Laminate structure to stabilize a dimensionally unstable layer

Abstract
A seal laminate for closing a mouth of a container is provided. The seal laminate includes a heat seal layer, a structural base support layer and upper and lower dimensional stable layers. The heat seal layer bonds the laminate to a rim surrounding the container's mouth. The structural base support layer may be comprised of a pulp, paper, cardboard, chipboard, paperboard, or cellulose based material having a moisture content of about 3 to about 6 percent and is positioned above the heat seal layer. The upper and lower dimensionally stable layers are disposed above and below the structural base support layer and are sized to balance the vertical forces on the structural base support layer upon exposure to about 60 percent or greater relative humidity. The upper and lower dimensionally stable layers have a water vapor transmission rate of about 1.5 g/100 in2/24 hours or below.
Description
FIELD

This disclosure relates to a laminate sealing member for the mouth of a container, and more particularly, to a laminate sealing member including a dimensionally unstable layer combined with one or more stabilizing layers.


BACKGROUND

One-piece induction seals typically include a membrane or foil layer combined with a heat seal layer for adhering the seal to an upper rim of a bottle or container. To support the foil and heat seal, such one-piece induction seals often include a top structural support or backing layer. The structural support is often a pulp, paper, paperboard, cardboard, chipboard, or other cellulose-type materials. This top backing layer provides a structural support for the barrier and heat seal layers of the induction seal.


In use, the one-piece induction seals are generally die-cut from sheets into a disk shape and, then, inserted into a container or bottle cap at a closure manufacture. The cap generally includes internal threading or other internal retention projections that hold the seal against the upper surface of the cap by friction or interference. The cap and seal combination may then be provided to an end user where the seal is induction sealed to the upper rim of a bottle or container when the cap is placed thereon after the container is filled with a product.


During periods of higher humidity, such as in the spring and summer months, the paper or pulp-based materials commonly used for the support layer tend to be susceptible to changes in the environment. When exposed to higher humidity levels, the paper or pulp-based materials tend to absorb moisture, swell, and then may deform or curl into a potato-chip like shape. If this backing curl is significant and occurs while the seal is in the cap or closure before being combined with the bottle or container, the threading or internal retention projections of the cap may not retain the seal within the cap. Due to the curling, the seal may actually fall out of the cap. In other cases, the curled seal may shift within the cap so that it can not be effectively induction sealed to the bottle during the bottle or container closing operations.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of an exemplary sealing member; and



FIG. 2 is a graph showing the dimensional stability of the laminates herein.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A one-piece, peelable sealing member or induction seal for a container is described herein. The sealing member is generally constructed from a flexible sheet or laminate and includes, in an upper portion thereof, at least one dimensionally unstable support layer that is susceptible to dimensional changes due to variations in environmental conditions. In one aspect, the sealing member includes relatively thin dimensionally stable layers bonded to upper and lower surfaces of the dimensionally unstable layer to provide enhanced dimensional stability to the seal in the presence of higher humidity. In some approaches, the combination of dimensionally stable layers above and below the unstable layers may, in some instances, provide balanced internal forces within the seal laminate structure to help retain the unstable layer in a flat configuration when exposed to higher humidity. In other approaches, the dimensionally stable layers may also exhibit a low water vapor transmission rate and/or a low oxygen transmission rate to hinder and, in some cases, prevent moisture and humidity to reach the dimensionally unstable stable layer that is sandwiched between the two stable layers above and below it. In yet other approaches, the seals described herein exhibit less than about 9.5 mm of curl, which is discussed more below, in the presence of higher humidity, which is sufficient so that the seal may be retained in a common closure or cap prior to capping operations.


As used herein, higher humidity generally refers to greater than about 60 percent relative humidity, and in some cases, about 60 percent to about 85 percent relative humidity at temperatures ranging from about 35° C. to about 50° C. As also used herein, dimensionally stable generally refers to materials that do not exhibit significant deformation or are otherwise not affected in size, shape, or thickness by variations in temperature, humidity, moisture, and the like. By one approach, as mentioned above, dimensionally stable is about 9.5 mm or less of curl. Dimensionally unstable generally refers to materials that tend to be negatively affected by environmental conditions, such as humidity and moisture, and may exhibit one or more of swelling, deformation, curling, expansion, shrinkage, and the like upon exposure to variations in environmental conditions, such as variations in humidity and moisture.


Turning to more of the specifics, FIG. 1 illustrates one example of a seal 10 showing enhanced levels of dimensional stability in the presence of variations in environmental conditions, such as exposure to higher relative humidity. Seal 10 includes a lower bonding layer 12 for bonding to the rim of a container. The lower bonding layer 12 may include a hot melt adhesive or heat seal layer for bonding or securing the liner to the container rim by a heat seal or induction sealing apparatus. Suitable heat-activated adhesives or sealants include, but are not limited to, ethylene vinyl acetate, ethylene-acrylic acid copolymers, surlyn and other suitable materials. In one approach, the lower bonding layer may be 0.5 to about 2 mils thick, and in other approaches, about 1.5 mils thick. On top of the lower bonding layer 12, the seal includes a first dimensionally stable layer 14. In this case, the first dimensionally stable layer 14 may be a metal layer or a foil layer. In one approach, the foil layer may be relatively thin, such as about 0.5 mil to about 1.5 mils thick, and in other approaches, about 1 mil thick.


Above the first dimensionally stable layer 14, the seal 10 include a dimensionally unstable structural or base layer 16. In one approach, this dimensionally unstable structural layer may be a pulp, paper, cardboard, chipboard, paperboard, or other cellulose-type layer. Base layer 16 may also include fibers or filaments. This base layer is about 5 to about 10 mils thick in one approach, and in other approaches, about 8 mils thick. By one approach, the base layer 16 is a blend of softwood and hardwood paper fibers having a moisture content of about 3 to about 6 percent that tends to be dimensionally stable at about 50 to about 55 percent relative humidity. When exposed to higher humidity as defined herein, these materials of layer 14 tend to absorb moisture. In prior seals, the paper or cardboard layer tended to exhibit undesirably high levels of deformation of about 10 mm to about 38 mm of curl in the presence of higher humidity.


To enhance the stability of seal laminates using the dimensionally unstable structural layer 16, the seal 10 also includes a second dimensionally stable layer 18 above the dimensionally unstable structural layer 16. In one approach, the second dimensionally stable layer 18 is a relatively thin layer of PET or other polymer layer having a relatively high resistance to moisture, water, and/or oxygen transmission. In another approach, the second dimensionally stable layer may be a coating of one or more polymers applied to the upper surface of the unstable layer 16 in an effective coating weight. The second dimensionally stable layer 18 may be about 0.5 to about 1.0 mils thick or a coating applied at about 6 to about 30 pounds per about 3000 square feet. By another approach, the layer 18 may be a thin and effective layer (coated or film layer) of PET (Polyethylene terephthalate), PEN (Polyethylene naphthalate), polyethylene, polypropylene, ethylene-acrylic acid copolymers, ethylene methacrylate copolymers, blends thereof, or the like materials so long as the materials are constructed in a manner and in a thickness to provide dimensional stability to the structural layer 16 as described herein when combined with the lower dimensionally stable layer 14.


In one approach, the seal 10 may also define a ratio of the thicknesses of the first and second dimensionally stable layers 14 and 18 relative to a thickness of the dimensionally unstable support layer 16 effective so that deformation of the dimensionally unstable support layer is less than about 9.5 mm of curl when exposed to about 60 to about 85 percent relative humidity. Effective ratios may be, in some cases, expressed as a thickness ratio of layer 14 to layer 16 to layer 18 of about 1:6:0.6 (thickest foil and layer 18 with thinnest backing) to about 1:20:1 (thinnest foil and layer 18 with thickest backing). Effective ratios may also be, in other approaches, expressed as a thickness of the sum of layer 14 and 18 relative to the thickness of layer 16 and range from about 1:2 to about 1:10. So constructed, the seal 10 exhibits about 0 to about 9.5 mm of curl when exposed to the higher humidity levels as defined herein, and in some cases, about 4 to about 9.5 mm of curl, and in other cases, no deformation or curling at all in the presence of higher humidity.


While not wishing to be limited by theory, it is believed that the combination of the dimensionally stable layers 14 and 18 above and below the dimensionally unstable layer 16 may have a thickness and/or composition effective to balance any vertical and/or transverse forces in the seal due to moisture absorption and swelling of the backing layer 16. This may be, in some cases, due to the layers 14 and 18 forming a sufficiently stable interface at the upper and lower perimeter edges of the backing layer 16 such that the swelling forces are balanced within the seal. The stable layers 14 and 18 also, in some cases, have water vapor transmission rates sufficient low (such as, in some cases, about 1.5 g/100 in2/24 hour at 100° F. at 90% or below and, in other cases, about 1 to about 1.5) so that the stable layers 14 and 18 hinder and, in some cases, prevent moisture and humidity from reaching the unstable layer 16. The advantage of the seal constructions herein is that they provide a dimensionally stable seal while minimizing the overall seal thickness at the same time. In some approaches, the overall thickness of seal 10 is about 12 to 15 mils or less. Any thicker, the seal is cost prohibitive and undesired from a structural standpoint when used in a bottle or container closure/cap. Thus, the enhanced dimensional stability is achieved with a minimum about of materials.


In another approach, the unstable structural base layer 16 is stabilized at an interface of its upper and lower surfaces by being bonded to the upper and lower structurally stable support layers 14 and 18. Thus, the upper and lower interface and surfaces of the base layer 16, upon exposure to higher humidity (as defined herein) are stabilized and hindered from expanding in a horizontal or transverse direction.


If desired, the seal 10 may also include a pull-tab or pull-tab portion. Many types of pull-tab portions may be used. Examples of pull-tabs suitable for the seal 10 include those as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,433,992; U.S. Pat. No. 5,514,442; U.S. Pat. No. 5,004,111; U.S. Pat. No. 6,866,926; U.S. Pat. No. 6,902,075; U.S. Pat. No. 7,217,454; US 2006/0151415; and US 2008/0233339. Each of these patents and publications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. In general, the pull-tab may be defined wholly within a perimeter of the sealing member or laminate.


Advantages and embodiments of the seal and the dimensional stability described herein are further illustrated by the following example; however, the particular conditions, processing schemes, materials, and amounts thereof recited in this example, as well as other conditions and details, should not be construed to unduly limit the seals as described herein. All percentages are by weight unless otherwise indicated.


EXAMPLES
Example 1

A dimensionally stable seal having a 0.5 mil PET layer bonded to a 8 mil backing with a 1 mil foil and 1.5 mil heat seal layer under the backing was evaluated for curl (identified as TR seal below). A comparative or base seal having the same 8 mil backing, 1 mil foil, and 1.5 mil heat seal, but no upper PET layer was also evaluated for curl (identified as BR seal below).


Curl was determined by cutting an 89 mm disk of the material and placing it on a flat surface in a humidity chamber. Curl was determined by measuring the distance an outer perimeter of the disk raised above the flat surface in the chamber. The degree of curl is shown in Tables 1 and 2 below. Table 1 shows the results of 6 different trials of the same dimensionally stable inner seal (labeled as TR 1-6 in the Table and Figure). Table 2 shows the results of 6 different comparative seals that do not demonstrate dimensional stability in the presence of higher humidity (Labeled as BR 1-6 in the Table and Figure). FIG. 2 shows the results of this study graphically.









TABLE 1







Dimensionally stable inner seals









Level of Curl, Inches














Temp
Humidity
TR1
TR2
TR3
TR4
TR5
TR6





35° C.
60%
0
0
0
0
0
0


38° C.
70%
0
0
0
0
0
0


38° C.
80%
0
4/16
3/16
5/16
3/16
0


48° C.
85%
0
5/16
0
6/16
4/16
0
















TABLE 2







Comparison dimensionally unstable inner seals









Level of Curl, Inches














Temp
Humidity
BR1
BR2
BR3
BR4
BR5
BR6





35° C.
60%
0
0
0
0
0
0


38° C.
70%
0
6/16
0
10/16
 5/16
 6/16


38° C.
80%
 5/16
9/16
6/16
12/16
12/16
10/16


48° C.
85%
14/16
14/16 
15/16
18/16
1
15/16









It will be understood that various changes in the details, materials, and arrangements of the seal laminate, which have been herein described and illustrated in order to explain the nature of the seals described herein, may be made by those skilled in the art within the principle and scope of the embodied description.

Claims
  • 1. A seal laminate having dimensional stability in high humidity and for closing a mouth of a container, the dimensionally stable seal laminate comprising: a heat seal layer having an upper surface thereof, the heat seal layer for bonding the seal laminate to a rim surrounding the container's mouth;a structural support layer having upper and lower surfaces thereof and positioned above and extending across the entire upper surface of the heat seal layer, the structural support layer including materials selected from the group consisting of pulp, paper, cardboard, chipboard, paperboard, cellulose based material, and mixtures thereof and including one of softwood fibers, hardwood fibers, and blends thereof with a moisture content of about 3 to about 6 percent at about 50 to about 55 percent relative humidity;upper and lower dimensionally stable layers directly bonded to the structural support layer on the upper and lower surfaces thereof, the upper and lower dimensionally stable layers each having a water vapor transmission rate of no more than about 1.5 g/100 in2/24 hours, the upper dimensionally stable layer being a polymer layer comprising at least one polymer in the form of a coating that is applied at about 6 to about 30 pounds per 3000 square feet; anda ratio of a total thickness of the sum of the upper and lower dimensionally stable layers to a thickness of the structural support layer from about 1:2 to about 1:10 such that the upper and lower dimensionally stable layers directed bonded to the structural support layer balance the vertical forces internal to the structural support layer upon exposure to about 60 percent or greater relative humidity so that the seal laminate has a curl of less than about 9.5 mm upon exposure to humidity of about 60 percent or greater.
  • 2. The seal laminate of claim 1, wherein the total thickness of the seal laminate is no greater than 15 mils thick and wherein the heat seal layer has a thickness of about 0.5 to about 2 mils, the structural support layer has a thickness of about 5 to about 10 mils, the upper dimensionally stable layer has a thickness of about 0.5 to about 1 mil, and the lower dimensionally stable layer has a thickness of about 0.5 to about 1.5 mils.
  • 3. The seal laminate of claim 1, wherein the upper dimensionally stable layer is selected from the group consisting of polyethylene terephthalate, polyethylene naphthalate, polyethylene, polypropylene, ethylene-acrylic acid copolymers, ethylene methacrylate copolymers and blends thereof.
  • 4. The seal laminate of claim 1, wherein the water vapor transmission rate is about 1 to about 1.5 g/100 in2/24 hours.
  • 5. The seal laminate of claim 1, wherein the lower dimensionally stable layer is selected from the group consisting of a metal layer and a foil layer.
  • 6. The seal laminate of claim 1, wherein the laminate has a ratio of a thickness of the lower dimensionally stable layer to a thickness of the structural support layer to a thickness of the upper dimensionally stable layer of from about 1:6:0.6 to about 1:20:1.
  • 7. The seal laminate of claim 2, further comprising a pull tab, the pull tab being positioned entirely with a perimeter of the seal laminate.
  • 8. A seal laminate for closing a mouth of a container comprising: a heat seal layer having an upper surface and for bonding the seal laminate to a rim surrounding the container's mouth;a structural support layer of a pulp, paper, cardboard, chipboard, paperboard, or cellulose based material having a moisture content of about 3 to about 6 percent positioned above and extending across the entire upper surface of the heat seal layer;upper and lower dimensionally stable layers disposed above and below the structural support layer sized to balance the vertical forces on the structural support layer upon exposure to about 60 percent or greater relative humidity; andthe upper and lower dimensionally stable layers having a water vapor transmission rate of about 1.5 g/100 in2/24 hours or below, the upper dimensionally stable layer being a polymer layer comprising at least one polymer,wherein the heat seal layer has a thickness of about 0.5 to about 2 mil, the structural support layer has a thickness of about 5 to about 10 mil, the upper dimensionally stable layer has a thickness of about 0.5 to about 1 mil, and the lower dimensionally stable layer has a thickness of about 0.5 to about 1.5 mil.
  • 9. The seal laminate of claim 8, wherein the heat seal layer is selected from the group consisting of ethylene vinyl acetate, ethylene-acrylic acid copolymers, surlyn and blends thereof.
  • 10. The seal laminate of claim 8, wherein the upper dimensionally stable layer is selected from the group consisting of polyethylene terephthalate, polyethylene naphthalate, polyethylene, polypropylene, ethylene-acrylic acid copolymers, ethylene methacrylate copolymers and blends thereof.
  • 11. The seal laminate of claim 8, wherein the structural support layer includes softwood and hardwood paper fibers having a moisture content of about 3 to about 6 percent and is substantially dimensionally stable at about 50 to about 55 percent relative humidity.
  • 12. The seal laminate of claim 8, wherein the lower dimensionally stable layer is selected from the group consisting of a metal layer and a foil layer.
  • 13. The seal laminate of claim 8, wherein the laminate has a ratio of a thickness of the lower dimensionally stable layer to a thickness of the structural support layer to a thickness of the upper dimensionally stable layer of from about 1:6:0.6 to about 1:20:1.
  • 14. The seal laminate of claim 8, wherein the laminate has a ratio of a total thickness of the upper and lower dimensionally stable layers to a thickness of the structural support layer of from about 1:2 to about 1:10.
  • 15. The seal laminate of claim 8, wherein the upper dimensionally stable layer is in the form of a coating that is applied at about 6 to about 30 pounds per 3000 square feet.
  • 16. The seal laminate of claim 8, further comprising a pull tab, the pull tab being positioned entirely with a perimeter of the seal laminate.
  • 17. The seal laminate of claim 8, wherein the structural support layer is located between and directly contacts at least a portion of each of the upper and lower dimensionally stable layers.
  • 18. The seal laminate of claim 8, wherein the laminate exhibits less than 9.5 mm of curl when subjected to about 60 to about 90 percent relative humidity.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a U.S. national phase application filed under 35 U.S.C. §371 of International Application PCT/US2012/030962, filed Mar. 28, 2012, designating the United States, which claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/468,257, filed Mar. 28, 2011, both of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/US2012/030962 3/28/2012 WO 00 2/10/2014
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2012/135353 10/4/2012 WO A
US Referenced Citations (127)
Number Name Date Kind
3235165 Jackson Feb 1966 A
3292828 Stuart Dec 1966 A
3302818 Balocca et al. Feb 1967 A
3990603 Brochman Nov 1976 A
4206165 Dukess Jun 1980 A
4254173 Peer, Jr. Mar 1981 A
4735335 Torterotot Apr 1988 A
4741791 Howard et al. May 1988 A
4770325 Gordon et al. Sep 1988 A
4837061 Smits et al. Jun 1989 A
4960216 Giles et al. Oct 1990 A
4961986 Galda Oct 1990 A
5004111 McCarthy Apr 1991 A
5015318 Smits et al. May 1991 A
5055150 Rosenfeld et al. Oct 1991 A
5057365 Finkelstein et al. Oct 1991 A
5071710 Smits et al. Dec 1991 A
5098495 Smits et al. Mar 1992 A
RE33893 Elias et al. Apr 1992 E
5125529 Torterotot Jun 1992 A
5149386 Smits et al. Sep 1992 A
5178967 Rosenfeld et al. Jan 1993 A
5197618 Goth Mar 1993 A
5265745 Pereyra et al. Nov 1993 A
5433992 Galda et al. Jul 1995 A
5513781 Ullrich et al. May 1996 A
5514442 Galda et al. May 1996 A
5598940 Finkelstein et al. Feb 1997 A
5601200 Finkelstein et al. Feb 1997 A
5615789 Finkelstein et al. Apr 1997 A
5669521 Wiening et al. Sep 1997 A
5702015 Giles et al. Dec 1997 A
5860544 Brucker Jan 1999 A
5871112 Giles Feb 1999 A
5915577 Levine Jun 1999 A
5975304 Cain et al. Nov 1999 A
6082566 Yousif et al. Jul 2000 A
6131754 Smelko Oct 2000 A
6139931 Finkelstein et al. Oct 2000 A
6158632 Ekkert Dec 2000 A
6194042 Finkelstein et al. Feb 2001 B1
6309504 Langan Oct 2001 B1
6312776 Finkelstein et al. Nov 2001 B1
6378715 Finkelstein et al. Apr 2002 B1
6458302 Shifflet Oct 2002 B1
6468708 Wang et al. Oct 2002 B1
6602309 Vizulis et al. Aug 2003 B2
6627273 Wolf et al. Sep 2003 B2
6699566 Zeiter et al. Mar 2004 B2
6705467 Kancsar et al. Mar 2004 B1
6722272 Jud Apr 2004 B2
6767425 Meier Jul 2004 B2
6790508 Razeti Sep 2004 B2
6866926 Smelko et al. Mar 2005 B1
6902075 O'Brien et al. Jun 2005 B2
6916516 Gerber et al. Jul 2005 B1
6955736 Rosenberger et al. Oct 2005 B2
6974045 Trombach et al. Dec 2005 B1
7128210 Razeti et al. Oct 2006 B2
7182475 Kramer et al. Feb 2007 B2
7217454 Smelko et al. May 2007 B2
RE39790 Fuchs et al. Aug 2007 E
7316760 Nageli Jan 2008 B2
7448153 Maliner et al. Nov 2008 B2
7531228 Perre et al. May 2009 B2
7648764 Yousif Jan 2010 B2
7713605 Yousif et al. May 2010 B2
7740730 Schedl et al. Jun 2010 B2
7740927 Yousif et al. Jun 2010 B2
7819266 Ross et al. Oct 2010 B2
7838109 Declerck Nov 2010 B2
7850033 Thorstensen-Woll Dec 2010 B2
8057896 Smelko et al. Nov 2011 B2
8329288 Allegaert et al. Dec 2012 B2
8348082 Cain Jan 2013 B2
20020068140 Finkelstein et al. Jun 2002 A1
20030168423 Williams Sep 2003 A1
20030196418 O'Brien et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040109963 Zaggia et al. Jun 2004 A1
20050048307 Schubert et al. Mar 2005 A1
20060000545 Nageli et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060003120 Nageli et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060003122 Nageli et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060151415 Smelko et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060278665 Bennett Dec 2006 A1
20070003725 Yousif Jan 2007 A1
20070087212 Iyengar et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070267304 Portier Nov 2007 A1
20070298273 Thies et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080026171 Gullick et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080073308 Yousif Mar 2008 A1
20080103262 Haschke May 2008 A1
20080156443 Schaefer et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080169286 McLean et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080231922 Thorstensen-Woll Sep 2008 A1
20080233339 Thorstensen-Woll Sep 2008 A1
20080233424 Thorstensen-Woll et al. Sep 2008 A1
20090004505 Carespodi Jan 2009 A1
20090057326 Opitz Mar 2009 A1
20090078671 Triquet et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090208729 Allegaert et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090304964 Sachs et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100009162 Rothweiler Jan 2010 A1
20100030180 Declerck Feb 2010 A1
20100047552 McLean et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100059942 Rothweiler Mar 2010 A1
20100116410 Yousif May 2010 A1
20100155288 Harper et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100170820 Leplatois et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100193463 O'Brien et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100201082 Hart Aug 2010 A1
20100213193 Helmlinger et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100221483 Gonzalez Carro et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100290663 Trassl et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100314278 Fonteyne et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110000917 Wolters et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110005961 Leplatois et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110089177 Thorstensen-Woll Apr 2011 A1
20110091715 Rakutt et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110100949 Grayer et al. May 2011 A1
20110100989 Cain May 2011 A1
20110138742 McLean Jun 2011 A1
20110147353 Kornfeld et al. Jun 2011 A1
20120000910 Ekkert Jan 2012 A1
20120043330 McLean et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120103988 Wiening May 2012 A1
20120241449 Frischmann et al. Sep 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (53)
Number Date Country
501 393 Aug 2006 AT
11 738 Apr 2011 AT
8200231 Sep 2003 BR
0300992 Nov 2004 BR
2 015 992 Jan 1991 CA
102 04 281 Aug 2003 DE
10 2006 030 118 May 2007 DE
10 2007 022 935 Apr 2009 DE
20 2009 000 245 Apr 2009 DE
0 668 221 Aug 1995 EP
0 826 598 Mar 1998 EP
0 826 599 Mar 1998 EP
0 717 710 Apr 1999 EP
0 915 026 May 1999 EP
0 706 473 Aug 1999 EP
0 803 445 Nov 2003 EP
1 462 381 Sep 2004 EP
1 577 226 Sep 2005 EP
1 814 744 Aug 2007 EP
1 834 893 Sep 2007 EP
1 839 898 Oct 2007 EP
1 839 899 Oct 2007 EP
1 857 275 Nov 2007 EP
1 873 078 Jan 2008 EP
1 445 209 May 2008 EP
1 918 094 May 2008 EP
1 968 020 Sep 2008 EP
1 992 476 Nov 2008 EP
2 230 190 Sep 2010 EP
2 292 524 Mar 2011 EP
2 916 157 Nov 2008 FR
2 943 322 Sep 2010 FR
10-0711073 Apr 2007 KR
10-0840926 Jun 2008 KR
10-0886955 Mar 2009 KR
PA05002905 Feb 2006 MX
2010001867 Apr 2010 MX
0066450 Nov 2000 WO
2006018556 Feb 2006 WO
2006021291 Mar 2006 WO
2008027029 Mar 2008 WO
2008027036 Mar 2008 WO
2008039350 Apr 2008 WO
2008125784 Oct 2008 WO
2008125785 Oct 2008 WO
2008148176 Dec 2008 WO
2009092066 Jul 2009 WO
2010115811 Oct 2010 WO
2011039067 Apr 2011 WO
2012079971 Jun 2012 WO
2012113530 Aug 2012 WO
2012152622 Nov 2012 WO
2012172029 Dec 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2012/030962 dated Jul. 20, 2012, 8 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140158691 A1 Jun 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61468257 Mar 2011 US