described herein. Total RNA of a hybridoma cell line is isolated (e.g., by RNeasy, Qiagen, Velencia, Calif.), followed by reverse transcription, e.g., using the SMART™ technology (Clontech, Palo Alto, Calif.) employing known primers (e.g., those of Dübel, et al. (J. Immunol. Methods 1994, 175:89-95)). The resulting heavy (VH) and light (VL) chain variable cDNA fragments are then subcloned into a suitable plasmid, e.g., pCR®2.1-TOPO® (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.). The materials utilized are not a limitation of these embodiments. The VH and VL chains generated are combined with a suitable linker, resulting in the desired scFv (see, e.g., Example 1). In one embodiment, the scFV comprises anti-RHCD sequences. In one embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos. 19 and 20. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 21 and 22. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 23 and 24. In one embodiment, the scFV comprises anti-Band3 sequences. In one embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos. 229 and 262. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 230 and 263. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 231 and 264. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 232 and 265. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 233 and 266. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 234 and 267. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 235 and 268. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 236 and 269. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 237 and 270. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 238 and 271. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 239 and 272. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 240 and 273. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 241 and 274. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 242 and 275. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 243 and 276. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 244 and 277. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 245 and 278. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 246 and 279. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 247 and 280. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 248 and 281. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 248 and 281. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 249 and 282. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 250 and 283. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 251 and 284. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 252 and 285. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 253 and 286. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 254 and 287. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 255 and 288. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 256 and 289. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 257 and 290. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 258 and 291. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 259 and 292. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 260 and 293. In another embodiment, the scFv comprises SEQ ID Nos: 261 and 294.

In one aspect, nucleic acid sequences are provided which encode the scFv. In one embodiment, the coding sequences include one of the sequences of Table 3 or Table 6. A cartoon of an exemplary RHCE scFv-human thrombomodulin fusion protein plasmid is provided in FIG. 18.

In another embodiment, the antibodies are chemically conjugated to their cargoes using molecular cross-linkers, spacers, and bridges. By cross-linkers, spacer and bridges are meant any moiety used to attach or associate the antibody to the cargo. In one embodiment, the cross-linker is a covalent bond. In another embodiment, the linker is a non-covalent bond. In still other embodiments, the linker can be a larger compound or two or more compounds that associate covalently or non-covalently. In still other embodiment, the linker can be a combination of the linkers, e.g., chemical compounds, nucleotides, amino acids, proteins, etc. In one embodiment, the cross-linker is biotin-streptavidin. In this embodiment, interconnecting molecule(s) such as streptavidin can be coupled to RBC either directly via chemical modification, or via biotin derivatives conjugated to the functional groups on RBC, inserted into RBC phospholipids or coupled to other appropriate RBC components such as sugars, with or without additional spacers between the active group anchoring biotin derivative to RBC. In turn, cargo molecules are coupled to streptavidin either via chemical conjugation or via using biotin derivatives as described above. In one embodiment a spacer is positioned between biotin and a reactive group, such as succinimide ester group. Various methods of bioconjugation are known in the art. See, e.g., Kalia and Raines, Curr Org Chem. 2010 January; 14(2): 138-147, which is incorporated herein by reference.

In one embodiment, a fusion protein as described herein is prepared by linking (fusing) the above-described scFv to a described cargo, (e.g., a above-described anti-thrombotic agent, anti-inflammatory agent, or pro-drug molecule). Moreover, genetic engineering allows the design and synthesis of targeted pro-drugs which can be cleaved by pathophysiologically relevant enzymes that are generated at the size of disease that cannot be attained using chemical conjugation.

Linkers may also be utilized to join variable heavy and variable light chain fragments. A linker as used herein refers to a chain of as short as about 1 amino acid to as long as about 100 amino acids, or longer. In a further embodiment, the linker is 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 amino acids in length. In one embodiment, the linker is 13 amino acids in length.

Further, a cleavage sequence, such as the thrombin-sensitive cleavage sequence or other enzyme cleavage sequence, can be inserted in the linker to provide for release of the drug when the RBC to which it is targeted encounters the appropriate cleaving enzyme at the site of the pathological condition, e.g., upon active thrombosis. This cleavage sequence may be located within a linker or at a terminus thereof. In one embodiment, a thrombin cleavage site -Met-Tyr-Pro-Arg-Gly-Asn- may be inserted in, or appended to, the linker between the scFv and the therapeutic molecule or pro-drug. In another embodiment, the thrombin cleavage site is Pro-Arg. In still a further embodiment, lack of the native Phe-Lys plasmin cleavage site prevents single chain (sc) uPA activation (into fully active two-chain plasminogen activator (tcuPA)) via plasmin.

In another embodiment, antibody-derived scFv with a thrombin releasing site can be cloned by an upstream primer, which anneals to the carboxy terminus and introduces the sequence including a short peptide linker with the thrombin cleavage site. In still another embodiment, the cleavage site is internal to the pro-drug itself.

In one embodiment, the antibody and cargo are conjugated using click chemistry. In one embodiment, the conjugation is done using copper-independent click chemistry. Briefly, the antibody (e.g., scFV) is chemically modified to site-specifically incorporate a strained alkyne for ‘click’ coupling. The cargo (e.g., liposome) is functionalized with a complementary group, such as DBCO and azide. Other examples of click chemistry reactions, include, without limitation: cycloaddition reactions, such as the 1,3-dipolar family, and hetero Diels-Alder reactions; nucleophilic ring-opening reactions (e.g., epoxides, aziridines, cyclic sulfates, and so forth); carbonyl chemistry, such as the formation of oxime ethers, hydrazones, and aromatic heterocycles; in addition to carbon-carbon multiple bonds, such as epoxidation and dihydroxylation and azide-phosphine coupling (Staudinger ligation). See, Nwe and Brechbiel, Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2009 June; 24(3): 289-302, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Methods of Preparation

The sequences, antibodies, fragments, fusion proteins and conjugates described herein may be produced by any suitable means, including recombinant production, chemical synthesis, or other synthetic means. Suitable production techniques are well known to those of skill in the art. See, e.g., Sambrook et al, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Press (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.). Alternatively, peptides can also be synthesized by the well-known solid phase peptide synthesis methods (Merrifield, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 85:2149 (1962); Stewart and Young, Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis (Freeman, San Francisco, 1969) pp. 27-62). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and related techniques are described in Derbyshire, et al. (Immunochemistry 1: A practical approach. M. Turner, A. Johnston eds., Oxford University Press 1997, e.g., at pp. 239-273). Plasmids useful herein have been described in Derbyshire, et al. (cited above), as well as Gottstein, et al. (Biotechniques 30: 190-200, 2001). Cloning techniques are also described in these and other suitable production methods are within the knowledge of those of skill in the art and are not a limitation of the compositions and methods described herein. Generation of recombinant proteins provides flexibility in design, rapid production, large-scale production and uniform composition.

In one aspect, a construct is provided which encodes the fusion proteins or antibodies described herein. Such a construct is, in on aspect, delivered to a subject in need thereof via an appropriate viral vector or the like. Suitable viral vectors include, without limitation, retrovirus, adenovirus, adeno-associated virus (AAV), herpes simplex virus, lentivirus, and chimeric viral vectors. These vectors may be designed and employed by the person of skill in the art using the sequences and teachings herein.

As an example, reference is made to the use of an AAV as a viral vector for gene therapy. However, similar vectors can be constructed using other types of viral vectors. Typically, an expression cassette for an AAV vector comprises an AAV 5′ inverted terminal repeat (ITR), the immunoglobulin/antibody coding sequences and any regulatory sequences, and an AAV 3′ ITR. However, other configurations of these elements may be suitable. In one embodiment, the expression cassette encodes a fusion protein, e.g., the scFv coding sequences in combination with the coding sequence for a cargo. Such a construct is shown in FIG. 18.

The expression cassette may contain at least one internal ribosome binding site, i.e., an IRES, located between the coding regions of the heavy and light chains, or located between the coding regions of the scFv and the cargo (e.g., thrombomodulin as in FIG. 18). Alternatively, the heavy and light chain or scFv and the cargo coding sequences may be separated by a furin-2a self-cleaving peptide linker (see, e.g., Radcliffe and Mitrophanous, Gene Therapy (2004), 11, 1673-1674, which is incorporated herein by reference). The use of AAV for delivering antibody sequences is known. See, e.g., WO 2017/106326, which is incorporated by reference herein.

In one embodiment, the antibody genes described herein are engineered into a genetic element (e.g., a plasmid) useful for generating viral vectors which transfer the immunoglobulin construct sequences carried thereon. The selected vector may be delivered to a packaging cell by any suitable method, including transfection, electroporation, liposome delivery, membrane fusion techniques, high velocity DNA-coated pellets, viral infection and protoplast fusion. Stable packaging cells can also be made. The methods used to make such constructs are known to those with skill in nucleic acid manipulation and include genetic engineering, recombinant engineering, and synthetic techniques. See, e.g., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, ed. Green and Sambrook, Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. (2012).

Pharmaceutical Compositions and Methods of Treatment

Pharmaceutical compositions containing antibodies, fragments, fusion proteins and/or conjugates described herein and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or vehicle as described herein are useful for the treatment of a variety of diseases and disorders, depending upon the selection and identity of the cargo. In one embodiment, a composition comprises a pharmaceutically acceptable vehicle for intravenous administration. In another embodiment, a composition comprises a pharmaceutically acceptable vehicle for administration via other vascular routes, including but not limited to, intra-arterial and intra-ventricular administration, as well as routes providing slower delivery of drugs to the bloodstream such as intramuscular administration to an animal in need thereof. As used herein, the terms “subject” and “patient” include any mammal. In a further embodiment, the terms “subject” and “patient” refer to a human.

Pharmaceutically acceptable vehicles/carriers include any of those conventionally used in the art, e.g., saline, phosphate buffered saline (PBS), or other liquid sterile vehicles accepted for intravenous injections in clinical practice. Pharmaceutical compositions may also include buffers, pH adjusting agents, and other additives conventionally used in medicine. Other exemplary carriers include sterile saline, lactose, sucrose, maltose, and water. Optionally, the compositions of the invention may contain excipient, diluent and/or adjuvant, other conventional pharmaceutical ingredients, such as preservatives, or chemical stabilizers. In one embodiment, compositions described herein are administered systemically as a bolus intravenous injection of a single therapeutic dose of the fusion protein. In a further embodiment, the dose is 0.1-5.0 mg/kg. In another embodiment, the dose is 0.01-0.5 mg/kg.

In one embodiment, methods of treatment are provided comprising delivering antibodies, fragments, fusion proteins and/or conjugates described herein, or a pharmaceutical composition described herein, to a mammalian subject, particularly a human. In other embodiments, methods of treatment are provided comprising delivering antibodies, fragments, fusion proteins and/or conjugates described herein, or a pharmaceutical composition described herein, to a blood vessel. In one embodiment, antibodies, fragments, fusion proteins and/or conjugates described herein are administered via a systemic intravascular route, e.g., a vascular catheter. In some embodiments, rapid targeting of an organ or system may be accomplished by delivery via coronary artery (e.g., for prophylaxis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI)) or the cerebral artery (e.g., for prophylaxis of stroke and other cerebrovascular thrombotic events). Further, the antibodies, fragments, fusion proteins and/or conjugates described herein may be administered prophylactically, i.e., in patients predisposed to thrombosis. In a further embodiment, the antibodies, fragments, fusion proteins and/or conjugates described herein may be administered to an organ donor, utilized with an isolated organ transplant (e.g., via perfusion), or used with vascular stents.

Thus, in one embodiment, methods of treating or preventing a cardiovascular disorder, such as thrombosis, tissue ischemia, AMI, ischemic stroke, pulmonary embolism, sepsis, acute lung injury (ALI) or other type of vascular inflammation, or ischemic peripheral vascular disease, involves administering antibodies, fragments, fusion proteins and/or conjugates described herein, or a pharmaceutical composition as described herein, to a blood vessel in a mammal in need thereof. In such disorders, the anti-thrombotic or anti-inflammatory agent and its dosage in delivery (i.e., the amount fused to an individual RBC may be selected and adjusted by an attending physician with regard to the nature of the disorder, the physical condition of the patient, and other such factors). The selection of the cleavage site, where included, may also be selected to match the disorder, e.g., a thrombin cleavage site suitable for most cardiovascular disorders. Loading red blood cells (RBC) in vivo with anti-thrombotic agents (ATAs) constitutes a new approach to thromboprophylaxis that holds promise for improving the management of patients at high risk of thrombosis for a defined period of time in whom anticoagulation poses an unacceptable risk. Delivery of plasminogen activators (PAs) and thrombomodulin (TM) via RBCs markedly prolongs intravascular lifespan and restricts vascular and tissue damage.

In one embodiment, the compositions described herein are effective in the treatment or prevention of cerebrovascular thrombi. In a further embodiment, the compositions described herein are effective in the treatment or prevention of cerebrovascular disease, such as transient ischemic attack and stroke. In yet another embodiment, the antibodies, fragments, fusion proteins and/or conjugates described herein, or a pharmaceutical composition as described herein are effective in prolonging the circulation of a cargo in a subject in need thereof.

Similarly, in another embodiment, methods of treating or preventing disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), sepsis, acute lung injury (ALI/ARDS), aseptic systemic inflammation, and other inflammatory conditions are provided by administering the appropriately designed fusion proteins and/or conjugate described herein, according to the teachings of this specification.

Also provided is the use of antibodies, fragments, fusion proteins and/or conjugates described herein or a pharmaceutical composition as described herein as a medicament. The use of antibodies, fragments, fusion proteins and/or conjugates described herein or a pharmaceutical composition as described herein is provided to treat any of the above conditions.

Provided herein is a method of treating or preventing thrombosis, tissue ischemia, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), non-segmented elevated AMI, deep vein thrombosis, ischemic stroke, hyperoxic injury, transient ischemic attack (TIA), cerebrovascular disease, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), pulmonary embolism, ischemic peripheral vascular disease, inflammation, pulmonary edema, sepsis, acute lung injury (ALI), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), aseptic systemic inflammation, malaria, SCD, hemolytic anemia, or a bleeding disorder such as hemophilia. The method includes administering an antibody-cargo conjugate composition as described herein to a subject in need thereof.

The dosages, administrations and regimens may be determined by the attending physician given the teachings of this specification. In one embodiment, the composition is administered in a single dosage. In another embodiment, the composition is administered as a split dosage. Split administration may imply a time gap of administration from intervals of minutes, hours, days, weeks or months. In another embodiment, a second administration of a composition as described herein is performed at a later time point. Such time point may be weeks, months or years following the first administration. In one embodiment, the second administration is 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 years or more after the first administration.

In still other embodiments, the compositions described herein may be delivered in a single composition or multiple compositions. Optionally, two or more different antibody conjugates, fusion proteins, or AAV may be delivered, or multiple viruses [see, e.g., WO 2011/126808 and WO 2013/049493]. In another embodiment, multiple viruses may contain different replication-defective viruses (e.g., AAV and adenovirus or lentivirus).

The compositions described herein have been shown to have little effect on RBC cell physiology. Previously used constructs, directed to Ter119, have been shown to induce rigidity in RBC. While targeting Wrb might be expected to induce rigidity[28], ligands to RHCE determinants were not previously characterized on human RBCs with respect to effects on cell physiology. These antibodies were then fused to the extracellular domain of human thrombomodulin (hTM-scFv) to produce an exemplary multi-faceted thromboprophylactic agent[20]. The binding of the scFv and hTM-scFv was characterized and examination of how both affected several clinically relevant aspects of human RBC physiology including osmotic resistance, mechanical strength, deformability under flow, and exposure of phosphatidylserine was performed. The efficacy of these human RBC-coupled TMs was compared using a whole-blood, microfluidic model of inflammatory microthrombosis recently described [33], as shown in the examples below.

In one aspect, a method of loading red blood cells is provided. In one embodiment, the red blood cells are loaded ex vivo. In said method, red blood cells are collected from a subject. The RBCs are isolated and contacted with an antibody-cargo construct of the invention. The loaded RBCs are then infused into a subject. In one embodiment, the subject is the same subject from which the RBCs were harvested. In another embodiment, the subject or a different subject from which the RBCs were harvested.

As described above, the term “about” when used to modify a numerical value means a variation of ±10%, unless otherwise specified. As used throughout this specification and the claims, the terms “comprise” and “contain” and its variants including, “comprises”, “comprising”, “contains” and “containing”, among other variants, is inclusive of other components, elements, integers, steps and the like. The term “consists of” or “consisting of” are exclusive of other components, elements, integers, steps and the like.

The following examples are illustrative only and are not a limitation on the invention described herein. It is demonstrated herein, that a human antibody was murinized and administered to a mouse to effectively lower cholesterol levels in a model of familial hypercholesterolemia.

Example 1—Materials and Methods

Cell Lines

Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were purchased and maintained in complete EGM (Lonza, Walkersville, Md.). Stably transfected Drosophila S2 cells were maintained in Schneider's complete medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Philadelphia, Pa.) with 25 μg/mL blasticidin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, Calif.) and transitioned to serum free Insect-Xpress (Lonza, Walkersville, Md.) supplemented with Glutamax and 0.8 mM CuSO4 (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.) for recombinant protein expression. Chemically competent One Shot Top10 E. coli were used for subcloning as well as for production of scFvs using the pBAD/gIII periplasmic production system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, Calif.).

Reagents

Human α-thrombin, human protein C, corn trypsin inhibitor (CTI), and blood collection tubes containing citrate and CTI were all purchased from Haematologic Technologies (Essex Junction, VT). Recombinant human TNF-α was purchased from Corning (Corning, N.Y.). Anti-human CD141 (thrombomodulin) antibody (clone Phx-01) was purchased from BioLegend (San Diego, Calif.). Calcein AM and flourescent labeling reagents AlexaFlour 647-NHS Ester and AlexaFlour 488-TFP Ester were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Carlsbad, Calif.). Anti-human fibrin (clone 59D8) was purified from hybridoma supernatant using protein G and fluorescently labeled with AlexaFluor 568-NHS Ester (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Monoclonal antibodies BRIC256 (anti-GPA), BRAD2 (anti-RHD), BRAD3 (anti-RHD), FOG-1 (anti-RHD), BRIC14 (anti-Band3/Wrb), BIRMA84b (anti-Band3/Wrb), and BRIC200 (anti-Band3) were purchased from the International Blood Group Reference Laboratory (Bristol, England, UK). Antibody BRIC69 (anti-RHCE) was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Carlsbad, Calif.).

Red Blood Cells

Human whole blood was obtained from healthy volunteer donors. All studies involving human subjects were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Pennsylvania. Written informed consent was obtained and phlebotomy was performed via the antecubital veins using a 21-gauge butterfly needle. Specimens were drawn into 3.2% sodium citrate vacuum tubes (BD, Franklin Lakes, N.J.). To obtain red blood cells, whole blood was spun at 1000×g for 10 min and the plasma and buffy coat were discarded. A portion of the packed red cells was then suspended in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) with 2% normal human AB serum (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.) at the indicated hematocrit for each subsequent assay. To measure osmotic resistance and mechanical resistance, human RBCs were isolated from the retained segments of non-expired O positive, leukoreduced, irradiated RBCs from our hospital blood bank and prepared similarly. Similar results were seen using either fresh RBCs or donor units.

Derivation and Production of Antibodies and Fusion Proteins

An IgG Fab/phage display library was prepared from the peripheral blood lymphocytes of a hyperimmunized macaque using homologous human V-region oligonucleotides (Siegel D L, R. M., Lee H, Blancher A., Production of large repertories of macaque mAbs to human RBCs using phage display. Transfusion, 1999. 39(S10): p. 92S, which is incorporated herein by reference). Fab/phage specific for human RBCs were isolated by panning on intact human RBCs. Monoclonal Fab/phage were grown to produce antibodies for immunoassays and their corresponding DNA was extracted for sequencing. To identify target epitopes, antibodies were screened against RBCs of known serologic phenotypes, including rare cells lacking highly conserved antigens, using standard immunohematologic techniques (Roback, J. D., Technical Manual. 2014: American Association of Blood Banks (AABB), which is incorporated herein by reference.)

After identification of the target epitopes, clones reactive against Wrb and Rh17 present at the highest titers were chosen to produce scFv derivatives of the encoded antibodies. Sequences of the antibody clones examined herein are available in the supporting information. For each VH and VL region, restriction enzyme sites were introduced for cloning into expression vectors and fusion to the extracellular domain of human TM (Glu22-Ser515). VH and VL were also ligated into a pBAD/gIII expression system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, Calif.) to produce scFv alone in E. coli. Sequences were modified by custom synthesis of double-stranded gene fragments (gBlock, IDT, Coralville, Iowa).

Recombinant Protein Expression and Purification

pMT/hTM-aBand3, pMT/hTM-aRh17, and pMT/shTM were each co-transfected with pCoBLAST in Drosophila S2 cells and selected with blasticidin to generate stable cell lines. Expression and purification were performed as described previously (Ding, B. S., et al., Anchoring fusion thrombomodulin to the endothelial lumen protects against injury-induced lung thrombosis and inflammation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2009. 180(3): p. 247-56, which is incorporated herein by reference), using a copper-induced promoter for secreted expression. Proteins harvested from culture supernatants were purified using an anti-FLAG (M2, Sigma, St Louis, Mo.) affinity resin. Purified proteins were assessed by SDS-PAGE and HPLC (Waters) using a size-exclusion column (Yarra, Phenomenex, Torrance, Calif.). HPLC was used to removed dimers from purified products when present. scFvs were produced using a pBAD/gIII vector production system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, Calif.) for periplasmic secretion. Cultures of transformed E. Coli were induced with 0.02% arabinose and grown for at least 6 hours at room temperature. The periplasmic fraction was isolated by osmotic shock and the resulting shock fluid was purified on an L5 anti-FLAG column (Biolegend, San Diego, Calif.).

Binding Assays

Recombinant proteins were radiolabeled with Na¹²⁵I (Perkin Elmer, Exton, Pa.) using pre-formulated iodination reagent (Pierce Iodination Reagent, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, Calif.) per the manufacturer's protocol. Radiochemical purity was verified by instant thin layer chromatography on silica and was typically >95%. Radiolabeled proteins were added to human RBCs at 0.02% hematocrit in PBS with 2% human AB serum. Binding was allowed to reach equilibrium over 4 hours at 37 degrees C. After binding, cell suspensions were rapidly washed at least four times with cold PBS. The resulting cell pellet was counted using a Perkin Elmer Wizard2 gamma counting system. Dissociation of the fusion proteins was assessed using RBCs saturated with radiolabeled proteins, washing unbound ligands, and placing in dilute suspensions prior to measurement of bound ligand at specified time points. Similar binding experiments were performed with fluorescently-labeled recombinant proteins and cells were analyzed by flow cytometry (Accuri C6, BD Biosciences, San Jose, Calif.). Fluorescently labeled proteins were produced by reaction with amine-reactive derivatives of fluorescent dyes AlexaFlour488 and AlexaFlour647 (typically 10- to 20-fold excess at pH 8) and purified using 10,000 MWCO centrifugal filter devices (EMD Milipore, Billerica, Mass.).

Activated Protein C Assay

Generation of activated protein C by TM proteins or TMs coupled to RBCs was measured as described previously (Carnemolla, R., et al., Quantitative analysis of thrombomodulin-mediated conversion of protein C to APC: translation from in vitro to in vivo. J Immunol Methods, 2012. 384(1-2): p. 21-4). In brief, a given concentration of recombinant protein (1-20 nM) or fusion-loaded RBCs was suspended with 300 nM human protein C and 1 nM human alpha thrombin for 1 hour at 37 degrees C. A portion of the reaction supernatant was then added to an excess of hirudin and 500 μM S-2366 chromogenic substrate. The absorbance was read kinetically at 405 nm with the slope of the linear portion of the resulting curve reflecting APC concentration.

Microfluidic Assay

Microfluidic experiments were performed on a Bioflux 1000 (Fluxion Biosciences, San Francisco, Calif.) multi-well microfluidic system. Microchannels were endothelialized with HUVECs as described previously (Colin F. Greineder, I. H. J., Carlos H. Villa, Douglas B. Cines, Mortimer Poncz, and Vladimir R. Muzykantov, Microfluidic Modeling of Human Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Reveals Efficacy and Mechanism of Targeted Thrombomodulin. Submitted, 2017) which typically resulted in complete coverage of the micro-channels. Channels were treated with TNF-alpha (10 ng/mL) under flow (at shear stress of 5 dyne/cm2) for 6 hours to flow condition and induce activation prior to exposure to whole blood. Whole blood was obtained from healthy volunteer donors and collected into citrate collection tubes containing corn trypsin inhibitor (CTI, Essex Junction, CT). The indicated concentrations of recombinant proteins were added to the whole blood for hour at prior to perfusion through the microchannels. Flourescently labeled anti-fibrin antibodies and calcein AM were also added to blood 15 minutes before microfluidic assay to image fibrin deposition and leukocyte and platelet adhesion, respectively. Blood was flowed through the channels under conditions mimicking post capillary venules (5 dyne/cm2) for 20 minutes while images were continuously acquired. Controls and experimental conditions were compared on simultaneously run channels using a motorized stage for real-time acquisition. Images were analyzed using ImageJ for quantification of mean fluorescence intensity.

Osmotic and Mechanical Resistance Assays

Osmotic and mechanical resistance was measured as previously described (Pan, D., et al., The Effect of Polymeric Nanoparticles on Biocompatibility of Carrier Red Blood Cells. PLoS One, 2016. 11(3): p. e0152074). In brief, human RBCs obtained from retained segments of donor RBCs were suspended in PBS at 5% hematocrit prior to incubation with various concentrations of antibodies or fusion proteins. The RBCs were then washed and exposed to osmotic or mechanical stress. Osmotic stress was induced by incubation in 64 mM NaCl solution, conditions that give approximately 50% hemolysis of normal RBCs. The suspensions were then centrifuged at 13,400 g and the resulting supernatants were assayed for hemoglobin content by measuring absorbance at 540 nm. Hemolysis of equivalent concentrations of RBCs in water was taken as 100% hemolysis. To measure mechanical stress, RBCs were similarly treated with antibodies and fusion proteins, resuspended at 1% hematocrit, and rotated in the presence of 8×4 mm glass beads (Corning Pyrex, Corning, N.Y.) for 1 hour at 37 C. The RBC suspension supernatants were then similarly analyzed spectrophotometrically for hemolysis.

Ekacytometry

Ektacytometry was performed using a RheoScan AnD system (Rheo Meditech, Seoul, Republic of Korea). In a typical experiment, 50 μL of 5% RBC or 5 μL of whole blood was suspended in 700 μL of a 5.5% (w/v) solution of 360 kDa poly-vinylpyrrolidine (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.) in PBS. A 500 μL sample within each microfluidic chamber was then analyzed per the manufacturer's protocol. The elongation indices at the corresponding shear stresses were then input into statistical software (Prism, GraphPad, San Diego, Calif.) and the data were fit using non-linear regression and a Streekstra-Bronkhost model (Baskurt, O. K. and H. J. Meiselman, Data reduction methods for ektacytometry in clinical hemorheology. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc, 2013. 54(1): p. 99-107) to derive the maximal elongation indices (EImax) and shear stress at half-maximal deformation (SS1/2).

Example 2: Synthesis of Targeting Ligands

Using antibody phage display, we identified non-human-primate Fab antibody fragments to antigenic determinants on human RBCs. By panning phage libraries on human RBCs, we produced a Fab/phage preparation with >10⁷RBC-specific clones capable of agglutinating human RBCs. By performing binding assays against rare RBC types lacking highly conserved antigens and epitopes, we identified the target antigens of >30 of these clones. At least 34 clones bound the Wright b (Wrb) epitope formed by a Band 3/GPA interaction, present on the RBCs of essentially 100% of the human population. The Wrb epitope, determined by the protein sequence of Band 3, is a site of association between Band 3 with GPA, and GPA expression is simultaneously required for its presence on the membrane (Huang C H, Reid M E, Xie S S, Blumenfeld 00. Human red blood cell Wright antigens: a genetic and evolutionary perspective on glycophorin A-band 3 interaction. Blood. 1996; 87(9):3942-3947). At least 3 other clones bound to a highly-conserved epitope Rh17(Hr0) on human RhCE protein, also present on essentially 100% of the human population. Both these targets are specific for erythroid lineage (Rojewski M T, Schrezenmeier H, Flegel W A. Tissue distribution of blood group membrane proteins beyond red cells: evidence from cDNA libraries. Transfus Apher Sci. 2006; 35(1):71-82; Huang C H, Reid M E, Xie S S, Blumenfeld O O. Human red blood cell Wright antigens: a genetic and evolutionary perspective on glycophorin A-band 3 interaction. Blood. 1996; 87(9):3942-3947; and Chou S T, Westhoff C M. The Rh and RhAG blood group systems. Immunohematology. 2010; 26(4):178-186). We assessed the extent of humanness of the variable chains using T20 scores44; scores of 79.8 for VH and 93.5 for VL framework regions were calculated for the anti-Rh17(aRh17), and 86.0 for VH and 85.4 for VL framework regions were calculated for anti-Wrb (aWrb). These scores are comparable with ‘humanized’ antibodies (Gao S H, Huang K, Tu H, Adler A S. Monoclonal antibody humanness score and its applications. BMC Biotechnol. 2013; 13:55) and therefore are encouraging with respect to potential lack of immunogenicity of derivatives of these ligands.

Example 3: Binding of Ligands and Cargoes to RBCs

The sequences of the variable fragment genes (amino acid sequences shown in Tables 2 and 5, nucleic acid sequences shown in Tables 3 and 6) were cloned into plasmids to produce single chain variants (scFv) of the parent Fab, as well as fusions of the scFv antibodies with human thrombomodulin (hTM-scFv). These scFvs and hTM-scFvs were produced with high purity as characterized by SDS gel electrophoresis and size-exclusion HPLC, with peaks consistent with the expected molecular weights (FIG. 1A and FIG. 1B). We then performed direct binding assays with radio-labeled and fluorescently-labeled scFv antibody fragments and fusion proteins (see Example 1). The aRh17 and aWrb scFvs and their corresponding TM fusions demonstrated similar binding affinities (KD 21-53 nM, FIG. 1C and FIG. 1D, and Table 7), as did both radio-iodinated and fluorescently-labeled proteins (FIG. 7A-FIG. 7D). The scFvs and fusion proteins bound to conserved epitopes on human, but not mouse, rat, or pig RBCs (FIG. 7A-FIG. 7D), and binding parameters (Kd, Bmax) were consistent between multiple donors. Binding saturated at the expected level of target expression (Bmax of 100,000 to 160,000 copies/RBC for aRh17 and 750,000 to 900,000 copies/RBC for aWrb) (Lomas-Francis C, Olsson M L. The blood group antigen factsbook: Elsevier/Academic Press; 2012). The dissociation rates were similar for both scFvs alone and their corresponding fusions, with >50% of the ligands remaining bound after 4 hours at 37 degrees (FIG. 1E and FIG. 1F, Table 7). We also examined effects of shear stress on scFv binding and the potential for ligand exchange onto unbound RBCs in whole blood under constant mixing (FIG. 8A-FIG. 8E and FIG. 9A-FIG. 9C). These experiments demonstrated that short periods of low (5 dyne/cm²) and high (200 dyne/cm²) shear in whole blood did not alter scFv binding and that similar dissociation kinetics were seen in the presence of whole blood containing mostly unbound RBCs (with gradual exchange onto the unbound RBC population). Hemagglutination by an anti-TM secondary antibody was seen when hTM-scFv fusions were added at concentrations estimated to generate 1000 copies of TM per RBC based on the calculated affinities (FIG. 1G). The fusion proteins alone did not induce aggregation or agglutination of RBCs in the absence of secondary anti-TM. Morphology of fusion protein loaded RBCs was confirmed on Wright-Giemsa stained peripheral blood smears and no morphologic abnormalities in the RBCs were noted (FIG. 10).

TABLE 7

Anti-Band3 and anti-RHCE antibody clones from phage library. scFv

produced as H₂N-VH-(GGGGS)3-VL-FLAGx3-COOH.

Speci-
VH gene
Vk gene

Clone#
ficity
family
family
VH sequence
VL sequence

KP3-17
Rh17
4
1
EVQLLESGPGLLKPSETLSLTCAVSGAPISNYW
AAELTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTITCQASQGISS

WSWIRQSPGKGLEWIGEIDGSIYTTYYNPSLKS
WLAWYQQKPGKAPKLLIYKASSLQSGVPS

RVAISKDTSKNRLSLKLTSVTAADTAVYYCAREG
RFSGSGSGTDFTLTISSLQSEDFATYYCQQY

QNPLVPTYGSTGFGLDFWGHGLAVTVSS
SSSPRTFGQGTKVEIK

KP2-23
Wr^b
4
3
EVQLLESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCTVSGSSLSSAYG
AAELTLTQSPATLSLSPGETATLSCRASQTV

WNWIRQPPGKGLEWIGSIGGSRDNTNYNPSL
GRNLAWYQQRPGQAPNLVHSAYFRATG

KRRVTISKDTSKNQFSLKLKSVTAADTAVYYCA
IPDRFSGSGSGTDFTLTISSLEPEDAGVYHC

QRGAYGYSYFDYWGQGVLVAVSS
QQYNDLLPLTFGGGTKVEIK

TABLE 8

Binding parameters for radiolabeled anti-RBC ligands. A slight decrease in

affinity and increase in k_offare seen for fusions in comparison to scFv alone.

Bmax (95% CI),

Protein
K_D(95% CI), nM
copies/RBC × 10³
k_off(95% CI), s⁻¹

aRh17 scFv
41.4 (34.1, 50.2)
99 (93, 105)
2.0 × 10⁻⁵(1.6, 2.4)

(anti-RhCE)

aWr^bscFv
21.3 (17.0, 26.5)
746 (704, 790)
2.9 × 10⁻⁵ (2.0, 3.8)

(anti-Band3/

GPA)

hTM-aRh17
45.6 (34.8, 56.5)
184 (173, 195)
4.7 × 10⁻⁵(3.2, 6.5)

(anti-RhCE)

hTM-aWr^b
52.6 (40.1, 65.1)
904 (848, 961)
4.8 × 10⁻⁵ (2.9, 7.0)

(anti-Band3/

GPA)

Example 4: Effect of Ligands and Cargoes on RBC Function

Having characterized the binding of the antibody fragments and fusion proteins to human RBCs, we then investigated how the binding of these ligands may affect several parameters of RBC integrity including osmotic fragility, mechanical resistance, membrane deformability, exposure of phosphatidylserine, and generation of reactive oxygen species. These experiments were conducted at 5% hematocrit and with ligand:RBC ratios calculated to yield 10,000 and 100,000 copies/RBC for both ligands based on their affinity and the known concentration of RBC targets. These copy numbers are below saturation for both Wrb and Rh17.

We found that the two scFvs (and their corresponding thrombomodulin fusions) had significantly different effects on target RBCs. Targeting of Wrb, but not Rh17, by the antibody fragments induced a left-shift in osmotic fragility curves (EC50 122 vs 128 mOsm, p<0.05) with a pattern suggesting a whole population change rather than just a subset (FIG. 2A and FIG. 2B). We tested the dose-dependence of the observed changes in osmotic resistance using the EC50 of naïve RBCs (128 mOsm) (FIG. 2C and FIG. 2E) and again found that aRh17 did not produce changes in osmotic hemolysis at this osmolarity, while aWrb again decreased hemolysis. The changes in osmotic resistance were paralleled by an increase in hemolysis following mechanical stress for aWrb (FIG. 2D), but similarly, no change was seen after treatment with aRh17 (FIG. 2F). While the mechanical stress assay (Pan D, Vargas-Morales O, Zern B, et al. The Effect of Polymeric Nanoparticles on Biocompatibility of Carrier Red Blood Cells. PLoS One. 2016; 11(3):e0152074) does not directly represent a pathophysiologic scenario, it is intended to reflect overall integrity of the RBC membrane architecture. Nearly identical effects were observed after treatment with the scFvs alone or with their corresponding TM fusions (FIG. 3A and FIG. 3B).

We then used ektacytometry to test whether effects on osmotic and mechanical fragility were mirrored by alterations in membrane deformability. In this technique, a decrease in the maximal elongation index (EImax) or an increase in the shear stress to reach half-maximal deformation (SS1/2) reflects an increase in RBC rigidity. As we expected, when ligands were bound to Wrb, there was a dose-dependent increase in RBC rigidity (FIG. 4), reflected in both increased SS1/2 (FIG. 4B and FIG. 4D) or decreased EImax (FIG. 11). This rigidifying effect was identical for TM-scFv fusions and scFvs alone, again demonstrating that the ligand, and not the TM cargo, induced these changes. Consistent with the mechanical and osmotic stress assays, binding of fusions or scFvs to RhCE did not change ektacytometric curves or indices (FIG. 4) and the behavior of aRh17 treated RBCs was consistently identical to naïve donor RBCs.

The target-dependent effect of these ligands on membrane deformability raised the question of how targeting other RBC epitopes (particularly on GPA, given its ubiquity as an erythroid specific target) might affect RBC physiology. To probe this question, we produced anti-GPA antibodies and Fab fragments from a commercially available hybridoma, YTH89.146 (FIG. 12). After incubating human RBCs with the anti-GPA IgG antibodies or their monovalent Fabs, we observed similar rigidifying effects to those seen with aWrb ligands. Monovalent Fab induced a slight dose-dependent change in ektacytometric indices, while the parent antibody induced more marked changes in red cell rigidity (FIG. 13A-FIG. 13D). The Fab also induced a slight increase in hemolysis under mechanical stress, while also inducing a slight increase in hemolysis under hypo-osmolar conditions. Because prior studies loading drugs onto murine RBCs have largely relied on Ter119 or other GPA-associated ligands as the targeting agent, we also examined the effects of a scFv-TM fusion of this antibody on mouse RBCs (Zaitsev S, Kowalska M A, Neyman M, et al. Targeting recombinant thrombomodulin fusion protein to red blood cells provides multifaceted thromboprophylaxis. Blood. 2012; 119(20):4779-4785). As with targeting of human Wrb or glycophorin A, Ter119-TM fusions decreased deformability of murine RBCs (increased SS1/2, decreased Elmax) as a monovalent fusion protein (Ter119-mTM), and markedly so as the parent IgG antibody (FIG. 14A-FIG. 14D). As with the human ligands, these changes in deformability were accompanied by changes in susceptibility to osmotic and mechanical stress.

To address the generalizability of the observed deformability effects of the Band 3, GPA, and RhCE ligands, we also compared the ektacytometric effects of a range of full-length IgG antibodies covering different epitopes on these membrane targets. For this purpose, we used BRIC69 (anti-RHCE, mouse IgG1), BRAD2 (anti-D, human IgG1), BRAD3 (anti-D, human IgG3), FOG1 (anti-D, human IgG1), BIRMA84b (anti-Wrb, mouse IgG3), BRIC14 (anti-Wrb, mouse IgG2a), YTH89.1 (anti-GPA, rat IgG2b), BRIC256 (anti-GPA, mouse IgG1), and BRIC200 (anti-Band3, mouse IgG1). In agreement with prior studies^26-28,31, we found that all IgGs tested against epitopes on GPA and Band3 induced decreases in deformability, while antibodies to RhCE and RhD (on serologically confirmed RHD positive RBC donors) showed minimal change from naïve RBCs (FIG. 5A-FIG. 5C). Although all IgGs were added at a ratio of approximately 104 mAbs per RBC (10 nM mAb in a 5% RBC suspension), the differences in affinities of these clones would likely result in different numbers of bound copies and, therefore, the relative degrees of rigidification as a function of bound copy numbers remained uncertain. To address this, we selected representative anti-RhCE (BRIC69) and anti-Wrb (BRIC14) IgG antibodies and performed additional dose-titration experiments to show that when the anti-RhCE antibodies were added at ratios below saturation and which resulted in similar total numbers of bound IgG as anti-Wrb antibodies (FIG. 5D-FIG. 5F), no change in SS1/2 was seen for anti-RhCE while anti-Wrb showed significant, dose-dependent rigidification.

Additional characterization of the effects of the scFvs and fusions on RBCs included assays of PS surface exposure, as measured by annexin V binding, and ROS generation. Binding of both scFvs and hTM-scFv fusions did not lead to detectable increase in PS exposure (FIG. 15A). None of the scFv ligands examined demonstrated detectable induction of ROS generation by a dihydrorhodamine-based assay (FIG. 15B).

Example 5: Therapeutic Effectiveness of RBC Cargoes

Having examined the effects on aWrb and aRh17 scFvs and their respective TM fusion proteins on human RBC physiology, we next compared the enzymatic activity and therapeutic efficacy of these fusions. In solution, fusion proteins demonstrated APC generative capacity identical to soluble TM in the presence of human protein C and thrombin (FIG. 16). Fusion proteins were then pre-bound to human RBCs at saturating concentrations and their capacity to generate APC was measured as a function of RBC concentration. The fusions generated a RBC-dose dependent increase in APC generation by carrier RBCs (FIG. 6A). Using a standard curve generated with soluble TM, the Wrb-coupled RBC-TM generated roughly 100,000 soluble TM ‘equivalents’ per loaded RBC at saturation while the RhCE-coupled RBC-TM generated 50,000. Therefore, although Wrb-coupled TM would be predicted to carry 5- to 10-fold more copies of the fusion per RBC at saturation, the APC generating capacity was only 2-fold higher. We then reversed these conditions such that RBCs and target epitopes were at excess (50 nM fusion in 20% Hct, approximately 10,000 copies/RBC), which would drive fusions to be essentially completely RBC-bound. At these high concentrations of RBCs, comparable to the circulatory environment, APC generation was similar for both fusion proteins and comparable to that seen for soluble TM, although a slight reduction was seen for hTM-aBand3/GPA and not hTM-aRhCE (FIG. 6B). These results confirm that the fusions maintain their enzymatic activity when coupled to RBCs, and suggest that RhCE-coupled TM may better conserve specific activity.

We then tested the therapeutic activity of hTM/scFv fusions bound to human RBC in a microfluidic model of microvascular inflammatory thrombosis that permits assessment of human-targeted therapeutics in whole blood in a system simulating human vessels³⁷. In this model, fully endothelialized micro-channels are activated with an inflammatory mediator (e.g. TNF-α), inducing leukocyte and platelet adhesion and widespread fibrin generation when the channels are exposed to flowing human whole blood. We hypothesized that if the fusions maintain their activity in whole blood, they would significantly reduce fibrin and platelet deposition in response to inflamed endothelium. To do so, we added 200 nM of each fusion protein (and soluble TM as a control) to whole blood (a ratio of approximately 25,000 copies of TM per RBC at normal RBC counts). Both fusions significantly reduced fibrin deposition (measured by red fluorescence) in response to TNF-α activation (FIG. 6C). Channels exposed to Wrb-targeted fusions, as compared to RhCE-targeted, showed a slight increase in mostly platelet-associated fibrin deposition at the end of the perfusion period (20 minutes), but both remained significantly reduced compared to untreated controls and similar to soluble TM (data not shown). Additional analysis of fluorescence from calcein AM labeling (leukocytes and platelets) demonstrated that RhCE targeted hTM-scFv was more effective than the Wrb targeted fusion at reducing platelet and leukocyte adhesion (FIG. 6D), with efficacy of hTM-aRhCE again similar to soluble TM. Hypothesizing that the increase in calcein signal and late fibrin generation in hTM-aWrb compared to hTM-aRhCE was a result of rigidifying effects of the aWrb, we performed additional experiments in this model using the aWrb and aRHCE scFvs alone (not fused to TM), and demonstrated that after 15 minutes of flow, activated channels exposed to aWrb treated blood showed greater platelet and leukocyte accumulation compared to that treated with aRh17 (FIG. 6E), suggesting the difference in efficacy of hTM-aRHCE and hTM-aWrb is due to aWrb promotion of leukocyte and platelet adhesion rather than a loss of efficacy of the appended TM. We also confirmed that RBC rigidification was seen at this ratio of scFv to RBC in whole blood (FIG. 15A-FIG. 15B).

Example 6

As a critical step in the translation of RBC-targeted therapeutic fusion proteins to clinical practice, we designed human RBC-specific fusion proteins based on scFvs derived from non-human-primate antibody phage-display libraries. Using this technique, we generated antibodies against highly conserved, erythroid-specific epitopes on Band3/GPA (Wrb) and RhCE (Rh17) proteins. Both epitopes are on multi-pass transmembrane proteins and exist predominantly within discrete multiprotein complexes. While Wrb is more widely distributed between Band3/ankrin complexes, junctional complexes, and free forms, Rh17 (as part of RhCE) exists largely within Band/ankrin complexes⁴⁷. Wrb has been localized to a juxtamembrane site of interaction between GPA and Band3, but the precise epitope for Rh17, which is defined serologically, is unknown. Both antibody fragments and their respective TM fusions showed affinities sufficient to drive rapid, complete binding in whole blood, where concentrations of their targets are >1 μM. While only a slight increase in off-rate was noted for TM fusion proteins, interaction with TM binding partners (thrombin, PF4, protein C) may promote dissociation in whole blood under flow, which was not directly assessed this in the present study. The primate origin of these ligands is expected to confer less immunogenicity than non-engineered murine monoclonal antibodies or foreign peptides, but further data would be required to support this.

Targeting of Band3/GPA (Wrb) led to changes in RBC membrane deformability, mechanical resistance, and osmotic resistance, while RhCE-targeted fusions and antibody fragments did not perturb any of the physiologic parameters assessed in this study. Membrane effects were shared, to varying extents, by other GPA and Band 3 ligands against human and murine RBCs, including Ter119, particularly for bivalent IgG ligands. In contrast, antibodies against RhD and RhCE failed to demonstrate significant rigidification of human RBCs. Antibodies against GPA and RhD also produce markedly different effects on different subsets of phagocytic cells³², and while the authors hypothesized that copy number was critical, the current findings suggest that altered deformability may have also been contributory. The precise function of RhCE has been difficult to define⁴⁸and a large diversity of polymorphisms have been described⁴³. Individuals expressing RhD but not RhCE (rare D-phenotype) show modest alteration of membranes without overt RBC or clinical phenotypes⁴⁹. While homologous proteins participate in ammonia/ammonium transport and acid/base balance, RhCE and RhD do not^50,51. Band 3 and GPA are highly expressed membrane proteins important for structural membrane complexes and ion exchange, and carriage of sialoglycoproteins, respectively. In this context, the apparent “unresponsiveness” of RBCs bound by RhD/RhCE-targeted ligands is consistent with a lack of recognized function in mature RBCs.

As a representative therapeutic, we coupled TM to both scFvs. TM shows promise in the treatment of sepsis⁵²and RBC-coupled TM has demonstrated superiority to soluble TM in mouse models^20,21. Coupling TM to either epitope resulted in efficacious RBC drug carriers as measured by enzymatic activity and in a humanized microfluidic model of inflammatory thrombosis. However, RhCE-coupled TM showed higher specific activity in vitro and improved efficacy in our microfluidic model. The reasons for the difference in enzymatic activity may reflect spatial localization, as the Wrb epitope is immediately adjacent to the RBC membrane which may limit substrate accessibility, while the precise Rh17 epitope localization is unknown. The difference in efficacy in our humanized microfluidic model was unexpected, but because cellular rigidity has significant effects on margination of red cells, white cells, and platelets within the vascular lumen, and decreased RBC deformability can drive increased platelet adhesion^53,54, we speculate that the difference in efficacy reflects the observed difference in membrane effects. Our observation of higher platelet adhesion after treatment with Wrb-targeted scFv is consistent with this phenomenon. The potential for drug or antibody loading of RBCs to affect their intravascular distribution and margination of cellular components, and how this distribution affects their therapeutic efficacy, warrants further investigation.

RBCs can respond to their environment in diverse ways including dynamic changes in linkage of membrane protein complexes⁵⁵, phosphorylation of membrane and cytoskeletal components^56-59, calcium influx^60,61, PS exposure^29,62, and oxidative stress responses³⁰. In targeting RBCs for delivery of therapeutics, the present findings suggest that dose and target dependent changes in membrane physiology, and ultimately, circulatory behavior should be carefully considered^24-29,63. As increases in RBC rigidity can result in an override of the CD47/SIRPA interaction⁶⁴, these factors may also play a role in RBC interactions with host defenses and immune response. This is especially important because RBC drug carriers are drawing increased attention for their apparent ability to modulate immune responses and even induce immune tolerance^13-15. However, while ligands to murine RBCs have been explored (e.g. Ter119, ERY1) in this approach, application to human RBCs has not been well-developed.

Based on the current findings, RhCE (on Rh17) may be a particularly attractive target for surface-loading of RBCs given its erythroid specificity, high copy number, apparent lack of adverse impact on RBC physiology, and presence on the RBCs of essentially 100% of the human population. The therapeutic efficacy of hTM targeted to human RBCs on either epitope was comparable to soluble TM, and was optimal when coupled to RhCE. The ligands described in the present study offer a new set of biochemical tools for optimizing the delivery of therapeutics by human RBCs.

Example 7: Red Blood Cell Targeting of Liposomes Provides Markedly Enhanced Circulation

Liposomes and other nanoparciles are limited by rapid reticuloendothelial system uptake and poor circulation. Red blood cells are natural long-circulating (˜120 days in humans) carriers. Targeting liposomes to red blood cells may offer the ability to prolong their circulation. Red blood cell targeting must be carefully controlled with respect to target epitopes, binding affinities and loading ratios to maximize biocompatibility.

RBC-targetable liposomes were synthesized to include site-specifically modified RBC-targeting antibody fragments (scFv). Copper-independent click chemistry coupling allowed for precise control of ligand loading. Targeting via scFv and IgG was compared. Radiolabeled liposomes were loaded onto mouse RBCs bod in vivo by direct intravenous injection and ex vivo onto isolated RBCs before transfusion. Biocompatibility was assessed by agglutination assays and ektacytometry to determine membrane disruptive effects.

RBC-targeted liposomes are maintained in circulation significantly longer than conventional ‘stealth’ liposomes. Whole animal biodistribution of Ter119-liposomes (100-200 scFv:liposome) loaded onto RBCs in vivo by direct injection into the blood stream (blue) or unconjugated PEGylated liposomes (red) (FIG. 19A). For in vivo loading liposomes were injected at a ratio of approximately 50 liposomes per RBC. Blood PK curves demonstrate that the large majority of both in vivo loaded Ter119-liposomes (blue) are maintained in circulation at 3 hours and gradually drop off over 24 hours (FIG. 19B). Compared to traditional “stealth” liposomes (red), there is approximately a 2-fold increase in area under the curve (p<0.05). Ter-119 liposomes are found mostly (>80%) in the RBC pellet of collected blood and gradually clear this compartment while free liposomes are largely in the plasma fraction (FIG. 19C).

These data demonstrate that RBC-targeted liposomes markedly prolonged the circulation of liposomes compared to traditional “stealth” technology (FIG. 19A-FIG. 19C). Circulation of ex vivo liposome loaded RBCs is dependent on the number of loaded nanocarriers. (FIG. 20A and FIG. 20B). RBC-bound liposomes circulate predominantly on the RBC surface over the initial 12 hours after which they are gradually cleared. Mechanisms of clearance remain uncertain. High loading induces RBC agglutination (FIG. 21A and FIG. 21B). Circulation is dependent on low loading ratios. scFv-liposomes provide superior circulation (FIG. 22) and better preserve normal RBC membrane physiology compared to IgG-liposomes (FIG. 23). Normal membrane deformability is both loading-ratio and target dependent.

Example 8: Rh17 Recognizes a Linear Epitope in Human RhCE

A Western blot was performed to assess the binding of Rh17 to proteins extracted from mouse and human erythrocyte ghosts (FIG. 25). Because proteins were denatured in reducing SDS-PAGE buffer prior to gel electrophoresis, the presence of binding is due to interaction with linear, and not conformational, epitopes. This is in contrast to anti-RhCE mAbs described by other groups, which recognize conformational epitopes.

Rh17 recognizes an epitope present in the 6th extracellular loop of human RhCE. Flow cytometry was used to assess the binding of Rh17 to human erythrocytes in the presence and absence of linear peptides corresponding to the amino acid sequence 6th extracellular loop of human RhD (negative control) and human RhCE (FIG. 26). A decrease in binding signal only in the presence of the RhCE-derived peptide demonstrates that the 6th extracellular loop of RhCE is involved in the binding of Rh17 to human erythrocytes.

REFERENCES

1. Ihler G M, Glew R H, Schnure F W. Enzyme loading of erythrocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1973; 70(9):2663-2666.

2. Ihler G, Lantzy A, Purpura J, Glew R H. Enzymatic degradation of uric acid by uricase-loaded human erythrocytes. J Clin Invest. 1975; 56(3):595-602.

3. Wakamiya R T, Lightfoot E N, Updike S J. Asparaginase entrapped in red blood cells: action and survival. Science (New York, N.Y. 1976; 193(4254).

4. Bourgeaux V, Lanao J M, Bax B E, Godfrin Y. Drug-loaded erythrocytes: on the road toward marketing approval. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016; 10:665-676.

5. Villa C H, Cines D B, Siegel D L, Muzykantov V. Erythrocytes as Carriers for Drug Delivery in Blood Transfusion and Beyond. Transfus Med Rev. 2017; 31(1):26-35.

6. Magnani M. Erythrocytes as carriers for drugs: the transition from the laboratory to the clinic is approaching. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2012; 12(2):137-138.

7. Leuzzi V, Micheli R, D'Agnano D, et al. Positive effect of erythrocyte-delivered dexamethasone in ataxia-telangiectasia. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2015; 2(3):e98.

8. Hunault-Berger M, Leguay T, Huguet F, et al. A Phase 2 study of L-asparaginase encapsulated in erythrocytes in elderly patients with Philadelphia chromosome negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia: The GRASPALL/GRAALL-SA2-2008 study. Am J Hematol. 2015; 90(9):811-818.

9. Kontos S, Hubbell J A. Improving protein pharmacokinetics by engineering erythrocyte affinity. Mol Pharm. 2010; 7(6):2141-2147.

10. Zaitsev S, Spitzer D, Murciano J C, et al. Sustained thromboprophylaxis mediated by an RBC-targeted pro-urokinase zymogen activated at the site of clot formation. Blood. 2010; 115(25):5241-5248.

11. Shi J, Kundrat L, Pishesha N, et al. Engineered red blood cells as carriers for systemic delivery of a wide array of functional probes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014; 111(28):10131-10136.

12. Fesnak A D, June C H, Levine B L. Engineered T cells: the promise and challenges of cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016; 16(9):566-581.

13. Kontos S, Kourtis I C, Dane K Y, Hubbell J A. Engineering antigens for in situ erythrocyte binding induces T-cell deletion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013; 110(1):E60-68.

14. Grimm A J, Kontos S, Diaceri G, Quaglia-Thermes X, Hubbell J A. Memory of tolerance and induction of regulatory T cells by erythrocyte-targeted antigens. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:15907.

15. Lorentz K M, Kontos S, Diaceri G, Henry H, Hubbell J A. Engineered binding to erythrocytes induces immunological tolerance to E. coli asparaginase. Sci Adv. 2015; 1(6):e1500112.

16. Villa C H, Pan D C, Zaitsev S, Cines D B, Siegel D L, Muzykantov V R. Delivery of drugs bound to erythrocytes: new avenues for an old intravascular carrier. Ther Deliv. 2015; 6(7):795-826.

17. Murciano J C, Medinilla S, Eslin D, Atochina E, Cines D B, Muzykantov V R. Prophylactic fibrinolysis through selective dissolution of nascent clots by tPA-carrying erythrocytes. Nat Biotechnol. 2003; 21(8):891-896.

18. Ganguly K, Krasik T, Medinilla S, et al. Blood clearance and activity of erythrocyte-coupled fibrinolytics. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005; 312(3):1106-1113.

19. Gersh K C, Zaitsev S, Cines D B, Muzykantov V, Weisel J W. Flow-dependent channel formation in clots by an erythrocyte-bound fibrinolytic agent. Blood. 2011; 117(18):4964-4967.

20. Zaitsev S, Kowalska M A, Neyman M, et al. Targeting recombinant thrombomodulin fusion protein to red blood cells provides multifaceted thromboprophylaxis. Blood. 2012; 119(20):4779-4785.

21. Carnemolla R, Villa C H, Greineder C F, et al. Targeting thrombomodulin to circulating red blood cells augments its protective effects in models of endotoxemia and ischemia-reperfusion injury. FASEB J. 2017; 31(2):761-770.

22. Kina T, Ikuta K, Takayama E, et al. The monoclonal antibody TER-119 recognizes a molecule associated with glycophorin A and specifically marks the late stages of murine erythroid lineage. Br J Haematol. 2000; 109(2):280-287.

23. Sahoo K, Koralege R S, Flynn N, et al. Nanoparticle Attachment to Erythrocyte Via the Glycophorin A Targeted ERY1 Ligand Enhances Binding without Impacting Cellular Function. Pharm Res. 2016; 33(5):1191-1203.

24. Knowles D W, Chasis J A, Evans E A, Mohandas N. Cooperative action between band 3 and glycophorin A in human erythrocytes: immobilization of band 3 induced by antibodies to glycophorin A. Biophys J. 1994; 66(5):1726-1732.

25. Pasvol G, Chasis J A, Mohandas N, Anstee D J, Tanner M J, Merry A H. Inhibition of malarial parasite invasion by monoclonal antibodies against glycophorin A correlates with reduction in red cell membrane deformability. Blood. 1989; 74(5):1836-1843.

26. Chasis J A, Reid M E, Jensen R H, Mohandas N. Signal transduction by glycophorin A: role of extracellular and cytoplasmic domains in a modulatable process. J Cell Biol. 1988; 107(4):1351-1357.

27. Chasis J A, Mohandas N, Shohet S B. Erythrocyte membrane rigidity induced by glycophorin A-ligand interaction. Evidence for a ligand-induced association between glycophorin A and skeletal proteins. J Clin Invest. 1985; 75(6):1919-1926.

28. Paulitschke M, Nash G B, Anstee D J, Tanner M J, Gratzer W B. Perturbation of red blood cell membrane rigidity by extracellular ligands. Blood. 1995; 86(1):342-348.

29. Head D J, Lee Z E, Swallah M M, Avent N D. Ligation of CD47 mediates phosphatidylserine expression on erythrocytes and a concomitant loss of viability in vitro. Br J Haematol. 2005; 130(5):788-790.

30. Khoory J, Estanislau J, Elkhal A, et al. Ligation of Glycophorin A Generates Reactive Oxygen Species Leading to Decreased Red Blood Cell Function. PLoS One. 2016; 11(1):e0141206.

31. Ballas S K, Mohandas N, Clark M R, Shohet S B. Rheological properties of antibody-coated red cells. Transfusion. 1984; 24(2):124-129.

32. Lizcano A, Secundino I, Dohrmann S, et al. Erythrocyte sialoglycoproteins engage Siglec-9 on neutrophils to suppress activation. Blood. 2017; 129(23):3100-3110.

33. Schofield A E, Reardon D M, Tanner M J. Defective anion transport activity of the abnormal band 3 in hereditary ovalocytic red blood cells. Nature. 1992; 355(6363):836-838.

34. Rojewski M T, Schrezenmeier H, Flegel W A. Tissue distribution of blood group membrane proteins beyond red cells: evidence from cDNA libraries. Transfus Apher Sci. 2006; 35(1):71-82.

35. Blancher A, Roubinet F, Reid M E, Socha W W, Bailly P, Benard P. Characterization of a macaque anti-Rh17-like monoclonal antibody. Vox Sang. 1998; 75(1):58-62.

36. Bruce L J, Ring S M, Anstee D J, Reid M E, Wilkinson S, Tanner M J. Changes in the blood group Wright antigens are associated with a mutation at amino acid 658 in human erythrocyte band 3: a site of interaction between band 3 and glycophorin A under certain conditions. Blood. 1995; 85(2):541-547.

37. Greineder C F, Johnston I H, Villa C H, et al. ICAM-1-targeted thrombomodulin mitigates tissue-factor driven inflammatory thrombosis in a human endothelialized microfluidic model. Blood Advances. 2017; 1(18):1452-1465.

38. Siegel D L R M, Lee H, Blancher A. Scientific Section. Transfusion. 1999; 39(S10):1S-123 S.

39. Roback J D. Technical Manual: American Association of Blood Banks (AABB); 2014.

40. Pan D, Vargas-Morales O, Zern B, et al. The Effect of Polymeric Nanoparticles on Biocompatibility of Carrier Red Blood Cells. PLoS One. 2016; 11(3):e0152074.

41. Baskurt O K, Meiselman H J. Data reduction methods for ektacytometry in clinical hemorheology. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2013; 54(1):99-107.

42. Huang C H, Reid M E, Xie S S, Blumenfeld 00. Human red blood cell Wright antigens: a genetic and evolutionary perspective on glycophorin A-band 3 interaction. Blood. 1996; 87(9):3942-3947.

43. Chou S T, Westhoff C M. The Rh and RhAG blood group systems. Immunohematology. 2010; 26(4):178-186.

44. Gao S H, Huang K, Tu H, Adler A S. Monoclonal antibody humanness score and its applications. BMC Biotechnol. 2013; 13:55.

45. Lomas-Francis C, Olsson M L. The blood group antigen factsbook: Elsevier/Academic Press; 2012.

46. Jokiranta T S, Men S. Biotinylation of monoclonal antibodies prevents their ability to activate the classical pathway of complement. J Immunol. 1993; 151(4):2124-2131.

47. Burton N M, Bruce L J. Modelling the structure of the red cell membrane. Biochem Cell Biol. 2011; 89(2):200-215.

48. Westhoff C M. Deciphering the function of the Rh family of proteins. Transfusion. 2005; 45(2 Suppl):117S-121S.

49. Flatt J F, Musa R H, Ayob Y, et al. Study of the D-phenotype reveals erythrocyte membrane alterations in the absence of RHCE. British Journal of Haematology. 2012; 158(2):262-273.

50. Ripoche P, Bertrand O, Gane P, Birkenmeier C, Colin Y, Cartron J P. Human Rhesus-associated glycoprotein mediates facilitated transport of NH(3) into red blood cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004; 101(49):17222-17227.

51. Gruswitz F, Chaudhary S, Ho J D, et al. Function of human Rh based on structure of RhCG at 2.1 A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010; 107(21):9638-9643.

52. Levi M. Recombinant soluble thrombomodulin: coagulation takes another chance to reduce sepsis mortality. J Thromb Haemost. 2015; 13(4):505-507.

53. Fay M E, Myers D R, Kumar A, et al. Cellular softening mediates leukocyte demargination and trafficking, thereby increasing clinical blood counts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016; 113(8):1987-1992.

54. Watts T, Barigou M, Nash G B. Comparative rheology of the adhesion of platelets and leukocytes from flowing blood: why are platelets so small? Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2013; 304(11):H1483-1494.

55. Chu H, McKenna M M, Krump N A, et al. Reversible binding of hemoglobin to band 3 constitutes the molecular switch that mediates 02 regulation of erythrocyte properties. Blood. 2016; 128(23):2708-2716.

56. Kalfa T A, Pushkaran S, Mohandas N, et al. Rac GTPases regulate the morphology and deformability of the erythrocyte cytoskeleton. Blood. 2006; 108(12):3637-3645.

57. Wautier M P, El Nemer W, Gane P, et al. Increased adhesion to endothelial cells of erythrocytes from patients with polycythemia vera is mediated by laminin alpha5 chain and Lu/BCAM. Blood. 2007; 110(3):894-901.

58. Glodek A M, Mirchev R, Golan D E, et al. Ligation of complement receptor 1 increases erythrocyte membrane deformability. Blood. 2010; 116(26):6063-6071.

59. Ferru E, Giger K, Pantaleo A, et al. Regulation of membrane-cytoskeletal interactions by tyrosine phosphorylation of erythrocyte band 3. Blood. 2011; 117(22):5998-6006.

60. Brody J P, Han Y, Austin R H, Bitensky M. Deformation and flow of red blood cells in a synthetic lattice: evidence for an active cytoskeleton. Biophys J. 1995; 68(6):2224-2232.

61. Shields M, La Celle P, Waugh R E, Scholz M, Peters R, Passow H. Effects of intracellular Ca2+ and proteolytic digestion of the membrane skeleton on the mechanical properties of the red blood cell membrane. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1987; 905(1):181-194.

62. Nguyen D B, Wagner-Britz L, Maia S, et al. Regulation of phosphatidylserine exposure in red blood cells. Cellular physiology and biochemistry: international journal of experimental cellular physiology, biochemistry, and pharmacology. 2011; 28(5):847-856.

63. Head D J, Lee Z E, Poole J, Avent N D. Expression of phosphatidylserine (PS) on wild-type and Gerbich variant erythrocytes following glycophorin-C(GPC) ligation. Br J Haematol. 2005; 129(1):130-137.

64. Sosale N G, Rouhiparkouhi T, Bradshaw A M, Dimova R, Lipowsky R, Discher D E. Cell rigidity and shape override CD47's “self”-signaling in phagocytosis by hyperactivating myosin-II. Blood. 2015; 125(3):542-552.

All publications cited in this specification are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties as is U.S. Provisional patent Application No. 62/594,909, filed Dec. 5, 2017. Similarly, the SEQ ID NOs which are referenced herein and which appear in the appended Sequence Listing are incorporated by reference. While the invention has been described with reference to particular embodiments, it will be appreciated that modifications can be made without departing from the spirit of the invention. Such modifications are intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims.

TABLE 1

Anti-RHCE antibody CDRs

VH
VL

SID

SID

SID

SID

SID

SID

Clone
CDR1
NO.
CDR2
NO.
CDR3
NO.
CDR1
NO.
CDR2
NO.
CDR3
NO.

KP3-
GASISNYW
1
IDGSTYST
2
AREGQDPLAPTLATSGSGLDS
3
ENVNNY
4
AAS
5
QHSYGTPLT
6

11

KP3-
GASISNYW
7
IDGSTYST
8
AREGQDPLAPTLATSGSGLDS
9
QDIYSN
10
GAS
11
QEVHRNPFT
12

14

KP3-
GAPISNYW
13
IDGSIYTT
14
AREGQNPLVPTYGSTGFGLDF
15
QGISSW
16
KAS
17
QQYSSSPRT
18

17

TABLE 2

Anti-RHCE antibody heavy and light variable chain protein sequences

Clone
VH
SID
VL
SID

KP3-
EVQLLESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCGVSGASISNYWWSWIRQSPGKGL
19
AAELQMTQSPSSLSASLGDRVTITCRASENVNNYLH
20

11
EWIGEIDGSTYSTHYNPSLKGRVTISKDASKNQLSLRLTSVTAADT

WYQQKPGKAPKLLIYAASTLQSGVPSRFSGSGSGTD

AVYYCAREGQDPLAPTLATSGSGLDSWGRGLVVSVSS

FTLTISSLQPEDVATYYCQHSYGTPLTFGGGTKVEIK

KP3-
EVQLLESGPGLGKPSETLSLTCGVSGASISNYWWSWIRQSPGKGL
21
AAELQMTQSPSALSASVGDRVTISCRASQDIYSNLA
22

14
EWIGEIDGSTYSTHYNPSLKGRVTISKDASKNQLSLRLTSVTAADT

WYQQKPGKAPKLLIYGASRLQSGIPSRFSASGAGTE

AVYYCAREGQDPLAPTLATSGSGLDSWGRGLVVTVSS

FTLTISGLQPEDSAVYYCQEVHRNPFTFGPGTKLDIK

KP3-
EVQLLESGPGLLKPSETLSLTCAVSGAPISNYWWSWIRQSPGKGL
23
AAELTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTITCQASQGISSWLAWY
24

17
EWIGEIDGSIYTTYYNPSLKSRVAISKDTSKNRLSLKLTSVTAADTAV

QQKPGKAPKLLIYKASSLQSGVPSRFSGSGSGTDFTL

YYCAREGQNPLVPTYGSTGFGLDFWGHGLAVTVSS

TISSLQSEDFATYYCQQYSSSPRTFGQGTKVEIK

TABLE 3

Anti-RHCE antibody heavy and light variable chain coding sequences

Clone
VH
SID
VL
SID

KP3-
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCAGGTCCAGGACTGGTGAAGCCTTCGG
25
GCGGCCGAGCTCCAGATGACCCAGTCTCCATCCTCCCTATCTGCATC
26

11
AGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCGGTGTCTCTGGTGCCTCCATCAGTAATT

GCTGGGAGACAGAGTCACCATCACTTGCAGGGCAAGTGAGAACGTT

ACTGGTGGAGTTGGATCCGCCAGTCCCCAGGGAAGGGACTGGAGT

AACAACTATTTACATTGGTATCAGCAGAAACCAGGGAAAGCCCCTA

GGATTGGGGAGATCGATGGTAGTACTTATAGCACCCACTACAACCC

AGCTCCTGATCTATGCTGCATCCACTTTGCAAAGTGGGGTCCCATCA

CTCCCTCAAGGGTCGAGTCACCATTTCAAAAGACGCGTCCAAGAATC

AGGTTCAGCGGCAGTGGATCTGGGACAGATTTCACTCTCACCATCA

AGTTGTCCCTGAGGCTGACCTCTGTGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCCGT

GCAGCCTGCAGCCTGAAGATGTTGCAACTTATTACTGTCAGCATAGT

GTATTATTGTGCGAGAGAGGGACAGGATCCTTTAGCGCCTACCCTT

TATGGTACCCCGCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCAAGGTGGAGATCA

GCCACGTCGGGTTCGGGGTTGGATTCCTGGGGCCGAGGGCTCGTCG

AACGA

TCTCCGTCTCCTCC

KP3-
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCAGGCCCAGGACTGGGGAAGCCTTCG
27
GCGGCCGAGCTCCAGATGACCCAGTCTCCATCTGCCTTGTCTGCATC
28

14
GAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCGGTGTCTCTGGTGCCTCCATCAGCAA

TGTAGGAGACAGAGTCACCATCTCTTGCCGGGCAAGTCAGGACATT

TTACTGGTGGAGCTGGATCCGCCAGTCCCCAGGGAAGGGACTGGA

TATAGTAATTTAGCGTGGTATCAACAGAAACCAGGGAAAGCCCCTA

GTGGATTGGGGAGATCGATGGTAGTACTTATAGCACCCACTACAAC

AGCTCCTGATCTATGGCGCATCCAGATTGCAAAGTGGGATTCCCTCT

CCCTCCCTCAAGGGTCGAGTCACCATTTCAAAAGACGCGTCCAAGAA

CGGTTCAGTGCTAGCGGAGCTGGGACAGAATTCACTCTCACCATCA

TCAGTTGTCCCTGAGGCTGACCTCTGTGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCC

GCGGCCTGCAACCTGAAGATTCTGCAGTATATTACTGTCAAGAGGTT

GTGTATTATTGTGCGAGAGAGGGACAGGATCCTTTAGCGCCTACCC

CATCGTAACCCATTCACTTTCGGCCCCGGGACCAAACTGGATATCAA

TTGCCACGTCGGGTTCGGGGCTGGATTCCTGGGGCCGAGGCCTCGT

ACGA

CGTCACCGTCTCCTCC

KP3-
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCGGGCCCAGGACTGCTGAAGCCATCG
29
GCGGCCGAGCTCACCCAGTCTCCATCTTCCTTGTCTGCATCTGTAGG
30

17
GAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCGCTGTCTCTGGTGCCCCCATCAGTAA

AGACAGAGTCACCATCACTTGCCAAGCCAGTCAGGGTATTAGCAGC

CTACTGGTGGAGTTGGATTCGTCAGTCCCCAGGGAAGGGACTGGAG

TGGTTAGCCTGGTATCAGCAGAAACCAGGGAAAGCCCCTAAGCTCC

TGGATTGGGGAGATCGATGGTAGTATATATACTACCTACTACAACCC

TGATCTATAAGGCATCCAGTTTGCAAAGTGGGGTCCCATCAAGGTTC

CTCCCTCAAGAGTCGAGTCGCCATTTCAAAGGACACGTCCAAGAACC

AGCGGCAGTGGATCTGGGACAGATTTCACTCTCACCATCAGCAGCCT

GGCTGTCCCTGAAACTGACCTCTGTGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCCGT

GCAGTCTGAAGATTTTGCAACTTATTACTGTCAACAGTATAGCAGTA

CTATTATTGTGCGAGAGAGGGCCAGAACCCTCTAGTGCCTACATATG

GCCCTCGGACGTTCGGCCAAGGGACCAAGGTGGAAATCAAACGA

GTTCGACGGGATTCGGATTGGATTTCTGGGGCCATGGACTCGCCGT

CACCGTCTCGTCA

TABLE 4

Anti-BAND 3 antibody CDRs

VH
VL

Clone
CDR1
SID
CDR2
SID
CDR3
SID
CDR1
SID
CDR
SID
CDR3
SID

KP2-
GDSISSGL
31
IGGSRGN
64
ARRAPYWGYSYL
97
QSIGSS
130
SAY
163
QQYNDLLPLT
196

01
G

T

DY

KP2-
GGSLSGG
32
IYDSRWT
65
ARRGGYGASYFD
98
QSIGSH
131
SVS
164
QQYNDLLPLT
197

02
YD

T

L

KP2-
GYSLSSAY
33
IGGSRDN
66
VRRATYGNSYFD
99
QSVGS
132
SAY
165
QQYNDLLPLT
198

04
G

V

S

H

KP2-
GSSLSSAY
34
IGGSRDN
67
AQRGAYGYSYFD
100
QSVGS
133
SIS
166
QQYNDFFPLT
199

06
G

T

Y

S

KP2-
GDSISSGY
35
IGGSRGT
68
ARDSGYSFRYFDF
101
QSVGS
134
SAY
167
QQYNDLLPLT
200

07
G

T

N

KP2-
GYSISSGY
36
IGGSRDN
69
ARDGGYGSRYIVI
102
QSIGTS
135
SAY
168
QQYNDLLPLT
201

08
G

T

DS

KP2-
GYSISSGY
37
IGGSRGN
70
ARDSGYNTRYFD
103
QSVGS
136
GAS
169
QQYNDLLPLT
202

09
G

T

Y

R

KP2-
GSSLSSAY
38
IGGSRDN
71
AQRGAYGYSYFD
104
QSLGS
137
GAS
170
QQYNDFPPLT
203

11
G

T

Y

R

KP2-
GGSISGGY
39
IYDSRGT
72
ARRAGYGSAYFD
105
QSIGT
138
TAY
171
QQYNDLLPLT
204

13
D

T

Y

N

KP2-
GSSLSSAY
40
IGGSRDN
73
ARRGAFGNSYFD
106
ESVGS
139
SAS
172
QQYNDLLPLT
205

14
G

T

Y

S

KP2-
GGSISGGY
41
IYDSRGT
74
ARRAGYGSAYFD
107
QTVGR
140
SAH
173
CQQYNDLLPL
206

15
D

T

Y

N

TF

KP2-
GYSISSGY
42
IGGSRGN
75
ARDGGYGERYLE
108
QSIGSS
141
FAS
174
HQSSSFPWT
207

17
G

A

F

KP2-
GNSISSGY
43
IGGSRSN
76
ARDWGYGYRYL
109
QSIGSS
142
YAS
175
QQSSSFPFT
208

18
G

T

DY

KP2-
GGSINGGY
44
IYGSRGT
77
AKRVGYGNSYFD
110
QSVSS
143
DAS
176
CQQYNDLLPL
209

19
D

T

S

R

TF

KP2-
GGSISGGY
45
IYDSRGT
78
ARRAGYGSAYFD
111
QSVGS
144
SGS
177
QQYNDLLPLT
210

20
D

T

Y

N

KP2-
GDSISSGY
46
IGGSRGN
79
ARRAPYWGYSYL
112
QSIGT
145
SAY
178
QQYNDLLPLT
211

22
G

T

DY

N

KP2-
GSSLSSAY
47
IGGSRDN
80
AQRGAYGYSYFD
113
QTVGR
146
SAY
179
QQYNDLLPLT
212

23
G

T

Y

N

KP2-
GYSISSGY
48
FGGSRG
81
ARDSGYSRRWVD
114
QSVGT
14
SAY7
180
QQYNDLLPLT
213

24
G

NT

Y

N

KP3-
GFSISSDY
49
IGGSRGN
82
ARDWGYGYRYF
115
QSVGS
148
YAS
181
QQTNTFPWT
214

01
G

T

DF

N

KP3-
YSISSGYG
50
IGGSRGN
83
ARDSGYNTRYFD
116
QSVGS
14
SAY9
182
QQYNDLLPLT
215

02

T

Y

N

KP3-
GSSLSSAY
51
IGGSRDN
84
AQRGAYGYSYFD
117
QSVGS
150
GAY
183
QQYNDLLPLT
216

03
G

T

Y

Y

KP3-
GSSLSSAY
52
IGGSRDN
85
AQRGAYGYSYFD
118
QSVGS
151
SAY
184
HQYNDLLPLT
217

05
G

T

Y

S

KP3-
GGSISSAS
53
ISGSGSP
86
ARRGGYGNRYFD
119
QSVGS
152
SAY
185
QQYNDLLPLT
218

06

T

Y

S

KP3-
GSSLSSAY
54
IGGSRDN
87
AQRGAYGYSYFD
120
QSIGSN
153
SAN
186
QQYNDFLPLT
219

07
G

T

Y

KP3-
GSSLSSAY
55
IGGSRDN
88
AQRGAYGYSYFD
121
QSLGG
154
GAS
187
QQYNDFLPLT
220

08
G

T

Y

R

KP3-
SLSLSSGF
56
IGGSRDN
89
VTIHGYRNWYLD
122
QSIGTS
155
SAY
188
QQYNDLLPLT
221

09
A

V

H

KP3-
GNSISSAY
57
IGGSRGT
90
ARDSGYSFRYFDF
123
QSIGT
156
SAY
189
QQYNDLLPLT
222

12
G

T

N

KP3-
GGSLSGG
58
IYDSRGT
91
ARRGGYGASYFD
124
QSVGS
157
SAS
190
QQYNDFFPLT
223

13
YD

T

L

N

KP3-
GSSLSSAY
59
IGGNRD
92
AQRGAYGYSYFD
125
QTVGR
158
SAH
191
QQYNDLLPLT
224

15
G

NT

Y

N

KP3-
GSSLSSAY
60
IGGSRDN
93
AQRGAYGYSYFD
126
QSLGS
159
GAS
192
QQYNDFLPLT
225

16
G

T

Y

R

KP3-
GYSLSSAY
61
IGGSRDN
94
VRRATYGNSYFD
127
QSVGS
160
SAH
193
QQYNDLLPLT
226

18
G

V

S

Y

KP3-
GGSLSGG
62
IYDSRGT
95
ARRVGYGATYFD
128
QSVGS
161
SAN
194
QQYNDLLPLT
227

19
YD

T

L

N

KP3-
GYSISSGF
63
IGGSRDN
96
ARRGAYGNSYFD
129
QSVGS
162
SAY
195
QQYNDLLPLT
228

20
A

T

F

N

TABLE 5

Anti-Band 3 antibody heavy and light variable chain protein sequences

Clone
VH
SID
VL
SID

KP2-
EVQLLESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCAVSGDSISSGLGWSWIRQTPGKGLEW
229
AAELTQSPATLSLSPGETATLSCRASQSIGSSLAWYQQRPGQA
262

01
IGYIGGSRGNTNYNPSFKSRVTISRDTSKNQFSLRLSSMTAADTAVYYC

PKLLVHSAYFRAAGIPDRFSGSGSRTDFTLTISSLEPEDVGVYH

ARRAPYWGYSYLDYWGQGVLVTVSS

CQQYNDLLPLTFGGGTKVELK

KP2-
EVQLLESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCAVSGGSLSGGYDWSWIRQSSRKGLE
230
AAELTQSPATLSLFPGETATLSCRASQSIGSHLAWYQQKPGQA
263

02
WIGYIYDSRVVTTNYNPSLKKRVTISIDTSKNQFSLNLKSVTAADTAVYYC

PKLLVHSVSFRATGIPDRFRGSGSRTDFTLTISSLEPEDVGVYH

ARRGGYGASYFDLWGQGVLVTVSS

CQQYNDLLPLTFGGGTKVEIK

KP2-
EVQLLESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCAVSGYSLSSAYGWNWIRQSPGKGLE
231
AAELTLTQSPATLSLSPGETATLSCRASQSVGSHLAWYQQKPG
264

04
WIGSIGGSRDNVNYNPSLKRRVTISKDTSTNHFSLRLSSVTAADTAVYY

QAPKLLVHSAYFRATGIPDRFSGSGSRTDFTLTISSLEPEDVGV

CVRRATYGNSYFDSWGQGVQVTVSS

YHCQQYNDLLPLTFGGGTKVEIK

KP2-
EVQLLESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCTVSGSSLSSAYGWNWIRQPPGKGLE
232
AAELTQSPATLSLSPGETATLSCRASQSVGSSLAWYQQKPGQ
265

06
WIGSIGGSRDNTNYNPSLKRRVTISKDTSKNQFSLKLKSVTAADTAVYY

APKLLVHSISVRATGIPDRFSGSGSRTDFTLTITSLEPEDVGVYH

CAQRGAYGYSYFDYWGQGVLVAVSS

CQQYNDFFPLTFGGGTKVEIK

KP2-
EVQLLESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCAVSGDSISSGYGWHWIRQVPGRGLE
233
AAELVMTQSPATLSLSPGETATLSCRASQSVGSNLAWYQQKP
266

07
WIGSIGGSRGTTNYNPSLKSRVTISEDTSKNQFSLSLRSVSAADTAVYF

GQAPKLLVHSAYFRATGIPDRFSGSGSRTDFTLTISSLEPEDVG

CARDSGYSFRYFDFWGQGVLVTVSS

VYHCQQYNDLLPLTFGGGTKVEIN

KP2-
EVQLLESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCAVSGYSISSGYGWNWIRQPPGKGLEW
234
AAELTQSPATLSLSPGEAATLSCRASQSIGTSLAWYQQKPGQA
267

08
IGSIGGSRDNTNYNPSLKSRVTLSKDTSKNHFSLRLRSVTAADTAVYYC

PRLLVHSAYFRATGIADRFSGSGSRTDFTLTISSLEPEDVGVYY

ARDGGYGSRYMDSWGQGVLVAVSS

CQQYNDLLPLTFGGGTKVEIK

KP2-
EVQLLESGPGLVRPSETLSLTCAVSGYSISSGYGWHWIRQPPGKGLES
235
AAELTQSPATLSLSPGERATLSCRASQSVGSRLAWYQQKPGQ
268

09
LGYIGGSRGNTNYNPSLKSRVTISTDTSKNQFSLKLRSVTAADTAVYYC

APRLLIYGASSRATGIPDRFSGSGSRTDFTLTISSLEPEDVGVY

ARDSGYNTRYFDYWGQGVLVTVSS

HCQQYNDLLPLTFGGGTKVEIK

KP2-
EVQLQLPGPGLVKPSETLSLTCTVSGSSLSSAYGWNWIRQPPGKGLE
236
AAELTLTQSPATLSLSPGETATLSCRASQSLGSRLAWYQQKPG
269

11
WIGSIGGSRDNTNYNPSLKRRVTISKDTSKNQFSLKLKSVTAADTAVYY

QPPRLLIYGASTRATGIPDRFSGSGSRTDFTLTISSLEPEDVGV

CAQRGAYGYSYFDYWGQGVLVAVSS

YHCQQYNDFPPLTFGGGTKVEIK

KP2-
EVQLLESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCAVSGGSISGGYDWSWIRQSPGKGLE
237
AAELTQSPATLSLAPGETATLSCRASQSIGTNLAWYHQKPGQP
270

13
WIGYIYDSRGTTNYNPSLRKRVAISIDTSRNQFSLNLRSLTAADTAVYYC

PKLLVHTAYVRATGIPNRFSGSGSRTDFTLTINSLQPEDVGVYH

ARRAGYGSAYFDYWGQGVLVTVSS

CQQYNDLLPLTFGGGTKIDIK

KP2-
EVQLLESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCAVSGSSLSSAYGWNWIRQAPGKRLE
238
AAELTQSPATLSLSPGETATLSCRASESVGSSLAWYHQKPGQA
271

14
WIGFIGGSRDNTNYNPSLRSRVTISKDTSKNHFSLKLTSVTAADTAVYF

PRLLVHSASFRATGIPDRFSGSGSRTEFTLTVSSLEPEDVGVYH

CARRGAFGNSYFDYWGQGVPVTVSS

CQQYNDLLPLTFGGGTKVEIK

KP2-
EVQLLESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCAVSGGSISGGYDWSWIRQSPGKGLE
239
AAELTQSPATLSVSPGEAATLSCRASQTVGRNLAWYQQKPGQ
272

15
WIGYIYDSRGTTNYNPSLRKRVTISIDTSRNQFSLKLRSLTAADTAVYYC

APKLLVHSAHFRATGIPDRFSGSGSGTDFTLTISSLEPEDAGIYH

ARRAGYGSAYFDYWGQGVLVTVSS

CQQYNDLLPLTFGGGTKVEIK

KP2-
EVQLLESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCAVSGYSISSGYGWTWIRQPPGKGLEW
240
AAELTQSPAFRSVTLKEKVTITCQASQSIGSSLHWYQQKPDQS
273

17
IGYIGGSRGNANYNPSLKSRVTISKDTSKNQFSLKLTSVTAADTAVYYC

PKLLIKFASQSISGVPSRFSGSGYGTDFTLTINSLEAEDAATYYC

ARDGGYGERYLEFWGQGALVTVSS

HQSSSFPVVTFGQGTKVEIK

KP2-
EVQLLESGPGLVRPSETLSLTCTVSGNSISSGYGWNWIRQPPGKGLELI
241
AAELTQSPAFRSVTLKEKVTITCQASQSIGSSLHWYQQKPDQS
274

18
GYIGGSRSNTNYNPSLKSRVTISIDTSKNQFSLKLRSVTAADTAVYYCA

PKLLIKYASQSISGVPSRFSGSGSGTDFTLTINSLEAEDAATYYC

RDWGYGYRYLDYWGQGVLVTVSS

QQSSSFPFTFGPGTKLDIK

KP2-
EVQLLESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCAVSGGSINGGYDWTWIRQSPGKGLQ
242
AAELTLTQSPATLSLSPGERATLSCRASQSVSSRLAWYQQKPG
275

19
WIGWIYGSRGTTNYNPSLRNRVTISIDTSRNQFSLRLSSLTAADTAVYY

QAPRLLIYDASSRVTGIPDRFSGSGSGTDFTLTISSLEPEDVGV

CAKRVGYGNSYFDSWGQGVLVTVSS

YHCQQYNDLLPLTFGGGTKVEIK

KP2-
EVQLLESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCAVSGGSISGGYDWSWIRQSPGKGLE
243
AAELTQSPATLSLSPGETATLSCRASQSVGSNLAWYQQKPGQ
276

20
WIGYIYDSRGTTNYNPSLRKRVTISIDTSRNQFSLKLRSLTAADTAVYYC

APKLLVHSGSVRATGIPDRFSGSGSRTDFTLITSSLEPEDVGVY

ARRAGYGSAYFDYWGQGVLVTVSS

HCQQYNDLLPLTFGGGTKVEIK

KP2-
EVQLLESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCAVSGDSISSGYGWSWIRQTPGKGLEW
244
AAELTLTQSPATLSLAPGETATLSCRASQSIGTNLAWYHQKPG
277

22
IGYIGGSRGNTNYNPSLKSRVTISKDTSKNQFSLKLSSVTAADTAVYYC

QSPKLLVHSAYVRATGIPDRFSGSGSRTDFTLTINSLQPEDVGV

ARRAPYWGYSYLDYWGQGVLVTVSS

YHCQQYNDLLPLTFGGGTKVEIK

KP2-
EVQLLESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCTVSGSSLSSAYGWNWIRQPPGKGLEWIG
245
AAELTLTQSPATLSLSPGETATLSCRASQTVGRNLAWYQQRPGQ
278

23
SIGGSRDNTNYNPSLKRRVTISKDTSKNQFSLKLKSVTAADTAVYYCAQR

APNLLVHSAYFRATGIPDRFSGSGSGTDFTLTISSLEPEDAGVYHC

GAYGYSYFDYWGQGVLVAVSS

QQYNDLLPLTFGGGTKVEIK

KP2-
EVQLLESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCTVSGYSISSGYGWGWIRQSPGKGLEW
246
AAELTQSPATLSLAPGETATLSCRASQSVGTNLAWYHQKPGQ
279

24
IGYFGGSRGNTNYNPSLKSRVTISQDTSKNQFSLKLKSVTAADTGIYYC

PPKLLVHSAYVRATGIPDRFSGSGSRTDFTLTINSLQPEDVGVY

ARDSGYSRRWVDYWGQGVLVTVSS

HCQQYNDLLPLTFGGGTKIDIK

KP3-
EVQLLESGPGLVKPLETLSLTCDVSGFSISSDYGWSWIRQPPGKGLELI
247
AAELTQSPAFRSVSLKETVTLTCQASQSVGSNLHWYQQKPAQ
280

01
GYIGGSRGNTNYNPSLKSRVTISRDTSKNQFSLKLTSVTAADTAVXYCA

SPKLLIKYASQSISGVPSRFSGTGSGTDFTLTINSLEAEDAATYY

RDWGYGYRYFDFWGQGVLVTVSS

CQQTNTFPVVTFGQGTRVEIK

KP3-
EVQLLESGPGLVRPSETLSLTCAVSGYSISSGYGWHWIRQPPGKGLESLG
248
AAELTQSPATLSLSPGETATLSCRASQSVGSNLAWYQQKPGQA
281

02
YIGGSRGNTNYNPSLKSRVTISTDTSKNQFSLKLRSVTAADTAVYYCARDS

PKLLVHSAYFRATGIPDRFSGSGSRTDFTLTISSLEPEDVGVYHCQ

GYNTRYFDYWGQGVLVTVSS

QYNDLLPLTFGGGTKVEIK

KP3-
EVQLLESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCTVSGSSLSSAYGWNWIRQPPGKGLE
249
AAELTQSPATLSLSPGETATLSCRASQSVGSYLAWYQQKPGQ
282

03
WIGSIGGSRDNTNYNPSLKRRVTISKDTSKNQFSLKLKSVTAADTAVYY

APKLLVHGAYFRAAGIPDRFTGSGSRTDFTLTISSLEPEDVGIYH

CAQRGAYGYSYFDYWGQGVLVAVSS

CQQYNDLLPLTFGGGTKVEIK

KP3-
EVQLLESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCTVSGSSLSSAYGWNWIRQPPGKGLE
250
AAELTQSPATLSLSPGETATLSCRASQSVGSSLAWYQQKPGQ
283

05
WIGSIGGSRDNTNYNPSLKRRVTISKDTSKNQFSLKLKSVTAADTAVYY

APKLLVHSAYFRATGIPDRFSGSGSRTDFTLTISSLEPEDVGVY

CAQRGAYGYSYFDYWGQGVLVAVSS

HCHQYNDLLPLTFGGGTKVEIK

KP3-
EVQLLESGPGLVRPSETLSVTCDVSGGSISSASWSWIRQAPGKRLEWI
251
AAELTQSPATLSLSPGETATLSCRASQSVGSSLAWYQQKPGQ
284

06
GAISGSGSPTNVNPSLKSRVTLSVDTSKNQLSLKLRSMTAADTAVYYCA

APKLLVHSAYFRATGIPDRFSGSGSRTDFTLTISSLEPEDVGVY

RRGGYGNRYFDYWGQGVAVTVSS

HCQQYNDLLPLTFGGGTKVEIK

KP3-
EVQLLESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCTVSGSSLSSAYGWNWIRQPPGKGLE
252
AAELVMTQSPATLSLSPGETATLSCRASQSIGSNLAWYQQKPG
285

07
WIGSIGGSRDNTNYNPSLKRRVTISKDTSKNQFSLKLKSVTAADTAVYY

QAPKLLVHSANIRATGIPDRFIGSGSRTDFTLTISSLEPEDVGVY

CAQRGAYGYSYFDYWGQGVLVTVSS

HCQQYNDFLPLTFGGGTKVEIK

KP3-
EVQLLESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCTVSGSSLSSAYGWNWIRQPPGKGLE
253
AAELTLTQSPATLSLSPGETATLSCRASQSLGGRLAWYQQKPG
286

08
WIGSIGGSRDNTNYNPSLKRRVTISKDTSKNQFSLKLKSVTAADTAVYY

QAPRLLIYGASTRATGIPDRFSGSGSRTEFTLTIAGLEPEDVGV

CAQRGAYGYSYFDYWGQGVLVAVSS

YHCQQYNDFLPLTFGGGTKVEIK

KP3-
EVQLLESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCAVSSLSLSSGFAWSWIRQPPGEGLEW
254
AAELTQSPAILSLSPGETATLSCRASQSIGTSLAWYQQKPGQA
287

09
IGSIGGSRDNVNYNPSLKSRVTISKDTSKNQFSLRLRSVTAADTAVYYC

PKLLVHSAYYRATDIPERFSGSGSRTDFTLTISSLEPEDVGVYH

VTIHGYRNWYLDHWGQGVLVTVST

CQQYNDLLPLTFGGGTKVEIK

KP3-
EVQLLESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCAVSGNSISSAYGWHWIRQVPGKGLEW
255
AAELTQSPATLSLAPGETATLSCRASQSIGTNLAWYHQKPGQP
288

12
IGSIGGSRGTTNYNPSLKSRGTISEDTSKNQFSLRLRSVSAADTAVYFC

PKLLVHSAYVRATGIPNRFSGSGSRTDFTLTINSLQPEDVGVYH

ARDSGYSFRYFDFWGRGVLVTVSS

CQQYNDLLPLTFGGGTKIDIK

KP3-
EVQLLESGPGLVRPSETLSLTCAVSGGSLSGGYDWSWIRQSPRKGLE
256
AAELTQSPATLSLSPGETATLSCRASQSVGSNLAWYQQKPGQ
289

13
WIGYIYDSRGTTNYNPSLKRRVTISIDTSKNQFSLNLKSVTAADTAVYYC

APKLLVHSASVRATGIPDRFSGSGSRTDFTLTISSLEPEDVGVY

ARRGGYGASYFDLWGQGVLVTVSS

HCQQYNDFFPLTFGGGTKVEIK

KP3-
EVQLLESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCTVSGSSLSSAYGWNWIRQPPGKGLE
257
AAELTQSPATLSVSPGEAATLSCRASQTVGRNLAWYQQKPGQ
290

15
WIGSIGGNRDNTNYNPSLKRRVTISKDTSKNQFSLKLKSVTAADTAVYY

APKLLVHSAHFRATGIPDRFSGSGSGTDFTLTISSLEPEDAGIYH

CAQRGAYGYSYFDYWGQGVLVAVSS

CQQYNDLLPLTFGGGTKVEIK

KP3-
EVQLLESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCTVSGSSLSSAYGWNWIRQPPGKGLE
258
AAELTQSPATLSLSPGETATLSCRASQSLGSRLAWYQQKPGQ
291

16
WIGSIGGSRDNTNYNPSLKRRVTISKDTSKNQFSLKLKSVTAADTAVYY

APRLLIYGASTRATGIPDRFSGSGSRTDFTLTISSLEPEDVGVYH

CAQRGAYGYSYFDYWGQGVLVAVSS

CQQYNDFLPLTFGGGTKVEIK

KP3-
EVQLLEWGPGLVKPSETLSLTCAVSGYSLSSAYGWNWIRQSPGKGLE
259
AAELTLTQSPATLSLSPGETATLSCRASQSVGSYLAWYQQKPG
292

18
WIGSIGGSRDNVNYNPSLKRRVTISKDTSTNHFSLRLSSVTAADTAVYY

QAPKLLVHSAHFRATGIPDRFSGSGSRTDFTLTISSLEPEDVGV

CVRRATYGNSYFDSWGQGVQVTVSS

YHCQQYNDLLPLTFGGGTKVEIK

KP3-
EVQLLESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCAVSGGSLSGGYDWYWIRQSPRKGLEY
260
AAELVMTQSPATLSLSPGETATLSCRASQSVGSNLAWYQQKP
293

19
IGYIYDSRGTTNYNPSLKNRVTISIDTSKNHFSLNLKSVTAADTAVYYCA

GQAPKLLVHSANFRATGISDRFSGSGSRTDFTLTISSLEPEDVG

RRVGYGATYFDLWGQGVLVTVSS

VYHCQQYNDLLPLTFGGGTKVEIK

KP3-
EVQLLESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCAVSGYSISSGFAWNWIRQTPGKGLEWI
261
AAELTQSPATLSLSPGETATLSCRASQSVGSNVAWYQQKPGQ
294

20
GYIGGSRDNTNYNPSLKSRVTISKDTSKNQFSLKLTSMTAADTAMYYCA

APKLLVHSAYYRATGIPDRFSGSGSRTDFTLTISSLEPEDVGVY

RRGAYGNSYFDFWGQGVPVTVSS

HCQQYNDLLPLTFGGGTKVEIK

TABLE 6

Anti-Band 3 antibody heavy and light variable chain coding sequences

Clone
VH
SID
VL
SID

KP2-01
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCGGGCCCAGGACTGGTGAAGC
295
GCGGCCGAGCTCACGCAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTTTGTCTCCA
296

CTTCGGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCGCTGTCTCTGGTGACT

GGGGAAACAGCCACCCTCTCCTGCAGGGCCAGTCAGAGTATTGGC

CCATCAGCAGTGGTTTGGGCTGGAGCTGGATCCGCCAGACC

AGCTCCTTAGCCTGGTACCAGCAGAGACCTGGGCAGGCTCCCAAG

CCAGGGAAGGGGCTGGAGTGGATTGGATACATCGGTGGTAG

CTCCTCGTCCATAGTGCATACTTCAGGGCCGCTGGCATCCCAGAC

TAGGGGCAACACCAACTACAACCCCTCGTTCAAGAGTCGAGT

AGGTTCAGCGGCAGCGGGTCTAGGACAGACTTCACTCTCACCATT

CACCATTTCAAGGGACACGTCCAAGAACCAGTTCTCCCTGAG

AGCAGCCTGGAGCCTGAAGATGTTGGAGTTTATCACTGTCAGCAG

GCTGTCCTCTATGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCCGTCTATTACT

TATAACGACTTGCTTCCGCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCAAGGTG

GTGCGAGAAGGGCCCCGTATTGGGGTTATTCCTATCTTGACT

GAACTCAAGCGA

ACTGGGGCCAGGGAGTCCTGGTCACCGTCTCCTCA

KP2-02
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCAGGTCCAGGACTGGTGAAGCC
329
GCGGCCGAGCTCACGCAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTTTGTTTCCA
297

TTCAGAGACCCTGTCGCTCACCTGCGCTGTCTCTGGAGGCTC

GGGGAAACAGCCACCCTCTCCTGCAGGGCCAGTCAGAGTATTGGC

TCTCAGCGGTGGGTATGACTGGAGCTGGATCCGCCAGTCCT

AGCCACTTAGCCTGGTACCAGCAGAAACCTGGGCAGGCTCCCAAG

CAAGAAAGGGGCTGGAGTGGATTGGCTATATCTATGATAGTC

CTCCTCGTCCATAGTGTATCCTTCAGGGCCACTGGCATCCCAGACA

GTTGGACCACCAACTACAACCCGTCCCTCAAGAAGCGCGTCA

GGTTCCGTGGCAGCGGGTCTAGGACAGACTTCACTCTCACCATTA

CCATTTCAATAGACACGTCCAAGAACCAGTTCTCCCTGAACC

GCAGCCTGGAACCTGAAGATGTTGGAGTTTATCACTGTCAGCAGTA

TCAAGTCTGTGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCCGTGTATTATTGTG

TAACGACTTACTTCCGCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCAAGGTGGA

CGAGACGAGGCGGCTACGGTGCCAGCTACTTTGACTTATGG

GATCAAACGA

GGCCAGGGAGTCCTGGTCACCGTCTCCTCA

KP2-04
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCGGGCCCAGGACTGGTGAAGC
330
GCGGCCGAGCTCACACTCACGCAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTTTG
298

CATCGGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCGCTGTCTCTGGTTACT

TCTCCAGGGGAAACAGCCACCCTCTCGTGCAGGGCCAGTCAGAGT

CCCTCAGCAGTGCTTATGGCTGGAACTGGATCCGACAGTCC

GTTGGCAGCCACTTAGCCTGGTACCAGCAGAAACCTGGACAGGCT

CCCGGGAAGGGGCTGGAGTGGATTGGGTCTATCGGTGGTAG

CCCAAGCTCCTCGTCCATAGTGCGTACTTCAGGGCCACTGGCATC

TAGGGATAATGTCAACTACAACCCCTCCCTCAAGAGGCGAGT

CCAGACAGGTTCAGTGGCAGCGGGTCTAGGACAGACTTCACTCTC

CACCATTTCAAAAGACACGTCCACGAACCACTTCTCCCTGAG

ACCATTAGCAGCCTGGAGCCTGAAGATGTTGGAGTTTATCACTGTC

GCTGAGTTCTGTGACGGCCGCGGACACGGCCGTGTATTATT

AGCAGTATAACGACTTGCTTCCGCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCA

GTGTGAGACGCGCGACCTACGGTAACAGCTACTTTGACTCCT

AGGTGGAGATCAAACGA

GGGGCCAGGGAGTCCAGGTCACGGTCTCTTCA

KP2-06
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCTGGCCCAGGACTGGTGAAGCC
331
GCGGCCGAGCTCACTCAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTTTGTCTCCA
299

TTCGGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCACTGTCTCTGGTTCCTC

GGGGAAACAGCCACCCTCTCCTGCAGGGCCAGTCAGAGTGTTGG

CCTCAGCAGTGCTTATGGGTGGAACTGGATCCGCCAGCCCC

CAGCTCCTTAGCCTGGTACCAGCAGAAACCTGGGCAGGCTCCCAA

CAGGGAAGGGGCTGGAGTGGATTGGGTCTATCGGTGGTAGT

ACTCCTCGTCCATAGTATATCCGTCAGGGCCACTGGCATCCCAGA

AGGGATAACACCAACTATAATCCCTCCCTCAAGAGGCGAGTC

CAGGTTCAGTGGCAGCGGGTCTAGGACAGACTTCACTCTCACCAT

ACCATTTCAAAGGACACGTCCAAGAACCAGTTCTCCCTGAAG

CACCAGCCTGGAGCCTGAAGATGTTGGAGTTTATCACTGTCAACAA

CTGAAGTCTGTGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCTGTCTATTACTGT

TATAACGACTTCTTTCCGCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCAAGGTG

GCGCAGAGGGGTGCTTACGGTTATTCCTATTTTGACTACTGG

GAGATCAAACGA

GGACAGGGAGTCCTGGTCGCCGTCTCCTCA

KP2-07
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCTGGCCCGGGACTGGTGAAGCC
332
GCGGCCGAGCTCGTGATGACGCAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTTTG
300

TTCGGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCGCTGTCTCTGGTGACTC

TCTCCAGGGGAAACAGCCACCCTCTCCTGCAGGGCCAGTCAGAGT

CATCAGCAGCGGCTATGGCTGGCACTGGATCCGCCAGGTCC

GTTGGCAGTAACTTAGCCTGGTACCAGCAGAAACCTGGGCAGGCT

CAGGGAGGGGGCTGGAGTGGATTGGATCTATCGGTGGTAGT

CCCAAGCTCCTCGTCCATAGTGCATACTTCAGGGCCACTGGCATC

AGGGGTACGACCAACTACAATCCCTCCCTCAAGAGTCGAGTC

CCAGACAGGTTCAGTGGCAGCGGGTCTAGGACAGACTTCACTCTC

ACCATTTCAGAAGACACGTCCAAGAACCAGTTCTCCCTGAGT

ACCATTAGCAGCCTGGAGCCTGAAGATGTTGGAGTTTATCACTGTC

CTGAGGTCAGTGTCCGCCGCGGACACGGCCGTGTATTTCTG

AGCAGTATAACGACTTGCTTCCGCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCA

TGCGAGAGACAGCGGATATAGTTTCCGTTACTTTGACTTCTG

AGGTGGAGATCAATCGA

GGGTCAGGGAGTCCTGGTCACCGTCTCCTCA

KP2-08
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCGGGCCCAGGACTGGTGAAGC
333
GCGGCCGAGCTCACGCAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTTTGTCTCCA
301

CTTCGGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCGCTGTCTCTGGTTACT

GGGGAGGCAGCCACCCTCTCCTGCAGGGCCAGTCAGAGTATTGG

CCATCAGCAGTGGTTATGGCTGGAACTGGATCCGCCAGCCC

CACCTCCTTAGCCTGGTACCAACAGAAACCTGGACAGGCTCCCAG

CCAGGGAAGGGGCTGGAGTGGATTGGGTCTATCGGCGGTAG

GCTCCTCGTCCATAGTGCATACTTCAGGGCCACTGGCATCGCAGA

TAGGGATAACACCAACTACAACCCCTCCCTCAAAAGTCGAGT

CAGGTTCAGTGGCAGCGGGTCTAGGACAGACTTCACTCTCACCAT

CACCCTTTCAAAAGACACATCCAAGAACCACTTCTCCCTGAG

TAGCAGCCTGGAGCCTGAAGATGTTGGAGTTTATTACTGTCAGCAG

GCTGCGCTCTGTGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCTGTGTATTACT

TATAACGACTTGCTCCCGCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCAAGGTG

GTGCGAGAGATGGTGGGTACGGTTCCCGATACATGGACTCC

GAGATCAAACGA

TGGGGCCAGGGAGTCCTGGTCGCCGTCTCCTCT

KP2-09
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCGGGCCCAGGACTGGTGAGGC
334
GCGGCCGAGCTCACACAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTTTGTCTCCA
302

CTTCGGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCGCTGTCTCTGGTTACT

GGGGAAAGAGCCACCCTCTCCTGCAGGGCCAGTCAGAGTGTTGG

CCATCAGCAGTGGTTATGGCTGGCACTGGATCCGCCAGCCC

CAGCAGGTTAGCCTGGTACCAGCAGAAACCTGGGCAGGCTCCCAG

CCAGGGAAGGGGCTGGAGTCGCTTGGCTATATCGGTGGTAG

GCTCCTCATCTATGGTGCATCCAGCAGGGCCACTGGCATCCCAGA

TAGGGGTAACACCAACTACAACCCCTCCCTCAAGAGTCGAGT

CAGGTTCAGTGGCAGCGGGTCTAGGACAGACTTCACTCTCACCAT

CACCATTTCAACAGACACGTCCAAGAACCAGTTCTCCCTGAA

TAGCAGCCTGGAGCCTGAAGATGTTGGAGTTTATCACTGTCAGCA

GCTGAGGTCTGTGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCCGTGTATTACT

GTATAACGACTTGCTTCCGCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCAAGGT

GTGCGAGAGATTCCGGATACAACACAAGATACTTTGACTACT

GGAGATCAAACGA

GGGGCCAGGGAGTCCTGGTCACCGTCTCCTCA

KP2-11
GAGGTGCAGCTGCAGCTGCCTGGGCCAGGACTGGTGAAGC
335
GCGGCCGAGCTCACACTCACGCAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTTTG
303

CTTCGGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCACTGTCTCTGGTTCCT

TCTCCAGGGGAAACAGCCACCCTCTCCTGCAGGGCCAGTCAGAGT

CCCTCAGCAGTGCTTATGGGTGGAACTGGATCCGCCAGCCC

CTTGGCAGCAGGTTAGCCTGGTACCAACAGAAACCTGGGCAGCCT

CCAGGGAAGGGGCTGGAGTGGATTGGGTCTATCGGTGGTAG

CCCAGGCTCCTCATCTATGGTGCATCCACCAGGGCCACTGGCATC

TAGGGATAACACCAACTATAATCCCTCCCTCAAGAGGCGAGT

CCAGACAGGTTCAGTGGCAGCGGGTCTAGGACAGACTTCACTCTC

CACCATTTCAAAGGACACGTCCAAGAACCAGTTCTCCCTGAA

ACCATTAGCAGCCTGGAGCCTGAAGATGTTGGAGTTTATCACTGTC

GCTGAAGTCTGTGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCCGTCTATTACT

AGCAGTATAACGACTTCCCTCCGCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCA

GTGCGCAGAGGGGTGCTTACGGTTATTCCTATTTTGACTACT

AGGTGGAGATCAAACGA

GGGGACAGGGAGTCCTGGTCGCCGTCTCCTCA

KP2-13
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCAGGCCCAGGACTGGTGAAGCC
336
GCGGCCGAGCTCACGCAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTTTGGCTCCA
304

TTCAGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCGCTGTCTCTGGAGGCTC

GGGGAAACAGCCACCCTCTCCTGCAGGGCCAGTCAGAGTATTGGC

TATCAGCGGTGGTTATGACTGGAGTTGGATCCGCCAGTCCCC

ACTAACTTAGCCTGGTATCACCAGAAACCTGGGCAGCCTCCCAAG

AGGGAAGGGGCTGGAGTGGATTGGTTATATCTATGATAGTAG

CTCCTCGTCCATACTGCATATGTCAGGGCCACTGGCATCCCAAACA

GGGGACCACCAACTACAACCCGTCCCTCAGGAAGCGGGTCG

GGTTCAGTGGCAGCGGGTCTAGGACAGACTTCACTCTCACCATTA

CCATTTCAATAGACACGTCCAGGAACCAGTTTTCCCTGAACC

ACAGCCTGCAGCCTGAAGATGTTGGCGTTTATCACTGTCAGCAATA

TGAGATCTCTGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCCGTCTATTACTGT

CAACGACTTGCTTCCTCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCAAGATAGA

GCGAGACGAGCCGGCTACGGTAGCGCCTACTTTGACTACTG

CATCAAACGA

GGGCCAGGGAGTCCTGGTCACCGTCTCCTCA

KP2-14
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCTGGCCCAGGACTGGTGAAGCC
337
GCGGCCGAGCTCACGCAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTTTGTCTCCA
305

TTCGGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCGCTGTGTCTGGTTCCTC

GGGGAAACAGCCACCCTCTCCTGCAGGGCCAGTGAGAGTGTTGG

CCTCAGCAGTGCTTATGGGTGGAACTGGATCCGTCAGGCTC

CAGCTCCTTAGCCTGGTACCACCAGAAGCCTGGGCAGGCTCCCAG

CAGGGAAGCGCCTGGAGTGGATTGGGTTTATCGGTGGTAGT

GCTCCTCGTCCATAGTGCATCCTTCAGGGCCACTGGCATCCCAGA

CGTGATAACACCAATTACAACCCCTCCCTCAGGAGTCGGGTC

CAGGTTCAGTGGCAGCGGGTCTAGGACAGAGTTCACTCTCACCGT

ACCATTTCAAAAGACACGTCCAAGAACCACTTCTCCCTGAAA

TAGCAGCCTGGAGCCTGAAGATGTTGGAGTTTATCACTGTCAGCA

CTGACTTCTGTGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCCGTGTATTTCTGT

GTATAACGACTTGCTTCCGCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCAAGGT

GCGAGAAGGGGGGCCTTCGGTAACTCCTACTTTGACTACTG

GGAGATCAAACGA

GGGCCAGGGAGTCCCGGTCACCGTCTCCTCA

KP2-15
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCTGGCCCAGGACTGGTGAAGCC
338
GCGGCCGAGCTCACGCAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTGTGTCTCCA
306

TTCAGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCGCTGTCTCTGGAGGCTC

GGGGAAGCAGCCACCCTCTCCTGCAGGGCCAGTCAGACTGTTGG

TATCAGCGGTGGTTATGACTGGAGTTGGATCCGCCAGTCCCC

CAGAAACTTAGCCTGGTACCAGCAGAAGCCTGGGCAGGCTCCCAA

AGGGAAGGGACTGGAGTGGATTGGTTATATCTATGATAGCAG

GCTCCTCGTCCATAGTGCACACTTCAGGGCCACTGGCATCCCGGA

GGGGACCACCAACTACAACCCGTCCCTCAGGAAACGGGTCA

CAGGTTCAGTGGCAGCGGGTCTGGGACAGACTTCACTCTCACCAT

CCATTTCAATAGACACGTCCAGGAACCAGTTCTCCCTGAAGC

TAGCAGCCTGGAGCCTGAAGACGCTGGAATTTATCACTGTCAGCA

TGAGATCTCTGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCCGTCTATTACTGT

ATATAACGACTTGCTTCCGCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCAAGGT

GCGAGACGAGCCGGCTACGGTAGCGCCTACTTTGACTACTG

GGAGATCAAACGA

GGGCCAGGGAGTCCTGGTCACCGTCTCCTCA

KP2-17
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCGGGCCCAGGACTGGTGAAGC
339
GCGGCCGAGCTCACACAGTCTCCAGCCTTTCGGTCTGTGACTCTG
307

CTTCGGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCGCTGTCTCTGGTTACT

AAGGAGAAAGTCACCATCACCTGCCAGGCCAGTCAGAGCATTGGT

CCATCAGCAGTGGTTATGGCTGGACCTGGATCCGCCAGCCC

AGTAGCTTACACTGGTACCAGCAGAAACCGGATCAGTCTCCAAAAC

CCAGGGAAGGGGCTGGAGTGGATTGGCTATATCGGTGGTAG

TCCTCATCAAGTTTGCTTCCCAGTCCATTTCAGGGGTCCCCTCAAG

TAGGGGAAACGCCAACTACAACCCCTCCCTCAAGAGTCGAGT

GTTCAGTGGCAGTGGATATGGGACAGATTTCACCCTCACTATCAAT

CACCATTTCAAAAGACACGTCCAAGAACCAGTTCTCCCTGAA

AGCCTGGAAGCTGAAGATGCTGCGACGTATTACTGTCATCAGAGTA

GCTGACCTCTGTGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCCGTGTATTACT

GTAGTTTCCCGTGGACGTTCGGCCAAGGGACCAAGGTGGAAATCA

GTGCGAGAGATGGGGGATACGGAGAGAGATACCTCGAATTC

AACGA

TGGGGCCAGGGCGCCCTGGTCACCGTCTCCTCC

KP2-18
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCAGGCCCAGGACTGGTGAGGC
340
GCGGCCGAGCTCACTCAGTCTCCAGCCTTTCGGTCTGTGACTCTA
308

CTTCGGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCACTGTCTCTGGTAACT

AAGGAGAAAGTCACCATCACCTGCCAGGCCAGTCAGAGCATTGGT

CCATCAGCAGTGGTTATGGCTGGAACTGGATCCGCCAGCCC

AGTAGCTTACACTGGTACCAGCAGAAACCGGATCAGTCTCCAAAG

CCAGGGAAGGGGCTGGAGTTGATTGGGTATATCGGTGGAAG

CTCCTCATCAAGTATGCTTCCCAGTCCATCTCAGGGGTCCCCTCAA

TAGAAGTAATACCAACTACAACCCCTCCCTCAAGAGTCGAGT

GGTTCAGTGGCAGTGGATCTGGGACAGATTTCACCCTCACTATCAA

CACCATTTCAATAGACACGTCCAAGAACCAGTTCTCCCTGAA

TAGCCTGGAAGCTGAAGATGCTGCGACGTATTACTGTCAGCAGAG

ACTGAGGTCTGTGACTGCCGCGGACACGGCTGTGTATTACT

TAGTAGTTTCCCATTCACTTTCGGCCCCGGGACCAAACTGGATATC

GTGCGAGAGATTGGGGCTACGGTTACAGATACCTTGACTACT

AAACGA

GGGGCCAGGGAGTCCTGGTCACCGTCTCCTCA

KP2-19
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCTGGCCCAGGACTGGTGAAGCC
341
GCGGCCGAGCTCACACTCACGCAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTTTG
309

TTCAGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCGCTGTCTCTGGAGGCTC

TCTCCAGGGGAAAGAGCCACCCTCTCCTGCAGGGCCAGTCAGAGT

TATCAACGGTGGTTATGACTGGACCTGGATCCGCCAGTCCCC

GTCAGCAGCAGGTTAGCCTGGTACCAGCAGAAACCTGGGCAAGCT

AGGGAAGGGGCTGCAGTGGATTGGGTGGATCTATGGTAGTA

CCCAGGCTCCTCATCTATGATGCATCCAGCAGGGTCACTGGTATC

GGGGGACCACCAACTACAACCCGTCCCTCAGGAATCGAGTC

CCAGACAGGTTCAGTGGCAGCGGGTCTGGGACAGACTTCACTCTC

ACCATTTCAATAGACACGTCCAGGAACCAGTTCTCCCTGAGG

ACCATCAGCAGCCTGGAGCCTGAAGATGTTGGAGTTTATCACTGTC

CTGAGCTCTCTGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCCGTCTATTACTG

AGCAGTATAACGACTTGCTTCCGCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCA

TGCGAAACGAGTCGGCTACGGTAACAGCTACTTTGACTCCTG

AGGTGGAGATCAAACGA

GGGCCAGGGAGTCCTGGTCACCGTGTCCTCA

KP2-20
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCAGGCCCAGGACTGGTGAAGCC
342
GCGGCCGAGCTCACGCAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTTTGTCTCCA
310

TTCAGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCGCTGTCTCTGGAGGCTC

GGGGAAACAGCCACCCTCTCCTGCAGGGCCAGTCAGAGTGTTGG

TATCAGCGGTGGTTATGACTGGAGTTGGATCCGCCAGTCCCC

CAGCAACTTAGCCTGGTACCAGCAGAAACCTGGGCAGGCTCCCAA

AGGGAAGGGACTGGAGTGGATTGGTTATATCTATGATAGCAG

GCTCCTCGTCCATAGTGGTTCCGTCAGGGCCACTGGCATCCCAGA

GGGGACCACCAACTACAACCCGTCCCTCAGGAAACGGGTCA

CAGGTTCAGTGGCAGCGGGTCTAGGACAGACTTCACTCTCATCATT

CCATTTCAATAGACACGTCCAGGAACCAGTTCTCCCTGAAGC

AGCAGCCTGGAGCCTGAAGATGTTGGAGTTTATCACTGTCAGCAG

TGAGATCTCTGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCCGTCTATTACTGT

TATAACGACTTGCTTCCGCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCAAGGTG

GCGAGACGAGCCGGCTACGGTAGCGCCTACTTTGACTACTG

GAGATCAAACGA

GGGCCAGGGAGTCCTGGTCACCGTCTCCTCA

KP2-22
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCGGGCCCAGGACTGGTGAAGC
343
GCGGCCGAGCTCACACTCACGCAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTTTG
311

CTTCGGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCGCTGTCTCTGGTGACT

GCTCCAGGGGAAACAGCCACCCTCTCCTGTAGGGCCAGTCAGAGT

CCATCAGCAGTGGTTATGGCTGGAGCTGGATCCGCCAGACC

ATTGGCACTAACTTAGCCTGGTATCACCAAAAACCTGGGCAGTCTC

CCAGGGAAGGGGCTGGAGTGGATTGGATACATCGGTGGTAG

CCAAGCTCCTCGTCCATAGTGCATATGTCCGGGCCACTGGCATCC

TAGGGGCAACACCAACTACAACCCCTCCCTCAAGAGTCGAGT

CAGACAGGTTCAGTGGCAGCGGGTCTAGGACAGACTTCACTCTCA

CACCATTTCAAAAGACACGTCCAAGAACCAGTTCTCCCTGAA

CCATTAACAGCCTGCAGCCTGAAGATGTTGGCGTTTATCACTGTCA

GCTGAGCTCTGTGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCCGTGTATTACT

GCAGTATAACGACTTGCTTCCGCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGAACCAA

GTGCGAGAAGGGCCCCGTACTGGGGTTATTCCTATCTTGACT

GGTGGAGATCAAACGA

ACTGGGGCCAGGGAGTCCTGGTCACCGTCTCCTCA

KP2-23
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCTGGCCCAGGACTGGTGAAGCCT
344
GCGGCCGAGCTCACACTCACGCAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTTTGTC
312

TCGGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCACTGTCTCTGGTTCCTCCCT

TCCAGGGGAAACAGCCACCCTCTCCTGCAGGGCCAGTCAGACTGTT

CAGCAGTGCTTATGGGTGGAACTGGATCCGCCAGCCCCCAGG

GGCAGAAACTTAGCCTGGTACCAGCAGAGGCCTGGGCAGGCTCCC

GAAGGGGCTGGAGTGGATTGGGTCTATCGGTGGTAGTAGGG

AACCTCCTCGTCCATAGTGCATACTTCAGGGCCACTGGCATCCCGGA

ATAACACCAACTATAATCCCTCCCTCAAGAGGCGAGTCACCAT

CAGGTTCAGTGGCAGCGGGTCTGGGACAGACTTCACTCTCACCATT

TTCAAAGGACACGTCCAAGAACCAGTTCTCCCTGAAGCTGAAG

AGCAGCCTGGAGCCTGAAGATGCTGGAGTTTATCACTGTCAGCAAT

TCTGTGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCCGTCTATTACTGTGCGCAGA

ATAACGACTTGCTTCCGCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCAAGGTGGA

GGGGTGCTTACGGTTATTCCTATTTTGACTACTGGGGACAGGG

GATCAAACGA

AGTCCTGGTCGCCGTCTCCTCA

KP2-24
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCGGGCCCAGGACTGGTGAAGC
345
GCGGCCGAGCTCACGCAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTTTGGCTCCA
313

CTTCGGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCACTGTCTCTGGTTACT

GGGGAAACAGCCACCCTCTCCTGCAGGGCCAGTCAGAGTGTTGG

CCATCAGCAGTGGTTATGGCTGGGGCTGGATCCGCCAGTCC

CACTAACTTAGCCTGGTATCACCAGAAACCTGGGCAGCCTCCCAA

CCAGGGAAGGGGCTGGAGTGGATTGGCTATTTTGGTGGTAG

GCTCCTCGTCCATAGTGCATATGTCAGGGCCACTGGCATCCCAGA

TAGAGGTAACACCAACTACAACCCCTCCCTCAAGAGTCGAGT

CAGGTTCAGTGGCAGCGGGTCTAGGACAGACTTCACTCTCACCAT

CACCATTTCACAAGACACGTCCAAGAATCAGTTCTCCCTGAA

TAACAGCCTGCAGCCTGAAGATGTTGGCGTTTATCACTGTCAGCAG

ACTGAAGTCTGTGACCGCCGCGGACACGGGCATTTATTACTG

TATAACGACTTGCTTCCGCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCAAGATA

CGCGCGAGACAGCGGTTATTCCCGGCGTTGGGTTGACTACT

GACATCAAACGA

GGGGCCAGGGAGTCCTGGTCACCGTCTCCTCA

KP3-01
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCGGGCCCAGGACTGGTGAAGC
346
GCGGCCGAGCTCACTCAGTCTCCAGCCTTTCGGTCTGTGAGTCTG
314

CTTTGGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCGATGTCTCTGGTTTCT

AAGGAGACAGTCACCCTCACCTGCCAGGCCAGTCAGAGCGTTGGT

CCATTAGTAGTGATTATGGCTGGAGCTGGATCCGCCAGCCCC

AGTAACTTACACTGGTACCAGCAGAAACCGGCTCAGTCTCCAAAAC

CAGGGAAGGGGCTGGAGTTGATTGGCTATATCGGTGGTAGT

TCCTCATCAAGTATGCTTCCCAGTCCATCTCAGGGGTCCCCTCAAG

CGTGGTAACACCAACTATAACCCCTCCCTCAAGAGTCGAGTC

GTTCAGTGGCACTGGATCTGGGACAGATTTCACCCTCACTATCAAT

ACCATTTCAAGAGACACTTCCAAGAATCAGTTCTCCCTGAAG

AGTCTGGAAGCTGAAGATGCTGCGACATATTACTGTCAGCAGACTA

CTGACCTCTGTGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCCGTCTACTACTG

ATACTTTCCCGTGGACGTTCGGCCAAGGGACCAGGGTGGAAATCA

TGCGAGAGATTGGGGCTACGGTTATAGGTACTTTGACTTCTG

AGCGA

GGGCCAGGGAGTCCTGGTCACCGTCTCCTCA

KP3-02
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCGGGCCCAGGACTGGTGAGGCCT
347
GCGGCCGAGCTCACTCAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTTTGTCTCCAGG
315

TCGGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCGCTGTCTCTGGTTACTCCAT

GGAAACAGCCACCCTCTCCTGCAGGGCCAGTCAGAGTGTTGGCAGC

CAGCAGTGGTTATGGCTGGCACTGGATCCGCCAGCCCCCAGG

AACTTAGCCTGGTACCAGCAGAAACCTGGGCAGGCTCCCAAGCTCC

GAAGGGGCTGGAGTCGCTTGGCTATATCGGTGGTAGTAGGG

TCGTCCATAGTGCATACTTCAGGGCCACTGGCATCCCAGACAGGTTC

GTAACACCAACTACAACCCCTCCCTCAAGAGTCGAGTCACCAT

AGTGGCAGCGGGTCTAGGACAGACTTCACTCTCACCATTAGCAGCC

TTCAACAGACACGTCCAAGAACCAGTTCTCCCTGAAGCTGAGG

TGGAGCCTGAAGATGTTGGAGTTTATCACTGTCAGCAGTATAACGA

TCTGTGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCCGTGTATTACTGTGCGAGA

CTTGCTTCCGCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCAAGGTGGAGATCAAA

GATTCCGGATACAACACAAGATACTTTGACTACTGGGGCCAG

CGA

GGAGTCCTGGTCACCGTCTCCTCA

KP3-03
GAGGTGCAGCTGGAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCTGGCCCAG
348
GCGGCCGAGCTCACGCAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTTTGTCTCCA
316

GACTGGTGAAGCCTTCGGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCACT

GGGGAAACAGCCACCCTCTCCTGCAGGGCCAGTCAGAGTGTTGG

GTCTCTGGTTCCTCCCTCAGCAGTGCTTATGGGTGGAACTGG

CAGCTACTTAGCCTGGTACCAGCAGAAACCTGGGCAGGCTCCCAA

ATCCGCCAGCCCCCAGGGAAGGGGCTGGAGTGGATTGGGT

GCTCCTCGTCCATGGTGCATACTTCAGGGCCGCTGGCATCCCAGA

CTATCGGTGGTAGTAGGGATAACACCAACTATAATCCCTCCC

CAGGTTCACTGGCAGCGGGTCTCGGACAGACTTCACTCTCACCAT

TCAAGAGGCGAGTCACCATTTCAAAGGACACGTCCAAGAACC

TAGCAGCCTGGAGCCTGAAGATGTTGGAATTTATCACTGTCAGCAG

AGTTCTCCCTGAAGCTGAAGTCTGTGACCGCCGCGGACACG

TATAACGACTTGCTTCCGCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCAAGGTG

GCTGTCTATTACTGTGCGCAGAGGGGTGCTTACGGTTATTCC

GAGATCAAACGA

TATTTTGACTACTGGGGACAGGGAGTCCTGGTCGCCGTCTCC

KP3-05
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCGGGCCCAGGACTGGTGAAGC
349
GCGGCCGAGCTCACGCAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTTTGTCTCCA
317

CTTCGGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCACTGTCTCTGGTTCCT

GGGGAAACAGCCACCCTCTCCTGCAGGGCCAGTCAGAGTGTTGG

CCCTCAGCAGTGCTTATGGGTGGAACTGGATCCGCCAGCCC

CAGCTCCTTAGCCTGGTACCAGCAGAAACCTGGGCAGGCTCCCAA

CCAGGGAAGGGGCTGGAGTGGATTGGGTCTATCGGTGGTAG

GCTCCTCGTCCATAGTGCATACTTCAGGGCCACTGGCATCCCAGA

TAGGGATAACACCAACTATAATCCCTCCCTCAAGAGGCGAGT

CAGGTTCAGTGGCAGCGGGTCTAGGACAGACTTCACTCTCACCAT

CACCATTTCAAAGGACACGTCCAAGAACCAGTTCTCCCTGAA

TAGCAGCCTGGAGCCTGAAGATGTTGGAGTTTATCACTGTCACCAG

GCTGAAGTCTGTGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCCGTCTATTACT

TATAACGACTTGCTTCCGCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCAAGGTG

GTGCGCAGAGGGGTGCTTACGGTTATTCCTATTTTGACTACT

GAGATCAAACGA

GGGGACAGGGAGTCCTGGTCGCCGTCTCCTCA

KP3-06
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCGGGCCCAGGACTGGTGAGGC
350
GCGGCCGAGCTCACGCAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTTTGTCTCCA
318

CTTCGGAGACCCTGTCTGTCACCTGCGATGTCTCTGGTGGCT

GGGGAAACAGCCACCCTCTCCTGCAGGGCCAGTCAGAGTGTTGG

CAATCAGCAGTGCTTCCTGGAGCTGGATCCGCCAGGCCCCA

CAGCTCCTTAGCCTGGTACCAGCAGAAACCTGGGCAGGCTCCCAA

GGGAAGAGACTGGAGTGGATTGGGGCTATCTCTGGTAGTGG

ACTCCTCGTCCATAGTGCATACTTCAGGGCCACTGGCATCCCAGA

TAGTCCCACCAACGTCAACCCCTCCCTCAAGAGTCGAGTCAC

CAGGTTCAGTGGCAGCGGGTCTAGGACAGACTTCACTCTCACCAT

CCTGTCAGTAGACACGTCCAAGAACCAGCTCTCCCTGAAGTT

TAGCAGCCTGGAGCCTGAAGATGTTGGAGTTTATCACTGTCAGCA

GAGGTCAATGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCCGTATATTACTGTG

GTATAACGACTTGCTTCCGCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCAAGGT

CAAGACGAGGGGGTTACGGTAATAGATACTTTGACTATTGGG

GGAGATCAAACGA

GCCAGGGAGTCGCGGTCACCGTCTCCTCA

KP3-07
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCGGGCCCAGGACTGGTGAAGC
351
GCGGCCGAGCTCGTGATGACACAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTTTG
319

CTTCGGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCACTGTCTCTGGTTCCT

TCTCCAGGGGAAACAGCCACCCTTTCCTGCAGGGCCAGTCAGAGT

CCCTCAGCAGTGCTTATGGGTGGAACTGGATCCGCCAGCCC

ATTGGCAGCAACTTAGCCTGGTACCAGCAGAAACCTGGGCAGGCT

CCAGGGAAGGGGCTGGAGTGGATTGGGTCTATCGGTGGTAG

CCCAAGCTCCTCGTCCATAGTGCAAACATCAGGGCCACTGGCATC

TAGGGATAACACCAACTATAATCCCTCCCTCAAGAGGCGAGT

CCAGACAGGTTCATTGGCAGCGGGTCTAGGACAGACTTCACTCTC

CACCATTTCAAAGGACACGTCCAAGAACCAGTTCTCCCTGAA

ACCATTAGCAGCCTGGAGCCTGAAGATGTTGGAGTTTATCACTGTC

GCTGAAGTCTGTGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCCGTCTATTACT

AGCAGTATAACGACTTCCTTCCGCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCA

GTGCGCAGAGGGGTGCTTACGGTTATTCCTATTTTGACTACT

AGGTGGAGATCAAACGA

GGGGACAGGGAGTCCTGGTCACCGTCTCCTCA

KP3-08
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCGGGCCCAGGACTGGTGAAGC
352
GCGGCCGAGCTCACACTCACGCAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTTTG
320

CTTCGGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCACTGTCTCTGGTTCCT

TCTCCAGGGGAAACAGCCACCCTCTCCTGCAGGGCCAGTCAGAGT

CCCTCAGCAGTGCTTATGGGTGGAACTGGATCCGCCAGCCC

CTTGGCGGCAGGTTAGCCTGGTACCAGCAGAAACCTGGGCAGGCT

CCAGGGAAGGGGCTGGAGTGGATTGGGTCTATCGGTGGTAG

CCCAGGCTCCTCATCTATGGTGCATCCACCAGGGCCACTGGCATC

TAGGGATAACACCAACTATAATCCCTCCCTCAAGAGGCGAGT

CCAGACAGGTTCAGTGGCAGCGGGTCTAGGACAGAGTTCACTCTC

CACCATTTCAAAGGACACGTCCAAGAACCAGTTCTCCCTGAA

ACCATTGCCGGCCTGGAGCCTGAAGATGTTGGAGTTTATCACTGTC

GCTGAAGTCTGTGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCCGTCTATTACT

AGCAGTATAACGACTTCCTTCCGCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCA

GTGCGCAGAGGGGTGCTTACGGTTATTCCTATTTTGACTACT

AGGTGGAGATCAAACGA

GGGGACAGGGAGTCCTGGTCGCCGTCTCCTCA

KP3-09
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCTGGGCCAGGACTGGTGAAGCC
353
GCGGCCGAGCTCACGCAGTCTCCAGCCATCCTGTCTTTGTCTCCA
321

TTCGGAGACCCTGTCGCTCACCTGCGCTGTCTCTAGTCTGTC

GGGGAAACAGCCACCCTCTCCTGTAGGGCCAGTCAGAGTATTGGC

CCTCAGTAGTGGTTTTGCCTGGAGCTGGATCCGCCAGCCCC

ACGTCCTTAGCCTGGTACCAGCAGAAACCTGGGCAGGCTCCCAAG

CAGGAGAGGGACTGGAGTGGATTGGGTCTATCGGTGGTAGT

CTCCTCGTCCATAGTGCATACTACAGGGCCACTGACATCCCAGAG

CGTGACAACGTCAATTATAACCCCTCCCTCAAGAGTCGAGTC

AGGTTCAGTGGCAGCGGATCTAGGACAGACTTCACTCTCACCATTA

ACCATTTCGAAAGACACGTCCAAGAACCAGTTCTCCCTGAGG

GCAGCCTGGAGCCTGAAGATGTTGGAGTTTATCACTGTCAGCAGT

CTGCGTTCTGTGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCCGTGTATTACTG

ATAACGACTTGCTTCCGCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCAAGGTGG

TGTGACCATTCATGGCTACCGTAACTGGTATCTTGACCACTG

AGATCAAACGA

GGGCCAGGGAGTCCTGGTCACCGTCTCCACA

KP3-12
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCTGGCCCAGGACTGGTGAAGCC
354
GCGGCCGAGCTCACGCAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTTTGGCTCCA
322

TTCGGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCGCTGTCTCTGGTAACTC

GGGGAAACAGCCACCCTCTCCTGCAGGGCCAGTCAGAGTATTGGC

CATCAGCAGCGCCTATGGCTGGCACTGGATCCGCCAGGTCC

ACTAACTTAGCCTGGTATCACCAGAAACCTGGGCAGCCTCCCAAG

CAGGGAAGGGGCTGGAGTGGATTGGATCTATCGGTGGTAGT

CTCCTCGTCCATAGTGCATATGTCAGGGCCACTGGCATCCCAAACA

AGGGGTACGACCAACTACAATCCCTCCCTCAAGAGTCGAGG

GGTTCAGTGGCAGCGGGTCTAGGACAGACTTCACTCTCACCATTA

CACCATTTCAGAAGACACGTCCAAGAACCAGTTCTCCCTGAG

ACAGCCTGCAGCCTGAAGATGTTGGCGTTTATCACTGTCAACAGTA

GCTGAGGTCAGTGTCCGCCGCGGACACGGCCGTGTATTTCT

CAACGACTTGCTTCCTCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCAAGATAGA

GTGCGAGAGACAGCGGATATAGTTTCCGTTACTTTGACTTCT

CATCAAACGA

GGGGTCGGGGAGTTCTGGTCACCGTCTCCTCA

KP3-13
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCGGGCCCAGGACTGGTGAGGC
355
GCGGCCGAGCTCACACAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTTTGTCTCCA
323

CTTCAGAGACCCTGTCGCTCACCTGCGCTGTCTCTGGAGGCT

GGGGAAACAGCCACCCTCTCCTGCAGGGCCAGTCAGAGTGTTGG

CTCTCAGCGGTGGTTATGACTGGAGCTGGATCCGCCAGTCC

CAGCAACTTAGCCTGGTACCAGCAGAAACCTGGGCAGGCTCCCAA

CCAAGAAAGGGGCTGGAGTGGATTGGCTATATCTATGATAGT

GCTCCTCGTCCATAGTGCATCCGTCAGGGCCACTGGCATCCCAGA

CGTGGGACCACCAACTACAACCCGTCCCTCAAGAGGCGAGT

CAGGTTCAGTGGCAGCGGGTCTAGGACAGACTTCACTCTCACCAT

CACCATTTCAATAGACACGTCCAAGAACCAGTTCTCCCTGAA

TAGTAGCCTGGAGCCTGAAGATGTTGGAGTTTATCACTGTCAGCAG

CCTCAAGTCTGTGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCCGTGTATTATT

TATAACGACTTCTTTCCGCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCAAGGTG

GTGCGAGACGAGGCGGCTACGGTGCCAGCTACTTTGACTTA

GAGATCAAACGA

TGGGGCCAGGGAGTCCTGGTCACCGTCTCCTCA

KP3-15
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCTGGCCCAGGACTGGTGAAGCC
356
GCGGCCGAGCTCACGCAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTGTGTCTCCA
324

TTCGGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCACTGTCTCTGGTTCCTC

GGGGAAGCAGCCACCCTCTCCTGCAGGGCCAGTCAGACTGTTGG

CCTCAGCAGTGCTTATGGGTGGAACTGGATCCGCCAGCCCC

CAGAAACTTAGCCTGGTACCAGCAGAAGCCTGGGCAGGCTCCCAA

CAGGGAAGGGGCTGGAGTGGATTGGGTCTATCGGTGGTAAT

GCTCCTCGTCCATAGTGCACACTTCAGGGCCACTGGCATCCCGGA

AGGGATAACACCAACTATAATCCCTCCCTCAAGAGGCGAGTC

CAGGTTCAGTGGCAGCGGGTCTGGGACAGACTTCACTCTCACCAT

ACCATTTCAAAGGACACGTCCAAGAACCAGTTCTCCCTGAAG

TAGCAGCCTGGAGCCTGAAGATGCTGGAATTTATCACTGTCAGCAA

CTGAAGTCTGTGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCCGTCTATTACTG

TATAACGACTTGCTTCCGCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCAAGGTG

TGCGCAGAGGGGTGCTTACGGTTATTCCTATTTTGACTACTG

GAGATCAAACGA

GGGACAGGGAGTCCTGGTCGCCGTCTCCTCA

KP3-16
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCTGGCCCAGGACTGGTGAAGCC
357
GCGGCCGAGCTCACGCAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTTTGTCTCCA
325

TTCGGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCACTGTCTCTGGTTCCTC

GGGGAAACAGCCACCCTCTCCTGCAGGGCCAGTCAGAGTCTTGGC

CCTCAGCAGTGCTTATGGGTGGAACTGGATCCGCCAGCCCC

AGCAGGTTAGCCTGGTACCAGCAGAAACCTGGGCAGGCTCCCAG

CAGGGAAGGGGCTGGAGTGGATTGGGTCTATCGGTGGTAGT

GCTCCTCATCTATGGTGCATCCACCAGGGCCACTGGCATCCCAGA

AGGGATAACACCAACTATAATCCCTCCCTCAAGAGGCGAGTC

CAGGTTCAGTGGCAGCGGGTCTAGGACAGACTTCACTCTCACCAT

ACCATTTCAAAGGACACGTCCAAGAACCAGTTCTCCCTGAAG

TAGCAGCCTGGAGCCTGAAGATGTTGGAGTTTATCACTGTCAGCA

CTGAAGTCTGTGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCCGTCTATTACTG

GTATAACGACTTCCTTCCGCTCACGTTCGGCGGAGGGACCAAGGT

TGCGCAGAGGGGTGCTTACGGTTATTCCTATTTTGACTACTG

GGAGATCAAACGA

GGGACAGGGAGTCCTGGTCGCCGTCTCCTCA

KP3-18
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTGGGGCCCAGGACTGGTGAAGC
358
GCGGCCGAGCTCACACTCACGCAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTTTG
326

CATCGGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCGCTGTCTCTGGTTACT

TCTCCAGGGGAAACAGCCACCCTCTCCTGCAGGGCCAGTCAGAGT

CCCTCAGCAGTGCTTATGGCTGGAACTGGATCCGACAGTCC

GTTGGCAGCTACTTAGCCTGGTACCAGCAGAAACCTGGGCAGGCT

CCCGGGAAGGGGCTGGAGTGGATTGGGTCTATCGGTGGTAG

CCCAAGCTCCTCGTCCATAGTGCACACTTCAGGGCCACTGGCATC

TAGGGATAATGTCAACTACAACCCCTCCCTCAAGAGGCGAGT

CCAGACAGGTTCAGTGGCAGCGGGTCTAGGACAGACTTCACTCTC

CACCATTTCAAAAGACACGTCCACGAACCACTTCTCCCTGAG

ACCATTAGCAGCCTGGAGCCTGAAGATGTTGGAGTTTATCACTGTC

GCTGAGTTCTGTGACGGCCGCGGACACGGCCGTGTATTATT

AGCAGTATAACGACTTACTTCCCCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCAA

GTGTGAGACGCGCGACCTACGGTAACAGCTACTTTGACTCCT

GGTGGAGATCAAACGA

GGGGCCAGGGAGTCCAGGTCACGGTCTCTTCA

KP3-19
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCAGGCCCAGGACTGGTGAAGCC
359
GCGGCCGAGCTCGTGATGACGCAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTTTG
327

CTCAGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCGCGGTCTCTGGAGGCT

TCTCCAGGGGAAACAGCCACCCTCTCCTGCAGGGCCAGTCAGAGT

CTCTCAGTGGTGGTTATGACTGGTACTGGATCCGCCAGTCCC

GTTGGCAGCAACTTAGCCTGGTACCAGCAGAAACCTGGGCAGGCT

CAAGAAAGGGCCTGGAGTATATTGGTTATATCTATGATAGTC

CCCAAGCTCCTCGTCCATAGTGCAAACTTCAGGGCCACTGGCATC

GTGGGACCACCAACTACAACCCGTCCCTCAAGAATCGAGTCA

TCAGACAGGTTCAGTGGCAGCGGGTCTAGGACAGACTTCACTCTC

CCATTTCAATAGACACGTCCAAGAACCACTTCTCCCTGAACCT

ACCATCAGCAGCCTGGAGCCTGAAGATGTTGGAGTTTATCACTGTC

CAAGTCTGTGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCCGTGTATTACTGTG

AGCAGTATAACGACTTGCTTCCGCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCA

CGAGACGAGTCGGGTACGGTGCCACCTATTTTGACTTATGGG

AGGTGGAGATCAAACGA

GCCAGGGAGTCCTGGTCACCGTCTCCTCA

KP3-20
GAGGTGCAGCTGCTCGAGTCTGGCCCAGGACTGGTGAAGCC
360
GCGGCCGAGCTCACACAGTCTCCAGCCACCCTGTCTTTGTCTCCA
328

TTCGGAGACCCTGTCCCTCACCTGCGCTGTGTCTGGTTACTC

GGGGAAACAGCCACCCTCTCCTGCAGGGCCAGTCAGAGTGTTGG

CATCAGCAGTGGTTTTGCCTGGAACTGGATCCGCCAGACCC

CAGTAATGTAGCCTGGTACCAGCAGAAACCTGGGCAGGCTCCCAA

CAGGGAAGGGACTGGAGTGGATTGGGTATATCGGTGGTAGT

GCTCCTCGTCCATAGTGCATACTACAGGGCCACTGGCATCCCAGA

CGTGATAACACCAACTACAACCCCTCCCTCAAGAGTCGAGTC

CAGGTTCAGTGGCAGCGGGTCTAGGACAGACTTCACTCTCACCAT

ACCATTTCAAAAGACACGTCCAAGAACCAGTTCTCCCTTAAG

TAGCAGCCTGGAGCCTGAGGATGTTGGAGTTTATCACTGTCAGCA

CTGACTTCTATGACCGCCGCGGACACGGCCATGTATTACTGT

GTATAACGACTTGCTTCCGCTCACTTTCGGCGGAGGGACCAAGGT

GCGAGAAGGGGGGCCTACGGTAACTCCTACTTTGACTTCTG

GGAGATCAAACGA

GGGCCAGGGAGTCCCGGTCACCGTCTCCTCA

TABLE 7

Bmax (95% CI),

Protein
K_D(95% CI), nM
copies/RBC × 10³
k_off(95% CI), s⁻¹

aRh17 scFv
41.4 (34.1, 50.2)
99 (93, 105)
2.0 × 10⁻⁵ (1.6, 2.4)

(anti-RhCE)

aWr^bscFv
21.3 (17.0, 26.5)
746 (704, 790)
2.9 × 10⁻⁵ (2.0, 3.8)

(anti-Band3/

GPA)

hTM-aRh17
45.6 (34.8, 56.5)
184 (173, 195)
4.7 × 10⁻⁵(3.2, 6.5)

(anti-RhCE)

hTM-aWr^b
52.6 (40.1, 65.1)
904 (848, 961)
4.8 × 10⁻⁵(2.9, 7.0)

(anti-Band3/

GPA)

Number	Name	Date	Kind
4916071	Hung et al.	Apr 1990	A
5229367	Perretti et al.	Jul 1993	A
5480869	Wei et al.	Jan 1996	A
6180370	Queen	Jan 2001	B1
7816449	Menovcik et al.	Oct 2010	B2
9517257	Hubbell	Dec 2016	B2
20060136184	Gustafsson et al.	Jun 2006	A1
20110033450	Thullier et al.	Feb 2011	A1
20140032186	Gustafsson et al.	Jan 2014	A1
20160347830	Behrens et al.	Dec 2016	A1

Number	Date	Country
WO 2011126808	Oct 2011	WO
WO 2013046704	Apr 2013	WO
WO 2013049493	Apr 2013	WO
WO 2015012924	Jan 2015	WO
WO 2017023358	Feb 2017	WO

Fusion proteins and antibodies targeting human red blood cell antigens

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Term Extension

Abstract

Description

Claims

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENT INTEREST

PCT Information

US Referenced Citations (10)

Foreign Referenced Citations (5)

Non-Patent Literature Citations (90)

Related Publications (1)

Provisional Applications (1)

Entry
Villa, Carlos Hipolito, et al. “Coupling Therapeutics to Human Erythrocytes Demonstrates Target-Dependent Effects on Red Cell Physiology While Preserving Efficacy.” Blood 128.22 (2016): 701. (Year: 2016).
Kudo, Daisuke, et al. Critical Care 25.1 (2021): 1-11 (Year: 2021).
Okamoto, Takayuki et al. Critical care research and practice vol. 2012 (2012): 614545. doi:10.1155/2012/614545 (Year: 2012).
Janeway, Charles A. “Immunobiology: The Immune System in Health and Disease.” 2001 (Year: 2001).
Kipriyanov, Sergey M., and Fabrice Le Gall. “Generation and production of engineered antibodies.” Molecular biotechnology 26.1 (2004): 39-60. (Year: 2004).
Andris et al., Variable Region Gene Segment Utilization In Rhesus Monkey Hybridomas Producing Human Red Blood Cell-Specific Antibodies: Predominance of the VH4 Family but not VH4-21(V4-34), Molecular Immunology, vol. 34(3):237-253, Feb. 1997.
Akbarzadeh et al, Liposome: classification, preparation, and applications, Nanoscale Research Letters, vol. 8(1):102, Feb. 2013.
Ballas et al., Rheological properties of antibody-coated red cells, Transfusion, vol. 24(2): 124-129, Mar. 1984.
Baskurt et al., Data reduction methods for ektacytometry in clinical hemorheology, Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, vol. 54(1):99-107, Jan. 2013.
Blancher et al., Characterization of a macaque anti-Rhl7-like monoclonal antibody, Vox Sanguinis, vol. 75(1):58-62, Sep. 1998.
Bourgeaux et al., Drug-loaded erythrocytes: on the road toward marketing approval, Drug Design, Development and Theory, vol. 10:665-76, Feb. 2016.
Brody et al., Deformation and flow of red blood cells in a synthetic lattice: evidence for an active cytoskeleton, Biophysical Journal, vol. 68(6):2224-32, Jun. 1995.
Bruce et al., Changes in the blood group Wright antigens are associated with a mutation at amino acid 658 in human erythrocyte band 3: a site of interaction between band 3 and glycophorin A under certain conditions, Blood, vol. 85(2):541-7, Jan. 1995.
Burton et al., Modelling the structure of the red cell membrane, Biochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire, vol. 89(2):200-15, Apr. 2011.
Carnemolla et al., Targeting thrombomodulin to circulating red blood cells augments its protective effects in models of endotoxemia and ischemia-reperfusion injury, FASEB Journal, vol. 31(2):761-770, Feb. 2017.
Carnemolla et al., Quantitative analysis of thrombomodulin-mediated conversion of protein C to APC: translation from in vitro to in vivo, Journal of Immunological Methods, vol. 384(1-2):21-4, Oct. 2012.
Chasis et al., Erythrocyte membrane rigidity induced by glycophorin A-ligand interaction. Evidence for a ligand-induced association between glycophorin A and skeletal proteins, vol. 75(6):1919-1926, Jun. 1985.
Chasis et al., Signal transduction by glycophorin A: role of extracellular and cytoplasmic domains in a modulatable process, Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 107(4):1351-1357, Oct. 1998.
Chien et al., Principles and Techniques for Assessing Erythrocyte Deformability, Red Cell Rheology, 71-79, 1978.
Chou et al., The Rh and RhAG blood group systems, Immunohematology, vol. 26(4):178-186, Nov. 4, 2010.
Chu et al., Reversible binding of hemoglobin to band 3 constitutes the molecular switch that mediates O2 regulation of erythrocyte properties, Blood, vol. 128(23):2708-2716, Dec. 2016.
Czerwinski et al., Production of large repertories of macaque mAbs to human RBCs using phage display, Transfusion, vol. 39(S10):92S, Apr. 1999.
Ding et al., Anchoring fusion thrombomodulin to the endothelial lumen protects against injury-induced lung thrombosis and inflammation, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 180(3):247-56, Aug. 2009.
Dubel et al., Isolation of IgG antibody Fv-DNA from various mouse and rat hybridoma cell lines using the polymerase chain reaction with a simple set of primers, Journal of Immunology Methods, vol. 175:89-95, Sep. 1994.
Fay et al., Cellular softening mediates leukocyte demargination and trafficking, thereby increasing clinical blood counts. PNAS U.S.A. vol. 113(8):1987-1992, Feb. 2016.
Ferru et al., Regulation of membrane-cytoskeletal interactions by tyrosine phosphorylation of erythrocyte band 3, Blood. vol. 117(22):5998-6006, Jun. 2011.
Fesnak et al., Engineered T cells: the promise and challenges of cancer immunotherapy, Nature Reviews. Cancer, vol. 16(9):566-581, Aug. 2016.
Flatt et al., Study of the D—phenotype reveals erythrocyte membrane alterations in the absence of RHCE, British Journal of Haematology, vol. 158(2):262-273, Jul. 2012.
GenBank Accession No. AAC02646.1, Feb. 1998, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/AAC02646.1.
Ganguly et al., Blood clearance and activity of erythrocyte-coupled fibrinolytics, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 312(3): 1106-1113, Mar. 2005.
Gao et al., Monoclonal antibody humanness score and its applications, BMC Biotechnology, vol. 13:55, Jul. 2013.
Gersh et al., Flow-dependent channel formation in clots by an erythrocyte-bound fibrinolytic agent, Blood, vol. 117(18):4964-4967, May 2011.
Glodek et al., Ligation of complement receptor 1 increases erythrocyte membrane deformability, Blood, vol. 116(26):6063-6071, Dec. 2010.
Godal et al., The normal range of osmotic fragility of red blood cells, Scandinavian Journal of Haematology, vol. 25(2):107-12, Aug. 1980.
Gottstein et al., Generation and characterization of recombinant vascular targeting agents from hybridoma cell lines, Biotechniques, vol. 30(1):190-200, Jan. 2001.
Greineder et al., ICAM-1-targeted thrombomodulin mitigates tissue-factor driven inflammatory thrombosis in a human endothelialized microfluidic model, Blood Advances, vol. 1(18):1452-1465, Aug. 2017.
Grimm et al., Memory of tolerance and induction of regulatory T cells by erythrocyte-targeted antigens, Scientific Reports, vol. 5:15907, Oct. 2015.
Gruswitz et al., Function of human Rh based on structure of RhCG at 2.1 A.,PNAS U.S.A,, vol. 107(21):9638-9643, May 2010.
Head et al., Expression of phosphatidylserine (PS) on wild-type and Gerbich variant erythrocytes following glycophorin-C (GPC) ligation, British Journal of Haematology, vol. 129(1): 130-137, Apr. 2005.
Head et al., Ligation of CD47 mediates phosphatidylserine expression on erythrocytes and a concomitant loss of viability in vitro, British Journal of Haematology, vol. 130(5):788-790, Sep. 2005.