Described herein are devices for placement in surgically created soft tissue spaces, potential spaces, or cavities. The implantable devices generally include a bioabsorbable body having an open framework that facilitates attachment of tissue thereto, while supporting adjacent margins of the surgical resection cavity in a manner that helps avoid post-surgical deformities. Methods for using the implantable devices in oncoplastic surgery are further described.
The treatment and/or prevention of breast cancer typically includes surgery to remove an area of tissue believed or proven to be cancerous or at high risk for developing cancer over time. Various surgical procedures are used to remove tissue of this nature, but in general, at least a section of the breast is removed to prevent further growth of abnormal tissue. Such surgical procedures include removal of a portion of the breast (partial mastectomy), or if needed, the entire breast is removed (mastectomy). Surgery is often followed by additional treatments to prevent recurrence of the cancer, and these treatments may include radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy. Soon after surgery is performed, bodily fluids known as seroma fluid usually fill the surgical cavity. This fluid contains varying amounts of bloody and proteinaceous materials, cells that help the body during the healing process, as well as anti-inflammatory biological elements. Seroma fluid almost immediately fills the surgical cavity and may temporarily appear to restore the shape of the breast. However over time, the body absorbs the seroma fluid, resulting in the cavity collapsing on itself to varying degrees. In many cases, scar tissue develops and can cause adherence of the margins or walls of the cavity as a natural part of the healing process. This process can result in undesirable deformities of the breast, ranging from dimpling of the overlying skin to large divots and concavities that are unsightly and painful. In addition, radiation of the area compounds these effects and makes correction of these painful abnormalities very challenging to address. When a mastectomy is performed, inadequate amounts of skin and tissue may remain to effectively reconstruct the breast to an acceptable aesthetic appearance.
Recent advances in breast cancer treatment combine the philosophy and/or principles of aesthetic and reconstructive surgery (plastic surgery) with the principles and techniques of surgical oncology in an attempt to restore the form and/or function of the breast at the time of (or after) removal of abnormal tissue. This relatively new field of surgery, referred to as oncoplastic surgery, generally involves removing cancerous tissue and then manipulating and utilizing various body tissues or rearranging the adjacent remaining tissue to help correct any defects or gaps that were created by the surgery. In this manner adjacent tissues are used to fill the voids left in surgery, which can decrease seroma formation and improve the ultimate outcome, particularly in regards to shape and contour of the breast. For example, tissue flaps may be created to provide easier manipulation, approximation, rotation and closure of tissues in and around the surgical wound. There may be situations, however, when insufficient tissue is present to create these flaps in the size needed, or to create a flap at all resulting in a smaller or malformed (deformed) breast after surgery. In other instances, the flap may be created in such a way that its blood supply is compromised, ultimately causing the flap and surrounding tissues to die, leading to fat necrosis and other undesirable patient outcomes. Accordingly, it would be desirable, for example, to have a device and/or technique to employ in circumstances where wound tension and sparsity of tissue may otherwise cause a long-standing deformity such as following removal of a portion of the breast. An important goal of the devices and approaches described herein is to improve surgical techniques for breast surgery.
Described herein are methods of breast surgery and devices for use thereof. The methods and devices may be useful in oncoplastic surgery, where it is desirable to preserve and/or improve the shape, size, and contour of an area of the body where tissue has been surgically removed, such as the breast. In some aspects, the methods and devices provide support for the tissue and may help to reapproximate tissues after surgery to prevent deformity of the skin overlying the cavity. For example, the methods and devices may be beneficial when insufficient tissue is present to create a tissue flap, or in the instance where sufficient tissue is present to form a tissue flap but its creation would compromise the blood supply to the tissue, causing tissue death and ultimately fat necrosis.
The methods of breast surgery described herein generally include the steps of removing tissue (such as breast tissue) to create a cavity or void (where the cavity or void may disrupt and/or deform the shape, size, or contour of the breast); placing an oncoplastic surgery device into the cavity, where the oncoplastic device comprises a body having an open framework formed primarily of a supportive bioabsorbable material having anterior, posterior, and lateral regions; manipulating, or otherwise mobilizing, undermining, and/or rotating adjacent tissues surrounding the cavity; and at some time during the surgical procedure, attaching the open framework to the surrounding tissue, typically via monofilament absorbable suture. This approach eliminates the need for the device to fill the defect, cavity or void with foreign material, as is described in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,637,498 to Corbitt, Jr (“Corbitt”). In contrast to the approach described by Corbitt, the approaches described herein include using a patient's native tissue in combination with a bioabsorbable open framework device to help reconstruct the cosmetic deformity caused by the surgical tissue resection.
Alternatively, the methods of breast surgery may include removing an area of breast tissue to create a cavity, an opening, or a space; placing an oncoplastic device into the cavity, the opening, or the space, the oncoplastic device comprising a body having an open framework and formed of a bioabsorbable material, the open framework comprising an anterior, a posterior, and lateral regions, and an array of cross-member elements that impart an ellipsoid profile to the open framework; manipulating tissue surrounding the cavity, the opening, or the space; and attaching the open framework to the manipulated tissue.
The oncoplastic devices described herein are implantable and may include a body formed of a bioabsorbable material. The body is generally configured to have an open framework so that it can be attached to tissues surrounding the cavity, e.g., by passing suture around or through the open framework and also through the adjacent tissue. The body has a length, width, and height, and may be comprised of one or more framework elements. In some variations, the body has a geometric profile that is generally of the form of a tri-axial ellipsoid or an oblate ellipsoid of revolution. The framework typically has sufficient rigidity to be sutured to adjacent tissue without significantly deforming the shape of the framework element. It also may be useful for the framework elements to have a degree of compliance, or “give” whereby the device elements are able to move while in position to accommodate patient movement. The compliant nature of the device framework, combined with the open architecture of the framework may allow the surrounding tissues to be integral within the body of the device, and may create a feeling of resilience or compliance when the area of the body overlying the device is touched or pressed upon through the skin, giving the device a natural feel to the patient. This compliance in the framework elements may also serve as a “strain relief” to the tissue that is sutured to the device, to minimize disruption of the suture/tissue interface. In some variations, it may be beneficial for the implantable oncoplastic devices to include a body formed of a bioabsorbable material and having an open framework, wherein the body has a length, width, and height, and wherein the open framework comprises a periphery and an array of cross-member elements that impart an ellipsoid profile to the open framework.
Additionally, the oncoplastic devices disclosed herein are generally structured in a way that helps to support the tissue during healing, while allowing body fluids, e.g., seroma fluid, to flow freely within them. The seroma fluid can organize within the oncoplastic device and heal in a manner that reconstitutes the form, shape, size and or contour of the breast. This process of regrowth generally mimics the ability of the breast to fill in the defect as seen with autologous fat grafting. Accordingly, due to their structure, the devices generally provide a means of autologous fat grafting without having to harvest and process fat from a remote surgical site. This in turn allows the breast to heal in a more natural manner and avoid potential mammographic artifacts such as calcifications associated with fat necrosis (unsuccessful fat grafting). As a result of the breast tissue being able to heal in a less stressful manner, the mammographic results may provide a more acceptable method for following the tumor resection area for recurrence of cancer.
The oncoplastic devices may further include a plurality of discrete radiographically visible elements, e.g., marker elements or marker clips, to aid in visualization of the device as it was placed at the site of the surgical resection cavity and sutured to the tissues at greatest risk for cancer recurrence. Given the specific arrangement of the spacing of these radiographically visible elements, they define the area to which the radiologist or other clinicians may direct their attention when they are seen using clinical imaging techniques such as mammography, CT, etc. Treatments after surgery often include radiation, and these visible elements of the device may be useful in a variety of clinical circumstances, such as when focusing external radiation to target tissue surrounding the cavity if radiation therapy is subsequently employed.
Additionally or alternatively, the framework of the oncoplastic device may be composed of a bioabsorbable element that has a relatively tissue-equivalent z-number that allows it to be relatively radiolucent on some types of imaging such as mammography, while marker clip components coupled thereto are radiopaque and easily seen on many forms of clinical imaging (e.g., CT, MR, kV X-ray).
Described herein are methods of breast surgery and devices for use thereof. As previously mentioned, the methods and devices may be useful in oncoplastic surgery, where it may be desirable to preserve and/or improve the size, shape, and/or contour of the breast. More specifically, the methods and devices may facilitate the reapproximation of tissues in a manner that provides for an improved surgical outcome, which may lead to decreasing fibrosis, pain, and scar tissue formation, and may also contribute to an improved aesthetic/cosmetic outcome, as well as mammographic outcome.
Oncoplastic Devices
The devices described herein are implantable oncoplastic surgical devices/tools/implants (also referred to herein as “oncoplastic devices” or “devices”) that may comprise a three-dimensional body having a length, width, and height. The body may have an open framework or trellis-like framework that is formed from one or more framework elements. The devices are generally configured for open surgical placement into a surgical area where tissue has been removed, e.g., lumpectomy, partial mastectomy, mastopexy, and reduction mastopexy, and employed in a way that is useful in avoiding post-surgical deformities of an anatomic region.
In some variations, the device is placed and secured with suture during the same operation (and through the same surgical incision) as the surgical removal of the tissue (e.g., the device is placed and secured during the lumpectomy procedure). When placed at the original time of surgery, the open framework and external elements on the body of the device may allow for the dermal lymphatics and vasculature of the breast to heal more appropriately. However, in certain circumstances, the device may be used for partial breast reconstruction in patients that have had previous breast surgery with poor cosmetic results such as a concavity or distortion of the breast. In these circumstances, the device is used to fill some of the void left by removal of a given volume of breast tissue, as well as restore the contour and shape of the breast. The semi-rigid, but pliable framework may allow for the device to “plump up” a previously depressed area of the breast, and may provide a mechanism for autologous fat grafting to occur spontaneously by the body itself without having to harvest, process and transfer fat into the area. Scar tissue may be sutured to the framework of the device, thereby decreasing the skin tension on the overlying wound.
In some variations, the devices are secured to tissues that have been mobilized from areas adjacent to the tissue cavity, e.g., tissue flaps. In instances where mobilization of tissue is not necessary, the device may be implanted with or without being secured to tissue of the cavity, and the cavity is closed around and/or through the device. The devices described herein can be used by surgeons who do not actively reapproximate the opposing walls of a tissue cavity created by, e.g., partial mastectomy/lumpectomy. In addition, the devices can be used by surgeons who choose to surgically reapproximate at least a portion of the breast tissue surrounding the lumpectomy cavity. This reapproximation, sometimes called cavity closure, is typically accomplished by suturing the breast tissue on either side of the lumpectomy cavity and drawing the tissue together prior to skin closure. In addition to the devices disclosed here, other suitable devices, e.g., those structures disclosed in commonly owned U.S. application Ser. No. 13/456,435 may be used with the surgical methods further described below.
The framework material of the device may be relatively rigid (or non-compressible), but the overall device can be compliant and pliable or deformable under modest loads encountered while implanted. In general, the open framework is configured to be rigid enough to support the surrounding tissue without fully collapsing, yet have large enough openings within it to allow substantial volumes of tissue to be pulled over or under it, be wrapped around it in various directions, or to flow through the open framework. The open architecture of the oncoplastic devices is generally intended to maximize the opportunity for tissue ingrowth, tissue mobilization, tissue approximation and/or fluid communication across the peripheral boundary of the device. The open architecture may also allow for the passage of suture around a portion of the device at multiple locations of the device by the clinician to help secure the device to adjacent tissue. There may also be specific sites along the device's structure intended for a more precise placement of suture or other fastening mechanisms in order to secure the device in a specific or particular manner, orientation or position.
In addition, those configurations of the device which are more linear or planar (i.e., having a length and/or width greater than its height, and in some instances having a contoured edge to the device) may be employed to improve size, shape, and/or contour of the breast. For example, the contoured edge can be incorporated into the tissues of the breast so as to impart a contour or projection to the reconstructed area of the breast thereby adding contour to the skin surface of the breast for improved cosmetic outcomes. This maneuver can be performed, for example, by placing the device in the center of the breast during a central lumpectomy to provide additional projection. Alternatively, the device may be placed in an outwardly projecting orientation (perpendicular to the skin surface), for example, underneath a vertical incision used for reduction mammoplasty. The devices may also be used with or without radiographically visible elements in these circumstances and can provide a visual cue for the radiologist and radiation oncologist for post-op treatment or long term follow up of the surgical area.
In some variations, the body of the oncoplastic device is formed of a bioabsorbable material, e.g., a bioabsorbable polymer, so as to not leave behind a permanent implant that would interfere with long term clinical imaging during patient follow-up or overall patient acceptance. Exemplary bioabsorbable polymers include without limitation, collagen, polygalactin, poliglecaprone, polylactic acid, polyglycolic acid, caprolactone, lactide, glycolide, and copolymers and blends thereof. The bioabsorbable structure may function as a trellis, support, bridge, etc., for tissues to be sutured to, and with openings to allow tissue to flow or be pulled through it. Further, the structure may allow the tissue to heal while being supported by the underlying device, as well as help to decrease the amount of tension on different aspects of the surgical wound, and/or surrounding and overlying tissues such as fat, muscle, breast tissue, or skin.
The open framework of the oncoplastic devices generally comprises one or more framework elements. The framework elements may be shaped or constructed to at least partially conform to the contours of the tissue cavity while also preventing collapse of the cavity if desired to maintain and/or improve the shape, size and/or contour of the specific area of the body, such as the breast. Maintaining separation of cavity tissues is believed to be important because the adherence of tissues during the healing process may exacerbate the scarring process and/or lead to severe fibrotic changes causing painful and unsightly aesthetic/cosmetic deformities as well as scar tissue that can obscure breast tissue during post-op follow-up (e.g., mammography).
In one variation, the oncoplastic devices include a single (unitary), continuous, framework element. The single framework element may be curved, arcuate, U-shaped, spiral-shaped, undulating, circular, ovoid, flattened (sheet like) or combinations of the foregoing, etc. In another variation, the oncoplastic devices include a plurality of framework elements. The framework elements may be characterized as base elements and spacer elements. The framework elements may take the general geometric profile shape of an ellipsoid or otherwise be configured to impart an ellipsoid geometric shape to the oncoplastic device. The base elements may take the form of a circle or an oval, to which is attached one or more spacer elements that provide height to the device (and thus separation of cavity tissues).
The circular and ovular base elements may have any diameter suitable for the intended area of implantation. In some variations, the diameter of the circular base element may range from about 2.0 cm to about 5.0 cm. For example, the diameter of the circular base may be about 2.0 cm, about 2.5 cm, about 3.0 cm, about 3.5 cm, about 4.0 cm, about 4.5 cm, or about 5.0 cm. There may be instances where the circular base diameter is less than 2.0 cm or more than 5.0 cm. Similarly, the diameters (short and long diameters) of the ovular base element may range from about 2.0 cm to about 6.0 cm. For example, the ovular base diameters (short and long diameters) may be about 2.0 cm, about 2.5 cm, about 3.0 cm, about 3.5 cm, about 4.0 cm, about 4.5 cm, about 5.0 cm, about 5.5 cm, or about 6.0 cm. Any suitable combination of short and long diameters may be employed for the ovular base element. It is also understood that other framework element shapes and geometries may be used.
The length, width, and height of the oncoplastic devices may be the same or different. In some variations, the devices are configured to have one dimension that is substantially less than the other two dimensions. For example, the height of the devices may be substantially less than their width and length. It may be beneficial to use such low profile devices in shallow tissue cavities or areas where there is minimal overlying tissue, small cavities, or where there is no cavity, as in e.g., reduction mastopexy. The height of the devices may range from about 0.2 cm to about 4.0 cm. For example, the height of the device may be about 0.2 cm, about 1.0 cm, about 1.5 cm, about 2.0 cm, about 2.5 cm, about 3.0 cm, about 3.5 cm, or about 4.0 cm. The width and length may range from about 1.0 cm to about 4.0 cm. For example, the width and length may be about 1.0 cm, about 1.5 cm, about 2.0 cm, about 2.5 cm, about 3.0 cm, about 3.5 cm, or about 4.0 cm. In one variation, the device height is about 1.0 cm, width is about 2.0 cm, and the length is about 3.0 cm. It is understood that the dimensions of the device can be modified or adjusted to suit the area of intended use.
The open framework may also include a plurality of discrete radiographically visible elements spaced thereon, or therapeutic drugs, radioactive implant seeds, etc., for potential treatment of cancer or it may contain various elements to improve or expedite tissue healing and/or prevent infection such as growth factors, vitamins, hemostatic agents, antibacterial agents, etc. These elements can be attached to the framework in a variety of ways. The elements may also be symmetrically or asymmetrically spaced upon the framework. The discrete radiographically visible elements generally assist in delineating a three-dimensional region or volume of tissue for subsequent clinical imaging for radiation therapy planning and delivery, and long term follow-up. They may also provide a visual cue for the targeting and alignment of proper patient positioning during radiation treatments, e.g., serving as a fiducial marker, and provide a mechanism for clinicians to accurately target an area that may move between or during radiation treatments. This may allow for greater accuracy in positioning from day to day during different sessions of radiation treatment. The device is generally intended to be placed into an open surgical resection cavity, typically at the site of tumor/cancer excision. Similarly the device allows for tracking the surgical site for the possibility of a delayed recurrence of cancer, and having a fixed plurality of indicators allows the clinicians (e.g., the radiologist reading mammograms) to draw their attention to the exact surgical site, which is typically the most common place for recurrence to occur over time.
A further variation of an oncoplastic device comprising a plurality of framework elements is shown in
Alternatively, the oncoplastic device may be configured as shown in
Additional variations of the oncoplastic device are provided in
The devices described herein may be differentiated from implantable elements used for aesthetic or prosthetic reconstruction such as permanent implants (for example, for the breast or chin) as the disclosed devices provide a temporary structure that enables the surgeon to use the patient's own tissues to reconstruct and minimize anatomic deformities or irregularities that would otherwise be caused by the surgical removal of tissue. In addition, the external perimeter surface of these devices is generally non-contiguous as compared to a typical prosthetic breast implant, which has a contiguous surface. Rather, the devices disclosed herein are based upon an open framework rather than a closed contiguous framework. The bioabsorbable nature of the implant absorbs slowly during the healing process, but maintains its structural integrity while it is supporting the surrounding tissue flaps as they heal in place and reconstitute the size, shape, form and/or contour of the surgical area. They may be used at the time of surgical removal, or may be inserted into an area previously deformed by a surgical intervention (e.g., used at a later time following excision of tissue after a deformity has occurred due to seroma resorption and subsequent fibrotic scarring).
Furthermore, after a given period of time (e.g., after the tissue healing response is complete), the bulk of the device is resorbed by the body, leaving behind the tissue that has grown into or moved into the original region of tissue removal, as well as leaving behind any permanent radiographically visible elements. This attribute can contribute to reduced scarring, minimal contour deformities, as well as contribute to reconstruction, reconstitution of, or preservation of prior contour, shape and size of the original anatomic region. By providing support to the tissues underneath the surgical wound, the devices allow the subcutaneous tissues and in particular the subcutaneous and/or dermal lymphatics to heal in a more efficient and direct manner, thereby decreasing the amount of post-surgical swelling (edema), and allowing for expedited and improved healing and overall improved aesthetic/cosmetic appearance. Also, prior to complete degradation of the bioabsorbable element(s), the radiographic elements are held in their three-dimensional array during the tissue healing process, limiting their migration from their original surgically placed positions.
As further described below, the devices may be configured to allow for tissue to be incorporated into the open framework, by way of suturing or other attachment methods (e.g., surgical clips, wires, etc.). The tissue may be mobilized (detached) from overlying skin and surrounding tissues in order to secure the tissue to the open framework. One way this mobilization can be achieved in breast surgery is by surgically dissecting breast tissue along the mastectomy plane, a relatively avascular plane of tissue that lies deep to the dermal layers to create a flap, which can then be mobilized and secured to the framework of the oncoplastic device. The tissue can be secured in many different ways to the device, and in particular the design of the device may allow the surgeon to customize how local reconstruction of the area is accomplished in order to avoid anatomic irregularities. The device can be used to reconstruct the area or otherwise improve the contour of the region surrounding the tissue that was removed during the surgical procedure. Such tissues might include anything that is concerning, troublesome, suspicious for cancer, or has a known biopsy-proven cancer requiring removal. This can be glandular tissue (e.g. breast, prostate) subcutaneous tissue (fat and fibrous tissue) and other soft tissue structures (e.g. muscle). The devices described herein may allow the surgeon to rearrange adjacent tissue to reconstitute and/or reconstruct the region that was excised. Accordingly, breast reconstruction for partial mastectomy and mastopexy may be facilitated by using a temporary bioabsorbable open framework breast implant.
Methods
The methods of breast surgery described herein generally include the steps of removing breast tissue to create a cavity, placing an oncoplastic device into the cavity, the oncoplastic device comprising a body having an open framework formed of a bioabsorbable material and having an anterior, posterior, and lateral regions, manipulating tissue surrounding the cavity, and attaching (e.g., via suture) the open framework of the oncoplastic device to the manipulated tissue, as illustrated in
Some variations of the method include removing an area of breast tissue to create a cavity, an opening, or a space; placing an oncoplastic device into the cavity, the opening, or the space, the oncoplastic device comprising a body having an open framework and formed of a bioabsorbable material, the open framework comprising an anterior, a posterior, and lateral regions, and an array of cross-member elements that impart an ellipsoid profile to the open framework; manipulating tissue surrounding the cavity, the opening, or the space; and attaching the open framework to the manipulated tissue.
In other variations, the method may be used in a breast lumpectomy procedure including all or some of the following steps: a lumpectomy cavity is created by surgically removing breast tissue via a carefully designed and contoured, cosmetically chosen skin incision that may be distinctly different from the site of the tissue removal (e.g., which may include tunneling from a circumareolar incision); the cavity is sized using a sizer and/or other sizing methods (e.g., direct examination of the lumpectomy specimen or cavity); estimating the location, size, shape and orientation of the tumor; placing an appropriately sized three-dimensional open architecture bioabsorbable tissue marker (implanted) directly into the lumpectomy cavity (preferably using a device size, shape, and location that corresponds to the size, shape, location and/or orientation of the tumor site) via the surgical incision causing the breast tissue at the margin of the cavity to actively (e.g., via suture closure) or passively insinuate or otherwise move across the peripheral boundary of the device; closing the surgical site via single or multiple layered closure techniques; and then closing the skin. Creation and mobilization of tissue flaps may be performed at any time during the above-described procedure, prior to skin closure.
Alternatively, the device may be used as above but with the added step of passing suture around one or more portions of the device and then passing the suture through adjacent tissue to tether or otherwise further secure the device to the adjacent tissue.
In one variation, as shown in
In other variations, the tissues can be mobilized and/or integrated within the device and sutured to the device at various locations through the device or along various aspects of its structural elements. The tissues may be attached to the perimeter (superior, inferior, lateral, medial) regions of the device with the device being used as a “bridge” to decrease tension on an area of tissue closure. For example, as shown in
Tissues may alternatively be connected to posterior regions of a device, as shown in
The methods and devices described herein generally enable surgeons to mobilize tissues into a region where they have removed tissue, and that would otherwise cause a void, fill with seroma fluid after surgery, and ultimately create an anatomic deformity or irregularity. It facilitates learning and practice in the field of oncoplastic surgery, which can be described as combining the principles, philosophy, and techniques of surgical oncology (adequate tissue removal with an adequate margin), with the principles, philosophy, and techniques of aesthetic and reconstructive surgery. The ability to perform oncoplastic surgery in this manner may be facilitated by the device because it holds the tissues in place during healing, since the tissues are secured directly to the device. This allows the surgeon to suture the adjacent tissues (particularly after mobilization) to the device and support the tissues during healing, thereby preserving the contour, shape, and size of an anatomic location such as the breast. In addition, tissues may also be wrapped entirely or in part around the periphery of the device so as to envelope the entirety or portions of the device.
This application is a continuation of pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/456,030, filed Mar. 10, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/808,852, filed Jul. 24, 2015, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 9,615,915, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/029,358, filed Jul. 25, 2014, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3157524 | Artandi | Nov 1964 | A |
3520402 | Nichols et al. | Jul 1970 | A |
4298998 | Naficy | Nov 1981 | A |
4832686 | Anderson | May 1989 | A |
4957479 | Roemer | Sep 1990 | A |
5019087 | Nichols | May 1991 | A |
5429582 | Williams | Jul 1995 | A |
5607477 | Schindler et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5626611 | Liu et al. | May 1997 | A |
5676146 | Scarborough | Oct 1997 | A |
5716404 | Vacanti et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5873865 | Horzewski et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6030333 | Sioshansi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6071301 | Cragg et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080099 | Slater et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6159165 | Ferrera et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6161034 | Burbank et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6174330 | Stinson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6203570 | Baeke | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214045 | Corbitt, Jr. et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228055 | Foerster et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6245103 | Stinson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6270464 | Fulton, III et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6340367 | Stinson et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6356782 | Sirimanne et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363940 | Krag | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371904 | Sirimanne et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6477423 | Jenkins | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6579310 | Cox et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6626939 | Burnside et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6638308 | Corbitt, Jr. et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6699205 | Fulton, III et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6725083 | Burbank et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6730042 | Fulton et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6746458 | Cloud | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6766186 | Hoyns et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6881226 | Corbitt, Jr. et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6893462 | Buskirk et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6993375 | Burbank et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7047063 | Burbank et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7229417 | Foerster et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7524274 | Patrick et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7547274 | Rapach et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7572287 | Stinson | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7637948 | Corbitt, Jr. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7837612 | Gill et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7871438 | Corbitt, Jr. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7875059 | Patterson et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7972261 | Lamoureux et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7972619 | Fisher | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8052658 | Field | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8060183 | Leopold et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8114006 | Cox et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8157862 | Corbitt, Jr. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8320993 | Sirimanne et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8486028 | Field | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8600481 | Sirimanne et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8680498 | Corbitt et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
9014787 | Stubbs et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9199092 | Stubbs et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9615915 | Lebovic et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9980809 | Lebovic et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
20010034528 | Foerster et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010041936 | Corbitt, Jr. et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047164 | Teague et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020035324 | Sirimanne et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020072806 | Buskirk et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030083732 | Stinson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030195561 | Carley et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040109823 | Kaplan | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040249457 | Smith et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050049489 | Foerster et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050074405 | Williams, III | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080338 | Sirimanne et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080339 | Sirimanne et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050101860 | Patrick et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050143770 | Carter et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050165480 | Jordan et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050234336 | Beckman et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060025795 | Chesbrough et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058570 | Rapach et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060116713 | Sepetka et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060173296 | Miller et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070021642 | Lamoureux et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070038014 | Cox et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038017 | Chu | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070104695 | Quijano et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070167665 | Hermann et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167668 | White et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070219446 | Beyhan | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080015472 | Ressemann et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080045773 | Popowski et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080082113 | Bishop et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097199 | Mullen | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080228164 | Nicoson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243226 | Fernandez et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281388 | Corbitt et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090024225 | Stubbs | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030298 | Matthews et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090143747 | Dias et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090149833 | Cima | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090319046 | Krespi et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010341 | Talpade et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030072 | Casanova et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042104 | Kota et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100222802 | Gillespie, Jr. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110004094 | Stubbs et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110028831 | Kent | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110130655 | Nielson et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110313288 | Chi Sing et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120059285 | Soltani et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120116215 | Jones et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130489 | Chernomorsky et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130032962 | Liu et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130289389 | Hermann et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130289390 | Hermann et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130317275 | Stubbs | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140100656 | Namnoum et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140200396 | Lashinski et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140275984 | Hermann et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150112194 | Stubbs | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150250582 | Greenhalgh et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150313708 | Mayo Martin | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160022416 | Felix et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160082286 | Stubbs et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160242899 | Lee et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170181842 | Lebovic et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170181843 | Lebovic et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170181845 | Lebovic et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20180036096 | Stubbs | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180092703 | Rodriguez-Navarro et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180200020 | Hermann et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1997457 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2008515592 | May 2008 | JP |
2008143896 | Jun 2008 | JP |
2008538303 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2009500089 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2012528687 | Nov 2012 | JP |
9818408 | May 1998 | WO |
0030534 | Jun 2000 | WO |
2006044132 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2006110733 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2007006303 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2010141422 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO-2012122215 | Sep 2012 | WO |
2013009282 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2013163381 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2016014990 | Jan 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bouman, Reconstruction of the breast after subcutaneous mastectomy. Possibilities and problems, 1974, Archivum Chirurgicum Neerlandicum, 26, 4:343-352 (Year: 1974). |
Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 22, 2017, for EP Application No. 15825567.9, filed on Jul. 24, 2015, 8 pages. |
Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 30, 2015, for EP Application No. 13782314.2, filed on Apr. 25, 2013, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 23, 2015, for EP Application No. 10783902.9, filed on Jun. 1, 2010, 5 pages. |
International Search Report dated Mar. 10, 2014 for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US13/64168, filed on Oct. 9, 2013, 4 pages. |
International Search Report dated Jul. 9, 2013, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/38145, Apr. 25, 2013, 2 pages. |
International Search Report dated Jul. 28, 2010, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/036828, filed on Jun. 1, 2010, 2 pages. |
International Search Report dated Oct. 28, 2015, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/042082, filed on Jul. 24, 2015, 2 pages. |
Medical Device Daily, (Sep. 30, 2005) The Medical Technology Newspaper 9(188):pp. 1 and 9 (2 pages). |
Final Office Action dated Dec. 27, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/920,126, filed Mar. 13, 2018, 18 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 1, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/954,589, filed Nov. 30, 2015, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 23, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/656,068, filed Oct. 19, 2012, 22 pages. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Apr. 4, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/456,078, filed Mar. 10, 2017, 4 pages. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated May 2, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/456,078, filed Mar. 10, 2017, 4 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/455,977, filed Mar. 10, 2017, 14 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2017, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/455,994, filed Mar. 10, 2017, 11 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Oct. 20, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/954,589, filed Nov. 30, 2015, 33 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Nov. 17, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/466,619, filed Mar. 22, 2017, 16 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Dec. 20, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/656,068, filed Oct. 19, 2012, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/456,078, filed Mar. 10, 2017, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 3, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/920,126, filed Mar. 13, 2018, 15 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 25, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/456,078, filed Mar. 10, 2017, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 28, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/456,078, filed Mar. 10, 2017, 2 pages. |
Appeal Brief (replacement) filed on Feb. 1, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/456,435, by Hermann et al., 14 pages. |
Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief mailed on Sep. 14, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/456,435, by Hermann et al., 23 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/456,435, filed Apr. 26, 2012, 22 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/656,068, filed Oct. 19, 2012, 14 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Dec. 17, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/656,068, filed Oct. 19, 2012, 16 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,041, filed Mar. 13, 2013, 9 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/790,314, filed May 28, 2010, 24 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 27, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/173,881, filed Jul. 16, 2008, 18 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Oct. 11, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/808,852, filed Jul. 24, 2015, 13 pages. |
Final Office Action dated May 10, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/656,068, filed Oct. 19, 2012, 18 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 25, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/456,435, filed Apr. 26, 2012, 17 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 27, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,041, filed Mar. 13, 2013, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 22, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/656,068, filed Oct. 19, 2012, 17 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 3, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/656,068, filed Oct. 19, 2012, 12 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 1, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/656,068, filed Oct. 19, 2012, 23 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 3, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/790,314, filed May 28, 2010, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 10, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/790,314, filed May 28, 2010, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 8, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/581,146, filed Dec. 23, 2014, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 5, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/455,994, filed Mar. 10, 2017, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 16, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/173,881, filed Jul. 16, 2008, 12 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 23, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/581,807, filed Dec. 23, 2014, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 25, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/808,852, filed Jul. 24, 2015, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/808,852, filed Jul. 24, 2015, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/954,589, filed Nov. 30, 2015, 12 pages. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowability dated Mar. 10, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/808,852, filed Jul. 24, 2015, 2 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 21, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/456,078, filed Mar. 10, 2017, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 24, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/455,977, filed Mar. 10, 2017, 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 25, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/581,146, filed Dec. 23, 2014, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 17, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/790,314, filed May 28, 2010, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 1, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/808,852, filed Jul. 24, 2015, 7 pages. |
Reply Brief filed on Nov. 14, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/456,435, by Hermann et al., 5 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jul. 9, 2013, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/38145, Apr. 25, 2013, 6 pages. |
Written Opinion dated Mar. 10, 2014 for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US13/64168, filed on Oct. 9, 2013, 6 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jul. 28, 2010, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/036828, filed on Jun. 1, 2010, 6 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Oct. 28, 2015, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/042082, filed on Jul. 24, 2015, 4 pages. |
Lakeshore Biomaterials, “General Mechanical Properties Chart”. Feb. 19, 2009, 1 page. |
Middleton, J., “Tailoring of Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) to Control Properties”, Lakeshore Biomaterials, 2007, 67 pages. |
Authorunknown, “PURASORB® Technology”, PURAC Biomaterials, 2009, 1 page. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190336274 A1 | Nov 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62029358 | Jul 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15456030 | Mar 2017 | US |
Child | 16518139 | US | |
Parent | 14808852 | Jul 2015 | US |
Child | 15456030 | US |