This invention relates generally to vehicle control systems and, in particular, to a system and method for controlling the headlights of the vehicles. The invention is particularly adapted to controlling the vehicle's headlamps in response to sensing the headlights of oncoming vehicles and taillights of leading vehicles.
It has long been a goal to automatically control the state of a vehicle's headlights in order to accomplish automatically that which is manually performed by the driver. In particular, the driver of a vehicle whose headlights are in a high-beam state will dim the headlights upon conscious realization that the headlights are a distraction to the driver of an oncoming vehicle or a leading vehicle. It is desirable to relieve the driver of such duties and thereby allow the driver to concentrate on the driving task at hand. The ideal automatic control would also facilitate the use of high beams in conditions which allow their use, increasing the safety for the controlled vehicle as well as reducing the hazard caused by the occasional failure of the driver to dim the headlights when such headlights are distracting another driver.
Prior attempts at vehicle headlight dimming controls have included a single light sensor which integrates light in the scene forward of the vehicle. When the integrated light exceeds a threshold, the vehicle headlights are dimmed. Such approaches have been ineffective. The headlights of oncoming vehicles are, at least from a distance, point sources of light. In order to detect such light sources in an integrated scene, it is necessary to set a sufficiently low threshold of detection that many non-point-sources at lower intensities are interpreted as headlights or taillights. Such prior art vehicle headlight dimming controls have also been ineffective at reliably detecting the taillights of leading vehicles. The apparent reason is that the characteristics of these two light sources; for example, intensity, are so different that detecting both has been impractical. In order to overcome such deficiencies, additional solutions have been attempted, such as the use of infrared filtering, baffling of the optic sensor, and the like. While such modifications may have improved performance somewhat, the long-felt need for a commercially useful vehicle headlight dimming control has gone unmet.
The present invention provides a vehicle control which is capable of identifying unique characteristics of light sources based upon a precise evaluation of light source characteristics made in each portion of the scene forward of the vehicle, in the vicinity of each light source, by separating each light source from the remainder of the scene and analyzing that source to determine its characteristics. One characteristic used in identifying a light source is the spectral characteristics of that source which is compared with spectral signatures of known light sources, such as those of headlights and taillights. Another characteristic used in identifying a light source is the spatial layout of the light source. By providing the ability to identify the headlights of oncoming vehicles and the taillights of leading vehicles, the state of the headlights of the controlled vehicle may be adjusted in response to the presence or absence of either of these light sources or the intensity of these light sources.
This is accomplished according to an aspect of the invention by providing an imaging sensor which divides the scene forward of the vehicle into a plurality of spatially separated sensing regions. A control circuit is provided that is responsive to the photosensors in order to determine if individual regions include light levels having a particular intensity. The control circuit thereby identifies particular light sources and provides a control output to the vehicle that is a function of the light source identified. The control output may control the dimmed state of the vehicle's headlamps.
In order to more robustly respond to the different characteristics of headlights and taillights, a different exposure period is provided for the array in order to detect each light source. In particular, the exposure period may be longer for detecting leading taillights and significantly shorter for detecting oncoming headlights.
According to another aspect of the invention, a solid-state light imaging array is provided that is made up of a plurality of sensors arranged in a matrix on at least one semiconductor substrate. The light-imaging array includes at least one spectral separation device, wherein each of the sensors responds to light in a particular spectral region. The control circuit responds to the plurality of sensors in order to determine if spatially adjacent regions of the field of view forward of the vehicle include light of a particular spectral signature above a particular intensity level. In this manner, the control identifies light sources that are either oncoming headlights or leading taillights by identifying such light sources according to their spectral makeup.
According to another aspect of the invention, a solid-state light-imaging array is provided that is made up of a plurality of sensors that divide the scene forward of the vehicle into spatially separated regions, and light sources are identified, at least in part, according to their spatial distribution across the regions. This aspect of the invention is based upon a recognition that headlights of oncoming vehicles and taillights of leading vehicles are of interest to the control, irrespective of separation distance from the controlled vehicle, if the source is on the central axis of travel of the vehicle. Oncoming headlights and leading taillights may also be of interest away from this axis, or off axis, but only if the source has a higher intensity level and is spatially larger. These characteristics of headlights and taillights of interest may be taken into consideration by increasing the resolution of the imaging array along this central axis or by increasing the detection threshold off axis, or both. Such spatial evaluation may be implemented by selecting characteristics of an optical device provided with the imaging sensor, such as providing increased magnification central of the forward scene, or providing a wide horizontal view and narrow vertical view, or the like, or by arrangement of the sensing circuitry, or a combination of these.
The present invention provides a vehicle headlight control which is exceptionally discriminating in identifying oncoming headlights and leading taillights in a commercially viable system which ignores other sources of light including streetlights and reflections of the controlled vehicle's headlights off signs, road markers, and the like. The present invention further provides a sensor having the ability to preselect data from the scene forward of the vehicle in order to reduce the input data set to optimize subsequent data processing. The invention is especially adapted for use with, but not limited to, photoarray imaging sensors, such as CMOS and CCD arrays.
These and other objects, advantages, and features of this invention will become apparent upon review of the following specification in conjunction with the drawings.
a-7d are a flowchart of a control program;
a-8c are spectral charts illustrating spectra regions useful with the invention;
a-11c are views forward of a vehicle illustrating different forms of spatial filtering; and
a and 12b are illustrations of use of the invention to detect particular atmospheric conditions.
Referring now specifically to the drawings and the illustrative embodiments depicted therein, a vehicle 10 includes a vehicle headlight dimming control 12 made up of an imaging sensor module 14 which senses light from a scene forward of vehicle 10, an imaging control circuit 13 which receives data from sensor 14, and a vehicle lighting control logic module 16 which exchanges data with control circuit 13 and controls headlamps 18 for the purpose of modifying the headlight beam (
Vehicle lighting control logic module 16 receives an input 20 from imaging control circuit 13. In particular embodiments, such as ones which adjust the state of the headlights between continuously variable states, module 16 may supply data to imaging control circuit 13, such as the speed of the vehicle, which may be combined with the data sensed by imaging sensor 14 in establishing the state of headlights 18. In the illustrated embodiment, imaging sensor module 14 may be fixedly mounted in a housing 28 by a bracket 34 mounted to, or near, the vehicle's windshield 32. Bracket 34 also mounts an interior rearview mirror 30. This is a preferred mounting for imaging sensor module 14 because the location within the interior of the vehicle substantially eliminates environmental dirt and moisture from fouling the light sensor module. Additionally, the position behind windshield 32, which typically is kept relatively clear through the use of washers and wipers and the like, ensures a relatively clear view of the scene forward of vehicle 10. Alternatively, imaging sensor module 14 may be mounted within a housing 29 of interior rearview mirror 30 facing forward with respect to vehicle 10 (
Imaging sensor module 14 includes an optical device 36, such as a lens, an array 38 of photon-accumulating light sensors, and a spectral separation device for separating light from the scene forward of vehicle 10 into a plurality of spectral bands, such as a filter array 40 disposed between optical device 36 and light-sensing array 38. Light-sensing array 38 is described in detail in co-pending application Ser. No. 08/023,918 filed Feb. 26, 1993, by Kenneth Schofield and Mark Larson for an AUTOMATIC REARVIEW MIRROR SYSTEM USING A PHOTOSENSOR ARRAY, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,550,677, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. Light-sensing array 36 includes a plurality of photosensor elements 42 arranged in a matrix of columns and rows (
Digital signal processor 13 includes an analog-to-digital converter 58 which receives the output 56 of array 36 and converts the analog pixel values to digital values. A digital output 68 of A/D converter 58 is supplied to a taillight detection circuit 76, a headlight detection circuit 78, and to ambient sense logic circuit 84. A detection control circuit 72 supplies control and timing signals on a line 74 which is supplied to array 38, A/D converter 58 taillight detection circuit 76, headlight detection circuit 78, and ambient sense logic 84. Such signals coordinate the activities of these modules and provide any data, from look-up tables provided in control circuit 72, needed by each circuit to perform its function. For example, control circuit 72 may provide intensity threshold levels to taillight detection circuit 76 and headlight detection circuit 78.
Taillight detection circuit 76 detects a red light source having an intensity above a particular threshold as follows. For each pixel that is “red,” a comparison is made with adjacent “green” pixels and “blue” pixels. If the intensity of a red pixel is more than a particular number of times the intensity of the adjacent green pixel and adjacent blue pixel, then it is determined that the light source is red. If the intensity of the “red” light source is greater than a particular threshold, an indication is provided at 80.
Headlight detection circuit 78 detects a white light source having an intensity above a particular threshold as follows. A white light is a combination of red, green, and blue components. If adjacent “red,” “green,” and “blue” pixels all exceed a particular threshold, a ratio comparison is made of the pixels. If the ratio of the intensity of the adjacent “red,” “green,” and “blue” pixels is within a particular range, such as 20 percent by way of example, then a white light source is detected.
Vehicle headlight dimming control 12 additionally includes an ambient light-sensing circuit 84 which receives an input from digital output signal 68. Ambient detection circuit 84 samples a subset of photosensor elements and detects light levels sensed by the subset over a long period of time in order to produce significant time filtration. Preferably, the photosensor elements in the sensed subset include sensors that detect portions of the forward-looking scene that are just above the earth's horizon which is more indicative of the ambient light condition. Ambient detection circuit 84 produces an indication 88 of ambient light levels which is supplied as an input to a lighting control module 90. A high ambient light level may be used by a module 90 to inhibit headlight actuation or to switch headlights 18 to a daytime running light mode. Ambient detection circuit 84 can, optionally, perform other functions, such as switching the daytime running lights of the vehicle between daytime and nighttime modes, controlling the intensity of the vehicle's instrument panel and providing an input to an electro-optic real view mirror system.
Indications 80 and 82 from the light detection units and indication 88 from ambient detection circuit 84 are supplied to a lighting control circuit 90 which produces a first indication 92 that headlights 18 are to be switched on, or switched from a daytime running condition to a night mode, and a high-beam enable indication 94 that the headlights may be switched to a high-beam state. Vehicle lighting control logic module 16 responds to indications 92 and 94 by switching headlights 18 to an appropriate mode. An output 96 from module 16 may be provided to supply lighting control circuit 90 with information with respect to vehicle telemetry, steering, speed, and any other parameter that may be incorporated into the algorithm to determine the state of the headlights of the vehicle. Digital signal processor 13 may be implemented using discrete digital circuit modules or with a suitably programmed micro-processor with input and output buffers.
In one embodiment, an imaging sensor module 14a includes a single photosensor array 38a, one spectral filter array 40a, and one optical device 36a (
Vehicle headlight dimming control 12 carries out a control routine 100 (
The taillight detecting frame process begins at 108 by setting the exposure period for the imaging sensor module to grab the next frame according to a headlamp exposure level. In the illustrated embodiment, the exposure period for detecting headlights is set at 0.0001 seconds. Processing of the taillight frame proceeds at 110 by examining, for each “red” pixel, whether the intensity of light sensed by that pixel is greater than a threshold and whether the intensity of light sensed by that pixel is greater than a selected number of multiples of the intensity of light sensed by an adjacent “blue” pixel and a selected number of multiples of the intensity of light sensed by an adjacent “green” pixel. If so, then a “red” counter is incremented at 114. Preferably, the ratio of red pixel intensity to green or blue pixel intensity is selected as a power of 2 (2, 4, 8, 16 . . . ) in order to ease digital processing. However, other ratios may be used and different ratios can be used between red/green and red/blue pixels. In the illustrated embodiment, a ratio of 4 is selected based upon ratios established from CIE illuminant charts known to skilled artisans. Based upon these charts, a ratio greater than 4 would provide greater discrimination. Such greater discrimination may not be desirable because it could result in failure to identify a leading taillight and, thereby, a failure to dim the headlights of the controlled vehicle. After all pixels have been processed, the parameter “process.tails” is set to “no” at 116 and control proceeds to 118 (
In a similar fashion, processing of a headlight frame begins at 110 by setting the exposure period for the imaging sensor module to grab the next frame as a red taillight detecting frame. This is accomplished by setting the exposure period of the imaging sensor module to 0.004 seconds. It is then determined at 120 for each pixel whether an adjacent set of “red,” “green,” and “blue” pixels each exceeds a particular threshold and whether the pixel intensity levels all fall within a particular range, such as within 20 percent of each other. If all of the red, green, and blue pixels exceed a threshold and pass the ratio test, then it is determined that a white light source is being sensed and a “white” counter is incremented at 122. After all of the pixels in the frame have been processed, the process.tails flag is set to a “yes” state at 124. Control then passes to 118.
It is determined at 118 whether both the “white” and the “red” counters are below respective high-beam thresholds. If so, a high-beam frame counter is incremented and a low-beam frame counter is set to zero at 120. If it is determined at 118 that both the “white” and the “red” counters are not less than a threshold, it is then determined at 126 whether either the “red” counter or the “white” counter is greater than a respective low-beam threshold. If so, the high-beam frame counter is set to zero and the low-beam frame counter is incremented at 128. If it is determined at 126 that neither the “red” counter or the “white” counter is greater than the respective low-beam threshold, then both the high-beam frame counters and the low-beam frame counters are set to zero at 130.
Control then passes to 132 where it is determined if the low-beam frame counter is greater than a particular threshold. If so, high-beam enable signal 94 is set to a “low-beam” state at 134. Additionally, the low-beam frame counter is set to the threshold level. If it is determined at 132 that the low-beam frame counter is not greater than its threshold, it is determined at 136 whether the high-beam frame counter is greater than its threshold. If so, high-beam enable signal 94 is set to “high-beam” state at 138 and the high-beam frame counter is reset to its threshold level.
Control routine 100 provides hysteresis by requiring that a headlight spectral signature or a taillight spectral signature be detected for a number of frames prior to switching the headlights to a low-beam state. Likewise, the absence of a detection of an oncoming headlight or a leading taillight must be made for multiple frames in order to switch from a low-beam to a high-beam state. This hysteresis guards against erroneous detection due to noise in a given frame and eliminates headlamp toggling when sources are at the fringe of detection range. In the illustrated embodiment, it is expected that a vehicle headlight control system 12 will respond to a change in the state of light sources in the forward field of view of the vehicle in less than 0.5 seconds. An additional level of hysteresis may be provided by forcing the headlamps to stay in a low-beam state for a given number of seconds after a transition from high beams to low beams. The reverse would not occur; namely, holding a high-beam state for a particular period to avoid annoyance to drivers of oncoming or leading vehicles.
In the illustrated embodiment, red light sources, which have the spectral signature and intensity of taillights, are detected by determining that a “red” pixel, namely a pixel which is exposed to light in the visible red band, is both greater than a given multiple of the “green” and “blue” adjacent pixels, as well as being greater than a threshold and that white light sources, which are the spectral signatures of headlights, are detected by determining that “red,” “green,” and “blue” pixels are both within a particular intensity range of each other as well as being greater than a threshold. This double-testing helps to reduce false detection of light sources. However, it would be possible to detect red light sources only by looking at the intensity of “red” pixels and to detect white light sources by determining that an adjacent set of “red,” “blue,” and “green” pixels are all above a particular threshold.
In the illustrated embodiment, spectral filtering is carried out in a manner which exposes each photosensing element in the photosensor array to a band of light falling within one of the primary ranges of the visible spectrum, namely red, green, or blue as illustrated in
Photosensing array 38 may be a charge couple device (CCD) array of the type commonly utilized in video camcorders and the like. Alternatively, photosensing array 38 could be a CMOS array of the type manufactured by VLSI Vision Ltd. (VVL) in Edinburgh, Scotland. Additionally, a hybrid of the CCD and CMOS technology may be employed. Other potentially useful photosensing technologies include CID, MOS, photo diodes, and the like.
In an alternative embodiment, an imaging sensor module 14b includes two or more pairs of photosensor arrays 38b (
In yet an additional single lens system embodiment, an imaging sensor module 14c includes three light-sensing arrays (not shown) and a spectral separation device overlying the light-sensing arrays which directs spectral bands to different arrays (
The present invention is capable of identifying point sources of light in any particular location within the scene viewed forward of the vehicle. Additional discrimination between oncoming headlights and leading taillights may be accomplished by taking into account the relative location of the source of light within the scene. For example, as best seen by reference to
In order to take into account this spatial differentiation, the present invention comprehends detecting light sources at a lower threshold centrally of the scene and at a higher threshold at the periphery of the scene. This may be accomplished either optically, or electronically, or both. Optically, this may be accomplished by providing a non-uniform magnification to optical device 36. For example, an optical device may have optical magnification at a central portion thereof and an optical attenuation at a peripheral region thereof. Additionally, optical device 36 may have a relatively wide horizontal field of view and a relatively narrow vertical field of view. The narrow vertical field of view would tend to reduce the detection of street lights and other overhead light sources. In a preferred embodiment, optical device 36 is a lens that is made from injection-molded plastic. Electronically, such spatial differentiation may be accomplished by establishing a higher threshold level for pixel intensity detection for pixels located at the periphery of the scene than for pixels located centrally of the scene. This would cause centrally positioned light sources to be detected at a lower intensity level than sources detected at the periphery of the scene. Such spatial differentiation could also be accomplished by a non-symmetrical mapping of light to the sensor array, as illustrated in
The present invention is exceptionally sensitive to sources of light having spectral signatures of oncoming headlights and leading taillights. By recognizing the spectral signature of the light sources, many non-relevant light sources may be ignored. By examining light sources pixel-by-pixel, relatively small light sources may be detected at great distances in order to dim the headlights well before they become a nuisance to the driver of the vehicle ahead of the control vehicle. This is accomplished, according to a preferred embodiment, by utilizing an imaging sensor made up of an array of photosensing elements in a compact design which responds to light sources in a scene forward of the vehicle. Furthermore, such sensor preferably utilizes digital processing techniques which are well adapted for use with custom digital electronic circuitry, avoiding the expense and speed constraints of general purpose programmable microprocessors.
The present invention takes advantage of the spectral signatures both of light sources which must be detected in a headlight dimming control as well as the spectral signatures of light sources which must be rejected in a headlight dimming control. For example, federal regulations establish specific spectral bands that must be utilized in vehicle taillights; namely red. Furthermore, federal legislation prohibits the use of red light sources in the vicinity of a highway. Lane markers, signs, and other sources of reflected light are all specified in a manner which may be readily identified by spectral signature. Oncoming headlights, according to known technology, have a visible spectral signature which is predominantly white light. As light source technology evolves, the present invention facilitates detection of other spectral signatures of light sources in the future.
The present invention is capable of utilizing spatial filtering to even further enhance the ability to identify light sources. By spatial filtering is meant consideration of not only whether a particular pixel, or pixel group, is detecting a light source having a particular spectral signature, but also what adjacent, or closely related, pixels or pixel groups, are detecting. For example, it can be concluded that very closely adjacent red and white light sources are not of interest as oncoming headlights or taillights. An example where such pattern could be observed is a streetlight observed with a system having imperfect color correction, which can produce a white light surrounded by a red halo. By evaluation of adjacent pixel groups, a closely proximate red light source and white light source can be identified as a streetlight and not either a headlight or a taillight.
Pattern recognition may be used to further assist in the detection of headlights, taillights, and other objects of interest. Pattern recognition identifies objects of interest based upon their shape, reflectivity, luminance, and spectral characteristics. For example, the fact that headlights and taillights usually occur in pairs could be used to assist in qualifying or disqualifying objects as headlights and taillights. By looking for a triad pattern, including the center high-mounted stoplight required on the rear of vehicles, stoplight recognition can be enhanced. Furthermore, object recognition can be enhanced by comparing identified objects over successive frames. This temporal processing can yield information on object motion and can be used to assist in qualifying or disqualifying objects of interest.
Spatial filtering can also be useful in identifying atmospheric conditions by detecting effects on light sources caused by particular types of atmospheric conditions. One such atmospheric condition is fog. A bright light source 102 is surrounded by a transition region 104 between the intensity of the light source and the black background (
Spatial filtering can also be used to detect rain on windshield 32. This may be accomplished by performing statistical analyses between a pixel, or pixel group, and adjacent pixels or pixel groups. A view forward of a vehicle through a dry windshield would be sensed by an imaging sensor module as continuously varying differences between adjacent pixels, or pixel groups, assumed to be under constant illumination from light sources. When, however, a droplet of water or a snowflake is on windshield 32, an effect is created which causes a lack of continuous variation of differences between adjacent pixels, or pixel groups. This has the tendency to reduce the first derivative of the pixel, a condition which can be determined by processing.
Processing can be used to determine the first derivative of an image captured by image-sensing module 14 by determining a measure of the entropy, or disarray, of a pixel, or pixel group, with respect to its neighbors. For example, an approximation of the first derivative for a pixel is:
where N=8 and where Pi is a given pixel and Pj is one of 8 neighboring pixels.
It should be apparent to those skilled in the art that the invention is capable of performing control functions other than controlling the dimming of the vehicle's headlights. For example, spectral signature identifications may be utilized to detect the state of a traffic light to either warn the driver that a light has changed from green to yellow to red or to automatically decelerate and stop the vehicle. Also, by sensing that the intensity of a leading taillight has abruptly increased, a condition where the leading vehicle is braking may be identified and suitable action taken.
The invention may be utilized to identify particular traffic signs by their spectral signature as well as their geometric organization. For example, red octagons may be identified as stop signs, yellow triangles as caution signs, and the like. These capabilities are a result of the present invention providing a significant reduction in the amount of data to be processed because the image forward of the vehicle is captured in a manner which preselects data. Preselection of data is accomplished by configuring the sensor array, including the optics thereof, to consider the spatial, as well as the spectral, characteristics of light sources.
The present invention may be used to determine the environment in which the vehicle is operated. For example, a high level of “non-qualified” light sources; namely, light sources that are not headlights or taillights, as well as “qualified” light sources can be used to determine a measurement of the activity level around the vehicle; namely, that the vehicle is in an urban environment which may be a useful input for particular control algorithms. This may be accomplished as follows. An activity counter is established which represents a total number of pixels, or pixel groups, whose red, green, or blue components exceed a threshold. The threshold is set to a relatively low value, namely just above the noise floor. This counter, which registers any real detected source, is reset and retabulated every frame, preferably during the exposure period for detecting taillights. If the activity counter exceeds a particular value, then a high activity environment is detected. One use of this information would be to inhibit the control from switching the vehicle's headlights from a low-beam state to a high-beam state unless a low activity condition exists for awhile. The activity counter may be used by the control in combination with a low-beam duration counter which records the number of frames that the system has been in a low-beam state. It is reset upon system power-up and at every transition from the high-to-low beam states. The control may be inhibited from switching the vehicle's headlights to the high-beam state unless either the low-beam duration counter exceeds a value or the activity counter indicates a sustained low activity condition.
The present invention can be used to detect lane markers in order to either assist in steering the vehicle or provide a warning to the driver that a lane change is occurring. The capability of the invention to detect rain on the vehicle's windshield could be used to control the vehicle's wipers both between OFF and ON conditions and to establish a frequency of intermittent operation.
Changes and modifications in the specifically described embodiments can be carried out without departing from the principles of the invention which is intended to be limited only by the scope of the appended claims, as interpreted according to the principles of patent law including the doctrine of equivalents.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/545,039, filed Oct. 6, 2006, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/441,341, filed Nov. 16, 1999, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/135,565, filed Aug. 17, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,097,023, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/621,863, filed Mar. 25, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,796,094, which is continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/023,918 filed Feb. 26, 1993, by Kenneth Schofield and Mark Larson, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,550,677; and application Ser. No. 11/545,039 is a continuation-in-part U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/246,593, filed Oct. 6, 2005 by Schofield et al. for VEHICULAR VISION SYSTEM, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/940,700, filed Sep. 14, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,953,253, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/372,873, filed Feb. 24, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,802,617, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/975,232, filed Oct. 11, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,523,964, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/227,344, filed Jan. 8, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,302,545, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/478,093, filed on Jun. 7, 1995, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,877,897, which is a continuation-in-part of International PCT Application No. PCT/US94/01954, which designates the United States and which was filed Feb. 25, 1994 and which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/023,918, filed Feb. 26, 1993, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,550,677.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2632040 | Rabinow | Mar 1953 | A |
2827594 | Rabinow | Mar 1958 | A |
3141393 | Platt | Jul 1964 | A |
3601614 | Platzer | Aug 1971 | A |
3612666 | Rabinow | Oct 1971 | A |
3665224 | Kelsey | May 1972 | A |
3680951 | Jordan | Aug 1972 | A |
3689695 | Rosenfield et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3708231 | Walters | Jan 1973 | A |
3746430 | Brean | Jul 1973 | A |
3807832 | Castellion | Apr 1974 | A |
3811046 | Levick | May 1974 | A |
3813540 | Albrecht | May 1974 | A |
3862798 | Hopkins | Jan 1975 | A |
3947095 | Moultrie | Mar 1976 | A |
3962600 | Pittman | Jun 1976 | A |
3985424 | Steinacher | Oct 1976 | A |
3986022 | Hyatt | Oct 1976 | A |
4037134 | Löper | Jul 1977 | A |
4052712 | Ohama et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4093364 | Miller | Jun 1978 | A |
4111720 | Michel et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4161653 | Bedini | Jul 1979 | A |
4200361 | Malvano | Apr 1980 | A |
4214266 | Myers | Jul 1980 | A |
4236099 | Rosenblum | Nov 1980 | A |
4247870 | Gabel et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4249160 | Chilvers | Feb 1981 | A |
4266856 | Wainwright | May 1981 | A |
4277804 | Robison | Jul 1981 | A |
4281898 | Ochiai | Aug 1981 | A |
4288814 | Talley et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4355271 | Noack | Oct 1982 | A |
4357558 | Massoni et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4381888 | Momiyama | May 1983 | A |
4420238 | Felix | Dec 1983 | A |
4431896 | Lodetti | Feb 1984 | A |
4443057 | Bauer | Apr 1984 | A |
4460831 | Oettinger et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4481450 | Watanabe et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4491390 | Tong-Shen | Jan 1985 | A |
4512637 | Ballmer | Apr 1985 | A |
4529275 | Ballmer | Jul 1985 | A |
4529873 | Ballmer | Jul 1985 | A |
4549208 | Kamejima et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4571082 | Downs | Feb 1986 | A |
4572619 | Reininger | Feb 1986 | A |
4580875 | Bechtel | Apr 1986 | A |
4603946 | Kato | Aug 1986 | A |
4614415 | Hyatt | Sep 1986 | A |
4620141 | McCumber et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4623222 | Itoh | Nov 1986 | A |
4626850 | Chey | Dec 1986 | A |
4629941 | Ellis | Dec 1986 | A |
4630109 | Barton | Dec 1986 | A |
4632509 | Ohmi | Dec 1986 | A |
4647161 | Müller | Mar 1987 | A |
4669825 | Itoh | Jun 1987 | A |
4669826 | Itoh | Jun 1987 | A |
4671615 | Fukada | Jun 1987 | A |
4672457 | Hyatt | Jun 1987 | A |
4676601 | Itoh | Jun 1987 | A |
4690508 | Jacob | Sep 1987 | A |
4692798 | Seko et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4697883 | Suzuki | Oct 1987 | A |
4701022 | Jacob | Oct 1987 | A |
4713685 | Nishimura et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4727290 | Smith et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4731669 | Hayashi et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4741603 | Miyagi | May 1988 | A |
4768135 | Kretschmer et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4789904 | Peterson | Dec 1988 | A |
4793690 | Gahan | Dec 1988 | A |
4817948 | Simonelli | Apr 1989 | A |
4820933 | Hong | Apr 1989 | A |
4825232 | Howdle | Apr 1989 | A |
4838650 | Stewart | Jun 1989 | A |
4847772 | Michalopoulos et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4862037 | Farber et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4867561 | Fujii et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4871917 | O'Farrell et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4872051 | Dye | Oct 1989 | A |
4881019 | Shiraishi et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4886960 | Molyneux | Dec 1989 | A |
4891559 | Matsumoto et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4892345 | Rachael, III | Jan 1990 | A |
4895790 | Swanson et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4896030 | Miyaji | Jan 1990 | A |
4910591 | Petrossian et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4916374 | Schierbeek | Apr 1990 | A |
4917477 | Bechtel et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4937796 | Tendler | Jun 1990 | A |
4956591 | Schierbeek | Sep 1990 | A |
4961625 | Wood et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4967319 | Seko | Oct 1990 | A |
4970653 | Kenue | Nov 1990 | A |
4974078 | Tsai | Nov 1990 | A |
4987357 | Masaki | Jan 1991 | A |
4991054 | Walters | Feb 1991 | A |
5001558 | Burley et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5003288 | Wilhelm | Mar 1991 | A |
5012082 | Watanabe | Apr 1991 | A |
5016977 | Baude et al. | May 1991 | A |
5027001 | Torbert | Jun 1991 | A |
5027200 | Petrossian et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5044706 | Chen | Sep 1991 | A |
5055668 | French | Oct 1991 | A |
5059877 | Teder | Oct 1991 | A |
5064274 | Alten | Nov 1991 | A |
5072154 | Chen | Dec 1991 | A |
5086253 | Lawler | Feb 1992 | A |
5096287 | Kakinami et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5121200 | Choi | Jun 1992 | A |
5124549 | Michaels et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5148014 | Lynam | Sep 1992 | A |
5168378 | Black | Dec 1992 | A |
5170374 | Shimohigashi et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5172235 | Wilm et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5182502 | Slotkowski et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5184956 | Langlais et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5193029 | Schofield | Mar 1993 | A |
5204778 | Bechtel | Apr 1993 | A |
5208701 | Maeda | May 1993 | A |
5245422 | Borcherts et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5253109 | O'Farrell | Oct 1993 | A |
5276389 | Levers | Jan 1994 | A |
5289182 | Brillard et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5289321 | Secor | Feb 1994 | A |
5305012 | Faris | Apr 1994 | A |
5307136 | Saneyoshi | Apr 1994 | A |
5313072 | Vachss | May 1994 | A |
5325096 | Pakett | Jun 1994 | A |
5325386 | Jewell et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5329206 | Slotkowski et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5331312 | Kudoh | Jul 1994 | A |
5336980 | Levers | Aug 1994 | A |
5341437 | Nakayama | Aug 1994 | A |
5351044 | Mathur et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5355118 | Fukuhara | Oct 1994 | A |
5374852 | Parkes | Dec 1994 | A |
5386285 | Asayama | Jan 1995 | A |
5406395 | Wilson et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5410346 | Saneyoshi et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5414257 | Stanton | May 1995 | A |
5414461 | Kishi et al. | May 1995 | A |
5416318 | Hegyi | May 1995 | A |
5424952 | Asayama | Jun 1995 | A |
5426294 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5430431 | Nelson | Jul 1995 | A |
5440428 | Hegg et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5444478 | Lelong et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5451822 | Bechtel et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5461357 | Yoshioka et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5461361 | Moore | Oct 1995 | A |
5469298 | Suman et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5471515 | Fossum et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5475494 | Nishida et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5487116 | Nakano et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5498866 | Bendicks et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5510983 | Iino | Apr 1996 | A |
5515448 | Nishitani | May 1996 | A |
5528698 | Kamei et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5529138 | Shaw et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5530420 | Tsuchiya et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5535314 | Alves et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5537003 | Bechtel et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5539397 | Asanuma et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5541590 | Nishio | Jul 1996 | A |
5550677 | Schofield et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5555312 | Shima et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5555555 | Sato et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5568027 | Teder | Oct 1996 | A |
5574443 | Hsieh | Nov 1996 | A |
5614788 | Mullins | Mar 1997 | A |
5634709 | Iwama | Jun 1997 | A |
5648835 | Uzawa | Jul 1997 | A |
5650944 | Kise | Jul 1997 | A |
5660454 | Mori et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5661303 | Teder | Aug 1997 | A |
5670935 | Schofield et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5675489 | Pomerleau | Oct 1997 | A |
5757949 | Kinoshita et al. | May 1998 | A |
5760826 | Nayer | Jun 1998 | A |
5760828 | Cortes | Jun 1998 | A |
5760931 | Saburi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5760962 | Schofield et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5765116 | Wilson-Jones et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5781437 | Wiemer et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790403 | Nakayama | Aug 1998 | A |
5793308 | Rosinski et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5793420 | Schmidt | Aug 1998 | A |
5796094 | Schofield et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5798575 | O'Farrell et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5837994 | Stam et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5844682 | Kiyomoto et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5845000 | Breed et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5848802 | Breed et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850176 | Kinoshita et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850254 | Takano et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5867591 | Onda | Feb 1999 | A |
5877897 | Schofield et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5883739 | Ashihara et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5890021 | Onoda | Mar 1999 | A |
5896085 | Mori et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5923027 | Stam et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5949331 | Schofield et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959555 | Furuta | Sep 1999 | A |
5963247 | Banitt | Oct 1999 | A |
5990469 | Bechtel et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6020704 | Buschur | Feb 2000 | A |
6049171 | Stam et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6066933 | Ponziana | May 2000 | A |
6084519 | Coulling et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6087953 | DeLine et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097023 | Schofield et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6097024 | Stam et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6124886 | DeLine et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6144022 | Tenenbaum et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6172613 | DeLine et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6201642 | Bos | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6222447 | Schofield et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6243003 | DeLine et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6302545 | Schofield et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6313454 | Bos et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320176 | Schofield et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6396397 | Schofield et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6411328 | Franke et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424273 | Gutta et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6433676 | DeLine et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6442465 | Breed et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6498620 | Schofield et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6523964 | Schofield et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6534884 | Marcus et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6553130 | Lemelson et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6559435 | Schofield et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6611202 | Schofield et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6636258 | Strumolo | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6650233 | DeLine et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6672731 | Schnell et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6717610 | Bos et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6802617 | Schofield et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6822563 | Bos et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831261 | Schofield et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6891563 | Schofield et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6953253 | Schofield et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7227459 | Bos et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
20020015153 | Downs | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020126875 | Naoi et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040051634 | Schofield et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040200948 | Bos et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050146792 | Schofield et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050200700 | Schofield et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060018511 | Stam et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060018512 | Stam et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060028731 | Schofield et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060091813 | Stam et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070023613 | Schofield et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070109406 | Schofield et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109651 | Schofield et al . | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109652 | Schofield et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109653 | Schofield et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109654 | Schofield et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070120657 | Schofield et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070176080 | Schofield et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2133182 | Jan 1973 | DE |
2808260 | Aug 1979 | DE |
3041612 | Nov 1980 | DE |
2931368 | Feb 1981 | DE |
2946561 | May 1981 | DE |
3041692 | May 1981 | DE |
324851 | Jul 1984 | DE |
4107965 | Sep 1991 | DE |
4118208 | Nov 1991 | DE |
4139515 | Jun 1992 | DE |
4123641 | Jan 1993 | DE |
48506 | Jun 1985 | EP |
0202460 | Nov 1986 | EP |
48810 | Oct 1988 | EP |
0416222 | Mar 1991 | EP |
0426503 | May 1991 | EP |
0492591 | Jul 1991 | EP |
0450553 | Oct 1991 | EP |
0513476 | Nov 1992 | EP |
0788947 | Aug 1997 | EP |
0830267 | Dec 2001 | EP |
2241085 | Apr 1973 | FR |
2513198 | Mar 1983 | FR |
2585991 | Feb 1987 | FR |
2 641 237 | Jul 1990 | FR |
2672857 | Aug 1992 | FR |
2673499 | Sep 1992 | FR |
2726144 | Apr 1996 | FR |
934037 | Aug 1963 | GB |
1535182 | Dec 1978 | GB |
2029343 | Mar 1980 | GB |
2119087 | Nov 1983 | GB |
2137373 | Oct 1984 | GB |
2137573 | Oct 1984 | GB |
2156295 | Oct 1985 | GB |
2244187 | Nov 1991 | GB |
2255539 | Nov 1992 | GB |
2327823 | Feb 1999 | GB |
5630305 | Aug 1979 | JP |
55039843 | Mar 1980 | JP |
57-173801 | Oct 1982 | JP |
57-208530 | Dec 1982 | JP |
58-19941 | Dec 1982 | JP |
57-208531 | Feb 1983 | JP |
58110334 | Jun 1983 | JP |
58209635 | Dec 1983 | JP |
59-51325 | Mar 1984 | JP |
5951301 | Apr 1984 | JP |
59114139 | Jul 1984 | JP |
59133336 | Sep 1984 | JP |
6080953 | May 1985 | JP |
0-212730 | Oct 1985 | JP |
60166651 | Nov 1985 | JP |
60261275 | Dec 1985 | JP |
6154942 | Apr 1986 | JP |
6156638 | Apr 1986 | JP |
6243543 | Feb 1987 | JP |
62-131837 | Jun 1987 | JP |
62122487 | Jun 1987 | JP |
62122844 | Jun 1987 | JP |
6414700 | Jan 1989 | JP |
01123587 | May 1989 | JP |
30061192 | Mar 1991 | JP |
03099952 | Apr 1991 | JP |
042394 | Nov 1991 | JP |
3284413 | Dec 1991 | JP |
417386 | Apr 1992 | JP |
4114587 | Apr 1992 | JP |
40245886 | Sep 1992 | JP |
50000638 | Jan 1993 | JP |
0550883 | Mar 1993 | JP |
0577657 | Mar 1993 | JP |
5213113 | Aug 1993 | JP |
6107035 | Apr 1994 | JP |
6227318 | Aug 1994 | JP |
06-267304 | Sep 1994 | JP |
06276524 | Sep 1994 | JP |
06-295601 | Oct 1994 | JP |
074170 | Jan 1995 | JP |
7-32936 | Feb 1995 | JP |
7-47878 | Feb 1995 | JP |
7-052706 | Feb 1995 | JP |
7-69125 | Mar 1995 | JP |
07105496 | Apr 1995 | JP |
08166221 | Jun 1996 | JP |
2630604 | Apr 1997 | JP |
WO 8605147 | Sep 1986 | WO |
9814974 | Apr 1988 | WO |
WO-9419212 | Sep 1994 | WO |
9427262 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO 9621581 | Jul 1996 | WO |
9638319 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9735743 | Oct 1997 | WO |
9914088 | Mar 1999 | WO |
9923828 | May 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070120706 A1 | May 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11545039 | Oct 2006 | US |
Child | 11626535 | US | |
Parent | 09441341 | Nov 1999 | US |
Child | 11545039 | US | |
Parent | 09135565 | Aug 1998 | US |
Child | 09441341 | US | |
Parent | 08621863 | Mar 1996 | US |
Child | 09135565 | US | |
Parent | 10940700 | Sep 2004 | US |
Child | 11246593 | US | |
Parent | 10372873 | Feb 2003 | US |
Child | 10940700 | US | |
Parent | 09975232 | Oct 2001 | US |
Child | 10372873 | US | |
Parent | 09227344 | Jan 1999 | US |
Child | 09975232 | US | |
Parent | 08478093 | Jun 1995 | US |
Child | 09227344 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 08023918 | Feb 1993 | US |
Child | 08621863 | US | |
Parent | 11246593 | Oct 2005 | US |
Child | 11545039 | Oct 2006 | US |
Parent | PCT/US94/01954 | Feb 1994 | US |
Child | 08478093 | US | |
Parent | 08023918 | Feb 1993 | US |
Child | PCT/US94/01954 | US |