The subject matter of each of the above-noted applications is incorporated by reference in its entirety by reference thereto.
This disclosure relates generally to methods and devices for use in treating glaucoma. The mechanisms that cause glaucoma are not completely known. It is known that glaucoma results in abnormally high pressure in the eye, which leads to optic nerve damage. Over time, the increased pressure can cause damage to the optic nerve, which can lead to blindness. Treatment strategies have focused on keeping the intraocular pressure down in order to preserve as much vision as possible over the remainder of the patient's life.
Past treatment has included the use of drugs that lower intraocular pressure through various mechanisms. The glaucoma drug market is an approximate two billion dollar market. The large market is mostly due to the fact that there are not any effective surgical alternatives that are long lasting and complication-free. Unfortunately, drug treatments need much improvement, as they can cause adverse side effects and often fail to adequately control intraocular pressure. Moreover, patients are often lackadaisical in following proper drug treatment regimens, resulting in a lack of compliance and further symptom progression.
With respect to surgical procedures, one way to treat glaucoma is to implant a drainage device, or shunt, in the eye. The drainage device functions to drain aqueous humour from the anterior chamber and thereby reduce the intraocular pressure. The drainage device is typically implanted using an invasive surgical procedure. Pursuant to one such procedure, a flap is surgically formed in the sclera. The flap is folded back to form a small cavity and a shunt is inserted into the eye through the flap. Such a procedure can be quite traumatic as the implants are large and can result in various adverse events such as infections and scarring, leading to the need to re-operate.
The following references describe various devices and procedures for treating glaucoma: U.S. Pat. No. 6,827,700 to Lynch, U.S. Pat. No. 6,666,841 to Bergheim, U.S. Pat. No. 6,508,779 to Suson, U.S. Pat. No. 6,544,208 to Ethier, U.S. Pat. No. 5,601,094 to Reiss, U.S. Pat. No. 6,102,045 to Nordquist, United States Patent Application 2002/0156413 to Williams, 2002/0143284 to Tu, 2003/0236483 to Ren, 2002/0193725 to Odrich, 2002/0165478 to Gharib, 2002/0133168 to Smedley, 2005/0107734, 2004/0260228 to Lynch, 2004/0102729 to Haffner, 2004/0015140 to Shields, 2004/0254521 to Simon, and 2004/0225250 to Yablonski. The aforementioned references are all incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Current devices and procedures for treating glaucoma have disadvantages and only moderate success rates. The procedures are very traumatic to the eye and also require highly accurate surgical skills, such as to properly place the drainage device in a proper location. In addition, the devices that drain fluid from the anterior chamber to a subconjunctival bleb beneath a scleral flap are prone to infection, and can occlude and cease working. This can require re-operation to remove the device and place another one, or can result in further surgeries. In view of the foregoing, there is a need for improved devices and methods for the treatment of glaucoma.
Disclosed are devices and methods for treatment of eye disease such as glaucoma. A shunt is placed in the eye wherein the shunt provides a fluid pathway for the flow or drainage of aqueous humour from the anterior chamber to the suprachoroidal space. The shunt is implanted in the eye using a delivery system that uses a minimally invasive procedure, as described below. By guiding fluid directly into the supraciliary or suprachoroidal space rather than to the surface of the eye, complications commonly encountered with conventional glaucoma surgery should be avoided. Shunting aqueous fluid flow directly into the supraciliary or suprachoroidal space should minimize scarring since the angle region is populated with a single line of non-proliferating trabecular cells. Shunting aqueous flow directly into the supraciliary or suprachoroidal space should minimize hypotony and also potentially eliminate complications such as endophthalmitis and leaks since an external filtering bleb is not the goal of surgery. The device described herein is designed to enhance aqueous flow through the normal outflow system of the eye with minimal to no complications. Any of the procedures and device described herein can be performed in conjunction with other therapeutic procedures, such as laser iridotomy, laser iridoplasty, and goniosynechialysis (a cyclodialysis procedure).
In one aspect, there is disclosed a glaucoma treatment device comprising an elongate member having a flow pathway, at least one inflow port communicating with the flow pathway, and an outflow port communicating with the flow pathway. The inflow port and outflow port are positioned such that the flow pathway provides a fluid pathway between an anterior chamber and a suprachoroidal space when the elongate member is implanted in the eye.
Among the methods provided herein, is a method of implanting an ocular device into the eye, comprising forming an incision in the cornea of the eye; inserting a shunt through the incision into the anterior chamber of the eye wherein the shunt includes a fluid passageway; passing the shunt along a pathway from the anterior chamber through the scleral spur of the eye into the suprachoroidal space; and positioning the shunt in a first position such that a first portion of the fluid passageway communicates with the anterior chamber and a second portion of the fluid passageway communicates with the suprachoroidal space to provide a fluid passageway between the suprachoroidal space and the anterior chamber.
In other embodiments, provided herein is a method of implanting an ocular device into the eye, comprising forming an incision in the cornea of the eye; inserting a shunt through the incision into the anterior chamber of the eye wherein at least a portion of the shunt can be opened to permit fluid flow along the shunt; passing the shunt along a pathway from the anterior chamber through the scleral spur of the eye into the suprachoroidal space; positioning the shunt in a first position such that a first portion of the shunt communicates with the anterior chamber and a second portion of the shunt communicates with the suprachoroidal space; and opening the shunt to permit fluid flow so that the shunt provides a fluid passageway between the suprachoroidal space and the anterior chamber.
In other embodiments, provided herein is a method of implanting an ocular device into the eye, comprising forming an incision in the cornea of the eye; mounting a shunt on a delivery device wherein at least a portion of the shunt or the delivery device has a curvature that matches a curvature of the eye; inserting the shunt through the incision into the anterior chamber of the eye wherein the shunt includes a fluid passageway; aiming the shunt relative to the suprachoroidal space such that the curvature of the shunt or the delivery device aligns with the curvature of the eye; and inserting at least a portion of the shunt into the suprachoroidal space to provide a fluid passageway between the suprachoroidal space and the anterior chamber.
In still further embodiments, provided herein is a method of implanting an ocular device into the eye, comprising forming an incision in the cornea of the eye; inserting a shunt through the incision into the anterior chamber of the eye wherein the shunt includes a fluid passageway; passing the shunt along a pathway from the anterior chamber through the scleral spur of the eye into the suprachoroidal space; and positioning the shunt in a first position such that a first portion of the fluid passageway communicates with the anterior chamber and a second portion of the fluid passageway communicates with the suprachoroidal space to provide a fluid passageway between the suprachoroidal space and the anterior chamber wherein the shunt is pre-shaped to position the first portion away from the iris.
In further embodiments, provided herein is a method of implanting an ocular device into the eye, comprising forming an incision in the sclera of the eye; inserting a shunt through the incision into the suprachoroidal space of the eye wherein the shunt includes a fluid passageway; passing the shunt along a pathway from the suprachoroidal space through the scleral spur of the eye into the anterior chamber; and positioning the shunt in a first position such that a first portion of the fluid passageway communicates with the anterior chamber and a second portion of the fluid passageway communicates with the suprachoroidal space to provide a fluid passageway between the suprachoroidal space and the anterior chamber.
Also provided herein, is a glaucoma treatment device, comprising an elongate member having a flow pathway, at least one inflow port communicating with the flow pathway, and an outflow port communicating with the flow pathway, wherein the elongate member is adapted to be positioned in the eye such that the inflow port communicates with the anterior chamber, the outflow port communicates with the suprachoroidal space, and at least a portion of the elongate member passes through the scleral spur to provide a fluid pathway between the anterior chamber and the suprachoroidal space when the elongate member is implanted in the eye.
In other embodiments, provided herein is a glaucoma treatment device, comprising an elongate member having a flow pathway, at least one inflow port communicating with the flow pathway, and an outflow port communicating with the flow pathway, wherein the elongate member is adapted to be positioned in the eye such that the inflow port communicates with the anterior chamber and the outflow port communicates with the suprachoroidal space, wherein at least a portion of the elongate member includes an enlarged bulbous region adapted to form a space within the suprachoroidal space for accumulation of fluid within the suprachoroidal space.
In another embodiment, provided herein is a glaucoma treatment device, comprising an elongate member having a flow pathway, at least one inflow port communicating with the flow pathway, and an outflow port communicating with the flow pathway, wherein the elongate member is adapted to be positioned in the eye such that the inflow port communicates with the anterior chamber and the outflow port communicates with the suprachoroidal space, the elongate member having a first region and a second region, wherein the second region is adapted to transition from a first shape to a second shape while the first regions remains unchanged.
In another embodiment, provided herein is a glaucoma treatment device, comprising a curved member sized to fit within an angle between the cornea and the iris of an eye; at least two legs extending outwardly from the curved member and shaped to extend into the suprachoroidal space, wherein at least one of the legs provides a fluid flow pathway into the suprachoroidal space.
In still further embodiments, provided herein is a glaucoma treatment system, comprising an elongate member having a flow pathway, at least one inflow port communicating with the flow pathway, and an outflow port communicating with the flow pathway, wherein the elongate member is adapted to be positioned in the eye such that the inflow port communicates with the anterior chamber and the outflow port communicates with the suprachoroidal space, wherein at least a portion of the elongate member includes an enlarged bulbous region adapted to form a space within the suprachoroidal space for accumulation of fluid within the suprachoroidal space; and a delivery device having an elongate applier that removably attaches to the elongate member, the delivery device including an actuator that removes the elongate member from the applier.
Other features and advantages should be apparent from the following description of various embodiments, which illustrate, by way of example, the principles of the invention.
Exemplary Eye Anatomy
The elastic lens L is located near the front of the eye. The lens L provides adjustment of focus and is suspended within a capsular bag from the ciliary body CB, which contains the muscles that change the focal length of the lens. A volume in front of the lens L is divided into two by the iris I, which controls the aperture of the lens and the amount of light striking the retina. The pupil is a hole in the center of the iris I through which light passes. The volume between the iris I and the lens L is the posterior chamber PC. The volume between the iris I and the cornea is the anterior chamber AC. Both chambers are filled with a clear liquid known as aqueous humour.
The ciliary body CB continuously forms aqueous humour in the posterior chamber PC by secretion from the blood vessels. The aqueous humour flows around the lens L and iris I into the anterior chamber and exits the eye through the trabecular meshwork, a sieve-like structure situated at the corner of the iris I and the wall of the eye (the corner is known as the iridocorneal angle). Some of the aqueous humour filters through the trabecular meshwork into Schlemm's canal, a small channel that drains into the ocular veins. A smaller portion rejoins the venous circulation after passing through the ciliary body and eventually through the sclera (the uveoscleral route).
Glaucoma is a disease wherein the aqueous humor builds up within the eye. In a healthy eye, the ciliary processes secrete aqueous humor, which then passes through the angle between the cornea and the iris. Glaucoma appears to be the result of clogging in the trabecular meshwork. The clogging can be caused by the exfoliation of cells or other debris. When the aqueous humor does not drain properly from the clogged meshwork, it builds up and causes increased pressure in the eye, particularly on the blood vessels that lead to the optic nerve. The high pressure on the blood vessels can result in death of retinal ganglion cells and eventual blindness.
Closed angle (acute) glaucoma can occur in people who were born with a narrow angle between the iris and the cornea (the anterior chamber angle). This is more common in people who are farsighted (they see objects in the distance better than those which are close up). The iris can slip forward and suddenly close off the exit of aqueous humor, and a sudden increase in pressure within the eye follows.
Open angle (chronic) glaucoma is by far the most common type of glaucoma. In open angle glaucoma, the iris does not block the drainage angle as it does in acute glaucoma. Instead, the fluid outlet channels within the wall of the eye gradually narrow with time. The disease usually affects both eyes, and over a period of years the consistently elevated pressure slowly damages the optic nerve.
Shunt and Delivery System
The internal lumen 305 serves as a passageway for the flow of aqueous humour through the shunt 105 directly from the anterior chamber to the suprachoroidal space. In addition, the internal lumen 305 can be used to mount the shunt 105 onto a delivery system, as described below. The internal lumen 305 can also be used as a pathway for flowing irrigation fluid into the eye generally for flushing or to maintain pressure in the anterior chamber, or using the fluid to hydraulically create a dissection plane into or within the suprachoroidal space. In the embodiment of
The shunt 105 can include one or more features that aid in properly positioning the shunt 105 in the eye. For example, the shunt can have one or more visual, tomographic, echogenic, or radiopaque markers 112 that can be used to aid in placement using any of the devices referenced above tuned to its applicable marker system. In using the markers to properly place the implant, the shunt is inserted in the suprachoroidal space, until the marker is aligned with a relevant anatomic structure, for example, visually identifying a marker on the anterior chamber portion of the shunt that aligns with the trabecular meshwork, or scleral spur, such that an appropriate length of the shunt remains in the anterior chamber. Under ultrasound, an echogenic marker can signal the placement of the device within the suprachoroidal space. Any marker can be placed anywhere on the device to provide sensory feedback to the user on real-time placement, confirmation of placement or during patient follow up. Other structural features are described below.
The shunt 105 can also include structural features that aid in anchoring or retaining the implanted shunt 105 in the eye. For example, as shown in
Other anchoring or retaining features can be employed with the shunt 105. For example, one or more hairs, such as human hairs, or synthetic hairs made from polymers, elastomers or metals can be attached to the shunt. The hairs cancan be glued or thermally bonded to the shunt. The hairs, if they are polyimide, can be attached to the shunt by dipping and polymerized by heat and pressure if the dipping material is polyimide. The hairs can be crimped to the shunt by rings. Alternatively, the shunt can have through-hole features that the hairs can be threaded through and tied or knotted. The hairs can be overmolded onto the shunt body. The hairs are positioned relative to the shunt such that at least a portion of the hair extends outwardly from the shunt for anchoring within or against the tissue of the eye. Various anchoring and retaining features are described herein and it should be appreciated that the features can be implemented in any of the shunt embodiments described herein.
The retaining features, such as wings or collars, can be manufactured by various methods. In one embodiment, the retaining features can be inherent in the raw material from which the shunt is constructed. The shunt can be machined or laser ablated from a unitary rod or block of stock of material with the material subtracted or removed, leaving the retaining features behind.
Alternatively, the retaining features can be manufactured as separate parts and assembled onto the shunt. They can be joined to the shunt by a friction fit or attached with biocompatible adhesives. They can fit into grooves, holes or detents in the body of the shunt to lock them together. If the retaining features are constructed from hairs or sutures, they can be threaded or tied onto the shunt. Alternatively, the retaining features can be overmolded onto the shunt via an injection molding process. Alternatively, the entire shunt and retention features can be injection molded in one step. Alternatively, the retaining features can be formed into the shunt with a post-processing step such as flaring or thermoforming parts of the shunt.
The shunt 105 can be made of various materials, including, for example, polyimide, Nitinol, platinum, stainless steel, molybdenum, or any other suitable polymer, metal, metal alloy, or ceramic biocompatible material or combinations thereof. Other materials of manufacture or materials with which the shunt can be coated or manufactured entirely include Silicone, PTFE, ePTFE, differential fluoropolymer, FEP, FEP laminated into nodes of ePTFE, silver coatings (such as via a CVD process), gold, prolene/polyolefins, polypropylene, poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), acrylic, PolyEthylene Terephthalate (PET), Polyethylene (PE), PLLA, and parylene. The shunt 105 can be reinforced with polymer, Nitinol, or stainless steel braid or coiling or can be a co-extruded or laminated tube with one or more materials that provide acceptable flexibility and hoop strength for adequate lumen support and drainage through the lumen. The shunt can alternately be manufactured of nylon (polyamide), PEEK, polysulfone, polyamideimides (PAI), polyether block amides (Pebax), polyurethanes, thermoplastic elastomers (Kraton, etc), and liquid crystal polymers.
Any of the embodiments of the shunt 105 described herein can be coated on its inner or outer surface with one or more drugs or other materials, wherein the drug or material maintains the patency of the lumen or encourages ingrowth of tissue to assist with retention of the shunt within the eye or to prevent leakage around the shunt. The drug can also be used for disease treatment. The shunt can also be coated on its inner or outer surface with a therapeutic agent, such as a steroid, an antibiotic, an anti-inflammatory agent, an anticoagulant, an antiglaucomatous agent, an anti proliferative, or any combination thereof. The drug or therapeutic agent can be applied in a number of ways as is known in the art. Also the drug can be embedded in another polymer (nonabsorbable or bioabsorbable) that is coated on the shunt.
The shunt can also be coated or layered with a material that expands outward once the shunt has been placed in the eye. The expanded material fills any voids that are positioned around the shunt. Such materials include, for example, hydrogels, foams, lyophilized collagen, or any material that gels, swells, or otherwise expands upon contact with body fluids.
The shunt can also be covered or coated with a material (such as polyester, ePTFE (also known as GORETEX®), PTFE that provides a surface to promote healing of the shunt into the surrounding tissue. In order to maintain a low profile, well-known sputtering techniques can be employed to coat the shunt. Such a low profile coating would accomplish a possible goal of preventing migration while still allowing easy removal if desired.
In another embodiment shown in
The features of the shunts shown in
In an exemplary embodiment, the shunt has a length in the range of 0.1″ to 0.75″ and an inner diameter for a flow path in the range of 0.002″ to 0.015″. In an embodiment, the inner diameter is 0.012″, 0.010″, or 0.008″. A wicking shunt can have a diameter in the range of 0.002″ to 0.025″. In the event that multiple shunts are used, and for example each shunt is 0.1″, the fully implanted device can create a length of 0.2″ to 1.0″, although the length can be outside this range. An embodiment of the shunt is 0.250″ long, 0.012″ in inner diameter, and 0.015″ in outer diameter. One embodiment of the shunt is 0.300″ long.
The shunt 105 has a column strength sufficient to permit the shunt 105 to be inserted into suprachoroidal space such that the distal tip of the shunt 105 tunnels through the eye tissue (such as the ciliary body) without structural collapse or structural degradation of the shunt 105. In addition, the surface of the inner lumen 305 is sufficiently smooth relative to the delivery device (described in detail below) to permit the shunt 105 to slide off of the delivery device during the delivery process. In an embodiment, the column strength is sufficient to permit the shunt to tunnel through the eye tissue into the suprachoroidal space without any structural support from an additional structure such as a delivery device.
The shunt 105 can be configured to transition between a first state of reduced size and a second state of expanded size. For example, the shunt 105 can be in a first state wherein the shunt 105 has a reduced radial size and/or overall length in order to facilitate fitting the shunt through a small portal during delivery. The shunt can then transition to a second state of increased radial size and/or overall length. The shunt can also change cross sectional shape along the length.
The transition between the first and second states can be implemented in various manners. For example, the shunt can be manufactured of a material such as Nitinol that deforms in response to temperature variations or a release of a constraining element. Thus, the shunt can be self-expanding or self-restricting at various locations along the length. In another embodiment or in combination with a self-expanding shunt, the shunt can be expanded manually, such as through use of an expansion balloon or by passing the shunt along a pre-shaped device, such as a reverse-tapered delivery trocar that increases in diameter. In addition, the shunt can be positioned inside a sheath during delivery wherein the sheath maintains the shunt in the first state of reduced size. Upon delivery, the sheath can be removed to permit the shunt to expand in size.
The delivery component 520 also includes a shunt deployment or advancing structure 530 positioned on a proximal end of the applier 525. The advancing structure 530 can be an elongated tube that is positioned over the applier 525. The delivery system 510 can be actuated to achieve relative, sliding movement between the advancing structure 530 and the applier 525. For example, the advancing structure 520 can be moved in the distal direction (as represented by the arrow 532), while the applier 525 remains stationary to push or otherwise advance the shunt 105 along the applier 525 for delivery of the shunt 105 into the eye. In an alternate embodiment, the applier 525 withdraws distally into the advancing structure 530 to remove the shunt 105 from the applier 525, as described below with reference to
In an embodiment, the applier 525 can have a length sufficient to receive a plurality of shunts in an end-to-end series arrangement on the applier 525. In this manner, multiple shunts 105 can be loaded onto the applier 525 and delivered one at a time such that the shunts collectively form an elongated lumen of sufficient length for adequate drainage. This permits relatively short length shunts that can be collectively used in various eye sizes. In addition, multiple shunts can be placed in multiple separate locations within one eye.
The applier 525 or any portion of the delivery component 520 can have an internal lumen that extends along its length for receipt of a guidewire that can be used during delivery of the shunt 105. The internal lumen in the delivery component 520 can also be used for the flow of fluid in order to irrigate the eye. The internal lumen can be sufficiently large to receive the shunt 105 such that the shunt 105 is mounted inside the applier 525, rather than over the applier 525, during delivery.
The handle component 515 of the delivery system 510 can be actuated to control delivery of the shunt 105. In this regard, the handle component 515 includes an applier control 540 that can be actuated to cause the applier 525 to extend in length in the distal direction or to retract in the opposite direction (proximal direction). The handle component 515 also includes an implant advancing actuator 535 that can be actuated to selectively move the advancing structure 530 along the applier 525 in the proximal or distal direction. In this manner, the advancing structure 530 can be used to push the shunt 105 in the distal direction and off of the applier 525 during delivery, or else to hold the shunt 105 in a fixed location in the eye while the applier 525 is withdrawn.
The handle component 515 can be adapted such that it can be actuated using only a single hand. In addition, the delivery system 510 can include an actuation member that is separate from the handle 515 such that the operator can use a foot to actuate the delivery system 510. For example, a foot pedal or hydraulics can be coupled to or incorporated within the delivery system 510 to save the use of the physician's hand at the worksite. Thus, the physician simply positions a cannula or delivery system with his or her hands and uses the foot pedal to advance the shunt. PCT Publication No. WO06012421, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, describes an exemplary hydraulic assist for an ablation catheter with a steerable tip.
In another embodiment, some of the functions of the applier 525 and the shunt 105 are combined. That is, the distal tip of the shunt 105 can have a pointed or other type of shape (such as a beveled or blunted shape) on the distal end that facilitates penetration of the shunt 105 through tissue. Exemplary methods for delivering the shunt 105 into the eye are described in detail below.
As mentioned, the applier 525 can be equipped with one or more mechanisms that cause expansion of the shunt 105. For example, the applier 525 can include an expandable structure, such as an inflatable sheath, that is mounted over a solid core of the applier 525. The inflatable sheath is positioned at least partially within the internal lumen of the shunt 105 when the shunt 105 is mounted on the applier 525. During delivery of the shunt 105, the inflatable sheath is expanded when the shunt 105 is positioned in the appropriate location in the eye to expand the shunt 105 and cause the shunt 105 to lodge in the location. The sheath is then deflated or otherwise reduced in size to permit the applier 525 to be withdrawn from the shunt 105. Exemplary methods are described below.
The applier 525 can be made of various materials, including, for example, stainless steel and Nitinol. The applier 525 can be straight (as shown in
The applier can also have a structure that enables or facilitates use of the applier 525. For example, the distal tip of the applier 525 can have a shape that facilitates blunt dissection of targeted tissue such as to facilitate dissection into the suprachoroidal space. In this regard, the distal tip of the applier 525 can have a flat, shovel, spade, etc. shape, for example.
This is described in more detail with reference to
At least a portion of the applier 525 can be flexible. For example, the distal region 537 of the applier 525 can be flexible such that it conforms to the shape of the shunt 105 when the shunt 105 is mounted on the distal region 537. The distal region 537 can also conform to the shape of the advancing element 530 when the applier 525 is withdrawn into the advancing element 530.
Various other embodiments of the shunt 105 are now described. The reference numeral 105 is used to refer to all embodiments of the shunt and it should be appreciated that features in the various embodiments can be combined with other embodiments. As mentioned, the shunt 105 can include various types of structures and mechanisms for retaining or otherwise anchoring the position of the shunt 105 in the eye. For example, the shunt 105 can be equipped with a structure (such as a mesh structure or spray coating) that facilitates endothelial growth of tissue around the shunt for permanent placement of the shunt.
The slots 705 form edges that interface with surrounding tissue to prevent the shunt 105 from becoming dislodged once implanted in the eye. The slots 705 form holes that communicate with the internal lumen of the shunt 105 for inflow and outflow of aqueous humour relative to the lumen. The proximal end of the shunt can also be equipped with an arrangement of slots 705.
Each of the holes can communicate with a separate flow path that extends through the shunt 105. That is, the shunt 105 can include a plurality of internal lumens wherein each internal lumen communicates with one or more of the holes in side wall of the shunt.
As shown in
The expansion members 910 can be biased toward the expanded state such that, when unopposed, the expansion members 910 automatically move toward the expanded state. In such a case, each of the expansion members 910 can be positioned within a sheath 915 during delivery, wherein the sheath 915 maintains the expansion members 910 in the reduced-size state. The sheath 915 is removed from the expansion members to permit the expansion members 910 to self-expand. The sheath 915 can have a strong hoop and tensile strength to hold the expansion members 910 in an unexpanded state until the shunt 105 in a proper place in the eye. In one embodiment, the sheath 915 is manufactured of PolyEthylene Terephthalate (PET).
The embodiment of
The shunt 105 of
As mentioned, the shunt 105 includes an internal lumen. The lumen can have a uniform diameter along the length of the shunt or that can vary in diameter along the length of the shunt. In this regard, the diameter of the internal lumen can taper in a manner that achieves a desired fluid flow rate through the shunt. Thus, the diameter of the lumen can be varied to regulate fluid flow through the shunt. Flow regulation can also be achieved by variation in size, quantity, and/or position of holes 1010 in the distal region of the shunt 105, wherein the holes 1010 communicate with the internal lumen. Thus, the holes 1010 can have shapes, sizes, and quantities that are selected to achieve a desired intraocular pressure of the eye as a result of the flow of aqueous humour through the shunt. In addition, the use of multiple holes permits fluid to flow through the shunt 105 even when one of the holes 1010 is blocked.
During delivery of the shunt 105, the holes 1010 can be positioned so as to align with predetermined anatomical structures of the eye. For example, one or more holes 1010 can align with the suprachoroidal space to permit the flow of aqueous humour into the suprachoroidal space, while another set of holes 1010 aligns with structures proximal to the suprachoroidal space, such as structures in the ciliary body or the anterior chamber of the eye. The shunt can have visual markers along its length to assist the user in positioning the desired portion of the shunt within the anterior chamber. Further, the shunt and delivery system can employ alignment marks, tabs, slots or other features that allow the user to know alignment of the shunt with respect to the delivery device.
Exemplary Methods of Delivery and Implantation
An exemplary method of delivering and implanting the shunt into the eye is now described. In general, the shunt is implanted using the delivery system by accessing the scleral spur to create a low profile dissection in the tissue plane between the choroid and the sclera. The shunt is then secured in the eye so that it provides communication between the anterior chamber and the suprachoroidal space.
An endoscope can also be used during delivery to aid in visualization. For example, a twenty-one to twenty-five gauge endoscope can be coupled to the shunt during delivery such as by mounting the endoscope along the side of the shunt or by mounting the endoscope coaxially within the shunt. Ultrasonic guidance can be used as well using high resolution bio-microscopy, OCT and the like. Alternatively, a small endoscope can be inserted though another limbal incision in the eye to image the tissue during the procedure.
In an initial step, one or more shunts 105 are mounted on the delivery device 510 for delivery into the eye. As mentioned, at least one shunt 105 can be mounted over the applier 525 or can be mounted within the applier 525. The eye can be viewed through the viewing lens 1405 or other viewing means such as is described above, in order to ascertain the location where the shunt 105 is to be delivered. At least one goal is to deliver the shunt 105 in the eye so that it is positioned such that the internal lumen of the shunt provides a fluid pathway between the anterior chamber and the suprachoroidal space. If a tube shunt having an internal lumen is used, then the internal lumen is positioned such that at least one ingress to the lumen communicates with the anterior chamber and at least one egress communicates with the suprachoroidal space. If a wick shunt is used, then the wick member can communicate with both the anterior chamber and the suprachoroidal space. As mentioned, the tube member and wick member can be combined. In such a case, the internal lumen can be open into the anterior chamber and be open at least partially into the suprachoroidal space, while the wick member extends further into the suprachoroidal space.
With reference to
The incision has a size that is sufficient to permit passage of the shunt therethrough. In this regard, the incision can be sized to permit passage of only the shunt without any additional devices, or be sized to permit passage of the shunt in addition to additional devices, such as the delivery device or an imaging device. In an embodiment, the incision is about 1 mm in size. In another embodiment, the incision is no greater than about 2.85 mm in size. In another embodiment, the incision is no greater than about 2.85 mm and is greater than about 1.5 mm. It has been observed that an incision of up to 2.85 mm is a self-sealing incision. For clarity of illustration, the drawing is not to scale and the viewing lens 1405 is not shown in
After insertion through the incision, the applier 525 is advanced through the cornea and the anterior chamber. The applier is advanced along a pathway that enables the shunt to be delivered from the anterior chamber into the suprachoroidal space. In one embodiment, the applier travels along a pathway that is toward the scleral spur such that the applier crosses through the scleral spur on the way to the suprachoroidal space. The applier 525 can be pre-shaped, steerable, articulating, or shapeable in a manner that facilitates the applier approaching the suprachoroidal space along a proper angle or pathway.
As mentioned, a guidewire can also be used to guide the applier or the shunt over the guidewire to the proper location in the eye. The guidewire can be looped at a distal end to assist in making suprachoroidal dissection. Once the shunt is properly in place, the loop can be released. If the shunt needs to be removed prior to releasing the loop, the guidewire loop can act as a retrieval mechanism. The loop can be larger than the distal lumen opening of the shunt such that when the guidewire is pulled back, the loop pulls the shunt along with it.
The guidewire can be left in place even after the applier is removed. This enables the user to repeatedly access the site via the guidewire without having to relocate the site in the eye. A cannula can be used to create an access pathway to the delivery site. The delivery tool can then be placed through the cannula. The cannula can remain fixed in place with the viewing lens, and the end of the delivery device can be articulated or steerable such that multiple shunts can be placed from one access site. For example an infusion cannula from Dutch Ophthalmic Research Center (D.O.R.C.) can be used, in particular models that allow for continuous infusion and aspiration to maintain a sufficient working area within the anterior chamber.
As discussed, the distal tip of the applier 525 can be sharp and can also be tapered to facilitate a smooth penetration through the cornea. The distal tip of the shunt 105 can also be sharp. In addition, the tip of the applier device can be connected to an energy source ES, to allow energy to be delivered to the tip of the applier body to assist in creating the initial corneal stick, and in addition facilitating entry into the suprachoroidal space through the scleral spur. In this embodiment shown schematically in
The scleral spur is an anatomic landmark on the wall of the angle of the eye. The scleral spur is above the level of the iris but below the level of the trabecular meshwork. In some eyes, the scleral spur can be masked by the lower band of the pigmented trabecular meshwork and be directly behind it. With the applier 525 positioned for approach, the applier 525 is then advanced further into the eye such that the distal tip of the applier and/or the shunt penetrates the scleral spur. The penetration through the scleral spur can be accomplished in various manners. In one embodiment, a sharpened distal tip of the applier or the shunt punctures, penetrates, dissects, pierces or otherwise passes through the scleral spur toward the suprachoroidal space. The crossing of the scleral spur or any other tissue can be aided such as by applying energy to the scleral spur or the tissue via the distal tip of the applier 525. The means of applying energy can vary and can include mechanical energy, such as by creating a frictional force to generate heat at the scleral spur. Other types of energy can be used, such as RF laser, electrical, etc.
The applier 525 is continuously advanced into the eye, via the trabecular meshwork and the ciliary body, until the distal tip is located at or near the suprachoroidal space such that a first portion of the shunt 105 is positioned within the suprachoroidal space and a second portion is positioned within the anterior chamber. In one embodiment, at least 1 mm to 2 mm of the shunt (along the length) remains in the anterior chamber.
One method of approach is to advance the applier 525 through the ciliary body as it approaches the suprachoroidal space. The tissue of the sclera is structurally tougher than the ciliary body. As the distal tip of the applier 525 passes through the ciliary body and reaches the scleral tissue, the scleral tissue provides an increased resistance to passage of the applier 525 therethrough. Thus, the surgeon will detect an increase in resistance to passage when the distal tip of the applier passes through the ciliary body and reaches the sclera. This can serve as an indication that the distal tip of the applier has reached the suprachoroidal space. In this regard, the distal region of the applier 525 or the shunt can have a shape, such as a spade shape or a blunt end that is configured to facilitate creating a dissection plan between the choroid and the sclera and positioning of the distal region of the applier in the suprachoroidal space. This thickness of this dissection plane is approximately the same as the size of the device being placed. The distal region can be flexible or looped to allow for preferential movement into the space between the sclera and choroid.
As mentioned, the delivery device 510 and/or the shunt 105 can be equipped with navigational aides, such as radiopaque markers, or means to enable ultrasonic visualization that assist in proper positioning of the applier and shunt in the eye. Once the applier 525 has been properly positioned, the shunt 105 is advanced off of the applier 525, such as by actuating the implant advancing actuator 535 to move the advancing structure 530 (
The shunt 105 can be deployed off of the applier in various manners. For example, as discussed above, the shunt can be pushed off the applier by moving the advancing structure 530 (shown in
The shunt can include structural features that assist in proper placement of the shunt, such as to ensure that the shunt 105 is not advanced any further than necessary into the eye. For example, the shunt 105 can include a structure, such as the proximal retaining member 1005 (shown in
Although
If multiple shunts are used, it is not necessary that all of the shunts (or all openings in a shunt) be initially patent. This will allow the drainage of aqueous humour to be initiated in a controlled manner by selectively opening additional shunts over a period of time. Over time, additional shunts can be activated (i.e., opened), such as by the insertion of a stylet or other needle-type device, such as during an office visit. The shunts can also be opened or re-opened (if a shunt becomes blocked after implantation) in various manners, such as using a photochemical, laser, RF, ultrasound, or thermal procedure, or combinations thereof. For instance, the shunt can have a single hole or multiple holes along its proximal end or distal end, one or more of which are initially covered by a second tube or other material. Applying light or other energy to the tube could cause the holes to open or could cause the tube to shrink longitudinally, exposing additional openings to increase flow.
In addition, the outer diameter of the shunt or the diameter of the internal lumen can be varied by shrinking or enlarging the shunt using thermal, light, or photochemical activation. For example, the shunt can be initially relatively long and thin. Applying energy or other activation to the shunt could cause it to become shorter and/or larger in diameter, increasing its flow rate.
It is possible that the dissection formed by the shunt can cause a leak between the anterior chamber and the suprachoroidal space. In such a case, the leak can be filled or otherwise plugged with a material (such as a foam or adhesive) or a structure (such as a gasket) that prevents leaking.
With reference still to
In another embodiment, the shunt 105 is not positioned on the applier 525 as the applier is advanced into the eye. In such a case, the handle component 515 of the delivery instrument can be detached from the proximal end of the applier after the applier has been properly positioned in the eye. The shunt 105 is then threaded over the applier, from the proximal end to the distal end, toward the delivery site.
In one implementation, a guide passageway is formed in the eye prior to advancing the applier through the eye. The applier is then advanced through the previously formed passageway rather than using the applier to tunnel through the eye. The passageway can be formed in various manners, such as by using an energy source or phacoemulsification equipment to form the passageway.
Additional Shunt and Delivery System Embodiments
Additional embodiments of the shunt 105 are now described.
The core 2205 can be a solid piece of material that does not have an internal lumen. A solid core 2205 can form a strong structure and can create a reliable flow path with a reduced risk of structural collapse or tissue ingrowth in the lumen. Alternately, the external flow channels can be combined with an internal lumen that extends through the core 2205. If the core 2205 is solid without an internal lumen, then it can be delivered into the eye through a delivery lumen of a delivery device, such as through an applier. If the core 2205 includes an internal lumen, then the core can be delivered into the eye mounted over a delivery device, such as over an elongate applier.
The core 2205 can be manufactured in various ways. For example, the core 2205 can be molded or can be extruded, such as from a biocompatible material or any of the materials described herein. The core 2205 can also be formed of a combination of different materials or can be co-extruded.
The degradation of the plug 2410 can be configured in various manners. For example, the rate of degradation of the plug can be based on the intraocular pressure such that the degradation rate increases as the intraocular pressure increases. Thus, a higher intraocular pressure results in a greater rate of plug degradation than a lower intraocular pressure. In this manner, the rate of degradation of the plug can slow as the intraocular pressure approaches a predetermined value.
An exemplary way of implementing such a feature is to include an internal lumen 2510 in the plug 2410, as shown in
In an alternate embodiment of the device shown in
The shunt can also be manufactured of a material that is absorbed into the eye tissue after placement in the eye. Once absorbed, a space remains where the shunt was previously located. In this regard, the shunt can be manufactured of a complex carbohydrate or a collagen that is non-inflammatory. In another embodiment, the shunt is covered with or filled with a material that absorbed into the eye over time such as to prevent hypotony or to prevent a clot forming within the tube.
In the case of biodegradable or bioabsorbable devices, a variety of materials can be used, such as biodegradable polymers including: hydroxyaliphatic carboxylic acids, either homo- or copolymers, such as polylactic acid, polyglycolic acid, polylactic glycolic acid; polysaccharides such as cellulose or cellulose derivatives such as ethyl cellulose, cross-linked or uncross-linked sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, sodium carboxymethylcellulose starch, cellulose ethers, cellulose esters such as cellulose acetate, cellulose acetate phthallate, hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose phthallate and calcium alginate, polypropylene, polybutyrates, polycarbonate, acrylate polymers such as polymethacrylates, polyanhydrides, polyvalerates, polycaprolactones such as poly-c-caprolactone, polydimethylsiloxane, polyamides, polyvinylpyrollidone, polyvinylalcohol phthallate, waxes such as paraffin wax and white beeswax, natural oils, shellac, zein, or a mixture thereof, as listed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,331,313 to Wong, which is expressly incorporated by reference in its entirety.
As discussed above with reference to
In another embodiment, shown in
As an alternative or in addition to sleeves that are positioned over the shunt, the outer surface of the shunt can include grooves that are machined or molded into the outer surface. The grooves can be a series of annular grooves or a single corkscrew groove that extends along the length of the shunt. The grooves function to form alternating raised and lowered surfaces on the shunt. The shunt could also include pits or pockmarks on the outer surface.
The sleeves 3405 can have a smooth outer surface, an undulating outer surface, or can include one or more slices that can be oriented at various angles relative to the longitudinal axis of the shunt 105. The slices form teeth in the sleeves 3405 to resist migration of the shunt. The sliced teeth can be biased outward such that the teeth flare outward and engage adjacent tissue to prevent movement in either the proximal or distal direction.
Any of the sleeves can also act as a marker to show the physician the proper shunt length to be inserted into the eye. Alternately, one or more printed markers can be formed on the shunt outer wall or on the delivery device. The markers can be BaSO4 markers embedded in the shunt material wall wherein the markers are made from an extruded polymer compounded with this radiopaque substance in the region of the desired radiopacity. Further, the markers can be laser printed or etched on the shunt device to show the amount of shunt deployed in the suprachoroidal space, or the amount by which the shunt device should be allowed to protrude into the anterior chamber. The sleeves can be manufactured of various materials. In one embodiment, at least one of the sleeves is made of an anti-microbial silver material.
It can be desirable to position one or more structures on the shunt that can be grasped, such as to reposition the shunt or remove the shunt from the eye. Some embodiments of the shunt that include removal or repositioning structures are now described. The removal or repositioning structure can be any structure on the shunt that can be grasped in order to move or remove the shunt. For example, the removal structure can be an enlarged region, a raised region, or a region of reduced diameter that provides a location that can be grasped by a removal tool. The retention elements described above can also serve as a grasping element for removal or moving of the shunt.
In another embodiment, shown in
As discussed, the shunt 105 can be shaped or otherwise configured so as to minimize the risk of trauma to the eye during delivery or during micromotion of the shunt after the shunt has been delivered. For example, any region of the shunt can have an atraumatic shape or can be manufactured of or coated with a soft material. In one embodiment, shown in
As discussed above with reference to
As shown in
The shunt can include features that are adapted to modify or enhance the flow of fluid through or along the shunt, such as after the shunt has been placed in the eye. In one embodiment, shown in
The use of the shunt 105 with the bulbous element 4905 is now described with reference to
In another embodiment, the lake is formed via hydro-dissection. A delivery cannula can be positioned in the eye such that fluid can be flowed into the suprachoroidal space via the cannula. The fluid is flowed into the eye with a pressure sufficient to form a dissection plane within the suprachoroidal space. The fluid can then accumulate within the suprachoroidal space so as to form a lake.
Different regions of the shunt 105 can transition to different shapes. For example, the shunt 105 can include a proximal region 5410 that is substantially round when the mandrel 5405 is positioned within the shunt. When the mandrel 5405 is removed from the shunt, the proximal region 5410 radially reduces in size while the remainder of the shunt remains the same shape, as shown in
When the mandrel is removed, the shunt 105 can transition to a shape that is particularly suited for placement and delivery into the suprachoroidal space. For example, with reference to
In use, the shunt 105 of
Further Description of Methods
There are various pathways of approach for delivering the shunt into the eye using the delivery system such as the system shown in
In one embodiment, the incision location 5702 is along the axis that separates quadrants I and IV (i.e., at the “9 o'clock” or “3 o'clock” position of the eye) and the dissection location 5703 is approximately 90 degrees from the incision location (i.e., at the “12 o'clock” position of the eye). Such a delivery pathway is transcorneal in that it traverses over the cornea. However, the delivery pathway need not be transcorneal.
With reference now to
With reference now to
As mentioned, the delivery system 510 can approach the eye in other manners than described above. In another embodiment, the incision location and the dissection location are within the same quadrant. In such an embodiment, the distal tip of the applier passes through an incision in the cornea that is closer to the scleral spur, rather than from across the eye as in the previously-described embodiments.
A further embodiment is one where multiple shunts are loaded into a delivery system and able to be delivered into various locations around the anterior chamber to the suprachoroidal space in a fashion such that the delivery device is not removed from the anterior chamber. The device is moved throughout the anterior chamber and has a multi-fire chamber such that as one shunt is delivered from the applier 525, another shunt is loaded onto the applier 525 and so on. This allows multiple shunt placements without reloading or using another device.
Infusion
During the procedure, fluid can be infused into the eye in order to stabilize the pressure in the anterior chamber, such as prior to, during, or after installation of a shunt. Infusion can also be used to maintain a clear field of view along the delivery pathway during delivery of the shunt. There is a risk that the pressure within the anterior chamber can adversely drop due to loss of fluid, which can possibly result in collapse of the anterior chamber. In order to counter a drop in pressure, fluid can be infused into the anterior chamber in order to maintain the pressure within a desired range. The fluid can be infused through a dedicated internal lumen in the applier or infused through the lumen in the shunt. The fluid can also be infused through a separate system that interfaces with the eye. For example, a cannulized member can be inserted into the anterior chamber and coupled to a source of fluid, such as a bag or saline or other biocompatible fluid source. If the pressure within the anterior chamber drops below a threshold value, the resulting pressure differential can cause fluid to automatically flow into the anterior chamber through the cannulized member.
A dye can be infused into the eye in order to provide visualization. The dye can be viewable through a visualization instrument. As the dye flows into the suprachoroidal space, it provides a visualization of flow. The dye can be photoactivated such that it shows aqueous humor dispersion when a certain type of light is applied to the dye. In addition, an ultrasound or Doppler can be used (such as by integrating a Doppler tip on the delivery device) to visualize or sense flow, or the rate of flow, through the suprachoroidal space.
Shunts in Use with Closed Angle Glaucoma
With reference to
Trans-Scleral Delivery of Shunt
In the previously-described embodiments, the shunt 105 is delivered by passing the shunt through a corneal incision or puncture. The surgeon then passes the shunt through the anterior chamber, across the scleral spur, and into the suprachoroidal space. In another embodiment, the surgeon makes an incision in the sclera to provide a trans-scleral delivery of the shunt into the eye. After making the scleral incision, the surgeon passes the proximal end of the shunt through the scleral incision sclera into suprachoroidal space. The surgeon then pushes the shunt toward the anterior chamber, such as via the scleral spur, until the proximal region of the shunt is positioned in the anterior chamber and the distal region of the shunt is positioned in the suprachoroidal space.
The trans-scleral approach is described in more detail with reference to
After the incision is formed, the applier 525 and attached shunt advances through the sclera and into the suprachoroidal space. The surgeon advances the applier 525 until a proximal region of shunt 105 is positioned within the anterior chamber and a distal region is within the suprachoroidal space, as shown in
As discussed above, various devices can be used to assist in guiding the delivery device and shunt into a proper position in the eye. For example, a guidewire can be used to guide the applier or the shunt over the guidewire to the proper location in the eye. The guidewire or the delivery can be equipped with a fiber optic that provides direct visualization of the eye during delivery of the shunt. In another embodiment, one or more imaging systems can be used during deliver of the device. Such imaging systems can include, for example, ultrasound (UBM), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and endoscopic viewing. OCT performs cross-sectional imaging of internal tissue microstructure by measuring the echo time delay of backscattered infrared light using an interferometer and a low coherence light source. For example, the Visante® OCT system from Zeiss Medical (Germany) can be used to non-invasively image during placement of the implants, or to confirm placement once the shunt has been place, post procedure and also at follow up. In addition, certain ultrasonic systems and those providing enhanced tactile feedback or ultrasonic guidance can be used, for example devices shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,969,384 and 6,676,607, incorporated by reference herein in their entirety, Endoscopes, such as the i-Scope™, and UBM devices (high frequency ultrasound) can be used such as those made by Ophthalmic Technologies, Inc. (Ontario, Canada).
In another embodiment, the shunt is deployed into the eye in combination with a cataract treatment procedure. In a cataract treatment procedure, the surgeon makes an incision in the cornea and inserts a viscoelastic material into the eye through the incision. The surgeon then removes the cataract through the incision. In combination with such a procedure, the surgeon implants a shunt 105 into the eye in the manner described above. A new lens can be implanted into the eye pursuant to this procedure. The shunt can be implanted either before or after removal of the lens.
Although embodiments of various methods and devices are described herein in detail with reference to certain versions, it should be appreciated that other versions, embodiments, methods of use, and combinations thereof are also possible. Therefore the spirit and scope of the appended claims should not be limited to the description of the embodiments contained herein.
This application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/615,810, filed Dec. 22, 2006, entitled “GLAUCOMA TREATMENT DEVICE” by Eugene de Juan, Jr., Stephen Boyd, Mark E. Deem, and Hanson S. Gifford III and Dan Rosenman, which claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. Nos. 60/759,835, filed Jan. 17, 2006, 60/783,632, filed Mar. 17, 2006; and 60/824,396, filed Sep. 1, 2006, each of which are entitled “GLAUCOMA TREATMENT DEVICE.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2990670 | Kingsbury | Jul 1961 | A |
3439675 | Cohen | Apr 1969 | A |
3767759 | Wichterle | Oct 1973 | A |
3788327 | Donowitz et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3915172 | Wichterle et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
4037604 | Newkirk | Jul 1977 | A |
4325375 | Nevyas | Apr 1982 | A |
4402681 | Haas et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4457757 | Molteno | Jul 1984 | A |
4521210 | Wong | Jun 1985 | A |
4554918 | White | Nov 1985 | A |
4604087 | Joseph | Aug 1986 | A |
4617715 | Koistinen et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4634418 | Binder | Jan 1987 | A |
4722724 | Schocket | Feb 1988 | A |
4750901 | Molteno | Jun 1988 | A |
4787885 | Binder | Nov 1988 | A |
4826478 | Schocket | May 1989 | A |
4846172 | Berlin | Jul 1989 | A |
4863457 | Lee | Sep 1989 | A |
4886488 | White | Dec 1989 | A |
4900300 | Lee | Feb 1990 | A |
4930512 | Henriksen et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4946436 | Smith | Aug 1990 | A |
4968296 | Ritch et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5041081 | Odrich | Aug 1991 | A |
5057098 | Zelman | Oct 1991 | A |
5071408 | Ahmed | Dec 1991 | A |
5073163 | Lippman | Dec 1991 | A |
5092837 | Ritch et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5127901 | Odrich | Jul 1992 | A |
5171213 | Price, Jr. | Dec 1992 | A |
5178604 | Baerveldt et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5180362 | Worst | Jan 1993 | A |
5284476 | Koch | Feb 1994 | A |
5300020 | L'Esperance, Jr. | Apr 1994 | A |
5338291 | Speckman et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5342370 | Simon et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5346464 | Camras | Sep 1994 | A |
5370607 | Memmen | Dec 1994 | A |
5372577 | Ungerleider | Dec 1994 | A |
5397300 | Baerveldt et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5423777 | Tajiri et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5433701 | Rubinstein | Jul 1995 | A |
5443505 | Wong et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5454746 | Guegan et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5476445 | Baerveldt et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5558629 | Baerveldt et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5558630 | Fisher | Sep 1996 | A |
5569197 | Helmus et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
RE35390 | Smith | Dec 1996 | E |
5601094 | Reiss | Feb 1997 | A |
5626558 | Suson | May 1997 | A |
5626559 | Solomon | May 1997 | A |
5651782 | Simon et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5676944 | Alvarado et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5702414 | Richter et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5704907 | Nordquist et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713844 | Peyman | Feb 1998 | A |
5741292 | Mendius | Apr 1998 | A |
5743868 | Brown et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5749879 | Middleman et al. | May 1998 | A |
5752928 | de Roulhac et al. | May 1998 | A |
5792075 | Schwager | Aug 1998 | A |
5807244 | Barot | Sep 1998 | A |
5807302 | Wandel | Sep 1998 | A |
5868697 | Richter et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5882327 | Jacob | Mar 1999 | A |
5893837 | Eagles et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5941250 | Aramant et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5968058 | Richter et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6007510 | Nigam | Dec 1999 | A |
6007511 | Prywes | Dec 1999 | A |
6019786 | Thompson | Feb 2000 | A |
6036678 | Giungo | Mar 2000 | A |
6050970 | Baerveldt | Apr 2000 | A |
6050999 | Paraschac et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6077299 | Adelberg et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6102045 | Nordquist et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6142969 | Nigam | Nov 2000 | A |
6152918 | Padilla et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6174307 | Daniel et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6186974 | Allan et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6203513 | Yaron et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6221078 | Bylsma | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6251090 | Avery et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261256 | Ahmed | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264668 | Prywes | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270472 | Antaki et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6331313 | Wong et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6375642 | Grieshaber et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383219 | Telandro et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6450984 | Lynch et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6464724 | Lynch et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468283 | Richter et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471666 | Odrich | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471777 | Kobayashi et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6494857 | Neuhann | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6508779 | Suson | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510600 | Yaron et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6524275 | Lynch et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6533768 | Hill | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537568 | Olejnik et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6544208 | Ethier et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6544249 | Yu et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558342 | Yaron et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6561974 | Grieshaber et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6579256 | Hughes | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6589203 | Mitrev | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6595945 | Brown | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6626858 | Lynch et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6638239 | Bergheim et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6648283 | Chase et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6666841 | Gharib et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6676607 | de Juan, Jr. et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6699210 | Williams et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6699211 | Savage | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719750 | Varner et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6726664 | Yaron et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6726676 | Stegmann et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730056 | Ghaem et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6736791 | Tu et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6741666 | Henry et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6752753 | Hoskins et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6780164 | Bergheim et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6783544 | Lynch et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6786888 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6827699 | Lynch et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6827700 | Lynch et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6881197 | Nigam | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6881198 | Brown | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6939298 | Brown et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6955656 | Bergheim et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6962573 | Wilcox | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6966888 | Cullen et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6969384 | de Juan, Jr. et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6981958 | Gharib et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6989007 | Shadduck | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7041077 | Shields | May 2006 | B2 |
7090681 | Weber et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7094225 | Tu et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7135009 | Tu et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7160264 | Lisk, Jr. et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7163543 | Smedley et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7186232 | Smedley et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7192412 | Zhou et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7195774 | Carvalho et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7207965 | Simon | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7220238 | Lynch et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7273475 | Tu et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7291125 | Coroneo | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7297130 | Bergheim et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7331984 | Tu et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7431710 | Tu et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7488303 | Haffner et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7563241 | Tu et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7708711 | Tu et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7850637 | Lynch et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7857782 | Tu et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7867186 | Haffner et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7867205 | Bergheim et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7972616 | Dubrow et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8075511 | Tu et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8128588 | Coroneo | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8545430 | Silvestrini | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8721656 | De Juan, Jr. et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
20010000527 | Yaron et al. | Apr 2001 | A1 |
20010025150 | de Juan et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020013546 | Grieshaber et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013572 | Berlin | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026200 | Savage | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020072673 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087111 | Ethier et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111608 | Baerveldt et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128613 | Nakayama | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133168 | Smedley et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143284 | Tu et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156413 | Williams et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165478 | Gharib et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169130 | Tu et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169468 | Brown | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020177856 | Richter et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188308 | Tu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193725 | Odrich | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193804 | Tickle | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009124 | Lynch et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028127 | Balzum et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030028228 | Sand | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030055372 | Lynch et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060752 | Bergheim et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069637 | Lynch et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030088260 | Smedley et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093084 | Nissan et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097151 | Smedley et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097171 | Elliott | May 2003 | A1 |
20030109883 | Matsuzaki et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120200 | Bergheim et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135149 | Cullen et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139809 | Worst | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030181848 | Bergheim et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187384 | Bergheim et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030187385 | Bergheim et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191428 | Bergheim et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208163 | Yaron et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220602 | Lynch et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220603 | Lynch et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229303 | Haffner et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030232015 | Brown et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236483 | Ren | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236484 | Lynch et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040015140 | Shields | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024345 | Gharib et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040050392 | Tu et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073156 | Brown | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088048 | Richter et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040092856 | Dahan | May 2004 | A1 |
20040097984 | Zapata | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102729 | Haffner et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106977 | Sullivan et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111050 | Smedley et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127843 | Tu et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147870 | Burns et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148022 | Eggleston | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040193095 | Shadduck | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193262 | Shadduck | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210181 | Vass et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210185 | Tu et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040216749 | Tu | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040225250 | Yablonski | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236343 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040249333 | Bergheim et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254517 | Quiroz-Mercado et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254519 | Tu et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254520 | Porteous et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254521 | Simon | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260227 | Lisk et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260228 | Lynch et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050008673 | Snyder et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038334 | Lynch et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049578 | Tu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050085892 | Goto et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090806 | Lynch et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090807 | Lynch et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050101967 | Weber et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107734 | Coroneo | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119601 | Lynch et al. | Jun 2005 | A9 |
20050119636 | Haffner et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050119737 | Bene et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125003 | Pinchuk et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143817 | Hunter et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149080 | Hunter et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171507 | Christian et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050175663 | Hunter et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050181011 | Hunter et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050181977 | Hunter et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182350 | Nigam | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050191331 | Hunter et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050192527 | Gharib et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197613 | Sniegowski et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209549 | Bergheim et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209550 | Bergheim et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050232972 | Odrich | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050244462 | Farooq | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050245911 | Wright et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050250788 | Tu et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050266047 | Tu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267397 | Bhalla | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267398 | Protopsaltis et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050271704 | Tu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273033 | Grahn et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050277864 | Haffner et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283108 | Savage | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288617 | Yaron et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288619 | Gharib et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004348 | Scheller et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020248 | Prescott | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060032507 | Tu | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036207 | Koonmen et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047263 | Tu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069340 | Simon | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074375 | Bergheim et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060084907 | Bergheim et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060116626 | Smedley et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149194 | Conston et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155238 | Shields | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173397 | Tu et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195055 | Bergheim et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195056 | Bergheim et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200113 | Haffner et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060235367 | Takashima et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241580 | Mittelstein et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241749 | Tu et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060276739 | Brown | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070010827 | Tu et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070088242 | Coroneo | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088424 | Greenberg et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088432 | Solovay et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070106235 | Coroneo | May 2007 | A1 |
20070106236 | Coroneo | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112292 | Tu et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118147 | Smedley et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070129717 | Brown et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149915 | Yablonski | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070191863 | De Juan et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070233037 | Gifford, et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070276315 | Haffner et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276316 | Haffner et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282244 | Tu et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282245 | Tu et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293807 | Lynch et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080015488 | Tu et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080045878 | Bergheim et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058704 | Hee | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080108933 | Yu et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125862 | Blake | May 2008 | A1 |
20080151188 | Kawai et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080195027 | Coroneo | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080200860 | Tu et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080228127 | Burns et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234624 | Bergheim et al. | Sep 2008 | A2 |
20090036819 | Tu et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090036840 | Viray et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090043321 | Conston et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090138022 | Tu et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090182421 | Silvestrini et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100010416 | Juan, Jr. et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100137981 | Silvestrini et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100152641 | Yablonski | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100211079 | Aramant | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100234790 | Tu et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100274259 | Yaron et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100280317 | Silvestrini et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110028883 | Juan, Jr. et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110028884 | Theodore Coroneo | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110087149 | Theodore Coroneo | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110087150 | Theodore Coroneo | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110087151 | Theodore Coroneo | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110098629 | Juan, Jr. et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110306915 | De Juan, Jr. et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120035524 | Silvestrini | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120123434 | Grabner et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120220917 | Silvestrini et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120271272 | Hammack et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130281817 | Schaller et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130281908 | Schaller et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140012279 | de Juan, Jr. et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140066831 | Silvestrini et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140081195 | Clauson et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140107556 | Silvestrini et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140135916 | Clauson et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140155805 | Schaller et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140188030 | Coroneo | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140213958 | Clauson et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140309599 | Schaller | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140323995 | Clauson et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140364789 | Schaller | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140378886 | de Juan, Jr. et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150022780 | John et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150126809 | Silvestrini et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150223982 | Yablonski | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150320596 | Gifford et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150335487 | de Juan, Jr. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160022486 | Clauson et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160135992 | Schaller et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160193083 | John et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160346125 | Coroneo | Dec 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1225027 | Aug 1999 | CN |
1285724 | Feb 2001 | CN |
1124164 | Oct 2003 | CN |
1681457 | Oct 2005 | CN |
10042310 | Mar 2002 | DE |
0 228 185 | Nov 1986 | EP |
1173124 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1173125 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1173126 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1184010 | Mar 2002 | EP |
1278492 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1292256 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1310222 | May 2003 | EP |
1473004 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1477146 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1418868 | Mar 2008 | EP |
1977724 | Oct 2008 | EP |
1545655 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2027837 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2101891 | Jan 1983 | GB |
2007-535386 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2010-533565 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2018289 | Aug 1994 | RU |
2056818 | Mar 1996 | RU |
2074686 | Mar 1997 | RU |
2074687 | Mar 1997 | RU |
2157678 | Oct 2000 | RU |
WO-8900869 | Feb 1989 | WO |
WO-9112046 | Aug 1991 | WO |
WO-9219294 | Nov 1992 | WO |
WO-9402081 | Feb 1994 | WO |
WO-9409721 | May 1994 | WO |
WO-9409837 | May 1994 | WO |
WO-9413234 | Jun 1994 | WO |
WO-9508310 | Mar 1995 | WO |
WO-9620742 | Jul 1996 | WO |
WO-9636377 | Nov 1996 | WO |
WO-9744085 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO-9823237 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO-9926567 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO-0006223 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO-0064389 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO-0064390 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO-0064391 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO-0064393 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO-0064511 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO-0168016 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO-0178631 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO-0178656 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO-0197727 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO-0236052 | May 2002 | WO |
WO-02070045 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO-02074052 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO-02080811 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO-02080829 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO-02087418 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO-02087479 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO-02089699 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO-02102274 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO-03015659 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO-03015667 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO-03041622 | May 2003 | WO |
WO-03045290 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO-03073968 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO-03096871 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO-03099175 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO-2004014218 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO-2004026347 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO-2004043231 | May 2004 | WO |
WO-2004056294 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO-2004060219 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO-2004062469 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO-2004073552 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO-2004110391 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO-2005016418 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO-2005-046516 | May 2005 | WO |
WO-2005046782 | May 2005 | WO |
WO-2005055873 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO-2005105197 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO-2005107664 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO-2005107845 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO-2006012421 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO-2006036715 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO-2007087061 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO-2007115259 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO-2007130393 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2008061043 | May 2008 | WO |
WO-2009012406 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO-2009158524 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO-2010065970 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO-2010115101 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO 2014078288 | May 2014 | WO |
WO 2014190029 | May 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Notice and Grounds of Opposition to European Patent No. EP 2 526 910 B1 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. opposed by Glaukos Corporation. (Grounds filed by Glaukos on May 6, 2016, Notice of Opposition mailed on May 18, 2016 and received by counsel on May 25, 2016). |
Barsky et al. “Evaluation of absorbable gelatin film (Gelfilm) in cyclodialysis clefts” Arch. Ophth. 60(6): 1044-1052,1958. |
Bick MW “Use of tantalum for ocular drainage” Arch Ophthal. 42(4): 373-88 (1949). |
Bietti “The present state of the use of plastics in eye surgery” Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 33(4):337-70 (1955). |
Brown et al., “Internal Sclerectomy for Glaucoma Filtering Surgery with an Automated Trephine,” Archives of Ophthalmology, 105:133-136 (1987). |
Burchfield JC, Kass MA, Wax MB. Primary valve malfunction of the Krupin eye valve with disk. J Glaucoma. Jun. 1997;6(3):152-6. |
Chiou et al. “Ultrasound biomicroscopy of eyes undergoing deep sclerectomy with collagen implant” Br J Ophthalmol 80 (1996), pp. 541-544. |
Chylack LT, Bellows AR. Molecular sieving in suprachoroidal fluid formation in man. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 17: 420, 1978. |
Classen et al. “A histopathologic and immunohistorchemical analysis of the filtration bleb after unsuccessful glaucoma seton implantation” Am. J. Ophthalmol. 122:205-12 (1996). |
Cohen et al. “First day post-operative review following uncomplicated phacoemulsification” Eye 12(4):634-6 (1998). |
Collaborative Normal-Tension Study Group. Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Am J Ophthalmol 1998;126:487-97. |
Congdon N, O'Colmain B, Klaver CC, et al. Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:477-85. |
Coote. “Glaucoma Hollow Fiber Filters—A New Glaucoma Seton. Preliminary Results.” J. Glaucoma. vol. 8 No. 1 Supplement (1999):p. S4. |
Cullen, et al. “Anterior Chamber of Frontal Sinus Shunt for the Diversion of Aqueous Humor: A Pilot Study in Four Normal Dogs”. Veterinary Ophthalmology. vol. 1. No. 1. (1998):31-39. |
Demailly et al. “Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) with or without collagen device (CD) in primary open-angle glaucoma: middle-term retrospective study” International Ophthalmology 20: 131-140, 1997. |
Derwent English abstract for EP 1184010, published Mar. 6, 2002 entitled: “Drainage unit for an eye, consists of a hollow line, a distribution member, and a pressure relief valve which only allows water to leave the eye chamber above a certain pressure,” Accession Nbr. 12409716 [351]. |
Dinakaran et al. “Is the first post-operative day review necessary following uncomplicated phacoemulsification surgery?” Eye, 14(3A):364-6 (2000). |
Draeger “Chirurgische Maβnahmen bei kongenitalem Glaukom” (Surgical Interventions in Congenital Glaucoma) Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1993; 202(5): 425-427 [Article in German with English summary included]. |
Einmahl et al. “Evaluation of a novel biomaterial in the suprachoroidal space of the rabbit eye” Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 43:1533-1539 (2002). |
Ellis, RA “A Reduction of Intraocular Pressure Using Plastics in Surgery” Am J Ophth. 50; 1960, 733-742. |
Emi et al. “Hydrostatic pressure of the suprachoroidal space” Invest. Ophthal. Visual Sci. 30(2):233-238 (1989). |
Fanous MM, Cohn RA. Propionibacterium endophthalmitis following Molteno tube repositioning. J Glaucoma. Aug. 1997;6(4):201-2. |
Friedman DS, Wolfs RC, O'Colmain BJ, et al. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:532-8. |
Fuchs E. “Detachment of the choroid inadvertently during cataract surgery” [German] von Graefes Arch Ophthalmol, 51:199-224 (1900) [Article in German with English summary]. |
Gills et al. “Action of cyclodialysis utilizing an implant studied by manometry in a human eye” Exp Eye Res 1967; 6:75-78. |
Gills JP “Cyclodialysis implants” South Med J. 1967 60(7):692-5. |
Gills, “Cyclodialysis Implants in Human Eyes” Am J Ophth 61:1966,841-846. |
Goldberg “Management of Uncontrolled Glaucoma With the Molteno System” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology 1987; 15: 97-107. |
Gordon MO, Kass. MA, for the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Design and baseline description of the participants. Arch Ophthalmol 1999:573-83. |
Grant, W.M. , MD, Further Studies on Facility of Flow Through the Trabecular Meshwork, A.M.A. Archives of Ophthalmololgy, Oct. 1958, vol. 60, pp. 523-533. |
Gross et al. “Surgical therapy of chronic glaucoma in aphakia and pseudophakia” Ophthalmology, 95:1195-201 (1988). |
Harper SL, Foster CS. Intraocular lens explantation in uveitis. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2000 Winter; 40(1):107-16. |
Harrington “Cataract and Glaucoma. Management of the coexistent conditions and a description of a new operation combining lens extraction with reverse cyclodialysis.” Am J Ophthalmol. May 1966;61(5 Pt 2):1134-40. |
Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, et al for the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression. Results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:1268-79. |
Heine I. “Cyclodialysis, a new glaucoma operation” [German] Dtsch Med Wochenschr, 31:824-826 (1905). |
Hildebrand et al. “Efficacy of anterior chamber decompression in controlling early intraocular pressure spikes after uneventful phacoemulsification” J. Catact Refract Surg., 29:1087-92 (2003). |
Hoskins, et al., “Aqueous Humor Outflow”, Becker-Shaffer's Diagnosis and Therapy of the Glaucomas, 6th Edition, Chapter 4, pp. 41-66, 1989. |
Howorth D J “Feasibility study for a micromachined glaucoma drainage device” Cranfield University School of industrial and manufacturing science MSc Thesis Academic Year 2001-2002 Sep. 13, 2002. |
Hylton et al. “Update on prostaglandin analogs” Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 14:65-9 (2003). |
In the Commonwealth of Australia—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”), Commonwealth of Australia—Opponent's Statement of Grounds and Particulars of Opposition. (Apr. 10, 2014). |
In the Commonwealth of Australia—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Mr. Craig Andrews in support of Opponent's opposition. (Sep. 9, 2014). |
In the Commonwealth of Australia—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Dr. Colin Clement in support of Opponent's opposition. (Sep. 10, 2014). |
In the Commonwealth of Australia—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Dr. Ilesh Patel in support of Opponent's opposition. (Sep. 9, 2014). |
In the Commonwealth of Australia—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Opponent's amended Statement of Grounds and Particulars of Opposition. (Sep. 10, 2014). |
In the Commonwealth of Australia—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Dr. Robert L. Stamper in support of Applicant's Evidence in Answer. (Dec. 4, 2014). |
In the Commonwealth of Australia—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Dr. Jonathan G. Crowston in support of Applicant's Evidence in Answer. (Dec. 6, 2014). |
In the Commonwealth of Australi—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Dr. Anne Jen-Wan Lee in support of Applicant's Evidence in Answer. (Dec. 7, 2014). |
In the Commonwealth of Australia—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Dr. Colin Clement in support of Opponent's Evidence in Reply. (Feb. 8, 2015). |
In the Commonwealth of Australia—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Dr. Ilesh Patel in support of Opponent's Evidence in Reply. (Feb. 10, 2015). |
In the Commonwealth of Australia—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Mr. Craig Andrews in support of Opponent's Evidence in Reply. (Feb. 11, 2015). |
Javitt JC, Chiang YP. Preparing for managed competition. Utilization of ambulatory eye care visits to ophthalmologists. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:1034-5. |
Jay JL, Allan D. The benefit of early trabeculectomy versus conventional management in primary open-angle glaucoma relative to severity of disease. Eye 1989; 3:528-35. |
Jordan J. “A Novel Approach to Suprachoroidal Drainage for the Surgical Treatment of Intractable Glaucoma” J. Glaucoma 15:200-205 (2006). |
Karlen et al. “Deep sclerectomy with collagen implant: medium term results” Br. J. Ophthalmol, Jan. 1999, 83(1):6-11. |
Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, et al for the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group. The Ocular HypertensionTreatment Study. A randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:701-13. |
Klemm et al. “Die Ultraschallbiomikroskopie als Kriterium der Funktionsprüfung des suprachorioidalen Spaltes nach kammerwinkelchirurgischen Eingriffen ; (Ultrasound Biomicroscopic Imaging for Assessment of the Suprachoroidal Cleft after Angle Surgery)” Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde 1997; 210: 74-77 [Article in German with English summary included]. |
Klemm et al. “Experimental use of space-retaining substances with extended duration: functional and morphological results” Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Sep. 1995; 233(9):592-7. |
Kozlov et al. “Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy with collagen” Eye microsurgery 3:44-46 (1990) [Russian with English translation]. |
Krejci “Cyclodialysis with hydroxymethyl methacrylate capillary strip (HCS). Animal experiments with a new approach in glaucoma drainage surgery” Ophthalmologica 1972; 164(2):113-21. |
Krejcí L. “Microdrainage of anterior chamber of eye glaucoma operation using hydron capillary drain.” Acta Univ Carol Med Monogr. 1974;(61):1-90. |
Kupfer “Studies on intraocular pressure. I. A technique for polyethylene tube implantation into the anterior chamber of the rabbit.” Arch Ophthalmol. Apr. 1961;65:565-70. |
La Rocca “Gonioplasty in Glaucoma*A Preliminary Report” Br J Ophth 46:1962, 404-415. |
Law et al., “Retinal Complications After Aqueous Shunt Surgical Procedures for Glaucoma” Arch Ophthal.; Dec. 1996; vol. 114:1473-1480. |
Lee et al. “Aqueous-venous shunt and intraocular pressure. Preliminary report of animal studies.” Investigative Ophthalmology. vol. 5 No. 1: 59-64. Feb. 1966. |
Lee et al. “Magnetic resonance imaging of the aqueous flow in eyes implanted with the trabeculo-suprachoroidal glaucoma seton” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 33:948 (1992). |
Lee KY. Trabeculo-suprachoroidal shunt for treating recalcitrant and secondary glaucoma. Presented at the American Academy of Ophthalmology Annual Meeting, Anaheim, CA, 1991. |
Leske MC, Heijl A, Hussein M, et al for the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment. The Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol Jan. 2003;121:48-56. |
Lichter PR, Musch DC, Gillespie BW, et al and the CIGTS Study Group. Interim clinical outcomes in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study comparing initial treatment randomized to medications or surgery. Ophthalmology 2001;108:1943-53. |
Losche W. “Proposals for improvement of cyclodialysis Klin Monatsblatter Augenheilkd Augenarztl Fortbild” 121(6):715-6 (1952) [German]. |
Marx et al., “Use of the Ganciclovir Implant in the Treatment of Recurrent Cytomegalovirus Retinitis” Arch Ophthal.; Jul. 1996; vol. 114:815-820. |
McPherson “Combined Trabeculotomy and Cataract Extraction as a Single Operation*” Tr. Am. Ophth. Soc., vol. LXXIV, 1976; 251-260. |
Migdal C, Gregory W, Hitchings R. Long term functional outcome after early surgery compared with laser and medicine in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1994;101:1651-7. |
Miglior S, Pfeiffer N, Zeyen T et al for the European Glaucoma Prevention Study Group. Results of the European Glaucoma Prevention Study. Ophthalmology 2005;112:366-75. |
Miglior S, Zeyen T, Pfeiffer N, et al for the European Glaucoma Prevention Study Group. The European Glaucoma Prevention Study design and baseline description of the participants. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1612-21. |
Miki, MD et al., “Intraocular Cannula for Continuous, Chronic Drug Delivery-Histopathic Observations and Function” Arch Ophthal.; May 1985; vol. 103:712-717. |
Molteno et al. “Long tube implants in the management of glaucoma” South African Medical Journal, Jun. 26, 1976;50(27):1062-6. |
Molteno et al. “The Vicryl tie technique for inserting a draining implant in the treatment of secondary glaucoma.” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology 1986; 14: 343-354. |
Moses RA “Detachment of ciliary body-anatomical and physical considerations” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Assoc. for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, US, vol. 4, No. 5, Oct. 1, 1965. |
Nesterov AP et al. “Surgical stimulation of the uveoscleral outflow. Experimental studies on enucleated human eyes” Acta Opthalmol (Copenh) June; 57(3):409-17 (1979). |
Nguyen et al., “Complications of Baerveldt Glaucoma Drainage Implants” Arch Ophthal.; May 1998; vol. 116:571-575. |
O'Brien et al. “Cyclodialysis” Arch Ophthal. 1949;42(5):606-619. |
Odrich. “The New Technique During Complex Tube-Shunt Implantation”. J. Glaucoma. vol. 9 No. 3 (2000):205-280. |
Olsen, Timothy W., et al., Cannulation of the Suprachoroidal Space: A Novel Drug Delivery Methodology to the Posterior Segment, American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 142, No. 5, Nov. 2006, pp. 777-787.e2. |
Ozdamar et al. “Suprachoroidal seton implantation in refractory glaucoma: a novel surgical technique” J. Glaucoma Aug. 2003; 12(4):354-9. |
Pinnas G. et al. “Cyclodialysis with teflon tube implants” Am J. Ophthalmol Nov. 1969; 68(5):879-883. |
Portney GL, “Silicone elastomer implantation cyclodialysis.” Arch Ophthalmol 1973; 89: 10-12. |
Pruett et al., “The Fishmouth Phenomenon-II. Wedge Scleral Buckling” Arch Ophthal.; Oct. 1977; vol. 95:1782-1787. |
Qadeer “Acrylic Gonio-Subconjunctival Plates in Glaucoma Surgery” Br J Ophthalmol. Jun. 1954; 38(6): 353-356. |
Quigley HA, Vitale S. Models of open-angle glaucoma prevalence and incidence in the United States. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38:83-91. |
Richards et al. “Artificial Drainage Tubes for Glaucoma” Am J Ophth 60:1965,405-408. |
Ritch, et al., “Uveoscleral Outflow”, The Glaucomas. St. Louis: Mosby, 1996; pp. 337-343. |
Rohen, Johannes W., Anatomy of the Aqueous Outflow Channels, Glaucoma, vol. 1, Chapter 14, pp. 277-296, Edited by J.E. Cairns, Grune & Stratton, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers, 1986. |
Rosenberg, et al. “Implants in glaucoma surgery” Chapter 88, The Glaucomas, Ritch et al. Eds. vol. 3. 2nd Ed. Mosby St. Louis 1996; p. 1783-1807. |
Row H. “Operation to control glaucoma: preliminary report” Arch. Ophthal 12:325 (1934). |
Rowan, Patrick J., MD, Combined Cyclodialysis and Cataract Surgery, Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers, Dec. 1998, vol. 29, No. 12, pp. 962-968 (9 pages). |
Sampimon “A New Approach to Filtering Glaucoma Surgery” Ophthalmologica (Basel) 151: 1966, 637-644. |
Schappert S. Office visits for glaucoma: United States, 1991-92. Advance data from vital and health statistics. vol. 262. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1995. |
Schocket, Stanley S. “Investigations of the Reasons for Success and Failure in the Anterior Shunt-To-The-Encircling-Band Procedure in the Treatment of Refractory Glaucoma.” Tr. Am. Ophth. Soc.vol. LXXXIX. (1986):743-798. |
Shaffer RN, Weiss DI. Concerning cyclodialysis and hypotony. Arch Ophthalmol 68: 25, 1962. |
SOLX Clinical Literature Handout; Industry Show Feb. 2006; “The SOLX Gold Micro-shunt (GMS) treatment”. |
Sommer A, Tielsch JM, Katz J, et al. Racial differences in the cause-specific prevalence of blindness in east Baltimore. N Engl J Med 1991;325:1412-7. |
Sourdille, Philippe, et al. “Reticulated hyaluronic acid implant in non-perforating trabecular surgery.” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery 25.3 (1999): 332-339. |
Spiegal et al. “Schlemm's Canal Implant: A New Method to Lower Intraocular Pressure in Patients With POAG?” Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers. vol. 30, No. 6: 492-494. Jun. 1999. |
Srinivasan et al. “Microbial contamination of the anterior chamber during phacoemulsification” J. Cataract Refract Surg. 28:2173-6 (2002). |
Suguro K, Toris CB, Pederson JE. Uveoscleral outflow following cyclodialysis in the monkey eye using a fluorescent tracer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985: 26, 810. |
The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. The AGIS Investigators. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;130:429-40. |
The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS); 13. Comparison of treatment outcomes within race: 10-year results. Ophthalmology 2004;111:651-64. |
The Glaucoma Laser Trial (GLT) and Glaucoma Laser Trial Follow-up Study: 7. Results. Am J Ophthahnol 1995;120:718-31. |
The Glaucoma Laser Trial (GLT). 2. Results of argon laser trabeculoplasty versus topical medicines. The Glaucoma Laser Trial Research Group. Ophthalmology 1990;97:1403-13. |
Tielsch JM, Sommer A, Katz J, et al. Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey. JAMA 1991;266:369-74. |
Toris CB. Extravascular albumin concentration of the uvea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990; 31:43. |
Toris et al. “Aqueous humor dynamics in the aging human eye” Am J. Ophthalmol., 127:407-12 (1999). |
Toris et al. “Effect of intraocular pressure on uveoscleral outflow following cyclodialysis in the monkey eye.” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 26 (1985) 1745-1749. |
Transcend Medical Inc. v. Glaukos Corporation, Transcend Medical, Inc.'s Disclosures Pursuant to Default Discovery Rule 4 (d) (United States District Court for the District of Delaware, dated Dec. 6, 2013; case No. C.A. No. 13-830 (MSG) and Certificate of Service, dated Dec. 9, 2013. |
Trigler L, Proia AD, Freedman SF. Fibrovascular ingrowth as a cause of Ahmed glaucoma valve failure in children. Am J Ophthalmol. Feb. 2006;141(2):388-9. |
Troncoso Manuel U., “Cyclodialysis with insertion of metal implant in treatment of glaucoma, A Preliminary Report” Arch. Ophthal. 23:270 (1940). |
Troncoso, Manuel U., Tantalum implants for inducing hypotny, Am Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 32(4):499-508 (1949). |
Van Der Veen, G. et al. “The Gonioseton, a surgical treatment for chronic glaucoma. Documenta Ophthalmologica” Oct. 1990, vol. 75, Issue 3-4, pp. 365-375. |
Wagner, Justin A., et al., Characterization of Uveoscleral Outflow in Enucleated Porcine Eyes Perfused under Constant Pressure, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci., Published in edited form in Sep. 2004, vol. 45, Issue 9, pp. 3203-3206. |
Wamsley S, Moster MR, Rai S, Alvim HS, Fontanarosa J. Results of the use of the Ex-Press miniature glaucoma implant in technically challenging, advanced glaucoma cases: a clinical pilot study. Am J Ophthalmol. Dec. 2004; 138(6): 1049-51. |
Yablonski, “Some thoughts on the pressure dependence of uveoscleral flow” Journal of Glaucoma, 12(1):90-92 (2003). |
Yablonski, “Trabeculectomy with Internal Tube Shunt: a novel glaucoma surgery” J. Glaucoma 14:91-97 (2005). |
Zhou et al. “A trabecular bypass flow hypothesis” J Glaucoma. 14(1):74-83 (2005). |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/365,175, filed Feb. 2, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/865,927, filed Apr. 18, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/071,500, filed Nov. 4, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/078,206, Nov. 12, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/140,322, filed Dec. 24, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/163,364, filed Jan. 24, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/260,041, filed Apr. 23, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/283,759, filed May 21, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/610,197, filed Jan. 30, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/804,008, filed Jul. 20, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/987,133, filed Jan. 14, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/005,745, filed Jan. 25, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/165,759, filed May 26, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150238360 A1 | Aug 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60824396 | Sep 2006 | US | |
60783632 | Mar 2006 | US | |
60759835 | Jan 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11615810 | Dec 2006 | US |
Child | 14706893 | US |