Gross positioning device and related systems and methods

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12109079
  • Patent Number
    12,109,079
  • Date Filed
    Monday, October 9, 2023
    a year ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 8, 2024
    a month ago
Abstract
Disclosed herein are gross positioning systems for use with robotic surgical devices to provide gross positioning of the robotic surgical devices. The gross positioning systems have a base, a first arm link operably coupled to the base, a second arm link operably coupled to the first arm link, a third arm link operably coupled to the second arm link, and a slidable coupling component slidably coupled to the third arm link.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The various embodiments herein relate to robotic surgical devices, and more specifically to gross positioning systems and devices that aid in the gross repositioning of surgical devices during surgical procedures. The combination of a gross positioning system with an in vivo surgical device results in an increase in the degrees of freedom of the in vivo device without increasing the size of the device.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The known positioning systems currently used for robotic surgery are large and cumbersome. For example, the Da Vinci SP Surgical System™ takes up a significant portion of the operating room and creates a crowded space over the surgical site, and the system created by Waseda University has bulky motor housings that create a larger than necessary profile. In a further example, the Raven™ mimics current laparoscopic techniques by inserting a single tool (in contrast to the in vivo robot systems used in the other two systems discussed above).



FIGS. 1A and 1B depict a known, generic spherical mechanism 10 and the necessary workspace 16 of the mechanism to reach the extents of the abdominal cavity of a patient. A “spherical mechanism” is a physical mechanism or software application that can cause all end effector motions to pass through a single point, thereby allowing a surgical system to use long rigid tools that perform procedures through incisions that serve as single pivot points. As an example, both COBRASurge and the Raven have mechanical spherical mechanisms, while Da Vinci has a software-based spherical mechanism.


This known mechanism as shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B has a cable-driven tool coupled to it. The link angles 12, 14 in the device 10 have been optimized at the University of Washington's BioRobotics lab to create the workspace 16 depicted in FIG. 1B. The workspace 16 is an elliptical cone 90° in the lateral directions and 60° in the cranial/caudal direction with a remote center 18 that is disposed at the bottom of the cone 16. The link angles 12, 14 can be changed for different workspaces. There is a need in the art for an improved gross positioning system.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Discussed herein are various gross positioning systems for use with in vivo robotic surgical devices.


In Example 1, a gross positioning system for use with a robotic surgical device comprises a base, a first arm link operably coupled to the base at a first rotational joint, a second arm link operably coupled to the first arm link at a second rotational joint, a third arm link operably coupled to the second arm link, and a slidable coupling component slidably coupled to the third arm link such that the slidable coupling component can move along a length of the third arm link between an extended position and a retracted position. The third arm link is rotatable about a third rotational joint and is configured to be positionable through an incision in a patient. The slidable coupling component is configured to be coupleable to the robotic surgical device.


Example 2 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 1, wherein an axis of rotation of the first rotational joint, an axis of rotation of the second rotational joint, and an axis of rotation of the third rotational joint intersect at a single point of intersection.


Example 3 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 2, wherein wherein the single point of intersection is a spherical joint.


Example 4 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 2, wherein the single point of intersection is disposed at some point along a portion of the robotic surgical device.


Example 5 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 2, wherein the gross positioning system is positioned such that the single point of intersection is disposed at an incision in a patient.


Example 6 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 5, wherein the third arm link is disposed through the single point of insertion.


Example 7 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 2, wherein the single point of intersection is disposed at an insertion point of a patient.


Example 8 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 7, wherein the insertion point comprises an incision or a natural orifice.


Example 9 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 7, wherein the third arm link is disposed through the single point of intersection.


Example 10 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 1, wherein the robotic surgical device comprises at least one arm, wherein the gross positioning system and robotic surgical device are configured to operate together to position the robotic surgical device within a body cavity of a patient.


Example 11 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 10, further comprising a controller operably coupled to the gross positioning system and the robotic surgical device.


In Example 12, a gross positioning system for use with a robotic surgical device comprises a base, a first arm link operably coupled to the base at a first rotational joint, a second arm link operably coupled to the first arm link at a second rotational joint, a third arm link operably coupled to the second arm link at a third rotational joint, a slidable coupling component slidably coupled to the third arm link such that the slidable coupling component can move along a length of the third arm link between an extended position and a retracted position, and the robotic surgical device operably coupled to the slidable coupling component. The robotic surgical device comprises a device body, a first arm operably coupled to the device body, and a second arm operably coupled to the device body. The first arm comprises at least one first actuator and the second arm comprises at least one second actuator.


Example 13 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 12, wherein an axis of rotation of the first rotational joint, an axis of rotation of the second rotational joint, and an axis of rotation of the third rotational joint intersect at a single point of intersection.


Example 14 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 12, wherein the third arm link is disposed through the single point of intersection and further is configured to be positionable through an insertion point in a patient.


In Example 15, a external gross positioning system for use with an internal robotic surgical device comprises a base, a first arm link operably coupled to the base at a first rotational joint, a second arm link operably coupled to the first arm link at a second rotational joint, a third arm link operably coupled to the second arm link at a third rotational joint, a slidable coupling component slidably coupled to the third arm link such that the slidable coupling component is moveable along a length of the third arm link between an extended position and a retracted position, and a single point of intersection at an intersection of an axis of rotation of the first rotational joint, an axis of rotation of the second rotational joint, and an axis of rotation of the third rotational joint. The slidable coupling component is configured to be coupleable to the robotic surgical device. The single point of intersection is disposed at an insertion point of a patient.


Example 16 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 15, wherein a portion of the third arm link is disposed through the single point of intersection.


Example 17 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 15, wherein a portion of the robotic surgical device is disposed through the single point of intersection.


Example 18 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 15, wherein the insertion point is an incision.


Example 19 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 15, wherein the robotic surgical device comprises at least one arm, wherein the gross positioning system and robotic surgical device are configured to operate together to position the robotic surgical device within a body cavity of the patient.


Example 20 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 19, further comprising a central processing unit operably coupled to the gross positioning system and the robotic surgical device and a controller operably coupled to the central processing unit. The central processing unit comprises software configured to transmit control instructions to the gross positioning system and the robotic surgical device.


In Example 21, a gross positioning system for use with a robotic surgical device comprises a base, a first arm link operably coupled to the base at a first rotational joint, a second arm link operably coupled to the first arm link at a second rotational joint, a third arm link operably coupled to the second arm link at a third rotational joint, a slidable coupling component slidably coupled to the third arm link, and the robotic surgical device operably coupled to the slidable coupling component. Further, the robotic surgical device comprises a device body, a first arm operably coupled to the device body, the first arm comprising at least one first actuator, and a second arm operably coupled to the device body, the second arm comprising at least one second actuator. In addition, the third arm link is positionable through an insertion point in a patient such that the robotic surgical device is positionable within a body cavity of the patient.


Example 22 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 21, wherein the slidable coupling component is slidable along a length of the third arm link between an extended position and a retracted position.


Example 23 relates to the gross positioning system according to Example 21, wherein an axis of rotation of the first rotational joint, an axis of rotation of the second rotational joint, and an axis of rotation of the third rotational joint intersect at a single point of intersection and the third arm link is disposed through the single point of intersection.


While multiple embodiments are disclosed, still other embodiments of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, which shows and describes illustrative embodiments of the invention. As will be realized, the invention is capable of modifications in various obvious aspects, all without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the drawings and detailed description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not restrictive.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1A is a perspective view of a known spherical mechanism.



FIG. 1B is a perspective view of the workspace of the known spherical mechanism of FIG. 1A.



FIG. 2A is a perspective view of a gross positioning device coupled to an in vivo robotic device that is disposed within a cavity of a patient, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 2B is another perspective view of the gross positioning device and in vivo robotic device of FIG. 2A disposed within the cavity of the patient.



FIG. 2C is another perspective view of the gross positioning device and in vivo robotic device of FIG. 2A disposed within the cavity of the patient.



FIG. 3 is an exploded perspective view of a gross positioning device, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 4 is an expanded, exploded perspective view of the first joint of the device of FIG. 3.



FIG. 5 is an expanded, exploded perspective view of the second joint of the device of FIG. 3.



FIG. 6 is an expanded, exploded perspective view of the third joint of the device of FIG. 3.



FIG. 7 is an expanded, exploded perspective view of the coupling component of the device of FIG. 3 coupled to a robotic device.



FIG. 8 is a side view of a gross positioning device and the actual axes of rotation resulting at each joint, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 9 is a perspective view of the gross positioning device and the global axes of rotation created by the actual axes of rotation of FIG. 8.



FIG. 10 is a schematic depiction of a control process for controlling a gross positioning device, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 11 is a perspective view of a controller, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 12 is a perspective view of another controller, according to a further embodiment.



FIG. 13A depicts a perspective view of the arms of robotic device, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 13B depicts a perspective view of the arms of the robotic device of FIG. 13A.



FIG. 14A is a side view of a gross positioning device coupled to an in vivo robotic device that is disposed within a cavity of a patient, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 14B is another side view of the gross positioning device and in vivo robotic device of FIG. 14A disposed within the cavity of the patient.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The various embodiments disclosed or contemplated herein relate to an improved gross positioning device that is coupled to a dexterous in vivo robotic device such that the gross positioning device can be used for global orientation of the robotic device within the cavity of a patient as described in further detail herein.


The various gross positioning device implementations disclosed or contemplated herein can be used to automatically grossly position a surgical device inside a cavity of a patient. “Gross positioning,” as used herein, is intended to mean general positioning of an entire moveable surgical device (in contrast to precise movement and placement of the specific components of such a device, such as an arm or end effector). In known robotic surgical systems, the gross positioning of those devices during a surgical procedure can be a challenging task. Further, minimally invasive surgical procedures (using either robotic or non-robotic systems) frequently require a surgical technician to reposition the surgical equipment, such as a laparoscope. Such gross repositioning takes time and additional effort. In addition, in some cases, the surgical technician is a junior medical student who is not fully trained in laparoscopy. As a result, the repositioning instructions from the surgeon often result in an obstructed and/or fogged view of the surgical site, requiring additional cognitive resources from the surgeon. Hence, the Da Vinci® system as well as known single incision surgical devices often require timely manual repositioning of the patient, the robotic system, or both while performing complicated procedures.


The various gross positioning devices contemplated herein aid in the gross repositioning of surgical devices (including, for example, any surgical devices that have a device body or rod configured to be positioned through an incision and at least one robotic arm coupled to the device body that is positioned entirely within the cavity of the patient) throughout the procedure without additional intervention or manual repositioning from the surgical staff. The gross positioning system embodiments are capable of controlling the degrees of freedom, azimuth and elevation angle, and roll and translation about the axis of insertion of laparoscopic surgical tools, including robotic laparoscopic surgical tools. As a result, the gross positioning device embodiments disclosed and contemplated herein can grossly position a surgical device through an incision into a patient cavity, such as the abdominal cavity, with high manipulability, reducing the operative time and stress induced upon the surgical staff. The combination of the external gross positioning system with the internal surgical device system will allow the degrees of freedom of the internal system to effectively increase without increasing the size of the surgical robot/device.


In one implementation, the various devices described and contemplated herein can be used with any single site surgical device with an available external positioning fixture, such as a protruding body, rod, or magnetic handle.



FIGS. 2A-2C depict a gross positioning device 20 with an in vivo robotic device 22 coupled thereto. The three figures depict the device 20 orienting the robotic device 22 in three different positions within the cavity 24 of the patient through an incision 26. The device 20 has a base (also referred to as a “body”) 28, a first arm link (or “upper arm”) 30, a second arm link (or “forearm”) 32, and a third link (or “extender”) 34. The robotic device 22 has a body 38 with two arms 40, with each arm 40 having an actuator 46 and an end effector 42. The extender 34 has a coupling component 36 that couples directly to the body 38 of the robotic device 22 such that the body 38 is disposed through the incision 26 that provides access to the cavity 24 (or, more typically, through a port (not shown) disposed in the incision 26 that provides access to the cavity 24).


As shown, the links 30, 32, 34 of the positioning device 20 (and any other positioning device embodiment disclosed or contemplated herein) allow the robotic device 22 to access the full extent of the workspace within the cavity 24. That is, the positioning device 20 makes it possible to position the robotic device 22 within the patient's cavity 24 with the body 38 of the device 22 positioned through the incision 26 (or port disposed in the incision 26) such that the end effectors 42 attached to the arms 40 of the robotic device 22 can reach any desired location in the workspace in the cavity 24 while the links 30, 32, 34 of the positioning device 20 function to create a “spherical joint” 44 where the device body 38 passes through the incision 26 such that all movements of the robotic device 22 pass through a single point. In other words, regardless of the positioning of the three links 30, 32, 34 and the resulting positioning of the robotic device 22 within the patient's cavity 24, the portion of the device body 38 at the incision 26 (the spherical joint 44) remains in the same position (through the incision 26) as a result of the positioning device 20. This allows operation of a robotic device (such as robotic device 22) within a cavity (such as cavity 24) such that the end effectors (such as end effectors 42) can reach any desired location within the cavity while the entire device 22 is connected to the positioning device 20 via a device body 38 that passes through and never moves from a single point (the spherical joint 44) at the incision 26, thereby making it possible to operate and position the device 22 through that single incision (such as incision 26). The creation of the spherical joint 44 by the positioning device 20 will be described in further detail below. Another advantage is that the positioning device 20 makes it possible to use the single in vivo robotic device within the patient's cavity instead of the multiple arms of the known Da Vinci™ system extending from the patient's cavity and thereby taking up a great deal of workspace outside the body of the patient.



FIG. 3 depicts an exploded view of the components of the gross positioning device 20. As will be described in further detail below, the device 20 has three degrees of freedom (“DOF”) and can utilize those DOFs to provide global orientation for the robotic device 22 (as best shown in FIGS. 2A-2C) coupled to positioning device 20. As discussed above, the device 20 has the base 28, the first arm link 30, the second arm link 32, the third link 34, and the coupling component 36. In this implementation, the first arm link 30 has a cover 30A and the second arm link 32 has a cover 32A. Alternatively, each of the links 30, 32 is a single, unitary component without a cover.


As best shown in FIGS. 3 and 4, the first arm link 30 is rotatably coupled to the base 28 at a first joint 50. More specifically, the base 28 is made up of a bracket 52 that is configured to receive a first motor 54 that is rotatably coupled to the bracket 52 and a bearing 56, thereby creating the first joint 50. That is, the motor 54 is positioned in the openings 58A, 58B such that the motor 54 rotates within those openings 58A, 58B. The first link 30 is fixedly coupled to the first motor 54 such that actuation of the first motor 54 causes rotation of the motor 54 in relation to the bracket 52, thereby causing rotation of the first link 30 around the first joint 50.


In one implementation, the base 28 is configured to keep the entire device 20 stable and secure during use. As shown, the base 28 is a bracket 52 as discussed above. In alternative embodiments, the base 28 can be any structure that provides such stability, including, for example, a very heavy or weighted structure that uses the weight to enhance stability. In certain implementations, the base 28 can be stably coupled to a surgical table on which the patient is placed. For example, the base 28 can be coupled to a rail (not shown) on the table (not shown). In a further alternative, the base 28 can be coupled to any fixed object in the operating room. Alternatively, the base 28 can be coupled to or be an integral part of a cart or other mobile standalone unit.


As best shown in FIGS. 3 and 5, the first arm link 30 and the second arm link 32 are rotatably coupled to each other at a second joint 60. More specifically, the joint 60 is made up of a bracket 62 that is configured to receive a second motor 64 that is rotatably coupled to the bracket 62 and a bearing 66, thereby creating the second joint 60. That is, the motor 64 is positioned in the openings 68A, 68B such that the motor 64 rotates within those openings 68A, 68B. The first link 30 is fixedly coupled to the second motor 64 and the second link 32 is fixed coupled to the bracket 62 such that actuation of the second motor 64 causes rotation of the motor 64 in relation to the bracket 62, thereby causing rotation of the second link 32 in relation to the first link 30 around the joint 60.


As best shown in FIGS. 3 and 6, the third link 34 is rotatably coupled to the second arm link 32 at a third joint 70. More specifically, the joint 70 is made up of a third motor 72 that is fixedly coupled to the second arm link 32 and rotatably coupled to the third link 34 such that actuation of the motor 72 causes rotation of the third link 34, thereby creating the third joint 70. As best shown in FIGS. 3 and 7, the third link 34 has the coupling component 36 at the distal end of the link 34 such that a robotic device 74 can be coupled thereto. It is understood that the object 74 depicted in FIGS. 3 and 7 is intended to represent an in vivo robotic device 74. In this specific example, only the rod or body 76 of the device 74 is shown, but not the robotic arms or other components. It is understood that this particular body component 76 as shown is merely intended as a schematic depiction of the device 74, and not a fully depiction of an actual robotic device having robotic arms (such as the device 22 discussed and depicted above). Thus, actuation of the third motor 72 causes rotation of the robotic device via the rotation of the third link 34.


Alternatively, any joint configurations can be used in the various gross positioning device implementations, so long as the links 30, 32, 34 can move in relation to each other as described herein.


According to one implementation, the coupling component 36 is slidably coupled to the third link 34 such that the coupling component 36 (and thus the robotic device 74) can be positioned anywhere along the longitudinal length of the third link 34. As such, the robotic device 74 can be moved toward and away from the third joint 70 as desired to position the device 74 along the longitudinal axis of the third link 34. In accordance with certain embodiments, the coupling component 36 has a quick-release handle 78 that can be actuated to fix or unfix the position of the coupling component 36 along the length of the third link 34. That is, the handle 78 can be actuated to move the coupling component 36 into the unfixed configuration such that the component 36 can slide along the length of the link 34. Once the coupling component 36 (and thus the robotic device 74) is positioned at the desired point along the length of the link 34, the handle 78 can be moved into the fixed position, thereby fixing the coupling component 36 at that point such that the component 36 is not slidable. Thus, the coupling component 36 can move along the length of the third link 34 between an extended position and a retracted position and any position therebetween. Alternatively, the third link 34 can have any known component or device that provides for movement between an extended and retracted position.



FIG. 8 depicts the axes of rotation 90, 92, 94 created by the joints 50, 60, 70 and further depict the linear stage D created by the coupling component 36 and third link 34. That is, rotation around axis 90 as shown at arrow A is caused by rotation of the first joint 50. Further, rotation around axis 92 as shown at arrow B is caused by rotation of the second joint 60. Finally, rotation around axis 94 as shown at arrow C is caused by rotation of the third joint 70. In addition, the linear movement represented by the arrow D results from the movement of the coupling component 36 along the third link 34. In one embodiment, the linear movement of the coupling component 36 is utilized at the surgeon's discretion to position the robotic device 74 further into the cavity of the patient (not shown) or to move the robotic device closer to the joint 70. In one implementation, the movement of the coupling component 36 in relation to the third link 34 is manual (and requires actuation of the quick-release lever 78 discussed above). Alternatively, the movement of the coupling component 36 can be motorized.


In one embodiment, the rotational axis 90 at rotational joint 50 is perpendicular to both the rotational axis 92 at rotational joint 60 and the rotational axis 94 at joint 70. In other words, each axis 90, 92, 94 can be perpendicular in relation to the other two. The three axes 90, 92, 94 being perpendicular can, in some implementations, simplify the control of the system 20 by causing each axis 90, 92, 94 to contribute solely to a single degree of freedom. For example, if the third link 34 is rotated around axis 94, the tilt of the in vivo robotic device 74 does not change when all three axes 90, 92, 94 are perpendicular. Similarly, if the first link 30 is rotated around axis 90, only the tilt of the surgical device 74 from side to side is affected. Alternatively, two of the three axes 90, 92, 94 are perpendicular to each other. In a further alternative, none of the axes 90, 92, 94 are perpendicular to each other.



FIG. 9 shows how the three local axes of rotation 90, 92, 94 of FIG. 8 result in the global orientation of the in vivo robot 74. That is, FIG. 8 depicts the actual axes of rotation 90, 92, 94 relating to each of the joints 50, 60, 70, respectively. In contrast, FIG. 9 depicts the global axes of rotation 100, 102, 104 that are created by the actual axes of rotation 90, 92, 94. That is, the global axes 100, 102, 104 are the axes used to describe the actual or desired orientation of the robotic device (such as device 74, for example). Thus, the axes 90, 92, 94 create global axis 100 such that rotation around axis 100 as shown at arrow D is the “pitch” rotation of the device 74. Further, the axes 90, 92, 94 create global axis 102 such that rotation around axis 102 as shown at arrow E is the “roll” rotation of the device 74. In addition, the axes 90, 92, 94 create global axis 104 such that rotation around axis 104 as shown at arrow F is the “yaw” rotation of the device 74. As such, according to certain embodiments, a desired global orientation of the device 74 can be controlled by the axes 90, 92, 94. For example, if the pitch of the device 74 is desired to be 90 degrees, then the local axes 90, 92, 94 can be rotated as necessary to some solved value such that the robotic device 74 has a pitch of 90 degrees.


In one embodiment, as best shown in FIG. 8, the three axes 90, 92, 94 intersect at the intersection 100, also known as the “spherical joint” 100 as described above. The intersection 100 remains fixed at the same location, regardless of the positioning of the arm links 30, 32, 34, and can be used as the insertion point during surgeries. That is, the gross positioning system 20 can be positioned such that the intersection 100 is positioned at the incision in the patient through which the robotic device 74 is positioned.


In one implementation, the intersection 100 causes the system 20 to act similarly to a spherical mechanism, as described above. In the device 20 as shown in FIG. 8, the configuration of the device 20 creates the spherical joint 100 such that the extender 34 must pass through the single point of the spherical joint 100, which is typically positioned at the incision in the patient. The spherical joint 100 created by the device 20 increases the size of the effective workspace for the surgical device 74 within the cavity of the patient while maintaining the spherical joint 100 at the incision.


Alternatively, the gross positioning device 20 can have a fourth link, a fifth link, or any number of additional links, and a related additional number of rotational joints. Further, the device 20 can also have fewer than three links, and a related number of rotational joints. In sum, the gross positioning device 20 can have a single rotational joint, two rotational joints, or any number of rotational joints.


According to one embodiment, the gross positioning device 20 can be controlled using the following control process 120 as shown in FIG. 10, according to one embodiment. A controller 122 is provided that is used as an input to communicate with the software architecture 124 (informally called the “RobotApp” in this exemplary embodiment). In accordance with one implementation, the software 124 is custom software 124 that allows for the integration of the different hardware and development of “plugins,” thereby resulting in a modular platform on which it is easy to build additional features. Alternatively, the software architecture 124 limits the use of hardware to a limited set of hardware and has no modularity. In a further alternative, the software architecture 124 can be any known type of architecture.


The communication from the controller 122 is interpreted (or “conditioned) by the software 124 (block 126) and used to calculate the kinematics (block 128). These kinematic calculations are then communicated to the gross positioning device 20 via a connection 130 such that the device 20 is actuated to move as communicated from the controller 122. In this specific embodiment, the connection is a USB port 130 in the hardware (not shown) that contains the software 124. The port 130 allows for connection of the gross positioning device 20 to the software 124 and thus to the controller 122. In one implementation, the controller 122 is the hardware that contains the software 124. Alternatively, the hardware can be any processing unit, such as a computer.


According to certain embodiments, a hand controller is used to control the gross positioning device and/or the robotic device. In one implementation, the hand controller 150 is a joystick controller 150 as depicted in FIG. 11. The joystick controller 150 controls the orientation of the gross positioning device (such as device 20) A further controller embodiment 152 is depicted in FIG. 12, in which the controller 152 is the commercially available GeoMagic Touch™ controller 152. In this implementation, the controller 152 can be used to control the gross positioning device (such as device 20). In a further embodiment, the controller 152 can be used to control both the gross positioning device (such as device 20) and the robotic device (such as device 22), but the control scheme must be changed each time the user wants to switch from controlling one of the devices to the other.


In another embodiment, two GeoMagic Touch™ controllers 152 are used in combination with a control process or application that allows for control of both the gross positioning device (such as device 20) and the robotic device (such as device 22) without having to change control schemes during a procedure. Instead, as best shown in FIGS. 13A and 13B, for purposes of the control process, the midpoint 160 between the two endpoints (end effectors) 162 of the in vivo robot 166 was identified. Using polar coordinates (θ, Φ), a midpoint envelope 164 was developed such that if the midpoint 160 leaves the area of the envelope 164, then the orientation of the in vivo robotic device 166 will be moved accordingly via the gross positioning device (such as device 20). More specifically, if the midpoint 160 of the end effectors 162 reaches the extent of the envelope 164, then the gross positioning device (such as device 20) will begin moving to adjust the view of the camera lens 168 on the device 166. As such, the robotic device 166 can control the view of the camera lens 168 by reaching or “gesturing” up, down, left, or right to move the camera lens 168 to the desired view. In order to stop the movement of the gross positioning device, the end effectors 162 must be returned to the midpoint profile (that is, they must be moved such that the midpoint 160 is within the envelope 164. In this way, the gross positioning device (such as device 20) and the robotic device (such as device 22) can both be operated such that the robotic device can reach the extent of the patient's cavity without changing control schemes.


In one embodiment, the midpoint envelope 164 corresponds to the extent of the camera lens 168. Alternatively, other approaches could be used for different cameras or if the robotic device has an optimal workspace within which it must stay.


Alternatively, the control process can operate in a different fashion, as best shown in FIGS. 14A and 14B. In this particular embodiment, if the midpoint 160 exits the envelope 164, both the gross positioning device (such as device 20) and the in vivo robotic device 166 could move together to keep the end effectors 162 fixed in space but return them inside the midpoint envelope 164 as shown. More specifically, the end effectors 162 are first offset to the right of the robotic device 166, but by repositioning the gross positioning device (such as device 20) and in vivo robot 166 together, the endpoints 162 remain fixed in space, but are returned inside the midpoint envelope 164.


In use, the gross positioning device 20 and other embodiments disclosed or contemplated herein can operate in the following fashion to position the surgical device (such as device 22, device 74, or device 166) within the surgical space in the cavity of the patient through the incision. The three links 30, 32, 34 rotate about the respective axes 90, 92, 94 to position the device 22, 74, 166 as desired. More specifically, the third link 34 can be rotated around axis 94 to rotate the surgical device 22, 74, 166 about the axis 94. Further, the arm links 30, 32 in combination with the extender 34 can be used to articulate the device 20 through two separate angular planes. That is, the two axes 90, 92 can affect the angular position of the extender 34. In addition, the coupling component 36 can be extended or retracted to allow for the surgical device 22, 74, 166 to be advanced into and out of the cavity of the patient.


In one implementation, the positioning system 20 and the surgical device 22, 74, 166 can be used in combination, such that the surgical device 22, 74, 166 is treated as an extension of the positioning system 20 wherein both are used together to move and operate the surgical device 22, 74, 166. For example, the surgeon may want to move the surgical device 22, 74, 166 a total of one inch to the right and thus actuates an external controller to cause this move. The controller (such as any controller embodiment discussed above) transmits the appropriate signals to the positioning system 20 and the surgical device 22, 74, 166 such that the system 20 and device 22, 74, 166 work in combination to move the surgical device 22, 74, 166 one inch to the right. In one example, the system 20 could move 0.5 inches and the device 22, 74, 166 could move 0.5 inches, thereby resulting in the device 22, 74, 166 moving the full one inch as desired. According to one embodiment, the positioning system 20 can thus be used to maximize the strength, workspace, and maneuverability of the combination of the system 20 and the device 22, 74, 166 by determining the optimal contribution of each component during use.


Alternatively, the positioning system 20 and the device 22, 74, 166 operate separately. That is, the system 20 is not operable or does not operate while the device 22, 74, 166 is being used, and the device 22, 74, 166 is not operable or does not operate while the system 20 is being used. For example, if the device 22, 74, 166 is being used and it is determined that a target object in the surgical space is outside the reach of the device 22, 74, 166, the device 22, 74, 166 is “shut down,” otherwise rendered inoperable, or simply placed in a “pause mode,” and the system 20 is used to reposition the device 22, 74, 166 accordingly.


It is understood that the device 20 can be operably coupled to a processor or computer (not shown) such that the processor can be used to control the positioning system 20, including movement of the arm links 30, 32, 34 to grossly position the surgical device 22, 74, 166.


In a further alternative implementation, the positioning system 20 can also be configured to incorporate or integrate equipment or devices that couple to the surgical device 22, 74, 166 to provide various functionalities to the device 22, 74, 166. For example, in one embodiment, the system 20 can contain suction and irrigation equipment that couples to corresponding equipment in the surgical device 22, 74, 166 such that the surgical device 22, 74, 166 includes suction and irrigation components. In another example according to a further implementation, the positioning device 20 can contain any known equipment that is configured to couple to corresponding equipment in the surgical device 22, 74, 166.


Alternative embodiments contemplated herein also include systems that can be used with surgical devices that are magnetically controlled (in contrast to the surgical devices described above, which are controlled via a body or positioning rod inserted through the surgical incision). In those implementations, the positioning system positions the surgical device anywhere along an internal surface inside the patient's cavity by positioning an external magnetic component (such as a magnetic handle or other type of external magnetic component) along the outer skin of the patient. This positioning of the device can include any combination of movement in two dimensions along the surface of the patient's skin as well as rotation of the external magnetic component about an axis perpendicular to the surface of the skin. Of course, it is understood that while the movement of the magnetic component along the skin of the patient is considered to be two dimensional, the patient's skin is curved such that movement of the external component along the skin demonstrates absolute manipulation in all six degrees of freedom.


Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, persons skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A robotic surgical system for performing surgery on a patient, the system comprising: (a) a gross positioning device comprising: (i) a base;(ii) a first arm link operably coupled to the base at a first rotational joint;(iii) a second arm link operably coupled to the first arm link at a second rotational joint;(iv) a third arm link operably coupled to the second arm link, wherein the third arm link is rotatable about a third rotational joint; and(v) a coupling mechanism coupled to the third arm link such that the coupling mechanism is moveable along a length of the third arm link between an extended position and a retracted position;(b) a robotic surgical device removably coupled to the coupling mechanism, the robotic surgical device comprising: (i) a device body;(ii) a first arm operably coupled to the device body; and(iii) a second arm operably coupled to the device body;(c) a controller operably coupled to the gross positioning device and the robotic surgical device, the controller comprising at least one hand controller; and(d) a processor operably coupled to the controller, the processor is configured to generate control instructions for the gross positioning device and the robotic surgical device such that the gross positioning device and the robotic surgical device operate together to position the robotic surgical device and the first and second arms within a body cavity of the patient.
  • 2. The robotic surgical system of claim 1, wherein at least two of an axis of rotation of the first rotational joint, an axis of rotation of the second rotational joint, and an axis of rotation of the third rotational joint substantially intersect at a single point of intersection.
  • 3. The robotic surgical system of claim 2, wherein the single point of intersection is disposed at an insertion point of the patient.
  • 4. The robotic surgical system of claim 2, wherein the third arm link or the device body is disposed through the single point of intersection.
  • 5. The robotic surgical system of claim 1, wherein the processor is configured to generate the control instructions for the gross positioning device and the robotic surgical device such that the gross positioning device and the robotic surgical device operate together simultaneously to position the robotic surgical device and the first and second arms within the body cavity of the patient.
  • 6. The robotic surgical system of claim 1, wherein the processor is configured to generate the control instructions for the gross positioning device and the robotic surgical device such that a first of the gross positioning device and the robotic surgical device operates to position the robotic surgical device and the first and second arms within the body cavity of the patient while a second of the gross positioning device and the robotic surgical device is inoperable.
  • 7. The robotic surgical system of claim 1, wherein the at least one hand controller is operably coupled to the processor such that manipulation of the at least one hand controller causes the processor to generate the control instructions.
  • 8. The robotic surgical system of claim 1, wherein the processor is configured to identify a midpoint between endpoints of the first and second arms and, when the midpoint is positioned outside a predetermined area, to generate the control instructions such that at least one of the gross positioning device and the robotic surgical device operates to move the midpoint back within the predetermined area.
  • 9. A robotic surgical system for performing surgery on a patient, the system comprising: (a) a gross positioning device comprising: (i) a base;(ii) a first arm link operably coupled to the base at a first rotational joint;(iii) a second arm link operably coupled to the first arm link at a second rotational joint;(iv) a third arm link operably coupled to the second arm link, wherein the third arm link is rotatable about a third rotational joint; and(v) a coupling mechanism coupled to the third arm link such that the coupling mechanism is moveable along a length of the third arm link between an extended position and a retracted position,wherein at least two of an axis of rotation of the first rotational joint, an axis of rotation of the second rotational joint, and an axis of rotation of the third rotational joint substantially intersect at a single point of intersection;(b) a robotic surgical device removably coupled to the coupling mechanism, the robotic surgical device comprising: (i) a device body;(ii) a first arm operably coupled to the device body, the first arm comprising a first actuator; and(iii) a second arm operably coupled to the device body, the second arm comprising a second actuator;(c) a controller operably coupled to the gross positioning device and the robotic surgical device, the controller comprising first and second hand controllers; and(d) a processor operably coupled to the controller, the processor is configured to generate control instructions for the gross positioning device and the robotic surgical device such that the gross positioning device and the robotic surgical device operate together to position the robotic surgical device and the first and second arms within a body cavity of the patient.
  • 10. The robotic surgical system of claim 9, wherein the single point of intersection is disposed at an insertion point of the patient.
  • 11. The robotic surgical system of claim 9, wherein the third arm link or the device body is disposed through the single point of intersection.
  • 12. The robotic surgical system of claim 9, wherein the processor is configured to generate the control instructions for the gross positioning device and the robotic surgical device such that the gross positioning device and the robotic surgical device operate together simultaneously to position the robotic surgical device and the first and second arms within the body cavity of the patient.
  • 13. The robotic surgical system of claim 9, wherein the processor is configured to generate the control instructions for the gross positioning device and the robotic surgical device such that a first of the gross positioning device and the robotic surgical device operates to position the robotic surgical device and the first and second arms within the body cavity of the patient while a second of the gross positioning device and the robotic surgical device is inoperable.
  • 14. The robotic surgical system of claim 9, wherein the first and second hand controllers are operably coupled to the processor such that manipulation of the first and second hand controllers causes the processor to generate the control instructions.
  • 15. The robotic surgical system of claim 9, wherein the processor is configured to generate control instructions for the first and second actuators.
  • 16. The robotic surgical system of claim 9, wherein the processor is configured to identify a midpoint between endpoints of the first and second arms and, when the midpoint is positioned outside a predetermined area, to generate the control instructions such that at least one of the gross positioning device and the robotic surgical device operates to move the midpoint back within the predetermined area.
  • 17. A robotic surgical system for performing surgery on a patient, the system comprising: (a) a gross positioning device comprising: (i) a base;(ii) a first arm link operably coupled to the base at a first rotational joint, wherein the first rotational joint comprises a first motor;(iii) a second arm link operably coupled to the first arm link at a second rotational joint, wherein the first rotational joint comprises a second motor;(iv) a third arm link operably coupled to the second arm link, wherein the third arm link is rotatable about a third rotational joint, wherein the first rotational joint comprises a third motor; and(v) a coupling mechanism coupled to the third arm link such that the coupling mechanism is moveable along a length of the third arm link between an extended position and a retracted position;(b) a robotic surgical device removably coupled to the coupling mechanism, the robotic surgical device comprising: (i) a device body;(ii) a first arm operably coupled to the device body, the first arm comprising a first actuator and a first end effector; and(iii) a second arm operably coupled to the device body, the second arm comprising a second actuator and a second end effector;(c) a controller operably coupled to the gross positioning device and the robotic surgical device, the controller comprising first and second hand controllers; and(d) a processor operably coupled to the controller, the processor is configured to generate control instructions for the gross positioning device and the robotic surgical device such that the gross positioning device and the robotic surgical device operate together to position the robotic surgical device and the first and second arms within a body cavity of the patient.
  • 18. The robotic surgical system of claim 17, wherein the processor is configured to generate the control instructions for at least the first, second, and third motors and the first and second actuators such that the gross positioning device and the robotic surgical device operate together simultaneously to position the robotic surgical device and the first and second arms within the body cavity of the patient.
  • 19. The robotic surgical system of claim 17, wherein the processor is configured to generate the control instructions for the gross positioning device and the robotic surgical device such that a first of the gross positioning device and the robotic surgical device operates to position the robotic surgical device and the first and second arms within the body cavity of the patient while a second of the gross positioning device and the robotic surgical device is inoperable.
  • 20. The robotic surgical system of claim 17, wherein the processor is configured to identify a midpoint between the first and second end effectors and, when the midpoint is positioned outside a predetermined area, to generate the control instructions such that at least one of the gross positioning device and the robotic surgical device operates to move the midpoint back within the predetermined area.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION(S)

This application claims priority as a continuation application to U.S. application Ser. No. 17/838,883, filed Jun. 13, 2022 and entitled “Gross Positioning Device and Related Systems and Methods,” which claims priority as a continuation application to U.S. application Ser. No. 15/821,169, filed on Nov. 22, 2017 and entitled “Gross Positioning Device And Related Systems And Methods,” which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 11,357,595 on Jun. 14, 2022, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application 62/425,149, filed Nov. 22, 2016 and entitled “Gross Positioning Device and Related Systems and Methods,” which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

GOVERNMENT SUPPORT

This invention was made with government support under Grant No. W81XWH-14-1-0058, awarded by the U.S. Department of Defense. The government has certain rights in the invention.

US Referenced Citations (571)
Number Name Date Kind
3870264 Robinson Mar 1975 A
3989952 Hohmann Nov 1976 A
4246661 Pinson Jan 1981 A
4258716 Sutherland Mar 1981 A
4278077 Mizumoto Jul 1981 A
4538594 Boebel et al. Sep 1985 A
4568311 Miyake Feb 1986 A
4623183 Aomori Nov 1986 A
4736645 Zimmer Apr 1988 A
4771652 Zimmer Sep 1988 A
4852391 Ruch et al. Aug 1989 A
4896015 Taboada et al. Jan 1990 A
4897014 Tietze Jan 1990 A
4922755 Oshiro et al. May 1990 A
4922782 Kawai May 1990 A
4990050 Tsuge et al. Feb 1991 A
5007550 Avot Apr 1991 A
5019968 Wang et al. May 1991 A
5030365 Christensen et al. Jul 1991 A
5063095 Kitagawa et al. Nov 1991 A
5066090 Mayerhofer et al. Nov 1991 A
5108140 Bartholet Apr 1992 A
5139563 Astles et al. Aug 1992 A
5172639 Wiesman et al. Dec 1992 A
5176649 Wakabayashi Jan 1993 A
5178032 Zona et al. Jan 1993 A
5187796 Wang et al. Feb 1993 A
5195388 Zona et al. Mar 1993 A
5201325 Mcewen et al. Apr 1993 A
5217003 Wilk Jun 1993 A
5263382 Brooks et al. Nov 1993 A
5271384 Mcewen et al. Dec 1993 A
5284096 Pelrine et al. Feb 1994 A
5297443 Wentz Mar 1994 A
5297536 Wilk Mar 1994 A
5304899 Sasaki et al. Apr 1994 A
5307447 Asano et al. Apr 1994 A
5353807 Demarco Oct 1994 A
5363935 Schempf et al. Nov 1994 A
5382885 Salcudean et al. Jan 1995 A
5388528 Pelrine et al. Feb 1995 A
5436542 Petelin et al. Jul 1995 A
5441494 Ortiz Aug 1995 A
5450104 Kisa et al. Sep 1995 A
5451027 Mchenry Sep 1995 A
5454758 Tophinke et al. Oct 1995 A
5458131 Wilk Oct 1995 A
5458583 Mcneely et al. Oct 1995 A
5458598 Feinberg et al. Oct 1995 A
5459926 Perea Oct 1995 A
5463361 Allen Oct 1995 A
5468203 Okonkwo Nov 1995 A
5468265 Adams Nov 1995 A
5470236 Wissler Nov 1995 A
5471515 Fossum et al. Nov 1995 A
5491691 Shtayer et al. Feb 1996 A
5491701 Zook Feb 1996 A
5497651 Matter et al. Mar 1996 A
5515478 Wang May 1996 A
5524180 Wang et al. Jun 1996 A
5553198 Wang et al. Sep 1996 A
5562448 Mushabac Oct 1996 A
5588442 Scovil et al. Dec 1996 A
5620417 Jang et al. Apr 1997 A
5623582 Rosenberg Apr 1997 A
5624380 Kaneko et al. Apr 1997 A
5624398 Smith et al. Apr 1997 A
5632761 Smith et al. May 1997 A
5645520 Nakamura et al. Jul 1997 A
5657429 Wang et al. Aug 1997 A
5657584 Hamlin Aug 1997 A
5672168 De La Torre et al. Sep 1997 A
5674030 Sigel Oct 1997 A
5728599 Rostoker et al. Mar 1998 A
5736821 Suyama Apr 1998 A
5754741 Wang et al. May 1998 A
5762458 Wang et al. Jun 1998 A
5769640 Jacobus et al. Jun 1998 A
5791231 Cohn et al. Aug 1998 A
5792135 Madhani et al. Aug 1998 A
5792663 Fry et al. Aug 1998 A
5797538 Heaton et al. Aug 1998 A
5797900 Madhani et al. Aug 1998 A
5807377 Madhani et al. Sep 1998 A
5808665 Green Sep 1998 A
5815640 Wang et al. Sep 1998 A
5825982 Wright et al. Oct 1998 A
5841950 Wang et al. Nov 1998 A
5845646 Lemelson Dec 1998 A
5855583 Wang et al. Jan 1999 A
5876325 Mizuno et al. Mar 1999 A
5878193 Wang et al. Mar 1999 A
5878783 Smart Mar 1999 A
5895417 Pomeranz et al. Apr 1999 A
5906591 Dario et al. May 1999 A
5907664 Wang et al. May 1999 A
5910129 Koblish et al. Jun 1999 A
5911036 Wright et al. Jun 1999 A
5971976 Wang et al. Oct 1999 A
5993467 Yoon Nov 1999 A
6001108 Wang et al. Dec 1999 A
6007550 Wang et al. Dec 1999 A
6030365 Laufer Feb 2000 A
6031371 Smart Feb 2000 A
6058323 Lemelson May 2000 A
6063095 Wang et al. May 2000 A
6066090 Yoon May 2000 A
6086529 Arndt Jul 2000 A
6102850 Wang et al. Aug 2000 A
6107795 Smart Aug 2000 A
6132368 Cooper Oct 2000 A
6132441 Grace Oct 2000 A
6139563 Cosgrove, III et al. Oct 2000 A
6156006 Brosens et al. Dec 2000 A
6159146 El Gazayerli Dec 2000 A
6162171 Ng et al. Dec 2000 A
D438617 Cooper et al. Mar 2001 S
6206903 Ramans Mar 2001 B1
D441076 Cooper et al. Apr 2001 S
6223100 Green Apr 2001 B1
D441862 Cooper et al. May 2001 S
6238415 Sepetka et al. May 2001 B1
6240312 Alfano et al. May 2001 B1
6241730 Alby Jun 2001 B1
6244809 Wang et al. Jun 2001 B1
6246200 Blumenkranz et al. Jun 2001 B1
D444555 Cooper et al. Jul 2001 S
6286514 Lemelson Sep 2001 B1
6292678 Hall et al. Sep 2001 B1
6293282 Lemelson Sep 2001 B1
6296635 Smith et al. Oct 2001 B1
6307447 Barber et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309397 Julian et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309403 Minor et al. Oct 2001 B1
6312435 Wallace et al. Nov 2001 B1
6321106 Lemelson Nov 2001 B1
6327492 Lemelson Dec 2001 B1
6331181 Tierney et al. Dec 2001 B1
6346072 Cooper Feb 2002 B1
6352503 Matsui et al. Mar 2002 B1
6364888 Niemeyer et al. Apr 2002 B1
6371952 Madhani et al. Apr 2002 B1
6382885 Isaksson May 2002 B2
6388528 Buer et al. May 2002 B1
6394998 Wallace et al. May 2002 B1
6398726 Ramans et al. Jun 2002 B1
6400980 Lemelson Jun 2002 B1
6408224 Okamoto et al. Jun 2002 B1
6424885 Niemeyer et al. Jul 2002 B1
6432112 Brock et al. Aug 2002 B2
6436107 Wang et al. Aug 2002 B1
6441577 Blumenkranz et al. Aug 2002 B2
6450104 Grant et al. Sep 2002 B1
6451027 Cooper et al. Sep 2002 B1
6454758 Thompson et al. Sep 2002 B1
6458131 Ray Oct 2002 B1
6458583 Bruhn et al. Oct 2002 B1
6459926 Nowlin et al. Oct 2002 B1
6463361 Wang et al. Oct 2002 B1
6468203 Belson Oct 2002 B2
6468265 Evans et al. Oct 2002 B1
6470236 Ohtsuki Oct 2002 B2
6491691 Morley et al. Dec 2002 B1
6491701 Tierney et al. Dec 2002 B2
6493608 Niemeyer Dec 2002 B1
6496099 Wang et al. Dec 2002 B2
6497651 Kan et al. Dec 2002 B1
6508413 Bauer et al. Jan 2003 B2
6512345 Borenstein et al. Jan 2003 B2
6515478 Wicklow et al. Feb 2003 B1
6522906 Salisbury et al. Feb 2003 B1
6544276 Azizi Apr 2003 B1
6548982 Papanikolopoulos et al. Apr 2003 B1
6554790 Moll Apr 2003 B1
6562448 Chamberlain et al. May 2003 B1
6565554 Niemeyer May 2003 B1
6574355 Green Jun 2003 B2
6587750 Gerbi et al. Jul 2003 B2
6588442 Babin Jul 2003 B2
6591239 Mccall et al. Jul 2003 B1
6594552 Nowlin et al. Jul 2003 B1
6610007 Belson et al. Aug 2003 B2
6620173 Gerbi et al. Sep 2003 B2
6624398 Sherrill et al. Sep 2003 B2
6632761 Ushita et al. Oct 2003 B1
6642836 Wang et al. Nov 2003 B1
6645196 Nixon et al. Nov 2003 B1
6646541 Wang et al. Nov 2003 B1
6648814 Kim et al. Nov 2003 B2
6657584 Cavallaro et al. Dec 2003 B2
6659939 Moll et al. Dec 2003 B2
6661571 Shioda et al. Dec 2003 B1
6671581 Niemeyer et al. Dec 2003 B2
6676684 Morley et al. Jan 2004 B1
6684129 Salisbury et al. Jan 2004 B2
6685648 Flaherty et al. Feb 2004 B2
6685698 Morley et al. Feb 2004 B2
6687571 Byrne et al. Feb 2004 B1
6692485 Brock et al. Feb 2004 B1
6699177 Wang et al. Mar 2004 B1
6699235 Wallace et al. Mar 2004 B2
6702734 Kim et al. Mar 2004 B2
6702805 Stuart Mar 2004 B1
6714839 Salisbury et al. Mar 2004 B2
6714841 Wright et al. Mar 2004 B1
6719684 Kim et al. Apr 2004 B2
6720988 Gere et al. Apr 2004 B1
6726699 Wright et al. Apr 2004 B1
6728599 Wang et al. Apr 2004 B2
6730021 Vassiliades et al. May 2004 B2
6731988 Green May 2004 B1
6736821 Squires et al. May 2004 B2
6746443 Morley et al. Jun 2004 B1
6754741 Alexander et al. Jun 2004 B2
6764441 Chiel et al. Jul 2004 B2
6764445 Ramans et al. Jul 2004 B2
6766204 Niemeyer et al. Jul 2004 B2
6770081 Cooper et al. Aug 2004 B1
6774597 Borenstein Aug 2004 B1
6776165 Jin Aug 2004 B2
6780184 Tanrisever Aug 2004 B2
6783524 Anderson et al. Aug 2004 B2
6785593 Wang et al. Aug 2004 B2
6788018 Blumenkranz Sep 2004 B1
6791231 Chang Sep 2004 B2
6792135 Toyama Sep 2004 B1
6792663 Krzyzanowski Sep 2004 B2
6793653 Sanchez et al. Sep 2004 B2
6799065 Niemeyer Sep 2004 B1
6799088 Wang et al. Sep 2004 B2
6801325 Farr et al. Oct 2004 B2
6804581 Wang et al. Oct 2004 B2
6810281 Brock et al. Oct 2004 B2
6815640 Spear et al. Nov 2004 B1
6817972 Snow Nov 2004 B2
6817974 Cooper et al. Nov 2004 B2
6817975 Farr et al. Nov 2004 B1
6820653 Schempf et al. Nov 2004 B1
6824508 Kim et al. Nov 2004 B2
6824510 Kim et al. Nov 2004 B2
6832988 Sproul Dec 2004 B2
6832996 Woloszko et al. Dec 2004 B2
6836703 Wang et al. Dec 2004 B2
6837846 Jaffe et al. Jan 2005 B2
6837883 Moll et al. Jan 2005 B2
6839612 Sanchez et al. Jan 2005 B2
6840938 Morley et al. Jan 2005 B1
6845646 Goto Jan 2005 B2
6852107 Wang et al. Feb 2005 B2
6855583 Krivokapic et al. Feb 2005 B1
6858003 Evans et al. Feb 2005 B2
6860346 Burt et al. Mar 2005 B2
6860877 Sanchez et al. Mar 2005 B1
6866671 Tierney et al. Mar 2005 B2
6870343 Borenstein et al. Mar 2005 B2
6871117 Wang et al. Mar 2005 B2
6871563 Choset et al. Mar 2005 B2
6878783 Yeager et al. Apr 2005 B2
6879880 Nowlin et al. Apr 2005 B2
6892112 Wang et al. May 2005 B2
6895417 Obara et al. May 2005 B2
6899705 Niemeyer May 2005 B2
6902560 Morley et al. Jun 2005 B1
6905460 Wang et al. Jun 2005 B2
6905491 Wang et al. Jun 2005 B1
6911036 Douk et al. Jun 2005 B2
6911916 Wang et al. Jun 2005 B1
6917176 Schempf et al. Jul 2005 B2
6933695 Blumenkranz Aug 2005 B2
6936001 Snow Aug 2005 B1
6936003 Iddan Aug 2005 B2
6936042 Wallace et al. Aug 2005 B2
6943663 Wang et al. Sep 2005 B2
6949096 Davison et al. Sep 2005 B2
6951535 Ghodoussi et al. Oct 2005 B2
6965812 Wang et al. Nov 2005 B2
6974411 Belson Dec 2005 B2
6974449 Niemeyer Dec 2005 B2
6979423 Moll Dec 2005 B2
6984203 Tartaglia et al. Jan 2006 B2
6984205 Gazdzinski Jan 2006 B2
6991627 Madhani et al. Jan 2006 B2
6993413 Sunaoshi Jan 2006 B2
6994703 Wang et al. Feb 2006 B2
6994708 Manzo Feb 2006 B2
6997908 Carrillo, Jr. et al. Feb 2006 B2
7025064 Wang et al. Apr 2006 B2
7027892 Wang et al. Apr 2006 B2
7033344 Imran Apr 2006 B2
7039453 Mullick et al. May 2006 B2
7042184 Oleynikov et al. May 2006 B2
7048745 Tierney et al. May 2006 B2
7053752 Wang et al. May 2006 B2
7063682 Whayne et al. Jun 2006 B1
7066879 Fowler et al. Jun 2006 B2
7066926 Wallace et al. Jun 2006 B2
7074179 Wang et al. Jul 2006 B2
7077446 Kameda et al. Jul 2006 B2
7083571 Wang et al. Aug 2006 B2
7083615 Peterson et al. Aug 2006 B2
7087049 Nowlin et al. Aug 2006 B2
7090683 Brock et al. Aug 2006 B2
7097640 Wang et al. Aug 2006 B2
7105000 Mcbrayer Sep 2006 B2
7107090 Salisbury, Jr. et al. Sep 2006 B2
7109678 Kraus et al. Sep 2006 B2
7118582 Wang et al. Oct 2006 B1
7121781 Sanchez Oct 2006 B2
7125403 Julian et al. Oct 2006 B2
7126303 Farritor et al. Oct 2006 B2
7147650 Lee Dec 2006 B2
7155315 Niemeyer et al. Dec 2006 B2
7166113 Arambula et al. Jan 2007 B2
7169141 Brock et al. Jan 2007 B2
7182025 Ghorbel et al. Feb 2007 B2
7182089 Ries Feb 2007 B2
7199545 Oleynikov et al. Apr 2007 B2
7206626 Quaid, III Apr 2007 B2
7206627 Abovitz et al. Apr 2007 B2
7210364 Ghorbel et al. May 2007 B2
7214230 Brock et al. May 2007 B2
7217240 Snow May 2007 B2
7239940 Wang et al. Jul 2007 B2
7249951 Bevirt Jul 2007 B2
7250028 Julian et al. Jul 2007 B2
7259652 Wang et al. Aug 2007 B2
7273488 Nakamura et al. Sep 2007 B2
7311107 Harel et al. Dec 2007 B2
7339341 Oleynikov et al. Mar 2008 B2
7372229 Farritor et al. May 2008 B2
7447537 Funda et al. Nov 2008 B1
7492116 Oleynikov et al. Feb 2009 B2
7566300 Devierre et al. Jul 2009 B2
7574250 Niemeyer Aug 2009 B2
7588537 Bass Sep 2009 B2
7637905 Saadat et al. Dec 2009 B2
7645230 Mikkaichi et al. Jan 2010 B2
7655004 Long Feb 2010 B2
7670329 Flaherty et al. Mar 2010 B2
7672168 Tanaka et al. Mar 2010 B2
7678043 Gilad Mar 2010 B2
7731727 Sauer Jun 2010 B2
7762825 Burbank et al. Jul 2010 B2
7772796 Farritor et al. Aug 2010 B2
7785251 Wilk Aug 2010 B2
7785333 Miyamoto et al. Aug 2010 B2
7789825 Nobis et al. Sep 2010 B2
7794494 Sahatjian et al. Sep 2010 B2
7799088 Geitz Sep 2010 B2
7865266 Moll et al. Jan 2011 B2
7960935 Farritor et al. Jun 2011 B2
8021358 Doyle et al. Sep 2011 B2
8179073 Farritor et al. May 2012 B2
8182469 Anderson et al. May 2012 B2
8231510 Abdo Jul 2012 B2
8231610 Jo et al. Jul 2012 B2
8353897 Doyle et al. Jan 2013 B2
8604742 Farritor et al. Dec 2013 B2
9089353 Farritor et al. Jul 2015 B2
9649020 Finlay May 2017 B2
11357595 Reichenbach Jun 2022 B2
11806097 Farritor Nov 2023 B2
11813124 Reichenbach Nov 2023 B2
20010018591 Brock et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010049497 Kalloo et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020003173 Bauer et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020013601 Nobles et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020026186 Woloszko et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020038077 De La Torre et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020065507 Zadno-Azizi May 2002 A1
20020091374 Cooper Jul 2002 A1
20020103417 Gazdzinski Aug 2002 A1
20020111535 Kim et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020120254 Julian et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020128552 Nowlin et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020140392 Borenstein et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020147487 Sundquist et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020151906 Demarais et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156347 Kim et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020171385 Kim et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020173700 Kim et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020190682 Schempf et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030020810 Takizawa et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030045888 Brock et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030065250 Chiel et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030089267 Ghorbel et al. May 2003 A1
20030092964 Kim et al. May 2003 A1
20030097129 Davison et al. May 2003 A1
20030100817 Wang et al. May 2003 A1
20030114731 Cadeddu et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030135203 Wang et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030139742 Wampler et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030144656 Ocel et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030159535 Grover et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030167000 Mullick et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030172871 Scherer Sep 2003 A1
20030179308 Zamorano et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030181788 Yokoi et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030191455 Sanchez et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030229268 Uchiyama et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030229338 Irion et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030230372 Schmidt Dec 2003 A1
20040024311 Quaid, III Feb 2004 A1
20040034282 Quaid, III Feb 2004 A1
20040034283 Quaid, III Feb 2004 A1
20040034302 Abovitz et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040050394 Jin Mar 2004 A1
20040070822 Takayama et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040099175 Perrot et al. May 2004 A1
20040102772 Baxter et al. May 2004 A1
20040106916 Quaid et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040111113 Nakamura et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117032 Roth Jun 2004 A1
20040138525 Saadat et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040138552 Harel et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040140786 Borenstein Jul 2004 A1
20040153057 Davison Aug 2004 A1
20040173116 Ghorbel et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040176664 Iddan Sep 2004 A1
20040183777 Bevirt Sep 2004 A1
20040215331 Chew et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040225229 Viola Nov 2004 A1
20040254680 Sunaoshi Dec 2004 A1
20040267326 Ocel et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050014994 Fowler et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021069 Feuer et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050029978 Oleynikov et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050043583 Killmann et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050049462 Kanazawa Mar 2005 A1
20050054901 Yoshino Mar 2005 A1
20050054902 Konno Mar 2005 A1
20050064378 Toly Mar 2005 A1
20050065400 Banik et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050083460 Hattori et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050095650 Julius et al. May 2005 A1
20050096502 Khalili May 2005 A1
20050143644 Gilad et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050154376 Riviere et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050165449 Cadeddu et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050234435 Layer Oct 2005 A1
20050283137 Doyle et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288555 Binmoeller Dec 2005 A1
20050288665 Woloszko Dec 2005 A1
20060020272 Gildenberg Jan 2006 A1
20060036264 Selover et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060046226 Bergler et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060100501 Berkelman et al. May 2006 A1
20060119304 Farritor et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060149135 Paz Jul 2006 A1
20060152591 Lin Jul 2006 A1
20060155263 Lipow Jul 2006 A1
20060195015 Mullick et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060196301 Oleynikov et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060198619 Oleynikov et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060241570 Wilk Oct 2006 A1
20060241732 Denker et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060253109 Chu Nov 2006 A1
20060258954 Timberlake et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070032701 Fowler et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070043397 Ocel et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070055342 Wu et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070080658 Farritor et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070106113 Ravo May 2007 A1
20070123748 Meglan May 2007 A1
20070135803 Belson Jun 2007 A1
20070142725 Hardin et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070156019 Larkin et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070156211 Wood et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070167955 Arnault De La Menardiere et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070225633 Wood et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070225634 Wood et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070241714 Okeynikov et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070244520 Ferren et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250064 Darois et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070255273 Fernandez et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080004634 Farritor et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080015565 Davison Jan 2008 A1
20080015566 Livneh Jan 2008 A1
20080033569 Ferren et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080045803 Williams et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080058835 Farritor et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080058989 Oleynikov et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080103440 Ferren et al. May 2008 A1
20080109014 De La Pena May 2008 A1
20080111513 Farritor et al. May 2008 A1
20080119870 Williams May 2008 A1
20080132890 Woloszko et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080161804 Rioux et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080164079 Jacobsen Jul 2008 A1
20080183033 Bern et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080221591 Farritor et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080269557 Marescaux et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080269562 Marescaux et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090012532 Blackwell et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090020724 Paffrath Jan 2009 A1
20090024142 Ruiz Morales Jan 2009 A1
20090048612 Farritor et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090054909 Farritor et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090069821 Farritor et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090076536 Rentschler et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090137952 Ramamurthy et al. May 2009 A1
20090143787 De La Pena Jun 2009 A9
20090163929 Yeung et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090171373 Farritor et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090234369 Bax Sep 2009 A1
20090236400 Cole et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090240246 Deville et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090247821 Rogers Oct 2009 A1
20090248038 Blumenkranz et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090281377 Acosta et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090305210 Guru et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100010294 Conlon et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100016659 Weitzner Jan 2010 A1
20100016853 Burbank Jan 2010 A1
20100042097 Newton et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100056863 Dejima et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100069710 Yamatani et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100069940 Miller et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100081875 Fowler et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100139436 Kawashima et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100185212 Sholev Jul 2010 A1
20100198231 Scott Aug 2010 A1
20100204713 Ruiz Morales Aug 2010 A1
20100245549 Allen et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100250000 Blumenkranz et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100262162 Omori Oct 2010 A1
20100292691 Brogna Nov 2010 A1
20100318059 Farritor et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110015569 Kirschenman et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110020779 Hannaford et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110071347 Rogers et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110071544 Steger et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110077478 Freeman et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110082365 Mcgrogan et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110098529 Ostrovsky et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110152615 Schostek et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110224605 Farritor et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110230894 Simaan et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110237890 Farritor et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110238080 Ranjit et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110264078 Lipow et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110270443 Kamiya et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110276046 Heimbecher et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120029277 Sholev Feb 2012 A1
20120029727 Malik Feb 2012 A1
20120035582 Nelson et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120109150 Blackwell et al. May 2012 A1
20120116362 Kieturakis May 2012 A1
20120179168 Farritor et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120253515 Coste-Maniere et al. Oct 2012 A1
20130041360 Farritor et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130131695 Scarfogliero et al. May 2013 A1
20130345717 Markvicka et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140039515 Mondry et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140046340 Wilson et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140058205 Frederick et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140100587 Farritor et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140249546 Shvartsberg et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140276944 Farritor Sep 2014 A1
20140303434 Farritor et al. Oct 2014 A1
20150051446 Farritor et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150297299 Yeung et al. Oct 2015 A1
20160015461 Farritor et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160074055 Ravikumar et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160228154 Mickiewicz et al. Aug 2016 A1
20170035526 Farritor et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170354470 Farritor et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180116734 Yeung et al. May 2018 A1
20180140377 Reichenbach et al. May 2018 A1
20190090965 Farritor et al. Mar 2019 A1
20210045836 Farritor et al. Feb 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (52)
Number Date Country
102821918 Dec 2012 CN
102010040405 Mar 2012 DE
105656 Apr 1984 EP
279591 Aug 1988 EP
1354670 Oct 2003 EP
2286756 Feb 2011 EP
2329787 Jun 2011 EP
2563261 Mar 2013 EP
2684528 Jan 2014 EP
2123225 Dec 2014 EP
2815705 Dec 2014 EP
2881046 Jun 2015 EP
2937047 Oct 2015 EP
04144533 May 1992 JP
05115425 May 1993 JP
06507809 Sep 1994 JP
06508049 Sep 1994 JP
07016235 Jan 1995 JP
07136173 May 1995 JP
07306155 Nov 1995 JP
08224248 Sep 1996 JP
2001505810 May 2001 JP
2002000524 Jan 2002 JP
2003220065 Aug 2003 JP
2004180781 Jul 2004 JP
2004322310 Nov 2004 JP
2004329292 Nov 2004 JP
2009106606 May 2009 JP
2010533045 Oct 2010 JP
2010536436 Dec 2010 JP
2011504794 Feb 2011 JP
2011045500 Mar 2011 JP
2011115591 Jun 2011 JP
9221291 Dec 1992 WO
0189405 Nov 2001 WO
02082979 Oct 2002 WO
02100256 Dec 2002 WO
2005009211 Feb 2005 WO
2005044095 May 2005 WO
2006005075 Jan 2006 WO
2006052927 May 2006 WO
2006079108 Jul 2006 WO
2007011654 Jan 2007 WO
2007111571 Oct 2007 WO
2007149559 Dec 2007 WO
2009023851 Feb 2009 WO
2009144729 Dec 2009 WO
2010042611 Apr 2010 WO
2010046823 Apr 2010 WO
2010050771 May 2010 WO
2011075693 Jun 2011 WO
2011118646 Sep 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (146)
Entry
Rentschler et al., “Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of In Vivo Wheeled Mobility,” ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences: 28th Biennial Mechanisms and Robotics Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, Sep. 28-Oct. 2, 2004, pp. 1-9.
Rentschler et al., “Toward In Vivo Mobility,” Studies in Health Technology and Infonnatics—Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, ISO Press, Long Beach, CA, 2005a, III: 397-403.
Rentschler et al., Mobile In Vivo Biopsy Robot, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Orlando, Florida, May 2006, pp. 4155-4160.
Rentschler et al., “In Vivo Robots for Laparoscopic Surgery,” Studies in Health Technology and Infonnatics—Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, ISO Press, Newport Beach, CA, 2004a, 98: 316-322.
Riviere et al., “Toward Active Tremor Canceling in Handheld Microsurgical Instruments,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Oct. 2003, 19(5): 793-800.
Rosen et al., “Force Controlled and Teleoperated Endoscopic, Grasper for Minimally Invasive Surgery—Experimental Performance Evaluation,” IEEE Transactions of Biomedical Engineering, Oct. 1999; 46(10): 1212-1221.
Rosen et al., “Objective Laparoscopic Skills Assessments of Surgical Residents Using Hidden Markov Models Based on Haptic Information and Tool/Tissue Interactions,” Studies in Health Technology and Infonnatics-Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, Jan. 2001, 7 pp.
Rosen et al., “Spherical Mechanism Analysis of a Surgical Robot for Minimally Invasive Surgery—Analytical and Experimental Approaches,” Studies in Health Technology and Infonnatics—Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, pp. 442-448, Jan. 2005.
Rosen et al., “The Blue Dragon—A System of Measuring the Kinematics and the Dynamics of Minimally Invasive Surgical Tools In-Vivo,” Proc. of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Washington, DC, pp. 1876-1881, May 2002.
Rosen et al., “Task Decomposition of Laparoscopic Surgery for Objective Evaluation of Surgical Residents' Learning Curve Using Hidden Markov Model,” Computer Aided Surgery, vol. 7, pp. 49-61, 2002.
Ruurda et al., “Feasibility of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 2002; 12(1 ):41-45.
Ruurda et al., “Robot-Assisted surgical systems: a new era in laparoscopic surgery,” Ann R. Coll Surg Engl., 2002; 84: 223-226.
Sackier et al., “Robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery,” Surgical Endoscopy, 1994; 8: 63-66.
Salky, “What is the Penetration of Endoscopic Techniques into Surgical Practice?” Digestive Surgery, 2000; 17:422-426.
Satava, “Surgical Robotics: The Early Chronicles,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 2002; 12(1): 6-16.
Schippers et al., (1996) “Requirements and Possibilities of Computer-Assisted Endoscopic Surgery,” In: Computer Integrated Surgery: Technology and Clinical Applications, pp. 561-565.
Schurr et al., “Robotics and Telemanipulation Technologies for Endoscopic Surgery,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2000; 14: 375-381.
Schwartz, “In the Lab: Robots that Slink and Squirm,” The New York Times, Mar. 27, 2007, 4 pp.
Sharp LL-151-30, http://www.sharp3d.com, 2006, 2 pp.
Slatkin et al., “The Development of a Robotic Endoscope,” Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 162-171, 1995.
Smart Pill “Fastastic Voyage: Smart Pill to Expand Testing,” http://www.smartpilldiagnostics.com, Apr. 13, 2005, 1 pg.
Southern Surgeons Club (1991), “A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies,” N. Eng. 1 Med. 324 (16): 1073-1078.
Stefanini et al., “Modeling and Experiments on a Legged Microrobot Locomoting in a Tubular Compliant and Slippery Environment,” Int. Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 25, No. 5-6, pp. 551-560, May-Jun. 2006.
Stiff et al., “Long-term Pain: Less Common After Laparoscopic than Open Cholecystectomy,” British Journal of Surgery, 1994; 81: 1368-1370.
Stoianovici et al., “Robotic Tools for Minimally Invasive Urologic Surgery”, Jan. 1, 2002, pp. 1-17.
Strong, et al., “Efficacy of Novel Robotic Camera vs. a Standard Laproscopic Camera,” Surgical Innovation vol. 12, No. 4, Dec. 2005, Westminster Publications, Inc., pp. 315-318.
Suzumori et al., “Development of Flexible Microactuator and its Applications to Robotics Mechanisms,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1991: 1622-1627.
Taylor et al., “A Telerobotic Assistant for Laparoscopic Surgery,” IEEE Eng Med Biol, 1995; 279-287.
Tendick et al., “Applications of Micromechatronics in Minimally Invasive Surgery,” IEEE/AS ME Transactions on Mechatronics, 1998; 3(1): 34-42.
Tendick et al. (1993), “Sensing and Manipulation Problems in Endoscopic Surgery: Experiment, Analysis, and Observation,” Presence 2(1): 66-81.
Thomann et al., “The Design of a new type of Micro Robot for the Intestinal Inspection,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE Intl. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Oct. 2002: 1385-1390.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/180,960 filed Feb. 2000.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/956,032, filed Aug. 15, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/983,445, filed Oct. 29, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,106, filed Nov. 26, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,062, filed Nov. 26, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,076, filed Nov. 26, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,086, filed Nov. 26, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,470, filed Nov. 27, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/025,346, filed Feb. 1, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/030,588, filed Feb. 22, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/030,617, filed Feb. 22, 2008.
Way et al., (editors), “Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery,” Churchill Livingstone Inc., 1995, 14 pp.
Wolfe et al., “Endoscopic Cholecystectomy: An analysis of Complications,” Arch. Surg. Oct. 1991; 126: 1192-1196.
Worn et al., “Espirit Project No. 33915: Miniaturised Robot for Micro Manipulation (MINIMAN)”, Nov. 1998; http://www.ipr.ira.ujka.de/-microbot/miniman.
Yu et al., “Microrobotic Cell Injection,” Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 2001; 620-625.
Yu, BSN, RN, “M2ATM Capsule Endoscopy A Breakthrough Diagnostic Tool for Small Intestine Imaging,” vol. 25, No. 1, 2002, Gastroenterology Nursing, pp. 24-27.
Abbott et al., “Design of an Endoluminal NOTES Robotic System,” from the Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/RSJ Int'l Conf. on Intelligent Robot Systems, San Diego, CA, Oct. 29-Nov. 2, 2007, pp. 410-416.
Abbou et al., “Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy with a Remote Controlled Robot,” The Journal of Urology, Jun. 2001, 165: 1964-1966.
Allendorf et al., “Postoperative Immune Function Varies Inversely with the Degree of Surgical Trauma in a Murine Model,” Surgical Endoscopy, 1997; 11: 427-430.
Ang, “Active Tremor Compensation in Handheld Instrument for Microsurgery,” Doctoral Dissertation, tech report CMU R.I-TR-04-28, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, May 2004, 167 pp.
Atmel 80C5X2 Core, http://www.atmel.com, 2006, 186 pp.
Bailey et al., Complications of Laparoscopic Surgery; Quality Medical Publishers, Inc., 1995, 25 pp.
Ballantyne, “Robotic Surgery, Telerobotic Surgery, Telepresence, and Telementoring,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2002; 16: 1389-1402.
Bauer et al., “Case Report: Remote Percutaneous Renal Percutaneous Renal Access Using a New Automated Welesurgical Robotic System,” Telemedicine Journal and e-Health 2001; (4): 341-347.
Begos et al., “Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: From Gimmick to Gold Standard,” J Clin Gastroenterol, 1994; 19 (4): 625-330.
Berg et al., “Surgery with Cooperative Robots,” Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, Feb. 2007, 1 pg.
Breda et al., “Future developments and perspectives in laparoscopy,” Eur. Urology 2001; 40(1): 84-91.
Breedveld et al., “Design of Steerable Endoscopes to Improve the Visual Perception of Depth During aparoscopic Surgery,” ASME, Jan. 2004; vol. 126, pp. 1-5.
Breedveld et al., “Locomotion through the Intestine by means of Rolling Stents,” Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, 2004, pp. 1-7.
Calafiore et al., Multiple Arterial Conduits Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Early Angiographic Results,: Ann Thorac Surg, 1999; 67: 450-456.
Camarillo et al., “Robotic Technology in Surgery: Past, Present and Future,” The American Journal of Surgery, 2004; 188: 2S-15.
Cavusoglu et al.,“Robotics for Telesurgery: Second Generation Berkeley/UCSF Laparoscopic Telesurgical Norkstation and Looking Towards the Future Applications,” Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 2003; 30(1): 22-29.
Cavusoglu et al., “Telesurgery and Surgical Simulation: Haptic Interfaces to Real and Virtual Surgical Environments,” In McLaughliin, M.L, Hespanha, J.P., and Sukhatme, G., editors. Touch in virtual environments, IMSC Series in Multimedia 2001, 28 pp.
Chanthasopeephan et al., (2003), “Measuring Forces in Liver Cutting: New Equipment and Experimenal Results,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering 31: 1372-1382.
Choi et al., “Flexure-based Manipulator for Active Handheld Microsurgical Instrument,” Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS), Sep. 2005, 4 pp.
Cleary et al., “State of the Art in Surgical Robotics: Clinical Applications and Technology Challenges”, “Computer Aided Surgery”, Jan. 1, 2002, pp. 312-328, vol. 6.
Cuschieri, “Technology for Minimal Access Surgery,” BMJ, 1999, 319: 1-6.
Dakin et al., “Comparison of laparoscopic skills perfonnance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic s;ystems,” Surg Endosc., 2003; 17: 574-579.
Dumpert et al., “Improving in Vivo Robot Vision Quality,” from the Proceedings of Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, ong Beach, CA, Jan. 26-29, 2005. 1 pg.
Dumpert et al., “Stereoscopic In Vivo Surgical Robots,” IEEE Sensors Special Issue on In Vivo Sensors for Medicine, Jan. 2007, 10 pp.
Falcone et al., “Robotic Surgery,” Clin. Obstel. Gynecol. 2003, 46(1): 37-43.
Faraz et al., “Engineering Approaches to Mechanical and Robotic Design for Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS),” Kluwer Academic Publishers (Boston), 2000, 13 pp.
Fearing et al., “Wing Transmission for a Micromechanical Flying Insect,” Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference to Robotics &Automation, Apr. 2000; 1509-1516.
Fireman et al., “Diagnosing small bowel Crohn's desease with wireless capsule endoscopy,” Gut 2003; 52: 39 392.
Flynn et al., “Tomorrow's Surgery: micromotors and microrobots for minimally invasive procedures,” Minimally Invasive Surgery & Allied Technologies, 1998; 7(4): 343-352.
Franklin et al., “Prospective Comparison of Open vs. Laparoscopic Colon Surgery for Carcinoma: Five-Year Results,” Dis Colon Rectum, 1996; 39: S35-S46.
Franzino, “The Laprotek Surgical System and the Next Generation of Robotics,” Surg Clin North Am, 2003 83(6): 1317-1320.
Fraulob et al., “Miniature assistance module for robot-assisted heart surgery,” Biomed. Tech. 2002, 47 Suppl. 1, Pt. 1: 12-15.
Fukuda et al., “Mechanism and Swimming Experiment of Micro Mobile Robot in Water,” Proceedings of the 1994 EEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1994: 814-819.
Fukuda et al., “Micro Active Catheter System with Multi Degrees of Freedom,” Proceedings of the IEEE Intemational Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 1994, pp. 2290-2295.
Fuller et al., “Laparoscopic Trocar Injuries: A Report from a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Genier for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) Systematic Technology Assessment of Medical Products (STAMP) Committee,” U.S. Food and Drug Adminstration, available at http://www.fda.gov, Finalized: Nov. 7, 2003; Updated: Jun. 24, 2005, 11 pp.
Glukhovsky et al., “The development and application of wireless capsule endoscopy,” Int. J. Med. Robot. Comput. Assist. Surgery, 2004; I (1): 114-123.
Gong et al., Wireless endoscopy, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2000; 51(6): 725-729.
Grady, “Doctors Try New Surgery for Gallbladder Removal,” The New York Times, Apr. 20, 2007, 3 pp.
Green, “Telepresence Surgery”, Jan. 1, 1995, Publisher: IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.
Guo et al., “Fish-like Underwater Microrobot with 3 DOF,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, May 2002: 738-743.
Guo et al., “Micro Active Guide Wire Catheter System—Characteristic Evaluation, Electrical Model and Operability Evaluation of Micro Active Catheter,” Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Apr. 1996: 2226-2231.
Hanly et al., “Robotic Abdominal Surgery,” The American Journal of Surgery 188 (Suppl.to Oct. 1994): 19S-26S, 2004.
Hanly et al., “Value of the SAGES Learning Center in introducing new technology,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2004; 19 (4): 477-483.
Heikkinen et al., “Comparison of laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication two years after operation: A prospective randomized trial,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2000; 14: 1019-1023.
Hissink, “Olympus Medical develops capsule camera technology,” Dec. 2004, accessed Aug. 29, 2007, http://www.letsgodigital.org , 3 pp.
Horgan et al., “Technical Report: Robots in Laparoscopic Surgery,” Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2001; 11(6): 415-419.
Ishiyama et al., “Spiral-type Micro-machine for Medical Applications,” 2000 International Symposium on Micromechatronics and Human Science, 2000: 65-69.
Jagannath et al., “Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005; 61(3): 449-453.
Kalloo et al., “Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2004; 60(1): 114-117.
Kang et al., “Robotic Assistants Aid Surgeons During Minimally Invasive Procedures,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Jan.-Feb. 2001; pp. 94-104.
Kantsevoy et al., “Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005; 62(2): 287-292.
Kantsevoy et al., “Transgastric endoscopic splenectomy,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2006; 20: 522-525.
Kazemier et al. (1998), “Vascular Injuries During Laparoscopy,” J. Am. Coli. Surg. 186(5): 604-5.
Kim, “Early Experience with Telemanipulative Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using da Vinci,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 2002; 12(1):33-40.
Ko et al., “Per-Oral transgastric abdominal surgery,” Chinese Journal of Digestive Diseases, 2006; 7: 67-70.
Lafullarde et al., “Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication: Five-year Results and Beyond,” Arch/Surg, Feb. 2001; 136: 180-184.
Leggett et al. (2002), “Aortic injury during laparoscopic fundoplication,” Surg. Endoscopy 16(2): 362.
Li et al. (2000), “Microvascular Anastomoses Performed in Rats Using a Microsurgical Telemanipulator,” Comp. Aid. Surg. 5: 326-332.
Liem et al., “Comparison of Conventional Anterior Surgery and Laparoscopic Surgery for Inguinal-hernia Repair,” New England Journal of Medicine, 1997; 336 (22): 1541-1547.
MacFarlane et al., “Force-Feedback Grasper Helps Restore the Sense of Touch in Minimally Invasive Surgery,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 1999; 3: 278-285.
Mack et al., “Present Role of Thoracoscopy in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Diseases of the Chest,” Ann Thorac Surgery, 1992; 54: 403-409.
Mack, “Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery,” JAMA, Feb. 2001; 285(5): 568-572.
Mei et al., “Wireless Drive and Control of a Swimming Microrobot,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, May 2002: 1131-1136.
Melvin et al., “Computer-Enhanced vs. Standard Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery,” J Gastrointest Surg 2002; 6: 11-16.
Menciassi et al., “Locomotion of a Leffed Capsule in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Theoretical Study and Preliminary Technological Results,” IEEE Int. Conf. on Engineering in Medicine and Biology, San Francisco, CA, pp. 2767-2770, Sep. 2004.
Menciassi et al., “Robotic Solutions and Mechanisms for a Semi-Autonomous Endoscope,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE/RSJ Intl. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Oct. 2002; 1379-1384.
Menciassi et al., “Shape memory alloy clamping devices of a capsule for monitoring tasks in the gastrointestinal tract,” J. Micromech. Microeng, 2005, 15: 2045-2055.
Meron, “The development of the swallowable video capsule (M2A),” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2000; 52 6: 817-819.
Micron, http://www.micron.com, 2006, 1/4-inch VGA NTSC/PAL CMOS Digital Image Sensor, 98 pp.
Midday Jeff et al., “Material Handling System for Robotic natural Orifice Surgery”, Proceedings of the 2011 Design of medical Devices Conference, Apr. 12-14, 2011, Minneapolis, MN, 4 pages.
Miller, Ph.D., et al., “In-Vivo Stereoscopic Imaging System with 5 Degrees-of-Freedom for Minimal Access Surgery,” Dept. of Computer Science and Dept. of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, 2004, 7 pp.
Munro (2002), “Laparoscopic access: complications, technologies, and techniques,” Curro Opin. Obstet. Gynecol., 14(4): 365-74.
Nio et al., “Efficiency of manual vs robotical (Zeus) assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of standardized tasks,” Surg Endosc, 2002; 16: 412-415.
Oleynikov et al., “In Vivo Camera Robots Provide Improved Vision for Laparoscopic Surgery,” Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (CARS), Chicago, IL, Jun. 23-26, 2004b.
Oleynikov et al., “In Vivo Robotic Laparoscopy,” Surgical Innovation, Jun. 2005, 12(2): 177-181.
Oleynikov et al., “Miniature Robots Can Assist in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy,” Journal of Surgical Endoscopy, 19-4: 473-476, 2005.
O'Neill, “Surgeon takes new route to gallbladder,” The Oregonian, Jun. 2007, 2 pp.
Orlando et al., (2003), “Needle and Trocar Injuries in Diagnostic Laparoscopy under Local Anesthesia: What Is the True Incidence of These Complications?” Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques 13 (3):181-184.
Palm, William, “Rapid Prototyping Primer” May 1998 (revised Jul. 30, 2002) (http://www.me.psu.edu/lamancusa/rapidpro/primer/chapter2.htm).
Park et al., “Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis (videos),” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005; 61 (4): 601-606.
Park et al., “Trocar-less Instrumentation for Laparoscopy: Magnetic Positioning of Intra-abdominal Camera and Retractor,” Ann Surg, Mar. 2007; 245(3): 379-384.
Patronik et al., “Crawling on the Heart: A Mobile Robotic Device for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Interventions,” MICCAI, 2004, pp. 9-16.
Patronik et al., “Development of a Tethered Epicardial Crawler for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Therapies,” IEEE, 2004, pp. 239-240.
Patronik et al., “Preliminary evaluation of a mobile robotic device for navigation and intervention on the beating heart,” Computer Aided Surgery, 10(4): 225-232, Jul. 2005.
Peirs et al., “A miniature manipulator for integration in a self-propelling endoscope,” Sensors and Actuators A, 2001, 92: 343-349.
Peters, “Minimally Invasive Colectomy: Are the Potential Benefits Realized?” Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 751-756.
Phee et al., “Analysis and Development of Locomotion Devices for the Gastrointestinal Tract,” IEEE Transaction on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 49, No. 6, Jun. 2002, pp. 613-616.
Phee et al., “Development of Microrobotic Devices for Locomotion in the Human Gastrointestinal Tract,” International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Robotics and Autonomous Systems (CIRAS 2001), Nov. 28-30, (2001), Singapore.
Platt et al., “In Vivo Robotic Cameras can Enhance Imaging Capability During Laparoscopic Surgery,” in the Proceedings of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Scientific Conference, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, Apr. 13-16, 2005, 1 Pg.
Rentschler et al., “An In Vivo Mobile Robot for Surgical Vision and Task Assistance,” Journal of Medical Devices, Mar. 2007, vol. 1: 23-29.
Rentschler et al., “In vivo Mobile Surgical Robotic Task Assistance,” 1 pg.
Rentschler et al., “In vivo Robotics during the NEEMO 9 Mission,” Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, Feb. 17, 2007, 1 pg.
Rentschler et al., “Mechanical Design of Robotic In Vivo Wheeled Mobility,” ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 2006a, pp. 1-11.
Rentschler et al., “Miniature in vivo Robots for Remote and Harsh Environments,” IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, Jan. 2008; 12(1): 66-75.
Rentschler et al., “Mobile In Vivo Biopsy and Camera Robot,” Studies in Health and Infonnatics Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, vol. 119, pp. 449-454, IOS Press, Long Beach, CA, 2006e.
Rentschler et al., “Mobile In Vivo Camera Robots Provide Sole Visual Feedback for Abdominal Exploration and Cholecystectomy,” Journal of Surgical Endoscopy, 20-1: 135-138, 2006b.
Rentschler et al., “Mobile In Vivo Robots Can Assist in Abdominal Exploration,” from the Proceedings of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Scientific Conference, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, Apr. 13-16, 2005b.
Rentschler et al., “Modeling, Analysis, and Experimental Study of In Vivo Wheeled Robotic Mobility,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 22 (2): 308-321, 2005c.
Rentschler et al., “Natural Orifice Surgery with an Endoluminal Mobile Robot,” The Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons, Dallas, TX, Apr. 2006d, 14 pp.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20240033037 A1 Feb 2024 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62425149 Nov 2016 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 17838883 Jun 2022 US
Child 18482959 US
Parent 15821169 Nov 2017 US
Child 17838883 US