A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
Automated electronics assembly machines are often used in the manufacture of printed circuit boards, which are used in various electronic devices. Such automatic electronic assembly machines are often used to process other devices that are similar to printed circuit boards. For example, the manufacture of photovoltaic cells (solar cells) often uses similar machines for printing conductive traces. Regardless of the substrate being processed, the process itself is generally required to operate quite swiftly. Rapid or high speed manufacturing ensures that costs of the completed substrate are minimized. However, the speed with which the substrates are manufactured must be balanced by the acceptable level of scrap or defects caused by the process. Printed circuit boards, for example, can be extremely complicated and small and any one board may have a vast number of components and consequently a vast number of electrical connections. Printed circuit boards are now produced in large quantities. Since such printed circuit boards can be quite expensive and/or be used in expensive equipment, it is important that they be produced accurately and with high quality, high reliability, and minimum scrap. Unfortunately, because of the manufacturing methods available, some level of scrap and rejects still occurs. Typical faults on printed circuit boards include inaccuracy of placement of components on the board, which might mean that the components are not correctly electrically connected in the board. Another typical fault occurs when an incorrect component is placed at a given location on a circuit board. Additionally, the component might simply be absent, or it may be placed with incorrect electrical polarity. Further, other errors may prohibit, or otherwise inhibit, electrical connections between one or more components, and the board. Further still, if there are insufficient solder paste deposits, this can lead to poor connections. Additionally, if there is too much solder paste, such a condition can lead to short circuits, and so on.
In view of all of these industry demands, a need has arisen for automated optical inspection systems. These systems can receive a substrate, such as a printed circuit board, either immediately after placement of the components upon the printed circuit board and before wave soldering, or post reflow. Typically, the systems include a conveyor that is adapted to move the substrate under test through an optical field of view that acquires one or more images and analyzes those images to automatically draw conclusions about components on the substrate and/or the substrate itself. One example of such device is sold under the trade designation Flex Ultra™ HR available from CyberOptics Corporation, of Golden Valley, Minn. However, as described above, the industry continues to pursue faster and faster processing, and accordingly faster automated optical inspection is desired. Moreover, given the wide array of various objects that the system may be required to inspect, it would be beneficial to provide an automated optical inspection system that was not only faster than previous systems, but better able to provide valuable inspection data relative to a wider variety of components, substrates, or inspection criteria.
An optical inspection system is provided for inspecting a workpiece including a feature to be inspected. The system includes a workpiece transport configured to transport the workpiece in a nonstop manner. An illuminator is configured to provide a first strobed illumination field type and a second strobed illumination field type. The illuminator includes a light pipe having a first end proximate the feature, and a second end opposite the first end and spaced from the first end. The light pipe also has at least one reflective sidewall. The first end has an exit aperture and the second end has at least one second end aperture to provide a view of the feature therethrough. An array of cameras is configured to digitally image the feature. The array of cameras is configured to generate a first plurality of images of the feature with the first illumination field and a second plurality of images of the feature with the second illumination field. A processing device is operably coupled to the illuminator and the array of cameras, the processing device is configured to store at least some of the first and second plurality of images and provide the first and second pluralities to an other device.
Embodiments of the present invention will generally be described with respect to the figures. A number of reference numerals are used to refer to the various features of the figures. For clarity, a listing of the various reference numerals follows.
2—camera
4—camera array
10—printed circuit board
11—small workpiece
14—belt
18—motor
20—encoder
22—programmable logic controller
24—panel sensor
26—workpiece transport conveyor
30—camera field of view
32—camera array field of view
33—camera array field of view
34—camera array field of view
35—camera array field of view
41—illuminator
42—illuminator
43—illuminator
44—illuminator
45—illuminator
46—LED
48—linear light source
50—aperture
52—diffuser plate
54—mirror
56—aperture
57—mixing chamber
58—top aperture plate
60—light source
62—collimated light ray bundle
64—light pipe
65—light pipe illuminator
66—light pipe side wall
67—mirrors
68—light pipe exit aperture
69—light pipe entrance aperture
70—reflective surface (side wall interior surface)
71—inspection application program
72—conveyor interface
76—system computer
80—main electronics board
82—image memory
83—strobe assembly
84—strobe board
86—strobe monitor
87—flash lamp (darkfield light source)
88—flash lamp (cloudy day light source)
92—inspection system
94—optical inspection sensor
Embodiments of the present invention generally provide an inspection system and method with high speed acquisition of multiple illumination images without the need for expensive and sophisticated motion control hardware. Processing of the images acquired with different illumination types may appreciably enhance the inspection results.
Workpiece transport conveyor 26 translates printed circuit board 10 in the X direction in a nonstop mode to provide high speed imaging of printed circuit board 10 by camera array 4. Conveyor 26 includes belts 14 which are driven by motor 18. Optional encoder 20 measures the position of the shaft of motor 18 hence the approximate distance traveled by printed circuit board 10 can be calculated. Other methods of measuring and encoding the distance traveled of printed circuit board 10 include time-based, acoustic or vision-based encoding methods. By using strobed illumination and not bringing printed circuit board 10 to a stop, the time-consuming transport steps of accelerating, decelerating, and settling prior to imaging by camera array 4 are eliminated. It is believed that the time required to entirely image a printed circuit board 10 of dimensions 210 mm×310 mm can be reduced from 11 seconds to 4 seconds using embodiments of the present invention compared to coming to a complete stop before imaging.
Panel sensor 24 senses the edge of printed circuit board 10 as it is loaded into inspection system 92 and this signal is sent to main board 80 to begin an image acquisition sequence. Main board 80 generates the appropriate signals to begin each image exposure by camera array 4 and commands strobe board 84 to energize the appropriate flash lamps 87 and 88 at the proper time. Strobe monitor 86 senses a portion of light emitted by flash lamps 87 and 88 and this data may be used by main electronics board 80 to compensate image data for slight flash lamp output variations. Image memory 82 is provided and preferably contains enough capacity to store all images generated for at least one printed circuit board 10. For example, in one embodiment, each camera in the array of cameras has a resolution of about 5 megapixels and memory 82 has a capacity of about 2.0 gigabytes. Image data from cameras 2A-2H may be transferred at high speed into image memory buffer 82 to allow each camera to be quickly prepared for subsequent exposures. This allows the printed circuit board 10 to be transported through inspection system 92 in a nonstop manner and generate images of each location on printed circuit board 10 with at least two different illumination field types. The image data may begin to be read out of image memory 82 into PC memory over a high speed electrical interface such as PCI Express (PCIe) as soon as the first images are transferred to memory 82. Similarly, inspection program 71 may begin to compute inspection results as soon as image data is available in PC memory.
The image acquisition process will now be described in further detail with respect to
In one preferred embodiment, each field of view 30A-30H has approximately 5 million pixels with a pixel resolution of 17 microns and an extent of 33 mm in the X direction and 44 mm in the Y direction. Each field of view 30A-30H overlaps neighboring fields of view by approximately 4 mm in the Y direction so that center-to-center spacing for each camera 2A-2H is 40 mm in the Y direction. In this embodiment, camera array field of view 32 has a large aspect ratio in the Y direction compared to the X direction of approximately 10:1.
There is a small overlap in the X dimension between field of views 32 and 34 in order to have enough overlapping image information in order to register and digitally merge, or stitch together, the images that were acquired with the first illumination field type. There is also small overlap in the X dimension between field of views 33 and 35 in order to have enough overlapping image information in order to register and digitally merge the images that were acquired with the second illumination field type. In the embodiment with fields of view 30A-30H having extents of 33 mm in the X direction, it has been found that an approximate 5 mm overlap in the X direction between field of views acquired with the same illumination field type is effective. Further, an approximate 14 mm displacement in the X direction between fields of view acquired with different illumination types is preferred.
Images of each feature on printed circuit board 10 may be acquired with more than two illumination field types by increasing the number of fields of view collected and ensuring sufficient image overlap in order to register and digitally merge, or stitch together, images generated with like illumination field types. Finally, the stitched images generated for each illumination type may be registered with respect to each other. In a preferred embodiment, workpiece transport conveyor 26 has lower positional accuracy than the inspection requirements in order to reduce system cost. For example, encoder 20 may have a resolution of 100 microns and conveyor 26 may have positional accuracy of 0.5 mm or more. Image stitching of fields of view in the X direction compensates for positional errors of the circuit board 10.
It is desirable that each illumination field is spatially uniform and illuminates from consistent angles. It is also desirable for the illumination system to be compact and have high efficiency. Limitations of two prior art illumination systems, linear light sources and ring lights, will be discussed with reference to
Although a ring light could be used to provide acceptable uniformity in azimuth, the ring light would need to be very large to provide acceptable spatial uniformity for camera field of view 32 of approximately 300 mm in the Y direction. For typical inspection applications, it is believed that the ring light would need to be over 1 meter in diameter to provide sufficient spatial uniformity. This enormous ring fails to meet market needs in several respects: the large size consumes valuable space on the assembly line, the large light source is expensive to build, the illumination angles are not consistent across the working field, and it is very inefficient—the light output will be scattered over a significant fraction of the 1 meter circle while only a slim rectangle of the board is actually imaged.
An optical device, referred to as a light pipe, can be used to produce a very uniform light field for illumination. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 1,577,388 describes a light pipe used to back illuminate a film gate. Conventional light pipes, however, need to be physically long to provide uniform illumination.
A brief description of light pipe principles is provided with respect to
As the elevation angle of light exiting illuminator 65 is the same as those present in the source 60, it is relatively easy to tune those angles to specific applications. If a lower elevation illumination angle is desired then the source may be aimed closer to the horizon. The lower limit to the illumination angle is set by the standoff of the light pipe bottom edge as light cannot reach the target from angles below the bottom edge of the light pipe. The upper limit to the illumination elevation angle is set by the length of light pipe 66 since several reflections are required to randomize, or homogenize, the illumination azimuth angle. As elevation angle is increased there will be fewer bounces for a given length light pipe 64 before reaching workpiece 11.
The polygonal light pipe homogenizer only forms new azimuth angles at its corners, therefore many reflections are needed to get a uniform output If all portions of the light pipe side walls could spread or randomize the light pattern in the azimuth direction, then fewer reflections would be required and the length of the light pipe in the Z direction could be reduced making the illuminator shorter and/or wider in the Y direction.
In one aspect, reflective surface 70 is curved in segments of a cylinder. This spreads incoming light evenly in one axis, approximating a one-dimensional Lambertian surface, but does not spread light in the other axis. This shape is also easy to form in sheet metal. In another aspect, reflective surface 70 has a sine wave shape. However, since a sine wave shape has more curvature at the peaks and valleys and less curvature on the sides, the angular spread of light bundle 62 is stronger at the peaks and valleys than on the sides.
Light pipe illuminator 42 can be shortened in the Z direction compared to illuminator 41 if multiple light sources are used. Multiple sources, for example a row of collimated LEDs, reduce the total number of reflections required to achieve a spatially uniform source and hence reduce the required light pipe length. Illuminator 42 is illustrated with light sources 87A-87E which may also be strobed arc lamp sources.
In another aspect of the present invention shown in
In another embodiment of the present invention,
Light projected by source 88 is reflected by mirrors 54 and 55 and aperture plate 58. As the light reflects in mixing chamber 57, diffuser plate 52 also reflects a portion of this light and is injected back into mixing chamber 57. After multiple light reflections within mixing chamber 57, diffuser plate 52 is uniformly illuminated. The light transmitted through diffuser plate 52 is emitted into the lower section of illuminator 44 which is constructed of reflective surfaces 70, such as those discussed with reference to
It is understood by those skilled in the art that the image contrast of various object features vary depending on several factors including the feature geometry, color, reflectance properties, and the angular spectrum of illumination incident on each feature. Since each camera array field of view may contain a wide variety of features with different illumination requirements, embodiments of the present invention address this challenge by imaging each feature and location on workpiece 10 two or more times, with each of these images captured under different illumination conditions and then stored into a digital memory. In general, the inspection performance may be improved by using object feature data from two or more images acquired with different illumination field types.
It should be understood that embodiments of the present invention are not limited to two lighting types such as dark field and cloudy day illumination field nor are they limited to the specific illuminator configurations. The light sources may project directly onto workpiece 10. The light sources may also have different wavelengths, or colors, and be located at different angles with respect to workpiece 10. The light sources may be positioned at various azimuthal angles around workpiece 10 to provide illumination from different quadrants. The light sources may be a multitude of high power LEDs that emit light pulses with enough energy to “freeze” the motion of workpiece 10 and suppress motion blurring in the images. Numerous other lighting configurations are within the scope of the invention including light sources that generate bright field illumination fields or transmit through the substrate of workpiece 10 to backlight features to be inspected.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
The present application is based on and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/244,616, filed Sep. 22, 2009 and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/244,671, filed on Sep. 22, 2009; the present application is a Continuation-In-Part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/864,110 filed Jul. 22, 2010; and the present application is a Continuation-In-Part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/564,131, filed Sep. 22, 2009. All applications listed above are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1577388 | Twyman | May 1923 | A |
4677473 | Okamoto | Jun 1987 | A |
4750798 | Whitehead | Jun 1988 | A |
4795913 | Blessing et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4799175 | Sano | Jan 1989 | A |
4896211 | Hung | Jan 1990 | A |
4978224 | Kishimoto et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4993826 | Yoder | Feb 1991 | A |
5039868 | Kobayashi | Aug 1991 | A |
5058178 | Ray | Oct 1991 | A |
5058982 | Katzir | Oct 1991 | A |
5060065 | Wasserman | Oct 1991 | A |
5086397 | Schuster | Feb 1992 | A |
5153668 | Katzir | Oct 1992 | A |
5245421 | Robertson | Sep 1993 | A |
5260779 | Wasserman | Nov 1993 | A |
5291239 | Jackson | Mar 1994 | A |
5347363 | Yamanaka | Sep 1994 | A |
5455870 | Sepai et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5517234 | Straayer et al. | May 1996 | A |
5550583 | Amir | Aug 1996 | A |
5684530 | White | Nov 1997 | A |
5696591 | Bilhorn | Dec 1997 | A |
5822055 | Tsai | Oct 1998 | A |
5825495 | Huber | Oct 1998 | A |
5880772 | Kalnajs | Mar 1999 | A |
6020957 | Rosengaus et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023663 | Kim | Feb 2000 | A |
6175107 | Juvinall | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6222624 | Yonezawa | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6362877 | Kobayashi | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6577405 | Kranz et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6603103 | Ulrich et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6633375 | Veith | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6750899 | Fishbaine et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757966 | Inoue et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6850855 | Kawai | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7019826 | Vook | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7027639 | Fishbaine | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7075565 | Raymond et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7310438 | Prince | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7372632 | Lizotte | May 2008 | B2 |
7460219 | Jung | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7828472 | Liu | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8098372 | Eitan et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
20020089664 | Shibata | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030039388 | Ulrich et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030110610 | Duquette et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030179369 | Feldman | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030227618 | Some | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040156539 | Jansson | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050219518 | Korngut | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050259245 | Cemic | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060062013 | Imade | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20110069154 | Case | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069507 | Haugan | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110075156 | Patel et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110090333 | Haugan | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110102575 | Case | May 2011 | A1 |
20110175997 | Case et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120133920 | Skunes et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120327215 | Case et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202008004430 | Jan 2009 | DE |
0301255 | Feb 1989 | EP |
0994646 | Apr 2000 | EP |
1578186 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1694109 | Feb 2006 | EP |
2271683 | Apr 1994 | GB |
2417072 | Feb 2006 | GB |
2444409 | Jun 2008 | GB |
61134718 | Jun 1986 | JP |
6229875 | Dec 1987 | JP |
63011842 | Jan 1988 | JP |
02268260 | Nov 1990 | JP |
08327561 | Dec 1996 | JP |
2002271099 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2006324599 | Nov 2006 | JP |
WO9819200 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 0026640 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0038494 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0196839 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 2009014940 | Jan 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Written Opinion for International application No. PCT/US2010/049617 dated Feb. 14, 2012. |
Notification of Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability for the International application No. PCT/US10/49617 dated Aug. 24, 2012. |
Notification of transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion for International application No. PCT/US2011/059040 dated Jul. 20, 2012. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees from International patent application No. PCT/US2011/059040 dated Mar. 15, 2012. |
Related U.S. Appl. No. 13/480,079, filed May 24, 2012. |
Martin, “A practical Guide to Machine Vision Lighting”, Advance Illumination, Rochester, VT, United States, Oct. 2007. |
Scharstein and Szeliski, “A Taxonomy and Evaluation of Dense Two-Frame Stereo Correspondence Algorithms”Microsoft Research, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, Apr. 2002. |
Smith, “Modern Optical Engineering: The Design of Optical Systems”, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008. |
Kang,Web, Zitinick, and Takeo, “A Multibaseline Stereo System with Active Illumination and Real-time Image Acquisition.”, Jun. 1995. |
Collins, “A Space-Sweep Approach to True Multi-Image Matching” University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, Jun. 1996. |
CyberOptics, “Flex Ultra TM HR, Automated Optical Inspection”, CyberOptics Corporation 2007. |
Notification of transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion for International application No. PCT/US2009/031744 dated May 18, 2009. |
Notification of transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion for International application No. PCT/US20101049619 dated Dec. 8, 2010. |
Notification of transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion for International application No. PCT/US2010/04617 dated Dec. 8, 2010. |
Notification of transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion for International application No. PCT/US2010/055452 dated Jan. 17, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/864,110, filed Jul. 22, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/940,214, filed Nov. 5, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/564,131, filed Sep. 22, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,784, filed Sep. 21, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/939,267, filed Nov. 4, 2010. |
Office Action from United States Patent Office issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/939,267, mailed Jun. 20, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in related application PCT/US2011/059040, mailed Sep. 1, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110069878 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61244616 | Sep 2009 | US | |
61244671 | Sep 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12864110 | Jan 2011 | US |
Child | 12886803 | US | |
Parent | 12564131 | Sep 2009 | US |
Child | 12864110 | US |