Patent Grant
11686692
This application relates generally to tomography and laminography x-ray imaging systems.
Three-dimensional (3D) x-ray imaging techniques are useful to image internal structures of objects. Typically, a tomography dataset consisting of x-ray transmission images that are collected over a large angular range (e.g., about 180 degrees; about 360 degrees), and that are subsequently reconstructed to obtain a 3D image. The large angular range is used to avoid (e.g., minimize) 3D image artifacts. A 3D x-ray imaging system comprises an x-ray source configured to illuminate an object for imaging, a position-sensitive x-ray detector configured to record transmission x-ray images, and an electromechanical system to manipulate the object with respect to the x-ray source and the position-sensitive x-ray detector.
X-ray flux incident on a region of interest of the object is inversely proportional to the square of the distance of the region of interest from the x-ray source, this distance can be referred to as the focus object distance (FOD). To achieve high throughput for 3D x-ray imaging, the FOD is selected to be small (e.g., the region of interest placed as close to the x-ray source as possible). For example, in view of the small voxel volume used to achieve the spatial resolution, placing the region of interest close to the x-ray source can be used in 3D x-ray imaging with high spatial resolution using a laboratory microfocus x-ray source. Furthermore, for 3D x-ray imaging of a small region of interest in a larger object (e.g., small regions of interest in a laterally extended planar object, examples of which include but are not limited to interconnects in semiconductor integrated circuit (IC) packages and fine structural details in a large fiber reinforced composite panel), the minimum FOD is limited by the dimensions of the object, which practically limits the achievable throughput because the object is to be rotated through 180 degrees.
However, prior art micro-x-ray computed tomography (μXCT) and micro x-ray computed laminography (μXCL) systems have numerous limitations. For example,
In certain implementations, a three-dimensional x-ray imaging system is configured to generate a transmission image of a region of interest in an object. The system comprises at least one position-sensitive x-ray detector comprising at least one active element. The system further comprises an x-ray source comprising an x-ray transmissive vacuum window having an outer surface. The x-ray source is configured to produce diverging x-rays, at least some of the diverging x-rays emerging from the vacuum window and propagating along an x-ray propagation axis extending from the x-ray source, through the region of interest of the object, to the at least one active element of the at least one position-sensitive x-ray detector. The diverging x-rays have propagation paths within an angular divergence angle greater than 1 degree centered on the x-ray propagation axis. The x-ray propagation axis is at a first angle with respect to the outer surface of the vacuum window, the first angle in a range of 3 degrees to 45 degrees. The system further comprises at least one sample motion stage configured to rotate the object about a rotation axis and configured such that the rotation axis has a second angle relative to the x-ray propagation axis, the second angle in a range of 45 degrees to 90 degrees. The system further comprises a sample mount on the at least one sample motion stage. The sample mount is configured to hold the object and comprises a first portion in the propagation paths of at least some of the diverging x-rays propagating through the object to the at least one position-sensitive x-ray detector. The first portion has an x-ray transmission greater than 30% for x-rays having energies greater than 50% of a maximum x-ray energy of an x-ray spectrum of the diverging x-rays.
In certain implementations, a three-dimensional x-ray imaging system comprises at least one position-sensitive x-ray detector. The system further comprises an x-ray source comprising an x-ray transmissive vacuum window having an outer surface. The x-ray source is configured to produce diverging x-rays, at least some of the diverging x-rays emerging from the vacuum window and propagating along an x-ray propagation axis extending from the x-ray source. The diverging x-rays propagate through a region of interest of an object to the at least one position-sensitive x-ray detector and have an angular divergence angle greater than 1 degree centered on the x-ray propagation axis. The x-ray propagation axis is at a first angle with respect to the outer surface of the vacuum window, the first angle in a range of 3 degrees to 45 degrees. The system further comprises at least one sample motion stage configured to rotate the object about a rotation axis and configured to adjust the rotation axis to have a second angle relative to the x-ray propagation axis, the at least one sample motion stage having a non-systematic angular wobble less than 5 microradians.
In certain implementations, a 3D x-ray imaging system enables imaging of an ROI with a very small FOD in a large object to reduce laminographic dataset collection time (e.g., to increase the imaging data collection speed). In certain implementations, the system also provides improved image quality (e.g., fidelity) and higher image resolution in planes parallel to the surface of a laterally extended object, which can be important for many applications, such as metrology, inspection, failure analysis, and process development of semiconductor IC packages (e.g., as solder bumps and Cu interconnects). The x-ray source can be configured to achieve the small FOD and for improving spatial resolution. Certain implementations are configured to use the measurement geometry to “compress” the electron beam focus in one dimension which can allow the use of an asymmetric larger, and therefore higher power, focus which after projection becomes symmetric or almost symmetric which can be desirable to have isotropic spatial resolution. Certain implementations are configured to have an x-ray source comprising an x-ray generating material with a thickness configured to achieve high spatial resolution in a direction substantially perpendicular to the surface of a laterally extended object being analyzed. Additionally, certain implementations comprise additional components and/or methods for implementing several modes of imaging contrast, including Talbot interferometry for obtaining absorption, phase, and darkfield (scattering) contrast, darkfield (scattering) contrast only, and enhanced absorption contrast.
In certain implementations, the system 5 further comprises at least one sample motion stage 80 (e.g., motorized and computer-controlled; comprising an electromechanical system). The at least one sample motion stage 80 is configured to rotate the object 30 about a rotation axis 19. The sample motion stage 80 is configured such that the rotation axis 19 has a second angle 16 relative to the x-ray propagation axis 10, the second angle 16 in a range greater than or equal to 45 degrees (e.g., in a range of 45 degrees to 90 degrees). In certain other implementations, the second angle 16 is less than 45 degrees. The second angle 16 of certain implementations can be in a range greater than or equal to 45 degrees and the rotation axis 19 can be at a third angle relative to a surface normal of the outer surface 27 of the vacuum window 29, the third angle in a range less than 45 degrees (e.g., less than 30 degrees). In certain implementations, the system 5 comprises a mechanism configured to vary the third angle. For example, the mechanism can comprise at least one tilt stage (e.g., goniometer; electromechanical motion driver; rotary motor; stepper motor; motor with encoder; linear motion driver with worm drive) configured to tilt the x-ray source 20 relative to the rotation axis 19 and/or the rotation axis 19 relative to the x-ray source 20.
In certain implementations, the system 5 further comprises a sample mount 85 on the at least one sample motion stage 80 and configured to hold the object 30. The sample mount 85 comprises a first portion 86 in the propagation paths of at least some of the diverging x-rays 60 propagating through the object 30 to the at least one position-sensitive x-ray detector 50. The first portion 86 has an x-ray transmission greater than 30% (e.g., greater than 50%) for x-rays having energies greater than 50% of a maximum x-ray energy of an x-ray spectrum of the diverging x-rays 60.
The example system 5 of
A three-dimensional (3D) image dataset of the ROI 31 can be collected by recording a series of x-ray transmission images of the diverging x-rays 60 that are transmitted through the ROI 31 of the object 30 to the at least one active element 52 of the at least one position-sensitive x-ray detector 50, with the object 30 rotated about the rotation axis 19 over an angular range (e.g., between 180 and 360 degrees). A computed laminography dataset can be reconstructed using a known laminography reconstruction method, to obtain a 3D image of the ROI 31. For another example, for imaging a ROI 31 in a planar object 30 (e.g., solder bumps and/or interconnects in a semiconductor IC package), the object 30 can be positioned so that the surface 32 of the object 30 closer to the ROI 31 faces the vacuum window 29. For a large/planar object 30, a small angle 14 between the outer surface 27 of the vacuum window 29 and the surface 32 of the object 30 can be used to place the ROI 31 close to the x-ray source 20 to increase x-ray flux on the ROI 31 and thus increase imaging throughput. In another example, the surface 32 of the object 30 faces away from the outer surface 27 of the vacuum window 29 (e.g., to reduce or minimize a radiation dose to the ROI 31).
X-Ray Source
As schematically illustrated by
The at least one x-ray target 28 is within the vacuum region 23 and configured to generate the diverging x-rays 60 in response to bombardment by the focused electron beam 24. The at least one x-ray target 28 comprises at least one x-ray generating material selected for its x-ray spectral production properties (e.g., characteristic x-ray energy) and/or other properties (e.g., atomic number Z; electron density) that affect the x-ray production capability of the at least one x-ray generating material. The at least one x-ray generating material can have a sufficiently high thermal conductivity to dissipate heat generated by the bombardment by electron beams 24 with high power. Examples of x-ray generating materials include but are not limited to: Cr, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, W, Rh, Mo, Au, Pt, Ag, SrB6, LaB6, and CeB6. As shown schematically by the insert of
In certain implementations, the vacuum window 29 consists essentially of atomic elements having atomic numbers (Z) less than 14 and is substantially transmissive to higher energy x-rays generated by the at least one x-ray generating material. For example, the vacuum window 29 can have a sufficiently high thermal conductivity to provide a thermal conduit to prevent thermal damage (e.g., melting) of the at least one x-ray generating material (e.g., one or more materials selected from the group consisting of: beryllium, diamond, boron carbide, silicon carbide, aluminum, and beryllium oxide (BeO)). The vacuum window 29 can further provide a sufficiently electrically conductive path to dissipate electric charge from the at least one x-ray generating material and/or the vacuum window 29. In certain implementations, the vacuum window 29 is configured to have an x-ray transmission such that more than 50% of the x-rays generated by the at least one x-ray source 28 having energies greater than one-half the selected maximum focused electron energy are transmitted through the vacuum window 29. In certain implementations, the diverging x-rays 60 emitted from the outer surface 27 of the vacuum window 29 are not obstructed by the x-ray source 20 along the x-ray propagation axis 10. While the x-ray source 20 emits x-rays into a solid angle of 4π,
In certain implementations, the system 5 further comprises a thermal cooling mechanism configured to reduce heating of the object 30 by heat produced by the x-ray source 20. For example, the thermal cooling mechanism can comprise an infrared (IR) reflective material (e.g., a thin IR reflective and highly x-ray transmissive film or layer, an example of which is aluminized mylar) between the vacuum window 29 and the object 30. The IR reflective material is configured to reflect heat generated by the x-ray source 20 (e.g., due to power of the electron beam being converted to heat in the at least one x-ray target 28) from reaching the object 30 and the sample mount 85 (e.g., directing the thermal energy away from the object 30 and the sample mount 85 to reduce or minimize heat transport to the object 30 and/or the sample mount 85). In this way, the IR reflective material can protect the object 30 and the sample mount 85 from changes in temperature of the sample that could otherwise cause thermal expansion that could deleteriously affect the accuracy of ROI selection and/or 3D volume reconstruction fidelity. The IR reflective material is sufficiently thin (e.g., thickness less than 1500 microns; thickness less than 100 microns) so as to not substantially impair the positioning of the object 30 close to the electron beam focus of the x-ray source 20.
In certain implementations, the x-ray source 20 comprises a grounded anode transmission x-ray source (e.g., with the vacuum housing electrically grounded), examples of which include but are not limited to: DAGE BrightHawk® x-ray source available from Nordson Corporation of Westlake, Ohio; L10711-03 microfocus x-ray source available from Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. of Hamamatsu City, Japan; Excillum Nanotube N1 and N2 x-ray sources available from Excillum Corporation of Kista Sweden; X-ray Worx GmbH of Garbsen, Germany; x-ray sources available from COMET Technologies of San Jose, Calif.). These example x-ray sources 20 can be configured to have an x-ray source point integrated with the vacuum window 29 and to have an object 30 placed close to the x-ray source 20 to reduce (e.g., minimize) the FOD and therefore to increase (e.g., maximize) the x-ray flux at the object 30. Due to the electrical and mechanical constraints, the x-ray source 20 can have a large flat face which is the terminus of the vacuum envelope and is co-planar with the vacuum window 29 but cannot be made smaller without interfering with the quality of the electron beam focus. For previously-existing x-ray tomography and laminography imaging techniques utilizing such x-ray sources 20, this large flat face has restricted the ability to place a large and/or planar object 30 close to the x-ray source 20 and being able to rotate the object 30 (e.g., up to 180 degrees) around a rotation axis 19 substantially perpendicular to the large flat face. Certain implementations described herein advantageously circumvent this major drawback of previously-existing x-ray imaging systems.
In certain implementations, the x-ray source 20 is configured to have a small x-ray spot size (e.g., having a dimension of less than 7 microns in at least one lateral direction substantially parallel to the outer surface 27 of the vacuum window 29) while generating sufficient x-ray flux to facilitate sufficiently short image collection times. In general, the x-ray spot size is approximately equal to a convolution of the focused electron beam spot size (e.g., radius) at the at least one x-ray target 28 and the size (e.g., radius) of the x-ray generation volume inside the at least one x-ray target 28 due to scattering of the electrons inside the at least one x-ray target 28. Thus, larger focused electron beam spot sizes can facilitate higher electron beam powers, with concomitant higher x-ray flux and shorter image acquisition times, at the expense of lower spatial resolutions, and smaller focused electron beam spot sizes can facilitate higher spatial resolutions at the expense of lower x-ray flux and longer image acquisition times. In addition, since a large fraction (e.g., about 99%) of the incident power from the focused electron beam 24 is converted into heat in the at least one x-ray target 28, it can be desirable to limit the incident electron beam power, which typically decreases linearly with the x-ray spot dimension.
In certain implementations, higher spatial resolution of x-ray transmission images in the direction of the plane containing the surface normal of the outer surface 27 of the vacuum window 29 and the rotation axis 19 is provided by reducing a thickness t of the at least one x-ray generating material of the at least one x-ray target 28, which reduces the effective x-ray source size s. For example, the thickness t of the at least one x-ray generating material along a direction substantially perpendicular to the outer surface 27 of the vacuum window 29 can be in a range of 0.1 micron to 15 microns.
With the effective x-ray spot size in the cross-sectional plane substantially smaller than the electron beam width W, certain implementations can further achieve a small x-ray spot size in a direction substantially perpendicular to the cross-sectional plane of
For another example, as schematically illustrated by
When viewed along the x-ray propagation axis 10 (e.g., the direction from the at least one position-sensitive x-ray detector 50), and taking into account the take-off angle between the outer surface 27 and the x-ray propagation axis 10, the x-ray spot of
Aperture
Sample Motion Stage and Sample Mount
In certain implementations, the at least one sample motion stage 80 is configured to move the object 30 relative to the x-ray source 20 and/or the at least one position-sensitive x-ray detector 50. In certain implementations, the at least one sample motion stage 80 comprises at least one linear motion substage 82 configured to controllably adjust a position of the object 30 (e.g., along substantially perpendicular x-, y-, and z-directions) and at least one rotational motion substage 84 configured to controllably adjust an orientation of the object 30 (e.g., rotating the object 30 about the rotation axis 19). For example, the at least one linear motion substage 82 can comprise one, two, or three electromechanical linear motion driver (e.g., linear motor; stepper motor; motor with encoder; piezoelectric motor; rotary motor with screw) configured to move the object 30 such that the ROI 31 is at a selected position along the x-ray propagation axis 10 and the at least one rotational motion substage 84 can comprise at least one electromechanical motion driver (e.g., rotary motor; stepper motor; motor with encoder; linear motion driver with worm drive) configured to rotate the object 30 and the ROI 31 about the rotation axis 19.
In certain implementations, as schematically illustrated by
In certain implementations, the sample mount 85 is configured to hold the object 30 while the object 30 is irradiated by the x-rays 60 such that the x-rays 60 are transmitted through the ROI 31 to the at least one position-sensitive x-ray detector 50. The sample mount 85 is configured such that the x-rays 60 minimally interact with (e.g., are minimally scattered and/or absorbed by) solid components of the at least one sample motion stage 80 (e.g., the at least one linear motion substage 82 and the at least one rotational motion substage 84). The sample mount 85 is configured to reduce (e.g., minimize) the portion of the diverging x-rays 60 that interact with solid portions of the at least one sample motion stage 80 as the object 30 is rotated around the rotation axis 19.
In certain implementations, the at least one sample motion stage 80 and the sample mount 85 are configured to hold and rotate the object 30 without compromising throughput. For example, since throughput for microfocus transmission x-ray computed laminography is inversely proportional to the square of the focus-to-object distance (FOD), high throughput can be achieved using a small FOD (e.g., having the object 30 as close as possible to the x-ray source 20).
In certain implementations, the sample mount 85 is configured to offset the object 30 from the at least one sample stage 80 so that the at least one sample stage 80 (e.g., the at least one linear motion substage 82 and the at least one rotational motion substage 84) is not in the imaging field-of-view of the at least one position-sensitive x-ray detector 50 (e.g., reduce, avoid, or minimize x-ray scattering and/or absorption that would deleteriously affect the image reconstruction fidelity). For example, the sample mount 85 can offset the object 30 from the at least one sample stage 80 by a distance that is greater than 50 millimeters (e.g., greater than 100 millimeters; in a range of 100 millimeters to 500 millimeters; in a range of 100 millimeters to 200 millimeters). The sample mount 85 of certain implementations comprises a first portion 86 configured to be impinged by at least a portion of the x-rays 60 as the object 30 and the sample mount 85 are rotated about the rotation axis 19 and a second portion 87 that mechanically couples the first portion 86 to the at least one motion substage (e.g., the at least one linear motion substage 82 and/or the at least one rotational motion substage 84). The first portion 86 and the second portion 87 are configured to offset the ROI 31 of the object 30 from the at least one motion substage such that the diverging x-rays 60 do not impinge the at least one motion substage or the second portion 87 (e.g., as the object 30 and the sample mount 85 are rotated about the rotation axis 19).
In certain implementations, the first portion 86 is comprised essentially of low Z elements (e.g., atomic elements having atomic numbers less than 14) and/or thin materials (e.g., thickness along the rotation axis 19 less than 10 millimeters). In certain implementations, the first portion 86 has an x-ray transmission greater than 50% for x-rays having energies greater than 50% of the maximum x-ray energy of the x-ray spectrum of the x-rays 60 (e.g., the x-rays emitted by the x-ray source 20). Certain such implementations concurrently provide a sufficiently high throughput with a sufficiently small amount of radiation damage to the object 30 (e.g., since the x-rays do not have to be transmitted through absorptive material of the at least one sample motion stage 80, the x-ray flux irradiating the object 30 can be kept sufficiently low to avoid radiation damage while providing sufficiently high amounts of detected x-rays for high throughput imaging). For example, the first portion 86 can comprise a carbon fiber or quartz plate (e.g., having a projected thickness along the x-ray propagation axis 10 less than or equal to 2 millimeters). The second portion 87 is mechanically coupled to the first portion 86 and to the at least one linear motion substage 82 and/or the at least one rotational motion substage 84. In certain implementations, the second portion 87 is comprised essentially of the same low Z elements and/or thin materials as is the first portion 86 (e.g., low Z rod or hollow tube, such as a carbon fiber or quartz tube having a projected thickness along the x-ray propagation axis 10 less than or equal to 2 millimeters), while in certain other implementations, the second portion 87 comprises any solid material (e.g., regardless of the x-ray absorption and/or scattering of the solid material). In certain implementations, the second portion 87 is part of the at least one linear motion substage 82 and/or the at least one rotational motion substage 84.
For example, as schematically illustrated by
For another example, as schematically illustrated by
Image reconstruction fidelity is dependent on precise rotation of the object 30 during measurements, and uncontrolled motions of the object 30 can create deviations of the actual recorded projection data from what a laminographic reconstruction algorithm would expect. As a result, these uncontrolled motions can create a blurring in the back-projected data that degrades the resolution and contrast in the reconstructed volume. In certain implementations, the at least one sample motion stage 80 reduces (e.g., avoids; minimizes) deviations from pure rotations that cause translation and/or orientation changes of the object 30 within the image field-of-view. The at least one sample motion stage 80 can have a sufficiently low non-systematic angular wobble (e.g., uncontrolled angular motion of the rotation axis 19 as a function of rotation about the rotation axis 19), sufficiently low radial runout (e.g., uncontrolled translation of the rotation axis 19 as a function of rotation about the rotation axis 19 resulting in lateral movement of the object 30 substantially perpendicular to the rotation axis 19), and/or sufficiently low axial runout (e.g., uncontrolled axial movement of the object 30 substantially parallel to the rotation axis 19) during rotation of the object 30 about the rotation axis 19 such that uncontrolled motion of the object 30 is less than one-fifth of the system resolution (e.g., less than 0.1 micron uncontrolled motion for a system resolution of 0.5 micron). For example, for an object 30 positioned a distance L above the at least one rotational motion substage 84 of the at least one sample motion stage 80 and an image resolution (e.g., detector resolution divided by image magnification) of δ, a non-systematic angular wobble of ω (e.g., less than 100 nanoradians; less than 200 nanoradians; less than 1 microradian; less than 5 microradians) can result in a radial runout of R=ωL<δ/5 (e.g., less than δ/3; less than δ/2; less than 1 micron; less than 0.5 micron; less than 200 nanometers; less than 100 nanometers) and/or an axial runout A<δ/5 (e.g., less than δ/3; less than δ/2; less than 1 micron; less than 0.5 micron; less than 200 nanometers; less than 100 nanometers). In certain implementations, the at least one sample motion stage 80 has a non-systematic angular wobble (e.g., error) less than 5 microradians (e.g., less than 1 microradian), a radial runout repeatability better than 1000 nanometers, and an axial runout repeatability better than 1000 nanometers. In certain implementations, the system 5 further comprises a metrology system configured to measure an angular wobble of the at least one sample motion stage 80 with an accuracy better than less than 5 microradians (e.g., less than 1 microradian), to measure a radial runout of the at least one sample motion stage 80 with an accuracy better than 1000 nanometers, and/or to measure an axial runout of the at least one sample motion stage 80 with an accuracy better than 1000 nanometers.
In certain implementations, the at least one rotational motion substage 84 of the at least one sample motion stage 80 can comprise an air-bearing rotary stage (e.g., A-62X or A-688 rotary stage available from PI (Physik Instrumente of Auburn, Mass.; ABRX00, ABRX150, or ABRX250 rotary stage available from Aerotech, Inc. of Pittsburgh, Pa.) having a wobble angle less than 5 microradians (e.g., less than 1 microradian; less than 200 nanoradians) and radial and axial runout less than 100 nanometers. The position of the object 30 over the angular range (e.g., 360 degrees) of rotation about the rotation axis 19 can be accurate to better than one-half of the resolution of the system.
Position-Sensitive x-Ray Detector
In certain implementations, the at least one position-sensitive x-ray detector 50 is configured to record images of the x-rays 60 received after transmitting through the ROI 31. Examples of the at least one position-sensitive x-ray detector 50 include but are not limited to: photon counting detectors (e.g., comprising silicon, CdTe, and/or CdZnTe and configured to directly convert x-rays to electrons with or without energy discrimination; Eiger ASICs and Pilatus ASICs available from Dectris of Baden-Daettwil, Switzerland); flat panel detectors (FPD) comprising a scintillator material (e.g., CdWO4, CsI, Gd2O2S, LSO, GAGG, and/or LYSO; Shad-o-Box HS detectors available from Teledyne Dalsa of Waterloo Canada; 2315N detectors available from Varex Imaging of Salt Lake City, Utah; Athena detectors and Onyx detectors available from Nordson Corporation of Westlake, Ohio; 1412HR detectors available from Spectrum Logic Corporation of Boulder, Colo.); fiber optic plates and CMOS or CCD detectors; a scintillator material (e.g., CdWO4, CsI, Gd2O2S, LSO, GAGG, and/or LYSO) and objective configured to magnify an image onto a CMOS or CCD detector. In certain implementations, the at least one position-sensitive x-ray detector 50 comprises a plurality of active elements 52 (e.g., pixels) having lateral dimensions (e.g., along a surface of the detector 50) less than 70 microns (e.g., less than 50 microns).
In certain implementations, the at least one position-sensitive x-ray detector 50 is configured to receive and image x-rays 60 transmitted through the object 30, including the ROI 31, the x-rays 60 having a predetermined range of energies (e.g., the x-ray spectrum) which facilitates (e.g., optimize) sufficient image contrast to discern features of interest in the ROI 31 and/or reduces imaging collection times. For example, the predetermined x-ray spectrum can be generated by selecting the focused electron energy and/or the at least one x-ray generating material of the at least one x-ray target 28, such that the generated x-rays 60 in the predetermined x-ray spectrum have a sufficiently large x-ray flux to facilitate the image contrast and/or the imaging collection times. For x-ray imaging using absorption contrast, the predetermined x-ray spectrum can include energies at which the object 30 has an x-ray transmission in a range of 5% to 85% (e.g., in a range of 8% to 30%). This range of x-ray transmission can provide an advantageous trade-off between image contrast (which favors lower energy x-rays) and transmission through the object 30 (which favors higher energy x-rays).
For another example, the at least one position-sensitive x-ray detector 50 can be configured to have at least one energy threshold for detecting x-rays (e.g., the at least one position-sensitive x-ray detector 50 can be configured to reject and/or suppress detection of x-rays having energies below a first energy threshold and/or energies above a second energy threshold). For example, the at least one energy threshold can comprise a threshold cut-off x-ray energy, the at least one position-sensitive x-ray detector 50 configured to only image x-rays having energies below the threshold cut-off x-ray energy. The threshold cut-off x-ray energy of certain implementations corresponds to x-rays for which the object 30 has an x-ray transmission less than 85% (e.g., less than 50%). For example, the at least one position-sensitive x-ray detector 50 can comprise a photon counting detector configured to select at least one threshold cut-off x-ray energy (e.g., to controllably adjust the threshold cut-off x-ray energy). The photon counting detector can be further configured to collect energy-dependent x-ray transmission images (e.g., using a plurality of operator-selectable energy windows to reduce noise, image artifacts, and/or to provide material differentiation). For another example, the at least one position-sensitive x-ray detector 50 can comprise a combination of scintillating screens and materials configured to only image x-rays below the threshold cut-off x-ray energy.
For example, as schematically illustrated by
While
As schematically illustrated by
In certain implementations, the first grating G1 comprises an absorption grating. For example, the one or both of the first grating G1 and the second grating G2 can comprise an array of patterned one-dimensional or two-dimensional x-ray substantially absorptive (e.g., absorption greater than 50%) structures having widths in a range of 0.5 micron to 20 microns and spaced from one another by substantially non-absorptive (e.g., absorption less than 50%) gaps having widths in a range of 0.5 micron to 20 microns. In addition to using a technique such as phase stepping for tri-contrast imaging (e.g., absorption, phase, and scattering), the system 5 of certain implementations can be configured to obtain only darkfield (e.g., scattering) contrast imaging by configuring the pitch, the distances from the x-ray source 20, and the alignments of the first and second gratings, such that the x-rays transmitted through the openings of the first (e.g., upstream) grating G1 are incident on absorbing portions of the second (e.g., downstream) grating G2. For example, the first grating G1 and the second grating G2 can be placed along the x-ray propagation axis 10 between the at least one x-ray source 20 and the at least one position-sensitive x-ray detector 50 (e.g., the first grating G1 closer to the at least one x-ray source 20 than to the at least one position-selective x-ray detector 50) such that the substantially non-absorptive structures of the second grating G2 are aligned with (e.g., in the shadows of) the substantially absorptive structures of the first grating G1 and that the substantially absorptive structures of the second grating G2 are aligned with the substantially non-absorptive structures of the first grating G1. In such a configuration, in the absence of an object 30, no x-rays would be expected to be transmitted through both the first grating G1 and the second grating G2, but in the presence of scattering features of an object 30, at least some of the scattered x-rays are transmitted through the second grating G2, leading to imaging of the features in the object 30 responsible for the scattered x-rays. In certain implementations, an enhanced absorption contrast image can be obtained by displacing the relative alignment of the first and second gratings by one-half the pitch from the configuration used in the darkfield imaging, such that the x-rays scattered by the object 30 are reduced by the absorbing structures of the second grating G2. In certain implementations, instead of having a second grating G2, a first set of the active elements 52 (e.g., pixels) of the at least one position-sensitive x-ray detector 50 are aligned with (e.g., in the shadows of) the substantially absorptive structures of the first grating G1 and a second set of the active elements 52 of the at least one position-sensitive x-ray detector 50 are aligned with the substantially non-absorptive structures of the first grating G1. In such a configuration, when the object 30 is placed along the x-ray propagation axis 10, the x-ray counts recorded by the second set of active elements 52 can be used to generate absorption contrast images while the x-ray counts recorded by the first set of active elements 52 can be used to generate scattered/darkfield and/or refraction images.
In certain implementations in which semiconductor IC packages are to be imaged in 3D, the system 5 is configured to obtain x-ray transmission images with the x-ray propagation axis 10 at a small angle (e.g., in a range less than 45 degrees) with respect to the surface normal of the surface 32 of the semiconductor chip. For example, a rotation laminography over a large angular range (e.g., 180 degrees to 630 degrees) or a limited angle translation laminography over a finite angular range (e.g., ±30 degrees) can be performed. The 3D image(s) can be combined with the laminography 3D image obtained with the x-ray propagation axis 10 at a large angle (e.g., greater than 60 degrees) with respect to the surface normal of the surface 32 of the semiconductor chip to generate a 3D image.
In certain implementations, the system 5 further comprises at least one motion mechanism configured to vary a geometric magnification of an image of the region of interest of the object generated by the at least one position-sensitive detector. For example, the at least one motion mechanism can comprise at least one first motion stage (e.g., linear motion stage; electromechanical linear motion driver; linear motor; stepper motor; motor with encoder; piezoelectric motor; rotary motor with screw) configured to move the x-ray source 20 relative to the object 30, at least one second motion stage (e.g., linear motion stage; electromechanical linear motion driver; linear motor; stepper motor; motor with encoder; piezoelectric motor; rotary motor with screw) configured to move the at least one position-sensitive detector 50 relative to the object 30, and/or at least one third motion stage (e.g., linear motion stage; electromechanical linear motion driver; linear motor; stepper motor; motor with encoder; piezoelectric motor; rotary motor with screw; the at least one linear motion substage 82) configured to move the object 30 relative to the x-ray source 20 and/or the at least one position-sensitive detector 50.
Although commonly used terms are used to describe the systems and methods of certain implementations for ease of understanding, these terms are used herein to have their broadest reasonable interpretations. Although various aspects of the disclosure are described with regard to illustrative examples and implementations, the disclosed examples and implementations should not be construed as limiting. Conditional language, such as “can,” “could,” “might,” or “may,” unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain implementations include, while other implementations do not include, certain features, elements, and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements, and/or steps are in any way required for one or more implementations. In particular, the terms “comprises” and “comprising” should be interpreted as referring to elements, components, or steps in a non-exclusive manner, indicating that the referenced elements, components, or steps may be present, or utilized, or combined with other elements, components, or steps that are not expressly referenced.
Conjunctive language such as the phrase “at least one of X, Y, and Z,” unless specifically stated otherwise, is to be understood within the context used in general to convey that an item, term, etc. may be either X, Y, or Z. Thus, such conjunctive language is not generally intended to imply that certain implementations require the presence of at least one of X, at least one of Y, and at least one of Z.
Language of degree, as used herein, such as the terms “approximately,” “about,” “generally,” and “substantially,” represent a value, amount, or characteristic close to the stated value, amount, or characteristic that still performs a desired function or achieves a desired result. For example, the terms “approximately,” “about,” “generally,” and “substantially” may refer to an amount that is within ±10% of, within ±5% of, within ±2% of, within ±1% of, or within ±0.1% of the stated amount. As another example, the terms “generally parallel” and “substantially parallel” refer to a value, amount, or characteristic that departs from exactly parallel by ±10 degrees, by ±5 degrees, by ±2 degrees, by ±1 degree, or by ±0.1 degree, and the terms “generally perpendicular” and “substantially perpendicular” refer to a value, amount, or characteristic that departs from exactly perpendicular by ±10 degrees, by ±5 degrees, by ±2 degrees, by ±1 degree, or by ±0.1 degree. The ranges disclosed herein also encompass any and all overlap, sub-ranges, and combinations thereof. Language such as “up to,” “at least,” “greater than,” less than,” “between,” and the like includes the number recited. As used herein, the meaning of “a,” “an,” and “said” includes plural reference unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. While the structures and/or methods are discussed herein in terms of elements labeled by ordinal adjectives (e.g., first, second, etc.), the ordinal adjectives are used merely as labels to distinguish one element from another, and the ordinal adjectives are not used to denote an order of these elements or of their use.
Various configurations have been described above. It is to be appreciated that the implementations disclosed herein are not mutually exclusive and may be combined with one another in various arrangements. Although this invention has been described with reference to these specific configurations, the descriptions are intended to be illustrative of the invention and are not intended to be limiting. Various modifications and applications may occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. Thus, for example, in any method or process disclosed herein, the acts or operations making up the method/process may be performed in any suitable sequence and are not necessarily limited to any particular disclosed sequence. Features or elements from various implementations and examples discussed above may be combined with one another to produce alternative configurations compatible with implementations disclosed herein. Various aspects and advantages of the implementations have been described where appropriate. It is to be understood that not necessarily all such aspects or advantages may be achieved in accordance with any particular implementation. Thus, for example, it should be recognized that the various implementations may be carried out in a manner that achieves or optimizes one advantage or group of advantages as taught herein without necessarily achieving other aspects or advantages as may be taught or suggested herein.
This application claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Appl. Nos. 63/122,354 filed Dec. 7, 2020 and 63/274,367 filed Nov. 1, 2021, each of which is incorporated in its entirety by reference herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4169228 | Briska et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
| 4642811 | Georgopoulos | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4945552 | Ueda | Jul 1990 | A |
| 5132997 | Kojima | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5173928 | Momose et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5204887 | Hayashida et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5220591 | Ohsugi et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5249216 | Ohsugi et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5280176 | Jach et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5684857 | De Bokx | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5778039 | Hossain | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5812629 | Clauser | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5832052 | Hirose et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5912940 | O'Hara | Jun 1999 | A |
| 6108398 | Mazor et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6181773 | Lee et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6195410 | Cash, Jr. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6226347 | Golenhofen | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6381303 | Vu et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6430254 | Wilkins | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6442231 | O'Hara | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6456688 | Taguchi et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6504902 | Iwasaki et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6512814 | Yokhin et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6611577 | Yamagami | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6639968 | Yokhin et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6711234 | Loxley et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6763086 | Platonov | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6829327 | Chen | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6891627 | Levy et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6895071 | Yokhin et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6914723 | Yun et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6934359 | Chen | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 7006596 | Janik | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7023955 | Chen et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7095822 | Yun | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7119953 | Yun et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7120228 | Yokhin et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7180979 | Momose | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7183547 | Yun et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7187751 | Kawahara et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7215736 | Wang | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7218703 | Yada et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7221731 | Yada et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7245696 | Yun et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7258485 | Nakano et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7268945 | Yun et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7388942 | Wang et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7394890 | Wang et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7400704 | Yun et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7406151 | Yun | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7414787 | Yun et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7463712 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7486770 | Baumann | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7492871 | Popescu | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7499521 | Wang et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7515684 | Gibson et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7522698 | Popescu | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7522708 | Heismann | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7532704 | Hempel | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7551719 | Yokhin et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7551722 | Ohshima et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7561662 | Wang et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7564941 | Baumann | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7639786 | Baumann | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7646843 | Popescu et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7653177 | Baumann et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7680243 | Yokhin et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7787588 | Yun et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
| 7796725 | Yun et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
| 7796726 | Gendreau et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
| 7809113 | Aoki et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7813475 | Wu et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
| 7817777 | Baumann et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7848483 | Platonov | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7864922 | Kawabe | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7889838 | David et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7899154 | Chen et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7920676 | Yun et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7924973 | Kottler et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7945018 | Heismann | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7949092 | Brons | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7949095 | Ning | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7974379 | Case et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
| 7983381 | David et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8005185 | Popescu | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8009796 | Popescu | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8009797 | Ouchi | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8041004 | David | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8058621 | Kommareddy | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8068579 | Yun et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
| 8073099 | Niu et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8139711 | Takahashi | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8165270 | David et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8184771 | Murakoshi | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8233587 | Sato | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8243879 | Itoh et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8306183 | Koehler | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8351570 | Nakamura | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8353628 | Yun et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
| 8374309 | Donath | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8451975 | Tada | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8513603 | Lederman et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
| 8559594 | Ouchi | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8559597 | Chen et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8565371 | Bredno | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8591108 | Tada | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8602648 | Jacobsen et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
| 8632247 | Ishii | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8755487 | Kaneko | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8767915 | Stutman | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8767916 | Hashimoto | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8781069 | Murakoshi | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8824629 | Ishii | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8855265 | Engel | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8859977 | Kondoh | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8908824 | Kondoh | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8972191 | Stampanoni et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8989474 | Kido et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9001967 | Baturin | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9016943 | Jacobsen et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9025725 | Kiyohara et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9031201 | Sato | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9036773 | David et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9063055 | Ouchi | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9086536 | Pang et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9129715 | Adler et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9222899 | Yamaguchi | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9230703 | Mohr et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9234856 | Mukaide | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9291578 | Adler | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9329141 | Stutman | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9357975 | Baturin | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9439613 | Stutman | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9448190 | Yun et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9453803 | Radicke | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9480447 | Mohr et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9486175 | Fredenberg et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9494534 | Baturin | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9532760 | Anton et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9551677 | Mazor et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9557280 | Pfeiffer et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9570265 | Yun et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
| 9588066 | Pois et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9594036 | Yun | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9632040 | Stutman | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9700267 | Baturin et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 9719947 | Yun et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9748012 | Yokoyama | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9757081 | Proksa | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9761021 | Koehler | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9770215 | Souchay et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9778213 | Bakeman et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9823203 | Yun et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 9826949 | Ning | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 9861330 | Rossl | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9874531 | Yun et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9881710 | Roessl | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9916655 | Sampanoni | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 10028716 | Rossl | Jul 2018 | B2 |
| 10045753 | Teshima | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10074451 | Kottler et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
| 10076297 | Bauer | Sep 2018 | B2 |
| 10085701 | Hoshino | Oct 2018 | B2 |
| 10141081 | Preusche | Nov 2018 | B2 |
| 10151713 | Wu et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
| 10153061 | Yokoyama | Dec 2018 | B2 |
| 10153062 | Gall et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
| 10247683 | Yun et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
| 10267752 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
| 10267753 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
| 10295485 | Yun et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10304580 | Yun et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10349908 | Yun et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
| 10352695 | Dziura et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
| 10352880 | Yun et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
| 10401309 | Yun et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
| 10416099 | Yun et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
| 10466185 | Yun et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
| 10473598 | Ogata et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
| 10485492 | Koehler et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
| 10514345 | Ogata et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
| 10514346 | Sako | Dec 2019 | B2 |
| 10568588 | Koehler et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
| 10578566 | Yun et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
| 10634628 | Kasper et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
| 10653376 | Yun et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
| 10697902 | Sharma et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10782252 | Gateshki et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
| 10794845 | Filsinger | Oct 2020 | B2 |
| 10895541 | Shchegrov et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
| 10962491 | Yun et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
| 10976270 | Wormington | Apr 2021 | B2 |
| 11054375 | Seidler et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
| 11215572 | Yun et al. | Jan 2022 | B2 |
| 20010046276 | Schneider et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020150208 | Yokhin et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030072413 | Yokhin et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030142781 | Kawahara | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030223536 | Yun et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040028186 | Yokhin et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040047446 | Platonov | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20050282300 | Yun et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060062350 | Yokhin | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060088139 | Nankano et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060182322 | Bernhardt et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20070108387 | Yun et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070183563 | Baumann | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070183579 | Baumann et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070189449 | Baumann | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070248215 | Ohshima et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20080043908 | Teramoto et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080084966 | Aoki et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080159475 | Mazor et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080170662 | Reinhold | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080181363 | Fenter et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080273662 | Yun | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090052619 | Endoh | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090092227 | David | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090154640 | Baumann et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090316857 | David et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100061508 | Takahashi | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100091947 | Niu | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100246765 | Murakoshi | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100260315 | Sato et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100284513 | Kawabe | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100329532 | Masuda et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110243302 | Murakoshi | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110268252 | Ozawa et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120041679 | Stampanoni | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120224670 | Kiyohara et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120228475 | Pang et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20130011040 | Kido et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130039460 | Levy | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130108012 | Sato | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130108022 | Kugland et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130251100 | Sasaki et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130308112 | Clube et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140023973 | Marconi et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140037052 | Adler | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140064445 | Adler | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140072104 | Jacobsen et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140105353 | Pfeiffer et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140105363 | Chen et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140146945 | Fredenberg et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140153692 | Larkin et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140205057 | Koehler et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140226785 | Stutman et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140270060 | Date et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20150023472 | Schmitt | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150030126 | Radicke | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150043713 | Chen | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150049860 | Das | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150051877 | Bakeman et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150055743 | Vedantham et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150055745 | Holzner et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150071402 | Handa | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150117599 | Yun et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150146847 | Liu | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150243397 | Yun et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150247811 | Yun et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150260663 | Yun et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150270023 | Adler | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150323478 | Stutman | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150357069 | Yun et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160066870 | Yun et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160091701 | Raghunathan | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160178541 | Hwang et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160206259 | Auclair et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160341674 | Wu et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160351283 | Adler et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170038481 | Cheng et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170047191 | Yun et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170162288 | Yun et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170184520 | Mortensen et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170227476 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170234811 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170261442 | Yun et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170336334 | Yun et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20180182131 | Koehler et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180202951 | Yun et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180261352 | Matsuyama et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180306734 | Morimoto et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180323032 | Strelec et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180348151 | Kasper et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20190011379 | Yun et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190017946 | Wack et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190027265 | Dey et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190064084 | Ullom et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190086342 | Pois et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190115184 | Zalubovsky | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190172681 | Owen et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190204757 | Brussard et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190206652 | Akinwande et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190212281 | Shchgegrov | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190216416 | Koehler et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190219713 | Booker et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190257774 | Seidler et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190261935 | Kitamura | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190302042 | Yun et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190317027 | Tsuboi et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190331616 | Schaff et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190391087 | Matejka et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
| 20200003712 | Kataoka et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200041429 | Cho et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200072770 | Yun et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200088656 | Pois et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200090826 | Adler | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200103358 | Wiell et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
| 20200155088 | Gruener et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
| 20200158662 | Horiba et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
| 20200182806 | Kappler et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
| 20200225172 | Sato et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200225173 | Sato et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200225371 | Greenberg et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200232937 | Yaroshenko et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200279351 | Ratner et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200292475 | Cao et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200300789 | Osakabe et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200300790 | Gellineau et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200303265 | Gellineau et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200319120 | Kitamura et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20200337659 | Sano et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20200378905 | Safai | Dec 2020 | A1 |
| 20200378908 | Fujimura et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
| 20210055237 | Shchegrov et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
| 20220082515 | Yun et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1656373 | Aug 2005 | CN |
| 1829910 | Sep 2006 | CN |
| 101257851 | Sep 2008 | CN |
| 101532969 | Sep 2009 | CN |
| 101566591 | Oct 2009 | CN |
| 101576515 | Nov 2009 | CN |
| 101413905 | Mar 2011 | CN |
| 102325498 | Jan 2012 | CN |
| 102507623 | Jun 2012 | CN |
| 102551761 | Jul 2012 | CN |
| 103604818 | Feb 2014 | CN |
| 104068875 | May 2017 | CN |
| 0751533 | Jan 1997 | EP |
| 1169713 | Jan 2006 | EP |
| 3168856 | May 2017 | EP |
| H06-188092 | Jul 1994 | JP |
| H07-194592 | Aug 1995 | JP |
| H08-128971 | May 1996 | JP |
| H08-184572 | Jul 1996 | JP |
| H11-304728 | Nov 1999 | JP |
| H11-352079 | Dec 1999 | JP |
| 2001-021507 | Jan 2001 | JP |
| 2001-124711 | May 2001 | JP |
| 2001-235437 | Aug 2001 | JP |
| 2003-149392 | May 2003 | JP |
| 2006-501444 | Jan 2006 | JP |
| 2007-218683 | Aug 2007 | JP |
| 2008-200359 | Apr 2008 | JP |
| 2008-145111 | Jun 2008 | JP |
| 2008-197495 | Aug 2008 | JP |
| 2009-195349 | Mar 2009 | JP |
| 2010-032341 | Feb 2010 | JP |
| 2010-236986 | Oct 2010 | JP |
| 2011-033537 | Feb 2011 | JP |
| 2011-095224 | May 2011 | JP |
| 2011-218147 | Nov 2011 | JP |
| 2012-032387 | Feb 2012 | JP |
| 2012-187341 | Oct 2012 | JP |
| 2012-254294 | Dec 2012 | JP |
| 2013-508683 | Mar 2013 | JP |
| 2013-096750 | May 2013 | JP |
| 2013-113782 | Jun 2013 | JP |
| 2015-529984 | Jul 2013 | JP |
| 2013-181811 | Sep 2013 | JP |
| 2014-178130 | Sep 2014 | JP |
| 2015-047306 | Mar 2015 | JP |
| 2015-072263 | Apr 2015 | JP |
| 2015-077289 | Apr 2015 | JP |
| 2017-040618 | Feb 2017 | JP |
| 10-2004-0072780 | Aug 2004 | KR |
| 10-2006-0088272 | Aug 2006 | KR |
| 10-2012-0012391 | Feb 2012 | KR |
| 10-2012-0091591 | Aug 2012 | KR |
| 10-2014-0059688 | May 2014 | KR |
| WO 1998041992 | Sep 1998 | WO |
| WO 2007125833 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008068044 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009104560 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| WO 2011032572 | Mar 2011 | WO |
| WO 2012032950 | Mar 2012 | WO |
| WO 2013004574 | Jan 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013111050 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013160153 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| WO 2015066333 | May 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015168473 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015176023 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015187219 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2016187623 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2017031740 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017213996 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| WO 2018122213 | Jul 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018175570 | Sep 2018 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Feng et al., “Reduction of Compton Background Noise for X-ray Fluorescence Computed Tomography with Deep Learning,” Photonics, vol. 9, p. 108 (2022). |
| Hirano et al., “X-ray zooming optics for analyzer-based multi-contrast computed tomography,” J. Synch. Rad. vol. 29, https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577522001412 (2022). |
| Holberg et al., “High-Resolution Table-Top NEXAFS Spectroscopy,” Anal. Chem. https://10.1021/acs.analchem.1c04374 (2022). |
| Hu et al., “Improving small animal cone beam CT resolution by mitigating x-ray focal spot induced blurring via deconvolution,” Phys. Med. Bio., in press, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ac6b7a (2022). |
| Khan et al., “Recent Trends in Applications of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Technique in Coatings for Corrosion Protection,” Chapter of “Recent Developments in Analytical Techniques for Corrosion Research,” I. Toor (ed.), Springer Nature Switzerland AG https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89101-5_8 (2022). |
| Longo et al., “Flexible Plenoptic X-ray Microscopy,” Photonics, vol. 9, p. 98 (2022). |
| Okolo, “A guide into the world of high-resolution 3D imaging: the case of soft X-ray tomography for the life sciences,” Biochem. Soc. Trans., https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20210886 (2002). |
| Pandeshwar et al., “Envelope modulated x-ray grating interferometry,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 120, 193701 (2022). |
| Soltau et al., “Coherent Diffractive Imaging with Diffractive Optics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 223901 (2022). |
| Tessarini et al., “Semi-classical Monte Carlo algorithm for the simulation of X-ray grating interferometry,” Sci. Rep. vol. 12, p. 2485 (2022). |
| Zhao et al., “X-ray wavefront sensing and optics metrology using a microfocus x-ray grating interferometer with electromagnetic phase stepping,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 120, 181105 (2022). |
| Zhu et al., “Optical Wafer Defect Inspection at the 10 nm Technology Node and Beyond,” 2022 Int. Extrem. Manuf. In press https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-7990/ac64d7 (2022). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2021/072695, in 14 pages, dated Apr. 5, 2022. |
| “High performance benchtop EDXRF spectrometer with Windows®® software,” published by: Rigaku Corp., Tokyo, Japan; 2017. |
| Altapova et al., “Phase contrast laminography based on Talbot interferometry,” Opt. Express, vol. 20, No. 6, (2012) pp. 6496-6508. |
| Anklamm et al., “A novel von Hamos spectrometer for efficient X-ray emission spectroscopy in the laboratory,” Rev. Sci. Instr. vol. 85 p. 053110 (2014). |
| Bachucki et al., “Laboratory-based double X-ray spectrometer for simultaneous X-ray emission and X-ray absorption studies,” J. Anal. Atomic Spectr. DOI:10.1039/C9JA00159J (2019). |
| Baron et al., “A compact optical design for Bragg reflections near backscattering,” J. Synchrotron Rad., vol. 8 (2001), pp. 1127-1130. |
| Bauer et al., “Increasing the sensitivity of micro X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy through an optimized adaptation of polycapillary lenses to a liquid metal jet source,” J. Anal. At. Spectrom. DOI:10.1039/d1ja00295c (2021). |
| Bech, “X-ray imaging with a grating interferometer,” University of Copenhagen PhD. Thesis, (May 1, 2009). |
| Bech, “In-vivo dark-field and phase-contrast x-ray imaging,” Scientific Reports 3, (2013), Article No. 03209. |
| Bertaux et al., “Sub-pixel high-resolution imaging of high-energy x-rays inspired by sub-wavelength optical imaging,” Op. Express, vol. 29, No. 22-25, p. 35003 (2021). |
| Birkholz, “Chapter 4: Grazing Incidence Configurations,” Thin Film Analysis by X-ray Scattering (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, 2006). |
| Birnbacher et al., “Quantitative X-ray phase contrast computed tomography with grating interferometry,” European J. of Nucl. Med. and Mol. Imaging, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05259-6 (2021). |
| Buchanan et al., “Effective modelling of high-energy laboratory-based x-ray phase contrast imaging utilising absorption masks or gratings,” J. Appl. Physics (accepted) (2020). |
| Chen et al., “Advance in detection of low sulfur content by wavelength dispersive XRF,” Proceedings of the Annual ISA Analysis Division Symposium (2002). |
| Coan et al., “In vivo x-ray phase contrast analyzer-based imaging for longitudinal osteoarthritis studies in guinea pigs,” Phys. Med. Biol. vol. 55(24) (2010), pp. 7649-7662. |
| Cohen et al., “Tunable laboratory extended x-ray absorption fine structure system,” Rev. Sci. Instr. vol. 51, No. 3, Mar. 1980, pp. 273-277. |
| David et al., “Hard X-ray phase imaging and tomography using a grating interferometer,” Spectrochimica Acta Part B vol. 62 (2007) pp. 626-630. |
| Davis et al., “Bridging the Micro-to-Macro Gap: A New Application for Micro X-Ray Fluorescence,” Microsc Microanal., vol. 17(3) (Jun. 2011), pp. 410-417. |
| Diaz et al., “Monte Carlo Simulation of Scatter Field for Calculation of Contrast of Discs in Synthetic CDMAM Images,” In: Digital Mammography, Proceedings 10th International Workshop IWDM 2010 (Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg), (2010), pp. 628-635 (9 pages). |
| Dibernardo, “Non-disruptive techniques for depth profiling in photoemission spectroscopy,” Nature Review Physics, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00331-4 (2021). |
| Dittler et al., “A mail-in and user facility for X-ray absorption near-edge structure: the CEI-XANES laboratory X-ray spectrometer at University of Washington,” J. Synch. Rad. vol. 26, eight pages, (2019). |
| Dong et al., “Improving Molecular Sensitivity in X-Ray Fluorescence Molecular Imaging (XFMI) of Iodine Distribution in Mouse-Sized Phantoms via Excitation Spectrum Optimization,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 56966-56976 (2018). |
| Du et al., “Removal of artifacts caused by grating imperfections in X-ray phase contrast tomography,” J. of Inst. vol. 16, p. 06039, doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/16/06/P06039 (2021). |
| Erko et al., “X-ray Optics,” Ch. 3 of “Handbook of Practical X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis,” B. Beckhoff et al., eds. (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2006), pp. 85-198. |
| Espes et al., “High-resolution X-ray source with advanced e-beam technology: pushing the resolution limitation for lab-scale NanoCT,” Micros. Microanal., vol. 27 (Suppl. 1), pp. 1230 (2021). |
| Fernández-Ruiz, “TXRF Spectrometry as a Powerful Tool for the Study of Metallic Traces in Biological Systems,” Development in Analytical Chemistry, vol. 1 (2014), pp. 1-14. |
| Fisher et al., “Laminography in the lab: imaging planar objects using a conventional x-ray CT scanner,” Meas. Sci. Technol., vol. 30, p. 035401 (2019). |
| Gaur et al., “On the method of calibration of the energy dispersive EXAFS beamline and Indus-2 and fitting theoretical model to the EXAFS spectrum,” Sadhana, vol. 36, No. 3 pp. 3390348 (2011). |
| Ge et al., “Investigation of the partially coherent effects in a 2D Talbot interferometer,” Anal. Bioanal. Chem. vol. 401, (2011), pp. 865-870. |
| Ghani et al., “A Phase Sensitive X-ray Brest Tomosynthesis System: Preliminary Patient Images with Cancer Legions,” Phys. Med. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ac2ea6 (2021). |
| Graetz et al., “Lenseless C-ray Nano-Tomography down to 150 nm Resolution: On the Quantification of Modulation Transfer and Focal Spot of the Lab-based ntCT System,” arXiv:2009.11749v1 [physics.ins-det] Sep. 24, 2020, 10 pages. |
| Günther et al., “Full-field structured-illumination super-resolution X-ray transmission microscopy,” Nature Comm. 10:2494 (2019) and supplementary information. |
| Gustschin et al., “High resolution and sensitivity bi-directional x-ray phase contrast imaging using 2D Talbot array illuminators,” arXiv:2105.07347v1 [physics.med-ph] May 16, 2021. |
| Harasse et al., “X-ray Phase Laminography with Talbot Interferometer”, in Developments in X-Ray Tomography VII, Proc. SPIE vol. 7804 (2010), 780411. |
| Harasse et al., “Iterative reconstruction in x-ray computed laminography from differential phase measurements”, Opt. Express, vol. 19 (2011), pp. 16560-16573. |
| Harasse et al., “X-ray Phase Laminography with a Grating Interferometer using Iterative Reconstruction”, in International Workshop on X-ray and Neutron Phase Imaging with Gratings, AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1466, (2012), pp. 163-168. |
| Hashimoto et al., “Improved reconstruction method for phase stepping data with stepping errors and dose fluctuations,” Optics Express, vol. 28, No. 11, pp. 16363-16384 (2020). |
| Hemraj-Benny et al., “Near-Edge X-ray Absorption Fine Structure Spectroscopy as a Tool for Investigating Nanomaterials,” Small, vol. 2(1), (2006), pp. 26-35. |
| Hennekam et al., “Trace metal analysis of sediment cores using a novel X-ray fluorescence core scanning method,” Quaternary Int'l, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2018.10.018 (2018). |
| Holfelder et al., “A double crystal von Hamos spectrometer for traceable x-ray emission spectroscopy,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. vol. 92, p. 123105 (2021). |
| Honma et al., Full-automatic XAFS Measurement System of the Engineering Science Research II beamline BL14B2 at Spring-8, 2011, AIP Conference Proceedings 1234, pp. 13-16. |
| Howard et al., “High-Definition X-ray Fluorescence Elemental Mapping of Paintings,” Anal. Chem., 2012, vol. 84(7), pp. 3278-3286. |
| Ide-Ektessabi et al., “The role of trace metallic elements in neurodegenerative disorders: quantitative analysis using XRF and XANES spectroscopy,” Anal. Sci., vol. 21(7) (Jul. 2005), pp. 885-892. |
| Ishisaka et al., “A New Method of Analyzing Edge Effect in Phase Contrast Imaging with Incoherent X-rays,” Optical Review, vol. 7, No. 6, (2000), pp. 566-572. |
| Ito et al., “A Stable In-Laboratory EXAFS Measurement System,” Jap. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 22, No. 2, Feb. 1, 1983, pp. 357-360. |
| Itoh et al., “Two-dimensional grating-based X-ray phase-contrast imaging using Fourier transform phase retrieval,” Op. Express, vol. 19, No. 4 (2011) pp. 3339-3346. |
| Janssens et al., “Recent trends in quantitative aspects of microscopic X-ray fluorescence analysis,” TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 29.6 (Jun. 2010): 464-478. |
| Jahrman et al., “Vacuum formed temporary spherically and toroidally bent crystal analyzers for x-ray absorption and x-ray emission spectroscopy,” Rev. Sci. Inst. vol. 90, 013106 (2019). |
| Jiang et al., “X-Ray Phase-Contrast Imaging with Three 2D Gratings,” Int. J. Biomed. Imaging, (2008), 827152, 8 pages. |
| Kalasová et al., “Characterization of a laboratory-based X-ray computed nanotomography system for propagation-based method of phase contrast imaging,” IEEE Trans. on Instr. and Meas., DOI 10.1109/TIM.2019.2910338 (2019). |
| Keyrilainen et al., “Phase contrast X-ray imaging of breast,” Acta Radiologica, vol. 51 (8), (2010), pp. 866-884. |
| Kido et al., “Bone Cartilage Imaging with X-ray Interferometry using a Practical X-ray Tube”, in Medical Imaging 2010: Physics of Medical Imaging, Proc. SPIE vol. 7622 (2010), 762240. |
| Kim, “Talbot images of wavelength-scale amplitude gratings,” Opt. Express vol. 20(5), (2012), pp. 4904-4920. |
| Kim et al., “Observation of the Talbot Effect at Beamline 6C Bio Medical Imaging of the Pohang Light Source-II,” J. Korean Phys. Soc., vol. 74, No. 10, pp. 935-940 (May 2019). |
| Kim et al., “A Simulation Study on the Transfer Characteristics of the Talbot Pattern Through Scintillation Screens in the Grating Interferometer,” J. Rad. Sci. and Tech. 42(1), pp. 67-75 (2019). |
| Kiranjot et al., “Surface and interface characterization of Ru/C/Ru trilayer structure using grazing incidence X-ray reflectivity and X-ray fluorescence,” Surf. and Interface Analysis, doi: 10.1002/sia7016 (2021). |
| Kiyohara et al., “Development of the Talbot-Lau Interferometry System Available for Clinical Use”, in International Workshop on X-ray and Neutron Phase Imaging with Gratings, AIP Cong. Proc. vol. 1466, (2012), pp. 97-102. |
| Klockenkämper et al., “7.1 Instrumental Developments” and “7.3 Future Prospects by Combinations,” from Chapter 7 of Total Reflection X-ray Fluorescence Analysis and Related Methods 2nd Ed. (J. Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2015). |
| Klockenkämper et al., “Chapter 3: Instrumentation for TXRF and GI-XRF,” Total Reflection X-ray Fluorescence Analysis and Related Methods 2nd Ed. (J. Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2015). |
| Kottler et al., “A two-directional approach for grating based differential phase contrast imaging using hard x-rays,” Opt. Express vol. 15(3), (2007), pp. 1175-1181. |
| Kottler et al., “Dual energy phase contrast x-ray imaging with Talbot-Lau interferometer,” J. Appl. Phys. vol. 108(11), (2010), 114906. |
| Kulow et al., “On the Way to Full-Field X-ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy Imaging with Coded Apertures,” J. Anal. At. Spectrom. Doi: 10.1039/C9JA00232D (2019). |
| Kuwabara et al., “Hard-X-ray Phase-Difference Microscopy with a Low-Brilliance Laboratory X-ray Source”, Appl. Phys. Express vol. 4 (2011) 062502. |
| Leatham et al., “X-ray dark-field and phase retrieval without optics, via the Fokker-Planck equation,” arXiv:2122.10999v1, physics.med-ph, Dec. 21, 2021. |
| Lei et al., “8-inch-diameter field of view for X-ray differential phase-contrast imaging,” Nucl. Inst. and Methods in Physics Research A, https://doi.org/10-1016/j.nima.2021.165375 (2021). |
| Li et al., “X-ray phase-contrast imaging using cascade Talbot-Lau interferometers,” Proc. SPIE 10964 (2018), pp. 1096469-1-1096469-6. |
| Lin et al., “Quasi-Monte Carlo method for calculating X-ray scatter in CT,” Op. Express, vol. 29, No. 9, p. 13746 (2021). |
| Lohmann et al., “An interferometer based on the Talbot effect,” Optics Communications vol. 2 (1971), pp. 413-415. |
| Lübcke et al., “Soft X-ray nanoscale imaging using a sub-pixel resolution charge coupled device (CCD) camera,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. vol. 90, 043111 (2019). |
| Lühl et al., “Scanning transmission X-ray microscopy with efficient X-ray fluorescence detection (STXM-XRF) for biomedical applications in the soft and tender energy range,” J. Synch. Rad. vol. 26, https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577518016879, (2019). |
| Malzer et al., “A laboratory spectrometer for high throughput X-ray emission spectroscopy in catalysis research,” Rev. Sci. Inst. 89, 113111 (2018). |
| Mamyrbayev et al., “Staircase array of inclined refractive multi-lenses for large field of view pixel super-resolution scanning transmission hard X-ray microscopy,” J. Synch. Rad., vol. 28 https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577521001521 (2021). |
| Matsuyama et al., “Wavefront measurement for a hard-X-ray nanobeam using single-grating interferometry”, Opt Express vol. 20 (2012), pp. 24977-24986. |
| Menzies et al., “Dual source X-ray and electron SEM system: Elemental mapping of an Epithermal gold-bearing sample from Karangahake, New Zealand,” Microsc. Microanal., vol. 27 (Suppl. 1), pp. 456 (2021). |
| Miao et al., “Motionless phase stepping in X-ray phase contrast imaging with a compact source,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 110(48), (2013), pp. 19268-19272. |
| Mijovilovich et al., “Analysis of trace metal distribution in plants with lab-based microscopic X-ray fluorescence imaging,” Plant Methods, vol. 16, No. 82, 21 pages (2020). |
| Mizutani et al., X-ray microscopy for neural circuit reconstruction in 9th International Conference on X-Ray Microscopy, J. Phys: Conf. Ser. 186 (2009) 012092. |
| Modregger et al., “Grating-Based X-ray Phase Contrast Imaging,” Ch. 3 of Emerging Imaging Technologies in Medicine, M. Anastasio & P. La Riviere, ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, (2012), pp. 43-56. |
| Momose et al., “Phase-Contrast X-Ray Imaging Using an X-Ray Interferometer for Biological Imaging”, Analytical Sciences vol. 17 Supplement (2001), pp. i527-i530. |
| Momose et al.,“Demonstration of X-Ray Talbot Interferometry”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 42 (2003), pp. L866-L868. |
| Momose et al.,“Phase Tomography Using an X-ray Talbot Interferometer”, in Developments in X-Ray Tomography IV, Proc. SPIE vol. 5535 (2004), pp. 352-360. |
| Momose, “Recent Advances in X-ray Phase Imaging”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 44 (2005), pp. 6355-6367. |
| Momose et al., “Biomedical Imaging by Talbot-Type X-Ray Phase Tomography” in Developments in X-Ray Tomography V, Proc. SPIE vol. 6318 (2006) 63180T. |
| Momose et al., “Phase Tomography by X-ray Talbot Interferometry for Biological Imaging” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 45 2006 pp. 5254-5262. |
| Momose et al., “X-ray Talbot Interferometry with Capillary Plates”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 45 (2006), pp. 314-316. |
| Momose et al., “Phase Imaging with an X-ray Talbot Interferometer”, Advances in X-ray Analysis vol. 49(3) (2006), pp. 21-30. |
| Momose et al., “Phase Tomography Using X-ray Talbot Interferometer”, in Synchrotron Radiation Instrumentation: Ninth International Conference, AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 879 (2007), pp. 1365-1368. |
| Momose et al., “Sensitivity of X-ray Phase Imaging Based on Talbot Interferometry”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 47 (2008), pp. 8077-8080. |
| Momose et al., “Grating-Based X-ray Phase Imaging Using Multiline X-ray Source”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 48 (2009), 076512. |
| Momose et al., “X-ray phase tomography with a Talbot interferometer in combination with an X-ray imaging microscope”, in 9th International Conference on X-Ray Microscopy, J. Phys: Conf. Ser. 186 (2009) 012044. |
| Momose et al., “High-speed X-ray phase imaging and X-ray phase tomography with Talbot interferometer and white synchrotron radiation”, Opt. Express vol. 17 (2009), pp. 12540-12545. |
| Momose et al., “X-Ray Phase Imaging with Talbot Interferometry”, in “Biomedical Mathematics: Promising Directions in Imaging, Therapy Planning, and Inverse Problems”, Y. Censor, M. Jiang & G.Wang, eds. (Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, WI, USA, 2010), pp. 281-320. |
| Momose et al., “X-ray Phase Measurements with Talbot Interferometry and Its Applications”, in International Conference on Advanced Phase Measurement Methods in Optics and Imaging, AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1236 (2010), pp. 195-199. |
| Momose et al., “X-ray Phase Imaging Using Lau Effect”, Appl. Phys. Express vol. 4 (2011) 066603. |
| Momose et al., “Four-dimensional X-ray phase tomography with Talbot interferometry and white synchrotron radiation: dynamic observation of a living worm”, Opt. Express vol. 19 (2011), pp. 8423-8432. |
| Momose et al., “X-ray Phase Imaging—From Static Observation to Dynamic Observation—”, in International Workshop on X-ray and Neutron Phase Imaging with Gratings AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1466, (2012), pp. 67-77. |
| Momose et al., “Recent Progress in X-ray and Neutron Phase Imaging with Gratings,” Quantum Beam Science, vol. 4, No. 9; doi:10.3390/qubs4010009 (2020). |
| Morimoto et al., “X-ray phase contrast imaging by compact Talbot-Lau interferometer with a signal transmission grating,” 2014, Optics Letters, vol. 39, No. 15, pp. 4297-4300. |
| Morimoto et al., “Design and demonstration of phase gratings for 2D single grating interferometer,” Optics Express vol. 23, No. 23, 29399 (2015). |
| Munro et al., Design of a novel phase contrast imaging system for mammography, 2010, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 55, No. 14, pp. 4169-4185. |
| Nango et al., “Talbot-defocus multiscan tomography using the synchrotron X-ray microscope to study the lacuno-canalicular network in mouse bone”, Biomed. Opt. Express vol. 4 (2013), pp. 917-923. |
| Nemeth et al., “Laboratory von Hamos X-ray Spectroscopy for Routine Sample Characterization,” arvix:1607.08045v1 (2016). |
| Neuhausler et al., “Non-destructive high-resolution X-ray imaging of ULSI micro-electronics using keV X-ray microscopy in Zernike phase contrast,” Microelectronic Engineering, Elsevier Publishers BV., Amsterdam, NO, vol. 83, No. 4-9 (Apr. 1, 2006) pp. 1043-1046. |
| Newville, “Fundamentals of XAFS,” (Univ. of Chicago, Chicago, IL, Jul. 23, 2004). |
| Nykanen et al., “X-ray scattering in full-field digital mammography,” Med. Phys. vol. 30(7), (2003), pp. 1864-1873. |
| O'Brien et al., “Recent Advances in X-ray Cone-beam Computed Laminography,” J. X-ray Sci. and Tech., vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 691-707 (2016). |
| Ohba et al., “Laboratory-size x-ray microscope using Wolter mirror optics and an electron-impact x-ray source,” Rev. Sci. Inst. 92, 093704 (2021). |
| Oji et al., Automatic XAFS measurement system developed at BL14B2 in SPring-8, Available online Nov. 15, 2011, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation, vol. 19, pp. 54-59. |
| Olbinado et al., “Demonstration of Stroboscopic X-ray Talbot Interferometry Using Polychromatic Synchrotron and Laboratory X-ray Sources”, Appl. Phys. Express vol. 6 (2013), 096601. |
| Ortega et al., “Bio-metals imaging and speciation in cells using proton and synchrotron radiation X-ray microspectroscopy,” J. Royal Society Interface vol. 6 suppl. 5 (Oct. 6, 2009), pp. 6S649-6S658. |
| Pandeshwar et al., “Modeling of beam hardening effects in a dual-phase X-ray grading interferometer for quantitative dark-field imaging,” Optics Express, vol. 28, No. 13, Jun. 22, 2020, pp. 19187-19204 (2020). |
| Parrill et al., “GISAXS—Glancing Incidence Small Angle X-ray Scattering,” Journal de Physique IV, vol. 3 (Dec. 1993), pp. 411-417. |
| Paunesku et al., “X-Ray Fluorescence Microprobe Imaging in Biology and Medicine,” J. Cell. Biochem. vol. 99, pp. 1489-1502 (2006). |
| Pfeiffer et al., “Phase retrieval and differential phase-contrast imaging with low-brilliance X-ray sources,” Nature Physics vol. 2, (2006), pp. 258-261. |
| Pfeiffer et al., “Hard x-ray phase tomography with low brilliance x-ray sources,” Phys. Rev. Lett. vol. 98, (2007), 108105. |
| Pfeiffer et al., “Hard-X-ray dark-field imaging using a grating interferometer,” Nature Materials vol. 7, (2008), pp. 134-137. |
| Pfeiffer, “Milestones and basic principles of grating-based x-ray and neutron phase-contrast imaging,” in International Workshop on X-ray and Neutron Phase Imaging with Gratings AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1466, (2012), pp. 2-11. |
| Pianetta et al., “Application of synchrotron radiation to TXRF analysis of metal contamination on silicon wafer surfaces,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 373(1-2), 2000, pp. 222-226. |
| Potts, “Electron Probe Microanalysis”, Ch. 10 of “A Handbook of Silicate Rock Analysis” (Springer Science + Business Media, New York, 1987), pp. 326-382. |
| Prewitt et al., “Focused ion beam repair: staining of photomasks and reticles,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. vol. 26 (1993), pp. 1135-1137. |
| Prewitt et al., “Gallium Staining in FIB Repair of Photomasks,” Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 21 (1993), pp. 191-196. |
| Prewitt et al., “FIB Repair of 5X Reticles and Effects on IC Quality,” Integrated Circuit Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control VII, Proc. SPIE vol. 1926 (1993), pp. 517-526. |
| Pushie et al., “Prion protein expression level alters regional copper, iron and zinc content in the mouse brain,” Metallomics vol. 3, 206-214 (2011). |
| Pushie et al., “Elemental and Chemically Specific X-ray Fluorescence Imaging of Biological Systems,” Chem. Rev. 114:17, 8499-8541 (2014). |
| Qiao et al., “Single-shot x-ray phase-contrast and dark-field imaging based on coded binary phase mask,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 011105 (2021). |
| Qin et al., “Trace metal imaging with high spatial resolution: Applications in biomedicine,” Metallomics, vol. 3 (Jan. 2011), pp. 28-37. |
| Redus et al., “Spectrometer configuration and measurement uncertainty in X-ray spectroscopy,” X-Ray Spectrom., pp. 1-14 (2020). |
| Renaud et al., “Probing surface and interface morphology with Grazing Incidence Small Angle X-ray Scattering,” Surface Science Reports, vol. 64:8 (2009), pp. 255-380. |
| Rix et al., “Super-Resolution X-ray phase-contrast and dark-field imaging with a single 2D grating and electromagnetic source stepping,” Phys. Med. Biol. In press https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab2ff5 (2019). |
| Rutishauser, “X-ray grating interferometry for imaging and metrology,” 2003, Eth Zurich, Diss. ETH No. 20939. |
| Sato et al., Two-dimensional gratings-based phase-contrast imaging using a conventional x-ray tube, 2011, Optics Letters, vol. 36, No. 18, pp. 3551-3553. |
| Scherer et al., “Bi-Directional X-Ray Phase-Contrast Mammography,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, Issue 5 (May 2014) e93502. |
| Scholze et al., “X-ray Detectors and XRF Detection Channels,” Ch. 4 of “Handbook of Practical X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis,” B. Beckhoff et al., eds. (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 2006), pp. 85-198. |
| Schunck et al., “Soft x-ray imaging spectroscopy with micrometer resolution,” Optica vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 156-160 (2021). |
| Seddon-Ferretti et al., “HERMES—a GUI-based software tool for pre-processing of X-ray absorption spectroscopy data from laboratory Rowland circle spectrometers,” J. Synch. Rad., vol. 29, https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577521012583, pp. 1-4 (2022). |
| Seifert et al., “Talbot-Lau x-ray phase-contrast setup for fast scanning of large samples,” Sci. Rep. 9:4199, pp. 1-11 (2019). |
| Shi et al., “Laboratory X-ray interferometry imaging with a fan-shaped source grating,” Optics Lett., doi.org/10.1364/OL.426867 (2021). |
| Shimura et al., “Hard x-ray phase contrast imaging using a tabletop Talbot-Lau interferometer with multiline embedded x-ray targets”, Opt. Lett. vol. 38(2) (2013), pp. 157-159. |
| Sparks Jr., “X-ray Fluorescence Microprobe for Chemical Analysis,” in Synchrotron Radiation Research, H. Winick & S. Doniach, eds. (Plenum Press, New York, NY 1980), pp. 459-512. |
| Stampanoni et al., “The First Analysis and Clinical Evaluation of Native Breast Tissue Using Differential Phase-Contrast Mammography,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 46, pp. 801-806. pub 2011-12-xx. |
| Storm et al., “Optimizing the energy bandwidth for transmission full-field X-ray microscopy experiments,” J. Synch. Rad., vol. 29, https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577521011206, pp. 1-10 (2022). |
| Streli et al., “Micro-X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy,” Chapter I.9.f of “Imaging Modalities for Biological and Preclinical Research: A compendium, vol. 1, Part I: Ex vivo biological imaging,” Ed. Walter et al., 8 pages, doi:10.1088/978-0-7503-3059-6ch42 (2021). |
| Sunday et al., “X-ray Metrology for the Semiconductor Industry Tutorial,” J. Res. Nat'l Inst. Stan. vol. 124: 124003 (2019); https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.124.003. |
| Takeda et al., “X-Ray Phase Imaging with Single Phase Grating”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 46 (2007), pp. L89-L91. |
| Takeda et al., “Differential Phase X-ray Imaging Microscopy with X-ray Talbot Interferometer” Appl. Phys. Express vol. 1 (2008) 117002. |
| Talbot, “Facts relating to optical science No. IV,” Philos. Mag. vol. 9 (1836), pp. 401-407. |
| Tanaka et al., “Cadaveric and in vivo human joint imaging based on differential phase contrast by X-ray Talbot-Lau interferometry”, Z. Med. Phys. vol. 23 (2013), pp. 222-227. |
| Tao et al., “Factors Affecting the Spatial Resolution in 2D Grating-Based X-Ray Phase Contrast Imaging,” Frontiers in Physics, doi: 10.3389/fphy.2021.672207 (2021). |
| Taphorn et al., “Grating-based spectral X-ray dark-field imaging for correlation with structural size measures,” Sci. Reports, vol. 10, 13195 (2020). |
| Terzano et al., Recent advances in analysis of trace elements in environmental samples by X-ray based techniques (IUPAC Technical Report), Pure Appl. Chem. 2019. |
| Tetef et al., “Unsupervised Machine Learning for Unbiased Chemical Classification in X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy and X-ray Emission Spectroscopy,” Royal Soc. of Chem. Doi: 10.33774/chemrxiv-2021-5tvrv (2021). |
| Titus et al., “Advancing the in-situ characterization of light elements via X-ray absorption spectroscopy using superconducting detectors,” Microsc. Microanal., vol. 27, (Suppl. 1), pp. 2890 (2021). |
| Tkachuk et al., “High-resolution x-ray tomography using laboratory sources”, in Developments in X-Ray Tomography V, Proc. SPIE 6318 (2006): 631810. |
| Tkachuk et al., “Multi-length scale x-ray tomography using laboratory and synchrotron sources”, Microsc. Microanal. vol. 13 (Suppl. 2) (2007), pp. 1570-1571. |
| Töpperwien et al., “Multiscale x-ray phase-contrast tomography in a mouse model of transient focal cerebral ischemia,” Biomed. Op. Express, vol. 10, No. 1, Jan. 2019, pp. 92-103. |
| Tsuji et al., “X-Ray Spectrometry: Recent Technological Advances,” John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Chichester, West Sussex, UK 2004), Chapters 1-7. |
| Udagawa, “An Introduction to In-House EXAFS Facilities,” The Rigaku Journal, vol. 6, (1) (1989), pp. 20-27. |
| Udagawa, “An Introduction to X-ray Absorption Fine Structure,” The Rigaku Journal, vol. 11(2)(1994), pp. 30-39. |
| Uehara et al., “Effectiveness of X-ray grating interferometry for non-destructive inspection of packaged devices”, J. Appl. Phys. vol. 114 (2013), 134901. |
| Viermetz et al., “High resolution laboratory grating-based X-ray phase-contrast CT,” Scientific Reports 8:15884 (2018). |
| Vila-Comamala et al., “High sensitivity X-ray phase contrast imaging by laboratory grating-based interferometry at high Talbot order geometry,” Op. Express vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 2049-2064 (2021). |
| Vogt, “X-ray Fluorescence Microscopy: A Tool for Biology, Life Science and Nanomedicine,” Presentation on May 16, 2012 at James Madison Univ., Harrisonburg, VA (31 slides), 2012. |
| Wan et al., “Fabrication of Multiple Slit Using Stacked-Sliced Method for Hard X-ray Talbot-Lau Interferometer”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 47 (2008), pp. 7412-7414. |
| Wang et al., “Advantages of intermediate X-ray energies in Zernike phase contrast X-ray microscopy,” Biotech. Adv., vol. 31 (2013) pp. 387-392. |
| Weitkamp et al., “Hard X-ray phase imaging and tomography with a grating interferometer,” Proc. SPIE vol. 5535, (2004), pp. 137-142. |
| Weitkamp et al., “X-ray phase imaging with a grating interferometer,” Opt. Express vol. 13(16), (2005), pp. 6296-6304. |
| Weitkamp et al., “X-ray wavefront analysis and optics characterization with a grating interferometer,” Appl. Phys. Lett. vol. 86, (2005), 054101. |
| Weitkamp et al., Tomography with grating interferometers at low-brilliance sources, 2006, SPIE, vol. 6318, pp. 0S-1 to 0S-10. |
| Weitkamp et al., “X-ray wavefront diagnostics with Talbot interferometers,” International Workshop on X-Ray Diagnostics and Scientific Application of the European XFEL, Ryn, Poland, (2010), 36 slides. |
| Weitkamp et al., “Design aspects of X-ray grating interferometry,” in International Workshop on X-ray and Neutron Phase Imaging with Gratings AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1466, (2012), pp. 84-89. |
| Wen et al., “Fourier X-ray Scattering Radiography Yields Bone Structural Information,” Radiology, vol. 251 (2009) pp. 910-918. |
| Wen et al., “Single-shot x-ray differential phase-contrast and diffraction imaging using two-dimensional transmission gratings,” Op. Lett. vol. 35, No. 12, (2010) pp. 1932-1934. |
| Wilde et al., “Modeling of an X-ray grating-based imaging interferometer using ray tracing,” Op. Express vol. 28, No. 17, p. 24657 (2020). |
| Wilde et al., “Statistical optics modeling of dark-field scattering in X-ray grating interferometers: Part 1. Theory,” Op. Express vol. 29, No. 25, p. 40891 (2021). |
| Wilde et al., “Statistical optics modeling of dark-field scattering in X-ray grating interferometers: Part 2. Simulation,” Op. Express vol. 29, No. 25, p. 40917 (2021). |
| Withers et al., “X-ray computed tomography,” Nature Reviews | Methods Primers, vol. 1, No. 18, pp. 1-21 (2021). |
| Witte et al., “From 2D STXM to 3D Imaging: Soft X-ray Laminography of Thin Specimens,” Nano Lett. vol. 20, pp. 1305-1314 (2020). |
| Wittry et al., “Properties of fixed-position Bragg diffractors for parallel detection of x-ray spectra,” Rev. Sci. Instr. vol. 64, pp. 2195-2200 (1993). |
| Wobrauschek et al., “Micro XRF of light elements using a polycapillary lens and an ultra-thin window Silicon Drift Detector inside a vacuum chamber,” 2005, International Centre for Diffraction Data 2005, Advances in X-ray Analysis, vol. 48, pp. 229-235. |
| Wobrauschek et al., “Energy Dispersive, X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis,” Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry, R.A. Meyers, Ed. (Wiley 2010). |
| Xiao et al., “TXM-Sandbox: an open-source software for transmission X-ray microscopy data analysis,” J. Synch. Rad., vol. 29, https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577521011978, p. 1-10 (2022). |
| Xu et al., “Synchrotron radiation computed laminography for polymer composite failure studies,” J. Synch. Rad., vol. 17, pp. 222-226 (2010). |
| Xu et al., “Comparison of image quality in computed laminography and tomography,” Op. Express, vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 794-806 (2012). |
| Yamada et al., “Compact full-field hard x-ray microscope based on advanced Kirkpatrick-Baez mirrors,” Optica, vol. 7, No. 4 pp. 367-370 (2020). |
| Yashiro et al., “Optimal Design of Transmission Grating for X-ray Talbot Interferometer”, Advances in X-ray Analysis vol. 49(3) (2006), pp. 375-379. |
| Yashiro et al., “Efficiency of capturing a phase image using cone-beam x-ray Talbot interferometry”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A vol. 25 (2008), pp. 2025-2039. |
| Yashiro et al., “Hard-X-Ray Phase-Difference Microscopy Using a Fresnel Zone Plate and a Transmission Grating”, Phys. Rev. Lett. vol. 103 (2009), 180801. |
| Yashiro et al., “Hard x-ray phase-imaging microscopy using the self-imaging phenomenon of a transmission grating”, Phys. Rev. A vol. 82 (2010), 043822. |
| Yashiro et al., “On the origin of visibility contrast in x-ray Talbot interferometry”, Opt. Express (2010), pp. 16890-16901. |
| Yashiro et al., “X-ray Phase Imaging Microscopy using a Fresnel Zone Plate and a Transmission Grating”, in The 10th International Conference on Synchrotron Radiation Instrumentation, AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1234 (2010), pp. 473-476. |
| Yashiro et al., “Distribution of unresolvable anisotropic microstructures revealed in visibility-contrast images using x-ray Talbot interferometry”, Phys. Rev. B vol. 84 (2011), 094106. |
| Yashiro et al., “X-ray Phase Imaging and Tomography Using a Fresnel Zone Plate and a Transmission Grating”, in “The 10th International Conference on X-ray Microscopy Radiation Instrumentation”, AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1365 (2011) pp. 317-320. |
| Yashiro et al., “Theoretical Aspect of X-ray Phase Microscopy with Transmission Gratings” in International Workshop on X-ray and Neutron Phase Imaging with Gratings, AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1466, (2012), pp. 144-149. |
| Yoshioka et al., “Imaging evaluation of the cartilage in rheumatoid arthritis patients with an x-ray phase imaging apparatus based on Talbot-Lau interferometry,” Scientific Reports, 10:6561, https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-020-63155-9 (2020). |
| Zan et al., “High-resolution multicontrast tomography with an X-ray microarray anode-structured target source,” PNAS, doi.org10.1073/pnas.2103126118 (2021). |
| Zanette et al., “Two-Dimensional X-Ray Grating interferometer,” Phys. Rev. Lett. vol. 105 (2010) pp. 248102-1 248102-4. |
| Zeeshan et al., “In-house setup for laboratory-based x-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy measurements,” Rev. Sci. Inst. 90, 073105 (2019). |
| Zeng et al., “Glass Monocapillary X-ray Optics and Their Applications in X-Ray Microscopy,” X-ray Optics and Microanalysis: Proceedings of the 20th International Congress, AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1221, (2010), pp. 41-47. |
| Zhang et al., “Application of confocal X-ray fluorescence based on capillary X-ray optics in nondestructively measuring the inner diameter of monocapillary optics,” Optics Comm. (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2018.11.064. |
| Zhang et al., “Measurement of the inner diameter of monocapillary with confocal X-ray scattering technology based on capillary X-ray optics,” Appl. Opt. (Jan. 8, 2019), doc ID 351489, pp. 1-10. |
| Zhou et al., “X-ray wavefront characterization with grating interferometry using an x-ray microfocus laboratory source,” Proceedings, vol. 11492, Advances in Metrology for X-Ray and EUV Optics IX; 114920Q, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2576152 (2020). |
| Dewulf et al., “Advances in the metrological traceability and performance of X-ray computed tomography,” CIRP Annals—Manuf. Tech. vol. 00, 1-24 (2022). |
| Heirwegh et al., “The focused beam X-ray fluorescence elemental quantification software package PIQUANT,” Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, https://doi.org/10/1016/j.sab.2022.106520 (2022). |
| Matsunaga et al., “Development of projection X-ray microscope with 10 nm spot size,” Nodestr. Test. and Eval., https://doi.org.10.1080/10589759.2022.2083616 (2022). |
| Pekel et al., “Geometric calibration of seven degree of freedom robotic sample holder for x-ray CT,” Proc. of SPIE 12304, 7th Int'l Conf. on Image Formation in X-Ray Computed Tomography, 123042L, doi:10.1117/12.2646492 (2022). |
| Simionovici et al., “X-ray focusing methods for X-ray absorption spectroscopy,” Int'l Tables Crystallog. vol. I, https://doi.org/10.1107/S1574870721006844 (2022). |
| Tao et al., “Moire artifacts reduction in Talbot-Lau X-ray phase contrast imaging using a three-step iterative approach,” Opt. Ex. vol. 30, No. 20, pp. 35096-35111 (2022). |
| Tang et al., “Detailed analysis of the interference patterns measured in lab-based X-ray dual-phase grating interferometry through wave propagation simulation,” Opt. Ex. vol. 31, No. 2. pp. 1677-1691 (2023). |
| Tebina et al., “X-Ray Fault Injection: Reviewing Defensive Approaches from a Security Perspective,” 2022 IEEE Int'l Symp. Defect and Fault Tolerances in VLSI and Nanotechnology Systems (DFT), doi: 10.1109/DFT56152.2022.9962362 (2022). |
| Zhang et al., “Laboratory-scale X-ray absorption spectrometer with a cylindrical Johansson crystal analyzer,” Nuclear Inst. and Methods in Physics Research, A (2023), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2023.168067 (2023). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20220178851 A1 | Jun 2022 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63274367 | Nov 2021 | US | |
| 63122354 | Dec 2020 | US |
