Not Applicable
Not Applicable
The present invention is generally related to medical and/or robotic devices, systems, and methods. In an exemplary embodiment, the invention provides an indicator associated with one or more robotic manipulator assemblies for communication of a state of the manipulator assembly or other component of the robotic system, for identification of one or more particular manipulators, or the like. The indicator(s) can provide an additional user interface between the robotic system and, for example, a surgical assistant, system operator, or the like.
Minimally invasive medical techniques are intended to reduce the amount of extraneous tissue which is damaged during diagnostic or surgical procedures, thereby reducing patient recovery time, discomfort, and deleterious side effects. One effect of minimally invasive surgery, for example, may be reduced post-operative hospital recovery times. Because the average hospital stay for a standard surgery is typically significantly longer than the average stay for an analogous minimally invasive surgery, increased use of minimally invasive techniques could save millions of dollars in hospital costs each year. While many of the surgeries performed each year in the United States could potentially be performed in a minimally invasive manner, only a portion of the current surgeries use these advantageous techniques due to limitations in minimally invasive surgical instruments and the additional surgical training involved in mastering them.
Minimally invasive robotic surgical or telesurgical systems have been developed to increase a surgeon's dexterity and avoid some of the limitations on traditional minimally invasive techniques. In telesurgery, the surgeon uses some form of remote control, e.g., a servomechanism or the like, to manipulate surgical instrument movements, rather than directly holding and moving the instruments by hand. In telesurgery systems, the surgeon can be provided with an image of the surgical site at the surgical workstation. While viewing a two or three dimensional image of the surgical site on a display, the surgeon performs the surgical procedures on the patient by manipulating master control devices, which in turn control motion of the servomechanically operated instruments.
The servomechanism used for telesurgery will often accept input from two master controllers (one for each of the surgeon's hands) and may include two or more robotic arms or manipulators on each of which a surgical instrument is mounted. Operative communication between master controllers and associated robotic arm and instrument assemblies is typically achieved through a control system. The control system typically includes at least one processor which relays input commands from the master controllers to the associated robotic arm and instrument assemblies and back from the instrument and arm assemblies to the associated master controllers in the case of, e.g., force feedback or the like. One example of a robotic surgical system is the DA VINCI® system available from Intuitive Surgical, Inc. of Mountain View, Calif.
The roles and interaction among the persons making up a telesurgical team may differ from those of conventional surgery. As telesurgery is often performed in an internal surgical site, at least some of those working under the direction of the lead surgeon (or other robotic system operator) may not have direct access to or direct visualization of the ongoing tissue manipulations. For example, surgical assistants within the operating room may remove a first surgical instrument (such as an electrosurgical scalpel) from a manipulator and replace it with a different surgical instrument (such as a needle holder), as a surgeon may desire the use of different surgical instruments during different phases of a surgical procedure. Similarly, the assistant may reposition a surgical instrument during a procedure, so that rather than approaching the procedure from a first minimally invasive access site, the instrument is advanced toward the internal surgical site from a second, different access site. More complex robotic systems (and team interactions) may also be used. For example, as surgery is often performed with more than two tools, input devices may be provided for one or more additional surgeons, with each additional surgeon robotically controlling (for example) at least one surgical instrument.
While the new telesurgical systems, devices and methods have proven highly effective and advantageous, still further improvements would be desirable. In general, it would be desirable to provide improved robotic and/or surgical devices, systems and methods, particularly for performing telesurgical procedures. It may also be desirable to provide improved techniques for communication among the members of a telesurgical team, and for interfacing with the telesurgical apparatus so as to more fully take advantage of the capabilities of telesurgery to provide enhanced patient outcomes with improved efficiencies. It may be particularly beneficial to avoid unnecessary interruptions and distractions of a surgeon or other system operator, and to avoid delays and/or mistakes in the coordinated activities of a telesurgical team.
The present invention is generally related to medical and/or robotic devices, systems and methods. An exemplary embodiment of the present invention provides a visual indicator associated with each manipulator assembly (and, hence, each surgical instrument) of a multi-arm telesurgical system. The exemplary indicator comprises a multi-color light emitting diode (LED), allowing the indicator to display any of a wide variety of signals through combinations of color, blinking, and the like. By establishing and using an appropriate indicator signal lexicography, the indicator can identify, for example:
In a first aspect, the invention provides a robotic method comprising moving a first end effector of a first manipulator assembly in response to a first robotic command. The first manipulator assembly has a first indicator. A second end effector of a second manipulator assembly is moved in response to a second robotic command. The second manipulator assembly has a second indicator. A command is transmitted from a processor, with the command being selectably directed to the first indicator and/or the second indicator.
In many embodiments, the end effectors will include the working ends of surgical instruments. The person receiving the identifiable signal will often be a member of a robotic surgical team within an operating room, with the processor acting as a master/slave telesurgical controller. In such embodiments, a movement command may be input by a system operator, and the system operator may also select which of the manipulator assemblies is to output the first signal. This can allow the system operator to maintain his or her concentration on movements of the end effectors shown in a display while communicating to, for example, an assistant regarding a specific surgical instrument. For example, rather than telling the assistant to “replace the electrosurgical scalpel on the arm now wiggling back and forth with a needle driver,” the surgeon can instead merely request a needle driver and activate the indicator of the appropriate manipulator assembly. Optionally, the processor may select the appropriate indicator and manipulator assembly, such as when the tool mounted on a manipulator reaches or exceeds its intended useful life.
The indicator will often include a visual indicator, with the first signal including a visual pattern such as blinking or the like, an identifiable color, or some other identifiable visual signal. In an exemplary telesurgical system, the indicators each include a plurality of light emitting diodes (LED). A variety of alternative indicators might also be employed, including any of the wide variety of light sources capable of generating different colors, audible indicators for generating tones or verbal signals, and the like. Preferably, a plurality of separately identifiable signals can be output from each indicator, thereby providing a user interface for communication to the assistant or the like regarding an associated manipulator assembly.
Typically, each manipulator assembly will include a manipulator movably supporting a tool holder, and a tool releasably mounted to the tool holder. The tool will generally include the end effector. The first identifiable signal may indicate, for example, a state of the tool, which specific manipulator assembly is operatively associated with a specific input device, an overall condition or state of all of the manipulator assemblies, an identity of one or more components of the selected manipulator assembly, or the like. Some listing or lexicography explaining the meaning of each identifiable signal will often be provided or known by the person receiving the signal, and that person will often take action in response to the signal, such as reconfiguring the manipulator assembly from which the signal is being output. The reconfiguration may include replacement of a tool of the manipulator assembly with another tool having a different (or the same) end effector, changing a mode of the manipulator assembly so as to initiate or inhibit master/slave movement of the end effector, or the like.
It will often be beneficial to include readily identifiable signal types or groups. For example, when the first signal includes a yellow color, it may communicate a warning that the associated manipulator assembly remains functional, but needs attention now or in the near future. A signal including a red color may communicate a sufficient fault along the robotic system chain to interrupt end effector movement.
A variety of refinements may be implemented with use of the manipulator assembly indicator. For example, the system operator who is inputting movement commands may benefit from graphical indicia in his or her display that corresponds to the first identifiable signal. Hence, when the system indicates that a tool is near the end of its life or the like by flashing the indicator, the same information may be communicated to the system operator by simple flashing of an icon on the operator's display screen, by superimposing a flashing color on the end effector of the instrument as shown in the display, or the like. In some embodiments, along with indicating which currently mounted tool or end effector is to be replaced, the processor may also energize another indicator associated with the new tool that is now desired, such as by flashing an LED at an appropriate location on a tool tray, or the like.
In another aspect, the invention provides a surgical robotic method comprising inputting a robotic movement command from a system operator to an input device. A surgical end effector of a manipulator assembly moves in response to the robotic command. The system operator views the movements of the end effector in a display while inputting the command. An identifiable visual signal is transmitted from a visual indicator of the manipulator assembly to a person nearby. In response, the person manually reconfigures the manipulator assembly.
In yet another aspect, the invention provides a surgical robotic system comprising a first manipulator assembly having a first indicator and a first end effector. The first end effector is movable in response to a first movement command. The second manipulator assembly has a second indicator and a second end effector. The second end effector is movable in response to a second movement command. A processor is coupled to the first and second indicators, and selectively induces at least one of the indicators to output a first signal identifiable by a person nearby.
The present invention generally provides improved robotic and/or medical devices, systems and methods. Embodiments of the present invention are particularly well suited for telesurgery, often providing an additional form of user interface that can enhance communication between a surgical system operator, an assistant, any other members of a telesurgical team and/or the telesurgical system. Other embodiments of the invention may be well suited for use in other telerobotic or robotic environments, particularly with robotic systems having a plurality of manipulators.
Typically, manipulator system 6 includes at least 3 robotic manipulator assemblies. Two linkages 7 (mounted at the sides of the cart in this example) support and position manipulators 8 with linkages 7 in generally supporting a base of the manipulators 8 at a fixed location during at least a portion of the surgical procedure. Manipulators 8 move surgical tools 5 for robotic manipulation of tissues. One additional linkage 9 (mounted at the center of the cart in this example) supports and positions manipulator 10 which controls the motion of an endoscope/camera probe 11 to capture an image (preferably stereoscopic) of the internal surgical site. The fixable portion of positioning linkages 7, 9 of the patient-side system is sometimes referred to herein as a “set-up arm.”
The image of the internal surgical site is shown to operator O by a stereoscopic display 12 in surgeon's console 3. The internal surgical site is simultaneously shown to assistant A by an assistance display 14. Assistant A can help prior to and during a surgical procedure. Prior to surgery, assistant A typically covers at least a portion of the system with sterile drapes. Such draping of the system may include attaching sterile adapters, cannulas, and/or the like to manipulators 8, switching one or more of the manipulators into and out of a manually articulatable clutch mode, and the like. Assistant A also assists in prepositioning manipulator assemblies 8 and 10 relative to patient P using set-up linkage arms 7, 9; in swapping tools 5 from one or more of the surgical manipulators for alternative surgical tools or instruments 5′; in operating related non-robotic medical instruments and equipment; in manually moving a manipulator assembly so that the associated tool accesses the internal surgical site through a different aperture, and the like. Some or all of these activities may be facilitated by providing feedback to assistant A via the indicators described herein, with the indicators often providing feedback to the assistant regarding a state of the manipulator assembly, a state of the tool mounted thereon, and/or a state of the robotic surgical system.
In general terms, the linkages 7, 9 are used primarily during set-up of patient-side system 6, and typically remain in a fixed configuration during at least a portion of a surgical procedure. Manipulators 8, 10 each comprise a driven linkage which is actively articulated under the direction of surgeon's console 3. Although one or more of the joints of the set-up arm may optionally be driven and robotically controlled, at least some of the set-up arm joints may be configured for manual positioning by assistant A. Each associated combination of a set-up joint, manipulator and tool is encompassed within the term “manipulator assembly” as that term is used herein, although some manipulator assemblies may not include set-up joints, and the manipulator assembly will not include a tool at all times.
For convenience, a manipulator such as manipulator 8 that is supporting a surgical tool used to manipulate tissues is sometimes referred to as a patient-side manipulator (PSM), while a manipulator 10 which controls an image capture or data acquisition device such as endoscope 11 may be referred to as an endoscope-camera manipulator (ECM). The manipulators may optionally actuate, maneuver and control a wide variety of instruments, tools, image capture devices and the like which are useful for surgery.
As can be seen in
As can be seen in
It can be advantageous to avoid distracting system operator O during a surgical procedure so as to require the operator to shift his or her attention away from the internal surgical site. Even when assistant A is replacing a tool 5 with an alternative tool 5′, the system operator may continue manipulating tissues with another tool, or may want to continue to view the surgical site to monitor bleeding, and/or the like. Nonetheless, it may be difficult for the system operator to communicate clearly with assistant A regarding which tool 5 is to be replaced by an alternate tool. Specifically, as endoscope 11 may be at any convenient orientation, the tool associated with the right hand of system operator O will often not be disposed to the right of the endoscope, particularly as viewed by the assistant.
So as to unambiguously identify a tool 5 to be replaced assistant A, system operator O may input a command into workstation 3 (such as by pushing a button on the input device 2, actuating foot peddle, inputting a voice command, or the like) so that indicator 20 on the manipulator assembly associated with the specific tool 5 generates a visually identifiable signal that can be viewed by the assistant. A corresponding graphical indication of the signal may be provided to system operator O in display 12, such as presentation of an appropriate icon, superimposing of text on the surgical site, the use of image processing to superimpose false colors on the image of the appropriate end effector, or the like. In response to the signal on indicator 20, assistant A can remove and replace the identified tool 5. Optionally, each alternative tool 5′ may also have an associated indicator 20, allowing the processor to transmit a signal so as to indicate which alternative tool the system operator O is to be mounted on the robotic system.
There are a number of additional uses for indicators 20 in telesurgical system 1. For example, assistant A will often manually position tools 5 and endoscope 11 when setting up for a surgical procedure, when reconfiguring the manipulator system 6 for a different phase of a surgical procedure, when removing and replacing a tool with an alternate tool 5′, and the like. During such manual reconfiguring of the manipulator assembly by assistant A, the manipulator assembly may be placed in a different mode than is used during master/slave telesurgery, with the manually repositionable mode as sometimes being referred to as a clutch mode. The manipulator assembly may change between the tissue manipulation mode and the clutch mode in response to an input such as pushing a button on manipulator 8 (or some other component to the manipulator assembly) thereby allowing assistant A to change the manipulator mode. By generating appropriate visually identifiable signals with indicators 20 whenever the manipulator is in clutch mode, assistant A can avoid errors and increase the efficiency of the surgical procedure.
Indicators 20 may also show an associated identifiable signal when, for example, no tool is attached to the manipulator, when a sterile adaptor or interface between tool 5 and manipulator 8 is not properly attached, if an instrument mounted onto a manipulator is incompatible with that manipulator, if the instrument has reached the end of its useful life, and/or the like. For some of these signals, system operator O may initiate generation of the signal and may specify the associated manipulator assembly from which the signal is to be produced. In others, processor 4 may initiate the signal and/or indicate which manipulator assembly(s) are to be indicated. For example, in the case of a power failure, robotic system 1 may continue to operate using backup batteries. So as to indicate to the assistant A that a power failure has occurred, indicators 20 on all manipulators may blink, optionally blinking with a yellow light as a warning. As the power in the battery is drained so that robotic system 1 can no longer continue to provide robotic movement of the tools, all indicators 20 may blink red, thereby indicating a system fault. A wide variety of alternative signals may also be provided, some of which are indicated by the exemplary lexicographies of
Referring now to
Manipulator 32 is shown in more detail in
As different colors may be combined with different illumination levels and different modulation patterns in a signal, a very large number of independently identifiable signals can be generated, often being more than three separately identifiable signals, typically being more than 10 separately identifiable signals, and optionally of being more than 100 separately identifiable signals. Interpretation of the identifiable signals may be facilitated by a listing correlating signals and their meaning, such as that included as
So as to facilitate interpretation of the signals generated by indicators 20, any of a wide variety of signal conventions may be established and/or employed. For example, as can be understood with reference to
Referring now to
When the second system operator O2 desires the tool 5 attached to manipulator assembly B be replaced an alternate tool 5′, for example, tool F, the system operator may verbally instruct assistant A to mount tool F to his manipulator assembly. The indicator 20 of manipulator assembly B generates a signal in response to an appropriate input by the second system operator O2, clearly indicating to the assistant A which tool from which manipulator assembly is to be replaced.
As noted above, additional indicators may optionally be associated with each of the alternative tools 5′, thereby foregoing any need for verbal instruction to the assistant regarding which alternative tool is to be mounted to the manipulator. Toward that end, alternative tools 5′ may be included in a tool rack 62 which is coupled to processor 4, often so as to provide communication between the circuitry of alternative tools 5′ and the processor. This can allow the processor to read identifying information from the tools, thereby allowing the processor to determine which alternative tools or tool types are available and/or appropriate to mount on the manipulator system. An LED or other indicator may be associated with each alternative tool 5′ included in the tool rack, and processor 4 may transmit a signal to the tool rack so as to energize one or more indicator associated with one or more tools. Hence, when system operator O1 indicates to processor 4 a desire to replace a mounted tool 5 (for example, tool B on manipulator B) with a different type of tool, a list of available tools and/or tool types may be displayed to the system operator. In response to the system operator selecting (for example, a tool type corresponding to tool F, indicators 20 associated with tool B and tool F may be activated, indicating to the assistant A that these two tools should be exchanged.
Processor 4 will typically include data processing hardware and software, with the software typically comprising machine-readable code. The machine-readable code will embody software programming instructions to implement some or all of the methods described herein. While processor 4 is shown as a single block in the simplified schematic of
Referring now to
Regardless of whether the signal is initiated by a change in state or a system operator, the processor will typically transmit an appropriate command to one or more of the manipulator assemblies 76, and, in response, the indicator on that manipulator assembly will display a visual signal 78. Optionally, corresponding graphics may be shown in a system operator display 80, thereby allowing the system operator to maintain his or her concentration on the internal surgical site.
In response to the visual signal, the other person, such as an assistant, may optionally reconfigure the manipulator assembly 82. For example, the assistant may remove and replace a tool (with its end effector) or may manually reposition the manipulator linkage so as to move the end effector into a desired position. In some embodiments, the assistant may merely monitor the manipulator assembly in response to one or more visual signals, and may optionally prepare to take some appropriate action if the visual signal changes so as to indicate that such an action is appropriate.
While described in some detail, for clarity of understanding and by way of example, a variety of changes, adaptations, and modifications will be obvious to those of skill in the art. Hence, the scope of the present invention is limited solely by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/012,582 (filed Feb. 1, 2016), which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/214,439 (filed Aug. 22, 2011), now U.S. Pat. No. 9,259,276, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/478,416 (filed Jun. 28, 2006), now U.S. Pat. No. 8,100,133, which claims benefit of priority from U.S. provisional Application No. 60/695,611 (filed Jun. 30, 2005), each of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4281447 | Miller et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4332066 | Hailey et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4486928 | Tucker et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4500065 | Hennekes et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4512709 | Hennekes et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4706372 | Ferrero et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4710093 | Zimmer et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4793053 | Zuccaro et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4809747 | Choly et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4830569 | Jannborg | May 1989 | A |
4832198 | Alikhan | May 1989 | A |
4943939 | Hoover | Jul 1990 | A |
4979949 | Matsen, III | Dec 1990 | A |
4996975 | Nakamura | Mar 1991 | A |
5018266 | Hutchinson et al. | May 1991 | A |
5078140 | Kwoh | Jan 1992 | A |
5143453 | Weynant nee Girones | Sep 1992 | A |
5154717 | Matsen, III et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5174300 | Bales et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5217003 | Wilk | Jun 1993 | A |
5221283 | Chang | Jun 1993 | A |
5236432 | Matsen, III et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5255429 | Nishi et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5257998 | Ota et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5271384 | McEwen et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5294209 | Naka et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5305203 | Raab | Apr 1994 | A |
5312212 | Naumec | May 1994 | A |
5313935 | Kortenbach et al. | May 1994 | A |
5343385 | Joskowicz et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5354314 | Hardy et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5355743 | Tesar | Oct 1994 | A |
5359993 | Slater et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5372147 | Lathrop, Jr. et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5397323 | Taylor et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5399951 | Lavallee et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5400267 | Denen et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5402801 | Taylor | Apr 1995 | A |
5403319 | Matsen, III et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5417210 | Funda et al. | May 1995 | A |
5427097 | Depp | Jun 1995 | A |
5451368 | Jacob | Sep 1995 | A |
5649956 | Jensen et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5697939 | Kubota et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5762458 | Wang et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5784542 | Ohm et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5792135 | Madhani et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5800423 | Jensen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
6071281 | Burnside et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6132368 | Cooper | Oct 2000 | A |
6223100 | Green | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6246200 | Blumenkranz | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6331181 | Tierney et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6522906 | Salisbury, Jr. et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6574355 | Green | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6659939 | Moll et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6731988 | Green | May 2004 | B1 |
7024750 | Isokyto et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7048745 | Tierney et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7107090 | Salisbury, Jr. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7379790 | Toth | May 2008 | B2 |
7525274 | Kazi et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7643862 | Schoenefeld | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7666191 | Orban, III et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7699855 | Anderson | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7727244 | Orban, III et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7763015 | Cooper | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7896815 | Thrope et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7955322 | Devengenzo | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8100133 | Mintz et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8182470 | Devengenzo et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8273076 | Devengenzo et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8527094 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8608773 | Tierney | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8894634 | Devengenzo et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9043027 | Durant | May 2015 | B2 |
9259276 | Mintz et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
10258416 | Mintz | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10335242 | Devengenzo et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
20030109780 | Coste-Maniere et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040106916 | Quaid et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111183 | Sutherland et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040267254 | Manzo et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050200324 | Guthart et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060052684 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070142969 | Devengenzo et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20150073437 | Devengenzo et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20160157943 | Mintz et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1131004 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1462895 | Sep 2004 | EP |
2350696 | Dec 2000 | GB |
H0724750 | Jan 1995 | JP |
H07194610 | Aug 1995 | JP |
H0966056 | Mar 1997 | JP |
2003339736 | Dec 2003 | JP |
2005536314 | Dec 2005 | JP |
WO-9313916 | Jul 1993 | WO |
WO-9426167 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO-9516396 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO-9530964 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO-9639944 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO-03094768 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO-2007005555 | Jan 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP19203799.2 dated Mar. 5, 2020, 9 pages. |
Chinese Patent Application No. 200680022931.5 Office Action dated Jul. 20, 2011, 8 pages. |
Chinese Patent Application No. 200680022931.5 Office Action dated May 10, 2010, 8 pages. |
Chinese Patent Application No. 200680022931.5 Office Action dated Oct. 25, 2010, 7 pages. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/752,755, filed Dec. 20, 2005. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP18162150.9 dated Oct. 5, 2018, 6 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP18162151.7 dated Oct. 4, 2018, 8 pages. |
Japanese Appl. No. 2008-519585 Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2011, 7 pages, including English translation. |
Office Action dated Jun. 9, 2015 for Chinese Application No. CN2013184099 filed Jun. 28, 2006, 8 pages. |
PCT/US06/25465 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Search Authority, dated Apr. 3, 2007, 12 pages. |
Vertut, Jean and Phillipe Coiffet, Robot Technology: Teleoperation and Robotics Evolution and Development, English translation, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Inglewood Cliffs, NJ, USA 1986, vol. 3A, 332 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190192240 A1 | Jun 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60695611 | Jun 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11478416 | Jun 2006 | US |
Child | 13214439 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15012582 | Feb 2016 | US |
Child | 16290239 | US | |
Parent | 13214439 | Aug 2011 | US |
Child | 15012582 | US |