Patent Grant
11883535
This application contains, as a separate part of the disclosure, a Sequence Listing in computer readable form (filename: 2013-201_SeqListing.txt; Created: Dec. 3, 2014; 1,893 bytes), which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The present disclosure relates to liposomal particles, methods of making the same, and uses thereof. Liposomal particles are useful in gene regulation and drug delivery.
Chemistry has been explored to create liposomes and small unilamellar vesicles (SUVs). For example, Vogel et al., “DNA Controlled Assembly of Lipid Membranes,” U.S. Patent Publication Number 2010/0144848, discloses that DNA modified with two lipophilic anchors can form liposomes or SUVs. This post modification technique does not favor high surface density modification.
Hook et el., “Oligonucleotides Related to Lipid Membrane Attachment,” U.S. Patent Publication Number 2013/0252852 describes liposomes or SUVs created having an oligonucleotide having a first strand and a second strand of nucleic acid and two or more hydrophobic anchoring moieties located in its terminal ends, wherein the hydrophobic anchoring moieties are found in the bilayer. Since two cholesterol molecules are used to anchor a molecule into the lipid bilayer, this post modification technique does not favor high surface density modification.
Lu et al., “Amphiphilic Substances and Functionalized Lipid Vesicles Including the Same,” U.S. Patent Publication Number 2010/0166842 describes liposomes or SUVs comprising at least two nucleotide segments hybridized with each other. This non-post modification technique based vesicle is less efficient in stabilizing vesicles since it incorporates stabilizing moieties on both sides of the lipid bilayer.
Non-patent literature also reveals chemistry to create liposomes and SUVs, but each of these chemistries has its issues too. For example, “Liposome-Anchored Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Aptamers” Bioconjugate Chem., 1998, 9, 573-582, describes the synthesis of aptamer DNA-functionalized liposomes and their application toward selective cancer cell targeting. The liposomes created by this method averaged 80 nanometers in size, had aptamer DNA molecules on both sides of the bilipid layer, and did not demonstrate gene regulation.
“Reversible Cell-Specific Drug Delivery with Aptamer-Functionalized Liposomes” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6494-6498, describes the synthesis of aptamer DNA-functionalized liposomes and their application toward selective cancer cell targeting and drug delivery. The liposomes created by this method averaged between 140 nanometers and 200 nanometers, utilize a cholesterol unit to anchor DNA into the lipid bilayer, comprise apatamer DNA molecules on both sides of the bilipid layer, and did not exhibit gene regulation.
“Selective delivery of an anticancer drug with aptamer-functionalized liposomes to breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo” J. Mater. Chem. B, 2013, 1, 5288, discloses the synthesis of aptamer DNA-functionalized liposomes and their application toward selective cancer cell targeting and drug delivery. This work is an extension of the research disclosed in “Reversible Cell-Specific Drug Delivery with Aptamer-Functionalized Liposomes” above Like before, these particles utilize a cholesterol unit to anchor DNA into the lipid bilayer, comprise aptamer DNA molecules on both sides of the bilipid layer, and did not exhibit gene regulation.
The research in “Phospholipid Membranes Decorated by Cholesterol-Based Oligonucleotides as Soft Hybrid Nanostructures” J. Phys. Chem. B, 2008, 112, 10942-10952, characterizes cholesterol DNA-functionalized liposomes. In this report, liposomes of 33 to 35 nm in size were prepared from 1-Palmitoyl-2-oleoylphosphatidylcholine (POPC) lipid and post functionalized with cholesterol modified DNA molecule. This report does not demonstrate gene regulation, and these particles utilize a cholesterol unit to anchor DNA into the lipid bilayer.
“Bivalent Cholesterol-Based Coupling of Oligonucleotides to Lipid Membrane Assemblies” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 10224-10225, describes the development of partially duplexed DNA strand containing two cholesterol units for anchoring into the lipid bilayer. The use of two cholesterol units to anchor a DNA strand into the lipid bilayer results in decreased surface density of oligonucleotides associated with the liposome.
In “Quantification of Oligonucleotide Modifications of Small Unilamellar Lipid Vesicles” Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 7493-7498, the researchers describe the development of a technique for the quantification of DNA strands on a functionalized liposomal nanoparticle. The particle described comprises a partially duplexed DNA strand containing two cholesterol units for anchoring into the lipid bilayer. The use of two cholesterol units to anchor a DNA strand into the lipid bilayer results in decreased surface density of oligonucleotides associated with the liposome.
“Single-Molecule Detection and Mismatch Discrimination of Unlabeled DNA Targets” Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 183-188, discloses 100 nanometer sized liposomes functionalized with partially duplexed DNA strand containing two cholesterol units. This work is an extension of the research disclosed in “Bivalent Cholesterol-Based Coupling of Oligonucleotides to Lipid Membrane Assemblies” and “Quantification of Oligonucleotide Modifications of Small Unilamellar Lipid Vesicles” above. Like before, these particles comprise a partially duplexed DNA strand containing two cholesterol units for anchoring into the lipid bilayer. The use of the two cholesterol units to anchor a DNA strand into the lipid bilayer results in decreased surface density of oligonucleotides associated with the liposome.
“DNA-Induced Programmable Fusion of Phospholipid Vesicles” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 9584-9585, is an analytical paper on the fusion of cholesterol DNA-functionalized liposomal nanoparticles. The vesicles utilized in this paper were at least 100 nanometers in size.
“Determinants for Membrane Fusion Induced by Cholesterol-Modified DNA Zippers” J. Phys. Chem. B, 2008, 112, 8264-8274, is an analytical paper on fusion of cholesterol DNA-functionalized liposomal nanoparticle, and is a continuation of the work from “DNA-Induced Programmable Fusion of Phospholipid Vesicles” described above. This paper combines sequence specific fusion with the utilization of a partially duplexed DNA strand containing two cholesterol units to anchor the oligonucleotide into the lipid bilayer (e.g., the partially duplexed DNA strand found in “Quantification of Oligonucleotide Modifications of Small Unilamellar Lipid Vesicles” above).
“Liposome-Based Chemical barcodes for Single Molecule DNA Detection Using Imaging Mass Spectrometry” Nano Lett., 2010, 10, 732-737, is an analytical paper on detection of specific DNA targets depending on the DNA sequence. This is an extension of the work from the same group that reported “DNA-Induced Programmable Fusion of Phospholipid Vesicles” that combines sequence specific fusion with different DNA anchoring (using bischolesteryl anchor, see: Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 7493-7498).
“Programmable Assembly of DNA-Functionalized Liposomes by DNA” is an analytical paper that discloses the assembly of cholesterol DNA functionalized liposomes. In this report, liposomes with a hydrodynamic diameter of 114 and 251 nm were synthesized and post synthetically functionalized with cholesterol modified DNA molecules. The particles in this report utilize cholesterol anchoring of the oligonucleotide molecule into the lipid bilayer.
Liposomes are spherical, self-closed structures in a varying size range consisting of one or several hydrophobic lipid bilayers with a hydrophilic core. The diameter of these lipid based carriers range from 0.15-1 micrometers, which is significantly higher than an effective therapeutic range of 20-100 nanometers. Liposomes termed small unilamellar vesicles (SUV), can be synthesized in the 20-50 nanometer size range, but encounter challenges such as instability and aggregation leading to inter-particle fusion. This inter-particle fusion limits the use of SUVs in therapeutics.
To combat this instability, SUVs can be functionalized with polymers, peptides, DNA, and other molecules of interest by two distinct techniques. In a first approach, a modified molecule of interest is added to the mixture of lipids, lipid film or hydration buffer during the synthesis of liposome. This approach results in a liposomes containing a functional molecule of interest on both inner and outer layers of the liposomal membrane. Generally speaking, structures created by this method are not stable at a size smaller than 80 nanometers (nm). In an alternative approach, a SUV may be made by anchoring a substrate of interest into the lipid bilayer of the preformed vesicle (a “post modification technique”). This alternative approach yields a liposomal nanoparticle containing a functional molecule of interest on the outer layer of the liposomal membrane. Importantly, this alternative post modification approach allows the creation of liposome of any size, even less than 50 nanometers.
Accordingly, in one aspect the disclosure provides an architecture comprising a lipophilic end and a non-lipophilic end. The lipophilic end, in some embodiments, comprises tocopherol. In additional embodiments, the tocopherol is chosen from the group consisting of alpha-tocopherol, beta-tocopherol, gamma-tocopherol and delta-tocopherol.
The non-lipophilic end, in further embodiments, is a charged polymer. In some embodiments, the charged polymer is an oligonucleotide. In related embodiments, the oligonucleotide comprises RNA or DNA, and in various embodiments the RNA is an inhibitory RNA (RNAi) that performs a regulatory function. In still further embodiments, the RNAi is selected from the group consisting of a small inhibitory RNA (siRNA), an RNA that forms a triplex with double stranded DNA, and a ribozyme. In additional embodiments, the RNA is a piwi-interacting RNA (piRNA), or the RNA is a microRNA that performs a regulatory function. In some embodiments, the DNA is antisense-DNA.
In another aspect, the disclosure provides a method for making an architecture of the disclosure, the method comprising providing an oligonucleotide, providing a phosphoramidite-modified-tocopherol, and exposing said oligonucleotide to said phosphoramidite-modified-tocopherol to make an architecture of the disclosure.
In a further aspect, a liposomal particle is provided by the disclosure, said liposomal particle having a substantially spherical geometry, said liposomal particle comprising a lipid bilayer comprising a plurality of lipid groups; and an oligonucleotide.
It is contemplated by the disclosure, in various embodiments, that said plurality of lipid groups comprises a lipid selected from the group consisting of the phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylglycerol, and phosphatidylethanolamine family of lipids.
In various embodiments, said lipid is selected from the group consisting of 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC), 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-phosphatidylcholine (DMPC), 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-phosphatidylcholine (POPC), 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-(1′-rac-glycerol) (DSPG), 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-(1′-rac-glycerol) (DOPG), 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC), 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC), 1,2-di-(9Z-octadecenoyl)-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DOPE), and 1,2-dihexadecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DPPE).
In further embodiments, the oligonucleotide is an oligonucleotide-lipid conjugate containing a lipophilic tethered group, wherein said lipophilic tethered group is adsorbed into the lipid bilayer. The lipophilic tethered group comprises, in various embodiments, tocopherol or cholesterol.
The disclosure also contemplates that the tocopherol, in various embodiments, is selected from the group consisting of a tocopherol derivative, alpha-tocopherol, beta-tocopherol, gamma-tocopherol and delta-tocopherol. In yet further embodiments, the disclosure also contemplates that the lipophilic tethered group (i.e., the lipid anchor) comprises, for example and without limitation, palmitoyl, dipalmitoyl, stearyl, or distearyl.
The oligonucleotide, in further embodiments, comprises RNA or DNA. In additional embodiments, the RNA is a non-coding RNA, and in still further embodiments, the non-coding RNA is an inhibitory RNA (RNAi). The disclosure further contemplates that, in some embodiments, the RNAi is selected from the group consisting of a small inhibitory RNA (siRNA), a single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) that forms a triplex with double stranded DNA, and a ribozyme. In further embodiments, the RNA is a microRNA. In some embodiments, the DNA is antisense-DNA.
In various embodiments, the diameter of said liposomal particle is less than or equal to about 50 nanometers. Regarding the surface density, the disclosure provides compositions and methods wherein a liposomal particle comprises from about 10 to about 100 oligonucleotides, or from about 10 to about 80 oligonucleotides. In some embodiments, the particle comprises 70 oligonucleotides.
In some embodiments, the oligonucleotide is a modified oligonucleotide.
In another aspect of the disclosure, a method of making a liposomal particle is provided, the method comprising adding a phospholipid to a solvent to form a first mixture, said first mixture comprising a plurality of liposomes; disrupting said plurality of liposomes to create a second mixture, said second mixture comprising a liposome and a small unilamellar vesicle (SUV); isolating said SUV from said second mixture, said SUV having a particle size between about 20 nanometers and 50 nanometers; and adding an oligonucleotide to the isolated SUV to make the liposomal particle.
In some embodiments, the particle size of the plurality of liposomes in said first mixture is between about 100 nanometers and 150 nanometers. In further embodiments, the particle size of the liposome and the SUV in said second mixture is between about 20 nanometers and about 150 nanometers. In still further embodiments, the liposomal particle has a particle size less than or equal to about 50 nanometers.
In some embodiments, the oligonucleotide is an oligonucleotide-lipid conjugate containing a lipophilic tethered group, wherein said lipophilic tethered group is adsorbed into the lipid bilayer. In related embodiments, the lipophilic tethered group comprises tocopherol or cholesterol. In further embodiments, tocopherol is chosen from the group consisting of a tocopherol derivative, alpha-tocopherol, beta-tocopherol, gamma-tocopherol and delta-tocopherol.
In further embodiments, the oligonucleotide comprises RNA or DNA. The RNA, in some embodiments, is a non-coding RNA. In further embodiments, the non-coding RNA is an inhibitory RNA (RNAi). The disclosure further contemplates that, in additional embodiments, the RNAi is selected from the group consisting of a small inhibitory RNA (siRNA), a single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) that forms a triplex with double stranded DNA, and a ribozyme.
In some embodiments, the RNA is a microRNA. In various embodiments, the DNA is antisense-DNA.
In some embodiments, the oligonucleotide is a modified oligonucleotide.
In another aspect of the disclosure, a method of inhibiting expression of a gene is provided comprising the step of hybridizing a polynucleotide encoding said gene product with one or more oligonucleotides complementary to all or a portion of said polynucleotide, said oligonucleotide being attached to the liposomal particle of the disclosure, wherein hybridizing between said polynucleotide and said oligonucleotide occurs over a length of said polynucleotide with a degree of complementarity sufficient to inhibit expression of said gene product.
In some embodiments, expression of said gene product is inhibited in vivo. In further embodiments, expression of said gene product is inhibited in vitro.
In additional embodiments, the liposomal particle has a diameter about less than or equal to 50 nanometers. In some embodiments, the oligonucleotide comprises RNA or DNA. The RNA, in some embodiments, is a non-coding RNA. In related embodiments, the non-coding RNA is an inhibitory RNA (RNAi). The disclosure also contemplates that the RNAi, in various embodiments, is selected from the group consisting of a small inhibitory RNA (siRNA), a single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) that forms a triplex with double stranded DNA, and a ribozyme. In some embodiments, the RNA is a microRNA. In further embodiments, the DNA is antisense-DNA.
In another aspect of the disclosure, a method for up-regulating activity of a toll-like receptor (TLR) is provided, comprising contacting a cell having the toll-like receptor with a liposomal particle of the disclosure. In some embodiments, the oligonucleotide is a TLR agonist. In further embodiments, the toll-like receptor is chosen from the group consisting of toll-like receptor 1, toll-like receptor 2, toll-like receptor 3, toll-like receptor 4, toll-like receptor 5, toll-like receptor 6, toll-like receptor 7, toll-like receptor 8, toll-like receptor 9, toll-like receptor 10, toll-like receptor 11, toll-like receptor 12, and toll-like receptor 13.
In a further aspect, the disclosure provides a method for down-regulating activity of a toll-like receptor (TLR), comprising contacting a cell having the toll-like receptor with a liposomal particle of the disclosure. In some embodiments, the oligonucleotide is a TLR antagonist. In further embodiments, the toll-like receptor is chosen from the group consisting of toll-like receptor 1, toll-like receptor 2, toll-like receptor 3, toll-like receptor 4, toll-like receptor 5, toll-like receptor 6, toll-like receptor 7, toll-like receptor 8, toll-like receptor 9, toll-like receptor 10, toll-like receptor 11, toll-like receptor 12, and toll-like receptor 13.
The disclosure also contemplates that, in various embodiments, a method as disclosed herein is performed in vitro. In further embodiments, the disclosure contemplates that a method as disclosed herein is performed in vivo.
Spherical nucleic acid (SNA) nanoparticle conjugates are structures typically synthesized from inorganic nanoparticle templates and shells of highly oriented nucleic acid ligands immobilized on the surface of such particles [Mirkin et al., Nature 382: 607 (1996)]. SNAs have been prepared in a variety of different forms [Cutler et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134: 1376 (2012); Will et al., In Nanomaterials for Biomedicine; American Chemical Society: Vol. 1119, p 1-20 (2012)]. Core compositions, including gold, silica [Young et al., Nano Lett. 12: 3867 (2012)], iron oxide [Cutler et al., Nano Lett. 10: 1477 (2010); Zhang et al., Nat. Mater. 12: 741 (2013)], and Ag [Lee et al., Nano Lett. 7: 2112 (2007)] with shell compositions consisting of DNA, RNA, LNA [Seferos et al., ChemBioChem 8: 1230 (2007)], and PNA [Lytton-Jean et al., Advanced Materials 21: 706 (2009)] have all been prepared and explored. Hollow SNA structures consisting of cross-linked oligonucleotide [Cutler et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133: 9254 (2011)] have been synthesized along with micelle-block copolymer structures [Li et al., Nano Lett. 4: 1055 (2004); Alemdaroglu et al., Advanced Materials 20: 899 (2008); Liu et al., Chemistry—A European Journal 16: 3791 (2010); Chien et al., Chem. Commun. 47: 167 (2011)]. Although there is now a tremendous structural and compositional diversity among the known SNAs, they all share some common properties and features. Their polyvalent architectures allow them to cooperatively bind oligonucleotides and form duplex structures that exhibit very narrow melting transitions. These properties have been exploited in the development of high sensitivity and high selectivity genomic detection systems [Rosi et al., Chem. Rev. 105: 1547 (2005)]. While linear nucleic acids do not enter cells well without polymer, peptide, or viral transfection agents, the three-dimensional SNA structure is recognized by class A scavenger receptors [Patel et al., Bioconjugate Chem. 21: 2250 (2010); Choi et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110: 7625 (2013)] and is rapidly taken into over 60 different cell types without the need for an ancillary transfection agent [McAllister et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124: 15198 (2002); Whitehead et al., Nat Rev Drug Discov 8: 129 (2009); Zhang et al., Biomaterials 31: 1805 (2010)]. This property has made such structures important elements in strategies for both intracellular detection [Zheng et al., Nano Lett. 9: 3258 (2009); Prigodich et al., ACS Nano 3: 2147 (2009)] and gene regulation via antisense or siRNA pathways [Rosi et al., Science 312: 1027 (2006); Agbasi-Porter et al., Bioconjugate Chem. 17: 1178 (2006); Giljohann et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131: 2072 (2009); Jensen et al., Science Translational Medicine 5: 209ra152 (2013)].
The barrier to therapeutic use is high, however, especially when such structures are made from materials that have known problems with clearance or unknown biodistribution characteristics. Ideally, one would like an SNA structure that is made from readily available starting materials, can be synthesized at scale, and consists of components that have been a part of FDA approved pharmaceuticals [Cutler et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134: 1376 (2012); Farokhzad et al., Drug Delivery Rev. 58: 1456 (2006)]. Herein, a strategy for making such structures is provided, which consist of small liposomal cores stabilized with a dense shell of a charged polymer with a hydrophobic tail that can intercalate between the phospholipids that define the liposome structure. One such charged polymer contemplated for use is a nucleic acid. As with conventional SNAs, these liposomal structures rapidly enter multiple cell lines and are used in some embodiments to effectively knockdown gene expression via antisense pathways. Conventional SNAs have been shown to enter cells derived from many organs and tissues, including Breast (SKBR3, MDA-MB-231, AU-565), Brain (U87, LN229, U118), Bladder (HT-1376, 5637, T24), Colon (LS513), Cervix (HeLa, SiHa), Skin (C166, KB, MCF 10A), Kidney (MDCK), Brain (Rat Hippocampus Neurons, Astrocytes, Glial Cells), Bladder, Blood (PBMC, T-cells), Pancreas (Human (3-Islets), Skin (Human), Blood (Sup T1, Jurkat), Leukemia (K562), Liver (HepG2), Kidney (293T), Ovary (CHO), Fibroblast (NIH3T3), Macrophage (RAW264.7). The spherical nucleic acid architecture facilitates the entry of these constructs into cells by binding to scavenger receptor A, a cell-membrane receptor. A few non-limiting examples of cell lines which express this receptor are HeLa, SKOV-3, U87, Neuro 2A, RAW cells, HepG2, Hep3B, MDA-MB-468, MCF-7, C8S, C166 Bend3, A549, Rab9, HeyA8, Jurkat cells.
The major drawback of employment of SUVs is their inherent instability in solution due to high propensity to fuse into bigger liposomal structures. It is disclosed herein that functionalization of these structures with a dense layer of negatively charged DNA increases their stability by, e.g., decreasing particle-particle interaction due to the repulsion of the negatively charged particle surfaces. In the course of the studies described herein, it was found that tocopherol functionalized DNA provides higher density of DNA strands on the particle compared to other known hydrophobic DNA analogues, significantly increasing stability of the particle. In addition to the general colloidal stability, high density of the DNA will increase the uptake of this nanoparticle via a scavenger receptor B pathway and will allow efficient delivery of the genetic material into a cell. Finally, the dense layer of DNA is expected to increase particle stability in a body, its circulation rate, and therefore improve bio distribution of this nanomedicine.
The present disclosure teaches that by increasing the surface negative charge of SUVs, via the attachment of anionic entities including, but not limited to, DNA and RNA, the colloidal stability of these vesicles is increased. Additionally, the dense spherical arrangement and radial orientation of nucleic acids exhibits unique chemical and biological properties, unlike their linear counterparts. These spherical nucleic acids (SNA) are non-toxic and though anionic, can efficiently enter cells without the aid of ancillary cationic transfection agents in a non-immunogenic fashion. These exceptional properties allow their use as delivery agents for gene regulation in different therapies. The liposome-template mediated synthesis of SNAs provides an alternative platform to metal core SNAs which limits SNAs therapeutic diversity with bioaccumulation of the metal core and inability to encapsulate therapeutic entities.
Tocopherol modified oligonucleotides and methods of making such oligonucleotides, liposomal particles and methods of making same, and uses of liposomal particles now will be described more fully hereinafter. Indeed, the disclosure may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. These embodiments are provided in sufficient written detail to describe and enable one skilled in the art to make and use the invention, along with disclosure of the best mode for practicing the invention, as defined by the claims and equivalents thereof.
Likewise, many modifications and other embodiments of the methods described herein will come to mind to one of skill in the art to which the invention pertains having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of skill in the art to which the invention pertains. Although any methods and materials similar to or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the invention, the preferred methods and materials are described herein.
Certain terms are first defined. Additional terms are defined throughout the specification.
For the sake of brevity, a description of an embodiment of the disclosure in terms of a small unilamellar vesicle (SUV), a liposomal SNA (LSNA), a liposomal particle, or a spherical nucleic acid (SNA) may also be applicable to an embodiment that uses any of the other foregoing terms. By way of example, a method of regulating gene expression using a liposomal SNA may also be described herein as a method of regulating gene expression using a liposomal particle. Small unilamellar vesicles (SUVs) are liposomal particles of sub-100 nanometer size and are used as the precursors to LSNAs. SUVs and LSNAs, as such, can be considered subclasses of liposomal particles.
Terms used herein are intended as “open” terms (for example, the term “including” should be interpreted as “including but not limited to,” the term “having” should be interpreted as “having at least,” the term “includes” should be interpreted as “includes but is not limited to”).
Furthermore, in those instances where a convention analogous to “at least one of A, B and C, etc.” is used, in general such a construction is intended in the sense of one having ordinary skill in the art would understand the convention (for example, “a system having at least one of A, B and C” would include but not be limited to systems that have A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, and/or A, B, and C together). It will be further understood by those within the art that virtually any disjunctive word and/or phrase presenting two or more alternative terms, whether in the description or figures, should be understood to contemplate the possibilities of including one of the terms, either of the terms, or both terms. For example, the phrase “A or B” will be understood to include the possibilities of “A or B” or “A and B.”
All language such as “from,” “to,” “up to,” “at least,” “greater than,” “less than,” and the like include the number recited and refer to ranges which can subsequently be broken down into sub-ranges as discussed above.
A range includes each individual member. Thus, for example, a group having 1-3 members refers to groups having 1, 2, or 3 members. Similarly, a group having 6 members refers to groups having 1, 2, 3, 4, or 6 members, and so forth.
The modal verb “may” refers to the preferred use or selection of one or more options or choices among the several described embodiments or features contained within the same. Where no options or choices are disclosed regarding a particular embodiment or feature contained in the same, the modal verb “may” refers to an affirmative act regarding how to make or use an aspect of a described embodiment or feature contained in the same, or a definitive decision to use a specific skill regarding a described embodiment or feature contained in the same. In this latter context, the modal verb “may” has the same meaning and connotation as the auxiliary verb “can.”
As used herein, the articles “a” and “an” refer to one or to more than one (for example, to at least one) of the grammatical object of the article.
“About” and “approximately” shall generally mean an acceptable degree of error for the quantity measured given the nature or precision of the measurements. Exemplary degrees of error are within 20-25 percent (%), typically, within 10%, and more typically, within 5% of a given value or range of values.
The chemical structures described herein are named according to IUPAC nomenclature rules and include art-accepted common names and abbreviations where appropriate. The IUPAC nomenclature can be derived with chemical structure drawing software programs, such as ChemDraw® (PerkinElmer, Inc.), ChemDoodle® (iChemLabs, LLC) and Marvin (ChemAxon Ltd.). The chemical structure controls in the disclosure to the extent that an IUPAC name is misnamed or otherwise conflicts with the chemical structure disclosed herein.
Headings, for example, (A), (B), (i) etc., are presented merely for ease of reading the specification and claims. The use of headings in the specification or claims does not require the steps or elements be performed in alphabetical or numerical order or the order in which they are presented.
The present disclosure describes novel particles, termed liposomal particles, methods of making the same, and uses of these particles. The present liposomal particles are advantageous over other known liposomal based materials in that they are stable at a particle size that is smaller than other known liposomal particles, and the dense layer of DNA increases particle stability in a body, and therefore increases the circulation rate of liposomal vesicles, which improves bio-distribution of these particles inside the body.
In a first embodiment, an architecture comprising a tocopherol modified oligonucleotide is disclosed. A tocopherol-modified oligonucleotide comprises a lipophilic end and a non-lipophilic end. The lipophilic end comprises tocopherol, and may be chosen from the group consisting of a tocopherol derivative, alpha-tocopherol, beta-tocopherol, gamma-tocopherol and delta-tocopherol. The lipophilic end, in further embodiments, comprises palmitoyl, dipalmitoyl, stearyl, or distearyl.
The non-lipophilic end of the tocopherol-modified oligonucleotide is an oligonucleotide. The oligonucleotide is either RNA or DNA. The RNA can be an inhibitory RNA (RNAi) that performs a regulatory function, and is chosen from the group consisting of a small RNAi that is selected from the group consisting of a small inhibitory RNA (siRNA), an RNA that forms a triplex with double stranded DNA, and a ribozyme. Alternatively, the RNA is microRNA that performs a regulatory function. In still further embodiments, the RNA is a piwi-interacting RNA (piRNA). The DNA is, in some embodiments, an antisense-DNA.
Oligonucleotides contemplated for use according to the disclosure are from about 5 to about 100 nucleotides in length. Methods and compositions are also contemplated wherein the oligonucleotide is about 5 to about 90 nucleotides in length, about 5 to about 80 nucleotides in length, about 5 to about 70 nucleotides in length, about 5 to about 60 nucleotides in length, about 5 to about 50 nucleotides in length about 5 to about 45 nucleotides in length, about 5 to about 40 nucleotides in length, about 5 to about 35 nucleotides in length, about 5 to about 30 nucleotides in length, about 5 to about 25 nucleotides in length, about 5 to about 20 nucleotides in length, about 5 to about 15 nucleotides in length, about 5 to about 10 nucleotides in length, and all oligonucleotides intermediate in length of the sizes specifically disclosed to the extent that the oligonucleotide is able to achieve the desired result. Accordingly, oligonucleotides of 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, and 100 nucleotides in length are contemplated.
Specific examples of oligonucleotides include those containing modified backbones or non-natural internucleoside linkages. Oligonucleotides having modified backbones include those that retain a phosphorus atom in the backbone and those that do not have a phosphorus atom in the backbone. Modified oligonucleotides that do not have a phosphorus atom in their internucleoside backbone are considered to be within the meaning of “oligonucleotide.”
Modified oligonucleotide backbones containing a phosphorus atom include, for example, phosphorothioates, chiral phosphorothioates, phosphorodithioates, phosphotriesters, aminoalkylphosphotriesters, methyl and other alkyl phosphonates including 3′-alkylene phosphonates, 5′-alkylene phosphonates and chiral phosphonates, phosphinates, phosphoramidates including 3′-amino phosphoramidate and aminoalkylphosphoramidates, thionophosphoramidates, thionoalkylphosphonates, thionoalkylphosphotriesters, selenophosphates and boranophosphates having normal 3′-5′ linkages, 2′-5′ linked analogs of these, and those having inverted polarity wherein one or more internucleotide linkages is a 3′ to 3′, 5′ to 5′ or 2′ to 2′ linkage. Also contemplated are oligonucleotides having inverted polarity comprising a single 3′ to 3′ linkage at the 3′-most internucleotide linkage, i.e. a single inverted nucleoside residue which may be abasic (the nucleotide is missing or has a hydroxyl group in place thereof). Salts, mixed salts and free acid forms are also contemplated. Representative United States patents that teach the preparation of the above phosphorus-containing linkages include, U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,687,808; 4,469,863; 4,476,301; 5,023,243; 5,177,196; 5,188,897; 5,264,423; 5,276,019; 5,278,302; 5,286,717; 5,321,131; 5,399,676; 5,405,939; 5,453,496; 5,455,233; 5,466,677; 5,476,925; 5,519,126; 5,536,821; 5,541,306; 5,550,111; 5,563,253; 5,571,799; 5,587,361; 5,194,599; 5,565,555; 5,527,899; 5,721,218; 5,672,697 and 5,625,050, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Modified oligonucleotide backbones that do not include a phosphorus atom therein have backbones that are formed by short chain alkyl or cycloalkyl internucleoside linkages, mixed heteroatom and alkyl or cycloalkyl internucleoside linkages, or one or more short chain heteroatomic or heterocyclic internucleoside linkages. These include those having morpholino linkages; siloxane backbones; sulfide, sulfoxide and sulfone backbones; formacetyl and thioformacetyl backbones; methylene formacetyl and thioformacetyl backbones; riboacetyl backbones; alkene containing backbones; sulfamate backbones; methyleneimino and methylenehydrazino backbones; sulfonate and sulfonamide backbones; amide backbones; and others having mixed N, O, S and CH2 component parts. See, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,034,506; 5,166,315; 5,185,444; 5,214,134; 5,216,141; 5,235,033; 5,264,562; 5,264,564; 5,405,938; 5,434,257; 5,466,677; 5,470,967; 5,489,677; 5,541,307; 5,561,225; 5,596,086; 5,602,240; 5,610,289; 5,602,240; 5,608,046; 5,610,289; 5,618,704; 5,623,070; 5,663,312; 5,633,360; 5,677,437; 5,792,608; 5,646,269 and 5,677,439, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
In still other embodiments, oligonucleotide mimetics wherein both one or more sugar and/or one or more internucleotide linkage of the nucleotide units are replaced with “non-naturally occurring” groups. In one aspect, this embodiment contemplates a peptide nucleic acid (PNA). In PNA compounds, the sugar-backbone of an oligonucleotide is replaced with an amide containing backbone. See, for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,539,082; 5,714,331; and 5,719,262, and Nielsen et al., 1991, Science, 254: 1497-1500, the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference.
In still other embodiments, oligonucleotides are provided with phosphorothioate backbones and oligonucleosides with heteroatom backbones, and including —CH2—NH—O—CH2—, —CH2—N(CH3)—O—CH2—, —CH2—O—N(CH3)—CH2—, —CH2—N(CH3)—N(CH3)—CH2— and —O—N(CH3)—CH2—CH2— described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,489,677, and 5,602,240. Also contemplated are oligonucleotides with morpholino backbone structures described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,034,506.
In various forms, the linkage between two successive monomers in the oligonucleotide consists of 2 to 4, desirably 3, groups/atoms selected from —CH2—, —O—, —S—, —NRH—, >C═O, >C═NRH, >C═S, —Si(R″)2—, —SO—, —S(O)2—, —P(O)2—, —PO(BH3)—, —P(O,S)—, —P(S)2—, —PO(R″)—, —PO(OCH3)—, and —PO(NHRH)—, where RH is selected from hydrogen and C1-4-alkyl, and R″ is selected from C1-6-alkyl and phenyl. Illustrative examples of such linkages are —CH2—CH2—CH2—, —CH2—CO—CH2—, —CH2—CHOH—CH2—, —O—CH2—O—, —O—CH2—CH2—, —O—CH2—CH═ (including R5 when used as a linkage to a succeeding monomer), —CH2—CH2—O—, —NRHCH2—CH2—, —CH2CH2—NRH—, —CH2—NRH—CH2—, —O—CH2—CH2—NRH—, —NRH—CO—O—, —NRH—CO—NRH—, —NRH—CS—NRH—, —NRH—C(═NRH)—NRH—, —NRH—CO—CH2—NRH—O—CO—O—, —O—CO—CH2—O—, —O—CH2—CO—O—, —CH2—CO—NRH—, —O—CO—NRH—, —NRH—CO—CH2—, —O—CH2—CO—NRH—, —O—CH2—CH2—NRH—, —CH═N—O—, —CH2—NRH—O—, —CH2—O—N═ (including R5 when used as a linkage to a succeeding monomer), —CH2—O—NRH—, —CO—NRH—CH2—, —CH2—NRH—O—, CH2—NRH—CO—, —O—NRH—CH2—, —O—NRH—, —O—CH2—S—, —S—CH2—O—, —CH2—CH2—S—, —O—CH2—CH2—S—, —S—CH2—CH═ (including R5 when used as a linkage to a succeeding monomer), —S—CH2—CH2—, —S—CH2—CH2—O—, —S—CH2—CH2—S—, —CH2—S—CH2—, —CH2—SO—CH2—, —CH2—SO2—CH2—, —O—SO—O—, —O—S(O)2—O—, —O—S(O)2—CH2—, —O—S(O)2—NRH—, —NRH—S(O)2—CH2—; —O—S(O)2—CH2—, —O—P(O)2—O—, —O—P(O,S)—O—, —O—P(S)2—O—, —S—P(O)2—O—, —S—P(O,S)—O—, —S—P(S)2—O—, —O—P(O)2—S—, —O—P(O,S)—S—, —O—P(S)2—S—, —S—P(O)2—S—, —S—P(O,S)—S—, —S—P(S)2—S—, —O—PO(R″)—O—, —O—PO(OCH3)—O—, —O—PO(OCH2CH3)—O—, —O—PO(O CH2CH2S—R)—O—, —O—PO(BH3)—O—, —O—PO(NHRN)—O—, —O—P(O)2—NRH H—, —NRH—P(O)2—O—, —O—P(O,NRH)—O—, —CH2—P(O)2—O—, —O—P(O)2—CH2—, and —O—Si(R″)2—O—; among which —CH2—CO—NRH—, —CH2—NRH—O—, —S—CH2—O—, —O—P(O)2—O—O—P(—O,S)—O—, —O—P(S)2—O—, —NRH P(O)2—O—, —O—P(O,NRH)—O—, —O—PO(R″)—O—, —O—PO(CH3)—O—, and —O—PO(NHRN)—O—, where RH is selected form hydrogen and C1-4-alkyl, and R″ is selected from C1-6-alkyl and phenyl, are contemplated. Further illustrative examples are given in Mesmaeker et. al., 1995, Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 5: 343-355 and Susan M. Freier and Karl-Heinz Altmann, 1997, Nucleic Acids Research, vol 25: pp 4429-4443.
Still other modified forms of oligonucleotides are described in detail in U.S. Patent Application No. 20040219565, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Modified oligonucleotides may also contain one or more substituted sugar moieties. In certain aspects, oligonucleotides comprise one of the following at the 2′ position: OH; F; O-, S-, or N-alkyl; O-, S-, or N-alkenyl; O-, S- or N-alkynyl; or O-alkyl-O-alkyl, wherein the alkyl, alkenyl and alkynyl may be substituted or unsubstituted C1 to C10 alkyl or C2 to C10 alkenyl and alkynyl. Other embodiments include O[(CH2)nO]mCH3, O(CH2)nOCH3, O(CH2)nNH2, O(CH2)nCH3, O(CH2)nONH2, and O(CH2)nON[(CH2)nCH3]2, where n and m are from 1 to about 10. Other oligonucleotides comprise one of the following at the 2′ position: C1 to C10 lower alkyl, substituted lower alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, alkaryl, aralkyl, O-alkaryl or O-aralkyl, SH, SCH3, OCN, Cl, Br, CN, CF3, OCF3, SOCH3, SO2CH3, ONO2, NO2, N3, NH2, heterocycloalkyl, heterocycloalkaryl, aminoalkylamino, polyalkylamino, substituted silyl, an RNA cleaving group, a reporter group, an intercalator, a group for improving the pharmacokinetic properties of an oligonucleotide, or a group for improving the pharmacodynamic properties of an oligonucleotide, and other substituents having similar properties. In one aspect, a modification includes 2′-methoxyethoxy (2′-O—CH2CH2OCH3, also known as 2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl) or 2′-MOE) (Martin et al., 1995, Helv. Chim. Acta, 78: 486-504) i.e., an alkoxyalkoxy group. Other modifications include 2′-dimethylaminooxyethoxy, i.e., a O(CH2)20N(CH3)2 group, also known as 2′-DMAOE, as described in examples herein below, and 2′-dimethylaminoethoxyethoxy (also known in the art as 2′-O-dimethyl-amino-ethoxy-ethyl or 2′-DMAEOE), i.e., 2′-O—CH2—O—CH2—N(CH3)2, also described in examples herein below.
Still other modifications include 2′-methoxy (2′-O—CH3), 2′-aminopropoxy (2′-OCH2CH2CH2NH2), 2′-allyl (2′-CH2—CH═CH2), 2′-O-allyl(2′-O—CH2—CH═CH2) and 2′-fluoro (2′-F). The 2′-modification may be in the arabino (up) position or ribo (down) position. In one aspect, a 2′-arabino modification is 2′-F. Similar modifications may also be made at other positions on the oligonucleotide, for example, at the 3′ position of the sugar on the 3′ terminal nucleotide or in 2′-5′ linked oligonucleotides and the 5′ position of 5′ terminal nucleotide. Oligonucleotides may also have sugar mimetics such as cyclobutyl moieties in place of the pentofuranosyl sugar. See, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,981,957; 5,118,800; 5,319,080; 5,359,044; 5,393,878; 5,446,137; 5,466,786; 5,514,785; 5,519,134; 5,567,811; 5,576,427; 5,591,722; 5,597,909; 5,610,300; 5,627,053; 5,639,873; 5,646,265; 5,658,873; 5,670,633; 5,792,747; and 5,700,920, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
In one aspect, a modification of the sugar includes Locked Nucleic Acids (LNAs) in which the 2′-hydroxyl group is linked to the 3′ or 4′ carbon atom of the sugar ring, thereby forming a bicyclic sugar moiety. The linkage is in certain aspects is a methylene (—CH2—)n group bridging the 2′ oxygen atom and the 4′ carbon atom wherein n is 1 or 2. LNAs and preparation thereof are described in WO 98/39352 and WO 99/14226.
Oligonucleotides may also include base modifications or substitutions. As used herein, “unmodified” or “natural” bases include the purine bases adenine (A) and guanine (G), and the pyrimidine bases thymine (T), cytosine (C) and uracil (U). Modified bases include other synthetic and natural bases such as 5-methylcytosine (5-me-C), 5-hydroxymethyl cytosine, xanthine, hypoxanthine, 2-aminoadenine, 6-methyl and other alkyl derivatives of adenine and guanine, 2-propyl and other alkyl derivatives of adenine and guanine, 2-thiouracil, 2-thiothymine and 2-thiocytosine, 5-halouracil and cytosine, 5-propynyl uracil and cytosine and other alkynyl derivatives of pyrimidine bases, 6-azo uracil, cytosine and thymine, 5-uracil (pseudouracil), 4-thiouracil, 8-halo, 8-amino, 8-thiol, 8-thioalkyl, 8-hydroxyl and other 8-substituted adenines and guanines, 5-halo particularly 5-bromo, 5-trifluoromethyl and other 5-substituted uracils and cytosines, 7-methylguanine and 7-methyladenine, 2-F-adenine, 2-amino-adenine, 8-azaguanine and 8-azaadenine, 7-deazaguanine and 7-deazaadenine and 3-deazaguanine and 3-deazaadenine. Further modified bases include tricyclic pyrimidines such as phenoxazine cytidine(1H-pyrimido[5,4-b][1,4]benzoxazin-2(3H)-one), phenothiazine cytidine (1H-pyrimido[5,4-b][1,4]benzothiazin-2(3H)-one), G-clamps such as a substituted phenoxazine cytidine (e.g. 9-(2-aminoethoxy)-H-pyrimido[5,4-b][1,4]benzox-azin-2(3H)-one), carbazole cytidine (2H-pyrimido[4,5-b]indol-2-one), pyridoindole cytidine (H-pyrido[3′,2′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-2-one). Modified bases may also include those in which the purine or pyrimidine base is replaced with other heterocycles, for example 7-deaza-adenine, 7-deazaguanosine, 2-aminopyridine and 2-pyridone. Further bases include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,687,808, those disclosed in The Concise Encyclopedia Of Polymer Science And Engineering, pages 858-859, Kroschwitz, J. I., ed. John Wiley & Sons, 1990, those disclosed by Englisch et al., 1991, Angewandte Chemie, International Edition, 30: 613, and those disclosed by Sanghvi, Y. S., Chapter 15, Antisense Research and Applications, pages 289-302, Crooke, S. T. and Lebleu, B., ed., CRC Press, 1993. Certain of these bases are useful for increasing the binding affinity and include 5-substituted pyrimidines, 6-azapyrimidines and N-2, N-6 and O-6 substituted purines, including 2-aminopropyladenine, 5-propynyluracil and 5-propynylcytosine. 5-methylcytosine substitutions have been shown to increase nucleic acid duplex stability by 0.6-1.2° C. and are, in certain aspects combined with 2′-O-methoxyethyl sugar modifications. See, U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,687,808, 4,845,205; 5,130,302; 5,134,066; 5,175,273; 5,367,066; 5,432,272; 5,457,187; 5,459,255; 5,484,908; 5,502,177; 5,525,711; 5,552,540; 5,587,469; 5,594,121, 5,596,091; 5,614,617; 5,645,985; 5,830,653; 5,763,588; 6,005,096; 5,750,692 and 5,681,941, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
A “modified base” or other similar term refers to a composition which can pair with a natural base (e.g., adenine, guanine, cytosine, uracil, and/or thymine) and/or can pair with a non-naturally occurring base. In certain aspects, the modified base provides a Tm differential of 15, 12, 10, 8, 6, 4, or 2° C. or less. Exemplary modified bases are described in EP 1 072 679 and WO 97/12896.
By “nucleobase” is meant the naturally occurring nucleobases adenine (A), guanine (G), cytosine (C), thymine (T) and uracil (U) as well as non-naturally occurring nucleobases such as xanthine, diaminopurine, 8-oxo-N6-methyladenine, 7-deazaxanthine, 7-deazaguanine, N4,N4-ethanocytosin, N′,N′-ethano-2,6-diaminopurine, 5-methylcytosine (mC), 5-(C3—C6)-alkynyl-cytosine, 5-fluorouracil, 5-bromouracil, pseudoisocytosine, 2-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-tr-iazolopyridin, isocytosine, isoguanine, inosine and the “non-naturally occurring” nucleobases described in Benner et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,432,272 and Susan M. Freier and Karl-Heinz Altmann, 1997, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 25: pp 4429-4443. The term “nucleobase” thus includes not only the known purine and pyrimidine heterocycles, but also heterocyclic analogues and tautomers thereof. Further naturally and non-naturally occurring nucleobases include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,687,808 (Merigan, et al.), in Chapter 15 by Sanghvi, in Antisense Research and Application, Ed. S. T. Crooke and B. Lebleu, CRC Press, 1993, in Englisch et al., 1991, Angewandte Chemie, International Edition, 30: 613-722 (see especially pages 622 and 623, and in the Concise Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, J. I. Kroschwitz Ed., John Wiley & Sons, 1990, pages 858-859, Cook, Anti-Cancer Drug Design 1991, 6, 585-607, each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety). The term “nucleosidic base” or “base unit” is further intended to include compounds such as heterocyclic compounds that can serve like nucleobases including certain “universal bases” that are not nucleosidic bases in the most classical sense but serve as nucleosidic bases. Especially mentioned as universal bases are 3-nitropyrrole, optionally substituted indoles (e.g., 5-nitroindole), and optionally substituted hypoxanthine. Other desirable universal bases include, pyrrole, diazole or triazole derivatives, including those universal bases known in the art.
In a second embodiment, methods of making tocopherol oligonucleotides are disclosed. First, an oligonucleotide and phosphoramidite-modified-tocopherol are provided. Then, the oligonucleotide is exposed to the phosphoramidite-modified-tocopherol to create the tocopherol modified oligonucleotide. While not meant to be limiting, any chemistry to one of skill in the art can be used to attach the tocopherol to the oligonucleotide, including amide linking or click chemistry.
In a third embodiment, liposomal particles are disclosed. The liposomal particle has at least a substantially spherical geometry, an internal side and an external side, and comprises a lipid bilayer. The lipid bilayer is comprised of a first-lipid and a second-lipid. The first-lipid and second-lipid are, in some embodiments, the same. In further embodiments, the first-lipid and second-lipid are different.
The first-lipid is chosen from the phosphocholine family of lipids or the phosphoethanolamine family of lipids. While not meant to be limiting, the first-lipid is chosen from group consisting of 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC), 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-phosphatidylcholine (DMPC), 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-phosphatidylcholine (POPC), 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-(1′-rac-glycerol) (DSPG), 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-(1′-rac-glycerol) (DOPG), 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC), 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC), 1,2-di-(9Z-octadecenoyl)-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DOPE), and 1,2-dihexadecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DPPE).
The second-lipid is chosen from the phosphocholine family of lipids or the phosphoethanolamine family of lipids. While not meant to be limiting, the second-lipid is chosen from group consisting of 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC), 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-phosphatidylcholine (DMPC), 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-phosphatidylcholine (POPC), 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-(1′-rac-glycerol) (DSPG), 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-(1′-rac-glycerol) (DOPG), 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC), 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC), 1,2-di-(9Z-octadecenoyl)-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DOPE), and 1,2-dihexadecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DPPE).
The liposomal particle further comprises a tocopherol modified oligonucleotide wherein the lipophilic end of the tocopherol modified oligonucleotide is absorbed into the lipid bilayer. The tocopherol is chosen from the group consisting of alpha-tocopherol, beta-tocopherol, gamma-tocopherol and delta-tocopherol. The non-lipophilic end of the tocopherol modified oligonucleotide is an oligonucleotide. This oligonucleotide is, in various embodiments, either RNA or DNA. The RNA can be an inhibitory RNA (RNAi) that performs a regulatory function, and in various embodiments is selected from the group consisting of a small inhibitory RNA (siRNA), an RNA that forms a triplex with double stranded DNA, and a ribozyme. Alternatively, and in further embodiments, the RNA is microRNA that performs a regulatory function. The DNA is optionally an antisense-DNA. In still further embodiments, the RNA is a piwi-interacting RNA (piRNA).
Put another way, the disclosure provides a liposomal particle, said liposomal particle having a substantially spherical geometry, said liposomal particle comprising a lipid bilayer comprising a plurality of lipid groups; and an oligonucleotide. In various embodiments, the oligonucleotide is a modified oligonucleotide. In some embodiments, the plurality of lipid groups comprises a lipid selected from the group consisting of the phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylglycerol, and phosphatidylethanolamine family of lipids. The oligonucleotide, in further embodiments is an oligonucleotide-lipid conjugate containing a lipophilic tethered group, wherein said lipophilic tethered group is adsorbed into the lipid bilayer. The lipophilic tethered group comprises, in various embodiments, tocopherol, palmitoyl, dipalmitoyl, stearyl, distearyl, or cholesterol.
Alternatively, the liposomal particle further comprises a therapeutic agent encapsulated on the internal side of the liposomal particle. In further embodiments, a liposomal particle of the disclosure further comprises a therapeutic agent that is either directly or indirectly attached to the liposomal particle. Indirect attachment includes, for example and without limitation, attachment to an oligonucleotide that is in turn attached to the liposomal particle.
In some embodiments, the liposomal particle further comprises a diagnostic agent encapsulated on the internal side of the liposomal particle. This diagnostic agent is in some embodiments gadolinium.
With respect to the surface density of oligonucleotides on the surface of a liposomal particle of the disclosure, it is contemplated that a liposomal particle as described herein comprises from about 1 to about 100 oligonucleotides on its surface. In various embodiments, a liposomal particle comprises from about 10 to about 100, or from 10 to about 90, or from about 10 to about 80, or from about 10 to about 70, or from about 10 to about 60, or from about 10 to about 50, or from about 10 to about 40, or from about 10 to about 30, or from about 10 to about 20 oligonucleotides on its surface. In further embodiments, a liposomal particle comprises at least about 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, or 100 oligonucleotides on its surface.
In a fourth embodiment, methods of making liposomal particles are disclosed. First, a phospholipid, solvent, and a tocopherol modified oligonucleotide are provided. Then, the phospholipid is added to the solvent to form a first mixture comprising liposomes. The size of the liposomes in the first mixture is between about 100 nanometers and about 150 nanometers.
Next, the liposomes are disrupted to create a second mixture comprising liposomes and small unilamellar vesicles (SUV). The size of the liposomes and SUVs in the second mixture is between about 20 nanometers and about 150 nanometers.
Next, the SUVs having a particle size between about 20 nanometers and about 50 nanometers are isolated from the second mixture. Finally, the tocopherol modified oligonucleotide is added to the isolated SUVs to make a liposomal particle.
The particle size of the liposomal particles created by a method of the disclosure is less than or equal to about 50 nanometers. In some embodiments, a plurality of liposomal particles is produced and the particles in the plurality have a mean diameter of less than or equal to about 50 nanometers (e.g., about 5 nanometers to about 50 nanometers, or about 5 nanometers to about 40 nanometers, or about 5 nanometers to about 30 nanometers, or about 5 nanometers to about 20 nanometers, or about 10 nanometers to about 50 nanometers, or about 10 nanometers to about 40 nanometers, or about 10 nanometers to about 30 nanometers, or about 10 nanometers to about 20 nanometers). In further embodiments, the particles in the plurality of liposomal particles created by a method of the disclosure have a mean diameter of less than or equal to about 20 nanometers, or less than or equal to about 25 nanometers, or less than or equal to about 30 nanometers, or less than or equal to about 35 nanometers, or less than or equal to about 40 nanometers, or less than or equal to about 45 nanometers.
Put another way, in some aspects the disclosure provides a method of making a liposomal particle, comprising adding a phospholipid to a solvent to form a first mixture, said first mixture comprising a plurality of liposomes; disrupting said plurality of liposomes to create a second mixture, said second mixture comprising a liposome and a small unilamellar vesicle (SUV); isolating said SUV from said second mixture, said SUV having a particle size between about 20 nanometers and 50 nanometers; and adding an oligonucleotide to the isolated SUV to make the liposomal particle.
Methods for inhibiting gene product expression provided herein include those wherein expression of the target gene product is inhibited by at least about 5%, at least about 10%, at least about 15%, at least about 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 30%, at least about 35%, at least about 40%, at least about 45%, at least about 50%, at least about 55%, at least about 60%, at least about 65%, at least about 70%, at least about 75%, at least about 80%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, at least about 96%, at least about 97%, at least about 98%, at least about 99%, or 100% compared to gene product expression in the absence of a liposome SNA. In other words, methods provided embrace those which results in essentially any degree of inhibition of expression of a target gene product.
The degree of inhibition is determined in vivo from a body fluid sample or from a biopsy sample or by imaging techniques well known in the art. Alternatively, the degree of inhibition is determined in a cell culture assay, generally as a predictable measure of a degree of inhibition that can be expected in vivo resulting from use of a specific type of liposomal SNA and a specific oligonucleotide.
In some aspects of the disclosure, it is contemplated that a liposomal particle performs both a gene inhibitory function as well as a therapeutic agent delivery function. In such aspects, a therapeutic agent is encapsulated in a liposomal particle of the disclosure and the particle is additionally functionalized with one or more oligonucleotides designed to effect inhibition of target gene expression. In further embodiments, a therapeutic agent is attached to a liposomal particle of the disclosure.
In various aspects, the methods include use of an oligonucleotide which is 100% complementary to the target polynucleotide, i.e., a perfect match, while in other aspects, the oligonucleotide is at least (meaning greater than or equal to) about 95% complementary to the polynucleotide over the length of the oligonucleotide, at least about 90%, at least about 85%, at least about 80%, at least about 75%, at least about 70%, at least about 65%, at least about 60%, at least about 55%, at least about 50%, at least about 45%, at least about 40%, at least about 35%, at least about 30%, at least about 25%, at least about 20% complementary to the polynucleotide over the length of the oligonucleotide to the extent that the oligonucleotide is able to achieve the desired degree of inhibition of a target gene product.
It is understood in the art that the sequence of an antisense compound need not be 100% complementary to that of its target nucleic acid to be specifically hybridizable. Moreover, an oligonucleotide may hybridize over one or more segments such that intervening or adjacent segments are not involved in the hybridization event (e.g., a loop structure or hairpin structure). The percent complementarity is determined over the length of the oligonucleotide. For example, given an antisense compound in which 18 of 20 nucleotides of the antisense compound are complementary to a 20 nucleotide region in a target polynucleotide of 100 nucleotides total length, the oligonucleotide would be 90 percent complementary. In this example, the remaining noncomplementary nucleotides may be clustered or interspersed with complementary nucleobases and need not be contiguous to each other or to complementary nucleotides. Percent complementarity of an antisense compound with a region of a target nucleic acid can be determined routinely using BLAST programs (basic local alignment search tools) and PowerBLAST programs known in the art (Altschul et al., J. Mol. Biol., 1990, 215, 403-410; Zhang and Madden, Genome Res., 1997, 7, 649-656).
Accordingly, in a fifth embodiment, methods of utilizing liposomal particles in gene regulation therapy are provided. This method comprises the step of hybridizing a polynucleotide encoding said gene product with one or more oligonucleotides complementary to all or a portion of said polynucleotide, said oligonucleotide being attached to a liposomal particle, wherein hybridizing between said polynucleotide and said oligonucleotide occurs over a length of said polynucleotide with a degree of complementarity sufficient to inhibit expression of said gene product. The liposomal particle has a diameter that is about less than or equal to 50 nanometers. The inhibition of gene expression may occur in vivo or in vitro.
The oligonucleotide utilized in this method is either RNA or DNA. The RNA can be an inhibitory RNA (RNAi) that performs a regulatory function, and in various embodiments is selected from the group consisting of a small inhibitory RNA (siRNA), an RNA that forms a triplex with double stranded DNA, and a ribozyme. Alternatively, the RNA is microRNA that performs a regulatory function. The DNA is, in some embodiments, an antisense-DNA.
In another aspect of the disclosure, a liposomal particle is used in a method for treating a traumatic brain injury (TBI). In the United States, there have been over 244,000 cases of TBI in the military since 2000, and it is the leading cause of death and disability in people under the age of 45. Further, it is currently difficult to predict the neurological outcome of “mild severity” incidents, and the secondary phase of the injury (e.g., inflammation, ischemia, and apoptosis) is very difficult to treat.
Thus, in some embodiments, methods of the disclosure are directed to the use of a liposomal particle designed to target and regulate the expression of a gene product implicated in TBI. For example and without limitation, the target gene product is selected from the group consisting of histone deacetylase (HDAC), BCL2-associated X (BAX), a matrix metallopeptidase/metalloproteinase (MMP; including, without limitation, matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9)), a hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF; including, without limitation, hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF1-α)), and calpain.
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are a class of proteins, expressed in sentinel cells, that plays a key role in regulation of innate immune system. The mammalian immune system uses two general strategies to combat infectious diseases. Pathogen exposure rapidly triggers an innate immune response that is characterized by the production of immunostimulatory cytokines, chemokines and polyreactive IgM antibodies. The innate immune system is activated by exposure to Pathogen Associated Molecular Patterns (PAMPs) that are expressed by a diverse group of infectious microorganisms. The recognition of PAMPs is mediated by members of the Toll-like family of receptors. TLR receptors, such as TLR 4, TLR 8 and TLR 9 that response to specific oligonucleotide are located inside special intracellular compartments, called endosomes. The mechanism of modulation of TLR 4, TLR 8 and TLR9 receptors is based on DNA-protein interactions.
Synthetic immunostimulatory oligonucleotides that contain CpG motifs that are similar to those found in bacterial DNA stimulate a similar response of the TLR receptors. Therefore immunomodulatory ODNs have various potential therapeutic uses, including treatment of immune deficiency and cancer. Employment of liposomal nanoparticles functionalized with immunomodulatory ODNs will allow for increased preferential uptake and therefore increased therapeutic efficacy. Notably, smaller particles (25 to 40 nm) such as those provided herein penetrate tissue barriers more efficiently, therefore providing more effective activation of innate immune responses. Thus, small liposomal nanoparticles of 30 nm in size, functionalized with stabilized with functional CpG motif-containing DNA, would provide enhanced therapeutic effect.
Down regulation of the immune system would involve knocking down the gene responsible for the expression of the Toll-like receptor. This antisense approach involves use of liposomal nanoparticles functionalized with specific antisense oligonucleotide sequences to knock out the expression of any toll-like protein.
Accordingly, in a sixth embodiment, methods of utilizing liposomal particles for modulating toll-like receptors are disclosed. The method either up-regulates or down-regulates the Toll-like-receptor through the use of a TLR agonist or a TLR antagonist, respectively. The method comprises contacting a cell having a toll-like receptor with a liposomal particle. The toll-like receptors modulated include toll-like receptor 1, toll-like receptor 2, toll-like receptor 3, toll-like receptor 4, toll-like receptor 5, toll-like receptor 6, toll-like receptor 7, toll-like receptor 8, toll-like receptor 9, toll-like receptor 10, toll-like receptor 11, toll-like receptor 12, and toll-like receptor 13.
In additional aspects of the disclosure, a liposomal particle is used to detect an intracellular target. Such methods are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,507,200, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Briefly, an oligonucleotide containing a recognition sequence that is specific for a target molecule is attached to a liposomal particle as described herein. Thus, “recognition sequence” as used herein is understood to mean a sequence that is partially or completely complementary to a target molecule of interest.
The liposomal particle with attached oligonucleotide containing a recognition sequence is initially associated with a reporter sequence. As used herein, a “reporter sequence” is understood to mean a sequence that is partially or completely complementary and therefore able to hybridize to the recognition sequence. The reporter sequence is labeled with a detectable label (such as, without limitation, a fluorophore), and is also referred to as a nanoflare. The reporter sequence is in various aspects comprised of fewer, the same or more bases than the recognition sequence, such that binding of the recognition sequence to its target molecule causes release of the hybridized reporter sequence, thereby resulting in a detectable and measurable change in the label attached to the reporter sequence.
The invention is illustrated by the following examples, which are not intended to be limiting in any way.
All reagents were obtained from the suppliers in highest purity and used without any further purification. HPLC was performed on a Varian Prostar system. UV/Vis was recorded on a Varian Cary 300 spectrophotometer. Fluorescence spectra were obtained on a SPEX FluoroLog fluorometer.
Oligonucleotides were synthesized in 1.0 micromolar scale on an automated DNA synthesizer (ABI 3400, Applied Biosystems, Inc.). After cleavage and deprotection with aqueous ammonium hydroxide (55° C., 14 h), the DNA was purified by reverse-phase HPLC and quantified by UV spectrometer.
The lipid monomer (40 μmol of 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC) dissolved in chloroform) was added to a 20 mL vial and then evaporated before overnight lyophilization to remove the solvent resulting in a thin lipid film. The film was then rehydrated with HBS buffer (5.0 mL, 20 mM Hepes buffer, 150 mM NaCl at pH 7.4) followed by vigorous mixing to form a liposomal suspension and was then probe-sonicated in an ice bath for 30 min without pulsating. The resulting suspension was then ultracentrifuged at 104,986 g and 4° C. for 90 min. The phospholipid concentration was calculated using elemental analysis.
Next, the DNA/RNA strands were synthesized with the α-tocopherol modification via standard solid-phase phosphoramidite chemistry on an Expedite Nucleotide Synthesis System. The strands were cleaved from the solid support and purified by reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography.
Lastly, the appropriate DNA/RNA (16 μM) was added to the 1.3 mM solution of SUVs and allowed to stir overnight. The particles were then purified the next day by centrifugation filters with cut-off of 100 kDa. The particles were then analyzed via TEM and dynamic light scattering. Gel electrophoresis of liposomal particles encapsulated with FITC and surface functionalized with CY5-labeled DNA is shown in
To visualize the cellular uptake of LSNAs, HeLa cells were grown on a Lab-Tek® II Chamber #1.5 German Coverglass System (Nalge Nunc International) overnight and incubated with Cy5-labled LSNAs (0.1 μM of DNA concentration). After 16 hours of incubation, the media was replaced with fresh media, and live cells were stained with Hoechst 33342 (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's instructions. All images were obtained with a Zeiss 510 LSM at 40× magnification using a Mai Tai 3308 laser (Spectra-Physics). Fluorescence emission was collected at 390-465 nm and 650-710 nm, with excitation at 729 and 633 nm respectively (
The cytotoxicity of liposomal particles was evaluated with a Alamar Blue® Assay (Invitrogen). Briefly, HeLa cells were seeded on a 96 well plate in 200 μL of media and incubated for 24 hours. The cells were then treated with FITC encapsulated bare SUVs and DNA functionalized LSNAs at varying concentrations of phospholipid concentrations (0, 32.5, 65, 162.5 μM). After 16 hours, medium was removed, cells were washed with PBS 3 times and then incubated with 90 μL fresh culture medium in addition to 10 μL of alamar blue reagent for 4 hours. They were then analyzed by checking the excitation at 560 nm and emission at 590 nm.
The 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine lipid monomer (DOPC), were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc. either in dry powder form or in a chloroform solution and used without further purification. Phosphoramidites and other DNA synthesis reagents were purchased from Glen Research, Inc., at the highest purity and were used as received from the manufacturer.
Lyophilization was carried out using a Freezone Lyohilizer (Labconco, Kansas City, MO). Sonication was conducted using a titanium-alloy solid probe sonicator (500 watt Vibra-Cell™ VC 505, Sonics & Materials, Inc., Newtown, CT) set at 40% intensity of 20 kHz without pulsing. Ultracentrifugation was carried out using Beckman-Coulter Avanti J-30I (Beckmann-Coulter, Inc., Indianapolis, IN). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed using Hitachi-2300 STEM electron microscope. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) was collected using a Malvern Zetasizer Nano-ZS (Malvern Instruments, UK). MALDI-ToF analysis was performed using Bruker Autoflex III SmartBean mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics Inc., MA, USA). Fluorescence measurements were carried out on Fluorlog-3 system (HORIBA Jobin Yvon Inc., NJ, USA). UV-Vis spectroscopy was collected using Cary 5000 UV-Vis spectrophotometer. (Varian Inc., CA, USA).
The oligonucleotides were synthesized using automated solid-support phosphoramidite synthesis on an Expedite 8909 Nucleotide Synthesis System (MM48 Synthesizer, Bioautomation) using DCI as an activator. Tocopherol phosphoramidite was coupled via an automated protocol using extended 15 minutes coupling time. After the completion of solid phase synthesis, the oligonucleotide strands were cleaved from the solid support using an overnight treatment with aqueous ammonium hydroxide (28-30% aqueous solution, Aldrich), after which time the excess of the ammonia was removed using a gentle flow of nitrogen gas (house nitrogen was used). The oligonucleotides were purified using Microsorb C18 column on a reverse-phase high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC, Varian) using a gradient of TEAA (triethylammonium acetate) buffer and acetonitrile (gradient: 10% v/v to 100% v/v acetonitrile over 30 min). The collected fractions containing product were concentrated on a lyophilizer. The obtained oligonucleotides were re-suspended in nanopure water and purity was analyzed using MALDI-TOF and denaturing acrylamide gel electrophoresis techniques.
The volume of lipid monomer stock solution (25-50 mg) was added to a 20 mL vial and placed into a 25 mL glass vial and the solvent was carefully evaporated using a stream of nitrogen. The obtained lipid monomer was further dried overnight under vacuum to remove the residual chloroform. The resulting lipid film was then hydrated with 20 mM HBS (5.0 mL) followed by vortexing the vial to form a liposomal suspension. This suspension was further probe-sonicated for 30 min keeping the temperature of the lipid mixture below 10° C. (cooling with an ice-water bath). After the sonication, the suspension was subjected to ultracentrifugation at 100,000×g for 90 min at 12° C. After the centrifugation, the clear supernatant containing the desired small unilamellar vesicles (SUV) was collected and the pellet was discarded (
The obtained SUVs were further analyzed using dynamic light scattering (DLS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) techniques (
In order to prepare liposomal SNAs, 15 μM of the desired 3′-tocopherol modified oligonucleotide was added to a SUV solution (1.3 mM of [phospholipid]) and allowed to shake overnight. The resulting solution was then purified via gel filtration chromatography on cross-linked sepharose column (Separose CL 4B, Aldrich). The particle size distribution was analyzed using DLS. To observe the liposomal SNAs using TEM, the samples were placed onto plasma-cleaned carbon TEM grids and further stained with solution of uranyl acetate (2% w/v) (stained for 2 min then washed with water and allowed to dry). The dried grid was then imaged under the Hitachi-2300 STEM electron microscope.
All gel electrophoresis experiments were conducted in a 1% agarose gel in 1×TBE (tris borate, EDTA) buffer. The samples were loaded in the wells with the aid of glycerol (30% v/v, 5 μL) as a loading agent. The gel chamber was filled with 1×TBE and was precooled with ice. The gels were run at 70V for 1 hour at 10° C. and the images of the gel were recorded with Fluorchem Q with a Cy5 filter.
To determine the loading of DNA on the surface of liposomes, an increasing concentration of Cy5-labeled 3′ tocopherol-modified DNA was incubated overnight with a fixed concentration of SUVs (1.3 mM of [P]). The liposomal SNAs were then analyzed using gel electrophoresis. To quantify the DNA density functionalized on the SUVs, the constructs were dissolved in 1% SDS solution and absorbance was collected at 260 nm and calculated using the extinction coefficient of the respective DNA strand. The number of liposomes in the corresponding solution was calculated using the theoretical equation with the assumption that the phospholipid concentration of the liposomes remains constant after functionalization.
A two nanoparticle-component system was formed using liposomal SNAs functionalized with strands complementary to the linker strand as described in Table 1. The aggregates were formed by addition of two DNA functionalized Liposomal SNAs and hybridizing them to the linker strand in a 1:1 ratio (the total DNA concentration 1.5 μM, volume 1 mL). The absorbance spectra for the liposomal SNAs with the linker was collected using Cary 5000 UV-Vis spectrometer and compared to the absorbance spectra of liposomal SNAs without the linker. The aggregates were then subjected to a gradual increase in temperature at a rate of 0.25° C./min from 20 to 65° C. and the absorbance was monitored at 260 nm for the aggregates.
Dry DOPC monomer (25 mg) was resuspended in a 20 mM Sulforhodamine B solution in HBS (5 mL). The resulting suspension was gradually extruded through a series of polycarbonate membranes, 100 nm, 80 nm, 50 nm, 30 nm sizes. The rhodamine containing liposomes were separated from the free rhodamine via gel filtration chromatography on cross-linked sepharose (Sepharose CL-4B, Aldrich). The obtained particles were functionalized with DNA-tocopherol conjugates using the procedure described above. To analyze the serum stability of the constructs, the rhodamine containing liposomes and liposomal-SNAs were suspended in 10% fetal bovine serum solution in HBS, and the release of the dye was monitored in a Fluorlog-3 system by exciting the sample at 420 nm and measuring the intensity at 480 nm.
SKOV-3 cells were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and were grown in the McCoy's 5A medium with 10% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum, 100 U of penicillin and 50 μg of streptomycin and maintained at 37° C. with 5% CO2 as per ATCC instructions. For cellular studies, the cells were plated 24 hours prior to the treatment at the 50% confluency.
For visualizing of the cellular internalization of liposomal SNAs, the SKOV3 cells were plated on 35 mm FluoroDish™ chamber at 50% confluent. The cells were incubated with Cy5-labeled liposomal SNAs (0.1 μM of DNA concentration) in media for 20 hours followed by three washes with 1×PBS containing 0.01% (by volume) tween-20 then replaced with fresh media. The nuclei were stained with Hoechst 3342 (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's protocol. The live cells were then imaged with Zeiss LSM 510 inverted laser scanning confocal microscope with Mai Tai 3308 laser (Spectra-Physics) at 40× magnification. The Hoechst was excited at 780 nm and collected at 390-495 nm and excited at 640 nm and emission at 650-710 nm.
To compare the cellular uptake of liposomal SNAs to free-DNA strand, the cells were plated on a 96 well in 100 μL of media and incubated with 0.1 μM concentration of free-DNA or liposomal SNAs and for 24 hours. The untreated cells were used as a negative control for the experiment. After the incubation period, the cells were washed 3 times with 1×PBS containing 0.01% (by volume) of Tween-20 and then trypsinized to form a suspension. Flow cytometry was performed on the cellular suspension using Cy5 intensity channel on Guava easyCyte 8HT (Millipore, USA) using the signal from the untreated cells as for background intensity. The error values were calculated using the standard error of the mean of median signal from different wells representing a single sample.
To evaluate the cytotoxicity of the liposomal SNAs, the SKOV-3 cells were plated on a 96 well 24 hours before the experiment. The cells were treated with liposomal SNAs at varying concentration of DNA for 24 hours. The cytotoxicity of liposomal SNAs was compared to DharmaFECT® 1 (Dharmacon), a commercially available transfection agent. The cells were transfected with varying concentrations of DNA transfected with DharmaFECT® 1 following the manufacturer's transfection protocol. The cells, that didn't receive the treatment, were used as a negative control. After the incubation period of 24 hours, the cells were washed three times with 1×PBS and incubated with alamarBlue® solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) and incubated at 37° C. in 5% CO2 for 4 hours. The fluorescence emission at 590 nm was recorded using the BioTek, Synergy H4 Hybrid Reader.
The SKOV-3 cells were plated in a 6-well plate and incubated at 37° C. in 5% CO2 overnight. The cells were incubated with anti-HER2 antisense liposomal SNAs and scrambled liposomal SNAs. After a treatment of 24 hours, the medium was replaced with fresh medium and the cells were allowed to grow for an additional 48 hours. To analyze the HER2 protein knockdown, the cells were collected and re-suspended in 100 μL of mammalian cell lysis buffer (Cell Signaling, MA, USA) containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors. (Thermo Scientific, IL, USA). The protein concentration in the cell lysates was determined using a BCA Protein Assay Kit (Pierce, IL, USA). Equal amounts (20 μg) of proteins were fractionated by 4-20% Precast gradient gel (Bio-Rad) and transferred to a nitrocellulose membranes (Thermo Scientific, IL, USA). The membrane was blocked using 5% dry non-fat milk solution (w/v) in tris-buffered saline (TBS). The proteins were detected with primary rabbit antibodies against HER2 (1:1000), and GAPDH (1:500) followed by anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (1:10,000) (LI-COR Biosciences, NE, USA). The fluorescence signal was recorded using the Odyssey® Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences, NE, USA).
A typical liposomal SNA was synthesized in two steps (
To prepare small unilamellar vesicles (SUVs), DOPC (1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine), an unsaturated lipid containing two oleic acid derivatives extending from a phosphate moiety and terminated with a quaternary ammonium head group, was selected. In a typical experiment, a suspension of DOPC monomers in 20 mM HBS was sonicated to produce on average 30 nm SUV particles. The particles were isolated by centrifugation (100,000×g). Further extrusion of this material, through a polycarbonate membrane with 30 nm pores yielded particles with a polydispersity index (PDI) of 0.11 in 70% overall yield. The particles were then redispersed in saline, and DLS was used to confirm their 30±3 nm diameter, which was also subsequently confirmed by TEM analysis using negative staining.
The second step of the synthesis involves surface functionalization of the liposome with a nucleic acid derivative possessing a hydrophobic tocopherol moiety, which effectively inserts into the lipid bilayer defining the SUV. Although a variety of hydrophobic head groups might be suitable [Pfeiffer et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126: 10224 (2004); Banchelli et al., J. Phys. Chem. B 112: 10942 (2008); Dave et al., ACS Nano 5: 1304 (2011); Jakobsen et al., Bioconjugate Chem. 24: 1485 (2013)], α-tocopherol (a form of vitamin E) was chosen because of its biocompatibility and low cost. The α-tocopherol was installed onto nucleic acid strands (DNA) via a conventional oligonucleotide synthesis, utilizing a commercially available tocopherol phosphoramidite derivative (Glenn Research). The liposomal SNAs were synthesized by incubating a suspension of SUVs (1.3 mM by lipid) with the nucleic acid-tocopherol conjugates (16 mM) using a lipid-to-nucleic acid ratio of 8:1 for 12 hours at room temperature. The liposome-free tocopherol-nucleic acid was then removed from the sample by size exclusion chromatography on a sepharose column (Sepharose 4LB). In the case of DNA, a significant drop in the zeta potential from −1 to −23 occurs after this step, indicating liposome surface functionalization with the negatively charged nucleic acid. In addition, dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis of the final nanoparticle samples showed an increase in particle size from 30 to 46 nm, consistent with the loading of the 8-9 nm long duplex structure. To determine quantitatively the average number of nucleic strands loaded onto the surface of a liposome, the liposomal-SNAs were dissolved in the presence of Triton X to release them. The final nucleic acid concentration was determined by measuring the absorbance at 260 nm relative to a calibrated oligonucleotide standard. The liposomal SNAs coated with DNA had on average of 70 strands per particle (
These liposome SNA structures have several interesting properties. First, they are remarkably stable compared to the native 30 nm liposome constructs from which they have been derived (
A second property of liposomal SNAs is their ability to cooperatively bind complementary nucleic acids. This is a hallmark feature of all SNAs and derives from the densely packed and highly oriented configuration of the surface-bound nucleic acids. To explore the binding and subsequent melting properties of the liposomal-SNA constructs, two sets of liposomal-SNA nanoparticles were synthesized, each made with different DNA sequences: particle A and particle B. A DNA linker sequence that is complementary to the oligonucleotide sequences of the liposomal-SNAs was used to facilitate polymerization through hybridization. Upon addition of the linker sequence to an equimolar mixture of the two liposomal SNA particles, aggregation occurred as evidenced by DLS and eventually a flaky precipitate was formed [Dave et al., ACS Nano 5: 1304 (2011)]. These aggregates were re-suspended in 20 mM HBS (150 mM NaCl), and a melting analysis was performed by monitoring the absorbance at 260 nm. Importantly, a remarkably narrow melting transition was observed at 47.5° C. (full width at half-maximum of the first derivative is approximately 2° C.), which is highly diagnostic of an SNA structure with a high surface density of nucleic acids (
An important property of SNAs pertains to their ability to enter cells without the need for ancillary transfection agents [Cutler et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134: 1376 (2012)]. To determine if liposomal SNAs exhibit this behavior, ovarian cancer ascites (SKOV3, American Type Culture Collection) were incubated in the presence of the liposomal SNAs synthesized with a 5′-Cy5-labeled DNA in the absence of any transfection agents at different DNA concentrations. The uptake of liposomal-SNAs in SKOV3 cells was analyzed using confocal microscopy and flow cytometry techniques. Remarkably, liposomal SNAs readily entered cells in high quantities even after 1 hour of incubation, which demonstrates their utility as intracellular probes and target regulating agents. In addition, no significant uptake of free DNA strand (5′-Cy5-labeled) in SKOV3 cells was detected even after 36 hours of incubation under identical conditions. Similar to the Au—SNAs, high uptake of liposomal-SNAs in SKOV3 cells didn't cause any toxicity even at high concentrations (
After establishing that liposomal-SNAs are not cytotoxic, a liposomal-SNA was synthesized that was capable of knocking down human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)—an oncogene overexpressed in SKOV3 cells [Zhang et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134: 16488 (2012)]. To compare the effectiveness of the antisense activity of liposomal-SNAs to that of conventional transfection systems, SKOV3 cells were incubated in the presence of anti-HER2 liposomal-SNAs, and control liposomal-SNAs (each at a total DNA concentration of 1 μM). After 72 hours of incubation, the cells were harvested and analyzed for protein content by Western blotting. Importantly, HER2 protein levels were reduced by 85% in the presence of anti-HER2 liposomal-SNAs compared to the internal reference gene glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (
In summary, a scalable synthetic route for novel metal-free liposomal SNAs has been developed. Such structures are assembled rapidly from readily available, non-toxic starting materials. The nucleic acid architecture not only stabilizes these small liposomal structures but also facilitates their internalization by SKOV3 cells. Consequently, such structures show utility as new biocompatible gene regulation constructs that exhibit many of the attractive properties of the more conventional gold nanoparticle-based SNAs.
Ramos-Blue™ cells are NF-κB/AP-1 reporter B lymphocyte cells. Ramos-Blue is a B lymphocyte cell line that stably expresses an NF-κB/AP-1-inducible SEAP (secreted embryonic alkaline phosphatase) reporter gene. When stimulated, they produce SEAP in the supernatant that can be readily monitored using the QUANTI-Blue assay. QUANTI-Blue is a SEAP detection medium that turns blue in the presence of SEAP (
When contacted with CpG-containing oligonucleotides, activation of the Ramos-Blue cells was detected (
To further demonstrate the effectiveness of a composition of the disclosure, liposomal particles were designed to individually target HIF1-α and BAX. The experiments utilized the Neuro-2a (N2A) cell line, which is a fast-growing mouse neuroblastoma cell line. Contacting the N2A cells with liposomal particles targeting both HIF1-α (
For the experiments in which HIF1-α was targeted, the N2A cells were first subjected to Cocl2-stimulated hypoxia, which increased HIF1-α mRNA expression by about 50%. Next, the N2A cells were contacted with the liposomal particles functionalized with siRNA directed against HIF1-α. The contacting resulted in a knockdown of HIF1-α of about 50% (
For the experiments in which BAX was targeted, treatment of N2A cells with the resulted in an approximate 65% knockdown of BAX mRNA by the liposomal particles and greater than 50% knockdown of BAX mRNA by lipid micelle SNAs (as measured against control liposomal SNAs) (
These experiments showed that the liposomal particles of the disclosure are highly effective at inhibiting target gene expression in mammalian cells.
It will be evident to one skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited to the foregoing illustrative examples, and that it can be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the essential attributes thereof. It is therefore desired that the examples be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, reference being made to the appended claims, rather than to the foregoing examples, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims and therefore intended to be embraced therein.
This application is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/242,704, filed Jan. 8, 2019, which is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/101,523, filed Jun. 3, 2016, which is a U.S. National Phase of International Patent Application No. PCT/US14/68429, filed Dec. 3, 2014, which claims the priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/911,334, filed Dec. 3, 2013, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/982,269, filed Apr. 21, 2014, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
This invention was made with government support under HR0011-13-2-0018 awarded by the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency and CA151880 awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The government has certain rights in the invention.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3687808 | Merigan et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
| 4469863 | Ts'o et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4476301 | Imbach et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4845205 | Huynh Dinh et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4981957 | Lebleu et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5008050 | Cullis et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5023243 | Tullis | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5034506 | Summerton et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5118800 | Smith et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5130302 | Spielvogel et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5134066 | Rogers et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5166315 | Summerton et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5175273 | Bischofberger et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5177196 | Meyer, Jr. et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5185444 | Summerton et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5188897 | Suhadolnik et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5194599 | Froehler et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5214134 | Weis et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5216141 | Benner | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5235033 | Summerton et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5264423 | Cohen et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5264562 | Matteucci | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5264564 | Matteucci | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5264618 | Felgner et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5276019 | Cohen et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5278302 | Caruthers et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5286717 | Cohen et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5319080 | Leumann | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5321131 | Agrawal et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5359044 | Cook et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5367066 | Urdea et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5393878 | Leumann | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5399676 | Froehler | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5405938 | Summerton et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5405939 | Suhadolnik et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5432272 | Benner | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5434257 | Matteucci et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5446137 | Maag et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5453496 | Caruthers et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5455233 | Spielvogel et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5457187 | Gmeiner et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5459255 | Cook et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5466677 | Baxter et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5466786 | Buhr et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5470967 | Huie et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5476925 | Letsinger et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5484908 | Froehler et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5489677 | Sanghvi et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5502177 | Matteucci et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5514785 | Van Ness et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5519126 | Hecht | May 1996 | A |
| 5519134 | Acevedo et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5525711 | Hawkins et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5527899 | Froehler | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5536821 | Agrawal et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5539082 | Nielsen et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5541306 | Agrawal et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5541307 | Cook et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5550111 | Suhadolnik et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5552540 | Haralambidis | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5561225 | Maddry et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5563253 | Agrawal et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5565555 | Froehler et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5567811 | Misiura et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5571799 | Tkachuk et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5576427 | Cook et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5587361 | Cook et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5587469 | Cook et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5591722 | Montgomery et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5594121 | Froehler et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5596086 | Matteucci et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5596091 | Switzer | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5597909 | Urdea et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5602240 | De Mesmaeker et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5608046 | Cook et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5610289 | Cook et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5610300 | Altmann et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5614617 | Cook et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5618704 | Sanghvi et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5623070 | Cook et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5625050 | Beaton et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5627053 | Usman et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5633360 | Bischofberger et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5639873 | Barascut et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5645985 | Froehler et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5646265 | McGee | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5646269 | Matteucci et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5658873 | Bertsch-Frank et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5663312 | Chaturvedula | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5670633 | Cook et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5672697 | Buhr et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5677437 | Teng et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5677439 | Weis et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5681941 | Cook et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5700920 | Altmann et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5714331 | Buchardt et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5719262 | Buchardt et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5721218 | Froehler | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5750692 | Cook et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5763588 | Matteucci et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5792608 | Swaminathan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5792747 | Schally et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5814666 | Green et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5830653 | Froehler et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5955589 | Cook et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6005096 | Matteucci et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6051698 | Janjic et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6239116 | Krieg et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6271209 | Smith et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6406705 | Davis et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6677153 | Iversen | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 7404969 | Chen et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7514099 | Chen et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7833992 | Vargeese et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7964578 | Vargeese et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 8507200 | Mirkin et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8846080 | Biemans et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8933046 | Machuy et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8940310 | Barrat et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 9364433 | Andersson et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9693957 | Lin et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 9868955 | Guiducci et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9901616 | Dhar et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
| 10182988 | Mirkin | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10208310 | Mader et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10653780 | Hope et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
| 20020172711 | Martin et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030026782 | Krieg | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030044354 | Carpenter et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030147966 | Franzen et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030170162 | Nayfeh et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040014956 | Woolf et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040033197 | Madar et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040053384 | Sligar et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040158051 | Ozkan et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040170560 | Fossheim et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040219565 | Kauppinen et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050130167 | Bao et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050130911 | Uhlmann et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20060014191 | Lao et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060083781 | Shastri et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060292174 | de los Rios et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070243136 | Fisher et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070298257 | Ludwig et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080175893 | Huang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080181928 | Hakimi-Mehr et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080194463 | Weller et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080311182 | Ferrari et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090018028 | Lindsay et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090053169 | Castillo et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090322327 | Gao | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100003317 | Akinc et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100092486 | Kandimalla et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100144848 | Vogel et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100166842 | Lu et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100267814 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20110020242 | Zheng et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110052680 | Hendrickson et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110052697 | Farokhzad et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110159081 | Biemans et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110201594 | Murthi et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110223257 | Zhao et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110229529 | Irvine et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110237435 | Ryan | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20120082616 | Trawick et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120149843 | Chien et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120282186 | Mirkin et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130028857 | Gao et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130089614 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130123333 | Mirkin et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130149374 | Lee et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130196951 | Schoenfisch et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130252852 | Pfeiffer et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130295129 | Irvine et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130315831 | Shi et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140065425 | Bogdanov | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20150080320 | Desai | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150111790 | Ategeka et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20160108123 | Freeman et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160186178 | Radovic-Moreno et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160194642 | Gryaznov et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160237429 | Cubillos-Ruiz et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160274134 | Mutharasan et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160310425 | Mirkin et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20170157048 | Radovic-Moreno et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20180222982 | Dranoff et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20200030440 | Bazmorelli et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 101180400 | May 2008 | CN |
| 103212089 | Jul 2013 | CN |
| 1 072 679 | Jan 2001 | EP |
| 2162117 | Mar 2010 | EP |
| 2399608 | Dec 2011 | EP |
| 2162117 | Feb 2018 | EP |
| WO-1996034876 | Nov 1996 | WO |
| WO-199712896 | Apr 1997 | WO |
| WO-9818810 | May 1998 | WO |
| WO-199839352 | Sep 1998 | WO |
| WO-199914226 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| WO-2003086280 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| WO-2005030259 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005063201 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005063288 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| WO-2006099445 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| WO-2007008463 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007064857 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007096134 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| WO-2008014979 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| WO-2009061515 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009073984 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009120887 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| WO-2010105209 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| WO-2012055933 | May 2012 | WO |
| WO-2012068470 | May 2012 | WO |
| WO-2013012628 | Jan 2013 | WO |
| WO-2013049941 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| WO-2013151771 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| WO-2014169264 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| WO-2015013673 | Jan 2015 | WO |
| WO-2015013675 | Jan 2015 | WO |
| WO-2015187966 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO-2017035278 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO-2018067302 | Apr 2018 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Watts, et al. (2012) “Silencing disease genes in the laboratory and the clinic”, Journal of Pathology, 226: 365-79. (Year: 2012). |
| Samadikhah, et al. (2011) “Preparation, characterization, and efficient transfection of cationic liposomes and nanomagnetic cationic liposomes”, International Journal of Nanomedicine, 6: 2275-83. (Year: 2011). |
| Raouane, et al. (2012) “Lipid Conjugated Oligonucleotides: A Useful Strategy for Delivery”, Bioconjugate Chemistry, 23: 1091-1104. (Year: 2012). |
| Agbasi-Porter et al., Transcription inhibition using oligonucleotide-modified gold nanoparticles, Bioconjugate Chem., 17(5):1178-83 (2006). |
| Alemdaroglu et al.,DNA Block Copolymer Micelles—A combinatorial Tool for Cancer Tanotechnology, Advanced Materials 20: 899 (2008). |
| Ali et al., “Vaccines Combined with Immune Checkpoint Antibodies Promote Cytotoxic T-cell Activity and Tumor Eradication,” Cancer Immunology Research 4(2):95-100 (2016). |
| Altschul et al., Basic local alignment search tool, J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-10 (1990). |
| Andrews, et al., “Conjugation of Lipid and CpG-Containing Oligonucleotide Yields an Efficient Method for Liposome Incorporation,” Bioconjugate Chem 22:1279-1286 (2011). |
| Bae et al., “Targeted drug delivery to tumors: myths, reality and possibility.” J Control Release 153(3):198-205 (2011). |
| Banchelli et al., “Phospholipid membranes decorated by cholesterol-based oligonucleotides as soft hybrid nanostructures,” J. Phys. Chem. B 112:10942-52 (2008). |
| Banga et al., “Liposomal spherical nucleic acids,” J Am Chem Soc. 136(28):9866-9 (2014). |
| Bouderault et al., “Nanoscale tools to selectively destroy cancer cells.” Chem Commun. (18):2118-20 (2008). |
| Briley et al., In Nanomaterials for Biomedicine; American Chemical Society, 1119:1-20 (2012). |
| Bunge et al., Lipophilic oligonucleotides spontaneously insert into lipid membranes, bind complementary DNA strands, and sequester into lipid-disordered domains, Langmuir, 23(8):4455-64 (2007). |
| Burgess, Liposome preparation—Avanti@ Polar Lipids. Sigma-Aldrich. 3 pages (1998). |
| Cagdas et al., “Liposomes as Potential Drug Carrier Systems for Drug Delivery,” In Application of Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery, Chapter 1, 51 pages (2014). |
| Cao et al., Reversible Cell-Specific Drug Delivery with Aptamer-Functionalized Liposomes, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 48:6494-8 (2009). |
| Capaccioli et al., “Cationic lipids improve antisense oligonucleotide uptake and prevent degradation in cultured cells and inhuman serum,” Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 197(2):818-25 (1993). |
| Chien et al., DNA-nanoparticle micelles as supramolecular fluorogenic substrates enabling catalytic signal amplification and detection by DNAzyme probes, Chem. Commun., 47: 167 (2011). |
| Chinnathambi et al,. “Binding Mode of CpG Oligodeoxynucleotides to Nanoparticles Regulates Bifurcated Cytokine induction via Toll-like Receptor 9,” Scientific Reports 2:534, pp. 1-9 (2012). |
| Cho et al., “Targeted delivery of siRNA-generating DNA nanocassettes using multifunctional nanoparticles,” Small 9(11):1964-73 (2013). |
| Cho et al., “Therapeutic nanoparticles for drug delivery in cancer,” Clin Cancer Res. 14(5):1310-6 (2008). |
| Choi et al., Mechanism for the endocytosis of spherical nucleic acid nanoparticle conjugates, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 110: 7625 (2013). |
| Cook, Medicinal chemistry of antisense oligonucleotides—future opportunities, Anti-Cancer Drug Design, 6:585-607 (1991). |
| Cutler et al., Polyvalent nucleic acid nanostructures, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 133:9254 (2011). |
| Cutler et al., Polyvalent oligonucleotide iron oxide nanoparticle “click” conjugates, Nano Lett., 10:1477 (2010). |
| Cutler et al., Spherical nucleic acids, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134: 1376 (2012). |
| Dave et al., Programmable assembly of DNA-functionalized liposomes by DNA, ACS Nano, 5:1304 (2011). |
| De Mesmaeker et al., Backbone modifications in oligonucleotides and peptide nucleic acid systems, Curr. Opin. in Struct. Biol., 5: 343-55 (1995). |
| Dua et al., “Liposome: Methods of Preparation and Applications,” International Journal of Pharmaceutical Studies and Research, 3(2): 14-20 (7 pages) (2012). |
| Englisch et al., Angewandte Chemie, International Edition, 30:613-722 (1991). |
| Farokhzad et al., Nanomedicine: developing smarter therapeutic and diagnostic modalities, Drug Delivery Rev., 58:1456 (2006). |
| Ferrari, “Cancer nanotechnology: opportunities and challenges,” Nature Reviews Cancer 5:161-71 (2005). |
| Freier et al., The ups and downs of nucleic acid duplex stability: structure-stability studies on chemically-modified DNA:RNA duplexes, Nucleic Acids Research, 25:4429-43 (1997). |
| Giljohann et al., Gene regulation with polyvalent siRNA-nanoparticle conjugates, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 131:2072 (2009). |
| Grijalvo et al., “Oligonucleotide delivery: a patent review (2010-2013),” Expert Opin Ther Pat. 24(7):801-19 (2014). |
| Gunnarsson et al., Liposome-Based Chemical barcodes for Single Molecule DNA Detection Using Imaging Mass Spectrometry, Nano. Lett., 10:732-37 (2010). |
| Gunnarsson et al., Single-Molecule Detection and Mismatch Discrimination of Unlabeled DNA Targets, Nano Lett., 8:183-8 (2008). |
| Hope et al., “Generation of Multilamellar and Unilamellar Phospholipid Vesicles,” Chemistry and Physics of Lipids 40:89-107 (1986). |
| Hope et al., Production of large unilamellar vesicles by a rapid extrusion procedure: characterization of size distribution, trapped volume and ability to maintain a membrane potential, Biochim. Biophys. Acta., 812:55-65 (1985). |
| Houot et al., “T-cell modulation combined with intratumoral CpG cures lymphoma in a mouse model without the need for chemotherapy,” Blood 113(15):546-3552 (2009). |
| Hurst et al., Maximizing DNA loading on a range of gold nanoparticle sizes, Anal. Chem., 78:8313 (2006). |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, United States Patent Office, PCT/US2014/068429, dated Jun. 7, 2016. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Search Authority, United States Patent Office, PCT/US2014/068429, dated Aug. 10, 2015. |
| Jahn et al., “Microfluidic Directed Formation of Liposomes of Controlled Size,” Langmuir 23(11): 6289-93 (5 pages) (2007). |
| Jakobsen et al., Assembly of liposomes controlled by triple helix formation, Bioconjugate Chem., 24:1485-95 (2013). |
| Jensen et al., Spherical nucleic acid nanoparticle conjugates as an RNAi-based therapy for glioblastoma, Sci. Trans. Med., 5:209ra152 (2013). |
| Kandimalla et al., “Secondary structures in CpG oligonucleotides affect immunostimulatory activity,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 306:948-953 (2003). |
| Kasuya et al., “Bio-nanocapsule-liposome conjugates for in vivo pinpoint drug and gene delivery,” Chapter 8, Methods Enzymol. 464:147-66 (2009). |
| Kelly et al., “Targeted Liposomal Drug Delivery to Monocytes and Macrophages,” Journal of Drug Delivery, Article ID 727241, pp. 1-11 (2011). |
| Kim et al., “Cationic solid lipid nanoparticles reconstituted from low density lipoprotein components for delivery of siRNA,” Mol Pharm. 5(4):622-31 (2008). |
| Kim et al., Effect of bovine serum albumin on the stability of methotrexate-encapsulated liposomes, Arch. Pharmacal Res., 14:336 (1991). |
| Kreig, “Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) agonists in the treatment of cancer,” Oncogene 27:116-67 (2008). |
| Kroschwitz ed., The Concise Encyclopedia Of Polymer Science And Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, 858-9 (1990). |
| Laouini et al., “Preparation, Characterization and Applications of Liposomes: State of the Art,” Journal of Colloid Science and Biotechnology 1:148-68 (2012). |
| Lee et al., “Imageable Antigen-Presenting Gold Nanoparticle Vaccines for Effective Cancer Immunotherapy In vivo”, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 51(35), 8800-8805 (2012). |
| Lee et al., Silver nanoparticle-oligonucleotide conjugates based on DNA with triple cyclic disulfide moieties, Nano Lett., 7: 2112 (2007). |
| Lesieur et al., “Size analysis and stability study of lipid vesicles by high-performance gel exclusion chromatography, turbidity. and dynamic light scattering,” Analytical Biochemistry 192(2):334-43 (Abstract Only) (1991). |
| Li et al., “Combination Delivery of Antigens and CpG by Lanthanides-Based Core-Shell Nanoparticles for Enhanced Immune Response and Dual-Mode Imaging,” Advanced Healthcare Materials 2(10):1309-1313 (2013). |
| Li et al., “Molecular spherical nucleic acids,” PNAS pp. 1-5 (2018). |
| Li et al., “Nucleolin-targeting liposomes guided by aptamer AS1411 for the delivery of siRNA for the treatment of malignant melanomas,” Biomaterials 35(12):3840-50 (2014). |
| Li et al., Reversible and Chemically Programmable Micelle Assembly with DNA Block-Copolymer Amphiphiles, Nano Lett., 4:1055 (2004). |
| Li et al., Thermal stability of DNA functionalized gold nanoparticles, Bioconjugate Chem., 24:1790-7 (2013). |
| Lin et al., “Gold Nanoparticle Delivery of Modified CpG Stimulates Macrophases and Inhibits Tumor Growth for Enhanced Immunotherapy”, PLOS ONE, 8(5):e63550 9 pages (2013). |
| Liu et al., “Membrane anchored immunostimulatory oligonucleotides for in vivo cell modification and localized immunotherapy,” Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 50(31):7052-5 (2011). |
| Liu et al., “Silica Nanoparticle Supported Lipid Bilayers for Gene Delivery,” Chem. Commun. 5100-5102 (2009). |
| Liu et al., DNA-based micelles: synthesis, micellar properties and size-dependent cell permeability, Chemistry, 16:3791-7 (2010). |
| Lytton-Jean et al., Highly Cooperative Behavior of Peptide Nucleic Acid Linked DNA Modified Gold Nanoparticle and Comb Polymer Aggregates, Advanced Materials, 21: 706 (2009). |
| Mangsbo et al., “Enhanced Tumor Eradication by Combining CTLA-4 or PD-1 Blockage with CpG Therapy”, Journal of Immunotherapy 33(3):225-235 (2010). |
| Martin et al.,Ein neur Zugang zu 2′-O-alkylribonucleosiden and Eigenschaften deren oligonucleotide Hely. Chim. Acta, 78:486-504 (1995). |
| Massich et al., “Regulating Immune Response Using Polyvalent Nucleic Acid-Gold Nanoparticle Conjugates”, Molecular Pharmaceutics 6(6):1934-1940 (2009). |
| McAllister et al., Polymeric nanogels produced via inverse microemulsion polymerization as potential gene and antisense delivery agents, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124:15198 (2002). |
| Mirkin et al., A DNA-based method for rationally assembling nanoparticles into macroscopic materials, Natur, 382:607-9 (1996). |
| Mohamed et al., “Effect of toll-like receptor 7 and 9 targeted therapy to prevent the development of hepatocellular carcinoma,” Liver Int. 35(3):1063-76 (2015). |
| Mohamed et al., “TLR9 mediates S. aureus killing inside osteoblasts via induction of oxidative stress,” BMC Microbiology, 16: article 230, 8 pages (2016). |
| Nielsen et al., Sequence-selective recognition of DNA by strand displacement with a thymine-substituted polyamide, Science, 254:1497-500 (1991). |
| Nikolov et al., “Bias-dependent admittance in hybrid bilayer membranes,” Langmuir. 22(17):7156-8 (2006). |
| Ozpolat et al., “Nanomedicine based approaches for the delivery of siRNA in cancer,” J. Intern. Med. 267(1):44-53 (2010). |
| Patel et al., Scavenger receptors mediate cellular uptake of polyvalent oligonucleotide-functionalized gold nanoparticles, Bioconj. Chem., 21:2250 (2010). |
| Peter et al., “Characterization of suppressive oligodeoxynucleotides that inhibit Toll-like receptor-9-mediated activation of innate immunity,” Immunology. 123(1):118-28 (2008). |
| Pfeiffer et al., Bivalent Cholesterol-Based Coupling of Oligonucleotides to Lipid Membrane Assemblies J. Am. Chem. Soc., 126, 10224-10225 (2004). |
| Pfeiffer et al., Quantification of oligonucleotide modifications of small unilamellar lipid vesicles, Anal. Chem., 78:7493-8 (2006). |
| Prigodich et al., Nano-flares for mRNA regulation and detection, ACS Nano, 3:2147 (2009). |
| Radovic-Moreno, et al., “Immunomodulatory spherical nucleic acids”, PNAS 112(13):3892-3897 (2015). |
| Rosi et al., Nanostructures in biodiagnostics, Chem. Rev., 105:1547 (2005). |
| Rosi et al., Oligonucleotide-modified gold nanoparticles for intracellular gene regulation. Science 312: 1027 (2006). |
| Sanghvi, Chapter 15, Antisense Research and Application, Ed. S. T. Crooke and B. Lebleu, CRC Press, (1993). |
| Seferos et al., “Polyvalent DNA nanoparticle conjugates stabilize nucleic acids,” Nano Lett. 9(1):308-11 (2009). |
| Seferos et al., Locked nucleic acid-nanoparticle conjugates, ChemBioChem, 8:1230 (2007). |
| Senior et al., Stability of small unilamellar liposomes in serum and clearance from the circulation: the effect of the phospholipid and cholesterol components, Life Sci. 30:2123 (1982). |
| Sokolova et al., “The use of calcium phosphate nanoparticles encapsulating Toll-like receptor ligands and the antigen hemagglutinin to induce dendritic cell maturation and T cell activation”, Biomaterials 31:5627-5633 (2010). |
| Stengel et al., Determinants for Membrane Fusion Induced by Cholesterol-Modified DNA Zippers, J. Phys. Chem. B., 112:8264-74 (2008). |
| Stengel et al., DNA-Induced Programmable Fusion of Phospholipid Vesicles, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 129:9584-5 (2007). |
| Sulkowski et al., The influence of temperature, cholesterol content and pH on liposome stability, J. Mol. Struct., 744-747: 737 (2005). |
| Switaj et al., “CpG Immunostimulatory Oligodeoxynucleotide 1826 Enhances Antitumor Effect of Interleukin 12 Gene-Modified Tumor Vaccine in a Melanoma Model in Mice,” Clinical Cancer Research 10:4165-4175 (2004). |
| Tincer et al., “Immunostimulatory activity of polysccharidepoly (I:C) nanoparticles,” Biomaterial 32(18):4275-4282 (2011). |
| Versluis et al., In situ modification of plain liposomes with lipidated coiled coil forming peptides induces membrane fusion, J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 135:8057 (2013). |
| Wei et al., “Polyvalent Immunostimulatory Nanoagents with Self-Assembled CpG Oligonucleotide-Conjugated Gold Nanoparticles”, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 51(5):1202-1206 (2012). |
| West et al., “Recognition and signaling by toll-like receptors,” Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 22:409-37 (2006). |
| Whitehead et al., Knocking down barriers: advances in siRNA delivery, Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov., 8:129 (2009). |
| Willis et al., “Liposome-Anchored Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Aptamers,” Bioconjugate Chem. 9 573-582 (1998). |
| Willis et al., Liposome-Anchored Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Aptamers, Biocon. Chem., 9:573-82 (1998). |
| Wilson et al., “pH-Responsive Nanoparticle Vaccines for Dual-Delivery of Antigens and Immunostimulatory Oligonucleotides”, ACS Nano, 7(5):3912-3925 (2013). |
| Wu et al., “DNA aptamer-micelle as an efficient detection/delivery vehicle toward cancer cells,” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107(1):5-10 (2010). |
| Xing et al., Selective delivery of an anticancer drug with aptamer-functionalized liposomes to breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo, J. Mater. Chem. B., 1:5288 (2013). |
| Yin et al., “Supramolecular self-assembled nanoparticles mediate oral delivery of therapeutic TNF-? siRNA against systemic inflammation,” Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. (22):5757-61 (2013). |
| Young et al., Hollow spherical nucleic acids for intracellular gene regulation based upon biocompatible silica shells, Nano Lett., 12:3867 (2012). |
| Zhang et al., “Informational Liposomes: Complexes Derived from Cholesteryl-conjugated Oligonucleotides and Liposomes,” Tetrahedron Letters 37(35):6243-6246 (1996). |
| Zhang et al., A general approach to DNA-programmable atom equivalents, Nat. Mater., 12:741 (2013). |
| Zhang et al., Antibody-linked spherical nucleic acids for cellular targeting, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 134:16488-91 (2012). |
| Zhang et al., PowerBLAST: a new network BLAST application for interactive or automated sequence analysis and annotation, Genome Res. 7:649:56 (1997). |
| Zhang et al., Structure-activity relationships of cationic shell-crosslinked knedel-like nanoparticles: shell composition and transfection efficiency/cytotoxicity, Biomaterials, 31:1805 (2010). |
| Zheng et al., “A spherical nucleic acid platform based on self-assembled DNA biopolymer for high-performance cancer therapy,” ACS Nano. 7(8):6545-54 (2013). |
| Zheng et al., Aptamer nano-flares for molecular detection in living cells, Nano Lett., 9: 3258 (2009). |
| [No Author Listed] Modern Pharmaceutical Design. 2006. Chapter 5. p. 273. English language summary. 2 pages. |
| Aissaoui et al., Efficient topical delivery of plasmid DNA to lung in vivo mediated by putative triggered, PEGylated pDNA nanoparticles, J .Control Release. 154:275-84 (2011). |
| Ballas et al., Induction of NK activity in murine and human cells by CpG motifs in oligodeoxynucleotides and bacterial DNA. J Immunol. Sep. 1, 1996;157(5):1840-5. |
| Chan et al., Lipid-anchored DNA mediates vesicle fusion as observed by lipid and content mixing. Biointerphases. Jun. 2008;3(2):FA17. doi: 10.1116/1.2889062. |
| Chandaroy et al., Temperature-controlled content release from liposomes encapsulating Pluronic F127. J Control Release. Sep. 11, 2001;76(1-2):27-37. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(01)00429-1. |
| De Titta et al., Nanoparticle conjugation of CpG enhances adjuvancy for cellular immunity and memory recall at low dose. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Dec. 3, 2013;110(49):19902-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1313152110. Epub Nov. 18, 2013. |
| Ding et al., A statistical sampling algorithm for RNA secondary structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. Dec. 15, 2003;31(24):7280-301. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg938. |
| Dunn et al., Reductively responsive siRNA-conjugated hydrogel nanoparticles for gene silencing. J Am Chem Soc. May 2, 2012;134(17):7423-30. Doi: 10.1021/ja300174v. Epub Apr. 19, 2012. Author Manuscript, 18 pages. |
| Fang et al., Cancer cell membrane-coated nanoparticles for anticancer vaccination and drug delivery. Nano Lett. 2014;14(4):2181-8. Doi: 10.1021/nl500618u. Epub Mar. 28, 2014. |
| Israelachvili et al., Physical principles of membrane organization. Q Rev Biophys. May 1980;13(2):121-200. doi: 10.1017/s0033583500001645. |
| Kaczmarek et al., 2,-Linking of lipids and other functions to uridine through 1,2,3-triazoles and membrane anchoring of the amphiphilic products. Eur J Org Chem. Mar. 1, 2010; 2010(8):1579-86. DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.200901073. |
| Karathanasis et al., Selective targeting of nanocarriers to neutrophils and monocytes. Ann Biomed Eng. Oct. 2009;37(10):1984-92. doi: 10.1007/s10439-009-9702-5. Epub Apr. 23, 2009. |
| Kim et al., pH-responsive biodegradable assemblies containing tunable phenyl-substituted vinyl ethers for use as efficient gene delivery vehicles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. Jun. 26, 2013;5(12):5648-58. Doi: 10.1021/am400977t. Epub Jun. 17, 2013. Author Manuscript, 28 pages. |
| Kusmierz et al., Defining the Design Parameters for in Vivo Enzyme Delivery Through Protein Spherical Nucleic Acids. ACS Cent Sci. May 27, 2020;6(5):815-822. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.0c00313. Epub Apr. 27, 2020. |
| Li et al., Targeted delivery of antisense oligodeoxynucleotide and small interference RNA into lung cancer cells. Mol Pharm. Sep.-Oct. 2006;3(5):579-88. doi: 10.1021/mp060039w. Publication Date: Jul. 12, 2006. |
| Manoharan et al., Lipidic nucleic acids. Tetrahedron Letters. May 22, 1995;36(21):3651-4. |
| Periyasamy et al., Nanomaterials for the local and targeted delivery of osteoarthritis drugs. J Nanomater. 2012:2012:Article 673968. 13 pages. doi:0.1155/2012/673968. |
| Perrault et al., Mediating tumor targeting efficiency of nanoparticles through design. Nano Lett. May 2009;9(5):1909-15. Doi: 10.1021/nl900031y. |
| Raouane et al., Lipid conjugated oligonucleotides: a useful strategy for delivery. Bioconjug Chem. Jun. 20, 2012;23(6):1091-104. doi: 10.1021/bc200422w. Epub Mar. 15, 2012. |
| Rubenstein et al., Antisense oligonucleotide intralesional therapy for human PC-3 prostate tumors carried in athymic nude mice. J Surg Oncol. Jul. 1996;62(3):194-200. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199607)62:3<194::AID-JSO9>3.0.CO;2-2. |
| Samadikhah et al., Preparation, characterization, and efficient transfection of cationic liposomes and nanomagnetic cationic liposomes. Int J Nanomedicine. 2011;6:2275-83. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S23074. Epub Oct. 12, 2011. |
| Townson et al., Re-examining the size/charge paradigm: differing in vivo characteristics of size- and charge-matched mesoporous silica nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. Oct. 30, 2013;135(43):16030-3. doi: 10.1021/ja4082414. Epub Oct. 16, 2013. Author Manuscript, 13 pages. |
| Tran et al., Targeting V600EB-Raf and Akt3 using nanoliposomal-small interfering RNA inhibits cutaneous melanocytic lesion development. Cancer Res. Sep. 15, 2008;68(18):7638-49. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6614. |
| Wang et al., Co-delivery of drugs and DNA from cationic core-shell nanoparticles self-assembled from a biodegradable copolymer. Nat Mater. Oct. 2006;5(10):791-6. doi: 10.1038/nmat1737. Epub Sep. 24, 2006. PMID: 16998471. |
| Wang et al., Nanometer-sized semiconductor clusters: materials synthesis, quantum size effects, and photophysical properties. J. Phys. Chem. Jan. 1, 1991;95(2):525-32. doi: 10.1021/j100155a009. Epub May 1, 2002. |
| Zammarchi et al., Antitumorigenic potential of STAT3 alternative splicing modulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Oct. 25, 2011;108(43):17779-84. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108482108. Epub Oct. 17, 2011. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210052497 A1 | Feb 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61982269 | Apr 2014 | US | |
| 61911334 | Dec 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16242704 | Jan 2019 | US |
| Child | 17011658 | US | |
| Parent | 15101523 | US | |
| Child | 16242704 | US |
