The present invention generally relates to the field of integrated circuit testing. In particular, the present invention is directed to a high-speed transceiver tester incorporating jitter injection.
High-speed transceiver circuitry is finding widespread use in the microelectronics and computer industries because of its superior traits over conventional bus technologies. These traits include, without limitation, improved throughput and wiring efficiencies. This circuitry, however, is analog in nature and is generally hard to design, characterize, and manufacture reliably. Accordingly, this unreliability creates challenges in the production test-phase. These challenges are forcing test professionals to revise their quality-assurance methodologies. These revisions, for example, include formulating new methodologies to screen modem high-speed transceiver designs because simple loop back testing is no longer sufficient.
Consequently, to properly screen high-speed transceiver designs, stressed-eye tests are required. These tests generate and introduce artificially induced jitter to a transceiver device, with the objective to measure the device's ability to resist the jitter. Notably, jitter-injection instruments for stressed-eye generation currently exist. These instruments, however, are rarely practical for production testing because of the instrument's high cost, limited number of channels, and the need for analog modulation circuitry. Moreover, delay-line techniques, used extensively for jitter injection, are unable to generate delay steps fine enough for the smallest delay element available in current high-speed transceiver designs. This deficiency may be overcome by using analog phase interpolation techniques, which allow for the generation of delay steps that are smaller than a unit delay element. These techniques, however, require careful tuning and are susceptible to process, manufacturing, and environmental conditions, and preclude the introduction of delay generators in digital-only or low-cost applications.
In one embodiment, the present disclosure is directed to a high-speed digital tester. The high-speed digital tester comprises a jitter generator that includes a multiplexer configured to receive a first clock input signal and a second clock input signal phased-shifted relative to the first clock input signal by a delay. The multiplexer has a multiplexer output and a multiplexer select port. A phase filter is operatively connected to the multiplexer output. A phase selection signal generator is in operative communication with the multiplexer select port and is configured to generate a phase-selecting signal for continually selecting between the first clock signal and the second clock signal.
In another embodiment, the present disclosure is directed to a method of generating a high-speed jittered test pattern. The method comprises generating a rapidly varying phase signal containing a low-frequency phase signal and at least one high-frequency component. The rapidly varying phase signal is filtered so as to create a filtered phase signal substantially lacking the at least one high-frequency component. Parallel data is serialized as a function of the filtered phase signal so as to create a high-speed jittered test pattern.
In yet another embodiment, the present disclosure is directed to a method of testing a device under test having a serial receive port and a serial transmit port. The method comprises generating a rapidly varying phase signal containing a low-frequency phase signal and at least one high-frequency component. The rapidly varying phase signal is filtered so as to create a filtered phase signal substantially lacking the at least one high-frequency component. Parallel data on a plurality of data input ports is serialized as a function of the filtered phase signal so as to create a serial test pattern. The serial test pattern is input into the serial receive port of the device under test. A serial data signal from the serial transmit port of the device under test. The serial data signal is deserialized into parallel data so as to create a deserialized data signal. The deserialized data signal for input into the serial receive port of the device under test.
In a further embodiment, the present disclosure is directed to a method of testing a device under test having a serial receive port and a serial transmit port. The method comprises enabling the device under test to transmit a serial data signal on its serial transmit port. The serial data signal is received from the serial transmit port of the device under test. The serial data signal is deserialized into parallel data. The parallel data is input into a plurality of data input ports of a serializer. A rapidly varying phase signal containing a low-frequency phase signal and at least one high-frequency component is generated. The rapidly varying phase signal is filtered so as to created a filtered phase signal substantially lacking the at least one high-frequency component. Data on the plurality of data input ports is serialized as a function of the filtered phase signal so as to create a serial test signal. The serial test signal is input into the serial receive port of the device under test. The device under test is enabled to compare the received signal against the serial data signal.
For the purpose of illustrating the invention, the drawings show aspects of one or more embodiments of the invention. However, it should be understood that the present invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown in the drawings, wherein:
Referring now to the drawings,
In the embodiment shown, tester 104 includes at least one high-speed data-transmit serializer 120 for serializing parallel test data 124 and a jitter generator 128 for driving the input of the data-transmit serializer so as to inject jitter into stimulus pattern 116. Test data 124 for stimulus pattern 116 may originate from one or more low-frequency parallel words applied to the inputs 132 of data-serializing multiplexer 120. Test data 124 may be produced from, for example, a memory (not shown) (such as a memory on board tester 104), that will typically, though not necessarily, run at a relatively slow frequency compared to stimulus pattern 116 and typically use the same low-cost technology as DUT 108. During operation, test data 124 enters data-transmit serializer 120 as a function of the output signal 136 of jitter generator 128, thereby converting the parallel test data into high-quality, jittered serial pattern 116 running, for example, at several Gigabits per second (Gbps). Those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that instead of single data-transmit serializer 120, tester 104 may include multiple data-transmit serializers to create a low cost multi-lane pulse or multi-lane pattern generator. It should also be understood that data-transmit serializer 120 can be designed to include protocol-specific functions, such as 8 b/10 b encoding, PRBS sourcing and checking, as well as others.
Jitter generator 128 may include a phase modulator 140 for generating a phase-modulated signal 144. In the embodiment shown, modulator 140 includes a multiplexer 148, which combines a clock signal 152 with a phase-delayed clock signal 156 as a function of a phase-selecting signal 160 that selects between the undelayed clock signal and the phase-delayed signal as a function of rapidly varying binary data 164 contained on the phase-selecting signal. As discussed below, binary data 164 is designed to contain various frequency components, e.g., low frequency sine wave and high frequency components and may be generated by any suitable source. Those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that in the context of multiplexer 148, phase-selecting signal 160 contains control data, represented, in this case of two multiplexed inputs, by a continuous data stream of high (“1”) and low (“0”) discrete data bits for selecting between the two inputs. In the embodiment shown, phase-delayed clock signal 156 may be simply generated by passing clock signal 152 through a delay 168, which may be designed to have a fixed delay or a programmable delay value that allows for delay values over a particular range. Those skilled in the art will recognize that these delay values may be selected based on the desired testing conditions for the DUTs under consideration.
An important feature of tester 104 is that delay 168 does not need to be small, so a reasonably margined size can be used to allow for more robustness to process variations. With tester 104 shown, achieving the fine delay generation is accomplished in the algorithmic step of the selection of phase-selecting signal 160 and is not dependent on or limited by any particular hardware implementation. There are several advantages to this property of the proposed invention. The clock speed at the input of the PLL, and the speed at which the phase selection logic is clocked, is in the range of 100 MHz to 300 MHz whereas the final output speed is in the range of 2 GHz to 6 GHz. Thus, tester 104 allows the injection of both large and small jitter values on GHz signals using a single hardware circuit: the largest value of jitter is equal to the value of delay 168 (which can be constructed easily at 100 MHz), and the smallest value is determined by the properties of sigma-delta modulation as discussed previously.
Referring to
Referring again to
In the embodiment shown, simulated sigma-delta modulator 316 comprises a circular memory 352 that stores a sequence of individual control bits 356 for selecting between the two inputs, i.e., clock signal 344 and phase-delayed clock signal 348, of multiplexer 340 sequentially at a high speed (e.g., 100 MHz-200 MHz) so as to generate phase-modulated signal 336 in the manner described above relative to
When sigma-delta modulator 400 is simulated in software, it generates a 1-bit output waveform that contains the original input signal x[n], as well as unwanted high-frequency quantization noise. By matching the bandwidth of sigma-delta modulator 400 to the bandwidth of PLL 332, the unwanted high-frequency quantization noise is guaranteed to be located in the stop-band of the PLL and, therefore, is not propagated through the PLL into phase-filtered output signal 324. For example, since most PLLs have a second-order phase response, only a second-order sigma-delta modulator needs to be simulated in software. If a higher-order PLL is used, a matching order sigma-delta modulator may be simulated. A description of the use of a periodic memory, such as circular memory 352, to emulate sigma-delta modulated signals appears in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/844,675, which is incorporated by reference herein. It is noted that a full-fledged sigma-delta modulator, such as sigma-delta modulator 400 of
The frequency of clock signal 344 and the clock frequency for the trigger 358 of circular memory 352 can be made equal or they can be different from one another. In the case when they are equal, the minimum frequency will be determined by the bandwidth of the phase response of PLL 332 and the quality of the sigma-delta modulator used. If the clock frequency is too slow, the over-sampling ratio of the sigma-delta modulator will be low, and the quality of the phase signal (e.g. sine wave) will be affected. Conversely, if the clock frequency is high, the quality of the encoded signal is improved, but the maximum size of delay 360 in
Referring to
Referring next to
On its transmit port side, data-transmit serializer 632 of tester 600 is driven by a jitter generator 636 that may be identical, or similar, to any of the jitter generators 128, 328, 700 of
It should be evident to those skilled in the art that the loop-back of tester 600 is different from conventional loop-back. By recovering the clock timing from DUT transmit port 612 and completely deserializing high-speed serial data stream 616, tester 600 completely decouples the DUT transmit performance from the DUT receive performance. What DUT receive port 644 sees is a nominally good signal with controlled jitter profiles. Thus, failures at this phase of the test will be due solely to DUT receive port 644 and not DUT transmit port 612. The clock timing recovery also allows tester 600 to run asynchronously with the DUT (in addition to running synchronously, of course). Depending on the application, the ability to test both modes of operation (i.e. synchronous and asynchronous) is often required.
Driving the multi-bit character of jitter generator 700 is a multiplexer 712 having more than two (binary) inputs. Therefore, more than a single bit is needed for an individual selection to be made from among the inputs. In the embodiment shown, multiplexer 712 is shown as having four inputs, i.e., a clock signal 716 and three delayed clock signals 720A-C. Thus, each selection requires two bits of control data 708. In alternative embodiments, the number of inputs to multiplexer 712 may be more or fewer than four, with control data 708 containing the appropriate number of control bits for each selection.
Delayed-clock signals 720A-C may be generated in any suitable manner. For example, in the embodiment shown, delayed-clock signals 720A-C are created using a cascade of delays 724A-C that may each be similar to delay 168 of
Exemplary embodiments have been disclosed above and illustrated in the accompanying drawings. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes, omissions and additions may be made to that which is specifically disclosed herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
This application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/730,633, filed Oct. 27, 2005, and titled “High-Speed Transceiver Tester Incorporating Jitter Injection,” that is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3931610 | Marin et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
3976940 | Chau et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4677648 | Zurfluh | Jun 1987 | A |
4807147 | Halbert et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
5329258 | Matsuura | Jul 1994 | A |
5349587 | Nadeau-Dostie et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5517147 | Burroughs et al. | May 1996 | A |
5563921 | Mesuda et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5606567 | Agrawal et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5835501 | Dalmia et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5883523 | Ferland et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5948115 | Dinteman | Sep 1999 | A |
6008703 | Perrott et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6057679 | Slizynski et al. | May 2000 | A |
6076175 | Drost et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6091671 | Kattan | Jul 2000 | A |
6181267 | MacDonald et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6225840 | Ishimi | May 2001 | B1 |
6275057 | Takizawa | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6329850 | Mair et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6356850 | Wilstrup et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6374388 | Hinch | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6420921 | Okayasu et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6570454 | Skierszkan | May 2003 | B2 |
6629274 | Tripp et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6640193 | Kuyel | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6650101 | MacDonald et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6658363 | Mejia et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6665808 | Schinzel | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6710726 | Kim et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6768360 | Tsuruki | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768390 | Dunsmore et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6775809 | Lambrecht et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785622 | Nygaard, Jr. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6791389 | Mikami et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6816987 | Olson et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6816988 | Barford | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6834367 | Bonneau et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6842061 | Suda et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6859106 | Sano | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6865222 | Payne | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6865496 | Camnitz et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6868047 | Sartschev et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6888412 | Kim et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6907553 | Popplewell et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6909316 | Owens et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6909980 | Fernando | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6918073 | Linam et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6931579 | Roberts et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6934896 | Larson et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6940330 | Okayasu | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6944835 | Okayasu | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6961745 | Laquai | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6993109 | Lee et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7136772 | Duchi et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7287200 | Miyaji | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7355378 | Rottacker et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7627003 | Fouts et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7681091 | Hafed | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7813297 | Hafed | Oct 2010 | B2 |
20010028251 | Okayasu | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020019962 | Roberts et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020033878 | Satoh et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020147951 | Nadeau-Dostie et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030031283 | Bronfer et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030122600 | Engl et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030128720 | Jones | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030165051 | Kledzik et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030189504 | Colonna et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030198311 | Song et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040051571 | Okamura | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050014300 | Welch et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050046584 | Breed | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050058234 | Stojanovic | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050069031 | Sunter et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050094927 | Kish et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050097420 | Frisch et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050286436 | Flask | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060005093 | Leslie | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060139387 | Silverbrook et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060176943 | Sindalovsky et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060284814 | Ng | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080013456 | Hafed | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080048726 | Hafed | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080192814 | Hafed et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1571455 | Sep 2005 | EP |
09331254 | Dec 1997 | JP |
2005006071 | Jan 2005 | JP |
W02005109666 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2007051160 | May 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070113119 A1 | May 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60730633 | Oct 2005 | US |