Patent Grant
11229228
The invention relates to a process for producing a highly purified food ingredient from the extract of the Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni plant and its use in various food products and beverages.
Nowadays sugar alternatives are receiving increasing attention due to awareness of many diseases in conjunction with consumption of high-sugar foods and beverages. However many artificial sweeteners such as dulcin, sodium cyclamate and saccharin were banned or restricted in some countries due to concerns on their safety. Therefore non-caloric sweeteners of natural origin are becoming increasingly popular. The sweet herb Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni, produces a number of diterpene glycosides which feature high intensity sweetness and sensory properties superior to those of many other high potency sweeteners.
The above-mentioned sweet glycosides, have a common aglycon, steviol, and differ by the number and type of carbohydrate residues at the C13 and C19 positions. The leaves of Stevia are able to accumulate up to 10-20% (on dry weight basis) steviol glycosides. The major glycosides found in Stevia leaves are Rebaudioside A (2-10%), Stevioside (2-10%), and Rebaudioside C (1-2%). Other glycosides such as Rebaudioside B, D, E, and F, Steviolbioside and Rubusoside are found at much lower levels (approx. 0-0.2%).
Two major glycosides—Stevioside and Rebaudioside A, were extensively studied and characterized in terms of their suitability as commercial high intensity sweeteners. Stability studies in carbonated beverages confirmed their heat and pH stability (Chang S. S., Cook, J. M. (1983) Stability studies of stevioside and Rebaudioside A in carbonated beverages. J. Agric. Food Chem. 31: 409-412.)
Steviol glycosides differ from each other not only by molecular structure, but also by their taste properties. Usually stevioside is found to be 110-270 times sweeter than sucrose, Rebaudioside A between 150 and 320 times, and Rebaudioside C between 40-60 times sweeter than sucrose. Dulcoside A is 30 times sweeter than sucrose. Rebaudioside A has the least astringent, the least bitter, and the least persistent aftertaste thus possessing the most favorable sensory attributes in major steviol glycosides (Tanaka O. (1987) Improvement of taste of natural sweetners. Pure Appl. Chem. 69:675-683; Phillips K. C. (1989) Stevia: steps in developing a new sweetener. In: Grenby T. H. ed. Developments in sweeteners, vol. 3. Elsevier Applied Science, London. 1-43.)
Methods for the extraction and purification of sweet glycosides from the Stevia rebaudiana plant using water or organic solvents are described in, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,361,697; 4,082,858; 4,892,938; 5,972,120; 5,962,678; 7,838,044 and 7,862,845.
However, even in a highly purified state, steviol glycosides still possess undesirable taste attributes such as bitterness, sweet aftertaste, licorice flavor, etc. One of the main obstacles for the successful commercialization of stevia sweeteners are these undesirable taste attributes. It was shown that these flavor notes become more prominent as the concentration of steviol glycosides increases (Prakash I., DuBois G. E., Clos J. F., Wilkens K. L., Fosdick L. E. (2008) Development of rebiana, a natural, non-caloric sweetener. Food Chem. Toxicol., 46, S75-S82.)
On the other hand, replacing large amounts of sugar in the formulations brings up such problems as reduced mouthfeel, incomplete flavor profile etc. Therefore the application of high intensity low calorie sweeteners has to provide solutions to address these problems.
Thus, if a single composition will be able to deliver not only sweetness, but also possess flavor enhancing properties and correct the incomplete mouthfeel associated with the elimination of sucrose from food and beverage formulations, it will certainly be advantageous compared to other high intensity sweeteners known in the art.
Some of these undesirable properties can be reduced or eliminated by subjecting steviol glycosides to the reaction of intermolecular transglycosylation, when new carbohydrate residues are attached to initial molecule at C13 and C19 positions. Depending on the number of carbohydrate residues in these positions the quality and potency of the compounds taste will vary.
Pullulanase, isomaltase (Lobov S. V., Jasai R., Ohtani K., Tanaka O. Yamasaki K. (1991) Enzymatic production of sweet stevioside derivatives: transglycosylation by glucosidases. Agric. Biol. Chem. 55: 2959-2965), β-galactosidase (Kitahata S., Ishikawa S., Miyata T., Tanaka O. (1989) Production of rubusoside derivatives by transglycosylation of various β-galactosidase. Agric. Biol. Chem. 53: 2923-2928), and dextran saccharase (Yamamoto K., Yoshikawa K., Okada S. (1994) Effective production of glucosyl-stevioside by α-1,6-transglucosylation of dextran dextranase. Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 58: 1657-1661) have been used as transglycosylating enzymes, together with pullulan, maltose, lactose, and partially hydrolyzed starch, respectively, as donors of glycosidic residues.
The transglucosylation of steviol glycosides was also performed by action of cyclodextrin glucanotransferases (CGTase) produced by Bacillus stearothermophilus (U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,219,571, and 7,807,206) as a result α-1,4-glucosyl derivatives were formed with degree of polymerization up to 10.
The treatment of transglucosylated stevioside with β-amylase resulted in a product consisting of mono- or di-α-1,4-glucosyl derivatives (Tanaka, 1987).
It was shown that the taste profile and sweetness power of glucosyl derivatives are largely dependent on number of additional glucosyl derivatives, i.e. the degree of polymerization of the α-1,4-glucosyl chain. The increase in number of α-1,4-glucosyl residues improved the taste quality but at the same time reduced the sweetness level (Tanaka, 1987).
It is noted also that many glucosyl stevia products contain up to 20% residual dextrins which do not possess significant functional properties and reduce the content of steviol glycosides in the product.
Therefore it is necessary to develop high purity products with optimal α-1,4-glucosyl chain length which will deliver the best combination of sweetness potency and flavor profile.
The present invention is aimed to overcome the disadvantages of existing Stevia sweeteners. The invention describes a process for producing a high purity food ingredient from the extract of the Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni plant and use thereof in various food products and beverages as a sweetness and flavor modifier.
The invention, in part, pertains to an ingredient comprising glucosylated derivatives of steviol glycosides of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni plant. The steviol glycodsides are selected from the group consisting of stevioside, Rebaudioside A, Rebaudioside B, Rebaudioside C, Rebaudioside D, Rebaudioside E, Rebaudioside F, dulcoside A, steviolbioside, rubusoside, as well as other steviol glycosides found in Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni plant and mixtures thereof.
The invention, in part, pertains to a process for producing an ingredient containing glucosylated forms of stevioside, Rebaudioside A, Rebaudioside B, Rebaudioside C, Rebaudioside D, Rebaudioside E, Rebaudioside F, dulcoside A, steviolbioside, rubusoside, as well as other steviol glycosides found in Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni plant. The process can be an enzymatic transglucosylating process using CGTases produced by cultures of Bacillus stearothermophilus. The process may include the step of shortening glucosyl chains by β-amylase. The process can also have the steps of decolorizing, desalting and removing maltooligosaccharides. The decolorizing can be performed using activated carbon. The desalting can be performed by passing through ion exchange resins and/or membrane filters. Removing the maltooligosaccharides can be performed by passing through macroporuos polymeric resin.
In the invention, Stevia extract commercialized by PureCircle (JiangXi) Co., Ltd. (China), containing stevioside (28-30%), Rebaudioside A (50-55%), Rebaudioside C (9-12%), Rebaudioside F (1-3%) and other glycosides amounting to total steviol glycosides' content of at least 95%, was used as a starting material. Alternatively stevia extracts with different ratio of steviol glycosides as well as highly purified steviol glycosides such as Rebaudioside A, stevioside, Rebaudioside D, rubusoside etc, may be used as starting materials.
The starting material was subjected to the enzymatic transglucosylation by action of cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase (CGTase) in the presence of starch as a glucose donor. As a result α-1,4-glucosyl derivatives were formed with degree of polymerization up to 10. Then the formed derivatives were subjected to treatment with β-amylase to produce α-1,4-glucosyl derivatives possessing a specific degree of polymerization.
The oligosaccharides from obtained reaction mixture were removed by Amberlite XAD7 HP resin, and then decolorized, deionized, concentrated and spray dried.
The obtained products were applied in various foods and beverages as sweeteners, sweetener enhancers and flavor modifiers, including ice cream, cookies, bread, fruit juices, milk products, baked goods and confectionary products.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory and are intended to provide further explanation of the invention as claimed.
The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the invention. The drawings illustrate embodiments of the invention and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the embodiments of the invention.
Advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the detailed description given hereinafter. However, it should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this detailed description.
Stevia extract commercialized by PureCircle (JiangXi) Co., Ltd. (China), containing stevioside (28-30%), Rebaudioside A (50-55%), Rebaudioside C (9-12%), Rebaudioside F (1-3%) and other glycosides (hereinafter collectively, “steviol glycosides”) amounting to total steviol glycosides content of at least 95%, was used as a starting material. Alternatively stevia extracts with different ratio of steviol glycosides as well as highly purified steviol glycosides such as Rebaudioside A, stevioside, Rebaudioside D, rubusoside etc, may be used as starting materials.
The HPLC analysis of the raw materials and products was performed on Agilent Technologies 1200 Series (USA) liquid chromarograph, equipped with Zorbax-NH2 (4.6×250 mm) column. The mobile phase was acetonitrile-water gradient from 80:20, v/v (0-2 min) to 50:50, v/v (2-70 min). A diode array detector set at 210 nm was used as the detector.
The transglucosylation was accomplished by cyclomaltodextrin glucanotransferases (CGTases; EC 2.4.1.19) produced by Bacillus stearothermophilus St-88 (PureCircle Sdn Bhd Collection of Industrial Microorganisms—Malaysia). However, any other CGTase or enzyme possessing intermolecular transglucosylation activity may be applied as well. The enzyme can be in a form of cell-free culture broth, concentrated liquid cell-free culture broth, spray dried or freeze dried cell-free culture broth, or high purity protein. Free and immobilized enzyme preparations can be used.
The activity of CGTase preparations was determined according to the procedure described in Hale W. S., Rawlins L. C. (1951) Amylase of Bacillus macerans. Cereal Chem. 28, 49-58.
Starches of different origin may be used as donors of glucosyl units such as, derived from wheat, corn, potato, tapioca, and sago.
Starch was subjected to partial hydrolysis (liquefaction) prior to the transglycosylation reaction. The dextrose equivalent of the partially hydrolyzed starch can be in the range of about 10-25, preferably about 12-16. Any enzyme capable of starch hydrolysis may be used for liquefaction, such as α-amylases, β-amylases etc. In one embodiment, CGTase and α-amylase mixtures as liquefying enzymes are preferred.
α-Amylase activity is expressed in Kilo Novo α-amylase Units (KNU). One KNU is the amount of α-amylase which, under standard conditions (pH 7.1; 37° C.), dextrinizes 5.26 g starch dry substance per hour.
The liquefaction mixture contains about 0.001-0.2 KNU, preferably about 0.05-0.1 KNU of α-amylase per one unit of CGTase.
The use of α-amylase in liquefaction allows achieving higher throughputs in further activated carbon filtration. When the CGTase is used as the only liquefying enzyme the filtration rate is approximately 10-15 L/hr per 1 m2 of filter surface. In case of liquefaction enzyme mixture (comprising α-amylase and CGTase) the filtration rate is twice as fast—approximately 20-30 L/hr per 1 m2 of filter surface.
The ratio of starch and CGTase in the liquefaction mixture is about 0.1-0.5 units per one gram of starch, preferably about 0.2-0.4 units per gram.
The concentration of starch in liquefaction mixture is about 15-40% (wt/wt), preferably about 20-30%.
The liquefaction is conducted at about 70-90° C. during about 0.5-5 hours, preferably about 1-2 hours.
After liquefaction, the reaction mixture is subjected to thermal inactivation of α-amylase at low pH conditions. The preferred pH range for inactivation is about pH 2.5 to pH 3.0 and preferred temperature is about 95-105° C. The duration of thermal inactivation is about 5-10 minutes.
After the inactivation, the pH of the reaction mixture is adjusted to about pH 5.5-6.5 and the steviol glycosides are added to the mixture and dissolved. The preferred ratio of steviol glycosides to starch (kg of steviol glycosides per 1 kg of starch) is about 0.5-1.5, preferably about 0.8-1.2.
A second portion of CGTase preparation is added and the transglucosylation reaction is conducted at about 65° C. for about 24-48 hours. The amount of the second portion of CGTase is about 0.2-4 units of CGTase per gram of solids, preferably about 0.5-1.2 units per gram of solids.
Upon completion of transglucosylation reaction, about 30-50 units per gram of solids of β-amylase was added and the reaction was continued for about 12-16 hours at about 35-55° C., preferably about 45° C. Soybean β-amylase was used in this stage. However β-amylases derived from any other source including barley, bacterial, fungal β-amylases and others may be used as well.
β-Amylase activity unit (1 AUN) is defined as the activity which liberates 100 μg of reducing sugar (expressed by dextrose equivalent) per minute under the following conditions: 1 mL of enzyme solution is mixed with 5 mL of 1.2% starch solution (pH 5.5, M/20 Acetate Buffer) and kept for 20 min at 40° C.
The reaction was stopped by heating at about 95° C. for about 15 minutes to inactivate the enzymes, and the solution was treated with activated carbon, to obtain decolorized reaction mixture. The amount of activated carbon was about 0.02-0.4 grams per gram of solids, preferably about 0.05-0.2 grams per gram of solids.
The decolorized reaction mixture was desalted by passing through ion exchange resins, such as Amberlite FPC23 (H+ type) and Amberlite FPA51 (OH− type). Other appropriate decolorizing and desalting methods, such as membrane filtration, or other methods known in the art can be used.
The desalted reaction mixture was further concentrated by vacuum evaporator and dried by means of a spray dryer. Other appropriate concentrating and drying methods, such as membrane filtration, freeze drying, or other methods known to art can be used. The resulting product contains non-modified glycosides, short-chain (containing four or less α-1,4-glucosyl residues) derivatives and a mixture of maltooligosaccharides (Sample 1).
In order to prepare a product with higher content of total sweet glycosides (the sum of glycosylated and non-glycosylated glycosides), the maltooligosaccharides were removed using Amberlite XAD7 HP prior to the desalting treatment. The steviol glycosides and their glucosylated derivatives were adsorbed on the resin and subsequently eluted by aqueous ethanol. The resulted aqueous ethanol eluate, containing glucosyl steviol glycosides, was subsequently decolorized and desalted as described above and the glycosides solution, after the evaporation of eluting solvent, was powdered by spray drying. The resulting product contains non-modified glycosides, and short-chain (containing four or less α-1,4-glucosyl residues) derivatives (Sample 2).
The embodiments of the invention exemplified by Samples 1 and 2 are free or substantially free of higher glucosylated derivatives having more than 4 glucosyl residues. In accordance with this invention, the highly purified glucosyl stevia composition preferably comprises greater than about 25% by weight di-, tri- and tetraglucosyl Rebaudioside A, and greater than about 9% by weight tri- and tetraglucosyl steviosides.
Using a similar process as for sample 2, with exclusion of the β-amylase treatment stage, a product containing non-modified glycosides and long chain α-1,4-glucosyl-derivatives (with up to nine α-1,4-glucosyl residues) was prepared (Sample 3).
As a control, a commercial β-amylase treated product containing non-modified glycosides, and short-chain (containing two or less α-1,4-glucosyl residues) derivatives was used (Sample 4). The composition of the samples is summarized in Table 1.
The sensory assessment of samples was carried using aqueous solutions, with 20 panelists. Based on overall acceptance the most desirable and most undesirable samples were chosen. The results are shown in Table 2.
As apparent from the results in Table 2, the sweetness quality of the Samples 1 and 2 was rated as most superior. Overall the samples with short-chain (containing four or less α-1,4-glucosyl residues) derivatives (No 1, and No. 2) possessed better taste profiles compared to samples with long-chain glucosyl derivatives (No. 3) and two or less α-1,4-glucosyl residues short-chain derivatives (No. 4).
Samples 1 and 2 show comparable sweetness power (150-160 times sweeter compared to a 5% sucrose solution) with control Sample 4 (150 times); however their flavor profile was clearly superior to the control sample.
The compositions can be used as sweetness enhancers, flavor enhancers and sweeteners in various food and beverage products. Non-limiting examples of food and beverage products include carbonated soft drinks, ready to drink beverages, energy drinks, isotonic drinks, low-calorie drinks, zero-calorie drinks, sports drinks, teas, fruit and vegetable juices, juice drinks, dairy drinks, yoghurt drinks, alcohol beverages, powdered beverages, bakery products, cookies, biscuits, baking mixes, cereals, confectioneries, candies, toffees, chewing gum, dairy products, flavored milk, yoghurts, flavored yoghurts, cultured milk, soy sauce and other soy base products, salad dressings, mayonnaise, vinegar, frozen-desserts, meat products, fish-meat products, bottled and canned foods, tabletop sweeteners, fruits and vegetables.
Additionally the compositions can be used in drug or pharmaceutical preparations and cosmetics, including but not limited to toothpaste, mouthwash, cough syrup, chewable tablets, lozenges, vitamin preparations, and the like.
The compositions can be used “as-is” or in combination with other sweeteners, flavors and food ingredients.
Non-limiting examples of sweeteners include steviol glycosides, stevioside, Rebaudioside A, Rebaudioside B, Rebaudioside C, Rebaudioside D, Rebaudioside E, Rebaudioside F, dulcoside A, steviolbioside, rubusoside, as well as other steviol glycosides found in Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni plant and mixtures thereof, stevia extract, Luo Han Guo extract, mogrosides, high-fructose corn syrup, corn syrup, invert sugar, fructooligosaccharides, inulin, inulooligosaccharides, coupling sugar, maltooligosaccharides, maltodextrins, corn syrup solids, glucose, maltose, sucrose, lactose, aspartame, saccharin, sucralose, sugar alcohols.
Non-limiting examples of flavors include lemon, orange, fruity, banana, grape, pear, pineapple, bitter almond, cola, cinnamon, sugar, cotton candy, vanilla flavors.
Non-limiting examples of other food ingredients include flavors, acidulants, organic and amino acids, coloring agents, bulking agents, modified starches, gums, texturizers, preservatives, antioxidants, emulsifiers, stabilisers, thickeners, gelling agents.
The following examples illustrate various embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that the invention is not limited to the materials, proportions, conditions and procedures set forth in the examples, which are only illustrative.
Preparation of CGTase
A strain of Bacillus stearothermophilus St-88 was inoculated in 2,000 liters of sterilized culture medium containing 1.0% starch, 0.25% corn extract, 0.5% (NH4)2SO4, and 0.2% CaCO3 (pH 7.0-7.5) at 56° C. for 24 hrs with continuous aeration (2,000 L/min) and agitation (150 rpm). The obtained culture broth was filtered using Kerasep 0.1 μm ceramic membrane (Novasep, France) to separate the cells. The cell-free permeate was further concentrated 2-fold on Persep 10 kDa ultrafilters (Orelis, France). The activity of the enzyme was determined according to Hale, Rawlins (1951). A crude enzyme preparation with activity of about 2 unit/mL was obtained.
Preparation of Short-Chain Glucosyl Stevia Composition
100 g of tapioca starch was suspended in 300 mL of water (pH 6.5). 2 KNU of α-amylase (Termamyl Classic, Novozymes, Denmark) and 30 units of CGTase obtained according to EXAMPLE 1 were added, and the liquefaction of starch was carried out at 80° C. for about one hour to dextrose equivalent about 15. The pH of reaction mixture was adjusted to pH 2.8 by hydrochloric acid and the mixture was boiled at 100° C. during 5 minutes to inactivate the enzymes. After cooling to 65° C., the pH was adjusted to pH 6.0 with sodium hydroxide solution. 100 g stevia extract produced by PureCircle (JiangXi) Co., Ltd. (China), containing stevioside 29.2%, Rebaudioside A 54.3%, Rebaudioside C 9.0%, Rebaudioside F (1.7%) and other glycosides amounting to total steviol glycosides content of about 96.4% was added to liquefied starch and stirred until a homogeneous solution was obtained. 200 units of CGTase was added to the solution and the mixture was held at a temperature of 65° C. for 24 hours under continuous agitation. Then the temperature was reduced to 45° C., and 8,000 units soybean β-amylase (#1500S, Nagase Chemtex Corp., Japan) was added to reaction mixture. The reaction was continued for another 12 hours. The obtained reaction mixture was heated at 95° C. for 15 minutes to inactivate the enzymes. 20 grams of activated carbon was added and the mixture was heated to 75° C. and held for 30 minutes. The mixture was filtered and the filtrate was diluted with water to 5% solids content and passed through columns packed with Amberlite FPC23 (H+) and Amberlite FPA51 (OH−) ion exchange resins. The desalted solution was concentrated at 60° C. under vacuum, and dried into a powder form using laboratory spray dryer. 196 grams of product was obtained (Sample 1).
Preparation of Highly Purified Short-Chain Glucosyl Stevia Composition
100 g of tapioca starch was suspended in 300 mL of water (pH 6.5). 2 KNU of α-amylase (Termamyl Classic, Novozymes, Denmark) and 30 units of CGTase obtained according to EXAMPLE 1 were added, and the liquefaction of starch was carried out at 80° C. for about one hour to dextrose equivalent about 15. The pH of reaction mixture was adjusted to pH 2.8 by hydrochloric acid and the mixture was boiled at 100° C. during 5 minutes to inactivate the enzymes. After cooling to 65° C., the pH was adjusted to pH 6.0 with sodium hydroxide solution. 100 g stevia extract produced by PureCircle (JiangXi) Co., Ltd. (China), containing stevioside 29.2%, Rebaudioside A 54.3%, Rebaudioside C 9.0%, Rebaudioside F (1.7%) and other glycosides amounting to total steviol glycosides content of about 96.4% was added to liquefied starch and stirred until a homogeneous solution was obtained. 200 units of CGTase was added to the solution and the mixture was held at a temperature of 65° C. for 24 hours under continuous agitation. Then the temperature was reduced to 45° C., and 8,000 units soybean β-amylase (#1500S, Nagase Chemtex Corp., Japan) was added to reaction mixture. The reaction was continued for another 12 hours. The obtained reaction mixture was heated at 95° C. for 15 minutes to inactivate the enzymes. 20 grams of activated carbon was added and the mixture was heated to 75° C. and held for 30 minutes. The mixture was filtered and the filtrate was diluted with water to 5% solids content and passed through columns each packed with 4000 mL Amberlite XAD 7HP macroporous adsorbent resin. The columns were washed with 5 volumes of water and 2 volumes of 20% (v/v) ethanol. The adsorbed glycosides were eluted with 50% ethanol. Obtained eluate was passed through columns packed with Amberlite FPC23 (H+) and Amberlite FPA51 (OH−) ion exchange resins. The ethanol was evaporated and the desalted and decolorized water solution was concentrated at 60° C. under vacuum, then dried into a powder form using laboratory spray dryer. 151 grams of product was obtained (Sample 2).
Preparation of Highly Purified Long-Chain Glucosyl Stevia Composition
100 g of tapioca starch was suspended in 300 mL of water (pH 6.5). 2 KNU of α-amylase (Termamyl Classic, Novozymes, Denmark) and 30 units of CGTase obtained according to EXAMPLE 1 were added, and the liquefaction of starch was carried out at 80° C. for about one hour to dextrose equivalent about 15. The pH of reaction mixture was adjusted to pH 2.8 by hydrochloric acid and the mixture was boiled at 100° C. during 5 minutes to inactivate the enzymes. After cooling to 65° C., the pH was adjusted to pH 6.0 with sodium hydroxide solution. 100 g stevia extract produced by PureCircle (JiangXi) Co., Ltd. (China), containing stevioside 29.2%, Rebaudioside A 54.3%, Rebaudioside C 9.0%, Rebaudioside F (1.7%) and other glycosides amounting to total steviol glycosides content of about 96.4% was added to liquefied starch and stirred until a homogeneous solution was obtained. 200 units of CGTase was added to the solution and the mixture was held at a temperature of 65° C. for 24 hours under continuous agitation. The obtained reaction mixture was heated at 95° C. for 15 minutes to inactivate the enzyme. 20 grams of activated carbon was added and the mixture was heated to 75° C. and held during 30 min. The mixture was filtered and the filtrate was diluted with water to 5% solids content and passed through columns each packed with 4000 mL Amberlite XAD 7HP macroporous adsorbent resin. The columns were washed with 5 volumes of water and 2 volumes of 20% (v/v) ethanol. The adsorbed glycosides were eluted with 50% ethanol. Obtained eluate was passed through columns packed with Amberlite FPC23 (H+) and Amberlite FPA51 (OH−) ion exchange resins. The ethanol was evaporated and the desalted and decolorized water solution was concentrated at 60° C. under vacuum, then dried into a powder form using laboratory spray dryer. 166 grams of product was obtained (Sample 3).
Low-Calorie Orange Juice Drink
Orange concentrate (35%), citric acid (0.35%), ascorbic acid (0.05%), orange red color (0.01%), orange flavor (0.20%), Rebaudioside A (0.003%) and different glucosyl stevia compositions (0.03%) were blended and dissolved completely in water (up to 100%) and pasteurized. Glucosyl stevia compositions were represented by Samples 1, 2, and 3, obtained according to EXAMPLES 2, 3, and 4, respectively; and Sample 4 was a commercial β-amylase treated product (containing only mono- and di-α-1,4-glucosyl-derivatives of steviol glycosides).
The sensory evaluations of the samples are summarized in Table 3. The data show that the best results can be obtained by using the high purity short-chain glucosyl stevia compositions (containing four or less α-1,4-glucosyl residues) derivatives (Samples 1 and 2). Particularly the drinks prepared with Samples 1 and 2 exhibited a rounded and complete flavor profile and mouthfeel.
The same method can be used to prepare juices and juice drinks from other fruits, such as apples, lemons, apricots, cherries, pineapples, mangoes, etc.
Low-Calorie Carbonated Beverage
A carbonated beverage according to formula presented below was prepared.
The sensory properties were evaluated by 20 panelists. The results are summarized in Table 4.
The above results show that the beverages prepared using Samples 1 and 2 possessed the best organoleptic characteristics.
Diet Cookies
Flour (50.0%), margarine (30.0%) fructose (10.0%), maltitol (8.0%), whole milk (1.0%), salt (0.2%), baking powder (0.15%), vanillin (0.1%) and different glucosyl stevia compositions (0.03%) were kneaded well in dough-mixing machine. The obtained dough was molded and baked in oven at 200° C. for 15 minutes. Glucosyl stevia compositions were by represented by Samples 1, 2, and 3, obtained according to EXAMPLES 2, 3, and 4, respectively; with Sample 4 being a commercial β-amylase treated product (containing only mono- and di-α-1,4-glucosyl-derivatives of steviol glycosides).
The sensory properties were evaluated by 20 panelists. The best results were obtained in samples prepared by high purity short-chain glucosyl stevia compositions (containing four or less α-1,4-glucosyl residues) derivatives (Samples 1 and 2). The panelists noted rounded and complete flavor profile and mouthfeel in cookies prepared with Samples 1 and 2.
Yoghurt
Different glucosyl stevia compositions (0.03%) and sucrose (4%) were dissolved in low fat milk. Glucosyl stevia compositions were by represented by Samples 1, 2, and 3, obtained according to EXAMPLES 2, 3, and 4, respectively; with Sample 4 being a commercial β-amylase treated product (containing only mono- and di-α-1,4-glucosyl-derivatives of steviol glycosides). After pasteurizing at 82° C. for 20 minutes, the milk was cooled to 37° C. A starter culture (3%) was added and the mixture was incubated at 37° C. for 6 hours then at 5° C. for 12 hours.
The sensory properties were evaluated by 20 panelists. The best results were obtained in samples prepared by high purity short-chain glucosyl stevia compositions (containing four or less α-1,4-glucosyl residues) derivatives (Samples 1 and 2). The panelists noted rounded and complete flavor profile and mouthfeel in samples prepared with Samples 1 and 2.
It is to be understood that the foregoing descriptions and specific embodiments shown herein are merely illustrative of the best mode of the invention and the principles thereof, and that modifications and additions may be easily made by those skilled in the art without departing for the spirit and scope of the invention, which is therefore understood to be limited only by the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a Divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/646,629, filed Jul. 11, 2017, which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/616,010, filed Feb. 6, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,706,792 issued Jul. 18, 2017, which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/073,423, filed Nov. 6, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,993,269 issued Mar. 31, 2015, which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/567,707, filed Aug. 6, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,647,844 issued Feb. 11, 2014, which is a Divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/029,263, filed Feb. 17, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,257,948 issued Sep. 4, 2012, the contents of which applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3723410 | Persinos | Mar 1973 | A |
| 4082858 | Morita | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4171430 | Matsushita | Oct 1979 | A |
| 4219571 | Miyake | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4361697 | Dobberstein | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4454290 | Dubois | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4590160 | Nishihashi | May 1986 | A |
| 4599403 | Kumar | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4612942 | Dobberstein | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4657638 | Le Grand | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4892938 | Giovanetto | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4917916 | Hirao | Apr 1990 | A |
| 5112610 | Kienle | May 1992 | A |
| 5576042 | Fuisz | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5756714 | Antrim et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5779805 | Morano | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5962678 | Payzant | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5972120 | Kutowy | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6031157 | Morita | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6080561 | Morita | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6204377 | Nishimoto | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6228996 | Zhou | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6706304 | Ishida | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 7807206 | Magomet | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7838011 | Abelyan et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7838044 | Abelyan | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7862845 | Magomet | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 8257948 | Markosyan | Sep 2012 | B1 |
| 8318459 | Markosyan | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8647844 | Markosyan | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8669077 | Markosyan | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8735101 | Markosyan | May 2014 | B2 |
| 20020132320 | Wang et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20030161876 | Hansson | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030236399 | Zheng | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20060083838 | Jackson | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060134292 | Abelyan | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060142555 | Jonnala | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20070082102 | Magomet | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070082103 | Magomet | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116800 | Prakash | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116819 | Prakash | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116820 | Prakash | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116821 | Prakash | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116822 | Prakash | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116823 | Prakash | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116824 | Prakash | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116825 | Prakash | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116826 | Prakash | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116827 | Prakash | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116828 | Prakash | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116829 | Prakash | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116830 | Prakash | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116831 | Prakash | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116832 | Prakash | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116833 | Prakash | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116834 | Prakash | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116835 | Prakash | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116836 | Prakash | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116837 | Prakash | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116838 | Prakash | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116839 | Prakash | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116840 | Prakash | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116841 | Prakash | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070128311 | Prakash | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070134390 | Prakash | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070134391 | Prakash | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070224321 | Prakash | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070292582 | Prakash | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080064063 | Brandle | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080102497 | Wong | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080107775 | Prakash | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080107776 | Prakash | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080107787 | Prakash | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080108710 | Prakash | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080111269 | Politi | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080226797 | Lee | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080292764 | Prakash | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080292765 | Prakash | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080292775 | Prakash | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080300402 | Yang | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090017185 | Catani | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090053378 | Prakash | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090074935 | Lee | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090079935 | Harris | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090142817 | Norman | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090226590 | Fouache | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20100055752 | Kumar | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100056472 | Duan | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100099857 | Evans | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100057024 | Cavallini et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100112155 | Abelyan | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100120710 | Watanabe | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100013756 | Prakash et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100137569 | Prakash | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100189861 | Abelyan | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100227034 | Purkayastha | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100255171 | Purkayastha | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100278993 | Prakash | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100316782 | Shi | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110030457 | Valery | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110033525 | Lui | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110092684 | Abelyan | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110104353 | Lee | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110111115 | Shi | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110124587 | Jackson | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110160311 | Prakash | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110189360 | Yoo | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110195169 | Markosyan | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20120164678 | Stephanopoulos | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120214752 | Markosyan | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| P10701736 | Jul 2008 | BR |
| 1049666 | Mar 1991 | CN |
| 1100727 | Mar 1995 | CN |
| 1112565 | Nov 1995 | CN |
| 1192447 | Sep 1998 | CN |
| 1238341 | May 2002 | CN |
| 1349997 | May 2002 | CN |
| 101200480 | Jun 2008 | CN |
| 52005800 | Jan 1977 | JP |
| 52083731 | Jul 1977 | JP |
| 52100500 | Aug 1977 | JP |
| 52136200 | Nov 1977 | JP |
| 54030199 | Mar 1979 | JP |
| 54132599 | Oct 1979 | JP |
| 55039731 | Mar 1980 | JP |
| 55081567 | Jun 1980 | JP |
| 55092400 | Jul 1980 | JP |
| 55120770 | Sep 1980 | JP |
| 55138372 | Oct 1980 | JP |
| 55159770 | Dec 1980 | JP |
| 55162953 | Dec 1980 | JP |
| 57005663 | Jan 1981 | JP |
| 56099768 | Aug 1981 | JP |
| 56109568 | Aug 1981 | JP |
| 56121453 | Sep 1981 | JP |
| 56121454 | Sep 1981 | JP |
| 56121455 | Sep 1981 | JP |
| 56160962 | Dec 1981 | JP |
| 57002656 | Jan 1982 | JP |
| 57046998 | Mar 1982 | JP |
| 57075992 | May 1982 | JP |
| 57086264 | May 1982 | JP |
| 58020170 | Feb 1983 | JP |
| 58028246 | Feb 1983 | JP |
| 58028247 | Feb 1983 | JP |
| 58212759 | Dec 1983 | JP |
| 58212760 | Dec 1983 | JP |
| 59045848 | Mar 1984 | JP |
| 62166861 | Jul 1987 | JP |
| 63173531 | Jul 1988 | JP |
| 1131191 | May 1989 | JP |
| H0383558 | Apr 1991 | JP |
| 3262458 | Nov 1991 | JP |
| 6007108 | Jan 1994 | JP |
| 6192283 | Jul 1994 | JP |
| 7143860 | Jun 1995 | JP |
| 7177862 | Jul 1995 | JP |
| 8000214 | Jan 1996 | JP |
| 9107913 | Apr 1997 | JP |
| 2000236842 | Sep 2000 | JP |
| 2002262822 | Sep 2002 | JP |
| 2010516764 | May 2010 | JP |
| 20070067199 | Jun 2007 | KR |
| 20080071605 | Aug 2008 | KR |
| 100888694 | Mar 2009 | KR |
| 20090021386 | Mar 2009 | KR |
| 2111969 | May 1998 | RU |
| 2123267 | Dec 1998 | RU |
| 2156083 | Sep 2000 | RU |
| 2167544 | May 2001 | RU |
| 2198548 | Feb 2003 | RU |
| 2005089483 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| 2006072878 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| 2006072879 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| 2008091547 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| 2009108680 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| 2010057024 | May 2010 | WO |
| 2010118218 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| 2011059954 | May 2011 | WO |
| 2011153378 | Dec 2011 | WO |
| 2012082493 | Jun 2012 | WO |
| 2012082677 | Jun 2012 | WO |
| 2013022989 | Feb 2013 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Akimasa Nishida, “Reversibility of Acid-Inactivation of Bacillus subtilis' & 945;-Amylase” Agr. Biol. Chem., vol. 31, No. 6, 1967, pp. 682-693. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/047499 dated Dec. 22, 2011. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/064343. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion ofpCT/US2012/024585. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/024722. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/030210. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/043294. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/051163. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/052659. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/052665. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2013/030439. |
| Jaitak, et al., “An Efficient Microwave-assisted Extraction Process of Stevioside and Rebaudioside-A from Stevia Rebaudiana (Bertoni)”, Phytochem. Anal. vol. 20 2009, 240-245. |
| Kennelly, “Sweet and non-sweet constituents ofStevia rebaudiana”, Stevia: The genus Stevia, Taylor & Francis, 2002, 68-85. |
| Kinghorn, “Overview”, Stevia: The genus Stevia, Taylor & Francis, 2002, 1-17. |
| Kitahata, S. et al., “Production of Rubusoside Derivatives by Transgalactosylation of Various b-Galactosidases” Agric. Biol. Chem., vol. 53, No. I I 1989, 2923-2928. |
| A-Glucosyltransferase Treated Stevia, Japan's Specifications and Standards for Food Additives, VIII edition, 2009, p. 257. |
| Ahmed, et al., “Use of p-Bromophenacyl Bromide to Enhance Ultraviolet Detection of Water-Soluble Organic Acids (Steviolbioside and Rebaudioside B) in High-Performance Liquid Chromatographic Analysis”, Journal of Chromatography, vol. 192, 1980, 387-393. |
| Chang, S.S. et al., “Stability Studies ofStevioside and Rebaudioside A in Carbonated Beverages”, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 31, 1983, 409-412. |
| Chen, et al., “Enrichment and separation ofrebaudioside A from stevia glycosides by a novel adsorbent with pyridvl group”, Science in China, vol. 42, No. 3 1999, 277-282. |
| Chen, et al., “Selectivity of polymer adsorbent in adsorptive separations ofstevia diterpene glycisides”, Science in China, vol. 41, No. 4 1998, 436-441. |
| Chen, et al., “Studies on the adsorptive selectivity of the polar resin with carbonyl group on rebaudioside A”, Acta Polymeric Scnica, No. 4 1999, 398-403. |
| Crammer, et al., “Sweet glycosides from the Stevia plant”, Chemistry in Britain, Oct. 1986, 915-916, 918. |
| Darise et al., “Enzymic Transglucosylation of Rubusoside and the Structure-Sweetness Relationship ofSteviol Bisglycosides,” Agric, Biol. Chem. vol. 48(10), 1984, 2483-2488. |
| Dubois et al., “Diterpenoid Sweeteners. Synthesis and Sensory Evaluation of Stevioside Analogues with Improved Organoleptic Properties,” J. Med. Chem, vol. 28, (I 985) 93-98. |
| Fuh, “Purification of steviosides by membrane and ion exchange process”, Journal of Food Science, vol. 55, No. 5 1990, 1454-1457. |
| Fukunaga et al., “Enzymic Transglucosylation Products of Stevioside: Separation and Sweetness-evaluation,” Agric. Biol. Chem. vol. 53(6) (1989) 1603-1607. |
| Fullas et al., “Separation of natural product sweetening agents using overpressured layer chromatography,” Journal of Chromatography vol. 464 (1989) 213-219. |
| Hale, et al., “Amylase of Bacillus Macerans”, Cereal Chemistry, vol. 28, No. I, Jan. 1951, 49-58. |
| United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organization/Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives (2010) Steviol Glycosides, Compendium of Food Additive Specifications, FAO JECFA Monographs 10, 17-21. |
| Van der Maarel et al., “Properties and applications of starch-converting enzymes of the a-amvlase family,” Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 94 (220) 137-155. |
| Vasquez et al., Stimulation of the Gerbil's Gustatory Receptors by Some Potently Sweet Terpenoids, J. Agric. Food Chem., vol. 41, 1305-1310, 1993. |
| Yamamoto, K. et al., “Effective Production ofGlycosyl-steviosides by a-1, 6 Transglucosylation of Dextrin Dextranase”, Biosci. Biotech, Biochem. vol. 58, No. 9 1994, 1657-1661. |
| Yoda, et al. “Supercritical fluid extraction from Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni using CO2 and CO2+ water: extraction kinetics and identification of extracted components”, Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 57 2003, 125-134. |
| Zell, et al. “Investigation of Polymorphism in Aspartame and Neotame Using Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy”, Tetrahedron, vol. 56, 2000, 6603-6616. |
| Zhang, et al. “Membrane-based separation schemern for processing sweetener from Stevia leaves”, Food Research International, vol. 33 2000, 617-620. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/047498 dated Dec. 22, 2011. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2010/055960 dated Jan. 25, 2011. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/028028. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/033734 dated Jul. 12, 2011. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/033737. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/033912. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/035173. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/036063 dated Aug. 5, 2011. |
| Teo, et al. “Validation of green-solvent extraction combined with Chromatographic chemical fingerprint to evaluate quality of Stevia reaudiana Bertoni”, J. Sep. Sci, vol. 32 2009, 613-622. |
| Tanaka, 0., “Improvement of taste of natural sweeteners,” Pure & Appl. Chem., vol. 69, No. 4 1997, 675-683. |
| Sweet Green Fields, LLC “Notice to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that the use of Rebiana (Rebaudiosid A) derived from Stevia rebaudiana, as a Food Ingredient is Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS),” Jan. 15, 2009, http:/www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/fen/gras_notices/gm000282. pdf (obtained from the Web on May 8, 2012) entire document esp. p. 22, Table 1. |
| Starratt, et al. “Rebaudioside F, a diterpene glycoside from Stevia Rebaudiana”, Phytochemist1y, vol. 59 2002, 367-370. |
| Shibata et al. “Glucosylation of Steviol and Steviol-Glucosides in Extracts from Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni,” Plant Physiol. vol. 95, (1991) 152-156. |
| Shi, et al. “Synthesis of bifuntional polymeric adsorbent and its application in purification ofStevia glycosides”, Reactive & functional Polymers, vol. 50 2002, 107-116. |
| Sakamoto et al., “Application of 13C NMR Spectroscopy to Chemistry of Natural Glycosides: Rebaudioside-C, a New Sweet Diterpene Glycoside of Stevia Rebaudiana”, Chem. Phann. Bull., vol. 25, 1977, 844-846. |
| Richman et al., “Fuctional genomics uncovers three glucosyltransferases involved in the synthesis of the major sweet glucosides ofStevia rebaudiana,” The Plant Journal, vol. 41 (2005) 56-67. |
| Prakash et al., “Development of Next Generation Stevia Sweetener: Rebaudioside M” Foods 2014, 3, 162-175, ISSN 2304-8158. |
| Prakash et al., “Development of rebiana, a natural, non-caloric sweetener,” Jul. 1, 2008, Food and Chemical Toxology, vol. 46, Is. 7, Sup. I, p. S75-S82. |
| Pol, et al., “Comparison of two different solvents employed for pressurised fluid extraction of stevioside from Stevia rebaudiana: methanol versus water”, Anal Bioanal Chem vol. 388 2007, 1847-1857. |
| Philips, K.C. “Stevia: steps in developing a new sweetener”, In T.H. Grenby, Editor, Developments in Sweeteners-3, Elsevier 1987, 1-43. |
| Ohtani et al. “Chapter 7. Methods to improve the taste of the sweet principles of Stevia rebaudiana.” The Genus Stevia, edited by A, Douglas Kinghorn, CRC Press 2001, Taylor and Francis, London and New York, pp. 138-159. |
| Ohta et al., “Characterization of Novel Steviol Glycosides from Leaves ofStevia rebaudiana Morita,” J. Aool. Glycosi., vol. 57, 199-209, 2010. |
| Moraes, et al., “Clarification ofStevia rebaudiana (Bert.) Bertoni extract adsorption in modified zeolites”, Acta Scientiarum, vol. 23, No. 6 2001, 1375-1380. |
| Montovaneli, et aL, “The effect of temperature and flow rate on the clarification of the aqueous Stevia-extract in fixed-bed column with zeolites”, Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 21, No. 3 2004, 449-458. |
| Lobov, S. V. et al., “Enzymic Production of Sweet Stevioside Derivatives: Transglucosylation ofGlucosidases”, Agric. Biol. Chem., vol. 55, No. 12 1991, 2959-2965. |
| Liu, et al., “Study ofstevioside preparation by membrane separation process”, Desalination vol. 83 1991, 375-382. |
| Kovylyaeva, et al., “Glycosides from Stevia rebaudiana”, Chemistry ofNatural Compounds, vol. 43, No. 1 2007, 81-85. |
| Kohda, et al., “New sweet diterpene glucosides from Stevia Rebaudiana”, Phytochemistry, vol. 15 1976, 981-983. |
| Kochikyan ,et al. , “Combined Enzymatic Modification of Stevioside and Rebaudioside A”, Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology, vol. 42, No. I, 2006, 31-37. |
| Kobayashi, et aL, “Dulcoside A and B, New diterpene glycosides from Stevia Rebaudiana”, Phytochemistry, vol. 16 1977, 1405-1408. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190150493 A1 | May 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15646629 | Jul 2017 | US |
| Child | 16255614 | US | |
| Parent | 13029263 | Feb 2011 | US |
| Child | 13567707 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14616010 | Feb 2015 | US |
| Child | 15646629 | US | |
| Parent | 14073423 | Nov 2013 | US |
| Child | 14616010 | US | |
| Parent | 13567707 | Aug 2012 | US |
| Child | 14073423 | US |
