The invention relates generally to the field of semiconductor wafer testing utilizing probe card assembly systems for testing one or more die on a wafer. More particularly, the invention relates to probe card assembly systems incorporating microfabricated probe tips and improvements thereto, which improve the performance, ease of use and lower the cost of ownership.
Probe card assembly systems are used in integrated circuit (IC) manufacturing to translate electrical signal paths from the tightly spaced electrical interconnection pads on ICs to the coarsely spaced electrical interconnection pads on printed circuit boards that interface to IC test systems.
Advances in semiconductor integrated circuit wafer design, processing, and packaging technologies have resulted in increases in the number of input/output (I/O) pads on each die and as well as in an increase in the diameter of the silicon wafers used in device fabrication. With more die to test per wafer and each die having more I/O pads, the cost of testing each die is becoming a greater and greater fraction of the total device cost. This undesirable trend can only be reversed if either the test time required for each die is reduced or else multiple die are tested simultaneously. If multiple die are tested simultaneously, then the requirements for parallelism between the probe tips and the semiconductor wafer and the co-planarity of the probe tips become increasingly stringent since all of the probe tips are required to make good electronic contact at the same time over a large area on the wafer.
In the prior art, probe card assembly systems have been equipped with various types of mechanical mechanisms designed to affect in-situ parallelism adjustment of the probe tips relative to the semiconductor wafer to insure that adequate electrical contact is made to all of the probed devices on the wafer.
Evans et al (U.S. Pat. No. 4,975,638) teach a method of correcting parallelism errors between the probe tips on a membrane probe card and a semiconductor wafer under test. Evans et al teach a test probe card which includes a flexible, thin film contactor which is subjected to pressure by a rigid pressure block having two degrees of freedom that permit the block to orient itself parallel to the plane of the IC device being tested and impose an evenly controlled force on the probe contacts carried by the contactor. Evans et al claims that the significant advantage of their invention is that the probe contacts carried by the flexible film contactor of the test probe card all lie in a common plane and are maintained in this plane in the course of a testing procedure.
In probe card assembly systems according to Eldridge et al (e.g. U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,624,648 and 5,974,662, parallelism errors between their probe tips and the semiconductor wafer are corrected by adjusting the orientation of a space transformer using multiple ball tipped linear actuators. The space transformer also serves as the support substrate for composite probe elements fabricated as described in the patent specification, each of which are individually mounted on the space transformer. Eldridge et al state that an object of their invention is that the space transformer, and hence, the tips of their elongate resilient probe elements can be “oriented without changing the position of the probe card”.
The examples of Evans and Eldridge given above are presented as exemplary methods for correcting parallelism errors between the plane of the probe tips and the reference surface of the probe card on which they are mounted. It is well known to those knowledgeable in the field that semiconductor wafer probers provide a head plate with a probe card mounting surface that is precisely aligned (mechanically) to be parallel to the plane in which the surface of the wafer chuck travels, that is the wafer reference surface (WRS). Thus if the parallelism error between the tips of a probe card relative to the probe card mounting surface are within acceptable tolerances, then the probe card can be mounted on a wafer prober head plate with high confidence that the probe tips will be parallel to the plane of travel of the wafer chuck, i.e. the WRS, and therefore to the surface of semiconductor wafer under test.
During the process of electrical testing of the integrated circuits (die) on a semiconductor wafer in a semiconductor wafer prober, the wafer chuck translates the surface of the wafer under test through a plane that is parallel to the WRS. As mentioned previously, the WRS is pre-adjusted to be parallel to the plane of the probe card interface assembly mounting surface in the wafer prober head plate. The semiconductor wafer under test is reversibly yet precisely mounted on the WRS of the wafer chuck, such as by electrostatic means or by an applied vacuum, thereby requiring the wafer to mechanically conform to the WRS. The surface of the semiconductor wafer is thus affixed and positioned so as to be precisely in a plane that is parallel to the WRS of the wafer chuck.
To test more than one die on a semiconductor wafer, simultaneous low-resistance electrical contacts must be established with positionally matching sets of spring probes, such as but not limited to stress metal spring (SMS) probe tips, for each die to be tested. The more die to be tested simultaneously, the greater the degree of parallelism that is required between the spring probes and the surface of the semiconductor wafer, i.e. the WRS, in order to insure that the probe tip scrub, and hence electrical contact, is uniform across the wafer. However, as higher numbers of die are tested in parallel, the number of simultaneous interconnects from the IC to the probe card assembly to the IC tester increases (not assuming pin multiplexing). Since probe tips for contacting the bonding pads on IC wafers require sufficient mechanical force on a per connection basis to assure a reliable low resistance connection, the total force between the probe card assembly and the wafer increases in proportion to the number of connections. The force between the IC tester and the probe card assembly also increases on a pin by pin basis when pogo pins are used as the electrical interface, however, there is a growing trend toward the use of zero insertion force connectors (ZIF) to reduce the force between the probe card and the IC tester.
A Precision Point VX probe card measurement tool, available through Applied Precision, LLC, of Issaquah, Wash., is capable of measuring parallelism error between the probe tips and the mounting surface of a probe card by measuring the relative “Z height” of each individual probe tip on the probe card through a measurement of the electrical conductivity between the probe tips and a highly polished electrically conductive tungsten surface of a so called checkplate. In order to obtain planarity measurements with the Precision Point VX that are accurate to within the manufacturers specification of 0.1 mils (2.5 microns) across the full X and Y dimensions of the checkplate, the parallelism between the checkplate and the “Support Plate” which holds the probe card “Mother Board” must be mechanically adjusted following a procedure specified by the manufacturer and referred to as the “Fine Leveling calibration procedure.” Because the reference surface on the “Mother Board” may be different for the Precision Point VX and a wafer prober, it is necessary to perform the fine leveling procedure or else significant errors may be introduced into the planarity measurement.
If all of the probe tips are co-planar, then any parallelism error of the probe tips relative to the mounting surface of the probe card can be measured, such as by using the Precision Point VX. The amount of parallelism correction required can be estimated from the data detailing the height of the first to the last probe tip to touch the checkplate. The parallelism error can them be corrected and the results verified on the Precision Point VX.
There are, however, several limitations to this method of parallelism correction and verification using Precision Point VX. First, it is time consuming. Verification can take four hours or more. Second, if the measurement is made under simulated tester interface force loading conditions, it may not include all aspects of the mechanical deflection associated with the forces applied during actual operation in a wafer prober. Third, the measurement may be done at room temperature and may not be indicative of the actual operating temperature that will induce mechanical changes due to the thermal coefficients of the various materials in the probe card assembly.
It is also possible to adjust the parallelism of the probe tips on the wafer prober. However, this is problematic because wafer probers are generally used in production environments and such activities may not be desirable. Additionally, special equipment or tooling may be required that can cause additional complication and chance for error. In any case, it is an additional burden on the user if it is required to adjust the planarity of the probe tips each time the probe card is moved from one wafer prober to another or from a quality control (QC) test instrument, such as from the Precision Point VX to a wafer prober.
There is a need for a probe card assembly system in which the parallelism of the probe tips relative to the semiconductor wafer is pre-set at the factory and no in-situ adjustment is necessary, even after changing the probe tip assembly. With such a system, it would be possible to change the probe tip assembly for cleaning, repair, or replacement or to accommodate work flow changes without the need to re-adjust the parallelism of the probe tips. With a probe card assembly having a pre-set parallelism adjustment, the customer could then keep on hand an adequate inventory of spare probe tip assemblies and would need to purchase only as many probe card assemblies as was necessary to sustain their peak throughput requirement.
It would be advantageous to provide a probe card assembly system that resists deflection under the forces generated when the probe tips are compressed during testing, i.e. due to upward displacement of the wafer prober chuck beyond the point at which the probe tips touch the wafer surface. Such a probe card assembly system would constitute a major technical advance.
Furthermore, it would be advantageous to provide a probe card assembly system that maintains low resistance electrical connections to a device under test at either elevated or depressed operating temperatures. Such a probe card assembly system would constitute a further technical advance.
As well, it would be advantageous to provide a probe card assembly system that comprises components with mechanical surfaces that are sufficiently flat and parallel to one another, to enable them to act as reference surfaces for other components either within the probe card assembly system, or that interface to the probe card assembly system. Such a probe card assembly system would constitute a further major technical advance.
It would be further advantageous to provide such a probe card assembly system having relatively flat and parallel component surfaces, that more evenly distribute and vertically transmit the high forces associated with high I/O count ICs and testers, to reduce peak-to peak mechanical deflections within the probe card assembly system, wherein the forces are generated either by the various spring pre-loading mechanisms or by the compression of the spring probes during wafer testing. Such a probe card assembly system would constitute a further major technical advance.
There is also a need for probe card assembly systems having components with improved flatness and parallelism that can rest against each other since such surfaces can enable pre-aligned, easy to replace components and sub-assemblies. Relatively flat and parallel surfaces and probe tip arrays having smaller deviations from co-planarity reduce the need for planarity adjustment. Additionally, relatively flat and parallel reference surfaces can also enable the use of very low force interposers, e.g. 0.05 g to 5 g per contact, to make low resistance high-density electrical connections over large areas, e.g. 1,000 sq cm for 300 mm wafers. Furthermore, low force interposers combined with flat and parallel reference and support surfaces enable simpler methods of clamping and achieving and maintaining planarity. Alternatively, large area components such as mother boards, Z-blocks, etc. with flat surfaces enable the use of vacuum actuated systems to achieve high levels of surface parallelism. Additionally, large area solid electrical interface connections fabricated with materials such as solder, gold wire bond bumps, plated bumps, or adhesives all have higher manufacturing yields and perform better and more reliably with flatter and more parallel interconnection support surfaces.
As well, time is often critical factor for users of probe card assemblies, such as semiconductor manufacturers and testers. However, conventional probe card assemblies typically comprise one or more key components that have long lead times, such as for multilayered ceramic components. As conventional assembly structures and manufacturing methods include such long lead time components, that the resulting fabrication cycle for one or more assemblies is long.
It would therefore be further advantageous to provide probe card assembly structures and methods having improved, i.e. rapid, fabrication cycles, for which portions of the probe card assembly can be fabricated, assembled, and/or pre-planarized, while long-lead lead time components, such as complex, custom, or semi-custom components, are readily mountable and/or remountable from the other components and assemblies. Such a probe card assembly system would constitute a further major technical advance.
An improved interconnection system and method is described, such as for connectors, socket assemblies and/or probe card systems. An exemplary system comprises a probe card interface assembly for establishing electrical connections to a semiconductor wafer mounted in a semiconductor wafer prober. The probe card interface assembly comprises a mother board having an upper surface and a lower planar mounting surface opposite the upper surface and parallel to the semiconductor wafer, a reference plane defined by a least three points located between the lower surface of the motherboard and the semiconductor wafer, at least one component having an upper mounting surface located below the motherboard mounting surface and a lower mounting surface opposite the upper mounting surface, and a mechanism for adjusting the planarity of the reference plane with respect to the semiconductor wafer. A probe chip having a plurality of spring probes extending there from is mountable and demountable from the probe card interface assembly, without the need for further planarity adjustment. The interconnection structures and methods preferably provide improved fabrication cycles.
Introductory disclosure regarding structures, processes and systems disclosed herein is seen in: U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/136,636, entitled Wafer Interface for High Density Probe Card, filed 27 May 1999; U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/146,241, entitled Method of Massively Parallel Testing of Circuits, filed 28 Jul. 1999; U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/573,541, entitled Quick-Change Probe Chip, filed 20 May 2004; U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/592,908, entitled Probe Card Assembly with Rapid Fabrication Cycle, filed 29 Jul. 2004; U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/651,294, entitled Nano-Contactor Embodiments for IC Packages and Interconnect Components, filed 8 Feb. 2005; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/870,095, entitled Enhanced Compliant Probe Card Systems Having Improved Planarity, US Filing Date 16 Jun. 2004; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/178,103, entitled Construction Structures and Manufacturing Processes for Probe Card Assemblies and Packages Having Wafer Level Springs, US Filing Date 24 Jun. 2002; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/980,040, entitled Construction Structures and Manufacturing Processes for Integrated Circuit Wafer Probe Card Assemblies, US Filing Date 27 Nov. 2001; PCT Patent Application Ser. No. PCT/US00/21012, filed 27 Jul. 2000; PCT Patent Application Ser. No. PCT/US00/14164, entitled Construction Structures and Manufacturing Processes for Integrated Circuit Wafer Probe Card Assemblies, US Filing Date 23 May 2000; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/069,902, entitled Systems for Testing and Packaging Integrated Circuits, filed 28 Jun. 2002, which are each incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference thereto.
The mounting surface 48 of the head plate 46 is pre-calibrated to be parallel to the plane of travel of the wafer chuck 40. Upward and downward looking cameras 50,52, as well as other types of sensors, provide data on the position of the wafer 20 and probe tip assembly 36, to enable software routines that ensure that the spring probes 180 (
The probe tips 181 of the spring probes 180 on the probe chip 68 are preferably pre-aligned to be parallel to the plane of the PCIA 62, ensuring that the probe tips 181 are also parallel to the surface 54 of the wafer chuck 40, and thus also parallel to the surface of a semiconductor wafer 20 attached to the wafer chuck 40. The spring probes 180 may comprise any of stress metal springs, flexible springs, compliant springs, and elongate resilient probe elements.
As seen in
The probe chip assembly mounting reference plane 92 is defined at any location below the PCIA mounting surface 94a of the motherboard 32, such as vertically between the PCIA mounting surface 94a of the motherboard 32 and the upper connection surface 93b of the probe chip 68, or vertically between the PCIA mounting surface 94a of the motherboard 32 and a semiconductor wafer 20.
In some embodiments, the probe chip assembly mounting reference plane 92 is defined at some point vertically between the PCIA mounting surface 94a of the motherboard 32 and the upper connection surface 93b of the probe chip 68. The probe chip assembly mounting reference plane 92 may coincide with a real surface within the probe chip mounting system 34, or may comprise a virtual defined plane 92 that is parallel to the PCIA mounting surface 94a. For example, for a probe chip mounting system 34 that is not initially parallel to the PCIA mounting surface 94a of the motherboard 32, measured data can be used to provide planarity compensation, e.g. three or more points in space, that can be provided by a planarity adjustment mechanism 166 (
Parallelism between the head plate 46 and the wafer reference surface (WRS) 54 is ensured when the WRS to PCIA dimension 115 is within a specified tolerance range over the travel of the X-Y stage 42. PCIA Parallelism of the PCIA 62 to the WRS 54 is ensured when reference dimension 116 is within a specified tolerance range over the surface of the mother board 32. Parallelism of the probe tips 181 to the WRS 54 is then inherently ensured, by mounting the probe chip 68 either directly or indirectly to the probe chip assembly mounting reference plane 92.
The probe card interface assembly PCIA 62 shown in
The quick-change probe card system 110 provides structures and methods for aligning the probe chip mounting reference plane 92 within the probe card interface assembly 62, so that the probe chip mounting reference plane 92 is precisely parallel with the probe card interface assembly mounting surface 48, and therefore also parallel to the (WRS) 54 of the wafer chuck 40 in a semiconductor wafer prober 12.
The quick-change probe card system 110 and associated method insures that the SMS probe tips 181 on the probe chip 68 are parallel with the surface of the probe chip assembly mounting surface 66. Means are provided for readily mounting the probe chip 68 to and demounting the probe chip 68 from the probe card interface assembly mounting surface 66 in the probe card interface assembly 62, thus insuring that probe tips 181 of the spring probes 180 on the probe chip 68 are parallel to the same plane of the probe card interface assembly mounting surface 48, and therefore parallel to the plane of the wafer reference surface WRS 54 and consequently to the surface of the semiconductor wafer under test 20.
The motherboard (MB) Z-block 132 is solder bonded 142 to the probe card motherboard 32 using a fixture 560 (
Outer alignment pins 168 typically extend from the top stiffener 162 through the probe card assembly 64, such as through the probe card interface assembly 62. The outer alignment pins 168 engage mechanical registration features 169, such as notches, slots, and/or holes, or any combination thereof, defined in components in the probe card assembly 64, such as the motherboard 32 and the Z-block flange 178. The use of registration features 169 preferably allows for differences in thermal expansion between components in the probe card assembly 64, to allow testing over a wide temperature range.
Interposer springs 172, such as photolithographically formed probe springs 172, are generally arranged within an interposer grid array, to provide a plurality of standardized connections. For example, in the dual-sided interposer 136a shown in
Interposer vias 173 extend through the interposer substrate 175, from the first surface 204a to the second surface 204b. The interposer vias 173 are preferably arranged in redundant via pairs, such as to increase the manufacturing yield of the interposer 136,474, and/or to promote electrical conduction, particularly for power traces.
The opposing surfaces 204a,204b are typically comprised of a release layer 198, such as comprising titanium, and a composite layer 197,198, typically comprising a plurality of conductive layers 197a-197n, having different inherent levels of stress. Interposer vias 173, e.g. such as CuW or gold filled, extend through the central substrate 175, typically ceramic, and provide an electrically conductive connection between the release layers 198. The composite layers 197,198 typically comprise MoCr, in which the interposer probe springs 172 are patterned and subsequently to be later released within a release region 203.
A seed layer 200, such as a 0.5 to 1 um thick gold layer, is preferably formed over the composite layers 197,199. In some embodiments, a tip coating 205, such as rhodium or palladium alloy, is controllably formed at least over the tips of spring fingers 172, such as to provide wear durability and/or contact reliability. Traces 201, typically comprising copper, are selectably formed by plating over the structure 196, as shown, such as to provide reduced resistance. As well polyimide PMID layers 202 are typically formed over the structure 196, as shown, to define the spring finger lift regions. A thick gold layer 200 remains on the lifted fingers 172, so as to reduce sheet resistance of the fingers 172.
In a standard structure and process 221, a probe chip 68 is fabricated 222, comprising a plurality of flexible spring probes 180, which typically comprise stress metal springs 180. Stress metal springs 180 are initially formed by creating a stress gradient within a MoCr spring structure 197, e.g. such as a plurality of layers 197a-197n (
In an alternative embodiment, the probe tips 281 are made parallel to the front surface 93a of the probe chip substrate 272, by replacing glass substrate 258 with a chuck 258 having a flat surface and one or more recesses, similar to the recess 303 shown in
Probe Chip Planarization
The upper reference chuck 262 and the upper flat reference surface element 264 are vertically controllable in relation to the fixture 300, such as through a Z-Translation mechanism 268. Solder balls 312 between probe chip 68 and the Z-Block 310 can be reflowed, by controllably affixing the Z-block 310 and the probe chip 68 within the fixture 300, and applying heat through heaters 261,263.
The quick-change probe card assembly 64 is comprised of the probe card interface assembly (PCIA) 62 and the probe chip 68. The quick-change probe card apparatus 64 and methodology 220 enables pre-calibrated probe chip assemblies 68 to be conveniently exchanged to/from compatible probe card interface assemblies (PCIA) 62 at the factory or in the field, such as by removing the quick-change probe card assembly 64 from a prober 12, demounting the probe chip 68 and associated components from the probe chip assembly mounting reference surface 66, remounting the same (or alternate) probe chip 68 and associated components to the probe chip assembly mounting reference surface 66, and re-installing the quick-change probe card assembly 64 in the prober 12.
The PCIA Mounting Surface 94a is defined as the peripheral region of the mother board 32 that physically mates to the probe card mounting surface 48 on the wafer prober head plate 46. The wafer prober head plate mounting surface 48 is pre-calibrated to be parallel to the plane of motion of the wafer chuck 40 in the wafer prober 12, wherein surface of the wafer chuck 40 in a commercial wafer prober 12 is defined to be the wafer reference surface (WRS) 54. The probe chip assembly mounting reference plane 92 is preferably pre-calibrated to be parallel to the PCIA mounting surface 48, and therefore inherently parallel to the WRS 54. As well, the probe chip 68 is preferably fabricated to ensure that the probe tips 181, e.g. stress metal spring (SMS) probe tips 181, lie in a common plane 280 (
There are two types of probe chip assemblies 68, parallel and non-parallel. Parallel probe chip assemblies have the plane 280 of the probe tips 181 parallel to the probe chip assembly mounting surface 48. With non-parallel probe chip assemblies 68, the mounting surface 48 is not parallel to the plane 280 of the probe tips 181. Non-parallel probe chip assemblies 68 can be changed without re-planarization of the quick-change probe card 64 by combining the factory calibration data for the PCIA 62 and factory calibration data of the probe chip 68, to re-calibrate the PCIA parallelism adjustment.
Probe Card Calibration Data
Mechanical parallelism calibration data, such as but not limited to shim thicknesses and/or differential screw settings, are preferably taken at the factory for the PCIA 62 and for non-parallel probe chip assemblies 68. The calibration data can be stored in a data base or in non-volatile memory chips mounted on the PCIA 62 or the probe chip assemblies 68. The PCIA calibration data provides the information required to establish the probe chip mounting reference plane 92 relative to the PCIA mounting surface 48. The probe chip assembly calibration data in combination with the PCIA calibration data provides the information required to set the PCIA planarity adjustments to make the stress metal spring (SMS) probe tips 181 on the probe chip 68 parallel to the plane of PCIA mounting surface 48.
Z-block Calibration Tool
A Z-block calibration tool is used to establish the probe chip assembly mounting reference plane 92 within a PCIA 62. This tool is fabricated to function as a mechanical reference standard with a sufficiently high degree of flatness and parallelism between its surfaces, to accurately determine the parallelism adjustment parameters of the probe chip assembly mounting reference plane 92.
In-Situ Calibration Probe Chip Assembly
Some embodiments of the probe chip assemblies 68 preferably designed to be installed and used for accelerated testing and verification of PCIA using a specific wafer prober 12, or a API PrecisionPoint VX, or other tool having a similar function, in which the tool may be used to adjust the planarity of the probe chip assembly mounting reference plane 92 in the PCIA 62. The calibration probe chip assembly is designed to include test structures that aid in reliability, accuracy, and diagnostic testing of the PCIA and/or the Probe Chip technology.
As seen in
Parallelism Error Measurement and Correction
The parallelism error for a probe chip assembly mounting reference plane (92) for a probe chip interface assembly (PCIA) 62 can be measured and corrected, such as by:
For a non-parallel probe chip 68, an exemplary parallelism error measurement and correction method comprises the steps of:
The location of features, such as contact pads on top of the Z-block 134, are optically determined, and the position of alignment pins 170, such as directly connected to the z-block 134, or to flange 178 (
Preferable planarity adjustment mechanisms provide optimal load spreading and minimize deflection of the Z-block 134. Planarity adjustment mechanisms may preferably comprise any of three or more adjustable screws, e.g. three or more differential screws 166, shims, spacers, washers, solder bonds, e.g. solder bonds 138, and/or springs and any combination thereof.
The use of low force interposers in the quick-change probe card assemblies 64 and associated methods 220 provide a plurality of reliable electrical connections between two flat and parallel surfaces each having an electrically conducive region, e.g. pads, in electrical contact with at least one of the low force SMS probe tips on an interposer 136. Low force interposers 136 reduce the total force required to compress the SMS spring probes 180 and hence the mechanical deflections of the load bearing components of the system. Alternatively, low force interposers 136 enable the use of thinner structures and/or lower elastic modulus materials to support or to compress the interposers under operating conditions.
Quick-change probe card assemblies 64 and associated methods 220 provide high quality electrical contacts, using low force interposers 136, such as having force per contact of between 0.05 grams to 5 grams, and is enhanced by the use of redundant SMS spring probes 180, i.e. more than one SMS spring probe 180 per electrical contact, e.g. 4 SMS spring probes 180 per contact has been demonstrated), non-oxidizing probe tips 181, e.g. clean Rhodium coated probe tips 181, and non-oxidizing contact pads, e.g. clean gold contact pads on both sides of the interposer 136.
In an alternative embodiment, the spring probes 180 and contact pads 278 are cleaned using methods that remove surface contaminants and expose a contaminant-free metal surface. For example, surface treatments such as mechanical polishing, plasma cleaning, and ion milling can be used to expose a contaminant-free surface on the spring probes 180 and electrical contact pads 278.
Quick-change probe card assemblies 64 and associated methods 220 allow the production of customizable probe card assemblies 64 having a rapid fabrication cycle time for testing semiconductor wafers 20. Rapid fabrication cycle time is accomplished by using semi-custom components with rapid fabrication cycle times, in combination with standard components that may have lengthy lead times. Since the standardized components are ordered in advance and held in inventory, until the time that they are needed for assembly into the finished product, the fabrication cycle time is then dependent only upon the fabrication cycle time for the semi-customizable component.
For example, the Z-block 134 is a standardized component, which can be ordered in advance and kept in inventory. The probe chip 68 is a semi-custom component, having a fixed manufacturing cycle time which is initiated at the time the customer's order is placed for the probe card system 64. The overall probe card fabrication cycle time is then determined primarily by the fabrication cycle time of the probe chip 68.
System Advantages
The quick change probe chip system 64 and method 220 lowers cost of ownership by allowing users to easily change probe chip assemblies 68, without the need to send an entire probe card assembly 68 back to the manufacturer. The quick change probe chip system 64 and method 220 allows a trained user or field service engineer to quickly change the probe chip 68 at the user site.
As well, customers can keep an inventory of spare probe chip assemblies 68 on hand, and swap probe chip assemblies 68, instead of the entire probe card assembly, e.g. 64. This capability minimizes downtime related to probe chip issues, such as for regular scheduled cleaning, tip wear, tip failure, and/or unexpected tip contamination.
The present invention provides methods of fabrication that reduce or eliminate the need for planarity adjustments at final assembly. However, after the installation of a new probe chip assembly, probe card function can readily be validated on an API Precision Point VX or equivalent. Planarity measurement can be performed if needed, such as by field personnel or by the customer, to verify proper alignment and function of the probe card prior to use in production.
The quick change probe chip system 64 and method 220 maintains low resistance electrical connections to a device under test at either elevated or depressed operating temperatures.
As well, the quick change probe chip system 64 and method 220 comprises components with mechanical surfaces that are sufficiently flat and parallel to one another, that enable them to act as reference surfaces for other components either within the probe card assembly system, or that interface to the probe card assembly system.
Furthermore, the quick change probe chip system 64 and method 220, having relatively flat and parallel component surfaces, more evenly distributes and vertically transmits the high forces associated with high I/O count ICs and testers, to reduce peak-to peak mechanical deflections within the probe card assembly system, wherein the forces are generated either by the various spring pre-loading mechanisms or by the compression of the spring probes during wafer testing.
In addition, the quick change probe chip system 64 and method 220 has components with improved flatness and parallelism that can rest against each other, that enable pre-aligned, easy to replace components and sub-assemblies. Relatively flat and parallel surfaces and probe tip arrays having smaller deviations from co-planarity reduce the need for planarity adjustment. Additionally, the use of relatively flat and parallel reference surfaces enables the use of very low force interposers, e.g. 0.05 g to 5 g per contact, to make low resistance high-density electrical connections over large areas, e.g. 1,000 sq cm for 300 mm wafers. Furthermore, low force interposers combined with flat and parallel reference and support surfaces enable simpler methods of clamping and achieving and maintaining planarity. Alternatively, large area components such as mother boards, Z-blocks, etc. with flat surfaces enable the use of vacuum actuated systems to achieve high levels of surface parallelism. Additionally, large area solid electrical interface connections fabricated with materials such as solder, gold wire bond bumps, plated bumps, or adhesives all have higher manufacturing yields and perform better and more reliably with flatter and more parallel interconnection support surfaces.
As well, time is often critical factor for users of probe card assemblies, such as semiconductor manufacturers and testers. Conventional probe card assemblies typically comprise one or more key components that have long lead times, such as for multilayered ceramic components. As conventional assembly structures and manufacturing methods include such long lead time components, the resulting fabrication cycle for one or more assemblies is long.
In contrast, the quick change probe chip system 64 and method 220 has improved, i.e. rapid, fabrication cycles, for which portions of the probe card assembly can be fabricated, assembled, and/or pre-planarized, while long-lead lead time components, such as complex, custom, or semi-custom components, are readily mountable and/or remountable from the other components and assemblies.
The methods according to the present invention adjust for the planarity differences during the probe card fabrication, by reducing or eliminating requirements for applying pressure to flexible connectors and/or adjusting linear actuators. The methods according the present teachings include creating co-planar arrays of probe springs using two or more plating steps and planarizing a probe chip assembly by causing variations in solder joint height to compensate for planar differences between the sub-components. Both manufacturing methods create flat reference tooling surfaces and use vacuum or other means to hold components under assembly flat against the reference tooling surfaces. In the case of probe springs, the first layer of plating is applied and the tips are made co-planar by heating while holding the tips against a reference tooling surface prior to completing the additional plating which is required to provide adequate probing force to insure a reliable electrical contact over an acceptable cycle life. In the case of the mother board to probe spring assembly, these components can be pulled flat to a reference tooling surface parallel to the WRS and solder can be reflowed to retain the parallelism.
The invention also uses standard components for both reducing manufacturing cost and manufacturing time.
Although probe card assembly systems having spring probes with improved co-planarity and parallelism, and methods for manufacturing are described herein in connection with integrated circuit test probes, probe cards, and/or packages, the system and techniques can be implemented with a wide variety of devices, such as interconnections between integrated circuits and substrates within electronic components or devices, burn-in devices and MEMS devices, or any combination thereof, as desired.
As well, those knowledgeable and skilled in the art will readily appreciate that various alternative types of probe tips could be substituted for the stress metal spring (SMS) probe tips described herein and that therefore the teachings relating to the methods and apparatus of the present invention should not be interpreted as being limited to the use of the SMS probe tips described herein.
Accordingly, although the invention has been described in detail with reference to a particular preferred embodiment, persons possessing ordinary skill in the art to which this invention pertains will appreciate that various modifications and enhancements may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the claims that follow.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US00/14164 | May 2000 | WO | international |
PCT/US00/21012 | Jul 2000 | WO | international |
This Application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/133,021, entitled High Density Interconnect System Having Rapid Fabrication Cycle, filed 18 May 2005, now U.S Pat. No. 7,382,142 which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/573,541, entitled Quick-Change Probe Chip, filed 20 May 2004; U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/592,908, entitled Probe Card Assembly with Rapid Fabrication Cycle, filed 29 Jul. 2004; and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/651,294, entitled Nano-Contactor Embodiments for IC Packages and Interconnect Components, filed 8 Feb. 2005. U.S. Patent application Ser. No. 11/133,021, entitled High Density Interconnect System Having Rapid Fabrication Cycle, filed 18 May 2005, is also a Continuation In Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/870,095, entitled Enhanced Compliant Probe Card Systems Having Improved Planarity, US Filing Date 16 Jun. 2004 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,349,223, which is a Continuation In Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/196,494, entitled Mosaic Decal Probe, filed 15 Jul. 2002, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,710,609 on 23 Mar. 2004. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/870,095, entitled Enhanced Compliant Probe Card Systems Having Improved Planarity, US Filing Date 16 Jun. 2004, now U.S Pat. No. 7,349,223 is also a Continuation In Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/178,103, entitled Construction Structures and Manufacturing Processes for Probe Card Assemblies and Packages Having Wafer Level Springs, US Filing Date 24 Jun. 2002, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,917,525 on 12 Jul. 2005, which is a Continuation In Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/980,040, entitled Construction Structures and Manufacturing Processes for Integrated Circuit Wafer Probe Card Assemblies, US Filing Date 27 Nov. 2001, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,799,976 on 5 Oct. 2004, which claims priority from PCT Patent Application Ser. No. PCT/US00/21012, filed Jul. 27, 2000, which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/146,241, filed on 28 Jul. 1999. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/980,040, entitled Construction Structures and Manufacturing Processes for Integrated Circuit Wafer Probe Card Assemblies, US Filing Date 27 Nov. 2001, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,799,976 on 5 Oct. 2004, also claims priority from PCT Patent Application Ser. No. PCT/US00/14164, entitled Construction Structures and Manufacturing Processes for Integrated Circuit Wafer Probe Card Assemblies, filed 23 May 2000, which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/136,636, entitled Wafer Interface for High Density Wafer Probe Card, filed on 27 May 1999. Each of the above documents is incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference thereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3806800 | Bove et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3806801 | Bove | Apr 1974 | A |
3810017 | Wiesler et al. | May 1974 | A |
3835381 | Garretson et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3842189 | Southgate | Oct 1974 | A |
3856647 | Blachman | Dec 1974 | A |
3939414 | Roch | Feb 1976 | A |
4000045 | Rotzow | Dec 1976 | A |
4035046 | Kloth | Jul 1977 | A |
4038599 | Bove et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4177425 | Lenz | Dec 1979 | A |
4195259 | Reid et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4201393 | Kawashima et al. | May 1980 | A |
4214201 | Kern | Jul 1980 | A |
4320438 | Ibrahim et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4362991 | Carbine | Dec 1982 | A |
4416759 | Harra | Nov 1983 | A |
4423376 | Byrnes et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4423401 | Mueller | Dec 1983 | A |
4436602 | Harra | Mar 1984 | A |
4480223 | Aigo | Oct 1984 | A |
4508612 | Blackwell et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4518910 | Hottenrott et al. | May 1985 | A |
4522893 | Bohlen et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4548451 | Benarr et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4567432 | Buol et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4599559 | Evans | Jul 1986 | A |
4622514 | Lewis | Nov 1986 | A |
4636722 | Ardezzone | Jan 1987 | A |
4647852 | Smith et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4661233 | Glasser | Apr 1987 | A |
4667154 | Allerton et al. | May 1987 | A |
4686464 | Elsasser et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4716500 | Payne | Dec 1987 | A |
4719417 | Evans | Jan 1988 | A |
4724377 | Maelzer et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4758927 | Berg | Jul 1988 | A |
4764723 | Strid | Aug 1988 | A |
4816754 | Buechele et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4834855 | Bloomquist et al. | May 1989 | A |
4837622 | Whann et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4908571 | Stoehr | Mar 1990 | A |
4924589 | Leedy | May 1990 | A |
4933045 | DiStefano et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4942076 | Panicker et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4956923 | Pettingell et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4965865 | Trenary | Oct 1990 | A |
4970106 | DiStefano et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4973903 | Schemmel | Nov 1990 | A |
4975638 | Evans et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5032896 | Little et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5055778 | Okubo et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5070297 | Kwon et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5084672 | Ikeuchi et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5103557 | Leedy | Apr 1992 | A |
5109596 | Driller et al. | May 1992 | A |
5121298 | Sarma et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5144228 | Sorna et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5148103 | Pasiecznik, Jr. | Sep 1992 | A |
5148265 | Khandros et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5148266 | Khandros et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5152695 | Grabbe et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5154810 | Kamerling et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5166774 | Banerji et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5189363 | Bregman et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5191708 | Kasukabe et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5208531 | Aton | May 1993 | A |
5210485 | Kreiger et al. | May 1993 | A |
5214375 | Ikeuchi et al. | May 1993 | A |
5225037 | Elder et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5227718 | Stowers et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5240583 | Ahonen | Aug 1993 | A |
5255079 | Kageyama | Oct 1993 | A |
5258648 | Lin | Nov 1993 | A |
5278442 | Prinz et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5280139 | Suppelsa et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5313157 | Pasiecznik, Jr. | May 1994 | A |
5326428 | Farnworth et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5347159 | Khandros et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5352266 | Erb et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5354205 | Feigenbaum | Oct 1994 | A |
5367764 | DiStefano et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5373627 | Grebe | Dec 1994 | A |
5385477 | Vaynkof et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5395253 | Crumly | Mar 1995 | A |
5412866 | Woith et al. | May 1995 | A |
5416429 | McQuade et al. | May 1995 | A |
5433797 | Erb et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5440241 | King et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5473254 | Asar | Dec 1995 | A |
5476211 | Khandros | Dec 1995 | A |
5489852 | Gomez | Feb 1996 | A |
5521518 | Higgins | May 1996 | A |
5521523 | Kimura et al. | May 1996 | A |
5523697 | Farnworth et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5530371 | Perry et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5532612 | Liang | Jul 1996 | A |
5532613 | Nagasawa et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5534784 | Lum et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5546012 | Perry et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5555422 | Nakano | Sep 1996 | A |
5558928 | DiStefano et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563521 | Crumbly | Oct 1996 | A |
5568054 | Iino et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5570032 | Atkins et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5600257 | Leas et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5613861 | Smith et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5621333 | Long et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5621373 | McCormick | Apr 1997 | A |
5629631 | Perry et al. | May 1997 | A |
5631571 | Spaziani et al. | May 1997 | A |
5635846 | Beaman et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5656138 | Scobey et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5657394 | Schwartz et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5663596 | Little | Sep 1997 | A |
5665648 | Little | Sep 1997 | A |
5670889 | Okubo et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5694050 | Noguchi | Dec 1997 | A |
5703494 | Sano | Dec 1997 | A |
5707575 | Litt et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5744283 | Spierings et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5756021 | Hedrick et al. | May 1998 | A |
5763941 | Flejstad | Jun 1998 | A |
5764070 | Pedder | Jun 1998 | A |
5772451 | Dozier, II et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5786701 | Pedder | Jul 1998 | A |
5798027 | Lefebvre et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5800184 | Lopergolo et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5801441 | Smith et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5806181 | Khandros et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5820014 | Dozier, II et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5821763 | Beaman et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5821764 | Slocum et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828226 | Higgins et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
D401250 | Tudhope | Nov 1998 | S |
D401251 | Tudhope | Nov 1998 | S |
D401252 | Tudhope | Nov 1998 | S |
5829128 | Eldridge et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5830327 | Kolenkow | Nov 1998 | A |
5832598 | Greenman et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5832601 | Eldridge et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
D403002 | Tudhope | Dec 1998 | S |
D403334 | Tudhope | Dec 1998 | S |
5844421 | Lee et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5847572 | Iwasaki et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5848685 | Smith et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5852871 | Khandros | Dec 1998 | A |
5864946 | Eldridge et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5869974 | Akram et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5878486 | Eldridge et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5884395 | Dabrowiecki et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5884398 | Eldridge et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5886535 | Budnaitis et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5896038 | Budnaitis et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5897326 | Eldridge et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5900738 | Khandros et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905305 | Fogal et al. | May 1999 | A |
5912046 | Eldridge et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5914218 | Smith et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5917707 | Khandros et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5926951 | Khandros et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5944537 | Smith et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5955888 | Frederickson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5968327 | Kobayashi | Oct 1999 | A |
5973504 | Chong et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974662 | Eldridge et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5977787 | Das et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5979892 | Smith | Nov 1999 | A |
5983493 | Eldridge et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993616 | Suwabe et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5994152 | Khandros et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5994222 | Smith et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5994781 | Smith | Nov 1999 | A |
5998228 | Eldridge et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
5998864 | Khandros et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6001671 | Fjelstad | Dec 1999 | A |
6002168 | Bellaar et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007349 | Distefano et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012224 | DiStefano et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014032 | Maddix et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020220 | Gilleo et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023103 | Chang et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028437 | Potter | Feb 2000 | A |
6029344 | Khandros et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6030856 | DiStefano et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032356 | Eldridge et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6033935 | Dozier, II et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042712 | Mathieu | Mar 2000 | A |
6043563 | Eldridge et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044548 | Distefano et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6045395 | Saito | Apr 2000 | A |
6045396 | Tighe | Apr 2000 | A |
6045655 | DiStefano et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6046076 | Mitchell et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049972 | Link et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049976 | Khandros | Apr 2000 | A |
6050829 | Eldridge et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6054337 | Solberg | Apr 2000 | A |
6054756 | DiStefano et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6060891 | Hembree et al. | May 2000 | A |
6063648 | Beroz et al. | May 2000 | A |
6064213 | Khandros et al. | May 2000 | A |
6075289 | Distefano | Jun 2000 | A |
6078186 | Hembree et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080603 | Distefano et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080605 | Distefano et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080932 | Smith et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081035 | Warner et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6090261 | Mathieu | Jul 2000 | A |
6091256 | Long et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6110823 | Eldridge et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6114864 | Soejima et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6117694 | Smith et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6118894 | Schwartz et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6137297 | McNair et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6147876 | Yamaguchi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6150186 | Chen et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6169411 | Johnson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183267 | Marcus et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6184053 | Eldridge et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6184065 | Smith et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6184699 | Smith et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190513 | Forster | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192982 | Divis et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6203331 | McHugh et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6204674 | Dabrowiecki et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6213789 | Chua et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215320 | Parrish | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215321 | Nakata | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218033 | Cao et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218910 | Miller | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6232143 | Maddix et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6245444 | Marcus et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246247 | Eldridge et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255126 | Mathieu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264477 | Smith et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6265888 | Hsu | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6274823 | Khandros et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277249 | Gopalraja et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281592 | Murayama | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285563 | Nelson et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6288560 | Wohlfarth | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290510 | Fork et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292003 | Fredrickson et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292007 | Potter | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6300783 | Okubo et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306265 | Fu et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6329713 | Farquhar et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336269 | Eldridge et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6340320 | Ogawa | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6347947 | Ong | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351133 | Jones et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352454 | Kim et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356098 | Akram et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358376 | Wang et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361331 | Fork et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6396677 | Chua et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6398929 | Chiang et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6419500 | Kister | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424166 | Henry et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425988 | Montcalm et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426686 | Douriet et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428673 | Ritzdorf et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6429671 | Duckworth et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6439898 | Chua et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6476626 | Aldaz et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6483328 | Eldridge et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6489795 | Klele et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6497799 | McLeod | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501343 | Miller | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6509751 | Mathieu et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6520778 | Eldridge et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6525555 | Khandros et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6528350 | Fork | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6528984 | Beaman et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6534856 | Dozier, II et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6544814 | Yasunaga et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6586956 | Aldaz et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6600334 | Hembree et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6616966 | Mathieu et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6624648 | Eldridge et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6640415 | Eslamy et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6645257 | Schacht et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6651325 | Lee et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6684499 | Romano et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6734688 | Castellano et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6741085 | Khandros et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6751850 | Hu et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6791171 | Mok et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6799976 | Mok | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6812718 | Chong et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6815961 | Mok et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6827584 | Mathieu et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6844214 | Mei et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6847218 | Nulty et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6856150 | Sporck et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6856225 | Chua et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6888362 | Eldridge et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6917525 | Mok et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6920689 | Khandros et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7048548 | Mathieu et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7116119 | Sporck et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7403029 | Chong et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
20010009305 | Fjelstad | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010009724 | Chen et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010021483 | Mathieu et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020000013 | Sugaya et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020000016 | Hsieh | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013070 | Fork et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016095 | Fork et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020055282 | Eldridge et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020075105 | Douriet et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020132501 | Eldridge et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020164893 | Mathieu et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020171133 | Mok et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030000010 | Shimizu | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030010615 | Fork et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030071348 | Eguchi et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030075795 | Hashimoto | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030197285 | Strandberg et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040038560 | Mathieu et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040058487 | Eslamy et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040102064 | Mathieu | May 2004 | A1 |
20040155337 | Strandberg et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040223309 | Haemer et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050012513 | Cheng et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050026476 | Mok et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050212540 | Nulty et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050270055 | Akram et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050280430 | Cram | Dec 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
5964196 | Dec 1996 | AU |
6028796 | Dec 1996 | AU |
6377796 | Dec 1996 | AU |
6635296 | Dec 1996 | AU |
1171167 | Jan 1998 | CN |
1191500 | Aug 1998 | CN |
1208368 | Feb 1999 | CN |
3630548 | Mar 1988 | DE |
69431565 | Jun 2003 | DE |
69633334 | Feb 2005 | DE |
369112 | Jul 1989 | EP |
0623826 | Nov 1994 | EP |
0681186 | Nov 1995 | EP |
0731369 | Sep 1996 | EP |
0792462 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0792463 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0795200 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0802419 | Oct 1997 | EP |
0828582 | Mar 1998 | EP |
0837750 | Apr 1998 | EP |
0859686 | Aug 1998 | EP |
0886894 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0792519 | Mar 2003 | EP |
0792517 | Oct 2003 | EP |
2518358 | Oct 1981 | FR |
02064091 | Mar 1990 | JP |
3058919 | Mar 1991 | JP |
3267763 | Nov 1991 | JP |
5335746 | Dec 1993 | JP |
7301642 | Nov 1995 | JP |
9512139 | Feb 1997 | JP |
1995-292471 | May 1997 | JP |
9508241 | Aug 1997 | JP |
9281144 | Oct 1997 | JP |
10506197 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10506238 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10510107 | Sep 1998 | JP |
11064386 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2892505 | May 1999 | JP |
11126800 | May 1999 | JP |
11506829 | Jun 1999 | JP |
11508407 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2968051 | Oct 1999 | JP |
11514493 | Dec 1999 | JP |
3022312 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2000067953 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2000513499 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2001020067 | Aug 2002 | JP |
252457 | Apr 2000 | KR |
55303 | Dec 1998 | SG |
WO9425987 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO9514314 | May 1995 | WO |
WO9615458 | May 1996 | WO |
WO9615459 | May 1996 | WO |
WO9615551 | May 1996 | WO |
WO9616440 | May 1996 | WO |
WO9617378 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO9637331 | Nov 1996 | WO |
WO9637332 | Nov 1996 | WO |
WO9638858 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO9641506 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO9743656 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO9744676 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO9801906 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO9852224 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO9914404 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO9918445 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO0052487 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO0052488 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO0052703 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO0073905 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0074110 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0075677 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0109623 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO0109952 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO0113130 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO0148818 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO0148870 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO0198793 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO03018865 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO03081725 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO2005091996 | Oct 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080246500 A1 | Oct 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60573541 | May 2004 | US | |
60592908 | Jul 2004 | US | |
60651294 | Feb 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11133021 | May 2005 | US |
Child | 11858064 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10870095 | Jun 2004 | US |
Child | 11133021 | US | |
Parent | 10196494 | Jul 2002 | US |
Child | 10870095 | US | |
Parent | 10178103 | Jun 2002 | US |
Child | 10196494 | US | |
Parent | 09980040 | Nov 2001 | US |
Child | 10178103 | US |