This invention pertains generally to the field of charge pumps and more particularly to the regulation of charge pumps.
Charge pumps use a switching process to provide a DC output voltage larger than its DC input voltage. In general, a charge pump will have a capacitor coupled to switches between an input and an output. During one clock half cycle, the charging half cycle, the capacitor couples in parallel to the input so as to charge up to the input voltage. During a second clock half cycle, the transfer half cycle, the charged capacitor couples in series with the input voltage so as to provide an output voltage twice the level of the input voltage. This process is illustrated in
Charge pumps are used in many contexts. For example, they are used as peripheral circuits on EEPROM, flash EEPROM and other non-volatile memories to generate many of the needed operating voltages, such as programming or erase voltages, from a lower power supply voltage. For many of these uses, it important that the output is accurately regulated to the desired output level. A number of charge pump designs are know in the art, but given the common reliance upon charge pumps, there is an on going need for improvements in charge pump system design, including the regulation elements.
According to a first set of aspects, a charge pump system includes a charge pump circuit connected to receive a control signal and, in response to the control signal, provide an output voltage at an output node and regulation circuitry responsive a multi-hit digital value. The regulation circuitry includes a first comparator, having as output the control signal, a first input connected to receive a first reference voltage, and a second input connected to a first node; a first current branch connected between the output node and ground; and a second current branch connected between the output node and ground in parallel with the first current branch. The first current branch has a first variable resistance connected between the output node and the first node and a first fixed resistance connected between the first node and ground, where the value of the first variable resistance is determined by a first set of bits of the digital value. The second current branch includes a second variable resistance connected between the output node and ground, including a fixed portion and an adjustable portion having a value determined by a second set of bits of the digital value, the bits of the second set being of lesser significance than the bits of the first set of bits in the digital value. The second current branch also includes a unity gain op-amp section having a first transistor connected between the output node and the second variable resistance and a second comparator having an output connected to the control gate of the first transistor, a first input connected to receive a second reference voltage, and a second input connected to a node between the first transistor and the second variable resistance.
Various aspects, advantages, features and embodiments of the present invention are included in the following description of exemplary examples thereof, which description should be taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. All patents, patent applications, articles, other publications, documents and things referenced herein are hereby incorporated herein by this reference in their entirety for all purposes. To the extent of any inconsistency or conflict in the definition or use of terms between any of the incorporated publications, documents or things and the present application, those of the present application shall prevail.
The various aspects and features of the present invention may be better understood by examining the following figures, in which:
a is a simplified circuit diagram of the charging half cycle in a generic charge pump.
b is a simplified circuit diagram of the transfer half cycle in a generic charge pump.
The main aspects considered here related to charge pump systems and particularly to the regulation process for such systems. Conventional voltage regulation circuitry, such as the high voltage regulation system used for a charge pump to supply programming voltages VPGM for a non-volatile memory, uses resistor chains as voltage divider to control the VPGM level and step size. As technology scale down, and VPGM step size required finer increments, conventional VPGM regulator requires a larger resistor chain. The parasitic capacitance of this large resistor chain becomes dominant, increasing VPGM ripple. The regulator system use approach described below can reduce regulator resistors chains, minimize parasitic capacitance, and thus reduce VPGM ripple.
Charge pumps are typically used as peripheral elements are a circuit that needs higher voltages than the supply level. An example is a non-volatile memory, such as flash memory, where charge pumps are used to provide the high voltages used in programming and erasing memory cells, and also for the various voltages used in sensing and verifying the memory cells. In such arrangements, a number of different, accurately determined values may be needed, such the programming voltages of each of the steps in a programming staircase type waveform, or the many voltages levels used for sensing in multi-state NAND arrays. (More detail on such memory systems can be found in US patent publication US-2009-0296488-A1, for example.) The arrangement shown in
To control the VPGM level and step size, a binary input signal can be provided of, say, 9 bits can be used to vary the level. The 9 bits can be decoded into the 3 least significant bits, for the finer adjustments, and the 6 most significant bits, where the 6 bits of larger steps can be implemented as a single variable resistance connected in parallel below the VMON node with 3 smaller resistances for the finer increments. If one large resistor is turned on, this means less current and therefore VPGM level is regulated at a lower level. If many resistors in parallel are on, a larger current results and therefore a higher VPGM level. As VPGM step size requires smaller increments (50 mV, for example), more parallel resistors are added to create a finer step. Thus, a large resistor chain is required and more parasitic capacitance is added to VMON. Large parasitic capacitance at the VMON node makes it harder to detect small movement at VPGM, resulting in large VPGM ripple.
To provide a regulated output voltage range of 3.0V-28.5V with step size of 50 mV for use in erase operation, the resistor Roffs 415 can be selectively connected between the VMON node and ground to offset the output range, lowering it by 5V. When Roffs 415 is connected, the current out of Rb 405 is split into I1 though the adjustable resistances to provide the steps size and I2 though Roffs 415 to lower the range to start at 3V for erase operations.
Although this arrangement can provide the desired step size over the desired range, the resistances connected in parallel must be taken quite large to avoid drawing excessive current. An actual example would use something like a total of ˜56M ohm due to the DAC resistors in arranged parallel. Such a large resistor chain will add a large amount of parasitic capacitance to VMON, making it harder to pick up small variation in the output at VPGM, resulting in large amount of output ripple. Consequently, it would quite useful to find a way to use smaller resistance values, thereby decreasing this parasitic capacitance and also needed area for resistors, while still drawing a relatively small amount of current.
The main discussion here is related to the regulation circuitry of the charge pump system and how the output voltage is compared with the reference level in order to generate the control signals used for regulation. With respect to the charge pump itself, any of the various designs (voltage doubler, Dickson type, and so on) can be used. Similarly, there are many ways for how the output is regulated based upon the control signal, such as varying the frequency of the input clock signal, the amplitude of the input voltage, the number of stages, and so on. More details on these aspects, which can be applied to the exemplary embodiments below as well as to the examples above can be found, for example, in “Charge Pump Circuit Design” by Pan and Samaddar, McGraw-Hill, 2006, or “Charge Pumps: An Overview”, Pylarinos and Rogers, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Toronto, available on the webpage “www.eecg.toronto.edu/˜kphang/ece1371/chargepumps.pdf”. Further information on various other charge pump aspects and designs can be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,436,587; 6,370,075; 6,556,465; 6,760,262; 6,922,096; 7,030,683; 7,554,311; 7,368,979; 7,795,952; 7,135,910; 7,973,592; and 7,969,235; US Patent Publication numbers 2009-0153230-A1; 2009-0153232-A1; 2009-0315616-A1; 2009-0322413-A1; 2009-0058506-A1; US-2011-0148509-A1; 2007-0126494-A1; 2007-0139099-A1; 2008-0307342 A1; and 2009-0058507 A1; and applications Nos. 12/973,641 and 12/973,493, both filed Dec. 20, 2010. In addition, two specific examples of charge pump systems where the regulation circuitry described here can employed can be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/228,605, filed Sep. 9, 2011, and a U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/240,664, entitled “Dynamic Switching Approach to Reduce Area and Power Consumption of High Voltage Charge Pumps” by Qui Vi Nguyen, Khin Htoo, and Jonathan Huynh, that is being filed concurrently herewith.
To overcome the imitations described above, a main aspect of the charge pump system presented here uses a regulator system that divides the binary decoding into two branches. One controls a set of parallel connected resistors for fine the VPGM step. The other controls a serial resistor to provide large step size. The exemplary embodiment, discussed with respect to
Referring now to
The comparison node TAP is taken from an internal node of the second branch above a fixed resistance Rbase 517. The resistance R200 507 is adjustable in increments of 200 mV, response to the 7 most significant bits of the binary input signal. (This can again be a chain of series connected resistors that can be tapped at a point based on the input signal.) The 9-bit (in this example) binary signal can be provided from the state machine (not shown) on the memory chip or other control circuitry, where, depending on the program and erase levels needed, the 9-bits will generated accordingly. To allow for the offset in output voltage when used for erase operations, a resistor Roffs 515 is connected in series with Rbase 517. (Here, Roffs 515 is connected above Rbase 517, but that could be switched or otherwise arranged, depending on the embodiment.) Roffs 515 can selectively be bypassed to shift the levels of Vout to start at a lower value, here to start Vout at 3V for erase levels.
The second branch, with current I2, uses two binary bits for the fine 50 mV and 100 mV steps. The current I2 flows through the transistor 523 to the parallel connected resistors R0 509, R100 511, and R50 513 and on to ground. The fixed portion R0 509 of these resistors is included to provide a constant resistance path for I2 to ground. The resistors R100 511 and R50 513 respectively selectively connectable to supply 100 mV and 50 mV steps for Vout when under regulation. The gate of the transistor 523 is connected controller by the output of operational amplifier 521, which has one input connected to receive a reference voltage VREF (here the same reference value as used for 503, ˜1.2V in this example) and the other input connected to take feedback from the node X below the transistor 523. The comparator 521 and transistor 523 work together as a unity gain op-amp to set the node X to VREF (here ˜1.2V). As the system here is for use with high voltages, a transistor 525 is placed above the transistor 523, although in other applications this may not be needed. For the exemplary embodiment, the gate of transistor 525 can be set at about the ˜4v level. More generally, when such a protective device is needed, its gate setting level should be such as to pass about 4v to source side of the high voltage NMOS 525. This is to protect NMOS 523, since it should not see a level higher than 5v. Alternately, in other high voltage situations, the circuit can use a high voltage NMOS for 523 and remove the NMOS 535, but the use of low voltage transistor at 523 is selected here for better gain and process variation.
This arrangement can provide the desired small step size in Vout, such as needed in VPGM values, with small amounts of ripple. For the exemplary embodiment, the step size is again 50 mV with the same range as for
The arrangement of
Consequently, the exemplary embodiment of
Although the invention has been described with reference to particular embodiments, the description is only an example of the invention's application and should not be taken as a limitation. Consequently, various adaptations and combinations of features of the embodiments disclosed are within the scope of the invention as encompassed by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3697860 | Baker | Oct 1972 | A |
4271461 | Hoffmann et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4511811 | Gupta | Apr 1985 | A |
4583157 | Kirsch et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4636748 | Latham | Jan 1987 | A |
4736121 | Cini et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4888738 | Wong et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
5140182 | Ichimura | Aug 1992 | A |
5168174 | Naso et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5175706 | Edme | Dec 1992 | A |
5263000 | Van Buskirk et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5335198 | Van Buskirk et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5392205 | Zavaleta | Feb 1995 | A |
5436587 | Cernea | Jul 1995 | A |
5483434 | Seesink | Jan 1996 | A |
5508971 | Cernea et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5521547 | Tsukada | May 1996 | A |
5563779 | Cave et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5563825 | Cernea et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568424 | Cernea et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5570315 | Tanaka et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5592420 | Cernea et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5596532 | Cernea et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5602794 | Javanifard et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5621685 | Cernea et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625544 | Kowshik et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5693570 | Cernea et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5732039 | Javanifard et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734286 | Takeyama et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5767735 | Javanifard et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5781473 | Javanifard et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5801987 | Dinh | Sep 1998 | A |
5818766 | Song | Oct 1998 | A |
5828596 | Takata et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5903495 | Takeuchi et al. | May 1999 | A |
5943226 | Kim | Aug 1999 | A |
5945870 | Chu et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5969565 | Naganawa | Oct 1999 | A |
5973546 | Le et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5982222 | Kyung | Nov 1999 | A |
6008690 | Takeshima et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6018264 | Jin | Jan 2000 | A |
6023187 | Camacho et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026002 | Viehmann | Feb 2000 | A |
6046935 | Takeuchi et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6104225 | Taguchi et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107862 | Mukainakano et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6134145 | Wong | Oct 2000 | A |
6151229 | Taub et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154088 | Chevallier et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6188590 | Chang et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198645 | Kotowski et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208198 | Lee | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6249445 | Sugasawa | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249898 | Koh et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6285622 | Haraguchi et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297687 | Sugimura | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307425 | Chevallier et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314025 | Wong | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320428 | Atsumi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320796 | Voo et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6329869 | Matano | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6344959 | Milazzo | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6344984 | Miyazaki | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6359798 | Han et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6369642 | Zeng et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370075 | Haeberli et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6400202 | Fifield et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6404274 | Hosono et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424570 | Le et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6445243 | Myono | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6456170 | Segawa et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6476666 | Palusa et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6486728 | Kleveland | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6518830 | Gariboldi et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6525614 | Tanimoto | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6525949 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6531792 | Oshio | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6538930 | Ishii et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6545529 | Kim | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6556465 | Wong et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6577535 | Pasternak | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6606267 | Wong | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6724241 | Bedarida et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6734718 | Pan | May 2004 | B1 |
6760262 | Haeberli et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6781440 | Huang | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6798274 | Tanimoto | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6819162 | Pelliconi | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6834001 | Myono | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6859091 | Nicholson et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6878981 | Eshel | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6891764 | Li | May 2005 | B2 |
6894554 | Ito | May 2005 | B2 |
6922096 | Cernea | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6927441 | Pappalardo et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6933768 | Hausmann | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6944058 | Wong | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6975135 | Bui | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6990031 | Hashimoto et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6995603 | Chen et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7002381 | Chung | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7023260 | Thorp et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7030683 | Pan et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7113023 | Cernea | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7116154 | Guo | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7116155 | Pan | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7120051 | Gorobets et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7129759 | Fukami | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7135910 | Cernea | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7135911 | Imamiya | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7208996 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7224591 | Kaishita et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7227780 | Komori et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7239192 | Tailliet | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7253676 | Fukuda et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7259612 | Saether | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7276960 | Peschke | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7279957 | Yen | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7345928 | Li | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7368979 | Govindu et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7397677 | Collins et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7436241 | Chen et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7468628 | Im et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7495500 | Al-Shamma et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7521978 | Kim et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7554311 | Pan | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7579903 | Oku | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7671572 | Chung | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7696812 | Al-Shamma et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7772914 | Jung | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7795952 | Lui et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7956673 | Pan | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7969235 | Pan | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7973592 | Pan | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8093953 | Pierdomenico et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8193853 | Hsieh et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20020008566 | Taito et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020014908 | Lauterbach | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020075706 | Foss et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020130701 | Kleveland | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140463 | Cheung | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030128560 | Saiki et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030214346 | Pelliconi | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040046603 | Bedarida et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050093614 | Lee | May 2005 | A1 |
20050195017 | Chen et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050237103 | Cernea | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050248386 | Pan et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060098505 | Cho et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060114053 | Sohara et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060244518 | Byeon et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060250177 | Thorp et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070001745 | Yen | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070053216 | Alenin | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070069805 | Choi et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070126494 | Pan | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070139099 | Pan | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070139100 | Pan | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070211502 | Komiya | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070222498 | Choy et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070229149 | Pan et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080012627 | Kato | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080024096 | Pan | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080042731 | Daga et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080111604 | Boerstler et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080116963 | Jung | May 2008 | A1 |
20080136500 | Frulio et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080157852 | Pan | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080157859 | Pan | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080218134 | Kawakami | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080239802 | Thorp | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080239856 | Thorp | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080278222 | Conti et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080307342 | Furches et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090033306 | Tanzawa | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090051413 | Chu et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090058506 | Nandi et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090058507 | Nandi et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090063918 | Chen et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090091366 | Baek et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090121780 | Chen et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090153230 | Pan et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090153231 | Pan et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090153232 | Fort et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090167418 | Ragavan | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090174441 | Gebara et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090219077 | Pietri et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090296488 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090315616 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090322413 | Huynh et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100019832 | Pan | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100074034 | Cazzaniga | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100085794 | Chen et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100244935 | Kim et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110133820 | Pan | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110148509 | Pan | Jun 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10 2007 026290 | Jul 2008 | DE |
0 382 929 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0 780 515 | Jun 1997 | EP |
2007-020268 | Jan 2007 | JP |
0106336 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 2006132757 | Dec 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Feng Pan et al., “Charge Pump Circuit Design”, McGraw-Hill, 2006, 26 pages. |
Louie Pylarinos et al., “Charge Pumps: An Overview”, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Toronto, 7 pages. |
Ang et al., “An On-Chip Voltage Regulator Using Switched Decoupling Capacitors,” 2000 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, 2 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/506,998 entitled “Charge Pump with Current Based Regulation” filed Jul. 21, 2009, 21 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/634,385 entitled “Multi-Stage Charge Pump with Variable Number of Boosting Stages” filed Dec. 9, 2009, 33 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/973,641, filed Dec. 20, 2010, 26 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/973,493, filed Dec. 20, 2010, 28 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/228,605, filed Sep. 9, 2011, 21 pages. |