This disclosure relates to a laminate sealing member for the mouth of a container, and more particularly, to a laminate sealing member including a dimensionally unstable layer combined with one or more stabilizing layers.
One-piece induction seals typically include a membrane or foil layer combined with a heat seal layer for adhering the seal to an upper rim of a bottle or container. To support the foil and heat seal, such one-piece induction seals often include a top structural support or backing layer. The structural support is often a pulp, paper, paperboard, cardboard, chipboard, or other cellulose-type materials. This top backing layer provides a structural support for the barrier and heat seal layers of the induction seal.
In use, the one-piece induction seals are generally die-cut from sheets into a disk shape and, then, inserted into a container or bottle cap at a closure manufacture. The cap generally includes internal threading or other internal retention projections that hold the seal against the upper surface of the cap by friction or interference. The cap and seal combination may then be provided to an end user where the seal is induction sealed to the upper rim of a bottle or container when the cap is placed thereon after the container is filled with a product.
During periods of higher humidity, such as in the spring and summer months, the paper or pulp-based materials commonly used for the support layer tend to be susceptible to changes in the environment. When exposed to higher humidity levels, the paper or pulp-based materials tend to absorb moisture, swell, and then may deform or curl into a potato-chip like shape. If this backing curl is significant and occurs while the seal is in the cap or closure before being combined with the bottle or container, the threading or internal retention projections of the cap may not retain the seal within the cap. Due to the curling, the seal may actually fall out of the cap. In other cases, the curled seal may shift within the cap so that it can not be effectively induction sealed to the bottle during the bottle or container closing operations.
A one-piece, peelable sealing member or induction seal for a container is described herein. The sealing member is generally constructed from a flexible sheet or laminate and includes, in an upper portion thereof, at least one dimensionally unstable support layer that is susceptible to dimensional changes due to variations in environmental conditions. In one aspect, the sealing member includes relatively thin dimensionally stable layers bonded to upper and lower surfaces of the dimensionally unstable layer to provide enhanced dimensional stability to the seal in the presence of higher humidity. In some approaches, the combination of dimensionally stable layers above and below the unstable layers may, in some instances, provide balanced internal forces within the seal laminate structure to help retain the unstable layer in a flat configuration when exposed to higher humidity. In other approaches, the dimensionally stable layers may also exhibit a low water vapor transmission rate and/or a low oxygen transmission rate to hinder and, in some cases, prevent moisture and humidity to reach the dimensionally unstable stable layer that is sandwiched between the two stable layers above and below it. In yet other approaches, the seals described herein exhibit less than about 9.5 mm of curl, which is discussed more below, in the presence of higher humidity, which is sufficient so that the seal may be retained in a common closure or cap prior to capping operations.
As used herein, higher humidity generally refers to greater than about 60 percent relative humidity, and in some cases, about 60 percent to about 85 percent relative humidity at temperatures ranging from about 35° C. to about 50° C. As also used herein, dimensionally stable generally refers to materials that do not exhibit significant deformation or are otherwise not affected in size, shape, or thickness by variations in temperature, humidity, moisture, and the like. By one approach, as mentioned above, dimensionally stable is about 9.5 mm or less of curl. Dimensionally unstable generally refers to materials that tend to be negatively affected by environmental conditions, such as humidity and moisture, and may exhibit one or more of swelling, deformation, curling, expansion, shrinkage, and the like upon exposure to variations in environmental conditions, such as variations in humidity and moisture.
Turning to more of the specifics,
Above the first dimensionally stable layer 14, the seal 10 include a dimensionally unstable structural or base layer 16. In one approach, this dimensionally unstable structural layer may be a pulp, paper, cardboard, chipboard, paperboard, or other cellulose-type layer. Base layer 16 may also include fibers or filaments. This base layer is about 5 to about 10 mils thick in one approach, and in other approaches, about 8 mils thick. By one approach, the base layer 16 is a blend of softwood and hardwood paper fibers having a moisture content of about 3 to about 6 percent that tends to be dimensionally stable at about 50 to about 55 percent relative humidity. When exposed to higher humidity as defined herein, these materials of layer 14 tend to absorb moisture. In prior seals, the paper or cardboard layer tended to exhibit undesirably high levels of deformation of about 10 mm to about 38 mm of curl in the presence of higher humidity.
To enhance the stability of seal laminates using the dimensionally unstable structural layer 16, the seal 10 also includes a second dimensionally stable layer 18 above the dimensionally unstable structural layer 16. In one approach, the second dimensionally stable layer 18 is a relatively thin layer of PET or other polymer layer having a relatively high resistance to moisture, water, and/or oxygen transmission. In another approach, the second dimensionally stable layer may be a coating of one or more polymers applied to the upper surface of the unstable layer 16 in an effective coating weight. The second dimensionally stable layer 18 may be about 0.5 to about 1.0 mils thick or a coating applied at about 6 to about 30 pounds per about 3000 square feet. By another approach, the layer 18 may be a thin and effective layer (coated or film layer) of PET (Polyethylene terephthalate), PEN (Polyethylene naphthalate), polyethylene, polypropylene, ethylene-acrylic acid copolymers, ethylene methacrylate copolymers, blends thereof, or the like materials so long as the materials are constructed in a manner and in a thickness to provide dimensional stability to the structural layer 16 as described herein when combined with the lower dimensionally stable layer 14.
In one approach, the seal 10 may also define a ratio of the thicknesses of the first and second dimensionally stable layers 14 and 18 relative to a thickness of the dimensionally unstable support layer 16 effective so that deformation of the dimensionally unstable support layer is less than about 9.5 mm of curl when exposed to about 60 to about 85 percent relative humidity. Effective ratios may be, in some cases, expressed as a thickness ratio of layer 14 to layer 16 to layer 18 of about 1:6:0.6 (thickest foil and layer 18 with thinnest backing) to about 1:20:1 (thinnest foil and layer 18 with thickest backing). Effective ratios may also be, in other approaches, expressed as a thickness of the sum of layer 14 and 18 relative to the thickness of layer 16 and range from about 1:2 to about 1:10. So constructed, the seal 10 exhibits about 0 to about 9.5 mm of curl when exposed to the higher humidity levels as defined herein, and in some cases, about 4 to about 9.5 mm of curl, and in other cases, no deformation or curling at all in the presence of higher humidity.
While not wishing to be limited by theory, it is believed that the combination of the dimensionally stable layers 14 and 18 above and below the dimensionally unstable layer 16 may have a thickness and/or composition effective to balance any vertical and/or transverse forces in the seal due to moisture absorption and swelling of the backing layer 16. This may be, in some cases, due to the layers 14 and 18 forming a sufficiently stable interface at the upper and lower perimeter edges of the backing layer 16 such that the swelling forces are balanced within the seal. The stable layers 14 and 18 also, in some cases, have water vapor transmission rates sufficient low (such as, in some cases, about 1.5 g/100 in2/24 hour at 100° F. at 90% or below and, in other cases, about 1 to about 1.5) so that the stable layers 14 and 18 hinder and, in some cases, prevent moisture and humidity from reaching the unstable layer 16. The advantage of the seal constructions herein is that they provide a dimensionally stable seal while minimizing the overall seal thickness at the same time. In some approaches, the overall thickness of seal 10 is about 12 to 15 mils or less. Any thicker, the seal is cost prohibitive and undesired from a structural standpoint when used in a bottle or container closure/cap. Thus, the enhanced dimensional stability is achieved with a minimum about of materials.
In another approach, the unstable structural base layer 16 is stabilized at an interface of its upper and lower surfaces by being bonded to the upper and lower structurally stable support layers 14 and 18. Thus, the upper and lower interface and surfaces of the base layer 16, upon exposure to higher humidity (as defined herein) are stabilized and hindered from expanding in a horizontal or transverse direction.
If desired, the seal 10 may also include a pull-tab or pull-tab portion. Many types of pull-tab portions may be used. Examples of pull-tabs suitable for the seal 10 include those as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,433,992; U.S. Pat. No. 5,514,442; U.S. Pat. No. 5,004,111; U.S. Pat. No. 6,866,926; U.S. Pat. No. 6,902,075; U.S. Pat. No. 7,217,454; US 2006/0151415; and US 2008/0233339. Each of these patents and publications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. In general, the pull-tab may be defined wholly within a perimeter of the sealing member or laminate.
Advantages and embodiments of the seal and the dimensional stability described herein are further illustrated by the following example; however, the particular conditions, processing schemes, materials, and amounts thereof recited in this example, as well as other conditions and details, should not be construed to unduly limit the seals as described herein. All percentages are by weight unless otherwise indicated.
A dimensionally stable seal having a 0.5 mil PET layer bonded to a 8 mil backing with a 1 mil foil and 1.5 mil heat seal layer under the backing was evaluated for curl (identified as TR seal below). A comparative or base seal having the same 8 mil backing, 1 mil foil, and 1.5 mil heat seal, but no upper PET layer was also evaluated for curl (identified as BR seal below).
Curl was determined by cutting an 89 mm disk of the material and placing it on a flat surface in a humidity chamber. Curl was determined by measuring the distance an outer perimeter of the disk raised above the flat surface in the chamber. The degree of curl is shown in Tables 1 and 2 below. Table 1 shows the results of 6 different trials of the same dimensionally stable inner seal (labeled as TR 1-6 in the Table and Figure). Table 2 shows the results of 6 different comparative seals that do not demonstrate dimensional stability in the presence of higher humidity (Labeled as BR 1-6 in the Table and Figure).
It will be understood that various changes in the details, materials, and arrangements of the seal laminate, which have been herein described and illustrated in order to explain the nature of the seals described herein, may be made by those skilled in the art within the principle and scope of the embodied description.
This application is a U.S. national phase application filed under 35 U.S.C. §371 of International Application PCT/US2012/030962, filed Mar. 28, 2012, designating the United States, which claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/468,257, filed Mar. 28, 2011, both of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2012/030962 | 3/28/2012 | WO | 00 | 2/10/2014 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/135353 | 10/4/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3235165 | Jackson | Feb 1966 | A |
3292828 | Stuart | Dec 1966 | A |
3302818 | Balocca et al. | Feb 1967 | A |
3990603 | Brochman | Nov 1976 | A |
4206165 | Dukess | Jun 1980 | A |
4254173 | Peer, Jr. | Mar 1981 | A |
4735335 | Torterotot | Apr 1988 | A |
4741791 | Howard et al. | May 1988 | A |
4770325 | Gordon et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4837061 | Smits et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4960216 | Giles et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4961986 | Galda | Oct 1990 | A |
5004111 | McCarthy | Apr 1991 | A |
5015318 | Smits et al. | May 1991 | A |
5055150 | Rosenfeld et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5057365 | Finkelstein et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5071710 | Smits et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5098495 | Smits et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
RE33893 | Elias et al. | Apr 1992 | E |
5125529 | Torterotot | Jun 1992 | A |
5149386 | Smits et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5178967 | Rosenfeld et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5197618 | Goth | Mar 1993 | A |
5265745 | Pereyra et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5433992 | Galda et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5513781 | Ullrich et al. | May 1996 | A |
5514442 | Galda et al. | May 1996 | A |
5598940 | Finkelstein et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5601200 | Finkelstein et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5615789 | Finkelstein et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5669521 | Wiening et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5702015 | Giles et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5860544 | Brucker | Jan 1999 | A |
5871112 | Giles | Feb 1999 | A |
5915577 | Levine | Jun 1999 | A |
5975304 | Cain et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6082566 | Yousif et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6131754 | Smelko | Oct 2000 | A |
6139931 | Finkelstein et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6158632 | Ekkert | Dec 2000 | A |
6194042 | Finkelstein et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6309504 | Langan | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312776 | Finkelstein et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6378715 | Finkelstein et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6458302 | Shifflet | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468708 | Wang et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6602309 | Vizulis et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6627273 | Wolf et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6699566 | Zeiter et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6705467 | Kancsar et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6722272 | Jud | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6767425 | Meier | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6790508 | Razeti | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6866926 | Smelko et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6902075 | O'Brien et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6916516 | Gerber et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6955736 | Rosenberger et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6974045 | Trombach et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7128210 | Razeti et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7182475 | Kramer et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7217454 | Smelko et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
RE39790 | Fuchs et al. | Aug 2007 | E |
7316760 | Nageli | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7448153 | Maliner et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7531228 | Perre et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7648764 | Yousif | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7713605 | Yousif et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7740730 | Schedl et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7740927 | Yousif et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7819266 | Ross et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7838109 | Declerck | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7850033 | Thorstensen-Woll | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8057896 | Smelko et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8329288 | Allegaert et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8348082 | Cain | Jan 2013 | B2 |
20020068140 | Finkelstein et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030168423 | Williams | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030196418 | O'Brien et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040109963 | Zaggia et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050048307 | Schubert et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060000545 | Nageli et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060003120 | Nageli et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060003122 | Nageli et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060151415 | Smelko et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060278665 | Bennett | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070003725 | Yousif | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070087212 | Iyengar et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070267304 | Portier | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070298273 | Thies et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080026171 | Gullick et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080073308 | Yousif | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080103262 | Haschke | May 2008 | A1 |
20080156443 | Schaefer et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080169286 | McLean et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080231922 | Thorstensen-Woll | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080233339 | Thorstensen-Woll | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080233424 | Thorstensen-Woll et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090004505 | Carespodi | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090057326 | Opitz | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090078671 | Triquet et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090208729 | Allegaert et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090304964 | Sachs et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100009162 | Rothweiler | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030180 | Declerck | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100047552 | McLean et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100059942 | Rothweiler | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100116410 | Yousif | May 2010 | A1 |
20100155288 | Harper et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100170820 | Leplatois et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100193463 | O'Brien et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100201082 | Hart | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100213193 | Helmlinger et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100221483 | Gonzalez Carro et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100290663 | Trassl et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100314278 | Fonteyne et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110000917 | Wolters et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110005961 | Leplatois et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110089177 | Thorstensen-Woll | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110091715 | Rakutt et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110100949 | Grayer et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110100989 | Cain | May 2011 | A1 |
20110138742 | McLean | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110147353 | Kornfeld et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120000910 | Ekkert | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120043330 | McLean et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120103988 | Wiening | May 2012 | A1 |
20120241449 | Frischmann et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
501 393 | Aug 2006 | AT |
11 738 | Apr 2011 | AT |
8200231 | Sep 2003 | BR |
0300992 | Nov 2004 | BR |
2 015 992 | Jan 1991 | CA |
102 04 281 | Aug 2003 | DE |
10 2006 030 118 | May 2007 | DE |
10 2007 022 935 | Apr 2009 | DE |
20 2009 000 245 | Apr 2009 | DE |
0 668 221 | Aug 1995 | EP |
0 826 598 | Mar 1998 | EP |
0 826 599 | Mar 1998 | EP |
0 717 710 | Apr 1999 | EP |
0 915 026 | May 1999 | EP |
0 706 473 | Aug 1999 | EP |
0 803 445 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1 462 381 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1 577 226 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1 814 744 | Aug 2007 | EP |
1 834 893 | Sep 2007 | EP |
1 839 898 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1 839 899 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1 857 275 | Nov 2007 | EP |
1 873 078 | Jan 2008 | EP |
1 445 209 | May 2008 | EP |
1 918 094 | May 2008 | EP |
1 968 020 | Sep 2008 | EP |
1 992 476 | Nov 2008 | EP |
2 230 190 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2 292 524 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2 916 157 | Nov 2008 | FR |
2 943 322 | Sep 2010 | FR |
10-0711073 | Apr 2007 | KR |
10-0840926 | Jun 2008 | KR |
10-0886955 | Mar 2009 | KR |
PA05002905 | Feb 2006 | MX |
2010001867 | Apr 2010 | MX |
0066450 | Nov 2000 | WO |
2006018556 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006021291 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2008027029 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008027036 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008039350 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008125784 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008125785 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008148176 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009092066 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2010115811 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2011039067 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2012079971 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012113530 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2012152622 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2012172029 | Dec 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2012/030962 dated Jul. 20, 2012, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140158691 A1 | Jun 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61468257 | Mar 2011 | US |