The invention relates generally to images sensors. In particular, the invention relates to image sensors that employ a rear-illuminated architecture and/or a plurality of contiguous photodetector arrays. Also provided are image sensor packages.
Microelectronic devices such as semiconductor chips are flat bodies having opposing front and rear surfaces. Contacts on either or both surfaces are typically connected to the internal electrical circuitry of the chip itself. Microelectronic devices have become ubiquitous in various consumer product markets, portable or otherwise, due to their size and functionality. For example, microelectronic devices have been employed in optical and imaging applications.
A number of microelectronic technologies are available for use in image sensing applications. For example, complementary metal-oxide semiconductors (CMOS) and charge-coupled device (CCD) technologies have been used in conventional image sensors, which have been incorporated into products such as digital camera and cellular telephones. Such image sensing microelectronic devices are typically illuminated from their front surface, e.g., the front surface of an image sensing chip.
One problem with the sensor architecture of
Thus, for the sensor architecture described above as well as other applications, microelectronic devices may require a protective element, e.g., a cover over all or part of the front surface. As alluded to above, certain electro-optical chips such as optical sensing chips and light-emitting chips have photosensitive elements which must be protected by a cover. Optionally, a cavity may be formed between the protective element and the front device surface. Other chips requiring a protective element include, for example, surface acoustic wave or “SAW” chips, microelectromechanical systems or “MEMS” chips (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,610,431 to Martin), and chips that employ voltage controlled oscillators (VCOs).
In some instances, optical devices such as image sensors can be made in the form of a unitary wafer, optionally undergo wafer-scale packaging, and be severed to form individual units. This may be done to improve productivity and reduce costs associated with microelectronic manufacturing. For example, U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2005/0095835, entitled “STRUCTURE AND METHOD OF MAKING CAPPED CHIPS HAVING VERTICAL INTERCONNECTS,” filed Sep. 24, 2004, inventors Humpston, Tuckerman, McWilliams, Haba, and Mitchell, describes wafer-level methods for producing capped chips. The capped chips have electrical interconnects made from elements that extend from contacts of a chip at least partially through a plurality of through holes of a cap. The electrical interconnects may be solid, so as to form seals extending across the through holes. In some cases, stud bumps extend from the contacts, forming parts of the electrical interconnects. In some cases, a fusible conductive medium forms a part of the electrical interconnects.
Nevertheless, there are some unavoidable drawbacks associated with the use of a cover in image sensor technology. For example, there is the cost associated with the manufacture of the cover as well as the cost associated with placement and/or alignment of the cover relative to the microelectronic device. Furthermore, when the cover is made from a material that has a coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) that differs from that of the microelectronic device, problems associated with the CTE mismatch between the cover and the device must be resolved.
Accordingly, opportunities exist in the art to provide alternatives and improvements to the image sensor architectures. In particular, it has been discovered that rear-illuminated architectures may be advantageously employed to overcome the drawbacks of known image sensor technologies. Furthermore, it has been discovered that architectures employing a plurality of contiguous photodetector arrays may also be advantageously used in conjunction with or as an alternative to rear-illuminated architectures.
In general, the invention provides image sensors. In a first embodiment, a sensor is provided that includes an optically transparent substrate having first and second opposing surfaces, a detector layer in contact with the second surface, a plurality of photodetectors, and one or more color filters. The first surface is a light-receiving surface. The photodetectors are located at sites of first, second, and third arrays in the detector layer. The one or more color filters are positioned to allow for selective transmission of light of first, second, and third wavelengths through the substrate to first, second, and third arrays, respectively. This embodiment is particularly suited for a sensor architecture that does not employ any microlenses.
In another embodiment, an image sensor is provided comprising a detector layer, first, second, and third arrays of photodetectors, and first, second, and third lenses. The arrays are each contiguous, located in the detector layer, and substantially coplanar to each other. The lenses are effective to direct transmission of light to their respective photodetector arrays.
In still another embodiment, an image sensor is provided comprising a detector layer containing first, second, and third contiguous arrays of photodetectors therein and having a light-receiving surface. The arrays are located in the layer at increasing distances from the light-receiving surface. In addition, at least a portion of each array does not overlap another.
For any of the sensors of the invention, the substrate, when used, is typically made from an insulating material. In some instances, a ceramic material may be used. When optical transparency is desired, exemplary suitable ceramic materials include oxides such as silicon oxides and aluminum oxides. Such oxides may be single crystalline, multicrystalline, or amorphous.
In addition, detectors of the invention are typically located in a detector layer comprising a semiconductor material. While the semiconductor material may consist of or comprise Si, other semiconductor materials may be used as well.
As alluded to above, different embodiments of the invention may have different arrangements of photodetectors. Typically, the photodetectors are arranged in at least one array. However, any number of photodetector arrays may be used. In any case, optimal sensor performance may result when arrays are provided in a nonzero positive integer multiples of three, four, or five.
When a plurality of arrays is employed, the arrays may be contiguous or noncontiguous, coplanar or noncoplanar. As an initial matter, any sensor that employs a plurality of arrays may involve the arrangement of the arrays in a linear pattern. In addition, depending on the number of arrays used, the arrays may be arranged in different patterns. For example, three coplanar arrays may be arranged in a triangle pattern. Four coplanar arrays may be are arranged in a quadrilateral pattern. Five coplanar arrays may be arranged in a cross pattern.
Each array typically corresponds to a wavelength of light or color. For example, when three arrays are provided, the arrays may each correspond to a different one of red, green, and blue. When a fourth array is added, the array may correspond to a different color, e.g., white, or the same color as one of the aforementioned, e.g., red, green, or red.
The invention also provides an image sensor package that includes any of the image sensors described above. The package includes a plurality of electrical contacts in electrical communication with the photodetectors. The contacts may be movable relative to the photodetectors, preferably in a sufficiently stress-relieving manner so as to maintain electrical communication with the photodetectors under repeated thermal cycling and other conditions.
Before describing the present invention in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to specific photodetector technologies or types of electronic products, as such may vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting.
As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular article forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include both singular and plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “an array,” includes a plurality of arrays as well as a single array, reference to “a wavelength” includes a single wavelength as well as a range of wavelengths, and the like.
In addition, terminology indicative or suggestive of a particular spatial relationship between elements of the invention is to be construed in a relative sense rather an absolute sense unless the context of usage clearly dictates to the contrary. For example, the terms “over” and “on” as used to describe the spatial orientation of a sensor relative to a carrier or contacts does not necessarily indicate that the sensor is located above the carrier or contacts. Thus, in a package that includes a sensor placed over or on a carrier and contacts, the sensor may be located above, at the same level as, or below, the carrier and contacts depending on the package's orientation.
Thus, in a first aspect, the invention pertains to an image sensor having a rear-illuminated architecture. Typically, such a sensor includes an optically transparent substrate having first and second opposing surfaces, a detector layer in contact with the second surface, and a plurality of photodetectors. In such a case, the first surface is a light-receiving surface, and the photodetectors are located in the detector layer.
A simple example of such a sensor architecture for a camera is shown in
In general, any of a number of materials may be used to form the transparent substrate. For example, a number of ceramic materials are optically transparent. The term “ceramic” is generally used herein in its ordinary sense to indicate to a hard, brittle, heat-resistant and corrosion-resistant dielectric material made typically made by heating an inorganic compound, e.g., single or mixed metal oxides such as aluminum, zirconium or silicon oxides, nitrides, and carbides, at a high temperature. A ceramic material may be single crystalline, multicrystalline, or, as in the case of glass, amorphous.
In particular, certain oxides have superior optical properties for use with the invention. Exemplary oxides for use in the invention include silicon oxides (e.g., quartz or silicon-based glass) and aluminum oxides (e.g., sapphire). As discussed in detail below, these materials may be used with existing image-sensor processes, particularly those that involve the application of heat.
The rear-illuminated architecture provides a number of advantages over the art. For example, when photodiodes are illuminated from the backside, there are no concerns with metal traces blocking the signal. In addition, the fill factor is larger. As discussed in detail below, increasing the fill factor decreases the need for microlenses and saves cost.
In another aspect, the invention pertains to an image sensor that employs a plurality of photodetectors in a plurality of contiguous arrays. The term “array” is used herein in its ordinary sense and refers to a two-dimensional arrangement of features such as an arrangement of photodetectors, filters, or lenses. Arrays are generally comprised of regular, ordered features, as in, for example, a rectilinear grid, parallel stripes, spirals, and the like. An “array” differs from a “pattern” in that “patterns” do not necessarily contain regular and ordered features. In addition, the term “contiguous array” is to an array in which features are uninterrupted. For example, contiguous array of a single first color generally should not contain any feature of another color between any two adjacent features of the first color. Thus, an array containing only red pixels uninterrupted by pixels of another color may be considered a contiguous array. In contrast, while a two-dimensional Bayer pattern of color pixels may be considered to include three coplanar arrays, i.e., a red pixel array, a green pixel array, and a blue pixel array, none of the three arrays may be considered “contiguous,” because the pixels of each color array is interrupted by interspersed pixels of the other two colors. Accordingly, two contiguous and coplanar arrays of features will not have any overlapping portions except, in certain instances, at their edges and/or corners.
Typically, photodetector arrays are located in a detector layer. In some instances, the arrays are coplanar to each other. In the alternative, the arrays may be located at increasing distances from a light-receiving surface of the image sensor. In any case, a sensor that incorporation this aspect of the invention typically, in contrast to those described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,632,701 to Merrill, include arrays located such that at least a portion of each array does not overlap another. In addition, the arrays may be substantially identical to or different from each other. For example, they may have the same or different number of photodetectors.
The detector layer may be provided in the form of a chip, wafer, or a portion thereof. In addition, the detector layer may be constructed from any material that does not interfere with the operation of the photodetectors. For example, photodetectors may take the form of photodiodes or photogates. The material may be selected according to the form of the photodetectors.
In any case, the detector layer typically includes a semiconductor material. The term “semiconductor” is used herein in its ordinary sense to indicate any of various solid crystalline substances having electrical conductivity greater than insulators but less than good conductors. For example, detector layers of the invention may include a single crystalline material consisting essentially of a single element, e.g., Si or Ge, or a compound semiconductor, e.g., a III-V semiconductor such as GaAs. The presence or absence of dopants is not critical to the invention, except when operability of the invention is in question. Alternatively, a multicrystalline or amorphous semiconductor material may be used. The invention may be advantageously employed in conjunction with technologies that employ either direct or indirect band gap semiconductors.
As the processing infrastructure for silicon is generally more robust than that of other semiconductors, silicon-based detector layers are often preferred regardless of the architecture of the image sensor. For example, silicon-based detector layers may be advantageously used in both front-illuminated and rear-illuminated sensor architectures. With the rear-illuminated sensor architecture, however, certain optically transparent substrate materials are preferred when a silicon-based detector layer is used. For example, rear illuminated sensors may be formed from silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafers. Exemplary silicon-on-insulator systems include silicon-on-quartz (SOQ), silicon-on-glass (SOG) and silicon-on sapphire (SOS). It is expected that SOQ systems may be particularly suited for use with the invention because it permits standard high-temperature processing techniques involving, for example, thermal oxidation, diffusion, etc. As a result, substantial changes would not be required to existing image-sensor processes.
Other features of the invention also relate to image sensors. For sensors that employ a plurality of photodetector arrays, one or more color filters may be positioned in a manner effective to allow selective transmission of light of particular wavelengths to each array. In addition or in the alternative, a plurality of lenses may be positioned in a manner effective to direct transmission of light to each array. Thus, an image sensor having first, second, and third photodetector arrays may employ: (a) one or more color filters positioned in a manner effective to allow selective transmission of light of first, second, and third wavelengths through the substrate to the first, second, and third arrays, respectively; and/or (b) first, second, and third lenses positioned in a manner effective to direct transmission of light to the first, second, and third arrays, respectively.
To illustrate the how color filters and or lenses may be advantageously used with the invention, the following provides some background on known image sensor architectures. In general, known color image sensor architectures use one or more color filters over an array of photodetectors. The filters serve to block photos with wavelengths other than a wavelength (or range of wavelengths) of interest, allow the remaining photons to be collected by the underlying photodetectors. The color filter or filters are often arranged in a “Bayer pattern.” See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 3,971,065 to Bayer. An exemplary pixel array is having color filters arranged in a “Bayer pattern” is depicted in
Each row of the array contains filters of alternating colors. That is, each row contains alternating red and green filters or alternating green and blue filters. Similarly, each column contains filters of alternative colors. No two neighboring filters in a row or in a column share the same color. Green filters occupy half of all array sites, while red and blue filters each occupy a quarter of all array sites.
Unlike the image sensors of the invention, certain known color image sensors require a plurality of microlenses. Typically, each photodetector requires its own microlens. In addition, as suggested by
In addition, microlenses are also problematic for additional reasons. In general, microlenses work for light coming in at close to normal incidence only. Light at the corners may be coming in at an angle to the sensor and be lost, resulting in darkness or vignetting (as discussed below). Microlenses also tend to be relatively soft and easily damaged. Thus, it is very hard to remove dust from the image sensor. By removing the microlenses from the sensor, the sensitivity and durability of the sensor is increased. Furthermore, microlenses are also implicated in causing purple fringe, an artifact common in digital imaging systems. It has been theorized that purple fringes are caused by chromatic aberration of the microlenses, particularly for light coming in off normal.
In contrast, some embodiments of the invention include an architecture that employs a plurality of contiguous pixel array. For example, the sixteen pixels of
As shown in
It should be noted that array based image sensors for cameras generally require a camera lens for each photodetector array. As shown in
As a result of the above-described optical considerations with respect to the focal length of the camera lens relative to its phototodetector array, image sensor architectures that employ a plurality of contiguous pixels arrays may exhibit form factor advantages over prior art architectures. For example,
As discussed above, when a plurality of contiguous arrays of photodetectors are provided in a detector layer, each array may employ a different lens positioned in a manner effective to direct transmission of light thereto. When each array is single color pixel array, the associated lens may be required to handle a subset of the visible wavelength range. Accordingly, the chromatic requirements on the lens are relaxed. The lenses for each different color can be optimized to work best with that particular color. The relaxed wavelength requirements also reduce lens complexity and lead to lower cost.
Lenses for use with the invention may be formed from any of materials that exhibit the appropriate optical properties for the intended application. For example, the material must be transparent to optical radiation at wavelengths keyed to the sensitivity of the sensor. In some instances, a lens may be formed from a ceramic material as described above and/or a polymeric material. The terms “polymer” or “polymeric” are used herein in their ordinary sense to refer to any of numerous natural and synthetic compounds of usually high molecular weight formed from a plurality of monomeric units, each typically having a low molecular weight. The terms include, for example, homopolymers as well copolymers, linear as well as branch and/or cyclic polymers, crosslinked as well as uncrosslinked polymers. Exemplary polymers suitable for use in the invention include those known in the microelectronic packaging industry such as those containing cyclic moieties, e.g., polycarbonates, polyimides, polyethylene terephthalates, and polystyrenes. In addition, polymer families such as polyarylene ethers, polyarylenes, and parylenes may be used as well. In some instances, halogenated polymers may be used. Exemplary commercially available fluorinated and/or chlorinated polymers include polyvinylchloride, polyvinylfluoride, polyvinylidene fluoride, polyvinylidene chloride, polychorotrifluoroethylene, polytetrafluoroethylene, polyhexafluoropropylene, and copolymers thereof.
When a plurality of lenses is used, the lenses may be formed individually or together. For example, three to five lenses could be implemented in one piece of injection molded polymer. Alternatively, the lenses could be written as a pattern in the interior of a single glass sheet otherwise. The lenses may also be made from etched glass. Both wet or dry etch techniques known in the art may be used to form the lenses of the invention. Similarly, techniques that use resist reflow or gray scale lithography may be used as well.
Color filters, when employed with the invention, may be provided in any of number of forms. In some instances, color filters may be provided on-chip, e.g., as an integral part of a chip or wafer that contains detector layer. In the alternative, moving the color filters off-chip or off-wafer has advantages as well. For example, wafer cost may be reduced by moving color filters off-chip. In addition, off-chip manufacturing of bulk filter provides greater precision and performance from a manufacturing perspective.
However, the color filters are not a requirement of the invention. In some instances, the invention, as an alternative to using color filters, takes advantage of the differential penetrative properties of photons of different wavelengths relative to the detector layer. For example, photons of different wavelengths penetrate silicon to different depths. Exploitation of this phenomenon has been described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,632,701 to Merrill. However, the present invention, unlike the technologies described in the '701 patent, does not require different color sensors to be stacked on top of each other. In some instances, all feature of an array may be located at a single depth. Alternatively, each array may be, for example, the different depth photodiodes could be arranged in a modified Bayer-Pattern as shown in
As an alternative or as an additional aspect of the invention to architectures that employ color filters and/or exploit differential penetrative properties of different colored light, the invention may use a prism. Prisms are often used to separate light having a plurality of wavelengths (e.g., white light) into its constituent wavelengths.
For the three or four array image sensors, some sections of an image may contain objects both close to and far from the camera lenses that include wavelengths covered by only one or two of the arrays. The information associated with the additional color wavelengths may have to be estimated in some way from adjacent pixels. One way to avoid problems with missing color information due to parallax is to use a symmetric pixel array as shown in
For image sensors containing five pixel arrays, the blue array may not be duplicated. Blue light has the highest quantum efficiency in photodetectors such as photodiodes because it is of higher energy than either green or red light. Furthermore, the human eye is the least sensitive to blue light as can be seen by the formula for luminance, which is based on average human vision, below:
LUMINANCE=0.299*RED+0.587*GREEN+0.114*BLUE
Thus, color accuracy of blue light is typically the least important. The two red and green arrays serve to reduce the overall errors in magnitude versus having only single arrays for those colors.
When a plurality of contiguous arrays is employed, there may be some parallax associated with their lenses. This causes the images on each array to be slightly shifted relative to each other. It is possible to compensate for this shift during image processing by maximizing the cross correlation function between the arrays. This compensation can also correct for temperature effects due to potentially unequal thermal expansion of the image sensors and lenses. Another way to reduce parallax is through the arrangement of the arrays. For example, when four arrays are used, they may be arranged in a two-by-two matrix (
Each object in the image can be shifted independently, depending on its distance from the camera. As an added benefit, the amount of shift can be recorded to provide information on object distance, e.g., for three-dimensional imaging. The required shift and thus distance can also be fed into an auto-focus system. This system may operate dynamically to track objects in motion for more responsive focusing. One of ordinary skill in the art upon routine experimentation should be able to come up with mechanism, software, and other items to take advantage of the parallax phenomenon associated with the invention.
Vignetting is another potential issue that should be addressed for image sensor technologies. In general, vignetting occurs when an array of pixels receive attenuated light at its edges and/or corners relative to its center. This may occur when the array has an area greater than that of the light circle generated from focused incoming light. In order to avoid vignetting, the light focused on a pixel array should extend beyond the pixel array, as shown in
It should be noted, however, that when pixel arrays are placed next to each other, they, as shown in
The invention also provide images sensor packages that may employ any of the image sensors described above. For example, the package may include a plurality of electrical contacts in electrical communication with the photodetectors. The contacts may be movable relative to the photodetectors, preferably in a sufficiently stress-relieving manner so as to maintain electrical communication with the photodetectors under repeated thermal cycling and other conditions. For example, the packaging technology described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,465,893 to Khandros et al. may be used with the invention.
Solder suitable for use with the invention may take any of a number of forms. Typically, balls or spheres are used. Pastes and other forms of solder may used as well. Regardless of the form of solder used, any various fusible alloys may be used. For example, eutectic solders containing tin and/or lead are known in the art. A flux may be advantageously used in conjunction with solder, since fluxless solder flow processes tend to be more costly. The flux may be present in the solder or in the passage. Optionally, a solder resist, typically an organic material, may be used to mask areas adjacent to the regions on which the solder may contact.
As shown, the sensor is placed on a compliant carrier, and the carrier is interposed between the sensor and the contacts in the form of solder balls. The compliant carrier allows the contacts to be movable relative to the photodetectors of the image sensor as well as other components of the image sensor. In addition, as evidenced by the package depicted in
Thus, the invention provides previously unknown advantages in the art of image sensor architecture leading to improved performances and/or reduction of cost. In general, the invention does not require the use of a transparent cover and a cavity such as those described in U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2005/0095835 and may be adapted to maximize the aperture ratio for an image sensor. As a result, sensor performance is improved by increasing the signal-to-noise ratio and low-light sensitivity. In addition, efficiency and low-light sensitivity may be improved. In some instances, the invention allows for the routing of conductive traces to be formed over instead of around pixels. As a result, the invention provides for a smaller and/or less costly chip than one made using a known architecture. Furthermore, the invention, in some instances, allows sensors to use nearly 100% of incoming light without filter loss. No cavity or cover are required
In packaging embodiments, the invention enables a low cost, ultrahigh yield integrated package that may be less expensive to produce. Such a package is compatible with existing assembly infrastructure.
Variations of the present invention will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art in view of the disclosure contained herein. In general, the inventive image sensor may be constructed to contain or exclude specific feature according to the intended use of the sensor. That is, the inventive image sensor does not require the incorporation of all novel features of the invention. For example, when the invention is provided in the context of front-illuminated architecture, an optically transparent substrate may be used or omitted. In some instances, antireflective and other optical coatings may be provided. The coating may serve more than one function.
As another example, an alignment mechanism may be provided for aligning the components of the image sensors of the invention, e.g., the detectors, the filters, etc. In general, aligning mechanisms or apparatuses known in the art, e.g., mating features, clips, clamps, guides (mechanical, optical, electronic, or magnetic), devices used in metrology, etc., may be used to facilitate proper positioning of the elements of the invention. Optionally, a locking mechanism may be used as well. The locking mechanism may be the same as or different from the aligning mechanism. Additional variations of the invention may be discovered upon routine experimentation without departing from the spirit of the present invention.
It is to be understood that, while the invention has been described in conjunction with the preferred specific embodiments thereof, the foregoing description merely illustrates and does not limit the scope of the invention. Numerous alternatives and equivalents exist which do not depart from the invention set forth above. For example, any particular embodiment of the invention, e.g., those depicted in any drawing herein, may be modified to include or exclude features of other embodiments. Other aspects, advantages, and modifications within the scope of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains.
All patents and patent applications mentioned herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
The present application claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/707,813, filed Aug. 12, 2005, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2507956 | Bruno | May 1950 | A |
2796370 | Ostrander | Jun 1957 | A |
2851385 | Spruance | Sep 1958 | A |
3971065 | Bayer | Jul 1976 | A |
3981023 | King et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4027323 | Lorenze, Jr. et al. | May 1977 | A |
4069095 | Lorenze, Jr. et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4196508 | Lorenze, Jr. | Apr 1980 | A |
4197633 | Lorenze, Jr. et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4259679 | Knibb et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4275407 | Lorenze, Jr. | Jun 1981 | A |
4279690 | Dierschke | Jul 1981 | A |
4339689 | Yamanaka et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4351101 | Young | Sep 1982 | A |
4551629 | Carson et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4764846 | Go | Aug 1988 | A |
4794092 | Solomon | Dec 1988 | A |
4797179 | Watson et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4862249 | Carlson | Aug 1989 | A |
4933601 | Sagawa et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4984358 | Nelson | Jan 1991 | A |
5037779 | Whalley et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5081520 | Yoshii et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5104820 | Go et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5118924 | Mehra et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5124543 | Kawashima | Jun 1992 | A |
5126286 | Chance | Jun 1992 | A |
5177753 | Tanaka | Jan 1993 | A |
5250462 | Sasaki et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5266501 | Imai | Nov 1993 | A |
5266833 | Capps | Nov 1993 | A |
5321303 | Kawahara et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5342681 | Sulzbach | Aug 1994 | A |
5393574 | Sulzbach | Feb 1995 | A |
5455386 | Brathwaite et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5455455 | Badehi | Oct 1995 | A |
5500540 | Jewell et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5526449 | Meade et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5546654 | Wojnarowski et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5547906 | Badehi | Aug 1996 | A |
5567657 | Wojnarowski et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5595930 | Baek | Jan 1997 | A |
5612570 | Eide et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5657206 | Pedersen et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5661087 | Pedersen et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5672519 | Song et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5675180 | Pedersen et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5677200 | Park et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5703400 | Wojnarowski et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5716759 | Badehi | Feb 1998 | A |
5814894 | Igarashi et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817541 | Averkiou et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5837562 | Cho | Nov 1998 | A |
5837566 | Pedersen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5849623 | Wojnarowski et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5857858 | Gorowitz et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5859475 | Freyman et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5869353 | Levy et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5888884 | Wojnarowski | Mar 1999 | A |
5891761 | Vindasius et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5900674 | Wojnarowski et al. | May 1999 | A |
5909052 | Ohta et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5938452 | Wojnarowski | Aug 1999 | A |
5952712 | Ikuina et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5965933 | Young et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5985695 | Freyman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5986746 | Metz et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993981 | Askinazi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002163 | Wojnarowski | Dec 1999 | A |
6020217 | Kuisl et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6022758 | Badehi | Feb 2000 | A |
6040235 | Badehi | Mar 2000 | A |
6046410 | Wojnarowski et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6072236 | Akram et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080596 | Vindasius et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083766 | Chen | Jul 2000 | A |
6087586 | Chen | Jul 2000 | A |
6092280 | Wojnarowski | Jul 2000 | A |
6098278 | Vindasius et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106735 | Kurle et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6124637 | Freyman et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6134118 | Pedersen et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6235141 | Feldman et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6307261 | Val et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6329708 | Komiyama et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6590291 | Akagawa et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6646289 | Badehi et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6891256 | Joshi et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6977431 | Oh et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7033664 | Zilber et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7425460 | Pain | Sep 2008 | B2 |
20050074954 | Yamanaka | Apr 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 490 739 | Jun 1992 | EP |
0 650 199 | Apr 1995 | EP |
0 790 653 | Aug 1997 | EP |
0 810 659 | Dec 1997 | EP |
63-166710 | Jul 1988 | JP |
11-326366 | Nov 1999 | JP |
WO-8502283 | May 1985 | WO |
WO-8904113 | May 1989 | WO |
WO-9519645 | Jul 1995 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070034777 A1 | Feb 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60707813 | Aug 2005 | US |