The invention relates to a hydraulic actuation system for a braking system with the features of the preamble of claim 1 and a 3/2-way valve correspondingly designed therefor.
A possible generic brake system is shown in
A disadvantage of the prescribed braking system is that at least three connecting valves and thus a relatively large number of hydraulic lines are required to shut off the master brake cylinder HZ with respect to the brake circuits BK1 and BK2 and the travel simulator WS, which is not only expensive to manufacture but also results in a relatively large construction volume of the hydraulic module in which the valves of the braking system are combined.
3/2-way solenoid valves are widely used in hydraulic drives and especially in automotive braking systems. In braking systems, 2/2-way solenoid valves are mostly used for pressure control and regulation. 3/2-way solenoid valves, on the other hand, are mostly used for switching individual components of the braking system on and off. DE 10 2017 000 472 A1, for example, discloses the use of 3/2-way solenoid valves to connect the brake circuits either to the motor-driven pressure supply device or to the master brake cylinder. However, the use of 3/2-way valves, as known from DE 10 2017 000 472 A1, leads to problems in the event of failure or a leaky valve seat. If, for example, the hydraulic connection from the master brake cylinder to the pressure supply device in the 3/2-way solenoid valve is defective, i.e. leaking, this leads adversely to a strong pedal reaction, which inevitably results in the pressure supply device being switched off, with the braking force boosting being lost at the same time.
The task of the present invention is to further develop the generic braking system in such a way that it requires fewer valves and is thus more cost-effective, smaller and lighter.
This task is solved according to the invention with a hydraulic actuation system having the features according to claim 1. A 3/2-way valve according to the invention for a hydraulic actuating system according to claims 1 to 9 is claimed by claim 11 and the following.
The invention is based on the idea of replacing the two 2/2-way solenoid valves V1 and V2 (see
In the hydraulic actuation system for a brake system according to the invention, the one working chamber of the master brake cylinder can be connected via the controlled 3/2-way valve either to a brake circuit or to the travel simulator. In addition, the brake system has at least one pressure-generating device for pressure control or regulation, in particular for pressure build-up and/or pressure reduction, in the at least one brake circuit. Of course, it is also in the spirit of the invention if the braking system additionally has at least one exhaust valve for pressure reduction and/or an alternative control element, such as a further pressure supply device DZ driven by an electric motor, for pressure reduction.
In so-called “normal operation” of the braking system, pressure control or regulation in the at least one brake circuit takes place by means of the pressure generating device. In this operating state, the working chamber of the master brake cylinder is only hydraulically connected to the travel simulator via the 3/2-way valve. The hydraulic connection from the working chamber to the brake circuit is interrupted. For this purpose, the 3/2-way valve is energized and the solenoid armature takes a first position, which is also referred to below as the second switching state of the 3/2-way valve, in which it presses a first valve closing body against the associated valve seat and thus closes a first hydraulic connection of the 3/2-way valve, which is used to connect the connections for the brake circuit and the master brake cylinder. The pressure prevailing in the brake circuit thereby acts in support of the magnetic force on the first valve closing body. To make this possible, according to the invention the 3/2-way valve is arranged in the hydraulic connection between the pressure supply device and the master brake cylinder. The valve spring in the 3/2-way valve can thus be dimensioned with increased restoring force, so that the 3/2-way valve advantageously still switches reliably from the first position of the solenoid armature to the second position of the solenoid armature in the second switching state of the 3/2-way valve even when the pressure in the brake circuit is greater than 150 bar, i.e. beyond the pressure during fading. This advantageously increases the reliability of the braking system.
A diagnosis to determine the failure of the valve spring can advantageously be made simply via the switching current of the solenoid valve.
If the 3/2-way valve leaks, the brake system can advantageously continue to be operated with the pressure supply device for pressure control in the wheel brakes or brake circuits. By controlling the 3/2-way valve accordingly, a pedal characteristic that can still be accepted by the person driving can be adjusted. For this purpose, the pressure in the working chamber of the master brake cylinder can advantageously be adjusted by appropriate switching of the 3/2-way valve between its two switching states in order to regulate a specific pedal characteristic, the pressure generated by the pressure supply device being used for this purpose. In this way, even in the event of failure of the travel simulator and/or leakage of the 3/2-way valve, in particular of the hydraulic connection between the connections for the travel simulator and the master brake cylinder, braking force boosting can still be maintained by means of the at least one pressure supply device.
Advantageously, many components of conventional 2/2-way valves, such as those used for the anti-lock braking function (ABS), can be used for the 3/2-way valve according to the invention. In particular, the electromagnetic part of a conventional 2/2-way valve can be used for the 3/2-way valve according to the invention. The additionally required second valve seat with second valve closing body and valve spring can be combined in a separate unit. The first valve closing body is arranged in a first valve chamber and the second valve closing body in a second valve chamber. A third valve chamber is arranged between the two valve seats. The first valve chamber is connected via a channel to a first valve connection for the brake circuit and the second valve chamber is connected via a channel to a second valve connection for the travel simulator. The third valve chamber is connected via a channel to the valve connection for the master cylinder. The first valve closing body is advantageously connected to the solenoid armature, with a plunger being arranged on the first valve closing body, which engages through both valve seats and is dimensioned in its length such that, in the first switching state of the solenoid valve, the second valve closing body is lifted off the second valve seat by the plunger against the valve spring force, so that the hydraulic connection between the second and third valve ports is opened. In the second valve position, when the 3/2-way valve is de-energized, the second valve closing body is pressed by the valve spring against the second valve seat in a sealing manner and, in the process, the first valve closing body is lifted from the first valve seat by the plunger, as a result of which the first hydraulic connection between the first and third valve connections is opened and the second hydraulic connection between the third and second valve connections is interrupted.
The diameter of the pin connecting the solenoid armature to the first valve closing body can be made smaller than in standard 2/2-way valves for ABS, which means that approx. 20% solenoid force can be realized. In order to reduce the power loss of the 3/2-way valve for the high forces, the excitation winding of the 3/2-way valve can advantageously be cast into the solenoid housing and this can be provided with a heat sink. It is also possible to arrange a permanent magnet in the yoke to reduce power loss.
Both a single and a tandem master cylinder can be used as the brake master cylinder.
The use of a single master brake cylinder is advantageous in terms of cost reduction and increased safety due to smart redundancy.
Wheel brakes are connected to the brake circuits described above in a known manner via further valve circuits, which are not explained further here.
The following figures illustrate in more detail the braking system according to the invention and the 3/2-way valve required for it.
Figures show:
The 3/2-way valve MV also has a second valve chamber K2 in which the valve spring VF and a second valve closing body VSK2 are arranged. The second valve chamber K2 is connected via a hydraulic channel to the second valve connection AN2, to which the travel simulator WS is connected. The second valve chamber K2 forms with its left side the second valve seat VS2 of the valve MV, which cooperates with the second valve closing body VSK2. A third valve chamber K3 is arranged between the two valve seats VS1 and VS2 and is connected to the third valve connection AN3 for the master cylinder SHZ or THZ. On the side of the first valve closing body VSK1 facing away from the pin 7, 7a, a plunger ST is formed or fastened, the length of which is dimensioned such that it reaches through the first valve seat VS1 and the third valve chamber K3 and can act with its free end on the second valve closing body VSK2 in the energized state of the 3/2-way valve MV.
The dimensions of the valve spring VF determine the opening pressure in the fallback state, e.g. in the event of failure of the pressure supply device DZ. Here, the legislator requires that a vehicle deceleration of 0.24 g can be generated with a foot force on brake pedal 1 of 500N. By dimensioning the valve spring to 75 bar opening pressure in the master brake cylinder, almost 3 times the deceleration value can be achieved.
A decrease in the valve spring force RF can be diagnosed, for example, by the opening current required for the excitation winding 5 to switch the solenoid valve MV to the second switching state in which the first hydraulic connection HV1 is closed.
B is the force characteristic that results when a second valve spring D is provided, which only acts at a small stroke h. A force curve C is obtained when a permanent magnet PM (see
The solenoid yoke 6 serves as a guide for the pin 7, 7a, which is connected to the first valve closing body VSK1. Compared to the standard design of the 2/2-way inlet valve, the pin 7 can be made smaller in diameter, which enlarges the effective pole area. This also allows the installation of a permanent magnet PM in the yoke 6 for force assistance of the return spring VF, as described in
As shown, the 2nd valve seat VS2 can be combined with the ball VSK2 and the valve spring VF in a separate housing as a construction unit. This offers advantages in pre-assembly and valve adjustment. For this purpose, the assembly unit is pressed into the yoke housing. To measure the plunger stroke, the ball stop has a hole to record the path of the ball via a measuring pin. For a safe connection of the assembly unit with the magnet yoke, a supply is recommended. To protect the valve seats VS1 and VS2, all connections to the brake circuit, master cylinder and travel simulator are protected with F1, F2 and F3 filters.
The valve is adjusted in such a way that the plunger ST has a small distance to the ball VSK2.
To reduce coil heating, the exciter winding 5 can be potted with the solenoid housing 9. In addition, a ribbed heat sink 10 can be provided.
A first possible error can be caused by a leakage of the 3/2 solenoid valve. When the 3/2-way valve is actuated, for example, there may be a leak in the hydraulic connection between the brake master cylinder and the brake circuit due to dirt particles that have penetrated. In this case, the braking system according to the invention can be used to form a fall-back state in which the preservation of the brake pedal characteristic or pe-dal feel is generated by brake pedal travel blending with the pressure supply device DZ.
Normally, during braking by the driver, the pressure in the brake circuit is controlled to the set pressure of the wheel cylinders, which is derived from the brake pedal travel, using the pressure supply device DZ. During braking by the driver (no recuperation), brake fluid flows from the brake circuit, BK1, via the leaky 3/2-way valve into the master brake cylinder SHZ or THZ due to a fault, as a result of which the brake pedal is pressed back and the brake pedal travel is reduced.
In an intact brake system, each brake pedal stroke is associated with a defined pressure in the master brake cylinder SHZ or THZ, which determines the pedal characteristics. The pressure in the master cylinder is measured, e.g. directly with a pressure sensor (not shown), or indirectly with a force-displacement sensor (not shown) which can measure the pedal force, for example. In this way, a target brake pedal travel can be determined for each brake pressure in the master cylinder. The design of the pedal characteristic is such that the pressure in the brake circuit is greater than the pressure in the master brake cylinder.
The error is detected by permanently comparing the actual brake pedal travel with the target brake pedal travel. In the fallback state, if the difference between actual brake pedal travel, which is measured, and target brake pedal travel,
In the following, a possible calculation example for the fallback level, based on average values from
The pressure Pauf in the wheel cylinders is increased to 100 bar by brake pedal actuation.
At the brake pressure of 100 bar the pedal travel is e.g. 54 mm. Due to the brake pedal travel blending, the amplitude of the pedal vibration should not exceed 5 mm. With a pedal ratio of 4.0, this means a main brake cylinder piston amplitude of 0.125 cm.
At 100 bar pressure in the brake circuit, the master cylinder pressure should be approx. 20 bar. The pressure difference between the master cylinder and the brake circuit is then 80 bar. On average, the pressure difference from the start of braking is 80/2=40 bar. At 40 bar pressure difference across the 3/2 valve, the leakage flow through the valve leakage is e.g. 7 cm3/s.
With a master cylinder piston area of e.g. 2.85 cm2, the master cylinder piston is pushed back by the leakage flow at a speed of 7 cm3/s/2.85 cm2=2.46 cm/s.
With a permitted HZ piston amplitude of 0.125 cm, the volume in the HZ must be reduced after 0.125 cm/2.46 cm/s=50 ms.
The volume leaked through the leaking 3/2 valve in 50 ms is then 0.050s*7 cm3/s=0.35 cm3. By shutting off the 3/2 valve and opening the exhaust valve (not drawn), brake fluid flows from the master brake cylinder, HZ, through the 3/2 valve, to the brake circuit, BK, and through the exhaust valve (not drawn) from the brake circuit BK to the reservoir. With valve cross-sectional areas of the 3/2 valve of e.g. 0.8 mm2 and of the outlet valve (not drawn) of e.g. 0.8 mm2 and mean pressure in the master brake cylinder of e.g. e.g. 10 bar, the volume flow out of the master cylinder, HZ, at a valve constant of e.g. 8.24:8.24* 0.8*sqrt(10*0.64/(0.64+0.64))=8.24*0.8*sqrt(5)=14.7 cm3/s. The leakage volume of 0.35 cm3 then flows off through the 3/2 valve and the exhaust valve (not drawn) in 0.35 cm3/14.7 cm3/s=approx. 25 ms. One cycle then takes 2*(50+25)ms=150 ms. The pedal vibrates with a frequency of approx. 1000 ms/150 ms=approx. 6.7 Hz.
It goes without saying that the actuation system for a braking system according to the invention only forms a complete braking system together with wheel brakes and intermediate valve circuits, such as known ABS/ESP modules or individual switching valves upstream of each wheel brake, via which the pressure control takes place. This also requires a control and regulation unit, commonly referred to as an ECU. All these components are or can of course also be part of the braking system according to the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2021 106 270.5 | Mar 2021 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2022/056626 | 3/15/2022 | WO |