Ion mirror for multi-reflecting mass spectrometers

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11239067
  • Patent Number
    11,239,067
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, July 26, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 1, 2022
    2 years ago
Abstract
Improved ion mirrors (30) (FIG. 3) are proposed for multi-reflecting TOF MS and electrostatic traps. Minor and controlled variation by means of arranging a localized wedge field structure (35) at the ion retarding region was found to produce major tilt of ion packets time fronts (39). Combining wedge reflecting fields with compensated deflectors is proposed for electrically controlled compensation of local and global misalignments, for improved ion injection and for reversing ion motion in the drift direction. Fine ion optical properties of methods and embodiments are verified in ion optical simulations.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION APPLICATIONS

This application is a U.S. national phase filing under 35 U.S.C. § 371 claiming the benefit of and priority to International Patent Application No. PCT/GB2018/052100, filed on Jul. 26, 2018, which claims priority from and the benefit of United Kingdom patent application No. 1712612.9, United Kingdom patent application No. 1712613.7, United Kingdom patent application No. 1712614.5, United Kingdom patent application No. 1712616.0, United Kingdom patent application No. 1712617.8, United Kingdom patent application No. 1712618.6 and United Kingdom patent application No. 1712619.4, each of which was filed on Aug. 6, 2017. The entire content of these applications is incorporated herein by reference.


FIELD OF INVENTION

The invention relates to the area of multi-reflecting time-of-flight mass spectrometers and electrostatic ion traps, and is particularly concerned with improved gridless ion mirrors.


BACKGROUND

Time-of-flight mass spectrometers (TOF MS) are widely used for combination of sensitivity and speed, and lately with the introduction of Multi-reflecting TOF MS (MRTOF), for their high resolution and mass accuracy. Resolution improves primarily due to substantial extension of the ion path from L=1-5 m in singly reflecting TOF to L=10-100 m in MRTOF. To fit longer ion paths into reasonable size instruments, the ion path is densely folded, as described in SU1725289, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,107,625, 6,570,152, GB2403063, U.S. Pat. No. 6,717,132, between gridless ion mirrors.


As exemplified by U.S. Pat. No. 6,744,042, WO2011086430, US2011180702, and WO2012116765, incorporated herein by reference, multi-reflecting analyzers are proposed for electrostatic ion traps, wherein ions are trapped within isochronous electrostatic analyzers, oscillate at mass dependent frequency, and the oscillation frequency is recorded with image current detectors for acquiring mass spectra.


Most of MRTOFs and a number of E-traps employ similar electrostatic analyzers composed of two parallel gridless ion mirrors, separated by a drift space. Mirrors are composed of frame electrodes, which are substantially extended in a so-called drift direction, conventionally denoted as Z-direction. If not using edge fringing fields, 2D gridless ion mirrors generate two dimensional (2D) electrostatic fields in the XY-plane between electrodes. Those fields are carefully engineered to provide for isochronous ion motion with high order compensation of time aberrations (up to full third order) and for spatial ion packet confinement in the XY-plane.


By nature, the electrostatic 2D-fields have zero component EZ=0 in the orthogonal drift Z-direction, i.e. they have no effect on ion packets free propagation and its expansion in the drift Z-direction. In MRTOF, ion packets are injected at small inclination angle α for ion passage through the analyzer along zigzag ion trajectories with multiple N ion reflections between ion mirrors at relatively higher energies (usually 3-10 keV) combined with slow ion drift in the Z-direction. In E-traps, ions are injected nearly orthogonal to the Z-direction to stay trapped in multiple reflections between mirrors. Various trapping means may be used to avoid ion losses at Z-edges of ion mirrors, including isochronous edge retarding, cylindrical topology of ion mirrors, or gentle curvature of ion mirrors as in U.S. Pat. No. 9,136,101. Intuitively, experts felt that inaccuracy of making, electrode bend by internal material stress, or limited parallelism of electrodes mounting, or stray electric fields may affect the ion rays inclination angle. Multiple complex solutions were proposed to define the ion drift advance per reflection, withstanding the analyzer misalignments and to confine the angular divergence of ion packets: U.S. Pat. No. 7,385,187 proposed periodic lens and edge deflectors for MRTOF; WO2010008386 and then US2011168880 proposed quasi-planar ion mirrors having weak (but sufficient) spatial modulation of mirror fields; U.S. Pat. No. 7,982,184 proposed splitting mirror electrodes into multiple segments for arranging EZ field; U.S. Pat. No. 8,237,111 and GB2485825 proposed electrostatic traps with three-dimensional fields, though without sufficient isochronicity in all three dimensions and without non-distorted regions for ion injection; WO2011086430 proposed first order isochronous Z-edge reflections by tilting ion mirror edge combined with reflector fields; U.S. Pat. No. 9,136,101 proposed bent ion MRTOF ion mirrors with isochronicity recovered by trans-axial lens.


With limited experimental use of MRTOFs and electrostatic-traps (E-traps), experts have not yet recognized the crucial and key role of minor ion mirror misalignments onto performance and tuning of both MRTOF and E-traps. However, up to inventors' knowledge, so far experts had no hint of the power and the scale of ion mirror misalignment effects onto tilting of ion packets time-fronts, affecting isochronicity of E-analyzers. While such effects are relatively modest in the case of using narrow ion packets, they are capable of ruining the mass resolving power of analyzers in which ion packets are wide in the Z-direction, as for example happens when using packets from orthogonal accelerators with the continuous ion beam injected in the Z-direction. Those effects are aggregated by mixing of ion packets at multiple reflections, since time fronts are different for initially wide parallel ion packets and for initially diverging ion packets.


It is desired to improve design of gridless ion mirrors for MRTOF and E-Traps, so that to withstand electrode misalignments at reasonable machining accuracy and to provide mechanisms and methods for ion mirror tuning for improved control over ion drift motion and for improved isochronicity of electrostatic analyzers.


SUMMARY

From a first aspect the present invention provides an ion mirror comprising: a plurality of electrodes and at least one voltage supply connected thereto that are configured to generate an electric field region that reflects ions in a first dimension (X-dimension), and wherein at least part of the electric field region through which ions travel in use has equipotential field lines that diverge or converge as a function of position along a second, orthogonal dimension (Z-direction).


Said at least part of the electric field region having equipotential field lines that diverge or converge, enables the time front of an ion packet pulsed into the ion mirror to be tilted. This may be used, for example, to compensate for time front tilts caused by misaligned or bent ion mirror electrodes, or time front tilts generated in other ion optical components upstream or downstream of the ion mirror. It has been discovered that the electric field region of the embodiments may provide relatively strong time front tilting whilst providing only a minor change in the mean ion trajectory of the ion packet.


For the avoidance of doubt, the time front of the ions may be considered to be a leading edge/area of ions in the ion packet having the same mass to charge ratio (and which may have the same energy).


Said least part of the electric field region having equipotential field lines that diverge or converge may be configured to tilt the time front of ions being reflected in the ion mirror.


The ions may enter the ion mirror having a time front arranged in a first plane, and said at least part of the electric field region may cause the time front of the ions to be tilted at an angle to the first plane.


Said least part of the electric field region may be configured to tilt the time front of ions being reflected in the ion mirror by a first angle, in the X-Z plane, that is greater than a second angle by which the electric field region steers the average ion trajectory, in the X-Z plane.


Said at least part of the electric field region may be arranged at or proximate an end of the ion mirror, in the second dimension, and the equipotential field lines may converge as a function of distance, in the second dimension, away from said end.


The electrodes and voltage supplies may be configured to generate a wedge-shaped electric field region.


The wedge-shaped electric field region may be a linear wedge-shaped electric field region or may be a (slightly) curved wedge-shaped electric field region (e.g. is substantially wedge-shaped).


The ion mirror may be electrically adjustable so as to adjust the field in the electric field region.


Electrodes may be arranged and configured for generating said wedge-shaped electric field region therebetween such that equipotential field lines in the wedge-shaped electric field region are angled to each other so as to form the wedge-shape. Therefore, the equipotential field lines may converge towards one another in a direction towards a first end of the wedge-shaped electric field region (in the second dimension), and diverge away from one another in a direction towards a second opposite end of the wedge-shaped electric field region.


Ions travelling through said at least part of the electric field region may be reflected and then accelerated in the first dimension (X-dimension) by an amount that varies as a function of distance along the second dimension, since the equipotential field lines converge or diverge along the second dimension. This may cause the time front of the ions to be tilted.


The ion mirror may comprise one or more electrodes defining an opening through which the ions pass, wherein the opening has a width in a third dimension (Y-dimension) orthogonal to the first and second dimensions that varies as a function of position along the second dimension (Z-direction) for generating said equipotential field lines that diverge or converge.


The width may vary over at least part of the length (in the second dimension) of the ion mirror.


The width may increase as a function of distance away from one end (or both ends), in the second dimension, of the ion mirror.


The width of the opening may taper (e.g. progressively and gradually) as a function of position along the second dimension.


The opening may be a slotted aperture formed through an electrode. Alternatively, the opening may be defined between electrodes arranged on opposing sides of the ion mirror in the third dimension (Y-dimension) that is orthogonal to the first and second dimensions.


Said one or more electrodes may be arranged between (in the first dimension) an end cap electrode of the ion mirror and a frame electrode of the ion mirror, wherein the frame electrode comprises an opening through which the ions pass. The opening in the frame electrode may have a width in the third dimension that is substantially constant as a function of position along the second dimension and/or a length in the second dimension that is substantially constant as a function of position along the third dimension.


Said at least part of the electric field region having equipotential field lines that diverge or converge may be formed by at least one electrode being tilted relative to other mirror electrodes.


The mirror may therefore comprise one or more first electrode arranged in a first plane and one or more second electrode arranged in a second plane that is angled to the first plane so as to define the electric field region having equipotential field lines that diverge or converge between the one or more first electrode and one or more second electrode. The first and second planes may be angled with respect to each other in the plane defined by the first and second dimensions (X-Z plane).


Each of the first and second electrodes may be a frame electrode of the ion mirror, wherein the frame electrode comprises an opening through which the ions pass.


Alternatively, the first electrode may be a frame electrode of the ion mirror and the second electrode may be the end cap electrode.


The ion mirror may comprise electrodes arranged on opposing sides of the ion mirror in a third dimension (Y-dimension) that is orthogonal to the first and second dimensions, wherein the ion mirror comprises one or more voltage supply configured to apply different voltages to different ones of these electrodes for generating said equipotential field lines that diverge or converge.


The ion mirror may comprise one or more first electrode arranged on a first side of the ion mirror, in the third dimension, and a plurality of second electrodes arranged on a second opposite side of the ion mirror; wherein the ion mirror is configured to apply different voltages to different ones of the second electrodes for generating said equipotential field lines that diverge or converge.


The different voltages may be DC voltages.


The second electrodes may be connected by a resistive chain such that a voltage supply connected to the resistive chain applies different electrical potentials to the second electrodes.


The ion mirror may be configured to apply different voltages to different ones of the first electrodes. The first electrodes may be connected by a resistive chain such that a voltage supply connected to the resistive chain applies different electrical potentials to the first electrodes.


Embodiments are also contemplated in which at least some of the electrodes connected by the resistive chain are replaced by a resistive layer.


Said one or more first electrode and/or said plurality of second electrodes may be arranged on a printed circuit board (PCB).


PCB as used herein may refer to a component containing conductive tracks, pads and other features etched from, printed on, or deposited on one or more sheet layers of material laminated onto and/or between sheet layers of a non-conductive substrate.


In embodiments in which electrodes are arranged on a PCB, a resistive layer may be provide between the electrodes, so as to avoid the insulating material of the substrate from becoming electrically charged.


The ion mirror may comprise a voltage supply and electrodes configured to apply a static electric field in an ion acceleration region adjacent, in a direction in which the ions are reflected, said part of the electric field region having equipotential field lines that diverge or converge; said ion acceleration region having parallel equipotential field lines for accelerating the ions out of the ion mirror.


The inventors have discovered that the ion acceleration region provides a strong amplifying effect onto the tilting angle of the ion packet time front (caused by said part of the electric field region having equipotential field lines that diverge or converge), whilst providing only a minor change in the mean ion trajectory.


The parallel equipotential field lines of the ion acceleration region may be parallel with the second dimension (Z-dimension) and may be formed by parallel electrodes that are parallel with the second dimension.


The ions may travel through the ion acceleration region substantially orthogonal to the parallel equipotential field lines.


The ion acceleration region may amplify the time front tilt of ions introduced by said part of the electric field region.


The ion mirror may have a first length in the second dimension that comprises said at least part of the electric field region having equipotential field lines that diverge or converge, and a second length in the second dimension that includes only parallel equipotential field lines for reflecting ions. Optionally, the ion mirror may have a third length in the second dimension that comprises said at least part of the electric field region having equipotential field lines that diverge or converge.


The first length may be arranged at a first end of the ion mirror. Optionally, the third length may be arranged at a second opposite end of the ion mirror (in the second dimension), with the second length between the first and third lengths.


The electrodes and voltage supplies of the ion mirror may be configured to allow the ions to drift in the second dimension (Z-direction) as they are being reflected in the first dimension (X-dimension).


The electrodes of said ion mirror may be substantially elongated in the second dimension and may form a substantially two-dimensional electrostatic field in plane orthogonal defined by the first dimension (X-dimension) and a third dimension (Y-dimension) orthogonal to the first and second dimensions.


The electrodes for generating said electric field region may be arranged to reflect ions substantially transverse to the equipotential field lines.


The equipotential field lines may diverge or converge as a function of position along the second dimension (Z-direction) in an ion retarding region of the ion mirror.


The ion retarding equipotential (e.g. the equipotential at which the ion mirror turns the ions) may be tilted or curved relative to the second dimension.


The ion mirror may be an electrostatic gridless ion mirror.


The ion mirror may be part of an electrostatic isochronous mass analyzer.


The present invention also provides a mass spectrometer comprising: a time-of-flight mass analyser or electrostatic ion trap having at least one ion mirror as described herein and a pulsed ion accelerator for pulsing ion packets into the ion mirror.


The pulsed ion accelerator may be one of: (i) a MALDI source; (ii) a SIMS source; (iii) a mapping or imaging ion source; (iv) an electron impact ion source; (v) a pulsed converter for converting a continuous or pseudo-continuous ion beam into ion pulses; (vi) an orthogonal accelerator; (vii) a pass-through orthogonal accelerator having an electrostatic ion guide; or (viii) a radio-frequency ion trap with pulsed ion ejection.


The pulsed ion accelerator may form ion packets that are elongated in the second direction.


The mass analyser may be an isochronous mass analyser.


The spectrometer may be an open trap mass spectrometer or an ion trap mass spectrometer with an image current detector.


The spectrometer may comprise: a multi-pass time-of-flight mass analyser or electrostatic ion trap having at least one ion mirror as described herein, and electrodes arranged and configured so as to provide an ion drift region that is elongated in a drift direction (z-dimension) and to reflect or turn ions multiple times in an oscillating dimension (x-dimension) that is orthogonal to the drift direction. Optionally, the drift direction (z-dimension) may correspond to said second dimension and/or the oscillating dimension (x-dimension) may corresponds t said first dimension.


The multi-pass time-of-flight mass analyser may be a multi-reflecting time of flight mass analyser having two ion mirrors that are elongated in the drift direction (z-dimension) and configured to reflect ions multiple times in the oscillation dimension (x-dimension), wherein at least one of said two ion mirrors is an ion mirror as described hereinabove. Alternatively, the multi-pass time-of-flight mass analyser may be a multi-turn time of flight mass analyser having an ion mirror as described herein above and at least one electric sector configured to reflect and turn ions multiple times in the oscillation dimension (x-dimension).


Where the mass analyser is a multi-reflecting time of flight mass analyser, the mirrors may be gridless mirrors.


Each mirror may be elongated in the drift direction and may be parallel to the drift dimension.


The spectrometer may comprise an ion deflector configured to back-steer the average ion trajectory of the ions, in the drift direction, thereby tilting the angle of the time front of the ions.


The ion deflector may be located downstream or upstream of said ion mirror.


The ion deflector may be located at substantially the same position in the drift direction as said at least part of the electric field region having equipotential field lines that diverge or converge.


The average ion trajectory of the ions travelling through the ion deflector may have a major velocity component in the oscillation dimension (x-dimension) and a minor velocity component in the drift direction. The ion deflector back-steers the average ion trajectory of the ions passing therethrough by reducing the velocity component of the ions in the drift direction. The ions may therefore continue to travel in the same drift direction upon entering and leaving the ion deflector, but with the ions leaving the ion deflector having a reduced velocity in the drift direction. This enables the ions to oscillate a relatively high number of times in the oscillation dimension, for a given length in the drift direction, thus providing a relatively high resolution. Additionally, or alternatively, the steering may be arranged such that the ions do not impact on ion optical elements other than the active surface of the detector, such as rims of the orthogonal accelerator, ion deflector or detector.


It is alternatively contemplated that the ion deflector may be configured to reverse the direction of the ions in the second dimension.


The electric field region having equipotential field lines that diverge or converge may be configured to tilt the time front of the ions passing therethrough so as to at least partially counteract a tilting of the time front by the ion deflector.


If the deflector is arranged downstream of the ion mirror, the ion mirror may tilt the time front of the ions in a first angular direction and the ion deflector may then tilt the angle of the time front in the opposite angular direction, at least partially back towards the plane it was in when the ions entered the ion mirror.


If the deflector is arranged upstream of the ion mirror, the deflector may tilt the time front of the ions in a first angular direction and the ion mirror may then tilt the angle of the time front in the opposite angular direction, at least partially back towards the plane it was in when the ions entered the ion deflector.


The time-front tilt angle introduced by the ion mirror and the ion steering angle introduced by the ion deflector may be electrically adjusted, or set, to compensate the T|Z and/or T/ZZ time-of-flight aberrations at the detector.


The ion deflector may be an electrostatic deflector.


The ion deflector may be configured to generate a quadrupolar field for controlling the spatial focusing of the ions in the drift direction.


It has been recognised that a conventional ion deflector inherently has a relatively high focusing effect on the ions, hence undesirably increasing the angular spread of the ion trajectories exiting the deflector, as compared to the angular spread of the ion trajectories entering the ion deflector. This may cause excessive spatial defocusing of the ions downstream of the focal point, resulting in ion losses and/or causing ions to undergo different numbers of oscillations in the spectrometer before they reach the detector. This may cause spectral overlap due to ions from different ion packets being detected at the same time. The mass resolution of the spectrometer may also be adversely affected. Such conventional ion deflectors are therefore particularly problematic in multi-pass time-of-flight mass analysers or multi-pass electrostatic ion traps, since a large angular spread of the ions will cause any given ion packet to diverge a relatively large amount over the relatively long flight path through the device. Embodiments of the present invention provide an ion deflector configured to generate a quadrupolar field that controls the spatial focusing of the ions in the drift direction, e.g. so as to maintain substantially the same angular spread of the ions passing therethrough, or to allow only the desired amount of spatial focusing of the ions in the z-direction.


The quadrupolar field for in the drift direction may generate the opposite ion focusing or defocusing effect in the dimension orthogonal to the drift direction and oscillation dimension. However, it has been recognised that the focal properties of MPTOF mass analyser (e.g. MRTOF mirrors) or electrostatic trap are sufficient to compensate for this.


The ion deflector may be configured to generate a substantially quadratic potential profile in the drift direction.


The ion deflector may back steer all ions passing therethrough by the same angle; and/or the ion deflector may control the spatial focusing of the ion packet in the drift direction such that the ion packet has substantially the same size in the drift dimension when it reaches an ion detector in the spectrometer as it did when it enters the ion deflector.


The ion deflector may control the spatial focusing of the ion packet in the drift direction such that the ion packet has a smaller size in the drift dimension when it reaches a detector in the spectrometer than it did when it entered the ion deflector.


At least one voltage supply may be provided that is configured to apply one or more first voltage to one or more electrode of the ion deflector for performing said back-steer and one or more second voltage to one or more electrode of the ion deflector for generating said quadrupolar field for said spatial focusing, wherein the one or more first voltage is decoupled from the one or more second voltage.


The ion deflector may comprise at least one plate electrode arranged substantially in the plane defined by the oscillation dimension and the dimension orthogonal to both the oscillation dimension and the drift direction (X-Y plane), wherein the plate electrode is configured back-steer the ions; and the ion deflector may comprise side plate electrodes arranged substantially orthogonal to the at least one plate electrode and that are maintained at a different potential to the plate electrode for controlling the spatial focusing of the ions in the drift direction.


The side plates may be Matsuda plates.


The at least one plate electrode may comprise two electrodes and a voltage supply for applying a potential difference between the electrodes so as to back-steer the average ion trajectory of the ions, in the drift direction.


The two electrodes may be a pair of opposing electrodes that are spaced apart in the drift direction.


However, it is contemplated that only the upstream electrode (in the drift direction) may be provided, so as to avoid ions hitting the downstream electrode.


The ion deflector may be configured to provide said quadrupolar field by comprising one or more of: (i) a trans-axial lens/wedge; (iii) a deflector with aspect ratio between deflecting plates and side walls of less than 2; (iv) a gate shaped deflector; or (v) a toroidal deflector such as a toroidal sector.


The ion deflector may be arranged such that it receives ions that have already been reflected or turned in the oscillation dimension by the multi-pass time-of-flight mass analyser or electrostatic ion trap; optionally after the ions have been reflected or turned only a single time in the oscillation dimension by the multi-pass time-of-flight mass analyzer or electrostatic ion trap.


The location of the deflector directly after the first ion mirror reflection allows yet denser ray folding


The ion mirror having said equipotential field lines that diverge or converge and ion deflector may tilt the time front of the ions so that it is aligned with the ion receiving surface of the ion detector and/or to be parallel to the drift direction (z-dimension).


The mass analyser or electrostatic trap may be an isochronous and/or gridless mass analyser or an electrostatic trap.


The mass analyser or electrostatic trap may be configured to form an electrostatic field in a plane defined by the oscillation dimension and the dimension orthogonal to both the oscillation dimension and drift direction (i.e. the XY-plane).


This two-dimensional field may have a zero or negligible electric field component in the drift direction (in the ion passage region). This two-dimensional field may provide isochronous repetitive multi-pass ion motion along a mean ion trajectory within the XY plane.


The energy of the ions received at the pulsed ion accelerator and the average back steering angle of the ion deflector may be configured so as to direct ions to an ion detector after a pre-selected number of ion passes (i.e. reflections or turns).


The spectrometer may comprise an ion source. The ion source may generate an substantially continuous ion beam or ion packets.


The spectrometer may comprise a pulsed ion accelerator such as a gridless orthogonal accelerator.


The pulsed ion accelerator has a region for receiving ions (a storage gap) and may be configured to pulse ions orthogonally to the direction along which it receives ions. The pulsed ion accelerator may receive a substantially continuous ion beam or packets of ions, and may pulse out ion packets.


The drift direction may be linear (i.e. a dimension) or it may be curved, e.g. to form a cylindrical or elliptical drift region.


The mass analyser or ion trap may have a dimension in the drift direction of: ≤1 m; ≤0.9 m; ≤0.8 m; ≤0.7 m; ≤0.6 m; or ≤0.5 m. The mass analyser or trap may have the same or smaller size in the oscillation dimension and/or the dimension orthogonal to the drift direction and oscillation dimension.


The mass analyser or ion trap may provide an ion flight path length of: between 5 and 15 m; between 6 and 14 m; between 7 and 13 m; or between 8 and 12 m.


The mass analyser or ion trap may provide an ion flight path length of: ≤20 m; ≤15 m; ≤14 m; ≤13 m; ≤12 m; or ≤11 m. Additionally, or alternatively, the mass analyser or ion trap may provide an ion flight path length of: ≥5 m; ≥6 m; ≥7 m; ≥8 m; ≥9 m; or ≥10 m. Any ranges from the above two lists may be combined where not mutually exclusive.


The mass analyser or ion trap may be configured to reflect or turn the ions N times in the oscillation dimension, wherein N is: ≥5; ≥6; ≥7; ≥8; ≥9; ≥10; ≥11; ≥12; ≥13; ≥14; ≥15; ≥16; ≥17; ≥18; ≥19; or ≥20. The mass analyser or ion trap may be configured to reflect or turn the ions N times in the oscillation dimension, wherein N is: ≤20; ≤19; ≤18; ≤17; ≤16; ≤15; ≤14; ≤13; ≤12; or ≤11. Any ranges from the above two lists may be combined where not mutually exclusive.


The spectrometer may have a resolution of: ≥30,000; ≥40,000; ≥50,000; ≥60,000; ≥70,000; or ≥80,000.


The spectrometer may be configured such that the pulsed ion accelerator receives ions having a kinetic energy of: ≥20 eV; ≥30 eV; ≥40 eV; ≥50 eV; ≥60 eV; between 20 and 60 eV; or between 30 and 50 eV. Such ion energies may reduce angular spread of the ions and cause the ions to bypass the rims of the orthogonal accelerator.


The spectrometer may comprise an ion detector.


The detector may be an image current detector configured such that ions passing near to it induce an electrical current in it. For example, the spectrometer may be configured to oscillate ions in the oscillation dimension proximate to the detector, inducing a current in the detector, and the spectrometer may be configured to determine the mass to charge ratios of these ions from the frequencies of their oscillations (e.g. using Fourier transform technology). Such techniques may be used in the electrostatic ion trap embodiments.


The detector for an electrostatic trap may alternatively be a sampling detector, e.g. as described in WO2011086430, FIG. 11. Ion packets may pass multiple times through a substantially (e.g. 99%) transparent mesh. A small proportion of the ions (e.g. 1%) hit the mesh and generate secondary electrons, which may be sampled. For example, the electrons may be detected by a detector (such as a TOF detector), e.g. a MCP or SEM. This may generate a series of periodic sharp signals, which may be interpreted similar to the Fourier transform MS method. The sharp signal improves resolution over standard image current signals. The detection of individual ions also improves sensitivity over an image current detector.


Alternatively, the ion detector may be an impact ion detector that detects ions impacting on a detector surface. The detector surface may be parallel to the drift dimension.


The ion detector may be arranged between the ion mirrors (or ion mirror and sectors), e.g. midway between (in the oscillation dimension) opposing ion mirrors.


From a second aspect, the present invention provides an ion mirror comprising: a plurality of electrodes and at least one voltage supply connected thereto that are configured to generate an electric field region that reflects ions in a first dimension (X-dimension), and wherein at least part of the electric field region through which ions travel in use has equipotential field lines that diverge, converge or curve as a function of position along a second, orthogonal dimension (Z-direction); wherein the ion mirror comprises tuning electrodes arranged on opposing sides of the ion mirror in a third dimension (Y-dimension) that is orthogonal to the first and second dimensions, and voltage supplies configured to apply different voltages to different ones of the tuning electrodes for generating said equipotential field lines that diverge, converge or curve; and wherein the voltage supplies are configured to be adjustable so as to adjust the voltages applied to the tuning electrodes.


The voltage supplies may be adjustable so as to adjust the voltages applied to the tuning electrodes to compensate for one or more time front tilt introduced to ions passing through the ion mirror, in use, due to the (mis)alignment or bending of electrodes in the ion mirror.


The ion mirror of the second aspect of the invention may have any of the features described in relation to the first aspect of the invention.


For example, the ion mirror may comprise one or more first electrode arranged on a first side of the ion mirror, in the third dimension, and a plurality of second electrodes arranged on a second opposite side of the ion mirror; wherein the ion mirror is configured to apply different voltages to different ones of the second electrodes and/or first electrodes for generating said equipotential field lines that diverge, converge or curve.


The different voltages may be DC voltages.


The second electrodes may be connected by a resistive chain such that a voltage supply connected to the resistive chain applies different electrical potentials to the second electrodes.


The first electrodes may be connected by a resistive chain such that a voltage supply connected to the resistive chain applies different electrical potentials to the first electrodes.


Embodiments are also contemplated in which at least some of the electrodes connected by the resistive chain are replaced by a resistive layer.


Said one or more first electrode and/or said plurality of second electrodes may be arranged on a printed circuit board (PCB).


In embodiments in which electrodes are arranged on a PCB, a resistive layer may be provide between the electrodes, so as to avoid the insulating material of the substrate from becoming electrically charged


The ion mirror may have a first length in the second dimension that comprises said at least part of the electric field region having equipotential field lines that diverge, converge or curve, and a second length in the second dimension that includes only parallel equipotential field lines for reflecting ions. The first length may be arranged at a first end of the ion mirror.


Optionally, the ion mirror has a third length in the second dimension that comprises said at least part of the electric field region having equipotential field lines that diverge, converge or curve.


The third length may be arranged at a second end of the ion mirror (in the second dimension), with the second length between the first and third lengths.


The ion mirror may comprise electrodes that are tilted at an angle with respect to each other in a plane defined by the first and second dimensions (X-Z plane); and/or may comprise one or more electrodes that are bent in a plane defined by the first and second dimensions (X-Z plane).


For example, the ion mirror may have a cap electrode that is tilted relative to a frame electrode, or frame electrodes that are tilted relative to each other.


The present invention also provides a method of mass spectrometry comprising: providing an ion mirror or mass spectrometer as described hereinabove; applying voltages to electrodes of the ion mirror so as to generate said electric field region having equipotential field lines that diverge, converge or curve as a function of position along the second dimension (Z-direction); and reflecting ions in the ion mirror in the first dimension (X-dimension).


The method may comprise tilting the time front of the ions in the ion mirror.


The method may comprise varying the divergence, convergence or curvature of the equipotential field lines (as a function of position along the second dimension) with time.


The ion mirror may comprise a voltage supply and electrodes that apply a static electric field in an ion acceleration region adjacent (in a direction in which the ions are reflected) said part of the electric field region having equipotential field lines that diverge, converge or curve; said ion acceleration region having parallel equipotential field lines for accelerating the ions out of the ion mirror.


The method may comprise varying the strength of the static electric field as a function of time.


The steps of varying the equipotential field lines and/or a static electric field may be performed so as to change the tilt of the time front of the ions.


The second aspect of the present invention also provides a method of tuning an ion mirror comprising: providing an ion mirror as described above; and adjusting the voltage supplies as a function of time so as to vary the voltages applied to the tuning electrodes and the divergence, convergence or curvature of said equipotential field lines.


The voltage supplies may be adjusted until the voltages applied to the tuning electrodes compensate for one or more time front tilt introduced to ions passing through the ion mirror, in use, due to the (mis)alignment or bending of electrodes in the ion mirror.


A commonly used model of the whole mirror tilted at angle Φ predicts that both time front tilt angle γ and ray steering angle ϕ induced by ion packet reflection from such mirror are twice the mirror tilt angle Φ. γ=2Φ; ϕ=2Φ. Contrary to the widely admitted and used model, the inventors have discovered a strong amplifying effect on the tilting angle γ of the ion packet time front by wedge (tilted) electrostatic fields localized in the ion reflecting region, accompanied by very minor angle ϕ of ion ray steering. The proposed model described herein for ion mirrors with misaligned electrodes in the ion reflecting region assumes a wedge field with tilted equipotential lines being bound by reflecting equipotential at zero mean ion energy K=0 and an equipotential line parallel to the Z-direction at energy K=K1, followed by post-acceleration to energy K=K0 by a flat (2D) field with equipotential lines being parallel to the drift Z-direction. The proposed model predicts twice larger time front tilt angle γ=4Φ at hypothetical case of K1=K0 and much larger time front tilt angle γ=4Φ*(K0/K1)0.5 in case of realistic ion mirrors with wedge fields localized in the vicinity of the ion turning point. Contrary to the conventional model, where γ=ϕ, the new model predicts a large difference between time front tilt angle and the ray steering angle: γ=3ϕ*K0/K1, where the realistic energy factor K0/K1 is expected between 10 and 30. In other words, contrary to knowledge of prior art, minor equipotential line tilt in ion reflecting regions actually produce much stronger tilt of time fronts and much smaller ion ray steering.


It is further realized that because of presence of the ion angular divergence, ion packets mix within E-analyzers at multiple reflections, that is time front tilts are different for initially parallel ion trajectories and initially divergent ones, so that it is much more preferable to compensate the parasitic, i.e. unintentional, time-front tilts locally along the whole Z-extension of the mirror. Embodiments of the invention propose introducing electronically controlled auxiliary wedge and/or electronically controlled bow fields for local compensation.


It is further realized that a combination of deflectors with ion mirrors with local wedge fields allow isochronous ion ray steering, where time front tilting of both devices are mutually compensated. Such steering is immediately useful for multiple ion injection schemes, for reverting of ion drift motion in the drift Z-direction (this way further increasing ion path), and for ion entrapment in E-traps in the Z-direction. The ray steering mechanism is further improved by introducing so-called compensated deflectors, incorporating quadrupolar field, in most simple example produced by Matsuda plates, or alternatively by trans-axial wedge and/or lens. The compensated deflectors overcome the over-focusing of conventional deflectors in MPTOF, so as provides an opportunity for controlled ion packet focusing and defocusing.


The ion optical quality of the proposed compensated steering is improved: it simultaneously removes so-called chromatic angular spread a1, and accompanying focusing/defocusing in the transverse Y-direction appears well compensated by isochronous and spatial focusing properties of 2D ion mirror fields.


An important feature of embodiments of the invention is the electronic control and tuning by adjusting parameters of wedge ion mirror, deflection angles, focusing by quadrupolar fields and by ion injection energies, as described below in multiple embodiments.


According to embodiments of the invention there is provided, within electrostatic isochronous mass analyzer, an electrostatic gridless ion mirror comprising means for generating at least one electrically adjustable wedge or curved wedge field in the ion retarding region with equipotential lines diverging or converging in the first Z-direction, said direction being perpendicular to the second X-direction of ion reflection from the mirror at the XZ-plane of ion motion in the mirror.


Preferably, said mirror may further comprise a set of parallel electrodes to form a “flat” post-acceleration field with equipotential lines parallel to the first Z-direction.


Preferably, electrodes of said gridless ion mirror may be substantially elongated in the first Z-direction and form substantially two dimensional electrostatic field in the orthogonal XY-plane.


Preferably, said means for generating said wedge or curved wedge field comprise one of the group: (i) a wedge slit electrode oriented substantially orthogonal to electric field lines of said wedge field; (ii) at least one electrode being tilted relative to other mirror electrodes; and (iii) a printed circuit board with multiple conductive pads interconnected by a resistive chain, said conductive pads are aligned with the direction of field lines divergence in said wedge field.


Preferably, said isochronous mass analyzer may be one of the group: (i) time-of-flight mass spectrometer; (ii) an open trap mass spectrometer; and (iii) an ion trap mass spectrometer with an image current detector.


Preferably, electrodes of said ion mirror are made of printed circuit boards (PCB) with partially conductive surface, and wherein said wedge or arc ion retarding field is electrically adjusted to compensate for tilt and bow of said electrodes at standard accuracy of the PCB technology.


According to embodiments of the invention there is provided, within a method of mass spectral analysis in electrostatic fields of an isochronous mass analyzer, an electrostatic field of gridless ion mirror comprising at least one electrically adjustable wedge or curved wedge field in the ion retarding region with equipotential lines, diverging or converging in the first Z-direction, said direction being perpendicular to the second X-direction of ion reflection from the mirror at the XZ-plane of ion motion in the mirror, said wedge or curved wedge field followed by a region of a flat post-acceleration field with equipotential lines parallel to said first Z-direction.


Preferably, said field may be substantially elongated in the first Z-direction and two dimensional in the orthogonal XY-plane.


Preferably, said method of mass spectral analysis may comprise one of the group: (i) time-of-flight mass analysis; (ii) mass analysis within an open ion trap; and (iii) mass analysis within an ion trap mass spectrometer with an image current detector.


Preferably, said wedge field may be electrically adjusted to tilt time front of ion packets, used for one purpose of the group: (i) compensating the time front tilt at ion ray steering by deflectors or lenses; (ii) compensating the time front tilt at ion ray steering by trans-axial deflectors or lenses; (iii) for compensating unintentional misalignments of ion mirror electrodes; and (iv) for compensating misalignments of mass spectrometer components, such as ion sources, accelerators and deflectors.


According to embodiments of the invention, there is provided a multi-reflecting mass spectrometer comprising:

  • (a) a pulsed ion source or a pulsed converter generating ion packets substantially elongated in the first Z-direction;
  • (b) a pair of parallel gridless ion mirrors separated by a drift space; electrodes of said ion mirrors are substantially elongated in the Z-direction to form an essentially two-dimensional electrostatic field in an orthogonal XY-plane; said field provides for an isochronous repetitive multi-pass ion motion and spatial ion confinement along a zigzag mean ion trajectory lying within the XY symmetry plane;
  • (c) an ion detector;
  • (d) at least one electrically adjustable electrostatic deflector, arranged for steering of ion trajectories for angle ψ associated with equal tilting of ion packets time front;
  • (e) at least one electrode structure to form at least one electrically adjustable wedge electrostatic field with equipotential lines diverging or converging in said Z-direction in the retarding region of said ion mirror, followed by electrostatic acceleration in a flat field with equipotential lines parallel to said Z-direction; said at least one wedge field is arranged for the purpose of adjusting the time-front tilt angle γ of said ion packets, associated with steering of ion trajectories at much smaller (relative to said angle γ) inclination angle φ;
  • (f) wherein said steering angles ψ and φ are arranged for either denser folding of ion trajectories, and/or for bypassing rims of said source or of said deflector or of said detector by ion packets, and/or for reverting ion drift motion; and
  • (g) wherein said time-front tilt angle γ and said ion steering angles ψ are electrically adjusted for compensating the T|Z and/or T/ZZ time-of-flight aberrations at said detector.


Preferably, for the purpose of controlling spatial defocusing or focusing of said at least one deflector, an additional quadrupolar field may be formed within said deflector by at least one electrode structure of the group: (i) Matsuda plates; (ii) gate shaped deflecting electrode; (iii) side shields of the deflector with the aspect ratio under 2; (iv) toroidal sector deflection electrodes; and (v) additional electrode curvature within a trans-axial wedge deflector.


Preferably, said reflecting wedge field within ion retarding region of at least one ion mirror may be arranged with one electrode structure of the group: (i) a wedge slit oriented in the ZY-plane and located between mirror electrodes; (ii) at least one printed circuit board with discrete electrodes aligned in the Z-direction, connected via resistive divider and located between mirror electrodes; (iii) a locally tilted portion of at least one electrode of said ion mirror; and (iv) at least one split portion of at least one electrode of said ion mirror, connected to a separate potential.


Preferably, for the purpose of electrically compensating unintentional minor inaccuracy of misalignments of said ion mirrors, said ion mirror may further comprise at least one printed circuit board, located between said mirror electrodes; said board forms discrete electrodes, connected via resistive chain to form a wedge or an arc shaped electrostatic wedge field within the ion retarding region of at least one ion mirror.


Preferably, said pulsed ion source or said pulsed converter may comprise one of the group: (i) a MALDI source; (ii) a SIMS source; (iii) a mapping or imaging ion source; (iv) an electron impact ion source; (v) an orthogonal accelerator; (vi) a pass-through orthogonal accelerator with an electrostatic ion guide; and (vii) a radio-frequency ion trap with radial pulsed ion ejection.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Various embodiments will now be described, by way of example only, and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:



FIG. 1 shows prior art U.S. Pat. No. 6,717,132 planar multi-reflecting TOF with gridless orthogonal pulsed accelerator OA, and;



FIG. 2 illustrates problems of dense trajectory folding and limitations set by mechanical precision of the analyzer of FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 shows novel amplifying reflecting wedge field of an embodiment of the present invention used for electrically adjustable tilt of ion packets time-front; shows one mirror wedge achieved with a wedge slit; and presents simulated field structure with bent retarding equipotential;



FIG. 4 shows another embodiment of the present invention of the amplifying wedge mirror field, achieved with an auxiliary printed circuit board (PCB), and shows compensation of unintentional misalignment of ion mirror electrodes;



FIG. 5 shows one embodiment of PCB ion mirror of the present invention;



FIG. 6 shows another embodiment of PCB ion mirror of the present invention and shows technological improvements for PCB ion mirrors;



FIG. 7 illustrates novel methods of compensated ion steering of embodiments of the present invention used for improved ion injection and for improved reversal of ion drift motion, both being achieved with novel wedge mirror fields in combination with novel compensated deflectors;



FIG. 8 shows results of ion optical simulations verifying improvements of FIG. 7.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring to FIG. 1, a prior art multi-reflecting TOF instrument 10 according to U.S. Pat. No. 6,717,132 is shown having an orthogonal accelerator (OA-MRTOF). MRTOF 10 comprises: an ion source 11 with a lens system 12 to form a substantially parallel ion beam 13; an orthogonal accelerator (OA) 14 with a storage gap to admit the beam 13; a pair of gridless ion mirrors 16, separated by a field-free drift region, and a detector 17. Both OA 14 and mirrors 16 are formed with plate electrodes having slit openings, oriented in the Z-direction, thus forming a two dimensional electrostatic field, symmetric about the XZ symmetry plane (also denoted as s-plane). Accelerator 14, ion mirrors 16 and detector 17 are parallel to the Z-axis. In operation, ion source 11 generates a continuous ion beam. Commonly, ion sources 11 comprise gas-filled radio-frequency (RF) ion guides (not shown) for gaseous dampening of ion beams. Lens 12 forms a substantially parallel continuous ion beam 13, entering OA 14 along the Z-direction. An electrical pulse in OA 14 ejects ion packets 15, which travel in MRTOF at small inclination angle α (to the X-dimension), controlled by the ion source bias UZ.


Referring to FIG. 2, simulation examples 20 and 21 illustrate multiple problems of prior art MRTOF 10, if pushing for higher resolutions and denser trajectory folding. Exemplary MRTOF parameters are: DX=500 mm cap-cap distance; DZ=250 mm wide portion of non-distorted XY-field; acceleration potential is UX=8 kV, OA rim=10 mm and detector rim=5 mm.


In the example 20, to fit 14 reflections (i.e. L=7 m flight path) the source bias is set to UZ=9V. Parallel rays with an initial width in the z-direction of Z0=10 mm and no angular spread Δα=0 start hitting rims of OA 14 and of detector 17. In example 21, the top ion mirror is tilted by λ=1 mrad, representing the realistic overall effective angle of mirror tilt, accounting for built up faults of stack assemblies, standard accuracy of machining and moderate electrode bend by internal stress at machining. Every “hard” ion reflection in the top ion mirror then changes the inclination angle α by 2 mrad. The inclination angle α grows from α1=27 mrad to α2=41 mrad, gradually expanding the central trajectory. To hit the detector after N=14 reflections, the source bias has to be reduced to UZ=6V. The angular divergence is amplified by the mirror tilt and increase the ion packets width in the z-direction to ΔZ=18 mm, inducing ion losses on the rims. Obviously, slits in the drift space may be used to avoid trajectory overlaps and spectral confusion, however, at a cost of additional ionic losses.


In example 21, the inclination of ion mirror introduces yet another and much more serious problem—the time-front 15 of the ions becomes tilted by angle γ=14 mrad in-front of the detector. The total ion packet spreading in the time-of-flight X-direction ΔX=ΔZ*γ=0.3 mm limits mass resolution to R<L/2ΔX=11,000 at L=7 m flight path, being low even for a regular TOF and too low for MRTOF. To avoid the limitation, the electrode precision has to be brought to non-realistic levels: λ<0.1 mrad, translated to better than 10 um accuracy and straightness of individual electrodes.


Summarizing the problems of prior art MRTOF, attempts of increasing flight path require much lower specific energies UZ of continuous ion beam and larger angular divergences Δα of ion packets, which induce ion losses on component rims and may produce spectral overlaps. Most important, small mechanical imperfections strongly affect MRTOF resolution and require unreasonably high precision.


Embodiments of the present invention propose to arrange wedge-shaped electrostatic fields with equipotential lines diverging in the Z-direction in the reflecting region of electrostatic gridless ion mirrors of either MRTOF or E-traps for effective and electrically adjustable control over the ion packets time-front tilt angle γ.


Referring to FIG. 3, a model gridless ion mirror 30 according to an embodiment of the present invention is shown and comprises a wedge reflecting field 35 and a flat post-accelerating field 38. An ion packet 34 (formed with any pulsed converter or ion source) is initially aligned with the Z-axis, as shown by a line for the time front. The ion packet 34 initially has a mean (average) ion energy K0 and energy spread ΔK. The ion packet 34 passes through field 38 and enters the wedge-shaped field 35 in the ion mirror at an inclination angle α (to the X-dimension). The ions are then reflected by the ion mirror (in the X-direction) and pass through the accelerating field 38.


Flat field 38 has equipotential lines arranged parallel to the Z-axis within potential boundaries corresponding to mean energies K0 and K1 of the ions, where K0>K1. Model wedge field 35 may be arranged with uniformly diverging equipotential lines in the XZ-plane, where the field strength E(z) is independent on the X-coordinate, and within the ion passage Z-region the field E(z) is reverse proportional to the Z-coordinate: E(z)˜1/z. Wedge field 35 starts at equipotential corresponding to K=K1 and continues at least to the ion retarding equipotential 36 (K=0), tilted to Z-axis at λ0 angle. This arrangement causes the time-front of the ion packet to be tilted by angle γ relative to the Z-axis, and the average trajectory of the ion packet (relative to the X-dimension) to be altered by steering angle ϕ.


While applying standard mathematics a non-expected and previously unknown result was arrived at: in ion mirror 30 with wedge field 35, the time-front tilt angle γ and the ion steering angle ϕ are controlled by the energy factor K0/K1 as:

γ=4λ0*(K0/K1)0.5=4λ0*u0/u1
ϕ=4λ0/3*(K1/K0)0.5=4λ0/3*u1/u0
i.e. γ/ϕ=3K0/K1>>1


where K1 and K0 are the mean ion kinetic energies at the exit of the wedge field 35 (index 1) and at the exit of flat field 38 (index 0) respectively, and u1 and u0 are the corresponding mean ion velocities. The angle ratio γ/ϕ=3K0/K1 may be practically reaching well over 10 or 30 and is controlled electronically.


At K0/K1=1 (i.e. without acceleration in the field 38), the wedge field already provides twice larger time front tilt γ compared to fully tilted ion mirrors (γ=4λ0 Vs γ=2λ0), while producing a smaller steering angle (ϕ=4/3λ0 Vs ϕ=2λ0). The angle ratio γ/ϕ further grows with the energy factor as K0/K1 because the angles are transformed with ion acceleration in the field 38: both flight time difference dT and z-velocity w are preserved with the flat field 38, where the time front tilt dT/u grows with ion velocity u and the steering angle dw/u decreases with ion velocity u. By arranging larger K0/K1 ratio, the combination of wedge field with post-acceleration provides a convenient and powerful tool for adjustable steering of the time fronts of ion packets, accompanied by negligibly minor steering of ion rays.


Again referring to FIG. 3, one embodiment 31 of ion mirror with amplifying reflecting wedge field comprises a regular structure of parallel mirror electrodes, all aligned in the Z-direction, where C denotes the cap electrode, and E1 denotes the first mirror frame electrode. Although only one mirror frame electrode E1 is shown, a plurality of such mirror frame electrodes may be provided stacked in the Z-direction (e.g. usually, from 4 to 8 such electrodes). Mirror 31 further comprises a thin wedge electrode W, located between cap electrode C and first electrode E1. The wedge electrode W has a constant thickness in the X-direction and is aligned parallel with the Z-axis. However, as shown in the lower part of embodiment 31, the wedge electrode has a wedge-shaped (tapered) window in the YZ-plane for variable attenuation of the field due to the cap electrode C potential. Such wedge window appears sufficient for minor curving of reflecting equipotential lines 36 in the XZ-plane, while having minor effect on the structure and curvatures of the XY-field, which is important for ion optical quality of the ion mirror—high order (up to full 3rd order) isochronicity, up to 5th order time per energy focusing, spatial quality and low spatial aberrations.


A simulated ion optical model for a realistic ion mirror with wedge electrode W of embodiment 31 is illustrated by icons 32 and 33, where icon 32 shows the electrode structure (C, W and E1) around the ion reflection region and also shows equipotential lines in the XY-plane at one particular Z-coordinate. Icon 33 illustrates a slight bending of retarding equipotential 36 in the XZ-middle plane at strong disproportional compression of the picture in the Z-direction, so that the slight curvature of the line 36 can be seen. Dark vertical strips in icon 33 correspond to ion trajectories, arranged at relative energy spread δ=0.05, so that angled tips illustrate the range of ion penetration into the mirror. Icon 33 shows that the wedge field 35 is spread in the Z-direction in the region for several ion reflections, which helps distributing the time-front tilting at yet smaller bend and smaller displacement of equipotential 36.


Simulations have confirmed that: (i) adjustments of the amplifying factor of 4(K0/K1)0.5 allows strong tilting of the time-front at small wedge angles λ0, thus not ruining the structure of electrical fields, which are optimized for reaching overall isochronicity and spatial focusing of ion packets; (ii) the time front tilt angle can be electronically adjusted from, for example, from 0 to 6 degrees if using wedge W in both opposite ion mirrors; (iii) the compensation of the time-front tilting for deflectors (see FIG. 7) is reached simultaneously with compensation of chromatic dependence of the Z-velocity, as illustrated in FIG. 7.


Referring to FIG. 4, yet another embodiment 40 of ion mirror with an amplifying wedge reflecting field is shown comprising conventional ion mirror electrodes (cap electrode C, first frame electrode E1, and optional further frame electrodes E2, etc.) and further comprising a printed circuit board 41, placed between cap C and first mirror electrode E1. PCB 41 may either be composed of two aligned parallel PCB plates or may be one PCB with a constant size (z-independent) window, being a wider window than the one in the first frame electrode E1 to prevent the board 41 being charged by stray ions.


To produce a desired curvature or bend of the ion retarding equipotential 46, the PCB 41 carries multiple conductive pads, connected via surface mounted resistive chain 42, energized by several power supplies U1 . . . Uj 43. Preferably, absolute voltages of supplies 43 are kept low, say under 1 kV, which is to be achieved at ion optical optimization of the mirror electrode structure. The net of resistors 42 and power supplies 43 allows adjusting the voltage distribution on PCB 41 flexibly and electronically, thus generating a desired tilt or curvature of retarding equipotential 46, either positive or negative, either weak or strong, either local or global, as illustrated by dashed lines 45. Flexible electronic control over tilt and curvature of the retarding line 46 is a strong advantage of the PCB wedge embodiment 40.


Again referring to FIG. 4, an exemplary embodiment 44 illustrates the case of mirror cap electrode C being unintentionally tilted by angle λC to the Z-axis, this angle being expected to be a fraction of 1 mrad at realistic accuracy of mirror manufacturing. A printed circuit board 41 may be used for recovering the straightness of the reflecting equipotential 47, primarily designed for local compensation of the time-front tilting by unintentional mirror faults. Similarly, a second (opposing) ion mirror may have another PCB with a quadratic distribution of PCB potentials for electronically controlled correction of unintentional overall bend of ion mirror electrodes. Exemplary retarding equipotentials 48 and 49 illustrate the ability of forming a compensating wedge or curvature.


Some practical aspects of using and tuning of PCB wedge are considered. Optionally, PCB electrodes 41 may be used at manufacturing tests only. The occurred inaccuracy of ion mirrors may be determined when measuring the required PCB compensation at recovered MRTOF resolution, which in turn could be used for calibrated mechanical adjustment of individual ion mirrors. Alternatively, the number of regulating power supplies 43 may be potentially reduced and the strategy of analyzer tuning may be optimized for constant use. It is expected that a pair of auxiliary power supplies may be used for simultaneous reaching of: creating preset wedge fields at far and near Z-edge, compensating electrodes faulty tilts, and compensating electrodes faulty bends. Indeed, all wedge fields may produce the same action—they tilt the time front of ion packets, and it is expected that a generic distribution of PCB potential may be pre-formed for each mirror, while controlling overall tilt and bow of wedge fields by a pair of low voltage power supplies 43.


Compared to wedge slit W in FIG. 3, PCB wedge mirrors 40 and 41 of FIG. 4 look more attractive for being more flexible. Adjusting potentials allows adjusting amplitude and sign of bend or tilt of the reflecting equipotential 46.


The proposed compensation mechanism of FIG. 3 and FIG. 4 relaxes the precision requirements onto parallelism and precision of ion mirror electrodes from the tens of microns range (as described in FIG. 1) to 100-300 um range and, hence, may allow using lower precision technologies. Embodiments of the invention propose ion mirrors manufactured with more robust, reproducible, and lower cost technology of printed circuit boards (PCBs) at standard (for PCB) precision, being notably lower compared to precision obtainable at standard electrode machining, while using PCB wedge compensation.


Referring to FIG. 5, one embodiment 50 of a PCB ion mirror of the present invention comprises: PCB electrodes 51 each having a conductive window 54, attachment ribs 52, and optional aligning holes 53; a base support 55; stiffing ribs 56 and/or stiffing supports 59; a compensating PCB 57 with multiple conductive pads; and an optional spacing electrode 58. PCB ion mirror 50 incorporates features to solve deficiencies of standard PCB technology:


It is important that compensating PCB 57 is used to form an electronically controlled wedge reflecting field (e.g. as described in FIG. 4) for the purpose of compensating electrodes 51 misalignments and limited parallelism, specified at 0.1 mm in PCB technology. It is believed that PCB ion mirrors are unable to operate in practice without this feature.


The internal edge of window 54 is made conductive, similarly to standard PCB vias (usually made electrolytic). The preferred coating is Nickel, referred to in PCB industry as soft gold. The conductive rim may be at least three times wider than the gaps between electrodes 51 to minimize the insulator exposure and to avoid field effects of charged surfaces.


The tracking distance of uncoated PCB is arranged at outer sides of PCB 51 to reduce surface gradient to under 300-500V/mm, where surface discharges are known to start at 1 kV/mm. Yet a larger tracking distance may be obtained if avoiding direct contact between edges of electrode 51 and base plate 55.


Though base support 55, stiffing ribs 56 or stiffing supports 59 may be made of any mechanically stable material, preferably, we propose PCB material for matching the thermal expansion coefficient (TCE) of electrodes 51, e.g. being 4-5 ppm/C for wide spread FR-4 PCB material. Otherwise, large thermal variations (specified from −50 to +50 C) at instrument transportation may ruin the ion mirror precision and flatness. Optionally, one may use more expensive materials with close TCE, say Titanium or ceramics, however, authors are not aware of any low cost material with matching TCE, except G-10 (equivalent of FR-4 PCB), which is far less preferable for reasons of generating dust and chips. Moreover, PCB supports and ribs allow convenient soldering. Slits in supports 55 are aligned with electrode ribs 52, so that ribs could be soldered at outer sides of PCB 55.


Embodiment 50 may be designed to compensate for the expected moderate PCB flexing. PCB electrodes 51 are stiff in the X- and Y-direction. Multiple aligning ribs 52 are soldered to slits in the base support 55, providing stiffness in the Z-direction. Flexing of base PCB plate 55 in the Y-direction (harmful at precision assembly) is compensated by attaching stiffing PCB ribs 56, or stiffing supports 59. Supports 59 may be metal (say aluminium) if using a hole and slit mounting to overcome TCE mismatch. Thus, PCB flexing is prevented in the fully assembled ion mirror in all three directions, where initial parallelism before soldering may be improved by technological jigs.


Referring to FIG. 6, embodiment 60 further improves the straightness and stiffness of individual mirror electrodes 51 before the step of entire mirror assembly by soldering of PCB or metal ridges 61 between a pair of electrodes 51. Parallelism of external surfaces of electrodes 51 and mutual alignment of windows 54 may be improved with technological jigs, e.g. referenced with aligning holes 53. Optionally, the same jig may be used for both the attachment of ridges and the assembly of the entire ion mirror.


Again referring to FIG. 6, another important step is proposed for improving the precision of electrode mounting, which is very likely to be affected by large variations of PCB thickness, specified to 5% of PCB thickness and rarely controlled at PCB manufacturing. Embodiment 62 illustrates the approach with exemplary milled slot 63 machined in PCB base plate 55 for precision of matching between bottom surface of base 55 and the edge of electrode 51. It is assumed that the bottom surface of PCB 55 is pressed against a flat and hard surface at machining and then to rigid jig fixture or support 59 during assembly stage. Similar slots may be machined on ribs 52 for improved parallelism of electrodes 51.


Preferably, external edge and ribs 52 are milled simultaneously with internal window 54 to ensure their parallelism, specified at 0.1 mm in PCB industry, while typically being better. Yet preferably, simultaneously machined aligning holes 53 may serve for better alignment of the windows in the electrodes 51 windows.


Again referring to FIG. 6, another embodiment of PCB ion mirror 64 of the present invention comprises: a pair of parallel PCB plates 65, connected via side stands 68 and enforced by stiffing ribs 69; a compensating PCB 57 with multiple pads, interconnected by (not shown) a resistive chain; and an optional spacing electrode 58, which may also serve as a mirror cap. FIG. 6 shows the bottom half of ion mirror 64 in solid lines and upper plate 65 in dashed lines. Slits 67 are machined mutually parallel (at single installation) and aligned with not shown reference holes. Straightness and flatness of strips 66 is improved with PCB stiffing ribs 69, soldered at conductive pads, preferably on external side of ion mirror 64. Preferably, back side of PCB plate 65 has machined slots (similar to 63) for improved precision of ribs mounting, ensuring plate 65 straightness after the assembly.


Electrodes of ion mirror 64 are formed as follows. Plates 65 have multiple conductive coated strips 66, which are separated by slits 67 with partially conductive edges. To arrange electrical separation of adjacent electrodes, slits 67 are made partially conductive, for example by initially making fully conductive edges with PCB vias technology, and then disrupting the coating by making additional holes at far Z-edges of slits 67.


Without going into further details, the inventors claim that embodiment 64 also satisfies all measures of embodiment 60 for compensating deficiencies of standard PCB technology.


The inventors believe that known methods of making PCB ion optical components were missing most of those steps and could not provide precision, sufficient for ion mirrors.


Referring to FIG. 7, an embodiment of an improved MRTOF 70 of the present invention is shown comprising: a conventional ion source 11, generating ion beam 13 along the Z-axis; an orthogonal accelerator 14 (or any other pulsed source) aligned with the Z-axis; a pair of gridless ion mirrors with two-dimensional fields 38 aligned with the Z-axis and local wedge fields 35; and front and rear deflectors 71F and 71R. Ion packets are steered by deflectors 71 to control the ion packets inclination angle α with respect to the X-axis. The time front tilting angle γ of ion packets, introduced by deflectors 71 is compensated by the combination of mirror wedge fields 35 and post-accelerating flat field 38 to bring the ion packets time front 79 being parallel to face of detector 17. Yet strongly preferably, the time front compensation is arranged locally in close vicinity of every deflector, so that spatial mixing of ion packets would not affect MRTOF isochronicity. Ion packet steering and tilting at front and rear zones are shown below in zoom views 74 and 75.


Again referring to FIG. 7, preferably, novel deflector 71 (F or R) of embodiments of the present invention comprise a pair of deflection plates 72 at potentials U and 0 (referenced to acceleration potential UACC), or biased for symmetric potentials +U/2 and −U/2) and side plates 73 set at different potential UQ. Side plates are known as Matsuda plates in sectors. Side plates 73 generate an additional quadrupolar field. The Z-component of the overall electric field becomes, for example, EZ=U/H−2UQ*z/H2, where H and D are distance and effective length of the deflecting field, and z is coordinate within ion packet. The quadrupolar field compensates to first order the variations of the ion steering angle ψ, produced by ions slowing down in the region of higher deflection potential and removes the over-focusing effect of conventional deflectors. As a result, deflector 71 is capable of compensating for the angular dispersion of conventional deflectors, is capable of steering ion rays for the same angle ψ independent on the Z-coordinate (i.e. focal distance F→∞), and tilts the time front for constant angle γ=−ψ, i.e. keeps time fronts straight. Alternatively, deflector 71 is capable of controlling the focal distance F independent of the steering angle ψ.

EZ=U/H−EQ*z/H,
ψ=D/2H*U/K;γ=−ψ
1/F=2/D−K/UQD=1/D(2ϕ2−K/UQ)


where K is the mean energy of ion packets.


Compensated deflectors 71 nicely fit MRTOF. The quadrupolar field in the Z-direction generates an opposite focusing or defocusing field in the transverse Y-direction. Below simulations prove that the focal properties of MRTOF analyzers are sufficient to compensate for the Y-focusing of deflectors 71 without any significant TOF aberrations.


Alternatively, compensated deflectors may be trans-axial (TA) deflectors, formed by wedge electrodes. The invention proposes using a second order correction, produced by an additional curvature of TA-wedge. Controlled focusing/defocusing may be also generated by combination of the TA-wedge and TA-lens, arranged separately or combined into a single TA-device. For a narrower range of deflection angles, the compensated deflector may be arranged with a single potential while selecting the size of Matsuda plates or with a segment of toroidal sector.


Again referring to FIG. 7, zoom views 74 and 75 of embodiment 70 illustrate methods and embodiments of (a) compensated ion injection at front end (74); and (b) compensated ion packet steering and drift reversal at the rear end (75).


View 74 illustrates the method of compensated ion injection. Ion injection mechanism into MRTOF of the embodiments of the present invention comprises: a “flat” orthogonal accelerator (OA) 14 aligned with the Z-axis; an ion mirror with a “flat” field 38 at higher ion energies; a reflecting wedge field 35 with retarding equipotential 36 tilted at λ0 angle; and a compensated deflector 71, preferably located along the ion path and after first ion mirror reflection.


Ion beam 13 propagates along the Z-axis at elevated (compared to FIG. 1) energies (e.g. 20-50V) to enhance ion admission into OA 14, to increase the inclination angle α1 of ion rays, thus, improving ion packet bypassing the OA rim, and to reduce the ion packets angular divergence Δα. The time-front 76 of ejected ion packets is parallel to the Z-axis, since both ion beam 13 and OA 14 are parallel to the Z-axis. After ion reflection within the wedge mirror field 35 and after post-acceleration in the flat field 38, ion packets' time-front 77 becomes tilted at angle γ>>λ0, as has been explained in FIG. 3. Ion rays are then steered back in compensated deflector 71F by angle ψ=−γ, so that the inclination angle α21−ψ is notably reduced, allowing for denser folding of ion rays in MRTOF (for the purpose of higher resolution), while the orientation of the time front 78 is recovered for γ=0.


Again referring to FIG. 7, view 75 illustrates the method and mechanism of compensated back-end steering in MRTOF with wedge field. The back end of ion mirror comprises a similar “flat” entrance field 38, and a wedge reflecting field 35 with retarding equipotential line 36 tilted at an angle λ0. Ion packets 76 arrive to the far Z-end after multiple reflections in MRTOF, where they traveled at an inclination angle α2 and with the time-front 76 being parallel to the Z-axis, i.e. γ=0. After ion reflection in mirror wedge field 35 and after post-acceleration in flat field 38, ion packets time-front 77 becomes tilted for relatively large (say, 3 deg) angle γ=2α2. Ion rays are steered back by angle ψ=−γ=2α2 in compensated deflector 71R, so that the inclination angle becomes −α2, while orientation of the time front 78 is recovered for γ=0. As a result, ion drift motion in the Z-direction is reverted without tilting of the time-front, which helps to achieve about twice denser folding of ion rays in MRTOF 70.


Similar time front compensation occurs in-front of the detector 17. Ions arrive at the inclination angle α2, deflector 71F steers ion rays and tilts time front, since deflector 71F is set static and it was set in deflecting state at the ion injections stage 74. Wedge field 35 with flat post-acceleration field 38 tilts the time front to compensate for the tilt at ray steering. The resulting time front 79 is then set parallel to the Z-axis, which simplifies the detector installation.


Alternatively, the front deflector 71F may be pulsed for trapping ion packets for multiple Z-passages, this way increasing the ion flight time and flight path with the purpose of increased resolution.


Table 2 below presents formulas for time front tilt angles γ, for ray steering angles ϕ and for chromatic dependence d(Δw)/dδ of the Z-component of ion velocity w induced by wedge ion mirror and by deflectors. Table 3 below shows conditions for compensating the time front tilt and the chromatic dependence of the Z-velocity in the combined system, which may be achieved simultaneously.












TABLE 2








Chromatic





dependence of



Time-front
Rays
Z-velocity



Tilt Angle
Steering Angle
d(Δw)/dδ







Wedge Mirror





γ
0

(
M
)


=

4


λ
0





K
0


K
1













φ

(
M
)





+


4


λ
0


3






K
1


K
0












2


λ
0



u
0





K
0


K
1












Deflector
−ψ0
ψ0
−½u0ψ0


















TABLE 3








Condition for
Condition for



the 1st order
Compensating



Time-front Tilt
Chromatic Spread



Compensation
of Z-velocity





Wedge Mirror + Deflector





4

λ




K
0


K
1




=

ψ
0










4

λ




K
0


K
1




=

ψ
0














Overall, accounting for all above described methods of compensated ion steering, embodiment 70 allows: (i) a more efficient ion injection at higher energies; (ii) dense folding of ion rays for multiple reflections; (iii) reversal of ion rays for doubling ion path; (iv) compensating additional time-of-flight aberrations associated with steering of elongated (in the Z-direction) ion packets; (v) compensating chromatic angular spreads for reduced ion packet divergence; and (vi) compensating Y-related TOF and spatial aberrations of deflectors by spatial and isochronous properties of ion mirrors. Below described simulations do confirm those claimed positive effects.


The above described methods allow minor compensation of components (OA, mirrors detector) misalignments by adjusting ion injection energy, steering angles and strength of wedge fields. Wedges 35 may be combined with global compensation of ion mirror misalignment 44 of FIG. 4.


Referring to FIG. 8, there are presented results of ion optical simulations of MRTOF 70 with compensated ion injection and with compensated reversal of ion trajectory in the Z-direction. The exemplar simulated compact MRTOF 80 comprises: parallel ion mirrors with cap-cap distance DX=450 mm and useful length DZ=250 mm, separated by a drift space at UX=−8 kV acceleration voltage; an ion source 11 generating an ion beam 13 along Z-axis at UZ=57V specific energy with ΔUZ=0.5V spread; a straight orthogonal accelerator 14 OA aligned with the Z-axis; front and rear deflectors 71F and 71R with compensating Matsuda plates; a wedge electrode W at front and rear Z-end; and a detector 17 at front Z-end.


Example 80 illustrates spatial focusing of ion rays 81 for Z0=10 mm long ion packets, while not accounting angular spread of ion packets Δα=0 at ΔUZ=0 and not accounting relative energy spread of ion packets δ=ΔK/K=0 at ΔX=0. The chosen position of deflector 71F improves the ion packets bypassing of the deflector 71F and of detector 17 rim. Matsuda plates' voltages of the deflectors 71F and 71R are electrically adjusted for moderate spatial focusing of initially parallel rays onto detector 17, while being balanced for achieving optimal focusing in other examples of FIG. 8.


Example 82 illustrates angular divergence of ion rays 83 at ΔUZ=0.5V, while not accounting ion packets width Z0=0 and energy spread δ=0. Matsuda plate of the reversing deflector 71R is adjusted (being the same for all examples of FIG. 8) for spatial focusing of initially diverging rays onto detector 17.


Example 84 illustrates ion rays at all accounted spreads of ion beam. Though trajectories look filling most of the drift space, apparently, simulated ion losses are within 10%.


Example 86 presents the overall mass resolution RM=82,000 achieved in compact 450×250 mm analyzer while accounting all realistic spreads of ion beam and ion packets, so as DET=1.5 ns time spread. The outstanding performance and low level of analyzer aberrations prove the entire concept and confirms the claimed low TOF and spatial aberrations of MRTOF with the novel wedge ion mirror.


Yet higher resolutions are expected at larger size instruments, since the flight path L grows as product of instrument dimensions: L=2DX*DZ/LZ, where LZ is the ion advance per reflection. Note that the dense packing became available with the novel mechanism of compensated ion injection of the present invention.


Annotations

Coordinates and Times:


x,y,z—Cartesian coordinates;


X, Y, Z—directions, denoted as: X for time-of-flight, Z for drift, Y for transverse;


Z0—initial width of ion packets in the drift direction;


ΔZ—full width of ion packet on the detector;


DX and DZ—used height (e.g. cap-cap) and usable width of ion mirrors


L—overall flight path


N—number of ion reflections in mirror MRTOF or ion turns in sector MTTOF


u—x-component of ion velocity;


w—z-component of ion velocity;


T—ion flight time through TOF MS from accelerator to the detector;


ΔT—time spread of ion packet at the detector;


Potentials and Fields:


U— potentials or specific energy per charge;


UZ and ΔUZ—specific energy of continuous ion beam and its spread;


UX— acceleration potential for ion packets in TOF direction;


K and ΔK—ion energy in ion packets and its spread;


δ=ΔK/K—relative energy spread of ion packets;


E—x-component of accelerating field in the OA or in ion mirror around “turning” point;


μ=m/z—ions specific mass or mass-to-charge ratio;


Angles:


α—inclination angle of ion trajectory relative to X-axis;


Δα—angular divergence of ion packets;


γ—tilt angle of time front in ion packets relative to Z-axis


λ—tilt angle of “starting” equipotential to axis Z, where ions either start accelerating or are reflected within wedge fields of ion mirror


θ—tilt angle of the entire ion mirror (usually, unintentional);


φ—steering angle of ion trajectories or rays in various devices;


ψ—steering angle in deflectors


ε—spread in steering angle in conventional deflectors;


Aberration Coefficients


T|Z, T|ZZ, T|δ, T|δδ, etc;


Indexes are within the text


Although the present invention has been describing with reference to preferred embodiments, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications in form and detail may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention as set forth in the accompanying claims.

Claims
  • 1. An ion mirror comprising: a plurality of electrodes and at least one voltage supply connected thereto that are configured to generate an electric field region that reflects ions in a first dimension (X-dimension), and wherein at least part of the electric field region through which ions travel in use has equipotential field lines that diverge, converge or curve as a function of position along a second, orthogonal dimension (Z-direction); andelectrodes arranged on opposing sides of the ion mirror in a third dimension (Y-dimension) that is orthogonal to the first and second dimensions, wherein the ion mirror comprises one or more voltage supply configured to apply different voltages to different ones of these electrodes for generating said equipotential field lines that diverge, converge or curve;wherein said electrodes arranged on opposing sides of the ion mirror in a third dimension comprise one or more first electrode arranged on a first side of the ion mirror, in the third dimension, and a plurality of second electrodes arranged on a second opposite side of the ion mirror; wherein the ion mirror is configured to apply different voltages to different ones of the second electrodes for generating said equipotential field lines that diverge, converge or curve.
  • 2. The ion mirror of claim 1, wherein said least part of the electric field region having equipotential field lines that diverge, converge or curve is configured to tilt the time front of ions being reflected in the ion mirror.
  • 3. The ion mirror of claim 1, wherein said least part of the electric field region is arranged at or proximate an end of the ion mirror, in the second dimension, and wherein the equipotential field lines converge as a function of distance, in the second dimension, away from said end.
  • 4. The ion mirror of claim 1, wherein said one or more first electrode and/or said plurality of second electrodes are arranged on a printed circuit board (PCB).
  • 5. The ion mirror of claim 1, comprising a voltage supply and electrodes configured to apply a static electric field in an ion acceleration region adjacent to, in a direction in which the ions are reflected, said part of the electric field region having equipotential field lines that diverge, converge or curve said ion acceleration region having parallel equipotential field lines for accelerating the ions out of the ion mirror.
  • 6. The ion mirror of claim 1, wherein the ion mirror has a first length in the second dimension that comprises said at least part of the electric field region having equipotential field lines that diverge, converge or curve, and a second length in the second dimension that includes only parallel equipotential field lines for reflecting ions.
  • 7. The ion mirror of claim 1, wherein said electrodes arranged on opposing sides of the ion mirror in the third dimension are tuning electrodes and the one or more voltage supply configured to apply different voltages to different ones of the electrodes are configured to be adjustable so as to adjust the voltages applied to the tuning electrodes.
  • 8. The ion mirror of claim 7, comprising electrodes that are tilted at an angle with respect to each other in a plane defined by the first and second dimensions (X-Z plane); and/or comprising one or more electrodes that are bent in a plane defined by the first and second dimensions (X-Z plane).
  • 9. A method of mass spectrometry comprising: providing an ion mirror or mass spectrometer as claimed in claim 1;applying voltages to electrodes of the ion mirror so as to generate said electric field region having equipotential field lines that diverge, converge or curve as a function of position along the second dimension (Z-direction); andreflecting ions in the ion mirror in the first dimension (X-dimension).
  • 10. A method of tuning an ion mirror comprising: providing an ion mirror as claimed in claim 7; andadjusting the voltage supplies as a function of time so as to vary the voltages applied to the tuning electrodes and the divergence, convergence or curvature of said equipotential field lines.
  • 11. A mass spectrometer comprising: a time-of-flight mass analyser or electrostatic ion trap having at least one ion mirror and a pulsed ion accelerator for pulsing ion packets into the ion mirror;wherein the at least one ion mirror comprises a plurality of electrodes and at least one voltage supply connected thereto that are configured to generate an electric field region that reflects ions in a first dimension (X-dimension), wherein at least part of the electric field region through which ions travel in use has equipotential field lines that diverge, converge or curve as a function of position along a second, orthogonal dimension (Z-direction); andwherein the mass spectrometer is configured so that one of the ion mirrors receives ions from the ion accelerator with a time front that is tilted relative to the second, orthogonal dimension, and wherein said electric field region having equipotential field lines that diverge, converge or curve is configured to tilt the time front of the ions passing therethrough so as to at least partially counteract the tilt of the time front that the ions have when they are received at the ion mirror.
  • 12. The spectrometer of claim 11, wherein the time-of-flight mass analyser or electrostatic ion trap is a multi-pass time-of-flight mass analyser or electrostatic ion trap having said at least one ion mirror, and electrodes arranged and configured so as to provide an ion drift region that is elongated in a drift direction (z-dimension) and to reflect or turn ions multiple times in an oscillating dimension (x-dimension) that is orthogonal to the drift direction.
  • 13. The spectrometer of claim 12, wherein: (i) the multi-pass time-of-flight mass analyser is a multi-reflecting time of flight mass analyser having two ion mirrors that are elongated in the drift direction (z-dimension) and configured to reflect ions multiple times in the oscillation dimension (x-dimension); or(ii) the multi-pass time-of-flight mass analyser is a multi-turn time of flight mass analyser having an ion mirror and at least one electric sector configured to reflect and turn ions multiple times in the oscillation dimension (x-dimension).
  • 14. The spectrometer of claim 12, comprising an ion deflector configured to back-steer the average ion trajectory of the ions, in the drift direction, thereby tilting the angle of the time front of the ions, and wherein said electric field region having equipotential field lines that diverge, converge or curve is configured to tilt the time front of the ions passing therethrough so as to at least partially counteract a tilting of the time front by the ion deflector.
  • 15. The spectrometer of claim 14, wherein the ion deflector is configured to generate a quadrupolar field for controlling the spatial focusing of the ions in the drift direction.
  • 16. A multi-reflecting mass spectrometer comprising: (a) a pulsed ion source or a pulsed converter generating ion packets substantially elongated in the first Z-direction;(b) a pair of parallel gridless ion mirrors separated by a drift space; electrodes of said ion mirrors are substantially elongated in the Z-direction to form an essentially two-dimensional electrostatic field in an orthogonal XY-plane; said field provides for an isochronous repetitive multi-pass ion motion and spatial ion confinement along a zigzag mean ion trajectory lying within the XY symmetry plane;(c) an ion detector;(d) at least one electrically adjustable electrostatic deflector, arranged for steering of ion trajectories for angle ψ, associated with equal tilting of ion packets time front;(e) at least one electrode structure to form at least one electrically adjustable wedge electrostatic field with equipotential lines diverging or converging in said Z-direction in the retarding region of said ion mirror, followed by electrostatic acceleration in a flat field with equipotential lines parallel to said Z-direction; said at least one wedge field is arranged for the purpose of adjusting the time-front tilt angle γ of said ion packets, associated with steering of ion trajectories at much smaller (relative to said angle γ) inclination angle φ;(f) wherein said steering angles ψ and φ are arranged for either denser folding of ion trajectories, and/or for bypassing rims of said source or of said deflector or of said detector by ion packets, and/or for reverting ion drift motion; and(g) wherein said time-front tilt angle γ and said ion steering angles ψ are electrically adjusted for compensating the TIZ and/or T/ZZ time-of-flight aberrations at said detector.
Priority Claims (7)
Number Date Country Kind
1712612 Aug 2017 GB national
1712613 Aug 2017 GB national
1712614 Aug 2017 GB national
1712616 Aug 2017 GB national
1712617 Aug 2017 GB national
1712618 Aug 2017 GB national
1712619 Aug 2017 GB national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/GB2018/052100 7/26/2018 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2019/030472 2/14/2019 WO A
US Referenced Citations (327)
Number Name Date Kind
3898452 Hertel Aug 1975 A
4390784 Browning et al. Jun 1983 A
4691160 Ino Sep 1987 A
4731532 Frey et al. Mar 1988 A
4855595 Blanchard Aug 1989 A
5017780 Kutscher et al. May 1991 A
5107109 Stafford, Jr. et al. Apr 1992 A
5128543 Reed et al. Jul 1992 A
5202563 Cotter et al. Apr 1993 A
5331158 Dowell Jul 1994 A
5367162 Holland et al. Nov 1994 A
5396065 Myerholtz et al. Mar 1995 A
5435309 Thomas et al. Jul 1995 A
5464985 Cornish et al. Nov 1995 A
5619034 Reed et al. Apr 1997 A
5654544 Dresch Aug 1997 A
5689111 Dresch et al. Nov 1997 A
5696375 Park et al. Dec 1997 A
5719392 Franzen Feb 1998 A
5763878 Franzen Jun 1998 A
5777326 Rockwood et al. Jul 1998 A
5834771 Yoon et al. Nov 1998 A
5847385 Dresch Dec 1998 A
5869829 Dresch Feb 1999 A
5955730 Kerley et al. Sep 1999 A
5994695 Young Nov 1999 A
6002122 Wolf Dec 1999 A
6013913 Hanson Jan 2000 A
6020586 Dresch et al. Feb 2000 A
6080985 Welkie et al. Jun 2000 A
6107625 Park Aug 2000 A
6160256 Ishihara Dec 2000 A
6198096 Le Cocq Mar 2001 B1
6229142 Bateman et al. May 2001 B1
6271917 Hagler Aug 2001 B1
6300626 Brock et al. Oct 2001 B1
6316768 Rockwood et al. Nov 2001 B1
6337482 Francke Jan 2002 B1
6384410 Kawato May 2002 B1
6393367 Tang et al. May 2002 B1
6437325 Reilly et al. Aug 2002 B1
6455845 Li et al. Sep 2002 B1
6469295 Park Oct 2002 B1
6489610 Barofsky et al. Dec 2002 B1
6504148 Hager Jan 2003 B1
6504150 Verentchikov et al. Jan 2003 B1
6534764 Verentchikov et al. Mar 2003 B1
6545268 Verentchikov et al. Apr 2003 B1
6570152 Hoyes May 2003 B1
6576895 Park Jun 2003 B1
6580070 Cornish et al. Jun 2003 B2
6591121 Madarasz et al. Jul 2003 B1
6614020 Cornish Sep 2003 B2
6627877 Davis et al. Sep 2003 B1
6646252 Gonin Nov 2003 B1
6647347 Roushall et al. Nov 2003 B1
6664545 Kimmel et al. Dec 2003 B2
6683299 Fuhrer et al. Jan 2004 B2
6694284 Nikoonahad et al. Feb 2004 B1
6717132 Franzen Apr 2004 B2
6734968 Wang et al. May 2004 B1
6737642 Syage et al. May 2004 B2
6744040 Park Jun 2004 B2
6744042 Zajfman et al. Jun 2004 B2
6747271 Gonin et al. Jun 2004 B2
6770870 Vestal Aug 2004 B2
6782342 LeGore et al. Aug 2004 B2
6787760 Belov et al. Sep 2004 B2
6794643 Russ, IV et al. Sep 2004 B2
6804003 Wang et al. Oct 2004 B1
6815673 Plomley et al. Nov 2004 B2
6833544 Campbell et al. Dec 2004 B1
6836742 Brekenfeld Dec 2004 B2
6841936 Keller et al. Jan 2005 B2
6861645 Franzen Mar 2005 B2
6864479 Davis et al. Mar 2005 B1
6870156 Rather Mar 2005 B2
6870157 Zare Mar 2005 B1
6872938 Makarov et al. Mar 2005 B2
6888130 Gonin May 2005 B1
6900431 Belov et al. May 2005 B2
6906320 Sachs et al. Jun 2005 B2
6940066 Makarov et al. Sep 2005 B2
6949736 Ishihara Sep 2005 B2
7034292 Whitehouse et al. Apr 2006 B1
7071464 Reinhold Jul 2006 B2
7084393 Fuhrer et al. Aug 2006 B2
7091479 Hayek Aug 2006 B2
7126114 Chernushevich Oct 2006 B2
7196324 Verentchikov Mar 2007 B2
7217919 Boyle et al. May 2007 B2
7221251 Menegoli et al. May 2007 B2
7326925 Verentchikov et al. Feb 2008 B2
7351958 Vestal Apr 2008 B2
7365313 Fuhrer et al. Apr 2008 B2
7385187 Verentchikov et al. Jun 2008 B2
7388197 McLean et al. Jun 2008 B2
7399957 Parker et al. Jul 2008 B2
7423259 Hidalgo et al. Sep 2008 B2
7498569 Ding Mar 2009 B2
7501621 Willis et al. Mar 2009 B2
7504620 Sato et al. Mar 2009 B2
7521671 Kirihara et al. Apr 2009 B2
7541576 Belov et al. Jun 2009 B2
7582864 Verentchikov Sep 2009 B2
7608817 Flory Oct 2009 B2
7663100 Vestal Feb 2010 B2
7675031 Konicek et al. Mar 2010 B2
7709789 Vestal et al. May 2010 B2
7728289 Naya et al. Jun 2010 B2
7745780 McLean et al. Jun 2010 B2
7755036 Satoh Jul 2010 B2
7772547 Verentchikov Aug 2010 B2
7800054 Fuhrer et al. Sep 2010 B2
7825373 Willis et al. Nov 2010 B2
7863557 Brown Jan 2011 B2
7884319 Willis et al. Feb 2011 B2
7932491 Vestal Apr 2011 B2
7982184 Sudakov Jul 2011 B2
7985950 Makarov et al. Jul 2011 B2
7989759 Holle Aug 2011 B2
7999223 Makarov et al. Aug 2011 B2
8017907 Willis et al. Sep 2011 B2
8017909 Makarov et al. Sep 2011 B2
8063360 Willis et al. Nov 2011 B2
8080782 Hidalgo et al. Dec 2011 B2
8093554 Makarov Jan 2012 B2
8237111 Golikov et al. Aug 2012 B2
8354634 Green et al. Jan 2013 B2
8373120 Verentchikov Feb 2013 B2
8395115 Makarov et al. Mar 2013 B2
8492710 Fuhrer et al. Jul 2013 B2
8513594 Makarov Aug 2013 B2
8633436 Ugarov Jan 2014 B2
8637815 Makarov et al. Jan 2014 B2
8642948 Makarov et al. Feb 2014 B2
8642951 Li Feb 2014 B2
8648294 Prather et al. Feb 2014 B2
8653446 Mordehai et al. Feb 2014 B1
8658984 Makarov et al. Feb 2014 B2
8680481 Giannakopulos et al. Mar 2014 B2
8723108 Ugarov May 2014 B1
8735818 Kovtoun et al. May 2014 B2
8772708 Kinugawa et al. Jul 2014 B2
8785845 Loboda Jul 2014 B2
8847155 Vestal Sep 2014 B2
8853623 Verenchikov Oct 2014 B2
8884220 Hoyes et al. Nov 2014 B2
8921772 Verenchikov Dec 2014 B2
8952325 Giles et al. Feb 2015 B2
8957369 Makarov Feb 2015 B2
8975592 Kobayashi et al. Mar 2015 B2
9048080 Verenchikov et al. Jun 2015 B2
9082597 Willis et al. Jul 2015 B2
9082604 Verenchikov Jul 2015 B2
9099287 Giannakopulos Aug 2015 B2
9136101 Grinfeld et al. Sep 2015 B2
9147563 Makarov Sep 2015 B2
9196469 Makarov Nov 2015 B2
9207206 Makarov Dec 2015 B2
9214322 Kholomeev et al. Dec 2015 B2
9214328 Hoyes et al. Dec 2015 B2
9281175 Haufler et al. Mar 2016 B2
9312119 Verenchikov Apr 2016 B2
9324544 Rather Apr 2016 B2
9373490 Nishiguchi et al. Jun 2016 B1
9396922 Verenchikov et al. Jul 2016 B2
9417211 Verenchikov Aug 2016 B2
9425034 Verentchikov et al. Aug 2016 B2
9472390 Verenchikov et al. Oct 2016 B2
9514922 Watanabe et al. Dec 2016 B2
9576778 Wang Feb 2017 B2
9595431 Verenchikov Mar 2017 B2
9673033 Grinfeld et al. Jun 2017 B2
9679758 Grinfeld et al. Jun 2017 B2
9683963 Verenchikov Jun 2017 B2
9728384 Verenchikov Aug 2017 B2
9779923 Verenchikov Oct 2017 B2
9786484 Willis et al. Oct 2017 B2
9786485 Ding et al. Oct 2017 B2
9865441 Damoc et al. Jan 2018 B2
9865445 Verenchikov et al. Jan 2018 B2
9870903 Richardson et al. Jan 2018 B2
9870906 Quarmby et al. Jan 2018 B1
9881780 Verenchikov et al. Jan 2018 B2
9899201 Park Feb 2018 B1
9922812 Makarov Mar 2018 B2
9941107 Verenchikov Apr 2018 B2
9972483 Makarov May 2018 B2
10006892 Verenchikov Jun 2018 B2
10037873 Wang et al. Jul 2018 B2
10141175 Verentchikov et al. Nov 2018 B2
10141176 Stewart et al. Nov 2018 B2
10163616 Verenchikov et al. Dec 2018 B2
10186411 Makarov Jan 2019 B2
10192723 Verenchikov et al. Jan 2019 B2
10290480 Crowell et al. May 2019 B2
10373815 Crowell et al. Aug 2019 B2
10388503 Brown et al. Aug 2019 B2
10593525 Hock et al. Mar 2020 B2
10593533 Hoyes et al. Mar 2020 B2
10622203 Veryovkin et al. Apr 2020 B2
10629425 Hoyes et al. Apr 2020 B2
10636646 Hoyes et al. Apr 2020 B2
20010011703 Franzen Aug 2001 A1
20010030284 Dresch et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020030159 Chernushevich et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020107660 Nikoonahad et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020190199 Li Dec 2002 A1
20030010907 Hayek et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030111597 Gonin et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030232445 Fulghum Dec 2003 A1
20040026613 Bateman et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040084613 Bateman et al. May 2004 A1
20040108453 Kobayashi et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040119012 Vestal Jun 2004 A1
20040144918 Zare et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040155187 Axelsson Aug 2004 A1
20040159782 Park Aug 2004 A1
20040164239 Franzen Aug 2004 A1
20040183007 Belov et al. Sep 2004 A1
20050006577 Fuhrer Jan 2005 A1
20050040326 Enke Feb 2005 A1
20050103992 Yamaguchi et al. May 2005 A1
20050133712 Belov et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050151075 Brown et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050194528 Yamaguchi et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050242279 Verentchikov Nov 2005 A1
20050258364 Whitehouse et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060169882 Pau et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060214100 Verentchikov et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060289746 Raznikov et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070023645 Chernushevich Feb 2007 A1
20070029473 Verentchikov Feb 2007 A1
20070176090 Verentchikov Aug 2007 A1
20070187614 Schneider et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070194223 Sato et al. Aug 2007 A1
20080049402 Han et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080197276 Nishiguchi et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080203288 Makarov et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080290269 Saito et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090090861 Willis et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090114808 Bateman et al. May 2009 A1
20090206250 Wollnik Aug 2009 A1
20090250607 Staats et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090272890 Ogawa et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090294658 Vestal et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090314934 Brown Dec 2009 A1
20100001180 Bateman et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100044558 Sudakov Feb 2010 A1
20100072363 Giles et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100078551 Loboda Apr 2010 A1
20100140469 Nishiguchi Jun 2010 A1
20100193682 Golikov et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100207023 Loboda Aug 2010 A1
20100301202 Vestal Dec 2010 A1
20110133073 Sato et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110168880 Ristroph Jul 2011 A1
20110180702 Flory et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110180705 Yamaguchi Jul 2011 A1
20110186729 Verentchikov Aug 2011 A1
20120168618 Vestal Jul 2012 A1
20120261570 Shvartsburg et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120298853 Kurulugama Nov 2012 A1
20130048852 Verenchikov Feb 2013 A1
20130056627 Verenchikov Mar 2013 A1
20130068942 Verenchikov Mar 2013 A1
20130187044 Ding et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130240725 Makarov Sep 2013 A1
20130248702 Makarov Sep 2013 A1
20130256524 Brown et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130313424 Makarov et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130327935 Wiedenbeck Dec 2013 A1
20140054454 Hoyes et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140054456 Kinugawa et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140084156 Ristroph et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140117226 Giannakopulos May 2014 A1
20140138538 Hieftje et al. May 2014 A1
20140183354 Moon et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140191123 Wildgoose et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140239172 Makarov Aug 2014 A1
20140246575 Langridge et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140291503 Shchepunov et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140312221 Verenchikov Oct 2014 A1
20140361162 Murray et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150028197 Grinfeld et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150028198 Grinfeld Jan 2015 A1
20150034814 Brown et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150048245 Vestal et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150060656 Ugarov Mar 2015 A1
20150122986 Haase May 2015 A1
20150194296 Verenchikov et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150228467 Grinfeld et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150279650 Verenchikov Oct 2015 A1
20150294849 Makarov et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150318156 Loyd et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150364309 Welkie Dec 2015 A1
20150380233 Verenchikov Dec 2015 A1
20160005587 Verenchikov Jan 2016 A1
20160035558 Verenchikov et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160079052 Makarov Mar 2016 A1
20160225598 Ristroph Aug 2016 A1
20160225602 Ristroph et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160240363 Verenchikov Aug 2016 A1
20170016863 Verenchikov Jan 2017 A1
20170025265 Verenchikov et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170032952 Verenchikov Feb 2017 A1
20170098533 Stewart Apr 2017 A1
20170168031 Verenchikov Jun 2017 A1
20170229297 Green et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170338094 Verenchikov Nov 2017 A1
20180144921 Hoyes et al. May 2018 A1
20180315589 Oshiro Nov 2018 A1
20180366312 Hamish et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190180998 Stewart et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190206669 Verenchikov et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190237318 Brown Aug 2019 A1
20190360981 Verenchikov Nov 2019 A1
20200083034 Hoyes et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200126781 Kovtoun Apr 2020 A1
20200152440 Hoyes et al. May 2020 A1
20200168447 Verenchikov May 2020 A1
20200168448 Verenchikov et al. May 2020 A1
20200243322 Stewart et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200373142 Verenchikov Nov 2020 A1
20200373143 Verenchikov et al. Nov 2020 A1
20200373145 Verenchikov et al. Nov 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (133)
Number Date Country
2412657 May 2003 CA
101369510 Feb 2009 CN
102131563 Jul 2011 CN
201946564 Aug 2011 CN
4310106 Oct 1994 DE
10116536 Oct 2002 DE
102015121830 Jun 2017 DE
102019129108 Jun 2020 DE
112015001542 Jul 2020 DE
0237259 Sep 1987 EP
1137044 Sep 2001 EP
1566828 Aug 2005 EP
1901332 Mar 2008 EP
2068346 Jun 2009 EP
1665326 Apr 2010 EP
1789987 Sep 2010 EP
1522087 Mar 2011 EP
2599104 Jun 2013 EP
1743354 Aug 2019 EP
3662501 Jun 2020 EP
3662502 Jun 2020 EP
2080021 Jan 1982 GB
2217907 Nov 1989 GB
2300296 Oct 1996 GB
2390935 Jan 2004 GB
2396742 Jun 2004 GB
2403063 Dec 2004 GB
2455977 Jul 2009 GB
2476964 Jul 2011 GB
2478300 Sep 2011 GB
2484361 Apr 2012 GB
2484429 Apr 2012 GB
2485825 May 2012 GB
2489094 Sep 2012 GB
2490571 Nov 2012 GB
2495127 Apr 2013 GB
2495221 Apr 2013 GB
2496991 May 2013 GB
2496994 May 2013 GB
2500743 Oct 2013 GB
2501332 Oct 2013 GB
2506362 Apr 2014 GB
2528875 Feb 2016 GB
2555609 May 2018 GB
2556451 May 2018 GB
2556830 Jun 2018 GB
2562990 Dec 2018 GB
2575157 Jan 2020 GB
2575339 Jan 2020 GB
S6229049 Feb 1987 JP
2000036285 Feb 2000 JP
2000048764 Feb 2000 JP
2003031178 Jan 2003 JP
3571546 Sep 2004 JP
2005538346 Dec 2005 JP
2006049273 Feb 2006 JP
2007227042 Sep 2007 JP
2010062152 Mar 2010 JP
4649234 Mar 2011 JP
2011119279 Jun 2011 JP
4806214 Nov 2011 JP
2013539590 Oct 2013 JP
5555582 Jul 2014 JP
2015506567 Mar 2015 JP
2015185306 Oct 2015 JP
2564443 May 2017 RU
2015148627 May 2017 RU
2660655 Jul 2018 RU
198034 Jun 1967 SU
1681340 Sep 1991 SU
1725289 Apr 1992 SU
9103071 Mar 1991 WO
13045428 Apr 1992 WO
13063587 Apr 1992 WO
13093587 Apr 1992 WO
13110587 Apr 1992 WO
13124207 Apr 1992 WO
1998001218 Jan 1998 WO
1998008244 Feb 1998 WO
200077823 Dec 2000 WO
2005001878 Jan 2005 WO
2006049623 May 2006 WO
2006102430 Sep 2006 WO
2006103448 Oct 2006 WO
2007044696 Apr 2007 WO
2007104992 Sep 2007 WO
2007136373 Nov 2007 WO
2008046594 Apr 2008 WO
2008087389 Jul 2008 WO
2010008386 Jan 2010 WO
2010034630 Apr 2010 WO
2010138781 Dec 2010 WO
2011086430 Jul 2011 WO
2011107836 Sep 2011 WO
2011135477 Nov 2011 WO
2012010894 Jan 2012 WO
2012013354 Feb 2012 WO
2012023031 Feb 2012 WO
2012024468 Feb 2012 WO
2012024570 Feb 2012 WO
2012116765 Sep 2012 WO
2013067366 May 2013 WO
2013098612 Jul 2013 WO
2013110588 Aug 2013 WO
2014021960 Feb 2014 WO
2014074822 May 2014 WO
2014110697 Jul 2014 WO
2014142897 Sep 2014 WO
2014152902 Sep 2014 WO
2015142897 Sep 2015 WO
2015152968 Oct 2015 WO
2015153622 Oct 2015 WO
2015153630 Oct 2015 WO
2015153644 Oct 2015 WO
2015175988 Nov 2015 WO
2016064398 Apr 2016 WO
2016174462 Nov 2016 WO
2017042665 Mar 2017 WO
2018073589 Apr 2018 WO
2018109920 Jun 2018 WO
2018124861 Jul 2018 WO
2019030474 Feb 2019 WO
2019030475 Feb 2019 WO
2019030476 Feb 2019 WO
2019030477 Feb 2019 WO
2019058226 Mar 2019 WO
2019162687 Aug 2019 WO
2019202338 Oct 2019 WO
2019229599 Dec 2019 WO
2020002940 Jan 2020 WO
2020021255 Jan 2020 WO
2020121167 Jun 2020 WO
2020121168 Jun 2020 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (78)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/062174 dated Mar. 6, 2017, 8 pages.
IPRP PCT/US2016/062174 issued May 22, 2018, 6 pages.
Search Report for GB Application No. GB1520130.4 dated May 25, 2016.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/062203 dated Mar. 6, 2017, 8 pages.
Search Report for GB Application No. GB1520134.6 dated May 26, 2016.
IPRP PCT/US2016/062203, issued May 22, 2018, 6 pages.
Search Report Under Section 17(5) for Application No. GB1507363.8 dated Nov. 9, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Search Authority for Application No. PCT/GB2016/051238 dated Jul. 12, 2016, 16 pages.
IPRP for application PCT/GB2016/051238 dated Oct. 31, 2017, 13 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/063076 dated Mar. 30, 2017, 9 pages.
Search Report for GB Application No. 1520540.4 dated May 25, 2016.
IPRP for application PCT/US2016/063076, dated May 29, 2018, 7 pages.
IPRP PCT/GB17/51981 dated Jan. 8, 2019, 7 pages.
IPRP for International application No. PCT/GB2018/051206, issued on Nov. 5, 2019, 7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2018/051206, dated Jul. 12, 2018, 9 pages.
Author unknown, “Electrostatic lens ,” Wikipedia, Mar. 31, 2017 (Mar. 31, 2017), XP055518392, Retrieved from the Internet:URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.phptitle=Electrostatic_lens oldid=773161674 [retrieved on Oct. 24, 2018].
Hussein, O.A. et al., “Study the most favorable shapes of electrostatic quadrupole doublet lenses” , AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1815, Feb. 17, 2017 (Feb. 17, 2017), p. 110003.
Guan S., et al. “Stacked-ring electrostatic ion guide”, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, Elsevier Science Inc, 7(1):101-106 (1996).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for application No. PCT/GB2018/052104, dated Oct. 31, 2018, 14 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for application No. PCT/GB2018/052105, dated Oct. 15, 2018, 18 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for application PCT/GB2018/052100, dated Oct. 19, 2018, 19 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for application PCT/GB2018/052102, dated Oct. 25, 2018, 14 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for application No. PCT/GB2018/052099, dated Oct. 10, 2018, 16 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for application No. PCT/GB2018/052101, dated Oct. 19, 2018, 15 pages.
Combined Search and Examination Report under Sections 17 and 18(3) for application GB1807605.9 dated Oct. 29 2018, 5 pages.
Combined Search and Examination Report under Sections 17 and 18(3) for application GB18076265, dated Oct. 29, 2018, 7 pages.
Yavor, M.I., et al., “High performance gridless ion mirrors for multi-reflection time-of-flight and electrostatic trap mass analyzers”, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, vol. 426, Mar. 2018, pp. 1-11.
Search Report under Section 17(5) for application GB1707208.3, dated Oct. 12, 2017, 5 pages.
Communication Relating to the Results of the Partial International Search for International Application No. PCT/GB2019/01118, dated Jul. 19, 2019, 25 pages.
Doroshenko, V.M., and Cotter, R.J., “Ideal velocity focusing in a reflectron time-of-flight mass spectrometer”, American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 10(10):992-999 (1999).
Kozlov, B. et al. “Enhanced Mass Accuracy in Multi-Reflecting TOF MS” www.waters.com/posters, ASMS Conference (2017).
Kozlov, B. et al. “Multiplexed Operation of an Orthogonal Multi-Reflecting TOF Instrument to Increase Duty Cycle by Two Orders” ASMS Conference, San Diego, CA, Jun. 6, 2018.
Kozlov, B. et al. “High accuracy self-calibration method for high resolution mass spectra” ASMS Conference Abstract, 2019.
Kozlov, B. et al. “Fast Ion Mobility Spectrometry and High Resolution TOF MS” ASMS Conference Poster (2014).
Verenchicov, A. N. “Parallel MS-MS Analysis in a Time-Flight Tandem. Problem Statement, Method, and Instrucmental Schemes” Institute for Analytical Instrucmentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2004) Abstract.
Yavor, M. I. “Planar Multireflection Time-Of-Flight Mass Analyser with Unlimited Mass Range” Institute for Analytical Instrucmentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2004) Abstract.
Khasin, Y. I. et al.“Initial Experimenatl Studies of a Planar Multireflection Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometer” Institute for Analytical Instrucmentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2004) Abstract.
Verenchicov, A. N. et al. “Stability of Ion Motion in Periodic Electrostatic Fields” Institute for Analytical Instrumentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2004) Abstract.
Verenchicov, A. N. “The Concept of Multireflecting Mass Spectrometer for Continuous Ion Sources” Institute for Analytical Instrucmentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006) Abstract.
Verenchicov, A. N., et al. “Accurate Mass Measurements for Inerpreting Spectra of atmospheric Pressure Ionization” Institute for Analytical Instrucmentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006) Abstract.
Kozlov, B. N. et al., “Experimental Studies of Space Charge Effects in Multireflecting Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometes” Institute for Analytical Instrucmentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006) Abstract.
Kozlov, B. N. et al., “Multireflecting Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometer With an Ion Trap Source” Institute for Analytical Instrucmentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006) Abstract.
Hasin, Y. I., et al., “Planar Time-Of-Flight Multireflecting Mass Spectrometer with an Orthogonal Ion Injection Out of Continuous Ion Sources” Institute for Analytical Instrucmentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006) Abstract.
Lutvinsky Y. I. et al., “Estimation of Capacity of High Resolution Mass Spectra for Analysis of Complex Mixtures” Institute for Analytical Instrucmentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006) Abstract.
Verenchicov, A. N. et al. “Multiplexing in Multi-Reflecting TOF MS” Journal of Applied Solution Chemistry and Modeling, 6:1-22 (2017).
Supplementary Partial EP Search Report for EP Application No. 16869126.9, dated Jun. 13, 2019.
Supplementary Partial EP Search Report for EP Application No. 16866997.6, dated Jun. 7, 2019.
Reflectron—Wikipedia, Oct. 9, 2015, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.phptitle=Reflectron oldid=684843442 [retrieved on May 29, 2019].
Scherer, S., et al., “A novel principle for an ion mirror design in time-of-flight mass spectrometry”, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 251, No. 1, Mar. 15, 2006.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/EP2017/070508 dated Oct. 16, 2017, 17 pages.
Search Report for United Kingdom Application No. GB1613988.3 dated Jan. 5, 2017, 4 pages.
Sakurai et al., “A New Multi-Passage Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer at JAIST”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A, Elsevier, 427(1-2): 182-186, May 11, 1999. Abstract.
Toyoda et al., “Multi-Turn-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectometers with Electrostatic Sectors”, Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 38: 1125-1142, Jan. 1, 2003.
Wouters et al., “Optical Design of the TOFI (Time-of-Flight Isochronous) Spectrometer for Mass Measurements of Exotic Nuclei”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A, 240(1): 77-90, Oct. 1, 1985.
Stresau, D., et al. “Ion Counting Beyond 10ghz Using a New Detector and Conventional Electronics”, European Winter Conference on Plasma Spectrochemistry, Feb. 4-8, 2001, Lillehammer, Norway, Retrieved from the Internet:URL: https://www.etp-ms.com/file-repository/21 [retrieved on Jul. 31, 2019].
Kaufmann, R., et. al., “Sequencing of peptides in a time-of-flight mass spectrometer: evaluation of postsource decay following matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation (MALDI)”, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Ion Processes, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co. Amsterdam, NL, 31:355-385, Feb. 24, 1994.
Barry Shaulis et al: “Signal linearity of an extended range pulse counting detector: Applications to accurate and precise U-Pb dating of zircon by laser ablation quadrupole ICP-MS”, G3: Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 11(11):1-12, Nov. 20, 2010.
Search Report for United Kingdom Application No. GB1708430.2 dated Nov. 28, 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2018/051320 dated Aug. 1, 2018.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2019/051839 dated Sep. 18, 2019.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2019/051234 dated Jul. 29, 2019.
Combined Search and Examination Report for United Kingdom Application No. GB1901411.7 dated Jul. 31, 2019.
Examination Report for United Kingdom Application No. GB1618980.5 dated Jul. 25, 2019.
Extended European Search Report for EP Patent Application No. 16866997.6, dated Oct. 16, 2019.
Combined Search and Examination Report for GB1906258.7, dated Oct. 25, 2019.
Combined Search and Examination Report for GB1906253.8, dated Oct. 30, 2019.
Search Report under Section 17(5) for GB1916445.8, dated Jun. 15, 2020.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International application No. PCT/GB2020/050209, dated Apr. 28, 2020, 12 pages.
Author unknown, “Einzel Lens”, Wikipedia [online] Nov. 2020 [retrieved on Nov. 3, 2020]. Retrieved from Internet URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einzel_lens, 2 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International application No. PCT/GB2019/051235, dated Sep. 25, 2019, 22 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International application No. PCT/GB2019/051416, dated Oct. 10, 2019, 22 pages.
Search and Examination Report under Sections 17 and 18(3) for Application No. GB1906258.7, dated Dec. 11, 2020, 7 pages.
Carey, D.C., “Why a second-order magnetic optical achromat works”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 189(203):365-367 (1981). Abstract.
Sakurai, T. et al., “Ion optics for time-of-flight mass spectrometers with multiple symmetry”, Int J Mass Spectrom Ion Proc 63(2-3):273-287 (1985). Abstract.
Wollnik, H., and Casares, A, “An energy-isochronous multi-pass time-of-flight mass spectrometer consisting of two coaxial electrostatic mirrors”, Int J Mass Spectrom 227:217-222 (2003). Abstract.
O'Halloran, G.J., et al., “Determination of Chemical Species Prevalent in a Plasma Jet”, Bendix Corp Report ASD-TDR-62-644, U.S. Air Force (1964). Abstract.
Examination Report under Section 18(3) for Application No. GB1906258.7, dated May 5, 2021, 4 pages.
Collision Frequency, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collision_frequency accessed Aug. 17, 2021.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200373143 A1 Nov 2020 US