A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material that is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
1. Technological Field
The present disclosure relates generally to circuit elements, and more particularly in one exemplary aspect to inductors or inductive devices, such as transformers, having various desirable electrical and/or mechanical properties, and methods of utilizing and manufacturing the same.
2. Description of Related Technology
A myriad of different configurations of inductors and inductive devices are known in the prior art. One common approach to the manufacture of efficient inductors and inductive devices is via the use of a magnetically permeable toroidal core. Toroidal cores are very efficient at maintaining the magnetic flux of an inductive device constrained within the core itself. Typically these cores (toroidal or not) are wound with one or more magnet wire windings thereby forming an inductor or an inductive device.
More recently, improved low cost and highly consistent inductive apparatus and methods for manufacturing, and utilizing, the same have been developed. One example of this is disclosed in co-owned and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/876,003 filed Sep. 3, 2010 and entitled “Substrate Inductive Devices and Methods”, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, which discloses a substrate based inductive device which utilizes inserted conductive pins in combination with plated substrates to replace traditional magnet wire windings disposed around a magnetically permeable core. In some variations this is accomplished without a header disposed between adjacent substrates while alternative variations utilize a header. In another variation, the substrate inductive devices are incorporated into integrated connector modules. However, as the electronics utilized within, for example, integrated connector modules has miniaturized, issues such as Conductive Anodic Filament (CAF) have become major barriers to implementing these substrate inductive devices. CAF occurs in substrates (such as printed circuit boards) when a copper filament foul's in the laminate dielectric material between two adjacent conductors or plated through-hole vias under an electrical bias. CAF can be a significant source of electrical failures in these substrate inductive devices.
Moreover, in signal transformer designs, the level of coupling between the primary side and the secondary side determines the bandwidth of the transformer. In transformer applications, the coupling can be: (1) capacitive (i.e., formed by the varying electric field between the two sides); and (2) inductive (i.e., formed by the varying magnetic field from the primary side of the windings). The bandwidth of the transformer is also greatly dependent on the matching of the impedance of the transformer to that of the line connected to the transformer. The impedance of a transformer is characterized by the ratio of its leakage (i.e., series) inductance and distributed (i.e., parallel) capacitance. Different manufacturing processes and designs may result in an imbalance in the matching ratio of the leakage inductance and the distributed capacitance. With large impedance mismatches, the bandwidth of the transformer can be greatly reduced. Furthermore, as the two above mentioned components that make up the impedance of a transformer are of a “distributed” type, they cannot easily be compensated by adding external components, such as via the addition of discrete capacitors and/or inductors.
Accordingly, despite the broad variety of substrate inductive device configurations, there is a salient need for substrate inductive devices that are much more resistant to failures (such as CAF) while simultaneously extending the bandwidth of the underlying device via, what is referred to herein as mixed mode coupling. Furthermore, such improved substrate inductive devices will be both: (1) low in cost to manufacture; and (2) offer improved electrical performance over prior art devices. Ideally such a solution would not only offer very low manufacturing cost and improved electrical performance for the inductor or inductive device, but also provide greater consistency between devices manufactured in mass production; i.e., by increasing consistency and reliability of performance by limiting opportunities for manufacturing errors of the device while minimizing failure modes such as CAF. Furthermore, methods and apparatus for extending the bandwidth of the transformer are also desired. Finally, methods and apparatus for incorporating these improved inductive devices into integrated connector modules are also needed.
The aforementioned needs are satisfied herein by providing improved substrate inductive device apparatus and methods for manufacturing and using the same.
In a first aspect, a substrate inductive device is disclosed. In one embodiment, the substrate inductive device includes a plurality of substrates with at least one of the substrates including a via-in-via connection. The via-in-via connection is separated by a non-conductive material that is different than the underlying substrate material. A toroidal core is disposed within, or between, the plurality of substrates.
In a second aspect, a method of manufacturing the aforementioned substrate inductive devices is disclosed. In one embodiment, the method includes disposing a first conductive via in a substrate; disposing a non-conductive coating on the substrate; and disposing a second conductive via in the substrate such that the second conductive via is separated by the first conductive via by the non-conductive coating.
In a third aspect, methods of using the aforementioned substrate inductive devices are disclosed. In one embodiment, the aforementioned substrate inductive devices are used within an integrated connector module.
In a fourth aspect, a single-port connector which utilizes the aforementioned substrate inductive device is disclosed. In one embodiment, the single-port connector comprises an integrated connector module that includes a connector housing having a substrate inductive device disposed therein, the substrate inductive device further including a plurality of substrates, at least one of the substrates including a plurality of via-in-via connections, each via-in-via connection comprising an inner via and an outer via separated from the inner via by a non-conductive material; and a toroidal core disposed adjacent to the plurality of via-in-via connections.
In a fifth aspect, a multi-port connector which utilizes the aforementioned substrate inductive device is disclosed. In one embodiment, the multi-port connector comprises an integrated connector module having a plurality of substrate inductive devices having one or more via-in-via connections disposed therein.
In a sixth aspect, a method of manufacturing a single-port connector utilizing the aforementioned substrate inductive device is disclosed.
In a seventh aspect, a method of manufacturing a multi-port connector utilizing the aforementioned substrate inductive device is disclosed.
In a eighth aspect, networking equipment which utilizes the aforementioned multi-port connectors is disclosed.
In a ninth aspect, methods and apparatus for implementing mixed mode coupling are disclosed. In one embodiment, the method includes implementing one or more via-in-via connections in combination with one or more single via connections within an underlying substrate inductive device.
In a variant, increased interwinding and distributed capacitance is accomplished via the addition or expansion of plates associated with the underlying windings of the substrate inductive device.
The features, objectives, and advantages of the disclosure will become more apparent from the detailed description set forth below when taken in conjunction with the drawings, wherein:
Reference is now made to the drawings wherein like numerals refer to like parts throughout.
As used herein, the terms “electrical component” and “electronic component” are used interchangeably and refer to components adapted to provide some electrical and/or signal conditioning function, including without limitation inductive reactors (“choke coils”), transformers, filters, transistors, gapped core toroids, inductors (coupled or otherwise), capacitors, resistors, operational amplifiers, and diodes, whether discrete components or integrated circuits, whether alone or in combination.
As used herein, the term “magnetically permeable” refers to any number of materials commonly used for forming inductive cores or similar components, including without limitation various formulations made from ferrite.
As used herein, the term “signal conditioning” or “conditioning” shall be understood to include, but not be limited to, signal voltage transformation, filtering and noise mitigation, signal splitting, impedance control and correction, current limiting, capacitance control, and time delay.
As used herein, the terms “top”, “bottom”, “side”, “up”, “down” and the like merely connote a relative position or geometry of one component to another, and in no way connote an absolute frame of reference or any required orientation. For example, a “top” portion of a component may actually reside below a “bottom” portion when the component is mounted to another device (e.g., to the underside of a PCB).
Overview
The present disclosure provides, inter alia, improved low cost and highly consistent inductive apparatus and methods for manufacturing, and utilizing, the same.
In one exemplary embodiment, issues with so-called substrate inductive devices such as conductive anodic filament (CAF) that occurs within laminate structures (such as a fiberglass-based printed circuit board) under certain conditions are addressed. These conditions include high humidity, high bias voltage (i.e. a large voltage differential), high-moisture content, surface and resin ionic impurities, glass to resin bond weakness and exposure to high assembly temperatures that can occur, for example, during lead free solder bonding applications.
In one embodiment, via-in-via connections that join the upper traces with the lower traces on a printed circuit board that address CAF are disclosed. The via-in-via connections are present on both the outer diameter and inner diameter of a ferrite core. In an exemplary embodiment, three (3) substrates are utilized in such a substrate inductive device application. One substrate will be formed and hollowed out (such as via routing, etc.) in order to accommodate a ferrite core such as magnetically permeable toroid. The printed circuit board(s) utilized for these via-in-via connections comprises a multi-layer printed circuit board having multiple conductive layers. The multi-layer printed circuit board has, for example, four conductive layers including: (1) two outer layers which are in electrical communication with the inner vias of the via-in-via connection; and (2) two inner layers which are in electrical communication with the outer vias of the via-in-via connection. In exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure, a layer of non-conductive material (e.g. parylene) separates the inner and outer conductive vias and is ostensibly immune to the effects of CAF.
In an alternative embodiment, the use of mixed mode coupling is accomplished by, for example, the inclusion of a mixture of both: (1) via-in-via connections; and (2) single via connections. The mixed mode coupling techniques described herein are used to adjust the ratio between the leakage inductance and distributed capacitance of the underlying substrate inductive device (e.g., a transformer). By adjusting the ratio of leakage inductance and distributed capacitance, improved impedance matching is achieved resulting in, for example, increased operating bandwidth for the underlying substrate inductive device.
Methods of manufacturing and using the aforementioned substrate inductive devices are also disclosed.
Detailed descriptions of the various embodiments and variants of the apparatus and methods of the present disclosure are now provided.
Substrate Inductive Device Apparatus—
It is well known in the electronics industry that conductive anodic filament (CAF) occurs within laminate structures (such as a fiberglass-based printed circuit board) under certain conditions. These conditions include high humidity, high bias voltage (i.e., a large voltage differential), high-moisture content, surface and resin ionic impurities, glass to resin bond weakness and exposure to high assembly temperatures that can occur, for example, during lead free solder bonding applications. Typically, CAF forms within the layers of the laminate, and at the surface from: (1) via-to-via; (2) via-to-trace; (3) trace-to-trace; and (4) layer-to-layer. Within the context of substrate inductive devices, via-to-via CAF formation is particularly problematic. Furthermore, within the context of substrate inductive devices, such as transformers, the relatively large bias voltages that can occur between the primary and secondary windings can be particularly problematic for CAF, especially during high-potential events.
Three (3) substrates are typically utilized in such a substrate inductive device application. One substrate will be formed and hollowed out (such as via routing, etc.) in order to accommodate a ferrite core in the center of the printed circuit board. In an exemplary embodiment, the ferrite core will be a toroid. Accordingly, the hollowed out portion of the substrate will be generally circular (i.e. toroidal) in shape to accommodate the toroidal core. Disposed adjacent to this inner printed circuit board will be a pair of outer printed circuit boards that serve as connections between the inner and outer vias seen on the inner printed circuit board. The height of this central printed circuit board will be generally larger than the toroidal core that it is to accommodate. More specifically, the central printed circuit board will be large enough to accommodate a buffer material between the disposed core and the adjacent outer substrate in order to accommodate the thermal expansion that occurs during, for example, soldering operations that would be typically seen during the processing of these substrate inductive devices. Disposed within this space used to accommodate this thermal expansion is a buffering material (such as a silicone type material) that enables the core to expand unimpeded and with minimal pressure so that the magnetic properties of the core are maintained.
Furthermore, as the via-in-via connection illustrated in
While disposing windings in the manner described above would be advantageous in many electronics applications, such a configuration is not without its drawbacks. For example, in many high-speed transformer applications (e.g., gigabit Ethernet) where balance between the primary and secondary windings is critical, one can see that by exclusively keeping the primary windings on one of the vias (e.g. on the outer vias) while disposing the secondary windings on the opposite one of the vias (e.g. on the inner vias) and imbalance will exist between the length of the path seen for the outer vias as opposed to the inner vias resulting in an imbalance between the primary and secondary windings. Accordingly, in applications in which balance is required between these alternate paths an alternative implementation is required.
Mixed Mode Coupling—
Referring back to
Impedance=Square Root(LLeakage/CDistributed) Equation (1)
Hence, in certain applications the design illustrated in
Referring now to
Accordingly, in instances where the coupling within a given inductive structure is mostly capacitive (see e.g.,
Conversely, in instances where the inductive coupling is rather poor (such as where the leakage inductance is higher than desired as a result of, for example, the inclusion of only single vias in a transformer design as opposed to via-in-via connections), an increased amount of distributed capacitance can be added in order to improve the impedance matching of the inductive device. This can be accomplished in a variety of different ways. For example, one way of increasing the distributed capacitance is via the addition of via-in-via connections to the underlying substrate inductive device design. The inclusion of via-in-via connections results in increased interwinding capacitance between the primary side and secondary side of the via-in-via connection. This resultant increased interwinding capacitance in turn results in increased distributed capacitance (i.e. an increased capacitance between adjacent turns of, for example, the primary winding).
Alternatively, one may increase the level of distributed capacitance of the substrate inductive device via expansion of the width of the upper 502 and/or lower traces 504. For example, by expanding the width of two (2) upper traces 522, 524, an increase in the amount of surface area 530 of the overlap between these adjacent traces is accomplished, thereby resulting in an increased interwinding capacitance and a resultant increase in the distributed capacitance for the substrate inductive device. Accordingly, this increased amount of distributed capacitance can be thought of as being accomplished via the addition of “plates”, or otherwise flat conductor components along the turns of the inductive device, resulting in increased capacitance and ultimately more finely tuned impedance matching.
Finally, although the concept of increasing the level of mixed mode coupling has been discussed in the context of a ferrite core that comprises a toroid shaped core, it is appreciated that the principles discussed herein are by no means limited to toroid structures. In fact, virtually any core structure size and shape may be utilized consistent with the principles of the present disclosure. See also the discussion of alternative core arrangements discussed previously herein with respect to
Methods of Manufacture—
Referring now to
At step 604, a non-conductive coating is disposed onto the substrate thereby covering the first via with a layer of insulating material. In an exemplary embodiment, the non-conductive coating comprises a parylene coating that is vapor deposited onto the substrate. The use of parylene coating is described in co-owned U.S. Pat. No. 8,234,778 filed on Jul. 18, 2011 and entitled “Substrate Inductive Devices and Methods”, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Parylene offers significant advantages in that parylene is essentially immune to the effects of CAF. While the use of parylene is exemplary, other non-conductive coatings that are resistant to CAF may be readily substituted if desired.
At step 606, the second conductive via is plated on the substrate. For example, as shown in
It will be recognized that while certain aspects of the present disclosure are described in terms of specific design examples, these descriptions are only illustrative of the broader methods of the present disclosure, and may be modified as required by the particular design. Certain steps may be rendered unnecessary or optional under certain circumstances. Additionally, certain steps or functionality may be added to the disclosed embodiments, or the order of performance of two or more steps permuted. All such variations are considered to be encompassed within the present disclosure disclosed and claimed herein.
While the above detailed description has shown, described, and pointed out novel features of the present disclosure as applied to various embodiments, it will be understood that various omissions, substitutions, and changes in the form and details of the device or process illustrated may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the present disclosure. The foregoing description is of the best mode presently contemplated of carrying out the present disclosure. This description is in no way meant to be limiting, but rather should be taken as illustrative of the general principles of the present disclosure. The scope of the present disclosure should be determined with reference to the claims.
This application claims the benefit of priority to co-owned U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/723,688 entitled “Substrate Inductive Device Methods and Apparatus” filed Nov. 7, 2012, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is also related to co-owned and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/797,530 of the same title filed Mar. 12, 2013, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/723,688 of the same title filed Nov. 7, 2012, the contents of each of the foregoing being incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is also related to co-owned and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/985,156 filed Nov. 13, 2007 and entitled “Wire-Less Inductive Devices and Methods”, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/859,120 filed Nov. 14, 2006 of the same title, the contents of each of the foregoing being incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is also related to co-owned U.S. Pat. No. 7,982,572 filed Jul. 15, 2009 and entitled “Substrate Inductive Devices and Methods”, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/135,243, filed Jul. 17, 2008 of the same title, the contents of each of the foregoing being incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Furthermore, this application is also related to co-owned and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/876,003 filed Sep. 3, 2010 and entitled “Substrate Inductive Devices and Methods”, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2470598 | Biebesheimer | May 1949 | A |
3419835 | Stein | Dec 1968 | A |
3477051 | Kendall et al. | Nov 1969 | A |
3605055 | Grady | Sep 1971 | A |
3614554 | Shield et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3626291 | Yauch et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
3699488 | Goodman et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3947795 | Donnelly et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
4091349 | Niederjohn et al. | May 1978 | A |
4103268 | Anders et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4146860 | Miller | Mar 1979 | A |
4253231 | Nouet | Mar 1981 | A |
4547961 | Bokil et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4616176 | Mercure et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4709205 | Baurand et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4777381 | Fernandes | Oct 1988 | A |
4847986 | Meinel | Jul 1989 | A |
5038104 | Wikswo et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5055816 | Altman et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5066904 | Bullock | Nov 1991 | A |
5126714 | Johnson | Jun 1992 | A |
5220488 | Denes | Jun 1993 | A |
5257000 | Billings et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5299956 | Brownell et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5414400 | Gris et al. | May 1995 | A |
5430613 | Hastings et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5442280 | Baudart | Aug 1995 | A |
5451914 | Stengel | Sep 1995 | A |
5487214 | Walters | Jan 1996 | A |
5671856 | Lisch | Sep 1997 | A |
5726615 | Bloom | Mar 1998 | A |
5736910 | Townsend et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5781091 | Krone et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5959846 | Noguchi et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5982265 | Von Skarczinski et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6018239 | Berkcan et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6087920 | Abramov | Jul 2000 | A |
6094044 | Kustera et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6148500 | Krone et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6193560 | Morana et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6225560 | Machado | May 2001 | B1 |
6270380 | Shichida et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6270381 | Adriaenssens et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6313623 | Kojovic et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6332810 | Bareel | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6409547 | Reede | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414475 | Dames et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428362 | Phommachanh | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440750 | Feygenson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445271 | Johnson | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6455885 | Lin | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6464541 | Hashim et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6545456 | Radosevich et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6585540 | Gutierrez et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6614218 | Ray | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6642827 | McWilliams | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6655988 | Simmons et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6677850 | Dames | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6696910 | Nuytkens et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6731193 | Meier et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6734661 | Colby et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6769166 | Blanchard | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6769936 | Gutierrez et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6822547 | Saito et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825650 | McCormack et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6848943 | Machado et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6926558 | Sasai et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6952153 | Jacobson et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6962511 | Gutierrez et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6963195 | Berkcan | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6965225 | De Buda et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7078888 | Budillon et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7109837 | Watts | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7145784 | Utsuno et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7158005 | Pleskach et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7196607 | Pleskach et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7227441 | Skendzic et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7227442 | Skendzic | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7241181 | Machado et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7253603 | Kovanko et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7271697 | Whittaker et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7277002 | Harding | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7322863 | Rapp | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7367851 | Machado et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7405643 | Jeong et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7408434 | Lee et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7477128 | Quilici et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7489226 | Chignola et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7510441 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7524206 | Gutierrez et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7538541 | Kojovic | May 2009 | B2 |
7564233 | Kojovic | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7598837 | Gilmartin et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7598839 | Wedley | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7656263 | Whittaker et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7661994 | Machado et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7671716 | Chen | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7708602 | Rascon et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7724204 | Annamaa et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7819699 | Xu et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7821374 | Harrison | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7868727 | Chen et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7961072 | Pilniak et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7982572 | Schaffer et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8203418 | Harrison et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8234778 | Schaffer et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8319628 | Schweitzer, III et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
20020158305 | Dalmia et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030011458 | Nuytkens et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030112000 | Sorenson, Jr. et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040000968 | White et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040005820 | Gutierrez et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040150502 | Jacobson et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050059295 | Chen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050088267 | Watts | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050208914 | Ogawa | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050248430 | Dupraz et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060176139 | Pleskach et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060290457 | Lee et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070001796 | Waffenschmidt et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070063807 | Quilici | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070111598 | Quilici | May 2007 | A1 |
20070152651 | Shiokawa et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070210787 | Ebenezer et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070216510 | Jeong et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070290695 | Mahon et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080007249 | Wilkerson et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080036448 | Kovach et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080077336 | Fernandes | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080079418 | Rea et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080096426 | Chou Huang et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080106253 | Kojovic | May 2008 | A1 |
20080111226 | White et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080186124 | Schaffer et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080211484 | Howell et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080233803 | Renteria | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090002111 | Harrison et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090077791 | Quilici | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090200682 | Zhang | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090231769 | Fischer et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100013589 | Schaffer et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100259275 | Grieshaber et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100295646 | Harrison et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110014800 | Cheng et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110025304 | Lint et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110025305 | Lint et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110034081 | Feldman et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110074397 | Bulumulla et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110148561 | Lint et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110291789 | Dalmia et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120058676 | Schaffer et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120175970 | Jackman | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130043967 | Rouaud et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130063125 | Chamarti et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130063129 | Chamarti et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130063131 | Chamarti et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130063161 | Chamarti et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1270332 | Aug 2006 | CN |
1993782 | Jul 2007 | CN |
12 78 006 | Sep 1968 | DE |
19712900 | Nov 1997 | DE |
0 555 994 | Aug 1993 | EP |
0 708 459 | Apr 1996 | EP |
0 756 298 | Jan 1997 | EP |
2004186099 | Jul 2004 | JP |
1279819 | Apr 2007 | TW |
WO 2010065113 | Jun 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
An Overview of Rogowski Coil Current Sensing Technology; David E. Shepard, Tactical Marketing Manager and Donald W. Yauch Applications Manager; LEM DynAmp Inc. |
Crotti G., et al., “Analysis of Rogowski Coil Behavior Under Non Ideal Measurement Conditions,” IMEKO XIX World Congress, Fundamental and Applied Metrology, Sep. 6-11, 2009, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 879-881. |
<gs id=“c4736986-e981-4d9e-b7b2-ee18fb1449d4” ginger—software—uiphraseguid=“30afc511-2e18-4614-b403-6236b1fac7b4” class=“GINGER—SOFTWARE—mark”>IRIS</gs>, “Smart Grid Monitoring,” Current Sensing For a Smarter Grid, Doc ref: 10068MAR10 V1.02, Sentec, http:/Jwww.sentec.co.uk/assets/library/documentliloriginA1/iris datasheet 1.02 v1<gs id=“47d4e4e1-fb18-4913-a86e-d2a3fd4141bb” ginger—software—uiphraseguid=“30afc511-2e18-4614-b403-6236b1fac7b4” class=“GINGER—SOFTWARE—mark”> .</gs><gs id=“d5dca3be-68c0-4c6f-a146-77e68f5f32c7” ginger—software—uiphraseguid=“30afc511-2e18-4614-b403-6236b1fac7b4” class=“GINGER—SOFTWARE—mark”>pdf</gs>, (pp. 1-2). |
Practical Aspects of Rogowski Coil Applications to Relaying by Kojovic, et A1. Sep. 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140127944 A1 | May 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61723688 | Nov 2012 | US |