Increased magnetoresistance in an inverted orthogonal spin transfer layer stack

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9082950
  • Patent Number
    9,082,950
  • Date Filed
    Monday, October 14, 2013
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 14, 2015
    10 years ago
Abstract
A magnetic device includes a pinned magnetic layer and a free magnetic layer including a first body-centered cubic material and having a variable magnetization vector that has a first stable state and a second stable state. The magnetic device also includes a first non-magnetic layer and a reference layer. The first non-magnetic layer spatially separates the pinned magnetic layer and the free magnetic layer and includes a second body-centered cubic material that interfaces with the first body-centered cubic material. The magnetic device includes a second non-magnetic layer spatially separating the free magnetic layer and the reference magnetic layer. A magnetic tunnel junction, located below the pinned magnetic layer, is formed by the free magnetic layer, the second non-magnetic layer, and the reference magnetic layer. Application of a current pulse through the magnetic device switches the variable magnetization vector.
Description
BACKGROUND

Orthogonal spin transfer magnetic random access devices (OST-MRAM™) incorporate a polarizer. The devices and layer stacks are discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,980,469, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference. Roughness within and near the magnetic tunnel junction of a layer stack impacts performance of the OST™ device. Increased roughness can negatively impact the breakdown of the magnetic tunnel junction. An OST™ layer stack with the polarizer on the top of the stack can reduce the roughness of the magnetic tunnel junction, increase the device magnetoresistance, and improve the performance of OST™ memory devices.


SUMMARY

In general, one aspect of the subject matter described in this specification is embodied in a magnetic device that includes a pinned magnetic layer that has a first fixed magnetization vector with a first fixed magnetization direction. The magnetic device also includes a free magnetic layer including a first body-centered cubic material and having a variable magnetization vector having at least a first stable state and a second stable state. The magnetic device also includes a first non-magnetic layer and a reference layer. The first non-magnetic layer spatially separates the pinned magnetic layer and the free magnetic layer and includes a second body-centered cubic material that interfaces with the first body-centered cubic material. The reference magnetic layer has a second fixed magnetization vector with a second fixed magnetization direction. The magnetic device also includes a second non-magnetic layer spatially separating the free magnetic layer and the reference magnetic layer. A magnetic tunnel junction is formed by the free magnetic layer, the second non-magnetic layer, and the reference magnetic layer. Application of a current pulse, having either positive or negative polarity and a selected amplitude and duration, through the magnetic device switches the variable magnetization vector. The magnetic tunnel junction is spatially located below the pinned magnetic layer. Other implementations of memory devices and memory systems are described in greater detail below.


The foregoing summary is illustrative only and is not intended to be in any way limiting. In addition to the illustrative aspects, implementations, and features described above, further aspects, implementations, and features will become apparent by reference to the following drawings and the detailed description.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing and other features of the present disclosure will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only several implementations in accordance with the disclosure and are, therefore, not to be considered limiting of its scope, the disclosure will be described with additional specificity and detail through use of the accompanying drawings.



FIG. 1 is an illustration of a magnetic device.



FIG. 2 is an illustration of a magnetic device with an inverted layer stack in accordance with an illustrative implementation.



FIG. 3 is an illustration of an inverted layer stack with the polarizer (FM1) at the top of the stack in accordance with an illustrative implementation.



FIG. 4 is an illustration of an inverted layer stack with a synthetic antiferromagnet polarizer in accordance with an illustrative implementation.



FIG. 5 is an illustration of an inverted layer stack with a pinned synthetic antiferromagnet polarizer in accordance with an illustrative implementation.



FIGS. 6A and 6C are transmission electron microscope cross sections of a non-inverted layer stack.



FIGS. 6B and 6D are transmission electron microscope cross sections of an inverted layer stack in accordance with an illustrative implementation.



FIG. 7 is an illustration of an inverted magnetic tunnel junction without a polarizer on top in accordance with an illustrative implementation.



FIG. 8 is an illustration of an inverted layer stack in accordance with an illustrative implementation.



FIG. 9 is an illustration of a fcc non-magnetic layer for use in an inverted layer stack in accordance with an illustrative implementation.



FIG. 10 is an illustration of a bcc non-magnetic layer inverted for use in an inverted stack in accordance with an illustrative implementation.



FIG. 11 is an illustration of a fcc and a bcc non-magnetic layer for use in an inverted layer stack in accordance with an illustrative implementation.



FIG. 12 is a graph of current in plane tunneling measurements of the magnetoresistance of two layer stacks in accordance with an illustrative implementation.





All numerical thicknesses illustrated in the figures are nanometers (nm). Reference is made to the accompanying drawings throughout the following detailed description. In the drawings, similar symbols typically identify similar components, unless context dictates otherwise. The illustrative implementations described in the detailed description, drawings, and claims are not meant to be limiting. Other implementations may be utilized, and other changes may be made, without departing from the spirit or scope of the subject matter presented here. It will be readily understood that the aspects of the present disclosure, as generally described herein, and illustrated in the figures, can be arranged, substituted, combined, and designed in a wide variety of different configurations, all of which are explicitly contemplated and made part of this disclosure.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Structure of a Basic Magnetic Device



FIG. 1 shows a prior art multilayered, pillar-shaped magnetic device comprising a pinned magnetic layer FM1 with a fixed magnetization direction and a free magnetic layer FM2 with a free magnetization direction. m1 is the magnetization vector of the pinned magnetic layer FM1, and m2 is the magnetization vector of the free magnetic layer FM2. The pinned magnetic layer FM1 acts as a source of spin angular momentum.


The pinned magnetic layer FM1 and the free magnetic layer FM2 are separated by a first non-magnetic layer N1 that spatially separates the two layers FM1 and FM2. N1 may be a non-magnetic metal (Cu, CuN, Cr, Ag, Au, Al, Ru, Ta, TaN, etc.) or a thin non-magnetic insulator such as Al2O3 or MgO. When N1 is a non-magnetic metal its thickness must be less or approximately equal to the spin-diffusion length in the material at the temperature of the device. This allows the electron spin-polarization to be substantially maintained as electrons traverse N1. In one implementation where Cu is used, the thickness of the layer be less than or approximately equal to 0.5 to 50 nm for a device operating at or near room temperature. When N1 is an insulating layer, its thickness must be such that electrons can traverse this layer by quantum mechanical tunneling and mainly preserve their direction of spin-polarization in this process. In an implementation where N1 is MgO or Al2O3, the layer should be approximately equal to 0.3 to 4 nm in thickness. The thickness of the non-magnetic layer N1 should be such there is an absence of scattering of the electron spin-direction on a short length scale, which is less than about the layer thickness. The pillar-shaped magnetic device is typically sized in nanometers, e.g., it may be less than approximately 200 nm laterally.


The free magnetic layer FM2 is essentially a magnetic thin film element imbedded in a pillar-shaped magnetic device with two additional layers—the pinned magnetic layer FM1 and the non-magnetic layer N1. The layer thicknesses are typically approximately 0.7 nm to 10 nm.


These pillar-shaped magnetic devices can be fabricated in a stacked sequence of layers by many different means, including physical vapor deposition (sputtering), thermal and electron-beam evaporation through a sub-micron stencil mask. These magnetic devices can also be fabricated in a stack sequence using sputtering, thermal and electron-beam evaporation to form a multilayered film followed by a subtractive nanofabrication process that removes materials to leave the pillar-shaped magnetic device on a substrate surface, such as that of a silicon of other semiconducting or insulating wafer. The semiconducting wafer may already include portions of the CMOS circuitry for reading and writing the magnetic device. Annealing may be used when the layer stack incorporates a magnetic tunnel junction. Annealing can crystallize an MgO insulating barrier and enhance the junction magnetoresistance. In various implementations, a single annealing process is used. In one implementation, the stacks are annealed at a temperature of 300 C to 450 C to thermally crystallize the MgO layer. The duration of the annealing is minutes (a rapid thermal anneal) to several hours, with higher annealing temperatures requiring shorter annealing times. The annealing is often done in a magnetic field of 1 Tesla or greater to set the magnetic state of the reference layer (FM3). The annealing provides a preferred direction of magnetic anisotropy and an enhanced uniaxial magnetic anisotropy of the free layer (FM2).


Materials for the ferromagnetic layers include (but are not limited to) Fe, Co, Ni; alloys of these elements, such as Ni1-xFex, and CoFe; alloys of these ferromagnetic metals with non-magnetic metals, such as B, Cu, V, Pd, and Pt at compositions in which the materials are ferromagnetically ordered at room temperature; conducting materials; conducting magnetic oxides such as CrO2 and Fe3O4; and fully spin-polarized materials such as the Heusler alloy NiMnSb. For the nonmagnetic layers, materials include (but are not limited to) Cu, CuN, Cr, Ag, Au, Al, Ru, Ta, and TaN.


An electric current source is connected to the pinned magnetic layer FM1 and the free magnetic layer FM2 so that an electric current, I, can traverse the pillar device. In another implementation, an electrical contact is made to the top and bottom of a pillar that incorporates the layer stack.



FIG. 2 is an illustration of an inverted layer stack 200 in accordance with an illustrative implementation of the invention. In this implementation, the inverted layer stack 200 contains a pinned layer FM1. The pinned layer FM1 can be magnetized perpendicular to the plane of the layer, and is represented by m1 in FIG. 2. The pinned layer FM1 can be inverted with respect to the free magnetic layer FM2. In other words, the pinned layer FM1 is formed after the free magnetic layer FM2 and the reference layer FM3. A non-magnetic layer N1 separates the pinned layer FM1 and the free magnetic layer FM2. The free magnetic layer FM2 can form a magnetic tunnel junction with another non-magnetic layer N2 as the insulator of the magnetic tunnel junction and the reference layer FM3. N1 can also be an insulating layer so that FM1 and FM2 form a second magnetic tunnel junction. The reference layer FM3 can be used to read the state of a device. The reference layer FM3 is separated from the free magnetic layer FM2 by a non-magnetic layer N2. Various materials, as described above in greater detail, can be used to make the various layers of the inverted layer stack 200. In addition, the layers can be of various different thicknesses.



FIG. 3 is an illustration of an inverted layer stack 300 in accordance with an illustrative implementation. The thickness of the various layers are in nanometers (nm). In addition the FM1, FM2, FM3, N1, and N2 layers that are related to the layers of those in FIG. 2 are shown. In the inverted stack 300, the magnetic tunnel junction layer 302 is at the bottom and the perpendicular polarizer 304 at the top. In some implementations, the polarizer is deposited on top of the magnetic tunnel junction, which is made up of the FM2, N2, and FM3 layers. In the inverted stack 300, the magnetic tunnel junction layer 302 are closer to a substrate or a semiconductor device (CMOS) wafer. The magnetic tunnel junction layer 302 are also smoother compared to the magnetic tunnel junction layers of a non-inverted layer stack with the polarizer at the bottom, e.g., FIG. 1. The increase of smoothness i.e., a reduction of roughness, of the magnetic tunnel junction layer 302 reduces sharp corners within the magnetic tunnel junction layer 302 and surrounding layers. Specifically, the smoothness of a second non-magnetic layer N2 (308) is increased when compared to a second non-magnetic layer of a non-inverted layer stack. Roughness within an insulating layer impacts when and under what circumstances the magnetic tunnel breaks down. The inverted stack 300 has a smoother non-magnetic layer 308 that improves performance of orthogonal spin transfer MRAM devices by increasing the breakdown voltage and improving magnetic switching characteristics when compared to orthogonal spin transfer MRAM devices that use a non-inverted layer stack. The inverted stack 300 also can reduce variations in device properties across a wafer. The Cu(N) layer is an optional layer and in various implementations, this layer is not present. The Cu(N) layer forms an electrical contact to a device. This contact can be part of the substrate, e.g., the CMOS drivers. The Cu(N) layer can also be made of different materials, such as, but not limited to, Al, Ta, Cu.



FIGS. 6A-6D illustrate the difference in smoothness of the magnetic tunnel junction layers between an inverted stack and a non-inverted layer stack. FIGS. 6A and 6C are transmission electron microscope cross sections of a non-inverted layer stack. A second non-magnetic layer MgO 602 can be seen at two different scales in FIGS. 6A and 6C. FIGS. 6B and 6D are transmission electron microscope cross sections of an inverted layer stack in accordance with an illustrative implementation. A second non-magnetic layer MgO 604 can be seen at two different scales in FIGS. 6B and 6D. As can be seen in comparing FIGS. 6A and 6C with FIGS. 6B and 6D, the second non-magnetic layer 604 is smoother than the second non-magnetic layer 602. The amplitude of the roughness of the MgO layer was reduced from 2.9+/−2.7 nanometers (nm) in the non-inverted layer stack to 0.8+/−0.3 nm in the inverted layer stack. Here, the amplitude is defined as the vertical distance between minima and maxima. The wavelength of the roughness of the MgO layer was also reduced from 33.1+/−11.0 nm in the non-inverted layer stack to 23.2+/−14.6 nm in the inverted stack. Here, the wavelength is defined as twice the horizontal distance between the minima and maxima and maxima and minima, respectively. The reduced roughness results in a higher device breakdown voltage that leads to a larger separation between the write voltage and the breakdown voltage. This leads to a higher performance device that has fewer device failures during operation.


Other inverted stacks can be produced with additional layers. FIG. 4 is an illustration of an inverted layer stack 400 with a synthetic antiferromagnet polarizer 404 in accordance with an illustrative implementation. The inverted layer stack 400 is similar to the inverted layer stack 300 illustrated in FIG. 3. The difference is that the perpendicular polarizer 304 is incorporated into a synthetic antiferromagnet 404. A thin antiferromagnetic coupling layer 402 creates an antiparallel magnetic alignment of the two ferromagnetic layers 304 and 405 in the synthetic antiferromagnet. This creates a synthetic antiferromagnet polarizer 404 that includes the perpendicular polarizer 304. In the illustrated example the antiferromagnetic coupling layer is comprised of Ruthenium. In this example, Ruthenium is one of the materials in the synthetic antiferromagnet and is the layer that creates the antiferromagnetic coupling between the Ni/Co and Pd/Co containing layers. In other implementations, other synthetic antiferromagnetic materials can be used, such as, but not limited to, chromium, copper, etc. The Cu(N) layer is an optional layer and in various implementations, this layer is not present.


The synthetic antiferromagnet polarizer 404 reduces the magnetic interactions between the perpendicular polarizer and the free magnetic layer FM2 in the inverted layer stack 400. The reduced magnetic interactions improves device performance, such as, but not limited to, more uniform rotation of the magnetization of the free layer during switching (e.g., writing data); reduction of the likelihood of undesired thermally induced switching events (e.g., fluctuations that erase or corrupt stored data).



FIG. 5 is an illustration of an inverted layer stack 500 with a pinned synthetic antiferromagnet polarizer 404 in accordance with an illustrative implementation. The inverted layer stack 500 is similar to the inverted layer stack 400 illustrated in FIG. 4, but with the addition of a layer of Iridium Manganese 502, an antiferromagnet. In other implementations, other antiferromagnets are used. The addition of the antiferromagnet 502 pins the synthetic antiferromagnetic polarizer 404 giving a perpendicular exchange bias. This makes the perpendicular polarizer 304 magnetically harder and more stable against unwanted demagnetization during usage of a device. This can lead to a longer device life and more repeatable device operation. The Cu(N) layer is an optional layer and in various implementations, this layer is not present.


In addition to inverting the perpendicular polarizer, changing the materials within the N1 layer can impact the properties of an inverted layer stack. FIG. 7 is an illustration of an inverted magnetic tunnel junction 700 without a polarizer on top in accordance with an illustrative implementation. The Cu(N) layer is an optional layer and in various implementations, this layer is not present. The inverted magnetic tunnel junction 700 contains magnetic tunnel junction layer 302, but there is no perpendicular polarizer. In an experiment, the tunnel magnetoresistance (TMR) was measured using the current in plane tunneling technique (CIPT). A layer stack with Copper at the interface with the CoFeB free layer exhibited a TMR of 55% to 69% depending on the thickness of the MgO layer. In another experiment, the Copper layer was removed. The TMR increased significantly up to 157%. Table 1 below summarizes these findings. The thickness of the MgO layer was not optimized and further increases may be achievable with an optimized MgO layer, but such optimization is not material for operation of the invention.












TABLE 1







With Cu Cap
Without Cu Cap




















TMR %
 55-69%
157%



RA Ohm μm2
2.5-14.4
6.18










While not limited to the following reason, Copper can induce its face-centered cubic (fcc) crystalline structure into the CoFeB layer with which it shares an interface. For an optimal TMR, a (body-centered cubic) bcc texture of the CoFeB is favorable. The Copper layer can magnetically decouple the polarizer and the magnetic tunnel junction. In these implementations, the Cu/CoFeB interfaces between the Copper interlayer and the CoFeB free layer is the reason for the reduced electric performance, e.g., smaller TMR. Using a bcc texture rather than an fcc structure such as Copper, can increase the TMR of the stack. In addition, using a material that crystallizes at a higher temperature than the CoFeB favors the formation of bcc textured CoFeB and can increase the TMR.


In one implementation, the Copper layer is replaced by a bcc non-magnetic layer. FIG. 8 is an illustration of an inverted layer stack 800 in accordance with an illustrative implementation. The inverted layer stack 800 is similar to the inverted stack 300 of FIG. 3 and contains a non-magnetic layer N1. The materials of this N1 layer can be various materials. The Cu(N) layer is an optional layer and in various implementations, this layer is not present. FIG. 9 illustrates one example where the N1 layer is comprised of Copper. In this example, the inverted layer stack 800 is the same as the inverted stack 300 of FIG. 3. The non-magnetic layer N1, however, can be made of other materials. As described above, replacing Copper, a fcc metal, with a bcc non-magnetic substance the TMR of the inverted layer stack 800 can be increased. FIG. 10 illustrates this example. In FIG. 10, the non-magnetic layer N1 is comprised of a bcc non-magnetic material 1002. The bcc non-magnetic material 1002 interfaces with the free magnetic layer FM2. In addition, the bcc non-magnetic material 1002 can support the growth of the underlying bcc free magnetic layer FM2, e.g., a CoFeB layer. The bcc non-magnetic layer has a long spin diffusion length to maintain the large perpendicular spin-polarization of the current after passing through the polarizer. Table 2 below summarizes some of the materials that can be used as the bcc non-magnetic material 1002. The thickness of the N1 layer when used with any of these materials can be less or approximately equal to the spin diffusion length of the material used as the bcc non-magnetic material 1002.













TABLE 2






Atomic
Crystal
Magnetic
Spin Diffusion


Material
Number
Strucure
Order
Length/nm







V
23
bcc
Paramagnetic
>40


Cr
24
bcc
Spin Density
4.5 at 4 K





Wave





Antiferromagnet


Nb
41
bcc
Paramagnetic
~25 or 5.9 ± 0.3


Mo
42
bcc
Paramagnetic
8.6 ± 1.3


Ta
73
bcc
Paramagnetic
2.7 ± 0.4









In another implementation, the non-magnetic layer N1 can be composed of both fcc and bcc materials. FIG. 11 is an illustration of an inverted layer stack with a fcc non-magnetic layer 1004 and a bcc non-magnetic layer 1002 in accordance with an illustrative implementation. In this implementation, the bcc non-magnetic layer 1002 is adjacent to the free magnetic layer FM1, e.g., CoFeB; and the fcc non-magnetic layer 1002 is adjacent to the polarizer. This ensures that the layers at the interlayer/polarizer interface have the same fcc crystal structure and also ensures that the layers at the interlayer/free layer interface have the same bcc crystal structure. Various fcc and bcc materials can be used in this implementation. Table 3 summarizes some of the non-limiting combinations of materials that can be used.












TABLE 3







Material
Crystal Structure



NM1/NM2 (thicknesses in nm)
NM1/NM2









0.3 to 3Ta/7Cu
bcc/fcc



0.3 to 3Ta/7Al
bcc/fcc



0.3 to 3Cr/7Cu
bcc/fcc



0.3 to 3Cr/7Al
bcc/fcc



[1Cr/1Cu] × 5
bcc/fcc











FIG. 12 is a graph 1200 of current in plane tunneling measurements of the magnetoresistance of two layer stacks in accordance with an illustrative implementation. The graph 1200 illustrates the magnetoresistance of the inverted layer stack that does not have a Ta interlayer 1202. Such an inverted layer stack is shown in FIGS. 8 and 9. The magnetoresistance of an inverted layer stack that includes a Ta interlayer and a copper fcc non-magnetic layer 1204 is also shown. FIG. 11 illustrates an example bcc non-magnetic interlayer. In testing, the MgO thickness was varied to produce layer stacks with different, systematically varying, resistance area (RA) products. This is shown in the X-axis of the graph 1200. The magnetoresistance was increased for inverted layer stacks that included a bcc non-magnetic interlayer for all resistance area product stacks studied.


While this specification contains many specific implementation details, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of any inventions or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features specific to particular implementations of particular inventions. Certain features described in this specification in the context of separate implementations can also be implemented in combination in a single implementation. Conversely, various features described in the context of a single implementation can also be implemented in multiple implementations separately or in any suitable subcombination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a subcombination or variation of a subcombination.


Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results. In certain circumstances, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous. Moreover, the separation of various system components in the implementations described above should not be understood as requiring such separation in all implementations, and it should be understood that the described program components and systems can generally be integrated in a single software product or packaged into multiple software products.


Thus, particular implementations of the invention have been described. Other implementations are within the scope of the following claims. In some cases as one of skill in the art would understand after reading this disclosure, the actions recited in the claims can be performed in a different order and still achieve desirable results. In addition, the processes depicted in the accompanying figures do not necessarily require the particular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve desirable results. In certain implementations, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous.

Claims
  • 1. A magnetic device comprising: a pinned magnetic layer having a first fixed magnetization vector with a first fixed magnetization direction;a free magnetic layer comprising a first body-centered cubic material and having a variable magnetization vector having at least a first stable state and a second stable state;a first non-magnetic layer spatially separating the pinned magnetic layer and the free magnetic layer and including a second body-centered cubic material that interfaces with the first body-centered cubic material;a reference magnetic layer having a second fixed magnetization vector with a second fixed magnetization direction; anda second non-magnetic layer spatially separating the free magnetic layer and the reference magnetic layer, wherein a magnetic tunnel junction is formed by the free magnetic layer, the second non-magnetic layer, and the reference magnetic layer, wherein application of a current pulse, having a selected amplitude and duration, through the magnetic device switches the variable magnetization vector, and wherein the magnetic tunnel junction is spatially located below the pinned magnetic layer.
  • 2. The magnetic device of claim 1, wherein the second body-centered cubic material increases the magnetoresistance of the magnetic device.
  • 3. The magnetic device of claim 1, wherein the second body-centered cubic material of the first non-magnetic layer is one of vanadium, chromium, niobium, molybdenum, and tantalum.
  • 4. The magnetic device of claim 1, wherein the first non-magnetic layer includes a face-centered cubic material that interfaces with a face-centered cubic material of the pinned magnetic layer.
  • 5. The magnetic device of claim 4, wherein the second body-centered cubic material of the first non-magnetic layer is one of vanadium, chromium, niobium, molybdenum, and tantalum.
  • 6. The magnetic device of claim 5, wherein the face-centered cubic material of the first non-magnetic layer is one of copper and aluminum.
  • 7. The magnetic device of claim 1, wherein the fixed magnetization vector is perpendicular to the plane of the pinned magnetic layer.
  • 8. The magnetic device of claim 1, further comprising a synthetic antiferromagnet layer, wherein the synthetic antiferromagent layer comprises the pinned magnetic layer.
  • 9. The magnetic device of claim 8, wherein the synthetic antiferromagnet layer reduces magnetic interactions between the pinned magnetic layer and the free magnetic layer.
  • 10. The magnetic device of claim 8, further comprising an antiferromagnet that pins the synthetic antiferromagnet layer providing a perpendicular exchange bias.
  • 11. The magnetic device of claim 1, further comprising a second magnetic tunnel junction comprising the pinned magnetic layer and the free magnetic layer.
  • 12. The magnetic device of claim 1, wherein the variable magnetization vector represents a bit of information.
  • 13. A memory system comprising: a memory cell comprising: a pinned magnetic layer having a first fixed magnetization vector with a first fixed magnetization direction;a free magnetic layer comprising a first body-centered cubic material and having a variable magnetization vector having at least a first stable state and a second stable state;a first non-magnetic layer spatially separating the pinned magnetic layer and the free magnetic layer and including a second body-centered cubic material that interfaces with the first body-centered cubic material;a reference magnetic layer having a second fixed magnetization vector with a second fixed magnetization direction; anda second non-magnetic layer spatially separating the free magnetic layer and the reference magnetic layer, wherein a magnetic tunnel junction is formed by the free magnetic layer, the second non-magnetic layer, and the reference magnetic layer, wherein application of a current pulse, having a selected amplitude and duration, through the magnetic device switches the variable magnetization vector, and wherein the magnetic tunnel junction is spatially located below the pinned magnetic layer; anda current source connected to the pinned magnetic layer and the reference magnetic layer such that current passes through the memory cell.
  • 14. The memory system of claim 13, wherein the second body-centered cubic material increases the magnetoresistance of the magnetic device.
  • 15. The memory system of claim 13, wherein the second body-centered cubic material of the first non-magnetic layer is one of vanadium, chromium, niobium, molybdenum, and tantalum.
  • 16. The memory system of claim 13, wherein the first non-magnetic layer includes a face-centered cubic material that interfaces with a face-centered cubic material of the pinned magnetic layer.
  • 17. The memory system of claim 16, wherein the second body-centered cubic material of the first non-magnetic layer is one of vanadium, chromium, niobium, molybdenum, and tantalum.
  • 18. The memory system of claim 17, wherein the face-centered cubic material of the first non-magnetic layer is one of copper and aluminum.
  • 19. A method of making a memory cell, comprising: forming a second non-magnetic layer spatially separating a free magnetic layer and a reference magnetic layer, wherein a magnetic tunnel junction is formed by the free magnetic layer, the second non-magnetic layer, and the reference magnetic layer, wherein application of a current pulse, having either positive or negative polarity and a selected amplitude and duration, through the magnetic device switches a variable magnetization vector of the free magnetic layer, and wherein the magnetic tunnel junction is spatially located below a pinned magnetic layer;forming the reference magnetic layer having a second fixed magnetization vector with a second fixed magnetization direction;forming a first non-magnetic layer spatially separating the pinned magnetic layer and the free magnetic layer and comprising a second body-centered cubic material that interfaces with a first body-centered cubic material of the free magnetic layer;forming the free magnetic layer comprising the first body-centered cubic material and having a variable magnetization vector having at least a first stable state and a second stable state;forming the pinned magnetic layer having a first fixed magnetization vector with a first fixed magnetization direction.
  • 20. The method of claim 19, wherein the second body-centered cubic material increases the magnetoresistance of the magnetic device.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/715,073, filed on Oct. 17, 2012, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (121)
Number Name Date Kind
5541868 Prinz Jul 1996 A
5629549 Johnson May 1997 A
5640343 Gallagher et al. Jun 1997 A
5654566 Johnson Aug 1997 A
5691936 Sakakima et al. Nov 1997 A
5695846 Lange et al. Dec 1997 A
5695864 Slonczewski Dec 1997 A
5856897 Mauri Jan 1999 A
5896252 Kanai Apr 1999 A
5966323 Chen et al. Oct 1999 A
6016269 Peterson et al. Jan 2000 A
6055179 Koganei et al. Apr 2000 A
6124711 Tanaka et al. Sep 2000 A
6134138 Lu et al. Oct 2000 A
6140838 Johnson Oct 2000 A
6154349 Kanai et al. Nov 2000 A
6172902 Wegrowe et al. Jan 2001 B1
6233172 Chen et al. May 2001 B1
6243288 Ishikawa et al. Jun 2001 B1
6252798 Satoh et al. Jun 2001 B1
6256223 Sun Jul 2001 B1
6272036 You et al. Aug 2001 B1
6292389 Chen et al. Sep 2001 B1
6347049 Childress et al. Feb 2002 B1
6376260 Chen et al. Apr 2002 B1
6385082 Abraham et al. May 2002 B1
6436526 Odagawa et al. Aug 2002 B1
6493197 Ito et al. Dec 2002 B2
6522137 Sun et al. Feb 2003 B1
6532164 Redon et al. Mar 2003 B2
6538918 Swanson et al. Mar 2003 B2
6545906 Savtchenko et al. Apr 2003 B1
6563681 Sasaki et al. May 2003 B1
6603677 Redon et al. Aug 2003 B2
6653154 Doan et al. Nov 2003 B2
6654278 Engel et al. Nov 2003 B1
6710984 Yuasa et al. Mar 2004 B1
6713195 Wang et al. Mar 2004 B2
6714444 Huai et al. Mar 2004 B2
6744086 Daughton et al. Jun 2004 B2
6750491 Sharma et al. Jun 2004 B2
6765824 Kishi et al. Jul 2004 B2
6773515 Li et al. Aug 2004 B2
6777730 Daughton et al. Aug 2004 B2
6812537 Okazawa et al. Nov 2004 B2
6829161 Huai et al. Dec 2004 B2
6835423 Chen et al. Dec 2004 B2
6838740 Huai et al. Jan 2005 B2
6842317 Sugita et al. Jan 2005 B2
6847547 Albert et al. Jan 2005 B2
6888742 Nguyen et al. May 2005 B1
6902807 Argoitia et al. Jun 2005 B1
6906369 Ross et al. Jun 2005 B2
6920063 Huai et al. Jul 2005 B2
6933155 Albert et al. Aug 2005 B2
6958927 Nguyen et al. Oct 2005 B1
6967863 Huai Nov 2005 B2
6980469 Kent et al. Dec 2005 B2
6985385 Nguyen et al. Jan 2006 B2
6992359 Nguyen et al. Jan 2006 B2
6995962 Saito et al. Feb 2006 B2
7002839 Kawabata et al. Feb 2006 B2
7005958 Wan Feb 2006 B2
7009877 Huai et al. Mar 2006 B1
7170778 Kent et al. Jan 2007 B2
7190611 Nguyen et al. Mar 2007 B2
7203129 Lin et al. Apr 2007 B2
7227773 Nguyen et al. Jun 2007 B1
7262941 Li et al. Aug 2007 B2
7307876 Kent et al. Dec 2007 B2
7573737 Kent et al. Aug 2009 B2
8279666 Dieny et al. Oct 2012 B2
8547731 Higo et al. Oct 2013 B2
20010033467 Engel et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020090533 Zhang et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020105823 Redon et al. Aug 2002 A1
20030117840 Sharma et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030151944 Saito Aug 2003 A1
20030197984 Inomata et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030218903 Luo Nov 2003 A1
20040012994 Slaughter et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040094785 Zhu et al. May 2004 A1
20040130936 Nguyen et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040257717 Sharma Dec 2004 A1
20050041342 Huai et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050063222 Huai et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050104101 Sun et al. May 2005 A1
20050128842 Wei Jun 2005 A1
20050136600 Huai Jun 2005 A1
20050158881 Sharma Jul 2005 A1
20050180202 Huai et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050184839 Nguyen et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050201023 Huai et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050237787 Huai et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050280058 Pakala et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060018057 Huai Jan 2006 A1
20060049472 Diao et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060092696 Bessho May 2006 A1
20060132990 Morise et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060227465 Inokuchi et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070019337 Apalkov et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070242501 Hung et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080049488 Rizzo Feb 2008 A1
20080112094 Kent et al. May 2008 A1
20080259508 Kent et al. Oct 2008 A2
20080297292 Viala et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090072185 Raksha et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090098413 Kanegae Apr 2009 A1
20090141540 Miura et al. Jun 2009 A1
20100028530 Parkin Feb 2010 A1
20100124091 Cowburn May 2010 A1
20100140726 Apalkov et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100226169 Gao et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100271870 Zheng et al. Oct 2010 A1
20110007560 Dieny et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110141791 Ahmed Jun 2011 A1
20110316103 Uchida et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120069649 Ranjan et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120261776 Tang et al. Oct 2012 A1
20130075845 Chen et al. Mar 2013 A1
20140008742 Chen et al. Jan 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (21)
Number Date Country
2766141 Jan 2011 CA
1 345 277 Sep 2003 EP
2817998 Jun 2002 FR
2832542 May 2003 FR
2910716 Jun 2008 FR
10-004012 Jan 1998 JP
11-120758 Apr 1999 JP
11-353867 Dec 1999 JP
2002-261352 Sep 2002 JP
2002-357489 Dec 2002 JP
2003-318461 Nov 2003 JP
2005-150482 Jun 2005 JP
2005-535111 Nov 2005 JP
2006-128579 May 2006 JP
2007-525005 Aug 2007 JP
2008-177421 Jul 2008 JP
2008-524830 Jul 2008 JP
2009-027177 Feb 2009 JP
2001195878 Jul 2011 JP
WO-2009080636 Jul 2009 WO
WO2011005484 Jan 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (46)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 14/053,448.
Decision of Rejection dated Mar. 18, 2014 for Japanese App. No. 2012-043157, 5 pages.
Firastrau et al., “Spin-torque nano-oscillator based on a synthetic antiferromagnet free layer and perpendicular to plane polarizer”, J. App. Phys. 113, 113908 (2013).
Stiles et al., “Spin-Transfer Torque and Dynamic”, Spin Dynamics in Confined Magnetic Structures III, Topics in Applied Physics vol. 101, pp. 225-308 (206).
Office Action dated May 13, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/919,466, 20 pages.
R.H. Koch, et al. Physical Review Letters, vol. 84, No. 23, Jun. 2000 Thermally Assisted Magnetization Reversal in Submicron-Sized Magnetic Thin Films, pp. 5419-5422.
Lee et al., Analytical investigation of spin-transfer dynamics using a perpendicular-to-plane polarizer, Applied Physics Letters 86, pp. 022505-1 to 022505-3 (2005).
Office Action for Canadian application No. 2,766,141 dated May 22, 2014, 3 pages.
US 7,026,672, 4/2006, Grandis, Inc. (withdrawn).
First Office Action (with English Translation) in Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-524031, dated May 10, 2011, (8 pgs.).
Martens et al., “Magnetic Reversal in nanoscopic Ferromagnetic Rings”, NSF grants PHY-0351964 (DLS), 2006, 23 pages.
Martens et al., “Thermally Induced Magnetic Switching in Thin Ferromagnetic Annuli”, NSF grants PHY-0351964 (DLS), 2005, 11 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/298,190, dated Jul. 2, 2013, (20 pgs.).
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/720,290, dated May 14, 2013, (20 pgs.).
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/720,290, mailed Sep. 12, 2013.
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,588, dated Feb. 3, 2011, (11 pgs.).
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/041,104, dated Sep. 21, 2012, (7pgs.).
Notice of Reasons for Rejection received for JP 2012-043157 dated Sep. 3, 2013.
Notification of Provisional Rejection received for Korean Appln. No. 10-2012-7001872 mailed Jun. 7, 2013.
Notification of Reasons for Refusal received in Japanese Appln. 2012-517632 dated Jul. 17, 2013.
Office Action for Canadian Application No. 2,766,141, dated Sep. 4, 2013, 4 pages.
Office Action issued by the Chinese Patent Office, Oct. 29, 2012, Chinese Application No. 200880119942.4, 10 pages.
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/041,104, dated Apr. 6, 2012, (17 pgs.).
Office Action received for JP 2010-531338 dated Jun. 18, 2013.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion on Int'l. Application No. PCT/US2010/039373, dated Jan. 5, 2011, (5 pgs.).
Supplementary European Search Report received for EP 10797550.0 completed Jul. 22, 2013 and mailed Sep. 16, 2013.
US Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/298,190, dated Sep. 30, 2013.
Notification of Transmittal of The International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for PCT/US2013/065055, dated Jan. 30, 2014, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/298,190 dated Sep. 20, 2013.
Notification of Provisional Rejection for Korean App. No. 10-2013-7023576 dated Oct. 30, 2013, 46 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/298,190 dated Oct. 28, 2013, 8 pages.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,980,469, IPR2014-00047, dated Oct. 10, 2013, 62 pages.
Declaration of Sanjay K. Banerjee, Ph.D., Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,980,469, IPR2014-00047, dated Oct. 9, 2013, 288 pages.
Observations by a third party concerning patentability in European App. No. 04781554.3 dated Dec. 13, 2013, 3 pages.
New York University's Patent Owner Preliminary Response, IPR2014-00047, dated Jan. 17, 2014, 59 pages.
Second Notification of Provisional Rejection for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2012-7001872, dated Dec. 30, 2013, 37 pages.
Notification of the Third Office Action for Chinese App. No. 200880119942.4 dated Dec. 16, 2013, 5 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and The Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for PCT/US2013/064975, dated Jan. 30, 2014, 7 pages.
Ingvarsson, S., et al., “Tunable magnetization damping in transition metal ternary alloys”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 85, No. 21, Nov. 22, 2004, pp. 4995-4997.
Office Action for Canada App. No. 2,535,965, dated Dec. 12, 2014, 3 pages.
Notification of Provisional Rejection for Korean App. No. 10-2010-7011550, dated Dec. 10, 2014, 6 pages.
Notification of Reasons of Refusal for Japanese App. No. 2013-257366, dated Dec. 3, 2014, 3 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/053,448 dated Oct. 6, 2014, 25 pages.
Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-257367, dated Feb. 12, 2015 with English Translation, 6 pages.
European Extended Search Report for Application No. 14198308.0, dated Apr. 8, 2015, 4 pages.
Japanese Final Office Action for Appl. No. 2013-257366, Dated Mar. 30, 2015, 3 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140103473 A1 Apr 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61715073 Oct 2012 US