Patent Grant
8399401
This invention relates to non-cytotoxic fusion proteins, and to the therapeutic application thereof as analgesic molecules.
Toxins may be generally divided into two groups according to the type of effect that they have on a target cell. In more detail, the first group of toxins kill their natural target cells, and are therefore known as cytotoxic toxin molecules. This group of toxins is exemplified inter alia by plant toxins such as ricin, and abrin, and by bacterial toxins such as diphtheria toxin, and Pseudomonas exotoxin A. Cytotoxic toxins have attracted much interest in the design of “magic bullets” (e.g. immunoconjugates, which comprise a cytotoxic toxin component and an antibody that binds to a specific marker on a target cell) for the treatment of cellular disorders and conditions such as cancer. Cytotoxic toxins typically kill their target cells by inhibiting the cellular process of protein synthesis.
The second group of toxins, which are known as non-cytotoxic toxins, do not (as their name confirms) kill their natural target cells. Non-cytotoxic toxins have attracted much less commercial interest than have their cytotoxic counterparts, and exert their effects on a target cell by inhibiting cellular processes other than protein synthesis. Non-cytotoxic toxins are produced by a variety of plants, and by a variety of microorganisms such as Clostridium sp. and Neisseria sp.
Clostridial neurotoxins are proteins that typically have a molecular mass of the order of 150 kDa. They are produced by various species of bacteria, especially of the genus Clostridium, most importantly C. tetani and several strains of C. botulinum, C. butyricum and C. argentinense. There are at present eight different classes of the clostridial neurotoxin, namely: tetanus toxin, and botulinum neurotoxin in its serotypes A, B, C1, D, E, F and G, and they all share similar structures and modes of action.
Clostridial neurotoxins represent a major group of non-cytotoxic toxin molecules, and are synthesised by the host bacterium as single polypeptides that are modified post-translationally by a proteolytic cleavage event to form two polypeptide chains joined together by a disulphide bond. The two chains are termed the heavy chain (H-chain or “HC”), which has a molecular mass of approximately 100 kDa, and the light chain (L-chain or “LC”), which has a molecular mass of approximately 50 kDa.
L-chains possess a protease function (zinc-dependent endopeptidase activity) and exhibit a high substrate specificity for vesicle and/or plasma membrane associated proteins involved in the exocytic process. L-chains from different clostridial species or serotypes may hydrolyse different but specific peptide bonds in one of three substrate proteins, namely synaptobrevin, syntaxin or SNAP-25. These substrates are important components of the neurosecretory machinery.
Neisseria sp., most importantly from the species N. gonorrhoeae, produce functionally similar non-cytotoxic proteases. An example of such a protease is IgA protease (see WO99/58571).
It has been well documented in the art that toxin molecules may be re-targeted to a cell that is not the toxin's natural target cell. When so re-targeted, the modified toxin is capable of binding to a desired target cell and, following subsequent translocation into the cytosol, is capable of exerting its effect on the target cell. Said re-targeting is achieved by replacing the natural Targeting Moiety (TM) of the toxin with a different TM. In this regard, the TM is selected so that it will bind to a desired target cell, and allow subsequent passage of the modified toxin into an endosome within the target cell. The modified toxin also comprises a translocation domain to enable entry of the non-cytotoxic protease into the cell cytosol. The translocation domain can be the natural translocation domain of the toxin or it can be a different translocation domain obtained from a microbial protein with translocation activity.
For example, WO94/21300 describes modified clostridial neurotoxin molecules that are capable of regulating Integral Membrane Protein (IMP) density present at the cell surface of the target cell. The modified neurotoxin molecules are thus capable of controlling cell activity (e.g. glucose uptake) of the target cell. WO96/33273 and WO99/17806 describe modified clostridial neurotoxin molecules that target peripheral sensory afferents. The modified neurotoxin molecules are thus capable of demonstrating an analgesic effect. WO00/10598 describes the preparation of modified clostridial neurotoxin molecules that target mucus hypersecreting cells (or neuronal cells controlling said mucus hypersecreting cells), which modified neurotoxins are capable of inhibiting hypersecretion from said cells. WO01/21213 describes modified clostridial neurotoxin molecules that target a wide range of different types of non-neuronal target cells. The modified molecules are thus capable of preventing secretion from the target cells. Additional publications in the technical field of re-targeted toxin molecules include: WO00/62814; WO00/04926; U.S. Pat. No. 5,773,586; WO93/15766; WO00/61192; and WO99/58571.
The above-mentioned TM replacement may be effected by conventional chemical conjugation techniques, which are well known to a skilled person. In this regard, reference is made to Hermanson, G. T. (1996), Bioconjugate techniques, Academic Press, and to Wong, S. S. (1991), Chemistry of protein conjugation and cross-linking, CRC Press.
Chemical conjugation is, however, often imprecise. For example, following conjugation, a TM may become joined to the remainder of the conjugate at more than one attachment site.
Chemical conjugation is also difficult to control. For example, a TM may become joined to the remainder of the modified toxin at an attachment site on the protease component and/or on the translocation component. This is problematic when attachment to only one of said components (preferably at a single site) is desired for therapeutic efficacy.
Thus, chemical conjugation results in a mixed population of modified toxin molecules, which is undesirable.
As an alternative to chemical conjugation, TM replacement may be effected by recombinant preparation of a single polypeptide fusion protein (see WO98/07864). This technique is based on the in vivo bacterial mechanism by which native clostridial neurotoxin (i.e. holotoxin) is prepared, and results in a fusion protein having the following structural arrangement:
NH2−[protease component]−[translocation component]−[TM]−COOH
According to WO98/07864, the TM is placed towards the C-terminal end of the fusion protein. The fusion protein is then activated by treatment with a protease, which cleaves at a site between the protease component and the translocation component. A di-chain protein is thus produced, comprising the protease component as a single polypeptide chain covalently attached (via a disulphide bridge) to another single polypeptide chain containing the translocation component plus TM. Whilst the WO98/07864 methodology follows (in terms of structural arrangement of the fusion protein) the natural expression system of clostridial holotoxin, the present inventors have found that this system may result in the production of certain fusion proteins that have a substantially-reduced binding ability for the intended target cell.
There is therefore a need for an alternative or improved system for constructing a non-cytotoxic fusion protein.
The present invention addresses one or more of the above-mentioned problems by providing a single chain, polypeptide fusion protein, comprising:
The WO98/07864 system works well for the preparation of conjugates having a TM that requires a C-terminal domain for interaction with a Binding Site on a target cell. In this regard, WO98/07864 provides fusion proteins having a C-terminal domain that is “free” to interact with a Binding Site on a target cell. The present inventors have found that this structural arrangement is not suitable for all TMs. One such category of TM is a group of TMs that binds to nociceptive sensory afferents. In more detail, the present inventors have found that the WO 98/07864 fusion protein system is not optimal for TMs requiring a N-terminal domain for interaction with a binding site on a nociceptive sensory afferent. This problem is particularly acute with TMs that require a specific N-terminus amino acid residue or a specific sequence of amino acid residues including the N-terminus amino acid residue for interaction with a binding site on a nociceptive sensory afferent.
In contrast to WO98/07864, the present invention provides a system for preparing non-cytotoxic conjugates, wherein the TM component of the conjugate includes the relevant binding domain in an intra domain or an amino acid sequence located towards the middle (ie. of the linear peptide sequence) of the TM, or preferably located towards the N-terminus of the TM, or more preferably at or near to the N-terminus. The N-terminal domain is capable of binding to a Binding Site on a nociceptive sensory afferent, and the TM preferably has a requirement for a specific and defined sequence of amino acid residue(s) to be free at its N-terminus.
The non-cytotoxic protease component of the present invention is a non-cytotoxic protease, or a fragment thereof, which protease or protease fragment is capable of cleaving different but specific peptide bonds in one of three substrate proteins, namely synaptobrevin, syntaxin or SNAP-25, of the exocytic fusion apparatus in a nociceptive sensory afferent. These substrates are important components of the neurosecretory machinery. The non-cytotoxic protease component of the present invention is preferably a neisserial IgA protease or a fragment thereof or a clostridial neurotoxin L-chain or a fragment thereof. A particularly preferred non-cytotoxic protease component is a botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) L-chain or a fragment thereof.
The translocation component of the present invention enables translocation of the non-cytotoxic protease (or fragment thereof) into the target cell such that functional expression of protease activity occurs within the cytosol of the target cell. The translocation component is preferably capable of forming ion-permeable pores in lipid membranes under conditions of low pH. Preferably it has been found to use only those portions of the protein molecule capable of pore-formation within the endosomal membrane. The translocation component may be obtained from a microbial protein source, in particular from a bacterial or viral protein source. Hence, in one embodiment, the translocation component is a translocating domain of an enzyme, such as a bacterial toxin or viral protein. The translocation component of the present invention is preferably a clostridial neurotoxin H-chain or a fragment thereof. Most preferably it is the HN domain (or a functional component thereof), wherein HN means a portion or fragment of the H-chain of a clostridial neurotoxin approximately equivalent to the amino-terminal half of the H-chain, or the domain corresponding to that fragment in the intact H-chain.
The TM component of the present invention is responsible for binding the conjugate of the present invention to a Binding Site on a target cell. Thus, the TM component is simply a ligand through which a conjugate of the present invention binds to a selected target cell.
In the context of the present invention, the target cell is a nociceptive sensory afferent, preferably a primary nociceptive afferent (e.g. an A-fibre such as an Aδ-fibre or a C-fibre). Thus, the conjugates of the present invention are capable of inhibiting neurotransmitter or neuromodulator [e.g. glutamate, substance P, calcitonin-gene related peptide (CGRP), and/or neuropeptide Y] release from discrete populations of nociceptive sensory afferent neurons. In use, the conjugates reduce or prevent the transmission of sensory afferent signals (e.g. neurotransmitters or neuromodulators) from peripheral to central pain fibres, and therefore have application as therapeutic molecules for the treatment of pain, in particular chronic pain.
It is routine to confirm that a TM binds to a nociceptive sensory afferent. For example, a simple radioactive displacement experiment may be employed in which tissue or cells representative of the nociceptive sensory afferent (for example DRGs) are exposed to labelled (e.g. tritiated) ligand in the presence of an excess of unlabelled ligand. In such an experiment, the relative proportions of non-specific and specific binding may be assessed, thereby allowing confirmation that the ligand binds to the nociceptive sensory afferent target cell. Optionally, the assay may include one or more binding antagonists, and the assay may further comprise observing a loss of ligand binding. Examples of this type of experiment can be found in Hulme, E. C. (1990), Receptor-binding studies, a brief outline, pp. 303-311, In Receptor biochemistry, A Practical Approach, Ed. E. C. Hulme, Oxford University Press.
The fusion proteins of the present invention generally demonstrate a reduced binding affinity (in the region of up to 100-fold) for nociceptive sensory afferent target cells when compared with the corresponding ‘free’ TM. However, despite this observation, the fusion proteins of the present invention surprisingly demonstrate good efficacy. This can be attributed to two principal features. First, the non-cytotoxic protease component is catalytic—thus, the therapeutic effect of a few such molecules is rapidly amplified. Secondly, the receptors present on the nociceptive sensory afferents need only act as a gateway for entry of the therapeutic, and need not necessarily be stimulated to a level required in order to achieve a ligand-receptor mediated pharmacological response. Accordingly, the fusion proteins of the present invention may be administered at a dosage that is much lower that would be employed for other types of analgesic molecules such as NSAIDS, morphine, and gabapentin. The latter molecules are typically administered at high microgram to milligram (even up to hundreds of milligram) quantities, whereas the fusion proteins of the present invention may be administered at much lower dosages, typically at least 10-fold lower, and more typically at 100-fold lower.
The TM preferably comprises a maximum of 50 amino acid residues, more preferably a maximum of 40 amino acid residues, particularly preferably a maximum of 30 amino acid residues, and most preferably a maximum of 20 amino acid residues.
Opioids represent a preferred group of TMs of the present invention. Within this family of peptides is included enkephalins (met and leu), endomorphins 1 and 2, β-endorphin and dynorphin. Opioid peptides are frequently used in the clinic to modify the activity to nociceptors, and other cells involved in the pain response. As exemplified by the three-step World Health Organisation Analgesic Ladder, opioids have entry points into the pharmacological treatment of chronic cancer and non-cancer pain at all three stages, underlining their importance to the treatment of pain. Reference to opioids embraces fragments, variants and derivatives thereof, which retain the ability to bind to nociceptive sensory afferents.
The TM of the invention can also be a molecule that acts as an “agonist” at one or more of the receptors present on a nociceptive sensory afferent, more particularly on a primary nociceptive afferent. Conventionally, an agonist has been considered any molecule that can either increase or decrease activities within a cell, namely any molecule that simply causes an alteration of cell activity. For example, the conventional meaning of an agonist would include a chemical substance capable of combining with a receptor on a cell and initiating a reaction or activity, or a drug that induces an active response by activating receptors, whether the response is an increase or decrease in cellular activity.
However, for the purposes of this invention, an agonist is more specifically defined as a molecule that is capable of stimulating the process of exocytic fusion in a target cell, which process is susceptible to inhibition by a protease (or fragment thereof) capable of cleaving a protein of the exocytic fusion apparatus in said target cell.
Accordingly, the particular agonist definition of the present invention would exclude many molecules that would be conventionally considered as agonists. For example, nerve growth factor (NGF) is an agonist in respect of its ability to promote neuronal differentiation via binding to a TrkA receptor. However, NGF is not an agonist when assessed by the above criteria because it is not a principal inducer of exocytic fusion. In addition, the process that NGF stimulates (i.e. cell differentiation) is not susceptible to inhibition by the protease activity of a non-cytotoxic toxin molecule.
The agonist properties of a TM that binds to a receptor on a nociceptive afferent can be confirmed using the methods described in Example 10.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the target for the TM is the ORL1 receptor. This receptor is a member of the G-protein-coupled class of receptors, and has a seven transmembrane domain structure. The properties of the ORL1 receptor are discussed in detail in Mogil & Pasternak (2001), Pharmacological Reviews, Vol. 53, No. 3, pages 381-415.
In one embodiment, the TM is a molecule that binds (preferably that specifically binds) to the ORL1 receptor. More preferably, the TM is an “agonist” of the ORL1 receptor. The term “agonist” in this context is defined as above.
The agonist properties of a TM that binds to an ORL1 receptor can be confirmed using the methods described in Example 10. These methods are based on previous experiments [see Inoue et al. 1998 [Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 95, 10949-10953]), which confirm that the natural agonist of the ORL1 receptor, nociceptin, causes the induction of substance P release from nociceptive primary afferent neurons. This is supported by the fact that:
Similarly, Inoue et al. confirm that an intraplantar injection of botulinum neurotoxin type A abolishes the nociceptin-induced responses. Since it is known that BoNT inhibits the release of substance P from primary afferent neurons (Welch et al., 2000, Toxicon, 38, 245-258), this confirms the link between nociceptin-ORL1 interaction and subsequent release of substance P.
Thus, a TM can be said to have agonist activity at the ORL1 receptor if the TM causes an induction in the release of substance P from a nociceptive sensory afferent neuron (see Example 10).
In a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention, the TM is nociceptin—the natural ligand for the ORL1 receptor. Nociceptin targets the ORL1 receptor with high affinity. Examples of other preferred TMs include:
The above-identified “variant” TM demonstrates particularly good binding affinity (when compared with natural nociceptin) for nociceptive sensory afferents. This is surprising as the amino acid modifications occur at a position away from the N-terminus of the TM. Moreover, the modifications are almost at the C-terminus of the TM, which in turn is attached to a large polypeptide sequence (i.e. the translocation domain). Generally speaking, a TM-containing fusion protein will demonstrate an approximate 100-fold reduction in binding ability vis-à-vis the TM per se. The above-mentioned “variant” TM per se demonstrates an approximate 3- to 10-fold increase in binding ability for a nociceptive sensory afferent (e.g. via the ORL1 receptor) vis-à-vis natural nociceptin. Thus, a “variant” TM-containing fusion might be expected to demonstrate an approximate 10-fold reduction in binding ability for a nociceptive sensory afferent (e.g. via the ORL1 receptor) vis-à-vis ‘free’ nociceptin. However, the present inventors have demonstrated that such “variant” TM-containing fusion proteins demonstrate a binding ability that (most surprisingly) closely mirrors that of ‘free’ nociceptin—see
In the context of the present invention, the term opioid or an agonist of the ORL1 receptor (such as nociceptin, or any one of the peptides listed in the table above) embraces molecules having at least 70%, preferably at least 80%, more preferably at least 90%, and most preferably at least 95% homology with said opioid or agonist. The agonist homologues retain the agonist properties of nociceptin at the ORL1 receptor, which may be tested using the methods provided in Example 10. Similarly, an opioid homologue substantially retains the binding function of the opioid with which it shows high homology.
The invention also encompasses fragments, variants, and derivatives of any one of the TMs described above. These fragments, variants, and derivatives substantially retain the properties that are ascribed to said TMs.
In addition to the above-mentioned opioid and non-opioid classes of TMs, a variety of other polypeptides are suitable for targeting the conjugates of the present invention to nociceptive sensory afferents (e.g. to nociceptors). In this regard, particular reference is made to galanin and derivatives of galanin. Galanin receptors are found pre- and post-synaptically in DRGs (Liu & Hokfelt, (2002), Trends Pharm. Sci., 23(10), 468-74), and are enhanced in expression during neuropathic pain states. Proteinase-activated receptors (PARs) are also a preferred group of TMs of the present invention, most particularly PAR-2. It is known that agonists of PAR-2 induce/elicit acute inflammation, in part via a neurogenic mechanism. PAR2 is expressed by primary spinal afferent neurons, and PAR2 agonists stimulate release of substance P (SP) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in peripheral tissues
A particularly preferred set of TMs of the present invention includes:
The protease cleavage site of the present invention allows cleavage (preferably controlled cleavage) of the fusion protein at a position between the non-cytotoxic protease component and the TM component. It is this cleavage reaction that converts the fusion protein from a single chain polypeptide into a disulphide-linked, di-chain polypeptide.
According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the TM binds via a domain or amino acid sequence that is located away from the C-terminus of the TM. For example, the relevant binding domain may include an intra domain or an amino acid sequence located towards the middle (i.e. of the linear peptide sequence) of the TM. Preferably, the relevant binding domain is located towards the N-terminus of the TM, more preferably at or near to the N-terminus.
In one embodiment, the single chain polypeptide fusion may include more than one proteolytic cleavage site. However, where two or more such sites exist, they are different, thereby substantially preventing the occurrence of multiple cleavage events in the presence of a single protease. In another embodiment, it is preferred that the single chain polypeptide fusion has a single protease cleavage site.
The protease cleavage sequence(s) may be introduced (and/or any inherent cleavage sequence removed) at the DNA level by conventional means, such as by site-directed mutagenesis. Screening to confirm the presence of cleavage sequences may be performed manually or with the assistance of computer software (e.g. the MapDraw program by DNASTAR, Inc.).
Whilst any protease cleavage site may be employed, the following are preferred:
Also embraced by the term protease cleavage site is an intein, which is a self-cleaving sequence. The self-splicing reaction is controllable, for example by varying the concentration of reducing agent present.
In use, the protease cleavage site is cleaved and the N-terminal region (preferably the N-terminus) of the TM becomes exposed. The resulting polypeptide has a TM with an N-terminal domain or an intra domain that is substantially free from the remainder of the conjugate. This arrangement ensures that the N-terminal component (or intra domain) of the TM may interact directly with a Binding Site on a target cell.
In a preferred embodiment, the TM and the protease cleavage site are distanced apart in the fusion protein by at most 10 amino acid residues, more preferably by at most 5 amino acid residues, and most preferably by zero amino acid residues. Thus, following cleavage of the protease cleavage site, a conjugate is provided with a TM that has an N-terminal domain that is substantially free from the remainder of the conjugate. This arrangement ensures that the N-terminal component of the Targeting Moiety may interact directly with a Binding Site on a target cell.
One advantage associated with the above-mentioned activation step is that the TM only becomes susceptible to N-terminal degradation once proteolytic cleavage of the fusion protein has occurred. In addition, the selection of a specific protease cleavage site permits selective activation of the polypeptide fusion into a di-chain conformation.
Construction of the single-chain polypeptide fusion of the present invention places the protease cleavage site between the TM and the non-cytotoxic protease component.
It is preferred that, in the single-chain fusion, the TM is located between the protease cleavage site and the translocation component. This ensures that the TM is attached to the translocation domain (i.e. as occurs with native clostridial holotoxin), though in the case of the present invention the order of the two components is reversed vis-à-vis native holotoxin. A further advantage with this arrangement is that the TM is located in an exposed loop region of the fusion protein, which has minimal structural effects on the conformation of the fusion protein. In this regard, said loop is variously referred to as the linker, the activation loop, the inter-domain linker, or just the surface exposed loop (Schiavo et al 2000, Phys. Rev., 80, 717-766; Turton et al., 2002, Trends Biochem. Sci., 27, 552-558).
In one embodiment, in the single chain polypeptide, the non-cytotoxic protease component and the translocation component are linked together by a disulphide bond. Thus, following cleavage of the protease cleavage site, the polypeptide assumes a di-chain conformation, wherein the protease and translocation components remain linked together by the disulphide bond. To this end, it is preferred that the protease and translocation components are distanced apart from one another in the single chain fusion protein by a maximum of 100 amino acid residues, more preferably a maximum of 80 amino acid residues, particularly preferably by a maximum of 60 amino acid residues, and most preferably by a maximum of 50 amino acid residues.
In one embodiment, the non-cytotoxic protease component forms a disulphide bond with the translocation component of the fusion protein. For example, the amino acid residue of the protease component that forms the disulphide bond is located within the last 20, preferably within the last 10 C-terminal amino acid residues of the protease component. Similarly, the amino acid residue within the translocation component that forms the second part of the disulphide bond may be located within the first 20, preferably within the first 10 N-terminal amino acid residues of the translocation component.
Alternatively, in the single chain polypeptide, the non-cytotoxic protease component and the TM may be linked together by a disulphide bond. In this regard, the amino acid residue of the TM that forms the disulphide bond is preferably located away from the N-terminus of the TM, more preferably towards to C-terminus of the TM.
In one embodiment, the non-cytotoxic protease component forms a disulphide bond with the TM component of the fusion protein. In this regard, the amino acid residue of the protease component that forms the disulphide bond is preferably located within the last 20, more preferably within the last 10 C-terminal amino acid residues of the protease component. Similarly, the amino acid residue within the TM component that forms the second part of the disulphide bond is preferably located within the last 20, more preferably within the last 10 C-terminal amino acid residues of the TM.
The above disulphide bond arrangements have the advantage that the protease and translocation components are arranged in a manner similar to that for native clostridial neurotoxin. By way of comparison, referring to the primary amino acid sequence for native clostridial neurotoxin, the respective cysteine amino acid residues are distanced apart by between 8 and 27 amino acid residues—taken from Popoff, M R & Marvaud, J-C, 1999, Structural & genomic features of clostridial neurotoxins, Chapter 9, in The Comprehensive Sourcebook of Bacterial Protein Toxins. Ed. Alouf & Freer:
CVRGIITSKTKS----LDKGYNKALNDLC
CVRGIIPFKTKS----LDEGYNKALNDLC
CKSVKAPG-------------------IC
CHKAIDGRS----------LYNKTLDC
CLRLTK---------------NSRDDSTC
CKN-IVSVK----------GIRK---SIC
CKS-VIPRK----------GTKAPP-RLC
CKPVMYKNT----------GKSE----QC
CKKIIPPTNIRENLYNRTASLTDLGGELC
1Information from proteolytic strains only
The fusion protein may comprise one or more purification tags, which are located N-terminal to the protease component and/or C-terminal to the translocation component.
Whilst any purification tag may be employed, the following are preferred:
His-tag (e.g. 6× histidine), preferably as a C-terminal and/or N-terminal tag
MBP-tag (maltose binding protein), preferably as an N-terminal tag
GST-tag (glutathione-S-transferase), preferably as an N-terminal tag
His-MBP-tag, preferably as an N-terminal tag
GST-MBP-tag, preferably as an N-terminal tag
Thioredoxin-tag, preferably as an N-terminal tag
CBD-tag (Chitin Binding Domain), preferably as an N-terminal tag.
According to a further embodiment of the present invention, one or more peptide spacer molecules may be included in the fusion protein. For example, a peptide spacer may be employed between a purification tag and the rest of the fusion protein molecule (e.g. between an N-terminal purification tag and a protease component of the present invention; and/or between a C-terminal purification tag and a translocation component of the present invention). A peptide spacer may be also employed between the TM and translocation components of the present invention.
A variety of different spacer molecules may be employed in any of the fusion proteins of the present invention. Examples of such spacer molecules include those illustrated in
The present inventors have unexpectedly found that the fusion proteins (eg. CPNv/A) of the present invention may demonstrate an improved binding activity for nociceptive sensory afferents when the size of the spacer is selected so that (in use) the C-terminus of the TM and the N-terminus of the translocation component are separated from one another by 40-105 angstroms, preferably by 50-100 angstroms, and more preferably by 50-90 angstroms. In another embodiment, the preferred spacers have an amino acid sequence of 11-29 amino acid residues, preferably 15-27 amino acid residues, and more preferably 20-27 amino acid residues. Suitable spacers may be routinely identified and obtained according to Crasto, C. J. and Feng, J. A. (2000) May, 13(5), pp. 309-312—see also the website with the address: fccc./edu/research/labs/feng/limker.html.
In accordance with a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a DNA sequence that encodes the above-mentioned single chain polypeptide. In a preferred aspect of the present invention, the DNA sequence is prepared as part of a DNA vector, wherein the vector comprises a promoter and terminator.
In a preferred embodiment, the vector has a promoter selected from:
The DNA construct of the present invention is preferably designed in silico, and then synthesised by conventional DNA synthesis techniques.
The above-mentioned DNA sequence information is optionally modified for codon-biasing according to the ultimate host cell (e.g. E. coli) expression system that is to be employed.
The DNA backbone is preferably screened for any inherent nucleic acid sequence, which when transcribed and translated would produce an amino acid sequence corresponding to the protease cleave site encoded by the second peptide-coding sequence. This screening may be performed manually or with the assistance of computer software (e.g. the MapDraw program by DNASTAR, Inc.).
According to a further embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method of preparing a non-cytotoxic agent, comprising:
This aspect provides a di-chain polypeptide, which generally mimics the structure of clostridial holotoxin. In more detail, the resulting di-chain polypeptide typically has a structure wherein:
According to a related aspect, there is provided a method of treating, preventing or ameliorating pain in a subject, comprising administering to said patient a therapeutically effective amount of a single chain or di-chain polypeptide of the invention.
The present invention addresses a wide range of pain conditions, in particular chronic pain conditions. Preferred conditions include cancerous and non-cancerous pain, inflammatory pain and neuropathic pain. The opioid-fusions of the present application are particularly suited to addressing inflammatory pain, though may be less suited to addressing neuropathic pain. The galanin-fusions are more suited to addressing neuropathic pain.
In use, the polypeptides of the present invention are typically employed in the form of a pharmaceutical composition in association with a pharmaceutical carrier, diluent and/or excipient, although the exact form of the composition may be tailored to the mode of administration. Administration is preferably to a mammal, more preferably to a human.
The polypeptides may, for example, be employed in the form of a sterile solution for intra-articular administration or intra-cranial administration. Spinal injection (e.g. epidural or intrathecal) is preferred.
The dosage ranges for administration of the polypeptides of the present invention are those to produce the desired therapeutic effect. It will be appreciated that the dosage range required depends on the precise nature of the components, the route of administration, the nature of the formulation, the age of the patient, the nature, extent or severity of the patient's condition, contraindications, if any, and the judgement of the attending physician.
Suitable daily dosages are in the range 0.0001-1 mg/kg, preferably 0.0001-0.5 mg/kg, more preferably 0.002-0.5 mg/kg, and particularly preferably 0.004-0.5 mg/kg. The unit dosage can vary from less that 1 microgram to 30 mg, but typically will be in the region of 0.01 to 1 mg per dose, which may be administered daily or preferably less frequently, such as weekly or six monthly.
A particularly preferred dosing regimen is based on 2.5 ng of fusion protein (e.g. CPNv/A) as the 1× dose. In this regard, preferred dosages are in the range 1×-100× (i.e. 2.5-250 ng). This dosage range is significantly lower (i.e. at least 10-fold, typically 100-fold lower) than would be employed with other types of analgesic molecules such as NSAIDS, morphine, and gabapentin. Moreover, the above-mentioned difference is considerably magnified when the same comparison is made on a molar basis—this is because the fusion proteins of the present invention have a considerably greater Mw than do conventional ‘small’ molecule therapeutics.
Wide variations in the required dosage, however, are to be expected depending on the precise nature of the components, and the differing efficiencies of various routes of administration.
Variations in these dosage levels can be adjusted using standard empirical routines for optimisation, as is well understood in the art.
Compositions suitable for injection may be in the form of solutions, suspensions or emulsions, or dry powders which are dissolved or suspended in a suitable vehicle prior to use.
Fluid unit dosage forms are typically prepared utilising a pyrogen-free sterile vehicle. The active ingredients, depending on the vehicle and concentration used, can be either dissolved or suspended in the vehicle.
In preparing administrable solutions, the polypeptides can be dissolved in a vehicle, the solution being made isotonic if necessary by addition of sodium chloride and sterilised by filtration through a sterile filter using aseptic techniques before filling into suitable sterile vials or ampoules and sealing. Alternatively, if solution stability is adequate, the solution in its sealed containers may be sterilised by autoclaving.
Advantageously additives such as buffering, solubilising, stabilising, preservative or bactericidal, suspending or emulsifying agents may be dissolved in the vehicle.
Dry powders which are dissolved or suspended in a suitable vehicle prior to use may be prepared by filling pre-sterilised drug substance and other ingredients into a sterile container using aseptic technique in a sterile area.
Alternatively the polypeptides and other ingredients may be dissolved in an aqueous vehicle, the solution is sterilized by filtration and distributed into suitable containers using aseptic technique in a sterile area. The product is then freeze dried and the containers are sealed aseptically.
Parenteral suspensions, suitable for intramuscular, subcutaneous or intradermal injection, are prepared in substantially the same manner, except that the sterile components are suspended in the sterile vehicle, instead of being dissolved and sterilisation cannot be accomplished by filtration. The components may be isolated in a sterile state or alternatively it may be sterilised after isolation, e.g. by gamma irradiation.
Advantageously, a suspending agent for example polyvinylpyrrolidone is included in the composition/s to facilitate uniform distribution of the components.
Definitions Section
Targeting Moiety (TM) means any chemical structure associated with an agent that functionally interacts with a Binding Site to cause a physical association between the agent and the surface of a target cell. In the context of the present invention, the target cell is a nociceptive sensory afferent. The term TM embraces any molecule (i.e. a naturally occurring molecule, or a chemically/physically modified variant thereof) that is capable of binding to a Binding Site on the target cell, which Binding Site is capable of internalisation (e.g. endosome formation)—also referred to as receptor-mediated endocytosis. The TM may possess an endosomal membrane translocation function, in which case separate TM and Translocation Domain components need not be present in an agent of the present invention.
The TM of the present invention binds (preferably specifically binds) to a nociceptive sensory afferent (e.g. a primary nociceptive afferent). In this regard, specifically binds means that the TM binds to a nociceptive sensory afferent (e.g. a primary nociceptive afferent) with a greater affinity than it binds to other neurons such as non-nociceptive afferents, and/or to motor neurons (i.e. the natural target for clostridial neurotoxin holotoxin). The term “specifically binding” can also mean that a given TM binds to a given receptor, for example the ORL1 receptor, with a binding affinity (Ka) of 106 M−1 or greater, preferably 107 M−1 or greater, more preferably 108 M−1 or greater, and most preferably, 109 M−1 or greater.
For the purposes of this invention, an agonist is defined as a molecule that is capable of stimulating the process of exocytic fusion in a target cell, which process is susceptible to inhibition by a protease (or fragment thereof) capable of cleaving a protein of the exocytic fusion apparatus in said target cell.
Accordingly, the particular agonist definition of the present invention would exclude many molecules that would be conventionally considered as agonists.
For example, nerve growth factor (NGF) is an agonist in respect of its ability to promote neuronal differentiation via binding to a TrkA receptor. However, NGF is not an agonist when assessed by the above criteria because it is not a principal inducer of exocytic fusion. In addition, the process that NGF stimulates (i.e. cell differentiation) is not susceptible to inhibition by the protease activity of a non-cytotoxic toxin molecule.
The term “fragment”, when used in relation to a protein, means a peptide having at least thirty-five, preferably at least twenty-five, more preferably at least twenty, and most preferably at least ten amino acid residues of the protein in question.
The term “variant”, when used in relation to a protein, means a peptide or peptide fragment of the protein that contains one or more analogues of an amino acid (e.g. an unnatural amino acid), or a substituted linkage.
The term “derivative”, when used in relation to a protein, means a protein that comprises the protein in question, and a further peptide sequence. The further peptide sequence should preferably not interfere with the basic folding and thus conformational structure of the original protein. Two or more peptides (or fragments, or variants) may be joined together to form a derivative. Alternatively, a peptide (or fragment, or variant) may be joined to an unrelated molecule (e.g. a second, unrelated peptide). Derivatives may be chemically synthesized, but will be typically prepared by recombinant nucleic acid methods. Additional components such as lipid, and/or polysaccharide, and/or polyketide components may be included.
Throughout this specification, reference to the “ORL1 receptor” embraces all members of the ORL1 receptor family. Members of the ORL1 receptor family typically have a seven transmembrane domain structure and are coupled to G-proteins of the Gi and G0 families. A method for determining the G-protein-stimulating activity of ligands of the ORL1 receptor is given in Example 12. A method for measuring reduction in cellular cAMP levels following ORL1 activation is given in Example 11. A further characteristic of members of the ORL1 receptor family is that they are typically able to bind nociceptin (the natural ligand of ORL1). As an example, all alternative splice variants of the ORL1 receptor, are members of the ORL1 receptor family.
The term non-cytotoxic means that the protease molecule in question does not kill the target cell to which it has been re-targeted.
The protease of the present invention embraces all naturally-occurring non-cytotoxic proteases that are capable of cleaving one or more proteins of the exocytic fusion apparatus in eukaryotic cells.
The protease of the present invention is preferably a bacterial protease (or fragment thereof). More preferably the bacterial protease is selected from the genera Clostridium or Neisseria (e.g. a clostridial L-chain, or a neisserial IgA protease preferably from N. gonorrhoeae).
The present invention also embraces modified non-cytotoxic proteases, which include amino acid sequences that do not occur in nature and/or synthetic amino acid residues, so long as the modified proteases still demonstrate the above-mentioned protease activity.
The protease of the present invention preferably demonstrates a serine or metalloprotease activity (e.g. endopeptidase activity). The protease is preferably specific for a SNARE protein (e.g. SNAP-25, synaptobrevin/VAMP, or syntaxin).
Particular mention is made to the protease domains of neurotoxins, for example the protease domains of bacterial neurotoxins. Thus, the present invention embraces the use of neurotoxin domains, which occur in nature, as well as recombinantly prepared versions of said naturally-occurring neurotoxins.
Exemplary neurotoxins are produced by clostridia, and the term clostridial neurotoxin embraces neurotoxins produced by C. tetani (TeNT), and by C. botulinum (BoNT) serotypes A-G, as well as the closely related BoNT-like neurotoxins produced by C. baratii and C. butyricum. The above-mentioned abbreviations are used throughout the present specification. For example, the nomenclature BoNT/A denotes the source of neurotoxin as BoNT (serotype A). Corresponding nomenclature applies to other BoNT serotypes.
The term L-chain fragment means a component of the L-chain of a neurotoxin, which fragment demonstrates a metalloprotease activity and is capable of proteolytically cleaving a vesicle and/or plasma membrane associated protein involved in cellular exocytosis.
A Translocation Domain is a molecule that enables translocation of a protease (or fragment thereof) into a target cell such that a functional expression of protease activity occurs within the cytosol of the target cell. Whether any molecule (e.g. a protein or peptide) possesses the requisite translocation function of the present invention may be confirmed by any one of a number of conventional assays.
For example, Shone C. (1987) describes an in vitro assay employing liposomes, which are challenged with a test molecule. Presence of the requisite translocation function is confirmed by release from the liposomes of K+ and/or labelled NAD, which may be readily monitored [see Shone C. (1987) Eur. J. Biochem; vol. 167(1): pp. 175-180].
A further example is provided by Blaustein R. (1987), which describes a simple in vitro assay employing planar phospholipid bilayer membranes. The membranes are challenged with a test molecule and the requisite translocation function is confirmed by an increase in conductance across said membranes [see Blaustein (1987) FEBS Letts; vol. 226, no. 1: pp. 115-120].
Additional methodology to enable assessment of membrane fusion and thus identification of Translocation Domains suitable for use in the present invention are provided by Methods in Enzymology Vol 220 and 221, Membrane Fusion Techniques, Parts A and B, Academic Press 1993.
The Translocation Domain is preferably capable of formation of ion-permeable pores in lipid membranes under conditions of low pH. Preferably it has been found to use only those portions of the protein molecule capable of pore-formation within the endosomal membrane.
The Translocation Domain may be obtained from a microbial protein source, in particular from a bacterial or viral protein source. Hence, in one embodiment, the Translocation Domain is a translocating domain of an enzyme, such as a bacterial toxin or viral protein.
It is well documented that certain domains of bacterial toxin molecules are capable of forming such pores. It is also known that certain translocation domains of virally expressed membrane fusion proteins are capable of forming such pores. Such domains may be employed in the present invention.
The Translocation Domain may be of a clostridial origin, namely the HN domain (or a functional component thereof). HN means a portion or fragment of the H-chain of a clostridial neurotoxin approximately equivalent to the amino-terminal half of the H-chain, or the domain corresponding to that fragment in the intact H-chain. It is preferred that the H-chain substantially lacks the natural binding function of the HC component of the H-chain. In this regard, the HC function may be removed by deletion of the HC amino acid sequence (either at the DNA synthesis level, or at the post-synthesis level by nuclease or protease treatment). Alternatively, the HC function may be inactivated by chemical or biological treatment. Thus, the H-chain is preferably incapable of binding to the Binding Site on a target cell to which native clostridial neurotoxin (i.e. holotoxin) binds.
In one embodiment, the translocation domain is a HN domain (or a fragment thereof) of a clostridial neurotoxin. Examples of suitable clostridial Translocation Domains include:
For further details on the genetic basis of toxin production in Clostridium botulinum and C. tetani, we refer to Henderson et al (1997) in The Clostridia: Molecular Biology and Pathogenesis, Academic press.
The term HN embraces naturally-occurring neurotoxin HN portions, and modified HN portions having amino acid sequences that do not occur in nature and/or synthetic amino acid residues, so long as the modified HN portions still demonstrate the above-mentioned translocation function.
Alternatively, the Translocation Domain may be of a non-clostridial origin (see Table 4). Examples of non-clostridial Translocation Domain origins include, but not be restricted to, the translocation domain of diphtheria toxin [O=Keefe et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1992) 89, 6202-6206; Silverman et al., J. Biol. Chem. (1993) 269, 22524-22532; and London, E. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Acta., 1112, pp. 25-51], the translocation domain of Pseudomonas exotoxin type A [Prior et al. Biochemistry (1992) 31, 3555-3559], the translocation domains of anthrax toxin [Blanke et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1996) 93, 8437-8442], a variety of fusogenic or hydrophobic peptides of translocating function [Plank et al. J. Biol. Chem. (1994) 269, 12918-12924; and Wagner et al (1992) PNAS, 89, pp. 7934-7938], and amphiphilic peptides [Murata et al (1992) Biochem., 31, pp. 1986-1992]. The Translocation Domain may mirror the Translocation Domain present in a naturally-occurring protein, or may include amino acid variations so long as the variations do not destroy the translocating ability of the Translocation Domain.
Particular examples of viral Translocation Domains suitable for use in the present invention include certain translocating domains of virally expressed membrane fusion proteins. For example, Wagner et al. (1992) and Murata et al. (1992) describe the translocation (i.e. membrane fusion and vesiculation) function of a number of fusogenic and amphiphilic peptides derived from the N-terminal region of influenza virus haemagglutinin. Other virally expressed membrane fusion proteins known to have the desired translocating activity are a translocating domain of a fusogenic peptide of Semliki Forest Virus (SFV), a translocating domain of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) glycoprotein G, a translocating domain of SER virus F protein and a translocating domain of Foamy virus envelope glycoprotein. Virally encoded Aspike proteins have particular application in the context of the present invention, for example, the E1 protein of SFV and the G protein of the G protein of VSV.
Use of the Translocation Domains listed in Table (below) includes use of sequence variants thereof. A variant may comprise one or more conservative nucleic acid substitutions and/or nucleic acid deletions or insertions, with the proviso that the variant possesses the requisite translocating function. A variant may also comprise one or more amino acid substitutions and/or amino acid deletions or insertions, so long as the variant possesses the requisite translocating function.
The Figures are now described in more detail.
FIG. 1—Purification of a LC/A-Nociceptin-HN/A Fusion Protein
Using the methodology outlined in Example 9, a LC/A-nociceptin-HN/A fusion protein was purified from E. coli BL21 cells. Briefly, the soluble products obtained following cell disruption were applied to a nickel-charged affinity capture column. Bound proteins were eluted with 100 mM imidazole, treated with Factor Xa to activate the fusion protein and remove the maltose-binding protein (MBP) tag, then re-applied to a second nickel-charged affinity capture column. Samples from the purification procedure were assessed by SDS-PAGE (Panel A) and Western blotting (Panel B). Anti-nociceptin antisera (obtained from Abcam) were used as the primary antibody for Western blotting. The final purified material in the absence and presence of reducing agent is identified in the lanes marked [−] and [+] respectively.
FIG. 2—Purification of a Nociceptin-LC/A-HN/A Fusion Protein
Using the methodology outlined in Example 9, a nociceptin-LC/A-HN/A fusion protein was purified from E. coli BL21 cells. Briefly, the soluble products obtained following cell disruption were applied to a nickel-charged affinity capture column. Bound proteins were eluted with 100 mM imidazole, treated with Factor Xa to activate the fusion protein and remove the maltose-binding protein (MBP) tag, then re-applied to a second nickel-charged affinity capture column. Samples from the purification procedure were assessed by SDS-PAGE (Panel A) and Western blotting (Panel B). Anti-nociceptin antisera (obtained from Abcam) were used as the primary antibody for Western blotting. The final purified material in the absence and presence of reducing agent is identified in the lanes marked [−] and [+] respectively.
FIG. 3—Purification of a LC/C-Nociceptin-HN/C Fusion Protein
Using the methodology outlined in Example 9, an LC/C-nociceptin-HN/C fusion protein was purified from E. coli BL21 cells. Briefly, the soluble products obtained following cell disruption were applied to a nickel-charged affinity capture column. Bound proteins were eluted with 100 mM imidazole, treated with Factor Xa to activate the fusion protein and remove the maltose-binding protein (MBP) tag, then re-applied to a second nickel-charged affinity capture column. Samples from the purification procedure were assessed by SDS-PAGE (Panel A) and Western blotting (Panel B). Anti-nociceptin antisera (obtained from Abcam) were used as the primary antibody for Western blotting. The final purified material in the absence and presence of reducing agent is identified in the lanes marked [−] and [+] respectively.
FIG. 4—Purification of a LC/A-met Enkephalin-HN/A Fusion Protein
Using the methodology outlined in Example 9, an LC/A-met enkephalin-HN/A fusion protein was purified from E. coli BL21 cells. Briefly, the soluble products obtained following cell disruption were applied to a nickel-charged affinity capture column. Bound proteins were eluted with 100 mM imidazole, treated with Factor Xa to activate the fusion protein and remove the maltose-binding protein (MBP) tag, then re-applied to a second nickel-charged affinity capture column. Samples from the purification procedure were assessed by SDS-PAGE. The final purified material in the absence and presence of reducing agent is identified in the lanes marked [−] and [+] respectively.
FIG. 5—Comparison of Binding Efficacy of a LC/A-Nociceptin-HN/A Fusion Protein and a Nociceptin-LC/A-HN/A Fusion Protein
The ability of nociceptin fusions to bind to the ORL1 receptor was assessed using a simple competition-based assay. Primary cultures of dorsal root ganglia (DRG) were exposed to varying concentrations of test material in the presence of 1 nM [3H]-nociceptin. The reduction in specific binding of the radiolabelled ligand was assessed by scintillation counting, and plotted in comparison to the efficacy of unlabelled ligand (Tocris nociceptin). It is clear that the LC/A-nociceptin-HN/A fusion is far superior to the nociceptin-LC/A-HN/A fusion at interacting with the ORL1 receptor.
FIG. 6—In Vitro Catalytic Activity of a LC/A-Nociceptin-HN/A Fusion Protein
The in vitro endopeptidase activity of the purified LC/A-nociceptin-HN/A fusion protein was determined essentially as described in Chaddock et al 2002, Prot. Express Purif. 25, 219-228. Briefly, SNAP-25 peptide immobilised to an ELISA plate was exposed to varying concentrations of fusion protein for 1 hour at 37° C. Following a series of washes, the amount of cleaved SNAP-25 peptide was quantified by reactivity with a specific antisera.
FIG. 7—Purification of a LC/A-Nociceptin Variant-HN/A Fusion Protein
Using the methodology outlined in Example 9, an LC/A-nociceptin variant-HN/A fusion protein was purified from E. coli BL21 cells. Briefly, the soluble products obtained following cell disruption were applied to a nickel-charged affinity capture column. Bound proteins were eluted with 100 mM imidazole, treated with Factor Xa to activate the fusion protein and remove the maltose-binding protein (MBP) tag, then re-applied to a second nickel-charged affinity capture column. Samples from the purification procedure were assessed by SDS-PAGE. The final purified material in the absence and presence of reducing agent is identified in the lanes marked [−] and [+] respectively.
FIG. 8—Comparison of Binding Efficacy of a LC/A-Nociceptin-HN/A Fusion Protein and a LC/A-Nociceptin Variant-HN/A Fusion Protein
The ability of nociceptin fusions to bind to the ORL1 receptor was assessed using a simple competition-based assay. Primary cultures of dorsal root ganglia (DRG) were exposed to varying concentrations of test material in the presence of 1 nM [3H]-nociceptin. The reduction in specific binding of the radiolabelled ligand was assessed by scintillation counting, and plotted in comparison to the efficacy of unlabelled ligand (Tocris nociceptin). It is clear that the LC/A-nociceptin variant-HN/A fusion (CPNv-LHA) is superior to the LC/A-nociceptin-HN/A fusion (CPN-LHA) at interacting with the ORL1 receptor.
FIG. 9—Expressed/Purified LC/A-Nociceptin-HN/A Fusion Protein Family with Variable Spacer Length Product(s)
Using the methodology outlined in Example 9, variants of the LC/A-CPN-HN/A fusion consisting of GS10, GS30 and HX27 are purified from E. coli cell paste. Samples from the purification of LC/A-CPN(GS10)-HN/A, LC/A-CPN(GS15)-HN/A, LC/A-CPN(GS25)-HN/A, LC/A-CPN(GS30)-HN/A and LC/A-CPN(HX27)-HN/A were assessed by SDS-PAGE prior to staining with Coomassie Blue. The electrophoresis profile indicates purification of a disulphide-bonded di-chain species of the expected molecular mass of CPBE-A. Top panel: M=benchmark molecular mass markers; S=total E. coli protein soluble fraction; FT=proteins that did not bind to the Ni2+-charged Sepharose column; FUSION=fusion protein eluted by the addition of imidazole. Bottom panel: Lane 1=benchmark molecular mass markers; Lane 2=total E. coli protein soluble fraction; Lane 3=purified material following initial capture on Ni2+-charged Sepharose; Lane 4=Factor Xa treated material prior to final capture on Ni2+-charged Sepharose; Lane 5=purified final material post activation with Factor Xa (5 μl); Lane 6=purified final material post activation with Factor Xa (10 μl); Lane 7=purified final material post activation with Factor Xa (20 μl); Lane 8=purified final material post activation with Factor Xa+DTT (5 μl); Lane 9=purified final material post activation with Factor Xa+DTT (10 μl); Lane 10=purified final material post activation with Factor Xa+DTT (20 μl).
FIG. 10—Inhibition of SP Release and Cleavage of SNAP-25 by CPN-A
Briefly, primary cultures of dorsal root ganglia (DRG) were exposed to varying concentrations of CPN-A for 24 hours. Cellular proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, Western blotted, and probed with anti-SNAP-25 to facilitate an assessment of SNAP-25 cleavage. The percentage of cleaved SNAP-25 was calculated by densitometric analysis and plotted against fusion concentration (dashed line). Material was also recovered for an analysis of substance P content using a specific EIA kit. Inhibition of substance P release is illustrated by the solid line. The fusion concentration required to achieve 50% maximal SNAP-25 cleavage is estimated to be 6.30±2.48 nM.
FIG. 11—Inhibition of SP release and cleavage of SNAP-25 over extended Time Periods After Exposure of DRG to CPN-A
Primary cultures of dorsal root ganglia (DRG) were exposed to varying concentrations of CPN-A for 24 hours. Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT/A) was used as a control. After this initial exposure, extracellular material was removed by washing, and the cells incubated at 37° C. for varying periods of time. At specific time points, cellular proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, Western blotted, and probed with anti-SNAP-25 to facilitate an assessment of SNAP-25 cleavage. The percentage of cleaved SNAP-25 was calculated by densitometric analysis and illustrated by the dotted lines. Material was also recovered for an analysis of substance P content using a specific EIA kit. Inhibition of substance P release is illustrated by the solid lines.
FIG. 12—Cleavage of SNAP-25 by CPNv-A
Primary cultures of dorsal root ganglia (DRG) were exposed to varying concentrations of CPNv-A for 24 hours. Cellular proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, Western blotted, and probed with anti-SNAP-25 to facilitate an assessment of SNAP-25 cleavage. The percentage of cleaved SNAP-25 was calculated by densitometric analysis. The fusion concentration required to achieve 50% maximal SNAP-25 cleavage is estimated to be 1.38±0.36 nM.
FIG. 13—Cleavage of SNAP-25 Over Extended Time Periods After Exposure of DRG to CPNv-A
Primary cultures of dorsal root ganglia (DRG) were exposed to varying concentrations of CPNv-A for 24 hours. CPN-A was used as a control. After this initial exposure, extracellular material was removed by washing, and the cells incubated at 37° C. for varying periods of time. At specific time points, cellular proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, Western blotted, and probed with anti-SNAP-25 to facilitate an assessment of SNAP-25 cleavage. The percentage of cleaved SNAP-25 was calculated by densitometric analysis.
FIG. 14—CPNv-A Fusion-Mediated Displacement of [3H]-Nociceptin Binding
The ability of nociceptin fusions to bind to the ORL1 receptor was assessed using a simple competition-based assay. Primary cultures of dorsal root ganglia (DRG) were exposed to varying concentrations of test material in the presence of 1 nM [3H]-nociceptin. The reduction in specific binding of the radiolabelled ligand was assessed by scintillation counting, and plotted in comparison to the efficacy of unlabelled ligand (Tocris nociceptin). It is clear that the LC/A-nociceptin variant-HN/A fusion (labelled as CPNv-LHnA) is superior to the LC/A-nociceptin-HN/A fusion (labelled as CPN-LHnA) at interacting with the ORL1 receptor.
FIG. 15—Expressed/Purified CPNv(Ek)-A Product
Proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE prior to staining with Coomassie Blue. The electrophoresis profile indicates purification of a disulphide-bonded di-chain species of the expected molecular mass of CPNv(Ek)-A. Lane 1=benchmark molecular mass markers; Lane 2=total E. coli protein soluble fraction; Lane 3=purified material following initial capture on Ni2+-charged Sepharose; Lane 4=purified final material post activation with enterokinase (5 μl); Lane 5=purified final material post activation with enterokinase (10 μl); Lane 6=purified final material post activation with enterokinase (20 μl); Lane 7=purified final material post activation with enterokinase+DTT (5 μl); Lane 8=purified final material post activation with enterokinase+DTT (10 μl); Lane 9=purified final material post activation with enterokinase+DTT (20 μl).
FIG. 16—Cleavage of SNAP-25 by CPNv(Ek)-A
Primary cultures of dorsal root ganglia (DRG) were exposed to varying concentrations of CPNv(Ek)-A for 24 hours. Cellular proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, Western blotted, and probed with anti-SNAP-25 to facilitate an assessment of SNAP-25 cleavage. The percentage of cleaved SNAP-25 was calculated by densitometric analysis. CPNv-A as prepared in Example 9 was used for comparison purposes. The percentage cleavage of SNAP-25 by CPNv(Ek)-A (labelled as En activated) and CPNv-A (labelled as Xa activated) are illustrated.
FIG. 17—Expressed/Purified CPNv-C Product
Proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE prior to staining with Coomassie Blue. The electrophoresis profile indicates purification of a disulphide-bonded di-chain species of the expected molecular mass of CPNv-C. Lane 1=benchmark molecular mass markers; Lane 2=total E. coli protein soluble fraction; Lane 3=purified material following initial capture on Ni2+-charged Sepharose; Lane 4=Factor Xa treated material prior to final capture on Ni2+-charged Sepharose; Lane 5=purified material following second capture on Ni2+-charged Sepharose; Lane 6=final purified material; Lane 7=final purified material+DTT; Lane 8=benchmark molecular mass markers.
FIG. 18—Cleavage of Syntaxin by CPNv-C
Primary cultures of dorsal root ganglia (DRG) were exposed to varying concentrations of CPNv-C for 24 hours. Cellular proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, Western blotted, and probed with anti-syntaxin to facilitate an assessment of syntaxin cleavage. The percentage of cleaved syntaxin was calculated by densitometric analysis. The fusion concentration required to achieve 50% maximal syntaxin cleavage is estimated to be 3.13±1.96 nM.
FIG. 19—CPN-A efficacy in the Acute Capsaicin-Induced Mechanical Allodynia Model
The ability of an LC/A-nociceptin-HN/A fusion (CPN/A) to inhibit capsaicin-induced mechanical allodynia was evaluated following subcutaneous intraplantar injection in the rat hind paw. Test animals were evaluated for paw withdrawal frequency (PWF %) in response to a 10 g Von Frey filament stimulus series (10 stimuli×3 trials) prior to recruitment into the study (Pre-Treat); after subcutaneous intraplantar treatment with CPN/A but before capsaicin (Pre-CAP); and following capsaicin challenge post-injection of CPN/A (average of responses at 15′ and 30′; CAP). Capsaicin challenge was achieved by injection of 10 μL of a 0.3% solution. Sample dilutions were prepared in 0.5% BSA/saline.
FIG. 20—CPN-A Efficacy in the Streptozotocin (STZ)-Induced Peripheral Diabetic Neuropathy (Neuropathic Pain) Model
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (250-300 g) are treated with 65 mg/kg STZ in citrate buffer (I.V.) and blood glucose and lipid are measured weekly to define the readiness of the model. Paw Withdrawal Threshold (PWT) is measured in response to a Von Frey filament stimulus series over a period of time. Allodynia is said to be established when the PWT on two consecutive test dates (separated by 1 week) measures below 6 g on the scale. At this point, rats are randomized to either a saline group (negative efficacy control), gabapentin group (positive efficacy control) or a test group (CPN/A). Test materials (20-25 μl) are injected subcutaneously as a single injection (except gabapentin) and the PWT is measured at 1 day post-treatment and periodically thereafter over a 2 week period. Gabapentin (30 mg/kg i.p. @ 3 ml/kg injection volume) is injected daily, 2 hours prior to the start of PWT testing.
FIG. 21—CPNv-A Efficacy in the Acute Capsaicin-Induced Mechanical Allodynia Model
The ability of an LC/A-nociceptin variant-HN/A fusion (CPNv/A) to inhibit capsaicin-induced mechanical allodynia was evaluated following subcutaneous intraplantar injection in the rat hind paw. Test animals were evaluated for paw withdrawal frequency (PWF %) in response to a 10 g Von Frey filament stimulus series (10 stimuli×3 trials) prior to recruitment into the study (Pre-Treat), after subcutaneous intraplantar treatment with CPNv/A but before capsaicin (Pre-CAP), and following capsaicin challenge post-injection of CPNv/A (average of responses at 15′ and 30′; CAP). Capsaicin challenge was achieved by injection of 10 μL of a 0.3% solution. Sample dilutions were prepared in 0.5% BSA/saline. These data are expressed as a normalized paw withdrawal frequency differential, in which the difference between the peak response (post-capsaicin) and the baseline response (pre-capsaicin) is expressed as a percentage. With this analysis, it can be seen that CPNv/A is more potent than CPN/A since a lower dose of CPNv/A is required to achieve similar analgesic effect to that seen with CPN/A.
FIG. 22—Expressed/Purified LC/A-CPLE-HN/A Product
Proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE prior to staining with Coomassie Blue. The electrophoresis profile indicates purification of a disulphide-bonded di-chain species of the expected molecular mass of CPLE-A. Lane 1=benchmark molecular mass markers; Lane 2=total E. coli protein soluble fraction; Lane 3=purified material following initial capture on Ni2+-charged Sepharose; Lane 4=Factor Xa treated material prior to final capture on Ni2+-charged Sepharose; Lane 5=purified material following second capture on Ni2+-charged Sepharose; Lane 6=final purified material; Lane 7=final purified material+DTT.
FIG. 23—Expressed/Purified LC/A-CPBE-HN/A Product
Proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE prior to staining with Coomassie Blue. The electrophoresis profile indicates purification of a disulphide-bonded di-chain species of the expected molecular mass of CPBE-A. Lane 1=total E. coli protein soluble fraction; Lane 2=purified material following initial capture on Ni2+-charged Sepharose; Lane 3=Factor Xa treated material prior to final capture on Ni2+-charged Sepharose; Lane 4=purified final material post activation with Factor Xa (5 μl; Lane 5=purified final material post activation with Factor Xa (10 μl); Lane 6=purified final material post activation with Factor Xa (20 μl); Lane 7=purified final material post activation with Factor Xa+DTT (5 μl); Lane 8=purified final material post activation with Factor Xa+DTT (10 μl); Lane 9=purified final material post activation with Factor Xa+DTT (20 μl); Lane 10=benchmark molecular mass markers.
FIG. 24—Expressed/Purified CPOP-A Product
Proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE prior to staining with Coomassie Blue. The electrophoresis profile indicates purification of a disulphide-bonded di-chain species of the expected molecular mass of CPOP-A. Lane 1=benchmark molecular mass markers; Lane 2=purified material following initial capture on Ni2+-charged Sepharose; Lane 3=Factor Xa treated material prior to final capture on Ni2+-charged Sepharose; Lane 4=purified material following second capture on Ni2+-charged Sepharose; Lane 5=purified final material post activation with Factor Xa (5 μl); Lane 6=purified final material post activation with Factor Xa (10 μl); Lane 7=purified final material post activation with Factor Xa (20 μl); Lane 8=purified final material post activation with Factor Xa+DTT (5 μl); Lane 9=purified final material post activation with Factor Xa+DTT (10 μl); Lane 10=purified final material post activation with Factor Xa+DTT (20 μl).
FIG. 25—Expressed/Purified CPOPv-A Product
Proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE prior to staining with Coomassie Blue. The electrophoresis profile indicates purification of a disulphide-bonded di-chain species of the expected molecular mass of CPOPv-A. Lane 1=benchmark molecular mass markers; Lane 2=total E. coli protein soluble fraction; Lane 3=purified material following initial capture on Ni2+-charged Sepharose; Lane 4=Factor Xa treated material prior to final capture on Ni2+-charged Sepharose; Lane 5=purified final material post activation with Factor Xa (5 μl); Lane 6=purified final material post activation with Factor Xa (10 μl); Lane 7=purified final material post activation with Factor Xa (20 μl); Lane 8=purified final material post activation with Factor Xa+DTT (5 μl); Lane 9=purified final material post activation with Factor Xa+DTT (10 μl); Lane 10=purified final material post activation with Factor Xa+DTT (20 μl).
FIG. 26—In vitro SNAP-25 Cleavage in a DRG Cell Model
Primary cultures of dorsal root ganglia (DRG) were exposed to varying concentrations of CPOPv-A for 24 hours. Cellular proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, Western blotted, and probed with anti-SNAP-25 to facilitate an assessment of SNAP-25 cleavage. The percentage of cleaved SNAP-25 was calculated by densitometric analysis.
FIG. 27—Expressed/Purified CPNv-A-FXa-HT (Removable His-Tag)
Proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE prior to staining with Coomassie Blue. The electrophoresis profile indicates purification of a disulphide-bonded di-chain species of the expected molecular mass of CPNv-A-FXa-HT. Lane 1=benchmark molecular mass markers; Lane 2=total E. coli protein soluble fraction; Lane 3=Factor Xa treated material prior to final capture on Ni2+-charged Sepharose; Lane 4=purified final material post activation with Factor Xa; Lane 5=purified final material post activation with Factor Xa+DTT.
FIG. 28—In vitro Efficacy of LC/A-Nociceptin-HN/A Fusion Proteins with Variable Spacer Length, as Assessed by Ligand Competition Assay
The ability of LC/A-nociceptin-HN/A fusions of variable spacer length to bind to the ORL1 receptor was assessed using a simple competition-based assay. Primary cultures of dorsal root ganglia (DRG) were exposed to varying concentrations of test material in the presence of 1 nM [3H]-nociceptin. The reduction in specific binding of the radiolabelled ligand was assessed by scintillation counting, and plotted in comparison to the efficacy of unlabelled ligand (Tocris nociceptin). The upper panel illustrates the displacement characteristics of the GS0, GS20, GS30 and Hx27 spacers, whilst the lower panel illustrates the displacement achieved by the GS10, GS15 and GS25 spaced fusion proteins. It is concluded that the GS0 and GS30 spacers are ineffective, and the GS10 is poorly effective, at displacing nociceptin from the ORL1 receptor.
FIG. 29—In vitro Efficacy of LC/A-Nociceptin-HN/A Fusion Proteins with Variable Spacer Length, as Assessed by in vitro SNAP-25 Cleavage
Primary cultures of dorsal root ganglia (DRG) were exposed to varying concentrations of CPN-A (of variable spacer length) for 24 hours. Cellular proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, Western blotted, and probed with anti-SNAP-25 to facilitate an assessment of SNAP-25 cleavage. The percentage of cleaved SNAP-25 was calculated by densitometric analysis. The poorly effective binding characteristics of the GS10 spaced fusion protein (see
SEQ ID NO:s
The following procedure creates the LC and HN fragments for use as the component backbone for multidomain fusion expression. This example is based on preparation of a serotype A based clone (SEQ ID NO:1 and SEQ ID NO:2), though the procedures and methods are equally applicable to the other serotypes [illustrated by the sequence listing for serotype B (SEQ ID NO:3 and SEQ ID NO:4) and serotype C (SEQ ID NO:5 and SEQ ID NO:6)].
Preparation of Cloning and Expression Vectors
pCR 4 (Invitrogen) is the chosen standard cloning vector, selected due to the lack of restriction sequences within the vector and adjacent sequencing primer sites for easy construct confirmation. The expression vector is based on the pMAL (NEB) expression vector, which has the desired restriction sequences within the multiple cloning site in the correct orientation for construct insertion (BamHI-SalI-PstI-HindIII). A fragment of the expression vector has been removed to create a non-mobilisable plasmid and a variety of different fusion tags have been inserted to increase purification options.
Preparation of Protease (e.g. LC/A) Insert
The LC/A (SEQ ID NO:1) is created by one of two ways:
The DNA sequence is designed by back translation of the LC/A amino acid sequence [obtained from freely available database sources such as GenBank (accession number P10845) or Swissprot (accession locus BXA1_CLOBO) using one of a variety of reverse translation software tools (for example EditSeq best E. coli reverse translation (DNASTAR Inc.), or Backtranslation tool v2.0 (Entelechon)]. BamHI/SalI recognition sequences are incorporated at the 5′ and 3′ ends respectively of the sequence, maintaining the correct reading frame. The DNA sequence is screened (using software such as MapDraw, DNASTAR Inc.) for restriction enzyme cleavage sequences incorporated during the back translation. Any cleavage sequences that are found to be common to those required by the cloning system are removed manually from the proposed coding sequence ensuring common E. coli codon usage is maintained. E. coli codon usage is assessed by reference to software programs such as Graphical Codon Usage Analyser (Geneart), and the % GC content and codon usage ratio assessed by reference to published codon usage tables (for example GenBank Release 143, 13 Sep. 2004). This optimised DNA sequence containing the LC/A open reading frame (ORF) is then commercially synthesized (for example by Entelechon, Geneart or Sigma-Genosys) and is provided in the pCR 4 vector.
The alternative method is to use PCR amplification from an existing DNA sequence with BamHI and SalI restriction enzyme sequences incorporated into the 5′ and 3′ PCR primers respectively. Complementary oligonucleotide primers are chemically synthesised by a supplier (for example MWG or Sigma-Genosys), so that each pair has the ability to hybridize to the opposite strands (3′ ends pointing “towards” each other) flanking the stretch of Clostridium target DNA, one oligonucleotide for each of the two DNA strands. To generate a PCR product the pair of short oligonucleotide primers specific for the Clostridium DNA sequence are mixed with the Clostridium DNA template and other reaction components and placed in a machine (the ‘PCR machine’) that can change the incubation temperature of the reaction tube automatically, cycling between approximately 94° C. (for denaturation), 55° C. (for oligonucleotide annealing), and 72° C. (for synthesis). Other reagents required for amplification of a PCR product include a DNA polymerase (such as Taq or Pfu polymerase), each of the four nucleotide dNTP building blocks of DNA in equimolar amounts (50-200 μM) and a buffer appropriate for the enzyme optimised for Mg2+ concentration (0.5-5 mM).
The amplification product is cloned into pCR 4 using either, TOPO TA cloning for Taq PCR products or Zero Blunt TOPO cloning for Pfu PCR products (both kits commercially available from Invitrogen). The resultant clone is checked by sequencing. Any additional restriction sequences which are not compatible with the cloning system are then removed using site directed mutagenesis [for example, using Quickchange (Stratagene Inc.)].
Preparation of Translocation (e.g. HN) Insert
The HN/A (SEQ ID NO:2) is created by one of two ways:
The DNA sequence is designed by back translation of the HN/A amino acid sequence [obtained from freely available database sources such as GenBank (accession number P10845) or Swissprot (accession locus BXA1_CLOBO)] using one of a variety of reverse translation software tools [for example EditSeq best E. coli reverse translation (DNASTAR Inc.), or Backtranslation tool v2.0 (Entelechon)]. A PstI restriction sequence added to the N-terminus and XbaI-stop codon-HindIII to the C-terminus ensuring the correct reading frame is maintained. The DNA sequence is screened (using software such as MapDraw, DNASTAR Inc.) for restriction enzyme cleavage sequences incorporated during the back translation. Any sequences that are found to be common to those required by the cloning system are removed manually from the proposed coding sequence ensuring common E. coli codon usage is maintained. E. coli codon usage is assessed by reference to software programs such as Graphical Codon Usage Analyser (Geneart), and the % GC content and codon usage ratio assessed by reference to published codon usage tables (for example GenBank Release 143, 13 Sep. 2004). This optimised DNA sequence is then commercially synthesized (for example by Entelechon, Geneart or Sigma-Genosys) and is provided in the pCR 4 vector.
The alternative method is to use PCR amplification from an existing DNA sequence with PstI and XbaI-stop codon-HindIII restriction enzyme sequences incorporated into the 5′ and 3′ PCR primers respectively. The PCR amplification is performed as described above. The PCR product is inserted into pCR 4 vector and checked by sequencing. Any additional restriction sequences which are not compatible with the cloning system are then removed using site directed mutagenesis [for example using Quickchange (Stratagene Inc.)].
Preparation of Linker-Nociceptin-Spacer Insert
The LC-HN linker can be designed from first principle, using the existing sequence information for the linker as the template. For example, the serotype A linker (in this case defined as the inter-domain polypeptide region that exists between the cysteines of the disulphide bridge between LC and HN) is 23 amino acids long and has the sequence VRGIITSKTKSLDKGYNKALNDL (SEQ ID NO:104). Within this sequence, it is understood that proteolytic activation in nature leads to an HN domain that has an N-terminus of the sequence ALNDL. This sequence information is freely available from available database sources such as GenBank (accession number P10845) or Swissprot (accession locus BXA1_CLOBO). Into this linker a Factor Xa site, nociceptin and spacer are incorporated; and using one of a variety of reverse translation software tools [for example EditSeq best E. coli reverse translation (DNASTAR Inc.), or Backtranslation tool v2.0 (Entelechon)], the DNA sequence encoding the linker-ligand-spacer region is determined. Restriction sites are then incorporated into the DNA sequence and can be arranged as BamHI-SalI-linker-protease site-nociceptin-NheI-spacer-SpeI-PstI-XbaI-stop codon-HindIII (SEQ ID NO:7). It is important to ensure the correct reading frame is maintained for the spacer, nociceptin and restriction sequences and that the XbaI sequence is not preceded by the bases, TC, which would result on DAM methylation. The DNA sequence is screened for restriction sequence incorporation, and any additional sequences are removed manually from the remaining sequence ensuring common E. coli codon usage is maintained. E. coli codon usage is assessed by reference to software programs such as Graphical Codon Usage Analyser (Geneart), and the % GC content and codon usage ratio assessed by reference to published codon usage tables (for example, GenBank Release 143, 13 Sep. 2004). This optimised DNA sequence is then commercially synthesized (for example by Entelechon, Geneart or Sigma-Genosys) and is provided in the pCR 4 vector.
Preparation of the LC/A-Nociceptin-HN/A Fusion
In order to create the LC-linker-nociceptin-spacer-HN construct (SEQ ID NO:13), the pCR 4 vector encoding the linker (SEQ ID NO:7) is cleaved with BamHI+SalI restriction enzymes. This cleaved vector then serves as the recipient vector for insertion and ligation of the LC/A DNA (SEQ ID NO:1) cleaved with BamHI+SalI. The resulting plasmid DNA is then cleaved with PstI+XbaI restriction enzymes and serves as the recipient vector for the insertion and ligation of the HN/A DNA (SEQ ID NO:2) cleaved with PstI+XbaI. The final construct contains the LC-linker-nociceptin-spacer-HN ORF (SEQ ID NO:13) for transfer into expression vectors for expression to result in a fusion protein of the sequence illustrated in SEQ ID NO:14.
The LC/A-HN/A backbone is constructed as described in Example 2 using the synthesised A serotype linker with the addition of a Factor Xa site for activation, arranged as BamHI-SalI-linker-protease site-linker-PstI-XbaI-stop codon-HindIII (SEQ ID NO:8). The LC/A-HN/A backbone and the synthesised N-terminal presentation nociceptin insert (SEQ ID NO:9) are cleaved with BamHI+HindIII restriction enzymes, gel purified and ligated together to create a nociceptin-spacer-LC-linker-HN. The ORF (SEQ ID NO:15) is then cut out using restriction enzymes AvaI+XbaI for transfer into expression vectors for expression to result in a fusion protein of the sequence illustrated in SEQ ID NO:16.
Following the methods used in Examples 1 and 2, the LC/C (SEQ ID NO:5) and HN/C (SEQ ID NO:6) are created and inserted into the C serotype linker arranged as BamHI-SalI-linker-protease site-nociceptin-NheI-spacer-SpeI-PstI-XbaI-stop codon-HindIII (SEQ ID NO:10). The final construct contains the LC-linker-nociceptin-spacer-HN ORF (SEQ ID NO:17) for expression as a protein of the sequence illustrated in SEQ ID NO:18.
Following the methods used in Examples 1 and 2, the LC/C (SEQ ID NO:5) and HN/C (SEQ ID NO:6) are created and inserted into the A serotype linker arranged as BamHI-SalI-linker-protease site-nociceptin-NheI-spacer-SpeI-PstI-XbaI-stop codon-HindIII (SEQ ID NO:7). The final construct contains the LC-linker-nociceptin-spacer-HN ORF (SEQ ID NO:19) for expression as a protein of the sequence illustrated in SEQ ID NO:20.
Due to the small, five-amino acid, size of the met-enkephalin ligand the LC/A-met enkephalin-HN/A fusion is created by site directed mutagenesis [for example using Quickchange (Stratagene Inc.)] using the LC/A-nociceptin-HN/A fusion (SEQ ID NO:13) as a template. Oligonucleotides are designed encoding the YGGFM (SEQ ID NO:105) met-enkephalin peptide, ensuring standard E. coli codon usage is maintained and no additional restriction sites are incorporated, flanked by sequences complimentary to the linker region of the LC/A-nociceptin-HN/A fusion (SEQ ID NO:13) either side on the nociceptin section. The SDM product is checked by sequencing and the final construct containing the LC-linker-met enkephalin-spacer-HN ORF (SEQ ID NO:21) for expression as a protein of the sequence illustrated in SEQ ID NO:22.
Following the methods used in Examples 1 and 2, the LC/A (SEQ ID NO:1) and HN/A (SEQ ID NO:2) are created and inserted into the A serotype β endorphin linker arranged as BamHI-SalI-linker-protease site-β endorphin-NheI-spacer-SpeI-PstI-XbaI-stop codon-HindIII (SEQ ID NO:11). The final construct contains the LC-linker-β endorphin-spacer-HN ORF (SEQ ID NO:23) for expression as a protein of the sequence illustrated in SEQ ID NO:24.
Following the methods used in Examples 1 and 2, the LC/A (SEQ ID NO:1) and HN/A (SEQ ID NO:2) are created and inserted into the A serotype nociceptin variant linker arranged as BamHI-SalI-linker-protease site-nociceptin variant-NheI-spacer-SpeI-PstI-XbaI-stop codon-HindIII (SEQ ID NO:12). The final construct contains the LC-linker-nociceptin variant-spacer-HN ORF (SEQ ID NO:25) for expression as a protein of the sequence illustrated in SEQ ID NO:26.
Defrost falcon tube containing 25 ml 50 mM HEPES pH 7.2, 200 mM NaCl and approximately 10 g of E. coli BL21 cell paste. Make the thawed cell paste up to 80 ml with 50 mM HEPES pH 7.2, 200 mM NaCl and sonicate on ice 30 seconds on, 30 seconds off for 10 cycles at a power of 22 microns ensuring the sample remains cool. Spin the lysed cells at 18 000 rpm, 4° C. for 30 minutes. Load the supernatant onto a 0.1 M NiSO4 charged Chelating column (20-30 ml column is sufficient) equilibrated with 50 mM HEPES pH 7.2, 200 mM NaCl. Using a step gradient of 10 and 40 mM imidazol, wash away the non-specific bound protein and elute the fusion protein with 100 mM imidazol. Dialyse the eluted fusion protein against 5 L of 50 mM HEPES pH 7.2, 200 mM NaCl at 4° C. overnight and measure the OD of the dialysed fusion protein. Add 1 unit of factor Xa per 100 μg fusion protein and Incubate at 25° C. static overnight. Load onto a 0.1 M NiSO4 charged Chelating column (20-30 ml column is sufficient) equilibrated with 50 mM HEPES pH 7.2, 200 mM NaCl. Wash column to baseline with 50 mM HEPES pH 7.2, 200 mM NaCl. Using a step gradient of 10 and 40 mM imidazol, wash away the non-specific bound protein and elute the fusion protein with 100 mM imidazol. Dialyse the eluted fusion protein against 5 L of 50 mM HEPES pH 7.2, 200 mM NaCl at 4° C. overnight and concentrate the fusion to about 2 mg/ml, aliquot sample and freeze at −20° C. Test purified protein using OD, BCA, purity analysis and SNAP-25 assessments.
Materials
Substance P EIA is obtained from R&D Systems, UK.
Methods
Primary neuronal cultures of eDRG are established as described previously (Duggan et al., 2002). Substance P release from the cultures is assessed by EIA, essentially as described previously (Duggan et al., 2002). The TM of interest is added to the neuronal cultures (established for at least 2 weeks prior to treatment); control cultures are performed in parallel by addition of vehicle in place of TM. Stimulated (100 mM KCl) and basal release, together with total cell lysate content, of substance P are obtained for both control and TM treated cultures. Substance P immunoreactivity is measured using Substance P Enzyme Immunoassay Kits (Cayman Chemical Company, USA or R&D Systems, UK) according to manufacturers' instructions.
The amount of Substance P released by the neuronal cells in the presence of the TM of interest is compared to the release obtained in the presence and absence of 100 mM KCl. Stimulation of Substance P release by the TM of interest above the basal release, establishes that the TM of interest is an “agonist ligand” as defined in this specification. If desired the stimulation of Substance P release by the TM of interest can be compared to a standard Substance P release-curve produced using the natural ORL-1 receptor ligand, nociceptin (Tocris).
Confirmation that a given TM is acting via the ORL1 receptor is provided by the following test, in which the TMs ability to inhibit forskolin-stimulated cAMP production is assessed.
Materials
[3H]adenine and [14C]cAMP are obtained from GE Healthcare
Methods
The test is conducted essentially as described previously by Meunier et al. [Isolation and structure of the endogenous agonist of opioid receptor-like ORL1 receptor. Nature 377: 532-535, 1995] in intact transfected-CHO cells plated on 24-well plastic plates.
To the cells is added [3H]adenine (1.0 μCi) in 0.4 ml of culture medium. The cells remain at 37° C. for 2 h to allow the adenine to incorporate into the intracellular ATP pool. After 2 h, the cells are washed once with incubation buffer containing: 130 mM NaCl, 4.8 mM KCl, 1.2 mM KH2PO4, 1.3 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 10 mM glucose, 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin and 25 mM HEPES pH 7.4, and replaced with buffer containing forskolin (10 μM) and isobutylmethylxanthine (50 μM) with or without the TM of interest. After 10 min, the medium is aspirated and replaced with 0.5 ml, 0.2 M HCl. Approximately 1000 cpm of [14C]cAMP is added to each well and used as an internal standard. The contents of the wells are then transferred to columns of 0.65 g dry alumina powder. The columns are eluted with 4 ml of 5 mM HCl, 0.5 ml of 0.1 M ammonium acetate, then two additional milliliters of ammonium acetate. The final eluate is collected into scintillation vials and counted for 14C and tritium. Amounts collected are corrected for recovery of [14C]cAMP. TMs that are agonists at the ORL1 receptor cause a reduction in the level of cAMP produced in response to forskolin.
Confirmation that a given TM is acting via the ORL1 receptor is also provided by the following test, a GTPγS binding functional assay.
Materials
[35S]GTPγS is obtained from GE Healthcare
Wheatgerm agglutinin-coated (SPA) beads are obtained from GE Healthcare
Methods
This assay is carried out essentially as described by Traynor and Nahorski [Modulation by μ-opioid agonists of guanosine-5-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate binding to membranes from human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. Mol. Pharmacol. 47: 848-854, 1995].
Cells are scraped from tissue culture dishes into 20 mM HEPES, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, then centrifuged at 500×g for 10 min. Cells are resuspended in this buffer and homogenized with a Polytron Homogenizer.
The homogenate is centrifuged at 27,000×g for 15 min, and the pellet resuspended in buffer A, containing: 20 mM HEPES, 10 mM MgCl2, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.4. The suspension is recentrifuged at 20,000×g and suspended once more in buffer A. For the binding assay, membranes (8-15 μg protein) are incubated with [35S]GTP S (50 pM), GDP (10 μM), with and without the TM of interest, in a total volume of 1.0 ml, for 60 min at 25° C. Samples are filtered over glass fibre filters and counted as described for the binding assays.
The linker-nociceptin-spacer insert is prepared as described in Example 2.
Preparation of the LC/A-Nociceptin-HN/A Fusion
In order to create the LC-linker-nociceptin-spacer-HN construct (SEQ ID NO:13), the pCR 4 vector encoding the linker (SEQ ID NO:7) is cleaved with BamHI+SalI restriction enzymes. This cleaved vector then serves as the recipient for insertion and ligation of the LC/A DNA (SEQ ID NO:1) also cleaved with BamHI+SalI. The resulting plasmid DNA is then cleaved with BamHI+HindIII restriction enzymes and the LC/A-linker fragment inserted into a similarly cleaved vector containing a unique multiple cloning site for BamHI, SalI, PstI, and HindIII such as the pMAL vector (NEB). The HN/A DNA (SEQ ID NO:2) is then cleaved with PstI+HindIII restriction enzymes and inserted into the similarly cleaved pMAL-LC/A-linker construct. The final construct contains the LC-linker-nociceptin-spacer-HN ORF (SEQ ID NO:13) for expression as a protein of the sequence illustrated in SEQ ID NO:14.
In order to create the nociceptin-spacer-LC/A-HN/A construct, an A serotype linker with the addition of a Factor Xa site for activation, arranged as BamHI-SalI-linker-protease site-linker-PstI-XbaI-stop codon-HindIII (SEQ ID NO:8) is synthesised as described in Example 13. The pCR 4 vector encoding the linker is cleaved with BamHI+SalI restriction enzymes. This cleaved vector then serves as the recipient for insertion and ligation of the LC/A DNA (SEQ ID NO:1) also cleaved with BamHI+SalI. The resulting plasmid DNA is then cleaved with BamHI+HindIII restriction enzymes and the LC/A-linker fragment inserted into a similarly cleaved vector containing the synthesised N-terminal presentation nociceptin insert (SEQ ID NO:9). This construct is then cleaved with AvaI+HindIII and inserted into an expression vector such as the pMAL plasmid (NEB). The HN/A DNA (SEQ ID NO:2) is then cleaved with PstI+HindIII restriction enzymes and inserted into the similarly cleaved pMAL-nociceptin-LC/A-linker construct. The final construct contains the nociceptin-spacer-LC/A-HN/A ORF (SEQ ID NO:51) for expression as a protein of the sequence illustrated in SEQ ID NO:52.
Using the same strategy as employed in Example 2, a range of DNA linkers were prepared that encoded nociceptin and variable spacer content. Using one of a variety of reverse translation software tools [for example EditSeq best E. coli reverse translation (DNASTAR Inc.), or Backtranslation tool v2.0 (Entelechon)], the DNA sequence encoding the linker-ligand-spacer region is determined. Restriction sites are then incorporated into the DNA sequence and can be arranged as BamHI-SalI-linker-protease site-nociceptin-NheI-spacer-SpeI-PstI-XbaI-stop codon-HindIII (SEQ ID NO:53 to SEQ ID NO:57). It is important to ensure the correct reading frame is maintained for the spacer, nociceptin and restriction sequences and that the XbaI sequence is not preceded by the bases, TC which would result on DAM methylation. The DNA sequence is screened for restriction sequence incorporation and any additional sequences are removed manually from the remaining sequence ensuring common E. coli codon usage is maintained. E. coli codon usage is assessed by reference to software programs such as Graphical Codon Usage Analyser (Geneart), and the % GC content and codon usage ratio assessed by reference to published codon usage tables (for example GenBank Release 143, 13 Sep. 2004). This optimised DNA sequence is then commercially synthesized (for example by Entelechon, Geneart or Sigma-Genosys) and is provided in the pCR 4 vector.
The spacers that were created included:
By way of example, in order to create the LC/A-CPN(GS15)-HN/A fusion construct (SEQ ID NO:58), the pCR 4 vector encoding the linker (SEQ ID NO:54) is cleaved with BamHI+SalI restriction enzymes. This cleaved vector then serves as the recipient vector for insertion and ligation of the LC/A DNA (SEQ ID NO:1) also cleaved with BamHI+SalI. The resulting plasmid DNA is then cleaved with BamHI+HindIII restriction enzymes and the LC/A-linker fragment inserted into a similarly cleaved vector containing a unique multiple cloning site for BamHI, SalI, PstI, and HindIII such as the pMAL vector (NEB). The HN/A DNA (SEQ ID NO:2) is then cleaved with PstI+HindIII restriction enzymes and inserted into the similarly cleaved pMAL-LC/A-linker construct. The final construct contains the LC/A-CPN(GS15)-HN/A ORF (SEQ ID NO:58) for expression as a protein of the sequence illustrated in SEQ ID NO:59.
As a further example, to create the LC/A-CPN(GS25)-HN/A fusion construct (SEQ ID NO:60), the pCR 4 vector encoding the linker (SEQ ID NO:55) is cleaved with BamHI+SalI restriction enzymes. This cleaved vector then serves as the recipient vector for insertion and ligation of the LC/A DNA (SEQ ID NO:1) cleaved with BamHI+SalI. The resulting plasmid DNA is then cleaved with BamHI+HindIII restriction enzymes and the LC/A-linker fragment inserted into a similarly cleaved vector containing a unique multiple cloning site for BamHI, SalI, PstI, and HindIII such as the pMAL vector (NEB). The HN/A DNA (SEQ ID NO:2) is then cleaved with PstI+HindIII restriction enzymes and inserted into the similarly cleaved pMAL-LC/A-linker construct. The final construct contains the LC/A-CPN(GS25)-HN/A ORF (SEQ ID NO:60) for expression as a protein of the sequence illustrated in SEQ ID NO:61.
Variants of the LC/A-CPN-HN/A fusion consisting of GS10, GS30 and HX27 are similarly created. Using the purification methodology described in Example 9, fusion protein is purified from E. coli cell paste.
Fusion protein prepared according to Examples 2 and 9 was assessed in the eDRG neuronal cell model.
Assays for the inhibition of substance P release and cleavage of SNAP-25 have been previously reported (Duggan et al., 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 34846-34852). Briefly, dorsal root ganglia neurons are harvested from 15-day-old fetal Sprague-Dawley rats and dissociated cells plated onto 24-well plates coated with Matrigel at a density of 1×106 cells/well. One day post-plating the cells are treated with 10 μM cytosine β-D-arabinofuranoside for 48 h. Cells are maintained in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium supplemented with 5% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 5 mM L-glutamine, 0.6% D-glucose, 2% B27 supplement, and 100 ng/ml 2.5S mouse nerve growth factor. Cultures are maintained for 2 weeks at 37° C. in 95% air/5% CO2 before addition of test materials.
Release of substance P from eDRG is assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Briefly, eDRG cells are washed twice with low potassium-balanced salt solution (BSS: 5 mM KCl, 137 mM NaCl, 1.2 mM MgCl2, 5 mM glucose, 0.44 mM KH2PO4, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 2 mM CaCl2). Basal samples are obtained by incubating each well for 5 min. with 1 ml of low potassium BSS. After removal of this buffer, the cells are stimulated to release by incubation with 1 ml of high potassium buffer (BSS as above with modification to include 100 mM KCl isotonically balanced with NaCl) for 5 min. All samples are removed to tubes on ice prior to assay of substance P. Total cell lysates are prepared by addition of 250 μl of 2 M acetic acid/0.1% trifluoroacetic acid to lyse the cells, centrifugal evaporation, and resuspension in 500 μl of assay buffer. Diluted samples are assessed for substance P content. Substance P immunoreactivity is measured using Substance P Enzyme Immunoassay Kits (Cayman Chemical Company or R&D Systems) according to manufacturers' instructions. Substance P is expressed in pg/ml relative to a standard substance P curve run in parallel.
SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis were performed using standard protocols (Novex). SNAP-25 proteins were resolved on a 12% Tris/glycine polyacrylamide gel (Novex) and subsequently transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. The membranes were probed with a monoclonal antibody (SMI-81) that recognises cleaved and intact SNAP-25. Specific binding was visualised using peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies and a chemiluminescent detection system. Cleavage of SNAP-25 was quantified by scanning densitometry (Molecular Dynamics Personal SI, ImageQuant data analysis software). Percent SNAP-25 cleavage was calculated according to the formula: (Cleaved SNAP-25/(Cleaved+Intact SNAP-25))×100.
Following exposure of eDRG neurons to an LC/A-nociceptin-HN/A fusion (termed CPN-A), both inhibition of substance P release and cleavage of SNAP-25 are observed (
The effect of the fusion is also assessed at defined time points following a 16 h exposure of eDRG to CPN-A.
Fusion protein prepared according to Examples 8 and 9 was assessed in the eDRG neuronal cell mode using the method described in Example 16.
Following exposure of eDRG neurons to an LC/A-nociceptin variant-HN/A fusion (termed CPNv-A), both inhibition of substance P release and cleavage of SNAP-25 are observed. After 24 h exposure to the fusion, 50% of maximal SNAP-25 cleavage is achieved by a fusion concentration of 1.4±0.4 nM (
The effect of the fusion is also assessed at defined time points following a 16 h exposure of eDRG to CPN-A.
The binding capability of the CPNv-A fusion protein is also assessed in comparison to the CPN-A fusion.
Following the methods used in Examples 1 and 2, the LC/A (SEQ ID NO:1) and HN/A (SEQ ID NO:2) are created and inserted into the A serotype nociceptin variant linker arranged as BamHI-SalI-linker-enterokinase protease site-nociceptin variant-NheI-spacer-SpeI-PstI-XbaI-stop codon-HindIII (SEQ ID NO:62). The final construct contains the LC-linker-nociceptin variant-spacer-HN ORF sequences (SEQ ID NO:63) for expression as a protein of the sequence illustrated in SEQ ID NO:64. The fusion protein is termed CPNv(Ek)-A.
The CPNv(Ek)-A prepared in Example 18 is obtained in a purified form and applied to the eDRG cell model to assess cleavage of SNAP-25 (using methodology from Example 16).
Following the methods used in Example 4, the LC/C (SEQ ID NO:5) and HN/C (SEQ ID NO:6) are created and inserted into the A serotype nociceptin variant linker arranged as BamHI-SalI-linker-nociceptin variant-NheI-spacer-SpeI-PstI-XbaI-stop codon-HindIII (SEQ ID NO:65). The final construct contains the LC-linker-nociceptin variant-spacer-HN ORF sequences (SEQ ID NO:66) for expression as a protein of the sequence illustrated in SEQ ID NO:67. The fusion protein is termed CPNv-C (act. A).
Following the methods used in Example 9, the CPNv-C (act. A) prepared in Example 20 is obtained in a purified form and applied to the eDRG cell model to assess cleavage of SNAP-25 (using methodology from Example 16). After 24 h exposure to the fusion, 50% of maximal syntaxin cleavage is achieved by a fusion concentration of 3.1±2.0 nM.
The ability of an LC/A-nociceptin-HN/A fusion (CPN/A) to inhibit acute capsaicin-induced mechanical allodynia is evaluated following subcutaneous intraplantar injection in the rat hind paw. Test animals are evaluated for paw withdrawal frequency (PWF %) in response to a 10 g Von Frey filament stimulus series (10 timuli×3 trials) prior to recruitment into the study, after subcutaneous treatment with CPN/A but before capsaicin, and following capsaicin challenge post-injection of CPN/A (average of responses at 15′ and 30′). Capsaicin challenge is achieved by injection of 10 μL of a 0.3% solution. Sample dilutions are prepared in 0.5% BSA/saline.
The ability of an LC/A-nociceptin-HN/A fusion (CPN/A) to inhibit streptozotocin (STZ)-induced mechanical (tactile) allodynia in rats is evaluated. STZ-induced mechanical allodynia in rats is achieved by injection of streptozotocin (i.p. or i.v.) which yields destruction of pancreatic β-cells leading to loss of insulin production, with concomitant metabolic stress (hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia). As such, STZ induces Type I diabetes. In addition, STZ treatment leads to progressive development of neuropathy, which serves as a model of chronic pain with hyperalgesia and allodynia that may reflect signs observed in diabetic humans (peripheral diabetic neuropathy).
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (250-300 g) are treated with 65 mg/kg STZ in citrate buffer (I.V.) and blood glucose and lipid are measured weekly to define the readiness of the model. Paw Withdrawal Threshold (PWT) is measured in response to a Von Frey filament stimulus series over a period of time. Allodynia is said to be established when the PWT on two consecutive test dates (separated by 1 week) measures below 6 g on the scale. At this point, rats are randomized to either a saline group (negative efficacy control), gabapentin group (positive efficacy control) or a test group (CPN/A). Test materials (20-25 μl) are injected subcutaneously as a single injection (except gabapentin) and the PWT is measured at 1 day post-treatment and periodically thereafter over a 2-week period. Gabapentin (30 mg/kg i.p. @ 3 ml/kg injection volume) is injected daily, 2 hours prior to the start of PWT testing.
The ability of an LC/A-nociceptin variant-HN/A fusion (CPNv/A) to inhibit capsaicin-induced mechanical allodynia is evaluated following subcutaneous intraplantar injection in the rat hind paw. Test animals are evaluated for paw withdrawal frequency (PWF %) in response to a 10 g Von Frey filament stimulus series (10 stimuli×3 trials) prior to recruitment into the study (Pre-Treat); after subcutaneous intraplantar treatment with CPNv/A but before capsaicin (Pre-CAP); and following capsaicin challenge post-injection of CPNv/A (average of responses at 15′ and 30′; CAP). Capsaicin challenge is achieved by injection of 10 μL of a 0.3% solution. Sample dilutions are prepared in 0.5% BSA/saline.
Due to the small, five-amino acid, size of the leu-enkephalin ligand the LC/A-leu enkephalin-HN/A fusion is created by site directed mutagenesis [for example using Quickchange (Stratagene Inc.)] using the LC/A-nociceptin-HN/A fusion (SEQ ID NO:13) as a template. Oligonucleotides are designed encoding the YGGFL leu-enkephalin peptide, ensuring standard E. coli codon usage is maintained and no additional restriction sites are incorporated, flanked by sequences complimentary to the linker region of the LC/A-nociceptin-HN/A fusion (SEQ ID NO:13) either side on the nociceptin section. The SDM product is checked by sequencing and the final construct containing the LC-linker-leu enkephalin-spacer-HN ORF (SEQ ID NO:68) for expression as a protein of the sequence illustrated in SEQ ID NO:69. The fusion protein is termed CPLE-A.
Following the methods used in Example 9, and with the LC/A-beta-endorphin-HN/A fusion protein (termed CPBE-A) created in Example 7, the CPBE-A is purified from E. coli.
Due to the single amino acid modification necessary to mutate the nociceptin sequence at position 1 from a Phe to a Tyr, the LC/A-nociceptin mutant-HN/A fusion is created by site directed mutagenesis [for example using Quickchange (Stratagene Inc.)] using the LC/A-nociceptin-HN/A fusion (SEQ ID NO:13) as a template. Oligonucleotides are designed encoding tyrosine at position 1 of the nociceptin sequence, ensuring standard E. coli codon usage is maintained and no additional restriction sites are incorporated, flanked by sequences complimentary to the linker region of the LC/A-nociceptin-HN/A fusion (SEQ ID NO:13) either side on the nociceptin section. The SDM product is checked by sequencing and the final construct containing the LC/A-nociceptin mutant-spacer-HN/A fusion ORF (SEQ ID NO:70) for expression as a protein of the sequence illustrated in SEQ ID NO:71. The fusion protein is termed CPOP-A.
Due to the single amino acid modification necessary to mutate the nociceptin sequence at position 1 from a Phe to a Tyr, the LC/A-nociceptin variant mutant-HN/A fusion is created by site directed mutagenesis [for example using Quickchange (Stratagene Inc.)] using the LC/A-nociceptin variant-HN/A fusion (SEQ ID NO:25) as a template. Oligonucleotides are designed encoding tyrosine at position 1 of the nociceptin sequence, ensuring standard E. coli codon usage is maintained and no additional restriction sites are incorporated, flanked by sequences complimentary to the linker region of the LC/A-nociceptin variant-HN/A fusion (SEQ ID NO:25) either side on the nociceptin section. The SDM product is checked by sequencing and the final construct containing the LC/A-nociceptin mutant-spacer-HN/A fusion ORF (SEQ ID NO:72) for expression as a protein of the sequence illustrated in SEQ ID NO:73. The fusion protein is termed CPOPv-A.
Using methodology described in Example 16, CPOPv-A is assessed for its ability to cleave SNAP-25 in the eDRG cell model.
The IgA protease amino acid sequence was obtained from freely available database sources such as GenBank (accession number P09790). Information regarding the structure of the N. Gonorrhoeae IgA protease gene is available in the literature (Pohlner et al., Gene structure and extracellular secretion of Neisseria gonorrhoeae IgA protease, Nature, 1987, 325(6103), 458-62). Using Backtranslation tool v2.0 (Entelechon), the DNA sequence encoding the IgA protease modified for E. coli expression was determined. A BamHI recognition sequence was incorporated at the 5′ end and a codon encoding a cysteine amino acid and SalI recognition sequence were incorporated at the 3′ end of the IgA DNA. The DNA sequence was screened using MapDraw, (DNASTAR Inc.) for restriction enzyme cleavage sequences incorporated during the back translation. Any cleavage sequences that are found to be common to those required for cloning were removed manually from the proposed coding sequence ensuring common E. coli codon usage is maintained. E. coli codon usage was assessed Graphical Codon Usage Analyser (Geneart), and the % GC content and codon usage ratio assessed by reference to published codon usage tables. This optimised DNA sequence (SEQ ID NO:74) containing the IgA open reading frame (ORF) is then commercially synthesized.
The IgA (SEQ ID NO:74) is inserted into the LC-linker-nociceptin variant-spacer-HN ORF (SEQ ID NO:25) using BamHI and SalI restriction enzymes to replace the LC with the IgA protease DNA. The final construct contains the IgA-linker-nociceptin variant-spacer-HN ORF (SEQ ID NO:75) for expression as a protein of the sequence illustrated in SEQ ID NO:76.
DNA was prepared that encoded a Factor Xa removable his-tag (his6), although it is clear that alternative proteases site such as Enterokinase and alternative purification tags such as longer histidine tags are also possible. Using one of a variety of reverse translation software tools [for example EditSeq best E. coli reverse translation (DNASTAR Inc.), or Backtranslation tool v2.0 (Entelechon)], the DNA sequence encoding the Factor Xa removable his-tag region is determined. Restriction sites are then incorporated into the DNA sequence and can be arranged as NheI-linker-SpeI-PstI-HN/A-XbaI-LEIEGRSGHHHHHHStop codon-HindIII (SEQ ID NO:77). The DNA sequence is screened for restriction sequence incorporated and any additional sequences are removed manually from the remaining sequence ensuring common E. coli codon usage is maintained. E. coli codon usage is assessed by reference to software programs such as Graphical Codon Usage Analyser (Geneart), and the % GC content and codon usage ratio assessed by reference to published codon usage tables (for example GenBank Release 143, 13 Sep. 2004). This optimised DNA sequence is then commercially synthesized (for example by Entelechon, Geneart or Sigma-Genosys) and is provided in the pCR 4 vector. In order to create CPNv-A-FXa-HT (SEQ ID NO:78, removable his-tag construct) the pCR 4 vector encoding the removable his-tag is cleaved with NheI and HindIII. The NheI-HindIII fragment is then inserted into the LC/A-CPNv-HN/A vector (SEQ ID NO:25) that has also been cleaved by NheI and HindIII. The final construct contains the LC/A-linker-nociceptin variant-spacer-HN-FXa-Histag-HindIII ORF sequences (SEQ ID NO:78) for expression as a protein of the sequence illustrated in SEQ ID NO:79.
The DNA sequence is designed by back translation of the amino acid sequence of the translocation domain of the diphtheria toxin (obtained from freely available database sources such as GenBank (accession number 1XDTT) using one of a variety of reverse translation software tools [for example EditSeq best E. coli reverse translation (DNASTAR Inc.), or Backtranslation tool v2.0 (Entelechon)]. Restriction sites are then incorporated into the DNA sequence and can be arranged as NheI-Linker-SpeI-PstI-diphtheria translocation domain-XbaI-stop codon-HindIII (SEQ ID NO:80). PstI/XbaI recognition sequences are incorporated at the 5′ and 3′ ends of the translocation domain respectively of the sequence maintaining the correct reading frame. The DNA sequence is screened (using software such as MapDraw, DNASTAR Inc.) for restriction enzyme cleavage sequences incorporated during the back translation. Any cleavage sequences that are found to be common to those required by the cloning system are removed manually from the proposed coding sequence ensuring common E. coli codon usage is maintained. E. coli codon usage is assessed by reference to software programs such as Graphical Codon Usage Analyser (Geneart), and the % GC content and codon usage ratio assessed by reference to published codon usage tables (for example GenBank Release 143, 13 Sep. 2004). This optimised DNA sequence containing the diphtheria translocation domain is then commercially synthesized as NheI-Linker-SpeI-PstI-diphtheria translocation domain-XbaI-stop codon-HindIII (for example by Entelechon, Geneart or Sigma-Genosys) and is provided in the pCR 4 vector (Invitrogen). The pCR 4 vector encoding the diphtheria translocation domain is cleaved with NheI and XbaI. The NheI-XbaI fragment is then inserted into the LC/A-CPLE-HN/A vector (SEQ ID NO:68) that has also been cleaved by NheI and XbaI. The final construct contains the LC/A-leu-enkephalin-spacer-diphtheria translocation domain ORF sequences (SEQ ID NO:81) for expression as a protein of the sequence illustrated in SEQ ID NO:82.
The DNA sequence is designed by back translation of the tetanus toxin LC amino acid sequence (obtained from freely available database sources such as GenBank (accession number X04436) using one of a variety of reverse translation software tools [for example EditSeq best E. coli reverse translation (DNASTAR Inc.), or Backtranslation tool v2.0 (Entelechon)]. BamHI/SalI recognition sequences are incorporated at the 5′ and 3′ ends respectively of the sequence maintaining the correct reading frame (SEQ ID NO:83). The DNA sequence is screened (using software such as MapDraw, DNASTAR Inc.) for restriction enzyme cleavage sequences incorporated during the back translation. Any cleavage sequences that are found to be common to those required by the cloning system are removed manually from the proposed coding sequence ensuring common E. coli codon usage is maintained. E. coli codon usage is assessed by reference to software programs such as Graphical Codon Usage Analyser (Geneart), and the % GC content and codon usage ratio assessed by reference to published codon usage tables (for example GenBank Release 143, 13 Sep. 2004). This optimised DNA sequence containing the tetanus toxin LC open reading frame (ORF) is then commercially synthesized (for example by Entelechon, Geneart or Sigma-Genosys) and is provided in the pCR 4 vector (invitrogen). The pCR 4 vector encoding the TeNT LC is cleaved with BamHI and SalI. The BamHI-SalI fragment is then inserted into the LC/A-CPNv-HN/A vector (SEQ ID NO:25) that has also been cleaved by BamHI and SalI. The final construct contains the TeNT LC-linker-nociceptin variant-spacer-HN ORF sequences (SEQ ID NO:84) for expression as a protein of the sequence illustrated in SEQ ID NO:85.
Following the methods used in Example 4, the LC/C (SEQ ID NO:5) and HN/C (SEQ ID NO:6) are created and inserted into the C serotype nociceptin variant linker arranged as BamHI-SalI-linker-nociceptin variant-NheI-spacer-SpeI-PstI-XbaI-stop codon-HindIII (SEQ ID NO:86). The final construct contains the LC-linker-nociceptin variant-spacer-HN ORF sequences (SEQ ID NO:87) for expression as a protein of the sequence illustrated in SEQ ID NO:88. The fusion protein is termed CPNv-C (act. C).
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0426394.3 | Dec 2004 | GB | national |
| 0504964.8 | Mar 2005 | GB | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5668255 | Murphy | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5989545 | Foster | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5998375 | Thøgersen et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6136564 | Kopetzki | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6395513 | Foster | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6461617 | Shone | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6632440 | Quinn | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6776990 | Sachs | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6843998 | Steward | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6962703 | Foster | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 7052702 | Duggan | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7056729 | Donovan | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7132259 | Dolly | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7192596 | Shone | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7208466 | Foster | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7244436 | Donovan | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7244437 | Donovan | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7262291 | Donovan | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7276473 | Sachs | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7413742 | Donovan | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7419676 | Dolly | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7422877 | Dolly | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7452543 | Chaddock | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7494661 | Sanders | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7514088 | Steward | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7658933 | Foster et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7659092 | Foster | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7709228 | Dolly | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7736659 | Donovan | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7740868 | Steward | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7749514 | Steward | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7780968 | Donovan | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7785606 | Ichtchenko | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7811584 | Steward | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7833535 | Donovan | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7887810 | Foster | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7892560 | Foster | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7897157 | Steward | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 8067200 | Foster et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 20030049264 | Foster et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030180289 | Foster et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040071736 | Quinn | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040115727 | Steward | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20050095251 | Steward | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050244435 | Shone | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060051356 | Foster | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060110410 | Shone | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060216283 | Foster | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20070010447 | Quinn | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070010475 | Richardson | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070066559 | Richardson | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070184048 | Foster | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070184070 | Shone | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070248626 | Shone | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20080025994 | Steward | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080032928 | Quinn | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080032931 | Steward | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080038274 | Foster | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080070278 | North | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080182294 | Dolly | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080311622 | Dolly | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090004224 | Steward | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090005313 | Steward | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090018081 | Steward | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090030182 | Dolly | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090030188 | Dolly | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090042270 | Dolly | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090069238 | Steward | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090081730 | Dolly | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090087458 | Dolly | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090104234 | Francis | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090117157 | Brin | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090162341 | Foster | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090280066 | Quinn | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20100034802 | Foster | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100055761 | Seed | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100196421 | Ichtchenko | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100209955 | Olyer | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100303757 | Francis | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100303789 | Francis | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100303791 | Francis | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110091437 | Foster | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1 422 240 | May 2004 | EP |
| WO 9633273 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| WO 9707208 | Feb 1997 | WO |
| 9807864 | Feb 1998 | WO |
| 9917806 | Apr 1999 | WO |
| WO 0057897 | Oct 2000 | WO |
| 0114570 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| 0158936 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| 0207759 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| 2004024909 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| 2005023309 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| 2006026780 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| 2006059093 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| 2006059105 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| 2006059113 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006059113 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| 2007138339 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Translation of Japanese Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2011 in JP 2007-543906. |
| Translation of Japanese Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2011 in JP 2007-543908. |
| Blanc, Jacky P. et al., Examination of the Requirement for an Amphiphilic Helical Structure in B-Endorphin through the Design, Synthesis, and Study of Model Peptides, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 258, No. 13, 1983, pp. 8277-8284. |
| Shone, Clifford C. et al., A 50-kDa fragment from the NH2-terminus of the heavy subunit of Clostridium botulinum type A neurotoxin forms channels in lipid vesicles, Eur. J. Biochem. 167, 175-180, 1987. |
| Wagner, Ernst et al., Influenza virus hemagglutinin HA-2 N-terminal fusogenic peptides augment gene transfer by transferrin-polylysine-DNA complexes: Toward a synthetic virus-like gene-transfer vehicle, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, USA, vol. 89, pp. 7934-7938, 1992. |
| Plank, Christian et al., The Influence of Endosome-disruptive Peptides on Gene Transfer Using Synthetic Virus-like Gene Transfer Systems, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 269, No. 17, 1994, pp. 12918-12924. |
| Dooley, Colette T., et al., Binding and In Vitro Activities of Peptides with High Affinity for the Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ Receptor, ORL1, The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 1997, vol. 283, No. 2, pp. 735-741. |
| Vergnollie, N. et al., Proteinase-activated receptor-2 and hyperalgesia: A novel pain pathway, Nature Medicine, vol. 7, No. 7, 2001, pp. 821-826. |
| Rizzi, Daniela et al., [Arg14, LYS15]Nociceptin, a Highly Potent Agonist of the Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ Receptor: in Vitro and in Vivo Studies, The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 2002, vol. 300, No. 1 pp. 57-63. |
| Turton, Kathryn et al., Botulinum and tetanus neurotoxins: structure, function and therapeutic utility, TRENDS in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 27, No. 11, 2002, pp. 552-558. |
| Maile, Rebecca et al., Effects of nociceptin and analogues of nociceptin upon spontaneous dorsal root activity recorded from an in vitro preparation of rat spinal cord, Neuroscience Letters 350 (2003) 190-192. |
| Chaddock, John A. et al., Manipulation of Signal Transduction by Botulinum Neurotoxins and their Derivatives, Current Signal Transduction Therapy, 2007, 2, 221-225. |
| Guerrini, Remo et al., Address and Message Sequences for the Nociceptin Receptor: A Structure-Activity Study of Nociceptin-(1-13)-peptide amide, J. Med. Chem., 1997, 40, 1789-1793. |
| Schiavo, Giampietro et al., Neurotoxins Affecting Neuroexocytosis, Physiological Reviews, vol. 80, No. 2, 2000, pp. 717-766. |
| Xu, X.J. et al., Galanin and spinal nociceptive mechanisms: recent advances and therapeutic implications, Neuropeptides, 2000, 34(3&4), 137-147. |
| Okada, Kazushi et al., Highly Potent Nociceptin Analog Containing the Arg-Lys Triple Repeat, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 278, 493-498, 2000. |
| Mogil, Jeffrey S. et al., The Molecular and Behavioral Pharmacology of the Orphanin FQ/Nociceptin Peptide and Receptor Family, Pharmacological Reviews, 2001, vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 381-415. |
| Chaddock, J.A., et al., A Conjugate Composed of Nerve Growth Factor Coupled to a Non-Toxic Derivative of Clostridium botulinum Neurotoxin Type A Can Inhibit Neurotransmitter Release In Vitro, Growth Factors 18(2):147-155, 2000. |
| Chaddock, J.A., et al., Expression and Purification of Catalytically Active, Non-Toxic Endopeptidase Derivatives of Clostridium botulinum Toxin Type A, Protein Expression and Purification 25(2):219-228, 2002. |
| Chaddock, J.A., et al., Inhibition of Vesicular Secretion in Both Neuronal and Nonneuronal Cells by Retargeted Endopeptidase Derivative of Clostridium botulinum Neurotoxin Type A, Infection and Immunity 68(5):2587-2593, 2000. |
| Cui, M., et al., Retargeted Clostridial Endopeptidase: Antinociceptive Activity in Preclinical Models of Pain, Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology:R16, 2002. |
| Duggan, M.J., et al., Inhibition of Release of Neurotransmitters from Rat Dorsal Root Ganglia by a Novel Conjugate of a Clostridium botulinum Toxin A Endopeptidase Fragment and Erythrina cristagalli Lectin, Journal of Biological Chemistry 277(38):34846-34852, 2002. |
| Foster, K.A., et al., Re-Engineering the Target Specificity of Clostridial Neurotoxins: A Route to Novel Therapeutics, Neurotoxicity Research 9(2,3):101-107, 2006. |
| Inoue, M., et al., Nociceptin/Orphannin FQ-Induced Nociceptive Responses Through Substance P Release From Peripheral Nerve Endings in Mice, PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA), 95 (18):10949-10953, 1998. |
| Sutton, J.M., et al., Preparation of Specifically Activatable Endopeptidase Derivatives of Clostridium botulinum Toxins Type A, B, and C and Their Applications, Protein Expression and Purification 40(1):31-41, 2005. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 08/513,878, filed Dec. 1, 1995, North. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 09/572,431, filed May 17, 2000, North. |
| Okada et al., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 278 :493-498 (2000). |
| Chaddock, J.A., et al., “Retargeted Clostridial Endopeptidases: Inhibition of Nociceptive Neurotransmitter Release In Vitro, and Antinociceptive Activity in In Vivo Models of Pain,” Movement Disorders, vol. 19, pp. S42-S47; Sep. 8, 2004. |
| Sagane et al., Dichain structure of botulinum neurotoxin : Identification of cleavage sites in Types C, D, and F neurotoxin molecules. J. Protein Chemistry 18(8) :855-892 (1999). |
| Office Action issued Sep. 10, 2012 in EP 10 166 556.0. |
| Office Action issued Sep. 10, 2012 in EP 10 184 150.0. |
| Office Action issued Sep. 10, 2012 in EP 10 184 114.6. |
| Office Action issued Sep. 10, 2012 in EP 05 810 711.1. |
| Office Action issued Aug. 22, 2012 in CA 2,595,115. |
| English Translation of Office Action issued Jun. 26, 2012 in JP 2007-543906. |
| English Translation of Office Action issued Jun. 26, 2012 in JP 2007-543908. |
| English Translation of Office Action issued Jun. 26, 2012 in CN 200780028089.0. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120064059 A1 | Mar 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11792210 | US | |
| Child | 13239573 | US |
