Patent Grant
9598469
Polynucleotides encoding antigenic HIV polypeptides (e.g., those shown in Table C) are described, as are uses of these polynucleotides and polypeptide products including formulations of immunogenic compositions and uses thereof.
Acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) is recognized as one of the greatest health threats facing modern medicine. There is, as yet, no cure for this disease.
In 1983-1984, three groups independently identified the suspected etiological agent of AIDS. See, e.g., Barre-Sinoussi et al. (1983) Science 220:868-871; Montagnier et al., in Human T-Cell Leukemia Viruses (Gallo, Essex & Gross, eds., 1984); Vilmer et al. (1984) The Lancet 1:753; Popovic et al. (1984) Science 224:497-500; Levy et al. (1984) Science 225:840-842. These isolates were variously called lymphadenopathy-associated virus (LAV), human T-cell lymphotropic virus type III (HTLV-III), or AIDS-associated retrovirus (ARV). All of these isolates are strains of the same virus, and were later collectively named Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). With the isolation of a related AIDS-causing virus, the strains originally called HIV are now termed HIV-1 and the related virus is called HIV-2 See, e.g., Guyader et al. (1987) Nature 326:662-669; Brun-Vezinet et al. (1986) Science 233:343-346; Clavel et al. (1986) Nature 324:691-695.
A great deal of information has been gathered about the HIV virus, however, to date an effective vaccine has not been identified. Several targets for vaccine development have been examined including the env and Gag gene products encoded by HIV. Gag gene products include, but are not limited to, Gag-polymerase and Gag-protease. Env gene products include, but are not limited to, monomeric gp120 polypeptides, oligomeric gp140 polypeptides and gp160 polypeptides.
Haas, et al., (Current Biology 6(3):315-324, 1996) suggested that selective codon usage by HIV-1 appeared to account for a substantial fraction of the inefficiency of viral protein synthesis. Andre, et al., (J. Virol. 72(2):1497-1503, 1998) described an increased immune response elicited by DNA vaccination employing a synthetic gp120 sequence with modified codon usage. Schneider, et al., (J. Virol. 71(7):4892-4903, 1997) discuss inactivation of inhibitory (or instability) elements (INS) located within the coding sequences of the Gag and Gag-protease coding sequences.
The Gag proteins of HIV-1 are necessary for the assembly of virus-like particles. HIV-1 Gag proteins are involved in many stages of the life cycle of the virus including, assembly, virion maturation after particle release, and early post-entry steps in virus replication. The roles of HIV-1 Gag proteins are numerous and complex (Freed, E. O., Virology 251:1-15, 1998).
Wolf, et al., (PCT International Application, WO 96/30523, published 3 Oct. 1996; European Patent Application, Publication No. 0 449 116 A1, published 2 Oct. 1991) have described the use of altered pr55 Gag of HIV-1 to act as a noninfectious retroviral-like particulate carrier, in particular, for the presentation of immunologically important epitopes. Wang, et al., (Virology 200:524-534, 1994) describe a system to study assembly of HIV Gag-β-galactosidase fusion proteins into virions. They describe the construction of sequences encoding HIV Gag-β-galactosidase fusion proteins, the expression of such sequences in the presence of HIV Gag proteins, and assembly of these proteins into virus particles.
Shiver, et al., (PCT International Application, WO 98/34640, published 13 Aug. 1998) described altering HIV-1 (CAM1) Gag coding sequences to produce synthetic DNA molecules encoding HIV Gag and modifications of HIV Gag. The codons of the synthetic molecules were codons preferred by a projected host cell.
Recently, use of HIV Env polypeptides in immunogenic compositions has been described. (see, U.S. Pat. No. 5,846,546 to Hurwitz et al., issued Dec. 8, 1998, describing immunogenic compositions comprising a mixture of at least four different recombinant virus that each express a different HIV env variant; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,840,313 to Vahlne et al., issued Nov. 24, 1998, describing peptides which correspond to epitopes of the HIV-1 gp120 protein). In addition, U.S. Pat. No. 5,876,731 to Sia et al, issued Mar. 2, 1999 describes candidate vaccines against HIV comprising an amino acid sequence of a T-cell epitope of Gag linked directly to an amino acid sequence of a B-cell epitope of the V3 loop protein of an HIV-1 isolate containing the sequence GPGR.
Described herein are novel HIV sequences, polypeptides encoded by these novel sequences, and synthetic expression cassettes generated from these and other HIV sequences. In one aspect, the present invention relates to improved HIV expression cassettes. In a second aspect, the present invention relates to generating an immune response in a subject using the expression cassettes of the present invention.
In a further aspect, the present invention relates to generating an immune response in a subject using the expression cassettes of the present invention, as well as, polypeptides encoded by the expression cassettes of the present invention. In another aspect, the present invention relates to enhanced vaccine technologies for the induction of potent neutralizing antibodies and/or cellular immune responses against HIV in a subject.
In certain embodiments, the present invention relates to isolated wild-type polynucleotides and/or expression cassettes encoding HIV polypeptides, including, but not limited to, Env, Gag, Pol, Prot, RT, Int, Vpr, Vpu, Vif, Nef, Tat, Rev and/or combinations and fragments thereof. Mutations in some of the genes are described that reduce or eliminate the activity of the gene product without adversely affecting the ability of the gene product to generate an immune response. Exemplary polynucleotides include, but are not limited to, EnvTV001c8.2 (SEQ ID NO:61), EnvTV001c8.5 (SEQ ID NO:62), EnvTV001c12.1 (SEQ ID NO:63), Env TV003cE260 (SEQ ID NO:64), EnvTV004cC300 (SEQ ID NO:65), EnvTV006c9.1 (SEQ ID NO:66), EnvTV006c9.2 (SEQ ID NO:67), EnvTV006cE9 (SEQ ID NO:68), EnvTV007cB104 (SEQ ID NO:69), EnvTV007cB105 (SEQ ID NO:70), EnvTV008c4.3 (SEQ ID NO:71), EnvTV008c4.4 (SEQ ID NO:72), EnvTV010cD7 (SEQ ID NO:73), EnvTV012c2.1 (SEQ ID NO:74), EnvTV012c2.2 (SEQ ID NO:75), EnvTV013cB20 (SEQ ID NO:76), EnvTV013cH17 (SEQ ID NO:77), EnvTV014c6.3 (SEQ ID NO:78), EnvTV014c6.4 (SEQ ID NO:79), EnvTV018cF1027 (SEQ ID NO:80), EnvTV019c5 (SEQ ID NO:81), GagTV001G8 (SEQ ID NO:82), GagTV001G11 (SEQ ID NO:83), GagTV002G8 (SEQ ID NO:84), GagTV003G15 (SEQ ID NO:85), GagTV004G17 (SEQ ID NO:86), GagTV004G24 (SEQ ID NO:87), GagTV006G11 (SEQ ID NO:88), GagTV006G97 (SEQ ID NO:89), GagTV007G59 (SEQ ID NO:90), GagTV008G65 (SEQ ID NO:91), GagTV008G66 (SEQ ID NO:92), GagTV010G74 (SEQ ID NO:93), GagTV012G34 (SEQ ID NO:94), GagTV012G40 (SEQ ID NO:95), GagTV013G2 (SEQ ID NO:96), GagTV013G15 (SEQ ID NO:97), GagTV014G73 (SEQ ID NO:98), GagTV018G60 (SEQ ID NO:99), GagTV019G20 (SEQ ID NO:100), GagTV019G25 (SEQ ID NO:101), 8_2_TV1 LTR (SEQ ID NO:181), and 2_1/4_TV12_C_ZA (SEQ ID NO:182).
In other embodiments, the present invention relates synthetic polynucleotides and/or expression cassettes encoding HIV polypeptides, including but not limited to Env, Gag, Pol, Prot, Int, Vpr, Vpu, Vif, Nef, Tat, Rev and/or combinations and fragments thereof. In addition, the present invention also relates to improved expression of HIV polypeptides and production of virus-like particles. Synthetic expression cassettes encoding the HIV polypeptides (e.g., Gag-, pol-, protease (prot)-, reverse transcriptase, integrase, RNAseH, Tat, Rev, Nef, Vpr, Vpu, Vif and/or Env-containing polypeptides) are described, as are uses of the expression cassettes. Mutations in some of the genes are described that reduce or eliminate the activity of the gene product without adversely affecting the ability of the gene product to generate an immune response. Exemplary synthetic polynucleotides include, but are not limited to, GagComplPolmut_C (SEQ ID NO:9), GagComplPolmutAtt_C (SEQ ID NO:10), GagComplPolmutIna_C (SEQ ID NO:11), GagComplPolmutInaTatRevNef_C (SEQ ID NO:12), GagPolmut_C (SEQ ID NO:13), GagPolmutAtt_C (SEQ ID NO:14), GagPolmutIna_C (SEQ ID NO:15), GagProtInaRTmut_C (SEQ ID NO:16), GagProtInaRTmutTatRevNef_C (SEQ ID NO:17), GagRTmut_C (SEQ ID NO:18), GagRTmutTatRevNef_C (SEQ ID NO:19), GagTatRevNef_C (SEQ ID NO:20), gp120mod.TV1.del118-210 (SEQ ID NO:21), gp120mod.TV1.delV1V2 (SEQ ID NO:22), gp120mod.TV1.delV2 (SEQ ID NO:23), gp140mod.TV1.del118-210 (SEQ ID NO:24), gp140mod.TV1.delV1V2 (SEQ ID NO:25), gp140mod.TV1.delV2 (SEQ ID NO:26), gp140mod.TV1.mut7 (SEQ ID NO:27), gp140mod.TV1.tpa2 (SEQ ID NO:28), gp140TMmod.TV1 (SEQ ID NO:29), gp160mod.TV1.del118-210 (SEQ ID NO:30), gp160mod.TV1.delV1V2 (SEQ ID NO:31), gp160mod.TV1.delV2 (SEQ ID NO:32), gp160mod.TV1.dV1 (SEQ ID NO:33), 160mod.TV1.dV1-gagmod.BW965 (SEQ ID NO:34), gp160mod.TV1.dV1V2-gagmod.BW965 (SEQ ID NO:35), 160mod.TV1.dV2-gagmod.BW965 (SEQ ID NO:36), gp160mod.TV1.tpa2 (SEQ ID NO:37), gp160mod.TV1-gagmod.BW965 (SEQ ID NO:38), int.opt.mut_C (SEQ ID NO:39), int.opt_C (SEQ ID NO:40), nef.D106G.-myr19.opt_C (SEQ ID NO:41), p15RnaseH.opt_C (SEQ ID NO:42), p2Pol.opt.YMWM_C (SEQ ID NO:43), p2Polopt.YM_C (SEQ ID NO:44), p2Polopt_C (SEQ ID NO:45), p2PolTatRevNef opt C (SEQ ID NO:46), p2PolTatRevNef.opt.native_C (SEQ ID NO:47), p2PolTatRevNef.opt_C (SEQ ID NO:48), protInaRT.YM.opt_C (SEQ ID NO:49), protInaRT.YMWM.opt_C (SEQ ID NO:50), ProtRT.TatRevNef.opt_C (SEQ ID NO:51), rev.exon1_2.M5-10.opt_C (SEQ ID NO:52), tat.exon1_2.opt.C22-37_C (SEQ ID NO:53), tat.exon1_2.opt.C37_C (SEQ ID NO:54), TatRevNef.opt.native_ZA (SEQ ID NO:55), TatRevNef.opt_ZA (SEQ ID NO:56), TatRevNefGag C (SEQ ID NO:57), TatRevNefgagCpolIna C (SEQ ID NO:58), TatRevNefGagProtInaRTmut C (SEQ ID NO:59), TatRevNefProtRT opt C (SEQ ID NO:60), gp140.modTV1.mut1.dV2 (SEQ ID NO:183); gp140mod.TV1.mut2.dV2 (SEQ ID NO:184), gp140mod.TV1.mut3.dV2 (SEQ ID NO:185), gp140mod.TV1.mut4.dV2 (SEQ ID NO:186), gp140.mod.TV1.GM161 (SEQ ID NO:187), gp140mod.TV1.GM161-195-204 (SEQ ID NO:188), gp140mod.TV1.GM161-204 (SEQ ID NO:189), gp140mod.TV1.GM-V1V2 (SEQ ID NO:190), gp140modC8.2mut7.delV2.Kozmod.Ta (SEQ ID NO:191), and Nef-myrD124LLAA (SEQ ID NO:203).
Thus, one aspect of the present invention relates to expression cassettes and polynucleotides contained therein. The expression cassettes typically include an HIV-polypeptide encoding sequence inserted into an expression vector backbone. In one embodiment, an expression cassette comprises a polynucleotide sequence encoding one or more polypeptides, wherein the polynucleotide sequence comprises a sequence having between about 85% to 100% and any integer values therebetween, for example, at least about 85%, preferably about 90%, more preferably about 95%, and more preferably about 98% sequence identity to the sequences taught in the present specification.
The polynucleotides encoding the HIV polypeptides of the present invention may also include sequences encoding additional polypeptides. Such additional polynucleotides encoding polypeptides may include, for example, coding sequences for other viral proteins (e.g., hepatitis B or C or other HIV proteins, such as, polynucleotide sequences encoding an HIV Gag polypeptide, polynucleotide sequences encoding an HIV Env polypeptide and/or polynucleotides encoding one or more of vif, vpr, tat, rev, vpu and nef); cytokines or other transgenes.
In one embodiment, the sequence encoding the HIV Pol polypeptide(s) can be modified by deletions of coding regions corresponding to reverse transcriptase and integrase. Such deletions in the polymerase polypeptide can also be made such that the polynucleotide sequence preserves T-helper cell and CTL epitopes. Other antigens of interest may be inserted into the polymerase as well.
In another embodiment, an expression cassette comprises a polynucleotide sequence encoding a polypeptide, for example, GagComplPolmut_C (SEQ ID NO:9), GagComplPolmutAtt_C (SEQ ID NO:10), GagComplPolmutIna_C (SEQ ID NO:11), GagComplPolmutInaTatRevNef_C (SEQ ID NO:12), GagPolmut_C (SEQ ID NO:13), GagPolmutAtt_C (SEQ ID NO:14), GagPolmutIna_C (SEQ ID NO:15), GagProtInaRTmut_C (SEQ ID NO:16), GagProtInaRTmutTatRevNef_C (SEQ ID NO:17), GagRTmut_C (SEQ ID NO:18), GagRTmutTatRevNef_C (SEQ ID NO:19), GagTatRevNef_C (SEQ ID NO:20), gp120mod.TV1.del118-210 (SEQ ID NO:21), gp120mod.TV1.delV1V2 (SEQ ID NO:22), gp120mod.TV1.delV2 (SEQ ID NO:23), gp140mod.TV1.del118-210 (SEQ ID NO:24), gp140mod.TV1.delV1V2 (SEQ ID NO:25), gp140mod.TV1.delV2 (SEQ ID NO:26), gp140mod.TV1.mut7 (SEQ ID NO:27), gp140mod.TV1.tpa2 (SEQ ID NO:28), gp140TMmod.TV1 (SEQ ID NO:29), gp160mod.TV1.del118-210 (SEQ ID NO:30), gp160mod.TV1.delV1V2 (SEQ ID NO:31), gp160mod.TV1.delV2 (SEQ ID NO:32), gp160mod.TV1.dV1 (SEQ ID NO:33), 160mod.TV1.dV1-gagmod.BW965 (SEQ ID NO:34), gp160mod.TV1.dV1V2-gagmod.BW965 (SEQ ID NO:35), gp160mod.TV1.dV2-gagmod.BW965 (SEQ ID NO:36), gp160mod.TV1.tpa2 (SEQ ID NO:37), gp160mod.TV1-gagmod.BW965 (SEQ ID NO:38), int.opt.mut_C (SEQ ID NO:39), int.opt_C (SEQ ID NO:40), nef.D106G.-myr19.opt_C (SEQ ID NO:41), p15RnaseH.opt_C (SEQ ID NO:42), p2Pol.opt.YMWM_C (SEQ ID NO:43), p2Polopt.YM_C (SEQ ID NO:44), p2Polopt_C (SEQ ID NO:45), p2PolTatRevNef opt C (SEQ ID NO:46), p2PolTatRevNef.opt.native_C (SEQ ID NO:47), p2PolTatRevNef.opt_C (SEQ ID NO:48), protInaRT.YM.opt_C (SEQ ID NO:49), protInaRT.YMWM.opt_C (SEQ ID NO:50), ProtRT.TatRevNef.opt_C (SEQ ID NO:51), rev.exon1_2.M5-10.opt_C (SEQ ID NO:52), tat.exon1_2.opt.C22-37_C (SEQ ID NO:53), tat.exon1_2.opt.C37_C (SEQ ID NO:54), TatRevNef.opt.native_ZA (SEQ ID NO:55), TatRevNef.opt_ZA (SEQ ID NO:56), TatRevNefGag C (SEQ ID NO:57), TatRevNefgagCpolIna C (SEQ ID NO:58), TatRevNefGagProtInaRTmut C (SEQ ID NO:59), and TatRevNefProtRT opt C (SEQ ID NO:60), wherein the polynucleotide sequence encoding the polypeptide comprises a sequence having between about 85% to 100% and any integer values therebetween, for example, at least about 85%, preferably about 90%, more preferably about 95%, and more preferably about 98% sequence identity to the sequences taught in the present specification.
The native and synthetic polynucleotide sequences encoding the HIV polypeptides of the present invention typically have between about 85% to 100% and any integer values therebetween, for example, at least about 85%, preferably about 90%, more preferably about 95%, and more preferably about 98% sequence identity to the sequences taught herein. Further, in certain embodiments, the polynucleotide sequences encoding the HIV polypeptides of the invention will exhibit 100% sequence identity to the sequences taught herein.
The polynucleotides of the present invention can be produced by recombinant techniques, synthetic techniques, or combinations thereof.
The present invention further includes recombinant expression systems for use in selected host cells, wherein the recombinant expression systems employ one or more of the polynucleotides and expression cassettes of the present invention. In such systems, the polynucleotide sequences are operably linked to control elements compatible with expression in the selected host cell. Numerous expression control elements are known to those in the art, including, but not limited to, the following: transcription promoters, transcription enhancer elements, transcription termination signals, polyadenylation sequences, sequences for optimization of initiation of translation, and translation termination sequences. Exemplary transcription promoters include, but are not limited to those derived from CMV, CMV+intron A, SV40, RSV, HIV-Ltr, MMLV-ltr, and metallothionein.
In another aspect the invention includes cells comprising one or more of the expression cassettes of the present invention where the polynucleotide sequences are operably linked to control elements compatible with expression in the selected cell. In one embodiment such cells are mammalian cells. Exemplary mammalian cells include, but are not limited to, BHK, VERO, HT1080, 293, RD, COS-7, and CHO cells. Other cells, cell types, tissue types, etc., that may be useful in the practice of the present invention include, but are not limited to, those obtained from the following: insects (e.g., Trichoplusia ni (Tn5) and Sf9), bacteria, yeast, plants, antigen presenting cells (e.g., macrophage, monocytes, dendritic cells, B-cells, T-cells, stem cells, and progenitor cells thereof), primary cells, immortalized cells, tumor-derived cells.
In a further aspect, the present invention includes compositions for generating an immunological response, where the composition typically comprises at least one of the expression cassettes of the present invention and may, for example, contain combinations of expression cassettes such as one or more expression cassettes carrying a Pol-derived-polypeptide-encoding polynucleotide, one or more expression cassettes carrying a Gag-derived-polypeptide-encoding polynucleotide, one or more expression cassettes carrying accessory polypeptide-encoding polynucleotides (e.g., native or synthetic vpu, vpr, nef, vif, tat, rev), and/or one or more expression cassettes carrying an Env-derived-polypeptide-encoding polynucleotide. Such compositions may further contain an adjuvant or adjuvants. The compositions may also contain one or more HIV polypeptides. The HIV polypeptides may correspond to the polypeptides encoded by the expression cassette(s) in the composition, or may be different from those encoded by the expression cassettes. In compositions containing both expression cassettes (or polynucleotides of the present invention) and polypeptides, various expression cassettes of the present invention can be mixed and/or matched with various HIV polypeptides described herein.
In another aspect the present invention includes methods of immunization of a subject. In the method any of the above described compositions are into the subject under conditions that are compatible with expression of the expression cassette(s) in the subject. In one embodiment, the expression cassettes (or polynucleotides of the present invention) can be introduced using a gene delivery vector. The gene delivery vector can, for example, be a non-viral vector or a viral vector. Exemplary viral vectors include, but are not limited to eucaryotic layered vector initiation systems, Sindbis-virus (or other alphavirus) derived vectors, retroviral vectors, and lentiviral vectors. Other exemplary vectors include, but are not limited to, pCMVKm2, pCMV6a, pCMV-link, and pCMVPLEdhfr Compositions useful for generating an immunological response can also be delivered using a particulate carrier (e.g., PLG or CTAB-PLG microparticles). Further, such compositions can be coated on, for example, gold or tungsten particles and the coated particles delivered to the subject using, for example, a gene gun. The compositions can also be formulated as liposomes. In one embodiment of this method, the subject is a mammal and can, for example, be a human.
In a further aspect, the invention includes methods of generating an immune response in a subject. Any of the expression cassettes described herein can be expressed in a suitable cell to provide for the expression of the HIV polypeptides encoded by the polynucleotides of the present invention. The polypeptide(s) are then isolated (e.g., substantially purified) and administered to the subject in an amount sufficient to elicit an immune response. In certain embodiments, the methods comprise administration of one or more of the expression cassettes or polynucleotides of the present invention, using any of the gene delivery techniques described herein. In other embodiments, the methods comprise co-administration of one or more of the expression cassettes or polynucleotides of the present invention and one or more polypeptides, wherein the polypeptides can be expressed from these polynucleotides or can be other HIV polypeptides. In other embodiments, the methods comprise co-administration of multiple expression cassettes or polynucleotides of the present invention. In still further embodiments, the methods comprise co-administration of multiple polypeptides, for example polypeptides expressed from the polynucleotides of the present invention and/or other HIV polypeptides.
The invention further includes methods of generating an immune response in a subject, where cells of a subject are transfected with any of the above-described expression cassettes or polynucleotides of the present invention, under conditions that permit the expression of a selected polynucleotide and production of a polypeptide of interest (e.g., encoded by any expression cassette of the present invention). By this method an immunological response to the polypeptide is elicited in the subject. Transfection of the cells may be performed ex vivo and the transfected cells are reintroduced into the subject. Alternately, or in addition, the cells may be transfected in vivo in the subject. The immune response may be humoral and/or cell-mediated (cellular). In a further embodiment, this method may also include administration of an HIV polypeptides before, concurrently with, and/or after introduction of the expression cassette into the subject.
The polynucleotides of the present invention may be employed singly or in combination. The polynucleotides of the present invention, encoding HIV-derived polypeptides, may be expressed in a variety of ways, including, but not limited to the following: a polynucleotide encoding a single gene product (or portion thereof) expressed from a promoter; multiple polynucleotides encoding a more than one gene product (or portion thereof) (e.g., polycistronic coding sequences); multiple polynucleotides in-frame to produce a single polyprotein; and, multiple polynucleotides in-frame to produce a single polyprotein wherein the polyprotein has protein cleavage sites between one or more of the polypeptides comprising the polyprotein.
These and other embodiments of the present invention will readily occur to those of ordinary skill in the art in view of the disclosure herein.
1, 99a2, 99b and 99c depict alignments of the deduced amino acid sequences of Nef (
The practice of the present invention will employ, unless otherwise indicated, conventional methods of chemistry, biochemistry, molecular biology, immunology and pharmacology, within the skill of the art. Such techniques are explained fully in the literature. See, e.g., Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 18th Edition (Easton, Pa.: Mack Publishing Company, 1990); Methods In Enzymology (S. Colowick and N. Kaplan, eds., Academic Press, Inc.); and Handbook of Experimental Immunology, Vols. I-IV (D. M. Weir and C. C. Blackwell, eds., 1986, Blackwell Scientific Publications); Sambrook, et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (2nd Edition, 1989); Short Protocols in Molecular Biology, 4th ed. (Ausubel et al. eds., 1999, John Wiley & Sons); Molecular Biology Techniques: An Intensive Laboratory Course, (Ream et al., eds., 1998, Academic Press); PCR (Introduction to Biotechniques Series), 2nd ed. (Newton & Graham eds., 1997, Springer Verlag).
All publications, patents and patent applications cited herein, whether supra or infra, are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
As used in this specification, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” include plural references unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “an antigen” includes a mixture of two or more such agents.
In describing the present invention, the following terms will be employed, and are intended to be defined as indicated below.
“Synthetic” sequences, as used herein, refers to HIV polypeptide-encoding polynucleotides whose expression has been modified as described herein, for example, by codon substitution, altered activities, and/or inactivation of inhibitory sequences. “Wild-type” or “native” sequences, as used herein, refers to polypeptide encoding sequences that are essentially as they are found in nature, e.g., Gag, Pol, Vif, Vpr, Tat, Rev, Vpu, Env and/or Nef encoding sequences as found in HIV isolates, e.g., SF162, SF2, AF110965, AF110967, AF110968, AF110975, 8_5_TV1_C.ZA, 8_2_TV1_C.ZA or 12-5_1_TV2_C.ZA. The various regions of the HIV genome are shown in Table A, with numbering relative to 8_5_TV1_C.ZA (
As used herein, the term “virus-like particle” or “VLP” refers to a nonreplicating, viral shell, derived from any of several viruses discussed further below. VLPs are generally composed of one or more viral proteins, such as, but not limited to those proteins referred to as capsid, coat, shell, surface and/or envelope proteins, or particle-forming polypeptides derived from these proteins. VLPs can form spontaneously upon recombinant expression of the protein in an appropriate expression system. Methods for producing particular VLPs are known in the art and discussed more fully below. The presence of VLPs following recombinant expression of viral proteins can be detected using conventional techniques known in the art, such as by electron microscopy, X-ray crystallography, and the like. See, e.g., Baker et al., Biophys. J. (1991) 60:1445-1456; Hagensee et al., J. Virol. (1994) 68:4503-4505. For example, VLPs can be isolated by density gradient centrifugation and/or identified by characteristic density banding. Alternatively, cryoelectron microscopy can be performed on vitrified aqueous samples of the VLP preparation in question, and images recorded under appropriate exposure conditions.
By “particle-forming polypeptide” derived from a particular viral protein is meant a full-length or near full-length viral protein, as well as a fragment thereof, or a viral protein with internal deletions, which has the ability to form VLPs under conditions that favor VLP formation. Accordingly, the polypeptide may comprise the full-length sequence, fragments, truncated and partial sequences, as well as analogs and precursor forms of the reference molecule. The term therefore intends deletions, additions and substitutions to the sequence, so long as the polypeptide retains the ability to form a VLP. Thus, the term includes natural variations of the specified polypeptide since variations in coat proteins often occur between viral isolates. The term also includes deletions, additions and substitutions that do not naturally occur in the reference protein, so long as the protein retains the ability to form a VLP. Preferred substitutions are those which are conservative in nature, i.e., those substitutions that take place within a family of amino acids that are related in their side chains. Specifically, amino acids are generally divided into four families: (1) acidic—aspartate and glutamate; (2) basic—lysine, arginine, histidine; (3) non-polar—alanine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, proline, phenylalanine, methionine, tryptophan; and (4) uncharged polar—glycine, asparagine, glutamine, cystine, serine threonine, tyrosine. Phenylalanine, tryptophan, and tyrosine are sometimes classified as aromatic amino acids.
The term “HIV polypeptide” refers to any amino acid sequence that exhibits sequence homology to native HIV polypeptides (e.g., Gag, Env, Prot, Pol, RT, Int, vif, vpr, vpu, tat, rev, nef and/or combinations thereof) and/or which is functional. Non-limiting examples of functions that may be exhibited by HIV polypeptides include, use as immunogens (e.g., to generate a humoral and/or cellular immune response), use in diagnostics (e.g, bound by suitable antibodies for use in ELISAs or other immunoassays) and/or polypeptides which exhibit one or more biological activities associated with the wild type or synthetic HIV polypeptide. For example, as used herein, the term “Gag polypeptide” may refer to a polypeptide that is bound by one or more anti-Gag antibodies; elicits a humoral and/or cellular immune response; and/or exhibits the ability to form particles.
An “antigen” refers to a molecule containing one or more epitopes (either linear, conformational or both) that will stimulate a host's immune system to make a humoral and/or cellular antigen-specific response. The term is used interchangeably with the term “immunogen.” Normally, a B-cell epitope will include at least about 5 amino acids but can be as small as 3-4 amino acids. A T-cell epitope, such as a CTL epitope, will include at least about 7-9 amino acids, and a helper T-cell epitope at least about 12-20 amino acids. Normally, an epitope will include between about 7 and 15 amino acids, such as, 9, 10, 12 or 15 amino acids. The term “antigen” denotes both subunit antigens, (i.e., antigens which are separate and discrete from a whole organism with which the antigen is associated in nature), as well as, killed, attenuated or inactivated bacteria, viruses, fungi, parasites or other microbes. Antibodies such as anti-idiotype antibodies, or fragments thereof, and synthetic peptide mimotopes, which can mimic an antigen or antigenic determinant, are also captured under the definition of antigen as used herein. Similarly, an oligonucleotide or polynucleotide which expresses an antigen or antigenic determinant in vivo, such as in gene therapy and DNA immunization applications, is also included in the definition of antigen herein.
For purposes of the present invention, antigens can be derived from any of several known viruses, bacteria, parasites and fungi, as described more fully below. The term also intends any of the various tumor antigens. Furthermore, for purposes of the present invention, an “antigen” refers to a protein which includes modifications, such as deletions, additions and substitutions (generally conservative in nature), to the native sequence, so long as the protein maintains the ability to elicit an immunological response, as defined herein. These modifications may be deliberate, as through site-directed mutagenesis, or may be accidental, such as through mutations of hosts which produce the antigens.
An “immunological response” to an antigen or composition is the development in a subject of a humoral and/or a cellular immune response to an antigen present in the composition of interest. For purposes of the present invention, a “humoral immune response” refers to an immune response mediated by antibody molecules, while a “cellular immune response” is one mediated by T-lymphocytes and/or other white blood cells. One important aspect of cellular immunity involves an antigen-specific response by cytolytic T-cells (“CTL”s). CTLs have specificity for peptide antigens that are presented in association with proteins encoded by the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and expressed on the surfaces of cells. CTLs help induce and promote the destruction of intracellular microbes, or the lysis of cells infected with such microbes. Another aspect of cellular immunity involves an antigen-specific response by helper T-cells. Helper T-cells act to help stimulate the function, and focus the activity of, nonspecific effector cells against cells displaying peptide antigens in association with MHC molecules on their surface. A “cellular immune response” also refers to the production of cytokines, chemokines and other such molecules produced by activated T-cells and/or other white blood cells, including those derived from CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells.
A composition or vaccine that elicits a cellular immune response may serve to sensitize a vertebrate subject by the presentation of antigen in association with MHC molecules at the cell surface. The cell-mediated immune response is directed at, or near, cells presenting antigen at their surface. In addition, antigen-specific T-lymphocytes can be generated to allow for the future protection of an immunized host.
The ability of a particular antigen to stimulate a cell-mediated immunological response may be determined by a number of assays, such as by lymphoproliferation (lymphocyte activation) assays, CTL cytotoxic cell assays, or by assaying for T-lymphocytes specific for the antigen in a sensitized subject. Such assays are well known in the art. See, e.g., Erickson et al., J. Immunol. (1993) 151:4189-4199; Doe et al., Eur. J. Immunol. (1994) 24:2369-2376. Recent methods of measuring cell-mediated immune response include measurement of intracellular cytokines or cytokine secretion by T-cell populations, or by measurement of epitope specific T-cells (e.g., by the tetramer technique) (reviewed by McMichael, A. J., and O'Callaghan, C. A., J. Exp. Med. 187(9)1367-1371, 1998; Mcheyzer-Williams, M. G., et al, Immunol. Rev. 150:5-21, 1996; Lalvani, A., et al, J. Exp. Med. 186:859-865, 1997).
Thus, an immunological response as used herein may be one which stimulates the production of CTLs, and/or the production or activation of helper T-cells. The antigen of interest may also elicit an antibody-mediated immune response. Hence, an immunological response may include one or more of the following effects: the production of antibodies by B-cells; and/or the activation of suppressor T-cells and/or γδ T-cells directed specifically to an antigen or antigens present in the composition or vaccine of interest. These responses may serve to neutralize infectivity, and/or mediate antibody-complement, or antibody dependent cell cytotoxicity (ADCC) to provide protection to an immunized host. Such responses can be determined using standard immunoassays and neutralization assays, well known in the art.
An “immunogenic composition” is a composition that comprises an antigenic molecule where administration of the composition to a subject results in the development in the subject of a humoral and/or a cellular immune response to the antigenic molecule of interest. The immunogenic composition can be introduced directly into a recipient subject, such as by injection, inhalation, oral, intranasal and mucosal (e.g., intra-rectally or intra-vaginally) administration.
By “subunit vaccine” is meant a vaccine composition which includes one or more selected antigens but not all antigens, derived from or homologous to, an antigen from a pathogen of interest such as from a virus, bacterium, parasite or fungus. Such a composition is substantially free of intact pathogen cells or pathogenic particles, or the lysate of such cells or particles. Thus, a “subunit vaccine” can be prepared from at least partially purified (preferably substantially purified) immunogenic polypeptides from the pathogen, or analogs thereof. The method of obtaining an antigen included in the subunit vaccine can thus include standard purification techniques, recombinant production, or synthetic production.
“Substantially purified” general refers to isolation of a substance (compound, polynucleotide, protein, polypeptide, polypeptide composition) such that the substance comprises the majority percent of the sample in which it resides. Typically in a sample a substantially purified component comprises 50%, preferably 80%-85%, more preferably 90-95% of the sample. Techniques for purifying polynucleotides and polypeptides of interest are well-known in the art and include, for example, ion-exchange chromatography, affinity chromatography and sedimentation according to density.
A “coding sequence” or a sequence which “encodes” a selected polypeptide, is a nucleic acid molecule which is transcribed (in the case of DNA) and translated (in the case of mRNA) into a polypeptide in vivo when placed under the control of appropriate regulatory sequences (or “control elements”). The boundaries of the coding sequence are determined by a start codon at the 5′ (amino) terminus and a translation stop codon at the 3′ (carboxy) terminus A coding sequence can include, but is not limited to, cDNA from viral, procaryotic or eucaryotic mRNA, genomic DNA sequences from viral or procaryotic DNA, and even synthetic DNA sequences. A transcription termination sequence such as a stop codon may be located 3′ to the coding sequence.
Typical “control elements”, include, but are not limited to, transcription promoters, transcription enhancer elements, transcription termination signals, polyadenylation sequences (located 3′ to the translation stop codon), sequences for optimization of initiation of translation (located 5′ to the coding sequence), and translation termination sequences. For example, the sequences and/or vectors described herein may also include one or more additional sequences that may optimize translation and/or termination including, but not limited to, a Kozak sequence (e.g., GCCACC, nucleotides 1 to 6 of SEQ ID NO:191) placed in front (5′) of the ATG of the codon-optimized wild-type leader or any other suitable leader sequence (e.g., tpa1, tpa2, wtLnat (native wild-type leader)) or a termination sequence (e.g., TAA or, preferably, TAAA, nucleotides 1978 to 1981 of SEQ ID NO:191) placed after (3′) the coding sequence.
A “polynucleotide coding sequence” or a sequence which “encodes” a selected polypeptide, is a nucleic acid molecule which is transcribed (in the case of DNA) and translated (in the case of mRNA) into a polypeptide in vivo when placed under the control of appropriate regulatory sequences (or “control elements”). The boundaries of the coding sequence are determined by a start codon, for example, at or near the 5′ terminus and a translation stop codon, for example, at or near the 3′ terminus Exemplary coding sequences are the modified viral polypeptide-coding sequences of the present invention. The coding regions of the polynucleotide sequences of the present invention are identifiable by one of skill in the art and may, for example, be easily identified by performing translations of all three frames of the polynucleotide and identifying the frame corresponding to the encoded polypeptide, for example, a synthetic nef polynucleotide of the present invention encodes a nef-derived polypeptide. A transcription termination sequence may be located 3′ to the coding sequence. Typical “control elements”, include, but are not limited to, transcription regulators, such as promoters, transcription enhancer elements, transcription termination signals, and polyadenylation sequences; and translation regulators, such as sequences for optimization of initiation of translation, e.g., Shine-Dalgarno (ribosome binding site) sequences, Kozak sequences (i.e., sequences for the optimization of translation, located, for example, 5′ to the coding sequence), leader sequences, translation initiation codon (e.g., ATG), and translation termination sequences. In certain embodiments, one or more translation regulation or initiation sequences (e.g., the leader sequence) are derived from wild-type translation initiation sequences, i.e., sequences that regulate translation of the coding region in their native state. Wild-type leader sequences that have been modified, using the methods described herein, also find use in the present invention. Promoters can include inducible promoters (where expression of a polynucleotide sequence operably linked to the promoter is induced by an analyte, cofactor, regulatory protein, etc.), repressible promoters (where expression of a polynucleotide sequence operably linked to the promoter is induced by an analyte, cofactor, regulatory protein, etc.), and constitutive promoters.
A “nucleic acid” molecule can include, but is not limited to, procaryotic sequences, eucaryotic mRNA, cDNA from eucaryotic mRNA, genomic DNA sequences from eucaryotic (e.g., mammalian) DNA, and even synthetic DNA sequences. The term also captures sequences that include any of the known base analogs of DNA and RNA.
“Operably linked” refers to an arrangement of elements wherein the components so described are configured so as to perform their usual function. Thus, a given promoter operably linked to a coding sequence is capable of effecting the expression of the coding sequence when the proper enzymes are present. The promoter need not be contiguous with the coding sequence, so long as it functions to direct the expression thereof. Thus, for example, intervening untranslated yet transcribed sequences can be present between the promoter sequence and the coding sequence and the promoter sequence can still be considered “operably linked” to the coding sequence.
“Recombinant” as used herein to describe a nucleic acid molecule means a polynucleotide of genomic, cDNA, semisynthetic, or synthetic origin which, by virtue of its origin or manipulation: (1) is not associated with all or a portion of the polynucleotide with which it is associated in nature; and/or (2) is linked to a polynucleotide other than that to which it is linked in nature. The term “recombinant” as used with respect to a protein or polypeptide means a polypeptide produced by expression of a recombinant polynucleotide. “Recombinant host cells,” “host cells,” “cells,” “cell lines,” “cell cultures,” and other such terms denoting procaryotic microorganisms or eucaryotic cell lines cultured as unicellular entities, are used interchangeably, and refer to cells which can be, or have been, used as recipients for recombinant vectors or other transfer DNA, and include the progeny of the original cell which has been transfected. It is understood that the progeny of a single parental cell may not necessarily be completely identical in morphology or in genomic or total DNA complement to the original parent, due to accidental or deliberate mutation. Progeny of the parental cell which are sufficiently similar to the parent to be characterized by the relevant property, such as the presence of a nucleotide sequence encoding a desired peptide, are included in the progeny intended by this definition, and are covered by the above terms.
Techniques for determining amino acid sequence “similarity” are well known in the art. In general, “similarity” means the exact amino acid to amino acid comparison of two or more polypeptides at the appropriate place, where amino acids are identical or possess similar chemical and/or physical properties such as charge or hydrophobicity. A so-termed “percent similarity” then can be determined between the compared polypeptide sequences. Techniques for determining nucleic acid and amino acid sequence identity also are well known in the art and include determining the nucleotide sequence of the mRNA for that gene (usually via a cDNA intermediate) and determining the amino acid sequence encoded thereby, and comparing this to a second amino acid sequence. In general, “identity” refers to an exact nucleotide to nucleotide or amino acid to amino acid correspondence of two polynucleotides or polypeptide sequences, respectively.
Two or more polynucleotide sequences can be compared by determining their “percent identity.” Two or more amino acid sequences likewise can be compared by determining their “percent identity.” The percent identity of two sequences, whether nucleic acid or peptide sequences, is generally described as the number of exact matches between two aligned sequences divided by the length of the shorter sequence and multiplied by 100. An approximate alignment for nucleic acid sequences is provided by the local homology algorithm of Smith and Waterman, Advances in Applied Mathematics 2:482-489 (1981). This algorithm can be extended to use with peptide sequences using the scoring matrix developed by Dayhoff, Atlas of Protein Sequences and Structure, M. O. Dayhoff ed., 5 suppl. 3:353-358, National Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington, D.C., USA, and normalized by Gribskov, Nucl. Acids Res. 14(6):6745-6763 (1986). An implementation of this algorithm for nucleic acid and peptide sequences is provided by the Genetics Computer Group (Madison, Wis.) in their BestFit utility application. The default parameters for this method are described in the Wisconsin Sequence Analysis Package Program Manual, Version 8 (1995) (available from Genetics Computer Group, Madison, Wis.). Other equally suitable programs for calculating the percent identity or similarity between sequences are generally known in the art.
For example, percent identity of a particular nucleotide sequence to a reference sequence can be determined using the homology algorithm of Smith and Waterman with a default scoring table and a gap penalty of six nucleotide positions. Another method of establishing percent identity in the context of the present invention is to use the MPSRCH package of programs copyrighted by the University of Edinburgh, developed by John F. Collins and Shane S. Sturrok, and distributed by IntelliGenetics, Inc. (Mountain View, Calif.). From this suite of packages, the Smith-Waterman algorithm can be employed where default parameters are used for the scoring table (for example, gap open penalty of 12, gap extension penalty of one, and a gap of six). From the data generated, the “Match” value reflects “sequence identity.” Other suitable programs for calculating the percent identity or similarity between sequences are generally known in the art, such as the alignment program BLAST, which can also be used with default parameters. For example, BLASTN and BLASTP can be used with the following default parameters: genetic code=standard; filter=none; strand=both; cutoff=60; expect=10; Matrix=BLOSUM62; Descriptions=50 sequences; sort by=HIGH SCORE; Databases=non-redundant, GenBank+EMBL+DDBJ+PDB+GenBank CDS translations+Swiss protein+Spupdate+PIR. Details of these programs can be found at the following internet address: http://www.ncbi.nlm.gov/cgi-bin/BLAST.
One of skill in the art can readily determine the proper search parameters to use for a given sequence, exemplary preferred Smith Waterman based parameters are presented above. For example, the search parameters may vary based on the size of the sequence in question. Thus, for the polynucleotide sequences of the present invention the length of the polynucleotide sequence disclosed herein is searched against a selected database and compared to sequences of essentially the same length to determine percent identity. For example, a representative embodiment of the present invention would include an isolated polynucleotide comprising X contiguous nucleotides, wherein (i) the X contiguous nucleotides have at least about a selected level of percent identity relative to Y contiguous nucleotides of one or more of the sequences described herein (e.g., in Table C) or fragment thereof, and (ii) for search purposes X equals Y, wherein Y is a selected reference polynucleotide of defined length (for example, a length of from 15 nucleotides up to the number of nucleotides present in a selected full-length sequence).
The sequences of the present invention can include fragments of the sequences, for example, from about 15 nucleotides up to the number of nucleotides present in the full-length sequences described herein (e.g., see the Figures), including all integer values falling within the above-described range. For example, fragments of the polynucleotide sequences of the present invention may be 30-60 nucleotides, 60-120 nucleotides, 120-240 nucleotides, 240-480 nucleotides, 480-1000 nucleotides, and all integer values therebetween.
The synthetic expression cassettes (and purified polynucleotides) of the present invention include related polynucleotide sequences having about 80% to 100%, greater than 80-85%, preferably greater than 90-92%, more preferably greater than 95%, and most preferably greater than 98% up to 100% (including all integer values falling within these described ranges) sequence identity to the synthetic expression cassette and/or polynucleotide sequences disclosed herein (for example, to the sequences of the present invention) when the sequences of the present invention are used as the query sequence against, for example, a database of sequences.
Two nucleic acid fragments are considered to “selectively hybridize” as described herein. The degree of sequence identity between two nucleic acid molecules affects the efficiency and strength of hybridization events between such molecules. A partially identical nucleic acid sequence will at least partially inhibit a completely identical sequence from hybridizing to a target molecule Inhibition of hybridization of the completely identical sequence can be assessed using hybridization assays that are well known in the art (e.g., Southern blot, Northern blot, solution hybridization, or the like, see Sambrook, et al., supra or Ausubel et al., supra). Such assays can be conducted using varying degrees of selectivity, for example, using conditions varying from low to high stringency. If conditions of low stringency are employed, the absence of non-specific binding can be assessed using a secondary probe that lacks even a partial degree of sequence identity (for example, a probe having less than about 30% sequence identity with the target molecule), such that, in the absence of non-specific binding events, the secondary probe will not hybridize to the target.
When utilizing a hybridization-based detection system, a nucleic acid probe is chosen that is complementary to a target nucleic acid sequence, and then by selection of appropriate conditions the probe and the target sequence “selectively hybridize,” or bind, to each other to form a hybrid molecule. A nucleic acid molecule that is capable of hybridizing selectively to a target sequence under “moderately stringent” typically hybridizes under conditions that allow detection of a target nucleic acid sequence of at least about 10-14 nucleotides in length having at least approximately 70% sequence identity with the sequence of the selected nucleic acid probe. Stringent hybridization conditions typically allow detection of target nucleic acid sequences of at least about 10-14 nucleotides in length having a sequence identity of greater than about 90-95% with the sequence of the selected nucleic acid probe. Hybridization conditions useful for probe/target hybridization where the probe and target have a specific degree of sequence identity, can be determined as is known in the art (see, for example, Nucleic Acid Hybridization: A Practical Approach, editors B. D. Hames and S. J. Higgins, (1985) Oxford; Washington, D.C.; IRL Press).
With respect to stringency conditions for hybridization, it is well known in the art that numerous equivalent conditions can be employed to establish a particular stringency by varying, for example, the following factors: the length and nature of probe and target sequences, base composition of the various sequences, concentrations of salts and other hybridization solution components, the presence or absence of blocking agents in the hybridization solutions (e.g., formamide, dextran sulfate, and polyethylene glycol), hybridization reaction temperature and time parameters, as well as, varying wash conditions. The selection of a particular set of hybridization conditions is selected following standard methods in the art (see, for example, Sambrook, et al., supra or Ausubel et al., supra).
A first polynucleotide is “derived from” second polynucleotide if it has the same or substantially the same basepair sequence as a region of the second polynucleotide, its cDNA, complements thereof, or if it displays sequence identity as described above.
A first polypeptide is “derived from” a second polypeptide if it is (i) encoded by a first polynucleotide derived from a second polynucleotide, or (ii) displays sequence identity to the second polypeptides as described above.
Generally, a viral polypeptide is “derived from” a particular polypeptide of a virus (viral polypeptide) if it is (i) encoded by an open reading frame of a polynucleotide of that virus (viral polynucleotide), or (ii) displays sequence identity to polypeptides of that virus as described above.
“Encoded by” refers to a nucleic acid sequence which codes for a polypeptide sequence, wherein the polypeptide sequence or a portion thereof contains an amino acid sequence of at least 3 to 5 amino acids, more preferably at least 8 to 10 amino acids, and even more preferably at least 15 to 20 amino acids from a polypeptide encoded by the nucleic acid sequence. Also encompassed are polypeptide sequences which are immunologically identifiable with a polypeptide encoded by the sequence. Further, polyproteins can be constructed by fusing in-frame two or more polynucleotide sequences encoding polypeptide or peptide products. Further, polycistronic coding sequences may be produced by placing two or more polynucleotide sequences encoding polypeptide products adjacent each other, typically under the control of one promoter, wherein each polypeptide coding sequence may be modified to include sequences for internal ribosome binding sites.
“Purified polynucleotide” refers to a polynucleotide of interest or fragment thereof which is essentially free, e.g., contains less than about 50%, preferably less than about 70%, and more preferably less than about 90%, of the protein with which the polynucleotide is naturally associated. Techniques for purifying polynucleotides of interest are well-known in the art and include, for example, disruption of the cell containing the polynucleotide with a chaotropic agent and separation of the polynucleotide(s) and proteins by ion-exchange chromatography, affinity chromatography and sedimentation according to density.
By “nucleic acid immunization” is meant the introduction of a nucleic acid molecule encoding one or more selected antigens into a host cell, for the in vivo expression of an antigen, antigens, an epitope, or epitopes. The nucleic acid molecule can be introduced directly into a recipient subject, such as by injection, inhalation, oral, intranasal and mucosal administration, or the like, or can be introduced ex vivo, into cells which have been removed from the host. In the latter case, the transformed cells are reintroduced into the subject where an immune response can be mounted against the antigen encoded by the nucleic acid molecule.
“Gene transfer” or “gene delivery” refers to methods or systems for reliably inserting DNA of interest into a host cell. Such methods can result in transient expression of non-integrated transferred DNA, extrachromosomal replication and expression of transferred replicons (e.g., episomes), or integration of transferred genetic material into the genomic DNA of host cells. Gene delivery expression vectors include, but are not limited to, vectors derived from alphaviruses, pox viruses and vaccinia viruses. When used for immunization, such gene delivery expression vectors may be referred to as vaccines or vaccine vectors.
“T lymphocytes” or “T cells” are non-antibody producing lymphocytes that constitute a part of the cell-mediated arm of the immune system. T cells arise from immature lymphocytes that migrate from the bone marrow to the thymus, where they undergo a maturation process under the direction of thymic hormones. Here, the mature lymphocytes rapidly divide increasing to very large numbers. The maturing T cells become immunocompetent based on their ability to recognize and bind a specific antigen. Activation of immunocompetent T cells is triggered when an antigen binds to the lymphocyte's surface receptors.
The term “transfection” is used to refer to the uptake of foreign DNA by a cell. A cell has been “transfected” when exogenous DNA has been introduced inside the cell membrane. A number of transfection techniques are generally known in the art. See, e.g., Graham et al. (1973) Virology, 52:456, Sambrook et al. (1989) Molecular Cloning, a laboratory manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories, New York, Davis et al. (1986) Basic Methods in Molecular Biology, Elsevier, and Chu et al. (1981) Gene 13:197. Such techniques can be used to introduce one or more exogenous DNA moieties into suitable host cells. The term refers to both stable and transient uptake of the genetic material, and includes uptake of peptide- or antibody-linked DNAs.
A “vector” is capable of transferring gene sequences to target cells (e.g., viral vectors, non-viral vectors, particulate carriers, and liposomes). Typically, “vector construct,” “expression vector,” and “gene transfer vector,” mean any nucleic acid construct capable of directing the expression of a gene of interest and which can transfer gene sequences to target cells. Thus, the term includes cloning and expression vehicles, as well as viral vectors.
Transfer of a “suicide gene” (e.g., a drug-susceptibility gene) to a target cell renders the cell sensitive to compounds or compositions that are relatively nontoxic to normal cells. Moolten, F. L. (1994) Cancer Gene Ther. 1:279-287. Examples of suicide genes are thymidine kinase of herpes simplex virus (HSV-tk), cytochrome P450 (Manome et al. (1996) Gene Therapy 3:513-520), human deoxycytidine kinase (Manome et al. (1996) Nature Medicine 2(5):567-573) and the bacterial enzyme cytosine deaminase (Dong et al. (1996) Human Gene Therapy 7:713-720). Cells which express these genes are rendered sensitive to the effects of the relatively nontoxic prodrugs ganciclovir (HSV-tk), cyclophosphamide (cytochrome P450 2B1), cytosine arabinoside (human deoxycytidine kinase) or 5-fluorocytosine (bacterial cytosine deaminase). Culver et al. (1992) Science 256:1550-1552, Huber et al. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:8302-8306.
A “selectable marker” or “reporter marker” refers to a nucleotide sequence included in a gene transfer vector that has no therapeutic activity, but rather is included to allow for simpler preparation, manufacturing, characterization or testing of the gene transfer vector.
A “specific binding agent” refers to a member of a specific binding pair of molecules wherein one of the molecules specifically binds to the second molecule through chemical and/or physical means. One example of a specific binding agent is an antibody directed against a selected antigen.
By “subject” is meant any member of the subphylum chordata, including, without limitation, humans and other primates, including non-human primates such as rhesus macaque, chimpanzees and other apes and monkey species; farm animals such as cattle, sheep, pigs, goats and horses; domestic mammals such as dogs and cats; laboratory animals including rodents such as mice, rats and guinea pigs; birds, including domestic, wild and game birds such as chickens, turkeys and other gallinaceous birds, ducks, geese, and the like. The term does not denote a particular age. Thus, both adult and newborn individuals are intended to be covered. The system described above is intended for use in any of the above vertebrate species, since the immune systems of all of these vertebrates operate similarly.
By “pharmaceutically acceptable” or “pharmacologically acceptable” is meant a material which is not biologically or otherwise undesirable, i.e., the material may be administered to an individual in a formulation or composition without causing any undesirable biological effects or interacting in a deleterious manner with any of the components of the composition in which it is contained.
By “physiological pH” or a “pH in the physiological range” is meant a pH in the range of approximately 7.0 to 8.0 inclusive, more typically in the range of approximately 7.2 to 7.6 inclusive.
As used herein, “treatment” refers to any of (i) the prevention of infection or reinfection, as in a traditional vaccine, (ii) the reduction or elimination of symptoms, and (iii) the substantial or complete elimination of the pathogen in question. Treatment may be effected prophylactically (prior to infection) or therapeutically (following infection).
By “co-administration” is meant administration of more than one composition or molecule. Thus, co-administration includes concurrent administration or sequentially administration (in any order), via the same or different routes of administration. Non-limiting examples of co-administration regimes include, co-administration of nucleic acid and polypeptide; co-administration of different nucleic acids (e.g., different expression cassettes as described herein and/or different gene delivery vectors); and co-administration of different polypeptides (e.g., different HIV polypeptides and/or different adjuvants). The term also encompasses multiple administrations of one of the co-administered molecules or compositions (e.g., multiple administrations of one or more of the expression cassettes described herein followed by one or more administrations of a polypeptide-containing composition). In cases where the molecules or compositions are delivered sequentially, the time between each administration can be readily determined by one of skill in the art in view of the teachings herein.
“Lentiviral vector”, and “recombinant lentiviral vector” refer to a nucleic acid construct which carries, and within certain embodiments, is capable of directing the expression of a nucleic acid molecule of interest. The lentiviral vector include at least one transcriptional promoter/enhancer or locus defining element(s), or other elements which control gene expression by other means such as alternate splicing, nuclear RNA export, post-translational modification of messenger, or post-transcriptional modification of protein. Such vector constructs must also include a packaging signal, long terminal repeats (LTRS) or portion thereof, and positive and negative strand primer binding sites appropriate to the retrovirus used (if these are not already present in the retroviral vector). Optionally, the recombinant lentiviral vector may also include a signal which directs polyadenylation, selectable markers such as Neo, TK, hygromycin, phleomycin, histidinol, or DHFR, as well as one or more restriction sites and a translation termination sequence. By way of example, such vectors typically include a 5′ LTR, a tRNA binding site, a packaging signal, an origin of second strand DNA synthesis, and a 3′LTR or a portion thereof
“Lentiviral vector particle” as utilized within the present invention refers to a lentivirus which carries at least one gene of interest. The retrovirus may also contain a selectable marker. The recombinant lentivirus is capable of reverse transcribing its genetic material (RNA) into DNA and incorporating this genetic material into a host cell's DNA upon infection. Lentiviral vector particles may have a lentiviral envelope, a non-lentiviral envelope (e.g., an ampho or VSV-G envelope), or a chimeric envelope.
“Nucleic acid expression vector” or “Expression cassette” refers to an assembly which is capable of directing the expression of a sequence or gene of interest. The nucleic acid expression vector includes a promoter which is operably linked to the sequences or gene(s) of interest. Other control elements may be present as well. Expression cassettes described herein may be contained within a plasmid construct. In addition to the components of the expression cassette, the plasmid construct may also include a bacterial origin of replication, one or more selectable markers, a signal which allows the plasmid construct to exist as single-stranded DNA (e.g., a M13 origin of replication), a multiple cloning site, and a “mammalian” origin of replication (e.g., a SV40 or adenovirus origin of replication).
“Packaging cell” refers to a cell which contains those elements necessary for production of infectious recombinant retrovirus which are lacking in a recombinant retroviral vector. Typically, such packaging cells contain one or more expression cassettes which are capable of expressing proteins which encode Gag, pol and env proteins.
“Producer cell” or “vector producing cell” refers to a cell which contains all elements necessary for production of recombinant retroviral vector particles.
Before describing the present invention in detail, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited to particular formulations or process parameters as such may, of course, vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments of the invention only, and is not intended to be limiting.
Although a number of methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice of the present invention, the preferred materials and methods are described herein.
2.1.0. The HIV Genome
The HIV genome and various polypeptide-encoding regions are shown in Table A. The nucleotide positions are given relative to 8_5_TV1_C.ZA (
It will be readily apparent that one of skill in the art can readily align any sequence to that shown in Table A to determine relative locations of any particular HIV gene. For example, using one of the alignment programs described herein (e.g., BLAST), other HIV genonomic sequences can be aligned with 8_5_TV1_C.ZA (Table A) and locations of genes determined Polypeptide sequences can be similarly aligned. For example,
2.1.1. Wild-Type HIV Sequences
Isolated nucleotide sequences for various novel subtype C novel isolates are shown in Table A1 below. Sequence were obtained and analyzed (e.g., phylogenetic tree analysis) as described in Engelbrecht et al (2001) AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 17(16):1533-1547. (See, also, GenBank). Sequences of accessory proteins and analysis of these sequences is described in Scriba et al. (2001) AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 17(8):775-781.
2.2.0 Synthetic Expression Cassettes
One aspect of the present invention is the generation of HIV-1 coding sequences, and related sequences, for example having improved expression relative to the corresponding wild-type sequences.
2.2.1 Modification of HIV-1 Nucleic Acid Coding Sequences
First, the HIV-1 codon usage pattern was modified so that the resulting nucleic acid coding sequence was comparable to codon usage found in highly expressed human genes. The HIV codon usage reflects a high content of the nucleotides A or T of the codon-triplet. The effect of the HIV-1 codon usage is a high AT content in the DNA sequence that results in a decreased translation ability and instability of the mRNA. In comparison, highly expressed human codons prefer the nucleotides G or C. The HIV coding sequences were modified to be comparable to codon usage found in highly expressed human genes.
Second, there are inhibitory (or instability) elements (INS) located within the coding sequences of, for example, the Gag coding sequences. The RRE is a secondary RNA structure that interacts with the HIV encoded Rev-protein to overcome the expression down-regulating effects of the INS. To overcome the post-transcriptional activating mechanisms of RRE and Rev, the instability elements can be inactivated by introducing multiple point mutations that do not alter the reading frame of the encoded proteins.
Third, for some genes the coding sequence has been altered such that the polynucleotide coding sequence encodes a gene product that is inactive or non-functional (e.g., inactivated polymerase, protease, tat, rev, nef, vif, vpr, and/or vpu gene products). Example 1 describes some exemplary mutations. Example 8 presents information concerning functional analysis of mutated Tat, Rev and Nef antigens.
The synthetic coding sequences are assembled by methods known in the art, for example by companies such as the Midland Certified Reagent Company (Midland, Tex.).
Modification of the Gag polypeptide coding sequences results in improved expression relative to the wild-type coding sequences in a number of mammalian cell lines (as well as other types of cell lines, including, but not limited to, insect cells).
Some exemplary polynucleotide sequences encoding Gag-containing polypeptides are GagComplPolmut_C, GagComplPolmutAtt_C, GagComplPolmutIna_C, GagComplPolmutInaTatRevNef_C, GagPolmut_C, GagPolmutAtt_C, GagPolmutIna_C, GagProtInaRTmut_C, GagProtInaRTmutTatRevNef_C, GagRTmut_C, GagRTmutTatRevNef_C, GagTatRevNef_C, and gp120mod.TV1.del118-210.
Similarly, the present invention also includes synthetic Env-encoding polynucleotides and modified Env proteins, for example, gp120mod.TV1.del118-210, gp120mod.TV1.delV1V2, gp120mod.TV1.delV2, gp140mod.TV1.del118-210, gp140mod.TV1.delV1V2, gp140mod.TV1.delV2, gp140mod.TV1.mut7, gp140mod.TV1.tpa2, gp140TMmod.TV1, gp160mod.TV1.del118-210, gp160mod.TV1.delV1V2, gp160mod.TV1.delV2, gp160mod.TV1.dV1, gp160mod.TV1.dV1-gagmod.BW965, gp160mod.TV1.dV1V2-gagmod.BW965, gp160mod.TV1.dV2-gagmod.BW965, 160mod.TV1.tpa2, and gp160mod.TV1-gagmod.BW965.
The codon usage pattern for Env was modified as described above for Gag so that the resulting nucleic acid coding sequence was comparable to codon usage found in highly expressed human genes. Experiments performed in support of the present invention show that the synthetic Env sequences were capable of higher level of protein production relative to the native Env sequences.
Modification of the Env polypeptide coding sequences results in improved expression relative to the wild-type coding sequences in a number of mammalian cell lines (as well as other types of cell lines, including, but not limited to, insect cells). Similar Env polypeptide coding sequences can be obtained, modified and tested for improved expression from a variety of isolates, including those described above for Gag.
Further modifications of Env include, but are not limited to, generating polynucleotides that encode Env polypeptides having mutations and/or deletions therein. For instance, the hypervariable regions, V1 and/or V2, can be deleted as described herein. Additionally, other modifications, for example to the bridging sheet region and/or to N-glycosylation sites within Env can also be performed following the teachings of the present specification. (see,
The present invention also includes expression cassettes which include synthetic Pol sequences. As noted above, “Pol” includes, but is not limited to, the protein-encoding regions comprising polymerase, protease, reverse transcriptase and/or integrase-containing sequences (Wan et al (1996) Biochem. J. 316:569-573; Kohl et al. (1988) PNAS USA 85:4686-4690; Krausslich et al. (1988) J. Virol. 62:4393-4397; Coffin, “Retroviridae and their Replication” in Virology, pp 1437-1500 (Raven, N.Y., 1990); Patel et. al. (1995) Biochemistry 34:5351-5363). Thus, the synthetic expression cassettes exemplified herein include one or more of these regions and one or more changes to the resulting amino acid sequences. Some exemplary polynucleotide sequences encoding Pol-derived polypeptides are presented in Table C.
The codon usage pattern for Pol was modified as described above for Gag and Env so that the resulting nucleic acid coding sequence was comparable to codon usage found in highly expressed human genes.
Constructs may be modified in various ways. For example, the expression constructs may include a sequence that encodes the first 6 amino acids of the integrase polypeptide. This 6 amino acid region is believed to provide a cleavage recognition site recognized by HIV protease (see, e.g., McCornack et al. (1997) FEBS Letts 414:84-88). Constructs may include a multiple cloning site (MCS) for insertion of one or more transgenes, typically at the 3′ end of the construct. In addition, a cassette encoding a catalytic center epitope derived from the catalytic center in RT is typically included 3′ of the sequence encoding 6 amino acids of integrase. This cassette encodes Ile178 through Serine 191 of RT and may be added to keep this well conserved region as a possible CTL epitope. Further, the constructs contain an insertion mutations to preserve the reading frame. (see, e.g., Park et al. (1991) J. Virol. 65:5111).
In certain embodiments, the catalytic center and/or primer grip region of RT are modified. The catalytic center and primer grip regions of RT are described, for example, in Patel et al. (1995) Biochem. 34:5351 and Palaniappan et al. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272(17):11157. For example, wild type sequence encoding the amino acids YMDD at positions 183-185 of p66 RT, numbered relative to AF110975, may be replaced with sequence encoding the amino acids “AP”. Further, the primer grip region (amino acids WMGY, residues 229-232 of p66RT, numbered relative to AF110975) may be replaced with sequence encoding the amino acids “PI.”
For the Pol sequence, the changes in codon usage are typically restricted to the regions up to the −1 frameshift and starting again at the end of the Gag reading frame; however, regions within the frameshift translation region can be modified as well. Finally, inhibitory (or instability) elements (INS) located within the coding sequences of the protease polypeptide coding sequence can be altered as well.
Experiments can be performed in support of the present invention to show that the synthetic Pol sequences were capable of higher level of protein production relative to the native Pol sequences. Modification of the Pol polypeptide coding sequences results in improved expression relative to the wild-type coding sequences in a number of mammalian cell lines (as well as other types of cell lines, including, but not limited to, insect cells). Similar Pol polypeptide coding sequences can be obtained, modified and tested for improved expression from a variety of isolates, including those described above for Gag and Env.
The present invention also includes expression cassettes which include synthetic sequences derived HIV genes other than Gag, Env and Pol, including but not limited to, regions within Gag, Env, Pol, as well as, GagComplPolmut_C, GagComplPolmutAtt_C, GagComplPolmutIna_C, GagComplPolmutInaTatRevNef_C, GagPolmut_C, GagPolmutAtt_C, GagPolmutIna_C, GagProtInaRTmut_C, GagProtInaRTmutTatRevNef_C, GagRTmut_C, GagRTmutTatRevNef_C, GagTatRevNef_C, gp120mod.TV1.del118-210, gp120mod.TV1.delV1V2, gp120mod.TV1.delV2, gp140mod.TV1.del118-210, gp140mod.TV1.delV1V2, gp140mod.TV1.delV2, gp140mod.TV1.mut7, gp140mod.TV1.tpa2, gp140TMmod.TV1, gp160mod.TV1.del118-210, gp160mod.TV1.delV1V2, gp160mod.TV1.delV2, gp160mod.TV1.dV1, gp160mod.TV1.dV1-gagmod.BW965, gp160mod.TV1.dV1V2-gagmod.BW965, gp160mod.TV1.dV2-gagmod.BW965, gp160mod.TV1.tpa2, gp160mod.TV1-gagmod.BW965, int.opt.mut_C, int.opt_C, nef.D106G.-myr19.opt_C, p15RnaseH.opt_C, p2Pol.opt.YMWM_C, p2Polopt.YM_C, p2Polopt_C, p2PolTatRevNef opt C, p2PolTatRevNef.opt.native_C, p2PolTatRevNef.opt_C, protInaRT.YM.opt_C, protInaRT.YMWM.opt_C, ProtRT.TatRevNef.opt_C, rev.exon12.M5-10.opt_C, tat.exon1_2.opt.C22-37_C, tat.exon1_2.opt.C37_C, TatRevNef.opt.native_ZA, TatRevNef.opt_ZA, TatRevNefGag C, TatRevNefgagCpolIna C, TatRevNefGagProtInaRTmut C, and TatRevNefProtRT opt C. Sequences obtained from other strains can be manipulated in similar fashion following the teachings of the present specification. As noted above, the codon usage pattern is modified as described above for Gag, Env and Pol so that the resulting nucleic acid coding sequence is comparable to codon usage found in highly expressed human genes. Typically these synthetic sequences are capable of higher level of protein production relative to the native sequences and that modification of the wild-type polypeptide coding sequences results in improved expression relative to the wild-type coding sequences in a number of mammalian cell lines (as well as other types of cell lines, including, but not limited to, insect cells). Furthermore, the nucleic acid sequence can also be modified to introduce mutations into one or more regions of the gene, for instance to alter the function of the gene product (e.g., render the gene product non-functional) and/or to eliminate site modifications (e.g., the myristoylation site in Nef).
Synthetic expression cassettes, derived from HIV Type C coding sequences, exemplified herein include, but are not limited to, those comprising one or more of the following synthetic polynucleotides: GagComplPolmut_C, GagComplPolmutAtt_C, GagComplPolmutIna_C, GagComplPolmutInaTatRevNef_C, GagPolmut_C, GagPolmutAtt_C, GagPolmutIna_C, GagProtInaRTmut_C, GagProtInaRTmutTatRevNef_C, GagRTmut_C, GagRTmutTatRevNef_C, GagTatRevNef_C, gp120mod.TV1.del118-210, gp120mod.TV1.delV1V2, gp120mod.TV1.delV2, gp140mod.TV1.del118-210, gp140mod.TV1.delV1V2, gp140mod.TV1.delV2, gp140mod.TV1.mut7, gp140mod.TV1.tpa2, gp140TMmod.TV1, gp160mod.TV1.del118-210, gp160mod.TV1.delV1V2, gp160mod.TV1.delV2, gp160mod.TV1.dV1, gp160mod.TV1.dV1-gagmod.BW965, gp160mod.TV1.dV1V2-gagmod.BW965, gp160mod.TV1.dV2-gagmod.BW965, gp160mod.TV1.tpa2, gp160mod.TV1-gagmod.BW965, int.opt.mut_C, int.opt_C, nef.D106G.-myr19.opt_C, p15RnaseH.opt_C, p2Pol.opt.YMWM_C, p2Polopt.YM_C, p2Polopt_C, p2PolTatRevNef opt C, p2PolTatRevNef.opt.native_C, p2PolTatRevNef.opt_C, protInaRT.YM.opt_C, protInaRT.YMWM.opt_C, ProtRT.TatRevNef.opt_C, rev.exon12.M5-10.opt_C, tat.exon1_2.opt.C22-37_C, tat.exon1_2.opt.C37_C, TatRevNef.opt.native_ZA, TatRevNef.opt_ZA, TatRevNefGag C, TatRevNefgagCpolIna C, TatRevNefGagProtInaRTmut C, and TatRevNefProtRT opt C.
Gag-complete refers to in-frame polyproteins comprising, e.g., Gag and pol, wherein the p6 portion of Gag is present.
Additional sequences that may be employed in some aspects of the present invention have been described in WO 00/39302, WO 00/39303, WO 00/39304, and WO 02/04493, all of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties.
2.2.2 Further Modification of Sequences Including HIV Nucleic Acid Coding Sequences
The HIV polypeptide-encoding expression cassettes described herein may also contain one or more further sequences encoding, for example, one or more transgenes. Further sequences (e.g., transgenes) useful in the practice of the present invention include, but are not limited to, further sequences are those encoding further viral epitopes/antigens {including but not limited to, HCV antigens (e.g., E1, E2; Houghton, M., et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,714,596, issued Feb. 3, 1998; Houghton, M., et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,712,088, issued Jan. 27, 1998; Houghton, M., et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,683,864, issued Nov. 4, 1997; Weiner, A. J., et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,728,520, issued Mar. 17, 1998; Weiner, A. J., et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,766,845, issued Jun. 16, 1998; Weiner, A. J., et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,670,152, issued Sep. 23, 1997; all herein incorporated by reference), HIV antigens (e.g., derived from one or more HIV isolate); and sequences encoding tumor antigens/epitopes. Further sequences may also be derived from non-viral sources, for instance, sequences encoding cytokines such interleukin-2 (IL-2), stem cell factor (SCF), interleukin 3 (IL-3), interleukin 6 (IL-6), interleukin 12 (IL-12), G-CSF, granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interleukin-1 alpha (IL-1), interleukin-11 (IL-11), MIP-1_, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), c-kit ligand, thrombopoietin (TPO) and flt3 ligand, commercially available from several vendors such as, for example, Genzyme (Framingham, Mass.), Genentech (South San Francisco, Calif.), Amgen (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), R&D Systems and Immunex (Seattle, Wash.). Additional sequences are described below. Also, variations on the orientation of the Gag and other coding sequences, relative to each other, are described below.
HIV polypeptide coding sequences can be obtained from other HIV isolates, see, e.g., Myers et al. Los Alamos Database, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, N. Mex. (1992); Myers et al., Human Retroviruses and Aids, 1997, Los Alamos, N. Mex.: Los Alamos National Laboratory. Synthetic expression cassettes can be generated using such coding sequences as starting material by following the teachings of the present specification.
Further, the synthetic expression cassettes of the present invention include related polypeptide sequences having greater than 85%, preferably greater than 90%, more preferably greater than 95%, and most preferably greater than 98% sequence identity to the polypeptides encoded by the synthetic expression cassette sequences disclosed herein.
Exemplary expression cassettes and modifications are set forth in Example 1.
2.2.3 Expression of Synthetic Sequences Encoding HIV-1 Polypeptides and Related Polypeptides
Synthetic HIV-encoding sequences (expression cassettes) of the present invention can be cloned into a number of different expression vectors to evaluate levels of expression and, in the case of Gag-containing constructs, production of VLPs. The synthetic DNA fragments for HIV polypeptides can be cloned into eucaryotic expression vectors, including, a transient expression vector, CMV-promoter-based mammalian vectors, and a shuttle vector for use in baculovirus expression systems. Corresponding wild-type sequences can also be cloned into the same vectors.
These vectors can then be transfected into a several different cell types, including a variety of mammalian cell lines (293, RD, COS-7, and CHO, cell lines available, for example, from the A.T.C.C.). The cell lines are then cultured under appropriate conditions and the levels of any appropriate polypeptide product can be evaluated in supernatants. (see, Table A). For example, p24 can be used to evaluate Gag expression; gp160, gp140 or gp120 can be used to evaluate Env expression; p6pol can be used to evaluate Pol expression; prot can be used to evaluate protease; p15 for RNAseH; p31 for Integrase; and other appropriate polypeptides for Vif, Vpr, Tat, Rev, Vpu and Nef. Further, modified polypeptides can also be used, for example, other Env polypeptides include, but are not limited to, for example, native gp160, oligomeric gp140, monomeric gp120 as well as modified and/or synthetic sequences of these polypeptides. The results of these assays demonstrate that expression of synthetic HIV polypeptide-encoding sequences are significantly higher than corresponding wild-type sequences.
Further, Western Blot analysis can be used to show that cells containing the synthetic expression cassette produce the expected protein at higher per-cell concentrations than cells containing the native expression cassette. The HIV proteins can be seen in both cell lysates and supernatants. The levels of production are significantly higher in cell supernatants for cells transfected with the synthetic expression cassettes of the present invention.
Fractionation of the supernatants from mammalian cells transfected with the synthetic expression cassette can be used to show that the cassettes provide superior production of HIV proteins and, in the case of Gag, VLPs, relative to the wild-type sequences.
Efficient expression of these HIV-containing polypeptides in mammalian cell lines provides the following benefits: the polypeptides are free of baculovirus contaminants; production by established methods approved by the FDA; increased purity; greater yields (relative to native coding sequences); and a novel method of producing the Sub HIV-containing polypeptides in CHO cells which is not feasible in the absence of the increased expression obtained using the constructs of the present invention. Exemplary Mammalian cell lines include, but are not limited to, BHK, VERO, HT1080, 293, 293T, RD, COS-7, CHO, Jurkat, HUT, SUPT, C8166, MOLT4/clone8, MT-2, MT-4, H9, PM1, CEM, and CEMX174 (such cell lines are available, for example, from the A.T.C.C.).
A synthetic Gag expression cassette of the present invention will also exhibit high levels of expression and VLP production when transfected into insect cells. Synthetic expression cassettes described herein also demonstrate high levels of expression in insect cells. Further, in addition to a higher total protein yield, the final product from the synthetic polypeptides consistently contains lower amounts of contaminating baculovirus proteins than the final product from the native sequences.
Further, synthetic expression cassettes of the present invention can also be introduced into yeast vectors which, in turn, can be transformed into and efficiently expressed by yeast cells (Saccharomyces cerevisea; using vectors as described in Rosenberg, S, and Tekamp-Olson, P., U.S. Pat. No. RE35,749, issued, Mar. 17, 1998, herein incorporated by reference).
In addition to the mammalian and insect vectors, the synthetic expression cassettes of the present invention can be incorporated into a variety of expression vectors using selected expression control elements. Appropriate vectors and control elements for any given cell an be selected by one having ordinary skill in the art in view of the teachings of the present specification and information known in the art about expression vectors.
For example, a synthetic expression cassette can be inserted into a vector which includes control elements operably linked to the desired coding sequence, which allow for the expression of the gene in a selected cell-type. For example, typical promoters for mammalian cell expression include the SV40 early promoter, a CMV promoter such as the CMV immediate early promoter (a CMV promoter can include intron A), RSV, HIV-Ltr, the mouse mammary tumor virus LTR promoter (MMLV-ltr), the adenovirus major late promoter (Ad MLP), and the herpes simplex virus promoter, among others. Other nonviral promoters, such as a promoter derived from the murine metallothionein gene, will also find use for mammalian expression. Typically, transcription termination and polyadenylation sequences will also be present, located 3′ to the translation stop codon. Preferably, a sequence for optimization of initiation of translation, located 5′ to the coding sequence, is also present. Examples of transcription terminator/polyadenylation signals include those derived from SV40, as described in Sambrook, et al., supra, as well as a bovine growth hormone terminator sequence. Introns, containing splice donor and acceptor sites, may also be designed into the constructs for use with the present invention (Chapman et al., Nuc. Acids Res. (1991) 19:3979-3986).
Enhancer elements may also be used herein to increase expression levels of the mammalian constructs. Examples include the SV40 early gene enhancer, as described in Dijkema et al., EMBO J. (1985) 4:761, the enhancer/promoter derived from the long terminal repeat (LTR) of the Rous Sarcoma Virus, as described in Gorman et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1982b) 79:6777 and elements derived from human CMV, as described in Boshart et al., Cell (1985) 41:521, such as elements included in the CMV intron A sequence (Chapman et al., Nuc. Acids Res. (1991) 19:3979-3986).
The desired synthetic polypeptide encoding sequences can be cloned into any number of commercially available vectors to generate expression of the polypeptide in an appropriate host system. These systems include, but are not limited to, the following: baculovirus expression {Reilly, P. R., et al., BACULOVIRUS EXPRESSION VECTORS: A LABORATORY MANUAL (1992); Beames, et al., Biotechniques 11:378 (1991); Pharmingen; Clontech, Palo Alto, Calif.)}, vaccinia expression {Earl, P. L., et al., “Expression of proteins in mammalian cells using vaccinia” In Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (F. M. Ausubel, et al. Eds.), Greene Publishing Associates & Wiley Interscience, New York (1991); Moss, B., et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,135,855, issued 4 Aug. 1992}, expression in bacteria {Ausubel, F. M., et al., CURRENT PROTOCOLS IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Media PA; Clontech}, expression in yeast {Rosenberg, S, and Tekamp-Olson, P., U.S. Pat. No. RE35,749, issued, Mar. 17, 1998, herein incorporated by reference; Shuster, J. R., U.S. Pat. No. 5,629,203, issued May 13, 1997, herein incorporated by reference; Gellissen, G., et al., Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 62(1-2):79-93 (1992); Romanos, M. A., et al., Yeast 8(6):423-488 (1992); Goeddel, D. V., Methods in Enzymology 185 (1990); Guthrie, C., and G. R. Fink, Methods in Enzymology 194 (1991)}, expression in mammalian cells {Clontech; Gibco-BRL, Ground Island, N.Y.; e.g., Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines (Haynes, J., et al., Nuc. Acid. Res. 11:687-706 (1983); 1983, Lau, Y. F., et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. 4:1469-1475 (1984); Kaufman, R. J., “Selection and coamplification of heterologous genes in mammalian cells,” in Methods in Enzymology, vol. 185, pp 537-566. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego Calif. (1991)}, and expression in plant cells {plant cloning vectors, Clontech Laboratories, Inc., Palo Alto, Calif., and Pharmacia LKB Biotechnology, Inc., Pistcataway, N.J.; Hood, E., et al., J. Bacteriol. 168:1291-1301 (1986); Nagel, R., et al., FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 67:325 (1990); An, et al., “Binary Vectors”, and others in Plant Molecular Biology Manual A3:1-19 (1988); Miki, B. L. A., et al., pp. 249-265, and others in Plant DNA Infectious Agents (Hohn, T., et al., eds.) Springer-Verlag, Wien, Austria, (1987); Plant Molecular Biology: Essential Techniques, P. G. Jones and J. M. Sutton, New York, J. Wiley, 1997; Miglani, Gurbachan Dictionary of Plant Genetics and Molecular Biology, New York, Food Products Press, 1998; Henry, R. J., Practical Applications of Plant Molecular Biology, New York, Chapman & Hall, 1997}.
Also included in the invention is an expression vector, containing coding sequences and expression control elements which allow expression of the coding regions in a suitable host. The control elements generally include a promoter, translation initiation codon, and translation and transcription termination sequences, and an insertion site for introducing the insert into the vector. Translational control elements have been reviewed by M. Kozak (e.g., Kozak, M., Mamm. Genome 7(8):563-574, 1996; Kozak, M., Biochimie 76(9):815-821, 1994; Kozak, M., J Cell Biol 108(2):229-241, 1989; Kozak, M., and Shatkin, A. J., Methods Enzymol 60:360-375, 1979).
Expression in yeast systems has the advantage of commercial production. Recombinant protein production by vaccinia and CHO cell line have the advantage of being mammalian expression systems. Further, vaccinia virus expression has several advantages including the following: (i) its wide host range; (ii) faithful post-transcriptional modification, processing, folding, transport, secretion, and assembly of recombinant proteins; (iii) high level expression of relatively soluble recombinant proteins; and (iv) a large capacity to accommodate foreign DNA.
The recombinantly expressed polypeptides from synthetic HIV polypeptide-encoding expression cassettes are typically isolated from lysed cells or culture media. Purification can be carried out by methods known in the art including salt fractionation, ion exchange chromatography, gel filtration, size-exclusion chromatography, size-fractionation, and affinity chromatography Immunoaffinity chromatography can be employed using antibodies generated based on, for example, HIV antigens.
Advantages of expressing the proteins of the present invention using mammalian cells include, but are not limited to, the following: well-established protocols for scale-up production; the ability to produce VLPs; cell lines are suitable to meet good manufacturing process (GMP) standards; culture conditions for mammalian cells are known in the art.
Synthetic HIV 1 polynucleotides are described herein, see, for example, the figures. Various forms of the different embodiments of the invention, described herein, may be combined.
Exemplary expression assays are set forth in Example 2. Exemplary conditions for Western Blot analysis are presented in Example 3.
2.3.0 Production of Virus-Like Particles and Use of the Constructs of the Present Invention to Create Packaging Cell Lines.
The group-specific antigens (Gag) of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) self-assemble into noninfectious virus-like particles (VLP) that are released from various eucaryotic cells by budding (reviewed by Freed, E. O., Virology 251:1-15, 1998). The Gag-containing synthetic expression cassettes of the present invention provide for the production of HIV-Gag virus-like particles (VLPs) using a variety of different cell types, including, but not limited to, mammalian cells.
Viral particles can be used as a matrix for the proper presentation of an antigen entrapped or associated therewith to the immune system of the host.
2.3.1 VLP Production Using the Synthetic Expression Cassettes of the Present Invention
The Gag-containing synthetic expression cassettes of the present invention may provide superior production of both Gag proteins and VLPs, relative to native Gag coding sequences. Further, electron microscopic evaluation of VLP production can be used to show that free and budding immature virus particles of the expected size are produced by cells containing the synthetic expression cassettes.
Using the synthetic expression cassettes of the present invention, rather than native Gag coding sequences, for the production of virus-like particles provide several advantages. First, VLPs can be produced in enhanced quantity making isolation and purification of the VLPs easier. Second, VLPs can be produced in a variety of cell types using the synthetic expression cassettes, in particular, mammalian cell lines can be used for VLP production, for example, CHO cells. Production using CHO cells provides (i) VLP formation; (ii) correct myristoylation and budding; (iii) absence of non-mammalian cell contaminants (e.g., insect viruses and/or cells); and (iv) ease of purification. The synthetic expression cassettes of the present invention are also useful for enhanced expression in cell-types other than mammalian cell lines. For example, infection of insect cells with baculovirus vectors encoding the synthetic expression cassettes results in higher levels of total Gag protein yield and higher levels of VLP production (relative to wild-oding sequences). Further, the final product from insect cells infected with the baculovirus-Gag synthetic expression cassettes consistently contains lower amounts of contaminating insect proteins than the final product when wild-oding sequences are used.
VLPs can spontaneously form when the particle-forming polypeptide of interest is recombinantly expressed in an appropriate host cell. Thus, the VLPs produced using the synthetic expression cassettes of the present invention are conveniently prepared using recombinant techniques. As discussed below, the Gag polypeptide encoding synthetic expression cassettes of the present invention can include other polypeptide coding sequences of interest (for example, HIV protease, HIV polymerase, Env; synthetic Env). Expression of such synthetic expression cassettes yields VLPs comprising the Gag polypeptide, as well as, the polypeptide of interest.
Once coding sequences for the desired particle-forming polypeptides have been isolated or synthesized, they can be cloned into any suitable vector or replicon for expression. Numerous cloning vectors are known to those of skill in the art, and the selection of an appropriate cloning vector is a matter of choice. See, generally, Sambrook et al, supra. The vector is then used to transform an appropriate host cell. Suitable recombinant expression systems include, but are not limited to, bacterial, mammalian, baculovirus/insect, vaccinia, Semliki Forest virus (SFV), Alphaviruses (such as, Sindbis, Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis (VEE)), mammalian, yeast and Xenopus expression systems, well known in the art. Particularly preferred expression systems are mammalian cell lines, vaccinia, Sindbis, eucaryotic layered vector initiation systems (e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,015,686, U.S. Pat. No. 5,814,482, U.S. Pat. No. 6,015,694, U.S. Pat. No. 5,789,245, EP 1029068A2, WO 9918226A2/A3, EP 00907746A2, WO 9738087A2, all herein incorporated by reference in their entireties), insect and yeast systems.
The synthetic DNA fragments for the expression cassettes of the present invention, e.g., Pol, Gag, Env, Tat, Rev, Nef, Vif, Vpr, and/or Vpu, may be cloned into the following eucaryotic expression vectors: pCMVKm2, for transient expression assays and DNA immunization studies, the pCMVKm2 vector is derived from pCMV6a (Chapman et al., Nuc. Acids Res. (1991) 19:3979-3986) and comprises a kanamycin selectable marker, a ColE1 origin of replication, a CMV promoter enhancer and Intron A, followed by an insertion site for the synthetic sequences described below followed by a polyadenylation signal derived from bovine growth hormone—the pCMVKm2 vector differs from the pCMV-link vector only in that a polylinker site is inserted into pCMVKm2 to generate pCMV-link; pESN2dhfr and pCMVPLEdhfr, for expression in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells; and, pAcC13, a shuttle vector for use in the Baculovirus expression system (pAcC13, is derived from pAcC12 which is described by Munemitsu S., et al., Mol Cell Biol. 10(11):5977-5982, 1990).
Briefly, construction of pCMVPLEdhfr was as follows.
To construct a DHFR cassette, the EMCV IRES (internal ribosome entry site) leader was PCR-amplified from pCite-4a+ (Novagen, Inc., Milwaukee, Wis.) and inserted into pET-23d (Novagen, Inc., Milwaukee, Wis.) as an Xba-Nco fragment to give pET-EMCV. The dhfr gene was PCR-amplified from pESN2dhfr to give a product with a Gly-Gly-Gly-Ser spacer in place of the translation stop codon and inserted as an Nco-BamH1 fragment to give pET-E-DHFR. Next, the attenuated neo gene was PCR amplified from a pSV2Neo (Clontech, Palo Alto, Calif.) derivative and inserted into the unique BamH1 site of pET-E-DHFR to give pET-E-DHFR/Neo(m2). Finally the bovine growth hormone terminator from pcDNA3 (Invitrogen, Inc., Carlsbad, Calif.) was inserted downstream of the neo gene to give pET-E-DHFR/Neo(m2)BGHt. The EMCV-dhfr/neo selectable marker cassette fragment was prepared by cleavage of pET-E-DHFR/Neo(m2)BGHt.
In one vector construct the CMV enhancer/promoter plus Intron A was transferred from pCMV6a (Chapman et al., Nuc. Acids Res. (1991) 19:3979-3986) as a HindIII-Sal1 fragment into pUC19 (New England Biolabs, Inc., Beverly, Mass.). The vector backbone of pUC19 was deleted from the Nde1 to the Sap1 sites. The above described DHFR cassette was added to the construct such that the EMCV IRES followed the CMV promoter. The vector also contained an ampr gene and an SV40 origin of replication.
A number of mammalian cell lines are known in the art and include immortalized cell lines available from the American Type Culture Collection (A.T.C.C.), such as, but not limited to, Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, HeLa cells, baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells, monkey kidney cells (COS), as well as others. Similarly, bacterial hosts such as E. coli, Bacillus subtilis, and Streptococcus spp., will find use with the present expression constructs. Yeast hosts useful in the present invention include inter alia, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Candida albicans, Candida maltosa, Hansenula polymorpha, Kluyveromyces fragilis, Kluyveromyces lactis, Pichia guillerimondii, Pichia pastoris, Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Yarrowia lipolytica. Insect cells for use with baculovirus expression vectors include, inter alia, Aedes aegypti, Autographa californica, Bombyx mori, Drosophila melanogaster, Spodoptera frugiperda, and Trichoplusia ni. See, e.g., Summers and Smith, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin No. 1555 (1987).
Viral vectors can be used for the production of particles in eucaryotic cells, such as those derived from the pox family of viruses, including vaccinia virus and avian poxvirus. Additionally, a vaccinia based infection/transfection system, as described in Tomei et al., J. Virol. (1993) 67:4017-4026 and Selby et al., J. Gen. Virol. (1993) 74:1103-1113, will also find use with the present invention. In this system, cells are first infected in vitro with a vaccinia virus recombinant that encodes the bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase. This polymerase displays exquisite specificity in that it only transcribes templates bearing T7 promoters. Following infection, cells are transfected with the DNA of interest, driven by a T7 promoter. The polymerase expressed in the cytoplasm from the vaccinia virus recombinant transcribes the transfected DNA into RNA which is then translated into protein by the host translational machinery. Alternately, T7 can be added as a purified protein or enzyme as in the “Progenitor” system (Studier and Moffatt, J. Mol. Biol. (1986) 189:113-130). The method provides for high level, transient, cytoplasmic production of large quantities of RNA and its translation product(s).
Depending on the expression system and host selected, the VLPS are produced by growing host cells transformed by an expression vector under conditions whereby the particle-forming polypeptide is expressed and VLPs can be formed. The selection of the appropriate growth conditions is within the skill of the art. If the VLPs are formed intracellularly, the cells are then disrupted, using chemical, physical or mechanical means, which lyse the cells yet keep the VLPs substantially intact. Such methods are known to those of skill in the art and are described in, e.g., Protein Purification Applications: A Practical Approach, (E. L. V. Harris and S. Angal, Eds., 1990).
The particles are then isolated (or substantially purified) using methods that preserve the integrity thereof, such as, by gradient centrifugation, e.g., cesium chloride (CsCl) sucrose gradients, pelleting and the like (see, e.g., Kirnbauer et al. J. Virol. (1993) 67:6929-6936), as well as standard purification techniques including, e.g., ion exchange and gel filtration chromatography.
VLPs produced by cells containing the synthetic expression cassettes of the present invention can be used to elicit an immune response when administered to a subject. One advantage of the present invention is that VLPs can be produced by mammalian cells carrying the synthetic expression cassettes at levels previously not possible. As discussed above, the VLPs can comprise a variety of antigens in addition to the Gag polypeptide (e.g., Gag-protease, Gag-polymerase, Env, synthetic Env, etc.). Purified VLPs, produced using the synthetic expression cassettes of the present invention, can be administered to a vertebrate subject, usually in the form of vaccine compositions. Combination vaccines may also be used, where such vaccines contain, for example, an adjuvant subunit protein (e.g., Env). Administration can take place using the VLPs formulated alone or formulated with other antigens. Further, the VLPs can be administered prior to, concurrent with, or subsequent to, delivery of the synthetic expression cassettes for DNA immunization (see below) and/or delivery of other vaccines. Also, the site of VLP administration may be the same or different as other vaccine compositions that are being administered. Gene delivery can be accomplished by a number of methods including, but are not limited to, immunization with DNA, alphavirus vectors, pox virus vectors, and vaccinia virus vectors.
VLP immune-stimulating (or vaccine) compositions can include various excipients, adjuvants, carriers, auxiliary substances, modulating agents, and the like. The immune stimulating compositions will include an amount of the VLP/antigen sufficient to mount an immunological response. An appropriate effective amount can be determined by one of skill in the art. Such an amount will fall in a relatively broad range that can be determined through routine trials and will generally be an amount on the order of about 0.1 μg to about 1000 μg, more preferably about 1 μg to about 300 μg, of VLP/antigen.
A carrier is optionally present which is a molecule that does not itself induce the production of antibodies harmful to the individual receiving the composition. Suitable carriers are typically large, slowly metabolized macromolecules such as proteins, polysaccharides, polylactic acids, polyglycollic acids, polymeric amino acids, amino acid copolymers, lipid aggregates (such as oil droplets or liposomes), and inactive virus particles. Examples of particulate carriers include those derived from polymethyl methacrylate polymers, as well as microparticles derived from poly(lactides) and poly(lactide-co-glycolides), known as PLG. See, e.g., Jeffery et al., Pharm. Res. (1993) 10:362-368; McGee J P, et al., J Microencapsul. 14(2): 197-210, 1997; O'Hagan D T, et al., Vaccine 11(2):149-54, 1993. Such carriers are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art. Additionally, these carriers may function as immunostimulating agents (“adjuvants”). Furthermore, the antigen may be conjugated to a bacterial toxoid, such as toxoid from diphtheria, tetanus, cholera, etc., as well as toxins derived from E. coli.
Adjuvants may also be used to enhance the effectiveness of the compositions. Such adjuvants include, but are not limited to: (1) aluminum salts (alum), such as aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate, aluminum sulfate, etc.; (2) oil-in-water emulsion formulations (with or without other specific immunostimulating agents such as muramyl peptides (see below) or bacterial cell wall components), such as for example (a) MF59 (International Publication No. WO 90/14837), containing 5% Squalene, 0.5% Tween 80, and 0.5% Span 85 (optionally containing various amounts of MTP-PE (see below), although not required) formulated into submicron particles using a microfluidizer such as Model 110Y microfluidizer (Microfluidics, Newton, Mass.), (b) SAF, containing 10% Squalane, 0.4% Tween 80, 5% pluronic-blocked polymer L121, and thr-MDP (see below) either microfluidized into a submicron emulsion or vortexed to generate a larger particle size emulsion, and (c) Ribi™ adjuvant system (RAS), (Ribi Immunochem, Hamilton, Mont.) containing 2% Squalene, 0.2% Tween 80, and one or more bacterial cell wall components from the group consisting of monophosphorylipid A (MPL), trehalose dimycolate (TDM), and cell wall skeleton (CWS), preferably MPL+CWS (Detox™); (3) saponin adjuvants, such as Stimulon™ (Cambridge Bioscience, Worcester, Mass.) may be used or particle generated therefrom such as ISCOMs (immunostimulating complexes); (4) Complete Freunds Adjuvant (CFA) and Incomplete Freunds Adjuvant (IFA); (5) cytokines, such as interleukins (IL-1, IL-2, etc.), macrophage colony stimulating factor (M-CSF), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), etc.; (6) oligonucleotides or polymeric molecules encoding immunostimulatory CpG motifs (Davis, H. L., et al., J. Immunology 160:870-876, 1998; Sato, Y. et al., Science 273:352-354, 1996) or complexes of antigens/oligonucleotides {Polymeric molecules include double and single stranded RNA and DNA, and backbone modifications thereof, for example, methylphosphonate linkages; or (7) detoxified mutants of a bacterial ADP-ribosylating toxin such as a cholera toxin (CT), a pertussis toxin (PT), or an E. coli heat-labile toxin (LT), particularly LT-K63 (where lysine is substituted for the wild-type amino acid at position 63) LT-R72 (where arginine is substituted for the wild-type amino acid at position 72), CT-S109 (where serine is substituted for the wild-type amino acid at position 109), and PT-K9/G129 (where lysine is substituted for the wild-type amino acid at position 9 and glycine substituted at position 129) (see, e.g., International Publication Nos. WO93/13202 and WO92/19265); and (8) other substances that act as immunostimulating agents to enhance the effectiveness of the composition. Further, such polymeric molecules include alternative polymer backbone structures such as, but not limited to, polyvinyl backbones (Pitha, Biochem Biophys Acta, 204:39, 1970a; Pitha, Biopolymers, δ: 965, 1970b), and morpholino backbones (Summerton, J., et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,142,047, issued Aug. 25, 1992; Summerton, J., et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,185,444 issued Feb. 9, 1993). A variety of other charged and uncharged polynucleotide analogs have been reported. Numerous backbone modifications are known in the art, including, but not limited to, uncharged linkages (e.g., methyl phosphonates, phosphotriesters, phosphoamidates, and carbamates) and charged linkages (e.g., phosphorothioates and phosphorodithioates).}; and (7) other substances that act as immunostimulating agents to enhance the effectiveness of the VLP immune-stimulating (or vaccine) composition. Alum, CpG oligonucleotides, and MF59 are preferred.
Muramyl peptides include, but are not limited to, N-acetyl-muramyl-L-threonyl-D-isoglutamine (thr-MDP), N-acteyl-normuramyl-L-alanyl-D-isogluatme (nor-MDP), N-acetylmuramyl-L-alanyl-D-isogluatminyl-L-alanine-2-(1′-2′-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-huydroxyphosphoryloxy)-ethylamine (MTP-PE), etc.
Dosage treatment with the VLP composition may be a single dose schedule or a multiple dose schedule. A multiple dose schedule is one in which a primary course of vaccination may be with 1-10 separate doses, followed by other doses given at subsequent time intervals, chosen to maintain and/or reinforce the immune response, for example at 1-4 months for a second dose, and if needed, a subsequent dose(s) after several months. The dosage regimen will also, at least in part, be determined by the need of the subject and be dependent on the judgment of the practitioner.
If prevention of disease is desired, the antigen carrying VLPs are generally administered prior to primary infection with the pathogen of interest. If treatment is desired, e.g., the reduction of symptoms or recurrences, the VLP compositions are generally administered subsequent to primary infection.
2.3.2 Using the Synthetic Expression Cassettes of the Present Invention to Create Packaging Cell Lines
A number of viral based systems have been developed for use as gene transfer vectors for mammalian host cells. For example, retroviruses (in particular, lentiviral vectors) provide a convenient platform for gene delivery systems. A coding sequence of interest (for example, a sequence useful for gene therapy applications) can be inserted into a gene delivery vector and packaged in retroviral particles using techniques known in the art. Recombinant virus can then be isolated and delivered to cells of the subject either in vivo or ex vivo. A number of retroviral systems have been described, including, for example, the following: (U.S. Pat. No. 5,219,740; Miller et al. (1989) BioTechniques 7:980; Miller, A. D. (1990) Human Gene Therapy 1:5; Scarpa et al. (1991) Virology 180:849; Burns et al. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:8033; Boris-Lawrie et al. (1993) Cur. Opin. Genet. Develop. 3:102; GB 2200651; EP 0415731; EP 0345242; WO 89/02468; WO 89/05349; WO 89/09271; WO 90/02806; WO 90/07936; WO 90/07936; WO 94/03622; WO 93/25698; WO 93/25234; WO 93/11230; WO 93/10218; WO 91/02805; in U.S. Pat. No. 5,219,740; U.S. Pat. No. 4,405,712; U.S. Pat. No. 4,861,719; U.S. Pat. No. 4,980,289 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,777,127; in U.S. Ser. No. 07/800,921; and in Vile (1993) Cancer Res 53:3860-3864; Vile (1993) Cancer Res 53:962-967; Ram (1993) Cancer Res 53:83-88; Takamiya (1992) J Neurosci Res 33:493-503; Baba (1993) J Neurosurg 79:729-735; Mann (1983) Cell 33:153; Cane (1984) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81; 6349; and Miller (1990) Human Gene Therapy 1.
In other embodiments, gene transfer vectors can be constructed to encode a cytokine or other immunomodulatory molecule. For example, nucleic acid sequences encoding native IL-2 and gamma-interferon can be obtained as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,738,927 and 5,326,859, respectively, while useful muteins of these proteins can be obtained as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,853,332. Nucleic acid sequences encoding the short and long forms of mCSF can be obtained as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,847,201 and 4,879,227, respectively. In particular aspects of the invention, retroviral vectors expressing cytokine or immunomodulatory genes can be produced as described herein (for example, employing the packaging cell lines of the present invention) and in International Application No. PCT US 94/02951, entitled “Compositions and Methods for Cancer Immunotherapy.”
Examples of suitable immunomodulatory molecules for use herein include the following: IL-1 and IL-2 (Karupiah et al. (1990) J. Immunology 144:290-298, Weber et al. (1987) J. Exp. Med. 166:1716-1733, Gansbacher et al. (1990) J. Exp. Med. 172:1217-1224, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,738,927); IL-3 and IL-4 (Tepper et al. (1989) Cell 57:503-512, Golumbek et al. (1991) Science 254:713-716, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,017,691); IL-5 and IL-6 (Brakenhof et al. (1987) J. Immunol. 139:4116-4121, and International Publication No. WO 90/06370); IL-7 (U.S. Pat. No. 4,965,195); IL-8, IL-9, IL-10, IL-11, IL-12, and IL-13 (Cytokine Bulletin, Summer 1994); IL-14 and IL-15; alpha interferon (Finter et al. (1991) Drugs 42:749-765, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,892,743 and 4,966,843, International Publication No. WO 85/02862, Nagata et al. (1980) Nature 284:316-320, Familletti et al. (1981) Methods in Enz. 78:387-394, Twu et al. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:2046-2050, and Faktor et al. (1990) Oncogene 5:867-872); beta-interferon (Seif et al. (1991) J. Virol. 65:664-671); gamma-interferons (Radford et al. (1991) The American Society of Hepatology 20082015, Watanabe et al. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:9456-9460, Gansbacher et al. (1990) Cancer Research 50:7820-7825, Maio et al. (1989) Can. Immunol. Immunother. 30:34-42, and U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,762,791 and 4,727,138); G-CSF (U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,999,291 and 4,810,643); GM-CSF (International Publication No. WO 85/04188).
Immunomodulatory factors may also be agonists, antagonists, or ligands for these molecules. For example, soluble forms of receptors can often behave as antagonists for these types of factors, as can mutated forms of the factors themselves.
Nucleic acid molecules that encode the above-described substances, as well as other nucleic acid molecules that are advantageous for use within the present invention, may be readily obtained from a variety of sources, including, for example, depositories such as the American Type Culture Collection, or from commercial sources such as British Bio-Technology Limited (Cowley, Oxford England). Representative examples include BBG 12 (containing the GM-CSF gene coding for the mature protein of 127 amino acids), BBG 6 (which contains sequences encoding gamma interferon), A.T.C.C. Deposit No. 39656 (which contains sequences encoding TNF), A.T.C.C. Deposit No. 20663 (which contains sequences encoding alpha-interferon), A.T.C.C. Deposit Nos. 31902, 31902 and 39517 (which contain sequences encoding beta-interferon), A.T.C.C. Deposit No. 67024 (which contains a sequence which encodes Interleukin-1b), A.T.C.C. Deposit Nos. 39405, 39452, 39516, 39626 and 39673 (which contain sequences encoding Interleukin-2), A.T.C.C. Deposit Nos. 59399, 59398, and 67326 (which contain sequences encoding Interleukin-3), A.T.C.C. Deposit No. 57592 (which contains sequences encoding Interleukin-4), A.T.C.C. Deposit Nos. 59394 and 59395 (which contain sequences encoding Interleukin-5), and A.T.C.C. Deposit No. 67153 (which contains sequences encoding Interleukin-6).
Plasmids containing cytokine genes or immunomodulatory genes (International Publication Nos. WO 94/02951 and WO 96/21015, both of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety) can be digested with appropriate restriction enzymes, and DNA fragments containing the particular gene of interest can be inserted into a gene transfer vector using standard molecular biology techniques. (See, e.g., Sambrook et al., supra., or Ausbel et al. (eds) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Greene Publishing and Wiley-Interscience).
Polynucleotide sequences coding for the above-described molecules can be obtained using recombinant methods, such as by screening cDNA and genomic libraries from cells expressing the gene, or by deriving the gene from a vector known to include the same. For example, plasmids which contain sequences that encode altered cellular products may be obtained from a depository such as the A.T.C.C., or from commercial sources. Plasmids containing the nucleotide sequences of interest can be digested with appropriate restriction enzymes, and DNA fragments containing the nucleotide sequences can be inserted into a gene transfer vector using standard molecular biology techniques.
Alternatively, cDNA sequences for use with the present invention may be obtained from cells which express or contain the sequences, using standard techniques, such as phenol extraction and PCR of cDNA or genomic DNA. See, e.g., Sambrook et al., supra, for a description of techniques used to obtain and isolate DNA. Briefly, mRNA from a cell which expresses the gene of interest can be reverse transcribed with reverse transcriptase using oligo-dT or random primers. The single stranded cDNA may then be amplified by PCR (see U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,683,202, 4,683,195 and 4,800,159, see also PCR Technology: Principles and Applications for DNA Amplification, Erlich (ed.), Stockton Press, 1989)) using oligonucleotide primers complementary to sequences on either side of desired sequences.
The nucleotide sequence of interest can also be produced synthetically, rather than cloned, using a DNA synthesizer (e.g., an Applied Biosystems Model 392 DNA Synthesizer, available from ABI, Foster City, Calif.). The nucleotide sequence can be designed with the appropriate codons for the expression product desired. The complete sequence is assembled from overlapping oligonucleotides prepared by standard methods and assembled into a complete coding sequence. See, e.g., Edge (1981) Nature 292:756; Nambair et al. (1984) Science 223:1299; Jay et al. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259:6311.
The synthetic expression cassettes of the present invention can be employed in the construction of packaging cell lines for use with retroviral vectors.
One type of retrovirus, the murine leukemia virus, or “MLV”, has been widely utilized for gene therapy applications (see generally Mann et al. (Cell 33:153, 1993), Cane and Mulligan (Proc, Nat'l. Acad. Sci. USA 81:6349, 1984), and Miller et al., Human Gene Therapy 1:5-14, 1990.
Lentiviral vectors typically, comprise a 5′ lentiviral LTR, a tRNA binding site, a packaging signal, a promoter operably linked to one or more genes of interest, an origin of second strand DNA synthesis and a 3′ lentiviral LTR, wherein the lentiviral vector contains a nuclear transport element. The nuclear transport element may be located either upstream (5′) or downstream (3′) of a coding sequence of interest (for example, a synthetic Gag or Env expression cassette of the present invention). Within certain embodiments, the nuclear transport element is not RRE. Within one embodiment the packaging signal is an extended packaging signal. Within other embodiments the promoter is a tissue specific promoter, or, alternatively, a promoter such as CMV. Within other embodiments, the lentiviral vector further comprises an internal ribosome entry site.
A wide variety of lentiviruses may be utilized within the context of the present invention, including for example, lentiviruses selected from the group consisting of HIV, HIV-1, HIV-2, FIV and SIV.
Within yet another aspect of the invention, host cells (e.g., packaging cell lines) are provided which contain any of the expression cassettes described herein. For example, within one aspect packaging cell line are provided comprising an expression cassette that comprises a sequence encoding synthetic Gag-polymerase, and a nuclear transport element, wherein the promoter is operably linked to the sequence encoding Gag-polymerase. Packaging cell lines may further comprise a promoter and a sequence encoding tat, rev, or an envelope, wherein the promoter is operably linked to the sequence encoding tat, rev, Env or sequences encoding modified versions of these proteins. The packaging cell line may further comprise a sequence encoding any one or more of other HIV gene encoding sequences.
In one embodiment, the expression cassette (carrying, for example, the synthetic Gag-polymerase) is stably integrated. The packaging cell line, upon introduction of a lentiviral vector, typically produces particles. The promoter regulating expression of the synthetic expression cassette may be inducible. Typically, the packaging cell line, upon introduction of a lentiviral vector, produces particles that are essentially free of replication competent virus.
Packaging cell lines are provided comprising an expression cassette which directs the expression of a synthetic Gag-polymerase gene or comprising an expression cassette which directs the expression of a synthetic Env genes described herein. (See, also, Andre, S., et al., Journal of Virology 72(2):1497-1503, 1998; Haas, J., et al., Current Biology 6(3):315-324, 1996) for a description of other modified Env sequences). A lentiviral vector is introduced into the packaging cell line to produce a vector producing cell line.
As noted above, lentiviral vectors can be designed to carry or express a selected gene(s) or sequences of interest. Lentiviral vectors may be readily constructed from a wide variety of lentiviruses (see RNA Tumor Viruses, Second Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1985). Representative examples of lentiviruses included HIV, HIV-1, HIV-2, FIV and SIV. Such lentiviruses may either be obtained from patient isolates, or, more preferably, from depositories or collections such as the American Type Culture Collection, or isolated from known sources using available techniques.
Portions of the lentiviral gene delivery vectors (or vehicles) may be derived from different viruses. For example, in a given recombinant lentiviral vector, LTRs may be derived from an HIV, a packaging signal from SIV, and an origin of second strand synthesis from HrV-2. Lentiviral vector constructs may comprise a 5′ lentiviral LTR, a tRNA binding site, a packaging signal, one or more heterologous sequences, an origin of second strand DNA synthesis and a 3′ LTR, wherein said lentiviral vector contains a nuclear transport element that is not RRE.
Briefly, Long Terminal Repeats (“LTRs”) are subdivided into three elements, designated U5, R and U3. These elements contain a variety of signals which are responsible for the biological activity of a retrovirus, including for example, promoter and enhancer elements which are located within U3. LTRs may be readily identified in the provirus (integrated DNA form) due to their precise duplication at either end of the genome. As utilized herein, a 5′ LTR should be understood to include a 5′ promoter element and sufficient LTR sequence to allow reverse transcription and integration of the DNA form of the vector. The 3′ LTR should be understood to include a polyadenylation signal, and sufficient LTR sequence to allow reverse transcription and integration of the DNA form of the vector.
The tRNA binding site and origin of second strand DNA synthesis are also important for a retrovirus to be biologically active, and may be readily identified by one of skill in the art. For example, retroviral tRNA binds to a tRNA binding site by Watson-Crick base pairing, and is carried with the retrovirus genome into a viral particle. The tRNA is then utilized as a primer for DNA synthesis by reverse transcriptase. The tRNA binding site may be readily identified based upon its location just downstream from the 5′LTR. Similarly, the origin of second strand DNA synthesis is, as its name implies, important for the second strand DNA synthesis of a retrovirus. This region, which is also referred to as the poly-purine tract, is located just upstream of the 3′LTR.
In addition to a 5′ and 3′ LTR, tRNA binding site, and origin of second strand DNA synthesis, recombinant retroviral vector constructs may also comprise a packaging signal, as well as one or more genes or coding sequences of interest. In addition, the lentiviral vectors have a nuclear transport element which, in preferred embodiments is not RRE. Representative examples of suitable nuclear transport elements include the element in Rous sarcoma virus (Ogert, et al., J. Virol. 70, 3834-3843, 1996), the element in Rous sarcoma virus (Liu & Mertz, Genes & Dev., 9, 1766-1789, 1995) and the element in the genome of simian retrovirus type I (Zolotukhin, et al., J. Virol. 68, 7944-7952, 1994). Other potential elements include the elements in the histone gene (Kedes, Annu. Rev. Biochem. 48, 837-870, 1970), the α-interferon gene (Nagata et al., Nature 287, 401-408, 1980), the β-adrenergic receptor gene (Koilka, et al., Nature 329, 75-79, 1987), and the c-Jun gene (Hattorie, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 9148-9152, 1988).
Recombinant lentiviral vector constructs typically lack both Gag-polymerase and Env coding sequences. Recombinant lentiviral vector typically contain less than 20, preferably 15, more preferably 10, and most preferably 8 consecutive nucleotides found in Gag-polymerase and Env genes. One advantage of the present invention is that the synthetic Gag-polymerase expression cassettes, which can be used to construct packaging cell lines for the recombinant retroviral vector constructs, have little homology to wild-type Gag-polymerase sequences and thus considerably reduce or eliminate the possibility of homologous recombination between the synthetic and wild-type sequences.
Lentiviral vectors may also include tissue-specific promoters to drive expression of one or more genes or sequences of interest.
Lentiviral vector constructs may be generated such that more than one gene of interest is expressed. This may be accomplished through the use of di- or oligo-cistronic cassettes (e.g., where the coding regions are separated by 80 nucleotides or less, see generally Levin et al., Gene 108:167-174, 1991), or through the use of Internal Ribosome Entry Sites (“IRES”).
Packaging cell lines suitable for use with the above described recombinant retroviral vector constructs may be readily prepared given the disclosure provided herein. Briefly, the parent cell line from which the packaging cell line is derived can be selected from a variety of mammalian cell lines, including for example, 293, RD, COS-7, CHO, BHK, VERO, HT1080, and myeloma cells.
After selection of a suitable host cell for the generation of a packaging cell line, one or more expression cassettes are introduced into the cell line in order to complement or supply in trans components of the vector which have been deleted.
Representative examples of suitable synthetic HIV polynucleotide sequences have been described herein for use in expression cassettes of the present invention. As described above, the native and/or synthetic coding sequences may also be utilized in these expression cassettes.
Utilizing the above-described expression cassettes, a wide variety of packaging cell lines can be generated. For example, within one aspect packaging cell line are provided comprising an expression cassette that comprises a sequence encoding synthetic Gag-polymerase, and a nuclear transport element, wherein the promoter is operably linked to the sequence encoding Gag-polymerase. Within other aspects, packaging cell lines are provided comprising a promoter and a sequence encoding tat, rev, Env, or other HIV antigens or epitopes derived therefrom, wherein the promoter is operably linked to the sequence encoding tat, rev, Env, or the HIV antigen or epitope. Within further embodiments, the packaging cell line may comprise a sequence encoding any one or more of tat, rev, nef, vif, vpu or vpr. For example, the packaging cell line may contain only tat, rev, nef, vif, vpu, or vpr alone, tat rev and nef, nef and vif, nef and vpu, nef and vpr, vif and vpu, vif and vpr, vpu and vpr, nef vif and vpu, nef vif and vpr, nef vpu and vpr, vif vpu and vpr, all four of nef, vif, vpu, and vpr, etc.
In one embodiment, the expression cassette is stably integrated. Within another embodiment, the packaging cell line, upon introduction of a lentiviral vector, produces particles. Within further embodiments the promoter is inducible. Within certain preferred embodiments of the invention, the packaging cell line, upon introduction of a lentiviral vector, produces particles that are free of replication competent virus.
The synthetic cassettes containing modified coding sequences are transfected into a selected cell line. Transfected cells are selected that (i) carry, typically, integrated, stable copies of the HIV coding sequences, and (ii) are expressing acceptable levels of these polypeptides (expression can be evaluated by methods known in the prior art in view of the teachings of the present disclosure). The ability of the cell line to produce VLPs may also be verified.
A sequence of interest is constructed into a suitable viral vector as discussed above. This defective virus is then transfected into the packaging cell line. The packaging cell line provides the viral functions necessary for producing virus-like particles into which the defective viral genome, containing the sequence of interest, are packaged. These VLPs are then isolated and can be used, for example, in gene delivery or gene therapy.
Further, such packaging cell lines can also be used to produce VLPs alone, which can, for example, be used as adjuvants for administration with other antigens or in vaccine compositions. Also, co-expression of a selected sequence of interest encoding a polypeptide (for example, an antigen) in the packaging cell line can also result in the entrapment and/or association of the selected polypeptide in/with the VLPs.
Various forms of the different embodiments of the present invention (e.g., synthetic constructs) may be combined.
2.4.0 DNA Immunization and Gene Delivery
A variety of HIV polypeptide antigens, particularly HIV antigens, can be used in the practice of the present invention. HIV antigens can be included in DNA immunization constructs containing, for example, a synthetic Env expression cassettes, a synthetic Gag expression cassette, a synthetic pol-derived polypeptide expression cassette, a synthetic expression cassette comprising sequences encoding one or more accessory or regulatory genes (e.g., tat, rev, nef, vif, vpu, vpr), and/or a synthetic Gag expression cassette fused in-frame to a coding sequence for the polypeptide antigen (synthetic or wild-type), where expression of the construct results in VLPs presenting the antigen of interest.
HIV antigens of particular interest to be used in the practice of the present invention include pol, tat, rev, nef, vif, vpu, vpr, and other HIV-1 (also known as HTLV-III, LAV, ARV, etc.) antigens or epitopes derived therefrom, including, but not limited to, antigens such as gp120, gp41, gp160 (both native and modified); Gag; and pol from a variety of isolates including, but not limited to, HIVIIIb, HIVSF2, HIV-1SF162, HIV-1SF170, HIVLAV, HIVLAI, HIVMN, HIV-1CM235, HIV-1US4, other HIV-1 strains from diverse subtypes (e.g., subtypes, A through G, and O), HIV-2 strains and diverse subtypes (e.g., HIV-2UC1 and HIV-2UC2). See, e.g., Myers, et al., Los Alamos Database, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, N. Mex.; Myers, et al., Human Retroviruses and Aids, 1990, Los Alamos, N. Mex.: Los Alamos National Laboratory. These antigens may be synthetic (as described herein) or wild-type.
To evaluate efficacy, DNA immunization using synthetic expression cassettes of the present invention can be performed, for example, as follows. Mice are immunized with a tat/rev/nef synthetic expression cassette. Other mice are immunized with a tat/rev/nef wild type expression cassette. Mouse immunizations with plasmid-DNAs typically show that the synthetic expression cassettes provide a clear improvement of immunogenicity relative to the native expression cassettes. Also, a second boost immunization will induce a secondary immune response, for example, after approximately two weeks. Further, the results of CTL assays typically show increased potency of synthetic expression cassettes for induction of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) responses by DNA immunization.
Exemplary primate studies directed at the evaluation of neutralizing antibodies and cellular immune responses against HIV are described below.
It is readily apparent that the subject invention can be used to mount an immune response to a wide variety of antigens and hence to treat or prevent infection, particularly HIV infection.
2.4.1 Delivery of the Synthetic Expression Cassettes of the Present Invention
Polynucleotide sequences coding for the above-described molecules can be obtained using recombinant methods, such as by screening cDNA and genomic libraries from cells expressing the gene, or by deriving the gene from a vector known to include the same. Furthermore, the desired gene can be isolated directly from cells and tissues containing the same, using standard techniques, such as phenol extraction and PCR of cDNA or genomic DNA. See, e.g., Sambrook et al., supra, for a description of techniques used to obtain and isolate DNA. The gene of interest can also be produced synthetically, rather than cloned. The nucleotide sequence can be designed with the appropriate codons for the particular amino acid sequence desired. In general, one will select preferred codons for the intended host in which the sequence will be expressed. The complete sequence is assembled from overlapping oligonucleotides prepared by standard methods and assembled into a complete coding sequence. See, e.g., Edge, Nature (1981) 292:756; Nambair et al., Science (1984) 223:1299; Jay et al., J. Biol. Chem. (1984) 259:6311; Stemmer, W. P. C., (1995) Gene 164:49-53.
Next, the gene sequence encoding the desired antigen can be inserted into a vector containing a synthetic expression cassette of the present invention. In one embodiment, polynucleotides encoding selected antigens are separately cloned into expression vectors (e.g., Env-coding polynucleotide in a first vector, Gag-coding polynucleotide in a second vector, Pol-derived polypeptide-coding polynucleotide in a third vector, tat-, rev-, nef-, vif-, vpu-, vpr-coding polynucleotides in further vectors, etc.). In certain embodiments, the antigen is inserted into or adjacent a synthetic Gag coding sequence such that when the combined sequence is expressed it results in the production of VLPs comprising the Gag polypeptide and the antigen of interest, e.g., Env (native or modified) or other antigen(s) (native or modified) derived from HIV. Insertions can be made within the coding sequence or at either end of the coding sequence (5′, amino terminus of the expressed Gag polypeptide; or 3′, carboxy terminus of the expressed Gag polypeptide) (Wagner, R., et al., Arch Virol. 127:117-137, 1992; Wagner, R., et al., Virology 200:162-175, 1994; Wu, X., et al., J. Virol. 69(6):3389-3398, 1995; Wang, C-T., et al., Virology 200:524-534, 1994; Chazal, N., et al., Virology 68(1):111-122, 1994; Griffiths, J. C., et al., J. Virol. 67(6):3191-3198, 1993; Reicin, A. S., et al., J. Virol. 69(2):642-650, 1995).
Up to 50% of the coding sequences of p55Gag can be deleted without affecting the assembly to virus-like particles and expression efficiency (Borsetti, A., et al, J. Virol. 72(11):9313-9317, 1998; Garnier, L., et al., J Virol 72(6):4667-4677, 1998; Zhang, Y., et al., J Virol 72(3):1782-1789, 1998; Wang, C., et al., J Virol 72(10): 7950-7959, 1998). In one embodiment of the present invention, immunogenicity of the high level expressing synthetic Gag expression cassettes can be increased by the insertion of different structural or non-structural HIV antigens, multiepitope cassettes, or cytokine sequences into deleted regions of Gag sequence. Such deletions may be generated following the teachings of the present invention and information available to one of ordinary skill in the art. One possible advantage of this approach, relative to using full-length sequences fused to heterologous polypeptides, can be higher expression/secretion efficiency of the expression product.
When sequences are added to the amino terminal end of Gag, the polynucleotide can contain coding sequences at the 5′ end that encode a signal for addition of a myristic moiety to the Gag-containing polypeptide (e.g., sequences that encode Met-Gly).
The ability of Gag-containing polypeptide constructs to form VLPs can be empirically determined following the teachings of the present specification.
The synthetic expression cassettes can also include control elements operably linked to the coding sequence, which allow for the expression of the gene in vivo in the subject species. For example, typical promoters for mammalian cell expression include the SV40 early promoter, a CMV promoter such as the CMV immediate early promoter, the mouse mammary tumor virus LTR promoter, the adenovirus major late promoter (Ad MLP), and the herpes simplex virus promoter, among others. Other nonviral promoters, such as a promoter derived from the murine metallothionein gene, will also find use for mammalian expression. Typically, transcription termination and polyadenylation sequences will also be present, located 3′ to the translation stop codon. Preferably, a sequence for optimization of initiation of translation, located 5′ to the coding sequence, is also present. Examples of transcription terminator/polyadenylation signals include those derived from SV40, as described in Sambrook et al., supra, as well as a bovine growth hormone terminator sequence.
Enhancer elements may also be used herein to increase expression levels of the mammalian constructs. Examples include the SV40 early gene enhancer, as described in Dijkema et al., EMBO 1 (1985) 4:761, the enhancer/promoter derived from the long terminal repeat (LTR) of the Rous Sarcoma Virus, as described in Gorman et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1982b) 79:6777 and elements derived from human CMV, as described in Boshart et al., Cell (1985) 41:521, such as elements included in the CMV intron A sequence.
Furthermore, plasmids can be constructed which include a chimeric antigen-coding gene sequences, encoding, e.g., multiple antigens/epitopes of interest, for example derived from more than one viral isolate.
Typically the antigen coding sequences precede or follow the synthetic coding sequence and the chimeric transcription unit will have a single open reading frame encoding both the antigen of interest and the synthetic coding sequences. Alternatively, multi-cistronic cassettes (e.g., bi-cistronic cassettes) can be constructed allowing expression of multiple antigens from a single mRNA using the EMCV IRES, or the like (Example 7).
In one embodiment of the present invention, a nucleic acid immunizing composition may comprise, for example, the following: a first expression vector comprising a Gag expression cassette, a second vector comprising an Env expression cassette, and a third expression vector comprising a Pol expression cassette, or one or more coding region of Pol (e.g., Prot, RT, RNase, Int), wherein further antigen coding sequences may be associated with the Pol expression, such antigens may be obtained, for example, from accessory genes (e.g., vpr, vpu, vif), regulatory genes (e.g., nef, tat, rev), or portions of the Pol sequences (e.g., Prot, RT, RNase, Int)). In another embodiment, a nucleic acid immunizing composition may comprise, for example, an expression cassette comprising any of the synthetic polynucleotide sequences of the present invention. In another embodiment, a nucleic acid immunizing composition may comprise, for example, an expression cassette comprising coding sequences for a number of HIV genes (or sequences derived from such genes) wherein the coding sequences are in-frame and under the control of a single promoter, for example, Gag-Env constructs, Tat-Rev-Nef constructs, P2Pol-tat-rev-nef constructs, etc. The synthetic coding sequences of the present invention may be combined in any number of combinations depending on the coding sequence products (i.e., HIV polypeptides) to which, for example, an immunological response is desired to be raised. In yet another embodiment, synthetic coding sequences for multiple HIV-derived polypeptides may be constructed into a polycistronic message under the control of a single promoter wherein IRES are placed adjacent the coding sequence for each encoded polypeptide.
Once complete, the constructs are used for nucleic acid immunization using standard gene delivery protocols. Methods for gene delivery are known in the art. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,399,346, 5,580,859, 5,589,466. Genes can be delivered either directly to the vertebrate subject or, alternatively, delivered ex vivo, to cells derived from the subject and the cells reimplanted in the subject.
A number of viral based systems have been developed for gene transfer into mammalian cells. For example, retroviruses provide a convenient platform for gene delivery systems. Selected sequences can be inserted into a vector and packaged in retroviral particles using techniques known in the art. The recombinant virus can then be isolated and delivered to cells of the subject either in vivo or ex vivo. A number of retroviral systems have been described (U.S. Pat. No. 5,219,740; Miller and Rosman, BioTechniques (1989) 7:980-990; Miller, A. D., Human Gene Therapy (1990) 1:5-14; Scarpa et al., Virology (1991) 180:849-852; Burns et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1993) 90:8033-8037; and Boris-Lawrie and Temin, Cur. Opin. Genet. Develop. (1993) 3:102-109.
A number of adenovirus vectors have also been described. Unlike retroviruses which integrate into the host genome, adenoviruses persist extrachromosomally thus minimizing the risks associated with insertional mutagenesis (Haj-Ahmad and Graham, J. Virol. (1986) 57:267-274; Bett et al., J. Virol. (1993) 67:5911-5921; Mittereder et al., Human Gene Therapy (1994) 5:717-729; Seth et al., J. Virol. (1994) 68:933-940; Barr et al., Gene Therapy (1994) 1:51-58; Berkner, K. L. BioTechniques (1988) 6:616-629; and Rich et al., Human Gene Therapy (1993) 4:461-476).
Additionally, various adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector systems have been developed for gene delivery. AAV vectors can be readily constructed using techniques well known in the art. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,173,414 and 5,139,941; International Publication Nos. WO 92/01070 (published 23 Jan. 1992) and WO 93/03769 (published 4 Mar. 1993); Lebkowski et al., Molec. Cell. Biol. (1988) 8:3988-3996; Vincent et al., Vaccines 90 (1990) (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press); Carter, B. J. Current Opinion in Biotechnology (1992) 3:533-539; Muzyczka, N. Current Topics in Microbiol. and Immunol. (1992) 158:97-129; Kotin, R. M. Human Gene Therapy (1994) 5:793-801; Shelling and Smith, Gene Therapy (1994) 1:165-169; and Zhou et al., J. Exp. Med. (1994) 179:1867-1875.
Another vector system useful for delivering the polynucleotides of the present invention is the enterically administered recombinant poxvirus vaccines described by Small, Jr., P. A., et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,676,950, issued Oct. 14, 1997, herein incorporated by reference).
Additional viral vectors which will find use for delivering the nucleic acid molecules encoding the antigens of interest include those derived from the pox family of viruses, including vaccinia virus and avian poxvirus. By way of example, vaccinia virus recombinants expressing the genes can be constructed as follows. The DNA encoding the particular synthetic HIV polypeptide coding sequence is first inserted into an appropriate vector so that it is adjacent to a vaccinia promoter and flanking vaccinia DNA sequences, such as the sequence encoding thymidine kinase (TK). This vector is then used to transfect cells which are simultaneously infected with vaccinia. Homologous recombination serves to insert the vaccinia promoter plus the gene encoding the coding sequences of interest into the viral genome. The resulting TK−recombinant can be selected by culturing the cells in the presence of 5-bromodeoxyuridine and picking viral plaques resistant thereto.
Alternatively, avipoxviruses, such as the fowlpox and canarypox viruses, can also be used to deliver the genes. Recombinant avipox viruses, expressing immunogens from mammalian pathogens, are known to confer protective immunity when administered to non-avian species. The use of an avipox vector is particularly desirable in human and other mammalian species since members of the avipox genus can only productively replicate in susceptible avian species and therefore are not infective in mammalian cells. Methods for producing recombinant avipoxviruses are known in the art and employ genetic recombination, as described above with respect to the production of vaccinia viruses. See, e.g., WO 91/12882; WO 89/03429; and WO 92/03545.
Molecular conjugate vectors, such as the adenovirus chimeric vectors described in Michael et al., J. Biol. Chem. (1993) 268:6866-6869 and Wagner et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1992) 89:6099-6103, can also be used for gene delivery.
Members of the Alphavirus genus, such as, but not limited to, vectors derived from the Sindbis, Semliki Forest, and Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis viruses, will also find use as viral vectors for delivering the polynucleotides of the present invention (for example, a synthetic Gag-polypeptide encoding expression cassette). For a description of Sindbis-virus derived vectors useful for the practice of the instant methods, see, Dubensky et al., J. Virol. (1996) 70:508-519; and International Publication Nos. WO 95/07995 and WO 96/17072; as well as, Dubensky, Jr., T. W., et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,843,723, issued Dec. 1, 1998, and Dubensky, Jr., T. W., U.S. Pat. No. 5,789,245, issued Aug. 4, 1998, both herein incorporated by reference. Preferred expression systems include, but are not limited to, eucaryotic layered vector initiation systems (e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,015,686, U.S. Pat. No. 5,814,482, U.S. Pat. No. 6,015,694, U.S. Pat. No. 5,789,245, EP 1029068A2, WO 9918226A2/A3, EP 00907746A2, WO 9738087A2, all herein incorporated by reference in their entireties).
A vaccinia based infection/transfection system can be conveniently used to provide for inducible, transient expression of the coding sequences of interest in a host cell. In this system, cells are first infected in vitro with a vaccinia virus recombinant that encodes the bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase. This polymerase displays exquisite specificity in that it only transcribes templates bearing T7 promoters. Following infection, cells are transfected with the polynucleotide of interest, driven by a T7 promoter. The polymerase expressed in the cytoplasm from the vaccinia virus recombinant transcribes the transfected DNA into RNA which is then translated into protein by the host translational machinery. The method provides for high level, transient, cytoplasmic production of large quantities of RNA and its translation products. See, e.g., Elroy-Stein and Moss, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1990) 87:6743-6747; Fuerst et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1986) 83:8122-8126.
As an alternative approach to infection with vaccinia or avipox virus recombinants, or to the delivery of genes using other viral vectors, an amplification system can be used that will lead to high level expression following introduction into host cells. Specifically, a T7 RNA polymerase promoter preceding the coding region for T7 RNA polymerase can be engineered. Translation of RNA derived from this template will generate T7 RNA polymerase which in turn will transcribe more template. Concomitantly, there will be a cDNA whose expression is under the control of the T7 promoter. Thus, some of the T7 RNA polymerase generated from translation of the amplification template RNA will lead to transcription of the desired gene. Because some T7 RNA polymerase is required to initiate the amplification, T7 RNA polymerase can be introduced into cells along with the template(s) to prime the transcription reaction. The polymerase can be introduced as a protein or on a plasmid encoding the RNA polymerase. For a further discussion of T7 systems and their use for transforming cells, see, e.g., International Publication No. WO 94/26911; Studier and Moffatt, J. Mol. Biol. (1986) 189:113-130; Deng and Wolff, Gene (1994) 143:245-249; Gao et al., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. (1994) 200:1201-1206; Gao and Huang, Nuc. Acids Res. (1993) 21:2867-2872; Chen et al., Nuc. Acids Res. (1994) 22:2114-2120; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,135,855.
Delivery of the expression cassettes of the present invention can also be accomplished using eucaryotic expression vectors comprising CMV-derived elements, such vectors include, but are not limited to, the following: pCMVKm2, pCMV-link pCMVPLEdhfr, and pCMV6a (all described above).
Synthetic expression cassettes of interest can also be delivered without a viral vector. For example, the synthetic expression cassette can be packaged in liposomes prior to delivery to the subject or to cells derived therefrom. Lipid encapsulation is generally accomplished using liposomes which are able to stably bind or entrap and retain nucleic acid. The ratio of condensed DNA to lipid preparation can vary but will generally be around 1:1 (mg DNA:micromoles lipid), or more of lipid. For a review of the use of liposomes as carriers for delivery of nucleic acids, see, Hug and Sleight, Biochim. Biophys. Acta. (1991) 1097:1-17; Straubinger et al., in Methods of Enzymology (1983), Vol. 101, pp. 512-527.
Liposomal preparations for use in the present invention include cationic (positively charged), anionic (negatively charged) and neutral preparations, with cationic liposomes particularly preferred. Cationic liposomes have been shown to mediate intracellular delivery of plasmid DNA (Felgner et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1987) 84:7413-7416); mRNA (Malone et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1989) 86:6077-6081); and purified transcription factors (Debs et al., J. Biol. Chem. (1990) 265:10189-10192), in functional form.
Cationic liposomes are readily available. For example, N[1-2,3-dioleyloxy)propyl]-N,N,N-triethylammonium (DOTMA) liposomes are available under the trademark Lipofectin, from GIBCO BRL, Grand Island, N.Y. (See, also, Feigner et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1987) 84:7413-7416). Other commercially available lipids include (DDAB/DOPE) and DOTAP/DOPE (Boerhinger). Other cationic liposomes can be prepared from readily available materials using techniques well known in the art. See, e.g., Szoka et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1978) 75:4194-4198; PCT Publication No. WO 90/11092 for a description of the synthesis of DOTAP (1,2-bis(oleoyloxy)-3-(trimethylammonio)propane) liposomes.
Similarly, anionic and neutral liposomes are readily available, such as, from Avanti Polar Lipids (Birmingham, Ala.), or can be easily prepared using readily available materials. Such materials include phosphatidyl choline, cholesterol, phosphatidyl ethanolamine, dioleoylphosphatidyl choline (DOPC), dioleoylphosphatidyl glycerol (DOPG), dioleoylphoshatidyl ethanolamine (DOPE), among others. These materials can also be mixed with the DOTMA and DOTAP starting materials in appropriate ratios. Methods for making liposomes using these materials are well known in the art.
The liposomes can comprise multilammelar vesicles (MLVs), small unilamellar vesicles (SUVs), or large unilamellar vesicles (LUVs). The various liposome-nucleic acid complexes are prepared using methods known in the art. See, e.g., Straubinger et al., in METHODS OF IMMUNOLOGY (1983), Vol. 101, pp. 512-527; Szoka et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1978) 75:4194-4198; Papahadjopoulos et al., Biochim. Biophys. Acta (1975) 394:483; Wilson et al., Cell (1979) 17:77); Deamer and Bangham, Biochim. Biophys. Acta (1976) 443:629; Ostro et al., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. (1977) 76:836; Fraley et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1979) 76:3348); Enoch and Strittmatter, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1979) 76:145); Fraley et al., J. Biol. Chem. (1980) 255:10431; Szoka and Papahadjopoulos, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1978) 75:145; and Schaefer-Ridder et al., Science (1982) 215:166.
The DNA and/or protein antigen(s) can also be delivered in cochleate lipid compositions similar to those described by Papahadjopoulos et al., Biochem. Biophys. Acta. (1975) 394:483-491. See, also, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,663,161 and 4,871,488.
The synthetic expression cassette of interest may also be encapsulated, adsorbed to, or associated with, particulate carriers. Such carriers present multiple copies of a selected antigen to the immune system and promote trapping and retention of antigens in local lymph nodes. The particles can be phagocytosed by macrophages and can enhance antigen presentation through cytokine release. Examples of particulate carriers include those derived from polymethyl methacrylate polymers, as well as microparticles derived from poly(lactides) and poly(lactide-co-glycolides), known as PLG. See, e.g., Jeffery et al., Pharm. Res. (1993) 10:362-368; McGee J P, et al., J Microencapsul. 14(2):197-210, 1997; O'Hagan D T, et al., Vaccine 11(2): 149-54, 1993. Suitable microparticles may also be manufactured in the presence of charged detergents, such as anionic or cationic detergents, to yield microparticles with a surface having a net negative or a net positive charge. For example, microparticles manufactured with anionic detergents, such as hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), i.e. CTAB-PLG microparticles, adsorb negatively charged macromolecules, such as DNA. (see, e.g., Int'l Application Number PCT/US99/17308).
Furthermore, other particulate systems and polymers can be used for the in vivo or ex vivo delivery of the gene of interest. For example, polymers such as polylysine, polyarginine, polyornithine, spermine, spermidine, as well as conjugates of these molecules, are useful for transferring a nucleic acid of interest. Similarly, DEAE dextran-mediated transfection, calcium phosphate precipitation or precipitation using other insoluble inorganic salts, such as strontium phosphate, aluminum silicates including bentonite and kaolin, chromic oxide, magnesium silicate, talc, and the like, will find use with the present methods. See, e.g., Felgner, P. L., Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews (1990) 5:163-187, for a review of delivery systems useful for gene transfer. Peptoids (Zuckerman, R. N., et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,831,005, issued Nov. 3, 1998, herein incorporated by reference) may also be used for delivery of a construct of the present invention.
Additionally, biolistic delivery systems employing particulate carriers such as gold and tungsten, are especially useful for delivering synthetic expression cassettes of the present invention. The particles are coated with the synthetic expression cassette(s) to be delivered and accelerated to high velocity, generally under a reduced atmosphere, using a gun powder discharge from a “gene gun.” For a description of such techniques, and apparatuses useful therefore, see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,945,050; 5,036,006; 5,100,792; 5,179,022; 5,371,015; and 5,478,744. Also, needle-less injection systems can be used (Davis, H. L., et al, Vaccine 12:1503-1509, 1994; Bioject, Inc., Portland, Oreg.).
Recombinant vectors carrying a synthetic expression cassette of the present invention are formulated into compositions for delivery to the vertebrate subject. These compositions may either be prophylactic (to prevent infection) or therapeutic (to treat disease after infection). The compositions will comprise a “therapeutically effective amount” of the gene of interest such that an amount of the antigen can be produced in vivo so that an immune response is generated in the individual to which it is administered. The exact amount necessary will vary depending on the subject being treated; the age and general condition of the subject to be treated; the capacity of the subject's immune system to synthesize antibodies; the degree of protection desired; the severity of the condition being treated; the particular antigen selected and its mode of administration, among other factors. An appropriate effective amount can be readily determined by one of skill in the art. Thus, a “therapeutically effective amount” will fall in a relatively broad range that can be determined through routine trials.
The compositions will generally include one or more “pharmaceutically acceptable excipients or vehicles” such as water, saline, glycerol, polyethyleneglycol, hyaluronic acid, ethanol, etc. Additionally, auxiliary substances, such as wetting or emulsifying agents, pH buffering substances, and the like, may be present in such vehicles. Certain facilitators of nucleic acid uptake and/or expression can also be included in the compositions or coadministered, such as, but not limited to, bupivacaine, cardiotoxin and sucrose.
Once formulated, the compositions of the invention can be administered directly to the subject (e.g., as described above) or, alternatively, delivered ex vivo, to cells derived from the subject, using methods such as those described above. For example, methods for the ex vivo delivery and reimplantation of transformed cells into a subject are known in the art and can include, e.g., dextran-mediated transfection, calcium phosphate precipitation, polybrene mediated transfection, lipofectamine and LT-1 mediated transfection, protoplast fusion, electroporation, encapsulation of the polynucleotide(s) (with or without the corresponding antigen) in liposomes, and direct microinjection of the DNA into nuclei.
Direct delivery of synthetic expression cassette compositions in vivo will generally be accomplished with or without viral vectors, as described above, by injection using either a conventional syringe or a gene gun, such as the Accell® gene delivery system (PowderJect Technologies, Inc., Oxford, England). The constructs can be injected either subcutaneously, epidermally, intradermally, intramucosally such as nasally, rectally and vaginally, intraperitoneally, intravenously, orally or intramuscularly. Delivery of DNA into cells of the epidermis is particularly preferred as this mode of administration provides access to skin-associated lymphoid cells and provides for a transient presence of DNA in the recipient. Other modes of administration include oral and pulmonary administration, suppositories, needle-less injection, transcutaneous and transdermal applications. Dosage treatment may be a single dose schedule or a multiple dose schedule. Administration of nucleic acids may also be combined with administration of peptides or other substances.
Exemplary immunogenicity studies are presented in Examples 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, and 12.
2.4.2 Ex Vivo Delivery of the Synthetic Expression Cassettes of the Present Invention
In one embodiment, T cells, and related cell types (including but not limited to antigen presenting cells, such as, macrophage, monocytes, lymphoid cells, dendritic cells, B-cells, T-cells, stem cells, and progenitor cells thereof), can be used for ex vivo delivery of the synthetic expression cassettes of the present invention. T cells can be isolated from peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) by a variety of procedures known to those skilled in the art. For example, T cell populations can be “enriched” from a population of PBLs through the removal of accessory and B cells. In particular, T cell enrichment can be accomplished by the elimination of non-T cells using anti-MHC class II monoclonal antibodies. Similarly, other antibodies can be used to deplete specific populations of non-T cells. For example, anti-Ig antibody molecules can be used to deplete B cells and anti-MacI antibody molecules can be used to deplete macrophages.
T cells can be further fractionated into a number of different subpopulations by techniques known to those skilled in the art. Two major subpopulations can be isolated based on their differential expression of the cell surface markers CD4 and CD8. For example, following the enrichment of T cells as described above, CD4+ cells can be enriched using antibodies specific for CD4 (see Coligan et al., supra). The antibodies may be coupled to a solid support such as magnetic beads. Conversely, CD8+ cells can be enriched through the use of antibodies specific for CD4 (to remove CD4+ cells), or can be isolated by the use of CD8 antibodies coupled to a solid support. CD4 lymphocytes from HIV-1 infected patients can be expanded ex vivo, before or after transduction as described by Wilson et. al. (1995) J. Infect. Dis. 172:88.
Following purification of T cells, a variety of methods of genetic modification known to those skilled in the art can be performed using non-viral or viral-based gene transfer vectors constructed as described herein. For example, one such approach involves transduction of the purified T cell population with vector-containing supernatant of cultures derived from vector producing cells. A second approach involves co-cultivation of an irradiated monolayer of vector-producing cells with the purified T cells. A third approach involves a similar co-cultivation approach; however, the purified T cells are pre-stimulated with various cytokines and cultured 48 hours prior to the co-cultivation with the irradiated vector producing cells. Pre-stimulation prior to such transduction increases effective gene transfer (Nolta et al. (1992) Exp. Hematol. 20:1065). Stimulation of these cultures to proliferate also provides increased cell populations for re-infusion into the patient. Subsequent to co-cultivation, T cells are collected from the vector producing cell monolayer, expanded, and frozen in liquid nitrogen.
Gene transfer vectors, containing one or more synthetic expression cassette of the present invention (associated with appropriate control elements for delivery to the isolated T cells) can be assembled using known methods and following the guidance of the present specification.
Selectable markers can also be used in the construction of gene transfer vectors. For example, a marker can be used which imparts to a mammalian cell transduced with the gene transfer vector resistance to a cytotoxic agent. The cytotoxic agent can be, but is not limited to, neomycin, aminoglycoside, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, sulfonamide, actinomycin, netropsin, distamycin A, anthracycline, or pyrazinamide. For example, neomycin phosphotransferase II imparts resistance to the neomycin analogue geneticin (G418).
The T cells can also be maintained in a medium containing at least one type of growth factor prior to being selected. A variety of growth factors are known in the art which sustain the growth of a particular cell type. Examples of such growth factors are cytokine mitogens such as rIL-2, IL-10, IL-12, and IL-15, which promote growth and activation of lymphocytes. Certain types of cells are stimulated by other growth factors such as hormones, including human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and human growth hormone. The selection of an appropriate growth factor for a particular cell population is readily accomplished by one of skill in the art.
For example, white blood cells such as differentiated progenitor and stem cells are stimulated by a variety of growth factors. More particularly, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-9, GM-CSF, M-CSF, and G-CSF, produced by activated TH and activated macrophages, stimulate myeloid stem cells, which then differentiate into pluripotent stem cells, granulocyte-monocyte progenitors, eosinophil progenitors, basophil progenitors, megakaryocytes, and erythroid progenitors. Differentiation is modulated by growth factors such as GM-CSF, IL-3, IL-6, IL-11, and EPO.
Pluripotent stem cells then differentiate into lymphoid stem cells, bone marrow stromal cells, T cell progenitors, B cell progenitors, thymocytes, TH Cells, TC cells, and B cells. This differentiation is modulated by growth factors such as IL-3, IL-4, IL-6, IL-7, GM-CSF, M-CSF, G-CSF, IL-2, and IL-5.
Granulocyte-monocyte progenitors differentiate to monocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils. Such differentiation is modulated by the growth factors GM-CSF, M-CSF, and IL-8. Eosinophil progenitors differentiate into eosinophils. This process is modulated by GM-CSF and IL-5.
The differentiation of basophil progenitors into mast cells and basophils is modulated by GM-CSF, IL-4, and IL-9. Megakaryocytes produce platelets in response to GM-CSF, EPO, and IL-6. Erythroid progenitor cells differentiate into red blood cells in response to EPO.
Thus, during activation by the CD3-binding agent, T cells can also be contacted with a mitogen, for example a cytokine such as IL-2. In particularly preferred embodiments, the IL-2 is added to the population of T cells at a concentration of about 50 to 100 μg/ml. Activation with the CD3-binding agent can be carried out for 2 to 4 days.
Once suitably activated, the T cells are genetically modified by contacting the same with a suitable gene transfer vector under conditions that allow for transfection of the vectors into the T cells. Genetic modification is carried out when the cell density of the T cell population is between about 0.1×106 and 5×106, preferably between about 0.5×106 and 2×106. A number of suitable viral and nonviral-based gene transfer vectors have been described for use herein.
After transduction, transduced cells are selected away from non-transduced cells using known techniques. For example, if the gene transfer vector used in the transduction includes a selectable marker which confers resistance to a cytotoxic agent, the cells can be contacted with the appropriate cytotoxic agent, whereby non-transduced cells can be negatively selected away from the transduced cells. If the selectable marker is a cell surface marker, the cells can be contacted with a binding agent specific for the particular cell surface marker, whereby the transduced cells can be positively selected away from the population. The selection step can also entail fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) techniques, such as where FACS is used to select cells from the population containing a particular surface marker, or the selection step can entail the use of magnetically responsive particles as retrievable supports for target cell capture and/or background removal.
More particularly, positive selection of the transduced cells can be performed using a FACS cell sorter (e.g. a FACSVantage™ Cell Sorter, Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, Calif.) to sort and collect transduced cells expressing a selectable cell surface marker. Following transduction, the cells are stained with fluorescent-labeled antibody molecules directed against the particular cell surface marker. The amount of bound antibody on each cell can be measured by passing droplets containing the cells through the cell sorter. By imparting an electromagnetic charge to droplets containing the stained cells, the transduced cells can be separated from other cells. The positively selected cells are then harvested in sterile collection vessels. These cell sorting procedures are described in detail, for example, in the FACSVantage™ Training Manual, with particular reference to sections 3-11 to 3-28 and 10−1 to 10-17.
Positive selection of the transduced cells can also be performed using magnetic separation of cells based on expression or a particular cell surface marker. In such separation techniques, cells to be positively selected are first contacted with specific binding agent (e.g., an antibody or reagent the interacts specifically with the cell surface marker). The cells are then contacted with retrievable particles (e.g., magnetically responsive particles) which are coupled with a reagent that binds the specific binding agent (that has bound to the positive cells). The cell-binding agent-particle complex can then be physically separated from non-labeled cells, for example using a magnetic field. When using magnetically responsive particles, the labeled cells can be retained in a container using a magnetic filed while the negative cells are removed. These and similar separation procedures are known to those of ordinary skill in the art.
Expression of the vector in the selected transduced cells can be assessed by a number of assays known to those skilled in the art. For example, Western blot or Northern analysis can be employed depending on the nature of the inserted nucleotide sequence of interest. Once expression has been established and the transformed T cells have been tested for the presence of the selected synthetic expression cassette, they are ready for infusion into a patient via the peripheral blood stream.
The invention includes a kit for genetic modification of an ex vivo population of primary mammalian cells. The kit typically contains a gene transfer vector coding for at least one selectable marker and at least one synthetic expression cassette contained in one or more containers, ancillary reagents or hardware, and instructions for use of the kit.
2.4.3 Further Delivery Regimes
Any of the polynucleotides (e.g., expression cassettes) or polypeptides described herein (delivered by any of the methods described above) can also be used in combination with other DNA delivery systems and/or protein delivery systems. Non-limiting examples include co-administration of these molecules, for example, in prime-boost methods where one or more molecules are delivered in a “priming” step and, subsequently, one or more molecules are delivered in a “boosting” step. In certain embodiments, the delivery of one or more nucleic acid-containing compositions and is followed by delivery of one or more nucleic acid-containing compositions and/or one or more polypeptide-containing compositions (e.g., polypeptides comprising HIV antigens). In other embodiments, multiple nucleic acid “primes” (of the same or different nucleic acid molecules) can be followed by multiple polypeptide “boosts” (of the same or different polypeptides). Other examples include multiple nucleic acid administrations and multiple polypeptide administrations.
In any method involving co-administration, the various compositions can be delivered in any order. Thus, in embodiments including delivery of multiple different compositions or molecules, the nucleic acids need not be all delivered before the polypeptides. For example, the priming step may include delivery of one or more polypeptides and the boosting comprises delivery of one or more nucleic acids and/or one more polypeptides. Multiple polypeptide administrations can be followed by multiple nucleic acid administrations or polypeptide and nucleic acid administrations can be performed in any order. In any of the embodiments described herein, the nucleic acid molecules can encode all, some or none of the polypeptides. Thus, one or more or the nucleic acid molecules (e.g., expression cassettes) described herein and/or one or more of the polypeptides described herein can be co-administered in any order and via any administration routes. Therefore, any combination of polynucleotides and/or polypeptides described herein can be used to generate elicit an immune reaction.
3.0 Improved HIV-1 Gag and Pol Expression Cassettes
While not desiring to be bound by any particular model, theory, or hypothesis, the following information is presented to provide a more complete understanding of the present invention.
The world health organization (WHO) estimated the number of people worldwide that are infected with HIV-1 to exceed 36.1 million. The development of a safe and effective HIV vaccine is therefore essential at this time. Recent studies have demonstrated the importance of CTL in controlling the HIV-1 replication in infected patients. Furthermore, CTL reactivity with multiple HIV antigens will be necessary for the effective control of virus replication. Experiments performed in support of the present invention suggest that the inclusion of HIV-1 Gag and Pol, beside Env for the induction of neutralizing antibodies, into the vaccine is useful.
To increase the potency of HIV-1 vaccine candidates, codon modified Gag and Pol expression cassettes were designed, either for Gag alone or Gag plus Pol. To evaluate possible differences in expression and potency, the expression of these constructs was analyzed and immunogenicity studies carried out in mice.
Several expression cassettes encoding Gag and Pol were designed, including, but not limited to, the following: GagProtease, GagPolΔintegrase with frameshift (gagFSpol), and GagPolΔintegrase in-frame (gagpol). Versions of GagPolΔintegrase in-frame were also designed with attenuated (Att) or non-functional Protease (Ina). The nucleic acid sequences were codon modified to correspond to the codon usage of highly expressed human genes. Mice were immunized with titrated DNA doses and humoral and cellular immune responses evaluated by ELISA and intracellular cytokine staining (Example 10).
The immune responses in mice has been seen to be correlated with relative levels of expression in vitro. Vaccine studies in rhesus monkeys will further address immune responses and expression levels in vivo.
4.0 Enhanced Vaccine Technologies for the Induction of Potent Neutralizing Antibodies and Cellular Immune Responses Against HIV.
While not desiring to be bound by any particular model, theory, or hypothesis, the following information is presented to provide a more complete understanding of the present invention.
Protection against HIV infection will likely require potent and broadly reactive pre-existing neutralizing antibodies in vaccinated individuals exposed to a virus challenge. Although cellular immune responses are desirable to control viremia in those who get infected, protection against infection has not been demonstrated for vaccine approaches that rely exclusively on the induction of these responses. For this reason, experiments performed in support of the present invention use prime-boost approaches that employ novel V-deleted envelope antigens from primary HIV isolates (e.g., R5 subtype B (HIV-1SF162) and subtype C(HIV-1TV1) strains). These antigens were delivered by enhanced DNA [polyactide co-glycolide (PLG) microparticle formulations or electroporation] or alphavirus replicon particle-based vaccine approaches, followed by booster immunizations with Env proteins in MF59 adjuvant. Efficient in vivo expression of plasmid encoded genes by electrical permeabilization has been described (see, e.g., Zucchelli et al. (2000) J. Virol. 74:11598-11607; Banga et al. (1998) Trends Biotechnol. 10:408-412; Heller et al. (1996) Febs Lett. 389:225-228; Mathiesen et al. (1999) Gene Ther. 4:508-514; Mir et al. (1999) Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA 8:4262-4267; Nishi et al. (1996) Cancer Res. 5:1050-1055). Both native and V-deleted monomeric (gp120) and oligomeric (o-gp140) forms of protein from the SF162 strain were tested as boosters. All protein preparations were highly purified and extensively characterized by biophysical and immunochemical methodologies. Results from rabbit and primate immunogenicity studies indicated that, whereas neutralizing antibody responses could be consistently induced against the parental non-V2-deleted SF162 virus, the induction of responses against heterologous HIV strains improved with deletion of the V2 loop of the immunogens. Moreover, using these prime-boost vaccine regimens, potent HIV antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses were also demonstrated.
Based on these findings, V2-deleted envelope DNA and protein vaccines were chosen for advancement toward clinical evaluation. Similar approaches for immunization may be employed using, for example, nucleic acid immunization employing the synthetic HIV polynucleotides of the present invention coupled with corresponding or heterologous HIV-derived polypeptide boosts.
One embodiment of this aspect of the present invention may be described generally as follows. Antigens are selected for the vaccine composition(s). Env polypeptides are typically employed in a first antigenic composition used to induce an immune response. Further, Gag polypeptides are typically employed in a second antigenic composition used to induce an immune response. The second antigenic composition may include further HIV-derived polypeptide sequences, including, but not limited to, Pol, Tat, Rev, Nef, Vif, Vpr, and/or Vpu sequences. A DNA prime vaccination is typically performed with the first and second antigenic compositions. Further DNA vaccinations with one or more of the antigenic compositions may also be included at selected time intervals. The prime is typically followed by at least one boost. The boost may, for example, include adjuvanted HIV-derived polypeptides (e.g., corresponding to those used for the DNA vaccinations), coding sequences for HIV-derived polypeptides (e.g., corresponding to those used for the DNA vaccinations) encoded by a viral vector, further DNA vaccinations, and/or combinations of the foregoing. In one embodiment, a DNA prime is administered with a first antigenic composition (e.g., a DNA construct encoding an Envelope polypeptide) and second antigenic composition (e.g., a DNA construct encoding a Gag polypeptide, a Pol polypeptide, a Tat polypeptide, a Nef polypeptide, and a Rev polypeptide). The DNA construct for use in the prime may, for example, comprise a CMV promoter operably linked to the polynucleotide encoding the polypeptide sequence. The DNA prime is followed by a boost, for example, an adjuvanted Envelope polypeptide boost and a viral vector boost (where the viral vector encodes, e.g., a Gag polypeptide, a Pol polypeptide, a Tat polypeptide, a Nef polypeptide, and a Rev polypeptide). Alternately (or in addition), the boost may be an adjuvanted Gag polypeptide, Pol polypeptide, Tat polypeptide, Nef polypeptide, and Rev polypeptide boost and a viral vector boost (where the viral vector encodes, e.g., an Envelope polypeptide). The boost may include all polypeptide antigens which were encoded in the DNA prime; however, this is not required. Further, different polypeptide antigens may be used in the boost relative to the initial vaccination and visa versa. Further, the initial vaccination may be a viral vector rather than a DNA construct.
Some factors that may be considered in HIV envelope vaccine design are as follows. Envelope-based vaccines have demonstrated protection against infection in non-human primate models. Passive antibody studies have demonstrated protection against HIV infection in the presence of neutralizing antibodies against the virus challenge stock. Vaccines that exclude Env generally confer less protective efficacy. Experiments performed in support of the present invention have demonstrated that monomeric gp120 protein-derived from the SF2 lab strain provided neutralization of HIV-1 lab strains and protection against virus challenges in primate models. Primary gp120 protein derived from That E field strains provided cross-subtype neutralization of lab strains. Primary sub-type B oligomeric o-gp140 protein provided partial neutralization of subtype B primary (field) isolates. Primary sub-type B o-gp140ΔV2 DNA prime plus protein boost provided potent neutralization of diverse subtype B primary isolates and protection against virus challenge in primate models. Primary sub-type C o-gp140 and o-gp140ΔV2 likely provide similar results to those just described for sub-type B.
Vaccine strategies for induction of potent, broadly reactive, neutralizing antibodies may be assisted by construction of Envelope polypeptide structures that expose conserved neutralizing epitopes, for example, variable-region deletions and de-glycosylations, envelope protein-receptor complexes, rational design based on crystal structure (e.g., β-sheet deletions), and gp41-fusion domain based immunogens.
Stable CHO cell lines for envelope protein production have been developed using optimized envelope polypeptide coding sequences, including, but not limited to, the following: gp120, o-gp140, gp120ΔV2, o-gp140ΔV2, gp120ΔV1V2, o-gp140ΔV1V2.
In addition, following prime-boost regimes (such as those described above) appear to be beneficial to help reduce viral load in infected subjects, as well as possibly slow or prevent progression of HIV-related disease (relative to untreated subjects).
Exemplary antigenic compositions and immunogenicity studies are presented in Examples 9, 10, 11, and 12.
Below are examples of specific embodiments for carrying out the present invention. The examples are offered for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention in any way.
Efforts have been made to ensure accuracy with respect to numbers used (e.g., amounts, temperatures, etc.), but some experimental error and deviation should, of course, be allowed for.
A. Generating Synthetic Polynucleotides
The polynucleotide sequences of the present invention were manipulated to maximize expression of their gene products. The order of the following steps may vary.
First, the HIV-1 codon usage pattern was modified so that the resulting nucleic acid coding sequence was comparable to codon usage found in highly expressed human genes. The HIV codon usage reflects a high content of the nucleotides A or T of the codon-triplet. The effect of the HIV-1 codon usage is a high AT content in the DNA sequence that results in a high AU content in the RNA and in a decreased translation ability and instability of the mRNA. In comparison, highly expressed human codons prefer the nucleotides G or C. The wild-type sequences were modified to be comparable to codon usage found in highly expressed human genes.
Second, for some genes non-functional variants were created. In the following table (Table B) mutations affecting the activity of several HIV genes are disclosed. All references cited are herein incorporated by reference.
Constructs comprising some of these mutations are described herein. Vif, vpr and vpu synthetic constructs are described. Reducing or eliminating the function of the associated gene products can be accomplished employing the teachings set forth in the above table, in view of the teachings of the present specification.
In one embodiment of the invention, the full length coding region of the Gag-polymerase sequence is included with the synthetic Gag sequences in order to increase the number of epitopes for virus-like particles expressed by the synthetic, optimized Gag expression cassette. Because synthetic HIV-1 Gag-polymerase expresses the potentially deleterious functional enzymes reverse transcriptase (RT) and integrase (INT) (in addition to the structural proteins and protease), it is important to inactivate RT and INT functions. Several in-frame deletions in the RT and INT reading frame can be made to achieve catalytic nonfunctional enzymes with respect to their RT and INT activity. {Jay. A. Levy (Editor) (1995) The Retroviridae, Plenum Press, New York. ISBN 0-306-45033×. Pages 215-20; Grimison, B. and Laurence, J. (1995), Journal Of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes and Human Retrovirology 9(1):58-68; Wakefield, J. K., et al., (1992) Journal Of Virology 66(11):6806-6812; Esnouf, R., et al., (1995) Nature Structural Biology 2(4):303-308; Maignan, S., et al., (1998) Journal Of Molecular Biology 282(2):359-368; Katz, R. A. and Skalka, A. M. (1994) Annual Review Of Biochemistry 73 (1994); Jacobo-Molina, A., et al., (1993) Proceedings Of the National Academy Of Sciences Of the United States Of America 90(13):6320-6324; Hickman, A. B., et al., (1994) Journal Of Biological Chemistry 269(46):29279-29287; Goldgur, Y., et al., (1998) Proceedings Of the National Academy Of Sciences Of the United States Of America 95(16):9150-9154; Goette, M., et al., (1998) Journal Of Biological Chemistry 273(17):10139-10146; Gorton, J. L., et al., (1998) Journal of Virology 72(6):5046-5055; Engelman, A., et al., (1997) Journal Of Virology 71(5):3507-3514; Dyda, F., et al., Science 266(5193):1981-1986; Davies, J. F., et al., (1991) Science 252(5002):88-95; Bujacz, G., et al., (1996) Febs Letters 398(2-3):175-178; Beard, W. A., et al., (1996) Journal Of Biological Chemistry 271(21):12213-12220; Kohlstaedt, L. A., et al., (1992) Science 256(5065):1783-1790; Krug, M. S, and Berger, S. L. (1991) Biochemistry 30(44):10614-10623; Mazumder, A., et al., (1996) Molecular Pharmacology 49(4):621-628; Palaniappan, C., et al., (1997) Journal Of Biological Chemistry 272(17):11157-11164; Rodgers, D. W., et al., (1995) Proceedings Of the National Academy Of Sciences Of the United States Of America 92(4):1222-1226; Sheng, N. and Dennis, D. (1993) Biochemistry 32(18):4938-4942; Spence, R. A., et al., (1995) Science 267(5200):988-993.}
Furthermore selected B- and/or T-cell epitopes can be added to the Gag-polymerase constructs within the deletions of the RT- and INT-coding sequence to replace and augment any epitopes deleted by the functional modifications of RT and INT. Alternately, selected B- and T-cell epitopes (including CTL epitopes) from RT and INT can be included in a minimal VLP formed by expression of the synthetic Gag or synthetic GagProt cassette, described above. (For descriptions of known HIV B- and T-cell epitopes see, HIV Molecular Immunology Database CTL Search Interface; Los Alamos Sequence Compendia, 1987-1997; Internet address: http://hiv-web.lan1.gov/immunology/index.html.)
In another aspect, the present invention comprises Env coding sequences that include, but are not limited to, polynucleotide sequences encoding the following HIV-encoded polypeptides: gp160, gp140, and gp120 (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,792,459 for a description of the HIV-1SF2 (“SF2”) Env polypeptide). The relationships between these polypeptides is shown schematically in
Wild-type HIV coding sequences (e.g., Gag, Env, Pol, tat, rev, nef, vpr, vpu, vif, etc.) can be selected from any known HIV isolate and these sequences manipulated to maximize expression of their gene products following the teachings of the present invention. The wild-type coding region maybe modified in one or more of the following ways. In one embodiment, sequences encoding hypervariable regions of Env, particularly V1 and/or V2 were deleted. In other embodiments, mutations were introduced into sequences, for example, encoding the cleavage site in Env to abrogate the enzymatic cleavage of oligomeric gp140 into gp120 monomers. (See, e.g., Earl et al. (1990) PNAS USA 87:648-652; Earl et al. (1991) J. Virol. 65:31-41). In yet other embodiments, hypervariable region(s) were deleted, N-glycosylation sites were removed and/or cleavage sites mutated. As discussed above, different mutations may be introduced into the coding sequences of different genes (see, e.g., Table B). For example, Tat coding sequences were modified according to the teachings of the present specification, for example to affect the transactivation domain of the gene product (e.g., replacing a cystein residue at position 22 with a glycine, Caputo et al. (1996) Gene Therapy 3:235).
To create the synthetic coding sequences of the present invention the gene cassettes are designed to comprise the entire coding sequence of interest. Synthetic gene cassettes are constructed by oligonucleotide synthesis and PCR amplification to generate gene fragments. Primers are chosen to provide convenient restriction sites for subcloning. The resulting fragments are then ligated to create the entire desired sequence which is then cloned into an appropriate vector. The final synthetic sequences are (i) screened by restriction endonuclease digestion and analysis, (ii) subjected to DNA sequencing in order to confirm that the desired sequence has been obtained and (iii) the identity and integrity of the expressed protein confirmed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting. The synthetic coding sequences are assembled at Chiron Corp. (Emeryville, Calif.) or by the Midland Certified Reagent Company (Midland, Tex.).
Percent identity to the synthetic sequences of the present invention can be determined, for example, using the Smith-Waterman search algorithm (Time Logic, Incline Village, Nev.), with the following exemplary parameters: weight matrix=nuc4×4hb; gap opening penalty=20, gap extension penalty=5, reporting threshold=1; alignment threshold=20.
Various forms of the different embodiments of the present invention (e.g., constructs) may be combined.
Exemplary embodiments of the synthetic polynucleotides of the present invention include, but are not limited to, the sequences presented in Table C.
B. Creating Expression Cassettes Comprising the Synthetic Polynucleotides of the Present Invention.
The synthetic DNA fragments of the present invention are cloned into the following expression vectors: pCMVKm2, for transient expression assays and DNA immunization studies, the pCMVKm2 vector was derived from pCMV6a (Chapman et al., Nuc. Acids Res. (1991) 19:3979-3986) and comprises a kanamycin selectable marker, a ColE1 origin of replication, a CMV promoter enhancer and Intron A, followed by an insertion site for the synthetic sequences described below followed by a polyadenylation signal derived from bovine growth hormone—the pCMVKm2 vector differs from the pCMV-link vector only in that a polylinker site was inserted into pCMVKm2 to generate pCMV-link; pESN2dhfr and pCMVPLEdhfr (also known as pCMVIII), for expression in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells; and, pAcC13, a shuttle vector for use in the Baculovirus expression system (pAcC13, was derived from pAcC12 which was described by Munemitsu S., et al., Mol Cell Biol. 10(11):5977-5982, 1990). See, also co-owned WO 00/39303, WO 00/39302, WO 00/39304, WO 02/04493, for a description of these vectors, all herein incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Briefly, construction of pCMVPLEdhfr (pCMVIII) was as follows. To construct a DHFR cassette, the EMCV IRES (internal ribosome entry site) leader was PCR-amplified from pCite-4a+ (Novagen, Inc., Milwaukee, Wis.) and inserted into pET-23d (Novagen, Inc., Milwaukee, Wis.) as an Xba-Nco fragment to give pET-EMCV. The dhfr gene was PCR-amplified from pESN2dhfr to give a product with a Gly-Gly-Gly-Ser spacer in place of the translation stop codon and inserted as an Nco-BamH1 fragment to give pET-E-DHFR. Next, the attenuated neo gene was PCR amplified from a pSV2Neo (Clontech, Palo Alto, Calif.) derivative and inserted into the unique BamH1 site of pET-E-DHFR to give pET-E-DHFR/Neo(m2). Then, the bovine growth hormone terminator from pcDNA3 (Invitrogen, Inc., Carlsbad, Calif.) was inserted downstream of the neo gene to give pET-E-DHFR/Neo(m2)BGHt. The EMCV-dhfr/neo selectable marker cassette fragment was prepared by cleavage of pET-E-DHFR/Neo(m2)BGHt. The CMV enhancer/promoter plus Intron A was transferred from pCMV6a (Chapman et al., Nuc. Acids Res. (1991) 19:3979-3986) as a HindIII-Sal1 fragment into pUC19 (New England Biolabs, Inc., Beverly, Mass.). The vector backbone of pUC19 was deleted from the Nde1 to the Sap1 sites. The above described DHFR cassette was added to the construct such that the EMCV IRES followed the CMV promoter to produce the final construct. The vector also contained an ampr gene and an SV40 origin of replication.
Expression vectors of the present invention contain one or more of the synthetic coding sequences disclosed herein, e.g., shown in the Figures. When the expression cassette contains more than one coding sequence the coding sequences may all be in-frame to generate one polyprotein; alternately, the more than one polypeptide coding sequences may comprise a polycistronic message where, for example, an IRES is placed 5′ to each polypeptide coding sequence.
The wild-type sequences are cloned into expression vectors having the same features as the vectors into which the synthetic HIV-derived sequences were cloned.
Expression efficiencies for various vectors carrying the wild-type (any known isolated) and corresponding synthetic sequence(s) are evaluated as follows. Cells from several mammalian cell lines (293, RD, COS-7, and CHO; all obtained from the American Type Culture Collection, 10801 University Boulevard, Manassas, Va. 20110-2209) are transfected with 2 mg of DNA in transfection reagent LT1 (PanVera Corporation, 545 Science Dr., Madison, Wis.). The cells are incubated for 5 hours in reduced serum medium (Opti-MEM, Gibco-BRL, Gaithersburg, Md.). The medium is then replaced with normal medium as follows: 293 cells, IMDM, 10% fetal calf serum, 2% glutamine (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, Md.); RD and COS-7 cells, D-MEM, 10% fetal calf serum, 2% glutamine (Opti-MEM, Gibco-BRL, Gaithersburg, Md.); and CHO cells, Ham's F-12, 10% fetal calf serum, 2% glutamine (Opti-MEM, Gibco-BRL, Gaithersburg, Md.). The cells are incubated for either 48 or 60 hours. Supernatants are harvested and filtered through 0.45 nm syringe filters and, optionally, stored at −20° C.
Supernatants are evaluated using the Coulter p24-assay (Coulter Corporation, Hialeah, Fla., US), using 96-well plates coated with a suitable monoclonal antibody directed against an HIV antigen (e.g, a murine monoclonal directed again an HIV core antigen). The appropriate HIV antigen binds to the coated wells and biotinylated antibodies against HIV recognize the bound antigen. Conjugated strepavidin-horseradish peroxidase reacts with the biotin. Color develops from the reaction of peroxidase with TMB substrate. The reaction is terminated by addition of 4NH2SO4. The intensity of the color is directly proportional to the amount of HIV antigen in a sample.
Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells are also transfected with plasmid DNA encoding the synthetic HIV polypeptides described herein (e.g., pESN2dhfr or pCMVIII vector backbone) using Mirus TransIT-LT1 polyamine transfection reagent (Pan Vera) according to the manufacturers instructions and incubated for 96 hours. After 96 hours, media is changed to selective media (F12 special with 250 μg/ml G418) and cells are split 1:5 and incubated for an additional 48 hours. Media is changed every 5-7 days until colonies start forming at which time the colonies are picked, plated into 96 well plates and screened by Capture ELISA. Positive clones are expanded in 24 well plates and are screened several times for HIV protein production by Capture ELISA, as described above. After reaching confluency in 24 well plates, positive clones are expanded to T25 flasks (Corning, Corning, N.Y.). These are screened several times after confluency and positive clones are expanded to T75 flasks. Positive T75 clones are frozen in LN2 and the highest expressing clones are amplified with 0-5 μM methotrexate (MTX) at several concentrations and plated in 100 mm culture dishes. Plates are screened for colony formation and all positive closed are again expanded as described above. Clones are expanded an amplified and screened at each step capture ELISA. Positive clones are frozen at each methotrexate level. Highest producing clones are grown in perfusion bioreactors (3 L, 100 L) for expansion and adaptation to low serum suspension culture conditions for scale-up to larger bioreactors.
Data from experiments performed in support of the present invention show that the synthetic HIV expression cassettes provided dramatic increases in production of their protein products, relative to the native (wild-type) sequences, when expressed in a variety of cell lines and that stably transfected CHO cell lines, which express the desired HIV polypeptide(s), may be produced. Production of HIV polypeptides using CHO cells provides (i) correct glycosylation patterns and protein conformation (as determined by binding to panel of MAbs); (ii) correct binding to CD4 receptor molecules; (iii) absence of non-mammalian cell contaminants (e.g., insect viruses and/or cells); and (iv) ease of purification.
Western blot analysis of cells transfected with the HIV expression cassettes described herein are performed essentially as described in co-owned WO 00/39302. Briefly, human 293 cells are transfected as described in Example 2 with pCMV6a-based vectors containing native or synthetic HIV expression cassettes. Cells are cultivated for 60 hours post-transfection. Supernatants are prepared as described. Cell lysates are prepared as follows. The cells are washed once with phosphate-buffered saline, lysed with detergent [1% NP40 (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.) in 0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.5], and the lysate transferred into fresh tubes. SDS-polyacrylamide gels (pre-cast 8-16%; Novex, San Diego, Calif.) are loaded with 20 μl of supernatant or 12.5 μl of cell lysate. A protein standard is also loaded (5 μl, broad size range standard; BioRad Laboratories, Hercules, Calif.). Electrophoresis is carried out and the proteins are transferred using a BioRad Transfer Chamber (BioRad Laboratories, Hercules, Calif.) to Immobilon P membranes (Millipore Corp., Bedford, Mass.) using the transfer buffer recommended by the manufacturer (Millipore), where the transfer is performed at 100 volts for 90 minutes. The membranes are exposed to HIV-1-positive human patient serum and immunostained using o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride (OPD; Sigma).
The results of the immunoblotting analysis are used to show that cells containing the synthetic HIV expression cassette produce the expected HIV-polypeptide(s) at higher per-cell concentrations than cells containing the native expression cassette.
A. Immunization
To evaluate the immunogenicity of the synthetic HIV expression cassettes, a mouse study may be performed. The plasmid DNA, e.g., pCMVKM2 carrying an expression cassette comprising a synthetic sequence of the present invention, is diluted to the following final concentrations in a total injection volume of 100 μl: 20 μg, 2 μg, 0.2 μg, and 0.02 μg. To overcome possible negative dilution effects of the diluted DNA, the total DNA concentration in each sample is brought up to 20 μg using the vector (pCMVKM2) alone. As a control, plasmid DNA comprising an expression cassette encoding the native, corresponding polypeptide is handled in the same manner. Twelve groups of four Balb/c mice (Charles River, Boston, Mass.) are intramuscularly immunized (50 μl per leg, intramuscular injection into the tibialis anterior) using varying dosages.
B. Humoral Immune Response
The humoral immune response is checked with a suitable anti-HIV antibody ELISAs (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays) of the mice sera 0 and 4 weeks post immunization (groups 5-12) and, in addition, 6 and 8 weeks post immunization, respectively, 2 and 4 weeks post second immunization (groups 1-4).
The antibody titers of the sera are determined by anti-HIV antibody ELISA. Briefly, sera from immunized mice were screened for antibodies directed against an appropriate HIV protein (e.g., HIV p55 for Gag). ELISA microtiter plates are coated with 0.2 μg of HIV protein per well overnight and washed four times; subsequently, blocking is done with PBS-0.2% Tween (Sigma) for 2 hours. After removal of the blocking solution, 100 μl of diluted mouse serum is added. Sera are tested at 1/25 dilutions and by serial 3-fold dilutions, thereafter. Microtiter plates are washed four times and incubated with a secondary, peroxidase-coupled anti-mouse IgG antibody (Pierce, Rockford, Ill.). ELISA plates are washed and 100 μl of 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethyl benzidine (TMB; Pierce) was added per well. The optical density of each well is measured after 15 minutes. The titers reported are the reciprocal of the dilution of serum that gave a half-maximum optical density (O.D.).
The results of the mouse immunizations with plasmid-DNAs are used to show that the synthetic expression cassettes provide improvement of immunogenicity relative to the native expression cassettes. Also, the second boost immunization induces a secondary immune response after two weeks (groups 1-3).
C. Cellular Immune Response
The frequency of specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTL) is evaluated by a standard chromium release assay of peptide pulsed Balb/c mouse CD4 cells. HIV protein-expressing vaccinia virus infected CD-8 cells are used as a positive control (vv-protein). Briefly, spleen cells (Effector cells, E) are obtained from the BALB/c mice (immunized as described above). The cells are cultured, restimulated, and assayed for CTL activity against, e.g., Gag peptide-pulsed target cells as described (Doe, B., and Walker, C. M., AIDS 10(7):793-794, 1996). Cytotoxic activity is measured in a standard 51Cr release assay. Target (T) cells are cultured with effector (E) cells at various E:T ratios for 4 hours and the average cpm from duplicate wells is used to calculate percent specific 51Cr release.
Cytotoxic T-cell (CTL) activity is measured in splenocytes recovered from the mice immunized with HIV DNA constructs described herein. Effector cells from the DNA-immunized animals exhibit specific lysis of HIV peptide-pulsed SV-BALB (MHC matched) targets cells indicative of a CTL response. Target cells that are peptide-pulsed and derived from an MHC-unmatched mouse strain (MC57) are not lysed. The results of the CTL assays are used to show increased potency of synthetic HIV expression cassettes for induction of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) responses by DNA immunization.
A. General Immunization Methods
To evaluate the immunogenicity of the synthetic HIV expression cassettes, studies using guinea pigs, rabbits, mice, rhesus macaques and baboons are performed. The studies are typically structured as follows: DNA immunization alone (single or multiple); DNA immunization followed by protein immunization (boost); DNA immunization followed by Sindbis particle immunization; immunization by Sindbis particles alone.
B. Guinea Pigs
Experiments may be performed using guinea pigs as follows. Groups comprising six guinea pigs each are immunized intramuscularly or mucosally at 0, 4, and 12 weeks with plasmid DNAs encoding expression cassettes comprising one or more the sequences described herein. The animals are subsequently boosted at approximately 18 weeks with a single dose (intramuscular, intradermally or mucosally) of the HIV protein encoded by the sequence(s) of the plasmid boost and/or other HIV proteins. Antibody titers (geometric mean titers) are measured at two weeks following the third DNA immunization and at two weeks after the protein boost. These results are used to demonstrate the usefulness of the synthetic constructs to generate immune responses, as well as, the advantage of providing a protein boost to enhance the immune response following DNA immunization.
C. Rabbits
Experiments may be performed using rabbits as follows. Rabbits are immunized intramuscularly, mucosally, or intradermally (using a Bioject needless syringe) with plasmid DNAs encoding the HIV proteins described herein. The nucleic acid immunizations are followed by protein boosting after the initial immunization. Typically, constructs comprising the synthetic HIV-polypeptide-encoding polynucleotides of the present invention are highly immunogenic and generate substantial antigen binding antibody responses after only 2 immunizations in rabbits.
D. Humoral Immune Response
In any immunized animal model, the humoral immune response is checked in serum specimens from the immunized animals with an anti-HIV antibody ELISAs (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays) at various times post-immunization. The antibody titers of the sera are determined by anti-HIV antibody ELISA as described above. Briefly, sera from immunized animals are screened for antibodies directed against the HIV polypeptide/protein(s) encoded by the DNA and/or polypeptide used to immunize the animals. Wells of ELISA microtiter plates are coated overnight with the selected HIV polypeptide/protein and washed four times; subsequently, blocking is done with PBS-0.2% Tween (Sigma) for 2 hours. After removal of the blocking solution, 100 μl of diluted mouse serum is added. Sera are tested at 1/25 dilutions and by serial 3-fold dilutions, thereafter. Microtiter plates are washed four times and incubated with a secondary, peroxidase-coupled anti-mouse IgG antibody (Pierce, Rockford, Ill.). ELISA plates are washed and 100 μl of 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethyl benzidine (TMB; Pierce) was added per well. The optical density of each well is measured after 15 minutes. Titers are typically reported as the reciprocal of the dilution of serum that gave a half-maximum optical density (O.D.).
Cellular immune response may also be evaluated.
A. Baboons
Four baboons are immunized 3 times (weeks 0, 4 and 8) bilaterally, intramuscular into the quadriceps or mucosally using the gene delivery vehicles described herein. The animals are bled two weeks after each immunization and an HIV antibody ELISA is performed with isolated plasma. The ELISA is performed essentially as described above except the second antibody-conjugate is an anti-human IgG, g-chain specific, peroxidase conjugate (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Md. 63178) used at a dilution of 1:500. Fifty μg/ml yeast extract may be added to the dilutions of plasma samples and antibody conjugate to reduce non-specific background due to preexisting yeast antibodies in the baboons. Lymphoproliferative responses to are observed in baboons two weeks post-fourth immunization (at week 14), and enhanced substantially post-boosting with HIV-polypeptide (at week 44 and 76). Such proliferation results are indicative of induction of T-helper cell functions.
B. Rhesus Macaques
The improved potency of the synthetic, codon-modified HIV-polypeptide encoding polynucleotides of the present invention, when constructed into expression plasmids may be confirmed in rhesus macaques. Typically, the macaques have detectable HIV-specific CTL after two or three 1 mg doses of modified HIV polynucleotide. In sum, these results demonstrate that the synthetic HIV DNA is immunogenic in non-human primates. Neutralizing antibodies may also detected.
The present invention includes co-transfection with multiple, monocistronic expression cassettes, as well as, co-transfection with one or more multi-cistronic expression cassettes, or combinations thereof.
Such constructs, in a variety of combinations, may be transfected into 293T cells for transient transfection studies.
For example, a bicistronic construct may be made where the coding sequences for the different HIV polypeptides are under the control of a single CMV promoter and, between the two coding sequences, an IRES (internal ribosome entry site (EMCV IRES); Kozak, M., Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 27(45):385-402, 1992; Witherell, G. W., et al., Virology 214:660-663, 1995) sequence is introduced after the first HIV coding sequence and before the second HIV coding sequence.
Supernatants collected from cell culture are tested for the presence of the HIV proteins and indicate that appropriate proteins are expressed in the transfected cells (e.g., if an Env coding sequence was present the corresponding Env protein was detected; if a Gag coding sequence was present the corresponding Gag protein was detected, etc).
The production of chimeric VLPs by these cell lines may be determined using electron microscopic analysis. (See, e.g., co-owned WO 00/39302).
The HIV-1 regulatory and accessory genes have received increased attention as components of HIV vaccines due to their role in viral pathogenesis, the high ratio of highly conserved CTL epitopes and their early expression in the viral life cycle. Because of various undesirable properties of these genes, questions regarding their safety and suitability as vaccine components have been raised. Experiments performed in support of the present invention have analyzed candidate HIV-1 subtype C tat, rev, and nef mutants for efficient expression and inactivation of potential deleterious functions. Other HIV subtype accessory genes may be evaluated similarly.
Sequence-modified, mutant tat, rev, and nef genes coding for consensus Tat, Rev and Nef proteins of South African HIV-1 subtype C were constructed using overlapping synthetic oligonucleotides and PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis. Constructs of the wild-type genes of the isolates closely resembling the respective consensus sequences were also made by PCR. In vitro expression of the constructs was analyzed by western blotting. The trans-activation activity of the Tat mutants and nuclear RNA export activity of the Rev mutants were studied after transfection of various cell lines using reporter-gene-based functionality assays.
In vitro expression of all constructs was demonstrated by western blotting using antigen specific mouse serum generated by DNA vaccination of mice with Tat, Rev, or Nef-expression plasmids. Expression levels of the sequence-modified genes were significantly higher than the wild-type genes.
Subtype B and C Tat cDNA was mutated to get TatC22, TatC37, and TatC22/37. Tat activity assays in three cell lines (RD, HeLa and 293). In the background of the subtype C consensus Tat, a single mutation at C22 was insufficient to inactivate LTR-dependent CAT expression. In contrast, this activity was significantly impaired in RD, 293 and HeLa cells using the single mutation, C37, or the double mutation, C22C37 (see Table B). Corresponding results were obtained for Tat mutants derived from subtype B strains.
Exemplary results are presented in
The subtype C constructs TatC22ProtRTTatRevNef and ProtRTTatC22RevNef showed reduced Tat activity when compared to TatC22 alone, probably due to structural changes caused by the fusion protein.
For Rev constructs, to test for the loss of function, a CAT assay with a reporter plasmid including native or mutated Rev was used. As shown in
Assays to measure Nef-specific functions may also be performed (Nef mutations are described in Table B). For example, FACs analysis is used to look for the presence of MHC1 and CD4 on cell surfaces. Cells are assayed in the presence and absence of Nef expression (for controls), as well as using the synthetic polynucleotides of the present invention that encode native nef protein and mutated nef protein. Down-regulation of MHC1 and CD4 expression indicates that the nef gene product is not functional, i.e., if nef is non-functional there is no down regulation.
These data demonstrate the impaired functionality of tat and rev DNA immunogens that may form part of a multi-component HIV-1 subtype C vaccine. In contrast to previous published data by other groups, the C22 mutation did not sufficiently inactivate the transactivation function of Tat. The C37 mutation appeared to be required for inactivation of subtype C and subtype B Tat proteins.
As noted above, the immunogenicity of any of the polynucleotides or expression cassettes described herein is readily evaluated. In the following table (Table D) are exemplified procedures involving a comparison of the immunogenicity of subtype B and C envelope plasmids, both individually and as a mixed-subtype vaccine, using electroporation, in rabbits. It will be apparent that such methods are equally applicable to any other HIV polypeptide.
The MF59C adjuvant is a microfluidized emulsion containing 5% squalene, 0.5% Tween 80, 0.5% span 85, in 10 mM citrate pH 6, stored in 10 mL aliquots at 4° c.
Immunogens are prepared as described in the following table (Table E) for administration to animals in the various groups. Concentrations may vary from those described in the table, for example depending on the sequences and/or proteins being used.
The immunization (Table F) and bleeding (Table G) schedules are as follows:
Cellular and Humoral immune responses were evaluated in mice (essentially as described in Example 4) for the following constructs: Gag, GagProtease (+FS) (GP1, protease codon optimized and inactivation of INS; GP2, protease only inactivation of INS), GagPolΔintegrase with frameshift (gagFSpol), and GagPolΔintegrase in-frame (GagPol) (see
In vitro expression data showed comparable expression of p55Gag and p66RT using Gag alone, GagProtease (+FS), GagFSpol and GagPolIna. Constructs with fully functional or attenuated protease (GagPol or GagPolAtt) were less efficient in expression of p55Gag and p66RT, possibly due to cytotoxic effects of protease.
DNA immunization of mice using Gag vs. GP1 and GP2 in pCMV vectors was performed intramuscularly in the tibialis anterior. Mice were immunized at the start of the study (0 week) and 4 weeks later. Bleeds were performed at 0, 4, and 6 weeks. DNA doses used were as follows: 20 μg, 2 μg, 0.2 μg, and 0.02 μg.
DNA immunization of mice using Gag vs. gagFSpol in pCMV vectors was performed intramuscularly in the tibialis anterior. Mice were immunized at the start of the study (0 week) and challenged 4 weeks later with recombinant vaccinia virus encoding Gag (rVVgag). Bleeds were performed at 0 and 4 weeks. DNA doses used were as follows: 20 μg, 2 μg, 0.2 μg, and 0.02 μg.
DNA immunization of mice using Gag vs. gagFSpol and gagpol in pCMV vectors was performed intramuscularly in the tibialis anterior. Mice were immunized at the start of the study (0 week) and challenged 4 weeks later with recombinant vaccinia virus encoding Gag (rVVgag). Bleeds were performed at 0 and 4 weeks. DNA doses used were as follows: 2 μg, 0.2 μg, 0.02 μg, and 0.002 μg.
Cellular immune responses against Gag were comparable for all tested variants, for example, Gag, GagProtease, gagFSpol and GagPolIna all had comparable potencies.
Humoral immune responses to Gag were also comparable with the exception of GP2 and especially GP1. Humoral immune responses were weaker in constructs comprising functional or attenuated proteases which may be due to less efficient secretion of p55Gag caused by overactive protease.
In vitro and in vivo experiments, performed in support of the present invention, suggest that the expression and immunogenicity of Gag was comparable with all constructs. Exceptions were GagPol in-frame with fully functional or attenuated protease. This may be the result of cytotoxic effects of protease. The immune response in mice correlated with relative levels of expression in vitro.
Envelope (Env) vaccines derived from the subtype C primary isolate, TV1, recovered from a South African individual, were tested in rabbits as follows. Gene cassettes were designed to express the gp120 (surface antigen), gp140 (surface antigen plus ectodomain of transmembrane protein, gp41), and full-length (gp120 plus gp41) gp160 forms of the HIV-1 envelope polyprotein with and without deletions of the variable loop regions, V2 and V1V2. All of the genes were sequence-modified to enhance expression of the encoded Env glycoproteins in a Rev-independent fashion and they were subsequently cloned into pCMV-based plasmid vectors for DNA vaccine and protein production applications as described above. The sequences were codon optimized as described herein. Briefly, all the modified envelope genes were cloned into the Chiron pCMVlink plasmid vector, preferably into EcoRI/XhoI sites.
A. Protein Expression
Full-length (gp160), truncated gp140 (Env ectodomain only) and gp120 native versions of the TV1 Env antigen were produced from the expression cassettes described herein. The gp140 encoding sequences were transiently transfected into 293T cells. The expression levels of the gene products were evaluated by an in-house antigen capture ELISA. Envelope genes constructed from the native sequences of TV001c8.2, TV001c8.5 and TV002c12.1 expressed the correct proteins in vitro, with gp140TV001c8.2 exhibiting the highest level of expression. In addition, the Env protein expressed from the TV1-derived clone 8.2 was found to bind the CD4 receptor protein indicating that this feature of the expressed protein is maintained in a functional conformation. The receptor binding properties/functionality of the expressed TV1 gp160 protein result was also confirmed by a cell-fusion assay.
Total expression increased approximately 10-fold for synthetic gp140 constructs compared with the native gp140 gene cassettes. Both the modified gp120 and gp140 variants secreted high amounts of protein in the supernatant. In addition, the V2 and V1V2 deleted forms of gp140 expressed approximately 2-fold more protein than the intact gp140. Overall, the expression levels of synthetic gp140 gene variants increased 10 to 26-fold compared with the gp140 gene with native sequences.
In sum, each synthetic construct tested showed more than 10-fold increased levels of expression relative to those using the native coding sequences. Moreover, all expressed proteins were of the expected molecular weights and were shown to bind CD4. Stable CHO cell lines were derived and small-scale protein purification methods were used to produce small quantities of each of the undeleted and V-deleted oligomeric forms (o-gp140) of these proteins for vaccine studies.
B. Neutralization Properties of TV001 and TV002 Viral Isolates
The transient expression experiment showed that the envelope genes derived from the TV001 and TV002 virus isolates expressed the desired protein products. Relative neutralization sensitivities of these two viral strains using sera from 18 infected South African individuals (subtypes B and C) were as follows. At a 1:10 serum dilution, the TV2 strain was neutralized by 18 of 18 sera; at 1:50, 16 of 18; at 1:250, 15/18. In comparison, the TV1 isolate was neutralized by 15 of 18 at 1:10; only 6 of 18 at 1:50; and none of the specimens at 1:250. In addition, the TV001 patient serum showed neutralization activity against the TV002 isolate at all dilutions tested. In contrast, the TV002 showed neutralization of TV001 only at the 1:10 serum dilution. These results suggest that TV001 isolate is capable of inducing a broader and more potent neutralizing antibody response in its infected host than TV002.
C Immunogenicity of the Modified TV1 Env DNA and Protein Antigens in Rabbit Studies
TV1 Env DNA (comprising the synthetic expression cassettes) and protein vaccines were administrated as shown in the following Table H.
Seven groups of 4 rabbits per group were immunized with the designated plasmid DNA and oligomeric Env protein antigens. Three doses of DNA, 1 mg of DNA per animal per immunization, were administrated intramuscularly by needle injection followed by electroporation on weeks 0, 4, and 20 weeks. A single dose of 100 ug of Env protein in MF59 adjuvant also was given intramuscularly in a separate site at 20 weeks.
The DNA immunization used subtype C sequence-modified genes (TV1)—gp160, gp160dV2, gp160dV1V2, gp140, gp140dV2 and gp140dV1V2—as well as a subtype B SF162 sequence modified gp140dV2. DNA immunizations were performed at 0, 4, and 20 weeks by needle injection by the intramuscular route using electroporation to facilitate transfection of the muscle cells and of resident antigen presenting cells.
A single Env protein booster (in MF59 adjuvant) was given at 20 weeks by intramuscular injection at a separate site. Antibody titers were evaluated by ELISA following each successive immunization. Serum specimens were collected at 0, 4, 6, 8, 12, 22, and 24 weeks. Serum antibody titers were measured on ELISA. 96-well plates were coated with a protein in a concentration of 1 ug/ml. Serum samples were diluted serially 3-fold. Goat anti-rabbit peroxidase conjugate (1:20,000) was used for detection. TMB was used as the substrate, and the antibody titers were read at 0.6 OD at 450 nm.
Neutralizing antibody responses against PBMC-grown R5HIV-1 strains were monitored in the sera collected from the immunized rabbits using two different assays in two different laboratories, the 5.25 reporter cell-line based assay at Chiron and the PBMC-based assay of David Montefiori at Duke University. Results are shown in
In
For the data presented in
Binding antibody titers were also measured using ELISA plates coated with either oligomeric subtype C o-gp140dV2.TV1 or subtype B o-gp140dV2.SF162 proteins (
The results indicate that the subtype C TV1-derived Env DNA and protein antigens are immunogenic inducing high titers of antibodies in immunized rabbits and substantial evidence of neutralizing antibodies against both subtype B and subtype C R5 virus strains. In particular, the gp140dV2.TV1 antigens have induced consistent neutralizing responses against the subtype B SF162Env_V2 and subtype C TV2 strains. Thus, TV1-based Env DNA and protein-based antigens are immunogenic and induce high titer antibody responses reactive with both subtype C and subtype B HIV-1 Env antigens. Neutralizing antibody responses against the neutralization sensitive subtype B R5HIV-1SF162_V2 strain were observed in some groups after only two DNA immunizations. Following a single booster immunization with Env protein, the majority of rabbits in groups that received V2-deleted forms of the TV1 Env showed neutralization activity against the closely related subtype C TV2 primary strain.
Cellular and humoral immune responses were evaluated in three groups of rhesus macaques (each group was made up of four animals) in an immunization study structured as shown in Table I. The route of administration for the immunizing composition was electroporation in each case. Antibody titers are shown in Table I for two weeks post-second immunization.
Pre-immune sera were obtained at week 0 before the first immunization. The first immunization was given at week 0. The second immunization was given at week 4. The first bleed was performed at 2 weeks post-second immunization (i.e., at week 6). A third immunization will be given at week 8 and a fourth at week 16. Animals 2A, 3A, 3B and 3D had been vaccinated previously (approximately 4 years or more) with gag plasmid DNA or gag VLP (subtype B).
Bulk CTL, 51Cr-release assays, and flow cell cytometry methods were used to obtain the data in Tables J and K. Reagents used for detecting gag- and pol-specific T-cells were (i) synthetic, overlapping peptides spanning “gagCpol” antigen (n=377), typically the peptides were pools of 15-mers with overlap by 11, the pools were as follows, pool 1, n=1-82, pool 2, n=83-164, pool 3, n=165-271, pool 4, n=272-377, accordingly pools 1 and 2 are “gag”-specific, and pools 3 and 4 are “pol”-specific, and (ii) recombinant vaccinia virus (rVV), for example, rVVgag965, rVVp2Po1975 (contains p2p7gag975), and VVwrparent.
Gag-specific IFNγ+CD8+ T-cells, Gag-specific IFNγ+CD4+ T-cells, Pol-specific IFNγ+CD8+ T-cells, and Pol-specific IFNγ+CD4+ T-cells in blood were determined for each animal described in Table I above, post second immunization. The results are presented in Tables J and K. It is possible that some of the pol-specific activity shown in Table K was directed against p2p7gag.
These results support that the constructs of the present invention are capable of generating specific cellular and humoral responses against the selected HIV-polypeptide antigens.
Although preferred embodiments of the subject invention have been described in some detail, it is understood that obvious variations can be made without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application is Continuation of Ser. No. 13/399,977 filed Feb. 17, 2012, which is a Continuation of Ser. No. 11/724,050, filed Mar. 13, 2007 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,133,494) which is a Divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/190,435 filed Jul. 5, 2012, (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,211,659), which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/316,860, filed Aug. 31, 2001, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/349,871, filed Jan. 16, 2002, all of which are incorporated herein by referenced in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| RE33653 | Mark et al. | Jul 1991 | E |
| 5032510 | Kovacevic et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5128319 | Arlinghaus | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5256767 | Salk et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5304472 | Bass et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5364773 | Paoletti et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5419900 | Lane et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5503833 | Redmond et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5550280 | Dao-Cong et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5637677 | Greene et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5665569 | Ohno | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5665720 | Young et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5670152 | Weiner et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5683864 | Houghton et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5686078 | Becker et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5693755 | Buonagurio et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5712088 | Houghton et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5714596 | Houghton et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5728520 | Weiner et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5741492 | Hurwitz et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5750373 | Garrard et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5766845 | Weiner et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5817637 | Weiner et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5837242 | Holliger et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5837818 | Buonagurio et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5853736 | Becker et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5858675 | Hillman et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5866320 | Rovinski et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5871747 | Gengoux-Sedlik et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5879907 | Aberg et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5879925 | Rovinski et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5889176 | Rovinski et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5932445 | Lal et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5951975 | Falo, Jr. et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5955342 | Rovinski et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5965726 | Pavlakis et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5972596 | Pavlakis et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6001977 | Chang et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6004763 | Gengoux et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6025125 | Rovinski et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6060273 | Dirks et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6060587 | Weiner et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6063384 | Morrow et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6074636 | Nichols | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6080408 | Rovinski et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6087486 | Weiner et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6093800 | Reiter et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6096505 | Selby et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6099847 | Tobin et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6114148 | Seed et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6132973 | Lal et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6139833 | Burgess et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6140059 | Schawaller | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6146635 | Cano et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6172201 | Weiner et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6174666 | Pavlakis et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6214804 | Felgner et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6291157 | Rovinski et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6291664 | Pavlakis et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6316253 | Innis et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6331404 | Berman et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6689879 | Barnett et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 187041 | Jul 1986 | EP |
| 199301 | Oct 1986 | EP |
| 242216 | Oct 1987 | EP |
| 314317 | May 1989 | EP |
| 449116 | Oct 1991 | EP |
| 617132 | Sep 1994 | EP |
| WO-8603224 | Jun 1986 | WO |
| WO-8702775 | May 1987 | WO |
| WO-8800471 | Jan 1988 | WO |
| WO-8810300 | Dec 1988 | WO |
| WO-8901940 | Mar 1989 | WO |
| WO-8902277 | Mar 1989 | WO |
| WO-8902922 | Apr 1989 | WO |
| WO-8903222 | Apr 1989 | WO |
| WO-9002568 | Mar 1990 | WO |
| WO-9003984 | Apr 1990 | WO |
| WO-9010438 | Sep 1990 | WO |
| WO-9011092 | Oct 1990 | WO |
| WO-9011359 | Oct 1990 | WO |
| WO-9012094 | Oct 1990 | WO |
| WO-9015141 | Dec 1990 | WO |
| WO-9104273 | Apr 1991 | WO |
| WO-9106319 | May 1991 | WO |
| WO-9107425 | May 1991 | WO |
| WO-9107510 | May 1991 | WO |
| WO-9113360 | Sep 1991 | WO |
| WO-9113906 | Sep 1991 | WO |
| WO-9115238 | Oct 1991 | WO |
| WO-9115512 | Oct 1991 | WO |
| WO-9116926 | Nov 1991 | WO |
| WO-9118928 | Dec 1991 | WO |
| WO-9119803 | Dec 1991 | WO |
| WO-9203475 | Mar 1992 | WO |
| WO-9204046 | Mar 1992 | WO |
| WO-9205799 | Apr 1992 | WO |
| WO-9302102 | Feb 1993 | WO |
| WO-9304090 | Mar 1993 | WO |
| WO-9308836 | May 1993 | WO |
| WO-9314789 | Aug 1993 | WO |
| WO-9320212 | Oct 1993 | WO |
| WO-9321346 | Oct 1993 | WO |
| WO-9323569 | Nov 1993 | WO |
| WO-9404574 | Mar 1994 | WO |
| WO-9407922 | Apr 1994 | WO |
| WO-9411523 | May 1994 | WO |
| WO-9413804 | Jun 1994 | WO |
| WO-9415621 | Jul 1994 | WO |
| WO-9416060 | Jul 1994 | WO |
| WO-9416737 | Aug 1994 | WO |
| WO-9418221 | Aug 1994 | WO |
| WO-9420141 | Sep 1994 | WO |
| WO-9426040 | Sep 1994 | WO |
| WO-9422477 | Oct 1994 | WO |
| WO-9426293 | Nov 1994 | WO |
| WO-9429339 | Dec 1994 | WO |
| WO-9503407 | Feb 1995 | WO |
| WO-9504818 | Feb 1995 | WO |
| WO-9511317 | Apr 1995 | WO |
| WO-9511701 | May 1995 | WO |
| WO-9524485 | Sep 1995 | WO |
| WO-9525124 | Sep 1995 | WO |
| WO-9527505 | Oct 1995 | WO |
| WO-9529700 | Nov 1995 | WO |
| WO-9533206 | Dec 1995 | WO |
| WO-9533835 | Dec 1995 | WO |
| WO-9602273 | Feb 1996 | WO |
| WO-9602557 | Feb 1996 | WO |
| WO-9604382 | Feb 1996 | WO |
| WO-9609066 | Mar 1996 | WO |
| WO-9609378 | Mar 1996 | WO |
| WO-9616178 | May 1996 | WO |
| WO-9620732 | Jul 1996 | WO |
| WO-9623509 | Aug 1996 | WO |
| WO-9625177 | Aug 1996 | WO |
| WO-9640290 | Dec 1996 | WO |
| WO-9703198 | Jan 1997 | WO |
| WO-9711605 | Apr 1997 | WO |
| WO-9726009 | Jul 1997 | WO |
| WO-9731115 | Aug 1997 | WO |
| WO-9808539 | Mar 1998 | WO |
| WO-9841536 | Sep 1998 | WO |
| WO-9841645 | Sep 1998 | WO |
| WO-9843182 | Oct 1998 | WO |
| WO-9848843 | Nov 1998 | WO |
| WO-9859074 | Dec 1998 | WO |
| WO-9902694 | Jan 1999 | WO |
| WO-9906599 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| WO-9909412 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| WO-9912416 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| WO-9913864 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| WO-9916883 | Apr 1999 | WO |
| WO-9933346 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| WO-9941397 | Aug 1999 | WO |
| WO-9941398 | Aug 1999 | WO |
| WO-9952463 | Oct 1999 | WO |
| WO-9953960 | Oct 1999 | WO |
| WO-9967395 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| WO-0008043 | Feb 2000 | WO |
| WO-0015819 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| WO-0018929 | Apr 2000 | WO |
| WO-0021556 | Apr 2000 | WO |
| WO-0039302 | Jul 2000 | WO |
| WO-0039303 | Jul 2000 | WO |
| WO-0039304 | Jul 2000 | WO |
| WO-0044926 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| WO-0065076 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO-0066179 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO-0067761 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO-0067787 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO-0071561 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO-0102607 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| WO-0112223 | Feb 2001 | WO |
| WO-0116342 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO-0119958 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO-0121270 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO-0126681 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| WO-0129225 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| WO-0136624 | May 2001 | WO |
| WO-0142308 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO-0143693 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO-0145748 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO-0146408 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO-0147955 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO-0154701 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO-0154719 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO-0160393 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO-0160838 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO-0204493 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Engelbrecht, S., et al., 2001, Genetic analysis of the complete gag and env genes of HIV type 1 subtype C primary isolates from South Africa, AIDS Res. Human Retrovir. 17(16):1533-1547. |
| Lee, S.-K., et al., 2000, A single point mutation in HIV-1 V3 loop alters the immunogenic properties of rgp120, Arch. Virol. 145:2087-2103. |
| Huang, W., et al., Jun. 2008, Coreceptor tropism can be influenced by amino acid substitutions in the gp41 transmembrane subunit of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope protein, J. Virol. 82(11):5584-5593. |
| Abaza et al. Effects of amino acid substitutions outside an antigenic site on protein binding to monoclonal antibodies of predetermined specificity obtained by peptide immunization. Journal of Protein Chemistry (1992) 11(5):433-444. |
| Adams et al., “The Expression of Hybrid Hiv:ty Virus-like Particles in Yeast,” Nature 329:68-70 (1987). |
| Anderson, et al., “Human Gene Therapy,” Nature 392(6679 Suppl):25-30 (1998). |
| Andre, et al., “Increased Immune Response Elicited by DNA Vaccination with a Synthetic GP120 Sequence With Optimized Codon Usage,” J. of Virology, 72(2): 1497-1503 (1998). |
| Arthur, et al., “Serological Responses in Chimpanzees Inoculated with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Glycoprotein (Gp120) Subunit Vaccine,” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84(23):8583-8587 (1987). |
| Attwood, T. “The babel of bioinformatics,” Science (2000) vol. 290, No. 5491, pp. 471-473. |
| Azevedo et al., “Main Features of DNA-Based Immunization Vectors,” Braz J Med Biol Res. 32(2):147-153 (1999). |
| Baker et al., “Structures of Bovine and Human Papillomaviruses. Analysis by Cryoelectron Microscopy and Three-dimensional Image Reconstruction,” Biophys. J. 60:1445-456 (1991). |
| Baker et al., “Protein structure prediction and structural gemonics,” Science (2001) 294(5540):93-96. |
| Barr, et al., “Antigenicity and Immunogenicity of Domains of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Envelope Polypeptide Expressed in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Vaccine 5(2):90-101 (1987). |
| Barrett, et al., “Large-scale production and purification of a vaccinia recombinant-derived HIV-1 gp160 and analysis of its immunogenicity,” AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 5(2):159-71 (1989). |
| Beard, W. A., et al., “Role of the “Helix Clamp” in HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Catalytic Cycling as Revealed by Alanine-Scanning Mutagenesis,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 271(21):12213-12220 (1996). |
| Berger, P.B., “New Directions in Research: Report from the 10th International Conference on AIDS,” Canadian Medical Association Journal 152(12):1991-1995 (1995). |
| Berman, et al., “Expression and Immunogenicity of the Extracellular Domain of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Envelope Glycoprotein, gp160,” J Virol. 63(8):3489-3498 (1989). |
| Berman, et al., “Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Challenge of Chimpanzees Immunized with Recombinant Envelope Glycoprotein gp120,” PNAS 85(14):5200-5204 (1988). |
| Birx and Redfield, “HIV Vaccine Therapy,” Int J Immunopharmacol. 13(1):129-132 (1991). |
| Bolognesi, D.P., “Progress in Vaccines Against AIDS,” Science 246:1233-1234 (1989). |
| Borrow, et al., “Virus-Specific CD8+ Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Activity Associated with Control of Viremia in Primary Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection,” J Virol. 68(9):6103-6110 (1994). |
| Bourgault, et al., “Cytotoxic T-Cell Response and AIDS-Free Survival in Simian Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Macaques,” AIDS. 7 (Suppl 2):S73-S79 (1993). |
| Brown et al., “Chimeric Parvovirus B19 Capsids for the Presentation of Foreign Epitopes,” Virology 198:477-488 (1994). |
| Bujacz, G., et al., “The Catalytic Domain of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Integrase: Ordered Active Site in the F185H Mutant,” Febs Letters 398(2-3):175-178 (1996). |
| Burgess et al. “Possible dissociation of the heparin-binding and mitogenic activities of heparin binding growth factor-1 from its receptor-binding activities by site directed mutagenesis of a single lysine residue,” Journal of Cell Biology (1990) vol. 111. |
| Burton et al., “Why Do We Not Have an HIV Vaccine and How Can We Make One?” Nat Med. 4(5 Suppl):495-498 (1998). |
| Carmichael et al., “Quantitative Analysis of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (Hiv-1)-specific Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte (Ctl) Response at Different Stages of Hiv-1 Infection: Differential Ctl Responses to Hiv-1 and Epstein-barr Virus in Late Disease,” J Exp Med. 177(2):249-256 (1993). |
| Chapman, et al., “Effect of Intron A From Human Cytomegalovirus (Towne) Immediate-Early Gene on Heterologous Expression in Mammalian Cells,” Nucleic Acids Research, 19:3979-3986 (1991). |
| Chazal N. et al., “Phenotypic Characterization of Insertion Mutants of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag Precursor Expressed in Recombinant Baculovirus-infected Cells,” Virology 68(1):111-122 (1994). |
| Ciernik et al., “Induction of Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes and Antitumor Immunity with Dna Vaccines Expressing Single T Cell Epitopes,” J. Immunol. 156(7):2369-2375 (1996). |
| Clavel et al., “Isolation of a New Human Retrovirus from West African Patients with AIDS,” Science 233:343-346 (1986). |
| Clavel et al., “Molecular Cloning and Polymorphism of the Human Immune Deficiency Virus Type 2,” Nature 324:691-695 (1986). |
| Daar et al, “Transient High Levels of Viremia in Patients with Primary Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection,” N Engl J Med. 324(14):961-964 (1991). |
| Davey et al., “Subcutaneous and administration of interleukin-2 in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected persons,” J Infect Dis. 175(4):781-789 (1997). |
| Davies J. F., et al., “Crystal structure of the ribonuclease H domain of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase,” Science 252(5002):88-95 (1991). |
| Deminie et al., “Evaluation of Reverse Transcriptase and Protease Inhibitors in Two-drug Combinations Against Human Immunodeficiency Virus Replication,” Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 40(6):1346-1351 (1996). |
| Desai et al., “Molecular Cloning and Primary Nucleotide Sequence Analysis of a Distinct Human immunodeficiency Virus Isolate Reveal Significant Divergence in its Genomic Sequence,” PNAS 83:8380-8384 (1986). |
| di Marzo et al. “Loss of a neutralizing epitope by a spontaneous point mutation in the V3 loop of HIV-1 isolated from an infected laboratory worker,” J Biol Chem (Dec. 1993) 268(34):25894-25901. |
| Doe et al., “Induction of HIV-1 Envelope (gp120)-Specific Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Responses in Mice by Recombinant CHO Cell-Derived gp120 is Enhanced by Enzymatic Removal of N-Linked Glycans,” Eur. J. Immunol. 24:2369-2376 (1994). |
| Doe, B. and Walker, C.M. “HIV-1 p24 Gag-Specific Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Responses in Mice,” AIDS 10(7):793-794 (1996). |
| Dyda F., et al., “Crystal Structure of the Catalytic Domain of HIV-1 Integrase: Similarity to Other Polynucleotidyl Transferases,” Science 266(5193):1981-1986 (1994). |
| Earl et al., “Isolate-and Group-specific Immune Responses to the Envelope Protein of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Induced by a Live Recombinant Vaccinia Virus in Macaques,” AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 5(1):23-32 (1989). |
| Edelman, R., “Vaccine Adjuvants,” Rev Infect Dis. 2(3):370-383 (1980). |
| Engelman, A. et al., “Structure-based Mutagenesis of the Catalytic Domain of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Integrase,” Journal of Virology 71(5):3507-3514 (1997). |
| Esnouf et al., “Mechanism of Inhibition of HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase by Nonnucleoside Inhibitors,” Structural Biology 2(4):303-308 (1995). |
| European Search Report and Opinion dated May 10, 2012, for EP Application No. 11161076 filed Jul. 5, 2002, 12 pages. |
| Evans et al., “An Engineered Poliovirus Chimaera Elicits Broadly Reactive Hiv-1 Neutralizing Antibodies,” Nature 339(6223):385-388 (1989). |
| Faust et al., “Outpatient Biopsies of the Palatine Tonsil: Access to Lymphoid Tissue for Assessment of Human Immunodeficiency Virus RNA Titers,” Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 114(4):593-598 (1996). |
| Fennie et al., “Model for Intracellular Folding of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 gp120,” J Virol. 63(2):639-646 (1989). |
| Ferre et al., “Combination Therapies Against HIV-1 Infection:Exploring the Concept of Combining Antiretroviral Drug Treatments with HIV-1 Immune-Based Therapies in Asymptomatic Individuals,” AIDS Patient Care STDS 10(6):357-361 (1996). |
| Fisher, et al., “Biologically diverse molecular variants within a single HIV-1 isolate,” Nature 334:444-447 (1988). |
| Fox et al., “No Winners Against AIDS,” Bio/Technology 12(2):128 (1994). |
| Freed EO. HIV-1 gag proteins: diverse functions in the virus life cycle. Virology (1998) vol. 251, No. 1, pp. 1-15. |
| Gallo, R. C., 2005, The end or the beginning of the drive to an HIV-preventive vaccine: a view from over 20 years, The Lancet 366:1894-1898. |
| Gamier, L. et al., “Particle Size Determinants in the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag Protein,” J Virol 72(6):4667-4677 (1998). |
| GenBank accession No. AF110965. |
| GenBank accession No. AF110967. |
| GenBank accession No. AF110968. |
| GenBank accession No. AF110975. |
| GenBank accession No. AF391230, submitted Dec. 1, 2001, 2 pages. |
| GenBank accession No. M65024. |
| Goldgur, Y. et al., “Three New Structures of the Core Domain of HIV-1 Integrase: an Active Site That Binds Magnesium,” PNAS 95(16):9150-9154 (1998). |
| Goudsmit et al., “Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Neutralization Epitope with Conserved Architecture Elicits Early Type-specific Antibodies in Experimentally Infected Chimpanzees,” PNAS 85:4478-4482 (1988). |
| Greene, “AIDS and the Immune System” Scientific American Sep.:99-105 (1993). |
| Griffiths J.C. et al., “Hybrid Human Immunodeficiency Virus Gag Particles as an Antigen Carrier System: Induction of Cytotoxic T-cell and Humoral Responses by a Gag:V3 Fusion,” J. Virol. 67(6):3191-3198 (1993). |
| Grimison B. and Laurence, J., “Immunodominant Epitope Regions of HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase: Correlations with HIV-1+ Serum IgG Inhibitory to Polymerase Activity and With Disease Progression,” Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes and Human Retrovirology 9(1):58-68 (1995). |
| Gurgo et al., “Envelope Sequences of Two New United States HIV-1 Isolates,” Virology 164:531-536 (1988). |
| Gurunathan et al., “CD40 Ligand/Trimer DNA Enhances Both Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses and Induces Protective Immunity to Infectious Tumor Challenge,” J Immunol. 161(9):4563-4571 (1998). |
| Guyader et al., “Genome Organization and Transactivation of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2,” Nature 326:662-669 (1987). |
| Haas et al., “Cytotoxin T-Cell Responses to HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase, Integrase and Protease,” AIDS, 12:1427-1436 (1998). |
| Hagensee et al., “Three-dimensional Structure of Vaccinia Virus-produced Human Papillomavirus Type 1 Capsids,” J. Virol. 68:4503-4505 (1994). |
| Hahn et al., “Genetic Variation in HTLV-III/LAV Over Time in Patients with AIDS or at Risk for AIDS,” Science 232:1548-1553 (1986). |
| Hamajima, et al., “The Combination of DNA and Peptide Vaccines Induces Strong Immunities Against HIV-1 in Both Humoral and CM1,” 11.sup.th International AIDS Conference, Vancouver, Britich Colombia, Jul. 7-12; 11:6 (abstract No. Mo.A.151) (1996). |
| Hammer et al., “Issues in Combination Antiretrovial Therapy: a Review,” J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 7(Suppl 2):S24-S37 (1994). |
| Haynes et al., “Toward an Understanding of the Correlates of Protective Immunity to Hiv Infection” Science 271:324-328 (1996). |
| Haynes et al., “Update on the Issues of Hiv Vaccine Development,” Ann Med. 28(1):39-41 (1996). |
| Heeney et al., “Beta-chemokines and Neutralizing Antibody Titers Correlate with Sterilizing Immunity Generated in HIV-1 Vaccinated Macaques,” PNAS 95(18):10803-10808 (1998). |
| Hickman, A. B., et al., “Biophysical and enzymatic properties of the catalytic domain of HIV-1 integrase,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 269(46):29279-29287 (1994). |
| Ho et al., “Human Immunodeficiency Virus Neutralizing Antibodies Recognize Several Conserved Domains on the Envelope Glycoproteins,” J Virol. 61(6):2024-2028 (1987). |
| Jacobo-Molina, A. et al., “Crystal Structure of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Reverse Transcriptase Complexed with Double-stranded DNA at 3.0 A Resolution Shows Bent DNA,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 90(13):6320-6324 (1993). |
| Katz, R. A. and Skalka, A. M., “The Retroviral Enzymes,” Annual Review of Biochemistry 63:133-73 (1994). |
| Keefer, et al., “Safety and Immunogenicity of Env 2-3, a Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Candidate Vaccine, in Combination with a Novel Adjuvant, MTP-PE/MF59. NIAID AIDS Vaccine Evaluation Group,” AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 12(8):683-693 (1996). |
| Kent, et al., “A Recombinant Avipoxvirus HIV-1 Vaccine Expressing Interferon-Gamma is Safe and Immunogenic in Macaques,” Vaccine 18:2250-2256 (2000). |
| Kirnbauer et al., “Efficient Self-assembly of Human Papillomavirus Type 16 L1 and L1-L2 into Virus-Like Particles,” J. Virol. 67:6929-6936 (1993). |
| Klenerman, et al., “Original Antigenic Sin Impairs Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Responses to Viruses Bearing Variant Epitopes,” Nature 394(6692):482-485 (1998). |
| Koff and Schultz, “Progress and Challenges Toward and AIDS Vaccine: Brother, Can You Spare a Paradigm?” J. Clinical Immunology 16(3):127-133 (1996). |
| Koff et al., “Development and Testing of AIDS Vaccines,” Science 241:426-432 (1988). |
| Kohl et al., “Active Human Immunodeficiency Virus Protease Is Required for Viral Infectivity,” PNAS USA 85:4686-4690 (1988). |
| Kohlstaedt, L. A. et al., “Crystal Structure at 3.5 A Resolution of HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Complexed with an Inhibitor,” Science 256(5065):1783-1790 (1992). |
| Koup et al., “Temporal Association of Cellular Immune Responses with the Initial Control of Viremia in Primary Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Syndrome,” J Virol. 68(7):4650-4655(1994). |
| Kovacs et al., “Controlled Trial of Interleukin-2 Infusions in Patients Infected with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus,” N Engl J Med. 335(18):1350-1356 (1996). |
| Kovacs et al., “Increases in CD4 T Lymphocytes with Intermittent Courses of Interleukin-2 in Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection,” NEJM 332(9):567-575 (1995). |
| Krausslich et al., “Processing of in Vitro-synthesized Gag Precursor Proteins of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Type 1 by HIV Proteinase Generated in Escherichia coli,” J. Virol. 62:4393-4397 (1988). |
| Kreuter J., et al., “Mode of Action of Immunological Adjuvants: Some Physicochemical Factors Influencing the Effectivity of Polyacrylic Adjuvants,” Infect Immun. 19(2):667-675 (1978). |
| Krug, M. S. and Berger, S. L., “Reverse Transcriptase from Human Immunodeficiency Virus: a Single Template-primer Binding Site Serves Two Physically Separable Catalytic Functions,” Biochemistry 30(44):10614-10623 (1991). |
| Lalvani A. et al., “Rapid effector Function in CD8+ Memory T Cells,” J. Exp. Med. 186:859-865 (1997). |
| Lasky et al., “Delineation of a Region of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 gp120 Glycoprotein Critical for Interaction with the CD4 Receptor,” Cell 50(6):975-985 (1987). |
| Lazar et al. Transforming growth factor alpha; mutations of aspartic acid 47 and leucine 48 results in different biological activities. Molecular and Cellular Biology (1988) 8(3):1247-1252. |
| Levy et al., “Isolation of Lymphocytopathic Retroviruses from San Francisco Patients with AIDS,” Science 225:840-842 (1984). |
| Littman et al., “Unusual Intron in the Immunoglobulin Domain of the Newly Isolated Murine CD4 (L3T4) Gene,” Nature 325(6103):453-455 (1987). |
| Looney et al., “Type-restricted Neutralization of Molecular Clones of Human Immunodeficiency Virus,” Science 241:357-359 (1988). |
| Maddon et al., “The Isolation and Nucleotide Sequence of a Cdna Encoding the T Cell Surface Protein T4: a New Member of the Immunoglobulin Gene Family,” Cell 42(1):93-104 (1985). |
| Maignan, S., et al. “Crystal Structures of the Catalytic Domain of HIV-1 Integrase Free and Complexed with its Metal Cofactor: High Level of Similarity of the Active Site with Other Viral Integrases,” Journal of Molecular Biology 282(2):359-368 (1998). |
| Manca et al., “Antigenicity of Hiv-derived T Helper Determinants in the Context of Carrier Recombinant Proteins: Effect on T Helper Cell Repertoire Selection,” Eur J Immunol. 26(10):2461-2469 (1996). |
| Mazumder, A., et al., “Effects of nucleotide analogues on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase,” Molecular Pharmacology 49(4):621-628 (1996). |
| Mazza et al., “Recombinant Interleukin-2 (Ril-2) in Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (Aids): Preliminary Report in Patients with Lymphoma Associated with Hiv Infection,” Eur J Haematol. 49(1):1-6 (1992). |
| McCluskie et al., “Route and Method of Delivery of DNA Vaccine Influence Immune Responses in Mice and Non-Human Primates,” Molecular Medicine 5: 287-300, 1999. |
| McCluskie, et al., “Route and method of delivery of DNA vaccine influence immune responses in mice and non-human primates,” Mol Med. 5(5):287-300 (1999). |
| McCornack et al., “HIV Protease Substrate Conformation: Modulation by Cyclophilin A,” FEBS Letts 414:84-88 (1997). |
| Mcheyzer-Williams, M.G. et al, “Enumeration and Characterization of Memory Cells in the Th Compartment,” Immunol. Rev. 150:5-21 (1996). |
| McMicahel, A. J., and T. Hanke, 2003, HIV vaccines 1983-2003, Nat. Med. 9(7):874-880. |
| McMichael, A.J. and O'Callaghan, C.A., “A New Look at T Cells,” J. Exp. Med. 187(9)1367-1371 (1998). |
| Modrow et al., “Computer-assisted Analysis of Envelope Protein Sequences of Seven Human Immunodeficiency Virus Isolates: Prediction of Antigenic Epitopes in Conserved and Variable Regions,” J. Virol. 61(2):570-578 (1987). |
| Montagnier et al., “Human T-Cell Leukemia Viruses: The Family of Human T-Lymphotropic Retroviruses: Their Role in Malignancies and Association with AIDS,” Gallo, Essex & Gross, eds., pp. 363-379 (1984). |
| Myers et al., “Human Retroviruses and AIDS,” published by the Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 1991, pp. I-A-48 to I-A-56 and II-77 to II-88. |
| Nabel, “HIV vaccine strategies,” Vaccine 20:1945-1947, 2002. |
| Nathanson et al., “Biological Considerations in the Development of a Human Immunodeficiency Virus Vaccine,” J Infect Dis. 182(2):579-589 (2000). |
| Ngo et al, in the Protein Folding Problem and Tertiary Structure Prediction, 1994, Edited by Merz et al., (ed.), Birkhauser, Boston, MA, pp. 433 and 492-495. |
| Novitsky et al., “Molecular Cloning and Phylogenetic Analysis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype C: a Set of 23 Full-Length Clones From Botswana,” J. Virol. 73(5):4427-4432 (1999). |
| Nowak and Bangham, “Population Dynamics of Immune Responses to Persistent Viruses,” Science 272(5258):74-79 (1996). |
| Nuss et al. Defining the requirements for an antibody epitope on influenza virus neuraminidase: How tolerant are protein epitopes? J Mol Biol (1994) 235:747-759. |
| Odile et al., “Anti-HIV Active Immunization, Evidence for Persistent Cell Mediated Immunity after a 2 Year Follow Up,” Eighth International Conference on AIDS/III STD World Congress Amsterdam, The Netherlands Jul. 19-24, 1992, Abstract No. MOB 0024. |
| O'Hagan et al., “Induction of potent immune responses by cationic microparticles with adsorbed human immunodeficiency virus DNA vaccines,” J. Virology 75(19):9037-9043, 2001. |
| Okuda et al., “Induction of Potent Humoral and Cell-mediated Immune Responses Following Direct Injection of DNA Encoding the HIV Type 1 Env and Rev gene Products,” AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 11(8):933-943 (1995). |
| Palaniappan, C. et al., “Mutations Within the Primer Grip Region of HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Result in Loss of RNase H Function,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 272(17):11157-11164 (1997). |
| Pantaleo, G., and R. A. Koup, 2004, Correlates of immune protection in HIV-1 infection: what we know, what we don't know, what we should know, Nat. Med. 10(8):806-810. |
| Park et al., “Overexpression of the Gag-pot Precursor From Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Proviral Genomes Results in Efficient Proteolytic Processing in the Absence of Virion Production,” J. Virol. 65:5111 (1991). |
| Patel et al., “Insights into DNA Polymerization Mechanisms from Structure and Function Analysis of HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase,” Biochemistry 34:5351-5363 (1995). |
| Perelson, et al., “Decay Characteristics of Hiv-1-infected Compartments During Combination Therapy,” Nature 387(6629):188-191 (1997). |
| Popovic et al., “Detection, Isolation, and Continuous Production of Cytopathic Retroviruses (HTLV-III) from Patients with AIDS and Pre-AIDS,” Science 224:497-500 (1984). |
| Pyle et al., “Immune Response to Immunostimulatory Complexes (ISCOMs) Prepared from Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) or the HIV-1 External Envelope Glycoprotein (gp120),” Vaccine 7(5):465-473 (1989). |
| Redfield and Birx, “Hiv-specific Vaccine Therapy: Concepts, Status, and Future Directions,” AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 8(6):1051-1058 (1992). |
| Reicin, A.S. et al., “Linker Insertion Mutations in the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag Gene: Effects on Virion Particle Assembly, Release, and Infectivity,” J. Virol. 69(2):642-650 (1995). |
| Riffkin et al. “A single amino-acid change between the antigenically different extracellular serine protease V2 and B2 from Dichelobacter nodous.” Gene (1955) vol. 167, pp. 279-283. |
| Robey, et al., “Prospect for Prevention of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection: Purified 120-kDa Envelope Glycoprotein Induces Neutralizing Antibody,” PNAS 83(18):7023-7027 (1986). |
| Rodgers, D. W. et al., “The Structure of Unliganded Reverse Transcriptase from the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92(4):1222-1226 (1995). |
| Saag and Kuritzkes, “Strategies for Continuing Antiretroviral Therapy,” Intl AIDS Society USA 4(2):16-19 (1996). |
| Saag, et al., “Extensive Variation of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type-1 in vivo,” Nature 334:440-444 (1988). |
| Salk et al., “Prospects for the Control of Aids by Immunizing Seropositive Individuals,” Nature 327(6122):473-476 (1987). |
| Schernthaner, et al., “Endosperm-specific Activity of a Zein Gene Promoter in Transgenic Tobacco Plants,” The EMBO J. 7:1249-1259 (1988). |
| Schulhafer et al., “Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome: Molecular Biology and its Therapeutic Intervention (review),” In Vivo 3(2):61-78 (1989). |
| Sheng N. and Dennis, D., “Active Site Labeling of HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase,” Biochemistry 32(18):4938-4942 (1993). |
| Smith et al., “Blocking of HIV-1 infectivity by a soluble, secreted form of the CD4 antigen,” Science 238(4834):1704-1707 (1987). |
| Spence R. A., et al., “Mechanism of Inhibition of HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase by Nonnucleoside Inhibitors,” Science 267(5200):988-993 (1995). |
| Srinivasan et al., “Molecular Characterization of Human Immunodeficiency Virus from Zaire: Nucleotide Sequence Analysis Identifies Conserved and Variable Domains in the Envelope Gene,” Gene 52:71-82 (1987). |
| Srivastava et al (2003). “Purification, Characterization, and Immunogenicity of a Soluble Trimeric Envelope Protein Containing a Partial Deletion of the V2 Loop Derived from SF162, an R5-Tropic Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Isolate,” J. Virol. 77(20):11244-11259. |
| Stamatatos (1998). “An Envelope Modification That Renders a Primary, Neutralization-Resistant Clade B Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Isolate Highly Susceptible to Neutralization by Sera from Other Clades,” J. Virol. 78:7840-7845. |
| Starcich et al., “Identification and Characterization of Conserved and Variable Regions in the Envelope Gene of HTLV-III/LAV, the Retrovirus of AIDS,” Cell 45:637-648 (1986). |
| Steimer et al., “Genetically Engineered Human Immunodeficiency Envelope Glycoprotein Gp120 Produced in Yeast Is the Target of Neutralizing Antibodies,” Vaccines 87:236-241 (1987). |
| Sternberg et al., “Prediction of Antigenic Determinants and Secondary Structures of the Major Aids Virus Proteins,” FEBS Letters 218(2):231-237 (1987). |
| Tao et al. “Studies of aglycosylated chimeric mouse-human IgG,” J Immunol (1989) 143(8):2595-2601. |
| Tindle et al., “Chimeric Hepatitis B Core Antigen Particles Containing B- and Th-epitopes of Human Papillomavirus Type 16 E7 Protein Induce Specific Antibody and T-helper Responses in Immunised Mice,” Virology 200:547-557 (1994). |
| Vacca et al., “L-735,524: an Orally Bioavailable Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Protease Inhibitor,” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91(9):4096-4100 (1994). |
| Verma et al., “Gene Therapy—Promises, Problems and Prospects,” Nature 389(6648):239-242 (1997). |
| Vilmer et al., “Isolation of New Lymphotropic Retrovirus from Two Siblings with Haemophilia B, One with AIDS,” The Lancet 1:753 (1984). |
| Wagner et al., “Assembly and Extracellular Release of Chimeric HIV-1 PR55gag Retrovirus-like Particles,” Virology 200:162-175 (1994). |
| Wagner et al., “Construction, Expression, and Immunogenicity of Chimeric HIV-1 Virus-like Particles,” Virology 220:128-140 (1996). |
| Wagner R., et al., “Studies on Processing, Particle Formation, and Immunogenicity of the HIV-1 gag Gene Product: a Possible Component of a HIV Vaccine,” Arch Virol. 127:117-137 (1992). |
| Wakefield, J. K.et al., “In Vitro Enzymatic Activity of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Reverse Transcriptase Mutants in the Highly Conserved YMDD Amino Acid Motif Correlates with the Infectious Potential of the Proviral Genome,” J Virol 66(11):6806-6812 (1992). |
| Walker, B. D., and D. R. Burton, 2008, “Toward an AIDS vaccine,” Science 320(760):760-764. |
| Wan et al., “Autoprocessing: an Essential Step for the Activation of HIV-1 Protease,” Biochem. J. 316:569-573 (1996). |
| Wang C. et al., “Analysis of Minimal Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag Coding Sequences Capable of Virus-like Particle Assembly and Release,” J Virol 72(10): 7950-7959 (1998). |
| Wang et al., “Induction of Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses to the Human Immunodeficiency Type 1 Virus in Nonhuman Primates by in Vivo DNA Inoculation,” Virology 211(1):102-112 (1995). |
| Williamson, et al., “Designing HIV-1 Subtype C Vaccine for South Africa,” South African Journal of Science, 96:318-324 (2000). |
| Wu X., et al., “Targeting foreign proteins to human immunodeficiency virus particles via fusion with Vpr and Vpx,” J. Virol. 69(6):3389-3398 (1995). |
| Yeni et al., “Antiretroviral and Immune-based Therapies: Update,” AIDS 7(Suppl 1):S173-S184 (1993). |
| Yenofsky et al., “A Mutant Neomycin Phosphotransferase II Gene Reduces the Resistance of Transformants to Antibiotic Selection Pressure,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:3435-3439 (1990). |
| Yourno et al., “Nucleotide Sequence Analysis of the Env Gene of a New Zairian Isolate of HIV-1,” AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 4(3):165-73 (1988). |
| Zagury et al., “One-year Follow-up of Vaccine Therapy in Hiv-infected Immune-deficient Individuals: a New Strategy,” J. Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 5:676-681 (1992). |
| Zagury et al., “Progress Report IV on AIDS Vaccine in Human: Phase I Clinical Trial in Hiv Infected Patients,” VII International Conference on AIDS, Florence Jun. 16-21, 1991, Abstract No. M.A. 67. |
| Zhang Y., et al., “Analysis of the Assembly Function of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag Protein Nucleocapsid Domain,” J Virol 72(3):1782-1789 (1998). |
| Zur Megede et al., “Increased Expression and Immunogenicity of Sequence-modified Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag Gene,” J Virol. 74(6):2628-2635 (2000). |
| Lian et al. (2005). “Evaluation of envelope vaccines derived from the South African subtype C human immunodeficiency virus type 1 TV1 strain,” J Virol, 79(21):13338-49. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140220060 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60303192 | Jul 2001 | US | |
| 60316860 | Aug 2001 | US | |
| 60349871 | Jan 2002 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10190435 | Jul 2002 | US |
| Child | 11724050 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13399977 | Feb 2012 | US |
| Child | 14141396 | US | |
| Parent | 11724050 | Mar 2007 | US |
| Child | 13399977 | US |
