This application is based on and claims priority to Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-187692 filed on Oct. 11, 2019, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The present invention relates to a gas spring maintenance management apparatus, a robot system, and a gas spring maintenance management method.
Robot equipped with gas springs serving as gas balancers are known (for example, see Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, Publication No. 2017-159402; and Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, Publication No. 2014-195849). A servomotor for driving a robot arm that rotates about a horizontal axis receives a load generated by gravity acting on the robot arm. A gas balancer is provided to alleviate the load applied to the servomotor due to gravity. A gas spring has a cylinder for enclosing a gas and a piston rod for compressing the gas inside the cylinder, and generates a repulsion force by compression of the gas. As the piston rod moves relative to the cylinder, the gas pressure inside the cylinder decreases gradually.
Various methods have been proposed to detect a decrease in gas pressure (for example, see Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, Publication No. 2017-159402; Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, Publication No. 2014-195849; Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, Publication No. 2007-098494; and Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, Publication No. Hei 08-313322). For example, in Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, Publication No. 2014-195849, the amount of decrease in gas pressure inside the cylinder is estimated based on the difference between an electrical current value of a servomotor and a reference electrical current value.
An aspect of the present disclosure provides a maintenance management apparatus that manages maintenance of a gas spring provided in an arm of an articulated robot, the maintenance management apparatus including a gas pressure measuring unit that measures a gas pressure inside the gas spring on a regular basis; a maintenance judgement unit that judges whether an abnormality is present in the gas spring based on an amount of decrease in the gas pressure per unit time or per unit operating distance; and a notifying unit that sends a notification based on a judgment result by the maintenance judgement unit to an operator.
A gas spring maintenance management apparatus 1 and a robot system 10 according to one embodiment of the present disclosure will now be described with reference to the drawings.
As shown in
The articulated robot 2 is equipped with a robot mechanical unit 4 that has at least one arm, a gas spring 3 connected to the at least one arm, and a controller 5 that controls the robot mechanical unit 4. The maintenance management apparatus 1 is provided in the controller 5.
One example of the robot mechanical unit 4 is a vertical articulated robot that has a base 4a, a swivel unit 4b swivelably attached to the base 4a, a lower arm 4c rotatably attached to the swivel unit 4b, an upper arm 4d rotatably attached to the lower arm 4c, and a wrist unit 4e attached to a tip of the upper arm 4d. In this embodiment, the robot mechanical unit 4 is a welding robot, and a welding tool 4f is attached to the wrist unit 4e.
The robot mechanical unit 4 includes servomotors for driving the swivel unit 4b and the arms 4c and 4d. The controller 5 is connected to the robot mechanical unit 4 via a power supply cable 7 and controls the operation of the servomotors.
A load generated by gravity acting on the lower arm 4c is applied to a servomotor 6 for the lower arm 4c that rotates about the horizontal axis. The gas spring 3 is used as a gas balancer that alleviates the load applied to the servomotor 6 due to gravity.
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As mentioned above, there is a correlation between the torque Ts of the servomotor 6 and the gas pressure inside the gas spring 3. The gas pressure measuring unit 11 obtains an electrical current value of the servomotor 6 from the control unit in the controller 5 that controls the servomotor 6. Next, the gas pressure measuring unit 11 indirectly measures the gas pressure from the electrical current value by converting the electrical current value of the servomotor 6 into a gas pressure based on a predetermined relationship between the electrical current value of the servomotor 6 and the gas pressure. The value of the measured gas pressure is stored in the storage unit 14 on a time-series basis.
The gas pressure changes depending on the position and the orientation of the robot mechanical unit 4. Thus, the gas pressure measuring unit 11 preferably measures the gas pressure while the robot mechanical unit 4 assumes a predetermined position and a predetermined orientation. For example, when the gas pressure measuring unit 11 is executing the gas pressure measurement, the controller 5 may control the robot mechanical unit 4 so that the robot mechanical unit 4 assumes a predetermined position and a predetermined orientation.
The frequency of measuring the gas pressure is appropriately set according to the operation status of the articulated robot 2. For example, the gas pressure measuring unit 11 measures the gas pressure once a week or once a month. Alternatively, the gas pressure measuring unit 11 measures the gas pressure each time the operating distance increases by a predetermined distance.
The maintenance judgement unit 12 calculates the rate of decrease ΔP/ΔD, which is the amount of the decrease in gas pressure per unit time or per unit operating distance, each time the gas pressure is measured by the gas pressure measuring unit 11. One example of the unit time is a predetermined operating time of the robot mechanical unit 4, and one example of the unit operating distance is a predetermined operating distance of the gas spring 3. The operating distance of the gas spring 3 is calculated from the total stroke of the lower arm 4c. For example, ΔP is the difference between the gas pressure measured this time and the gas pressure measured the last time, and ΔD is the difference between the operating distance measured this time and the operating distance measured the last time.
Next, the maintenance judgement unit 12 judges whether an abnormality is present in the gas spring 3 by comparing the rate of decrease ΔP/ΔD with a predetermined threshold C. Moreover, the maintenance judgement unit 12 judges the maintenance to be performed on the gas spring 3 based on the judgement result of whether an abnormality is present.
The threshold C is a value set based on the rate of decrease in gas pressure caused by normal gas leakage. As shown by the left half of
When the rate of decrease ΔP/ΔD is equal to or smaller than the threshold C, the maintenance judgement unit 12 judges that no abnormality is present in the gas spring 3 and thus judges that the maintenance to be performed is charging the gas. Next, the maintenance judgement unit 12 calculates the time remaining until the gas pressure decreases to a predetermined threshold Pth by assuming that the decrease in gas pressure continues at a rate of decrease ΔP/ΔD. The threshold Pth is a lower limit of the gas pressure at which the gas spring 3 can output a torque Tg necessary for the gas spring 3 to serve as a gas balancer. The remaining time may be the operating distance of the gas spring 3 or the operating time of the robot mechanical unit 4 taken until the gas pressure decreases to the threshold Pth.
Meanwhile, when the rate of decrease ΔP/ΔD is larger than the threshold C, the maintenance judgement unit 12 judges that an abnormality is present in the gas spring 3 and thus judges that the maintenance to be performed is replacement of the gas spring 3.
For example, foreign matter generated by the operation of the robot mechanical unit 4, such as spatters generated by welding, may adhere to the exposed surface of the piston rod 3b. Penetration of the foreign matter into inside the gas spring 3 is usually prevented by a dust seal 3d. However, the foreign matter may pass through the dust seal 3d, enter a gap between the piston rod 3b and a rod guide 3e, and scratch the surface of the piston rod 3b. In addition, foreign matter such as abrasion powder or the like generated by sliding between parts of the gas spring 3 may become stuck between the piston rod 3b and the rod seal 3c.
Furthermore, the seal performance of the rod seal 3c may be degraded due to deterioration with age, deterioration by heat, chemical attacks by foreign matter, etc.
In
When it is judged that no abnormality is present in the gas spring 3, the notifying unit 13 sends a notification regarding the remaining time. For example, the notifying unit 13 causes an operation panel 5a of the controller 5 to display an instruction instructing the charging of gas into the gas spring 3 within the remaining time. Meanwhile, when it is judged that an abnormality is present in the gas spring 3, the notifying unit 13 sends the operator a notification regarding the replacement of the gas spring 3. For example, the notifying unit 13 causes the operation panel 5a to display an instruction that instructs prompt replacement of the gas spring 3. The notifying unit 13 may indicate the aforementioned instruction on a display of a portable teach pendant (not illustrated) of the controller 5 instead of the operation panel 5a.
Next, a method for managing the maintenance of the gas spring 3 by using the maintenance management apparatus 1 is described with reference to
The gas pressure measuring unit 11 measures the gas pressure inside the gas spring 3 on a regular basis (step S1). After the gas pressure measurement, the maintenance judgement unit 12 calculates the rate of decrease ΔP/ΔD, which is the amount of decrease in gas pressure per unit time or per unit operating distance (step S2), and, based on the rate of decrease ΔP/ΔD, whether an abnormality is present in the gas spring 3 and what maintenance should be performed on the gas spring 3 are judged (step S3).
Specifically, when the rate of decrease ΔP/ΔD is equal to or smaller than the threshold C (YES in step S3), the maintenance judgement unit 12 judges that no abnormality is present in the gas spring 3, thus judges that the maintenance to be performed is charging the gas (step S4), and calculates the remaining time until the gas pressure decreases to the threshold Pth (step S5). Next, a notification regarding the remaining time is sent to the operator via the notifying unit 13 (step S6).
Based on the notification, the operator charges the gas into the cylinder 3a from the check valve 3g within the remaining time, and returns the gas pressure inside the cylinder 3a to the initial value Pi.
Meanwhile, when the rate of decrease ΔP/ΔD is larger than the threshold C (NO in step S3), the maintenance judgement unit 12 judges that an abnormality is present in the gas spring 3 and thus judges that the maintenance to be performed is replacing the gas spring 3 (step S7). Next, a notification regarding replacement of the gas spring 3 is sent to the operator via the notifying unit 13 (step S8).
Based on of the notification, the operator promptly replaces the gas spring 3 with a new one.
As mentioned above, the gas pressure in the gas spring 3 gradually decreases with the operation of the robot mechanical unit 4; thus, gas charging is necessary on a regular basis as routine maintenance for the gas spring 3. Thus, if the operator is notified of the fact of the decrease in gas pressure or the amount of decrease in gas pressure, the operator first charges gas into the gas spring 3. However, if the seal performance of the gas spring 3 is abnormal, the gas pressure would immediately decrease due to rapid gas leakage after the resumption of operation of the robot mechanical unit 4 despite the fact that the gas has just been charged. At this stage, the operator becomes aware of the abnormality in the gas spring 3, and replaces the gas spring 3. In this case, extra steps and maintenance become necessary, and the downtime of the production line caused by the maintenance of the articulated robot 2 is prolonged.
In contrast, according to this embodiment, whether the decrease in gas pressure is caused by normal gas leakage or by abnormal seal performance of the gas spring 3 is judged based on the rate of decrease ΔP/ΔD in gas pressure. Moreover, a notification of appropriate maintenance that corresponds to the cause of the decrease in gas pressure is sent to the operator. The operator can identify, through the notification, whether the way in which the gas pressure decreases is normal or abnormal, and thus can perform appropriate maintenance on the gas spring 3 without hesitation.
In addition, when the seal performance of the gas spring is abnormal, the abnormality in the gas spring 3 can be found at an early stage based on the rate of decrease ΔP/ΔD in gas pressure, and the operator can be notified of the need to replace the gas spring 3 at an early stage.
When the gas spring 3 is normal, the remaining time for which the articulated robot 2 can operate normally is notified to the operator. The operator can perform maintenance on the gas spring 3 in a planned manner based on the notified remaining time.
The gas pressure measured by the gas pressure measuring unit 11 changes depending on the temperature inside the cylinder 3a. Thus, the maintenance judgement unit 12 may convert the measured gas pressure into a gas pressure at a predetermined temperature and calculate the rate of decrease ΔP/ΔD by using the gas pressure at that predetermined temperature.
For example, the maintenance judgement unit 12 acquires a temperature T of the surrounding of the gas spring 3 from a temperature sensor provided in the gas spring 3, and converts the measured gas pressure P into a gas pressure P(20) at 20° C. by using the following equation:
P(20)=P×(273.15+T)/(273.15+20)
In the aforementioned embodiment, the gas pressure measuring unit 11 indirectly measures the gas pressure from the electrical current value of the servomotor 6; alternatively, the gas pressure may be measured by using other means. For example, the gas pressure measuring unit 11 may be equipped with a pressure sensor provided inside the cylinder 3a, and the gas pressure may be directly measured with the pressure sensor.
In the aforementioned embodiment, the maintenance management apparatus 1 is provided in the controller 5; alternatively, the maintenance management apparatus 1 may be separate from the controller 5. For example, the maintenance management apparatus 1 may be a computer connected to the controller 5.
Alternatively, some of the functions of the maintenance management apparatus 1 may be performed by an upper-level control system connected to multiple articulated robots 2. For example, the gas pressure measuring unit 11 may be provided in each of the articulated robots 2, and the maintenance judgement unit 12 and the notifying unit 13 may be provided in the upper-level control system.
The upper-level control system receives data regarding the gas pressure from each of the articulated robots 2 and judges whether an abnormality is present in the gas spring 3 of each of the articulated robots 2 and makes a judgment regarding the maintenance.
When one upper-level control system comprehensively manages the information regarding the maintenance of the gas springs 3 of the multiple articulated robots 2 as such, the operator can perform maintenance on multiple gas springs 3, such as simultaneously charging gas into multiple gas springs 3, in a more planned manner.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2019-187692 | Oct 2019 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6408225 | Ortmeier | Jun 2002 | B1 |
20080023451 | Salsich | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20100212305 | Runesson | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20120065781 | Ikeda | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20140290414 | Hasuo | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140297032 | Hayashi | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140297037 | Hayashi | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20160163175 | Jenkins | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20190160676 | Harada | May 2019 | A1 |
20200164529 | Kitamura | May 2020 | A1 |
20200306995 | Yerazunis | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20210069919 | Fujii | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210387362 | Yoshino | Dec 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3 427 908 | Jan 2019 | EP |
H08-313322 | Nov 1996 | JP |
H11-015511 | Jan 1999 | JP |
2007-098494 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2013-169609 | Sep 2013 | JP |
2014-195849 | Oct 2014 | JP |
5628953 | Nov 2014 | JP |
2017-159402 | Sep 2017 | JP |
2019120031 | Jul 2019 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210107171 A1 | Apr 2021 | US |