The present invention relates generally to the data processing field, and more particularly, relates to a method and structure for implementing manufacture of a printed circuit board (PCB) with enhanced via creation without creating a via barrel stub, eliminating the need to back-drill.
The computer hardware development industry has reached a point wherein many computer interfaces are of sufficient switching speed as to require signal routing layer change vias to be back-drilled to remove via barrel stubs. Backdrilling is a conventional technique used to remove the via barrel stub. Without removal of the unnecessary section or length of a via barrel, some amount of the propagating signal is reflected away from the intended receiver, thereby significantly reducing the amount of total energy effectively transferred from driver to receiver.
While there are known processes to mechanically remove these stubs, once back-drilled, it is no longer possible to probe those locations on the printed circuit board (PCB), cost of the PCB increases substantially, and success of the process is statistically less than ideal. These facts significantly complicate our ability to manufacture cost-effective PCBs, measure high-speed interfaces in the lab during system bring-up and model-to-hardware correlation activities, and maximize the electrical performance of our computer interfaces. When system errors occur in the field, the field engineer cannot measure and confirm function at these PCB via locations while at the customer's site.
A need exists for a method and structure for implementing via creation that eliminates creation of a via barrel stub, eliminating the need to back-drill, reducing PCB cost, and maximizing interface margin.
As used in the following description and claims, the term printed circuit board (PCB) should be understood to broadly include a printed wiring board or other substrate, an interconnect substrate, and various substrates including a plurality of insulator layers, and internal conductive traces.
Principal aspects of the present invention are to provide a method and structure for implementing manufacture of a printed circuit board (PCB) with enhanced via creation without creating a via barrel stub, eliminating the need to back-drill. Other important aspects of the present invention are to provide such method and structure substantially without negative effects and that overcome many of the disadvantages of prior art arrangements.
In brief, a method and structure are provided for implementing enhanced via creation without creating a via barrel stub. The need to backdrill during printed circuit board (PCB) manufacturing is eliminated. After the vias have been drilled, but before plating, a plug is inserted into each via and the plug is lowered to a depth just below a desired signal trace layer. A thin anti-electroplate coating is applied onto the walls of the via below the signal trace. Then the plugs are removed and a board plating process for the PCB is performed.
In accordance with features of the invention, the anti-electroplate coating includes, for example, a Teflon coating or a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) coating, Teflon is a trade name for PTFE.
In accordance with features of the invention, the Teflon coating is applied, for example, using vapor deposition onto the walls of the via below the signal trace.
In accordance with features of the invention, the coating prevents the plating from creating via barrel stubs, thus eliminating the need to backdrill each via after the plating process.
In accordance with features of the invention, eliminating back-drilling improves yield and late fail discoveries, both of which can improve cost and reliability of boards.
The present invention together with the above and other objects and advantages may best be understood from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention illustrated in the drawings, wherein:
In the following detailed description of embodiments of the invention, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which illustrate example embodiments by which the invention may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the invention.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
In accordance with features of the invention, a method and structure are provided for implementing enhanced via creation without creating a via barrel stub. The need to backdrill vias during printed circuit board (PCB) manufacturing is eliminated. After the vias have been drilled, but before plating, a plug is inserted into each via and the plug is lowered to a depth just below a desired signal trace layer. A thin anti-electroplate coating is applied onto the walls of the via below the plug and the signal trace. Then the plugs are removed and a board plating process for the PCB is performed.
Having reference now to the drawings, in
Structure 100 includes a printed circuit board (PCB) 102 having an internal conductive or signal trace 104. PCB 102 includes an insulator substrate or insulator layers, with one or more internal conductive traces 104. Structure 100 includes a via 106 extending through the printed circuit board (PCB) 102 and the internal conductive trace 104. Structure 100 includes an anti-electroplate coating 110 covering the walls of the via 106 below the signal trace 104. The anti-electroplate coating 110 eliminates via barrel stub creation during a PCB plating process during PCB manufacturing. The anti-electroplate coating 110 is a chemically resistant polymer and is hydrophobic. The anti-electroplate coating 110 has a selected thickness, for example, in a range between 0.2 μm and 0.5 μm.
The anti-electroplate coating 110 includes, for example, a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) coating (e.g., trade name Teflon), that is applied for example, using vapor deposition onto the walls of the via 106 below the signal trace 104.
“PTFE Deposition: View” by MNX MEMS & Nanotechnology Exchange, detailing example vapor deposition of Teflon, is provided at:
https://www.mems-exchange.org/catalog/P3372/
The PTFE coating 110 prevents the PCB plating process from creating via barrel stubs, thus eliminating the need to backdrill each via after the plating process. Eliminating back-drilling improves yield and late fail discoveries, both of which can improve cost and reliability of boards.
In accordance with features of the invention, the printed circuit board (PCB) 102 and via 106 are formed generally including standard PCB manufacturing processes, including via drilling and plating. However, the step of back-drilling at the end is removed and the PCB process of the invention provides that after the vias 106 have been drilled, but before plating, a small plug 108 is inserted into each via 106 extending to a defined depth just below the desired signal trace layer 104. A thin coating 110 of Teflon is then applied using vapor deposition onto the walls of the via 106 below the signal trace 104, and then the plugs 108 are removed. The PCB 102 is then sent through the normal plating process. The coating 110 prevents the plating from taking hold, thus eliminating the need to backdrill each via after the plating process.
Referring now to
As indicated at a block 202, a lamination is formed defining the PCB 102 and at least one internal conductive traces 104.
As indicated at a block 204, vias 106 are drilled. Conventional via drilling is performed.
As indicated at a block 206, the plugs 108 are inserted into the via 106, with the plugs extending from a top or first surface to a depth below the signal trace 104. The plugs 108 optionally are configured as sprayers (like fuel injectors) to apply the Teflon coating applied to the walls of the via 106 below plugs 108. Optionally, individual plugs 108 having a specified length are pushed flush with one side of the PCB 102, then moved or poked out from the other PCB side. Optionally, individual plugs 108 are mechanically inserted to a specific depth, the retracted. Optionally, an array of plugs 108, typically of differing lengths extending from a plate are all inserted at once, the removed.
As indicated at a block 208, the anti-electroplate coating 110 is applied to the walls of the via 106 below plugs 108 and the signal trace 104, for example, by vapor deposition of Teflon.
As indicated at a block 210, the plugs 108 are removed from the vias 106 after the anti-electroplate coating 110 is applied.
As indicated at a block 212, the PCB plating process is performed, using a conventional plating process.
As indicated at a block 214, conventional PCB finishing processes are performed, advantageously eliminating the need to backdrill each via after the plating process.
Referring now to
Structure 300 includes the printed circuit board (PCB) 102 having the internal conductive or signal trace 104. Structure 100 includes the via 106 extending through the printed circuit board (PCB) 102 and the internal conductive trace 104. Structure 300 includes the anti-electroplate coating 110 covering the walls of the via 106 below the signal trace 104. Structure 300 includes a plating 302 applied during the PCB plating process that is performed using a conventional plating process.
In accordance with features of the invention, the alternative method for via creation eliminates creation of the via barrel stub. Since the via barrel stub is not created, the need to back-drill is eliminated, reducing PCB cost and maximizing interface margin.
While the present invention has been described with reference to the details of the embodiments of the invention shown in the drawing, these details are not intended to limit the scope of the invention as claimed in the appended claims.
This application is a continuation application of Ser. No. 15/217,019 filed Jul. 22, 2016.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4510347 | Wiech, Jr. | Apr 1985 | A |
4675694 | Bupara | Jun 1987 | A |
5798559 | Bothra et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
6147249 | Watanabe et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6280898 | Hasegawa et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284429 | Kinsho et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6399274 | Kinsho et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6420085 | Nishi et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6458696 | Gross | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6524765 | Nishi et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6511783 | Uenishi | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6667145 | Nishi et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6673512 | Uenishi et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6887646 | Fujiwara et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
7586047 | Hayashi et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
20010055726 | Kanna et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020136980 | Sasaki et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030049913 | Gaku et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030054287 | Yasunami et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030075708 | Kodama | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030165776 | Yasunami et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030186537 | Yamanaka et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030198894 | Mizutani et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030203305 | Yasunami et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040033438 | Hamada et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050014092 | Hasegawa et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038261 | Maewawa et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050117251 | Matono et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060003252 | Hirayama et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060127652 | Kanaya | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060199390 | Dudnikov, Jr. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20080029855 | Chang | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080241745 | Shirakawa et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080296057 | Dudnikov, Jr. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090173532 | Sugane | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100044095 | Kuczynski et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100044096 | Kuczynski et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100126009 | Li et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20120160556 | Kim et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120181251 | Minegishi et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120236523 | Yasuo | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130277097 | Maeng | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130341073 | Hsu et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140014401 | Liao et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140190733 | Dudnikov, Jr. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140220783 | Koumura et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140251663 | Iketani | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140262455 | Iketani | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150181724 | Iketani | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20160021762 | Kallman | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160278208 | Pen et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160360624 | Kuwako | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160372276 | Han et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10510706394 | Nov 2015 | CN |
105200473 | Dec 2015 | CN |
105338758 | Feb 2016 | CN |
Entry |
---|
Appendix P List of Patents and Patent Applications Treated as Related Jan. 24, 2018. |
PTFE Deposition: View by MNX MEMS & Nanotechnology Exchange, https://www.mems-exchange.org/catalog/P3372/ 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180027666 A1 | Jan 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15217019 | Jul 2016 | US |
Child | 15722519 | US |