Embodiments of the invention relate to the field of force transmissions; and more specifically, to force transmissions for use in surgical instruments intended for use in minimally invasive surgeries.
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) (e.g., endoscopy, laparoscopy, thoracoscopy, cystoscopy, and the like) allows a patient to be operated upon through small incisions by using elongated surgical instruments introduced to an internal surgical site. Generally, a cannula is inserted through the incision to provide an access port for the surgical instruments. The surgical site often comprises a body cavity, such as the patient's abdomen. The body cavity may optionally be distended using a clear fluid such as an insufflation gas. In traditional minimally invasive surgery, the surgeon manipulates the tissues by using hand-actuated end effectors of the elongated surgical instruments while viewing the surgical site on a video monitor.
The elongated surgical instruments will generally have an end effector in the form of a surgical tool such as a forceps, a scissors, a clamp, a needle grasper, or the like at one end of an elongate tube. The surgical tool is generally coupled to the elongate tube by one or more articulated sections to control the position and/or orientation of the surgical tool. An actuator that provides the actuating forces to control the articulated section is coupled to the other end of the elongate tube. A means of coupling the actuator forces to the articulated section runs through the elongate tube. The actuator may control an articulated section, such as a “wrist” the orients and manipulates the surgical tool, with means for coupling the actuator forces running through the elongate tube.
It may desirable that the elongate tube be somewhat flexible to allow the surgical instrument to adapt to the geometry of the surgical access path. In some cases, the articulated sections provide access to a surgical site that is not directly in line with the surgical access port. It may be desirable to use cables as the means of coupling the actuator forces to the articulated sections because of the flexibility they provide and because of the ability of a cable to transmit a significant force, a substantial distance, through a small cross-section. However, a cable is generally only able to transmit a force in tension. Thus it is generally necessary to provide two cables to transmit a bidirectional actuating force. The articulated section may be in the form of a gimbal that provides angular motion with two degrees of freedom around a center of rotation. A gimbal can be controlled by three cables.
If a wrist is to be provided with a wide range of motion, for example ±90°, it may be desirable to stack two gimbal joints and provide half of the motion in each of the two joints. This provides a more gradual change of direction at the wrist which may be advantageous if cables have to pass through the wrist to control the end effector. The two stacked sets of joints can be made to create a constant velocity joint that avoids the singularity or gimbal lock that occurs at 90° with one set of joints. It requires six cables to control two stacked gimbal joints. However, the six cables do not have independent motions.
In view of the above, it is desirable to provide an improved apparatus and method for transmitting actuating forces through an elongate tube of a surgical instrument intended for use in minimally invasive surgeries that uses six cables connected to two stacked gimbal type articulated sections.
A force transmission transmits forces received by three levers to an input gimbal plate having three support points. The input gimbal play may in turn transmit the force to a wrist assembly coupled to a surgical tool. A first gimbal support point is supported by a first lever having a fulcrum with one degree of rotational freedom. Second and third gimbal support points may be supported by second and third levers having fulcrums with two degrees of rotational freedom. These fulcrums may include a first axle coupled to the lever and a second axle that supports the first axle and provides the fulcrum for the supported lever. A spring may draw the second and third levers toward one another. The force transmission may include a parallelogram linkage that includes a rocker link pivotally coupled to the first lever and having a flat surface that supports the first gimbal support point.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the accompanying drawings and from the detailed description that follows below.
The invention may best be understood by referring to the following description and accompanying drawings that are used to illustrate embodiments of the invention by way of example and not limitation. In the drawings, in which like reference numerals indicate similar elements:
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth. However, it is understood that embodiments of the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known circuits, structures and techniques have not been shown in detail in order not to obscure the understanding of this description.
In the following description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which illustrate several embodiments of the present invention. It is understood that other embodiments may be utilized, and mechanical compositional, structural, electrical, and operational changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. The following detailed description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the embodiments of the present invention is defined only by the claims of the issued patent.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. Spatially relative terms, such as “beneath”, “below”, “lower”, “above”, “upper”, and the like may be used herein for ease of description to describe one element's or feature's relationship to another element(s) or feature(s) as illustrated in the figures. It will be understood that the spatially relative terms are intended to encompass different orientations of the device in use or operation in addition to the orientation depicted in the figures. For example, if the device in the figures is turned over, elements described as “below” or “beneath” other elements or features would then be oriented “above” the other elements or features. Thus, the exemplary term “below” can encompass both an orientation of above and below. The device may be otherwise oriented (e.g., rotated 90 degrees or at other orientations) and the spatially relative descriptors used herein interpreted accordingly.
As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising” specify the presence of stated features, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
The term “instrument” is used herein to describe a device configured to be inserted into a patient's body and used to carry out surgical procedures. The instrument includes a surgical tool, such as a forceps, a needle driver, a shears, a monopolar cauterizer, a bipolar cauterizer, a tissue stabilizer or retractor, a clip applier, an anastomosis device, an imaging device (e.g., an endoscope or ultrasound probe), and the like. Some instruments used with embodiments of the invention further provide an articulated support for the surgical tool so that the position and orientation of the surgical tool can be manipulated.
The term “gimbal” is used herein to describe a device configured to provide a motion that is constrained to provide only rotation about two orthogonal axes. Typically such devices employ a Cardan suspension in which an innermost gimbal plate is supported by a rotational axis in an inner ring that is supported in turn by an orthogonal rotational axis in an outer ring. It will be observed that the gimbal plate is constrained so that it only moves rotationally about the center of motion at the point of intersection of the two rotational axes. It will also be observed that there is no net movement of any set of points that are equally spaced from the center of motion. For example, the sum of changes in position of three points that are spaced 120° apart on a circle centered on the center of motion will be zero for all positions of the gimbal plate.
The simplified perspective view of the system 100 shows only a single instrument 120 to allow aspects of the invention to be more clearly seen. A functional teleoperated surgical system would further include a vision system that enables the operator to view the surgical site from outside the patient's body 122. The vision system can include a video monitor for displaying images received by an optical device provided at a distal end of one of the surgical instruments 120. The optical device can include a lens coupled to an optical fiber which carries the detected images to an imaging sensor (e.g., a CCD or CMOS sensor) outside of the patient's body 122. Alternatively, the imaging sensor may be provided at the distal end of the surgical instrument 120, and the signals produced by the sensor are transmitted along a lead or wirelessly for display on the monitor. An illustrative monitor is the stereoscopic display on the surgeon's cart in the da Vinci® Surgical System, marketed by Intuitive Surgical, Inc., of Sunnyvale Calif.
A functional teleoperated surgical system would further include a control system for controlling the insertion and articulation of the surgical instruments 120. This control may be effectuated in a variety of ways, depending on the degree of control desired, the size of the surgical assembly, and other factors. In some embodiments, the control system includes one or more manually operated input devices, such as a joystick, exoskeletal glove, or the like. These input devices control motors, such as servo motors, which, in turn, control the articulation of the surgical assembly. The forces generated by the motors are transferred via drivetrain mechanisms, which transmit the forces from the motors generated outside the patient's body 122 through an intermediate portion of the elongate surgical instrument 120 to a portion of the surgical instrument inside the patient's body 122 distal from the motor. Persons familiar with telemanipulative, teleoperative, and telepresence surgery will know of systems such as the da Vinci® Surgical System and the Zeus® system originally manufactured by Computer Motion, Inc. and various illustrative components of such systems.
The surgical instrument 120 is shown inserted through an entry guide 124, e.g., a cannula in the patient's abdomen. A functional teleoperated surgical system may provide an entry guide manipulator (not shown; in one illustrative aspect the entry guide manipulator is part of the support system 110) and an instrument manipulator (discussed below). The entry guide 124 is mounted onto the entry guide manipulator, which includes a mechanically actuated positioning system for positioning the distal end of the entry guide 124 at the desired target surgical site. The mechanically actuated positioning system may be provided in a variety of forms, such as a serial link arm having multiple degrees of freedom (e.g., six degrees of freedom) or a jointed arm that provides a remote center of motion (due to either hardware or software constraints) and which is positioned by one or more unpowered, lockable setup joints mounted onto a base. Alternatively, the entry guide manipulator may be manually maneuvered so as to position the entry guide 124 in the desired location. In some telesurgical embodiments, the input devices that control the manipulator(s) may be provided at a location remote from the patient (outside the room in which the patient is placed). The input signals from the input devices are then transmitted to the control system, which, in turn, manipulates the manipulators 130 in response to those signals. The instrument manipulator may be coupled to the entry guide manipulator such that the instrument manipulator 130 moves in conjunction with the entry guide 124.
The surgical instrument 120 is detachably connected to the mechanically actuated instrument manipulator 130. The mechanically actuated manipulator includes a coupler 132 to transfer controller motion from the mechanically actuated manipulator to the surgical instrument 120. The instrument manipulator 130 may provide a number of controller motions which the surgical instrument 120 may translate into a variety of movements of the end effector on the surgical instrument such that the input provided by a surgeon through the control system is translated into a corresponding action by the surgical instrument.
Surgical instruments that are used with the invention are controlled by a plurality of flexible cables. Cables provide a means of transmitting forces to the joints that is compact and flexible. A typical elongate tube 210 for a surgical instrument 120 is small, perhaps six millimeters in diameter, roughly the diameter of a large soda straw. The diminutive scale of the mechanisms in the surgical instrument 120 creates unique mechanical conditions and issues with the construction of these mechanisms that are unlike those found in similar mechanisms constructed at a larger scale because forces and strengths of materials do not scale at the same rate as the size of the mechanisms. The cables must fit within the elongate tube 210 and be able to bend as they pass through the joints of the “wrist” 254.
The articulated section 254 in the embodiment shown includes five segments 320, 322, 324, 326, 328 that form a gimbal mechanism having two degrees of angular freedom. Each pair of adjacent segments (e.g. 320, 322) is coupled such that the two segments of the pair can rotate (e.g., pitch or yaw) relative to one other approximately around a single axis. (Each of the two segments may rotate about its own axis that is parallel to and slightly spaced apart from the axis of rotation for the other of the two segments.) Thus the two segments in each of the pairs of segments are not rotating relative to each other about a single axis but rather a pair of axes to provide a “cable balancing pivotal mechanism” as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,736,356,
The use of two stacked gimbals permits a greater range of angular movement and provides a greater radius of curvature for the articulation of the wrist. The stacked gimbals also allow singularity free motion in a manner similar to a double U-joint structure. A single U-joint contains single pair of orthogonal gimbal axes that intersect at a point. The single U-joint suffers from gimbal lock at 90 degree articulation, a condition in which the output can no longer roll. The secondary output gimbal plate moves to a first angle that is a portion of the total angle of the wrist movement and the output gimbal plate moves the remainder of the total angle. In the embodiment shown, the secondary output gimbal plate moves through one-half of the total angle and the output gimbal plate moves through the same amount relative to the secondary output gimbal plate to provide the total angle of movement.
Three output linkages 302, 304, 306, such as flexible cables, are coupled to the most distal segment 328 of the articulated section 254 at a first end 332 of the output linkages and coupled to the input gimbal plate 300 at a second end 352, 354, 356 of the output linkages. The three output linkages are coupled to the segment and to the gimbal plate with the three ends spaced apart so that they determine the position of a plane. The input gimbal plate 300 moves in response to movements of force inputs as described in detail below.
Each of three secondary output linkages 312, 316, 314 has a first end 336 coupled to the middle segment 324 of the articulated section 254, which is the most distal of the three segments 320, 322, 324 that act as a secondary output gimbal plate, and a second end 342, 344, 346 coupled to input gimbal plate 300. The three secondary output linkages are coupled to the segment and to the gimbal plate with the three ends spaced apart so that they determine the position of a plane.
Each secondary output linkage is coupled to the input gimbal plate 300 at a point that is diametrically opposite the point where an associated output linkage is coupled to the input gimbal plate and at half the radius of the associated output linkage. For example, the secondary output linkage designated by reference numeral 312 is associated with the output linkage designated by reference numeral 302.
The secondary output linkages 312, 316, 314 are coupled to the input gimbal plate 300 to move the secondary output linkages with a motion that is proportional to the motion of the associated output linkages 302, 304, 306. In the embodiment shown, each secondary output linkage moves one-half the distance of the associated output linkage in the opposite direction. The secondary output linkage is coupled to the secondary output gimbal plate 324 at a point that is diametrically opposite the point where the output linkage for the associated output linkage is coupled to the output gimbal plate 328. This causes the secondary output gimbal plate 324 to move through half the angle of the output gimbal plate 328. Both output gimbals move in the same direction because the diametrically opposed attachments cancel the effect of the opposite directions of motion at the input gimbal plate 300.
As best seen in
In the embodiment shown two of the support points 402, 404 are equidistant from the axes of rotation for the levers. It will be appreciated that if these two support points 402, 404 are coupled to the levers 412, 414 such that the support points are constrained to have no displacement relative to the levers, then the levers must have a second degree of rotational freedom because the two support points move along a curved path.
Each of the second 412 and third 414 levers is supported by a fulcrum support that constrains the lever to two degrees of rotational freedom. In the embodiment best seen in
As seen in
As seen in
While certain exemplary embodiments have been described and shown in the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that such embodiments are merely illustrative of and not restrictive on the broad invention, and that this invention is not limited to the specific constructions and arrangements shown and described, since various other modifications may occur to those of ordinary skill in the art. For example, while first class bell crank levers have been shown as an exemplary embodiment, straight levers and levers of other classes may be used. The description is thus to be regarded as illustrative instead of limiting.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 14/461,320 (filed Aug. 15, 2014), which claims the benefit pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/866,238 (filed Aug. 15, 2013), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2421279 | Marty | May 1947 | A |
2906143 | Musser | Sep 1959 | A |
3312496 | Albert et al. | Apr 1967 | A |
3618420 | Horwitt et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
4139104 | Mink | Feb 1979 | A |
4243257 | Shackleford | Jan 1981 | A |
4540211 | Masserang | Sep 1985 | A |
4705311 | Ragard | Nov 1987 | A |
4728137 | Hamed et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
5099705 | Dravnieks | Mar 1992 | A |
5317952 | Immega | Jun 1994 | A |
5325845 | Adair | Jul 1994 | A |
5792135 | Madhani et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5807377 | Madhani et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5816769 | Bauer et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5855583 | Wang et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5876325 | Mizuno et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6322312 | Sundar | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331181 | Tierney et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6394998 | Wallace et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6817974 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6994708 | Manzo | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7090683 | Brock et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7169141 | Brock et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7214230 | Brock et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7331967 | Lee et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7338513 | Lee et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7608083 | Lee et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7736356 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7935130 | Williams | May 2011 | B2 |
8142421 | Cooper | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8316961 | Isobe et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8444631 | Yeung et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8479969 | Shelton, IV | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8506555 | Ruiz Morales | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8551115 | Steger et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8597280 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8602288 | Shelton, IV et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8603077 | Cooper | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8771270 | Burbank | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8800838 | Shelton, IV | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8808166 | Hosaka | Aug 2014 | B2 |
9028494 | Shelton, IV et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9078684 | Williams | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9204923 | Manzo et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9232979 | Parihar et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9243696 | Isobe et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9259274 | Prisco | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9289112 | Takemoto et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9533122 | Weitzner et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9664262 | Donlon et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9839439 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9931106 | Au et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9962228 | Schuh et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10076348 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10130366 | Shelton, IV et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10550918 | Cooper et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10682141 | Moore et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10792112 | Kokish et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10799303 | Cooper et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10932868 | Solomon et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
20020111621 | Wallace et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111635 | Jensen et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20050042943 | Mocivnik et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050059960 | Simaan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050119527 | Banik et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20070043338 | Moll et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070232858 | Macnamara et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080046122 | Manzo et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080065102 | Cooper | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065105 | Larkin et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080087871 | Schena et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103491 | Omori et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080196533 | Bergamasco et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090088774 | Swarup et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090198272 | Kerver et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100170519 | Romo et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100175701 | Reis et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198253 | Jinno et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100318101 | Choi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110015650 | Choi et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110118754 | Dachs, II et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110277580 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110277775 | Holop et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295269 | Swensgard et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110295270 | Giordano et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120046522 | Naito | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120123441 | Au et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120239060 | Orban, III et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120289974 | Rogers et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130046318 | Radgowski et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130123783 | Marczyk et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130144395 | Stefanchik et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140005662 | Shelton, IV | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140005678 | Shelton, IV et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140005708 | Shelton, IV | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140100558 | Schmitz et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140114327 | Boudreaux et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140257333 | Blumenkranz | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276723 | Parihar et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140309625 | Okamoto et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150051034 | Cooper et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150150635 | Kilroy et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150157355 | Price et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20160058443 | Yates et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160151115 | Karguth et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160184034 | Holop et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160296219 | Srivastava et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160361049 | Dachs, II et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160361123 | Hares et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170007345 | Smith et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170022754 | Nien et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170027656 | Robert et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170172672 | Bailey et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170333037 | Wellman et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180168572 | Burbank | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180229021 | Donlon et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190117325 | Kishi | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190125468 | Adams | May 2019 | A1 |
20190223960 | Chaplin et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190231451 | Lambrecht et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190231464 | Wixey et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190239965 | Abbott | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190249759 | Abbott | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190298323 | Lambrecht et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190307522 | Lambrecht et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190328467 | Waterbury et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20210220062 | Lambrecht et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2548529 | Jan 2013 | EP |
2783843 | Oct 2014 | EP |
3103374 | Dec 2016 | EP |
3195993 | Jul 2017 | EP |
H06114000 | Apr 1994 | JP |
H10249777 | Sep 1998 | JP |
2003024336 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2005288590 | Oct 2005 | JP |
WO-9729690 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO-0030557 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO-2009039506 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO-2016161449 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO-2012068156 | May 2012 | WO |
WO-2015142290 | Sep 2015 | WO |
WO-2016172299 | Oct 2016 | WO |
WO-2016189284 | Dec 2016 | WO |
WO-2017064303 | Apr 2017 | WO |
WO-2017188851 | Nov 2017 | WO |
WO-2018069679 | Apr 2018 | WO |
WO-2020102776 | May 2020 | WO |
WO-2020252184 | Dec 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Vertut, Jean and Phillipe Coiffet, Robot Technology: Teleoperation and Robotics Evolution and Development, English translation, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Inglewood Cliffs, NJ, USA 1986, vol. 3A, 332 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200173525 A1 | Jun 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61866238 | Aug 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14461320 | Aug 2014 | US |
Child | 16780432 | US |