The various embodiments herein relate to robotic surgical devices, and more specifically to gross positioning systems and devices that aid in the gross repositioning of surgical devices during surgical procedures. The combination of a gross positioning system with an in vivo surgical device results in an increase in the degrees of freedom of the in vivo device without increasing the size of the device.
The known positioning systems currently used for robotic surgery are large and cumbersome. For example, the Da Vinci SP Surgical System™ takes up a significant portion of the operating room and creates a crowded space over the surgical site, and the system created by Waseda University has bulky motor housings that create a larger than necessary profile. In a further example, the Raven™ mimics current laparoscopic techniques by inserting a single tool (in contrast to the in vivo robot systems used in the other two systems discussed above).
This known mechanism as shown in
Discussed herein are various gross positioning systems for use with in vivo robotic surgical devices.
In Example 1, a gross positioning system for use with a robotic surgical device comprises a base, a first arm link operably coupled to the base at a first rotational joint, a second arm link operably coupled to the first arm link at a second rotational joint, a third arm link operably coupled to the second arm link, and a slidable coupling component slidably coupled to the third arm link such that the slidable coupling component can move along a length of the third arm link between an extended position and a retracted position. The third arm link is rotatable about a third rotational joint and is configured to be positionable through an incision in a patient. The slidable coupling component is configured to be coupleable to the robotic surgical device.
Example 2 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 1, wherein an axis of rotation of the first rotational joint, an axis of rotation of the second rotational joint, and an axis of rotation of the third rotational joint intersect at a single point of intersection.
Example 3 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 2, wherein wherein the single point of intersection is a spherical joint.
Example 4 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 2, wherein the single point of intersection is disposed at some point along a portion of the robotic surgical device.
Example 5 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 2, wherein the gross positioning system is positioned such that the single point of intersection is disposed at an incision in a patient.
Example 6 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 5, wherein the third arm link is disposed through the single point of insertion.
Example 7 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 2, wherein the single point of intersection is disposed at an insertion point of a patient.
Example 8 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 7, wherein the insertion point comprises an incision or a natural orifice.
Example 9 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 7, wherein the third arm link is disposed through the single point of intersection.
Example 10 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 1, wherein the robotic surgical device comprises at least one arm, wherein the gross positioning system and robotic surgical device are configured to operate together to position the robotic surgical device within a body cavity of a patient.
Example 11 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 10, further comprising a controller operably coupled to the gross positioning system and the robotic surgical device.
In Example 12, a gross positioning system for use with a robotic surgical device comprises a base, a first arm link operably coupled to the base at a first rotational joint, a second arm link operably coupled to the first arm link at a second rotational joint, a third arm link operably coupled to the second arm link at a third rotational joint, a slidable coupling component slidably coupled to the third arm link such that the slidable coupling component can move along a length of the third arm link between an extended position and a retracted position, and the robotic surgical device operably coupled to the slidable coupling component. The robotic surgical device comprises a device body, a first arm operably coupled to the device body, and a second arm operably coupled to the device body. The first arm comprises at least one first actuator and the second arm comprises at least one second actuator.
Example 13 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 12, wherein an axis of rotation of the first rotational joint, an axis of rotation of the second rotational joint, and an axis of rotation of the third rotational joint intersect at a single point of intersection.
Example 14 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 12, wherein the third arm link is disposed through the single point of intersection and further is configured to be positionable through an insertion point in a patient.
In Example 15, a external gross positioning system for use with an internal robotic surgical device comprises a base, a first arm link operably coupled to the base at a first rotational joint, a second arm link operably coupled to the first arm link at a second rotational joint, a third arm link operably coupled to the second arm link at a third rotational joint, a slidable coupling component slidably coupled to the third arm link such that the slidable coupling component is moveable along a length of the third arm link between an extended position and a retracted position, and a single point of intersection at an intersection of an axis of rotation of the first rotational joint, an axis of rotation of the second rotational joint, and an axis of rotation of the third rotational joint. The slidable coupling component is configured to be coupleable to the robotic surgical device. The single point of intersection is disposed at an insertion point of a patient.
Example 16 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 15, wherein a portion of the third arm link is disposed through the single point of intersection.
Example 17 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 15, wherein a portion of the robotic surgical device is disposed through the single point of intersection.
Example 18 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 15, wherein the insertion point is an incision.
Example 19 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 15, wherein the robotic surgical device comprises at least one arm, wherein the gross positioning system and robotic surgical device are configured to operate together to position the robotic surgical device within a body cavity of the patient.
Example 20 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 19, further comprising a central processing unit operably coupled to the gross positioning system and the robotic surgical device and a controller operably coupled to the central processing unit. The central processing unit comprises software configured to transmit control instructions to the gross positioning system and the robotic surgical device.
In Example 21, a gross positioning system for use with a robotic surgical device comprises a base, a first arm link operably coupled to the base at a first rotational joint, a second arm link operably coupled to the first arm link at a second rotational joint, a third arm link operably coupled to the second arm link at a third rotational joint, a slidable coupling component slidably coupled to the third arm link, and the robotic surgical device operably coupled to the slidable coupling component. Further, the robotic surgical device comprises a device body, a first arm operably coupled to the device body, the first arm comprising at least one first actuator, and a second arm operably coupled to the device body, the second arm comprising at least one second actuator. In addition, the third arm link is positionable through an insertion point in a patient such that the robotic surgical device is positionable within a body cavity of the patient.
Example 22 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 21, wherein the slidable coupling component is slidable along a length of the third arm link between an extended position and a retracted position.
Example 23 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 21, wherein an axis of rotation of the first rotational joint, an axis of rotation of the second rotational joint, and an axis of rotation of the third rotational joint intersect at a single point of intersection and the third arm link is disposed through the single point of intersection.
While multiple embodiments are disclosed, still other embodiments of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, which shows and describes illustrative embodiments of the invention. As will be realized, the invention is capable of modifications in various obvious aspects, all without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the drawings and detailed description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not restrictive.
The various embodiments disclosed or contemplated herein relate to an improved gross positioning device that is coupled to a dexterous in vivo robotic device such that the gross positioning device can be used for global orientation of the robotic device within the cavity of a patient as described in further detail herein.
The various gross positioning device implementations disclosed or contemplated herein can be used to automatically grossly position a surgical device inside a cavity of a patient. “Gross positioning,” as used herein, is intended to mean general positioning of an entire moveable surgical device (in contrast to precise movement and placement of the specific components of such a device, such as an arm or end effector). In known robotic surgical systems, the gross positioning of those devices during a surgical procedure can be a challenging task. Further, minimally invasive surgical procedures (using either robotic or non-robotic systems) frequently require a surgical technician to reposition the surgical equipment, such as a laparoscope. Such gross repositioning takes time and additional effort. In addition, in some cases, the surgical technician is a junior medical student who is not fully trained in laparoscopy. As a result, the repositioning instructions from the surgeon often result in an obstructed and/or fogged view of the surgical site, requiring additional cognitive resources from the surgeon. Hence, the Da Vinci® system as well as known single incision surgical devices often require timely manual repositioning of the patient, the robotic system, or both while performing complicated procedures.
The various gross positioning devices contemplated herein aid in the gross repositioning of surgical devices (including, for example, any surgical devices that have a device body or rod configured to be positioned through an incision and at least one robotic arm coupled to the device body that is positioned entirely within the cavity of the patient) throughout the procedure without additional intervention or manual repositioning from the surgical staff. The gross positioning system embodiments are capable of controlling the degrees of freedom, azimuth and elevation angle, and roll and translation about the axis of insertion of laparoscopic surgical tools, including robotic laparoscopic surgical tools. As a result, the gross positioning device embodiments disclosed and contemplated herein can grossly position a surgical device through an incision into a patient cavity, such as the abdominal cavity, with high manipulability, reducing the operative time and stress induced upon the surgical staff. The combination of the external gross positioning system with the internal surgical device system will allow the degrees of freedom of the internal system to effectively increase without increasing the size of the surgical robot/device.
In one implementation, the various devices described and contemplated herein can be used with any single site surgical device with an available external positioning fixture, such as a protruding body, rod, or magnetic handle.
As shown, the links 30, 32, 34 of the positioning device 20 (and any other positioning device embodiment disclosed or contemplated herein) allow the robotic device 22 to access the full extent of the workspace within the cavity 24. That is, the positioning device 20 makes it possible to position the robotic device 22 within the patient's cavity 24 with the body 38 of the device 22 positioned through the incision 26 (or port disposed in the incision 26) such that the end effectors 42 attached to the arms 40 of the robotic device 22 can reach any desired location in the workspace in the cavity 24 while the links 30, 32, 34 of the positioning device 20 function to create a “spherical joint” 44 where the device body 38 passes through the incision 26 such that all movements of the robotic device 22 pass through a single point. In other words, regardless of the positioning of the three links 30, 32, 34 and the resulting positioning of the robotic device 22 within the patient's cavity 24, the portion of the device body 38 at the incision 26 (the spherical joint 44) remains in the same position (through the incision 26) as a result of the positioning device 20. This allows operation of a robotic device (such as robotic device 22) within a cavity (such as cavity 24) such that the end effectors (such as end effectors 42) can reach any desired location within the cavity while the entire device 22 is connected to the positioning device 20 via a device body 38 that passes through and never moves from a single point (the spherical joint 44) at the incision 26, thereby making it possible to operate and position the device 22 through that single incision (such as incision 26). The creation of the spherical joint 44 by the positioning device 20 will be described in further detail below. Another advantage is that the positioning device 20 makes it possible to use the single in vivo robotic device within the patient's cavity instead of the multiple arms of the known Da Vinci™ system extending from the patient's cavity and thereby taking up a great deal of workspace outside the body of the patient.
As best shown in
In one implementation, the base 28 is configured to keep the entire device 20 stable and secure during use. As shown, the base 28 is a bracket 52 as discussed above. In alternative embodiments, the base 28 can be any structure that provides such stability, including, for example, a very heavy or weighted structure that uses the weight to enhance stability. In certain implementations, the base 28 can be stably coupled to a surgical table on which the patient is placed. For example, the base 28 can be coupled to a rail (not shown) on the table (not shown). In a further alternative, the base 28 can be coupled to any fixed object in the operating room. Alternatively, the base 28 can be coupled to or be an integral part of a cart or other mobile standalone unit.
As best shown in
As best shown in
Alternatively, any joint configurations can be used in the various gross positioning device implementations, so long as the links 30, 32, 34 can move in relation to each other as described herein.
According to one implementation, the coupling component 36 is slidably coupled to the third link 34 such that the coupling component 36 (and thus the robotic device 74) can be positioned anywhere along the longitudinal length of the third link 34. As such, the robotic device 74 can be moved toward and away from the third joint 70 as desired to position the device 74 along the longitudinal axis of the third link 34. In accordance with certain embodiments, the coupling component 36 has a quick-release handle 78 that can be actuated to fix or unfix the position of the coupling component 36 along the length of the third link 34. That is, the handle 78 can be actuated to move the coupling component 36 into the unfixed configuration such that the component 36 can slide along the length of the link 34. Once the coupling component 36 (and thus the robotic device 74) is positioned at the desired point along the length of the link 34, the handle 78 can be moved into the fixed position, thereby fixing the coupling component 36 at that point such that the component 36 is not slidable. Thus, the coupling component 36 can move along the length of the third link 34 between an extended position and a retracted position and any position therebetween. Alternatively, the third link 34 can have any known component or device that provides for movement between an extended and retracted position.
In one embodiment, the rotational axis 90 at rotational joint 50 is perpendicular to both the rotational axis 92 at rotational joint 60 and the rotational axis 94 at joint 70. In other words, each axis 90, 92, 94 can be perpendicular in relation to the other two. The three axes 90, 92, 94 being perpendicular can, in some implementations, simplify the control of the system 20 by causing each axis 90, 92, 94 to contribute solely to a single degree of freedom. For example, if the third link 34 is rotated around axis 94, the tilt of the in vivo robotic device 74 does not change when all three axes 90, 92, 94 are perpendicular. Similarly, if the first link 30 is rotated around axis 90, only the tilt of the surgical device 74 from side to side is affected. Alternatively, two of the three axes 90, 92, 94 are perpendicular to each other. In a further alternative, none of the axes 90, 92, 94 are perpendicular to each other.
In one embodiment, as best shown in
In one implementation, the intersection 100 causes the system 20 to act similarly to a spherical mechanism, as described above. In the device 20 as shown in
Alternatively, the gross positioning device 20 can have a fourth link, a fifth link, or any number of additional links, and a related additional number of rotational joints. Further, the device 20 can also have fewer than three links, and a related number of rotational joints. In sum, the gross positioning device 20 can have a single rotational joint, two rotational joints, or any number of rotational joints.
According to one embodiment, the gross positioning device 20 can be controlled using the following control process 120 as shown in
The communication from the controller 122 is interpreted (or “conditioned) by the software 124 (block 126) and used to calculate the kinematics (block 128). These kinematic calculations are then communicated to the gross positioning device 20 via a connection 130 such that the device 20 is actuated to move as communicated from the controller 122. In this specific embodiment, the connection is a USB port 130 in the hardware (not shown) that contains the software 124. The port 130 allows for connection of the gross positioning device 20 to the software 124 and thus to the controller 122. In one implementation, the controller 122 is the hardware that contains the software 124. Alternatively, the hardware can be any processing unit, such as a computer.
According to certain embodiments, a hand controller is used to control the gross positioning device and/or the robotic device. In one implementation, the hand controller 150 is a joystick controller 150 as depicted in
In another embodiment, two GeoMagic Touch™ controllers 152 are used in combination with a control process or application that allows for control of both the gross positioning device (such as device 20) and the robotic device (such as device 22) without having to change control schemes during a procedure. Instead, as best shown in
In one embodiment, the midpoint envelope 164 corresponds to the extent of the camera lens 168. Alternatively, other approaches could be used for different cameras or if the robotic device has an optimal workspace within which it must stay.
Alternatively, the control process can operate in a different fashion, as best shown in
In use, the gross positioning device 20 and other embodiments disclosed or contemplated herein can operate in the following fashion to position the surgical device (such as device 22, device 74, or device 166) within the surgical space in the cavity of the patient through the incision. The three links 30, 32, 34 rotate about the respective axes 90, 92, 94 to position the device 22, 74, 166 as desired. More specifically, the third link 34 can be rotated around axis 94 to rotate the surgical device 22, 74, 166 about the axis 94. Further, the arm links 30, 32 in combination with the extender 34 can be used to articulate the device 20 through two separate angular planes. That is, the two axes 90, 92 can affect the angular position of the extender 34. In addition, the coupling component 36 can be extended or retracted to allow for the surgical device 22, 74, 166 to be advanced into and out of the cavity of the patient.
In one implementation, the positioning system 20 and the surgical device 22, 74, 166 can be used in combination, such that the surgical device 22, 74, 166 is treated as an extension of the positioning system 20 wherein both are used together to move and operate the surgical device 22, 74, 166. For example, the surgeon may want to move the surgical device 22, 74, 166 a total of one inch to the right and thus actuates an external controller to cause this move. The controller (such as any controller embodiment discussed above) transmits the appropriate signals to the positioning system 20 and the surgical device 22, 74, 166 such that the system 20 and device 22, 74, 166 work in combination to move the surgical device 22, 74, 166 one inch to the right. In one example, the system 20 could move 0.5 inches and the device 22, 74, 166 could move 0.5 inches, thereby resulting in the device 22, 74, 166 moving the full one inch as desired. According to one embodiment, the positioning system 20 can thus be used to maximize the strength, workspace, and maneuverability of the combination of the system 20 and the device 22, 74, 166 by determining the optimal contribution of each component during use.
Alternatively, the positioning system 20 and the device 22, 74, 166 operate separately. That is, the system 20 is not operable or does not operate while the device 22, 74, 166 is being used, and the device 22, 74, 166 is not operable or does not operate while the system 20 is being used. For example, if the device 22, 74, 166 is being used and it is determined that a target object in the surgical space is outside the reach of the device 22, 74, 166, the device 22, 74, 166 is “shut down,” otherwise rendered inoperable, or simply placed in a “pause mode,” and the system 20 is used to reposition the device 22, 74, 166 accordingly.
It is understood that the device 20 can be operably coupled to a processor or computer (not shown) such that the processor can be used to control the positioning system 20, including movement of the arm links 30, 32, 34 to grossly position the surgical device 22, 74, 166.
In a further alternative implementation, the positioning system 20 can also be configured to incorporate or integrate equipment or devices that couple to the surgical device 22, 74, 166 to provide various functionalities to the device 22, 74, 166. For example, in one embodiment, the system 20 can contain suction and irrigation equipment that couples to corresponding equipment in the surgical device 22, 74, 166 such that the surgical device 22, 74, 166 includes suction and irrigation components. In another example according to a further implementation, the positioning device 20 can contain any known equipment that is configured to couple to corresponding equipment in the surgical device 22, 74, 166.
Alternative embodiments contemplated herein also include systems that can be used with surgical devices that are magnetically controlled (in contrast to the surgical devices described above, which are controlled via a body or positioning rod inserted through the surgical incision). In those implementations, the positioning system positions the surgical device anywhere along an internal surface inside the patient's cavity by positioning an external magnetic component (such as a magnetic handle or other type of external magnetic component) along the outer skin of the patient. This positioning of the device can include any combination of movement in two dimensions along the surface of the patient's skin as well as rotation of the external magnetic component about an axis perpendicular to the surface of the skin. Of course, it is understood that while the movement of the magnetic component along the skin of the patient is considered to be two dimensional, the patient's skin is curved such that movement of the external component along the skin demonstrates absolute manipulation in all six degrees of freedom.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, persons skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application claims priority as a continuation application to U.S. application Ser. No. 17/838,883, filed Jun. 13, 2022 and entitled “Gross Positioning Device and Related Systems and Methods,” which claims priority as a continuation application to U.S. application Ser. No. 15/821,169, filed on Nov. 22, 2017 and entitled “Gross Positioning Device And Related Systems And Methods,” which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 11,357,595 on Jun. 14, 2022, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application 62/425,149, filed Nov. 22, 2016 and entitled “Gross Positioning Device and Related Systems and Methods,” which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
This invention was made with government support under Grant No. W81XWH-14-1-0058, awarded by the U.S. Department of Defense. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3870264 | Robinson | Mar 1975 | A |
3989952 | Hohmann | Nov 1976 | A |
4246661 | Pinson | Jan 1981 | A |
4258716 | Sutherland | Mar 1981 | A |
4278077 | Mizumoto | Jul 1981 | A |
4538594 | Boebel et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4568311 | Miyake | Feb 1986 | A |
4623183 | Aomori | Nov 1986 | A |
4736645 | Zimmer | Apr 1988 | A |
4771652 | Zimmer | Sep 1988 | A |
4852391 | Ruch et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4896015 | Taboada et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4897014 | Tietze | Jan 1990 | A |
4922755 | Oshiro et al. | May 1990 | A |
4922782 | Kawai | May 1990 | A |
4990050 | Tsuge et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5007550 | Avot | Apr 1991 | A |
5019968 | Wang et al. | May 1991 | A |
5030365 | Christensen et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5063095 | Kitagawa et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5066090 | Mayerhofer et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5108140 | Bartholet | Apr 1992 | A |
5139563 | Astles et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5172639 | Wiesman et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176649 | Wakabayashi | Jan 1993 | A |
5178032 | Zona et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5187796 | Wang et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5195388 | Zona et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5201325 | Mcewen et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5217003 | Wilk | Jun 1993 | A |
5263382 | Brooks et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5271384 | Mcewen et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5284096 | Pelrine et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5297443 | Wentz | Mar 1994 | A |
5297536 | Wilk | Mar 1994 | A |
5304899 | Sasaki et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5307447 | Asano et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5353807 | Demarco | Oct 1994 | A |
5363935 | Schempf et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5382885 | Salcudean et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5388528 | Pelrine et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5436542 | Petelin et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5441494 | Ortiz | Aug 1995 | A |
5450104 | Kisa et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5451027 | Mchenry | Sep 1995 | A |
5454758 | Tophinke et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5458131 | Wilk | Oct 1995 | A |
5458583 | Mcneely et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5458598 | Feinberg et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5459926 | Perea | Oct 1995 | A |
5463361 | Allen | Oct 1995 | A |
5468203 | Okonkwo | Nov 1995 | A |
5468265 | Adams | Nov 1995 | A |
5470236 | Wissler | Nov 1995 | A |
5471515 | Fossum et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5491691 | Shtayer et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5491701 | Zook | Feb 1996 | A |
5497651 | Matter et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5515478 | Wang | May 1996 | A |
5524180 | Wang et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5553198 | Wang et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5562448 | Mushabac | Oct 1996 | A |
5588442 | Scovil et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5620417 | Jang et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5623582 | Rosenberg | Apr 1997 | A |
5624380 | Kaneko et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624398 | Smith et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5632761 | Smith et al. | May 1997 | A |
5645520 | Nakamura et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5657429 | Wang et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5657584 | Hamlin | Aug 1997 | A |
5672168 | De La Torre et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674030 | Sigel | Oct 1997 | A |
5728599 | Rostoker et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5736821 | Suyama | Apr 1998 | A |
5754741 | Wang et al. | May 1998 | A |
5762458 | Wang et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769640 | Jacobus et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5791231 | Cohn et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5792135 | Madhani et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5792663 | Fry et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797538 | Heaton et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797900 | Madhani et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5807377 | Madhani et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5808665 | Green | Sep 1998 | A |
5815640 | Wang et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5825982 | Wright et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5841950 | Wang et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5845646 | Lemelson | Dec 1998 | A |
5855583 | Wang et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5876325 | Mizuno et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5878193 | Wang et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5878783 | Smart | Mar 1999 | A |
5895417 | Pomeranz et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5906591 | Dario et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907664 | Wang et al. | May 1999 | A |
5910129 | Koblish et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5911036 | Wright et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5971976 | Wang et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5993467 | Yoon | Nov 1999 | A |
6001108 | Wang et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007550 | Wang et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6030365 | Laufer | Feb 2000 | A |
6031371 | Smart | Feb 2000 | A |
6058323 | Lemelson | May 2000 | A |
6063095 | Wang et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066090 | Yoon | May 2000 | A |
6086529 | Arndt | Jul 2000 | A |
6102850 | Wang et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107795 | Smart | Aug 2000 | A |
6132368 | Cooper | Oct 2000 | A |
6132441 | Grace | Oct 2000 | A |
6139563 | Cosgrove, III et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6156006 | Brosens et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159146 | El Gazayerli | Dec 2000 | A |
6162171 | Ng et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
D438617 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2001 | S |
6206903 | Ramans | Mar 2001 | B1 |
D441076 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2001 | S |
6223100 | Green | Apr 2001 | B1 |
D441862 | Cooper et al. | May 2001 | S |
6238415 | Sepetka et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240312 | Alfano et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241730 | Alby | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6244809 | Wang et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246200 | Blumenkranz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
D444555 | Cooper et al. | Jul 2001 | S |
6286514 | Lemelson | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292678 | Hall et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293282 | Lemelson | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296635 | Smith et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307447 | Barber et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309397 | Julian et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309403 | Minor et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312435 | Wallace et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321106 | Lemelson | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327492 | Lemelson | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331181 | Tierney et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6346072 | Cooper | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352503 | Matsui et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364888 | Niemeyer et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371952 | Madhani et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6382885 | Isaksson | May 2002 | B2 |
6388528 | Buer et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6394998 | Wallace et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6398726 | Ramans et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6400980 | Lemelson | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408224 | Okamoto et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424885 | Niemeyer et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432112 | Brock et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6436107 | Wang et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441577 | Blumenkranz et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6450104 | Grant et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6451027 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454758 | Thompson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458131 | Ray | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6458583 | Bruhn et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6459926 | Nowlin et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463361 | Wang et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468203 | Belson | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6468265 | Evans et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470236 | Ohtsuki | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6491691 | Morley et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6491701 | Tierney et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6493608 | Niemeyer | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496099 | Wang et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6497651 | Kan et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6508413 | Bauer et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6512345 | Borenstein et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6515478 | Wicklow et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522906 | Salisbury et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6544276 | Azizi | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6548982 | Papanikolopoulos et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6554790 | Moll | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6562448 | Chamberlain et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6565554 | Niemeyer | May 2003 | B1 |
6574355 | Green | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6587750 | Gerbi et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6588442 | Babin | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6591239 | Mccall et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594552 | Nowlin et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610007 | Belson et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6620173 | Gerbi et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6624398 | Sherrill et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6632761 | Ushita et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6642836 | Wang et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6645196 | Nixon et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6646541 | Wang et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6648814 | Kim et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6657584 | Cavallaro et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6659939 | Moll et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6661571 | Shioda et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671581 | Niemeyer et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6676684 | Morley et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6684129 | Salisbury et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685648 | Flaherty et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6685698 | Morley et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6687571 | Byrne et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6692485 | Brock et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6699177 | Wang et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6699235 | Wallace et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6702734 | Kim et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6702805 | Stuart | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714839 | Salisbury et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6714841 | Wright et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6719684 | Kim et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6720988 | Gere et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6726699 | Wright et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728599 | Wang et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730021 | Vassiliades et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6731988 | Green | May 2004 | B1 |
6736821 | Squires et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6746443 | Morley et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754741 | Alexander et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764441 | Chiel et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6764445 | Ramans et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6766204 | Niemeyer et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770081 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6774597 | Borenstein | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6776165 | Jin | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6780184 | Tanrisever | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6783524 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785593 | Wang et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788018 | Blumenkranz | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6791231 | Chang | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6792135 | Toyama | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792663 | Krzyzanowski | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6793653 | Sanchez et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6799065 | Niemeyer | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6799088 | Wang et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801325 | Farr et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6804581 | Wang et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6810281 | Brock et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6815640 | Spear et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6817972 | Snow | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6817974 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6817975 | Farr et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6820653 | Schempf et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6824508 | Kim et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6824510 | Kim et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6832988 | Sproul | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6832996 | Woloszko et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836703 | Wang et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6837846 | Jaffe et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6837883 | Moll et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6839612 | Sanchez et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6840938 | Morley et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6845646 | Goto | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6852107 | Wang et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6855583 | Krivokapic et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6858003 | Evans et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6860346 | Burt et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6860877 | Sanchez et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6866671 | Tierney et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6870343 | Borenstein et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6871117 | Wang et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6871563 | Choset et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6878783 | Yeager et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6879880 | Nowlin et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6892112 | Wang et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6895417 | Obara et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6899705 | Niemeyer | May 2005 | B2 |
6902560 | Morley et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6905460 | Wang et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6905491 | Wang et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6911036 | Douk et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911916 | Wang et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6917176 | Schempf et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6933695 | Blumenkranz | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936001 | Snow | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6936003 | Iddan | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936042 | Wallace et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6943663 | Wang et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949096 | Davison et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6951535 | Ghodoussi et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6965812 | Wang et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6974411 | Belson | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6974449 | Niemeyer | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6979423 | Moll | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6984203 | Tartaglia et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6984205 | Gazdzinski | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6991627 | Madhani et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993413 | Sunaoshi | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6994703 | Wang et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6994708 | Manzo | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6997908 | Carrillo, Jr. et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7025064 | Wang et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7027892 | Wang et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7033344 | Imran | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039453 | Mullick et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7042184 | Oleynikov et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7048745 | Tierney et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7053752 | Wang et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7063682 | Whayne et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7066879 | Fowler et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066926 | Wallace et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7074179 | Wang et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7077446 | Kameda et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7083571 | Wang et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7083615 | Peterson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7087049 | Nowlin et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7090683 | Brock et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7097640 | Wang et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7105000 | Mcbrayer | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7107090 | Salisbury, Jr. et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7109678 | Kraus et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7118582 | Wang et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7121781 | Sanchez | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7125403 | Julian et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7126303 | Farritor et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7147650 | Lee | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155315 | Niemeyer et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7166113 | Arambula et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7169141 | Brock et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7182025 | Ghorbel et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7182089 | Ries | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7199545 | Oleynikov et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7206626 | Quaid, III | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7206627 | Abovitz et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7210364 | Ghorbel et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7214230 | Brock et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7217240 | Snow | May 2007 | B2 |
7239940 | Wang et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7249951 | Bevirt | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7250028 | Julian et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7259652 | Wang et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7273488 | Nakamura et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7311107 | Harel et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7339341 | Oleynikov et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7372229 | Farritor et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7447537 | Funda et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7492116 | Oleynikov et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7566300 | Devierre et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7574250 | Niemeyer | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7588537 | Bass | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7637905 | Saadat et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7645230 | Mikkaichi et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7655004 | Long | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7670329 | Flaherty et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7672168 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7678043 | Gilad | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7731727 | Sauer | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7762825 | Burbank et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7772796 | Farritor et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785251 | Wilk | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785333 | Miyamoto et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7789825 | Nobis et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7794494 | Sahatjian et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7799088 | Geitz | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7865266 | Moll et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7960935 | Farritor et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8021358 | Doyle et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8179073 | Farritor et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8182469 | Anderson et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8231510 | Abdo | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8231610 | Jo et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8353897 | Doyle et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8604742 | Farritor et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
9089353 | Farritor et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9649020 | Finlay | May 2017 | B2 |
11357595 | Reichenbach | Jun 2022 | B2 |
11806097 | Farritor | Nov 2023 | B2 |
11813124 | Reichenbach | Nov 2023 | B2 |
20010018591 | Brock et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010049497 | Kalloo et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020003173 | Bauer et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013601 | Nobles et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026186 | Woloszko et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020038077 | De La Torre et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020065507 | Zadno-Azizi | May 2002 | A1 |
20020091374 | Cooper | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103417 | Gazdzinski | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111535 | Kim et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120254 | Julian et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128552 | Nowlin et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140392 | Borenstein et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147487 | Sundquist et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151906 | Demarais et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156347 | Kim et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020171385 | Kim et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020173700 | Kim et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020190682 | Schempf et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030020810 | Takizawa et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030045888 | Brock et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065250 | Chiel et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030089267 | Ghorbel et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030092964 | Kim et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097129 | Davison et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030100817 | Wang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030114731 | Cadeddu et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135203 | Wang et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139742 | Wampler et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144656 | Ocel et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030159535 | Grover et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167000 | Mullick et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172871 | Scherer | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030179308 | Zamorano et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030181788 | Yokoi et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030191455 | Sanchez et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030229268 | Uchiyama et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229338 | Irion et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030230372 | Schmidt | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040024311 | Quaid, III | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034282 | Quaid, III | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034283 | Quaid, III | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034302 | Abovitz et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040050394 | Jin | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040070822 | Takayama et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040099175 | Perrot et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102772 | Baxter et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106916 | Quaid et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111113 | Nakamura et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117032 | Roth | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040138525 | Saadat et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138552 | Harel et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040140786 | Borenstein | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153057 | Davison | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040173116 | Ghorbel et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040176664 | Iddan | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040183777 | Bevirt | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040215331 | Chew et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225229 | Viola | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254680 | Sunaoshi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267326 | Ocel et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050014994 | Fowler et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021069 | Feuer et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050029978 | Oleynikov et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043583 | Killmann et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049462 | Kanazawa | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050054901 | Yoshino | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050054902 | Konno | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050064378 | Toly | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065400 | Banik et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050083460 | Hattori et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050095650 | Julius et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050096502 | Khalili | May 2005 | A1 |
20050143644 | Gilad et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154376 | Riviere et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165449 | Cadeddu et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050234435 | Layer | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050283137 | Doyle et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288555 | Binmoeller | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288665 | Woloszko | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020272 | Gildenberg | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060036264 | Selover et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060046226 | Bergler et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060100501 | Berkelman et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060119304 | Farritor et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149135 | Paz | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060152591 | Lin | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155263 | Lipow | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060195015 | Mullick et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060196301 | Oleynikov et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060198619 | Oleynikov et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060241570 | Wilk | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241732 | Denker et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253109 | Chu | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060258954 | Timberlake et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070032701 | Fowler et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043397 | Ocel et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055342 | Wu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070080658 | Farritor et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070106113 | Ravo | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123748 | Meglan | May 2007 | A1 |
20070135803 | Belson | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070142725 | Hardin et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156019 | Larkin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156211 | Wood et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167955 | Arnault De La Menardiere et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070225633 | Wood et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225634 | Wood et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070241714 | Okeynikov et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244520 | Ferren et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250064 | Darois et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255273 | Fernandez et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080004634 | Farritor et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015565 | Davison | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015566 | Livneh | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033569 | Ferren et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080045803 | Williams et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058835 | Farritor et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080058989 | Oleynikov et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080103440 | Ferren et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109014 | De La Pena | May 2008 | A1 |
20080111513 | Farritor et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080119870 | Williams | May 2008 | A1 |
20080132890 | Woloszko et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080161804 | Rioux et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080164079 | Jacobsen | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183033 | Bern et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080221591 | Farritor et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080269557 | Marescaux et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269562 | Marescaux et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090012532 | Blackwell et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090020724 | Paffrath | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024142 | Ruiz Morales | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090048612 | Farritor et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090054909 | Farritor et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090069821 | Farritor et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076536 | Rentschler et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090137952 | Ramamurthy et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090143787 | De La Pena | Jun 2009 | A9 |
20090163929 | Yeung et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171373 | Farritor et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090234369 | Bax | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090236400 | Cole et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240246 | Deville et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090247821 | Rogers | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248038 | Blumenkranz et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090281377 | Acosta et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090305210 | Guru et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010294 | Conlon et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100016659 | Weitzner | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100016853 | Burbank | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100042097 | Newton et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100056863 | Dejima et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069710 | Yamatani et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069940 | Miller et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100081875 | Fowler et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100139436 | Kawashima et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100185212 | Sholev | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198231 | Scott | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100204713 | Ruiz Morales | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100245549 | Allen et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250000 | Blumenkranz et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100262162 | Omori | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100292691 | Brogna | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100318059 | Farritor et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110015569 | Kirschenman et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110020779 | Hannaford et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110071347 | Rogers et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071544 | Steger et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110077478 | Freeman et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110082365 | Mcgrogan et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110098529 | Ostrovsky et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110152615 | Schostek et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110224605 | Farritor et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110230894 | Simaan et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110237890 | Farritor et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238080 | Ranjit et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110264078 | Lipow et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110270443 | Kamiya et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276046 | Heimbecher et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120029277 | Sholev | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120029727 | Malik | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120035582 | Nelson et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120109150 | Blackwell et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120116362 | Kieturakis | May 2012 | A1 |
20120179168 | Farritor et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120253515 | Coste-Maniere et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130041360 | Farritor et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130131695 | Scarfogliero et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130345717 | Markvicka et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140039515 | Mondry et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140046340 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140058205 | Frederick et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140100587 | Farritor et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140249546 | Shvartsberg et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276944 | Farritor | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140303434 | Farritor et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150051446 | Farritor et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150297299 | Yeung et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160015461 | Farritor et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160074055 | Ravikumar et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160228154 | Mickiewicz et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170035526 | Farritor et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170354470 | Farritor et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180116734 | Yeung et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180140377 | Reichenbach et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20190090965 | Farritor et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20210045836 | Farritor et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102821918 | Dec 2012 | CN |
102010040405 | Mar 2012 | DE |
105656 | Apr 1984 | EP |
279591 | Aug 1988 | EP |
1354670 | Oct 2003 | EP |
2286756 | Feb 2011 | EP |
2329787 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2563261 | Mar 2013 | EP |
2684528 | Jan 2014 | EP |
2123225 | Dec 2014 | EP |
2815705 | Dec 2014 | EP |
2881046 | Jun 2015 | EP |
2937047 | Oct 2015 | EP |
04144533 | May 1992 | JP |
05115425 | May 1993 | JP |
06507809 | Sep 1994 | JP |
06508049 | Sep 1994 | JP |
07016235 | Jan 1995 | JP |
07136173 | May 1995 | JP |
07306155 | Nov 1995 | JP |
08224248 | Sep 1996 | JP |
2001505810 | May 2001 | JP |
2002000524 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2003220065 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2004180781 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004322310 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2004329292 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2009106606 | May 2009 | JP |
2010533045 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2010536436 | Dec 2010 | JP |
2011504794 | Feb 2011 | JP |
2011045500 | Mar 2011 | JP |
2011115591 | Jun 2011 | JP |
9221291 | Dec 1992 | WO |
0189405 | Nov 2001 | WO |
02082979 | Oct 2002 | WO |
02100256 | Dec 2002 | WO |
2005009211 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2005044095 | May 2005 | WO |
2006005075 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006052927 | May 2006 | WO |
2006079108 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2007011654 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007111571 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2007149559 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2009023851 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2009144729 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010042611 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010046823 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010050771 | May 2010 | WO |
2011075693 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2011118646 | Sep 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Rentschler et al., “Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of In Vivo Wheeled Mobility,” ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences: 28th Biennial Mechanisms and Robotics Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, Sep. 28-Oct. 2, 2004, pp. 1-9. |
Rentschler et al., “Toward In Vivo Mobility,” Studies in Health Technology and Infonnatics—Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, ISO Press, Long Beach, CA, 2005a, III: 397-403. |
Rentschler et al., Mobile In Vivo Biopsy Robot, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Orlando, Florida, May 2006, pp. 4155-4160. |
Rentschler et al., “In Vivo Robots for Laparoscopic Surgery,” Studies in Health Technology and Infonnatics—Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, ISO Press, Newport Beach, CA, 2004a, 98: 316-322. |
Riviere et al., “Toward Active Tremor Canceling in Handheld Microsurgical Instruments,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Oct. 2003, 19(5): 793-800. |
Rosen et al., “Force Controlled and Teleoperated Endoscopic, Grasper for Minimally Invasive Surgery—Experimental Performance Evaluation,” IEEE Transactions of Biomedical Engineering, Oct. 1999; 46(10): 1212-1221. |
Rosen et al., “Objective Laparoscopic Skills Assessments of Surgical Residents Using Hidden Markov Models Based on Haptic Information and Tool/Tissue Interactions,” Studies in Health Technology and Infonnatics-Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, Jan. 2001, 7 pp. |
Rosen et al., “Spherical Mechanism Analysis of a Surgical Robot for Minimally Invasive Surgery—Analytical and Experimental Approaches,” Studies in Health Technology and Infonnatics—Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, pp. 442-448, Jan. 2005. |
Rosen et al., “The Blue Dragon—A System of Measuring the Kinematics and the Dynamics of Minimally Invasive Surgical Tools In-Vivo,” Proc. of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Washington, DC, pp. 1876-1881, May 2002. |
Rosen et al., “Task Decomposition of Laparoscopic Surgery for Objective Evaluation of Surgical Residents' Learning Curve Using Hidden Markov Model,” Computer Aided Surgery, vol. 7, pp. 49-61, 2002. |
Ruurda et al., “Feasibility of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 2002; 12(1 ):41-45. |
Ruurda et al., “Robot-Assisted surgical systems: a new era in laparoscopic surgery,” Ann R. Coll Surg Engl., 2002; 84: 223-226. |
Sackier et al., “Robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery,” Surgical Endoscopy, 1994; 8: 63-66. |
Salky, “What is the Penetration of Endoscopic Techniques into Surgical Practice?” Digestive Surgery, 2000; 17:422-426. |
Satava, “Surgical Robotics: The Early Chronicles,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 2002; 12(1): 6-16. |
Schippers et al., (1996) “Requirements and Possibilities of Computer-Assisted Endoscopic Surgery,” In: Computer Integrated Surgery: Technology and Clinical Applications, pp. 561-565. |
Schurr et al., “Robotics and Telemanipulation Technologies for Endoscopic Surgery,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2000; 14: 375-381. |
Schwartz, “In the Lab: Robots that Slink and Squirm,” The New York Times, Mar. 27, 2007, 4 pp. |
Sharp LL-151-30, http://www.sharp3d.com, 2006, 2 pp. |
Slatkin et al., “The Development of a Robotic Endoscope,” Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 162-171, 1995. |
Smart Pill “Fastastic Voyage: Smart Pill to Expand Testing,” http://www.smartpilldiagnostics.com, Apr. 13, 2005, 1 pg. |
Southern Surgeons Club (1991), “A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies,” N. Eng. 1 Med. 324 (16): 1073-1078. |
Stefanini et al., “Modeling and Experiments on a Legged Microrobot Locomoting in a Tubular Compliant and Slippery Environment,” Int. Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 25, No. 5-6, pp. 551-560, May-Jun. 2006. |
Stiff et al., “Long-term Pain: Less Common After Laparoscopic than Open Cholecystectomy,” British Journal of Surgery, 1994; 81: 1368-1370. |
Stoianovici et al., “Robotic Tools for Minimally Invasive Urologic Surgery”, Jan. 1, 2002, pp. 1-17. |
Strong, et al., “Efficacy of Novel Robotic Camera vs. a Standard Laproscopic Camera,” Surgical Innovation vol. 12, No. 4, Dec. 2005, Westminster Publications, Inc., pp. 315-318. |
Suzumori et al., “Development of Flexible Microactuator and its Applications to Robotics Mechanisms,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1991: 1622-1627. |
Taylor et al., “A Telerobotic Assistant for Laparoscopic Surgery,” IEEE Eng Med Biol, 1995; 279-287. |
Tendick et al., “Applications of Micromechatronics in Minimally Invasive Surgery,” IEEE/AS ME Transactions on Mechatronics, 1998; 3(1): 34-42. |
Tendick et al. (1993), “Sensing and Manipulation Problems in Endoscopic Surgery: Experiment, Analysis, and Observation,” Presence 2(1): 66-81. |
Thomann et al., “The Design of a new type of Micro Robot for the Intestinal Inspection,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE Intl. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Oct. 2002: 1385-1390. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/180,960 filed Feb. 2000. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/956,032, filed Aug. 15, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/983,445, filed Oct. 29, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,106, filed Nov. 26, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,062, filed Nov. 26, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,076, filed Nov. 26, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,086, filed Nov. 26, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,470, filed Nov. 27, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/025,346, filed Feb. 1, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/030,588, filed Feb. 22, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/030,617, filed Feb. 22, 2008. |
Way et al., (editors), “Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery,” Churchill Livingstone Inc., 1995, 14 pp. |
Wolfe et al., “Endoscopic Cholecystectomy: An analysis of Complications,” Arch. Surg. Oct. 1991; 126: 1192-1196. |
Worn et al., “Espirit Project No. 33915: Miniaturised Robot for Micro Manipulation (MINIMAN)”, Nov. 1998; http://www.ipr.ira.ujka.de/-microbot/miniman. |
Yu et al., “Microrobotic Cell Injection,” Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 2001; 620-625. |
Yu, BSN, RN, “M2ATM Capsule Endoscopy A Breakthrough Diagnostic Tool for Small Intestine Imaging,” vol. 25, No. 1, 2002, Gastroenterology Nursing, pp. 24-27. |
Abbott et al., “Design of an Endoluminal NOTES Robotic System,” from the Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/RSJ Int'l Conf. on Intelligent Robot Systems, San Diego, CA, Oct. 29-Nov. 2, 2007, pp. 410-416. |
Abbou et al., “Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy with a Remote Controlled Robot,” The Journal of Urology, Jun. 2001, 165: 1964-1966. |
Allendorf et al., “Postoperative Immune Function Varies Inversely with the Degree of Surgical Trauma in a Murine Model,” Surgical Endoscopy, 1997; 11: 427-430. |
Ang, “Active Tremor Compensation in Handheld Instrument for Microsurgery,” Doctoral Dissertation, tech report CMU R.I-TR-04-28, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, May 2004, 167 pp. |
Atmel 80C5X2 Core, http://www.atmel.com, 2006, 186 pp. |
Bailey et al., Complications of Laparoscopic Surgery; Quality Medical Publishers, Inc., 1995, 25 pp. |
Ballantyne, “Robotic Surgery, Telerobotic Surgery, Telepresence, and Telementoring,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2002; 16: 1389-1402. |
Bauer et al., “Case Report: Remote Percutaneous Renal Percutaneous Renal Access Using a New Automated Welesurgical Robotic System,” Telemedicine Journal and e-Health 2001; (4): 341-347. |
Begos et al., “Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: From Gimmick to Gold Standard,” J Clin Gastroenterol, 1994; 19 (4): 625-330. |
Berg et al., “Surgery with Cooperative Robots,” Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, Feb. 2007, 1 pg. |
Breda et al., “Future developments and perspectives in laparoscopy,” Eur. Urology 2001; 40(1): 84-91. |
Breedveld et al., “Design of Steerable Endoscopes to Improve the Visual Perception of Depth During aparoscopic Surgery,” ASME, Jan. 2004; vol. 126, pp. 1-5. |
Breedveld et al., “Locomotion through the Intestine by means of Rolling Stents,” Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, 2004, pp. 1-7. |
Calafiore et al., Multiple Arterial Conduits Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Early Angiographic Results,: Ann Thorac Surg, 1999; 67: 450-456. |
Camarillo et al., “Robotic Technology in Surgery: Past, Present and Future,” The American Journal of Surgery, 2004; 188: 2S-15. |
Cavusoglu et al.,“Robotics for Telesurgery: Second Generation Berkeley/UCSF Laparoscopic Telesurgical Norkstation and Looking Towards the Future Applications,” Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 2003; 30(1): 22-29. |
Cavusoglu et al., “Telesurgery and Surgical Simulation: Haptic Interfaces to Real and Virtual Surgical Environments,” In McLaughliin, M.L, Hespanha, J.P., and Sukhatme, G., editors. Touch in virtual environments, IMSC Series in Multimedia 2001, 28 pp. |
Chanthasopeephan et al., (2003), “Measuring Forces in Liver Cutting: New Equipment and Experimenal Results,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering 31: 1372-1382. |
Choi et al., “Flexure-based Manipulator for Active Handheld Microsurgical Instrument,” Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS), Sep. 2005, 4 pp. |
Cleary et al., “State of the Art in Surgical Robotics: Clinical Applications and Technology Challenges”, “Computer Aided Surgery”, Jan. 1, 2002, pp. 312-328, vol. 6. |
Cuschieri, “Technology for Minimal Access Surgery,” BMJ, 1999, 319: 1-6. |
Dakin et al., “Comparison of laparoscopic skills perfonnance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic s;ystems,” Surg Endosc., 2003; 17: 574-579. |
Dumpert et al., “Improving in Vivo Robot Vision Quality,” from the Proceedings of Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, ong Beach, CA, Jan. 26-29, 2005. 1 pg. |
Dumpert et al., “Stereoscopic In Vivo Surgical Robots,” IEEE Sensors Special Issue on In Vivo Sensors for Medicine, Jan. 2007, 10 pp. |
Falcone et al., “Robotic Surgery,” Clin. Obstel. Gynecol. 2003, 46(1): 37-43. |
Faraz et al., “Engineering Approaches to Mechanical and Robotic Design for Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS),” Kluwer Academic Publishers (Boston), 2000, 13 pp. |
Fearing et al., “Wing Transmission for a Micromechanical Flying Insect,” Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference to Robotics &Automation, Apr. 2000; 1509-1516. |
Fireman et al., “Diagnosing small bowel Crohn's desease with wireless capsule endoscopy,” Gut 2003; 52: 39 392. |
Flynn et al., “Tomorrow's Surgery: micromotors and microrobots for minimally invasive procedures,” Minimally Invasive Surgery & Allied Technologies, 1998; 7(4): 343-352. |
Franklin et al., “Prospective Comparison of Open vs. Laparoscopic Colon Surgery for Carcinoma: Five-Year Results,” Dis Colon Rectum, 1996; 39: S35-S46. |
Franzino, “The Laprotek Surgical System and the Next Generation of Robotics,” Surg Clin North Am, 2003 83(6): 1317-1320. |
Fraulob et al., “Miniature assistance module for robot-assisted heart surgery,” Biomed. Tech. 2002, 47 Suppl. 1, Pt. 1: 12-15. |
Fukuda et al., “Mechanism and Swimming Experiment of Micro Mobile Robot in Water,” Proceedings of the 1994 EEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1994: 814-819. |
Fukuda et al., “Micro Active Catheter System with Multi Degrees of Freedom,” Proceedings of the IEEE Intemational Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 1994, pp. 2290-2295. |
Fuller et al., “Laparoscopic Trocar Injuries: A Report from a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Genier for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) Systematic Technology Assessment of Medical Products (STAMP) Committee,” U.S. Food and Drug Adminstration, available at http://www.fda.gov, Finalized: Nov. 7, 2003; Updated: Jun. 24, 2005, 11 pp. |
Glukhovsky et al., “The development and application of wireless capsule endoscopy,” Int. J. Med. Robot. Comput. Assist. Surgery, 2004; I (1): 114-123. |
Gong et al., Wireless endoscopy, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2000; 51(6): 725-729. |
Grady, “Doctors Try New Surgery for Gallbladder Removal,” The New York Times, Apr. 20, 2007, 3 pp. |
Green, “Telepresence Surgery”, Jan. 1, 1995, Publisher: IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology. |
Guo et al., “Fish-like Underwater Microrobot with 3 DOF,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, May 2002: 738-743. |
Guo et al., “Micro Active Guide Wire Catheter System—Characteristic Evaluation, Electrical Model and Operability Evaluation of Micro Active Catheter,” Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Apr. 1996: 2226-2231. |
Hanly et al., “Robotic Abdominal Surgery,” The American Journal of Surgery 188 (Suppl.to Oct. 1994): 19S-26S, 2004. |
Hanly et al., “Value of the SAGES Learning Center in introducing new technology,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2004; 19 (4): 477-483. |
Heikkinen et al., “Comparison of laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication two years after operation: A prospective randomized trial,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2000; 14: 1019-1023. |
Hissink, “Olympus Medical develops capsule camera technology,” Dec. 2004, accessed Aug. 29, 2007, http://www.letsgodigital.org , 3 pp. |
Horgan et al., “Technical Report: Robots in Laparoscopic Surgery,” Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2001; 11(6): 415-419. |
Ishiyama et al., “Spiral-type Micro-machine for Medical Applications,” 2000 International Symposium on Micromechatronics and Human Science, 2000: 65-69. |
Jagannath et al., “Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005; 61(3): 449-453. |
Kalloo et al., “Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2004; 60(1): 114-117. |
Kang et al., “Robotic Assistants Aid Surgeons During Minimally Invasive Procedures,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Jan.-Feb. 2001; pp. 94-104. |
Kantsevoy et al., “Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005; 62(2): 287-292. |
Kantsevoy et al., “Transgastric endoscopic splenectomy,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2006; 20: 522-525. |
Kazemier et al. (1998), “Vascular Injuries During Laparoscopy,” J. Am. Coli. Surg. 186(5): 604-5. |
Kim, “Early Experience with Telemanipulative Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using da Vinci,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 2002; 12(1):33-40. |
Ko et al., “Per-Oral transgastric abdominal surgery,” Chinese Journal of Digestive Diseases, 2006; 7: 67-70. |
Lafullarde et al., “Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication: Five-year Results and Beyond,” Arch/Surg, Feb. 2001; 136: 180-184. |
Leggett et al. (2002), “Aortic injury during laparoscopic fundoplication,” Surg. Endoscopy 16(2): 362. |
Li et al. (2000), “Microvascular Anastomoses Performed in Rats Using a Microsurgical Telemanipulator,” Comp. Aid. Surg. 5: 326-332. |
Liem et al., “Comparison of Conventional Anterior Surgery and Laparoscopic Surgery for Inguinal-hernia Repair,” New England Journal of Medicine, 1997; 336 (22): 1541-1547. |
MacFarlane et al., “Force-Feedback Grasper Helps Restore the Sense of Touch in Minimally Invasive Surgery,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 1999; 3: 278-285. |
Mack et al., “Present Role of Thoracoscopy in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Diseases of the Chest,” Ann Thorac Surgery, 1992; 54: 403-409. |
Mack, “Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery,” JAMA, Feb. 2001; 285(5): 568-572. |
Mei et al., “Wireless Drive and Control of a Swimming Microrobot,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, May 2002: 1131-1136. |
Melvin et al., “Computer-Enhanced vs. Standard Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery,” J Gastrointest Surg 2002; 6: 11-16. |
Menciassi et al., “Locomotion of a Leffed Capsule in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Theoretical Study and Preliminary Technological Results,” IEEE Int. Conf. on Engineering in Medicine and Biology, San Francisco, CA, pp. 2767-2770, Sep. 2004. |
Menciassi et al., “Robotic Solutions and Mechanisms for a Semi-Autonomous Endoscope,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE/RSJ Intl. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Oct. 2002; 1379-1384. |
Menciassi et al., “Shape memory alloy clamping devices of a capsule for monitoring tasks in the gastrointestinal tract,” J. Micromech. Microeng, 2005, 15: 2045-2055. |
Meron, “The development of the swallowable video capsule (M2A),” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2000; 52 6: 817-819. |
Micron, http://www.micron.com, 2006, 1/4-inch VGA NTSC/PAL CMOS Digital Image Sensor, 98 pp. |
Midday Jeff et al., “Material Handling System for Robotic natural Orifice Surgery”, Proceedings of the 2011 Design of medical Devices Conference, Apr. 12-14, 2011, Minneapolis, MN, 4 pages. |
Miller, Ph.D., et al., “In-Vivo Stereoscopic Imaging System with 5 Degrees-of-Freedom for Minimal Access Surgery,” Dept. of Computer Science and Dept. of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, 2004, 7 pp. |
Munro (2002), “Laparoscopic access: complications, technologies, and techniques,” Curro Opin. Obstet. Gynecol., 14(4): 365-74. |
Nio et al., “Efficiency of manual vs robotical (Zeus) assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of standardized tasks,” Surg Endosc, 2002; 16: 412-415. |
Oleynikov et al., “In Vivo Camera Robots Provide Improved Vision for Laparoscopic Surgery,” Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (CARS), Chicago, IL, Jun. 23-26, 2004b. |
Oleynikov et al., “In Vivo Robotic Laparoscopy,” Surgical Innovation, Jun. 2005, 12(2): 177-181. |
Oleynikov et al., “Miniature Robots Can Assist in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy,” Journal of Surgical Endoscopy, 19-4: 473-476, 2005. |
O'Neill, “Surgeon takes new route to gallbladder,” The Oregonian, Jun. 2007, 2 pp. |
Orlando et al., (2003), “Needle and Trocar Injuries in Diagnostic Laparoscopy under Local Anesthesia: What Is the True Incidence of These Complications?” Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques 13 (3):181-184. |
Palm, William, “Rapid Prototyping Primer” May 1998 (revised Jul. 30, 2002) (http://www.me.psu.edu/lamancusa/rapidpro/primer/chapter2.htm). |
Park et al., “Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis (videos),” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005; 61 (4): 601-606. |
Park et al., “Trocar-less Instrumentation for Laparoscopy: Magnetic Positioning of Intra-abdominal Camera and Retractor,” Ann Surg, Mar. 2007; 245(3): 379-384. |
Patronik et al., “Crawling on the Heart: A Mobile Robotic Device for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Interventions,” MICCAI, 2004, pp. 9-16. |
Patronik et al., “Development of a Tethered Epicardial Crawler for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Therapies,” IEEE, 2004, pp. 239-240. |
Patronik et al., “Preliminary evaluation of a mobile robotic device for navigation and intervention on the beating heart,” Computer Aided Surgery, 10(4): 225-232, Jul. 2005. |
Peirs et al., “A miniature manipulator for integration in a self-propelling endoscope,” Sensors and Actuators A, 2001, 92: 343-349. |
Peters, “Minimally Invasive Colectomy: Are the Potential Benefits Realized?” Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 751-756. |
Phee et al., “Analysis and Development of Locomotion Devices for the Gastrointestinal Tract,” IEEE Transaction on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 49, No. 6, Jun. 2002, pp. 613-616. |
Phee et al., “Development of Microrobotic Devices for Locomotion in the Human Gastrointestinal Tract,” International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Robotics and Autonomous Systems (CIRAS 2001), Nov. 28-30, (2001), Singapore. |
Platt et al., “In Vivo Robotic Cameras can Enhance Imaging Capability During Laparoscopic Surgery,” in the Proceedings of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Scientific Conference, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, Apr. 13-16, 2005, 1 Pg. |
Rentschler et al., “An In Vivo Mobile Robot for Surgical Vision and Task Assistance,” Journal of Medical Devices, Mar. 2007, vol. 1: 23-29. |
Rentschler et al., “In vivo Mobile Surgical Robotic Task Assistance,” 1 pg. |
Rentschler et al., “In vivo Robotics during the NEEMO 9 Mission,” Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, Feb. 17, 2007, 1 pg. |
Rentschler et al., “Mechanical Design of Robotic In Vivo Wheeled Mobility,” ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 2006a, pp. 1-11. |
Rentschler et al., “Miniature in vivo Robots for Remote and Harsh Environments,” IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, Jan. 2008; 12(1): 66-75. |
Rentschler et al., “Mobile In Vivo Biopsy and Camera Robot,” Studies in Health and Infonnatics Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, vol. 119, pp. 449-454, IOS Press, Long Beach, CA, 2006e. |
Rentschler et al., “Mobile In Vivo Camera Robots Provide Sole Visual Feedback for Abdominal Exploration and Cholecystectomy,” Journal of Surgical Endoscopy, 20-1: 135-138, 2006b. |
Rentschler et al., “Mobile In Vivo Robots Can Assist in Abdominal Exploration,” from the Proceedings of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Scientific Conference, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, Apr. 13-16, 2005b. |
Rentschler et al., “Modeling, Analysis, and Experimental Study of In Vivo Wheeled Robotic Mobility,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 22 (2): 308-321, 2005c. |
Rentschler et al., “Natural Orifice Surgery with an Endoluminal Mobile Robot,” The Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons, Dallas, TX, Apr. 2006d, 14 pp. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20240033037 A1 | Feb 2024 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62425149 | Nov 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17838883 | Jun 2022 | US |
Child | 18482959 | US | |
Parent | 15821169 | Nov 2017 | US |
Child | 17838883 | US |