In-line shuffle modules utilizing three dimensional optical circuits

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6832032
  • Patent Number
    6,832,032
  • Date Filed
    Monday, March 18, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 14, 2004
    19 years ago
Abstract
A three dimensional optical circuit featuring an optical manifold for organizing, guiding and protecting individual optical fibers is shown. One aspect of the present invention is a three dimensional manifold which may be constructed using a rapid prototyping process such as, but not limited to, stereolithography (“SLA”), fused deposition modeling (“FDM”), selective laser sintering (“SLS”), and the like. The manifold has a number of input openings in a first ordered arrangement at one end connected by passageways to a number of output openings in a second ordered arrangement at the opposite end. A plurality of optical fibers may be directed through the passageways of the manifold to produce a three dimensional optical circuit such as a shuffle. Moreover, the optical manifold may be used in conjunction with a number of connections or terminations to form a various optical modules. These modules may be configured for various in-line applications and may include protective housings or enclosures of metal or the like.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention relates generally to three dimensional optical circuits and, more particularly, to an optical shuffle module comprising an optical manifold and a method for making the same.




2. Background of the Invention




Optical fiber networks are becoming increasingly common in modern telecommunications systems, high speed routers, computer systems and other systems for managing large volumes of data. Optical fiber networks typically comprise a large number of optical fibers which are routed over relatively long distances in order to increase transmission speeds and efficiencies relative to the propagation of conventional electrical signals. There is often the need to route individual optical fibers between various connection points throughout a system creating an “optical circuit”. One of the more common optical circuits in use today is referred to as an “optical shuffle”. By way of example only, a simple optical shuffle may be carried out using eight optical fiber cables each having eight individual optical fibers enclosed therein. In what may be referred to as a “perfect shuffle”, using the fibers of our example here, fiber


1


of each of the eight cables coming in may be routed to a single first cable going out, and the second fiber of each of the eight cables coming in may be routed to a single second cable going out, and so forth. Referring now to

FIG. 1

, this particular optical shuffle is represented in a simplified schematic in which C


m


refers to the input ribbon or cable, C


m


F


n


refers to the individual fibers F


n


which originate in cable C


m


, and C


m


′ is the output ribbon or cable following the optical shuffle. It is to be understood, that although this particular example featured only 64 optical fibers, optical circuits often involve a far larger number of fibers which must be routed. Therefore, creating optical shuffles and other optical circuit structures by hand can be a tedious and highly error prone process. One can easily envision the nest of tangled optical fibers occurring in circuits between the input cables and the output cables.




Several solutions have been proposed for the creation of various optical circuits rather than simply trying to route fibers from input points to output points by hand through a large tangle of other fibers. One such solution is the use of semiautomatic machines which weave the individual fibers into the needed circuit arrangement. This solution often requires a significant financial investment in machines which are of little or no use in applications other than the weaving of optical fibers.




Another solution to the problem of creating optical circuits includes a number of attempts to route optical fibers on a flexible polymer substrate. By way of example only, one popular form of this construct is marketed as a Flex Foil®. One such approach to a flexible optical circuit solution is set forth and described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,204,925 issued to Bonanni et al. This reference describes a solution in which a flexible polymer substrate such as Mylar® or Kapton® may be coated with a pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA) and have optical fibers mounted thereon. After a number of optical fibers are laid on the substrate in the proper arrangement, a protective cover layer, usually of the same type of material as the substrate, can be bonded on top of the fibers. Of course, the exposed surface of this cover layer may subsequently be coated with an adhesive itself and additional layers of optical fibers and cover materials may be built up in the form of a laminate structure. However, the fiber lay-up process is quite labor intensive and, much like fiber weaving, would require highly specialized equipment to automate. Bonanni et al. further discloses the use of flexible side tabs or thinner strips of substrate material which extend laterally from the main body where the shuffle has occurred, and permit the optical fibers to be bent or rotated at, for example, a 90° angle to reorient the fibers from a horizontal position to a vertical position.




Another approach which incorporates a flexible optical circuit is set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 6,005,991 issued to Knasel. This particular reference discloses a printed circuit board (PCB) assembly that includes an interior portion upon which a flexible optical circuit is mounted. Much like the Bonanni et al. reference, Knasel arranges a plurality of optical fibers which are sandwiched between flexible sheets. These flexible sheets are commonly formed of Mylar® or the like and hold the optical fibers in place and are subsequently bonded to other flexible sheets using pressure sensitive adhesives, as known in the art. In this reference, space is conserved along the edge of a printed circuit board by attaching a multifiber connector to the respective first ends of the optical fibers and using single fiber connectors at the second ends of the optical fibers where space is more readily available, such as the less populated interior portion of the printed circuit board.




It should also be noted that both of these flexible circuit approaches are generally implemented in the form of large sheets with prerouted fiber networks or printed circuit boards with flexible optical circuit portions mounted thereon. In either case, these circuits normally have splices at both the input and output ends of the optical circuit to facilitate attachment to the input fiber cables and the output fiber cables during installation. Splices are normally required to overcome the length limitations of the tabs extending from the body of the flexible circuit. Additionally, splices may be used to attach specialized connectors to the input and output ends of the circuit for coupling to ruggedized cables. The splices at both the input and output end of the shuffle or optical circuit produce optical signal losses which when added across an entire optical network may be significant and unacceptable to the user. Furthermore, both mechanical and fusion splices commonly require considerable amounts of space because of the need to mechanically reinforce or strengthen the splice. Additionally, the flexible optical circuit approaches described here generally do not permit the use of protectively sheathed or “ruggedized” fiber optic ribbons leading all the way up to the flexible circuit, nor do they offer much protection to the optical fibers within the circuit or shuffle beyond the meager protection provided by a single layer of polymer film. Moreover, flexible optical circuit designs do not isolate and protect the individual fibers in that, at crossing points within the circuit, many of these fibers are in direct contact with each other.




Therefore, there is a need for three dimensional optical circuits which can be created without the expense of weaving machines and which can be more readily routed into a number of different shuffle arrangements. There is a need for an optical circuit arrangement which is less labor intensive than building up a multilayer laminate structure of polymer films, various adhesives and optical fibers, several strands of optical fiber at a time. There is also a need for an optical circuit which allows ruggedized ribbons of fiber optic cable to be run up to the circuit and away from the circuit and which provides a ruggedized protected environment for the optical fibers during the shuffle itself. There is a need for a three dimensional optical circuit having fewer fiber splices and reduced optical signal loss. Additionally, there is a need for a three dimensional optical circuit which fits into environments with limited surface area (x-y axes) by more efficiently stacking the shuffle to fully utilize space in a vertical direction (z-axis).




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The three dimensional optical fiber circuit apparatus and method described herein below will address each of these aforementioned needs and provide a number of additional benefits as well. In one embodiment, the present invention is a rigid, unitary, three dimensional manifold constructed using a rapid prototyping process such as, but not limited to, stereolithography (“SLA”), fused deposition modeling (“FDM”), selective laser sintering (“SLS”), and the like. Note that the terms rapid prototyping and rapid manufacturing are interchangeable in regard to the present invention in that this technology may be utilized not only for creating prototypes, but actual manufacturing as well.




Although the equipment for carrying out SLA processes and other rapid prototyping techniques are relatively expensive machines, these systems are general purpose and are readily available. SLA machines and other rapid prototyping machines are readily programmable to create virtually any three dimensional object which can be designed on a computer aided design (“CAD”) system. Accordingly, the design of a three dimensional manifold for routing a large number of optical fibers may be laid out in any number of configurations or arrangements limited only to the capabilities of the CAD system or the imagination of the designer. Moreover, it is possible to program these systems to create passageways or channels for routing optical fibers to provide for an appropriate bend radius and thereby minimize optical signal loss, and to isolate and protect the individual fibers throughout the optical circuit. Further, it is possible to create optical circuits that could not be readily manufactured using conventional molding or forming techniques.




The fiber optic manifold, in accordance with the present invention, may take any number of possible embodiments, including a solid block having a number of hollow passageways connecting input points and output points or a large plurality of rigid hollow tubes which again have a number of input points and output points. By way of example only, these input openings may be arranged in a matrix having an equal number of rows and columns. In the case of 8 fiber optic cables each having 8 fibers, this would require an optical manifold having 64 input openings, 64 output openings, and 64 passageways connecting therebetween. If the input and output ends of the manifold are properly labeled, it should be relatively easy for a user to determine which optical fiber is to be inserted into the appropriate opening and will exit from the appropriate opening on the opposite end of the manifold. Moreover, since there is only one passageway connecting a particular input with a particular output there is no need to worry about fibers becoming entangled within each other or causing confusion for the person guiding them through the manifold.




In yet another embodiment, the present invention is a process for forming a three dimensional optical circuit including the steps of providing a rigid, unitary optical manifold having an input end and an output end; arranging a plurality of optical fiber cables leading up to the input end of the manifold, and arranging a plurality of optical fiber cables leading away from the output end of the manifold; splitting out the individual fibers of each input cable and guiding each fiber to an individual input opening of the manifold, collecting up the individual fibers extending from the output openings of the optical manifold and gathering them back up into optical cable bundles. Generally, it is possible to merely strip and separate the optical fibers from the input cables and feed them into the input openings of the manifold, passing them through the manifold and then terminating the resulting cable groups at the output side only and have no fiber splices within the shuffle itself. Thus, it is not unreasonable to completely eliminate optical signal losses incurred by splices within individual optical circuits, including shuffles. This reduction in optical signal losses could be quite significant if multiplied throughout an entire optical network.




In a further embodiment, the present invention is a three dimensional optical circuit that has been configured to operate as an in-line shuffle module. Although an optical shuffle module may take a number of different forms, one particularly useful embodiment would be an in-line shuffle configured to fit within the spaces normally allotted for optical fiber bundles in building utility tunnels, electronic equipment housings and the like. One form of shuffle module may be cylindrical in shape with about a one inch diameter and fitted with a number of ruggedized cable attachments at either end. This particular in-line shuffle would receive ruggedized fiber bundles at the input end, shuffle the individual fibers by passing them through a particularly small optical manifold and permit the fibers to be gathered back into ruggedized fiber bundles at the output end, all within a space commonly allowed for cable trunk lines. Moreover, if the in-line shuffle module were placed in the optical cable during installation, it would be possible to carry out this entire shuffle without a splicing any of the optical fibers.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




A more complete understanding of the method and apparatus of the present invention may be obtained by reference to the following Detailed Description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like reference numerals refer to like parts and wherein:





FIG. 1

is a simplified schematic representation of a number cables and fibers in a perfect 8×8 optical shuffle;





FIG. 2

is a perspective view of an optical manifold constructed in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention and featuring cross bracing members to ensure proper spacing and structural rigidity between the various rows and columns of the input ends and output ends of the optical manifold;





FIG. 3

is a perspective view of an optical manifold constructed in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention featuring staggered side-by-side inputs and stacked outputs;





FIG. 4

is a perspective view of the optical manifold in accordance with the embodiment of

FIG. 3

featuring ruggedized cable attachments for receiving ruggedized cables at one end of the manifold;





FIG. 5

is a detailed perspective view showing the interior structure of a pitch tool aligned with the optical manifold of FIG.


4


.





FIG. 6

is a perspective view of the optical manifold in accordance with the embodiment of

FIG. 3

, featuring ruggedized cable attachments at both the input and output ends of the optical manifold;





FIG. 7

is a perspective view of an optical manifold in accordance with yet another embodiment of the present invention, further incorporating an input endplate, an output endplate and mounting brackets.





FIG. 8

is a bottom view of the optical manifold in accordance with the embodiment of FIG.


7


and clearly showing the four mounting holes located near the corners of the manifold;





FIG. 9

is a side elevational view of the optical manifold in accordance with the embodiment of

FIG. 7

featuring integral endplates at both input and output ends;





FIG. 10

is a detailed perspective view of the optical manifold in accordance with the embodiment of

FIG. 7

, featuring the input endplate and the ribbon and fiber numbering system;





FIG. 11

is a detailed perspective view of the optical manifold in accordance with the embodiment of

FIG. 7

, featuring the output endplate and the ribbon and fiber numbering system;





FIG. 12

is an exploded perspective view of an optical manifold constructed in accordance with the present invention by stacking a series of plates having inscribed grooves or channels;





FIG. 13

is an exploded perspective view of an alternative embodiment optical manifold to that shown in

FIG. 12

constructed by stacking a series of plates having inscribed grooves or channels;





FIG. 14

is an exploded perspective view of an optical manifold constructed in accordance with the present invention by stacking a series of plates having a plurality of fiber guide pieces affixed to a surface to form grooves or channels;





FIG. 15

is an exploded perspective view of an alternative embodiment optical manifold to that shown in

FIG. 14

constructed by stacking a series of plates having a plurality of fiber guide pieces affixed to a surface to form grooves or channels;





FIG. 16

is a perspective view of a three dimensional optical circuit constructed in accordance with the present invention in which the optical manifold has been enclosed within a protective housing and mounted on a plug-in card;





FIG. 17

is an exploded perspective view of a three dimensional optical circuit constructed in accordance with the present invention in which a ruggedized optical cable is coupled to a ruggedized cable attachment on the optical manifold;





FIG. 18

is an exploded perspective view of a three dimensional optical circuit constructed in accordance with the present invention and illustrating a shuffling connector with ferrule spring, push-pin connectors;





FIG. 19

is an assembled perspective view of the three dimension optical circuit shown in FIG.


18


and illustrating a shuffling connector with ferrule spring, push-pin connectors;





FIG. 20

is a perspective view of a three dimensional optical circuit constructed in accordance with the present invention and illustrating an integrated shuffle module with ruggedized fiber inputs, bulkhead connector outputs, and an enclosure suitable for rack mounting;





FIG. 21

is a perspective view of a 64 fiber compact shuffle manifold, which incorporates a scheme or formula for routing fibers similar to that of the embodiment shown in

FIG. 7

, but in an entirely different physical configuration;





FIG. 22

is an end-on view of the compact shuffle manifold of

FIG. 21

showing representative dimensions for 30 mm minimum bend radius fibers;





FIG. 23

is a top plan view of the compact shuffle manifold of

FIG. 21

showing representative dimensions for 30 mm minimum bend radius fibers;





FIG. 24

is a top plan view of the compact shuffle manifold of

FIG. 21

showing representative dimensions for 10 mm minimum bend radius fibers;





FIG. 25

is a perspective view of a simple tube shuffle module providing a housing about the compact shuffle manifold of

FIG. 21

;





FIG. 26

is an exploded perspective view of the simple tube shuffle module of

FIG. 25

;





FIG. 27

is a perspective view of a ruggedized cylindrical shuffle module providing a housing about the compact shuffle manifold of

FIG. 21

;





FIG. 28

is an exploded perspective view of the ruggedized cylindrical shuffle module of

FIG. 27

;





FIG. 29

is a perspective view of a hinged, ruggedized cylindrical shuffle module providing a housing about the compact shuffle manifold of FIG.


21


.





FIG. 30

is an exploded perspective view of the hinged, ruggedized cylindrical shuffle module of

FIG. 29

;





FIG. 31

is an end-on view of the hinged, ruggedized cylindrical shuffle module of

FIG. 29

with the hinged portions opened to show interior details;





FIG. 32

is a perspective view of a one-side ruggedized shuffle module providing a housing about the compact shuffle manifold of

FIG. 21

; and





FIG. 33

is a partially exploded perspective view of the one-side ruggedized shuffle module of

FIG. 32

with the top cover removed to show interior details.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




Referring now to the Figures, and in particular to

FIGS. 2-6

, there is disclosed a number of embodiments or variations constructed in accordance with the present invention for providing an optical manifold which may be incorporated into a three dimensional optical circuit such as a shuffle. As used herein, the term “optical manifold” shall refer to a component of a three dimensional optical circuit which provides a number of passageways for connecting a set of input openings to a set of output openings and for receiving a plurality of optical fibers in a first ordered arrangement at the input and outputting the plurality of fibers in a second ordered arrangement at the exit. As used in regard to the openings of an optical manifold, the term “ordered arrangement” refers not to the actual spatial relationship or location of one hole relative to another, but rather to the relationship of an input opening to an output opening.




By way of example only, an optical manifold for carrying out a perfect shuffle, as described in regard to

FIG. 1

, may have a first ordered relationship in which the holes of row


1


correspond to fibers


1


-


8


of cable


1


, the holes of row


2


correspond to fibers


1


-


8


of cable


2


, and so forth. For this particular shuffle, the holes at the output end of the manifold may have a second ordered relationship in which the holes in row


1


correspond to fiber


1


of cables


1


-


8


, the holes of row


2


correspond to fiber


2


of cables


1


-


8


, and so forth. Thus, even though the holes at both ends of the manifold are disposed in an 8×8 array the ordered relationship of one hole to another at the input may be quite different from the ordered relationship at the output. In other words, by merely shifting the positions, relative to each other, of at least two fibers passing through an optical manifold, the ordered relationship of holes at the input end and output end of the manifold must be different.




Individual optical fibers may be split out of optical cables, guided through the optical manifold, and subsequently interfaced with another optical fiber, an optical connector, an optical waveguide or nearly any other optical device. It should be further noted that, although each of the examples shown and described herein involve the use of 8 optical cables, each containing 8 optical fibers, for a total of 64 individual optical fibers, these optical circuits may involve larger or smaller numbers of cables and fibers limited only by the imagination of the designer, the limitations of the CAD system and the physical limitations of the stereolithography or other rapid prototyping machines. Of course, fibers are most commonly bundled in multiples of 4 to produce cables having, for example, 8, 12, 16 or 24 fibers each. It should also be noted that, although in the examples shown herein the optical fiber manifolds are constructed of various UV curable photopolymers, as known in the art, it is also possible to utilize rapid prototyping techniques with various ceramic and metal compounds as well.




A fairly common optical circuit is that of a perfect shuffle which is carried out by inputting the individual fibers corresponding to row


1


, columns


1


-


8


and routing them to column


1


, rows


1


-


8


, inputting the optical fibers of row


2


, columns


1


-


8


and routing them to column


2


, rows


1


-


8


and so forth. Of course, as will be illustrated in

FIGS. 7-11

, it is also possible to also arrange the fibers using an imperfect shuffle arrangement in which the fibers of row N are each advanced by N−1 number of columns from the input to the output end of the manifold. For example, in row


1


the fiber corresponding to column


1


at the input will exit at column


1


. The fiber corresponding to column


2


at the input will exit at column


2


and so forth, with the fiber at input column


8


exiting at output column


8


. In row


2


, the fiber at input column


1


will exit at output column


2


, the fiber at input column


2


will exit at column


3


, and so forth with the fiber from input column


8


exiting at output column


1


. Again, it is to be understood that these imperfect shuffles may be arranged in any number of ways (e.g., N+1, N−2, or the like), limited only by the CAD systems and rapid prototyping machinery used. One preferred form of rapid prototyping discussed herein is stereolithography, and although this is not the primary focus of the present invention, it is worth noting in some detail how a part is generally produced using stereolithography techniques.




Rapid prototyping is the name given to a host of related technologies that are commonly used to fabricate three dimensional physical objects directly from CAD data sources. These methods are generally similar to each other in that they normally create a three dimensional object by building up materials in a layer-wise fashion. Rapid prototyping is also referred to by the name of free form fabrication (“FFF”), layered manufacturing, automated fabrication and other variations of these terms. Stereolithography (“SLA”) is the most commonly used rapid prototyping technology. This technique creates three dimensional plastic parts or objects one layer at a time by tracing or rasterizing a laser beam on the surface of a liquid photopolymer. This specialized class of polymer materials quickly solidifies wherever the laser beam strikes the surface of the liquid. Once one layer of the object is completely traced, the object is lowered one layer thickness on a stage into a container filled with photopolymeric material and a second layer is then traced by the laser right on top of the first. The photopolymer is self-adhesive in nature and the layers tend to bond one to another as they are built up to form a three dimensional object. Following the creation of the three dimensional part, it may be removed from the stereolithography apparatus and placed in an ultraviolet (“UV”) post-curing, oven-like apparatus for a more complete cure and added dimensional stability.




The technique of selective laser sintering is somewhat similar to stereolithography in that the object is built up one layer at a time using a laser tracing a pattern on the surface. However, the polymer or other material is usually in powder form and is heated and fused together by the laser which melts the powder where it strikes under the guidance of a scanning system. Regardless of the rapid prototyping technique used, following curing, the resulting three dimensional object is a single, unitary and integral part and requires little, if any, further machining to produce a finished product. In the case of the various embodiments of the present invention, these three dimensional parts may be referred to as optical manifolds and may be laid out in any number of geometries or arrangements but will feature a number of hollow passageways, tubes or channels for routing individual optical fibers each from a single input opening to a single output opening of the manifold. The manifold has the additional benefit of being quite rigid and tough enough to protect the optical fibers from various environmental conditions and hazards that may be encountered.




Referring now to

FIG. 2

, a perspective view of a stacked eight by eight shuffle manifold


200


is shown. As shown here, the input openings


210


and the output openings


220


are arranged in an 8×8 matrix with each of the columns of the input end and rows of the output end arranged in a stacked configuration with support members


230


disposed therebetween. The support members


230


serve to ensure proper spacing of the columns and rows, and also to provide additional strength and rigidity to the finished part. When filled with optical fibers, not shown, this particular embodiment produces a perfect shuffle in that the individual fibers of row


1


from columns


1


-


8


are brought together in column


1


, rows


1


-


8


of the output end. The fibers of input row


2


, columns


1


-


8


are shuffled to be arranged in column


2


, rows


1


-


8


of the output end and so forth, with the fibers of row


8


, columns


1


-


8


being shuffled into column


8


, rows


1


-


8


of the output end of the manifold. It is to be noted that the CAD system has been programmed to ensure that none of the individual fibers are forced to experience a bend tighter than the critical bend radius, thereby minimizing optical signal loss and maximizing mechanical life span for each of the fibers passing through the optical manifold.




Referring now to

FIG. 3

, another embodiment of an optical manifold


300


constructed in accordance with the present invention is shown. In this particular design, the input openings


310


and the output openings


320


of the manifold


300


are again stacked one on top of the other or side-by-side with each other, but the support members disposed therebetween have been removed. Additionally, at the input end of the manifold


300


columns


1


-


8


have been staggered side-by-side to provide additional spacing between each set of input openings


310


.




Referring now to

FIG. 4

, a manifold


400


constructed in accordance with the embodiment illustrated in

FIG. 3

has been modified by the addition of a number of ruggedized cable attachments


450


, leading to the input openings


410


of the manifold


400


. This manifold


400


is suitable for receiving up to eight ruggedized fiber optic cables, not shown. Each of these cables will have a snap-fit member that may be coupled to the cable attachments


450


and then subsequently routed through the optical manifold


400


. The term “ruggedized” cable generally refers to a type of optical cable with a tough polymer exterior which may be further reinforced by the use of Kevlar® or other internal tension-bearing members. Cables such as these provide the optical fibers with a great deal of physical and mechanical protection from harsh external environments.




Referring now to

FIG. 5

, a detailed illustration of a multifiber pitch tool


500


is shown. This tool is designed to receive fibers


100


having ribbon spacing or ribbon pitch and to split out or spread the individual fibers of each cable before entering the optical manifold


400


. The multifiber pitch tool


500


ensures the proper spacing and alignment of the fibers with the input openings of the manifold


410


.




Of course, it is also possible to use this same form of ruggedized cable attachments at the output openings of the manifold to gather individual fibers into cable bundles, as shown in FIG.


6


. Referring now to

FIG. 6

, yet another variation of the embodiment shown in

FIG. 3

is illustrated. In this particular optical manifold


600


, ruggedized cable attachments


650


have been provided at both the input


610


and output


620


ends of the manifold


600


.




Referring now to

FIGS. 7-11

, and in particular to

FIG. 7

, a perspective view of an imperfect shuffle featuring an input endplate and an output endplate as well as openings for screws or other mounting hardware is shown. Note that in this particular optical manifold


700


embodiment the input rows are numbered 1-8 from the bottom to the top and the input columns are numbered 1-8 from left to right. As described earlier, the individual fibers of this imperfect shuffle are rearranged in a stepwise fashion. The formula for this shuffle is for row N move the fiber N−1 columns over. Thus, the fibers in row


1


, columns


1


-


8


correlate to output row


1


, columns


1


-


8


without any movement. The individual fibers of input row


2


, columns


1


-


8


correspond to output row


2


with columns shuffled one step in which the input of column


1


corresponds to the output of column


2


, the input of column


2


corresponds to the output of column


3


and so forth with the input of column


8


corresponding to the output of column


1


. Likewise, in row


3


, the input of column


1


corresponds to the output of column


3


, the input of column


2


corresponds to the output of column


4


, and so forth, until the input of column


8


corresponds to the output of column


2


. This progression is carried on through row


8


, in which column


1


corresponds to output column


8


, input column


2


corresponds to output column


1


and so forth with input column


8


corresponding to output column


7


.




Referring now to

FIG. 8

, a bottom view of the optical fiber manifold


700


of

FIG. 7

is shown. From this view it is possible to observe how the 64 individual fiber tubes are arranged to ensure that the fibers do not go beneath the minimum bend radius and that, because they are enclosed in individual tubes, the individual fibers may be very densely overlapped without worry of entanglement. Additionally, this figure shows the input endplate


705


, the output endplate


715


and the holes


730


extending through the entire depth of the object for screws or other mounting hardware. It should be noted that the manifold


700


may be mounted in any number of systems or configurations, as well as attached to a removable card, much like a printed circuit board, as known in the art. Additionally, although this manifold


700


is shown without any sort of connectors or terminations at the input


710


or output


720


end, it is to be understood that multifiber attachments or individual fiber connections or terminations may be used at the input and output ends of the manifold


700


, much like those illustrated in

FIGS. 4 and 6

.

FIG. 8

, further illustrates a significant number of free spaces or openings provided between the tubes or passageways of the optical manifold. These free spaces may also be particularly useful in rack mounting applications in that the spaces permit cooling airflow for heat generating components to pass completely though the manifold.




Referring now to

FIG. 9

, a side elevational view of the manifold of

FIG. 7

is shown. This figure best illustrates the stacked vertical arrangement of each of the layers of individual tubes, channels or passageways that make up the manifold


700


. As a result of the rapid prototyping techniques used, it is possible to achieve an incredibly compact and efficient design without fear of fiber entanglement or significant optical signal loss. Rapid prototyping also allows adjacent passageways or tubes to share a common sidewall. Accordingly, a manifold


700


produced in accordance with the present invention will be far more compact than a collection of preformed tubes that have been brought together to form a manifold.




Referring now to

FIG. 10

, an enlarged perspective view of the manifold of

FIG. 7

is shown. Here, the input end


710


of the manifold


700


is clearly illustrated indicating markings for a user to identify the ribbon or cable numbers from 1 to 8 and the individual fibers that make up those cables, again from 1 to 8 at the input end. Of course, the rows and columns of the manifold may be labeled or color-coded in almost any manner which facilitates proper identification.




Referring now to

FIG. 11

, another enlarged perspective drawing of the manifold embodiment shown in FIG.


7


. This particular figure best illustrates the output end


720


of the manifold


700


again featuring a numbering guide for users illustrating the ribbon or cable numbers from 8 to 1 and the fiber numbers ranging from 1 to 8. It is believed that one of the unique benefits of the present invention is that it facilitates a shuffle of any number of mathematical arrangements in a nearly error proof manner by merely feeding the properly numbered or color-coded fiber of each input cable and then collecting the fibers into the appropriate output cables at the opposite end of the manifold. In short, as long as the appropriate fibers are fed into the proper input holes, they must emerge at the appropriate output holes of the manifold and be collected into the appropriate multifiber cables or bundles.




Referring now to

FIG. 12

, another alternative embodiment constructed in accordance with the present invention is shown. The body of an optical manifold


800


may be constructed by building up a series of stacked plates


810


. Each of these plates


810


will have a number of grooves or channels


820


extending completely across its length from the input end


830


to the output end


840


of the plate


810


. As the plates


810


are indexed to align the edges and stacked to form an optical manifold


800


, the channels


820


in each plate


810


act as passageways connecting input openings at one end of the manifold


800


with output openings at the opposite end of the manifold. Of course, these plates may be manufactured by a number of different techniques including, but not limited to, milling channels into a solid plate, molding the plate with channels on a surface, or building the plate up in a layer additive process such as those described hereinabove.




Referring now to

FIG. 13

, an alternative embodiment of the optical manifold set forth and described in regard to

FIG. 12

is shown. As in the embodiment of

FIG. 12

, the body of an optical manifold


900


may be constructed by building up a series of stacked plates


910


in which each of these plates has a number of grooves or channels


920


extending completely across its length from the input end


930


to the output end


940


of the plate


910


. However, in this particular embodiment, the channels or grooves


920


are arranged on each plate to avoid any intersections. This may be done to prevent fibers from coming in direct contact with each other or being possibly misdirected into the wrong channel


920


while passing from the input end


930


to the output end


940


of the manifold


900


. As shown here, a manifold constructed in this manner will require at least twice the number of grooved plates


910


to facilitate the same optical circuit constructed from plates which allow the channels to intersect and the fibers to touch. This also results in a stacked plate manifold which is much taller or larger in the z-direction than the embodiment depicted in FIG.


12


.




Referring now to

FIGS. 14 and 15

, a manufacturing variation of the stacked plate manifolds shown in

FIGS. 12 and 13

, respectively, is shown. The manifold embodiments


800


′,


900


′ as shown in

FIGS. 14 and 15

are again created by stacking plates


810


′,


910


′ one on top of another and indexing them to form a manifold. However, the embodiments of

FIGS. 14 and 15

do not have channels or grooves


820


′,


920


′ which are milled, cut or molded into the plates, but rather a large number of individual guide pieces


850


′,


950


′ which are glued, affixed or attached in some manner to a particular plate


810


′,


910


′ to create a pattern thereon. As one skilled in the art will recognize, the labor or manufacturing steps required to produce a large number of guide pieces, attach them to their respective plates, and then stack the plates one on top of another to form a manifold would be considerable, particularly in comparison to plates formed by milling, injection molding, or other production techniques.

FIGS. 14 and 15

are provided to show yet another approach to creating a stacked plate manifold as depicted in

FIGS. 12 and 13

.




Referring now to

FIG. 16

, a perspective view of an optical manifold that has been enclosed within a protective housing


1010


and mounted on a plug-in card


1020


is shown. This embodiment may also be referred to as a plug-in optical shuffle module


1000


. As shown here, ruggedized and ribbonized optical cables


50


are directed to multifiber attachments


1050


and the unterminated fiber ends are inputted to an optical shuffle in accordance with the present invention. The optical manifold is enclosed within a protective housing


1010


of molded polymer, formed sheet metal embedded in epoxy or the like. Following the shuffle, the individual fibers are again gathered into ribbonized bundles


60


and directed to blind-mate, plug-in or other optical card connectors


1060


. These connectors


1060


serve as terminations that are adapted to allow fiber connections at the edge of the plug-in card


1020


and allow the optical shuffle to be implemented in a fully modular quick-connect design.




Referring now to

FIG. 17

, a three dimensional optical circuit


1200


with an exploded detail view of a single ruggedized optical fiber cable


50


attached thereto is shown. The three dimensional optical circuit features an optical manifold


400


similar to that set forth and described in regard to FIG.


4


. This manifold features eight ruggedized cable attachments


450


at the input end, which are designed to receive a snap fit, crimp barb


1230


to facilitate the transfer of mechanical loads and stresses from the ruggedized exterior of the optical cable


50


through the crimp barb


1230


and into the body of the optical manifold


400


itself. In short, one of the unique and surprising features of an optical circuit utilizing the optical manifold of the present invention is that mechanical loads or stresses may actually be transferred to and carried by the unitary body of the manifold itself. This is quite different from flexible substrate or woven fiber approaches in that the manifold itself can provide stress relief to the fibers which are passing therethrough. It is the inventors' belief that the prior art does not show any sort of apparatus which could both shuffle or organize optical fibers into a circuit while also carrying a mechanical load or providing stress relief to the fibers themselves.




As shown here, a ruggedized cable


50


containing a number of optical fibers


100


is passed through a manifold


400


by first cutting back the ruggedized exterior portion of the cable


50


; passing the exposed fibers


100


through a strain relief boot


1210


, a crimp ring


1220


and a crimp barb


1230


; crimping the crimp ring


1220


to the load bearing ruggedized exterior of the cable


50


; fitting the crimp ring


1220


within the crimp barb


1230


to transfer mechanical stresses from the ruggedized cable


50


to the barb


1230


; and finally connecting the barb


1230


to the ruggedized attachment


450


of the manifold


400


to transfer stresses from the cable


50


to the crimp ring


1220


to the crimp barb


1230


to the manifold itself


400


. As the optical fibers


100


of the ruggedized cable


50


are passed through the ruggedized attachment


450


, they may be spread using a pitch tool or the like to ensure proper alignment with the manifold


400


. Finally, the optical fibers


100


are guided and inserted into the appropriate input openings


410


of the optical manifold


400


to create a three dimensional optical circuit.




Referring now to

FIG. 18

, a three dimensional optical circuit constructed for use as a shuffling connector


1400


with ferrule spring, push-pin connectors


1410


is shown. As shown here, a particularly small optical shuffle


1450


may be used to arrange optical fibers


100


into a three dimensional circuit and output the fibers to shuffle adapters


1460


which gather individual fibers


100


back together into bundles or ribbonized form. The ribbonized fiber bundles


60


may then be terminated in a ferrule spring, push-pin type connector


1410


for use with a blind mate card connector


1420


, as shown. It is possible to envision a particularly small shuffling connector


1400


such as this fitting within various environments including enclosures for electronics as a sort of optical plug-in card or module. This small, highly efficient modular design is quite different from the significantly greater amounts of surface space required to create optical circuits including shuffles using prior art flexible substrate techniques and optical fiber splices to attach the appropriate connectors.




As best seen in

FIG. 19

, an assembled shuffling connector


1400


may be quite compact in design. This entire modular component may be less than 2.0 inches in both length and width, and less than 1.0 inch in height. For comparison purposes, a flexible substrate optical circuit configured to carry out a similar function, may require 12.0 inches or more in both the length and width directions, and while being thinner in the z-direction, it is difficult to allow for such large surface areas within the densely packed environment of an electronic enclosure.




Referring now to

FIG. 20

, a perspective view of a three dimensional optical circuit illustrating an integrated shuffle module


1500


having ruggedized fiber inputs


1510


, bulkhead connector outputs


1520


, and a housing


1550


suitable for rack mounting is shown. The modular design shown here, features a durable housing


1550


suitable for rack mounting within an electronic enclosure. This particular three dimensional optical circuit features an optical manifold


700


of the embodiment shown and described in regard to

FIGS. 7-11

. It further includes fiber routing features or fins


1530


for guiding the optical fibers through a safe bend radius within the housing


1550


and toward the optical terminations and bulkhead connectors


1520


provided at the output of the module


1500


. It should also be noted that at the input of this module


1500


there are provided ruggedized cable attachments


1510


adapted to receive fibers from ruggedized cables


50


, of nearly any length, and for efficiently transmitting mechanical loads and stresses from the ruggedized cables


50


into the body of the housing itself to again provide stress relief for the optical fibers. Although this modular design features one particular form of optical manifold, one skilled in the art will appreciate that virtually any optical manifold, and particularly those created in accordance with the unitary body, rapid prototyping optical manifold embodiments of the present invention.




Referring now to

FIGS. 21-24

, and in particular to

FIG. 21

, a perspective view of a


64


fiber imperfect shuffle manifold


1600


which is similar in design to that of

FIG. 7

is shown. As with the embodiment set forth in

FIG. 7

, the formula for this shuffle is for row N to move the fiber N−1 columns over, thus rearranging the fibers in a stepwise fashion. Note that in this particular optical manifold


1600


, a highly compact configuration results from the elimination of free spaces in the embodiment shown in FIG.


7


and the elimination of potentially load-bearing end caps. Accordingly, this compact shuffle manifold


1600


is designed to accept loose non-ruggedized fibers at the input end, pass them through a series of tubes or passageways to carry out the shuffle, and exit individual non-ruggedized fibers at the exit. The primary benefit of this compact design is a substantial decrease in the amount of space required to create an optical circuit and carry out a shuffle.




By way of example only,

FIGS. 22 and 23

show an end on view and a top plan view, respectively, of the compact shuffle manifold


1600


of

FIG. 21

with exemplary dimensions specified on the drawings for use with optical fibers having about a 30 mm minimum bend radius. Although it is possible with conventional optical fibers to attain minimum bend radius approaching 25 mm, the exemplary manifold


1600


presented in

FIGS. 21-23

configured on a 30 mm minimum bend radius basis is suitable for most applications in small spaces and should also permit a certain factor of safety to ensure adequate mechanical life of the fiber. Smaller bend radii tend to induce larger mechanicals strains in optical fibers and may shorted the mechanical life of the fiber.




As noted on

FIGS. 22 and 23

, the compact shuffle manifold


1600


design shown here has a maximum width of 18.2 mm, a height of 11.8 mm and a total length from input end to output lend of 83.4 mm. Accordingly, the embodiment shown here may be configured to fit within housings and other enclosures of less than 1 inch or 25.4 mm in diameter. This is particularly useful in regard to in-line shuffle applications in which it is desirable to receive input fibers, carry out a shuffle and output the fibers in a space which is scarcely larger than that which is required for the optical fiber bundles themselves. It is common to provide at least a 1 inch diameter area to route optical fibers and other cables within housings for electronic equipment or conduits for running cables throughout buildings and the like.




Additionally, as best seen in

FIG. 24

, an even smaller compact shuffle manifold


1700


may be designed for use with low bend radius optical fibers. There has been a drive underway within the optical fibers industry to construct fibers that exhibit tighter bend radii than are currently possible. Although there are a number of approaches being explored to achieve this goal, these types of fibers are being developed to provide low light loss and high mechanical life when used in applications having small bend radiuses. When fibers such as these having safe minimum bend radiuses of about 10 mm become commercially available, it would possible to reduce the overall length of the compact shuffle manifold


1700


to a mere 52.3 mm. As with the embodiment shown in

FIGS. 21-23

, this manifold


1700


is also ideally suited for use in many different in-line applications and may be particularly well suited for use in board or card type mounting applications where it is to be placed within a crowded environment such as an enclosure for electronic equipment.




With reference now to

FIG. 25

, a perspective view of a simple tube shuffle module


1800


providing a housing about the compact shuffle manifold of

FIG. 21

is shown. As seen here, this is a rather straightforward embodiment which places a compact shuffle manifold within a cylindrical enclosure


1810


formed of metal, structural polymer, or the like and sealed by endcaps


1820


at the input and output ends.




As best seen in

FIG. 26

, the compact shuffle manifold


1800


may be further provided with cylindrical ribs


1840


along its length and end flanges


1830


to assist in the positioning of the manifold within the simple tube enclosure


1810


. As shown in this exploded view, the outer tube


1810


may be slid into place over one end of the manifold


1850


and endcaps


1820


fastened into place using screws


1825


, grommets or other suitable fastening means to attach the endcaps


1820


at the input and output ends.




By selecting the appropriate materials for the tube


1810


and endcaps


1820


, it is possible to make the housing for the shuffle manifold


1850


extremely durable. For example, a stainless steel tubular shell


1810


would provide a great deal of physical protection to the components inside and have the additional benefit of providing a significant degree of flame resistance under conditions similar to those of the UL-94V0 standard.




One lower cost alternative to a stainless steel or metal housing would be presented by using a tube


1810


and endcaps


1820


formed of specialty polymers which have been treated to achieve an appropriate level of heat and flame resistance. In this type of embodiment, the tube


1810


may be fitted about the components, the endcaps


1820


put in place and the tube


1810


may be heat shrunk or otherwise made to fit snugly about the manifold


1850


. In this case, the cylindrical ribs


1840


along the length of the manifold


1850


could also help to maintain a small air gap between the tube


1810


and the manifold


1850


itself providing an additional limited amount of heat insulation. It is also notable that although the simple tube shuffle module


1800


shown in

FIGS. 25 and 26

does not provide a ruggedized environment for the individual optical fibers leading up to and away from the module


1800


, it is possible to design the endcaps


1820


to accept various hardware compatible for use with ruggedized cables leading to and from the module


1800


, as shown in the other embodiments herein.




With reference now to

FIGS. 27 and 28

, one embodiment of an in-line cylindrical shuffle module


1900


for use with ruggedized cables is shown. An in-line shuffle module


1900


such as that shown in

FIG. 27

, may be configured to incorporate the compact shuffle manifold


1950


of FIG.


21


and have overall dimensions of about 153 mm in length and an outer diameter of about 25.4 mm. This particular embodiment of the in-line shuffle module


1900


is suitable for use with ruggedized fiber cables at both the input and output ends and easily fits within spaces and access ways of only about 1 inch in diameter.




Referring now to

FIG. 28

, an exploded view of the ruggedized cylindrical shuffle module


1900


is shown. As shown here, a


64


fiber optical manifold


1950


similar to the one set forth and described in regard to

FIGS. 21-23

is located at the center of the module


1900


. The compact optical manifold


1950


may be fitted within a shuffle cradle


1920


which helps to secure the manifold


1950


to the tube half bottom


1910


of the ruggedized cylindrical module


1900


. A barb keeper


1940


is positioned at the input and output ends of the tube. Each barb keeper


1940


is provided with a spider spring


1945


and designed to received eight hexcrimp barbs


1960


. The spider spring


1945


on each barb keeper


1940


helps to ensure that the hexcrimp barbs


1960


are held securely in place. As shown here, the hexcrimp barbs


1960


are crimp barbs having a hexagonal head resembling a bolt at one end and gradually to taper to a substantially circular opening at the other end. Of course, other forms of crimp barbs, such at those described hereinabove, may also be used. Following the installation and threading of the optical fibers, tube half top cover portions


1930


may be attached to the shuffle cradle


1920


and the barb keepers


1940


to complete the module enclosure.




Still referring to

FIG. 28

, a suggested assembly flow for this type of ruggedized cylindrical module


1900


may be described as follows. An optical cable jumper is made up to the proper length, tested and then cut in half. The heat shrink and crimp tube is then placed on each jumper half. Following the removal of an appropriate amount of the ruggedized jacket from the jumper half, the jacket end is split to accommodate the diameter of the crimp barb


1960


. The attachment barb


1965


is crimped onto the end of the jacket. These four steps are then repeated until a sufficient number of jumper halves have been created for the needs of the circuit to be created. In the case of an 8×8 shuffle, there should be 4 double length jumpers tested and 8 jumper halves prepared. The operator then places one of the prepared attachment barbs


1960


into the input end of the module


1900


and proceeds to feed all of the fibers into the appropriate input holes of the manifold


1950


for the cable number being sequenced. This step is then repeated until all eight of the input jumper halves have been processed. The operator then gathers up the appropriate fibers which have now exited the compact shuffle manifold


1950


and gathers them into output barbs at which point the bare fibers may be rejacketed to complete the output jumper half. This step is then repeated until all eight of the output jumper halves have been completed. Following these steps, the operator then attaches the tube half top covers


1930


to complete the housing and end ring


1970


which may be tightened with screws


1975


or other fasteners about prepared jumper halves to ensure that the crimped jumpers remained securely attached to the input and output barbs of the module. The operator may then complete the output cables with fiber optic terminations appropriate for the final use of the module. In this matter, it is possible to input ruggedized fiber bundle cables, shuffle individual fibers using the manifold contained within the ruggedized cylindrical housing and output ruggedized fiber bundles at the other end.




With reference now to

FIGS. 29-31

, a hinged, ruggedized cylindrical shuffle module


2000


is shown. As best seen in

FIG. 29

, the hinged module is similar in shape and overall dimensions to that of the non-hinged ruggedized cylindrical module


1900


set forth and described in regard to

FIGS. 27 and 28

. As best seen in

FIG. 30

, the compact shuffle manifold


2050


is enclosed between a half body top portion


2020


and a half body bottom portion


2010


, each having a number of hinge-like projections


2005


molded or machined into the input and output ends. As shown here, there are four hinged body portions


2040


containing an integral barb holder designed to receive four barbs


2060


each and a semi-cylindrical barb keeper


2045


attached to each hinged body portion


2040


to securely lock the barbs


2060


into place.




With reference now to

FIG. 31

, an assembled hinged, ruggedized cylindrical shuffle module


2000


is shown with the hinged portions


2040


opened at both the input and output ends of the module


2000


. The hinged body portions


2040


have been hooked in place to the hinges


2005


of the upper and lower half body portions of the module


2000


and the input and output ends of the manifold


2050


are exposed.




A suggested assembly technique for this type of module


2000


may be described as follows. A cable jumper is made up to twice the desired length, it is tested and then cut in half. The heat shrink and crimp tube is placed on each jumper half following the removal of an appropriate amount of ruggedized jacket, the jacket end is split to accommodate the diameter of the crimp barb


2060


. The attachment barb is then crimped onto the end of the jacket and these four steps are repeated until enough jacket jumper halves have been created for both the input and output ends of the optical circuit to be created. Again, the operator should produce 8 jumper halves of the desired length. The operator then sequences the eight input jumper halves and directs the individual optical fibers to the appropriate openings of the manifold in a manner similar to that which was described for

FIGS. 27 and 28

. The operator then gathers the fibers and completes the eight output jumper halves. Upon completion of the fiber routing, the operator may then close the hinged portion


2040


at both the input and output end of the module


2000


and further secure the ruggedized cables using an end ring, not shown. Of course, although this particular embodiment is intended for use with ruggedized fiber optic cables it may also be used with loose collections of individual optical fibers which may later be ribbonized or connectorized, if desired.




With reference now to

FIGS. 32 and 33

, a further embodiment of an in-line shuffle module


2100


is shown. This particular embodiment features a generally rectangular body portion and appropriate fittings


2130


for ruggedized cable attachment at one end and an opening


2140


for lose or ribbonized optical fibers at the output end. As best seen in

FIG. 33

, this module features generally rectangular base


2110


and lid


2120


portions which may be molded or machined to fit about the compact shuffle manifold


2150


. The base portion


2110


is further provided with a number of barb keepers which are positioned in a side-by-side manner at one end of the module


2100


. The ruggedized cables may be crimped and attached to the barbs


2160


and fitted into the barb keeper as described previously in regard to the other in-line modules. The fibers are then directed to the appropriate input openings of the shuffle manifold


2150


and then exit at the output end of the manifold where they may again be collected up and ribbonized, if desired. This substantially rectangular box-like design is particularly well suited for mounting to lie flat on a card which may subsequently be placed into a rack type system. As with the cylindrical modules, this box-type module also provides a high degree of physical protection to the fibers prior to entering the shuffle and to the shuffle module itself, both from mechanical hazards and those presented by heat or flame.




Although preferred embodiments of the invention have been described in the examples and foregoing description, it will be understood that the invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed, but is capable of numerous rearrangements and modifications of the parts and elements without departing from the spirit of the invention, as defined in the following claims. Therefore, the spirit and the scope of the appended claims should not be limited to the description of the preferred embodiments contained herein.



Claims
  • 1. An in-line optical shuffle module comprising:a housing; an optical manifold disposed within said housing, said optical manifold comprising: a unitary body having an input end and an output end; said input end having a plurality of input openings in a first ordered arrangement; said output end having a plurality of output openings in a second ordered arrangement which differs from that of said first ordered arrangement; and said unitary body further comprising a plurality of integrally formed passageways, each of said passageways connecting a single input opening with a single output opening.
  • 2. The in-line optical shuffle module of claim 1, wherein said housing further comprises a substantially cylindrical tubular body with endcaps.
  • 3. The in-line optical shuffle module of claim 2, wherein said tubular body is formed of a metal.
  • 4. The in-line optical shuffle module of claim 2, wherein said tubular body is formed of a flame resistant polymer.
  • 5. The in-line optical shuffle module of claim 1, wherein said housing further comprises at least one semi-cylindrical bottom portion and at least one a semi-cylindrical top portion.
  • 6. The in-line optical shuffle module of claim 1, wherein a housing further comprises at least one semi-cylindrical bottom portion, at least one semi-cylindrical top portion and a shuffle cradle.
  • 7. The in-line optical shuffle module of claim 1, wherein said optical manifold is a unitary part formed using a rapid prototyping technique.
  • 8. The in-line optical shuffle module of claim 7, wherein said optical manifold is formed using stereolithography.
  • 9. The in-line optical shuffle module of claim 1, wherein said housing further comprises at least one hinged body portion that may pivot about an axis to provide access to the optical manifold.
  • 10. The in-line optical shuffle module of claim 9, wherein said housing further comprises a substantially cylindrical body portion having pins proximate the input and output ends of the optical manifold end having a plurality of hinged body portions pivotally mounted to said pins.
  • 11. The in-line optical shuffle module of claim 1, wherein said housing further comprises a substantially rectangular box-like body.
  • 12. The in-line optical shuffle module of claim 11, wherein said housing further comprises a plurality of fittings for ruggedized cable attachment at one end.
  • 13. The in-line optical shuffle module of claim 12, wherein said plurality of fittings comprise a plurality of barb keepers positioned in a side-by-side manner.
  • 14. A three dimensional optical circuit comprising the in-line shuffle module of claim 1 and a plurality of optical fibers, wherein each of said plurality of optical fibers is disposed within the passageways of the optical manifold on a one-fiber-per-passageway basis.
  • 15. The in-line optical shuffle of claim 14 wherein said optical fibers have a safe minimum bend radius of about 30 mm.
  • 16. The in-line optical shuffle of claim 14 wherein said optical fibers have a safe minimum bend radius of about 10 mm.
  • 17. The in-line optical shuffle module of claim 2, wherein said housing further comprises a plurality of fittings for ruggedized cable attachment at one end.
RELATED PATENTS

This application is a Continuation-In-Part (CIP) of commonly owned and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/927,655 filed Aug. 10, 2001 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,556,754. This application is also related to commonly owned and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/927,663 filed Aug. 10, 2001 and incorporated in its entirety herein by reference thereto.

US Referenced Citations (37)
Number Name Date Kind
4086001 Chen et al. Apr 1978 A
4534615 Iwasaki Aug 1985 A
4653845 Tremblay et al. Mar 1987 A
4902092 Grandy Feb 1990 A
4923275 Kaukeinen May 1990 A
5009475 Knudson Apr 1991 A
5134673 Stephenson et al. Jul 1992 A
5155785 Holland et al. Oct 1992 A
5204925 Bonanni et al. Apr 1993 A
5222179 Auteri Jun 1993 A
5239609 Auteri Aug 1993 A
5367595 Jennings et al. Nov 1994 A
5381501 Cardinal et al. Jan 1995 A
5394502 Caron Feb 1995 A
5537501 Iwano et al. Jul 1996 A
5568574 Tanguay et al. Oct 1996 A
5715345 McKinley Feb 1998 A
5732173 Bylander et al. Mar 1998 A
5734777 Merriken et al. Mar 1998 A
5774617 Stockman et al. Jun 1998 A
5832150 Flint Nov 1998 A
5926598 Klein Jul 1999 A
5937133 Moss et al. Aug 1999 A
6005991 Knasel Dec 1999 A
6034821 Schenfeld et al. Mar 2000 A
6088493 Brenner Jul 2000 A
6148134 Schoon Nov 2000 A
6151437 Cherbettchian et al. Nov 2000 A
6185348 Shahid Feb 2001 B1
6222976 Shahid Apr 2001 B1
6224269 Engstrand et al. May 2001 B1
6304784 Allee et al. Oct 2001 B1
6351590 Shahid Feb 2002 B1
6381390 Hutton et al. Apr 2002 B1
6421493 Burek et al. Jul 2002 B1
6464404 Robinson et al. Oct 2002 B1
6498882 Buckelew et al. Dec 2002 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (7)
Number Date Country
1 180 708 Feb 2002 EP
63-138306 Jun 1988 JP
63-286807 Nov 1998 JP
11-258448 Sep 1999 JP
WO 9945719 Sep 1999 WO
WO 0000344 Jan 2000 WO
WO 0033117 Jun 2000 WO
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/927655 Aug 2001 US
Child 10/101255 US