Lithography scanner throughput

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9529275
  • Patent Number
    9,529,275
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, February 21, 2007
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 27, 2016
    8 years ago
  • CPC
  • Field of Search
    • US
    • 355 053000
    • 355 077000
    • 355 067-071
    • 355 072-075
    • 250 492100
    • 250 492200
    • 250 492220
    • 250 548000
    • 430 008000
    • 430 030000
    • 430 311000
    • 430 005000
    • 430 022000
    • 430 322000
    • 716 054000
    • 716 055000
    • CPC
    • G03F7/70358
    • G03F7/70425
    • G03F7/70466
    • G03F7/70458
    • G03F7/70533
    • G03F7/70758
    • G03F7/70775
    • G03F7/70716
    • G03F7/70725
  • International Classifications
    • G03B27/58
    • G03F7/20
    • Term Extension
      1567
Abstract
A method for use in the manufacture of a microelectronic apparatus, the method comprising exposing a dummy field on a substrate by utilizing a lithographic scanner at a first speed, and exposing a production field on the substrate by utilizing the lithographic scanner at a second speed, where the first speed is substantially greater than the second speed. In a related embodiment, a method for use in the manufacture a microelectronic apparatus comprises exposing a non-critical layer of the apparatus by utilizing a lithographic scanner at a first speed, and exposing a critical layer of the apparatus by utilizing the lithographic scanner at a second speed, where the first speed is substantially greater than the second speed.
Description
BACKGROUND

A lithographic apparatus is a machine that applies a desired pattern onto a target portion of a substrate. Lithographic apparatus can be used, for example, in the manufacture of integrated circuits (ICs), flat panel displays and other devices involving fine structures. In a conventional lithographic apparatus, a patterning means, which is alternatively referred to as a mask or a reticle, may be used to generate a circuit pattern corresponding to an individual layer of the IC (or other device), and this pattern can be imaged onto a target portion (e.g., comprising part of one or several dies) on a substrate (e.g., a silicon wafer or glass plate) that has a layer of radiation-sensitive material (resist).


In general, a single substrate will contain a network of adjacent target portions that are successively exposed. One type of lithographic apparatus is a scanner, in which each target portion is exposed by scanning a pattern reticle through a projection beam in a given direction (the “scanning” direction), while synchronously scanning the wafer substrate parallel or anti-parallel to this direction. Successful scanning requires extremely precise synchronization between the moving reticle and wafer stages during the exposure. For example, the scanning speed of a scanner is a key factor affecting quality and throughput.


During processing, some critical layers may require lithography steps to expose a dummy image near wafer edges. The dummy image exposures can account for 20% or more of the total layer exposure time. Generally, a maximum scanning speed is selected for the exposure of a single layer. Moreover, a maximum scanning speed is often selected for use with both critical and non-critical layers.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present disclosure is best understood from the following detailed description when read with the accompanying figures. It is emphasized that, in accordance with the standard practice in the industry, various features are not drawn to scale. In fact, the dimensions of the various features may be arbitrarily increased or reduced for clarity of discussion.



FIGS. 1a-1c are schematic views of at least a portion of apparatus demonstrating one or more aspects of the present disclosure.



FIG. 2 is a top view of at least a portion of apparatus demonstrating one or more aspects of the present disclosure.



FIG. 3 is a top view of at least a portion of apparatus demonstrating one or more aspects of the present disclosure.



FIG. 4 is a schematic view of at least a portion of apparatus demonstrating one or more aspects of the present disclosure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following disclosure provides many different embodiments, or examples, for implementing different features of various embodiments. Specific examples of components and arrangements are described below to simplify the present disclosure. These are, of course, merely examples and are not intended to be limiting. In addition, the present disclosure may repeat reference numerals and/or letters in the various examples. This repetition is for the purpose of simplicity and clarity and does not in itself dictate a relationship between the various embodiments and/or configurations discussed. Moreover, the formation of a first feature over or on a second feature in the description that follows may include embodiments in which the first and second features are formed in direct contact, and may also include embodiments in which additional features may be formed interposing the first and second features, such that the first and second features may not be in direct contact.


Referring to FIGS. 1a-1c, collectively, illustrated are schematic views of at least a portion of an apparatus 100 demonstrating one or more aspects of the present disclosure. The apparatus 100 may be or include a lithographic scanner configured to transfer a pattern from a reticle 110 to an exposure field 122 on a substrate or wafer 120 (hereafter collectively referred to as a substrate 120). Light 130 from a light source or other illumination means 140 passes through an exposure slit 150 before passing through the reticle 110. The exposure slit 150 may be about as wide as the intended exposure field 122 on the substrate 120, but may only be a fraction of its length. The light 130 then passes through a reduction apparatus 160 configured to reduce the image of the reticle by, for example, 4×, 5×, or otherwise. The light 130 then impinges on the exposure field 122.


During the above exposure process, the reticle 110 and the substrate 120 may be moving relative to each other. The relative speed of the reticle 110 and the substrate 120 may be referred to herein as the scanner speed or the lithographic scanner speed. This speed may result from movement of either of the reticle 110 and the substrate 120 relative to each other, the positionally-fixed exposure slit 150, and/or the positionally-fixed reduction apparatus 160. For example, the reticle 110 may remain positionally-fixed relative to the exposure slit 150 and reduction apparatus 160 while the substrate 120 is translated relative to the exposure slit 150 and reduction apparatus 160, whether in the X-direction (sideways across the page in FIGS. 1a-1c), the Y-direction (into or out of the page in FIGS. 1a-1c), and/or the Z-direction (up or down across the page in FIGS. 1a-1c). Alternatively, the substrate 120 may remain positionally-fixed relative to the exposure slit 150 and reduction apparatus 160 while the reticle 110 is translated relative to the exposure slit 150 and reduction apparatus 160, whether in the X-, Y-, and/or Z-directions. However, as depicted in the series of FIGS. 1a-1c, both the reticle 110 and the substrate 120 may be translated relative to the exposure slit 150 and reduction apparatus 160, whether in X-, Y-, and/or Z-directions.


For example, in FIG. 1a, the left end of the reticle 110 and the right end of the exposure field 122 are introduced into the light 130. Then, as shown in FIG. 1b, a middle portion of the reticle 110 and a middle portion of the exposure field 122 are exposed to the light 130, as the result of translation of the reticle 110 towards the left side of the page (in the negative X-direction) and translation of the substrate 120 towards the right side of the page (in the positive X-direction). Then, as shown in FIG. 1c, the right end of the reticle 110 and the left end of the exposure field 122 are exposed to the light 130, as the result of further translation of the reticle 110 towards the left side of the page and further translation of the substrate 130 towards the right side of the page.


It is noted that the exposure field 122 and the illustrated portion of the reticle 110 that is utilized to expose the exposure field 122 do not necessarily have the same dimension in the direction of translation (i.e., in the X-direction, left and right across the page). Thus, the speed at which the reticle 110 is translated during exposure of the exposure field 122 may not necessarily be the same speed at which the substrate 120 is translated during exposure of the exposure field 122, both relative to the positionally-fixed exposure slit 150 and reduction apparatus 160. However, what may be of greater importance is the relative speed of the reticle 110 and the substrate 120, as will be described further below. It is also noted that the reticle 110 and substrate 120 may not necessarily be translated in anti-parallel directions during exposure of the exposure field 122, as depicted in FIGS. 1a-1c. For example, the reticle 110 and substrate 120 may alternatively be translated in substantially parallel directions during exposure of the exposure field 122.


In the above description, the “left” and “right” references are to the page on which FIGS. 1a-1c are printed, and are used merely for the sake of convenience and clarity in describing aspects of the present disclosure. Such references are not intended to be limiting to the scope of the present disclosure.


There may be many factors that influence the determination of the scanner speed. For example, a hypothetical microelectronic device may require the lithographic scanning jobs set forth in Table 1 below.









TABLE 1







Hypothetical Scanning Jobs












Scanning Job
Layer
Image
XY Spec.
Z Spec.
Energy Spec.





1
A11
B1
XY1
Z1
E1


2
A11
B2
XY3
Z5
E3


3
A12
B1
XY1
Z1
E1


4
A12
B2
XY1
Z1
E1


5
A12
B3
XY5
Z5
E5


6
A12
B4
XY5
Z5
E5


7
A13
B1
XY5
Z5
E3









As shown in Table 1, a scanning job may have multiple specifications upon which the scanner speed may be dependent. For example, in Table 1 above, scanning job 6 comprises exposing image B4 on layer A12, which corresponds to each of an XY5 specification, a Z5 specification, and an E5 specification. Each of these specifications may have a corresponding maximum, minimum or otherwise preferred scanner speed, as in the hypothetical examples set forth in Tables 2-4 below.









TABLE 2







XY-Speed Ranges











Speed



Specification
Range







XY1
S11



XY2
S12



XY3
S13



XY4
S14



XY5
S15



XY6
S16

















TABLE 3







Z-Speed Ranges











Speed



Specification
Range







Z1
S21



Z2
S22



Z3
S23



Z4
S24



Z5
S25



Z6
S26

















TABLE 4







Energy-Speed Ranges











Speed



Specification
Range







E1
S31



E2
S32



E3
S33



E4
S34



E5
S35



E6
S36










If it is desired that a particular scanning job be performed as quickly as possible, such as to improve production throughput, for example, the maximum scanning speed which may satisfactorily complete the scanning job may be selected. Continuing with the example of scanning job 6 discussed above, the speed range for the scanning job must be selected from S15, the speed range for the XY5 specification, S25, the speed range for the Z5 specification, and S35, the speed range for the E5 specification. In this example, the S35 speed range is larger (in velocity) than the S25 speed range, which is larger than the S15 speed range. Thus, for the scanning job 6, the larger (fastest) scanning speed which satisfies the XY5, Z5 and E5 specifications is the S15 speed range.


However, a single scanner speed may be employed when exposing all of the patterns of a single layer. For example, in Table 1 above, each of the scanning jobs 3-6 may be required to use the same scanner speed. Thus, for example, if the slowest scanning speed for scanning jobs 3 and 4 is the S11 speed range, and the slowest scanning speed for scanning jobs 5 and 6 is the S15 speed range, where the S15 speed range is faster than the S11 speed range, then the S11 speed range may be used for all of scanning jobs 3-6 because the jobs each comprise exposing a portion of the same manufacturing layer.


To further demonstrate this aspect, FIG. 2 is a top view of the substrate 120 shown in FIGS. 1a-1c. The substrate 120 is subdivided into a plurality of exposure areas collectively referred to herein as exposure areas 122. The exposure areas 122 include production exposure areas 122a, which are un-shaded in FIG. 2, and dummy exposure areas 122b, which overlap the boundary of the substrate 120 and are shaded in FIG. 2. For the sake of clarity, only a few of each of the exposure areas 122a and 122b have been labeled in FIG. 2. The production exposure areas 122a correspond to areas of the substrate 120 which are intended to be used in production units. However, the dummy exposure areas 122b are intended to be discarded and not used in production units, and are merely included to improve yield of the production units.


As described above, a single scanning speed may be selected for exposing all of the exposure areas 122 of a single layer being formed on the substrate 120. However, if the scanner speed employed when exposing the dummy exposure areas 122b is increased, then the total time required for exposing the layer comprising the exposure areas may be decreased, thus increasing throughput of the scanning procedure. That is, if the scanner speed utilized to expose the dummy exposure areas 122b is substantially greater than the scanner speed utilized to expose the production exposure areas 122a, then the total scanning time for the layer comprising the exposure areas 122 may be decreased. For example, the scanner speed utilized to expose the dummy exposure areas 122b may be at least about 50% greater than the scanner speed utilized to expose the production exposure areas 122a.


Consider the example where there are 58 dummy exposure areas 122b and there are 142 production exposure areas 122a, for a total of 200 exposure areas 122, as illustrated in FIG. 2. If the scanner speed utilized to expose the dummy exposure areas 122b is at least about 100% greater than the scanner speed utilized to expose the production exposure areas 122a, then the total time required to expose the layer comprising the exposure areas 122 may be reduced by at least about 9.5% compared to processing all of the exposure areas 122 when utilizing the scanner speed that is utilized to scan the production exposure areas 122a. For example, the scanner speed utilized to scan the production exposure areas 122a may be about 360 mm/second, whereas the scanner speed utilized to scan the dummy exposure areas 122b may be about 720 mm/sec. If the number of dummy exposure areas 122b is a greater percentage of the total number of exposure areas 122 of a single layer, then even greater time savings may be accomplished by utilizing a faster scanner speed when exposing the dummy exposure areas 122b relative to the scanner speed utilized to expose the production exposure areas 122a.


Referring to FIG. 3, illustrated is a top view of the substrate 120 shown in FIG. 2 in a different stage of manufacture in which a different layer is being lithographically exposed. The layer being exposed in FIG. 3 may be a non-critical layer compared to the layer being exposed in FIG. 2. For example, the accuracy of overlay and/or dose of the layer being exposed in FIG. 3 may be greater than 10%, whereas the accuracy of overlay and/or dose of the layer being exposed in FIG. 2 may smaller than 3%.


As described above, a single scanning speed may be selected for exposing all of the exposure areas 122 of a single layer being formed on the substrate 120. However, if the scanner speed employed when exposing the exposure areas 122 of a non-critical layer is increased, relative to the scanner speed employed when exposing the exposure areas 122 of a critical layer, then the total time required for exposing the non-critical layers (and therefore all of the layers, cumulatively) may be decreased, thus increasing throughput of the scanning procedure. That is, if the scanner speed utilized to expose the exposure areas 122 of a non-critical layer is substantially greater than the average scanner speed utilized to expose the exposure areas 122 of a critical layer, then the total scanning time for the all of the layers may be decreased. For example, the scanner speed utilized to expose the exposure areas 122 of a non-critical layer may be at least about 50% greater than the average scanner speed utilized to expose the exposure areas 122 of a critical layer. Or, the scanner speed utilized to expose the exposure areas 122 of a non-critical layer may be at least about 50% greater than the slowest scanner speed utilized to expose any one exposure area 122 of a critical layer (such as one of the exposure areas 122a of FIG. 2).


Consider the example where there are 200 exposure areas 122 of a non-critical layer, as illustrated in FIG. 3. If the scanner speed utilized to expose the exposure areas 122 of the non-critical layer is at least about 100% greater than the slowest scanner speed utilized to expose any one of the exposure areas 122 of a critical layer, then the total time required to expose all of the exposure areas 122 of the non-critical layer may be reduced by at least about 50% compared to processing all of the exposure areas 122 of the non-critical layer when utilizing the slowest scanner speed that is utilized to scan any one of the exposure areas 122 of a critical layer. For example, the slowest scanner speed utilized to scan any one of the exposure areas 122 of a critical layer may be about 360 mm/second, whereas the scanner speed utilized to scan the exposure areas 122 of a non-critical layer may be about 720 mm/sec.


Referring to FIG. 4, illustrated is a schematic view of at least a portion of apparatus 400 demonstrating one or more aspects of an environment in which one or more aspects of the present disclosure may be implemented. The apparatus 400 may be, include, or be included in a lithography system according to one or more aspects of the present disclosure.


The apparatus 400 comprises an illumination system 410, a reticle stage 415 configured to hold a reticle 420, a projection unit 425, and a stage unit 430. Among other possible components, the illumination system 410 may include a light source, an illuminance uniformity optical system (such as may include an optical integrator or the like), a beam splitter, a relay lens, a filter, and/or a reticle blind (none of which are shown). In illumination system 410, an illumination or exposure light illuminates through an exposure slit (such as may be set by the reticle blind) and onto the reticle 420 where the circuit pattern or the like is fabricated with substantially uniform illuminance. The illumination or exposure light may comprise an ArF excimer laser beam (e.g., wavelength of 193 nm), a far ultraviolet light such as the KrF excimer laser beam (e.g., wavelength of 248 nm), or bright lines in the ultraviolet region generated by an ultra high-pressure mercury lamp (such as the g-line or the i-line), among others. The illumination system 410 may also comprise a fly-eye lens, a rod integrator (an internal reflection type integrator), and/or a diffraction optical element, such as may be a component of the optical integrator.


The reticle 420 is secured to the reticle stage 415 by vacuum, for example. The reticle stage 415 may be drivable in an XY plane perpendicular to the optical axis of the illumination system 410 by a reticle stage drive section, such as may comprise one or more linear motors or other motion-inducing components. The reticle stage 415 may be drivable in a predetermined scanning direction, such as along the Y-axis shown in FIG. 4. Such scanning may be as described above with respect to FIGS. 1a-1c, 2 and 3.


The position of reticle stage 415 within its moving plane of the stage may be detected periodically or at all times via a reticle laser interferometer 435 via a movable mirror 440, possibly at a resolution of ranging between about 0.5 nm and about 1.0 nm. The reticle stage 415 may comprise a movable mirror that has a reflection surface orthogonal to the Y-axis direction and another movable mirror that has a reflection surface orthogonal to an X-axis direction, as well as a reticle Y interferometer and a reticle X interferometer corresponding to such mirrors. However, in FIG. 4, such an embodiment and others are schematically represented by movable mirror 440 and reticle interferometer 435.


Information describing the position of the reticle stage 415 may be communicated from reticle interferometer 435 to a main controller 445, such as via a stage control unit 450. The stage control unit 450 may be configured to drive and/or control the reticle stage 415 via the reticle stage drive section, based on the positional information of the reticle stage 415 and in response to instructions from the main controller 445.


The optical axis of the projection unit 425 may coincide with the optical axis of the illumination system 410. The projection unit 425 may comprises a barrel-shaped structure housing a projection optical system that includes a plurality of lenses, lens elements, and/or other optical elements which share the same optical axis in the Z-axis direction and are held at a predetermined positional relationship within the housing. For example, a both-side telecentric dioptric system having a predetermined projection magnification (e.g., ¼× or ⅕×) may be employed. Accordingly, when exposure light from the illumination system 410 illuminates the illumination area on the reticle 420, the illumination light that passes through the reticle 420 may the pass through the projection unit 425 and form a reduced image of the circuit pattern within the illumination area on the reticle 420 (a partial reduced image of the circuit pattern) on the wafer or substrate 455, whose surface may be coated with a resist and/or other photosensitive material.


The apparatus 400 may also comprise a liquid supply/drainage unit 460, such that the apparatus 400 may be configured for use in immersion lithography processing. The liquid supply/drainage unit 32 may be attached to the projection unit 425 so that it surrounds the lower end of the projection unit 425.


The stage unit 430 may comprise a wafer stage 465 which may serve as a substrate stage, a wafer holder 470 provided on the wafer stage 465, and a wafer stage drive section 475 which is configured to drive the wafer stage 465 and wafer holder 470. The wafer stage 465 comprises an XY stage 480, such as may be driven in the XY direction by linear motors and/or other components. The wafer stage 465 also comprises a Z stage 485, such as may be mounted on the XY stage 480 and may be configured to provide movement in the Z-axis direction and/or in an inclination direction with respect to the XY plane (the rotational direction around the X-axis (ΩX) and the rotational direction around the Y-axis (ΩY)), such as by a Z tilt drive mechanism. The XY stage 480 may also be configured to be movable not only in the scanning direction (the Y-axis direction) but also in a non-scanning direction (the X-axis direction) perpendicular to the scanning direction.


The XY stage 480 and the Z stage 485 may be collectively referred to as a wafer stage. The position of wafer stage within the XY plane, possibly including rotation around the Z-axis (ΩZ) is detected periodically or at all times by a wafer laser interferometer 490, such as via a movable mirror 495 provided on the upper surface of the Z tilt stage 485, possibly at a resolution ranging between about 0.5 nm and about 1 nm, for example. Such configuration may also comprise a dual-mirror, dual-interferometer configuration as described above with regard to the reticle stage 415.


Positional and/or velocity (speed) information regarding the wafer stage may be communicated to the stage control unit 450, and then to main controller 445. The stage control unit 450 may be configured to control the wafer stage via the wafer stage drive section 475 based on the positional and/or velocity information of the wafer stage, such as in response to instructions from the main controller 445.


Thus, the present disclosure introduces a method for use in the manufacture of a microelectronic apparatus, the method comprising exposing a dummy field on a substrate by utilizing a lithographic scanner at a first speed, and exposing a production field on the substrate by utilizing the lithographic scanner at a second speed, where the first speed is substantially greater than the second speed.


Another method for use in the manufacture a microelectronic apparatus introduced in the present disclosure comprises exposing a non-critical layer of the apparatus by utilizing a lithographic scanner at a first speed, and exposing a critical layer of the apparatus by utilizing the lithographic scanner at a second speed, where the first speed is substantially greater than the second speed.


The present disclosure also introduces an apparatus comprising means for exposing a dummy field and a production field on a substrate by utilizing a lithographic scanner at a first speed to expose the dummy field and at a second speed to expose the production field, where the first speed is substantially greater than the second speed.


Another apparatus introduced in the present disclosure comprises means for exposing a critical layer and a non-critical layer on a substrate in the manufacture of a microelectronic device by utilizing a lithographic scanner at a first speed to expose the non-critical layer and at a second speed to expose the critical layer, where the first speed is substantially greater than the second speed.


The foregoing outlines features of several embodiments so that those skilled in the art may better understand the aspects of the present disclosure. Those skilled in the art should appreciate that they may readily use the present disclosure as a basis for designing or modifying other processes and structures for carrying out the same purposes and/or achieving the same advantages of the embodiments introduced herein. Those skilled in the art should also realize that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure, and that they may make various changes, substitutions and alterations herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.

Claims
  • 1. A method of manufacturing a microelectronic apparatus, comprising: exposing a pattern in a dummy field on a substrate by utilizing a lithographic scanner at a first speed; andexposing the same pattern in a production field on the substrate by utilizing the lithographic scanner at a second speed;wherein the first speed is substantially greater than the second speed, and wherein the dummy field comprises an exposure area that overlaps an outermost edge of the substrate, and further wherein the production field comprises an exposure area that lies completely within the outermost edge of the substrate, further wherein the pattern extends to the outermost edge of the substrate.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the first speed and the second speed are each a speed of the substrate and at least a portion of the lithographic scanner relative to each other.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the first speed is at least about 50% greater than the second speed.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the first speed is at least about 100% greater than the second speed.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the first speed is about 720 mm/second and the second speed is about 360 mm/second.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein exposing the dummy field on the substrate comprises exposing a layer on the substrate, and wherein exposing the production field on the substrate comprises exposing the same layer.
  • 7. A method of manufacturing microelectronic devices on a substrate including a plurality of layers, the method comprising: exposing a non-critical layer by utilizing a lithographic scanner at a first speed;exposing a pattern in a production field of a critical layer by utilizing the lithographic scanner at a second speed; andexposing the same pattern in a dummy field of the critical layer by utilizing the lithographic scanner at a third speed,wherein the first speed and the third speed are substantially greater than the second speed, and wherein the dummy field comprises an exposure area that overlaps an outermost edge of the substrate, and further wherein the production field comprises an exposure area that lies completely within the outermost edge of the substrate, further wherein the pattern extends to the outermost edge of the substrate.
  • 8. The method of claim 7 wherein the first speed and the second speed are each a speed of the substrate and at least a portion of the lithographic scanner relative to each other.
  • 9. The method of claim 7 wherein the first speed is at least about 50% greater than the second speed.
  • 10. The method of claim 7 wherein the first speed is at least about 100% greater than the second speed.
  • 11. The method of claim 7 wherein the first speed is about 720 mm/second and the second speed is about 360 mm/second.
  • 12. An apparatus, comprising: means for exposing a pattern in a dummy field on a substrate at a first speed; andmeans for exposing the same pattern in a production field on the substrate at a second speed, wherein the first speed is substantially greater than the second speed, and wherein the dummy field comprises an exposure area that overlaps an outermost edge of the substrate, and further wherein the production field comprises an exposure area that lies completely within the outermost edge of the substrate, further wherein the pattern extends to the outermost edge of the substrate.
  • 13. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein the first speed and the second speed are each a speed of the substrate and at least a portion of the lithographic scanner relative to each other.
  • 14. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein the first speed is at least about 50% greater than the second speed.
  • 15. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein the first speed is at least about 100% greater than the second speed.
  • 16. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein the first speed is about 720 mm/second and the second speed is about 360 mm/second.
  • 17. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein exposing the dummy field on the substrate comprises exposing a layer on the substrate, and wherein exposing the production field on the substrate comprises exposing the same layer.
  • 18. An apparatus for manufacturing microelectronic devices on a substrate including a plurality of layers, comprising: means for exposing a non-critical layer on the substrate at a first speed;means for exposing a pattern in a production field of a critical layer on the substrate at a second speed; andmeans for exposing the same pattern in a dummy field of the critical layer of the substrate at a third speed,wherein the first speed and the third speed are substantially greater than the second speed , and wherein the dummy field comprises an exposure area that overlaps an outermost edge of the substrate, and further wherein the production field comprises an exposure area that lies completely within the outermost edge of the substrate, further wherein the pattern extends to the outermost edge of the substrate.
  • 19. The apparatus of claim 18 wherein the first speed and the second speed are each a speed of the substrate and at least a portion of the apparatus relative to each other.
  • 20. The apparatus of claim 18 wherein the first speed is at least about 50% greater than the second speed.
  • 21. The apparatus of claim 18 wherein the first speed is at least about 100% greater than the second speed.
  • 22. The apparatus of claim 18 wherein the first speed is about 720 mm/second and the second speed is about 360 mm/second.
US Referenced Citations (41)
Number Name Date Kind
4910549 Sugita Mar 1990 A
5168304 Hattori Dec 1992 A
5461237 Wakamoto et al. Oct 1995 A
5575706 Tsai et al. Nov 1996 A
5617182 Wakamoto et al. Apr 1997 A
5699260 Lucas et al. Dec 1997 A
5793471 Kanda et al. Aug 1998 A
5811211 Tanaka et al. Sep 1998 A
5960305 Kumar Sep 1999 A
5994003 Hara et al. Nov 1999 A
6015975 Kawakami et al. Jan 2000 A
6104035 Muraki Aug 2000 A
6195155 Kawai Feb 2001 B1
6381004 Hagiwara et al. Apr 2002 B1
6424405 Kurosawa et al. Jul 2002 B2
6573976 Takeishi Jun 2003 B2
6934008 Lin Aug 2005 B2
6980917 Ward et al. Dec 2005 B2
7002165 Lin Feb 2006 B2
7016013 Van Der Biggelaar et al. Mar 2006 B2
7019815 Jasper et al. Mar 2006 B2
7034921 Tanaka Apr 2006 B2
RE39083 Nishi May 2006 E
7057705 Heintze Jun 2006 B2
20010031407 Okino et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020186359 Meisburger et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030147060 Tokuda et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030183860 Uchiyama et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040032575 Nishi et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040043311 McCullough et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040156028 Okada Aug 2004 A1
20050007572 George et al. Jan 2005 A1
20060001852 Lee et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060094246 Whitefield et al. May 2006 A1
20060119812 Kruijswijk et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060119820 Hirukawa Jun 2006 A1
20060139591 Jung Jun 2006 A1
20070013893 Loopstra Jan 2007 A1
20070048668 Liegl Mar 2007 A1
20070229789 Kawamura Oct 2007 A1
20080106712 Nagasaka May 2008 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
06020903 Jan 1994 JP
11-168042 Jun 1999 JP
2001-291662 Oct 2001 JP
2004-311639 Apr 2004 JP
WO 2004021269 Mar 2004 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
English translation of JP 06-020903A, published on Jan. 28, 1994.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20080198351 A1 Aug 2008 US