The present invention relates to an inspection apparatus which detects defects such as a flaw or a foreign substance in a sample, and an adjusting method for the inspection apparatus.
A semiconductor element is manufactured by performing various processes on a silicon wafer. In the middle of semiconductor manufacturing steps, if a flaw is generated on the silicon wafer or a foreign substance is attached thereto, operation errors occur in the semiconductor element.
For this reason, it is important to improve a yield by detecting defects such as a flaw or a foreign substance on the wafer and feeding back the result to the semiconductor manufacturing steps. An inspection apparatus is used to detect a defect on the semiconductor wafer.
As the related art of the inspection apparatus, there is a technique disclosed in PTL 1. The technique disclosed in PTL 1 is a technique in which an inspection apparatus is calibrated by using polystyrene latex as a standard foreign substance.
As the other related art of the inspection apparatus, there are techniques disclosed in PTLs 2 to 5.
PTL 1: JP-A-2008-58239
PTL 2: JP-A-2011-75431
PTL 3: JP-A-2010-85135
PTL 4: JP-A-10-325807
PTL 5: JP-A-2011-232354
Hereinafter, a problem to be solved by the present invention will be described, but the following description is not intended to limit the present invention.
In the related art, in calibration of an inspection apparatus, a sphere of the above-described polystyrene latex is used as a standard particle.
However, there is no consideration of the following (1) to (3) in the standard particle in the related art, and an improvement in inspection accuracy of the inspection apparatus is difficult.
In other words, due to micronization of a defect to be detected, ambiguity and instability of the standard particle used as a reference in the related art cannot be disregarded.
(1) The intensity of light from a defect is proportional to the sixth power of a size of the defect, but it is difficult to manufacture the standard particle in the related art so as to have a necessary diameter, and sufficient data for calibration cannot be obtained.
(2) A plurality of standard particles are used in calibration, but there is a dispersion among sizes of the standard particles, and thus accurate calibration data cannot be obtained.
(3) The standard particle made of the polystyrene latex changes in its size or its optical characteristic due to burning with illumination light, reaction with moisture in air, or change over time, and thus accurate calibration data cannot be obtained.
An object of the present invention is to realize an adjusting method for an inspection apparatus, capable of accurately calibrating the inspection apparatus regardless of a use environment or an amount of use time, and the inspection apparatus.
The present invention is characterized in that a detection optical system is calibrated by using a diffraction grating.
The present invention has the following aspects as other features.
In an adjusting method for an inspection apparatus, a reference substrate provided with a diffraction grating having a predetermined height and interval is placed on a support stand; the diffraction grating of the reference substrate placed on the support stand is irradiated with illumination light by an illumination optical section; scattered light from the diffraction grating is detected by a detection optical section; light from a detection aperture portion formed in the detection optical section is applied to a sensor; the light is converted into an electric signal by the sensor; a processing section determines whether or not there is a defect or a foreign substance on the basis of the scattered light which has been converted into the electric signal; the defect or the foreign substance determined by the processing section is displayed on a display section as an image; and it is determined whether or not the illumination optical section, the support stand, the detection optical section, and the sensor are required to be calibrated on the basis of the image displayed on the display section.
In addition, an inspection apparatus includes a support stand that supports a sample; a transport section that transports the sample; an illumination optical section that irradiates the sample placed on the support stand with light; a detection optical section that detects scattered light from the sample; a sensor that converts light detected by the detection optical section into an electric signal; a processing section that determines whether or not there is a defect or a foreign substance on the sample on the basis of the signal from the sensor; a display section that displays the defect or the foreign substance determined by the processing section; and a reference substrate that is provided with a diffraction grating having a predetermined height and interval, in which light is applied to the diffraction grating of the reference substrate supported by the support stand with light from the illumination optical section so as to be scattered by the diffraction grating and to be detected by the detection optical section, and a result determined by the processing section is displayed on the display section.
According to the present invention, for example, it is possible to accurately adjust an inspection apparatus regardless of at least one of a particle diameter of PSL, a use environment, and an amount of use time.
Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.
In addition, constituent elements having the same function are given the same reference numeral through all the drawings for describing the embodiments of the present invention, and repeated description will be omitted as much as possible.
In addition, the inspection apparatus includes an illumination optical system 104 which irradiates a sample with light, and the illumination optical system (illumination optical section) 104 irradiates the sample with light 105 so as to form an illumination region 106. The illumination region 106 may be a substantial circle or may be a substantial line.
Further, the inspection apparatus includes a detection optical system (detection optical section) 108 which detects light from a sample. The detection optical system 108 includes a detection lens 108a, and the detection lens 108a may be constituted by an objective lens, a zoom lens, and an imaging lens, and may be provided with a spatial filter on a Fourier plane in order to block specific light (for example, diffracted light).
A detection aperture portion 109 is formed on a light emission side of the detection optical system 108, and a size of an aperture of the detection aperture portion 109 can be changed. In addition, a position and a size of the aperture of the detection aperture portion 109 can be arbitrarily changed by using various movement mechanisms.
Further, the inspection apparatus includes a sensor 111 which is irradiated with light having passed through the detection aperture portion 109 and detects the light. The sensor 111 includes a sensor such as a photomultiplier tube (PMT), a photo counter, and an avalanche photodiode, a sensor in which a plurality of PMTs, photo counters and avalanche photodiodes are arranged in a matrix, a CCD line sensor, a time delay integration (TDI) sensor, and the like.
A signal having undergone photoelectric conversion in the sensor 111 is sent to a processing section 112. The processing section 112 determines that there is a defect if the magnitude of the signal is greater than a predetermined threshold value, and determines that there is not a defect but noise if the magnitude of the signal is equal to or smaller than the predetermined threshold value. In addition, the processing section 112 has a function (conversion function) of converting the magnitude of the signal into a size of a standard particle by using calibration data which is created in advance.
In the example illustrated in
For example, as illustrated in
In the example illustrated in
In an example illustrated in
Also in the example illustrated in
In an example illustrated in
In the example illustrated in
In addition, a plurality of diffraction gratings which are of different types are formed on the reference substrate 100, and the different types of diffraction gratings include different diffraction gratings illustrated in
In an example illustrated in
In addition, in an example illustrated in
Diffraction gratings with different grating heights and diffraction gratings with different grating pitches are also included in different types of diffraction gratings.
In addition, since the intensity of light from a defect on a wafer is inversely proportional to the fourth power of a wavelength of the light to be applied, it may be desirable that a wavelength of the light 105 from the illumination optical system 104 is short (for example, ultraviolet rays). Therefore, it may be desirable that a diffraction grating is made of a material (for example, an oxide film such as silica) having resistance to ultraviolet light. In other words, it may be desirable that a diffraction grating used in Example of the present invention is made of a material having resistance to illumination light.
In
Next, as in
A worker refers to a simulation value which is preserved in the processing section 112 and is displayed on the display section 113, and obtains a difference Δ1 (an absolute value of Δ1 may also be used) between the output value from the sensor 111 in step S501 and the simulation value (step S503). Next, the worker judges whether or not the difference Δ1 is within a first allowable range (step S504).
In addition, the simulation value is an ideal value obtained when the diffraction gratings 201A and 202B are illuminated with the light 105, and light intensity is measured with the sensor 111. When the simulation value is obtained by the processing section 112, there are used a wavelength of the light 105, light intensity, a relative positional relationship between the light 105 and the diffraction gratings 201A and 202B, diffraction efficiency of the diffraction gratings 201A and 202B, an interval between gratings, an arrangement relationship among the detection optical system 108, the detection aperture portion 109, and the sensor 111, and the like.
Similarly, the worker refers to the simulation value which is preserved in the processing section 112 and is displayed on the display section 113, and obtains a difference Δ2 (an absolute value of Δ2 may also be used) between the output value from the sensor 111 in step S502 and the simulation value (step S505).
Next, the worker judges whether or not the difference Δ2 is within the first allowable range (step S506).
If at least one of the differences Δ1 and Δ2 is not within the first allowable range (the minimum value m1 and the maximum value M1), this state indicates that a position of the detection aperture portion 109 is not appropriate, and light emitted from the detection optical system 108 is blocked by the detection aperture portion 109.
In this case, the worker changes at least one of a size of the detection aperture portion 109 and a position of the detection aperture portion 109 (step S507). In other words, ideally, it is preferable that Δ1=0 and Δ2=0.
In addition, the worker judges again whether or not the differences Δ1 and Δ2 are within the first allowable range in step S506, and the flow proceeds to step S508 if the differences Δ1 and Δ2 are within the first allowable range.
Next, the worker judges whether or not the differences Δ1 and Δ2 are within a second allowable range (the minimum value m2 (>m1) and the maximum value M2 (<M1)) which is narrower than the first allowable range (step S508).
If the differences Δ1 and Δ2 are not within the second allowable range, this state indicates that there is a deviation which cannot be allowed in a lens surface of the detection optical system 108.
In this case, the worker performs work such as changing of installation of the lens of the detection optical system 108 or changing the lens to another lens (step S509). In addition, the worker judges again whether or not the differences Δ1 and Δ2 are within the second allowable range in step S508.
If the differences Δ1 and Δ2 are within the second allowable range, the adjusting process is finished (step S510).
Further, the above-described judgment performed by the worker may be performed by using the processing section 112, and the first allowable range and the second allowable range may be arbitrarily changed.
Furthermore, the size and the position of the detection aperture portion 109 may be automatically adjusted by adding an adjustment motor which can change the size and the position so that the differences Δ1 and Δ2 enter the first allowable range.
The same description is also applicable to step S509. In other words, the scope of disclosure of the present example includes at least one of changing of the size of the detection aperture, changing of the position of the detection aperture, and changing of the installation of the lens being performed by any processing section. Moreover, the adjustment includes not only adjustment which is completely automatically performed by the processing section but also adjustment in which a part thereof is performed by the worker and remaining adjustment is performed by the processing section.
As described above, in Example 1 of the present invention, standard data for calibrating the inspection apparatus which inspects a defect such as a foreign substance on a silicon wafer is obtained by using a plurality of types of diffraction gratings, and thus it is possible to implement an adjusting method for the inspection apparatus, capable of accurately calibrating the inspection apparatus regardless of a use environment or an amount of use time, and the inspection apparatus.
Next, a description will be made of an example of adjusting (calibrating) an inspection apparatus including a plurality of detection optical systems and a plurality of sensors.
An azimuth of light diffracted by a diffraction grating can be controlled by changing a relative positional relationship between applied light and the diffraction grating. Example 2 of the present invention uses this characteristic.
In
The detection optical unit 6001 includes a detection optical system 108, a detection aperture portion 109, and a sensor 111. In addition, the detection optical unit 6002 includes a detection optical system 601, a detection aperture portion 602, and a sensor 603, and the detection optical unit 6003 includes a detection optical system 604, a detection aperture portion 605, and a sensor 606.
Each of the detection optical systems 108, 601, and 604 may include an objective lens, a zoom lens, and an imaging lens, and may include a spatial filter on a Fourier plane in order to block specific light (for example, diffracted light). In addition, each of the detection optical systems 108, 601 and 604 may be a so-called condensing system detection optical system, and may be a so-called imaging system detection optical system.
A size of an aperture of each of the detection aperture portions 109, 602, and 605 can be changed. In addition, a position of each of the aperture of the detection aperture portions 109, 602, and 605 can be arbitrarily changed by using various movement mechanisms.
A signal having undergone photoelectric conversion in each of the sensors 111, 603, and 606 is sent to the processing section 112. The processing section 112 adds the signals from the sensors 111, 603 and 606 together, and determines that there is a defect if the magnitude of an addition result signal obtained by adding the signals together is greater than a predetermined threshold value. In addition, it is determined that there is not a defect but noise if the magnitude of the addition result signal is equal to or smaller than the predetermined threshold value.
In addition, the processing section 112 has a function (conversion function) of converting the magnitude of the addition result signal into a size of a standard particle by using calibration data which is created in advance. Further, the processing section 112 may have a function of sorting defects by comparing signals from the sensors 111, 603 and 606 with each other.
In the apparatus illustrated in
In addition, various modifications may be employed in order to dispose the reference substrate 100 and to dispose the diffraction grating 202C and the like. As illustrated in
Next, with reference to
First, a worker obtains a simulation value preserved in the processing section 112 in advance (step S801). The simulation value in Example 2 of the present invention is obtained by fixing a wavelength, intensity, an incidence angle, and an azimuth of the light 105 from the illumination optical system 104 to predetermined values, and by recording changes in signals detected by the respective detection optical units 6001, 6002 and 6003 due to a change in a rotation angle θ of the diffraction grating 202C when the diffraction grating 202C is rotated (Is1=fs1(θ), Is2=fs2(θ), and Is3=fs3(θ); here, s stands for simulation). When the simulation value is obtained by the processing section 112, there are used a wavelength and intensity of the light 105, a relative positional relationship between the light 105 and the diffraction grating 202C, diffraction efficiency of the diffraction grating 202C, an interval between gratings, an ideal arrangement of the detection optical units 6001, 6002 and 6003, and the like. The maximum change value of the simulation value, a rotation angle at that time, the minimum change value, and a rotation angle at that time are stored in the processing section 112.
Next, the worker acquires a value obtained by actually fixing a wavelength, intensity, an incidence angle, and an azimuth of the light 105 from the illumination optical system 104 to predetermined values, and by recording changes in signals detected by the respective detection optical units 6001, 6002 and 6003 due to a change in a rotation angle θ of the diffraction grating 202C when the diffraction grating 202C is rotated (I1=f1(θ), I2=f2(θ), and I3=f3(θ)) (step S802).
Next, the worker acquires the respective maximum values Ismax1, Ismax2, and Ismax3 of the changes Is1=fs1(θ), Is2=fs2(θ) and Is3=fs3(θ) in the simulation detection signals, and rotation angles θsmax1, θsmax2 and θsmax3 when the maximum values are obtained (step S803).
In addition, the worker obtains the respective minimum values Ismin1, Ismin2, and Ismin3 of the changes Is1=fs1(θ), Is2=fs2(θ) and Is3=fs3(θ) in the simulation detection signals, and rotation angles θsmin1, θsmin2 and θsmin3 when the minimum values are obtained (step S804).
Next, the worker acquires the respective maximum values Imax1, Imax2, and Imax3 of the changes I1=f1(θ), I2=f2(θ) and I3=f3(θ) in the actual detection signals, and rotation angles θmax1, θmax2, and θmax3 when the maximum values are obtained (step S805).
In addition, the worker acquires the respective minimum values Imin1, Imin2, and Imin3 of the changes I1=f1(θ), I2=f2(θ), and I3=f3(θ) in the actual detection signals, and rotation angles θmin1, θmin2, and θmin3 when the minimum values are obtained (step S806).
Next, the worker obtains differences ΔImax1, ΔImax2, and ΔImax3 between the maximum values Ismax1, Ismax2 and Ismax3 on the simulation values and the actual maximum values Imax1, Imax2, and Imax3. Similarly, the worker obtains differences Δθmax1, Δθmax2, and Δθmax3 between the rotation angles θsmax1, θsmax2, and θsmax3 when the maximum values on the simulation values are obtained and the rotation angles θmax1, θmax2, and θmax3 when the actual maximum values are obtained (step S807).
Next, the worker obtains differences ΔImin1, ΔImin2, and ΔImin3 between the minimum values Ismin1, Ismin2, and Ismin3 on the simulation values and the actual minimum values Imin1, Imin2, and Imin3. Similarly, the worker obtains differences Δθmin1, Δθmin2 and Δθmin3 between the rotation angles θsmin1, θsmin2, and θsmin3 when the minimum values on the simulation values are obtained and the rotation angles θmin1, θmin2, and θmin3 when the actual minimum values are obtained (step S808).
Next, the worker judges whether or not each of ΔImax1, ΔImax2, ΔImax3, ΔImin1, ΔImin2, and ΔImin3 is within a first allowable range (the minimum value m1 and the maximum value M1) (step S809). For example, if at least one of ΔImax1 and ΔImin1 is not within the first allowable range, this state indicates that a position of the detection aperture portion 109 of the detection optical unit 6001 is deviated from a position where the detection aperture portion 109 is to be originally located, and light emitted from the detection optical system 108 is blocked.
Therefore, in this case, the worker changes at least one of a size and a position of the detection aperture portion 109 (step S810). This is also the same for ΔImax2, ΔImax3, ΔImin2, and ΔImin3.
In addition, the worker checks again whether or not each of ΔImax1, ΔImax1, ΔImax3, ΔImin1, ΔImin2, and ΔImin3 is within the first allowable range, and finishes step S809 if each of the values is within the first allowable range.
Next, the worker judges whether or not each of ΔImax1, ΔImax2, ΔImax3, ΔImin1, ΔImin2 and ΔImin3 is within a second allowable range (the minimum value m2 (>m1) and the maximum value M2 (<M1)) which is narrower than the first allowable range (step S811). For example, if at least one of ΔImax1 and ΔImin1 is not within the second allowable range, this state indicates that there is a deviation which cannot be allowed in a lens surface of the detection optical system 108. In this case, the worker performs work such as changing of installation of the lens of the detection optical system 108 or changing the lens themselves to another lens (step S812). This is also the same for ΔImax2, ΔImax3, ΔImin2, and ΔImin3.
In addition, the worker checks again whether or not each of ΔImax1, ΔImax2, ΔImax3, ΔImin1, ΔImin2, and ΔImin3 is within the second allowable range, and finishes step S811 if each of the values is within the second allowable range.
Next, the worker judges whether or not each of Δθmax1, Δθmax2, Δθmax3, Δθmin1, Δθmin2, and Δθmin3 is within a third allowable range (step S813). For example, if Δθmin1 is not within the third allowable range, this state indicates that a position of the detection optical unit 6001 is in itself deviated from a position where the detection aperture portion is to be originally located. Therefore, in this case, the worker changes the position of the detection optical unit 6001 (step S814). This is also the same for Δθmax1, Δθmax2, Δθmax3, Δθmin2, and Δθmin3.
In addition, the flow returns to step S813, and the worker checks again whether or not each of Δθmin1, Δθmin2, and Δθmin3 is within the third allowable range, and finishes step S813 if each of the values is within the third allowable range.
As described above, in Example 2 of the present invention, standard data for calibrating the inspection apparatus which inspects a defect such as a foreign substance on a silicon wafer is obtained by using diffraction gratings and is obtained through comparison with simulation data, and thus it is possible to implement an adjusting method for the inspection apparatus, capable of accurately calibrating the inspection apparatus including a plurality of detection optical systems and a plurality of sensors regardless of a use environment or an amount of use time, and the inspection apparatus.
Next, Example 3 of the present invention will be described. Example 3 is characterized in that an illumination intensity (also referred to as an illumination light amount) is changed when an inspection apparatus is adjusted by using a diffraction grating. The present example may also be expressed as follows: an amount of illumination light is changed from a first illumination light amount to a second illumination light amount which is smaller than the first illumination light amount when a detection optical system is calibrated.
In Example 3 of the present invention, it is possible to achieve substantially the same effect as in a case of adjusting an inspection apparatus by using a standard particle whose dimension is so finely controlled that it is difficult to actually manufacture the standard particle. Hereinafter, Example 3 of the present invention will be described with a focus on differences from Examples 1 and 2.
In step 111 of
Example 3 of the present invention is applicable to an inspection apparatus including a plurality of detection optical systems and a plurality of sensors as in Example 2. In an adjusting method in this case, steps S801 to S814 illustrated in
The processes in steps S501 to S509 illustrated in
Further, steps S801 to S814 illustrated in
In Example 3 of the present invention, the inspection apparatus is adjusted by using the diffraction grating 107, but changing the illumination intensity in Example 3 is the same meaning as changing a size of the standard particle in stages.
As described above, a size of the standard particle is discrete, and, for example, it is very difficult to create a plurality of standard particles having different sizes in the units of 1 nm.
On the other hand, it is considerably easy to continuously change an illumination light amount. In Example 3 of the present invention, it is possible to achieve substantially the same effect as in a case of adjusting an inspection apparatus by using a standard particle whose dimension is so finely controlled that it is difficult to actually manufacture the standard particle.
In the above-described Examples 1 to 3, the reference substrate 100 provided with the diffraction grating 107 is used, but, in Example 4 of the present invention, the reference substrate 100 is not used, and a diffraction grating is formed on a support stand (chuck) on which a silicon wafer which is an inspection target is disposed.
As illustrated in
Furthermore, the diffraction grating in the above-described Examples 1 to 4 may be formed by using a typical manufacturing method. For example, as illustrated in
As above, Examples of the present invention have been described, but the present invention is not limited to the above-described Examples. For example, building the above-described reference substrate 100 into an inspection apparatus and adjusting the inspection apparatus at any time are included in the scope of the invention disclosed in the present specification and the like. In addition, adjusting a so-called bright field type inspection apparatus by using the diffraction grating is also included in the scope of the present invention.
The present invention can be expressed as, for example, adjusting an inspection apparatus by using a predetermined surface which is formed in a predetermined shape exemplified in the diffraction grating. The present invention can be expressed as, for example, changing illumination intensity when a predetermined surface is illuminated with light. In addition, changing illumination intensity can be expressed as being substantially equivalent to continuously changing a dimension of the standard particle. Here, continuously changing a dimension of the standard particle can be expressed as including changing a dimension of the standard particle in nanometer order, for example, in the units of 1 nm or 10 nm. The present invention is widely applicable to adjustment of optical apparatuses other than an inspection apparatus.
100 REFERENCE SUBSTRATE, 102 ROTATION PORTION, 103 MOVEMENT PORTION, 104 ILLUMINATION OPTICAL SYSTEM, 107, 201A, 201B, 202A, 202B, 202C, 203C, 204A, 204D, AND 301 DIFFRACTION GRATING, 108, 601, AND 604 DETECTION OPTICAL SYSTEM, 108a DETECTION LENS, 109, 602, AND 605 DETECTION APERTURE PORTION, 110 TRANSPORT SYSTEM, 111, 603, AND 606 SENSOR, 112 PROCESSING SECTION, 113 DISPLAY SECTION, 300 SUPPORT STAND (CHUCK)
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2013-003961 | Jan 2013 | JP | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2013/084156 | 12/19/2013 | WO | 00 |