Modern oil field operators demand access to a great quantity of information regarding the parameters and conditions encountered downhole. Such information typically includes characteristics of the earth formations traversed by the borehole and data relating to the size and configuration of the borehole itself. The collection of information relating to conditions downhole, which commonly is referred to as “logging,” can be performed by several methods including wireline logging, “logging while drilling” (LWD), and tubing-conveyed logging.
In wireline logging, a probe or “sonde” is lowered into the borehole after some or all of the well has been drilled. The sonde hangs at the end of a long cable or “wireline” that provides mechanical support to the sonde and also provides an electrical connection between the sonde and electrical equipment located at the surface of the well. In accordance with existing logging techniques, various parameters of the earth's formations are measured and correlated with the position of the sonde in the borehole as the sonde is pulled uphole.
In LWD, the drilling assembly includes sensing instruments that measure various parameters as the formation is being penetrated, thereby enabling measurements of the formation while it is less affected by fluid invasion. While LWD measurements are desirable, drilling operations create an environment that is generally hostile to electronic instrumentation, telemetry, and sensor operations.
Tubing-conveyed logging, like wireline logging, is performed in an existing borehole. Unlike wireline logging, tubing-conveyed logging enables a logging tool to travel where a wireline-suspended tool cannot, e.g., in a horizontal or ascending borehole. Tubing-conveyed logging tools typically suffer from restricted communications bandwidths, meaning that acquired data is generally stored in memory and downloaded from the tool when the tool returns to the surface.
In these and other logging environments, measured parameters are usually recorded and displayed in the form of a log, i.e., a two-dimensional graph showing the measured parameter as a function of tool position or depth. In addition to making parameter measurements as a function of depth, some logging tools also provide parameter measurements as a function of azimuth. Such tool measurements have often been displayed as two-dimensional images of the borehole wall, with one dimension representing tool position or depth, the other dimension representing azimuthal orientation, and the pixel intensity or color representing the parameter value.
Once a borehole has been drilled, operators often wish to perform downhole formation testing before finalizing a completion and production strategy. Fluid sampling tools enable operators to draw fluid samples directly from the borehole wall and measure contamination levels, compositions, and phases, usually based on the properties (e.g., optical properties, electrical properties, density, NMR, and PVT properties) of the materials drawn into the sample chamber.
A better understanding of the various disclosed embodiments can be obtained when the following detailed description is considered in conjunction with the attached drawings, in which:
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof are shown by way of example in the drawings and will herein be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the drawings and detailed description thereto are not intended to limit the disclosure, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the plain-language scope of the claims.
Accordingly, there are disclosed herein various systems and methods for performing optical analysis downhole with an interferogram (a pattern of interference created by superposition of light waves). The interferogram is produced by introducing an interferometer into the light path, with the two arms of the interferometer having a propagation time difference that varies as a function of time. Before or after the interferometer, the light encounters a material to be analyzed, such as a fluid sample from the formation, a borehole fluid sample, a core sample, or a portion of the borehole wall. The encounter can take various forms, including transmission/attenuation through the sample, reflection off the sample, attenuated total reflectance (evanescent wave), scattering from the sample, and fluorescence excitation. In any event, the spectral characteristics of the material are imprinted on the light beam and can be readily analyzed by processing electronics that perform a Fourier Transform to obtain the spectrum or that enable a comparison with one or more templates. An interferometer designed to perform well in the hostile environments downhole is expected to enable laboratory-quality measurements.
The disclosed systems and methods are best understood in the context of the larger systems in which they operate.
A LWD tool 26 is integrated into the bottom-hole assembly near the bit 14. As the bit extends the borehole through the formations, logging tool 26 collects measurements relating to various formation properties as well as the tool orientation and various other drilling conditions. The logging tool 26 may take the form of a drill collar, i.e., a thick-walled tubular that provides weight and rigidity to aid the drilling process. As explained further below, tool assembly 26 includes a optical fluid analysis tool that monitors wellbore fluid properties. A telemetry sub 28 may be included to transfer measurement data to a surface receiver 30 and to receive commands from the surface. In some embodiments, the telemetry sub 28 does not communicate with the surface, but rather stores logging data for later retrieval at the surface when the logging assembly is recovered.
At various times during the drilling process, the drill string 8 may be removed from the borehole as shown in
An alternative logging technique is logging with coil tubing.
Surface computer system 66 is configured to communicate with supervisory sub 64 during the logging process or alternatively configured to download data from the supervisory sub after the tool assembly is retrieved. Surface computer system 66 is preferably configured by software (shown in
In each of the foregoing logging environments, the logging tool assemblies preferably include a navigational sensor package that includes directional sensors for determining the inclination angle, the horizontal angle, and the rotational angle (a.k.a. “tool face angle”) of the bottom hole assembly. As is commonly defined in the art, the inclination angle is the deviation from vertically downward, the horizontal angle is the angle in a horizontal plane from true North, and the tool face angle is the orientation (rotational about the tool axis) angle from the high side of the wellbore. In accordance with known techniques, wellbore directional measurements can be made as follows: a three axis accelerometer measures the earth's gravitational field vector relative to the tool axis and a point on the circumference of the tool called the “tool face scribe line”. (The tool face scribe line is typically drawn on the tool surface as a line parallel to the tool axis.) From this measurement, the inclination and tool face angle of the logging assembly can be determined. Additionally, a three axis magnetometer measures the earth's magnetic field vector in a similar manner. From the combined magnetometer and accelerometer data, the horizontal angle of the logging assembly can be determined.
A collimation mirror 101 parallelizes the light rays from the light source 100 and directs the light to a beam splitter 102 in an interferometer 110. The beam splitter is directs half of the light to a fixed mirror 103 and the other half to a movable mirror 104. (Mirrors 103 and 104 are shown as retroreflectors, which exhibit improved tolerance for misalignment errors than do flat mirrors.) The mirrors reflect the light back to the beam splitter 102. At this point, the beams have traveled path lengths having a difference that depends on the position of the movable mirror 104. Movable mirror 104 oscillates back and forth, causing the combined beam leaving the beam splitter to suffer interference in a manner that makes the different frequency components of the light beam undergo intensity oscillations at rates that are related to their frequencies. This combined beam is herein termed a “spectralized” beam, because it makes the spectral composition of the beam measurable from the time variation of its intensity. (In the literature, this spectralized beam is sometimes referred to as an “interferogram”.)
As it exits the interferometer 110, the spectralized beam travels from the beam splitter 102 (via an intermediate mirror 113) to a focusing mirror 105. The focusing mirror 105 focuses the light at a point in a sample chamber 106, after which a second focusing mirror 107 directs the light onto a detector 108. The detector 108 measures the time variation of the incident light intensity. In some embodiments, the electronics process the measured time variation, determining a Fourier Transform that reveals the transmission spectrum of the material in the sample chamber 106. Note, however, that the Fourier Transform is not obligatory. In some embodiments, the electronics operate on the interferogram in the time-domain to measure characteristics of the material in the sample chamber.
The rate of intensity variation for each of the frequency components depends on the speed of the movable mirror 104. To compensate for variations in this speed, the processing electronics can track the position of the movable mirror. Alternatively, a narrowband light beam can be added to the broadband light beam. In
The input light beam 201 enters through a polished surface of the body and impinges on a beam splitter 202. Half of the light is reflected (via the optional compensator 203) off of a fixed mirror 204, from which it returns to the beam splitter 202. The other half of the light travels outside the integrated component, via a retroreflector 205, to reflect off of a fixed mirror 206 attached to the body of the integrated component. From the fixed mirror 206, the light returns (again via the retroreflector) to the beam splitter 202, where it combines with light from the other path to form an output beam 206.
As before, motion of the movable retroreflector causes the output beam to be spectralized. The movable element can be reciprocated by various mechanisms. In some embodiments, the movable element is mounted on a spring and driven with an inductive field acting on a magnet. In other embodiments, a piezoelectric element is used to convert voltage into axial motion. Similarly, a magnetic field can drive a magnetorestrictive element, The speed of the movable retroreflector can be tracked directly or measured using a reference light beam injected as before. Although the monolithic construction offers improved stability, the speed of the retroreflector can still be affected by vibration, shock, or imperfections in the drivers. A rotary motion can often be more precisely controlled and suffer less sensitivity to vibration or shock.
Accordingly,
This configuration makes use of two properties of the corner reflector. First—corner reflectors are a type of retroreflector, meaning that incident light is reflected in a direction parallel to the incoming light, regardless of the direction of incidence. Second—when the light strikes the retroreflector from an off-axis direction, the distance traveled by the light varies based on the light's offset distance from the axis in the base plane. (The base plane includes the apex of the corner reflector and is oriented perpendicular to the axis of the corner reflector.) Thus, when a corner reflector spins around an offset axis, the light path of light striking the corner reflector from an angle undergoes a periodic oscillation in length. The light path for light striking from an opposite angle as shown in
The use of a spinning corner reflector 306 provides improved performance because rotary motion can be precisely controlled even in the presence of vibration, and the position of a rotating object can be easily measured, e.g., using a rotary position encoder. With the ability to track the position of the moving mirror, the need for a reference light beam is eliminated.
Note that other techniques for varying light path differences can be employed in place of the spinning corner reflector. Examples include fibers or waveguides with electrically controlled index of refraction or fibers with controlled stretch, e.g., by varying a magnetic field around an optical fiber clad in a magnetostrictive material or mounted on a magnetostrictive member, or by varying an electrical field across a piezoelectric element to achieve the stretch.
Elsewhere along the light path, the tool directs the light to a material that is to be analyzed, as indicated by block 508. The material can take the form of a gas, fluid, or mixed phase flow captured within a sample cell or flowing past a window. Alternatively, the material can be a solid that is visible through a window or aperture, such as a core sample or a portion of the borehole wall adjacent to the tool. In block 510, the tool collects transmitted light, reflected light, scattered light, and/or emitted light or fluorescence from the sample and directs it to a detector of light intensity. The detector can take the form of a photodiode, a thermal detector (including thermopiles and pyroelectric detectors), a Golay cell, or a photoconductive element. Cooling can be employed to improve the signal-to-noise ratio of the detector.
In block 512, the tool tracks the motion of the movable element used in the interferometer (or the variation of some other element used to provide light path length variation) and uses it to determine the appropriate compensation to the measured signal. In block 514, the tool employs a digital signal processor, a general purpose processor, or other processing electronics to digitize the light intensity signal and process it in combination with the motion measurements to determine the spectrum of the light striking the detector. This spectrum is stored in memory for later use, possibly in association with a measurement time and/or tool position.
In block 516, the tool processes the measured interferograms or spectra to analyze one or more parameters of the illuminated material. That parameter is stored, displayed, or used as the basis for a subsequent tool operation (e.g., the decision to stop pumping after the contamination level drops sufficiently. Illustrative analyses include determining contamination levels in a sampled fluid, identifying fluid composition, identifying fluid type, identifying PVT properties, etc. The composition analysis might include determining concentrations of compounds such as CO2, H2S, etc., or determining hydrocarbon fractions of saturated, aromatics, resins, and asphaltenes. Fluid type determination can be finding volume percentages of oil, water, and gas. PVT properties can include bubble point determination, gas/oil ratio, density variation with pressure, etc. Measurements can be communicated to the surface for display to an operator and further processing.
Various processing techniques are known for determining composition or type information from a spectrum of reflected, transmitted, or scattered light. They include Inverse Least Squares Regression and Principal Component Analysis. However, other techniques can also be used, such as operating directly on the time-domain signal rather than converting to the spectral domain. (Correlation of measured interferograms with template interferograms is expected to be an effective way to measure concentrations of the substances from which the templates are derived.)
Various other features can be incorporated into the tool, including outfitting the tool with a reservoir of a reference fluid for downhole calibration of the system and for compensating for contamination on the windows of the flow cell. A shock and vibration monitoring system (e.g., an accelerometer that is mounted to the tool and periodically sensed by the processing electronics) can be used to detect periods of high vibration that might make measurements less reliable. Measurements collected during these periods can be discarded or given a lower weighting that reflects their reduced reliability. Scattered light can be analyzed to determine the size distribution of particles entrained in a fluid flow. An ultraviolet light source can be included to induce fluorescence in the material, which fluorescence can be analyzed to aid in determining composition of the sample. To monitor the spectrum and intensity of the light source, a bypass path can be provided to direct light to a detector without passing through the sample cell. In some embodiments, a collection of varied detector types can be used, with filters, dichroic mirrors or other distribution means used to split the received light into bands best suited to be measured by the individual detectors.
Numerous variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art once the above disclosure is fully appreciated. It is intended that the following claims be interpreted to embrace all such variations and modifications.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2009/069492 | 12/23/2009 | WO | 00 | 8/2/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/078869 | 6/30/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2757300 | Laidig | Jul 1956 | A |
2972251 | Harper | Feb 1961 | A |
3449546 | Dhoble | Jun 1969 | A |
4103174 | McClatchie et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4160929 | Thorington et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4499955 | Campbell et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4774396 | Salit et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4802761 | Bowen et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4839516 | Freeman et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4994671 | Safinya et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4996421 | Rai et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5161409 | Hughes et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5166747 | Schroeder et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5258620 | Sueyasu et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5284054 | Loebach | Feb 1994 | A |
5331399 | Tank et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5341207 | Tank et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5360738 | Jones et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368669 | Maine et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5457259 | Elgarhy et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5621523 | Oobayashi et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5790432 | Morys | Aug 1998 | A |
5939717 | Mullins | Aug 1999 | A |
5946641 | Morys | Aug 1999 | A |
6006844 | Van Puymbroeck et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6040191 | Grow | Mar 2000 | A |
6162766 | Muir et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6178815 | Felling et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181427 | Yarussi et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6220371 | Sharma et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6268726 | Prammer et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6325146 | Ringgenberg et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6350986 | Mullins et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6362619 | Prammer et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6378364 | Pelletier et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6403949 | Davis et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6437326 | Yamate et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446719 | Ringgenberg et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6446720 | Ringgenberg et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6465775 | Mullins et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6518756 | Morys et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6527052 | Ringgenberg et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6543281 | Pelletier et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6583621 | Prammer et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6688176 | Storm et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6729398 | Ringgenberg et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6748328 | Storm et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755079 | Proett et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6765384 | Morys | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768105 | Mullins et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6788066 | Wisler et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6825659 | Prammer et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6853452 | Laufer | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6888127 | Jones et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6912904 | Storm et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6956204 | Dong et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6967322 | Jones et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6967722 | Manning | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6975112 | Morys et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7021375 | Ringgenberg et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7061168 | Schmidt | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7073579 | Ringgenberg et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7086463 | Ringgenberg et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7095012 | Fujisawa et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7195731 | Jones | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7245382 | Ronnekleiv | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7248370 | Jones | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7251037 | Jones | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7251565 | Storm et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7280214 | DiFoggio et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7293613 | Goldberg et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7315377 | Holland et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7337660 | Ibrahim et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7347267 | Morys et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7362422 | DiFoggio et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7377217 | Swanson | May 2008 | B2 |
7423258 | DiFoggio et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7490428 | Morys | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7490664 | Skinner et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7508506 | Christian et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7511819 | DiFoggio | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7511823 | Schultz et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7532129 | Radzinski | May 2009 | B2 |
7571644 | Ibrahim et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7579841 | San Martin et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7581435 | Pelletier | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7696756 | Morys et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7697141 | Jones et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7762131 | Ibrahim et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7775276 | Pelletier et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7784350 | Pelletier | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7800513 | Morys | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7866387 | Van Zuilekom et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7938175 | Skinner et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7958936 | McGregor et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7976780 | Elrod et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8037935 | Pelletier | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8212568 | Morys et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8237920 | Jones et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
20010016562 | Muir et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20030048441 | Manning | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030048450 | Pope et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040023407 | Casal et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040069942 | Fujisawa et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040152028 | Singh et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040159002 | Carlucci et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040164237 | Jones et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050005694 | Jones et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050007583 | DiFoggio | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050019955 | Dahl et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050099618 | DiFoggio et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050213313 | Baumberg et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060052963 | Shkarlet | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060142955 | Jones et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070035736 | Vannuffelen et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070103162 | Morys et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070259433 | Jones et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080099241 | Ibrahim et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125335 | Bhavsar | May 2008 | A1 |
20080202747 | Gleitman et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080297808 | Riza et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090095529 | Rezgui et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090107667 | Mullins et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090120637 | Kirkwood et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090151939 | Bailey et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090180101 | Csutak | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090199630 | DiFoggio et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090288820 | Barron et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100148787 | Morys et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153048 | Myrick et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100231225 | Morys et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100245096 | Jones et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100265094 | Zannoni et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110023583 | Jones et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110023594 | Pelletier et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110031972 | Pelletier et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110181870 | Penney et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110218736 | Pelletier et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110251794 | Bittar et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120018152 | Zuilekom et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120018167 | Konopczynski et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120084021 | Jones et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120150451 | Skinner et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120160018 | Jones et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120211650 | Jones et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120223221 | Jones et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120232707 | Jones et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120250017 | Morys et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130068940 | Jones et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130109100 | Sarkar et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2009356978 | Jun 2011 | AU |
177816 | Mar 1922 | GB |
310895 | Oct 1930 | GB |
1088268 | Oct 1967 | GB |
2064217 | Jun 1981 | GB |
2441069 | Feb 2008 | GB |
2493652 | Feb 2013 | GB |
H0227686 | Jan 1990 | JP |
2003157807 | May 2003 | JP |
WO-2004003984 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO-2011063086 | May 2011 | WO |
WO-2011078869 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO-2011153190 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO-2011159289 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO-2011159294 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO-2012161693 | Nov 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Adur, Rohan “Using Single Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers in Diamond Nanocrystals for Sensitive Sensing of Weak Magnetic Fields with Nanoscale Resolution”, Ohio State Physics Term Paper, circa 2009, 4 pgs. |
Balasubramanian, Gopalakrishnan et al., “Nanoscale Imaging Magnetometry with Diamond Spins under Ambient Conditions”, Nature, vol. 455, Oct. 2, 2008, pp. 648-651. |
Bittar, Michael S., et al., “A 3D Borehole Imager”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/061,759, filed Mar. 2, 2011, 15 pgs. |
Bleier, Z et al., “A Monolithic Interferometer for FT-IR Spectroscopy”, Spectroscopy, 13 (10), pp. 46-49. |
Boudou, J.P. et al., “High Yield Fabrication of Fluorescent Nanodiamonds”, Nanotechnology v20 n23, Jun. 10, 2009, 11 pgs. |
Dumeige, Y. et al., “Photo-Induced Creation of Nitrogen-Related Color Centers in Diamond Nanocrystals Under Femtosecond Illumination”, Elsevier, www.elsevier.com/locate/jlumin, Journal of Luminescence 109 (2004), pp. 61-67. |
Faklaris, Orestis et al., “Comparison of the Photoluminescence Properties of Semiconductor Quantum Dots and Non-Blinking Diamond Nanoparticles. Observation of the Diffusion of Diamond Nanoparticlesin Living Cells”, J. European Optical Society, v4, 2009, 8 pgs. |
Florescu, Marian et al., “Improving Solar Cell Efficiency Using Photonic Band-Gap Materials”, ScienceDirect.com, (Jun. 29, 2007),1599-1610. |
ICX Photonics, “markIR Infrared Emitters”, icxphotonics.com, ICx Photonics,pp. 1-2. |
Jones, Christopher M., et al., “Spectroscopic Nanosensor Logging Systems and Methods”, PCT Appl No. PCT/US11/038693; filed Jun. 1, 2011, 16 pgs. |
Lee, Seung W., et al., “A Soluble Photoreactive Polyimide Bearing the Coumarin Chromophore in the Side Group: Photoreaction, Photoinduced Molecular Reorientation, and Liquid-Crystal Alignability in Thin Films”, Langmuir 19 (24) 2003, pp. 10381-10389. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Aug. 24, 2010, Appl No. PCT/US10/038747 , “Downhole Sources Having Enhanced IR Emission”, filed Jun. 16, 2010, 8 pgs. |
PCT Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jun. 3, 2010, Appl No. PCT/US09/069492, Interferometry-Based Downhole Analysis Tool, filed Dec. 23, 2009, 8 pgs. |
Pelletier, Michael T., et al., “Downhole Sources Having Enhanced IR Emission”, PCT Appl No. PCT/US10/038747 , “Downhole Sources Having Enhanced IR Emission”, filed Jun. 16, 2010, Appl No. PCT/US10/038747 , “Downhole Sources Having Enhanced IR Emission”, filed Jun. 16, 2010, 22 pgs. |
Rabeau, J. R., et al., “Single Nitrogen Vacancy Centers in Chemical Vapor Deposited Diamond Nanocrystals”, Nano Letters, v7 n11 p. 3433-3437, 2007, Macquarie University, New South Wales 2109, Australia., pp. 1-20. |
Simons, J. K., et al., “X-ray Energy Dependent Photochemestry of the Adamantane (C10H16)/Si(111)-7×7 Surface”, American Vacuum Society, J. Vac Sci. Technol. A 11(4) Jul./Aug. 1993, pp. 2244-2249. |
Sonnefraud, Yannick et al., “25-nm Diamond Cyrstals Hosting Single NV Color Centers Sorted by Photon-Correlation Near-field Microscopy”, Optics Letters, vol. 33, Issue 6, 2008, pp. 611-613. |
Tank, V. “Remote Detection and Quantification of Hot Molecular Combustion Products—Experimental Instrumentation and Determination of Optimal Infrared Spectral Micro Windows”, Journal of Molecular Structure, vol. 744-747, 3, pp. 235-242. |
Tisler, Julia et al., “Fluorescence and Spin Properties of Defects in Single Digit Nanodiamonds”, American Chemical Society, ACS Nano v3 n7 p. 1959-1965, 2009, pp. 1959-1965. |
Van Der Sar, T. et al., “Nanopositioning of a Diamond Nanocrystal Containing a Single NV Defect Center”, Applied Physics Letters v94 n17, 2009, 3 pgs. |
Zhang, Wei et al., “Method to Increase the Number of Filters per Optical Path in a Downhole Spectrometer”, PCT Appl No. PCT/US11/03655, filed May 24, 2011, 12 pgs. |
AU First Examination Report, dated Jun. 24, 2013, Appl No. 2010355321, “Downhole Sources Having Enhanced IR Emission”, filed Jun. 6, 2010, 3 pgs. |
US Non-Final Office Action, dated Jul. 2, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/510,231, “Downhole Sources Having Enhanced IR Emission”, filed May 16, 2012, 38 pgs. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Mar. 2, 2011, Appl No. PCT/US2010/057172, “Downhole Optical Radiometry Tool”, filed Nov. 18, 2010, 13 pgs. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Sep. 16, 2011, Appl No. PCT/US2011/038693, “Spectroscopic Nanosensor Logging Systems and Methods”, filed Jun. 1, 2011, 10 pgs. |
Alaskar, Mohammed, et al., “In-Situ Multifunction Nanosensors for Fractured Reservoir Characterization”, Proceedings, Thirty-fifth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, Feb. 1-3, 2010, SGP-TR-188., 13 pgs., Retrieved from the Internet <http://ere.stanford.edu/pdf/IGAstandard/SGW/2010/askar.pdf>. |
Myrick, M. L., et al., “Application of Multivariate Optical Computing to Simple Near-Infrared Point Measurements”, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4574, (2002), pp. 208-215. |
Zhang, Wei et al., Appl No. PCT/US2011/037662, “Downhole Optical Fluid Analyzer Having Intermittently Driven Filter Wheel”, filed May 24, 2011, 15 pgs. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated May 31, 2012, Appl No. PCT/US2010/057172, “Downhole Optical Radiometry Tool”, filed Nov. 18, 2010, 8 pgs. |
First Australian Examination Report, dated Jun. 25, 2012, Appl No. 2009356978, “Interferometry-Based Downhole Analysis Tool”, filed Dec. 23, 2009, 4 pgs. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Jul. 5, 2012, Appl No. PCT/US2009/069492, “Interferometry-Based Downhole Analysis Tool”, filed Dec. 23, 2009, 7 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Oct. 28, 2011, Appl No. PCT/US/2011/027655, “Method to Increase the Number of Filters per Optical Path in a Downhole Spectrometer”, filed May 24, 2011, 10 pgs. |
Morys, Marian, et al., “Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Logging Tool Having an Array of Antennas”, Appl No. PCT/US2010/038844, filed Jun. 16, 2010, 30 pgs. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Jan. 3, 2013, Appl No. PCT/US2010/038747, “Downhole Sources Having Enhanced IR Emission”, filed Jun. 16, 2010, 7pgs. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Dec. 13, 2012, Appl No. PCT/US2011/038693, “Spectroscopic Nanosensor Logging Systems and Methods”, filed Jun. 1, 2011, 9 pgs. |
First Chinese Office Action, dated Feb. 5, 2013, Appl No. 200980157701.3, “Interferometry-Based Downhole Analysis Tool”, filed Dec. 23, 2009, 13 pgs. |
Canadian Examiner Letter, dated Oct. 24, 2012, Appl No. 2,756,285, “Interferometry-Based Downhole Analysis Tool”, filed Dec. 23, 2009, 2 pgs. |
Supplementary European Search Report, dated Sep. 2, 2013, Appl No. 10853352.2, “Downhole Sources Having Enhanced IR Emissions”, filed Jun. 16, 2010, 13 pgs. |
CA Examiner'S Letter, dated Jul. 31, 2013, Appl No. 2,781,331, “Downhole Sources Having Enhanced IR Emission”, filed May 16, 2012, 6 pgs. |
European Search Report, dated Dec. 12, 2013, Appl No. 09852686.6, “Interferometry-Based Downhole Analysis Tool”, filed Dec. 23, 2009, 7 pgs. |
US Non-Final Office Action, dated Jan. 28, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/636,294, “Spectroscopic Nanosensor Logging Systems and Methods,” filed Sep. 20, 2012, 28 pgs. |
Downhole Sources Having Enhanced IR Emission, dated Feb. 4, 2014, Appl No. 2014200604, “Downhole Sources Having Enhanced IR Emission,” filed Jan. 4, 2014, 35 pgs. |
US Final Office Action, dated Apr. 17, 2014, Appl No. 2013/510,231Downhole Sources Having Enhanced IR Emission, filed May 16, 2012, 18 pgs. |
US Non-Final Office Action, dated Apr. 25, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/502,805, “Downhole Optical Radiometry Tool,” filed Apr. 19, 2012, 19 pgs. |
US Final Office Action, dated May 15, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/636,294, “Spectroscopic Nanosensor Logging Systems and Methods,” filed Sep. 20, 2012, 25 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120250017 A1 | Oct 2012 | US |